WEBVTT - Truth Social and US and China Tech Tensions

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:04.800
<v Speaker 1>From the Heart of Where Innovations, Money and Power Collie

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley, NBR. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Hyde and Ed Ludlow. I'm Caroline Hyder Bloomberg's World Headquarters

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>in New York, and I'med Ludlow in San Francisco. This

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up, we'll look at the implications

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:36.559
<v Speaker 1>of Trump's indictment on his ability to communicate to his

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 1>own followers through the truth social app been discussed with

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Galen Stocking of the Pew Research Center. Plus, we'll discuss

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 1>the escalating technology war between the US and China as

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Japan joins the United States and Netherlands in restricting exports

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of chipmaking gear to China. And we'll get a read

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>on the red hot race for ev dominance with Kia

0:00:56.520 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Motors COO Steve Center. All that and so much more

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>coming up, but we return to those markets, will return

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to some of that news around Japan joining the US

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the Netherlands in terms of impacting and restricting the exports

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.839
<v Speaker 1>of chip industry over to China, and it's impacting the socks.

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking that down by two point two percent at

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the moment. NASDAC off of its highs that we've been

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:18.759
<v Speaker 1>seeing off for one and a quarter percent. Today. We're

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>basically seeing risk aversion in the market today. We're worried

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>about banks, We're worried about economic data pointing towards the

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>US recession. We're therefore seeing a flight to safety. US

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>government bonds doing well. We're seeing the yields down eleven

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>basis points on the two year. Let's move it on

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>because actually what's managed to withstand some of the turbulence

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and stock market has been Bitcoin. It is off just

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>slightly today, only by up a quarter of a percent,

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:42.680
<v Speaker 1>though over the last three trading days we're basically stopping

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>out at twenty eight thousand DS. Some great reporting coming

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg all about that, but I know you're

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>going to dig into some of the microdata. Yeah, look,

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>we kind of really risk off. There's a lot of

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>positive headlines on the Bloomberg, but not supporting individual stocks.

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft and Palentteer, for example, both firmly lower, but they've

0:01:57.400 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>expanded their cloud partnership and that was actually boost the

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Palanteer in particular Premrket. It has not held onto those games,

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>C three, AI and name we increasingly Track had its

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>worst session ever twenty four hours ago, on Track for

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>its worst two day drop ever as well. Not a

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of support in that AI space, And I just

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>put z Scaler there because as part of that risk

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>off mode, you look at some of the worst performers

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>on the NASDAC one hundred higher, multiple software names really

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 1>getting hit. There is an emphasis right now on stocks

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>relating two conservative social media platforms. We've been talking about

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>this for a number of days. Digital World Acquisition, the

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>spack that's due to take true. Social Public is still

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>continuing to slide down number five percent, Rumble also down

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>six point three percent. Very short lived. Feel good around

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>those conservative social media names, Caroline. When the news cycle

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>around Trump started, we've given up those games and we're

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>continuing to slide, and we are going to dig into

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>exactly those social media names. In a moment. Let's turn

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>towards Donald Trump's indictment the former president, of course saying

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>it's all political, but District Attorney Alvin Bragg says Trump

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>engaged in a so called catch and kill scheme that

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>is a scheme to buy and suppress negative information to

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>help mister Trump's chance of winning the election. This fake

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>case was brought only to interfere with the upcoming twenty

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty four election, and it should be dropped immediately, immediately

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>with us to wrap it all up, as well as

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:26.239
<v Speaker 1>some of those techangles, a social media perspective, mimogs, Kutti

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Gupta and extraordinary day. Of course, Kuti talk to us

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about what indeed you're seeing after the impact.

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was historical in many ways. It was

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>historical in many ways, a potential first criminal conviction to

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.839
<v Speaker 1>any American president in history. It's a massive deal. Isn't

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>going to disqualify him from president? Even if it is

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a criminal conviction? The answers simply no, because there are

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>other cases that could potentially do that, things like treason,

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>things like moving some of those classified documents from Washington

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>see to mar Lago. But today the conviction that we

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>heard or is someb the arraignment that we saw yesterday.

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>It's really interesting the way that it's really turned into

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of banter for his campaign for twenty twenty four.

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's going to be the crucial takeaway here. At

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>what point did the legal allegations actually rally his base

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and social media is a really big part of that.

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>A great example was his comments when he went back

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to Marlago last evening at eight fifteen pm Eastern. He

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>specifically called out the likes of Twitter, Meta, which is

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting because it's only recently that he's been allowed back

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>on to those platforms Critty. Both the judge in the

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:32.799
<v Speaker 1>arraignment and the district's attorney had something to say about

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the influence and impact of social media and Trump's use

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of it. What did they say, Yeah, it's been a

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>very careful kind of maneuvering and how this case is handled.

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>A mug shot, for example, was pretty typical when you

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>do have an arraignment like this. This time around, though

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the mug shot did not happen for the reason of

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>its potential use as a campaign ploy. That is something

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to keep in mind. The prosecutor did outright say, look,

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>President Trump has a massive base, he has a lot

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of influence. Can there be some sort of court order

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>for President Trump to not use social media when it

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>comes to the developments of this particular case. Now, the

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>judge on the other hand, saying, no, we're not going

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>to put that court order, but we are going to

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>discourage that. Whether that or not that changes at that

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>next hearing December fourth, is going to be the real

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>story there. But for now, all spare and game when

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>it comes to social media. All right, bloom Best critic

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>Good said, thank you, Let's stick with it more on

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump and True Social and bringing Galen Stocking, a senior

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>computational social scientists for the Pew Research Center. Your publisher

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>report in November about the numbers behind true Social It's

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>use at that time, what has your read been on

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:42.239
<v Speaker 1>how the arraignment of former President Trump has driven traffic

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to those more conservative social platforms. Well, we don't have

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>any numbers on that have been updated since last year

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:53.799
<v Speaker 1>when we published this data, But what we have seen

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>reported elsewhere Inland New York Times is that there has

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 1>been increased traffic to Choose Social since the news of

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 1>the indictment came out the impact of these more right

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>leaning social media offerings that we saw all at once

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of come to an already crowded space. Your report

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 1>in October not only high delighted truth Social, but you

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 1>went into bitchhoot, gab getter, parlor, rumble telegram. How prevalent

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:25.840
<v Speaker 1>it is the use of was the use back in

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that report of October twenty twenty two, and are they

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>impactful in terms of where people get their news. So

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>six percent use any of the seven social media sites

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that we were looking at as of May twenty twenty two,

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>including truth Social Truth Social was used by two percent

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.279
<v Speaker 1>of US adults, and this was after just three months

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of it actually being released to the public, so it

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>was released the public in February of twenty and twentyo.

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 1>We conducted this survey in May of twenty twenty two,

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and what we found was that people actually believe that

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>they are being in four when they use these sites.

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Fifty six percent of users of any of these sites

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>say that staying informed is a major reason use them.

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Most of what their news, the news that they're getting

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>there is government politics news, according to these users, and

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>about half of them are saying that they are seeing

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>news there that they wouldn't seem somewhere else. So these

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>are becoming crucial parts of the media diet for many Americans.

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>When you say many, though, put it into context versus

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Facebook versus Twitter. Sure, we found two percent used to

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>social as a source for news. That is, of course

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>much much lower than many other platforms. Thirty one percent

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>as of summer of two thousand and two used Facebook

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>for news, twenty five percent used YouTube, and then Twitter, Instagram,

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and TikTok. We're all in the teams. And what's interesting,

0:07:55.800 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>ed is how important some of these mainstays, the facebooks,

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the twitters were for President Trump and his previous election campaigns. Yeah,

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that's right. I mean, Galen, Caroline and I have been

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>tracking the reinstatement of form President Trump to platforms like

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and Meta. In that arrayment proceedings, the judge cited

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>irresponsible social media posts. What is the concern, to your

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>mind from the judge about those posts? Well, I can't

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>speak to anything any concerns of the judge in particular

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>might have had. But what I can point you two

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>is how much he's actually using these other platforms just

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>since he's been reinstated. He was reinstated on Twitter, I

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>think a few months ago now he has not tweeted

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>since then. Reinstated on YouTube a couple of weeks ago,

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>he has posted one video Facebook. He in his campaign

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>is using that platform. In fact, last night, when he

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>gave his speech at Mara Lago, links to that speech

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Speaker 1>were posted on true social and on Facebook and on rumbled,

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>but not to any of those other two platforms. We

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know what he will do in the future, but

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 1>it is clear that he has been using truth Social

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>quite frequently to express his views. I guess that you know.

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>The point Carolina and pointing out was that social media

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>was the modus operandi by which Trump, not the only one,

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>but by which Trump communicated with his face. Right, He's

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>not on Twitter or Facebook, but do you see the

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>messaging that he's putting on true Social permeate those platforms.

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>So when we looked in in May of twenty twenty

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 1>two add these platforms, one of the things that we

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>looked at was what is happening outside of just Donald

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump on tchoo social. We wanted to see what other

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>kinds of accounts were saying and what they were doing,

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and how they were presenting himself. So we looked at

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>two hundred of the most followed accounts on True Social

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>in June of twenty twenty two, and one things we

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>looked at was their profile photos, their banners, their whole

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>profile page, how are they presenting themselves? And we found

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that about half of them were outright saying that they

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>were conservative or Republican or pro Trump. So they're projecting

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>this air of right leaning attitude on the platform itself.

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Others had projecting a religious identity, a message of patriotism.

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>And when we connected that back to the survey, we

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>found that people tended to say that they had found

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a sense of community on the site that they were using.

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Looking more broadly at all these sites, to the point

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that sixty five percent of users of any of these

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>sites said that they had found a community of people

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>who shared their views on those platforms. Because True Social

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>says it's nonpartisan, and that of course it's all about

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>free speech. Is it what it isn't doing that? Is

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>it non partisan? Is it allowing free speech? So it's

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>difficult to do a full summary of everything that True

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Social does or doesn't do it do as you, as

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned say that it is a non partisan site.

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>There have been report of True Social banning users or

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 1>banning posts that have partisan messages that are do people

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>disagree with, But it's difficult to tell the extent to

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>which this is happening overall. Galen, we thank you bringing

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 1>us the research. Galen Stocking of the Pew rec Center.

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Sticking with Social media. According to estimates by similar Web,

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>which analyzes Internet traffic, Twitter is struggling to sell users

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.839
<v Speaker 1>on its new subscription product, Twitter Blue. Only one hundred

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and sixteen thousand people signed up for the service of

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 1>two point six million people who actually visited Twitter blue

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>sales page on the web in March. Now more than

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 1>five hundred million people use Twitter on a monthly basis,

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Musk said, and Twitter's advertising revenue has declined by half

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>between October and March. He tweeted that last month. Now,

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan's president is in Los Angeles today meeting with a

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>bipartisan group of US lawmakers led by House Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Now it's the first time a Taiwanese leader we'll meet

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>with a House speaker in the US since the US

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>recognized diplomatic relations with China more than four decades ago.

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>China said it would closely monitor the situation. Tomorrow in

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, the group will have lunch with executives from Google, Microsoft, Palanteer,

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.559
<v Speaker 1>even Apple CEO Tim Cook. This, of course, is as

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>trade tensions continue to ramp up between developed nations and China.

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Japan's just decided to join the US and Netherlands in

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>restricting exports of chipmaking gear to China. Will this give

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the allies a powerful leg up and the escalating tech

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 1>war We're kind of discussed all orbiting bogs Ian King

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and this tip for tap keeps continuing. But how integral

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>are some of the players in Japan and I can,

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:48.679
<v Speaker 1>for example, to China. Yeah, now, they're very important parts

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of the food chain. Tokyo or Electron is obviously the standout.

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a company that's worldly similar to Applied Materials here

0:12:56.679 --> 0:13:00.079
<v Speaker 1>in the US, very important machinery that you absolutely have

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to have if you want to make a leading edge

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>production lines for semi conductors. But Japan also is home

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to a number of other companies which also do niche

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>but very important things materials, testing, that kind of thing

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>as well. So this is definitely a step forward in

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 1>what the Biden administration has been hoping to achieve. How

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.079
<v Speaker 1>far a step and how big a step that's kind

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>of open to interpretation. The story gives a sense of

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>how global the supply chamber semiconductors is, but we're talking

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>about specific technology, which is hardware that manufactures the chips,

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>not the chips themselves. I mean Yes, it is diverse.

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.199
<v Speaker 1>Yes it is all over the world. But there are

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>basically five or six COMPANIESSNL in the Netherlands, three companies here,

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>including Applied Materials, and a couple in Japan. And you

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 1>need their machines, you need access to their technology. If

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't have that, you're done. You can't be a

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>modern semi conductor producer. How does China respond therefore? Do

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>they have companies of their own that are able to

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:04.319
<v Speaker 1>develop technology at a similar level? Short term? Absolutely not,

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>not even close long term. The argument from those who

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 1>oppose this kind of rule is, look, we're going to

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 1>push them further towards accelerating their own efforts to cut

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>us out. Our ability to influence them on a friendly

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>basis is going to go away. In we've actually seen

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>an impact on US chipmakers today as well. We've seen

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the socks and next down we've seen some impacts on

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a video for example. Is this something that we're going

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to see really curtailing the business models, the ongoing revenue

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>streams for these US companies. I, it's already happened. You're

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right. This is an ongoing sort of concern and

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>ongoing cloud and describe it how you want, but this

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>is something that people have to be conscious of, this

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>idea of decoupling. China is the biggest market for semi conductors.

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>It was on its way to being the biggest market

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>for semi conductor capital equipment. If you are a shareholder

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of these companies, whether they're European, whether they're North America,

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you want your company to do business there. If they can't,

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>then that's a problem. And I know you've sort of

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>touched on it within a moment ago, but it sets

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>China back How far? How long can we make some

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of view on whether this ha indeed, as we

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>set this whole conversation up, given the US and its

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>allies a leg up. Yeah, I mean that's that's a

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>very difficult question to answer. I think most people would say, look,

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you cut them off from our technology, from the West technology,

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and we're talking years before they can even get to parity.

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe never. But the flip side of that is, though,

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>is that you know, chip companies here are saying, actually,

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the fine print, what the Japanese

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>are doing and what the Dutch are doing is nowhere

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>near as severe as what we're doing. So unless we

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>have this consensus, this similar level of action. Actually we're

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>not really doing what we're supposed to be doing, so

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a bit of a debate there as to how

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>effective these rules are going to be. All right, thanks

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to Bloombergsy and King on the chip beat. Now coming up,

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Apple actually trying to reduce its dependence on China for

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>its iPhone manufacturing. More on that next. Take a look

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>at Apple shares really quickly and how we're trading. A

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of analysis of how Apple will fare politically US China,

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>but also supply chain Reja. We're down almost two percent

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>though in the session, in this risk off mode. This

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>is bloomberg time. Now for talking text, starting with Amazon

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and Microsoft, whose cloud services could face a full blown

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>ANTITUSK probe over in the UK as after the country's

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Digital Regulator ofcom says it found evidence that the firms

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and maybe abusing their market power, making it basically hard

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>for people to switch or use multiple cloud suppliers off cooms.

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>It's particularly concerned about the US tech firms because of

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 1>their dominant position. Here's another big tech company under scrutiny. Meta.

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>That's after Italy's Competition authority opened a probe against its

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:14.439
<v Speaker 1>over allegations it may have exploited its bargaining power more

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>negotiating with the country's main artists rights organization. The watchdog

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>also says look Meta may have withheld information needed to

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 1>carry out negotiations. And over to Asia, where Fox Con,

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the world's largest maker of Apple devices, increased revenue year

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 1>on year and only by four percent last quarter, underscoring

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>houphes or a recession is really crimping demand for iPhones

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and other consumer electronics, and the reported revenue of forty

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>eight billion dollars while it's down steeply even from the

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.920
<v Speaker 1>previous three months when a COVID outbreak prompted protests and

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>its main facility in Central China disrupting iPhone production basically

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>for weeks end. And we're going to dig in more. Yeah,

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>So'scot and Apple. Are those two tech names re examining

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:57.880
<v Speaker 1>their electronic supply chain which is centered on China. Let's

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:00.360
<v Speaker 1>start deeper into all things Apple and how it's laying

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the foundation to make iPhones elsewhere, which was the topic

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>of a Business Week piece today Bloomberg Business Weeks Josh E.

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Brustein here with more. There was a very public visit

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>by Tim Cook to China recently. What sources is telling

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.880
<v Speaker 1>us josh is that at the same time, executives are

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to move away from China. What's happening. Yeah. Absolutely.

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 1>You see Cook and Apple doing a sort of delicate

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>dance here where they're trying to reassure China, a very

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>important partner, that everything is okay, while also trying to

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>make sure that they are less reliant on China. We

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>saw the big disruptions late last year at the Fox

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>kN plant and iPhone City, and they're building up capacity

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 1>in other countries so that they are less vulnerable to

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 1>geographic disruptions in the future. Joshua, Can you tell us

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about where, which countries where does the

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>supply chain shift? Yeah? Absolutely so for iPhones, which is

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the majority of their production that is shifting primarily to India.

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>This has been happening for about five years, but it's

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>really ramped up over the last year or so, and

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the next iPhone generation could be the first time we

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>see the first batch of iPhones leaving both from China

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and India at the same time. For mac production, that's

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>happening in Southeast Asia as well, Malaysia and also Vietnam,

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.399
<v Speaker 1>a little bit in Ireland, but less complex kind of

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>put together. Yeah, exactly for some mac products that will

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>happen in Ireland, but primarily the focus there is on

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Southeast Asia. Josh, I guess the question goes to which

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>products and what rationale. Right when the second wave of

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>COVID hit mainland China, it became apparent that the higher

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 1>end pro models, the production of them, was concentrated in

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Jung Joe. A lot of our reporting seems to suggest

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that this is political as well, in terms of what's

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>going on between the US and China. Which is it? Yeah,

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think that there's two things going on

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>simultaneously right now. You do have just the inherent vulnerability

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of concentrating such an important production pacity in one geographic area.

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, if there's a disruption due to COVID and

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the only place shoemake these phones there's in one area

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're suffering from COVID, then you really run into

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:13.919
<v Speaker 1>a problem. But also it's really impossible to ignore the

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>intention between the United States and China and all sorts

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 1>of areas. And I think Apple is looking to avoid

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>some of that by having a fallback plan if something

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.160
<v Speaker 1>does happen. It's a great weed. Go get your business week,

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Joshua bursting, Well, thank you so much for it. This

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>is a incredibly disruptive new technology. All of the leading

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>AI labs know they're creating something dangerous, but none of

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>them really want to stop it. Welcome back to new technology.

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm Canaine hiding and I'm d Lovelow in San Francisco.

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>The chat GPT revolution carrow could open the door to

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 1>a four day week by providing a major productivity boost

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>for many jobs. That's according to Nobel Prize winning labor

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>economists Christopher Pissarides, who says the labor market can adapt

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>quickly enough to AI backchatbots tampering down concerns that rapid

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>advances in tech could bring mass job layoffs. And I

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you saw this one, but President Biden

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>tweeting about AI overnight. I was wondering, Carol, when the

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 1>White House would weigh in on this, as often is

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the case, and here comes the split. We have the

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>pro side, in fact, the Nobel Prize winning economists saying, look,

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 1>this could be really additive to our productivity. Yes, there

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>are sub concerns and President Biden really highlighting them there,

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>but we continue to daily discuss how much are we

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>really thinking about the ethics involved, how much are we

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the negative consequences as well as the positive consequences?

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>And Professor parisides thoughts in line with what Goldman said

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>last month, three hundred million global jobs at risk, but

0:21:56.960 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 1>plus seven percent annual contribution to global GDP potentially from

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>generative AI. So you know there's concern, but there's hope.

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 1>So let's bring in Richard Socher for more. He's the

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 1>CEO and founder of the AI search engine you dot com.

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>He also served as the Chief Scientists a VP at Salesforce,

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and was the CEO and CTO of AI startup meta

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Mind before that. You were not one of the signatories

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to the pause petition last week, but you operate a

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:29.439
<v Speaker 1>generative AI search engine. Are you one of those that

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 1>thinks a pause is helpful or just adds to the noise?

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think a pause is feasible. It's hard to

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.439
<v Speaker 1>tell people like, don't think about this, don't work on

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>this abstract general purpose technology. I do think it is

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:49.199
<v Speaker 1>important for lawmakers to think about how to deal with

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:53.160
<v Speaker 1>a changing job landscape. I do think it'll make sense

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 1>for us to regulate this technology as it gets applied

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>in specific areas such as military, healthcare, transportation, and so on.

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Regulation makes sense there, But it's kind of like trying

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to regulate the chip sets and say this chip is

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to make this kind of computation or compute dysfunction.

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>It's just very hard to do that. Versus when you

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>apply chips and put them into a weapon, there is

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:24.120
<v Speaker 1>actual regulation of how that weapon should be used. And

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not using weapons because I think this is weapons

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>great technology. I think I'm just using that in that

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a general purpose technology. It's more like a hammer

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>or the Internet, and the Internet you can share illegal

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and horror content, but we don't make the entire Internet

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>illegal and say hey, how about we slow down the

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Internet tide. Instead, we say no, if you'd share this

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>particular kind of content like child pornography or like murder

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>videos and things like that, like we make that illegal.

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>And that makes a lot of sense. Which we're just

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 1>looking at that exact tweet basically that you put out

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>there saying regulated regular related in a thoughtful manner. Here,

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting you seem to be aligning in some ways

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>with why I think of what's been being put out

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>by other professors. I'm thinking particularly of many Bender the

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>stochastic parrots and report where she's saying, sometimes when you're

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>putting too much thought around the intelligence of artificial intelligence,

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you're almost adding to the hype. Here. That's exactly right.

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like there's a whole industry now what I

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>call them anti hype hypers and by then saying, oh, wow,

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:33.400
<v Speaker 1>this is so omnipotent, so dangerous, we have to regulate it. Honestly,

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>it probably makes some people think, wow, well, then I

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 1>really got to have like countries, certain organizations where values

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>aren't really important to them. At the same time, I

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>think we're antropomorphizing a lot the technology, thinking it has

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>its own thoughts and things like that. It isn't terdably powerful.

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>The impact on jobs is real, but it doesn't have

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a super intelligence that will have a mind of its own.

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:00.879
<v Speaker 1>It really just it's the next word, because that's what

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you're asking it to do. Will it has now capability

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 1>currently to say, Oh, I just don't want to predict

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:09.360
<v Speaker 1>next words anymore. I want to just have my own

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:12.880
<v Speaker 1>thoughts and do my own thing. It's interesting. Of course,

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>there's also this narrative EDD that some that were signing

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the petition for a pause perhaps were just a bit

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:21.959
<v Speaker 1>behind the curve and the application of their own AI technology.

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>But and you've been playing with you dot Com in particular. Yeah,

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I use chat GBT, I use barred by Google, Richard,

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 1>I have been using you dot Com very similar products.

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 1>And the question I put to you, because you actually

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>seem to be taking a somewhat objective view on this,

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>is is whether this is just sour greats from an

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>industry trying to catch up with a clear leader in

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 1>open AI. I do think so. I do think some

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:49.640
<v Speaker 1>folks trying to slow it down while we say, oh,

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>it'll be nice if recap sometime to catch up to

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>this whole situation. We were actually at dot Com the

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>first to instead of trying to regulate the technology or

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 1>says or saying this is impossible to use for a

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>search engine, just trying to make it better. For instance,

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>they hallucinated a lot, and so now we added the

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 1>capability of these lms to have citatients and to stick

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>closer to the sources that they find online. We launched

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>it in December last year, and Open Eye and others

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>like Being have copied that capability now and I think

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>it makes the whole larger language model space better and

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>more useful for search engine. Yes, Caroline JP Morgan out

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>with that note this morning, right, calling Microsoft a clear

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>early leader in the generative AI space. It's partnership with

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>open Ai. Big names moved early here, didn't they. Yeah,

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and Richard, you can speak to this. You've worked in

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>big names, you worked at Salesforce, you now got your

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>own startup. Is it right? It's Open Aye sucking all

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:54.479
<v Speaker 1>the oxygen out of the room when it shouldn't be.

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 1>How much do we need to work to think of

0:26:56.480 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>smaller players? And now are the bigger players really marching here? Yeah,

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a great question. You know Microsoft Pad has its

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>monopoly days and use that monopoly power a lot in

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the past, and they're certainly applying that playbook now to

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:15.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, an almost subsidiary of Microsoft. You know it's

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>they own fifty percent of Opening Eye, and it is

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:21.879
<v Speaker 1>it can be tough. You know, we launched certain capabilities

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:28.359
<v Speaker 1>like LMS with citations, then Microsoft later on copied that feature.

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 1>They're now trying to end all the little competition and

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>search engines that they used to want to support in

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>their struggle against Google. Now they say, oh, it seems

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:41.479
<v Speaker 1>like we would be able to lose ourselves, So they

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 1>increase the prices by ten or even fifty x, making

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>it not feasible anymore to partner with them. So there's

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:52.400
<v Speaker 1>definitely that attempt for Microsoft to try to get back

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to this monopoly power. Interesting, and of course I'm sure

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft will go to for commonness or whether they feel

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 1>that they're in an anti competitive competitive manner. But Richard,

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>what do you do at you dot com to continue

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to be relevant in the space, to continue to grow. Yeah,

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:13.159
<v Speaker 1>we've been very much ahead of everyone when we launched

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>this larger language model chat search engine in December last year.

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>The field moves so quickly. It didn't last very long.

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>When we became the first to have multimodal outputs in

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 1>these chat models. So if the aster chat model, oh,

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>what's the stock price of salesforce? Instead of making up

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of numbers, which what most is what most

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of these models will do, we just show you a

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>stock taker. So the outputs kind of different modalities can

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>be a table, can be a craph, can be an image,

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>can be an interactive element. So we essentially introduced the

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.479
<v Speaker 1>idea of an app store to a search engine, and

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that allows the chat model to be a lot more

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 1>powerful in an actual replacement to Google. So we're trying

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to merge the best ideas of a traditional search engine

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>with the chat bat like capabilities of summarize this whole

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>website for me, write me an entire HTML website or

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>longer piece of code, and all of these things, and

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll continue to innovate than some more exciting things are

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 1>on the pipeline. Well, continue to innovate. Richard, the Bloomberg

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Opinion Editorial Board have an opinion piece out today saying

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that an AI pause would be a disaster for innovation.

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 1>You seem to agree with that argument. My question is

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>what are you doing to innovate? How busy are you

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>going out there trying to get new checks from your

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>backers to continue the research, to continue the development. Yeah,

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's just impossible to regulate. It's like saying, hey,

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>these models need the Internet, so let's make Internet a

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit slower. Or these models need chip sets, how

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>about we makeing chips a little bit slower so that

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>we slow this all down because some of these chips

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>would be used to do bad things. It's just not

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>even feasible. Not every country would participate, and it's just

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't even make sense because the technology can be

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 1>used for so many good things. We've trained the same

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>technology that you see for a textual chat in natural

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>language English. We use that technology back in my salesforce

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>stays to train on protein generation so we can find

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 1>for cancer, we can find new cures for viruses and

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>things like that. This technology is so general purpose, it

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 1>can do a lot of amazing things, and to say

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 1>let's slow it down at the very basic player just

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make sense when you apply it to medicine and

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 1>other areas yating that it needs to do this, Richard,

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Does U dot com survive in a world where Google's

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 1>barred and Microsoft three bang are offering exactly the same thing?

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Does the pucky plucky player survive? We think so. There

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>have been multiple smaller search engines that are worth billion

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars already like that dock Go, and people still care

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 1>about privacy. And to be honest, Google's barred and Maxwell's

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>being have not yet caught up with everything that we

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>do and I think we have a shot up. Great

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>to have some time with you, great conversation, Richard Socio.

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>We thank you dot Com CEO. We while coming up,

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk a little bit more about funding as Ed

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 1>was just getting to it. Why Stripe, one of the

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 1>world's most valuable startups, is seeing a payment's volume slowdown.

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>More on that and more in our VC roundup. That's next. First,

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>let's get back to some of the banking concerns that

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 1>are swirling today and shine a light on all of

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Warden Tech player First Republic because another two and a

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>half percent as we once again worry about some of

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the deposits at these smaller lenders from New York and

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:50.239
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, the Suremberg. But when you look at how

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the economy is evolving, how the technology of the economy

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 1>is evolving, or we're still seeing increasing demand for more

0:31:56.680 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>data centers because of more Internet traffic, because of more

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 1>sensors on car, because of generative AI. Right, so company

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 1>is like in video, a more diverse folk company like

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a broad camp is a good position for a client

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 1>all right, Time for the VC roundup. Stripe says that

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>growth in payments volumes slowed last year, even as it

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 1>helped more large businesses and clients handle payments over the internet.

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>The payments company says volume climb twenty six twenty twenty two,

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 1>but that's compared with sixty percent growth in twenty twenty one,

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>when Stripe and many of its rivals saw rapid growth

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 1>as consumers did more shopping online during the pandemic. Over

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to Saudi Arabia's to You, a startup that provides a

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>range of services from ridehailing to food delivery. It's hired

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Moelis and Co. To help raise funds to fuel the

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>super app's growth. Talks for the financing round at an

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 1>early stage, and the target amount is still being firmed up.

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 1>According to say Caroline. Let's talk about another key payments startup,

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Chipper Cash, the African cross border payments platform. It's not

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>been immune from the banking crisis. In fact, the massive

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 1>layoffs hitting Silicon Valley this year. The company's co founder

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and CEO spoke with Newberg about where they go from here.

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 1>We're not immune to the idea that even we've had

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to become a bit more capital efficient. I mentioned Alia,

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>we had to take my belts in a couple of areas,

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 1>because I think even as a business, we've also had

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to rethink and of asked my entire teams and everyone

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 1>in the company to think about every single expense in

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the business, think about it again and deeply do we

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 1>need to spend money in that area? Where can we

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>be more efficient? Do you see more cost cutting coming

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 1>in the near future for Chipper, because I know you,

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 1>like many other tech companies, you've had to lay off

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a number of a lot of your workforce. I mean,

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>do you see that continuing on for more months? Want

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 1>unforesee additional layoffs with Chipper specifically, And to give some

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 1>more context there, you know, we came out of a

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>period where we hired over two hundred and fifty people

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:10.800
<v Speaker 1>in a space of you know, eighteen months, and we

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 1>grew to almost five hundred people globally, and you know,

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 1>including acquiring another company, and that rate of growth just

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 1>by function of how fast it's happening. Building some inefficiencies

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and so for us, part of making sure that we're

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:30.879
<v Speaker 1>being as officient as possible as meant revisiting every single

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:33.360
<v Speaker 1>aspect of the organization and seeing where can we be

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>as efficient as possible, Chipper Cash, co founder and CEO,

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 1>her Mam Sarah and Jogi. There some of the most

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 1>iconic and beloved characters in the gaming universe are coming

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to a big screen near you. But if you live

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in Japan, you're gonna have to wait. The Super Mario

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 1>film premiering internationally today won't feature in Japanese theaters for

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 1>another three weeks or so. So why do fans in

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the birthplace of Super Mario and the home base of

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 1>its creating Nintendo have to wait? The straightforward answer is

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that Japan will be up, will be the toughest audience

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:16.879
<v Speaker 1>to please. Yes, the rest of the world has die

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:20.600
<v Speaker 1>hard fans, but no country Caroline has the same concentration

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:24.920
<v Speaker 1>of Morrow followers than Japan does. Oh gotta know your audience,

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 1>gray one. Meanwhile, let's talk about EVS a little bit.

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:31.959
<v Speaker 1>Kia today is unveiling It's all electric EV nine SUV.

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:35.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a flaction with the company's plan S strategy, basically

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:38.719
<v Speaker 1>to spearhead it's transition to EVS and too millibility solutions

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 1>by twenty twenty five. Let's talk about all of it.

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's c centis Kia executive vice president and Coo and Steve.

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 1>The EV nine, the suv, who is it wanting to

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 1>compete with? Right now? It isn't going to compete with

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:56.799
<v Speaker 1>anyone because it has a clear space at the tap

0:35:56.880 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 1>of the suv market. So in the coming year, some

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>other vehicles such a Chevy Blazer might be a competitor.

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 1>But this is a full size three rowd suv, a

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 1>six or seven passenger with a targeted three hundred mile range,

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 1>and there is anything like that on the market right now. See,

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the biggest question for you, guys, I suppose is pricing.

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:26.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, lots of models coming online here in North America.

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Everyone has their eyes set on Tesla, So how do

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:34.239
<v Speaker 1>you price that upcoming EV to make it competitive? Good questions. Well,

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Kia has added a lot of new vehicles to the

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 1>line in the past few years, and tell your eye

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:45.279
<v Speaker 1>as single handedly changed the brand and we've been attracting

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:50.400
<v Speaker 1>newer customers, younger, better educated, much wealthier that are purchasing

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a car well into the sixty dollar range, and that's

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 1>paved the way for EV line. So I would say, well,

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 1>we're not ready to pricing. It will be priced beginning

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>with the high end of telling the right and then

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 1>up the premier packages and features. So, Steve, we've got

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to put you on the spot about the IRA, then

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the Inflation Reduction Act. Do you design the vehicle and

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 1>priced as a vehicle so that it is caught within

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the parameters of that legislation. No, you have to design

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:30.479
<v Speaker 1>for the market and you don't make long long term

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 1>decisions based on a short term taxation policies. And the

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 1>IRA is a disruptive type of legislation where auto companies

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:47.360
<v Speaker 1>who are moving along based on just insider rules and

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the government changed them all of a sudden. As an example,

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:55.799
<v Speaker 1>we had already announced our hundred order of metaplans in

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Georgia who are building a battery factor the end of

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:03.840
<v Speaker 1>vehicle assymbol factor as well, and that was before IRA

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:08.280
<v Speaker 1>was announced. So we're moving for the plans for electrification

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 1>based on what the market demands. Let's talk about the

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 1>market and in fair in fact, let's talk about competition

0:38:14.960 --> 0:38:16.799
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more. Steve, we actually went to our

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:20.760
<v Speaker 1>audience and ask them about Tesla in particular and perhaps

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:24.239
<v Speaker 1>whether in this current environment it's losing market share or

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:28.400
<v Speaker 1>whether it's an impact of slowing economy that perhaps is

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 1>curtailing the demand for Tesla's at the moment or in fact,

0:38:31.719 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine percent in the audience thought that demand for

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's evs are still full on. Do you think they

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 1>are or do you think that your gaming market share

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:43.439
<v Speaker 1>from the likes of Tesla. Yeah, well, there's two things

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:46.759
<v Speaker 1>that are happening. You have everyone else getting in the

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:50.240
<v Speaker 1>game right now, So the number of choices for electric

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:55.320
<v Speaker 1>vehicles is expanding, the acceptance of electric vehicles for variety

0:38:55.760 --> 0:39:00.439
<v Speaker 1>is expanding. So you may be kind of questing they're

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 1>difficult to concourse from, but we're attracting customers from all

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:07.879
<v Speaker 1>brands now, and these are people that are considering their

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 1>first EAVY or the first ev sub in the case

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of six or so. The market's growing, so not everyone's

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 1>coming to Teslas. Steve, what's the secret source for Kia?

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 1>What is it you think you have an advantage in

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:27.719
<v Speaker 1>when you're going up not just against Tesla but the

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:31.279
<v Speaker 1>usoms who are bringing all these models online. What are

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you going to do to win? Well, we're a bit

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of a disruptive brand. Kia is thirty years old and

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 1>we started out with small internal combustion cars who are

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:46.200
<v Speaker 1>relatively newer to larger su needs until your hearts maybe

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 1>only four years on the market, So perhaps our secret

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 1>sauces are innovative technology, are willingness to take risks, and

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:58.959
<v Speaker 1>also our customer focus and development products that are fought

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:05.600
<v Speaker 1>on for customers. Right, Steve Center of Kia Motives, thank

0:40:05.680 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 1>you for your time. That Caroline, there was a time

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 1>where Tesla was the only game in town. But you're not.

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Are learning this week that's not true anymore. Twenty thousand

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>orders in the first quarter going to the acts of GM,

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand going to Forward Kia. I mean everywhere you look,

0:40:19.680 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 1>there's hybrids, there's Toyota. We haven't discussed yet. A lot

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 1>more to come in the numbers. Difficult economic outlook for

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the rest of this year. Well that does it for

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:31.799
<v Speaker 1>this edition of Bloomberg Technology, though, character and you do

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:33.600
<v Speaker 1>not want to forget to check out our podcast. You

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 1>can find it on the terminal. You can go online

0:40:35.920 --> 0:40:38.680
<v Speaker 1>on apcoholes, what if I on iHeart Whether you like

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to consume your audio from New York from San Francisco.

0:40:42.800 --> 0:40:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Wish you wonderful rest of the day. This is a

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:45.200
<v Speaker 1>roombag