WEBVTT - "Goldilocks" Era Will End For The U.S. Next Year: Bill Rhodes

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P M L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. US

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Paying Day will meet

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday in Argentina on the sidelines of a G

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty summit taking place in Buenos rs. Joining us now

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to tell us more about that meeting and other world

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>events is Bill Rhodes is commonly known as the Banker

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to the World. He is the author of the book

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Banker to the World, Leadership Lessons from the front Lines

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:59.279
<v Speaker 1>of a Global Finance and the book I Understand is

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>currently in a second English edition. It has been published

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>in Mandarin, Korean, Japanese, Portuguese, Do This for a Reason,

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and most recently two editions in Spanish. Tell us what

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>you believe will happen at the G twenty meeting in

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Buenos Aires. Well, I think, Pim, there are great expectations

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that President Hi Jim Ping of China and our President

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump will be able to cut a deal on trade.

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.039
<v Speaker 1>As you know, at this point in time, we have

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>tariffs on ten percent on two hundred going to come

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>into effect in January UH billion dollars worth of Chinese

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>exports to the United States, and UH President Trump is

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>threatening to increase that amount to from ten percent on

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that two billion, but also saying that if he doesn't

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>get some indication of positive movement on the part of

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>China next year, he could put a similar tariff on

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the remaining two sixty seven billion UH vis a vis

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the trade balance between the two countries. UH. There's great

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>hype over this, not clear what will come out. I

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>think the good point is they're gonna be talking face

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to face. The real work will be done by the

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>people under them. But there's something else going on at

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that G twenty the people have sort of forgotten. You

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>will have the three largest producers of oil in the

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>world sitting down. They're together. In other words, the United

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>States was with President Trump putin of Russia and also

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 1>UH the head of Saudi Arabia, UH, either the king

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>or someone the king will send. And as you know,

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the chief disturbers or let's say, in the

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:56.679
<v Speaker 1>marketplace today the chief sources of volatility is oil, and

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>so one side light could be that there could be

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>some discussion on oil. Also because there's a meeting on

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the fifth of December OPEC, and the feeling is Saudi

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>always is a mover there and will Saudi go along

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with President Trump who wants to keep prices low or

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>for their own income, will they move on it? So

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>this is sort of a side light which could come

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:24.519
<v Speaker 1>out of there, as well as the discussion between Trump

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and she jumping. Yeah, because a lot of people expect

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a supply cut at that OPEQUE meeting, It'll be interesting

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to see whether Saudi Arabia's view is tipped in their

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>connections with President Trump. I do want a home And

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>though on trade and the discussion between Ji jimping and Trump,

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>just because this really has been a huge main driver

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of recent market volatility, I'm wondering do you view the

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>threat as additional tariffs that President Trump just came out

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>with as a negotiating tactic, or does this indicate that

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>President Trump is serious about trying to completely rejigg or

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>supply chains. Most people think it's a threat On the

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>other hand, I never underestimate what he might do having

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>known him since I think the real issue here is

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I've said on your show before and on Bloomberg Television,

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>is I think not so much trade but intellectual property

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>because if you go take the long view, which is

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>so called Chinese view, but we have to take the

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>long view. Two, we've always been dominant in this area

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, et cetera. And Uh, I think one of

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the issues that really has to be threshed out here,

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>apart from the trade situation, is what's going to happen

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>on intellectual property. To me, that's the most difficult thing

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 1>to work on. Bill Rhodes, do you see a possibility

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that at the last moment, Ping of China will not

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>go to the G twenty meeting and send someone else? No,

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:53.679
<v Speaker 1>he he actually glories in these meetings. You will note

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that he never misses any regional meeting, whether it be

0:04:56.480 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 1>in Asia or any uh, you know, any brick meeting

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it is. Uh. So there's no doubt that

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 1>he will go, barring some illness or something. The real

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>question is, uh, is anything going to come out of it? Uh?

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>And he has said very little recently except to talk

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>about the need to have balanced and free trade in

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the world and all of this. But President Trump has

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>been very vocal almost daily on Twitter and and and

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>he views himself as as a great deal maker. So

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to see whether there's just an airing of

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 1>views or something comes out of it. I think it's

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 1>about fifty fifty whether something specific will come out of it,

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>or we'll just go on to another phase. Bill Rhodes,

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping he can understand and translate for us how

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>andres Manuel Lopez Orador or am Low, the new president

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:54.679
<v Speaker 1>of Mexico who is taking the home in the next

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>few days, how he is going to treat markets because

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>so far the sig knowlls have been very bad, and

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>we've seen stocks plunge in Mexico, the pesos testing uh

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the year lows, and you're seeing bond yields searched to

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 1>the highest in at least seven years. Well, I think

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons for that, Liza is that, uh,

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 1>he was insistent that the that the government go through

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 1>with some sort of a referendum on the new airport,

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>which was already thirty five complete billion dollar airport. Yeah.

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Actually more than that. I think the final run was

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be between thirty five and thirty eight billion dollars.

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>And of course very a very few number of people

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>showed up for this referendum or plebicite and was turned down,

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and he says that based on that, he's not going

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to go ahead with it, and that shook up the

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Mexican markets because a lot of that paper, the bonds

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 1>that we used to finance it, are held by Mexicans.

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Of course, a lot of held by Americans do, but

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot by by the Mexican business community. UH So

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of con tarned there as to

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>what will happen. I was with one of the lead

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Mexican business people the other day will go unnamed, and

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>he's more optimistic because he's got as his chief advisor

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of Puncho Romo, who is one of the leading business

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>people of northern Mexico, as his advisor, will be his

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>chief of staff. And the last time I was with

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>UH with Almo, which a little over a year ago,

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I co hosted a small dinner for him here. Council

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in America's UH He and UH Puncha Romo were very

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>positive on some of the things they wanted to do.

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>One of the concerns is what he's also going to

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>do in the oil business. UH. Is he going to

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>cut out the contracts going forward? Is he going to

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>seek to modify them? There's concerned there also. And of course,

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the immediate crisis he faces on his border, of course,

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>is the migrant uh immigration problem with the caravans coming

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>up from Central America, and it's a very difficult situation

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>for him because his predecessors haven't done a very good

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>job with it, and our President Trump is talking about

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>closing the border completely. I think what Trump is looking

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>for is something like Merkel negotiated with Turkey, which is

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you keep them over there on your side of the border.

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh and UH we will from time to time let

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>some of them go through the normal procedures to come

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>in and UH. There's been a lot of talk that

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Almo uh and his government will put forth a program

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.839
<v Speaker 1>to resettle some of these migrants, but it's not clear

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't take office until December one, but that's

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:44.079
<v Speaker 1>the first order of importance. And then the other thing

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that's being watched is before the end of the month

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>in December, he he must go to Congress and present

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a budget and people are not sure what that budget

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>is gonna say. So because of all these things have

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>been very uh, you know, very many doubts in the market.

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>You've seen the stress on the Mexican peso. You've seen

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the stress in the stock market in Mexico. So everything

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>is sort of on hold until uh, the week after

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 1>December one. On how he handles all these programs. Bill Rhodes,

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>just to continue on this oil theme and PEMMICS, which

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>is the nationalized the national oil company in Mexico, price

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of oil, and you started the segment earlier talking about

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:34.319
<v Speaker 1>oil prices from the beginning of October to the current

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:38.079
<v Speaker 1>let's say fifty barrel on Thenmax oil has declined in

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>value in dollars more than thirty three per cent. What

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>does that do to the economics of Mexico. Well, certainly,

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>uh a low Mexico doesn't produce as much as it

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>used to. It is not particularly positive obviously, And it's

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting to note that the President of Mexico will be

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 1>this meeting in low He will be attle office on

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:07.439
<v Speaker 1>December one, and also the president of Nigeria, which is

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a major producer. They're all members of the Group of

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty excuse me of the group of twenty and so

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that what you're going to have here is

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>some discussions on the sidelines of this conference about it.

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I think what has happened is the US has every

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>day has been reaching higher production levels with the shale

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>oil boom that we see. But if the price of

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>oil drops substantially below fifty dollars, a lot of those

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>operations are not viable. Uh. But the Saudis are peak

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 1>production at this point. Uh. Many think trying to a

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>suage and gain the favor of President Trump, but they

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>can't continue to do that because they don't have the income.

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>And the Russians are at peak production too. So if

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>you're advising a company right now in the United States,

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>with respect to their relationship in Mexico, which you advised

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that they would go and make an acquisition because things

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>are so cheap right now, or would you recommend that

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>they stay away you're talking about a new oil business

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in the oil business were beyond just in general, just

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:14.439
<v Speaker 1>taking a look at the background backdrop here politically as

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>well as economically well as you know, because I've said

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>it on the show several times. I think here in

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the United States we're in a goldilocks period. I think

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>for a year from now we will not be I

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>think next year is problematic because the FED I think

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>will definitely raise in December, and I think we're going

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to see a couple more increases next year, and then

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to see what the economy does. But China

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>is slowing down big time, there's no doubt about it.

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:46.319
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to really have a fight to

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>keep six percent growth. It could dip next year below that.

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 1>And Europe is slowing down also with the doubts on Brexit,

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the problems in Italy, even Germany, automobile production slowing. So

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 1>what you is the United States is a star in

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the sense of economic growth for the moment, but we're

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>in an intertwined world. And this is why this whole

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>situation about trade, the trade wars, particularly with China, but

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>also what's going on between the United States and Europe

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>on automobiles. I think all of this is very very important,

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and so I think we're in for even more volatility

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>uh in both the markets, in the sense of the

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>stock markets, the bond markets, but also in the commodities markets.

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Over the next twelve months, Bill, just quickly, because you've

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>written in the past and proved impression when it comes

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to stock prices. You're not a stock picker. I understand that,

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:44.959
<v Speaker 1>But that same period beginning of October to the current

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>level of stock prices down more than nine per cent,

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you kind of telegraph that in a lot of your writing.

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>What do you see next? Well, I think what the

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>people on the floor of the Stock Exchange of hoping

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the trade is. We're gonna get to fame Santa Claus rally.

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 1>But that's going to be very much tied in with

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 1>what we've been discussing on the G twenty Because if

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:09.439
<v Speaker 1>we don't see some progress between China and the United States,

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and you want to take the radical view the President

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump will go ahead and increase the tariffs on China

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and uh, we don't have any resolution on oil, then

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we could be in a difficult situation. Thank

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you very much, Bill Rhodes. As always bankers to the world,

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Bill Rhodes, President and chief executive of William Rhodes Global Advisors.

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>US Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley said in

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the Security Council meeting earlier that Russia's shooting and seizing

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of Ukrainian vessels is quote outrageous violation of sovereign Ukrainian

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:58.319
<v Speaker 1>territory and marks yet another reckless Russian escalation. Here to

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>tell us more about what is going on in geopolitics,

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>including Russia and the United States, is retired Admiral James Stavridis.

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>He is a calmist for Bloomberg Opinion. He is, of

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 1>course a retired US Navy admiral, former military commander of NATO,

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and dean emeritus of the Fletcher School of Law and

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Diplomacy at Tufts University. Admiral Stavridas, thank you for being

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>with us, give us your thoughts, your reaction to the

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Russian shooting and seizure of those Ukrainian vessels that were

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>transitting to the Sea of Azof from the Black Sea. Well,

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>first of all, having spent my life at sea, even

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I had to take a moment to recall where the

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Sea of Azov is. It's tucked away in a little

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>corner of the Black Sea. It's very shallow, it's smaller

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>than the US Great Lakes. But it has now become

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a flashpoint. And you know, m I would say whoever

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>heard the Gulf Tonkin before Vietnam. So a, there is

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a potential for this to grow into something much bigger.

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Be Nikki Haley as usual is completely right. This is

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>an outrageous seizure of sovereign warships on the high seas.

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a big deal in international law. And see, the

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>question is how far is Putin willing to go. He's

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a risk taker. He's clearly probing here, and I am

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>very concerned that this could escalate into something very dangerous,

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>not only for Russian Ukraine, but for NATO in the west.

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>So can you just extrapolate, extrapolate out what would happen

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>in an escalation like that? I can, Lisa, what I

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>would see happening if there is not an immediate strong

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>pushback in response to this event. Uh Putin will continue

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to probe, and his real objective here is not simply

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to control the Strait of Kersh which is what connects

0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov, but he

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>also wants a land bridge from Russia through to Crimea,

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and that requires him to consolidate real control over southeast Ukraine,

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 1>notably the city of Mario Pool. So I could see

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a kind of Christmas surprise where we're all very distracted.

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>There hasn't been a lot of pushback, and Putin decides

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>now is the time to really consolidate a strip of

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>land between Crimea, which he's already seized, and the mainland

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of Russia. And you say that there hasn't been a

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of pushback, you're talking about President Trump and his response. Correct,

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I am, and uh. Otherwise, we have seen a great

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>deal of pushback from European nations, from NATO as an alliance.

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>We saw the Secretary General. We saw fortunately our u

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>S Ambassador to the United Nations, NICKI Haley. I think

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna miss her in a few months, Uh, pushing

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>back hard. We haven't seen the White House step up

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and go at this. And the big thing, as you've

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>been talking about, is the G twenty down in Argentina.

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 1>President Trump will be their face to face with President Putin.

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:08.959
<v Speaker 1>I hope he raises this both privately and publicly. Admiral

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>ste Frida's Russia has already built a bridge connecting Crimea

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:18.919
<v Speaker 1>to the Russian mainland. It's a twelve mile bridge, I believe,

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and it is so low that it prevents Panamax vessels

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 1>from actually docking in the Ukraine city of Mario Pole.

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>So is this just another extension of what we see

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>more things like that? Unfortunately, I think we will, given

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the state in general of Russian infrastructure and their construction abilities.

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I think no less than six bridges have collapsed in

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Russia in the last twelve months. Perhaps the Ukrainian shouldn't

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:54.400
<v Speaker 1>overly worry about that. But in all seriousness, yes, Tim,

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:57.919
<v Speaker 1>this is part of what is sometimes called hybrid warfare.

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:01.880
<v Speaker 1>This is what Russia uses without actively going to war

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 1>with the nation. But it's this combination of using the

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>social networks, using propaganda, troops that are not marked in

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>their uniforms, special forces, seizing points, supporting the rebels in

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 1>southeastern Ukraine, building bridges that block ships. All of that

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>is part of what I would call hybrid warfare. Putin

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>plays that very well, and it's a dangerous game. Admiral.

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to shift gears a little bit to the

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>southern border. Here in the northern hemisphere. The US has

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:36.680
<v Speaker 1>had an increasingly tense relationship with Mexico over immigration. President

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump threatening to close all ports of entry from Mexico.

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Incidented states as a result of illegal immigration. Can I

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 1>just get your sense of how feasible that would be

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and what's been going on down there in the southern border. Well,

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 1>first of all, we could, certainly, we the United States

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 1>could certainly build a quote big beautiful wall, and Lisa,

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it could stretch for eighteen hundred miles, it could be

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty five ft high. Um. It would cost billions and

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.199
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars. But here's a news flash, and I

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>know this is true because I'm an admiral. Right to

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:13.719
<v Speaker 1>the left of the wall is an ocean. People are

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>going to find ways to get here. So do we

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>need to control our border? Absolutely? What we need is

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a smart wall, if you will, That is a big

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 1>physical structure in some places, is unmanned vehicles patrolling in

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>other places. We need to plus up the border patrol

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:33.199
<v Speaker 1>and give them the resources to do their job on

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>the border. We ought to get our troops off the border.

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>That's not their job. That could lead to dangerous confrontation.

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>And so we need to control the southern border, certainly,

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>but we need to do it in a more constructive fashion,

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and above all, to conclude, we need to do it

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>in cooperation with Mexico not in an antagonistic relationship. Threats

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of simply closing the border are untenable and would hurt

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>both nations. Adams Stevita's in your most recent books see Power,

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>The History and Geopolitics of the World's Oceans. You underscore

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 1>what you just described. But is Mexico and the migrants,

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>or the asylum seekers or the people on the border,

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>is that really a security threat to the United States.

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>It is not, in the sense that they are not

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>invading the United States. There is a diminimous, a tiny

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>percentage of truly bad actors. Most of these people are

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>economic refugees. They have a legitimate case, both economically and

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>because of violence in Central America, to plead their case

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:42.199
<v Speaker 1>for asylum. We can either grant it or not, but

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 1>we are to respect that process. I do like the

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>idea of working with Mexico to do this on Mexican soil, culturally, linguistically, geographically,

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. I hope we can cut that deal.

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>But as I said before, Pim, what we need is

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:03.920
<v Speaker 1>a coopera relationship with Mexico to deal jointly with this challenge.

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Admiral just ten seconds. I'm curious do you think that

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:10.400
<v Speaker 1>we have a greater degree of geopolitical risk today than

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a year ago or a lower one. It is higher

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>because of the things we've discussed, but principally because of

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>ongoing confrontation between the United States and China economically and

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the South China Sea. We are steaming into dangerous waters.

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 1>As we would say in the Navy, it's going to

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>require international cooperation to solve these problems. Admiral, we so

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>appreciate your time. Thank you so much for being with US.

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Admiral James Stavridi's columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, retired US Navy

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 1>admiral and former military commando of NATO. Always wonderful to

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 1>get his thoughts. This is Bloomberg Markets with Pim Fox

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and Lisa Abramowitz on Bloomberg Radio. We are broadcasting live

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 1>from the Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studios. A lot of people

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:59.199
<v Speaker 1>are sitting around and thinking what we hold well. If

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 1>you listen to Emily Rowland, perhaps you might be getting

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>a little concerned. Perhaps Emily Rowland, head of Capital markets

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 1>research for John Hancock Investments based in Boston, bejoining us

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>here in our eleven three studios. I was reading the

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>outlook for that you put together. You said you see

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a market peak after the yield curve inverts, and advised

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>against taking on too much risk and perhaps even advised

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 1>shedding some Please explain, well, I can see you read

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>all the way to the end of the outlook there.

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>The first part of it actually states that we are

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 1>still positive on risk assets. We do still think that

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 1>there's room left to go in this cycle. The yield

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>curve hasn't inverted yet. The leading economic indicators are still

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>coming in in positive territory. But to us, the time

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to repair the roof is when the sun is shining

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>right looking ahead into You know, we're going into a

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 1>very very different macro regime here right. The Fed is

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>continuing down this path of rate normalization, quantitative tightening is

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.199
<v Speaker 1>going to increase meaningfully. We shed four hundred billion dollars

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>from the balance sheet this year. That goes to six

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:11.199
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion next year. That's a very different environment for

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>investors who are used to plentiful liquidity, used to low rates.

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>The Fed buying up fixed income, and we think that

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that should lead us to a point where potentially we

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 1>do see a yield curban version and then potentially a

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>market peak down the road. Not there yet, but again

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:29.360
<v Speaker 1>preparing to become more defensive. Is the world over leveraged?

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a great question, and I think that's certainly a

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 1>concern as we head into into and it's a it's

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a risk that we're watching, um, you know, and I

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>think as credit conditions tighten, as liquidity as withdrawn from

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the system, you know, you could see that put real

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>pressure on markets globally. Do you think that emerging markets

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to haven right now? That's an interesting question too. And

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>we've seen you know, a bid for emerging markets over

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the last few weeks here. We were down more than

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty at one point this year through October, and we're

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:04.159
<v Speaker 1>starting to sort of carve out a bit of a

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:07.239
<v Speaker 1>bottom here, you know, I think investors are pricing in

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a somewhat you know, better resolution to trade and terroriffs.

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:13.159
<v Speaker 1>We'll have to see what happens after the G twenty

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>meeting this weekend, you know, But for us, we're not

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 1>ready to go to really go in uh to emerging

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>markets yet until we see some of the fundamentals start

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to turn around. So we look at things like earnings

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>estimates where you're really continuing to move sideways and emerging

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>market equities, we're gonna need to see that really come

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>back in order to go more positive there. So we're

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>neutral on them right now. What are you finding when

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 1>you look at investment behavior, because they've certainly voted with

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:43.919
<v Speaker 1>their money when it comes to technology stocks, is it

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 1>likely that investors will put their money into cash? Well,

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've really seen that happen, and looking back

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>on it's been the year of cash and the year

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>of ultrashore bonds. Who would have thought that would have

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>happened in right, And as we look at investors really

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 1>piling into cash and ultra sharp short bond funds, we

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>think that that actually might reverse a bit as we

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:11.360
<v Speaker 1>head into twenty nineteen. If you look at the way

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 1>that investment grade corporates have performed this year, if you

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>look at the way the bar cap AGG has performed

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:22.360
<v Speaker 1>this year, it's actually been almost like investment grade corporates

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>have really been beaten down. The eggs down one and

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a half two percent when you look back at thirteen.

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>When you look back at two thousand eight, when fixed

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>income was really under pressure broadly, the following years were

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:37.959
<v Speaker 1>actually quite good for fixed income. So it sounds like

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>rotation into investment grade is something that you foresee in

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the future because it's gotten pretty beaten up. What are

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you looking for? What sort of the trigger that will

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>make you reassess and start shutting risk more meaningfully. Yeah,

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>so I think what we'll be looking for first, of course,

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>is a yield curb and version. We're right around twenty

0:25:56.760 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>two tons. You're looking at two tens. Looking at two tens. Um,

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll be looking for, you know, economic indicators to really

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 1>start to roll over meaningfully. They're still coming in positive

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>things like consumer confidence, things like jobless claims, you know,

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>very low levels here. That data is all still very good.

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>But of course markets are you know, forward looking, right,

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>so you know we're looking for for a you know,

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a catalyst. Um, we need those things to play out. Um.

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 1>We also need to see what happens with earnings. Right

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 1>looking on the equity side, you know earnings of course,

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>peak earnings are behind us, but that doesn't mean that

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>earnings growth broadly is behind us. If we start to

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>see earnings estimates and earnings revisions start to roll over,

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be another indication for us that it's

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:43.880
<v Speaker 1>time to get more defensive. Again, we're not there yet.

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Just give you about thirty seconds. Do you foresee a

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:49.919
<v Speaker 1>time when credit rating agencies are going to have to

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>issue revisions to their analysis of investment grade companies? Yeah,

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's certainly a lot of talk about investment

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 1>aid corporates and the risks and the triple be market. Um,

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, we will keep an eye on that. But

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>at this point, again, investment grade corporates have been treated

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 1>like it's a or even two thousand eight type environment,

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:15.199
<v Speaker 1>and we think that there could be an opportunity for

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>them to you know, come back catch a bit a bit.

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, our managers are continuing to allocate uh portions

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>of their portfolio there, and we're comfortable owning some investment

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>grade corporates heading into the next year. Thanks very much

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>for being with us, very enlightening. Emily Rowland is the

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>head of Capital markets research for John Hancock Investments, based

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>in Boston, but joining us here in our Bloomberg Interactive

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>broker's studios. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 1>L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews at

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer I'm

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 1>pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast. You

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide on bloom A Radio m