WEBVTT - It’s Not the Guns with Dr. John Lott

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>After public mass shootings, there's always these calls to do something,

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 1>do something, do something, But what if what we do

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't stop the next shooting. I want to have on

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>this week's episode, just a data driven conversation. We're going

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to remove the emotion. We're just going to get into

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the numbers, get into the facts. And I've got none

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>other than Dr John Lott for this episode. He runs

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.759
<v Speaker 1>and started the Crime Prevention Research Center before he got

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>into a lot of the gun research he's He started

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>his academic journey at u C l A, where he

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>got his bachelor's degree in economics. He went on to

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:37.479
<v Speaker 1>get both his master's and PhD from there as well.

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>He worked as an economist at the University of Maryland,

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Yale Law School, the University of Stanford, Texas, A and

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:46.239
<v Speaker 1>M We're in business school, all these different places, right,

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>So he starts at a place really from digging in

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the numbers. That that's what he loves, that's what he does.

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>He had also worked as a chief economist at the

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>United States Sentencing Commission. So we're going to get into

0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>all of this stuff with him. What would actually prevent

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the next public mass shooting? What's the profile of a

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 1>mass shooter. Why did these keep happening? And are they

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>happening more since Columbine or is the media just covering

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the more. So I've got a lot of questions for

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Dr John Lott. We're also going to get into, you know,

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the latest proposal from Congress, this bipartisan proposal, things like

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:22.839
<v Speaker 1>red flag laws, you know, do they allow for due process?

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 1>So I've got a whole host of questions for him,

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Dr John Lott. He knows the data, he knows the research,

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and he's going to give it to us on this show.

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>Dr Lot, I'm really looking forward to having this conversation

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>because after mass shootings, there's always these calls we have

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to do something, we have to do something, But what

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>if that do something doesn't stop the next mass shooting?

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>You know? So I really want to just have a

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>data driven conversation, not an emotional conversation, but a data

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>driven one with you. And I know that's what you

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>do at the Crime Prevention Center. So I appreciate you

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>joining the show. Sure, yeah, no, thanks for having me on.

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh right, Look, everybody wants to go and stop these attacks. Uh,

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>but what you want to do is do something that's

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>relevant for stopping them, and uh, you know you have

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>this push for things like universal background checks. Um, it's

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>been kind of the game go to type of legislation

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that they wanted. But yet there's not one mass public

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>shooting this century that would have been stopped if such

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a law had been in effect, these background checks on

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the private transfers of guns, And yet they keep bringing

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>it up, and it makes one begin to think that

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>they have reasons other than trying to stop these types

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of attacks that are motivating it. Why is the focus

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>always Okay, well, the answer is getting rid of guns,

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>are limiting the ability to own them to some degree.

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I think they want to get rid of guns. If

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to pass something like a universal background check,

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>these background checks on private transfers of guns. I've been

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>telling them for over twenty years how they could easily

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>get something like that passed if they made a few

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>reasonable changes. I mean, they keep on saying, we just

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>want reasonable gun control. Well, I can give you a

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>few extremely reasonable fixes to the bills that they have

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 1>that would make it easy to get it passed. But

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>they refused to do that, and it kind of convinces

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>me over time that they really don't care about things

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>like universal background checks per se. They care about making

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>it costly for people to be able to go and

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>get guns. You know, we're talking about, obviously the desire

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to put more laws on the books, but how many

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>gun laws do we currently have on the books and

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to what extent are we following them. We have a

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of laws that I guess it depends how you

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>want to count them. Uh. Uh. There's a guy named

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Alan Corwin who goes around and kind of counts the

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>number of words in different uh gun laws, either federally

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>or in the state. He doesn't do it for all

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the states, but I mean for states like California may

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>literally have hundreds of thousands of words, uh dealing with

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the gun control laws just at the state level. And

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you probably have thousands of gun control laws if you

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>count local ordinances and restrictions people have locally in counties

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>or cities on guns. Um. But nobody has really ever

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>gone through and systematically counted all the laws uh in

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>any way. It's just I mean, we have a lot,

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>um and you know, my concern is that a lot

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of the problems that we have are due to existing

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>gun control laws like these gun free zones that are there,

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and rather than going back and undoing the existing laws,

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the push seems to be, well, we need yet even

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>more laws that will fix the problem, and they cause

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>more problems, so you know, just kind of continue in

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the background check stuff. As an example, UM, if my

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 1>research convinces me of anything, it's the two groups of

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 1>people benefit the most from having guns. One of them

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>are poor blacks who live in high crime urban areas.

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>The very people who are most likely victims of violent crime,

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>according to my research, are the ones who benefit the

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>most from having guns for protection. Police are extremely important,

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>but if you talk to the police or look at

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>surveys of police, police themselves understand they virtually always arrive

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>on the crime seen after the crimes committed, and so

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>what's the safest course of action for them to take?

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>And it turns out having a gun is by far

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the safest course of action. So we have the errors

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>in the background check system I was talking about, but

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>we also have the costs. If you live in Washington,

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>d c. Lisa, Let's say you and I lived in

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>d c UH and I'm going to give you a gun.

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>It costs a hundred twenty five dollars to go through

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a background check. Now, just to give you an idea

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 1>of how these laws are purposely set up to make

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 1>it difficult for people to get guns. Let's say now

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to give you four guns. So it's just

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>John giving Lisa four guns, one person giving one other

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>person the guns. You think it's just one background check

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>because the same person is getting all the guns from

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>one person. But no, they require a separate background check

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>on each gun. So if I'm going to give you

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>four guns, that is going to cost five hundred dollars

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>rather than a I mean, there's like no logical reason

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>to me why you should have to require a separate

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>background check on each gun, right than just on the

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>one person who's getting the guns. Uh. But you know,

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it's just an example where they kind of purposely go

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:12.559
<v Speaker 1>out of their way to make it costly. Now, look,

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>if you believe that is going to control I advocate

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>say that the background checks are important for stopping crime,

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and I don't believe that. But if you do believe it,

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>then presumably you want to encourage people to go out

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of their way, not to just to make it for

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>me to give you the guns, but to go and

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>find a license dealer and make the transfer through them. Um,

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you want to encourage people to do that, Well, how

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>is making people pay a tax essentially encouraging them to

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>go and obey the law? Or you know, if you

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>if you believe it reduces crime, it reduces crime for everybody,

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>not just the law abiding individual who's going out of

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>their way to go and do the background check. Well,

0:07:56.240 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>how how is making them, the person who's obeying the

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>law bear the entire freight of paying for this accomplishing

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that if if as an economist, I would say, if

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>everybody benefits, everybody should pay, you know, pay for this

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>out of general revenue. But they will fight you. They

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>will fight you against this. Okay, quick commercial break back

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>with Dr John Lott on the other side. The reason

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I had asked you about the gun laws is, you know,

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>we we look at prosecutors in major cities across America

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that aren't prosecuting criminals right now. So it's just hard

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to imagine that increasing the amount of laws in the

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>books will do anything when we already you know, have

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 1>essentially lawless cities across America. But I want to get

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>into some of the basics of mass shootings with you

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and just go through some basic questions on this. You know,

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the first is how are mass shootings to find? Well,

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>you have two definitions. You have mass shootings and you

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>have mass public shootings. Mass shooting are any shooting that

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>occurs where you have four more people killed other than

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the murderer. Usually now there's a place called the and

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>that's been the traditional FBI definition. Uh. Now you have

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a place called the Gun Violence Archive, which is a

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>gun control group, which is what the media sites all

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the time, and they have their own definition. They have

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:30.680
<v Speaker 1>three or more people shot, either wounded and or killed. Um,

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's the definitely, that's the number that you hear

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>when they say, well, we've had two hundred mass shootings

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>or something this year. Um. Mass public shootings is a

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>narrower definition. And what that tries to get at are

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>these attacks that occur at a mall or school or

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a movie theater or something where the point of the

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 1>attack is simply to kill as many people as possible.

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>And um, so as public is four more people killed

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 1>in a public place, not involving some other type of

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>crime or like a gang fight over drug turf. You

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>know what most people miss is that the mass shooting

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:19.559
<v Speaker 1>about eighties seven percent of those are gang fights over

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>drug turf, and the vast majority of the rest are

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>things like a robbery which resulted in the death of

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>multiple people and uh or in the case of the

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>gun violence archived just woundings or whatever. And uh. Now

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>are gang fights over drug turf important? Yeah, sure, any

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>time people get killed is important, But the causes and

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>solutions of gang fights over drug turf are very different

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 1>than the causes and solutions to things like stopping these

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>mass public shootings. Um. You know, getting rid of gun

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 1>freeze owns I think is important for stopping these mass

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>public shootings. But you know, the notion that you're going

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to easily get rid of the guns that drug gangs have, UM,

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>isn't really serious. Well and if you look at you know,

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>these public mass shootings. Have we seen more of them

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>increase since colibine or is it just or coverage of

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>them has increased? The rate of mass public shootings has

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>been fairly constant. You had a little bit of an

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>increase around twenty and it's gone back down again. Um.

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:43.199
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you had some increase around the same time,

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and the number of people killed but you know, one

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>thing I think needs to be clear. Over the last

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks or a few weeks, there's been kind

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of this theme in the media that the United States

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>is unique in terms of mass public shooting. So that's

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that's simply false. Um. You have a number of countries

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>in Europe that have higher per capita rates of mass

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>public shootings in the United States hip per capita rates

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of public school shootings than the United States. Um. The

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>problem that people make in these comparisons is that usually

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the media and gun control people and Democrats will just

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about the number of attacks. But you have to

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>take into account is that the United States has over

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>three people. Um. There are a lot of countries in

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Europe that have five million people or six or eight

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>million people. Germany, which is the most populous country in Europe,

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>has has eighty million people. Uh, So that's less than

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the fourth of the population in the United States. If

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you look at mass public school shootings since two thousand,

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>there have been nine in the United States. Uh, there

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>have been three in Germany. Uh. The most deadly one

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>had eighteen people killed, The second most deadly one had

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>fifteen people killed. Then you have another one where there's

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:19.199
<v Speaker 1>four killed. Uh, you multiply three times four, you get twelve. Uh.

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, you have a country like Finland, which has

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>had a couple uh school shootings. Um, they have five

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>million people in the country. They have one the population

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that the United States has. You know, it's kind of

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>like people if you with the news media compared the

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>number of murders in Rhode Island or let's say, Wyoming

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>with Texas or California, presumably not. You know, if you're

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>going to compare it across states, people know you'd put

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>it in per capita terms, but for some reason they

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>refuse to do that when when they're talking about these

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>mass public shootings, probably because it's about the narrative as

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>opposed to getting the truth out to the public. You know,

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you, is the contigient or the

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>copy of cat affects real with some of these when

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you look at the public mass shootings like these school shooters,

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>or is that a real thing? There's no doubt. I

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>mean you just have to read their diaries and manifestos

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and other things that they leave time after time after time.

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>The murderers will say, if I can only kill more

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>people than such and such killed, I can get more

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>media attention. So you look at the Sandy Hook killer.

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>He had He had been planning his attack for over

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>two and a half years. According to police, he had

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>put together the equivalent of a doctoral dissertation where he

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>had looked at mass public shootings over the previous forty years. UM.

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>He had apparently graft out the relationship between the number

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of people killed in attacks and the amount of media

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>coverage that they had gotten. In His goal, according to

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>one police report, was to go and kill more people

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>than the Norway killer had killed. He he the Norway killer,

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>if you ignore the bombing deaths, had shot to death

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>sixty seven people. That's more than any mass public shooting

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. And uh, and he was hoping

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that if he could kill more people than the Norway

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>killer had killed, that he could get even more worldwide

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>media attention. UM. You know, at some point along the line,

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've always had people who want to go

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and commit suicide, but at some point along the line,

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>several decades ago, UM, there were a group of people

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that knew they wanted to go and commit suicide, but

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>realized that they could commit suicide in a way that

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>people at least would know that they were here. And Uh,

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>they talked about, well, my name will be in the

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>history books. People will know that I was important, Um,

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that I mannered so many When you read the diaries

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>or statements from these other murders, Um, they just don't

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>feel appreciated. Uh. You know, women won't go out on

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>dates with them or something, or they you know, people

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>won't be their friends or whatever. Um. And you know,

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you read the diaries and stuff, and you realize, well,

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a pretty good reason why people your friend, you're

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a really strange guy. But the but they want to

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>commit suicide in a way that people will know that

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>they were here. And so they discovered that they could

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>get massive news attention by killing lots of people, and

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>so they planned these things. Six months is a short

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>amount of time for them to plan it. Uh. Many

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of them plan for a year or two years or more. Um.

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>And they pick and they go through detailed planning. Uh.

0:16:56.200 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>They case places beforehand. You have, like you or a

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Batman movie theater shooter, he had cased multiple movie theaters

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.679
<v Speaker 1>before he went in there. He picked the one. There

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>were seven movie theaters that were showing the premiere of

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the Batman movie within a twenty minute drive of his apartment.

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>He picked the one movie theater that banned permanent concealed handguns.

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Um you see the same thing over and over again,

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 1>the the Omaha, Nebraska mall shooting, or the uh St

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Louis mall shooting, or the Salt Lake City mall shooting,

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>or the um uh the Portland, Oregon mall shooting. You

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:42.479
<v Speaker 1>may have, you know, five six malls in an area,

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and only one or two will have signs posting banning

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 1>permier concealed handguns. And so where do they go? Well,

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's also yeah, the one that doesn't have or

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the gun free zones. And that makes sense because you know,

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 1>if you just look at it from a common sense standpoint,

0:17:57.160 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking to inflict mass harm, you go to

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the easiest place to do it. So I feel like

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, common sense. Yet a lot of lawmakers

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>can't seem to grasp that concept. But you talked about

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:10.919
<v Speaker 1>some of the background of some of these public mass shooters.

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>What's the typical profile for what is there a typical profile?

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>There's no typical age. You know, people are focusing right

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>now because of a couple of recent attacks on people

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:27.160
<v Speaker 1>who are under twenty one. But if you look at

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>all the mass public shooters over the last twenty five years,

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the most common age rage is five. The next most

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>common age rage is thirty six to forty, the next

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>one is umtet and then only at that point do

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:51.919
<v Speaker 1>you get to sixteen to twenty. Um. Uh. You know

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 1>you have mass public shooters who are in their sixties

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>out there. Uh. As far as other parts of the profile,

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>they're overwhelmingly male. Uh. You know, like nineties seven percent

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>or so are male. Um Uh. There are people that

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:15.119
<v Speaker 1>have no real political or religious views. Um. You know,

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:19.199
<v Speaker 1>we keep on hearing white supremacists. You have if you

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>look at people who are anything from white supremacists, neo Nazis,

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>or just people who are upset about illegal immigration. Uh,

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you get about nine percent of the mass public shooters.

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Um Uh. Muslims who are doing it because of radical

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 1>views on Muslim things are about nine percent of the

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:50.719
<v Speaker 1>population to their make up about half of one percent

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of the population, but they make up nine percent of

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the mass public shooters. Um. But overwhelmingly you just have

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:02.959
<v Speaker 1>people who to commit suicide and who want to do

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:06.679
<v Speaker 1>it in a way that's going to get them attention. Uh.

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 1>That's that's the overwhelming common view that's there. Uh. The

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 1>other thing is, over the last twenty five years, over

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>half the mass public shooters were actually seeing mental health

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>care professionals prior to their attack. And yet and not

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>one single case where mental health care professionals able to

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>identify those individuals as a danger to themselves or others. Why. Well,

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole academic literature on that. Uh. And and

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the explanation is usually, well, um, people with mental health

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 1>problems are usually on average, less violent than the general population.

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>They're actually more likely to be victims of violence than

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 1>the general population themselves. Um. And it's just such a

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>rare thing, they'll say. They'll say, look, Uh, they're about

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>two and a half in schizophrenics in the United States

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in any given year. And yet if you look over

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty five years, there's really only one clear

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:12.880
<v Speaker 1>case of a schizophrenic uh committing a mass public shooting

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:16.479
<v Speaker 1>and uh one other one. Whether is at least an

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:20.159
<v Speaker 1>argument to be made that he may have been Um.

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>But uh, you know, if I were to say, okay,

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of these two point five million people, pick the thousand

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>most likely ones to go and do it. Even if

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 1>you get a guy who's in the thousand that you pick,

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you'll still be wrong nine out of the thousand times.

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's usually the type of argument that you see

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>being provided by mental health care professionals. Um, you know,

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. I have no problem with people spending

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 1>more money on mental health care for people. Uh, it's

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>just that, you know, it's pretty hard to believe that

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you're going to catch most of these people beforehand, or

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>even a small fraction of them. And so to me,

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:09.919
<v Speaker 1>the question is, what's your backup plan? What do you

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:14.880
<v Speaker 1>do if you can't identify these individuals beforehand? And that's

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>where allowing people to protect themselves comes in. If you can't,

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>if you can't, if you really have very little hope

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 1>of identifying these individuals beforehand, what what do you do

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:30.199
<v Speaker 1>if you can't catch them? Quick break more data on

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>public mass shootings. I guess you know. My concern is

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 1>when we start getting into some of the mental health conversations,

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>like with the Senate proposal that they just put out,

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:45.640
<v Speaker 1>including you know, funding and encouraging of things like red

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 1>flag laws. I mean, we just got through a time

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>period with COVID where you know, I didn't get the

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>vaccine right, and like Democrats wanted to find me, wanted

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to confine me to my home, wanted to potentially imprison

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:03.919
<v Speaker 1>me just for questioning vaccine efficacy, wanted to put me

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in a designated facility, and if I had kids, would

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>want to take away my kids for me simply because

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't share the same opinion as they did on

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine. So the concern for me when you look

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>at red flag laws or you give increased authority to

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 1>mental health officials to flag people, is could they flag

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>me simply because I hold different opinions than they do. Well,

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 1>I suppose anything as possible. Look, as far as I'm concerned,

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.439
<v Speaker 1>you already have a better law on the books for

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.959
<v Speaker 1>dealing with this than red flag laws. Uh. They go

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>by different names in different states. Uh. Oh, states to

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>call them Baker Act or in California it's called where

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 1>if somebody's concerned about the behavior of somebody, either that

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>they believe that they're danger to themselves or somebody else. Uh,

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 1>they can go and contact the police. The police will

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>come in and evaluate if they have what's called a

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>reasonable suspicion about the person. Uh, then they'll take them

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to a mental health care professional who will evaluate them.

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Either one or two will evaluate them, and then if

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>there's additional concerns at that point, there can be an

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>immediate hearing. Um. If you can't afford a lawyer, one

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>is provided for you, and a judge at that point

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>has a broad range of options. He can say, look,

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm concerned, Uh, I want you to go and see

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 1>a mental health expert. Um, and then we'll have you

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>come back in in a couple of weeks and we'll

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>evaluate how your treatment's going. At that point. Um, they

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>could in theory, take away somebody's guns. They could uh

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:52.679
<v Speaker 1>involuntarily commit you in the most extreme cases. Um. What

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:56.640
<v Speaker 1>red flat laws do is they sensely strip out all

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>those protections that are there. Um. Red flag laws are

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:08.399
<v Speaker 1>virtually always used regarding concerns about suicide. And Uh. What

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>happens is is that somebody will make a complaint. The

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 1>complaint will be given to a judge. All the judge

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 1>sees in front of them is the written complaint doesn't

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>question the person. There's no cross examination that's there. The

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>judge solely based on the written complaint will make a

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 1>decision whether or not to take away a person's guns.

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>So you don't even know that there's a complaint until

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the police show up at your house at five am

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 1>in the morning. And uh, and then maybe within a month, Uh,

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:45.920
<v Speaker 1>there'll be a hearing in which to decide whether or

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 1>not to make the order permanent or not. Uh. No

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>lawyers are provided for you. You have to go in

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 1>the higher one yourself. I've talked to lawyers involved in

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:58.679
<v Speaker 1>these types of cases. You're talking about legal fees that

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:01.919
<v Speaker 1>will be around tenth thousand dollars or so to handle

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a hearing like that. Um. And what you find is

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that the vast majority of people UH don't hire lawyers

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to go and represent them because the only thing that

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>happens with the red flag law is that your guns

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>are taken away. So you may value your guns, but

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, is it really worth ten thou dollars to you?

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>A few people are going to say yes it is. UM.

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>The problem is, if you are concerned about somebody being suicidal,

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:36.880
<v Speaker 1>is it really a serious solution just to say, well,

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I just I'll take away their guns. I mean, if

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody is suicidal. Uh, there's so many different ways that

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>people can commit suicide, and the notion that's simply taking

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>away their guns solves the problem is not a serious response.

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>And they don't involve mental health care professionals in any

0:26:57.000 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>part in the process. Only a couple of a state

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>red flag laws even mentioned mental illness. And they don't

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>even provide in any of these places for mental health

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>care professionals to be involved any place in the process. Uh.

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think it's a couple of things they're

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 1>going on. One is, um, it's a lot easier to

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 1>write a new law that doesn't have any civil rights

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 1>protection than it is to go and remove uh civil

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:32.119
<v Speaker 1>rights protections from existing laws. Uh. And the other thing is,

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I think gun control people want to make laws that

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 1>where they said, well, if we just take away the gun,

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:41.360
<v Speaker 1>then the problem is solved because the guns are the problem.

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's just silly stuff. I mean, it's just irresponsible,

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I think to frame things that way. But that's they're

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 1>their modus operandi, that's the way they operate. That's the

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 1>image that they want to get across to people, right,

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:01.160
<v Speaker 1>And I wanted to you talked previously for the red

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>flag laws that states already have these laws on the books.

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Does every state have you know, some law you know,

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:11.360
<v Speaker 1>in lieu of a you know, a red flag type thing.

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Does every state have a law in the books currently

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>addressing being able to take a gun away from someone

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>who is, you know, maybe mentally deranged or whatever. Every

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>state and the federal government has these Baker Act type laws.

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Every state does. Now. You know, if they were serious

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>about dealing with mental health issues, what they would say is, Okay,

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe we need more funding for mental health facilities or something.

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they'd make some tweak I don't know what it

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>would be because they never focus on that. Uh. Nobody

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of forces them to go and debate those types

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of issues. Um, but uh uh, you know I would uh,

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that would be my approach. But you know, if you

0:28:57.320 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>have some problem, if you think that there's a reason

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you need this new law, fine state what it is

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and maybe we can make an adjustment to the existing law.

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 1>But no, they won't do that. Their approaches to have

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>this new law that kind of guts all these civil

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>rights protections that are there. Obviously, had the federal assault

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>weapons bad it was in place for a decade, What

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 1>impact did that have and would banning air fifteens have

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 1>any impact? Well, it didn't have any effect. Even studies

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>paid for by the Clinton administration weren't able to find

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 1>any effect on any type of violent crime or on

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>mass public shootings. Um. And you know it's you know,

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the bizarre thing is you have after the Buffalo shooting, which,

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 1>by the way, if you read as manifesto, Uh, he

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>talks about using an air fifteen precisely because he thought

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>it would get people the most upset. He knew that

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it would lead to more calls for gun control. Um.

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>And uh you know he uh he bought a New

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 1>York state compliant a R fifteen. Uh. New York has

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>more stringent assault weapons ban than the original federal one.

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, we're kind of treated to this

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>uh spectacle of Biden going to Buffalo and calling for

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:30.239
<v Speaker 1>an assault weapons ban and saying, if we only had

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>an assault weapons ban, uh, we wouldn't have attacks like

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the one in Buffalo, and New York already has an

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>assault weapons ban, and nobody in the press even asks

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 1>him about that contradiction that's there. Um. Look, uh, when

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you go from the ten years before the assault weapons

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>ban to the ten years that it was in effect,

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>there's absolutely no change in the number of attacks mass

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>public shooting is using assault weapons. Um. You would think if, uh,

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>if the assault weapons ban were driving any dropped, that

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you would see in the number of attacks. Uh, you

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>would see a drop in the percentage of mass public

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>shootings using assault weapons because some of the people who

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 1>may have used assault weapons so called assault weapons, would

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 1>have switched to other types of guns. If you look

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 1>over the last twenty five years of mass public shootings

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>involve a rifle of any type, um, Uh, fifty eight

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>percent involve handguns. UM. So they're not even the ones

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that are most likely used in these attacks. They could

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>switch to something else that you can't have a drop

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>in the total without a drop in the percentage of

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>attacks using these so called assault weapons. In fact, actually

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 1>during the band, the percentage of attacks using assault weapons

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it up, and after the band they went down, which

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>is the exact opposite pattern. People can see all the

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:09.719
<v Speaker 1>data at our website at crime research dot org if

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 1>they're interested, but um, you know it's if you go

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>back and know how they put the assault ament's band together.

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Senator Feinstein had her staff go and look through catalogs

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of guns and put check marks next to the guns

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>that they thought looked particularly threatening or what have you.

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>There's no kind of logical difference in the guns that

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 1>were there that they were doing. It was purely based

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 1>on the list of guns that they named. There were

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 1>based solely on how they looked. UM. Just to make clear,

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, now we're having some people like Biden talk

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 1>about just banning UH. Semi automatic guns. As I mentioned before,

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority of guns owned in the United States

0:32:57.200 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>are semi automatic. UM. The These are guns where one

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>pull the trigger, one bullet comes out. It reloads itself.

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>One pull the trigger, one bullet comes out. So if

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about different types of rifles, you have manually

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>loaded rifles where you fire a bullet and you have

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to physically yourself put another bullet in the chamber, you

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>have semi automatic guns, and then you have fully automatic

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 1>machine guns. None of these mass public shootings have involved

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 1>machine guns. None of the crimes generally are murder is

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 1>generally involved machine guns. With the nineteen thirties has been

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 1>like one murder with with the machine gun and UH.

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 1>The thing is, though regular people benefit a lot from

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>having semi automatic guns. There's a reason why almost all

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the guns sold in the United States or semi automatics,

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and that is, if you're attacked by multiple criminals, or

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 1>if you fire and miss, or if you fire and

0:33:57.000 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 1>wound the attacker but don't incapacitate them, you may really

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 1>wish that you could quickly fire a second bullet, and

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and you may not have the luxury of time to

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 1>manually reload your rifle there uh in order to fire it. Um.

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:19.839
<v Speaker 1>So you know, uh, I think a lot of these

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 1>gun control laws that they push are more likely to

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>make it difficult for law abiding citizens to defend themselves,

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to be uh stopping criminals. To be clear,

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I am not a gun owner, but I support the

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Second Amendment because all you have to do is look

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 1>at history and see what happens once citizens become disarmed

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and tyranny takes over. And so for that reason alone,

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I support the Second Amendment because I think it serves

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 1>on a check against tyranny, and it serves on a

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>check of keeping America free. So that's why I support

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:55.319
<v Speaker 1>guns personally. You know how challenging is it as a

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:59.239
<v Speaker 1>researcher in today's political climate, looking at the media. I mean,

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:02.399
<v Speaker 1>how much missing formation is out there? You know, how

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 1>much does that change the perception? And a lot of

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 1>these conversations of just a lot of these reports coming

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 1>from a place of you know, a lack of understanding

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 1>or or from falsehoods has a huge impact. I'll give

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 1>you one example. Uh. You know, the theme under the

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.760
<v Speaker 1>buying administration is that in order to reduce violent crime,

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>we have to have gun control. You know, I don't know,

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's just because I deal with these numbers all

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 1>the time. I'm just astounded by the discussion. Let's an

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 1>eight percent of violent crime involves guns. Now, I don't

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 1>think that Biden's solutions even for that eight percent are

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be very useful. But you know, the way

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you reduce gun violence is the same way you reduce

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 1>violent crime. General. You have to make it risky for

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 1>criminals to go and commit crime. And you know, as

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you were alluding to earlier with prosecutors, you have district

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 1>attorneys around the country were refusing to prosecute very violent criminals.

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:08.720
<v Speaker 1>You've had many urban areas over half even two thirds

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:12.319
<v Speaker 1>of inmates have been released from jail's. Uh, You've had

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>police budgets being cut. Uh. In New York City, they

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 1>cut the police budget by billion dollars a year. In Chicago, Uh,

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in they eliminated four hundred positions uh from full time

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement uh there in the city. Um. You know,

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 1>they've had other restrictions on how police are able to

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:37.160
<v Speaker 1>go and do their job. You've had bail reform. I mean,

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the bail reform is just crazy. Um. You know the

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 1>guy who drove his SUV through the Christmas crowd in Wisconsin, Um,

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 1>he uh was facing charges he had been arrested for

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 1>an attempted murder of the mother of his child with

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 1>his car. He had tried to run her over. Uh.

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:02.360
<v Speaker 1>He was facing attempted murder charges. There. He was facing

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 1>other felony charges. Uh. He's facing twenty five years or

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 1>so imprisoned for all the different crimes that he was

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>facing already. What are you gonna do. You're gonna the

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 1>twenty five years in jail that he's facing didn't stop him.

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:21.120
<v Speaker 1>But if you go and say, well, if he kills

0:37:21.160 --> 0:37:24.480
<v Speaker 1>six more people and and sends sixties some people to

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the hospital, Um, you know, we'll give him an additional

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 1>uh six life sentences. You know, if he's already essentially

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 1>facing he's thirty eight years old, uh, facing twenty five

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:41.320
<v Speaker 1>years in jail. Uh. The guy, you know, the guy

0:37:41.520 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be in his sixties when he gets out.

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Um Uh, it's almost as if he's already facing a

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:53.319
<v Speaker 1>life sentences there. Uh. And you have people you know,

0:37:53.840 --> 0:37:56.719
<v Speaker 1>uh in New York or other places, they're facing long

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:59.800
<v Speaker 1>prison sentences. They get out with little or no bail.

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 1>That's there. Is it surprising that they go and commit

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:07.719
<v Speaker 1>other crimes when there's really no additional penalty that you

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 1>can put on them because they're already facing long prison sentences. Uh.

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 1>It's just crazy stuff. But the bottom line is you

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 1>want to you want to make it risking. Biden has

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 1>given four major addresses on violent crime, um and uh.

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 1>In those four speeches, he's never mentioned the district attorneys once.

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 1>He's never mentioned all the inmates being released from jail's once.

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Um he uh, he goes. He's mentioned police four times,

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 1>but when he's mentioned police, it's been in terms of

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:41.919
<v Speaker 1>them enforcing gun control laws. You know, if I were

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Biden when he gave his big talk in New York

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:47.799
<v Speaker 1>in February, I would have gone in and said, look, uh,

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, you've cut the police budget by billion dollars

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a year. You know, is it surprising that you've had

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:58.239
<v Speaker 1>any increase in violent crime that's occurred here? It's insane,

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you know. To take us through, so said it has

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 1>released their proposal on what they want to do on

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, guns, and in their way, they're trying to

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 1>address the vol the shooting. You know, take us through.

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 1>We kind of we already got into red flag laws,

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:12.880
<v Speaker 1>which is part of it. They want to try to

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 1>increase and encourage states to administer red flag laws. Uh,

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 1>you know they're trying to increase that. But take us through,

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the rest of it. What do you think

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:25.799
<v Speaker 1>of it? What's your takeaway? Would any of it help,

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 1>would any of it hurt? You know, kind of just

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:30.800
<v Speaker 1>take us through broadly, sort of what you think about

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:33.360
<v Speaker 1>what you've read so far on it. The devil is

0:39:33.400 --> 0:39:36.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be in the details on what they do here,

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, we're just gonna have to see

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 1>what they end up coming down to. Uh in terms

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:46.799
<v Speaker 1>of the agreements, I you know, right now, it's a

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:54.520
<v Speaker 1>very vague sketch on on what they're proposing. Um, you know,

0:39:54.600 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 1>they wanna Uh they're talking about things like, um uh

0:40:00.600 --> 0:40:04.319
<v Speaker 1>having go after straw purchasers. I have no idea what

0:40:04.400 --> 0:40:08.920
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about there. They're talking about um things like

0:40:09.320 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 1>uh uh more strictly regulating uh licensed dealers. Well, okay, again,

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what they mean. I mean, you look

0:40:19.080 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 1>at what Biden's done on something like uh licensed firearms dealers.

0:40:25.120 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 1>He's adopted so called zero tolerance approach where he's having

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco on firearms and explosive experts agents

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 1>go in and check paperwork. Biden has this description of

0:40:41.239 --> 0:40:43.879
<v Speaker 1>licensed dealers selling guns out of the back of their

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:47.640
<v Speaker 1>store to criminals. And that's that's what's happening. And that's

0:40:47.680 --> 0:40:50.280
<v Speaker 1>not what they're going after. They're looking to see whether

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:53.839
<v Speaker 1>they have any paperwork mistake, no matter how tiny, no

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 1>matter how trivial, over let's say the last fifteen years,

0:40:58.080 --> 0:41:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and if they find one mistake, you're out of business.

0:41:01.320 --> 0:41:04.719
<v Speaker 1>It can be a very trivial, tiny paperwork mistake. But

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:10.800
<v Speaker 1>then they've already put thousands of of licensed gun dealers,

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:13.879
<v Speaker 1>something like five thousand or so out of business. Uh.

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's just getting going. I assume when they get

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the new Uh. Ahead of the a t F in there,

0:41:20.800 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 1>they'll go even more full bore on doing that. And uh.

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, UM, I don't know whether the Democrats want

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to try to codify that more or make it even

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:36.359
<v Speaker 1>more restringent or whatever that's going to be there. I

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:39.839
<v Speaker 1>assume the Republicans will push back. I don't know whether

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 1>they will even come to an agreement on something like that. Um.

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 1>So Uh they want to have changed the rules for

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:53.279
<v Speaker 1>people under twenty one buying a gun. Um. Uh. My

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 1>understanding is from this, Uh, the Texas school shooter had

0:42:00.600 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a felony charge that was on his record as a

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 1>juvenile domestic or at least a domestic violence charge and uh,

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and so they want to make it so you can

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:17.800
<v Speaker 1>go and look at the juvenile records. Look, if somebody's

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:20.880
<v Speaker 1>seventeen and a half and they commit a crime, do

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you learn something about them when they turn eighteen? Sure? Okay,

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's just because you become eighteen, we

0:42:29.280 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 1>don't learn something about things about you that you did earlier. Traditionally,

0:42:34.719 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 1>what's happened is we've said if somebody makes, uh does

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a crime when they're fourteen, fifteen, sixteen, or whatever, Um.

0:42:44.480 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, people make stupid mistakes when they're young. We

0:42:47.200 --> 0:42:49.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want them to follow that for the rest of

0:42:49.239 --> 0:42:54.719
<v Speaker 1>their lives. And so we've sealed juvenile records that are there.

0:42:54.880 --> 0:42:59.400
<v Speaker 1>So much of the gun control debate focuses on one

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 1>particular or instant as far as I know, in the

0:43:01.719 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 1>last twenty five years, Um, the Texas school shooting is

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the only case where we had somebody who had a

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:15.360
<v Speaker 1>juvenile record like that, who, in theory, could have been

0:43:15.400 --> 0:43:19.600
<v Speaker 1>prevented from legally at least obtaining a gun. Uh if

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:24.239
<v Speaker 1>this had been including his records. My impression is that

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Democrats want to make this a ban for all ages.

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Um uh you know, and so you just have an

0:43:32.480 --> 0:43:35.200
<v Speaker 1>additional thing that they put on that's going to disqualify

0:43:35.320 --> 0:43:37.759
<v Speaker 1>people for life from only a gun. So you know,

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:41.279
<v Speaker 1>you've we talked about mental illness before. If if you

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 1>have a problem, let's say when you're eighteen or twenty,

0:43:45.800 --> 0:43:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and you're involuntarily committed, your ban for your life from

0:43:50.000 --> 0:43:51.359
<v Speaker 1>being able to go and own a gun, it may

0:43:51.400 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 1>have been a one time, transitory thing that occurred. Uh.

0:43:55.239 --> 0:43:58.960
<v Speaker 1>You may be perfectly fine when you're thirty or forty

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:02.239
<v Speaker 1>or fifty but you're still banned for life from being

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:06.440
<v Speaker 1>able to go and have a gun. Um. So you know,

0:44:06.640 --> 0:44:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I understand uh that we can learn stuff about people

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 1>from their behavior when they're a juvenile. Um. The question

0:44:16.640 --> 0:44:18.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to be where do you end it and

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:21.400
<v Speaker 1>how do you make sure it's ended at that point

0:44:21.800 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 1>because once you kind of unseal these juvenile records and

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:29.719
<v Speaker 1>they're put into these other systems, I'm not sure how

0:44:29.760 --> 0:44:33.439
<v Speaker 1>easy it is to go and remove it. So would

0:44:33.440 --> 0:44:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the number one thing be to to stop these school shootings,

0:44:36.640 --> 0:44:39.279
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of gun free zones? I mean, look,

0:44:39.680 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 1>we we did a report where people can find it

0:44:43.239 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 1>out our website at crime research dot org where we

0:44:45.680 --> 0:44:51.239
<v Speaker 1>looked at all the discharges of firearms on school property

0:44:51.680 --> 0:44:56.440
<v Speaker 1>from two thousand on um, anything from an axonal discharge

0:44:56.480 --> 0:44:58.680
<v Speaker 1>by a police officer all the way up to a

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 1>mass public school shooting. And uh, Um we have twenty states,

0:45:05.640 --> 0:45:09.960
<v Speaker 1>including uh parts of Texas where you have armed teachers

0:45:09.960 --> 0:45:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and staff. Of the schools in Texas have armed teachers

0:45:15.040 --> 0:45:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and staff. But this attacker picked a school where teachers

0:45:20.400 --> 0:45:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and staff were banned from being able to go and

0:45:22.640 --> 0:45:25.960
<v Speaker 1>have guns. UM. So you literally when you look at

0:45:26.000 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 1>these thousands of these twenty states, you have thousands of

0:45:31.040 --> 0:45:35.280
<v Speaker 1>schools that have armed teachers and staff. You cannot find

0:45:35.440 --> 0:45:41.320
<v Speaker 1>one attack where anybody has been wounded or killed anywhere

0:45:41.400 --> 0:45:45.280
<v Speaker 1>near during school hours when teachers would be around. UM

0:45:45.400 --> 0:45:49.120
<v Speaker 1>at as any of those schools where teachers and staff

0:45:49.200 --> 0:45:53.600
<v Speaker 1>are armed. All the school shootings, every single one where

0:45:53.600 --> 0:45:58.319
<v Speaker 1>anybody's been wounded or killed has occurred at uh at

0:45:58.360 --> 0:46:02.600
<v Speaker 1>places where teachers and stay for a band from having guns. Look,

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:05.239
<v Speaker 1>you have two different types of signs that you put

0:46:05.239 --> 0:46:07.600
<v Speaker 1>in front of schools. Either they have signs that say

0:46:07.680 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 1>this school is a gun free zone, or you have

0:46:10.160 --> 0:46:13.759
<v Speaker 1>a sign that says warning, select teachers and staff are

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:17.880
<v Speaker 1>carrying concealed handguns and we'll use them to go and

0:46:18.080 --> 0:46:22.560
<v Speaker 1>uh protect students and others here at the school. UM.

0:46:23.160 --> 0:46:27.839
<v Speaker 1>You know. UH, a lot of people, even Republicans, are saying, well,

0:46:27.840 --> 0:46:31.200
<v Speaker 1>we need to have one police officer in each school.

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think people appreciate what an incredibly difficult job

0:46:36.680 --> 0:46:43.440
<v Speaker 1>having one person in uniform faces and stopping these attacks. Uh.

0:46:43.520 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 1>If you have one person and only one person who

0:46:46.120 --> 0:46:51.200
<v Speaker 1>is a gun and he's in uniform, he's readily identifiable. Uh.

0:46:51.280 --> 0:46:54.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, we talked about the Buffalo shooting. The Buffalo

0:46:54.760 --> 0:46:58.399
<v Speaker 1>shooter had cased the grocery store. He knew that there

0:46:58.480 --> 0:47:00.960
<v Speaker 1>was one arm guard there. He knew where the one

0:47:01.040 --> 0:47:04.919
<v Speaker 1>armed guard was stationed in uniform. Who do you think

0:47:04.960 --> 0:47:08.879
<v Speaker 1>he took out first? They know if they take out

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the one person in uniform first, they're gonna have free

0:47:12.680 --> 0:47:15.600
<v Speaker 1>rein to go after everybody else because they're the only

0:47:15.640 --> 0:47:19.239
<v Speaker 1>person with a gun in these places. You know, if

0:47:19.280 --> 0:47:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have a guard at a place, or a

0:47:21.600 --> 0:47:25.960
<v Speaker 1>police officer, for for heaven's sakes, don't put them in uniform.

0:47:26.600 --> 0:47:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Don't make them readily identifiable. If you're gonna have one

0:47:30.440 --> 0:47:34.759
<v Speaker 1>police officer, make them a gym teacher or something. Okay,

0:47:34.880 --> 0:47:38.440
<v Speaker 1>uh so they blend in, uh so that the attackers

0:47:38.520 --> 0:47:40.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know who it is that they have to go

0:47:41.000 --> 0:47:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and try to take out first. These attackers have real

0:47:44.040 --> 0:47:47.920
<v Speaker 1>strategic advantages if you're if you're a police officer and

0:47:47.920 --> 0:47:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you're guarding an elementary school. I mean, talk about a

0:47:51.120 --> 0:47:55.600
<v Speaker 1>boring job. You know, day after day, week after week,

0:47:55.719 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>month after month, nothing happens. It's hard to be on

0:47:59.760 --> 0:48:02.800
<v Speaker 1>your hose all the time there. You don't have eyes

0:48:02.840 --> 0:48:05.200
<v Speaker 1>in the back of your head. We're talking about one guard.

0:48:06.200 --> 0:48:10.960
<v Speaker 1>It's very expensive to put one full time police officer

0:48:11.120 --> 0:48:14.880
<v Speaker 1>in each of these schools and uh and the benefit

0:48:14.960 --> 0:48:19.160
<v Speaker 1>is relatively small. And besides, if you have teachers and

0:48:19.200 --> 0:48:23.400
<v Speaker 1>staff caring, you make the job of at one uniformed

0:48:23.480 --> 0:48:28.160
<v Speaker 1>officer much safer because the attackers. You put your signs

0:48:28.239 --> 0:48:30.880
<v Speaker 1>out in front of the school, warning the attackers, because

0:48:30.920 --> 0:48:35.280
<v Speaker 1>what happens is the attackers have to reveal their position

0:48:35.360 --> 0:48:37.840
<v Speaker 1>when they start firing at the officer, and they have

0:48:37.920 --> 0:48:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to worry that maybe somebody behind them or to the side,

0:48:41.480 --> 0:48:44.400
<v Speaker 1>somebody that they can't identify to begin with. Well, and

0:48:44.440 --> 0:48:47.160
<v Speaker 1>we saw, you know, there's recently, you know, a Texas

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:50.399
<v Speaker 1>church shooting where a congregant was able to take out

0:48:50.440 --> 0:48:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, so we've seen this happen. And there's also,

0:48:52.800 --> 0:48:54.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, not too long ago at a party in

0:48:54.880 --> 0:48:57.239
<v Speaker 1>West Virginia, a woman with a pistol was able to

0:48:57.280 --> 0:48:59.440
<v Speaker 1>take out you know. But Dr John Lytte, I really

0:48:59.480 --> 0:49:01.759
<v Speaker 1>appreciate your time, you know, thank you so much for

0:49:01.840 --> 0:49:06.000
<v Speaker 1>joining the show. But just one quick thing. On our

0:49:06.040 --> 0:49:09.400
<v Speaker 1>website at Crime Research dot or, we have dozens of

0:49:09.440 --> 0:49:13.439
<v Speaker 1>those types of cases that you're mentioning. Rarely do these

0:49:13.480 --> 0:49:17.040
<v Speaker 1>cases get national news coverage, and often when they do,

0:49:17.120 --> 0:49:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the media gets it wrong. Uh. But just in the

0:49:20.719 --> 0:49:23.919
<v Speaker 1>last few years, we have dozens of these cases up

0:49:23.920 --> 0:49:28.600
<v Speaker 1>on our website. Uh, dramatic cases where if the people

0:49:28.680 --> 0:49:31.680
<v Speaker 1>weren't there with their permanent concealed handguns we're talking about

0:49:31.680 --> 0:49:35.800
<v Speaker 1>in public places, you know, they would have gotten national

0:49:35.840 --> 0:49:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and international news coverage. These are cases where the police

0:49:39.000 --> 0:49:42.360
<v Speaker 1>themselves have said that multiple people would have been killed

0:49:42.400 --> 0:49:46.720
<v Speaker 1>if it hadn't been for the presence of the permit holder.

0:49:47.239 --> 0:49:50.359
<v Speaker 1>So just in conclusion my debate, my guess is the

0:49:50.520 --> 0:49:53.719
<v Speaker 1>entire debate that we have right now would be dramatically

0:49:53.760 --> 0:49:55.920
<v Speaker 1>different if the types of stories that you were just

0:49:56.400 --> 0:50:00.680
<v Speaker 1>referring to got national news coverage and even once in

0:50:00.680 --> 0:50:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a while and even and also if you got uh,

0:50:05.680 --> 0:50:08.480
<v Speaker 1>when they cover these mass public shootings, if once in

0:50:08.520 --> 0:50:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a while they would go and mention we've had yet

0:50:11.239 --> 0:50:14.720
<v Speaker 1>another mass public shooting where guns are banned. It's often

0:50:14.719 --> 0:50:17.759
<v Speaker 1>the easiest thing for the reporters or whatever to go

0:50:17.800 --> 0:50:20.719
<v Speaker 1>and check. Instead, they'll go and say, well, we think

0:50:20.719 --> 0:50:22.759
<v Speaker 1>he used this type of gun, or we think he

0:50:22.880 --> 0:50:26.040
<v Speaker 1>got it this way. Things that are often wrong. You know,

0:50:26.120 --> 0:50:29.800
<v Speaker 1>these last couple of tacks, We've had multiple news stories

0:50:29.840 --> 0:50:34.120
<v Speaker 1>about these guys supposedly wearing body armor. You know, Uh,

0:50:34.280 --> 0:50:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the news media just completely gets this stuff wrong. They

0:50:37.520 --> 0:50:40.360
<v Speaker 1>lie through their teeth and it's it's unfortunate, which is

0:50:40.440 --> 0:50:42.879
<v Speaker 1>you know why we try to do segments like this

0:50:43.160 --> 0:50:46.120
<v Speaker 1>on this show. Dr John lytte, I appreciate your time,

0:50:46.440 --> 0:50:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Take care, sir, have a great day. Thank you. Dr

0:51:00.200 --> 0:51:02.040
<v Speaker 1>John ly So. Trying to bring you a bunch of

0:51:02.040 --> 0:51:04.320
<v Speaker 1>different guests on the show to really dig into a

0:51:04.400 --> 0:51:06.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of the hot button issues, the issues that impact

0:51:06.680 --> 0:51:10.760
<v Speaker 1>your lives and and obviously members of Congress, literally coming

0:51:10.800 --> 0:51:14.480
<v Speaker 1>from your guns as law abiding citizens is worthy of

0:51:14.560 --> 0:51:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the evan episode on this show. So I hope you

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:19.080
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed the show. If you don't mind leave us a

0:51:19.080 --> 0:51:21.880
<v Speaker 1>review on Apple Podcast, you can rate us five stars

0:51:21.880 --> 0:51:24.480
<v Speaker 1>as well. Please share with your family and friends. And

0:51:24.840 --> 0:51:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I thank you so much for listening. And I want

0:51:26.520 --> 0:51:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to thank John Cassio, my executive producer, for all the

0:51:29.600 --> 0:51:31.520
<v Speaker 1>work that he does to put this together as well.