1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:08,760 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. He is magnificent. The 2 00:00:09,400 --> 00:00:13,600 Speaker 1: essay at High Frequency Economics is a yield based analysis 3 00:00:13,720 --> 00:00:16,959 Speaker 1: of the economy. It is what Karl Weinberg did at 4 00:00:17,000 --> 00:00:20,239 Speaker 1: Lehman Brothers for decades, and it was just thrilled that 5 00:00:20,280 --> 00:00:21,640 Speaker 1: he could join us here this morning. 6 00:00:21,840 --> 00:00:22,120 Speaker 2: Karl. 7 00:00:22,200 --> 00:00:24,360 Speaker 1: I love your research note and that you say the 8 00:00:24,440 --> 00:00:28,600 Speaker 1: labor market's going to hover, but GDP may be light 9 00:00:28,920 --> 00:00:32,560 Speaker 1: link the two together into the first part of twenty 10 00:00:32,680 --> 00:00:33,280 Speaker 1: twenty six. 11 00:00:34,360 --> 00:00:36,320 Speaker 3: Hi Tom, good morning, Thanks for having me back on 12 00:00:36,360 --> 00:00:38,800 Speaker 3: the show. It's been a while. You know, we're at 13 00:00:38,800 --> 00:00:42,440 Speaker 3: full employment. That's my assessment anyhow, others might not agree 14 00:00:42,479 --> 00:00:44,680 Speaker 3: with that. But even at a four and a half 15 00:00:44,680 --> 00:00:47,199 Speaker 3: percent unemployment rate, which I think, by the way, is 16 00:00:47,240 --> 00:00:49,879 Speaker 3: going to go down in this morning's report, and we'll 17 00:00:49,880 --> 00:00:52,720 Speaker 3: get a revision downward to the figure that we saw 18 00:00:52,800 --> 00:00:56,960 Speaker 3: for in November. But when we're at full employment like this, 19 00:00:57,280 --> 00:00:59,960 Speaker 3: all right, the economy has trouble growing. The only way 20 00:01:00,120 --> 00:01:03,720 Speaker 3: it can grow is either by immigration or getting more 21 00:01:03,760 --> 00:01:07,039 Speaker 3: people in the labor force, or by increasing productivity. So 22 00:01:07,160 --> 00:01:10,440 Speaker 3: productivity was really strong in the third quarter. The economy 23 00:01:10,480 --> 00:01:13,520 Speaker 3: grew well, but there's no promise that those productivity gains 24 00:01:13,560 --> 00:01:16,440 Speaker 3: are going to continue into the fourth quarter. So GDP 25 00:01:16,600 --> 00:01:19,640 Speaker 3: growth may be capped, if you will, by the economy 26 00:01:19,680 --> 00:01:21,080 Speaker 3: being at full employment right now. 27 00:01:21,560 --> 00:01:24,440 Speaker 1: I really I'm more focused, folks on the SAGGI GDP 28 00:01:24,600 --> 00:01:28,679 Speaker 1: outlook of selected economists. Mister Myron want six rate cuts 29 00:01:28,720 --> 00:01:31,360 Speaker 1: one and a half percent? Down? Down down? Is that 30 00:01:31,400 --> 00:01:32,640 Speaker 1: a Carl Weinberg theme. 31 00:01:33,600 --> 00:01:36,679 Speaker 3: Absolutely not. I think Myron is wrong. I think he's 32 00:01:36,720 --> 00:01:40,600 Speaker 3: abusing and misinterpreting the Tailor rule and the estimates and 33 00:01:40,640 --> 00:01:45,039 Speaker 3: the importance of our star within the Taylor rule. Our 34 00:01:45,080 --> 00:01:49,560 Speaker 3: star certainly has come down, but potential GDP has also 35 00:01:49,640 --> 00:01:52,320 Speaker 3: come down, potential GDP growth. So when you put the 36 00:01:52,360 --> 00:01:55,920 Speaker 3: two together, there's no recommendation from the Tailor rule or 37 00:01:55,960 --> 00:01:58,680 Speaker 3: anything that I know about economics for the Fed to 38 00:01:58,720 --> 00:02:02,240 Speaker 3: continue to cut rate with the economy at full employment. 39 00:02:02,520 --> 00:02:05,680 Speaker 1: This is Kurt Weinberg and Michael Faroli at JP Morgan 40 00:02:06,000 --> 00:02:10,000 Speaker 1: this phrase potential GDP. None of these people within the 41 00:02:10,040 --> 00:02:12,640 Speaker 1: Trump administration talk about. It's like they're blank to it. 42 00:02:13,120 --> 00:02:15,600 Speaker 2: Carl. The focus obviously today will be on the labor market. 43 00:02:15,600 --> 00:02:18,760 Speaker 2: But the other side of the Fed mandate is inflation. 44 00:02:19,840 --> 00:02:22,359 Speaker 2: What's your inflation view, are you concerned that we may 45 00:02:22,400 --> 00:02:25,160 Speaker 2: see stick your inflation that maybe the market's discounting. 46 00:02:26,160 --> 00:02:31,040 Speaker 3: I'm concerned about more inflation as twenty twenty six progresses, 47 00:02:31,440 --> 00:02:35,120 Speaker 3: because if the economy continues to grow but it can't 48 00:02:35,160 --> 00:02:38,480 Speaker 3: find the workers to make it grow, then we'll have 49 00:02:38,720 --> 00:02:42,079 Speaker 3: too much income chasing too few goods, and that will 50 00:02:42,120 --> 00:02:45,520 Speaker 3: put upward pressure on prices once again. To me, that's 51 00:02:45,560 --> 00:02:48,800 Speaker 3: what the FED should be thinking about. To my clients, 52 00:02:49,000 --> 00:02:52,000 Speaker 3: that's not what the FED is thinking about. But in 53 00:02:52,040 --> 00:02:55,079 Speaker 3: my view, that's what the FED should be thinking about. 54 00:02:55,240 --> 00:02:57,800 Speaker 2: So given that backdrop, how do you expect the FED 55 00:02:57,840 --> 00:03:00,360 Speaker 2: to behave this year? Is it one cut too cuts? 56 00:03:00,400 --> 00:03:03,079 Speaker 2: Do they need to be more aggressive or less aggressive? 57 00:03:04,080 --> 00:03:06,320 Speaker 3: I don't know. I mean, that's really a big question 58 00:03:06,360 --> 00:03:08,400 Speaker 3: we have. First of all, we have four new voters 59 00:03:08,400 --> 00:03:12,359 Speaker 3: on the FOMC. We've lost both of the voters who 60 00:03:12,440 --> 00:03:16,560 Speaker 3: dissented from previous rate cuts, and at least two of 61 00:03:16,600 --> 00:03:20,000 Speaker 3: the new people coming on board may be more inclined 62 00:03:20,040 --> 00:03:23,799 Speaker 3: to ease rather than to hold steady. Even as soon 63 00:03:23,840 --> 00:03:27,960 Speaker 3: as the next meeting against that, FED Chair Powell still 64 00:03:28,000 --> 00:03:32,560 Speaker 3: commands probably three votes on the FOMC out of the twelve. 65 00:03:32,800 --> 00:03:35,440 Speaker 3: And that's the swing, if you will, between those who 66 00:03:35,480 --> 00:03:37,600 Speaker 3: will ease and those who will settle. So I don't 67 00:03:37,600 --> 00:03:39,640 Speaker 3: really know where they're going to go on this, but 68 00:03:39,800 --> 00:03:42,400 Speaker 3: what I'm hoping to see as we move through the 69 00:03:42,480 --> 00:03:46,320 Speaker 3: year is a change in the perception that payrolls are 70 00:03:46,400 --> 00:03:49,400 Speaker 3: slowing because the economy is weak. That's where the FED 71 00:03:49,520 --> 00:03:53,080 Speaker 3: is right now to payrolls are slowing because the labor 72 00:03:53,120 --> 00:03:56,280 Speaker 3: market is tight and there just aren't enough workers to 73 00:03:56,440 --> 00:03:59,280 Speaker 3: hire to keep payrolls growing quickly. 74 00:04:00,160 --> 00:04:01,720 Speaker 1: Some time left here, and I want to get you 75 00:04:01,720 --> 00:04:04,240 Speaker 1: on much more in twenty twenty six. You should see 76 00:04:04,240 --> 00:04:07,040 Speaker 1: where he lives. I mean I took the Nash Rambler once. Yeah, 77 00:04:07,120 --> 00:04:09,520 Speaker 1: I had to put you know, the chains on it 78 00:04:09,560 --> 00:04:12,040 Speaker 1: in I'll enter to get up. Okay, it's up the toconomy. 79 00:04:12,080 --> 00:04:14,920 Speaker 1: You know it's it's like God's country. Yes, sure it's beautiful, 80 00:04:15,240 --> 00:04:17,200 Speaker 1: Carl in your note, And I got any ways to 81 00:04:17,240 --> 00:04:18,880 Speaker 1: go your Carl, but I got to go to your 82 00:04:18,960 --> 00:04:23,680 Speaker 1: legendary reputation on the Pacific rim and on crisis. Do 83 00:04:23,760 --> 00:04:27,039 Speaker 1: you are your radar up in twenty twenty six for 84 00:04:27,320 --> 00:04:32,000 Speaker 1: China or other currency or debt upsets. 85 00:04:32,520 --> 00:04:35,920 Speaker 3: I'm upset for I'm on the alert for a lot 86 00:04:35,960 --> 00:04:38,600 Speaker 3: of things coming from China this year that we've never 87 00:04:38,640 --> 00:04:43,520 Speaker 3: seen before. Right, if you read the IEA's Critical Critical 88 00:04:43,680 --> 00:04:47,599 Speaker 3: Critical Minerals Outlook, I believe is the proper name of it. Okay, 89 00:04:47,839 --> 00:04:51,599 Speaker 3: China sits at the root of every supply chain for 90 00:04:51,720 --> 00:04:56,719 Speaker 3: every critical material for every Western economy, no exceptions to that. 91 00:04:57,440 --> 00:05:01,120 Speaker 3: So all right, this is a weapon that G tested 92 00:05:01,200 --> 00:05:04,920 Speaker 3: with rare earths last year that he's testing right now 93 00:05:05,000 --> 00:05:08,520 Speaker 3: again with Japan. And G has things that he wants 94 00:05:08,520 --> 00:05:10,760 Speaker 3: and I think he's going to asking for them with 95 00:05:10,920 --> 00:05:13,400 Speaker 3: Lee Bridge. I think that's the risk for China in 96 00:05:13,480 --> 00:05:14,000 Speaker 3: the new year. 97 00:05:14,520 --> 00:05:16,880 Speaker 1: Carl, not enough time, Thank you so much, Carl Weinberger. 98 00:05:16,880 --> 00:05:20,440 Speaker 1: With this high Frequency Economics, just definitive research report,