WEBVTT - Investing In The Cannabis Market 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Let's talk right now

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>about what's going on in the world of cannabis. Alex

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Pasternak joins us. He's the executive vice president of BINSK

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and he can talk to us about um, the market

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and the future. It's it's interesting out because I was

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>just in New York City for a few weeks and

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I started to see these cannabis stores popping up. They

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:47.200
<v Speaker 1>weren't selling real weed yet. It was like Delta eight

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 1>th HC, which I guess is kind of a knockoff,

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>slightly legal version of legit th HC. But it'll come.

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder how you expect this market to develop?

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Is it going to be like the liquor market developed? Hey,

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>how you doing? Thanks for first and foremost thanks for

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>having me today. UM, I would say that the liquor

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>market is going to be uh, you know, a little

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>bit of provides a little bit of insight for us

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of as legalization continues to roll out and

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>how they do it. You'll see differences in terms of

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the distribution models in particular in some states that that are,

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, share some of the characteristics that you see

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>on the liquor side. But altogether, no, I think cannabis

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to prove to continue to be its own, um,

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 1>its own product category that takes a few few things

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>in particular from the liquor segment, but no, on its own,

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be completely different. To be ho.

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the liquor market has been legal for so long, um,

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess the cannabis. Cannabis was legal for a long

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>time before anyone figured out what it really was. But

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>it's been uh, fairly well demonized in the US. How

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you go about now in this kind of quasi legal

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>state sourcing and selling weed? Is it? Are you looking

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>over your shoulder all the time depending on which state

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you're in? Great question? No, Actually, we were able to

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>sleep pretty well at night over here. Everything we do

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>is fully legal. We only operate in legal territories. So

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>even though it's federally still illegal. Um. As you all know,

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>it was deemed an essential business during the pandemics. So

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the the idea of having concerns at this point, UM,

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>are are long gone. And it's proven by the fact

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that you see more and more investors entering the space

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>on a daily basis. So the risk factor is almost

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>fully mitigated at this point. And no, we are only

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>operating in legal territories. On the liquor comparison, as you

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>compare it to there, there are some things to look at.

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>For example, I could go into a liquor store today

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and buy fifty handles of vodka and in six kegs

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and no one says a word to me. But in

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>most legal territories, I can only buy a edibles or

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 1>announcer to a flower. So there's major compliance and regulatory

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>issues that we're still battling through here. Alex, you mentioned

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the federal legislation, your federal approval. Give us a sense

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of where you think that is and how that may fall. Yeah,

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>great question. Um. Look, I'm a big numbers guy, engineering

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.359
<v Speaker 1>background geek out on data and science in particular, there's

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>nineteen recreational states in thirty six medical nineteen and thirty six.

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't take an engineer to understand that there's really

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>no turning back at this point. Full legalization is imminent

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>at the federal level. Look at the latest proposals by

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the Schumer Bill and progress on the Stafe Act and

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>in Congress. I mean, there's just too much money on

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the table for the private and public sectors, particularly the government.

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Putting aside the money, there's two other major factors that

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to address. Number one, the opioid crisis and

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>number two the criminal justice system. Last year alone, we

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>lost about a hundreds thousand people to an overdo us

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>on opioids or another synthetic drug. The legalization of cannabis

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>can immediately help this horrible, horrible opioid epidemic. Lastly, the

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>war on drugs needs to end with sensible criminal justice reform.

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>We need to address the fact the imprisonment of more

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>than forty thousand Americans incarcerated still for activities that are

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>now legal in a significant portion of the country. Well,

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what kind of people do you have to

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>deal with then? I mean, when I was a kid,

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>we drive down to Athens County in Ohio, or at

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the Humble County in California, and there was a pretty

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:39.919
<v Speaker 1>shady group of grow ops. Um in those places, you

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>did not want to tread on someone else's farm. Has

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that changed significantly? You know, there is a ton of

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:51.919
<v Speaker 1>black market still going on today. They're estimating in California

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>alone that the black market is somewhere between two to

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>five the legal market. That range of two to five

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>is just so mad, considering the legal market in California

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is tracking to be four billion. So you really just

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>have endless black market cultivators and endless black market producers

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>at this point. Um, what's going on back there of

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>theft and stealing from farms and security is uh, it's

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 1>definitely a slippery slope. And again we're pretty grateful that

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:24.479
<v Speaker 1>we are nowhere near what's going on in some of

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>those parts of the country. In particular, what about the

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>quality and the strength alex of the of the weed

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that you guys are getting today, I mean, it has

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>steadily increased to a point where, um, you've got to

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>be careful if you want to smoke a joint, especially

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>if you're an older person. Is that going to be

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>easier to measure and easier to decipher? Yeah, So think

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>about like alcohol again to compare as you get as

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>we grow older, you go into some of these superstores,

0:05:56.480 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>these mega stores, in the product variety just ranges from

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 1>from lower and lower quality and two dollar bottles of

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>wines that select stores to thousands and thousands of bottles

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of wines in some stores. So I think the same

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:12.359
<v Speaker 1>thing is gonna happen with cannabis. Over time, We're gonna see, uh,

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna see products going again a little bit towards

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the race to the bottom on on the value products,

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and then we're gonna have continuously higher and higher end

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>products what you see on the what the first part

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 1>of your question what's happening right now is one of

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the only data points associated to cannabis is the THC

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>percentage that's the consumer sees when you go by cannabis

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>or flower as we call it in the industry. There's

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>a numerical value associated to that test that strain from

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:44.599
<v Speaker 1>that batch. They usually range between let's say fifteen and thirty.

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>But if you watch what happens in a given dispensary

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>on a given day, these these uh, these people come

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 1>in these a construction worker after work or um a

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:58.600
<v Speaker 1>an electrician after work and they have a twenty dollar

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>bill in their hand, and they say, how far can

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 1>I take this twenty dollar bill? What is the highest

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>high I can get from this twenty in in comparison

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>again to alcohol, what's happening is ever Clear is being

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>valued at a higher quality product. And let's say a

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>blue label. Just because ever Clear has a higher alcohol content,

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.119
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean it's a better product than blue label.

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>And unfortunately in the cannabis market, it's just not as

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>educated and it's not as sophisticated yet, and so the

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>blue label is literally selling for less money than the

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>ever Clear. And that's part of what I'm trying to

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>do every day is help educate and help everyone understands all.

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Alex Pastron act there from Bens, Thanks very much. This

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Now. We got earnings out today UM from

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a number of retailers, and we're going to continue to

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>get them out over the next couple of sessions from

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>more Walmart UM coming out this morning, and UM giving

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a beat in term of its UM in terms of

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>its previous earnings and and raising its UM outlook in

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of its forward earnings. And then we at home Depot,

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.679
<v Speaker 1>which disappointed. How to bring Katie Thomas, she is leading

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the Kearney Consumer Institute out of Pittsburgh to talk about

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>retail because it's going to be such a huge theme

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>this week. Katie, First off, what's your reaction to what

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>we saw already? You know, honestly, I would say I'm

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>not that surprise that Walmart and some of the big

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>box retailers that really stand to benefit from some of

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the trends we've been seeing with consumers, so they're set

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>up to benefit in all the right ways. And to two,

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>we were seeing them return to stores. The store is

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>king as much as we hear about convenience. When we

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>talked to consumers where do you prefer to shop, especially

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>for groceries, they still still tell us they love this store.

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>And on top of that, in general getting as much

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>done in one trip as possible, it's still you know,

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>relatively attractive to consumers. They're not doing as many of

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>those quick runs to local grocery store is but instead

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>really focusing on the big box how much can I

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>get in one trip? Um the it's competitive pricing, giving

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the inflationary concerns and so a lot of

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>positive tail wins for Walmart that I'm not surprised you

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>saw flow through in those comp uh store sales. So, uh, Katie,

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:23.199
<v Speaker 1>the omni channel strategy where I can maybe order online

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>pick up at the store, that seems to maybe have

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>been a pretty good strategy for retail. Is that something

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that can boost this industry going forward. Absolutely, So when

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>we talk to consumers, they really love that as an

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>additional option because it's really that perfect hybrid approach. So

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you're still physically going to the store you forgot something

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you can run in, but especially at the store the

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>size of a big box retailer, whether it's Walmart and

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Target or Best Buy, you don't have to wander through

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the whole store either. So it's really like those those

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 1>different options, the optionality that we didn't have before that

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>consumer really are excited to take advantage of, and I

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>think you'll continue to see it not just in those

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>types of swords, but as we're seeing it with small

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>retailers and just across the industry in general. What happened

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:16.719
<v Speaker 1>at um Home Depot there their sales forecast is kind

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of hinting at a slow down in the boom that

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>we had seen is that just to be expected. I think, yeah,

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of people we've made the investments

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 1>we were going to make in our house. Um, and

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:32.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, Walmart really stands to benefit from that everyday consumption,

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 1>whereas the delta variant is driving just enough concern in

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the eyes of consumers. Now where what we really thought

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>over the pandemic is people held off on buying things

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:44.559
<v Speaker 1>until they really felt like they wanted it or needed it.

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>And so with some of those home improvement I think

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, pressing pause for right now. You're not

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>going to see the impact of the child tax credit

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 1>flow through to home improvement as much either. So it's

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 1>just kind of a combination of factors that I think

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>is having home depots often a little bit Katie, one

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:04.199
<v Speaker 1>of the themes of retail in America over the last

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>decade or so is there's just too many stores were

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>overstored here. Um, where are we in terms of that metric?

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>You think we still need to reduce the footprint of

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the stores across the U S Well, it's an interesting question.

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I think you're seeing a lot of you know, uh

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 1>press around that, a lot of shift to online businesses,

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>all of that but the challenge there is direct to

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>consumer businesses that are online only really have a challenge

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 1>with eyeballs and footprints. So you know, in fact, you're

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>seeing some of these big box retailers make those strategic

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>partnerships target with Alta Coals, with the Flora and with

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:46.439
<v Speaker 1>the DNC smaller brand. So it's hard to say consumers

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>really like to get out there and shop. Um. I

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's really what we called at the beginning of

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the Pennant pandemic, what you saw was the death of

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the middle So it's really some of those middle of

0:11:56.480 --> 0:12:00.199
<v Speaker 1>the road retailers that lost their value to consumers. Then,

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, consumers do have so many options nowadays, you're

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>just not ultimately going to be successful unless you have

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a real value offering in differentiation. Does the Delta virus

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Does at Delta Delta variant of the virus offer any

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>severe headwinds? I don't think so no. If anything, I'm

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm more concerned about some of the ships we're going

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 1>to see in the labor market to flow through of

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain. Right now, you're seeing a little bit

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of an uptick in avoidance of stores, But ultimately, consumers

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>have money to spend, and they do want to spend it,

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>it's just gonna be a little bit of bumpy um

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of spending when they know they'll need it.

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I think to slow down in the return to work

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>is slowing that down a little bit again. Even apparel,

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>non back to school apparel, apparel for adults is slowing

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>down a little bit in the retail numbers today. And

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:48.679
<v Speaker 1>that's just I'm going to hold off and see how

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 1>things play out. Katie, real quickly thirty seconds, talk to

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>us about the supply chain. Is stuff gonna be on

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the shelves back to schooling holidays. There are a certain

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>categories where there are some challenge and it's definitely on

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>consumer's radar. We're hearing from them directly, I should buy

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>student then later. But at the same time, it's it's

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>coming through in pocket. So it's really hard to say

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>exactly what that's gonna look like. And I think some

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:15.319
<v Speaker 1>of these bigger retailers are actually the most protected because

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>they have so much strength in the market. So if anything, unfortunately,

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be some of the smaller retailers that

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.319
<v Speaker 1>I think are going to feel more of the impact. Katie,

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you, so much. We really appreciate it getting your

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>thoughts here is we're in the midst of these retail

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>or earnings Katie Thomas, she's a lead at the Currently

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Consumer Institute based in Pittsburgh, PA. And again, you know,

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I think what a lot of investors are are focusing

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>on this quarter as the retailer's report is kind of

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:43.959
<v Speaker 1>how is the consumer doing? Is the delta variant causing,

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 1>as Matt suggests, perhaps some headwinds for some consumers and

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>consumers spending, and so that goes to not only the

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>results that they report, but maybe more importantly to the

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>guidance they provide. So some good numbers out of Walmart

0:13:56.360 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly a good indicator of the consumer. There gotta sell

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>off in this market. As Greg was just reporting, what

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>really jumps out of me is the Russell Uh. It

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>is off one point five percent. So the small caps

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>are really underperforming. UH. And it's a good time to

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>speak to our next guest, Brian Small, principal portfolio manager

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>at hood River Capital Management. UH. They are located in

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Florida like everybody else these days and money management business. Brian,

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. Give us your

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>thoughts based upon your experience of kind of where you

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>envisioned small cap stocks here again under performing today, but

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>in the reopening, a lot of people like the small cappers. Yeah,

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>we're constructive from here the markets. The biggest concern I

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>think is the impact on the delta variant on the economy,

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>consumer behavior, business behavior. And we're constructive as we look

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>out too small caps that significantly lab lag this year

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>there about flat versus the FMP up. So it's been

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of multiple compression in these names. And I

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>think as as we kind of go through the peaking

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>phase here of the delta varian, people get their booster shots,

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>case decline and people come to grips that earnings need

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to go up next sharing earnings estimates than we think

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>small caps will tend to outperform. But we're constructive on

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the market in general. So small camps is a big universe.

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Is there are there specific places that you like best?

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>So at Hood River were bombs of stock pickers. So

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>we like to see inefficiencies and stocks that that we're buying.

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>We aren't really making industry top down calls bottom bombs.

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>That basis right now where overweight consumers, loutical financial and

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>industrial stocks in general, those valuations are better. They're tied

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>to more of reopening in the economy, and I think

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>ear introvisions are gonna be good and valuations are attractive,

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'd love to get your thoughts. I'm a former

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>sell side equity research channels, and I know what I've

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>been hearing a lot over the last you know, decade

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in particular sense of financial crisis, is that the equity

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>research from Wall Street on small and mid cap stocks

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>is as really declined in terms of how many names

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>are in fact covered. How does that impact your job

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>on the bi side as you think about, you know,

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>doing research analysis on the names of you guys invest in. Yeah,

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a great question. So, as you mentioned, there's been

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a big dislocation on the cell side covering our stocks,

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>which has made those stocks a lot more inefficient. So

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>it's made our job easier, which is why it's been

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>easier in general for active management to our perform in

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>particular product. We see that as being the case going forward.

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of reasons why why that's the case.

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Commissions have been tougher to come by in general, Compensation

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>for sething Elysis dropped significantly, and so it's just given

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>us more of an opportunity to find stocks where the

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>earnings estimates are inaccurate. Looking out well eighteen twenty four months,

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>so you're looking at Western Alliance, Chart Industries, Coulica, and Cepha,

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:11.719
<v Speaker 1>what what what do you like specifically? Are those are

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 1>some of the names that we like. We like Western Alliance.

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a regional bank that trades it around twelve times earnings.

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 1>The street has about nine dollars and worty cents for

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>next year. We think that's really low as they continue

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to grow loans and the north of twelve range. Uh.

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>We like Chart Industries, as you mentioned, it's an infrastructure

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>provider for all sorts of chemicals and gases. And what's

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 1>growing the fastest there is hydrogen and there's big demand

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>for green hydrogen. Is is the economy more moves to

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>more sustainable energy and it's relatively inexpensive, especially in comparison

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to other hydrogen plays like plug power and Coolic and

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Sofa is a semiconductor capital equipment company. Specifically, they make

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>wire bonding equipment and that that's as you've seen the

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>news all over the place, there's been a big shortage

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>there they had great earnings, uh, and they guided to

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a little north of two dollars per share next quarter,

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and the street was at a dollar. So obviously that

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>stock has been acting well and it's still cheap around

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>twelve times earnings there as well. Broadly speaking, when you

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>look at the small cap universe, is give us a

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>sense of kind of where we are in terms of

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:29.199
<v Speaker 1>historical valuations because ones a lot of fun managers will

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:31.199
<v Speaker 1>come on here and say, boy, it's a twenty times

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>forward earnings. That's yes, that's high, but interest rates are

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>so low, so you know, it's not that big an issue.

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about evaluations in small cap land? Yeah, so,

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned earlier, relatives multiples have compressed significantly. So

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>what I tend to look at is the the earnings,

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the positive earnings companies in the index, and what the

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>valuation is there versus the benchmark. And right now that's

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 1>at parody with the some ps about twenty times next

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>year's earnings. And there's always this large swath of non

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 1>earnings companies like biotech, and it's a little bit harder

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.479
<v Speaker 1>to take a swag at that, but we usually are

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>underweight that area. So that's one of the reasons why

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I like small cap is that when you look at

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 1>the relative valuation versus the SMP and the higher growth

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and the higher concentration of domestic focus here in the US,

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 1>I think it can outperform. What's your screening technique? What

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>do you do uh to start looking at these companies

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 1>bottoms up? So most of it is just organically talking

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to a ton of companies. We talked around for Warner.

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Companies popetrated every single quarter. So really it's just putting

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>together mosaic in terms of how the business is doing

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.159
<v Speaker 1>and comparing that versus where the streets doing. And obviously

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>those are businesses that we want to be a part

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of long term. We're looking for companies that are growing

0:19:55.720 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>north of that have leading market share the in an

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>industry that's growing, and most importantly, have a management team

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that's going to deliver. We do have some screens that

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 1>look at the fundamental data and the odds of them

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>exceeding analy assessments over the next twelve and twenty four months.

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>That's but that's really more to stop gap. Again, it

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 1>just comes down to just having a lot of conversations

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.399
<v Speaker 1>and talk to a ton of people. Brian, thanks so

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:24.360
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Brian Smallock, there is the principal

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and portfolio manager at hood River Capital Management, coming to

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>us out of Florida. Of course, he's a long career

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>in banking. Started it, Sally, this is Bloomberg. Now let's

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 1>get back to r T oh. We haven't talked about

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>returning to the workplace over the past couple of sessions. Here,

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>let's bring in Shawn Lyons, Global Chief executive Officer at

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>r G A Sean are we are we looking at

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a future where it basically goes back to the past.

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to all eventually go back to our offices,

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 1>get back on plane, start our long commutes and just

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 1>forget about the hybrid work that we did over the

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years. Well, hi, Paul, I thank you

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 1>for having me on. I hope not. I really hope not.

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I think there's too much binary thinking right now in

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of back to office all remote. I think there's

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 1>a real benefit of of how we've all worked in

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the past year and a half. I think the tremendous

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>benefit to the technology we've we've used, the diversity of

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 1>talent we've been able to pull into the company. So

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm we're we're all in on hybrid and I'm all

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 1>in on the actual long term benefits of a hybrid model,

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>which I think, you know, while maybe require a lot

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 1>of thought and and burden on management to manage, I

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>think the benefits and the long term we're just gonna

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>be tremendous. So we're fully embracing it. Yeah, it's interesting

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 1>here in New York City, and obviously Bloomberg we focus

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot on the big financial institutions. Uh, they were talking,

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:56.399
<v Speaker 1>some of them were talking a big game about getting

0:21:56.440 --> 0:22:00.160
<v Speaker 1>people back in full time all the time, and they

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>since push back some of those dates. What are you

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing at there from some of the leading companies about

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:10.639
<v Speaker 1>how they're thinking about their back to work. Yeah, I

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>mean I think we I think generally there's a like

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.159
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, there's some short term thinking happening right now.

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>There's there's some fear involved in this, which is, how

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>do I make sure I can monitor the proctivity of

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:23.679
<v Speaker 1>my employees, how do I make sure that everybody can

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>work together and build team chemistry, because we know how

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that works in an office environment, It's it's a little

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 1>bit more unknown when you think about it from from

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 1>a hybrid of remote environment, but we actually like to

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>think about it as like, well, how do we look

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 1>at this creatively, where's the opportunities in here where we

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.919
<v Speaker 1>can actually attract more talent in more places. Where in

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:43.679
<v Speaker 1>some of the biggest cities in the world, with fifteen locations,

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>some of them are quite expensive to live in, we

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>now have an opportunity to hire from more broadly, So

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at that as an opportunity, I think. But

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I do think some of this is just based on

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the concern and fear that leadership has on making sure

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:58.159
<v Speaker 1>they can keep everything going, make the machine work, and

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>make sure people are engaged at work every day. I'm

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 1>not really that that that concerned with that. I think

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that people are happier when they have a choice, and

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 1>I think having a physical environment that they can go

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to and work in, because that's important. I'm also having

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to work remotely at home or somewhere else

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:16.360
<v Speaker 1>is equally beneficial, So we fund it as a tremendous

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>advantage for us. You have, over your twenty year or

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:23.640
<v Speaker 1>so career, worked with at r g A and havas

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>huge clients. Ibm um her she's Nike Liberty, Liberty, Liberty. Um.

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 1>Where do you see the biggest success stories in terms

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 1>of current workforce model? You know, I haven't actually looked

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>at different models to try to follow. I've actually looked

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 1>at what we need to do, and I've done that

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>deliberately because I think this is so new. It's still

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 1>new in terms of where we can actually learn from

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the last year and a half has been remote work.

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Only nobody would design it that way along, but you

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>really need to do need to think about how you

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>can do the great physical environment where you bring people

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>together and also then kind of combine that with it

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 1>with great digital tools so people can collaborate and work

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>remotely together. UM. But we found is that our relationships

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is our clients in many ways have gotten better when

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.400
<v Speaker 1>we've worked in this way. There's more frequent communications, there's

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>less burden on that one trip you need to take

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:19.199
<v Speaker 1>for a two hour meeting, which everybody understands doesn't make

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 1>sense anymore. So this Harvard work model remote work is

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 1>actually I think improves client relationships. They've been quite flexible.

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>We're actually going to monitor what each of our clients

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>is doing as we go along to make sure, we

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 1>understand how they're they're gonna roll out their plans, but

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I think for us it will be an advantage for us,

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>but also for them because they're gonna get to work

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>with a kind of broader and more diverse team. And

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>sometimes that means, you know, time shifting, where we have

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 1>teams working in the US for setting number of hours

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and we can shift the work over to Asia Pacific

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:49.159
<v Speaker 1>to continue that work. So that there's benefits to to

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:51.239
<v Speaker 1>uh to the model that we're hopefully going to bring

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:54.439
<v Speaker 1>to our clients. Sean just thirty seconds. Um, what do

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:58.880
<v Speaker 1>you think is the ideal model? Well, I look at

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>e commerce as a example here, right, so everybody has

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 1>been used to being in the office for what sixty

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 1>seventy years, just the same kind of method of work

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>where everybody shows up nine to five. I really think

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the sweeping changes that happened in

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.479
<v Speaker 1>digital commerce over the past twenty years, how it forced

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>evolution in retail. So the retail was hit by that,

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.159
<v Speaker 1>we know that, but it also forced companies to think

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 1>about what their retail environment spaces was about, not just

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>about shopping should be an experience. So I do believe

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>this is going to require innovation within the physical workspace

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that's going to benefit everybody, and that's what I see

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>is the biggest change. Hey, Sean, thanks so much for

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Really appreciate getting your thoughts in perspective. You're

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:37.120
<v Speaker 1>on a really key topic for corporate America. Sawn Lines,

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Global chief executive Officer for r g A. Thanks for

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:44.239
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:48.360
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Miller V three and on ball Sweeney I'm on Twitter

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch

0:25:58.040 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio