WEBVTT - FFW Week 16 (Fantasy Championships)

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly on the Fan, presented

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>by green Belt Premium and Devanny's, your weekly source for

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the nation's best fantasy football speculation and advice. Fantasy Football

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Weekly is brought to you by fanball dot Com, town

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Hall Family, Breeder, Twin Cities, Honda Dealers, Shoe Sensors, Hudson

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Ford and by Park Tavern now Wow, along with fanball

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, Scott Fish, Matt Harrison, and Brian Johnson. Here's

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the fans. Paul Charchi in welcome you a championship edition

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>of Fantasy Football Weekly. If you are listening now, it

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>means you are two of ten, or two of twelve,

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>or two of fourteen or two of twenty people left

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>in your league. Congratulate you think there's nobody listening that

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>is out, No, because you because you're better, and you

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:07.479
<v Speaker 1>give up although you could play daily fantish or you're

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>playing fall that works. Yes, maybe they're just last two weeks,

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks. Don't Are we doing the auction game

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>into the playoffs? I believe so, I think A right,

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't. Yeah, I hope so. Uh, you want to

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>get the auction game in while you can, though it

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>runs through the NFL season, So you want to do that? Uh.

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 1>My co host today Brian Johnson, Scott Fish, Good morning, morning,

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Merry Christmas. Let's put a bow on this baby. Yeah,

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>let's unwrap some championship gifts. So let's unwrap some hardware

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:39.759
<v Speaker 1>for our listeners Championship week. You know who won't be, uh,

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>who won't be helping out our fantasy owners, Todd Gurley.

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>It's he might, but he might not, and you're not

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna know. And here's the the really bad part with

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Gurley is it's a late game start, late afternoon starts.

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>So now the problem is for to put this in

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Central time uh time zone, You're gonna have to make

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>decisions by twelve o'clock noon, not knowing in all probability

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>if Todd Gurley is going to play against the worst

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>run defense in the NFL. And that magnet that that

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:16.239
<v Speaker 1>all gets magnified by the fact that there's not a

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of clarity behind Todd Gurley where the team has

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>been I think trying to mask their true plans for

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>what they what they want to do if Todd Gurley

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 1>can't go. So let's start the show, and we've got

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:29.799
<v Speaker 1>sixteen matchups to do it. There's no Thursday game. We

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>gotta get through every matchup. We gotta take calls, Ben, Chris, Matt, Tommy,

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Ellie and Greg. We already have got full phone money.

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 1>We have a lot to get to. But let's talk

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>about Girly because this is so important to so many people.

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I believe if you have another viable starter in the

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>noon games, you can't start Girly obviously. If you've got

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a viable start in a later game, then you can

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>wait and find out if Gurley's in or not. And

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>if you do, put Girley in your flex, not in

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:58.839
<v Speaker 1>your running backs. Yeah, very great, it's a great point.

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Put him in your flex. You could x in a

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver if you needed to, So don't be a

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>end warm. Yes, even if doesn't play, he's probably better

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>than most head ends here. Well that is that that

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>might be true. The tight end landscape is so bad.

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>So you guys with me that, given what we know

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>right now Saturday morning, and I don't think we're gonna

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>know anymore because I think they're playing coy, you can't

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>start Todd Todd Gurley based on on on what it

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>looks like right now. If you have another quasi startable

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>player like somebody and maybe my top thirty of my

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.519
<v Speaker 1>rankings on fanball. You with me on this, absolutely, okay,

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, so let's play it one step deeper. Now

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you are a John Kelly owner and you've got to

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>make a decision. You've got to make another similar decision.

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you try John Kelly? Now? I think this is

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a far more difficult decision. Here's why.

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Even if Gurley goes, Kelly's still going to have a role.

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Eight different back up runners had Fantasy significant games backups

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>against the Cardinals because they're so bad against the run.

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Kelly has a degree of safety that you don't have

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>with Todd Gurley. What do you guys do about John Kelly. Well,

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get into this matchup later, of course. But

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>c J. Anderson is a thing now, and they say

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>they want to give him a look, get him up

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to speed on the plays one of the playoffs. I

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but I think Kelly, you can start with confidence,

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>at least at the flexi level. John Kelly got every

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>first team snap this week pretty much. Yes, so c J.

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Anderson has been on the team for five days, Illuzzes

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>on Kelly, you know, two different teams this year on

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>his third team. Who does when the past It's one

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:47.799
<v Speaker 1>thing to teach him a handful of plays for running.

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>He can't be on the field on passing plays very

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>much at all, even though he's a decent pass blocker.

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>He can't know all the You can't know all the assignments.

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>You can't know all the blitz pickups when you've been

0:04:57.400 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 1>on the team for four days. That stuff is out.

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I am not listening to the c J. Anderson steam. Yeah,

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm only on Kelly. I'm not going to argue that

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>at all. All right, good, let's move on to the

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>matchups because we have so much to get to. We

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 1>begin with Cincinnati taking on the Cleveland Brown Scott It's

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mixon has been fantastic, but I don't and but

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Boyd is out, and I'm worried that the whole

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>defensive game plan for Cleveland, who just shut down Philip

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>lindsay it's going to be to stop Joe Mixon and

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>win the game. That that could be true. I mean,

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>this is a game where both Mixing and Chubb had

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a hunt and twenty plus total yards each then the

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>last time they played, which is pretty rare for both

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>running backs to have great games. But honestly, I don't

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>like anything in the passing game here. I just don't

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>with boyd out Ross is your little dart throw thing.

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't even think he can get it done. Uh Uzoma.

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>He had thirteen targets against the Browns a few weeks ago,

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and the Browns ever allowed double digit fantasy days to

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Jared Coke, O j Howard, Travis Kelsey, Austin Hooper, Jordan

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Thomas into a bunch of players. So I gave it

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 1>Uzoma just like a kind of a C grade. I

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.919
<v Speaker 1>don't even like it. But in the tonight end landscape nowadays,

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>yeah you might have to, and it's an okay matchup

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 1>for him, But I'm not starting Drisk, I'm not starting

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the wide receivers, and I know what you said about mixing.

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm still giving him an A grade here because he's

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 1>averaging over thirty touches a game over the last two

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and he's going to need that this week for them

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to have, so at that kind of volume, I'm giving

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>him an A grade. All four running backs with at

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>least twenty touches against the Browns hundred fifteen plus total

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>yards and three of those four were over a hundred

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty total yards. So I I still have an A

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>grade on mixing. I think I have in my top

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 1>six or seven running backs this week. I'm I'm more

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>nervous about mixing than you are. But we'll we'll find out.

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>And he's been great. Yeah, I'm curious where you haven't

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 1>ranked now, But let's let's go to the Browns while

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you okay uh on the brown outside. Mayfield gets his

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>second revenge game against Hugh Jackson. If you remember a

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago, he had two hundred and fifty yards

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and four touchdowns. Since then, his numbers have dropped a

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 1>little little in the Bengals held down Keenum and rivers

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and cars, so that expectations should be a little tempered,

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>but he does have multiple touchdowns in six of the

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>last eight. I gave kind of a week B grade

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>here to Baker Mayfield, but I don't love Landry or callaway.

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Landry is so boom or bust right now. He felt

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a hundred day up with a fifty plus day and

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>then a thirty seven yard game, and since who Hugh left.

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>He's been all over the map. Really, Uh. I have

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a bench grade on Landry, believe it or not, a

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>bench grade on Callaway as well. And I like Gallowey,

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>do you man, he's so inconsistent Goose Just two weeks

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>ago he had a Goose. That's he's he's he's a

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Callaway is a boom or bust, all or nothing guy.

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>And it feels like against Cincinnati, this could this could be.

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, he's fresh off a career high

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>five catch performance last week, right, so you know he's

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>trending short term, trending one game short term, that's right.

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I like him as I like him. It's a dark

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>dark and I like is what's this fan ball price?

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Callaway? Thank you? Maybe I just don't have the

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>cojones to drop him into my championship game line. His

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>price is uh, David and Joeku. I have a C

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>grade on because I think he's going to do better

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>than that, and every time I give him a higher grade,

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>he does nothing. So he had five or sixty three

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown last time against Cincinnati, and that if

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you remember that sweet crowd surfey and touchdown. He had

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>basically in that game. The Bengals of a lot of

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>five tight end touchdowns in the last eight weeks and

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>over sixty yards to tight ends in five of those

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 1>eight games. I actually like him better than to see,

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>but I'm given to see just because I think he'll

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>do better and I want to be scored in that

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>game too. And Nick Chubb, I want to say it's

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>just an obvious a but maybe he's not to some.

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>But hundred twenty eight and two touchdowns last time. Since

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:52.199
<v Speaker 1>Hyde left, he's averaging a hundred four total yards per game,

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and he scored eight touchdowns in those eight games. He's

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>just an every week start now, So a grade on Chubb.

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:00.199
<v Speaker 1>I love Nick Chubbs my number three running back this week.

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>That's three. We're talking on the earlier show. That's about

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>where I have him. He's gonna go off. He's sitting

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 1>on a monster game, Nick Child. Love him. This week

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta taking on Carolina. Carolina is gonna be with without

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>its starting quarterback. Tyler Heineke will be your starter. Yeah, yeah, Atlanta,

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with the Atlanta side of the matchup. Though,

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna breeze through this game win handily

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and I see a lot of points coming. You see

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>it the same way pretty much. Uh, We'll start with

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Tevin Coleman, with Judge Edo Smith on I R now

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Avonta Freeman not coming back, Coleman's in line for some

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>bell cow usage in this game, and then with Cam

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>on the shelf. This game script look looks like it's

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna heavily favor the running game for the Falcons. So

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>even though it's kind of a tough matchup on paper,

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Tevin Coleman's gotta get an a grade this week, especially

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 1>with all the injuries at running back. He's he's in

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>line for twenty touches minimum in this game, So I'm

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>giving Coleman an a coming off the big game. You

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>actually had a big game in the first meeting way

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>back in Week two, over a hundred yards on six

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 1>point seven yards per carry. Julio Jones listen as a

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>game time decision right now. A little nervous about that,

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:05.079
<v Speaker 1>but he's expected to play with ribbon hip injuries obvious

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>a there. If he's active, you're starting him forever. Reason

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:11.079
<v Speaker 1>he sits, that's the only reason. Calvin Ridley or Mohammed's

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Sanu become viable. But if Julio is active, they're both

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. Especially Ridley hasn't scored since mid October.

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Is a disappointment he's been after the crazy hot start.

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I really thought he was heading for like a bonkers

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 1>rookie year. I will say his snaps in those hot

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>star games like he was not playing very many snaps,

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>so it was a little bit flukey. I kind of

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>like Sannu against Captain Munderland in the slot. Manolin has

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>been bad. Yeah, the ceiling, he's got a safe floor,

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>but there's no no exciting ceiling with Sanu. But if

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:41.839
<v Speaker 1>you're desperate, I could see Sannu as a dart throw

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>take on type receiver. Definitely like him more than Ridley

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>in this game. Austin Hooper not liking him a whole lot.

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Served up a zero burger last week. Dropped a touchdown

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>which wasn't even a real target, was off a broken play.

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>He's dinged up the Panthers on but the season looks

0:10:58.080 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>soft against tight ends, but they hadn't conceded to tell

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't touchdown in five straight games and no tight end.

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I said forty yards during that span. The forty yard

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>mark Hooper did have five catches for fifty nine yards

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown in the first meeting, but I almost

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>would look else where. Odds are you're not contemplating starting Hooper,

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>but I'll give him a see if he suited up

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and teamed healthy. And then Matt Ryan just obviously last

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>week's top scoring quarterback, top five quarterback on the season,

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>You're starting him in this game. And I'm gonna cut

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to the chase with Carolina. The only player worth mentioning

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 1>now is Christian McCaffrey's nobody else. I'm not going d J.

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Moore of Chritis Samuel with heine Key and uh No,

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey. Caroline has packed it in, but he has

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>milestones to hit. I think his four team catches shot

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of the receiving record for running backs. He got snubbed

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>for the Pro Bowl to guys usually and it's the Falcons.

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>It's Christian McCaffrey against the Falcons scene that gives up

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 1>the most receptions to running backs and has for four

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>straight years. So let's just give him the old fantasy

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:58.959
<v Speaker 1>Fonzie at it. I love it. Uh Tonight's game Baltimore

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:02.199
<v Speaker 1>taking on the chart jurors on the Baltimore side, Lamar

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Jackson a fascinating matchup here. Now you already know that

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the rushing line basically reads like a running back averaging

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>seventeen carries for eighty six yards. He's Chris Carson playing

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>he is He's Chris Carson playing running back or playing quarterback,

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna need all of those rushing yards because

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna pass on the Chargers elite pass defense.

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles just put Patrick Mahomes and his passing abilities

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>on his worst performance of the year, and Lamar Jackson's

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>fractionally as good a patcher a passer as Patrick Mahomes.

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's all about the legs here. So what are

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you gonna get from Lamar Jackson's legs? Chargers having a

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of rushing touchdown in twenty games twenty that is

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of a few and so that is going

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to make things tough on Lamar Jackson. I've got him

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>as a B start because the rushing numbers give him

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a very safe floor, but I don't think he's got

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:57.959
<v Speaker 1>the explosive upside that you want from Lamar Jackson. I

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>want to see like a quarterback Jamal Charles, remember when

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>he had twenty rushing yards and a hundred fifty receiving.

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Honestly passing yards and rushing, we might get that. Gus

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Edwards gets a B grade here. Uh, you know, he

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>is somewhat touchdown dependent here, but I think there's a

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>good chance he does score. Charges have allowed eight rushing

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns to backs in their last five games. They've also

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>allowed almost five yards to carry to running backs over

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the last eight games. Gus Edwards good start. Kenne Dickson

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 1>even gets into this mix a bit here as well,

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>with a C grade Los Angeles. As I mentioned, they've

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>given up all those rushing touchdowns, all those yards per carry.

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Gus got more work, he got more carries last week,

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>but Dixon had more snaps last week. So this thing

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>could be a little closer to fifty fifty, and I

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>think you can still start Dixon in a pinch. Let's

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>go to the Chargers side. Melvin Gordon goes right back

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to being in A grade, even though he's got a

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>tough matchup with the Ravens defense allowing the fourth fewest

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 1>rushing attempts in the third fewest rushing yards per game.

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>They have been a little more vulnerable lately though, giving

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>up eighty eight rush yards and a touchdown per game

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to Peyton Barber and the Chiefs Committee of running back.

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>So there's you know, there's still some safety here, and

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon was great all year. We're gonna keep starting

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>in with an A grade. Keenan Allen's expected to play

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 1>through his hip injury, but uh, he's gonna sleep. See

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>slot cornerback Brandon Carr in coverage, who's allowed over thirty

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>two yards just once in his last five games. That

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>is a tough matchup for Keenan Allen. He's surrendered no

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>scores all year out of the slot. That's again, tough

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>matchup for Keenan Allen, who I'm putting a B grade

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>on out of respect for Keenan Allen, but he's probably

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>in reality closer to a seat. Mike Williams was an

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>unexpected here last week. Zero chance of a repeat this week. Uh,

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that is, it's not happening against a great Baltimore defense

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>that hasn't allowed a score to a wide receiver in

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>four straight games. So I've got I've got a wobbly

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>SED grade here on Mike Williams. I don't love him,

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and I still think you're you're reaching if you try

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to chase last week's box score. No great on Hunter

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Henry this week, not yet, not yet, But I'll tell

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you what flash forward the next year. So August, I

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>think we are August four, third August of next year.

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Hunt is Hunter Henry a second round heick. I think

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna go. I think his average draft position is

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be round two. That's how high Hunter Henry

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>is gonna go. Next year. The Year of the tight End,

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the year is it's gonna be all It's gonna be

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>all tight ends all the time. And those that or

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be our big talking point in our on

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>our silver anniversary shows when we come back, take a

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>chance on me. Even though it's the championship week. Look

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>at all the problems that running back people have. Look

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>at all the brutally tough matchups for quarterbacks out there.

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>We will help you find good matchups, even for those

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of you in the championship week. Take a chance on me.

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Coming up next, this is Fantasy Football Weekly Green Bell

0:15:56.480 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Premium on the van. If you change, take the final

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>show of the year Final'll take a chance on me.

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Of the year, Paul Charchi and Brian Johnson, Scott Fish.

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>These are nine players not normally you're starting lineup, and

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>even in a championship week, you can start these guys

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>in many cases. Um and Uh. In particular, I think

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>all three of the running backs you're gonna hear about

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>startable for many of you with all of the running

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>back problems. Um that all the people have limped into

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the championship game with these running back issues. These are

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>guys that are gonna help. But we're gonna start the

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>quarterback position, and Brian Johnson, I'm gonna go with Sam Donald.

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Or if Mike Francesco was called us calling this, you'd

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>call him Sam Donald. But Sam Donald at home Bruce's

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay. Donald understandably struggled in his first game back

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>from injury at Buffalo, but I looked very good at

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>home against the Texans last week, which was a tough,

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>tough matchup. This is not a tough matchup considering Green

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Bay's decimated by injury. They have allowed multiple touchdown passes

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>in four of their last five games. The only one

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>failed to do it was Josh Rosen. Uh. That's because

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals actually dominated that gamemall control. So I'm liking

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Stamp Donald this week. You might outscore Aaron Rodgers. Okay,

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't like going second. Just why? I don't know

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>why I go third? Is it better to go third?

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea. Uh So, my my guys, Dak Prescott.

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>UH had a weird week with Dak Prescott. At first,

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a good matchup. Then I thought

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>over the last half season, nine games, whatever they're average,

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 1>they're allowing the Bucks are allowing two yards and one

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>point three touchdowns, even a vastly improved secondary. Right, But

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:43.920
<v Speaker 1>in that span there are road games, multiple touchdowns to

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>three of them. And if you look at their road

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.439
<v Speaker 1>games this year, they're allowing an average of thirty seven

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>points per game on the road. All Right, Six of

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the seven teams thirty four or more points. And if

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys scored twenty five points, they will be the

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.880
<v Speaker 1>worst road team in NFL history by points allowed, by

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>points allowed. All right, Um, and the Bucks in road

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>games they're allowing an average of three hundred yards or

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>three yards and two points seven touchdowns against. I really

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.239
<v Speaker 1>have started to like Dak Prescott this week. All right,

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>let's go to UH let's go to Marcus Mariota. I

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>hope Mariota, I hope most of you don't have to

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:24.400
<v Speaker 1>go this far down the down the list, really, but uh,

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>if you throw out the Redskins domination of Cody Kessler

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Jaguars and feel free because Kessler is not requisite,

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm got starting quarterback. Five of the last six quarterbacks

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:35.640
<v Speaker 1>have faced the Redskins have all posted big games, including

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 1>three or four touchdowns, and half of the last six.

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm also throwing out Marcus Mariotta's Mayor Mariota's last two

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>games because he handed off to Derrick Henry fifty times.

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.400
<v Speaker 1>That probably doesn't happen. I just think everything corrects back

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to the middle here. Mariota's arm might just light up Washington,

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and maybe if his arm doesn't, his legs might. Kessler

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.359
<v Speaker 1>just ran for sixty eight yards against Washington, and mobile

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.360
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks have fared well against the Redskins. It's a dark throw,

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>for sure, and I hope you don't need him, but

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Mariota a plausible play. Let's go to the running

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>back position. I'm gonna stay in Jersey and go with

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the Packers. Jamal Williams at the Jets. Uh limited this

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 1>week with a toe injury, but don't be concerned with

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that at all. He'll be full go on Sunday and

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:18.640
<v Speaker 1>basically he's in line for bell call work as well

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:21.160
<v Speaker 1>with Aaron Jones on. I are the Jets have shut

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>down the Texans and Bills in recent weeks, but I'm

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:26.880
<v Speaker 1>not reading into that too much. Randall Cobb also doubtful

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>for this game, so the Packers are short on pass catchers.

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>So Jamal Williams, you can start with confidence this week. Yeah,

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>all right, great, agreed? Running back position, Yes, all right.

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I have this weird guy. We just talked about John Kelly. Uh.

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:43.880
<v Speaker 1>During the break, we're watching a little bit of John

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Kelly Porne, some stiff arms from college and whatnot, just

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>just devastating players. His stiff arms are so devastating. But

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 1>this is a great spot for him. The Cardinals have

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>allowed the most rushing attempts, most rushing yards, and the

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>most rushing touchdowns this year, not to mention over the

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:02.959
<v Speaker 1>last five games five point two yards per carry. I'm

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>with charge. I think it's a John Kelly day. I

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>think it is too. Elijah McGuire's you're starting running back

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>for the Jets, and he has been for two weeks

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>when he's seen twenty touches per game, and he gets

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>a juicy matchup with Green Bay. This is the same

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Green may defense that Jordan Howard just rumbled through last week.

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Week for that, Atlanta put up five yards per carry

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>from their backfield. Week for that, Chase Edmunds, Remember Chase

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Edmunds carving up the uh the Packers. And if that's

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>not enough, Packers just put their second defensive tackle on

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I R. Kenny Clark, who joins Mike Daniels on injured

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 1>reserve Elijah A. Choir is a shockingly safe play this week.

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the wide receiver position. Bryan, let me

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 1>peacock really quick. Mcguires might take a chance on me

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>running back last week, but I like you piggybacking on that.

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Im all right. We're going deep deep here at wide

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>receiver with Isaiah McKenzie of the Buffalo Bills. That is

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>deep leads the team and target over the last two

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>weeks and has five carries for twenty six yards as well.

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:05.919
<v Speaker 1>Runs out of the slot for the Bills, and the

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Patriots are very susceptible to slot receivers. Allowing six yards

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>per game in the seam and the Bills should be

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 1>chasing points. You expect Belichick to shut down Josh Allen's legs.

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I see him looking Mackenzie's waist seven or eight times

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>in this game, and he has a PPR upside. M hmm.

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with Blake Jarwin in that game where you

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>need to explain who Blake Jarwin is. That's that's sad

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that I really do. But big Blake Jarwin is a

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>tight end for the Dallas Cowboys. Um they play the box.

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 1>It's been a tight end wasteland. So I like this.

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Jarwin has seven targets in each of the last two

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>games and nine different targets have had five nine different

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>tight ends about five targets against the Bucks this year,

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and all but one had double digit a Fantasy day.

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I like Darwin and what I think is going to

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 1>be a decently high scoring game. I mean they they've

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 1>allowed the fourth most receptions and fourth fifth most yards

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to tight ends this year. Remember da Marius Thomas when

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>he was a guy, Yeah, and he's a thing now.

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>He's fresh off a six catch, eight target performance, both

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of those career highs with his new team the Texans.

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Kiki Cutie's out, He's going to continue to get a

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:13.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of volume. And he goes up against an Eagle

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>secondary that is dead last in yards and dead last

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>in receptions allowed to wide receivers, and they just ruled

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>out starting cornerback Sydney Jones with a hamstring problem. What

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>meager resources Philadelphia has will be pushed to DeAndre Hopkins

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 1>side of the field. So it's gonna be primo matchups

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>all game long. For to Marius Thomas, I really like

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 1>him this week. That's a I think that is a

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>very strong take a chance on me, play a little

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:49.360
<v Speaker 1>bit of house house cleaning. I failed to mention Philip

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Rivers entirely in my in my in my breakdown of

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers, and maybe it's because I wanted to forget

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>because it is not a friendly matchup at all. Now.

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Rivers has to touchdowns in every game and multiple touchdowns

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>in every game but one. But this is the toughest

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>matchup of his year. He faces the NFL's best past defense.

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>He's got to do it with a hobbled Keenan Allen

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and Baltimore completely shut down Jamis Winston last week four

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of the fat past five opposing corner of court start over.

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Four of the past five opposing quarterbacks have failed to

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>top even two hundred eleven passing yards against the Ravens.

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>A C grade on Philip Rivers um the waiver wire

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 1>may be more helpful to you than what Philip Rivers

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to produce. We haven't talked about some of

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>these guys, but we will. With the big name quarterbacks, Rivers, Brady, Breeze,

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh it's bad. It's I've never recalled the scarier Championship

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 1>week with the big name quarterbacks like this. Totally agree.

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Brady's Brady right now is at seventeen, Rivers is at fifteen,

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Breeze is a thirteen, Rogers is at eleven. It's you know, none,

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>none of those guys inside the top ten. And these

0:23:57.800 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 1>are the guys you thought you'd start every week and

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>never have to think wise about. Yeah, it's it's a

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 1>weird week where guys like car and Keenaman Prescott, I'm

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 1>actually considering with or above some of those guys exactly.

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's work in one more matchup into the segment,

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay taking on Dallas Scott and I don't like

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>any any players for Tampa Bay in this matchup, and

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 1>I think Mike Evans is the only startable player. What

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>do you got that? That's pretty much where I am

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>because Brad is so touchdown dependent given the tight end

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:26.919
<v Speaker 1>waste Land probably gave. I gave him a C grade,

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>but he's so dependent on that. Barbara, I also gave

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:32.479
<v Speaker 1>a C grade, but I really considered benching. It's only

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:35.400
<v Speaker 1>because he always he gets fifteen touches every day game

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and he's scored in like four of the last five,

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>so he actually runs hard from that offense. He does

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys having allowed to runner over sixty five yards

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>since Week seven, So it is it's a C grade

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:49.159
<v Speaker 1>on volume and hope for a touchdown and barely. But

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>you're you're right about everything else. I have Winston on

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:53.159
<v Speaker 1>the bench. The Cowboys since that Saints game, are just

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>crushing quarterbacks. And Mike Evans he leads the NFL and

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>hunrew yard receiving games, and he's right now on a

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 1>career high ACE with eighteen yards per carry, which is

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>per catch, which is which gives him. I gave him

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a low B grade. Honestly, it is a homecoming game.

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I believe from Mike Evans. Correct. I believe he's a

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Texas guy. He went to Texas Tech. M yeah, he

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 1>went to A and M wait, I'm really thinking about that.

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I think he did. Yeah, that's right, because he was

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Manzell's he was bailing out Johnny Manzel, making Manzel look

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>like an NFL caliber quarterback. On the other side the Cowboys,

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I gave Dak Prescott a B grade. He was my takeom.

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I didn't mention this every quarterback on

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the road to face to face the box twenty plus

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points, every single one on the road. Uh Amari

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Cooper I gave a B grade because that um, he

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:45.639
<v Speaker 1>crushed it for He's crushed at the four out of

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the five weeks since during the Cowboys and disappeared last week.

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I know that it was a tough game and not

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 1>his fault. Though the Colts have only allowed one top

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>twelve performance from a wide receiver all year, so Mari

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>was gonna get, you know, a little ding that week.

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>But but since during the Howboys, he's been awesome. UM.

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 1>Of the eleven receivers that had seven or more targets

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>against Tampa Bay this year, nine had seventy five yards

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and more in sixth scored. I gotta be grade on him.

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Already talked about Jarwin is gonna take a chance on me?

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Guy and Zeke I have is my number one running

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>back this week? I think it's a clear cut obvious

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:19.439
<v Speaker 1>A yeah, that's all. We'll take a break when we

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>come back. Buffalo taking on New England. This is such

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a tricky matchup for the Patriots. Suddenly without Josh Gordon

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>will tell you who you can trust and who you

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>can't when we come back. This is Fantasy Football Weekly

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 1>presented by Dean on a Man. Welcome back to a

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>championship edition of Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Chiarchi and Scott

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Fish and Brian Johnson with you. I want to spend

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:51.880
<v Speaker 1>just a moment thanking our yearlong sponsors who have been

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 1>kind enough to help support the show throughout the season.

0:26:56.520 --> 0:27:00.919
<v Speaker 1>Devanni's Pizza, Delicious, Fanball dot Com, Town Hall Brewery, the

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Greater Twin Cities, Honda Dealers, Joe Sensors, Hudson Ford Park Tavern,

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and of course, our decade long sponsor, grain Belt Premium,

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 1>the official beer Fantasy Football UM one. You only have

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>two weeks left to find your way to Manny's for

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the big winners banquet. Chance to meet Dave Wilson and

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>all the great people at Manny's and myself. I'll be there.

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Your chance to win two thousand dollars Brian will be there.

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Uh and your trip to the winner's banquet. You have

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to go to grain belt dot Com play the Crush

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 1>Charts challenge. You have two weeks left to do it.

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Many thanks for our friends at the Brewery of course,

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:39.879
<v Speaker 1>Sean Ryan, Brett, moss Ley Wendinger, Ted and Jody Marty

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the owners and hope to see you there. Take me down.

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I got a weird lineup this week. It might happen.

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's go get a green built after the show. I

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 1>like the sound of that. We should celebrate, except you

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 1>know what I have to do Washington Redskins pregame radio

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>after the show. Well you need, I might need. You

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 1>know it's weird right from this to go to Redskins

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Pregame what. Yeah, weird, very weird. Let's let's jump into

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a couple of matchups and Buffalo taking on New England.

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:11.719
<v Speaker 1>We know the Buffalo sides is a little more obvious

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Patriots side. I can't wait to hear what you have

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to say, Brian, because this is a nasty matchup. I

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 1>like kind of like the Buffalo side better in general.

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Starting with Robert Foster Fish's boy uh nine plus yards

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and four of his last five games over the last

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 1>four weeks, he's averaging it insane twenty four yards per catch,

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>which is by far and away first among wide receivers

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:33.399
<v Speaker 1>with double digit catches during that span. Uh, he's getting

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a B from me. I like him in this matchup

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Not like Zay Jones. He has struggled since

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>moving to the outside. He's on the bench. But I

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>do like Isaiah McKenzie as might take a chance of

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>me wide receiver might play a little running back in

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>this game because they're all banged up. Uh. Speaking of Shady,

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>McCoy says he's gonna play. Can't do it. He's on

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the bench and making matters where for of him. Josh

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Allen has thrown to his running backs just eleven times

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 1>in the last four games. So uh, the PPR aspect

0:28:57.920 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>is not there for Shady. So he didn't get you

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to the championship, so you're not gonna play him in

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the championship. As for Josh Allen. He's gotten a lot

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of people to the championship and highest scoring fantasy quarterback

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 1>for the sense he returned from injury four weeks ago.

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Nobody's outscard Josh Allen over the last four weeks QB one.

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Like he just said um on paper. The Yeah, the

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Patriots don't give up a ton to rushing quarterbacks. But

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the five true comparable rushing quarterbacks they faced the Shawn Watson,

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Blake Portles, Patrick Mahomes, Marcus Mariotta, and Mitch Dubisky combined

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 1>for carries and a hundred eighty six yards. That's about

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>still only like, yeah, like eight carries and I don't know,

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>like forty yards, but if you get one touchdown. But right,

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>but if each each of those got Trubisky had six carries,

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>if he gets seven to eight carries, Allen will do

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff with his legs. Everyone says, you know, belloffs to

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>take that away. I would play Josh Allen over Tom

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Brady in this game. But so I'm giving Allen a B. Now,

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>speaking of the Patriots, we can start with Brady. I

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>can't give him to see uh three four yards and

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:01.719
<v Speaker 1>zero touchdowns in the week eight. Uh matchup between these

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>two teams, and that was on forty five pass attempts.

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Since then, Buffalo is yielding under twenty six pass attempts

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>per game. And here the touchdown totals since then in

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>each game one zero, one, three to Ryan Tannehills somehow

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>one one. They've given up zero or one touchdowns the

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Bills have in ten of the last twelve. You're looking

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>at in all probability zero or one to Brady, who,

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>by the way, terrible. It's track record. It's the Bills

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>is bad. It's not like you think you go dominate

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bills every time they met and he doesn't. It's

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>weird can saying how good record is. Yeah, that's true.

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, Brady gets a soft sea here. Uh not

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>a slam dunk start by any means. I can't fall

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 1>at you for starting them, but I would honestly look elsewhere. Uh.

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of Gronk, I'm gonna give him a b even

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 1>though he's looked pretty old lately. But that's based on

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the talent pool in the tight end. Waste Land historically

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>has destroyed Buffalo. Being a Buffalo native and all but

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 1>just had three catches for forty three yards in the

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 1>first meeting. I just referenced uh. Since then, no tight

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 1>end as top forty three yards, grons forty three yards

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and on the whole season, fifty five yards is the

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 1>most yards opposing. It's a bad game for Gronk. He

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 1>gets to be uh, Julian Edelman safe be here with her.

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Without Josh Gordon, he was gonna get a be He's

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot for at least eight targets in this game.

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 1>And the Bills have surrendered four wide receivers four wide

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 1>receiver touchdowns over the last three and Edelman had nine

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>for one of four in the first meeting, So he's

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a safe play. Chris Hogan is not. I'm not going there,

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>even with Josh Gordon no longer on the team. Just no, oh,

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I gotta talk runn backs with quick. Sony Michelle has

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 1>disappointing down the stretch, yet hasn't topped sixty three yards

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>or scored in the last three weeks. James Devlin and

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Rex burkhead clearly culture threats. The Bills are ranked nine

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 1>against the run by Football Outsiders and since Week eight,

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>only one opposing running back has top sixty yards, but

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>they have given up the second most rushing touchdowns. They've

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>even up three in the past two games. But again

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you can't count on those going to the you can't.

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 1>So he's he's a very soft Sea as well, and

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>so is James White in PPR. He's clearly a bench

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 1>in standard. Uh. New England is nine in one when

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>White gets at least nine touches, and he does better

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:08.959
<v Speaker 1>at home, So there's hope here. He's the only one

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 1>who had any success against Buffalo practically as a running back.

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Ten catches for seventy nine yards and he ran a

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in in the first week. Figure, but do not

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 1>expect that to happen again. Uh, he's a cn PPR

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 1>at best. Yeah, that's it for James White. Let's go

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to Washington, Tennessee and this will not take long. The

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>whole Washington passing games on the bench behind Josh Johnson.

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>No elaboration required there. Let's go to Adrian Peterson. I've

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>got the softest of Sea grades on him. Tennessee is

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>completely shut. They completely shut down Leonard four Nette and

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 1>say Kwon Barkley and back to back weeks. That's it.

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I could really just stop there. They have

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 1>in recent recent history, though giving up big games of

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Miller and Isaiah Crowwell, so you know, maybe there's

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 1>an angle for Peterson if there's one touchdown to be had,

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>he's the probable guy. But I can't even tell you

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>there's one touchdown coming from this Washington offense. So the

0:32:57.200 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 1>softest of Sea grades on Adrian, I hope you don't

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>have to use him. Let's go to the Tennessee side,

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>where Derrick Henry is locked in as an A. The

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Redskins have been trampled by opposing running backs lately. Over

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>their last five games, they're giving up over five yards

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 1>per carry, and big volume backs like Lamar Miller and

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Ezekiel Elliott and Sae Kwon Barkley have averaged one d

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty six rushing yards alone over that span. Derrick Henry's

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the definition of volume lately at with fifty touches the

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:27.719
<v Speaker 1>last two games. So an A grade for Derrick Henry,

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a B grade for Corey Davis. The Redskins secondary didn't

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>allow a touchdown to Jacksonville's receivers last week, but they

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>gave up because Jacksonville doesn't can't pass. But they gave

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>up a ridiculous seven scores to wide receivers in the

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 1>three prior games. Uh, Corey Davis primarily lines up on

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the left side of the field, where he'll face cornerback

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:47.959
<v Speaker 1>Fabian Moreau, who they was. So he was terrible as

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a slot corners, they're trying him on the outside. He's

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 1>bad there too. He's surrendered at least one hundred yards

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and two of his last six outings in his coverage.

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>That's not good. So Cory Davis gets a B and

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Mariota was might take a chance on me quarterback.

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's squeeze in another matchup, maybe even two. Their their

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 1>brisk like this one, and it might be Jacksonville taking

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 1>on Miami. There's no Jacksonville players outside of Leonard four

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Net right, Yeah, normally we go side to side like

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville in Miami. I'm just gonna say the Jacksonville and

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Miami passing games are all on the bench. For all

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 1>of them. Kessler's averaging a hundred forty nine yards per game,

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Jacksonville defense is number one against wide receivers

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and held seven quarterbacks under two hundred this year. They're

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:30.359
<v Speaker 1>all on the bench. So let's go to the running backs.

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:32.760
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about four next. He's been bad,

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>he's and it's such a good match out. He is

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 1>completely off the injury report now after after dealing with

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 1>his twenty seventh lower leg injury. Since during the league,

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:45.439
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins surrending the second most rush attempts, the third

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:49.239
<v Speaker 1>most rushing yards, and a running back has topped ten

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>total yards against the Miami Dolphins nine times this season,

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:58.840
<v Speaker 1>so nine times. I have a B grade on Leonard

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 1>four nett uh. And then on the other side, Kitlin

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Blage the Belage Barrage coming, as they like to joke,

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 1>I have a C grade on him. It's a top

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:11.359
<v Speaker 1>five d against fantasy running backs. But the Jags, they

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>are just not tackling. They've given up. You could see

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:17.840
<v Speaker 1>it in that there's so much quit and I honestly

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:20.280
<v Speaker 1>think Bellage is gonna take all of those Gore twelve

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.760
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen carries and maybe then some. It's volume, energy,

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>EGS team that's given up. I'm giving him a C grade.

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:27.839
<v Speaker 1>This is the first game in NFL history without an

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:33.919
<v Speaker 1>over under, I believe, just kidding, big, don't even bother.

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 1>It's actually the lowest of the week at thirty eight

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 1>point five. Alright, final matchup of this segment, Houston taking

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 1>on Philadelphia. I already gave you to Marrius Thomas is

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 1>might take a chance, I mean wide receiver. I like

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 1>this passing game. What do you think about Deshaun Watson,

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 1>Brian Well. Volume has been the issue with Lotson when

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:52.360
<v Speaker 1>it comes to pass it. But Philly is getting passed

0:35:52.400 --> 0:35:56.799
<v Speaker 1>on copiously, copiously, great words. So Watson just simply he

0:35:56.840 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>gets a B. He's got d T or take a

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:00.839
<v Speaker 1>chance to me wide receiver of course. Deane Hopkins, who

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:03.319
<v Speaker 1>gets an A. I don't care if they roll quadruple

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:06.319
<v Speaker 1>coverage on Hopkins. He's a slam dunk start, of course.

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 1>And Lamar Miller burned a lot of people last week,

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:10.840
<v Speaker 1>me being one of them. Not not his fault, but

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 1>uh appears he will return from that ankle injury in

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 1>a very very meaty matchup, so you have, let's hope,

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 1>so he has a game time decision, he's questionable. I

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>definitely wanna you want to monitor that, and I grab

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Alfred Blue if you can. But whoever gets the start

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 1>gets to be Uh. The Eagles have loud the most

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:27.880
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points are running backs for the last six weeks,

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 1>giving up nearly one eighty yards two touchdowns per game

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:33.399
<v Speaker 1>to the position. So if now I think the best

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:37.400
<v Speaker 1>case scenario is for fantasy at least Lamar Millard is

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:40.479
<v Speaker 1>inactive and then Alfred Blue just houses all that work

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 1>and he turns into potentially a top ten running back

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:45.759
<v Speaker 1>in that scenario, yep, I agree. But I bet you

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Miller plays in this game, and it's gonna muddy those waters.

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 1>But if if he goes, I think you gotta you

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:52.319
<v Speaker 1>gotta give Miller at least the flexi level play uh

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 1>over to Philly. Not a ton to say I got

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:57.319
<v Speaker 1>Josh Adams on the bench. Houston allows only sixty six

0:36:57.400 --> 0:36:59.359
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards per game on three point two yards per

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:01.759
<v Speaker 1>carried to oppose backs, and Wendell Smallwood was way too

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:03.920
<v Speaker 1>much of a factor last week. So Josh Adams cannot

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:06.759
<v Speaker 1>be trusted. Zach Ertz can definitely be trusted. He's an

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:08.759
<v Speaker 1>obvious a and this is a great matchup for him.

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Houston has allowed tight end touchdowns and seven of their

0:37:10.960 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 1>last eight and UH over eighty yards per game during

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:16.719
<v Speaker 1>that span to the to the position, So you gotta

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 1>love Zach Or It's even without Carson Wentz and uh

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 1>alshon Jeffrey last week's wide receiver one uh number ones

0:37:22.760 --> 0:37:25.799
<v Speaker 1>that fared well against Houston, as evidence by my take

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me wide receiver last week, Robby Anderson.

0:37:28.520 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Can we get that peak? Oh? I was, I was

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 1>already headed that way alright, So alexand Jeffrey, I'm gonna

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:36.760
<v Speaker 1>give an a. H He and Nick Foles make sweet

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:38.960
<v Speaker 1>music together. So I'm giving Jeffrey the A. But you're not.

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:41.480
<v Speaker 1>You're not starting Golden Tate in the championship week. And

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm still not going with Nick Foles, even though I

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 1>like he can be. I'll get foals to see, just

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 1>because I love Arts and Jeffrey so much. This week

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>he gotta like fold a little bit. I'll give him

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a see. I agree with that, and but that's more

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of like two quarterback play take a chance on the

0:37:55.160 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 1>type of play. Yeah, I don't think anybody needs to

0:37:56.800 --> 0:37:59.320
<v Speaker 1>start falls now champiship week unless you're in that quarterback flex.

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:04.279
<v Speaker 1>But a very nice daily option as well. Yes, that

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>is true where you'd want to play, not the other famble.

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Hello Ellie, Hello, thank you for calling in. How can

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:16.360
<v Speaker 1>we help you? Okay, So I'm in a championship around

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 1>with my uncle, Big Bad Chad, and I have two

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:25.279
<v Speaker 1>questions regarding my quarterback. In my tight end. From my quarterback,

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I could start Jack Attack Prescott or Russell the Mussell Wilson,

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>or I could pick up Jared dot Off. What should

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I do if she needs to be on the show? Now,

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I know you need your own show. I think I

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:39.719
<v Speaker 1>love it. I have Wilson easily the highest of those three. Yeah,

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 1>he's my number two quarterback this week. We love Russell Wilson,

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Big Bad Chad's going down, great chief snatch up. Okay.

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 1>For my tight end, I could do of Ingram or

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 1>jim jim Graham. What do you recommend that I love?

0:38:56.120 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I love these uh these nicknames. Oh it's it was

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 1>more Jimmy Graham. Yeah, Jimmy Graham's giving us nothing. And

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:07.359
<v Speaker 1>you know the you know, the broken thumb hasn't helped

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 1>him catch any better either. You're in Wisconsin, you know

0:39:09.520 --> 0:39:13.040
<v Speaker 1>all about the troubles that you're having with Jimmy Graham

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 1>over there. Yes, Jimmy, jim Jimmy Ellie, thank you for

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 1>calling in. Don't be a stranger. We'll talk to you

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 1>next year. Okay, okay, Steal, thank you. Yeah, she's a

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 1>poet and she knows it. I like it. Matt, say

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:29.240
<v Speaker 1>good morning guys. See before I get to my two questions,

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:31.600
<v Speaker 1>because it's not lightening around. Thanks for another great season.

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Matt. Saturday, Next Saturday. I always feel that

0:39:35.360 --> 0:39:37.880
<v Speaker 1>void and that first Saturday when you guys out there

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'm already looking forward to mid August. Outstanding. Thank

0:39:40.480 --> 0:39:43.719
<v Speaker 1>you very much. Oh you bet guy. Um luck for

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan my first question. Okay, I've got him three

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and four. I love him. I lean luck just because

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the Panthers are probably gonna struggle to score

0:39:57.200 --> 0:40:00.799
<v Speaker 1>this one. I'm gonna lean luck. Why does that help?

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Why does that hurt Ryan? If? I don't know. If

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:05.319
<v Speaker 1>Ryan's the volumes will be there, I don't know. I

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 1>feel more of a runfriendly script for the Falcons of

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:11.959
<v Speaker 1>this game, where the Giants could still manage to score more.

0:40:12.560 --> 0:40:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'm just gonna lean look. I just

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 1>like look more in this one. I have luck in

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:19.840
<v Speaker 1>there now, so I'll keep it that way. Okay, next one, um, Okay,

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:24.320
<v Speaker 1>if I have to sit girly, I've got mixing along

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:27.319
<v Speaker 1>with him, Tariko and is my flex if I gotta

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:31.839
<v Speaker 1>sit Girly. Mike Kelly is available, I believe, or I

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 1>could throw mark Ingram in there. So I think I'm okay,

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you're lucky. Go ahead. I'm starting to lean toward towards

0:40:38.200 --> 0:40:40.239
<v Speaker 1>benching Girly. So what do you guys think? I was

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 1>just gonna say you're lucky that besides mixing, all of

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:45.200
<v Speaker 1>those are late games, so you don't have to decide

0:40:45.239 --> 0:40:49.319
<v Speaker 1>till the You know, that's a huge advantage. Go get

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Kelly right the second. I was gonna say, get Kelly,

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 1>because if Gurley doesn't go and you're gonna probably maybe

0:40:54.440 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 1>know at that game time decision, Kelly might be the

0:40:57.080 --> 0:40:58.839
<v Speaker 1>guy to play and it's not a good matchup for Ingram.

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:01.360
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to that later. But know Ingram is not

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 1>in this discussion. I'm mixing and co are oh yeah,

0:41:04.120 --> 0:41:05.719
<v Speaker 1>without but I think you go get Girly and you're

0:41:05.719 --> 0:41:07.880
<v Speaker 1>playing over alright, go get killed playing over Girly. What

0:41:08.000 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 1>luck that Ingram? You know Cohen and Kelly games? No kidding,

0:41:13.160 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you appreciate it. Yeah, we're gonna work in one

0:41:15.520 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 1>more call. We're doing. We're consider we have sixteen matchups

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to get there. We're doing great. I love that. On time,

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, hello, Ben, credit me, Hey guys from work.

0:41:26.640 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Merry Christmas everyone, you guys, thank you appreciate it. I'm

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:32.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna do this and if I have more time, I'll

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 1>ask the actual question. Give me a scenario, because you

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 1>guys are the gods of fancy football. Scenario is this

0:41:39.320 --> 0:41:43.520
<v Speaker 1>week four team, the commissioner is still in the playoffs.

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:47.320
<v Speaker 1>The other guy, the other owner, offers me this trade,

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:51.280
<v Speaker 1>offers me three Cohen for Tyler Boyd. I wait twenty

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:56.520
<v Speaker 1>four hours. This is Wednesday. I accepted. Thursday nights games play.

0:41:57.080 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Friday comes along again. Commissioner in the playoff decides to say, hey, guys,

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:05.840
<v Speaker 1>my bill of rights were set. The trade deadline was

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 1>set for week twelve, so no clusion. And then he

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 1>reverses the trade, doesn't call me and lets things go.

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 1>What's your guys? Overall two cents on that, Well, the

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:22.920
<v Speaker 1>trade deadline was twelve and you made a week fifteen

0:42:22.960 --> 0:42:26.239
<v Speaker 1>trade right. System allowed it. Basically, it's the system allowed it,

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:29.520
<v Speaker 1>but the rules. Yeah. I think he did the right

0:42:29.560 --> 0:42:32.319
<v Speaker 1>thing to do it. He just should have communicated it better. Yeah,

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:37.319
<v Speaker 1>yeahst better. Yeah, that's why I wasn't too much a

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:39.359
<v Speaker 1>stickler on it. But but I just wanted to kind

0:42:39.360 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of get it. It is a bad beat. It sucks. Yeah,

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:44.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's unfortunate, but yeah, it's you shouldn't let the

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 1>fact that he didn't have a there was a wonky

0:42:47.200 --> 0:42:49.799
<v Speaker 1>setting that, you know, stop you stop you guys from

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:53.560
<v Speaker 1>playing away. Everybody's agreed to play. Yeah, I was all right, guys,

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:57.560
<v Speaker 1>all right, what else you got? Alright? Really quick? I

0:42:57.600 --> 0:43:00.400
<v Speaker 1>need two of four, one of which has to be

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a receiver. So I think it's Robbie Anderson or Calvin Ridley. Okay,

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that's what I thought. My flex Kalen Bellas or Damian Williams,

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Wiam Williams non PPR both Still are you guys? Are awesome?

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, appreciate, good luck, Bye bye. Um, we'll take

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:23.239
<v Speaker 1>a break when we come back. Lots more matchups to

0:43:23.280 --> 0:43:27.439
<v Speaker 1>get to and three hot questions. Can you go? Three?

0:43:27.440 --> 0:43:29.279
<v Speaker 1>And O find out when we return for our number

0:43:29.280 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 1>two of Championship Week Fantasy Football Weekly. This is Fantasy

0:43:34.760 --> 0:43:55.919
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly presented by Devannies on the San Tim had

0:43:56.000 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to Twitter follower Jeff Brumfield who alert to me that

0:44:00.600 --> 0:44:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Miller has been ruled out and I had not

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:05.239
<v Speaker 1>seen that. That news came down overnight and I had

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 1>not seen it yet, and I've seen it anywhere else,

0:44:08.120 --> 0:44:11.240
<v Speaker 1>but you know, doing going through Twitter, it's it's legit.

0:44:11.360 --> 0:44:14.600
<v Speaker 1>He's not traveling with the team. Lamar Miller's out, Alfred

0:44:14.640 --> 0:44:18.799
<v Speaker 1>Blue launches up the rankings, and I I think if

0:44:18.800 --> 0:44:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you were to put a letter grade on Alfred Blue,

0:44:20.840 --> 0:44:23.920
<v Speaker 1>it's probably in a grade considering the opportunity against the

0:44:23.920 --> 0:44:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia run defense that has been brutal for six weeks.

0:44:29.680 --> 0:44:32.680
<v Speaker 1>To quote Will Ferrell in old school, you're my boy Blue,

0:44:32.920 --> 0:44:36.839
<v Speaker 1>You're my boy Blue. Um, he needed the money we need.

0:44:37.080 --> 0:44:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to make a sizeable adjustment on Alfred

0:44:40.200 --> 0:44:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Blue right now. But he will probably move into top twelve,

0:44:45.080 --> 0:44:49.560
<v Speaker 1>top twelve ish territory at the running back position phase

0:44:50.120 --> 0:44:52.719
<v Speaker 1>on the opportunity. See, there's there's really a lot of

0:44:52.760 --> 0:44:54.759
<v Speaker 1>this goes back to do the opposite, right, you know,

0:44:54.840 --> 0:44:58.040
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of good running backs had good years.

0:44:58.680 --> 0:45:00.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, say Kwon Barkley had a really nice year

0:45:00.960 --> 0:45:03.319
<v Speaker 1>and he was consistent all season. Zeke was good all year.

0:45:03.600 --> 0:45:06.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, sooner or later, most running backs end

0:45:06.160 --> 0:45:08.040
<v Speaker 1>up doing this to you. And there's gonna be a

0:45:08.080 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 1>team with Alfred Blue, Damian Williams, and John Kelly. That

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:16.399
<v Speaker 1>win there is and by Jamal Williams or Elijah McGuire. Right,

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the guy you're talking about. It's unbelievable. Hot question

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:30.160
<v Speaker 1>number one. Who should be pick number one on your

0:45:30.239 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 1>cheat sheet when we do our first show next year

0:45:33.120 --> 0:45:39.799
<v Speaker 1>on auguste, Brian, there's some steam. We've been talking tight ends.

0:45:39.800 --> 0:45:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I know Harrison said he's taken Kelsey one oh one.

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:44.279
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like that, but not enough over the

0:45:44.320 --> 0:45:46.120
<v Speaker 1>big running backs. It's got to be a running back

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:48.439
<v Speaker 1>to me, and it's three guys, comes down three guys.

0:45:48.440 --> 0:45:53.439
<v Speaker 1>It's Girly, McCaffrey and Barkley. But and I don't really

0:45:53.440 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 1>know right now. I don't know, but I'm just in

0:45:56.640 --> 0:45:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the history of the show, nobody's ever said, well, I

0:45:58.440 --> 0:46:01.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I don't know right I know between those three,

0:46:01.960 --> 0:46:04.960
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna go with McCaffrey just because he's going

0:46:05.000 --> 0:46:08.839
<v Speaker 1>to break the receiving reception record for running backs. And

0:46:08.880 --> 0:46:11.520
<v Speaker 1>he's not only top five running back, he's a top

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:14.240
<v Speaker 1>twelve wide receiver if you just use his receiving numbers.

0:46:14.280 --> 0:46:17.239
<v Speaker 1>And Barkley's close but there is Odell Beckham. There is

0:46:17.520 --> 0:46:20.239
<v Speaker 1>some competition on that team for touches, not a ton

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:23.440
<v Speaker 1>on Carolina outside DJ more. So I'm gonna take CMC

0:46:23.680 --> 0:46:26.360
<v Speaker 1>one dot zero one. Do you like that you're Kamara

0:46:26.440 --> 0:46:28.799
<v Speaker 1>this year? And yeah, I see that. Uh, just for

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:31.439
<v Speaker 1>the listeners, McCaffrey is eight away with two games left

0:46:31.520 --> 0:46:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to break the reception record. Um, I will always say

0:46:34.520 --> 0:46:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Kawan Barkley because mostly because it's tough to go Gurley

0:46:39.080 --> 0:46:42.080
<v Speaker 1>three years in a row. That's just really tough to do.

0:46:42.800 --> 0:46:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Just board him. No, it's just no. If Gurley ends

0:46:46.760 --> 0:46:51.440
<v Speaker 1>up repeating as Fantasy champ here um, that'll be the

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:53.560
<v Speaker 1>first time it's happened two years in a row since

0:46:53.760 --> 0:46:57.480
<v Speaker 1>before one. It's just really rare. And see to see

0:46:57.480 --> 0:46:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a third I just don't know that I can see it.

0:46:59.080 --> 0:47:02.359
<v Speaker 1>And he's he gets less touches than Zeke and then

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Barkley and guys like that, so it's it's a lot

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of touchdowns. So I went Barkley, who has been top

0:47:07.719 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 1>thirteen in all but two weeks, had a top thirteen

0:47:10.600 --> 0:47:14.080
<v Speaker 1>performance in all but two weeks. He's twenty two. He's

0:47:14.080 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 1>failed the top a hundred plus total yards just twice um,

0:47:17.640 --> 0:47:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and the Rams offensive line oldest in the NFL. So

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with Barkley. What the heck? Uh? Needless

0:47:24.760 --> 0:47:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to say, I'm not someone who demands that running backs

0:47:26.880 --> 0:47:29.080
<v Speaker 1>be taken with the first overall pick, but it's a

0:47:29.160 --> 0:47:32.279
<v Speaker 1>running back and it's Sae Kwon Barkley. Sa Kwan has

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the most upside next season since LaDainian Tomlinson, who posted

0:47:37.360 --> 0:47:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that transcendental fantasy season in two thousand six when he

0:47:40.960 --> 0:47:44.480
<v Speaker 1>had two thousand, three hundred total yards and thirty one

0:47:44.560 --> 0:47:47.799
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns and two passing By the way we got that's

0:47:47.800 --> 0:47:50.680
<v Speaker 1>a great point and two passing touchdowns that year. Um.

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Barkley has that kind of upside in his game. And

0:47:55.520 --> 0:48:00.040
<v Speaker 1>here's why. He's got the agility of Barry Sanders in

0:48:00.080 --> 0:48:03.319
<v Speaker 1>Paris and I've never casually made for any other running back.

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:06.640
<v Speaker 1>He has that level of agility. He has the receiving

0:48:06.640 --> 0:48:10.279
<v Speaker 1>ability of a Thurman Thomas he had or a Marshall Falk.

0:48:10.480 --> 0:48:14.600
<v Speaker 1>He has the explosiveness of an Eric Dickerson. Say Kwan

0:48:14.640 --> 0:48:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Barkley is the most complete running back this league has

0:48:17.480 --> 0:48:22.239
<v Speaker 1>seen since LaDainian Tomlinson, and he gives you that crazy,

0:48:22.480 --> 0:48:26.520
<v Speaker 1>bonkers upside that nobody else can touch. Now, if you

0:48:26.560 --> 0:48:30.319
<v Speaker 1>look ahead to next year, one way or another, that

0:48:30.360 --> 0:48:32.600
<v Speaker 1>offensive line is gonna get better. It's probably the worst

0:48:32.640 --> 0:48:36.560
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. Probably gonna get better, god, I hope so.

0:48:37.480 --> 0:48:40.360
<v Speaker 1>And one way or another, his quarterback, whether it's Manning

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:42.560
<v Speaker 1>or somebody else, probably gets better by default because Manning

0:48:42.600 --> 0:48:45.440
<v Speaker 1>has been about as bad as any starting quarterback in

0:48:45.480 --> 0:48:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, and Barkley has still been awesome for fantasy owners.

0:48:51.360 --> 0:48:53.360
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't get to play the Falcons in Bucks twice

0:48:53.400 --> 0:48:56.120
<v Speaker 1>like McCaffrey doesn't. Well, but you know that was this

0:48:56.200 --> 0:49:00.200
<v Speaker 1>year's Falcons and Bucks. Who knows next year? Right? Um?

0:49:00.239 --> 0:49:02.759
<v Speaker 1>You know, even though Pat Schermer frustrated some of us

0:49:02.760 --> 0:49:05.800
<v Speaker 1>with Barkley's usage at various points this year, He's still

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:09.120
<v Speaker 1>already touched the ball three hundred times this season, So

0:49:09.200 --> 0:49:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you sage is not going to be a problem. Sherman's

0:49:11.640 --> 0:49:14.800
<v Speaker 1>a very good offensive mind, say Kwon Barkley should be

0:49:14.840 --> 0:49:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the first pick on your cheat sheets when we're doing

0:49:17.080 --> 0:49:25.520
<v Speaker 1>our shows next year. Hot question number two on next

0:49:25.520 --> 0:49:28.000
<v Speaker 1>August cheat sheet. You see a theme here? Who should

0:49:28.000 --> 0:49:33.040
<v Speaker 1>be higher? Juju Smith, Schuster or Antonio brown Man. This

0:49:33.080 --> 0:49:39.680
<v Speaker 1>is tough because Antonio Brown scores like crazy. But I'm

0:49:39.840 --> 0:49:42.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's just the dynasty mindset coming in, But I'm

0:49:42.160 --> 0:49:45.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna lean Juju here. Uh He's he's had a hundred

0:49:45.960 --> 0:49:48.560
<v Speaker 1>yards and or a type stone in seventeen twenty eight

0:49:48.600 --> 0:49:51.799
<v Speaker 1>games and through the first two years, he's fourth in

0:49:51.840 --> 0:49:55.000
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards in the first two years of his career,

0:49:55.040 --> 0:49:59.879
<v Speaker 1>fourth in the NFL history receiving yards, averaging nearly eight

0:50:00.120 --> 0:50:03.520
<v Speaker 1>per game. Uh. Man, I like his upside and his potential,

0:50:03.560 --> 0:50:06.279
<v Speaker 1>and Antonio Brown is coming up on thirty here, so

0:50:06.719 --> 0:50:10.719
<v Speaker 1>give me Juju. Yeah, we've had the mentality where you

0:50:10.920 --> 0:50:13.520
<v Speaker 1>want to be a year early before a guy falls off, right,

0:50:13.880 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown might not fall off next year, but he's

0:50:16.200 --> 0:50:19.720
<v Speaker 1>getting to that point where he's getting old. And Juju

0:50:19.880 --> 0:50:22.839
<v Speaker 1>really closed the gap this year. And uh, I'd rather

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:25.480
<v Speaker 1>be off a guy you're early and be wrong rather

0:50:25.560 --> 0:50:28.160
<v Speaker 1>than go and you know, invest the first round pick,

0:50:28.200 --> 0:50:30.400
<v Speaker 1>second round pick on a thirty old wide receiver. So

0:50:30.440 --> 0:50:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna go with the younger guy, and I

0:50:32.080 --> 0:50:33.959
<v Speaker 1>go Juju as well. I want to crackt he's thirty.

0:50:33.960 --> 0:50:36.399
<v Speaker 1>He'll be thirty one next year. Okay, Antonio Brown when

0:50:36.600 --> 0:50:38.440
<v Speaker 1>When I crafted the question, I thought the answer was

0:50:38.440 --> 0:50:40.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna be Juju Smith Schuster, and then I started digging

0:50:40.680 --> 0:50:44.600
<v Speaker 1>into it and decided it's not um. Eight of the

0:50:44.640 --> 0:50:48.360
<v Speaker 1>top ten fantasy receivers this year have something in common.

0:50:48.400 --> 0:50:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Guys of the top twenty have something in common. They're

0:50:56.000 --> 0:51:01.360
<v Speaker 1>not slot receivers. Slot receivers all most always struggled to

0:51:01.400 --> 0:51:05.880
<v Speaker 1>consistently produce fantasy numbers and especially touchdowns. And that's the

0:51:05.880 --> 0:51:09.120
<v Speaker 1>big difference here. Good slot receivers can turn into Jarvis

0:51:09.160 --> 0:51:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Landry at a moment's notice. Remember, Jarvis Landry was an

0:51:12.560 --> 0:51:16.200
<v Speaker 1>an elite scoring option just last year. Even Adam Feeling

0:51:16.400 --> 0:51:19.879
<v Speaker 1>an excellent receiver having a borderline historic season this year,

0:51:20.920 --> 0:51:24.040
<v Speaker 1>it's just wide receiver twenty three. Since the second half

0:51:24.080 --> 0:51:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of the season, wide receiver twenty three digs his wide

0:51:27.040 --> 0:51:32.120
<v Speaker 1>receiver sixteen in that same time frame. Slot receivers aren't

0:51:32.360 --> 0:51:37.360
<v Speaker 1>generally the elite guys that lead you to fantasy championships

0:51:37.360 --> 0:51:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and the are the highest scoring receivers. It's the outside receivers.

0:51:40.280 --> 0:51:42.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think I think Antonio Brown is still there's

0:51:42.760 --> 0:51:45.319
<v Speaker 1>no reason to suggest he falls off a cliff next

0:51:45.360 --> 0:51:48.040
<v Speaker 1>year at thirty one. He's got plenty of good years

0:51:48.080 --> 0:51:50.640
<v Speaker 1>left and is still an elite receivers. Also double the

0:51:50.640 --> 0:51:53.400
<v Speaker 1>outside receivers that there are slot receivers that hurt. That

0:51:53.440 --> 0:51:55.640
<v Speaker 1>helps a little. I don't think the ball off. I

0:51:55.719 --> 0:52:02.400
<v Speaker 1>was just fully mitigating that risk. Vanni tot question number three.

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Now is the perfect time to work on twenty nineteen

0:52:05.480 --> 0:52:08.360
<v Speaker 1>rule changes? Next year, rule changes. Well, everybody's still engage,

0:52:08.400 --> 0:52:11.000
<v Speaker 1>all your owners are still in a fantasy football mindset,

0:52:11.560 --> 0:52:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and the season still fresh. What's the one rule that

0:52:15.560 --> 0:52:19.000
<v Speaker 1>every league should adopt for next year? Brian? And do

0:52:19.000 --> 0:52:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you actually have an answer this time? Yes? Alright, always

0:52:22.000 --> 0:52:24.359
<v Speaker 1>answer right, the right answer both times. Uh. And I'll

0:52:24.400 --> 0:52:26.960
<v Speaker 1>go three for three here saying I'm done with the

0:52:27.040 --> 0:52:29.560
<v Speaker 1>head to head in the semifinals. I think just say

0:52:29.560 --> 0:52:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you're standard four teams in the semifinals. Make it short

0:52:32.640 --> 0:52:35.239
<v Speaker 1>and sweet. Top two scores advance of the championship, no

0:52:35.320 --> 0:52:38.440
<v Speaker 1>head to head in the semifinals. That or let the

0:52:38.520 --> 0:52:40.239
<v Speaker 1>number one seed picked their opponent. But I let's keep

0:52:40.239 --> 0:52:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it simple and say everyone plays each other essentially in

0:52:43.440 --> 0:52:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the semifinals. Top two run four wild cards play to advance,

0:52:47.480 --> 0:52:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Then the four two buys to wild cards play to advance.

0:52:50.160 --> 0:52:51.839
<v Speaker 1>That's how you know how nearly all my league run.

0:52:53.239 --> 0:52:57.640
<v Speaker 1>You're done, all right? Mine is. It's simple and it's easy,

0:52:57.760 --> 0:53:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's just something everybody needs to do. Is have

0:53:00.840 --> 0:53:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the sixth playoffs Bobby top points or or all player,

0:53:04.200 --> 0:53:07.040
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want, but the top five. I know so

0:53:07.080 --> 0:53:09.279
<v Speaker 1>many people really love the head to head and they're

0:53:09.360 --> 0:53:11.879
<v Speaker 1>very passionate about that. Tough five still had to head.

0:53:11.920 --> 0:53:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Whatever you want there. But the last spot, get that

0:53:14.200 --> 0:53:16.920
<v Speaker 1>best team in. Don't don't allow a bad beat totally.

0:53:18.360 --> 0:53:21.359
<v Speaker 1>That's all of my league's last last and last last

0:53:21.360 --> 0:53:24.560
<v Speaker 1>spot is goes to the highest scoring team, regardless of records.

0:53:24.719 --> 0:53:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Get that team should get in. Ye absolutely, Jared, just

0:53:26.840 --> 0:53:28.799
<v Speaker 1>throw something in with mine. Uh in the same vein

0:53:28.840 --> 0:53:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of not screwing over like the best teams who get

0:53:31.600 --> 0:53:33.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, bouncing the playoffs one bad week. I like

0:53:33.480 --> 0:53:36.680
<v Speaker 1>reserving some of the prize pool for best record or

0:53:36.719 --> 0:53:40.200
<v Speaker 1>most points like smiles don't event yeah, and then the

0:53:40.280 --> 0:53:43.200
<v Speaker 1>rest goes to the playoff. I'm cool with that. But

0:53:43.280 --> 0:53:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the right answer is free agent blind bidding. It's the

0:53:47.200 --> 0:53:50.279
<v Speaker 1>single most important thing. We're still talking about that, but

0:53:50.360 --> 0:53:52.520
<v Speaker 1>we are. I know, more more than half of the

0:53:52.560 --> 0:53:57.279
<v Speaker 1>league's don't use free agent blind bidding. Still, it is mandatory.

0:53:57.320 --> 0:54:01.640
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing more important than the equitable distribution of free

0:54:01.680 --> 0:54:05.120
<v Speaker 1>agents throughout the season. The teams that are winning now,

0:54:05.280 --> 0:54:07.080
<v Speaker 1>or the teams that are that have picked up Damian

0:54:07.120 --> 0:54:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Williams and Alfred Blue and are working the waiver wire,

0:54:09.440 --> 0:54:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the people who got Philip Lindsay early, who got George

0:54:12.000 --> 0:54:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Kittle off the waiver wire, these are the teams that

0:54:14.400 --> 0:54:16.920
<v Speaker 1>need to be rewarded. And if you can't do it

0:54:17.200 --> 0:54:20.719
<v Speaker 1>any other way than free agent blind bidding, and it's

0:54:20.760 --> 0:54:24.400
<v Speaker 1>on wax now, you will now approve of zero dollar bids. Correct,

0:54:24.800 --> 0:54:28.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm on, I'm I'm fifty one percent on zero dollar

0:54:28.880 --> 0:54:34.040
<v Speaker 1>bit on it. It's it's narrow, but I'm I'm on

0:54:34.080 --> 0:54:36.440
<v Speaker 1>it over one dollar free agent pickups. So that's a

0:54:36.440 --> 0:54:43.280
<v Speaker 1>different that's whole different story. Correct answer free agent blind bidding. Honestly,

0:54:43.320 --> 0:54:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we just gave people three good things. I

0:54:46.560 --> 0:54:49.440
<v Speaker 1>think not doing head to head in the playoffs is

0:54:49.600 --> 0:54:53.520
<v Speaker 1>freaking cowardice. That's what it is. This is some bitter

0:54:53.640 --> 0:54:55.440
<v Speaker 1>owners like well, I would have beat if I were

0:54:55.440 --> 0:54:57.360
<v Speaker 1>in the other bracket, I would have won my game.

0:54:57.800 --> 0:55:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Who part of the fun and drama of fantasy football

0:55:02.239 --> 0:55:05.320
<v Speaker 1>is the bad beats and the head to head matchups.

0:55:05.560 --> 0:55:07.720
<v Speaker 1>The a f C doesn't get to play the NFC

0:55:07.840 --> 0:55:09.480
<v Speaker 1>just because the a f C has got an easier,

0:55:09.520 --> 0:55:12.120
<v Speaker 1>harder matchup. It doesn't work that way. I just like

0:55:12.200 --> 0:55:16.319
<v Speaker 1>the two best teams advancing each week. Yea, It just

0:55:16.480 --> 0:55:19.160
<v Speaker 1>life doesn't work that way. I like the draw. I

0:55:19.200 --> 0:55:22.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know. There's a lot of meritocracy out there. Life

0:55:22.080 --> 0:55:23.880
<v Speaker 1>works that way in a lot of scales where the

0:55:23.920 --> 0:55:27.120
<v Speaker 1>best just rises to the top. Vikings take on the

0:55:27.160 --> 0:55:31.759
<v Speaker 1>Detroit Lions and um so moving parts here, at least

0:55:31.800 --> 0:55:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. We'll try. We'll do our best with

0:55:33.440 --> 0:55:35.600
<v Speaker 1>what we can and based on what we know. Uh.

0:55:35.760 --> 0:55:40.840
<v Speaker 1>One of the key moving parts, Snacks Harrison, the Lions

0:55:41.000 --> 0:55:43.759
<v Speaker 1>run stuffing defensive lineman, may not play in this game.

0:55:43.800 --> 0:55:45.680
<v Speaker 1>He's shaping up as a game time decision. If he

0:55:45.719 --> 0:55:48.239
<v Speaker 1>doesn't go, Dalvin Cook vaults from a B to an A.

0:55:49.440 --> 0:55:51.799
<v Speaker 1>In the time since Snacks got there, they went from

0:55:51.840 --> 0:55:53.799
<v Speaker 1>five and a half yards per carry down to four

0:55:53.880 --> 0:55:56.760
<v Speaker 1>yards per carrying. Only two backs have scored rushing touchdowns

0:55:56.800 --> 0:56:00.279
<v Speaker 1>since they acquired Snacks Harrison. But if he doesn't play,

0:56:00.400 --> 0:56:02.760
<v Speaker 1>then again, Cook goes right to an A grade, otherwise

0:56:02.760 --> 0:56:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a B grade. Obviously, Dalvin Cook coming off a season

0:56:06.120 --> 0:56:08.320
<v Speaker 1>high nineteen carries in a lot of success in Steven

0:56:08.440 --> 0:56:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Stefanski's new system. Let's go to the passing game.

0:56:11.640 --> 0:56:14.000
<v Speaker 1>B grade on Kirk Cousins. The last four quarterbacks to

0:56:14.040 --> 0:56:16.200
<v Speaker 1>face the Lions have averaged a very modest two U

0:56:16.320 --> 0:56:19.879
<v Speaker 1>or twenty yards in one touchdown, which is actually Kirk

0:56:19.880 --> 0:56:22.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't even get to those numbers against um against the

0:56:22.640 --> 0:56:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Lions last time they played, but that was without Stefan

0:56:24.600 --> 0:56:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Digs in the game. Diggs makes a huge difference. He'll

0:56:27.000 --> 0:56:29.200
<v Speaker 1>keep Darius Slay busy. Feeling should have a much better

0:56:29.239 --> 0:56:32.080
<v Speaker 1>game because, uh, Darius Slay won't be able to go

0:56:32.120 --> 0:56:34.080
<v Speaker 1>on him out of the slot. So I still think

0:56:34.160 --> 0:56:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Kirk ittt finds his way to a decent game here.

0:56:36.560 --> 0:56:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I've got I've got B grades on both on both

0:56:41.239 --> 0:56:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Diggs and Feeling. On the dig side, he does draw

0:56:44.280 --> 0:56:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Darius Slay and that is a tough matchup. But frankly,

0:56:46.960 --> 0:56:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Diggs is better that Darius Slay. And it's not like

0:56:48.960 --> 0:56:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Slay is absolutely He's not Patrick Peterson, He's not Xavier Rhodes.

0:56:53.440 --> 0:56:56.680
<v Speaker 1>He is not a stone cold, lockdown cornerback, So you

0:56:56.760 --> 0:57:00.080
<v Speaker 1>still start Diggs, you still start feeling. Lions did to

0:57:00.360 --> 0:57:03.000
<v Speaker 1>hold theland to twenty two receiving yards in the other matchup,

0:57:03.040 --> 0:57:05.759
<v Speaker 1>but again that was without Digs, so they double and

0:57:05.800 --> 0:57:07.680
<v Speaker 1>tripled him for the whole game. He lines up against

0:57:07.719 --> 0:57:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Nevin Lawson in the slot. That's a corner that has

0:57:10.880 --> 0:57:14.040
<v Speaker 1>seated five or more receptions in four of the past

0:57:14.200 --> 0:57:18.160
<v Speaker 1>six weeks. Kevin Kyle Rodolph goes to the bench. He

0:57:18.240 --> 0:57:20.760
<v Speaker 1>hasn't scored in eleven games and has top forty one

0:57:20.840 --> 0:57:22.919
<v Speaker 1>yards just once in his last ten. The Lions haven't

0:57:22.960 --> 0:57:25.840
<v Speaker 1>allowed more than forty tight end yards and they've given

0:57:25.920 --> 0:57:29.240
<v Speaker 1>up only one tight end score in the past seven weeks.

0:57:30.080 --> 0:57:33.680
<v Speaker 1>On the Lions side, the only starting grade player is

0:57:33.760 --> 0:57:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Zack Center, and it's in part because Lindvall Joseph may

0:57:36.600 --> 0:57:38.360
<v Speaker 1>not go. I mentioned moving parts here. He may not

0:57:38.440 --> 0:57:40.400
<v Speaker 1>go in this game. And Eric Kendricks has been ruled out.

0:57:40.440 --> 0:57:42.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's two guys right in the middle of the

0:57:42.400 --> 0:57:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Vikings defense. And here comes to the north south running

0:57:45.680 --> 0:57:49.680
<v Speaker 1>style of Egan native Zach Zentner, who's actually averaged four

0:57:49.720 --> 0:57:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and a half yards per carry. Not bad over the

0:57:51.560 --> 0:57:54.440
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks. He has scored in each of those games,

0:57:54.880 --> 0:57:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and callin blage. Even if you take away that's seventy

0:57:58.520 --> 0:58:00.720
<v Speaker 1>five yard touchdown, he's still average four and a half

0:58:00.800 --> 0:58:03.440
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry against the Vikings, so starting great of

0:58:03.480 --> 0:58:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a sea on Zack Center the whole passing games on

0:58:05.320 --> 0:58:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the bench, Matthew Stafford is missing his number one and

0:58:07.800 --> 0:58:10.360
<v Speaker 1>number two wide receivers. The Vikings are elite against the

0:58:10.360 --> 0:58:12.760
<v Speaker 1>past anyway, and that brings us to the bench grade

0:58:12.760 --> 0:58:15.400
<v Speaker 1>on Kenny Golladay, even though it's coming off a career

0:58:15.480 --> 0:58:18.560
<v Speaker 1>best outing of one forty six yards, but a lot

0:58:18.600 --> 0:58:20.439
<v Speaker 1>of that came last week because they moved him into

0:58:20.440 --> 0:58:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the slot to get a better match up. The Vikings

0:58:23.440 --> 0:58:26.800
<v Speaker 1>are solid all across the board and there's nowhere to

0:58:26.840 --> 0:58:30.240
<v Speaker 1>hide Kenny Golladay here. Mackenzie Alexander has been awesome over

0:58:30.280 --> 0:58:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the last really two months, and the Vikings have allowed

0:58:33.200 --> 0:58:37.560
<v Speaker 1>just three wide receiver touchdowns in their last ten games.

0:58:38.240 --> 0:58:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Golladay bench fish, How does that feel? Scott? Are

0:58:44.520 --> 0:58:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you stinging? Are you mad? I'm just gonna cry a little,

0:58:48.000 --> 0:58:49.640
<v Speaker 1>weep a little in the corner. We need to go

0:58:49.680 --> 0:58:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to break instead of me doing this. You're you're right,

0:58:52.280 --> 0:58:54.280
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't do this on there. Let's go to break

0:58:54.280 --> 0:58:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and we'll come back to tell you if you can

0:58:55.640 --> 0:58:58.000
<v Speaker 1>get a rebound game from se Kwon Barkley this week

0:58:58.040 --> 0:59:02.400
<v Speaker 1>against a vastly improved its defense. This is Fantasy Football

0:59:02.440 --> 0:59:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Weekly presented my Green Bell Premium on the van. Welcome

0:59:21.440 --> 0:59:25.320
<v Speaker 1>back to the show. Championship Week Fantasy Football Weekly. Hopefully

0:59:25.360 --> 0:59:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you are still alive playing for something. You've got something

0:59:28.320 --> 0:59:31.120
<v Speaker 1>on the line. I hope that's the case. Uh Scott

0:59:31.880 --> 0:59:37.160
<v Speaker 1>a quick flashback listener request for a more specific rating

0:59:37.320 --> 0:59:40.600
<v Speaker 1>on on Kenyan Drake. We sort of gloss store. We

0:59:40.720 --> 0:59:42.720
<v Speaker 1>just went you know, we're not starting any Dolphins but

0:59:43.240 --> 0:59:45.640
<v Speaker 1>other than Caitlin Blage, but you want to just mentioned

0:59:45.680 --> 0:59:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Drake in particular for a moment. Was it Kenyan Drake's

0:59:47.800 --> 0:59:51.240
<v Speaker 1>mom that called in and asked us question the email

0:59:51.280 --> 0:59:54.440
<v Speaker 1>or Dan Grant in that game I just gave for

0:59:54.600 --> 0:59:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Net and Bellage starting grades. I have. I have Kenyan

0:59:58.200 --> 1:00:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Drake firmly to the mid to lower end of your bench,

1:00:01.640 --> 1:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>right in that range, midd to low end of the benches. Okay,

1:00:05.080 --> 1:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>thank you. You would think that middle far out that

1:00:09.520 --> 1:00:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Drake would be would make sense, and I was shocked

1:00:12.360 --> 1:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that they just went wholeheartedly for Blage. But that's what

1:00:14.640 --> 1:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>they did last It wasn't injury related, no, So that's it.

1:00:18.360 --> 1:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Giants taking on the Cult. Scott.

1:00:21.960 --> 1:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>My worry as a frequent se Kwam Barkley owner, is

1:00:26.160 --> 1:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>no Odell Beckham, no real passing threat and now the

1:00:29.120 --> 1:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>whole Colts offense is there to take away Kwan. Maybe

1:00:35.560 --> 1:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm nervous. It's the same guy that I just mentioned

1:00:37.800 --> 1:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>has been a top thirteen back all but two weeks

1:00:40.280 --> 1:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>this year. Right, right? How are you benching him in

1:00:43.080 --> 1:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>your championship game? I don't want to. I'm still giving

1:00:45.840 --> 1:00:48.480
<v Speaker 1>him a low A grade. He's had eighteen touches and

1:00:48.680 --> 1:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>basically every game this year, and the Colts are Cults

1:00:51.600 --> 1:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>are allowing the second most receptions and seventh most receiving

1:00:54.480 --> 1:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>yards to running backs. Still giving him an A grade,

1:00:58.000 --> 1:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>but because of O b j outs and the tough

1:01:00.280 --> 1:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>matchup against the Cults team who has only allowed one

1:01:02.480 --> 1:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>top twelve performance from a wide receiver this year. Uh,

1:01:05.320 --> 1:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and they're good against quarterback all the whole passing game

1:01:07.760 --> 1:01:11.040
<v Speaker 1>except for Ingram is on the bench. Ingram the Colts,

1:01:11.040 --> 1:01:13.960
<v Speaker 1>allowing the second most receptions and most yards to tight ends.

1:01:14.000 --> 1:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I have a B grade on Ingram, but you could

1:01:15.760 --> 1:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>even talk me into an A. I think it's a

1:01:17.200 --> 1:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>good matchup. But I have a B. What a dog

1:01:19.200 --> 1:01:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Ingram has been this year? You know he was tight

1:01:22.040 --> 1:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>end one last week? Been hurt? Yeah, I think I

1:01:25.160 --> 1:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>think he has Uh. I think the sixth most tight

1:01:27.800 --> 1:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>end one weeks this season something like that, which is

1:01:30.400 --> 1:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>crazy considering. But all you have to be have to

1:01:34.000 --> 1:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>have a tight end one week is top twelve. Yeah

1:01:36.800 --> 1:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that's right, so about eight points. Now, this is a

1:01:39.680 --> 1:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>super Bowl homecoming of sorts for Eli Manning and if

1:01:42.720 --> 1:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>they bring back Mario Manning him, I like it. This

1:01:45.120 --> 1:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>is where they wanted the last super Bowl in the

1:01:46.840 --> 1:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Cult stadium. Okay, this is I told Brian this this morning.

1:01:50.720 --> 1:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I have all major Cults players in my top ten

1:01:54.320 --> 1:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>of their respective positions right now. So I have an

1:01:57.440 --> 1:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>A grade on Andrew Luck, t Y Hilton, Eric E. Bron,

1:02:00.400 --> 1:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and Marlon Mack. Yeah. Ebron's got twelve touches as a

1:02:05.120 --> 1:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>tight end in this year of titends, uh and uh

1:02:10.000 --> 1:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>in the three grame. I'm not even gonna go over it.

1:02:12.600 --> 1:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Hebrons an A grade. Obviously you're starting him. Marlon Mack.

1:02:15.640 --> 1:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I love this. Giants or bottom eight in nearly every

1:02:18.720 --> 1:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>category against running backs, and Marlon Mack just torched a

1:02:23.360 --> 1:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>much better Dallas defense. A grade there, and with luck

1:02:26.200 --> 1:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>In Hilton when Hilton plays, Look at the last six

1:02:29.080 --> 1:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>weeks with with t Y Hilton, he's averaging just under

1:02:32.680 --> 1:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>ten targets, seven catches, and a hundred and twenty yards

1:02:36.640 --> 1:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>per game over the last six Next year, is he

1:02:39.560 --> 1:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a top Is he gonna be in your top five

1:02:41.760 --> 1:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>at the y t Y Hilton top five on your

1:02:43.800 --> 1:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>cheat sheet next August? He then rolling healthy? You know

1:02:47.560 --> 1:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Luck a whole year healthier and that line keeping right. Yeah,

1:02:52.880 --> 1:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe man, he's gonna be He'll be top ten, But

1:02:55.600 --> 1:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>how close? How high does he climb? H He hasn't

1:02:58.120 --> 1:03:00.360
<v Speaker 1>had fewer than seventy seven yards since week ate, so

1:03:00.520 --> 1:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>a grade there and and Luck. I know that he's

1:03:03.240 --> 1:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of duds, but this is a bounce

1:03:04.880 --> 1:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>back place. Watson, Newton, wentz Ryandale had three hundred yard

1:03:09.200 --> 1:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>games in our multiple touchdowns. I got an A grade, unlock.

1:03:11.960 --> 1:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>We should mention t why Hilton's a game time decision. No,

1:03:14.720 --> 1:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>he may not play in this game. There's a real

1:03:16.640 --> 1:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and I don't and there's a real threat he may play.

1:03:19.120 --> 1:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>What what I've seen is that he's questionable but likely

1:03:22.000 --> 1:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to play, is what I've seen. But maybe that's been

1:03:24.120 --> 1:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the case the last like three weeks. I think goes off. Yeah,

1:03:27.760 --> 1:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>he's it's it's tricky, but so keep an eye on it. Yeah,

1:03:30.760 --> 1:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you do want to keep it eye. It's an ankle injury.

1:03:32.400 --> 1:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>You do want to keep an eye on that. Yeah.

1:03:33.800 --> 1:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's a Neon game, so you'll know early Green

1:03:36.040 --> 1:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Bay takes on the Jets. We've already talked about a

1:03:37.840 --> 1:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>bunch of players from this game. What do you think

1:03:40.440 --> 1:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>about Aaron Rodgers and what otherwise feels like a pretty

1:03:43.240 --> 1:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>juicy matchup against a bad secondary. But Rodgers has just

1:03:46.160 --> 1:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>been so mad as a fantasy producer. Yeah, and he's

1:03:49.760 --> 1:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>banged up to knee groin injuries. Uh, I'm doing him.

1:03:54.840 --> 1:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>See honestly, almost like Donald Moore in this game, the

1:03:58.160 --> 1:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>only been going for him only Josh Allen and brock Us.

1:04:00.200 --> 1:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>While I failed through multiple touchdowns against the Jets in

1:04:02.280 --> 1:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the last eleven games, I cannot fault you for starting

1:04:04.880 --> 1:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers, but again, he's another big name quarterback. I

1:04:08.320 --> 1:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>would uhhly suggest you explore other options in a better matchup,

1:04:11.560 --> 1:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>so just to see for Rogers. Uh, Basically, the only

1:04:14.080 --> 1:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>guy who's got throwed to is Davante Adams, who has

1:04:16.240 --> 1:04:18.600
<v Speaker 1>just been money in the bank all year. Only the

1:04:18.640 --> 1:04:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Eagles have surrendered mour yards through the air, two wide

1:04:21.280 --> 1:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>receivers in the Jets, So Davante Adams automatic a Randall

1:04:24.640 --> 1:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Cobb listen as doubtful. I was kind of intrigued by

1:04:27.120 --> 1:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>his prospects, but anymore, not anymore. But I'm not going

1:04:30.680 --> 1:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to uh Marquez Valdez scantling fish say that. Other say

1:04:34.840 --> 1:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>ESP's name for me. I can never do it right.

1:04:39.240 --> 1:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>It's more like Equamini st bench. They're both on the bench,

1:04:43.480 --> 1:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and so is Jimmy Graham. I'm not trusting him in

1:04:45.560 --> 1:04:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the championship we get all uh. Only Gronk and Eric

1:04:49.880 --> 1:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Ebron have topped forty two yards against the Jets of

1:04:52.560 --> 1:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>this year. They're brutal on titles, and Jimmy Graham is

1:04:55.640 --> 1:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>brutal all around. So he's on the bench, and Jamal

1:04:58.040 --> 1:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Williams was might take a chance on me running back

1:05:00.040 --> 1:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>very viable this week over the Jets. Eli McGuire was

1:05:02.640 --> 1:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>here to take a chance for me running back charge,

1:05:04.960 --> 1:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I love it, I like him. You can love him

1:05:07.840 --> 1:05:10.439
<v Speaker 1>this week, which is said especially against the Packers, who, yeah,

1:05:10.800 --> 1:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>probably packed it in. I would imagine anyway, great play

1:05:13.880 --> 1:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>this week, so is Robbie Anderson was a great play

1:05:15.920 --> 1:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>last week, even better matchup this week. Green Bay secondary

1:05:19.160 --> 1:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>is very exploitable. Uh. They've allowed the second most touchdowns

1:05:22.080 --> 1:05:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of wide receivers and Robbie and Donald are really clicking

1:05:24.680 --> 1:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>right now. And that's why Donald was might take a

1:05:26.560 --> 1:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>chance on the quarterback and I'm not going Chris Herndon.

1:05:29.640 --> 1:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>He's been mentioned a lot, but hopefully you're not contemplating

1:05:32.120 --> 1:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>starting him, even though he's a borderline top twelve tight

1:05:34.840 --> 1:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>end option this week. Uh, the Packers also tough on

1:05:37.440 --> 1:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. We've allowed just two scores of the decision

1:05:39.880 --> 1:05:42.720
<v Speaker 1>to the position all season. So I'm bention Herndon. In

1:05:42.800 --> 1:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Championship week, Chicago taking on the San Francisco forty Niners,

1:05:47.200 --> 1:05:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and I like a bunch of Bears in this matchup

1:05:49.440 --> 1:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Let's start with the running game or Tariko

1:05:51.880 --> 1:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and gets an A grade forty Niners give up the

1:05:55.040 --> 1:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>fourth most receptions and ninth most receiving yards to opposing

1:05:58.600 --> 1:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>running back, so you know own will help you through

1:06:00.800 --> 1:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the air. Here. They allowed Chris Carson and Mike Davis

1:06:03.720 --> 1:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to catch all fourteen of their targets last week. Who

1:06:07.600 --> 1:06:10.479
<v Speaker 1>Cohen has caught twenty eight of his last thirty two

1:06:10.480 --> 1:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>targets and he has scored twice over the last four games.

1:06:13.560 --> 1:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I think he chips in with a really nice all

1:06:15.720 --> 1:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>around all purpose game here and an A grade Ontarikohen.

1:06:19.000 --> 1:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>But Jordan Howard also startable. Over the last three games,

1:06:22.520 --> 1:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>He's average eighteen carries per game on a solid four

1:06:25.320 --> 1:06:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and a half yards per carry. That eighteen has been

1:06:27.600 --> 1:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a magic number for running backs against the forty nine Ers,

1:06:29.960 --> 1:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the five backs to get eighteen carries, four of them scored,

1:06:34.160 --> 1:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>two of them found the end zone twice. So I

1:06:36.200 --> 1:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>like Jordan Howard here as well. Be grade on Jordan Howard.

1:06:39.640 --> 1:06:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I've got a borderline A grade on Alan Robinson in

1:06:44.320 --> 1:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>this matchup. I love him here. The forty Niners just

1:06:48.400 --> 1:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>put a Kello Witherspoon on in reserve. That means they're

1:06:51.360 --> 1:06:55.280
<v Speaker 1>starting three rookies in their secondary and that was a

1:06:55.320 --> 1:06:57.920
<v Speaker 1>group that already allowed the fifth most fantasy points to

1:06:57.920 --> 1:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers with three rookies starting here, the forty Niners

1:07:01.320 --> 1:07:04.720
<v Speaker 1>have allowed the seventh have allowed seven wide receiver touchdowns

1:07:04.720 --> 1:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>in the last three games alone. Allen Robinson is a

1:07:07.720 --> 1:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>great start. He's up to wide receiver. I think I've

1:07:10.160 --> 1:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>talked to myself into wide receiver eleven for me this week.

1:07:13.720 --> 1:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Doug Baldwin did last week to the Niners. A rob

1:07:16.720 --> 1:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>could duplicate that's not out of the slot, but yes,

1:07:19.360 --> 1:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that could be. He runs all over the field, but

1:07:21.200 --> 1:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>anyway that is story does run from all positions of

1:07:24.440 --> 1:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the field. He's my favorite of their receivers. You could

1:07:27.400 --> 1:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>because of all of those problems. I've got a C

1:07:30.240 --> 1:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>grade on Taylor Gabriel. Anthony Miller has been just completely

1:07:34.560 --> 1:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>off the radar. It's not nothing for three or four weeks,

1:07:37.560 --> 1:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and I mean nothing, but in a dire pitch you

1:07:40.840 --> 1:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>could use him, but I hope you don't have to

1:07:42.400 --> 1:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>go to that level. Trey Burton gets a C grade.

1:07:45.560 --> 1:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't topped forty yards or four catches in eight

1:07:47.960 --> 1:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>weeks now. He did score his first touchdown in six

1:07:51.080 --> 1:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>games last week, but the forty Niners are good up

1:07:54.040 --> 1:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>just one tight end touchdown in the last ten games.

1:07:56.080 --> 1:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a Again, in any other year, Trey Burton would

1:07:59.000 --> 1:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>be a flat out bench. This year he gets he

1:08:01.040 --> 1:08:03.439
<v Speaker 1>gets a C grade and that bride leaves just Mitch

1:08:03.480 --> 1:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Drabinsky with a solid B grade. He hasn't uh mit

1:08:07.080 --> 1:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>bisk He hasn't been allowed to throw more than thirty

1:08:09.240 --> 1:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>one passes in two months. And I don't like that

1:08:11.680 --> 1:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>part where they're dialing back is his volume and this

1:08:14.080 --> 1:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>there are gonna They're gonna run a lot. But the

1:08:17.520 --> 1:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>forty nine secondary so bad for the reasons that we

1:08:20.040 --> 1:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>already discussed. And and he's thrown one or two touchdowns

1:08:23.560 --> 1:08:27.679
<v Speaker 1>in every game in the last two months. The Niners

1:08:27.840 --> 1:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>secondary all banged up. As I mentioned, they're allowing the

1:08:30.040 --> 1:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>third most passing touchdowns over the last five games. Mitch Robinsky,

1:08:33.479 --> 1:08:35.519
<v Speaker 1>one way or another, air or ground, will have a

1:08:35.600 --> 1:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>nice game, all right. Let's go to the other side.

1:08:37.240 --> 1:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Forty nine only a couple of guys to mention the

1:08:39.720 --> 1:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>running game. Matt brit is back at the helm. But

1:08:42.120 --> 1:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bears give up the six fewest rushing attempts, the

1:08:44.439 --> 1:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>fourth fewest rushing yards, and the fewest rushing touchdowns per

1:08:47.920 --> 1:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>game to opposing running backs, and he's always at risk

1:08:51.160 --> 1:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of failing to finish a game. I've got a C

1:08:53.280 --> 1:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>grade on the Niners starting running back and you don't

1:08:55.880 --> 1:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>want to go to the depth players at all. And then, um,

1:08:59.800 --> 1:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that only leaves us a couple of the guys to

1:09:01.280 --> 1:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>talk about. George Kettle, of course supposed to great numbers,

1:09:04.880 --> 1:09:07.559
<v Speaker 1>but the Bears have been great against tight ends. No

1:09:07.960 --> 1:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>tight end has gone for fifty yards and none have

1:09:12.160 --> 1:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>scored in the last seven weeks. That said, the Bears

1:09:16.200 --> 1:09:19.559
<v Speaker 1>have not faced a single top ten tight end all

1:09:19.640 --> 1:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>year long, and in home games. Kill has seen at

1:09:22.439 --> 1:09:24.599
<v Speaker 1>least seven targets in five of the last of five

1:09:24.640 --> 1:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of the six home games, and he had a hundred

1:09:27.360 --> 1:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>yards and a score in the game in which he

1:09:28.840 --> 1:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't see seven targets. So one way or another, Kittle

1:09:31.360 --> 1:09:33.519
<v Speaker 1>ought to get you to a good game. Here a

1:09:33.720 --> 1:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>grade George Kittle. Last guy I'll mention Dante Pettis. Chicago

1:09:37.439 --> 1:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>actually as great as Chicago's defense is, they actually give

1:09:40.960 --> 1:09:43.519
<v Speaker 1>up the fifth most receptions in the six most receiving

1:09:43.600 --> 1:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>yards to wide receivers. Pettis has has turned into the

1:09:46.920 --> 1:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>go to receiver and Marquis go to and totally disappeared.

1:09:49.920 --> 1:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Pettis has been a consistent producer here for a month.

1:09:52.439 --> 1:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Touchdowns in three games, hundred yard game and the other one.

1:09:55.400 --> 1:09:58.679
<v Speaker 1>So um he is he gets a B grade. As

1:09:58.680 --> 1:10:02.680
<v Speaker 1>they battle back, playing from behind throughout. Nick Mullins is

1:10:02.720 --> 1:10:06.639
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. All right. That wraps up this segment.

1:10:07.200 --> 1:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, the last segment of the year

1:10:10.720 --> 1:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>for Fantasy Football Weekly, our championship edition. Stay tuned. This

1:10:16.080 --> 1:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>is Fantasy Football Weekly, the final segment of a championship

1:10:30.320 --> 1:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>edition of Fantasy Football, the most weekly Thank you for

1:10:32.439 --> 1:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>joining us. I hope you are in the championship game.

1:10:34.880 --> 1:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>We have four games to get through and then we're

1:10:36.160 --> 1:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna get to Lightning Round. We'll do our best to

1:10:38.080 --> 1:10:39.439
<v Speaker 1>be brief here so we can get to as many

1:10:39.479 --> 1:10:42.559
<v Speaker 1>of your questions as possible. We begin with the Rams

1:10:42.600 --> 1:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>taking on Arizona. We broke down the Todd Gurley situation

1:10:46.360 --> 1:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>in great detail at the start of the show. If

1:10:49.240 --> 1:10:51.479
<v Speaker 1>you miss that, go back to the podcast, which will

1:10:51.520 --> 1:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>be posted I'm told within minutes of the end of

1:10:54.600 --> 1:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the show, So check out the podcast for detail on that.

1:10:58.800 --> 1:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>So let's do let's you know, given that, let's not

1:11:01.400 --> 1:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>repeat that whole opening part of no No, Let's so

1:11:04.000 --> 1:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>we can take the no. Uh. John Kelly was my

1:11:06.760 --> 1:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>takeome guy, so obviously I like him whether Girly plays

1:11:10.280 --> 1:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>or not. I like him because I think he'll end

1:11:12.840 --> 1:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the game. He'll get he'll get the touches girly if

1:11:15.080 --> 1:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>he starts. I'm only giving him a C grade just

1:11:16.920 --> 1:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>because I think he could come out early. I really do.

1:11:20.479 --> 1:11:22.479
<v Speaker 1>It's a sixteen and a half point line. I think

1:11:22.560 --> 1:11:25.320
<v Speaker 1>they could get ahead and he could just come out um.

1:11:25.360 --> 1:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>In the passing game, I'm giving Golf a Z A

1:11:28.120 --> 1:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>C A Z wow a CEE. As you've mentioned many

1:11:31.320 --> 1:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>times on this show, the dichotomy when when it's a

1:11:33.720 --> 1:11:36.439
<v Speaker 1>running day versus a passing day, when it's a girly day.

1:11:36.479 --> 1:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be a girly Kelly day, So

1:11:38.960 --> 1:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I have Golf with a C grade here. I don't

1:11:41.920 --> 1:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to pass a ton against the top

1:11:44.120 --> 1:11:47.879
<v Speaker 1>five past defense and the league's second worst run at defense,

1:11:48.320 --> 1:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>so uh, I give him a C grade. I give

1:11:51.160 --> 1:11:54.839
<v Speaker 1>Cooks a C grade mainly because it's a tough matchup

1:11:54.840 --> 1:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>with Buddha Baker, but he could always have one of

1:11:57.000 --> 1:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>those big one hundred yard days. He has five of

1:11:59.200 --> 1:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>them this season. He's always good for a big play.

1:12:02.120 --> 1:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>A C grade there, B grade for Robert Woods, who

1:12:05.120 --> 1:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>is top sixty yards in fourteen straight and he's averaging

1:12:08.040 --> 1:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>ten targets per game in the last four. But he

1:12:10.760 --> 1:12:12.719
<v Speaker 1>gets Patrick. No, he won't get Pat. He'll get Budda

1:12:12.720 --> 1:12:15.519
<v Speaker 1>Baker for a lot of this matchup yet tricky. Yeah, yeah,

1:12:15.760 --> 1:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>he gets tough match up with Buddha Aker. What I think.

1:12:17.960 --> 1:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I said that for Cooks, but not not Cooks. It's

1:12:19.800 --> 1:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Woods that gets the tough match up, right, But Peter, Yeah, exactly. Uh,

1:12:25.280 --> 1:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Reynolds I have on the bench. I just don't think

1:12:27.240 --> 1:12:28.720
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be enough meat on the bones in the

1:12:28.720 --> 1:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>passing game in this one. The only way that he's

1:12:30.960 --> 1:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>he has a game good game here is if they

1:12:32.880 --> 1:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>just throw away from Patrick Peterson go to Reynolds. And

1:12:36.000 --> 1:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and that was last week. He had twelve targets last week,

1:12:38.280 --> 1:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>but not even a great game on those twelve targets.

1:12:41.040 --> 1:12:43.599
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, I've Rosen on the bench, bench

1:12:43.760 --> 1:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and the whole passing Honestly, I gave Fits a sea

1:12:47.760 --> 1:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>because he's averaging five for sixty two over the last

1:12:49.960 --> 1:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>few weeks. He's getting something. So in PPR leagues, I

1:12:52.760 --> 1:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>get in the sea. But Roby Coleman is very good

1:12:55.280 --> 1:12:58.839
<v Speaker 1>in the barely a C grade and DJ I actually

1:12:58.880 --> 1:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>did give a B grade too, because he's mill of

1:13:00.800 --> 1:13:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the pack against the running I think Rosen's gonna have

1:13:02.720 --> 1:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to dump it off to him just enough to give

1:13:04.360 --> 1:13:08.639
<v Speaker 1>him an Okay day, that's it. Pittsburgh takes on New

1:13:08.720 --> 1:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Orleans and a high flying shootout. Brian that there's not

1:13:11.479 --> 1:13:14.439
<v Speaker 1>many people to bench here. I don't think they're kind

1:13:14.479 --> 1:13:17.519
<v Speaker 1>of is well, let's talk about well, you're mentioned James Conner,

1:13:17.560 --> 1:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>he's been ruled out. Yeah, the Jalen Samuels show again.

1:13:19.880 --> 1:13:21.479
<v Speaker 1>But uh, I'm gonna give him a be because New

1:13:21.560 --> 1:13:23.759
<v Speaker 1>Orleans is very tough against running backs on the ground,

1:13:24.160 --> 1:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>allowing just over fifteen carries and like fifty five yards

1:13:27.320 --> 1:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>per game, so they are susceptible through the air running

1:13:30.320 --> 1:13:32.599
<v Speaker 1>backs and Jalen Samuels can catch the ball, So he's

1:13:32.640 --> 1:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>You're starting Samuels if you want him this week. The

1:13:34.439 --> 1:13:36.839
<v Speaker 1>volume is definitely gonna be there for him. Uh, speaking

1:13:36.880 --> 1:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>of your starting is an elite run D I mean

1:13:40.200 --> 1:13:43.080
<v Speaker 1>this is not. He have to downgrade him in standard standard.

1:13:43.120 --> 1:13:45.559
<v Speaker 1>He's a C. Actually I should clarify that p PRB

1:13:45.880 --> 1:13:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Standard C. It's a brutal matchup, sort of a tough

1:13:50.120 --> 1:13:53.519
<v Speaker 1>matchup for Antonio Brown, but not really. He's obviously the

1:13:53.560 --> 1:13:56.439
<v Speaker 1>real The real concern here is Juju, who heard his

1:13:56.520 --> 1:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>growing this week in practice game time decision. I don't

1:14:00.400 --> 1:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>know what to tell you other than you gotta monitor this,

1:14:02.040 --> 1:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and if you're banking on him, I think James Washington

1:14:05.280 --> 1:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>is the next guy. Up. Four targets in each of

1:14:07.280 --> 1:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the last two games of Juju is out entirely. You

1:14:09.840 --> 1:14:11.559
<v Speaker 1>will have to absorb some of those, and you know

1:14:11.640 --> 1:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna focus a ton on Antonio Brown. But I

1:14:14.800 --> 1:14:17.519
<v Speaker 1>would have a better Uh. It's a late game, though,

1:14:17.520 --> 1:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>so you're not gonna have a lot of ballback options.

1:14:19.120 --> 1:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>So he's one that is definitely available out there if

1:14:21.800 --> 1:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you're desperate. Uh. But yeah, keep you around Juju. All

1:14:24.800 --> 1:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I can say vans McDonald, I'm I got him on

1:14:29.040 --> 1:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the bench. Uh. Even though the Saints have allowed three

1:14:32.280 --> 1:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>tight end scores over the last two games, allowing under

1:14:34.320 --> 1:14:36.439
<v Speaker 1>three catches and under under thirty yards per game to

1:14:36.439 --> 1:14:38.639
<v Speaker 1>the position, I just can't trust Vans in this game.

1:14:39.040 --> 1:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>And then uh big Ben, you get road Ben. But

1:14:41.120 --> 1:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>he's been pretty good on the road this year. The

1:14:42.840 --> 1:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>yard the touchdowns have been middling, one or two touchdowns

1:14:46.240 --> 1:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>in every road game, but the Saints are allowing two

1:14:48.720 --> 1:14:51.559
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns per game. So Ben offers a very safe

1:14:51.600 --> 1:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>floor in the Championship week in this matchup with it,

1:14:53.720 --> 1:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly still a high ceiling possibility over the Saints.

1:14:57.680 --> 1:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Really not a whole lot to talk about. We'll start

1:14:59.720 --> 1:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>with the un Backs album. Kamara just cann give him

1:15:01.880 --> 1:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a B. The Steelers have allowed only one yard rusher

1:15:05.479 --> 1:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>all year, and only one back has top sixty receiving

1:15:08.120 --> 1:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>yards overall. They give up the seventh he was rushing

1:15:10.960 --> 1:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>yards and the third few was receiving yards of the position.

1:15:13.080 --> 1:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>So just a it's a tough matchup. He's down at

1:15:15.840 --> 1:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>running back thirteen for me, and and that puts mark

1:15:18.240 --> 1:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Ingram firmly on the bench for me. Uh yeah, what

1:15:21.479 --> 1:15:24.679
<v Speaker 1>a disaster mark Ingram has been for his owners this year?

1:15:24.800 --> 1:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Holy cow, really really disappointing. He's had about three good

1:15:29.760 --> 1:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>games and well, he said, and of course he missed

1:15:33.360 --> 1:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the first four games. We said avoid him at all

1:15:35.120 --> 1:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>costs going into the year. I know I did, at

1:15:36.960 --> 1:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>least I'm pretty sure you did charge. But anyway, he's

1:15:38.680 --> 1:15:42.599
<v Speaker 1>on the bench over and over to uh the receiving game.

1:15:42.640 --> 1:15:46.679
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas obvious A I'm not recommending other wide receiver.

1:15:46.920 --> 1:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>His owners wouldn't feel like it's well, well obviously and

1:15:50.360 --> 1:15:52.439
<v Speaker 1>that no touchdowns in a month of play. Hasn't it

1:15:52.479 --> 1:15:55.439
<v Speaker 1>a hundred yards in a month of play. It's it's

1:15:55.439 --> 1:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>been obviously. But you're starting him, Yes, it doesn't matter

1:15:58.840 --> 1:16:00.599
<v Speaker 1>what his great is. You have to start Michael Thomas

1:16:00.680 --> 1:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>in this game, but you don't have to start any

1:16:02.280 --> 1:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>other wide receiver. Tra K wants Smith is way too

1:16:04.240 --> 1:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>much of a dark throw and we're not going anywhere

1:16:06.280 --> 1:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>there North, Ben Watson, and Well, I'll finish with Drew Brees.

1:16:11.080 --> 1:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>He gets a sea. Along with Tom Brady, Philip Rivers

1:16:14.479 --> 1:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and Aaron Rodgers. Drew Brees all have gotten seas down

1:16:18.240 --> 1:16:20.719
<v Speaker 1>this show. Odds are if you've been banking on Breeze,

1:16:20.760 --> 1:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you've been bounced from your playoffs already because he's been

1:16:23.280 --> 1:16:26.479
<v Speaker 1>absolutely brutal statistically over the last three weeks. Not an

1:16:26.479 --> 1:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>amazing matchup, but over the last three games. Pittsburgh is

1:16:29.200 --> 1:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the line of three yards and nearly two passing touchdowns,

1:16:31.640 --> 1:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>so you're gonna start breeze. But you might have better

1:16:34.400 --> 1:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>options out there. That's all I can say. Kansas City

1:16:36.800 --> 1:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>takes on Seattle. Patrick Mahomes, Tyreek Hill, and and Travis

1:16:40.280 --> 1:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey are all obvious a great Mahomes is my number

1:16:43.280 --> 1:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>one quarterback, Kelsey's my number one tight end, and I

1:16:47.479 --> 1:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>like to Rek Hill here as well. Even though there

1:16:50.200 --> 1:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>there there are some matchup. There are some tricky parts

1:16:53.080 --> 1:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of this matchup. But Tyree Hill lines up all over

1:16:55.400 --> 1:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the field. He's probably sitting on a night's game as well.

1:16:58.080 --> 1:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>The only the big question, the big thing to know.

1:16:59.880 --> 1:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>He Spencer wears out and date well, he's doubtful, so

1:17:03.160 --> 1:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>we assume he's not going to go. I can't remember

1:17:05.920 --> 1:17:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the last time a doubtful player played almost never right, Uh.

1:17:09.760 --> 1:17:13.519
<v Speaker 1>Damian Williams will be your your workhorse quasi workhorse running back,

1:17:13.560 --> 1:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and I've got a B grade on him, but it's

1:17:15.240 --> 1:17:19.719
<v Speaker 1>almost an A grade. Since becoming regularly involved in Week thirteen,

1:17:20.000 --> 1:17:22.479
<v Speaker 1>Williams's average to four and half yards per carry and

1:17:22.560 --> 1:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown per game on the ground, but he's also

1:17:25.040 --> 1:17:28.360
<v Speaker 1>caught twelve of thirteen passes in that span, and he

1:17:28.439 --> 1:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>faces a Seahawks team that gives up the eighth most receptions,

1:17:31.960 --> 1:17:36.639
<v Speaker 1>fourth most receiving yards per game. Two opposing backs other

1:17:36.720 --> 1:17:38.960
<v Speaker 1>all purpose backs like Aaron Jones and Christian McCaffrey and

1:17:39.000 --> 1:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook all had big games both through the air

1:17:41.360 --> 1:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and on the ground. I like Damian Williams in this one.

1:17:43.560 --> 1:17:46.519
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Seattle. Chris Carson is sitting on a

1:17:46.560 --> 1:17:49.120
<v Speaker 1>monster game and he's my number two ranked running back

1:17:49.160 --> 1:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>this week. The Kansas City Chiefs give up the sixth

1:17:52.080 --> 1:17:56.400
<v Speaker 1>most rushing yards per game and five yards per carry

1:17:56.439 --> 1:17:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to opposing running backs. They also give up the most

1:17:59.240 --> 1:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards and the most receiving touchdowns per game to

1:18:02.120 --> 1:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>running backs. So a great game coming for Chris Carson.

1:18:05.640 --> 1:18:08.799
<v Speaker 1>They're so bad here that Mike Davis gets a starting grade.

1:18:09.120 --> 1:18:11.920
<v Speaker 1>He's up at a sea here. Rashad Penny is out,

1:18:12.240 --> 1:18:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and Davis is gonna get enough work that he could

1:18:14.200 --> 1:18:16.559
<v Speaker 1>even chip in something meaningful as well. Let's go to

1:18:16.600 --> 1:18:19.559
<v Speaker 1>the passing game. I like Russell Wilson a lot too.

1:18:19.800 --> 1:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Now he's got low volume, and that has meant that

1:18:23.080 --> 1:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>because no team runs more than the Seahawks in he

1:18:25.880 --> 1:18:29.639
<v Speaker 1>ranks twenty seven in passing yards amongst starting quarterbacks. Yet

1:18:30.000 --> 1:18:32.559
<v Speaker 1>despite that, he's throwing multiple touchdowns twelve different times, and

1:18:32.560 --> 1:18:35.679
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs of allowed multiple touchdown passes nine times, including

1:18:35.920 --> 1:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>four straight. So you're all that together and Russell Wilson

1:18:39.840 --> 1:18:43.439
<v Speaker 1>sitting on a couple of touchdowns here, Doug Baldwin, be great.

1:18:43.479 --> 1:18:45.599
<v Speaker 1>Be great on Russell Wilson, by the way, be great

1:18:45.600 --> 1:18:49.680
<v Speaker 1>on Doug Baldwin. Over Baldwin's last four games played, he

1:18:49.760 --> 1:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>has seen almost double the targets of Tyler Lockett. So

1:18:53.280 --> 1:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, Baldwin is always more of the go to

1:18:55.080 --> 1:18:57.679
<v Speaker 1>receiver traditionally than lock It. Lock It is the low

1:18:57.760 --> 1:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>volume guy. You like the volume here for Baldwin a lot.

1:19:00.880 --> 1:19:05.799
<v Speaker 1>He goes up against strong, usually strong coverage from Kendall Fuller.

1:19:06.160 --> 1:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>In Fuller's last two months, he hasn't allowed any touchdowns

1:19:09.120 --> 1:19:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and only once in his coverage did he give up

1:19:11.160 --> 1:19:13.439
<v Speaker 1>more than fifty four yards. So I don't love the

1:19:13.439 --> 1:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>matchup with Fuller, but I love how much volume Doug

1:19:16.240 --> 1:19:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Baldwin's getting. He gets a B, Tyler Lockett gets a B.

1:19:19.880 --> 1:19:23.360
<v Speaker 1>The chief secondary allowing the sixth most receptions to receivers,

1:19:23.680 --> 1:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and six of the last seven touchdowns they've given up

1:19:26.040 --> 1:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>have been to non slot receivers. That brings Tyler lock

1:19:29.880 --> 1:19:33.360
<v Speaker 1>into play here. Orlando Scandrick is the only Chief's cornerback

1:19:33.400 --> 1:19:35.599
<v Speaker 1>who is the speed to hang with. Locket is really

1:19:35.600 --> 1:19:38.519
<v Speaker 1>really fast, but Scander Colon plays one side of the field,

1:19:38.760 --> 1:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>so you can get a positive matchup for Tyler Lockett

1:19:42.280 --> 1:19:45.639
<v Speaker 1>against the much slower Steven Nelson on the other side.

1:19:45.840 --> 1:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>So I like lock It here as well, A B

1:19:48.320 --> 1:19:54.160
<v Speaker 1>grade for him. Final matchup, it's the do we have

1:19:54.160 --> 1:19:55.519
<v Speaker 1>a Monday night game? I think it is a Monday

1:19:56.280 --> 1:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Monday in games, Denver taking on Oakland Scott wrap it

1:19:59.320 --> 1:20:01.160
<v Speaker 1>up for US final matchup of the year. Yeah, I

1:20:01.160 --> 1:20:03.120
<v Speaker 1>actually like the quarterbacks in this game. I get them

1:20:03.120 --> 1:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>both starting grades. Let's start on Denver side. I like Keenum.

1:20:06.360 --> 1:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I know he had a bad game against them week

1:20:08.120 --> 1:20:10.559
<v Speaker 1>two when they faced but since then the Raiders have

1:20:10.640 --> 1:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>gone on to allow the most passing touchdowns in the NFL,

1:20:14.560 --> 1:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>including eleven straight multiple touchdown games until Driskill screwed that

1:20:18.880 --> 1:20:22.400
<v Speaker 1>up last week. But I I really, I really like

1:20:22.479 --> 1:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Keenham this week to uh re can restart that trend. Uh.

1:20:27.560 --> 1:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>So for the wide receivers, I'm benching Sutton. He's just

1:20:30.760 --> 1:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>lost right now. He's just lost since Emmanuel Sanders went out,

1:20:34.040 --> 1:20:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and Hamilton's and Patrick are getting the work. Hamilton's is

1:20:36.680 --> 1:20:40.120
<v Speaker 1>getting the targets, he's getting the receptions. Um, He's had

1:20:40.120 --> 1:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>at least nine targets and at least seven receptions in

1:20:42.280 --> 1:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>each game since he went out. I have a C

1:20:43.920 --> 1:20:46.439
<v Speaker 1>grade on Hamilton's and a C grade on Patrick, who's

1:20:46.439 --> 1:20:49.559
<v Speaker 1>more of the big play guy, gets more yards. Uh.

1:20:49.840 --> 1:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I think they're both playable at see. If I had

1:20:51.720 --> 1:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to choose one, I'll choose Hamilton's if those two of

1:20:54.200 --> 1:20:57.400
<v Speaker 1>those two though, because the Raiders have allowed seven touchdowns

1:20:57.400 --> 1:21:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to the slot in just since Week ten and Hamilton's

1:21:01.720 --> 1:21:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that angle yep. So uh, Philip Lindsay I'm given an A.

1:21:05.520 --> 1:21:08.599
<v Speaker 1>The Raiders are allowing a ridiculous amount of rushing yards.

1:21:08.600 --> 1:21:10.759
<v Speaker 1>I think it's like a hundred and twenty game something

1:21:10.840 --> 1:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>like that. Uh, second worst in the NFL. In that case,

1:21:13.880 --> 1:21:16.639
<v Speaker 1>I think lindsay o rebound. I know that since Sanders

1:21:16.720 --> 1:21:19.880
<v Speaker 1>went down four carries for forty four yards, you're scared,

1:21:20.320 --> 1:21:23.200
<v Speaker 1>but but this is this is a get right game.

1:21:24.200 --> 1:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, Derek Carr, I'm also given a

1:21:26.280 --> 1:21:28.599
<v Speaker 1>C grade. He's averaging two hundred nine yards and two

1:21:28.640 --> 1:21:31.759
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns per game over the last three and the Broncos

1:21:31.800 --> 1:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>have allowed three hundred plus and or multiple touchdowns and

1:21:34.200 --> 1:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>six of the last seven. And we're just talking off air.

1:21:36.520 --> 1:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't thrown a pick since Week five. So I

1:21:39.400 --> 1:21:41.679
<v Speaker 1>like Derek Carr right now. I don't like his wide

1:21:41.680 --> 1:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>receivers though, because I don't know who to start. They're

1:21:43.840 --> 1:21:46.599
<v Speaker 1>so they're so hit and miss. I have them all

1:21:46.600 --> 1:21:48.519
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. Where I do like their passing game

1:21:48.640 --> 1:21:50.640
<v Speaker 1>is Jared Cook, who I give an A grade to

1:21:50.760 --> 1:21:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos fourth worst against tight ends. Cook the fifth

1:21:53.920 --> 1:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>best tight end on the season and kid only two

1:21:57.000 --> 1:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half Denver Broncos team just a couple of

1:21:59.680 --> 1:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. I remember, so uh, and I have the

1:22:02.080 --> 1:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>running backs on the bench. I don't I don't care

1:22:03.840 --> 1:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>how many Carr's Martin gets. I just can't start him

1:22:05.840 --> 1:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>in this matchup. I don't blame These teams hate each

1:22:08.320 --> 1:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>other too, so they're gonna go at it. It's gonna

1:22:10.000 --> 1:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>be a good game. Final Lightning Round of the year.

1:22:13.760 --> 1:22:15.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll try to zip through as many colleges as we can,

1:22:15.720 --> 1:22:18.519
<v Speaker 1>and about the four or five minutes that we've got left,

1:22:18.600 --> 1:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>beginning with Patrick, thank you for your patience today. Hello Patrick, Hi,

1:22:24.840 --> 1:22:31.559
<v Speaker 1>um PPR league and we get credit for return yards?

1:22:32.040 --> 1:22:38.160
<v Speaker 1>So three Cohen or Derrick Henry. Wow, I don't know

1:22:38.200 --> 1:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>how much return yards Cohen gets. You can't sit Derrick

1:22:41.360 --> 1:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Henry right now. He's he's got another great matchup and

1:22:44.120 --> 1:22:51.120
<v Speaker 1>yeah he's on fire. Tommy, Hello, Dak or Rivers? Oh

1:22:51.120 --> 1:22:55.880
<v Speaker 1>oh boy? Wow? Um, I got Dak a few spots higher.

1:22:56.120 --> 1:23:00.519
<v Speaker 1>It's a Rivers Baltimore. Ye, Rivers is Baltimore. I'll take Dak, Bill,

1:23:00.640 --> 1:23:06.599
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Fanily. Hey, thanks guys, Rivers, Rogers or Keenum.

1:23:06.840 --> 1:23:10.360
<v Speaker 1>That's the toughest question between two players. You're breaking the

1:23:10.479 --> 1:23:18.160
<v Speaker 1>rules in Championship week Rivers, Keenum. I think you just

1:23:18.240 --> 1:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you just talked to me into clean Um you Keenum,

1:23:20.240 --> 1:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you just talked me into Keenam James Hello, Hey, thanks guys.

1:23:26.560 --> 1:23:30.639
<v Speaker 1>I got half point PPR for the Lindsay or do Cook. Wow,

1:23:30.680 --> 1:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you really gotta pick between those two. I think it

1:23:34.120 --> 1:23:36.160
<v Speaker 1>hinges on snaps. I was gonna say with us, Yeah,

1:23:36.240 --> 1:23:39.360
<v Speaker 1>there you go. I totally agree. If they're snackless, then

1:23:39.400 --> 1:23:42.479
<v Speaker 1>you start cooking. Who cook looks great? Right? Andrew? Hello?

1:23:45.040 --> 1:23:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Andrew by uh between Uh, I'm sorry, I got head

1:23:52.720 --> 1:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the wrong page up here. Between David Johnson or Marii

1:23:56.080 --> 1:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Cooper for half point PPR higher, Okay, I think that's

1:24:01.120 --> 1:24:02.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be more of a shootout than people think.

1:24:03.040 --> 1:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Chris Hello, Hey, half point PPR. Corey Davis or Ken Allen.

1:24:10.720 --> 1:24:13.519
<v Speaker 1>I'd actually go Corey Davis in this one. I'm nervous

1:24:13.520 --> 1:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>about Keenan Allen. I don't like that matchup at all.

1:24:17.320 --> 1:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>And he's banged up and he's banged up. Ryan Hello. Yeah.

1:24:21.120 --> 1:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>If Gurley doesn't go, go with Kelly or Damian Williams,

1:24:25.760 --> 1:24:28.400
<v Speaker 1>well you gotta pick. Oh, no, you don't. They're both

1:24:28.439 --> 1:24:33.160
<v Speaker 1>like games. I go Damian Williams. I think Mark you

1:24:33.160 --> 1:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>are next? Two running back? Uh, Melvin Gordon, Chris Carson

1:24:40.200 --> 1:24:43.839
<v Speaker 1>a cop opped up. It's your one question between two guys.

1:24:44.880 --> 1:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Bring it down to two guys. Mark, I don't think

1:24:47.800 --> 1:24:52.599
<v Speaker 1>this has happened over here. Now it's happening, right, Damian Williams,

1:24:52.640 --> 1:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Jamal william or Melvin Gordon, Bobby you are next? Stravinsky

1:25:01.200 --> 1:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>or Breed Rabinsky, there's our guy here. Yes, ye, Tommy,

1:25:07.320 --> 1:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you're next, PPR Cavin Coleman or James Wood, Kevin Coleman

1:25:14.160 --> 1:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Smith out It's yeah, it's gonna be Coleman. Fred you're

1:25:17.280 --> 1:25:21.719
<v Speaker 1>on the fan. Yes, I like to know between Philip

1:25:21.920 --> 1:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>rivers Um just one more cousins or should I take

1:25:26.320 --> 1:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>up one of your take a chance on the quarterball

1:25:29.240 --> 1:25:32.599
<v Speaker 1>because he's trying to have people trying to beat the system.

1:25:32.640 --> 1:25:38.880
<v Speaker 1>In Championship week, John the next John, I'm gonna met

1:25:39.000 --> 1:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>running back starts too, and then I've got Melvin Garden,

1:25:42.560 --> 1:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Williams, Jalen Samwell or John Kelly. All right, let

1:25:49.080 --> 1:25:52.960
<v Speaker 1>me just see the idea here is as it has

1:25:53.000 --> 1:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>been now for five years. It's one question between two

1:25:57.000 --> 1:25:59.439
<v Speaker 1>players so that we can get to as many callers

1:25:59.439 --> 1:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>as possible bowl and not try to decode your start

1:26:02.280 --> 1:26:04.880
<v Speaker 1>three or five. That's how we do this, and that's

1:26:04.880 --> 1:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>how we've always done it, and I think we've now

1:26:06.800 --> 1:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>on our third or fourth time through. This one just

1:26:09.280 --> 1:26:13.679
<v Speaker 1>sums up the fantasy football season right this season. Trance,

1:26:14.040 --> 1:26:22.360
<v Speaker 1>please help me here, I can't. I'm sorry, Trent say

1:26:22.360 --> 1:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it again. Louder League Balliage or blue. I think it's

1:26:30.040 --> 1:26:39.200
<v Speaker 1>blue now that la Dave, You're next, Dave, I got

1:26:39.200 --> 1:26:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Sony Michelle or you might be talking me into Outfred Blue.

1:26:43.000 --> 1:26:45.559
<v Speaker 1>I honestly think it's blue. It is. There's no James

1:26:45.560 --> 1:26:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Devlin on the Texas. That's right, Greg, you're next, watch

1:26:50.720 --> 1:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Foreman getations. Yes that's you. Greg? Oh? Um, Gordon or

1:26:58.240 --> 1:27:03.479
<v Speaker 1>drop somebody and go pick up there and a NONR Gordon. Yeah, Gordon, Yeah,

1:27:03.520 --> 1:27:06.439
<v Speaker 1>it's Melvin Gordon. You can pick up Derek. Wait is

1:27:06.439 --> 1:27:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry? Did he say Derrick Henry? Oh? I just

1:27:10.479 --> 1:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>tuned out after he said, you gotta go get Derrick Henry.

1:27:13.160 --> 1:27:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I have Derrick Henry higher than Gordon. Yeah. Yeah, to

1:27:17.479 --> 1:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>take a defensive move if nothing else. Um. In our

1:27:21.760 --> 1:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>final moments, I want to send a heartfelt thank to

1:27:24.360 --> 1:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>my co host Scott, Brian and Matt for a it.

1:27:29.200 --> 1:27:31.360
<v Speaker 1>As you guys know, as ever as the listeners know,

1:27:32.080 --> 1:27:36.920
<v Speaker 1>preparing this show is not easy. These guys dedicate a

1:27:36.920 --> 1:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of hours throughout the week to be ready on

1:27:39.280 --> 1:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Saturday and to execute this level this this program at

1:27:42.000 --> 1:27:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the level that you've become used to, and it is

1:27:44.439 --> 1:27:47.679
<v Speaker 1>not easy. And I'm very grateful. Thank you very much guys,

1:27:48.160 --> 1:27:50.439
<v Speaker 1>and thank you Matt Harrison as well. Are great the

1:27:50.479 --> 1:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>opportunity it is you work incredibly hard obviously as well.

1:27:54.840 --> 1:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. I appreciate that. We'll be back next August

1:27:58.000 --> 1:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>three for the twenty five year, the silver anniversary of

1:28:01.640 --> 1:28:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. We had a great year with everybody.

1:28:04.920 --> 1:28:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I hope you did too. Best of luck in the

1:28:06.400 --> 1:28:10.920
<v Speaker 1>championship game. Bye bye. You're listening to the fan