WEBVTT - Western Asset Adding Junk Bonds, Local Currency EM: Buchanan

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. As

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>stock traders freaked out and the Dow, SMP and NASDAC

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>all plummeted earlier this week, credit markets remained a picture

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>of tranquility, or almost so. The big question here is

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>is that truly a reflection of not a lot of

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>risk and steady as she goes? Or is this something

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>else and perhaps the calm before a storm? And here

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to help us understand that is Mike buck And And

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>he's Deputy Chief Investment Officer at Western Asset Management Co,

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>an independent affiliate of Like Mason, which overseas four hundred

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:09.839
<v Speaker 1>and thirty three billion dollars uh and he is based

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in Pasadena, California, where he comes to us from. Mike,

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us. What's your

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>take here? Because we have seen a bit of spread widening,

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>particularly in high yield credit UH and yields are rising.

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You are seeing some high yield bond deals getting pulled.

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Are we Is this sort of the precipice before a

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>bigger weakness AILSA and thanks for having me on UM. Yeah.

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 1>I think our view is that, no, it's not the

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>precipice before some more meaningful fall. In fact, you know,

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>as we were watching all this volatility unfolding the equity

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>markets UH one, we maintained that it didn't seem like

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>this was a fundamental pullback. We couldn't find any real

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>evidence that, you know, fundamentals were the catalyst for what

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>was happening. It appeared to be technical. I think when

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>we got more clarity on the short ball funds and

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>how they were playing out in the market, it became

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a little more clear what was driving that volatility. And

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>we came in yesterday morning really hoping to put some

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>money to work at UH meaningfully cheaper levels, and as

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you pointed out in your introduction, didn't quite see that.

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>But we have seen some some weekending in price and

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's just creating a better opportunity in a

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of these spread markets. So what are you buying

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>right now? Well, we're adding to high yield, and you know,

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>high yield still at you know, three d and sixty

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>basis points over if you look at just the generic index,

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that's that's almost forty basis points wider UH than where

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>we were towards the end of January. And you know,

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>as you pointed out with with overall rates moving higher,

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, that gets you to north of six percent.

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know, as much as we wanted it to

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>go a little cheaper to add, we still think that's

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a very good opportunity. We look at the fundamental backdrop

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and seem very supportive credit fundamentals. UH fourth quarter earnings

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>are coming in very strong h so just a lot

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of fundamental support for adding to that position.

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:18.119
<v Speaker 1>UM also emerging markets. We think the real meaningful opportunity

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and spread markets right now is in local currency emerging markets.

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:26.119
<v Speaker 1>And again didn't really see you know, a meaningful sell off,

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>but UM saw a little bit of a backup, and

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that just made it more attractive. Mike. If

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>yields increase, if interest rates increase, won't that put even

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>greater pressure on companies that have to go to the

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>high yield bond market. In order to finance their businesses. Yeah,

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I think at the margin, that's that's accurate. Um. You know,

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you do have a lot of below investment grade companies

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that have accessed the floating rate market, and now that

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>short term rates libraar is essentially above all those library floors.

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Every pick up in lieb or translates into you know,

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>higher interest costs for these companies. So you do have

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>to have a view on ultimately where you think rates

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>are going. Our view right now is that, um. You know,

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>if you look at what's priced into the market, you know,

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>three hikes this year, two hikes next year, that pretty

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>much gets you to the FEDS target their their terminal rate. Um.

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>So we we look at where rates are currently and

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 1>we think based on growth, based on inflation, Uh, there's

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:36.479
<v Speaker 1>not a significant risk of meaningfully higher rates. Mike. I

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about liquidity because you said that you

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>were hoping, you came in yesterday morning hoping to buy

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>some discounted bonds. Uh, there weren't that many opportunities because

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 1>people weren't necessarily selling them at such a big discounts.

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>And I'm wondering, you know, how concerned are you that

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you really cannot move very big blocks of bonds. And

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 1>I know liquidity worries were all in vogue a couple

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of years ago that people stopped caring, but I'm starting

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to hear about it again around the margins. What's your

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>take on this, Well, I do think you have to

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>be very sensitive to um, you know, liquidity in the market,

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's just a byproduct of of one the growth

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 1>in the corporate credit market, uh, combined with the amount

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:22.479
<v Speaker 1>of risk capital that dealers have to commit to their

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>their inventory, and that was typically you know, the first

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>layer of of liquidity UM. And and just that dynamic

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 1>alone tells you there's less liquidity in this market, and

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>we operate with that assumption. When we're pricing out a bond.

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>We want to make sure that that we put a

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 1>little more of a liquidity premium than we did, you know,

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>let's say five or or ten years ago. UM. That

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>being said, Uh, what we found yesterday, and you know,

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you only know this when you're kind of out in

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the market and you're you're testing levels, is that UM,

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the bids were actually very deep in the credit markets

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:01.679
<v Speaker 1>and the e M markets. UM. You know, it seemed

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of people had the same view or

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>or or we're trying to do the same thing that

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>we were, which was put money to work at more

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>attractive levels. So I do think if if, if we

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 1>had wanted to sell that, um, the bids were there,

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:19.040
<v Speaker 1>albeit at maybe at lower prices, and we would have

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>been able to move substantial size. But to me, it

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 1>seemed like more more investment professionals were lining up on

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the bidside, wanting to be buyers at lower levels as

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 1>opposed to wanting to sell it at higher levels. Where's

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 1>the biggest opportunity left in credit? I mean specific sectors

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>or even companies. Yeah, I mean I think there's there's

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>still a few within developed market credit. We do like

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the high yield space, and I know that maybe a

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:49.679
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a contrarian view, but our assessment really

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>is that ultimately fundamentals drive valuations, and fundamentals we see improving,

0:06:55.839 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>we see UH leverage metrics going lower, we see UH,

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:04.599
<v Speaker 1>we see cash flow generation improving. We think tax reform

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a little bit of an added

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>tail wind. And like I said earlier, at three sixty

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>basis points over treasuries, I think, um, that's that's that's

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a reasonable. I mean not not a table pounder, but

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a reasonable relative value anomaly. UM, I do think in

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>it within high yield. Uh. You know, you can focus

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>on some of the strong double bees that have a

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a reasonable chance to move to investment grade. I think

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>in names like Freeport, McMoRan, H. Williams. You know, those

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>are names that UM, we think can definitely get to

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I G. And if they do, you've you've got probably

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>another thirty to forty basis points of spread tightening there.

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I just want to give you about twenty seconds that

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you talked about emerging markets. What about Argentina, the Republic

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of Argentina. We like Argentina. We think that UM, you

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>know that you're just you're starting with such a high

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>nominal rate almost fifteen percent on their local currency tenure.

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>UM that even when you factor in the inflation, and

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>by the way, we think inflation is trending lower there. UM,

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you look at the real yield and that looks very

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>compelling when you compare it to the real yields that

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you're getting in most developed markets. Thanks very much for

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>being with us. Mike Buchanan is Deputy Chief Investment Officer

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>for Western Asset Management. They are an independent affiliate of

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>leg Mason helping to manage more than four hundred and

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty billion dollars. Joining us from Pasadena, California. Tesla a

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>company to surely draw some passionate responses, whether people are

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>afford it or against it. Here to talk about what

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to expect for the earnings which we should get after

0:08:55.800 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the bell. Today's Alan Boum Auto Analysts and principle Aboum

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.719
<v Speaker 1>and Associates. Alan, thank you so much for being with us.

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>How much are we really going to learn about? The

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 1>burning question? And no, it is not the space rocket

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 1>that was launched yesterday. It is can Tesla actually produce

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the cars they have promised? Yeah, I mean the answer

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>is they can. The obvious question is when, uh and

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>so uh you know, the the idea of are they

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>going to hit their goals at the end of this

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 1>quarter and at the end of the next quarter. Each

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>of those have been put off several times and obviously

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the burning question as you as you mentioned for

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the earnings called this afternoon because this is obviously a

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:46.439
<v Speaker 1>future stock, you know, it's based on where this company

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>is going. Um, and so that's the issue, ar if,

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 1>that's the issue. Is it likely that they're going to

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:57.079
<v Speaker 1>announce any management changes at Tesla because there has been

0:09:57.080 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a rotating senior executive panel when it comes to actually

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>producing this model three. Yeah, there have been a lot

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of changes, and actually I'm more interested in this probably

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't get much coverage in the in the call today.

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 1>On the operational side. Uh, you know if some quarters

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>there even a year or two ago. Uh, Tesla brought

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:23.959
<v Speaker 1>in some manufacturing experts. Uh that got them uh some

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>progress obviously, but those are the kinds of things that

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that they need to do. UM. I've always said that

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Tesla understood, unlike a lot of it startup EV competitors, UH,

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that it was an auto company. UM. And it has

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>over a long period of time for AUDI in key

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 1>technical professionals. Uh, there's obviously been a fair amount of

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:51.319
<v Speaker 1>churn there. Um. And uh what they're trying to do

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>is obviously very difficult. So they need that kind of

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>help and uh those kind of questions need to be answered. Allan,

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand how anyone tries to actually value these shares.

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I should just point out that the broad SMP index

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>is up lesson two percent, Tesla shares up about ten

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent just so far this year, following

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a forty game last year. How are you evaluating this company? Well,

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:25.959
<v Speaker 1>clearly you can't do it on the fundamental This is

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a momentum stock. This is an emotional stock. I'm not

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna sit here and say, well, based on the expectation

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>of failed production profits, we're gonna see this. Um. The

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>market is determining this stock. And obviously that's the ridiculous

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and true statement. Um. But the point being is how

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>can they move forward? As obviously they continue to miss

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the targets. Now, the flip side of that is the

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Model three is different, um. And what I mean by

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:04.839
<v Speaker 1>that is, Um, you know, the bolt is out there,

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the leaf has been redone and we're gonna have a

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>second version of it later this year. And I would

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>argue that just doesn't matter because the Model three, the

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Model Esque, the Model X, they are viewed in a

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>different spectrum than those vehicles. Now, what does matter, perhaps

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>is as Audi as Poors, as BMW, uh as uh

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:33.440
<v Speaker 1>as Daimler start to put out models. Um. And yes

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>those are luxury brands, and Tesla is trying to move

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>down market, if you will, But it's still viewed in

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that luxury mill you and so the that has the

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 1>potential to be a problem. I just don't see the

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>bolts or the leaf uh as as a competitor. Really,

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>why not, because it's because of the way the product

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 1>is viewed. What Tesla has done is not only did

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>they create an electric car, obviously and and but they

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>created a good car from a from a non uh,

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>environmental perspective. It was is fun to drive the S

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and the X, the three. It's obviously going to be different,

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>but it is still viewed within that that genre of

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>being Okay, this is something special and uh. Of course,

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you can't make the car, or if

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the quality isn't awful, then you're gonna lose some of

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that specialness if you will. But I just see it

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>as still being has the opportunity to be viewed in

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that positive light. Thank you very much. Alan Boum, auto

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>analyst and a principle at Boum and Associates, giving us

0:13:47.280 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a preview of Testa the shares of trunk they are

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>higher right now by more than twenty six percent. After

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 1>agreeing to sell the Los Angeles Times for five hundred

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, this begins a new chapter in the newspapers

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and thirty six year old history. Here to

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>tell us about this another media events his Porter bib

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>managing partner Media Tech Capital Partners, and he can be

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>followed on Twitter at Porter three. Al Right, Porter, what

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>do you make of this sale to a local investor? And? Um,

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the future of the San Diego Union Tribune and the

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>l A Times, Well, the l A Times and and

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the San Diego Tribune, We're both going to implode

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>over the dysfunctional Trunk management. And so this is a

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>lifesaver for the papers and for the community, and having

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a local owner is a huge benefit. The real issue, though,

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>is the price. Half of half a billion dollars is

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>twice what Jeff Be's was paid for the Washington Post.

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>This is cash twenty in cash and pension liabilities. Yeah,

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>but he's a the buyer is a shareholder, major shareholder

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>in Trunk. So, Uh, he had to have some insight

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>into what he was doing. Um, I think if he,

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>if he is smart, and he lets the editorial and

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>management staff of the two papers, uh do their thing. Uh,

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a great opportunity because clearly the l A Times

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>is one of the three great newspapers along with the

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Washington Post in the New York Times that will survive

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>in the United States and globally. I think there's a

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>big question. And we've actually seen the Washington Post in

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>New York Times gain traction with getting subscribers actually pay

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>digital subscribed. That's what I'm saying, digital subscribers. I should

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>have said the digital parks. But but you know, the

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>actually pay for the content and the l a times

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>UH needs to provide. Yeah, they're they're offering a dollar

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine for six months subscription. It's not that's not

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>one but one dollar nine. But with respect to subscriptions,

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>we also got results from Disney last night, and I

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>thought that it was interesting what they're doing with ESPN,

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>looking to create some kind of UH special service that

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you can pay for almost five dollars a month for.

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>What is this and does that make ESPN more valuable

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>or is this just more noise? Well, ESPN, like everything

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>else on cable UH and and traditional television distribution UM,

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the legendary media that we used to know UM, has

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>been losing customers. And when they lose customers or viewers

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in this case, they lose advertising revenue. So the Disney

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>is adopting over the top two revenue stream. They want

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>subscription money and they want advertising, and they will do

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that because an awful lot of people subscribe to cable

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>right now for two reasons. HBO and ESPN and all

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 1>the live sports that ESPN can provide on cable. And

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>if if you can save eight ninety d plus dollars

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>on your cable subscription and spend only five or ten

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>or fifteen for HBO and for ESPN, your way ahead

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:22.879
<v Speaker 1>of the game. And that they're targeting the millennials who

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>are already over the top and not they're not cord cutters,

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 1>their cord nevers. And that's the future. Tell me about

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the future of Viacom. They're going to be releasing their

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>results tomorrow before the market opens. Uh, tell me about

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the challenges that Viacom faces and the h I guess

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:44.439
<v Speaker 1>it's a maybe they could even make it into a movie.

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Viacom and CBS and the red Stone Family that that

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that's something Viacom could do, because Paramount could use some

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>some new down in their their film side. I think

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>we're not in an apocalypse, but we're in a sea

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>change train in sition period two thousand and eighteen is

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>going to go down as as the end of legacy

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>media and the real beginning of digital media. And Vehicom

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>has to combine with CBS. Not for any other reason

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>than that's what Sherry Redstone really wants to do. She's

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>put her foot down. Less moonves is is the stumbling

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 1>block because he wants unfettered, absolute control of the combined

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>companies or he won't play. He did try to buy

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>CBS three years ago and he couldn't persuade the Ridstones

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to sell it to him. So he may or may

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.719
<v Speaker 1>not be part of the picture going forward. But what

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>is is the next shoe to drop is Verizon steps

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>in and buys the combined Vehcom and CBS. And Sherry

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>knows that if CBS, which is Verizon's real target, um doesn't.

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>If CBS gets bought by Verizon, she'll never get rid

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of Vehicom and it'll just die. I want to I

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>want to pick up on something that you said digital

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>media they need to transform to that. What is that

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and what is the uh sort of premier model of

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>who's doing it right? Well, Disney has a good start,

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 1>but you have to give Netflix as the pioneer. They

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 1>have done it better than anybody. They've got a ninety

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>million subscribers in the United States right now. They've kept

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the price low. If you remember three or four years ago,

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:31.199
<v Speaker 1>Netflix tried to increase the monthly subscription and the bottom

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 1>fell out of their subscriber base. So keeping the price low. Uh,

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>That's that's half the secret. The other secret is having

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>terrific content and lots of it and refreshing the content.

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>That's why Netflix is spending eight billion dollars creating new

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>content this year. Twenty one century. Fox is going to

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>report their results after the market closes today. What are

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts about the Murdoch empire. Well, Uh, Rupert has

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>one last team and that's to be the largest shareholder

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 1>in Disney, which he will be um he and his

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>family and his and his family trust when the Disney

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Fox deal billion dollar deal, that's right, and and what

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>he will be left with is what he what he

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>knows and loves, which is news and sports. And by

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the way, he's still trying to get control of Sky

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in the UK and the government that the parliamentary regulators

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>have said there's no way, Jose. They want Disney to

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:35.160
<v Speaker 1>buy those assets and to own all of Sky, which

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Disney wants to do as well. Bob Iger mentioned that

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 1>in his earning school yesterday, So just a real quick

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>what's the m and a deal that hasn't happened yet

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to be talking about later this year.

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>The real issue is what happens to the cable companies,

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:57.159
<v Speaker 1>because they're going to lose the cable business over the

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>next five years. The flips eye of that whole story, though,

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>is that they are the largest Internet service providers and

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>they will get more and more entrenched in providing a faster, better,

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 1>and unfortunately more expensive access to the Internet. So in

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.199
<v Speaker 1>other words, Verizon and others other Verizon already has that

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Comcast Charter spectrum. The uh look, look what all Tiss

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>has come up with. This is the future of the

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 1>cable industry. They have eliminated the cable box. They've got

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:35.679
<v Speaker 1>voice controlled. It've eliminated the remote control, so that you

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:39.120
<v Speaker 1>can just say channel five verbally the way you would

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to Alexa or Google Assistant, and that changes the channel

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>on your TV. That's the future of of the cable industry.

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>But it's really all targeted at Internet and over the top. Porter,

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>bb thank you so much for being with us. Always

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a pleasure. Porter, managing partner at Media Tech Capital Partners

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in New York, joining us here in our eleven three

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 1>oh studios. The shares of Win Resorts are hired by

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>nearly ten percent. The former chief executive of the company,

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Steven Wynn, he owns a little bit more than eleven

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent. Former wife Lane Win owning about

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>nine and a quarter percent. What's next for the company

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that has his name on the door? Here to tell

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 1>us more? Brian Eggar are senior Gaming and Lodging analyst

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 1>for a Bloomberg Intelligence Brian, thanks very much for being

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>with us in coming in so all right, give us

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>the details about Win Resorts. When you've got someone whose

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>name is literally on the door uh and owns almost

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:54.639
<v Speaker 1>twelve percent of the company, and he's no longer going

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to be running it's next. So the successor CEO, a

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>guy named Matt Maddox, had previously been president. He was

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>chief financial officer before that. UH, fairly well known and

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>well respected by the street. Clearly not known for the

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>developing of all the UH of all the famous casinos

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>for which Win is known going back to the days

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of the gold Nugget and mirage. Nevertheless, I think there

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:20.639
<v Speaker 1>was some expectation that we'd see a succession here, given

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 1>the allegations that came out on February and the subsequent

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:28.360
<v Speaker 1>scrutiny by both the Bord of Directors and Win itself

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and several gaming regulators. So not entirely unexpected. Not expected,

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of people were talking about the cult

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 1>of personality amid a lot of the allegations, and you

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>know he had that, so you know, will there be

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:47.440
<v Speaker 1>something lost without that? I think you could argue there

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>is a win premium associated with the valuation and with

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the stock having retreated from the low two hundreds before

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>this scandal broke two more recently mid one sixties today

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>back to the one seventies um much of at has

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:02.400
<v Speaker 1>been taken to account of the way we do the math.

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:06.399
<v Speaker 1>If you lob one multiple point off of the valuation

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Ibadat cash flow in either Vegas or Macau,

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:12.640
<v Speaker 1>it reduces the value of when by anywhere from three

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>percent to five percent. Much of that has happened. The

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>reason the stock is up today is with the resolution

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of succession. Uh it does away some concerns that regulators

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>might have had about suitability of Mr Wynn himself and

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>perhaps reduces the risk associated with them pursuing their midnightteen,

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 1>mid twenty nineteen opening of a casino in Boston Harbor,

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>which is a really important project for the company. Brian,

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>why didn't the boards suspend Steve Win prior to this? Uh?

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>This announcement? I mean, you know, when the investigation was

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>going on, So basically the day this news broken was

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>originally discussed in the media when Resorts set up a

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>special committee of outside directors to investigate the allegations, parallel

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:02.159
<v Speaker 1>to the investigations being done by gaming regulators in Massachusetts

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>as well as Nevada. Uh. And this is really the

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>outcome of of that that process of reviewing the allegations

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:10.719
<v Speaker 1>and coming to them. But it wasn't made. If it

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>hadn't been made public and splashed across all of the media,

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>do you think they would really have been investigating. I mean,

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it was a seven and a half million dollar payment, right,

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 1>one could argue, and we have looked at this in

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>our own written research that the board itself, from a

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 1>governor's perspective, has to be held to a greater dey

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of accountability. We've looked at things like age, tenure, gender

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of the board itself, so no doubt the board itself

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>will be subject to ongoing scrutiny. I admit Steve wins

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>resignation itself does not completely address what the board should

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>HULD not have been doing well. But on that point,

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 1>is there some kind of legal liability that's hanging over

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the company as a whole since some of these allegations

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:54.640
<v Speaker 1>were known inside the company, right? I think what needs

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to be determined is what wet allegations were known, at

0:25:57.760 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>what time they were known, and I don't have the

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:01.400
<v Speaker 1>answered to that. What I will tell you is that

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>what regulators were concerned about, and very much the board

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I think has been responsive to the risk of regulatory

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>license UH being removed, is the suitability of Mr Wynn

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>in particular, or not only the allegations themselves, but whether

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>or not with respect to the legal settlement that he

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>had made with at least one individual, whether or not

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>that legal settlement was suitably disclosed. So the Massachusetts Gaming

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Commission is going to continue to look at this. I

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>think you're actually having a meeting today and in the

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:34.120
<v Speaker 1>process of doing this, they still have to um address

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:38.919
<v Speaker 1>these issues. My assumption is that Win's departure goes a

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>long way towards addressing some of those concerns, but ultimately

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 1>the Gaming Commission itself still has to determine whether or

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 1>not it's comfortable with suitability. We think the likely is

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>they will proceed and the project will proceed, but I

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>think the everyone involved in that application process is still

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 1>going to be held accountable for what they did or

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>did not disclose. Any idea of what the role of

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>his ex wife, Elaine Win will play. At the time

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of his departure, UH, Steve when himself had voting control

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>over the shares the nine percent of shares in when

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>resorts owned by Elaine Win. Steve Win, as you pointed out,

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 1>still owns twelve percent of it. Some of the details

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>surrounding his departure and the relationship with the company still

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 1>have to be worked out, but what we do know

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>is he has gone and Matt Maddox, former president, takes

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>over as CEO both of the Las Vegas operation and

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the Becau operation, whether where there had also been concerns

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 1>about the renewal of a gaming license there which expires ino.

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Is there some kind of way to handicap the monetary

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>value of any potential investigation, including the one that regulators

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>are meeting about today. I don't think that's something that's

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>readily quantifiable. What we have endeavored to quantify is both

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the value of the wind premium multiple assigned to both

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the Las Vegas and co operations, and also the value

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Massachusetts property, which we estimate probably was probably

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>about tem per cent of the enterprise value of this company.

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh And certainly, again, if you're ask me why is

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the stock up today, for example, I would say that's

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>probably because the risk of a forfeiture of that license

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>is greatly mitigated, if not completely eliminated by When stepping down,

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Brian Egger, thank you so much for being here with

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 1>us to sort of break down and understand the story

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>from a bigger picture point of view. Brian Egger, senior

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Gaming and Lodging analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us here

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>in our eleven three oh studios. Thanks for listening to

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg p m L podcast. You can subscribe and

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm PIM Fox. I'm on Twitter at

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramowits one before

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Radio bo