Speaker 1: This is Buck's first thoughts, the news you need to
Speaker 1: get for your day in forty five minutes. Make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe on the iHeart app or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. All the crises we see playing out with
Speaker 1: this bid administration, and one part of it that you
Speaker 1: have to remember is that they have no plan to
Speaker 1: deal with any of this. Right, they're not good at
Speaker 1: fixing things. Not only are they causing the crises, but
Speaker 1: they don't respond well to the crises. What's the answer
Speaker 1: to we're worried about inflation, Oh, don't worry, It'll just
Speaker 1: be a little temporary inflation. Oh how are you going
Speaker 1: to stop people from flooding across the border? Oh, no
Speaker 1: big deal. We'll just build more facilities for all the
Speaker 1: people illegally crossing and then release them even faster in
Speaker 1: the United States. Right when you understand that they don't
Speaker 1: view the end state here the same way you do,
Speaker 1: it all becomes so much more clear. I am worried
Speaker 1: about the economy these days, and you know that, But
Speaker 1: there's also still a lot of opportunity out there, especially
Speaker 1: if you're in the markets. I've got friends who are
Speaker 1: talking about a melt up thesis where you're in the
Speaker 1: last months of a crazy, frenzied run and you can
Speaker 1: make a lot of money in that right, Well, you've
Speaker 1: got to talk to my buddies at Carnivore Trading. All
Speaker 1: you have to do is sign up and you'll see
Speaker 1: what the several key indicators are that make them think
Speaker 1: that some of the biggest profits are going to come
Speaker 1: in Wall Street sectors that a lot of experts are missing.
Speaker 1: Carnivore Trading is an elite squad of strategists and they
Speaker 1: influence major Wall Street investors. I'm getting text messages from
Speaker 1: them all day long, and I'm taking action based upon
Speaker 1: what I know these guys at Carnivore are doing. I
Speaker 1: want the best, and so that's why I go with Carnivore.
Speaker 1: I mirror their trades with my discount broker. You can
Speaker 1: do the same. Remember a lot of their trades crush
Speaker 1: the S and P five hundred. It's pretty routine for
Speaker 1: them to do. So. They guarantee you'll earn five times
Speaker 1: your monthly subscription or double your money back. It's just
Speaker 1: a subscription. You pay it monthly. They text you their
Speaker 1: trades that they're making. You follow their trades. You get
Speaker 1: that upside five extra monthly fee is what they guarantee
Speaker 1: just by mirroring their trades. The market looks to be
Speaker 1: on the verge of a big upswing. Here, get off
Speaker 1: the sidelines and mirror carnivorous trades today. You can get
Speaker 1: two weeks of this service free. Just go to get
Speaker 1: our Trades dot com and use promo code buck. That's
Speaker 1: get our Trades dot Com promo code buck. See website
Speaker 1: for guarantee terms and conditions. Pass performance not a guarantee
Speaker 1: of future earnings. When the Trump administration negotiated the Remain
Speaker 1: in Mexico agreement, the numbers plummeted. Now, the Remain in
Speaker 1: Mexico agreement didn't magically end poverty in the Northern Triangle.
Speaker 1: The Remain in Mexico agreement didn't magically cause the cartels
Speaker 1: they're committing horrific acts of crimes in the Northern Triangle
Speaker 1: to disappear. What the Remain in Mexico policy did is
Speaker 1: it was an agreement with the government of Mexico that
Speaker 1: people acrossed illegally, primarily from the Northern Triangle from Central
Speaker 1: America through Mexico, that they would remain in Mexico while
Speaker 1: their US asylum cases were proceeding, and it was an
Speaker 1: incredible success. Frankly, the success exceeded any reasonable expectations. The
Speaker 1: numbers plummeted and they stayed low. They stayed low, month
Speaker 1: after month after month after month. It was a success.
Speaker 1: Now you suddenly see the numbers skyrocketing. It wasn't suddenly
Speaker 1: poverty returned to the Northern Triangle. It wasn't suddenly these
Speaker 1: vicious murdering cartels rediscovered. They were vicious murdling cartels. What
Speaker 1: happened is Joe Biden put his hand on the Bible
Speaker 1: and put his right hand in the air and repudiated
Speaker 1: the policies that we're working, ripped that international agreement to shreds,
Speaker 1: and that caused the spike. That is the one and
Speaker 1: only cause Biden, cause and effect. Friends, when we're talking
Speaker 1: about the border, it couldn't be more clear. And the
Speaker 1: senator from Texas, Senor Cruz san Fuego, he gets it,
Speaker 1: he sees it, he knows, he understands as a Texan
Speaker 1: and as a constitutional lawyer and senator, exactly what happened here.
Speaker 1: But anybody who's been paying attention, anyone who's honest about
Speaker 1: this knows that the Biden administration is the reason why
Speaker 1: we had close to one hundred and eighty thousand people
Speaker 1: apprehended last month at our southern border. One hundred and
Speaker 1: eighty thousand people. Remember, there are also all the gotaways,
Speaker 1: hundreds and hundreds a day, sometimes a thousand a day,
Speaker 1: and those are individuals who are just getting across the
Speaker 1: border and not getting caught that we know about. Think
Speaker 1: about the smuggling that goes on, Think about the human trafficking,
Speaker 1: the cartel activity that border patrol and I don't even
Speaker 1: know about that's also going on. It's a mess. It's
Speaker 1: a disaster, and it is the clear and direct result
Speaker 1: of the Biden administration essentially ringing the dinner bell in
Speaker 1: America and saying who wants free food? We all see it,
Speaker 1: we get it, we know happened here. Skip the immigration line,
Speaker 1: claim asylum at the border. It works. It works for
Speaker 1: people who cross illegally, those who don't want to go
Speaker 1: through our actual process, and so they're going to keep
Speaker 1: doing it. Cause and effect. This is reality. This is
Speaker 1: what is happening. Why did the remain in Mexico policy
Speaker 1: work so well? See, this goes to the heart of
Speaker 1: the essential, the fundamental lie that Democrats weren't telling during
Speaker 1: the Trump administration about what was happening at the border.
Speaker 1: Their narrative was, these are all asylum seekers and they
Speaker 1: know if they go home they will be subject to
Speaker 1: political or criminal persecution, violence, And essentially it's a question
Speaker 1: of safety right. Asylum exists for people who if they
Speaker 1: don't get access into a place like the US, are
Speaker 1: likely to face severe harm and or be killed, and
Speaker 1: perhaps their families as well. So it's really a sacred thing.
Speaker 1: It's really goes to the core of our humanitarian impulse
Speaker 1: for our fellow human beings. Asylum in these cases is
Speaker 1: being abused. And you have to understand that the people
Speaker 1: who are claiming asylum, who are sometimes even reading off
Speaker 1: a sheet of paper, I have a credible fear of
Speaker 1: violence in my home country of insert the blank. They
Speaker 1: are posing as those who would jump off a ship,
Speaker 1: you know, within sight of America, knowing that if they
Speaker 1: were taken back to their home country they may be
Speaker 1: tortured and killed. They're posing as those people and they
Speaker 1: are not those people. There is no reason for them
Speaker 1: not to go through our legal immigration system other than
Speaker 1: it's arduous it's annoying, it's time consuming. But if everybody
Speaker 1: just decides they're not going to do it, we don't
Speaker 1: have an immigration them anymore. So why did the remain
Speaker 1: in Mexico policy work so well? The numbers make this
Speaker 1: very clear. It's because the moment you took out this
Speaker 1: loophole policy that was started really just four kids who
Speaker 1: are at the border that you will take people in
Speaker 1: and they can claim defensive asylum and say, oh, no,
Speaker 1: I know I crossed in your country illegally, but if
Speaker 1: I go home, I'm going to be subject to persecution
Speaker 1: and violence. They said that's what was going on. It
Speaker 1: was not true. In hundreds of thousands of cases, they
Speaker 1: were just economic migrants seeking better job opportunities and stuff.
Speaker 1: And I always say this, I do not begrudge people this.
Speaker 1: I understand why they want this, and that they you know,
Speaker 1: that doesn't make anybody worthy of criticism or thinking any
Speaker 1: any less of them. But we can't have everyone just
Speaker 1: breaking our laws and forgetting that we have an immigration process,
Speaker 1: or else do we even have sovereignty as a country.
Speaker 1: You know, if Democrats really want to keep going down
Speaker 1: this pathway, which I think unfortunately they do, they're going
Speaker 1: to have to eventually argue for why do we even
Speaker 1: have an immigration system. What's the point of it? If
Speaker 1: everyone gets to stay, why do we pretend that anyone
Speaker 1: doesn't get to stay? Remain in Mexico made it so
Speaker 1: that you could not, and the Trump administration figured this out.
Speaker 1: You could not immediately gain access into the US by
Speaker 1: crossing illegally at the southern border and then gain the
Speaker 1: system by either not showing up or just or you
Speaker 1: can show up and then not show up for your
Speaker 1: next hearing. I mean, there's all these different phases gaming.
Speaker 1: This system did not get you what you wanted if
Speaker 1: once remade in Mexico went into effect, because now you
Speaker 1: actually had a a entry into the US foreign asylum hearing,
Speaker 1: and if it did not go the way of the
Speaker 1: individual who wanted asylum, they were immediately subject to deportation
Speaker 1: back across the southern border. So it took out the loophole. Essentially,
Speaker 1: real assilees sure they would they could be granted the
Speaker 1: right to stay in the US forever. I mean people
Speaker 1: that you know we're speaking out against MS thirteen in
Speaker 1: a newspaper in Honduras or something. I mean, there are
Speaker 1: people who should get asylum under our laws, but those
Speaker 1: with phony asylum claims no longer were able to exploit
Speaker 1: a week seam in the system. What do the Biden
Speaker 1: team do when they came in? Kick that week seam
Speaker 1: as hard as you can break it wide open. And
Speaker 1: this is the result. And Ted Cruz knows it. You
Speaker 1: know it, I know it. Play nineteen. Kamala Harris has
Speaker 1: been to the Canadian border as Vice president, but not
Speaker 1: the southern border. The last I checked, we don't have
Speaker 1: crisis of thousands of Canucks coming south across the border.
Speaker 1: This is a dereliction of duty. It is deliberate, and
Speaker 1: they don't intend to fix it. They don't intend to
Speaker 1: fix it because they have promised the radicals they will
Speaker 1: have open borders and they will not enforce our laws.
Speaker 1: And that is endangering the people of my home state
Speaker 1: of Texas. It's endangering people all across the country. It
Speaker 1: is unacceptable, it is inhumane, and it's wrong all true.
Speaker 1: This is the kind of fire in the belly that
Speaker 1: we need from Republicans on this issue, on all the
Speaker 1: swirling crises now around the Biden administration. They want people
Speaker 1: to think that everything's under control. They want you to
Speaker 1: believe that good old Amtrak Joe is the engineer and
Speaker 1: we just have to sit on the train and he'll
Speaker 1: make the choo choo go in the right direction. That's
Speaker 1: just not the case. He was never up for this job.
Speaker 1: He's not up for this job. He won't be up
Speaker 1: for it. But they were able to use him in
Speaker 1: the moment for their purposes of achieving power and defeating Trump,
Speaker 1: and now we are stuck with the result. The Left
Speaker 1: doesn't want the border to be secure. They don't even
Speaker 1: talk about border security anymore. That was just a talking
Speaker 1: point they used in the past to pretend that there
Speaker 1: was some common ground so they could continue the incremental
Speaker 1: chipping away of our actual border security and get us
Speaker 1: to this point where now we have a de facto
Speaker 1: open border. And they know that over the long run,
Speaker 1: this has enormous political implications that benefit the Democrat Party.
Speaker 1: So that's why this is happening. We have to first
Speaker 1: understand the fundamental reality of these situations, and particularly of
Speaker 1: the southern border, before we can get back to how
Speaker 1: about fixing it. Senator Martha Blackburn of Tennessee has introduced
Speaker 1: the reinstating essentially the Trump policy the Trump era migrant
Speaker 1: Protection protocols. She's saying, let's do it. The Migrant Protection
Speaker 1: Protocols Mandatory Act is what it is called. This bill
Speaker 1: would require migrants without proper documentation to stay in Mexico.
Speaker 1: This is just bring back remain in Mexico. This would
Speaker 1: fix the problem. There would still be unaccompanied miners. See
Speaker 1: I actually know how this works. There would still be
Speaker 1: uncompanied miners coming across the border, but not the family units,
Speaker 1: not the individuals who are claiming defensive asylum. So you
Speaker 1: would cut this down dramatically. You'd see an eighty ninety
Speaker 1: percent reduction in the first month or two in my opinion,
Speaker 1: of the reintroduction of reintroduction rather of this protocol. And yet,
Speaker 1: who wants to place a bet whether the Biden administration
Speaker 1: will do this or not. They will do nothing to
Speaker 1: secure the border. They're going to keep on waving in
Speaker 1: as many people who break our laws as they can
Speaker 1: until the midterms really get in sight, and then they'll
Speaker 1: pose as reason bowl to avoid the judgment of that
Speaker 1: same center of America that is still persuadable that Joe
Speaker 1: Biden is an ignorant old buffoon. It look in a
Speaker 1: little over one hundred days, we went from a secure
Speaker 1: border to crisis. We went from energy independence two lines
Speaker 1: at the pump, and now we went from peace in
Speaker 1: the Middle East to hundreds of rockets fired by terrorists
Speaker 1: on our best ally, actually over a thousand rockets being
Speaker 1: fired on our best ally, Israel. This is exactly what happens,
Speaker 1: as you said, when we project weakness from the Oval Office.
Speaker 1: It is not a good situation. But the American people
Speaker 1: see it for what it is, and that's why they're
Speaker 1: demanding change. And I think as we look ahead, frankly,
Speaker 1: you're going to see the Republicans take back the House
Speaker 1: next year because of all the turmoil they see coming
Speaker 1: as a result of this administration's policies. I hope Jim
Speaker 1: Jordan is right about what will happen. He's certainly right
Speaker 1: about his assessment of what is happening in terms of
Speaker 1: the Biden administration. And it's not Remember, these are not
Speaker 1: just crises that it seems like the Biden team can't handle,
Speaker 1: but they're also in some cases clearly either caused by
Speaker 1: the Biden decision making apparatus, which is not just Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: As you know, there are all these puppeteers around him
Speaker 1: who make the little marionette or the old kind of
Speaker 1: decrepit marionette dance around. But also in response to just
Speaker 1: Biden being the president, right, that's certainly pushing for example,
Speaker 1: some of the wolves around the world, terrorist organizations, the Iranians,
Speaker 1: what we see going on now with hamas pushing them
Speaker 1: to take more action than they would under a Trump administration.
Speaker 1: As I've said all along, there's something to be said
Speaker 1: for a guy who is a little bit unpredictable. I'm
Speaker 1: always reminded of a line in Tombstone where they say
Speaker 1: where they say, let's keep Doc meeting Doc holiday on
Speaker 1: the street, howitzer shotgun. They'll be a little less jumpy
Speaker 1: that way. Essentially, you want to give your guy thet
Speaker 1: You want your machine gunner to be somebody who isn't
Speaker 1: afraid to use it, you know what I mean. And
Speaker 1: with Trump you have a situation where or you had
Speaker 1: a situation where enemies recognized an unpredictability and also an
Speaker 1: aggressiveness that could have been an aggression that could have
Speaker 1: been an issue for them had they transgressed against America.
Speaker 1: With Biden, you know, he wants to get us back
Speaker 1: in deep with the Iranians. You know, he wants to
Speaker 1: create a a phony Iran deal pox Rania which is
Speaker 1: not going to actually work out in our favor in
Speaker 1: the long run. But nonetheless, they don't know how to
Speaker 1: fix these things. And in fact, on the gas crisis
Speaker 1: another thing that's come up this week, it's more of
Speaker 1: the response from the Biden team than it is anything
Speaker 1: they've they did to get us to this point. Although
Speaker 1: they did cancel the Keystone XL pipeline, which goes to
Speaker 1: the mentality of fossil fuel is somehow bad. And here
Speaker 1: is what Here is what Biden says about this gas crisis,
Speaker 1: Play seventeen. I'd also point out that I think what
Speaker 1: this shows is that I think we have to make
Speaker 1: a greater investment in education as it relates to being
Speaker 1: able to train and graduate more people proficient in cybersecurity. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's a that's a really good answer to the crisis.
Speaker 1: Let's let's have an initiative to have more cyber security
Speaker 1: people graduating from schools. Look, it's very likely that however
Speaker 1: this uh, this intrusion came about, it was probably probably
Speaker 1: engineer social engineering of some kind or a usage of
Speaker 1: human error to get access into the system. I don't
Speaker 1: think that's going to solve it. But you know what
Speaker 1: the government could do is have greater redundancy and and
Speaker 1: essentially understand that our energy infrastructure is fossil fuel based. See,
Speaker 1: they don't want to accept that. They want to take
Speaker 1: us to a place where we're we're phasing out pipelines,
Speaker 1: we're phasing out fossil fuels, natural gas, all these things
Speaker 1: because they believe, oh, by twenty fifty we're gonna be,
Speaker 1: you know, carbon neutral whatever I mean, the dates come on,
Speaker 1: the dates will change a million times between now and
Speaker 1: when we actually get the twenty fifty, all the numbers
Speaker 1: will shift. That's what they'll have to do because it
Speaker 1: will not be what they say it will be. It's
Speaker 1: not going to work the way they say it will work.
Speaker 1: And yet what is their approach to all of this
Speaker 1: To talk about how we need investments in green energy
Speaker 1: and to say that we need more help with cyber
Speaker 1: I have to tell you, I think this is absurd,
Speaker 1: But get ready for this administration to have all the
Speaker 1: support of the hack journal media that's spent three years
Speaker 1: give or take, because really they then they focused on
Speaker 1: COVID more and blaming Trump for all that on the
Speaker 1: Russia collusion lies. Anytime you see Democrats changing the subject
Speaker 1: to something that it's that they don't really care about
Speaker 1: and has something to do with Trump, just remember they
Speaker 1: still suffer from Trump's arrangement syndrome. Here's Claire McCaskill put
Speaker 1: twenty one. You know, and I gotta tell you the truth.
Speaker 1: If one of these Republicans has the nerve to talk
Speaker 1: about cancel culture with what they're doing to Liz Cheney,
Speaker 1: I would use such an unladylike word right now if
Speaker 1: I could. I mean, fam you know, I mean, what
Speaker 1: about that a lecturius about doctor Seusan the cancel culture,
Speaker 1: and they are canceling her. They are canceling Liz Cheney
Speaker 1: because she has the audacity to tell the truth. Shame
Speaker 1: on all of them. I mean, she's a moron mccaskeell's,
Speaker 1: she's actually just not very smart. Cancel culture isn't when
Speaker 1: people take a voice vote to remove you from a
Speaker 1: leadership position in Congress, but you still keep your job.
Speaker 1: No one says that you know, you should be kicked
Speaker 1: out of all society. No one calls you a racist,
Speaker 1: No one says, you're a big at that's cancel culture.
Speaker 1: But notice that they don't even know what it is
Speaker 1: that they're so use to just wielding it against their
Speaker 1: political opponents. Oh and Jen Saki is really upset about
Speaker 1: it too. Play fifteen. Let's start with the facts. More
Speaker 1: and eighty judges across the country throughout lawsuits attempting to
Speaker 1: overturn the outcome of the election, and on January sixth,
Speaker 1: this moment in history. We're looking at their hearings on
Speaker 1: Capitol Hill about the events on January sixth. Our nation's
Speaker 1: capital was attacked, our democracy was attacked, and six people
Speaker 1: lost their lives. So it's disturbing to see any leader,
Speaker 1: regardless of party, being attacked for simply speaking the truth.
Speaker 1: And as the President said last week, it's hard to understand,
Speaker 1: but our belief. His belief is that the American people
Speaker 1: will have to make their own decisions about whether the
Speaker 1: reaction by the people they elected to represent them should
Speaker 1: be embracing and elevating conspiracies and attacks on our democracy,
Speaker 1: or whether it should be standing up for ideals that
Speaker 1: have historically been owned by both Democrats and Republicans. Representing
Speaker 1: the country throughout history. I cannot let this go. We're
Speaker 1: going to dive into now Jensaki's smears, lies and propaganda
Speaker 1: about Liz Cheney in the insurrection. You know what's at
Speaker 1: the top of my to do list this week and
Speaker 1: the one thing I'm really looking forward to having some
Speaker 1: filet and yawn that's going to be the most tender, juicy,
Speaker 1: flavorful meat I've had in a long time, courtesy of Monk.
Speaker 1: That's right. I just take them out of my freezer
Speaker 1: and I know that I have the best grass fed
Speaker 1: and grass finished beef you can get anywhere, plus lamb,
Speaker 1: pastured pork and chicken. This is top quality. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm so thankful that whenever it's time to make some
Speaker 1: really good protein for myself, I've got the delicious stuff
Speaker 1: from Moink the best. Their animals are raised outdoors, their
Speaker 1: fish swim wild in the ocean, and monk meat is
Speaker 1: free of antibiotics, hormone, sugar and all the other junk
Speaker 1: you find in the meat aisle that's prepackaged. Monk was
Speaker 1: founded by an eighth generation farmer who's actually featured on
Speaker 1: Shark Tank. Host Kevin O'Leary said it's the best bacon
Speaker 1: he's ever tasted, and I totally agree. And Jamie Simonoff,
Speaker 1: creator of the Ring video Doorbell, invested in Monk all right,
Speaker 1: So this is an independent, not big Agra family farms.
Speaker 1: You need to support them and have the best meat,
Speaker 1: best chicken, best beef you'll get anywhere, have it delivered
Speaker 1: right to your door in a box. It's so easy
Speaker 1: and straightforward. Join the Monk movement today. Go to monkbox
Speaker 1: dot com slash buck right now and listeners to this show.
Speaker 1: Get free ground beef for a year. That's one of
Speaker 1: the best deals you're going to get anywhere. This is amazing,
Speaker 1: amazing ground beef. M o I n k box dot com,
Speaker 1: slash Buck. That's moinkbox dot com, slash Buck. The former President.
Speaker 1: I will do everything I can to ensure that the
Speaker 1: former President never again gets anywhere near the Oval office.
Speaker 1: We have seen the danger uh that he continues to
Speaker 1: provoke with his language. We have seen his lack of
Speaker 1: commitment and dedication to the Constitution, and I think it's
Speaker 1: very important that we make sure whomever we elect is
Speaker 1: somebody who will be faithful to the Constitute. Why is
Speaker 1: Liz Cheney playing into the hands of the left, the socialist,
Speaker 1: the authoritarians, increasingly just the straight up commies in the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party and the media and across the country. Why
Speaker 1: do this? Why give them what they want? I think
Speaker 1: you can come up with a number of plausible answers ego, bitterness,
Speaker 1: desire for power. It might sound crazy, but in an
Speaker 1: error where we just had President Trump come out of
Speaker 1: seemingly nowhere in the political world and become the actual
Speaker 1: president of the United States, doesn't it feel like anything's possible.
Speaker 1: Maybe in Liz Cheney's warped mind, even she would get
Speaker 1: further than even Dad did as VP to become the
Speaker 1: full on president of the United States. Yeah, that's possible,
Speaker 1: isn't it. I had mentioned before Jensaki as the White
Speaker 1: House Press secretary. They pretend that this is the administration
Speaker 1: that's all about truth. And I have to tell you this.
Speaker 1: When they say that six people died in the Capitol
Speaker 1: Hill riot, which as we know, was was largely comprised
Speaker 1: of and I'm talking about the people that actually broke
Speaker 1: the law, destructured a destruction of some federal property. They
Speaker 1: didn't go around you know, slashing priceless painting somebody, you know,
Speaker 1: they broke some doors and windows, which is not okay,
Speaker 1: And I'm never going to say that's okay. You can't
Speaker 1: do that. That's a criminal act. And trespassing and selfie taking,
Speaker 1: which is not a crime. But I'm just saying that's
Speaker 1: the kind of stuff that went on. They were not armed.
Speaker 1: There was no use of lethal force against law enforcement.
Speaker 1: There was the use of lethal force against the protester
Speaker 1: shot in the neck through a door. You imagine, I
Speaker 1: imagine if a cop in Portland, one of those federal
Speaker 1: officers when there was that deployment last summer, a federal
Speaker 1: law enforcement by Trump to Portland when the anti FA
Speaker 1: lunatics were trying to burn down a federal courthouse. That's
Speaker 1: what they were trying to do. But imagine if if
Speaker 1: a cop from twenty feet away, as a guy was,
Speaker 1: you know, banging on the door of the courthouse or
Speaker 1: you know, trying to set a Molotov cocktail a light
Speaker 1: and throw it against the side of the building, a
Speaker 1: cop just just shot him right in the neck or
Speaker 1: right in the head twenty thirty feet away through a door.
Speaker 1: I think the media would be very would have a
Speaker 1: very different feeling about that. It's inexcusable though that Jensaki
Speaker 1: says that six people lost their lives in the Capitol
Speaker 1: Hill riot. People died of heart attacks from a day later,
Speaker 1: people that had nothing, nothing to do with actual violence
Speaker 1: on the side of the protesters, that that caused us
Speaker 1: to death. We've we've been through this. Officer sick, Nick
Speaker 1: had an aneurysm from stress. Well, cops deal with a
Speaker 1: lot of stressful situations. Okay, it's not murder when a
Speaker 1: cop has an aneurism a day after they're doing riot control.
Speaker 1: Do you think they would say at a BLM riot
Speaker 1: that you know, got out of hand. Well, all riots
Speaker 1: rut of hand, but you see what I'm saying, a
Speaker 1: BLM protest that got out of hand. Do you think
Speaker 1: they would say that it's murder if an officer had
Speaker 1: a stroke a day later? Six people, six people died.
Speaker 1: Jen Psaki says, Oh, this, this is the bloody shirt
Speaker 1: they wave around. It's all a lie. The only person
Speaker 1: killed as a result of violence and the Capitol Hill
Speaker 1: riot was Ashley Babbitt. And yet they continue with this.
Speaker 1: And this is also tied directly to their obsession with
Speaker 1: Liz Cheney. She's been canceled she when you are being
Speaker 1: used as a club to bludgeon your own side in politics,
Speaker 1: there's clearly a problem. That's what we're seeing. She has
Speaker 1: absolutely no interest in it seems what the long term
Speaker 1: ramifications of this are. Cheney just is on this jihad
Speaker 1: against Trump and she's not going to let it go,
Speaker 1: which then brings me to what this really is about.
Speaker 1: They there's an obsession, particularly from from CNN and from
Speaker 1: some people in this White House, an obsession with keeping
Speaker 1: the January Insurrection as an issue that people are thinking
Speaker 1: about and concerned about it. Just recently this week, there
Speaker 1: was some some testimony about how you know white supremacy.
Speaker 1: This was on Capitol Hill. White supremacy is the biggest
Speaker 1: national security threat we face or something. This is the
Speaker 1: people who tell you that are brainwashed and trying to
Speaker 1: create grounds for further authoritarianism in America. That's a stupid,
Speaker 1: nonsensical thing to say, but you'll you'll have you know,
Speaker 1: FBI directors who say it. You'll have all these individuals
Speaker 1: who work for the government because they know who's in
Speaker 1: charge right now, and the narrative of white supremacy as
Speaker 1: this imminent threat of overthrow of the government of a
Speaker 1: coup is so satisfying to the Democrats. It excuses all
Speaker 1: of their excesses, their viciousness, their insanity, their overreach. It
Speaker 1: excuses all of it. It justifies all of it. Sorry,
Speaker 1: we have to do this. We have to treat you,
Speaker 1: the opposition, the Republicans, the Trump supporters, We have to
Speaker 1: treat you like you are a clear and present danger
Speaker 1: to America because you are. We have to treat you
Speaker 1: like you're not really human, You're not really our fellow
Speaker 1: Americans because you are. That's the attitude the left has
Speaker 1: about all of this, and they're looking to justify it.
Speaker 1: That's the attitude they have about why there's no good
Speaker 1: faith extended from the other side really on any issues
Speaker 1: these days. They want to control you, they want to
Speaker 1: shut you down to they want to cancel you. And
Speaker 1: Liz Cheney plays right into it. She continues to scratch
Speaker 1: at the scab of the January sixth riot, and Democrats
Speaker 1: are saying, great, keep doing it, keep it going, because
Speaker 1: it justifies the power grab that we are seeing that
Speaker 1: we're going through right now as a country. You know,
Speaker 1: we talk about freedom allott as conservatives, we talk about
Speaker 1: liberty on the right we have gone through twelve months
Speaker 1: of the greatest intrusions on liberty, on constitutional guarantees of
Speaker 1: our individual rights in my lifetime, and it's not even close.
Speaker 1: And the media and the Democrat Party who perpetrated all
Speaker 1: of this are hoping that we don't ever really wake up,
Speaker 1: or that enough of us don't wake up to what
Speaker 1: they've done and what it means for this country going forward.
Speaker 1: And Liz Cheney unfortunately has allowed herself to become a
Speaker 1: weapon of the oppressive tyrants on the left. And it's
Speaker 1: shameful and it's sad. Reality is finally starting to set
Speaker 1: in for some of the lockdowners about masks. It's no
Speaker 1: longer possible to be a reasonable, rational person who's constantly
Speaker 1: wearing two mass Some of wear two mess I'm on
Speaker 1: a bike out in the woods by myself, and what
Speaker 1: if the COVID finds me. The COVID is like a
Speaker 1: heat seeking this all. It'll find me from wherever I
Speaker 1: need to hide. I need to hide from the COVID.
Speaker 1: You know, there are people who are writing serious articles
Speaker 1: these days. I'm telling you the truth about pandemic PTSD.
Speaker 1: What have I been telling you for six months? There
Speaker 1: is a mass psychological disorder happening. I've been saying this,
Speaker 1: It's true, it's clear, And now finally there are people
Speaker 1: who are you know, mds and experts and all the
Speaker 1: rest of it, who are saying, you know what, turns
Speaker 1: out that there is really an issue here. There's an
Speaker 1: article in the Atlantic, which is usually a left wing
Speaker 1: trash journal. Lucy McBride, who's an MD in washing DC, wrote,
Speaker 1: I tell my patients not to mask their kids outside.
Speaker 1: For most young people, the social and emotional benefits of
Speaker 1: taking off masks outdoors greatly outweigh the personal on public
Speaker 1: health advantages of keeping them on. This is central, This
Speaker 1: is central to what I've been saying for a year now.
Speaker 1: They have pretended that everything was a binary either or
Speaker 1: you take the virus seriously or you don't. When every
Speaker 1: decision they were making for us, mandated with the force
Speaker 1: of law, the force of the state behind it was
Speaker 1: a judgment call based upon highly imperfect information that was
Speaker 1: supposed to be when competing goods, competing upside and downside.
Speaker 1: And yet everything in the lockdown, everything in the pandemic,
Speaker 1: according to the Fauciites and the Democrats, because we know
Speaker 1: this was deeply politicized. Remember they were used to pretend
Speaker 1: mask warring is not a political statement. Bull crap. We
Speaker 1: all know it is, We've all known it is. But
Speaker 1: remember when you know, early on they were acting like
Speaker 1: they listened to the science. No, no, they don't. They
Speaker 1: absolutely do not listen to the science. Because that's why
Speaker 1: they have problems. Now, that's why there are issues with
Speaker 1: their ability to see the statements made by the CDC
Speaker 1: and say, okay, finally we'll calm down. One in five people,
Speaker 1: According to this article, one in five people experience post
Speaker 1: pandemic PTSD, especially those who were infected, or it's higher
Speaker 1: than that for those who were infected or quarantined. I've
Speaker 1: been telling you that this is a mass hysteria, and
Speaker 1: I've been using those words intentionally, clearly and knowing what
Speaker 1: I'm what I'm really trying to imply. I meant it.
Speaker 1: People have gone nuts. You see it, you know it.
Speaker 1: It's all over the place. This broke a lot of
Speaker 1: people emotionally and psychologically. And that's why they were clinging
Speaker 1: to Fauci's little lab coat. That's why they were begging
Speaker 1: that little stalinist smurf, please please tell me it's all
Speaker 1: gonna be okay because they were suffering from a form
Speaker 1: of mental illness. That's what we've seen. And it's scary,
Speaker 1: isn't it to think that our country could fall into
Speaker 1: that so quickly. It's scary to think that at a
Speaker 1: clinical level. And here you have an MD writing in
Speaker 1: the Atlantic about just this and how in other pandemics
Speaker 1: it's the same thing. People lost rationality, lost the ability
Speaker 1: to calculate real risks, and we all suffered as a result.
Speaker 1: Because the neurotics on the left made this an anti
Speaker 1: Trump statement very early on. And also I believe, and
Speaker 1: now this gets into a deeper psychological level, that if
Speaker 1: you are generally, if you're an atheist with tremendous faith
Speaker 1: in the state, you were a lockdowner and all out
Speaker 1: lockdowner because you believe that the government, the experts in
Speaker 1: the government, we're going to keep you alive, and that
Speaker 1: all we had to do was give up all of
Speaker 1: our rights, give up all of our decision making to
Speaker 1: people who work in the government, and we'd be safe.
Speaker 1: Because the notion of living your life and accepting that
Speaker 1: we are all on bar time. A lot of leftists
Speaker 1: have a tremendous difficulty with that, and it goes to
Speaker 1: their look, there's an existential angst, there's no question about
Speaker 1: it for people who don't believe that anything comes after
Speaker 1: this life. You see in a lot of the Red States,
Speaker 1: the attitude was among people, including much older people, including
Speaker 1: those who are at high risk, was I don't have
Speaker 1: that much time, and I don't have that much time left.
Speaker 1: I want to live my life. Remember that in the
Speaker 1: early days, you know, back last April, last May, people
Speaker 1: were saying, yeah, I can't give up. You know, I'm
Speaker 1: in my late seventies. I don't want to give up
Speaker 1: a year or two of my life locked away in
Speaker 1: isolation from my children, my grandchild. I don't want to
Speaker 1: do that. That was shouted, Oh no, you shut up.
Speaker 1: The government's gonna take control of the government's in charge.
Speaker 1: People talk about post pandemic PTSD. I have post fauci
Speaker 1: PTSD at some level. I mean, I don't think I'm
Speaker 1: actually suffering from a mental illness because of it, but
Speaker 1: I do think that this is something that's really stuck
Speaker 1: with me. And I know for some of you, you know,
Speaker 1: we've covered this issue a lot on the show, and
Speaker 1: I get your messages where you say, you know, okay,
Speaker 1: we get it with masks, we get it with your
Speaker 1: ear disdain for Faucci. This is central and it's about
Speaker 1: much more than just masks and Fauci, don't you see.
Speaker 1: This is about your underlying relationship between citizen and state.
Speaker 1: This goes to the heart of whether or not you
Speaker 1: have any actual rights, any real protections from the state
Speaker 1: and freedoms as an individual that the government cannot transgress.
Speaker 1: What we saw in this last year is that for
Speaker 1: a lot of people the answer is no, that the
Speaker 1: government can decide it has a right to do effectively
Speaker 1: anything that should be very troubling to you. And it's
Speaker 1: a reminder that even in America, with all of our
Speaker 1: fancy gadgets and our incredible prosperity and our ability to
Speaker 1: start companies sitting on the couch that become worth millions
Speaker 1: or billions of dollars, I mean, all all these things
Speaker 1: that are going on that seemed just unfathomably amazing in
Speaker 1: so many ways, we could have a turn toward tyranny
Speaker 1: that destroys the most essential characteristics of our society. And
Speaker 1: it can happen in the blink of an eye. That's
Speaker 1: why I've been saying that this was all ultimately an
Speaker 1: advertisement for an armed population and the Second Amendment. Let
Speaker 1: me let me explain to you why I feel that way.
Speaker 1: We had a virus that had a less than one
Speaker 1: percent fatality rate in this country, and people were there
Speaker 1: was mass hysteria, there was pandemic trauma, and that made
Speaker 1: it psychologically impossible for a lot of people to make
Speaker 1: reasonable decisions. And the government was shutting down churches, the
Speaker 1: government was telling people that had to stay in their homes,
Speaker 1: and there was there were even considerations among some there
Speaker 1: were people who were experts who were saying we should
Speaker 1: have full on Chinese or Australian style lockdowns where you're
Speaker 1: forced to stay in your home for weeks and weeks
Speaker 1: at a time. That was for a virus with a
Speaker 1: less than one percent fatality rate. The actual fatality rate
Speaker 1: for the Spanish influenza of nineteen eighteen was more like
Speaker 1: five percent. And in the second wave it went after
Speaker 1: specifically when after twenty to forty year olds, and they
Speaker 1: never even really understood why, but people would die. They
Speaker 1: would get the Spanish flu. They would die in a
Speaker 1: matter of hours from the onset of symptoms young healthy people.
Speaker 1: How hysterical and tyrannical do you think the lockdowners would
Speaker 1: get if we were faced with anything even close to that?
Speaker 1: Do you think they would hesitate to lock you in
Speaker 1: your home and not understand why that's just not their right?
Speaker 1: Do you think they would hesitate from using the force
Speaker 1: of the state, using armed men paid by the government
Speaker 1: to make you comply, to take away your freedom, to
Speaker 1: lock you in a cell, to lock you in quarantine,
Speaker 1: to maybe even use lethal force if you refused. We've
Speaker 1: been through a stress test with this pandemic as a people.
Speaker 1: Not all of us, but a big portion of the
Speaker 1: American people failed, and we need to be honest about that.
Speaker 1: When you spend a lot of time in the great outdoors,
Speaker 1: you know mother nature doesn't always play nice. SA Company
Speaker 1: has all the protective gear you need to brave the
Speaker 1: elements and explore more every day like they're multi use
Speaker 1: face shields UPF thirty, lightweighted, breathable. They come in dozens
Speaker 1: of eye catching designs for the entire family, perfect for
Speaker 1: your next outdoor adventure. Look, the SA face shields have
Speaker 1: such cool patterns. I've got one that's got an American
Speaker 1: flag design. I love it and they're meant for outdoor activity. Friends, understand,
Speaker 1: this is not about COVID. This is about making sure
Speaker 1: you keep dust stout. This is about having a gator
Speaker 1: that's really comfortable, that looks cool, that you can wear
Speaker 1: anytime at the range, out in the woods. We're just
Speaker 1: walking around outside doing work. Right. There are over ten
Speaker 1: ways to put this to use. Face mask, bandanna, neckgator,
Speaker 1: so many more. So how have you been wearing yours? Well,
Speaker 1: you gotta get one first, right. Say company also gives
Speaker 1: back to the men and women who put themselves in
Speaker 1: the front lines every day through their partnership with Operation Gratitude.
Speaker 1: Say Company has donated over one hundred thousand face shields.
Speaker 1: With every order, they donate one face shield to first responders.
Speaker 1: Right now, say companies offering an insane deal. Buy one
Speaker 1: face shield, get four free, one hundred and fifty dollar
Speaker 1: value for just twenty four ninety nine. That's buy one,
Speaker 1: get four free. Just go to sa phishing dot com
Speaker 1: slash buck to get five face shields for the price
Speaker 1: of one, plus a lifetime warranty and free returns. That's
Speaker 1: s a phishing dot com slash buck. We'll speaking of
Speaker 1: that June fifteenth, big deal. Paint a picture. What does
Speaker 1: that look like June fifteenth, Well, we're right now one
Speaker 1: percent positivity. It's been the lowest in the nation. It's
Speaker 1: been that way for almost two and out three weeks.
Speaker 1: We're seeing this blueprint where the vast majority of counties
Speaker 1: are in orange and yellow, and we're gonna move beyond
Speaker 1: the blueprint on the fifteenth of June. So just in
Speaker 1: a number of weeks, and that world looks a lot
Speaker 1: like the world we entered into before the pandemic. We're
Speaker 1: not wearing face coverings. We're not We're not you know,
Speaker 1: restricted in any way, shape or form or doing the
Speaker 1: old things that we used to do, save huge large
Speaker 1: scale indoor convention events like that where we'll use our
Speaker 1: common sense. But look, our vaccine numbers are still holding
Speaker 1: five hundred thirty three thousand shots in the last forty
Speaker 1: eight hours, or thirty two almost thirty three million. So
Speaker 1: we keep that going, we're gonna hear a lot of
Speaker 1: horns of enthusiasm because we'll get out the other side
Speaker 1: by June fifteenth. Not wearing face coverings. They're saying in California,
Speaker 1: people are finally saying enough is enough. I think it's
Speaker 1: so interesting too that they say face covering. It has
Speaker 1: to be a mask, friends, if you're going to be
Speaker 1: even remotely and as you know, look, is there anybody
Speaker 1: that you've heard that is more that is basically more
Speaker 1: anti mask than me? It has been all along. There's
Speaker 1: a handful that are as anti this nonsense as I am.
Speaker 1: But the point is if you think that, you know,
Speaker 1: having a like loosely draped handkerchief over your mouth is
Speaker 1: really doing a lot epidemiologically. I just don't even know
Speaker 1: what to say, Like we're just this is absurd. Airflow
Speaker 1: going above it, airflow going below it, spreading out of
Speaker 1: the air around you. There's no filtration, there's anyway though
Speaker 1: it's so oh, it's also people are all sick. But
Speaker 1: like I said, it's not only is it's so dumb,
Speaker 1: but there's a there's a lunacy involved here, there's pandemic PTSD.
Speaker 1: It's real. And why is Gavin Newsom taking this position now? Though? Ah, yes,
Speaker 1: this is important, it's not because Gavin Newsom is such
Speaker 1: an honorable fellow who understands that he was being a
Speaker 1: lockdown lunatic for so many months. It's that recall, baby,
Speaker 1: we all know that Newsome's not long for the governor's
Speaker 1: mansion if this continues. So what's a good way to
Speaker 1: get people to stop thinking you're an authoritarian psycho putting
Speaker 1: in place or removing after having in place the strictest
Speaker 1: mandates in the country. That, I mean, he should feel
Speaker 1: like an idiot. He should feel like a fool, because
Speaker 1: he is. He's a fool. They shut down outdoor dining,
Speaker 1: my friends, after telling people outdoor dining will always be fine.
Speaker 1: They shut down outdoor dining in California. No benefit, no
Speaker 1: benefit from it whatsoever, none, zero that they can point to.
Speaker 1: And then, as we know, Gavin Newsom went to French
Speaker 1: laundry and did his whole thing. I mean, he's he's
Speaker 1: such a perfect politician for California. It's like, you know,
Speaker 1: I look goodness suit and I kind of just have
Speaker 1: this kind of gravelly, breathy thing going on and a
Speaker 1: lot of gel in my hair, and I'm just here
Speaker 1: to tell the great people of California that this is
Speaker 1: my best angle. You know. Is so this guy really
Speaker 1: should be like a soap opera actor, but instead he's
Speaker 1: Gavin Newsom. I know, it's it's remarkable to see his
Speaker 1: fall from grace. It's great though, it's great. I can't
Speaker 1: tell you how happy I am that this clown he's
Speaker 1: going through what he's going through right now, because it
Speaker 1: shows that even in California, which has been overrun by
Speaker 1: leftist lunacy, there is still some albeit small, some hope
Speaker 1: of accountability for bad decision making. Is there any in
Speaker 1: this White House? Not yet, but people will start figure
Speaker 1: out that there's some funky stuff going on. Andy Slavitt,
Speaker 1: for example, is out there being an asked. He's a
Speaker 1: senior advisor on COVID response this White House and journals
Speaker 1: are asked. I actually think some of the journals are
Speaker 1: curious about this because they're now finally able to put
Speaker 1: it together. Oh my gosh, Biden and a lot of
Speaker 1: these senior Democrats, masking really is the maga hat for them,
Speaker 1: For the left, Masking really is a symbol of politics
Speaker 1: to them, Like you know, they were ignoring it in
Speaker 1: the past, or they couldn't believe, they couldn't bring themselves
Speaker 1: to believe it. It's very much true. Andy Slavit asked
Speaker 1: about this play too, And you're the vaccine guy you're
Speaker 1: not the mask guy. But part of getting people vaccinated
Speaker 1: is to tell them their lives will be different, changed
Speaker 1: better if they get the vaccine. There is this Oval
Speaker 1: Office meeting yesterday with the President and the leaders of Congress.
Speaker 1: Everyone in this room has been vaccine dated. So why
Speaker 1: were they all wearing masks? And what message is that set? Well, look,
Speaker 1: I think people who have been vaccinated are starting to
Speaker 1: get a little bit impatient with um, what can I do?
Speaker 1: You know, can I go indoors? Gonna take masks off? Etc.
Speaker 1: And I think the CDC is getting their step by
Speaker 1: step so right now you can do pretty much everything
Speaker 1: outdoors without a mask. You can do everything indoors if
Speaker 1: you're around vaccinated people with without a mask. So why
Speaker 1: are they all wearing masks in there? Yes, I don't
Speaker 1: think that. I'm not sure sure that the president is
Speaker 1: the average person. I personally think there's a lot of
Speaker 1: protections around the president. Why does he need lots of
Speaker 1: Secret Service agents? Why does he why do they you know,
Speaker 1: belt and suspender everything with the president Because there's a
Speaker 1: very important person. And I think you shouldn't take your
Speaker 1: mark just by what you see in the Oval Office.
Speaker 1: I think most people. If you're indoors around other people
Speaker 1: that are vaccinated, the cd says it's okay, And I
Speaker 1: think you should listen to the CDC on that. What
Speaker 1: the heck was that? Did you hear this more on?
Speaker 1: I mean just I'm playing the audio for you. You
Speaker 1: could hear yourself. Well, you know, the president of Secret
Speaker 1: Service protector. So yeah, that's to stop lunatics from trying
Speaker 1: to assassinate the president. Has nothing to do with COVID, right.
Speaker 1: The Secret Service is not trying to karate chop viral
Speaker 1: particles in the air. They're not carrying around submachine guns
Speaker 1: because of the possibility of sub spittle from an aid,
Speaker 1: you know, becoming aerosolized and finding its way into Biden's
Speaker 1: you know, nasal farringal whatever you call it, nasal farynx.
Speaker 1: I believe, yeah, one has nothing to do with the other.
Speaker 1: But he doesn't have an answer because you know what
Speaker 1: the real answer is, because I think Biden himself might
Speaker 1: be suffering from some degree of pandemic PTSD. I think
Speaker 1: for a lot of people, this the face covering was
Speaker 1: a security blanket for them, and it was a symbol
Speaker 1: to them, and they could wear this thing and think
Speaker 1: I'm a good, smart person who listens to the Thullians.
Speaker 1: And that was after a while, not only something that
Speaker 1: they they needed, but they enjoyed. I'm just gonna say it,
Speaker 1: I think there are libs out there who enjoy this craziness.
Speaker 1: They like not not the pandemic, but they like mask conformity.
Speaker 1: It's a show of mass solidarity with government mandates and policy.
Speaker 1: If we can get everybody to wear masks, we can
Speaker 1: get everybody to lessen their CEO two footprint. If we
Speaker 1: can get everybody to wear masks, we can get everybody
Speaker 1: to hand in their firearms or else right, collective action,
Speaker 1: the moral equivalent of war. Take it all the way
Speaker 1: back to the origins, the earliest days of mass propaganda
Speaker 1: in America, with the advent of Yes Radio in World
Speaker 1: War One, and you have a very clear connection and
Speaker 1: the messaging of the moral equivalent of war. Everyone has
Speaker 1: to move together and do what the state says, and
Speaker 1: we're all in this, and you know, don't be don't
Speaker 1: be questioning, don't be an outsider. There's a lot of comfort,
Speaker 1: far too much of it among Democrats on this issue,
Speaker 1: and they I think they've really acclimated themselves to a
Speaker 1: world in which the government can restrict your physical comfort
Speaker 1: and freedom in whatever way it deems necessary, just based
Speaker 1: upon the fact that you're a human being who needs oxygen.
Speaker 1: And that's why Andy Slavitt, who's supposed to be an
Speaker 1: expert on what's going on with COVID response and the
Speaker 1: vaccine specifically bumbles like a moron on National TV when
Speaker 1: he's asked, why is old man Biden vaccinated? Surrounded with
Speaker 1: the vaccinated and still wearing a mask indoors? Why is
Speaker 1: he doing it? Well, it's the same answers you get
Speaker 1: when they ask why is old man Biden wearing a
Speaker 1: mask outside even though he's vaccinated. The chance of him
Speaker 1: getting COVID and it being a severe event even if
Speaker 1: he were to get it is is something that should
Speaker 1: be ignored. But he won't do it because it was
Speaker 1: never about listening to the science. It was always about
Speaker 1: controlling you.