WEBVTT - ETFs to Watch in 2026

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news, bokom Our Trains.

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joel Webber and I'm Eric Belchernas.

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Happy New Year, Happy New Year, buddy, twenty twenty six.

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>We're here. We made it, but we're recording this in

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>advance so that you know we can sleep in on

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the holiday.

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that was that was me pretending to be in

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 2>the future.

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes, good job, thank you. So as we looked at

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six, as always when we do this on Trillions,

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:39.520
<v Speaker 1>we try and enter the new year with some spotlights

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>on some tickers.

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 3>This is really born out of me doing the Money Show,

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 3>which is a direct to retail conference that they have

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 3>like in Florida, and it's a lot of like investors

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 3>who are just looking for cool investments. And I used

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 3>to do my like like top down Trends PowerPoint and

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 3>I could tell like they weren't that into it, but

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 3>every time I brought up a ticker, they come up

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 3>after what was the ticker?

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>You said?

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 2>So I realized they just like tickers.

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 3>So I did any show presentation called like twenty three

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 3>ets for twenty twenty three.

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:04.559
<v Speaker 2>I was like, this should be a note.

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 3>So you started writing that every year, and I got

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 3>really good feedback on it. People just like tickers stroll

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 3>at the end of the day, you can tell them

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 3>all the cool trends. But this is like the Silicon

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:16.400
<v Speaker 3>Valley of the investing world, and so we know all

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 3>the gadgets and here we are going to unearth some

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.960
<v Speaker 3>stuff that we find interesting and people like that.

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 2>But twenty two.

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Twenty six for twenty six seem like maybe a little

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>too much, So we're gonna pair it back just a

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit and do sixteen ish for twenty six.

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we just we just don't have enough time to

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 3>do all of them. Sixteen seems like a good number.

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 3>But if you want to see the full list, happy

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 3>to just email me and I'll send you the report

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 3>we did on it.

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Also joining us Athanasio, Sarah Vegas, and James Seffert ETF

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>analysts with Bloomberg Intelligence, this time on trillions tickers for

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six. Athanasios, James, welcome back to Trillions.

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having me, glad to be back.

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, who's gonna go first. We're gonna go kind of

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>round robin. Eric, you want to kick us.

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Off, I will because I have six they have five.

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, so you're gonna give one and then we'll

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>transition to the other guys. Yep, okay.

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 3>My first one is bank the I Shares Flexible Income

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:15.519
<v Speaker 3>ETF E I n K no B I n C

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 3>B I n Z yep I guess for income I

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 3>n C. Here's what's interesting. So this is the fund

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 3>managed by Rick Reader, who is actually one of the

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 3>people in consideration to be the new FED chair. So

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 3>he's a pretty big deal. He got into the ETF game.

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 3>A lot of big names got in in the past

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 3>couple of years. And this ETF is amazing. It's got

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 3>fifteen billion. That means it's the fastest growing active etf ever,

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:42.519
<v Speaker 3>faster than JEFPI, faster than JPST, which are the kings

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 3>of each of those categories. So this is a juggernaut.

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 3>It's forty BIPs and I looked at the returns. It's

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:55.639
<v Speaker 3>beating the aggregate bond index pretty easily with half the volatility.

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 3>That means what I'm not it's real. That's why it's

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 3>got all the money. Honestly, that's kind of the holy

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 3>grail to be able to outperform with less vol And

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 3>how long has it been around since May of twenty

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 3>twenty three. So I'm watching it because a it's it's

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 3>the fastest growing active ETF right now. It's going to

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 3>challenge JPST for the king of active bond and it

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 3>may even challenge someday JEPPI. And the other thing that

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 3>is interesting about this is when we look at mutual

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 3>funds flows this year, the equity side want over one

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 3>trillion out flows, like nobody wants stock pickers anymore. However,

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 3>on the fixed income side, active bond mutual funds have

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 3>taken in money.

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 2>So I think for.

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 3>People out there when they think of their bond allocation,

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 3>like the AG is a bit dull full of treasuries,

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 3>people really are much more open to active So I

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 3>think that's why this is really checking a lot of

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 3>boxes for people. And at forty BIPs it feels like

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 3>a good deal.

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 2>So look out for this thing.

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 3>This thing is you know, total juggernaut and one that

0:03:58.520 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 3>I will watch the next year.

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Anoxious.

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think that's a good pick, and I think,

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 4>like you said, it gives a lot of hope to

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 4>active right to active bonds. If you can outperform do

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 4>with lower vowel, you have a chance, So I guess

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 4>you know that's a good pick.

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Nice name drop for twenty twenty six too. Okay, that's Anosios.

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 4>In your next let's go, I'll start with L R

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 4>and D. So it basically just stands for a large

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 4>cap R and D spending. So this is from New

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 4>York Life. You know, we talk a lot about dividends,

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 4>we talk a lot about buybacks, but we don't talk

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 4>about companies that are investing in R and D or

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.720
<v Speaker 4>in like Capex and things like that. And we've actually

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 4>brought this idea up in the past about well what

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 4>about companies that are investing in things? In twenty twenty five,

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 4>it's actually beating the S and P five hundred. And

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:43.720
<v Speaker 4>the reason this I picked this is it came out

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 4>of some research from our quant analyst, Chris Kane, and

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 4>he was saying that companies that were actually spending more

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:52.679
<v Speaker 4>in R and D were beating those that weren't. And actually,

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 4>this product is really cheap. It's twenty fourteen bases points,

0:04:56.320 --> 0:05:00.479
<v Speaker 4>it's pretty launch in twenty twenty two. It doesn't have

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 4>a whole lot of assets, but I think it's very unique.

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 4>There's no other product out there that is actually investing

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 4>in companies that are spending money on R and D.

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 4>So that's something that I'm looking at for next year.

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>So is it waited by what the spind is?

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 4>It is, so you'll get and it's also market cap weighted,

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:18.720
<v Speaker 4>so you do get some Nvidia, some Apple in there,

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 4>but then you get some unique names like a lot

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 4>of healthcare. You get Philip Morris. That's in there too, right,

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 4>regardless of how you feel about cigarettes and vaping. But

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 4>you do get some non obvious names in there, so

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 4>it's pretty diversified, is pretty concentrated.

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, all right, James.

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 5>I love the R and D play. I think it's great, fascinating.

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, thedn't they tried Capex, right, that was one

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 3>they did, and I think it liquidated, but maybe this

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 3>won't work.

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:47.479
<v Speaker 4>It did, but actually Capex performs really well over like

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 4>buybacks and total shareholder yields, so I think it's something

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 4>that kind of gets overlooked.

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 1>All right, James, take us around the around the circle.

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>What's your first pick? All right?

0:05:56.520 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 6>My pick is VXUS, which is the Vanguard Total International

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 6>Stock Index Fund, which, yeah, sounds pretty boring, but I

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.479
<v Speaker 6>mean in twenty twenty five it outperformed the S and

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 6>P five hundred by about thirteen percent A few years ago.

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 3>I picked VXUS. Yeah, and I should have picked it

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 3>last year. I was gonna say, I'm getting deja vu, Like,

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 3>don't you pick this every year?

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 5>No, I didn't pick it. I haven't been.

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 3>This is like the word fetch from mean Girls. He's

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 3>trying to make international happen.

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 1>It hap.

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean it did happen, to be fair, but it happened.

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we're gonna find probably not gonna happen again.

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna find you one one year is like all

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:30.679
<v Speaker 2>you get for like ten years. We'll see.

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 6>I mean there's I mean, it's had a record inflow year.

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 6>It's taken in about seventeen seventeen billion. Right. The question

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 6>is are people one going to rebalance out of this

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 6>thing and going back into their domestic if because it's

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 6>outperformed domestic, or are they going to pile in because

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 6>they think it's going to outperform going forward. I mean, valuation,

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 6>If you look at valuations, international stocks look pretty appetizing.

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:52.919
<v Speaker 6>But then again, we have the best companies in the

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 6>world here in the US. So it's a hard debate

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 6>to have, so, yeah, I'm just watching this and the

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 6>other thing I would point out, which this is going

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 6>to give you real djavu. This thing had launched in

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 6>twenty eleven, it's had like four days of outflows. Like

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:07.679
<v Speaker 6>in total, it's had four days where it had an outflow.

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 6>So this thing just pulls in money hand over fist

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 6>and rain or shine for the most part. It'll be

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 6>interesting to see if that flips a little bit after

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 6>this outperformance.

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Now, Eric, howo'd Jack Bogo feel about that product?

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 3>He would say, you don't need it? And he started it.

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 3>That's what's so great about Bogel. He would he actually

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 3>dumped on his own creations because over time as he

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 3>got older, he just he didn't see the need for it.

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 3>He you know, he would he was pretty savage, and

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 3>he would take shots at some of these foreign countries

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 3>for having no like not a lot of work ethic.

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 3>France in particular. He's like, they tried to pass a

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 3>law that you can only work thirty five hours.

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 2>What's the point investing there? You know?

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Like, and he also thought that with the global nature

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 3>of this economy, that the US would reflect a lot

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 3>of the overseas markets. Anyway, and you also have all

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 3>your investments in the same currency, so why take currency

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 3>risk one, which is what you do with international investing,

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 3>So he had those reasons. I will say this, if

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 3>you're an investor who can't stay in volatility, like if

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 3>you can't stand in the US having two off years,

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 3>then you might want international because that will go up

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 3>sometimes when US is like struggling, and that will lower

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 3>your overall if that makes you feel better, like, hey,

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 3>at least this part of my portfolio is up because

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 3>this one's down, you may need international. So for behaviorally,

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 3>international can help advisors calm clients down because it diversifies. However,

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Bogel did not need behavioral help. He was going to

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 3>buy the S and P and wait fifty years, and

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 3>you were going to get him out of there with

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 3>like a crowbar. If you're that committed, like a Buffet

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:39.199
<v Speaker 3>or Bogel, and you're like, I don't care if it's

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 3>down three years in a row the US rules, I'm

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 3>sticking to it, then you don't need international probably, So

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 3>I think it depends on your own behavior that that

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 3>would be my take on it.

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:48.679
<v Speaker 2>But I'm with you.

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 3>This year International outperformed and we all have to acknowledge that.

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I think, well, it took him a second to get there,

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, yeah, there was a yeah.

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 3>Well but ironically you picked it three years ago and

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:01.839
<v Speaker 3>it didn't and now you're picking it this year when

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 3>it probably won't.

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 6>So well, I'm picking it more because it's interesting to see.

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 6>Is it going to are we going to see it continue?

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 6>And what are flows going to do?

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 5>Are people gonna bet on it continuing or not?

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Real question won't be if he's back next year. Okay,

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>let's go to round two. Eric.

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I'm actually sticking international, believe it or not.

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:22.719
<v Speaker 2>But it's not exactly. It's not this like.

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 5>What is this it's time for international thing?

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 2>It's not that.

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, It's not like that columnist telling me, oh, you

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 3>have to sell America thing. Okay, this is an ETF

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 3>that you guys will not know.

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Watch this.

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 3>These guys like live and eat and breathe this stuff.

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 3>Have you guys even heard of OTGL?

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 5>No? No, no, what is it?

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:41.359
<v Speaker 2>Okay, it's the OTG.

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 3>I haven't heard of that either, Latin America ETF And

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 3>the reason that I even found it, I didn't even

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:50.959
<v Speaker 3>know it existed. But there's been a couple elections in

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 3>South America that have gone far right, which usually means

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 3>pro business, which usually means big returns. You start with Argentina,

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 3>obviously that thing's up like two hundred percent, and then

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 3>Chile just went to the right, and that was anticipating that,

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 3>and that's up like sixty percent on that anticipation. Now

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Brazil they might have somebody elected who's on the right

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:12.959
<v Speaker 3>side in next year, and that's already got that thing

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.559
<v Speaker 3>starting to move. So here's a continent that's going from

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 3>like socialism to capitalism pretty quickly. And so if you

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 3>wanted to try to play that or at least own it,

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 3>you don't own a lot in your international Latin America

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:26.959
<v Speaker 3>is pretty tiny waiting.

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's in it.

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 3>The reason I found it is because I was looking

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 3>for ETFs that had both Argentina and Chile. There's not many.

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Argentina is tough, it's not in a lot of equitytfs.

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 3>This one has two percent to Argentina, eleven percent to Chile,

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 3>and forty three percent in Brazil. So it really does

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 3>a good job of getting you all of Latin America,

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 3>whereas the I Shares one doesn't have a lot of that,

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 3>especially it does no Argentina really, So anyway, this is

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 3>one that captures I think the best of this sort

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 3>of shift to more pro business leaders in that continent.

0:10:57.320 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 3>And it's for that reason that I'm watching it, because

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm telling you, traders like nothing more, especially emerging markets,

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 3>than to see an election shift that way. I've seen

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 3>it my whole career. So it looks like it's spreading

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 3>across the continent, and if it does, I would stand

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 3>I would think this would benefit from that. That said,

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 3>this isn't the one I'm gonna watch for like volume

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 3>and flows. The other ones will probably see more of

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 3>the single ticker ones, but this one captures the all

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 3>those countries the best.

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 2>But this is why we do ETFs.

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 3>There is always an ETF out there that gets you

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 3>the closest to something, and sometimes it's not the one

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:35.959
<v Speaker 3>you think, mister.

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:36.719
<v Speaker 1>International over here.

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I still hate International, but if I had

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 4>to pick, I think South America. I like these countries

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 4>that are going through massive shifts versus like Europe, so

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 4>I probably would be more inclined to buy like not

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:51.079
<v Speaker 4>America over something like Europe.

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 3>And this is not like saying sell America and like

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 3>rotate to international like this guy. It's basically saying it's

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:00.439
<v Speaker 3>a little hot sauce. This is like, oh, maybe sell

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 3>your AI E t F and put this one on.

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 3>This is like a hot sauce bucket.

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Play okay, Ethan your what's your second? Okay?

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 4>I got a question. Have you heard of this company?

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 4>You pexy? Don't know what they do?

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Run twos where you trying and stump each other?

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, because I don't know either. But there's a two

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 4>x ETF on this company and it's only got one

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 4>hundred and thirty six million dollar market cap.

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:23.479
<v Speaker 1>What the letters in the ticker.

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 4>So the ticker is p XIU, which is tx TX

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 4>you PIXI. I think this is the year something blows up.

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 4>I think we got a little crazy with these two

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 4>X levered products. We've gone really far down the market cap.

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 4>Like I mentioned this one, he got one hundred and

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 4>thirty six million dollar market cap. Especially like a small

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 4>slash microcap company, we have a two x leveraged version

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 4>of it. I don't know if this might be the

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 4>one that actually like liquidates in a single day, but

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 4>I think we're going to have an event this year

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 4>on one of these single stock ones. So I'm just

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 4>throwing this ticker out to keep an eye on its

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 4>more like category. Yeah, exactly, it is fine. Hey, stuff

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 4>blows up. You know, we had XIV a couple of

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 4>years ago. I think we're due for one.

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe just don't want to be there when it happens.

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Yeah, it might not have any assets in it,

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:09.559
<v Speaker 4>but I think it just might be symbolic of just

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 4>how far we've pushed it into some of these products.

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the vall is two hundred and fifteen percent,

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 3>which is a lot. That's like, what is that like

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:22.319
<v Speaker 3>fifteen times the SMP. There's some a little more volatile,

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 3>but the stock would only need to move obviously what

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 3>fifty percent, But that vall indicates that fifty percent isn't

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 3>that outrageous? What you need is if one of these

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 3>little quantum stocks like has A goes bust, then the

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 3>two X will obviously terminate because it will go down

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 3>more than fifty percent.

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>In a day.

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 6>I mean the other part is like the sec stop

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 6>those three X and five X number one, I think, yeah,

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 6>but full endorse. I think we're going to see some

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:48.959
<v Speaker 6>sort of liquidation of that this year.

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but one or two a year, no big deal.

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 2>If you had three x, you'd have them every other week.

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, we can handle one once in a while, exactly.

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.239
<v Speaker 1>All right, James, you got it one that's gonna stump.

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 6>Them, Yes, actually, but it's it's more a category one.

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.359
<v Speaker 6>It's I think it has the lowest assets.

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 5>Of anything that anyone's gonna pick here today TXBC ever

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 5>hear of it?

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 6>No, all right, so twenty one shares foot see crypto

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 6>ten x, BTC etshot.

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh he's discussed looking them over there. Ethen's the anti

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 2>crypto gus the team. But it's good. We need that.

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because just in case, like everything goes to hell,

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 3>Athen will have been quarantined from all this.

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 2>We definitely have the cryptovirus.

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 6>So this is more just I think that these crypto

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 6>index type products are really going to take off. I

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 6>think there's gonna be a lot of band We have

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 6>one from bitwise that has over a billion gray scalees

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 6>one hashtecks coin shares, they all have them. There's a

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 6>lot of been filed. I like this one because it's

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 6>it gives you the crypto market cap without Bitcoin. A

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 6>lot of people are ready probably have exposure to bitcoin.

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 6>If you want to add more diversified exposure to crypto,

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 6>this does it without doubling up on your bitcoin because

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 6>in those other market cap oided ones, bitcoin seventy five

0:14:58.080 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 6>eighty percent, So.

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>It's crypto x bitcoin correct.

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 6>And then and then I think longer term we're going

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 6>to see like fundamental weighted stuff. Kai Wu friend of

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 6>the show who park Line, he has SMAs where he

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 6>does fundamental trading and waiting of these ald coin ETFs.

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 6>I think a year from now we're going to see

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 6>a lot of that. But I just think this whole

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 6>category is going to be huge.

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm with him.

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 3>I think an index will be because who can pay

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 3>attention all this stuff?

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 3>The question is if you already own bitcoin, do you

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 3>use a big an index with bitcoin in it? That

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 3>has to be worked out. But yeah, long term, I

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 3>see some value here. Okay, Round three, Okay, I'm going

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 3>to go with one that I might have picked this

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 3>last year.

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 2>I can't remember, but I was watching it all year. XOVR.

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 3>This is uh the Public Privates Crossover ETF, which was

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 3>a nobody ETF that did I think value stocks like

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 3>nobody cared. It was an oblivion probably about to die,

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 3>and it switched this category to add some private equity.

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 3>You can add up to fifteen per cent of liquid

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 3>investments in added SpaceX. Once it added SpaceX, it like

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 3>immediately got three hundred million flows.

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Like it was like build it and they will come.

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 3>And this was happening the same time the private credit

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 3>ETFs launch, which really underwhelmed, and to me, it showed

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 3>me that there was a huge unmet demand to get

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 3>private equity in an ETF, not private credit. And then

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 3>when SpaceX got root in the rumor to go IPO,

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 3>it took in another three hundred million over the past

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 3>couple weeks, and this again tells me that there is

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 3>a huge demand out there.

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't know why the ETF industry has filed so

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 3>many private credit and heartland really no private equity. There's

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 3>been a couple to try to do synthetic private equity

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 3>with using public stocks, but not that. I just think

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 3>they should really try to push the envelope with putting

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 3>literal private equity in here, maybe not one hundred percent,

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 3>but like the way priv did with putting more than

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 3>fifty percent private credit. XOVR at seven hundred million again

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 3>total ind I think it's a one man show. That's

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 3>an enormous sign right there. So I think we're going

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 3>to see a lot with this next year. And this

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 3>ETF to me is like the guinea pig.

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>If you're looking at IPOs for next year, SpaceX atop

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that list. Is this your preferred way to get exposure

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to that or is it more.

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 3>Like ARC.

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Right now?

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes, because it owns it like it will definitely feel

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 3>some of that. That said, there's also the IPO ETF,

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 3>which would own SpaceX a couple of days after the IPO,

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 3>so you have to like ask yourself, like when do

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 3>you want it? But this gets it before, which is

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 3>really cool, So I'd assume this would be the better play. Still,

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 3>though it's only five to ten percent, I think right

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 3>now that's not a ton, but that's enough to move

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 3>the needle if SpaceX were to go, If if you

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 3>were to get, like I don't know, an eighty percent return,

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.120
<v Speaker 3>that would definitely lift the returns of xovr.

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 4>Athanasius, I love this ticker. This ETF is pending, but

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:53.399
<v Speaker 4>it's grift GRFT. It's from Tuttle. It's the Tuttle Capital

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 4>Government Grift etf. So it does two things. Want it

0:17:57.000 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 4>kind of I know, I know, but you know, you

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 4>have to admire the opportunistic nature of the industry right

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 4>sometimes to a fault. But they think this one could

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 4>be really interesting. Obviously you've seen the government buying stake

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 4>in companies right and promoting these companies. So it does

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:18.239
<v Speaker 4>two things. One it actually kind of follows insider not

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 4>insider but trading of what politicians are doing. But it

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:25.439
<v Speaker 4>also is investing in companies that have political ties. So

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 4>something like Intel is a perfect example. So would pick

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:31.640
<v Speaker 4>up these companies. The thing is they're gonna be really

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 4>interesting companies to watch. I think if there's money being

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 4>pumped into a lot of these companies, follow them. I

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 4>think it could be an interesting strategy. You know, even Nance,

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 4>the the kind of Nancy Pelosi one has done really

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:47.919
<v Speaker 4>well performance wise. It's got a couple hundred million in assets.

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 4>It's actually like a pretty decent size. I think this

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 4>one can probably have some similar success. I don't know

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 4>if the expense ratio is because it's pending, but I

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 4>think this is definitely one I want to watch for

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 4>next year.

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 2>I think that the cynicism alone is funny. And interest thing.

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Is it being ironic or is it actually like, well.

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 3>There's been there a couple attempts to do like here

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 3>and invest in these stocks that are democrat leaning or

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 3>republic leaning. Those never took off. This is just like

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 3>let's make money on the corruption, which I think is

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 3>a more honest way to try to play this. There's

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 3>also one that's coming out called the Roundhill USA Government

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 3>Portfolio ETF, which was supposed to be called I think

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 3>the White House Sovereign Wealth Fund, and it's it's basically

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 3>trying to it's going to own all the stuff that

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 3>the White House likes and buys, basically, so semiconductors, Bitcoin,

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 3>stuff like that. So we're going to see some ETFs

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 3>trying to ride the sort of you know, government connection

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 3>with business and capitalism.

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 6>James, all right, this is a ticker that both these

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 6>guys know pretty well. I think this might have been

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 6>selected in years past. But I'm picking box b O

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 6>x X from Alpha Architect. It's the Alpha Architect one

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:58.880
<v Speaker 6>to three month box ETF. Basically, what it does is

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 6>we we talk about a lot of those products that

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 6>offer tons of yield. Right, they do things cover derivatives

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 6>to offer tons of yield. This is almost like the inverse.

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.439
<v Speaker 6>It's taking the return stream of like your treasury bills

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 6>and not actually distributing any income. So you get the

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 6>same return stream as though you're getting income, but you

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:17.120
<v Speaker 6>don't have to pay it out. So if you hold

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 6>it for longer than a year, all of a sudden,

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 6>you're in the long term capital gains rate, which if

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 6>your income is taxed at thirty five, thirty seven percent,

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 6>even higher than that, and you can get it down

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 6>to the fifteen percent range, whatever it may be, that's

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 6>a huge tax savings. So there's two reasons I picked

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 6>at one. It's fascinating because the FED, we don't know

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 6>what's going to happen with the FEDNIXTU, we're gonna get

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 6>new FED share, what are they can do the rates?

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 6>Are people going to leave if the yields are down

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 6>in treasuries? The other part of it is like this

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 6>is kind of like it's like changing the way the

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 6>tax structure is set up, and there's some people that

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 6>have concerns around whether or not this should be allowed

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 6>and is this something they're going to look into doing

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 6>so I just think it's fascinating. This thing is taken

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 6>in money hand or a fist. Every month, it takes

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 6>in a couple hundred million dollars and it's almost a

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 6>ten billion dollar product from an arguably in the issuer.

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 6>So I think it's just a true success story.

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Highly creative.

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, you can be creative on all different ways

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 3>in ETF LAN So there's a bunch of ETF's work

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 3>and looking to innovate on taxes.

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Interesting though, what you said.

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 3>The price return of this is fifteen percent, and so

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 3>is the total return for SHV, which actually holds short

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 3>term debt that doesn't have any price return. I mean

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 3>it's basically zero. Fifteen percent is a total return, but

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:25.640
<v Speaker 3>that's all from income, so that is a huge swing.

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 3>It's not like even a little And I can see

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 3>why people like this. I mean, it's fairly, really creative,

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 3>and really I think it almost kicked off a whole category.

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think it did kick off a whole category.

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 6>We're gonna see more of this stuff.

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay, run four, Okay, I'm gonna go with buff b

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 3>buh buff B.

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 2>I love that ticker. By the way, there's also one buff.

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 3>Buff but buff B is a laddered buffer, so a

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 3>couple of weeks ago, my mom, who like rarely comes

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 3>to me with ETF questions, He's like, I'm thinking of

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 3>buying one of these buffery, but I want the ladder

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 3>ones off to worry about it. So it's like, okay,

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 3>if she's getting wind of this, you know, it's like

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 3>you's got to be in Time magazine at this point

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 3>or something like.

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 2>That USA today.

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 3>Like it's like, how popular are buffers that she even

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:16.399
<v Speaker 3>knows about it, right, and she's thinking, I don't want

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 3>to worry about it. I'm like, then I looked. The

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 3>ladder buffer from First Trust is the most popular buffer ETF.

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 3>I get it. It's a little more costly, but it

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:26.439
<v Speaker 3>just does all the work of like having to go

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 3>to the new ladder.

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 1>So there's the new five picks and one pick from

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>your mom.

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 3>Basically, well, because this is another reason I picked it

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 3>is so a it's Innovator's ladder buffer that challenges BUFR,

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 3>which is First Trust number one buffer ETF on the planet.

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:46.360
<v Speaker 2>But this one doesn't have nearly as much assets. This one.

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Basically, like BUFR is nine percent buffered, right, so that's

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:53.120
<v Speaker 3>how much the market would go down that it would

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 3>protect you from. So anyway, these two products, the first

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 3>trust is huge, this one not so huge. But guess

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:02.919
<v Speaker 3>who just bought innovator goal now Brian Lake runs Goldman.

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 3>You saw what he did with JEPY and JPST, So

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 3>if he's listening, I am almost challenging him. This thing

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 3>probably should have ten times the assets given it does

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 3>the same thing as BUFR pretty much and has a

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 3>minuscule amount of the assets. An innovator put buffers on

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 3>the map. So this is a product that I could

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 3>see if it got you know, the Goldman firepower behind it,

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:28.920
<v Speaker 3>it could really take off, especially if you have people

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 3>like my mom who want buffers but don't want to

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 3>have to like put the new buffer in every year.

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Ethan run foth.

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 4>Can I pick one that what you shouldn't do?

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 4>Okay, yeah, this one annoyed me from the second at launch.

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Just think about these to watch it's.

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, honestly, would you say more ETFs annoy

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:48.119
<v Speaker 3>you than don't?

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 4>Probably?

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, he's the old man, the only clouds on

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 3>the teams like, but it's good.

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 4>This one's a peak clean, it's a PCL and it's

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 4>the pictet cleaner plane at ETF And it's nothing against them,

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 4>it's just about reading the room of the industry. And

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 4>you've seen the tickers that we've mentioned. It's intense. This

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 4>is a really competitive industry. You need to come either

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 4>with some sort of really differentiated strategy or we look

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:14.120
<v Speaker 4>at most successful launches this year, a lot of them

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:17.400
<v Speaker 4>had their a lot of b YOB sorry b YOA

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 4>just bring your own assets. This one is just a

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.400
<v Speaker 4>firm that I think is not really reading the TF industry.

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 4>But it's not just about them. It's about if you're

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 4>going to enter the industry, you need to have a plan.

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 4>You know, this is seventy basis points, it's an ESG product,

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 4>So not only is it expensive, it's a strategy that

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 4>no one is really looking for. So this year is

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 4>going to be interesting with share class potential. You're gonna

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 4>have a lot of issue, a lot of asset managers

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:44.959
<v Speaker 4>trying to come into the industry. It's about, you know,

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 4>you got to be aggressive, you got to be all in,

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 4>and I think this is an example of not being

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 4>all in. Honestly, I want to be surprised if this

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 4>closes in a couple of years, but just sort of

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, Yeah, there's stuff that we're watching, but also

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 4>there's kind of stuff that you should, you know, maybe

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 4>not necessarily do.

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Also, they are coming from the European mutual fund world,

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 3>and they are big in themes there. But European mutual

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 3>funds is pretty cush. It's a cush lifestyle. This is

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:14.199
<v Speaker 3>the Deterredeme. It's interesting they skipped the ETF market in

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 3>Europe and went right to the US, which is like,

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's like a real crazy swing going from

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 3>europe mutual funds to US ETFs seventy BIPs.

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 2>The whole cleaner planet thing.

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Like remember like Gabelli tried that it's out of vogue,

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 3>it'll be tough. You're right, this one is. I'd be

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.239
<v Speaker 3>surprised if it if it gets organic. I think it

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 3>needs to get some BYO or something to get going.

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Not to say they won't have no successes, but this

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 3>one in particular, I don't know.

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 6>I don't see it, but James run for Yeah. I mean,

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 6>one quick note I would say is like I don't understand.

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 6>I'm with them, one hundred percent with them.

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 6>It just it's not they need an institution to come

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 6>in and back them up. It doesn't make any sense.

0:25:56.240 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 6>All right, I'm gonna pick one that I think you

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:02.400
<v Speaker 6>guys know it. You guys definitely do know it, Joe,

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 6>you might not. So this is actually the fourth largest

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 6>flow getter in twenty twenty five, and the ticker is SPY.

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>M don't know it.

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 5>It's basically SPI's Mini shares. It used to be. I

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 5>think they had a different SPLG.

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 2>I think SPLG.

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:19.439
<v Speaker 6>Yes ticker it's State Street Spider Portfolio S and P

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 6>five hundred ETF. This thing has one hundred and one

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 6>billion dollars. That is a massive product. It's done exceptionally well.

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 6>The reason it's done exceptionally well is it charges two

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 6>basis points to get exposure to the S and P

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 6>five hundred, So it's cheaper than IVV. It's cheaper than VUU,

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 6>the number one flow getter this this past year. So yeah,

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 6>it's taken in thirty five billion. So I'm interested to

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 6>see one. How are they going to do going forward?

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 6>It seems to be ciphering assets off of SPY the

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 6>legacy asset, the legacy product. And will Vanguard or I

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 6>Shares decide maybe we should compete with this because these

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 6>things are doing well.

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 5>I guess Vanguard doesn't have to.

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 6>They're the flow leader, but it'll be interesting to see

0:26:59.119 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 6>how the shakes out.

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Is it actually showing up on a day to day

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>basis in a way. That's like Spy is no longer

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the preferred trading vehicle, So Spy I don't think.

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:10.159
<v Speaker 6>I don't know if Spy will ever get dethroned as

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:12.119
<v Speaker 6>the preferred trading vehicle. This is like you want S

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:14.400
<v Speaker 6>and P five hundred, you want the cheapest exposure. Ironically,

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 6>there were some products that offered free exposure to the

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 6>S and P five hundred or a large cap. Specifically,

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.239
<v Speaker 6>it wasn't the SMP. Yeah, but people one want the

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 6>S and P and two. I think there's people skeptical

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:24.679
<v Speaker 6>of free. So if you could get as close to

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 6>free without actually getting there, you can probably get a

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 6>lot of assets.

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 5>And that's what I'm seeing here as far as I'm concerned.

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, it's true that one.

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, I had a section in my first book

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 3>called the Power of one Dot dot dot basis point

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 3>and because IVYV and VU went from like five to four,

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 3>four to three, and it actually moved the needle. That's

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 3>how cost obsessed people are, so yeah, that's a good one.

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 3>It's already the twentieth biggest ETF and climbing I called

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 3>the fourth Amigo because he used to call the other

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 3>three the three Amigos. I don't know who the fourth

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:53.159
<v Speaker 3>amigo would be in that movie, but El Guapo.

0:27:53.480 --> 0:28:05.400
<v Speaker 7>Anyway, it's sym Yeah, Okay.

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Round five, Okay, so I'm picking one. I like to

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 3>pick one of a theme or sector that's just totally

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 3>shot to hell, because you remember pick uranium that one

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 3>year and I nailed that. This is the Advisor Shares

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 3>pure Us Cannabis CTFMSOS. This thing is a billion dollars,

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 3>but it's the most US centric of all of them,

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 3>and it holds mss's, which are state operators. Anyway, anytime

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 3>there's any like legislative win, this thing goes up. So

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 3>there was recently where there was a rumor that they

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 3>were going to reclassify it marijuana and Trump was going

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 3>to sign this thing, and it went up fifty percent

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 3>in a day. It's still down like over eighty percent.

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Even with that bump. That tells you that like this

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 3>thing could run if it gets the right environment. And

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 3>I talked to Ken shay Over in BI who covers

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 3>this area, and basically there's like all these baby steps.

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 3>It gets reclassified.

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 2>That means the taxes are way better for these state operators.

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 2>That's one win.

0:28:57.320 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 3>But then it's like, Okay, well maybe it should be

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 3>inside the banking system because if it's reclassified, then it's like, well,

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 3>why aren't we even making this legal? He just thinks

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 3>these this is like the road to federal legalization, which

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 3>is the ultimate holy grail. And so there's a lot

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 3>of potential here given that this stuff usually happens in

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 3>a chain reaction. I'm not saying it will happen, but

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 3>with how much it's beat up, its certainly any little

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 3>news should move it. And MSOs I think is the

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 3>one that captures the US market the best.

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 2>So that's one I'll be watching interesting.

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Ethan.

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's a good pick, and I'm gonna go deep

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 4>in the pull up a classic here from two thousand

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 4>and six Housing ITV, which is the I Shares Home

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 4>Construction ETF. Obviously, Housing comes up a lot. You know,

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 4>it's been a big political platform everywhere. It didn't have

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 4>a great year. It was pretty much flat this year

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 4>versus s seventeen percent for the SMP. But I think

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 4>it's a really interesting sentiment barometer. Obviously, we might have

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 4>rates coming down next year, you have some regulatory support

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 4>of a home builders. I think it's something that you know,

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 4>and usually what happens with home builders it either has

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 4>a really bad year or a really good year, and

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 4>it's coming off of, like not of a great year.

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 4>So I think it's just something to watch, obviously just

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 4>being just because it's how much affordability is such a

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 4>something that's talked about a lot recently, A political.

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 3>Word that, by the way, that is a I like

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 3>this because I believe that the new FED share one

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 3>of their goals is to get rates lower so people

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 3>start buying more houses, because that's been a problem for years.

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, honestly, low rates are really good for housing.

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 3>It seems like a no brainer, honestly.

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And I think they want to help some of

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 4>the home builders.

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Famous I don't see am I don't see a bair case.

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 3>We don't make a T shirt that says that, because

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 3>sometimes we're like we get all hot about something. We're like,

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't see a bare case, and it's like that's

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 3>when you know you got to like be worried.

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Not not that, James, your final pick, all right, my

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>final pick.

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 6>At our annual conference a few weeks back, erica A

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 6>presentation is this as good as it gets. And I

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 6>think that's something that people should be worried about. And

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 6>a lot of times what we see with these alternative

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 6>ETFs is people pile in like after they should have

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 6>already been in them. So the one I'm picking is

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 6>the IMDBI Managed Future Strategy ETF DBMF, and it's basically

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 6>managed future strategy.

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 5>What they do is it's more tactical.

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 6>It's kind of like CTA Trading, not exactly so what

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 6>they had a stellar year in twenty twenty two. There

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:28.479
<v Speaker 6>it's now a two billion dollar product. But honestly, if

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 6>you want to have this as a diversifier in your portfolio,

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 6>you should have it before you know, you know what

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 6>hits the fan. So if you're looking at this will

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 6>be interesting to see how this product does. And I

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 6>also like I'm gonna throw out another tick or a

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 6>bonus ticker RSST, which is a return stacked version which

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 6>will basically, instead of having to sell your S and

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 6>P five hundred product, you can add this on and

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 6>will give you kind of leverage exposure to this managed

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 6>future strategy alongside the S and P five hundred.

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 5>I just think some sort of all exposure.

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 6>If you're trying to have a diversified portfolio and you

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 6>don't want just sm P five hundred, like Eric or

0:31:57.280 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 6>Jack Bogel, this might be a good idea to have

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 6>so much to unpack.

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 1>There that we're, uh, we're gonna let it ride. What

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 1>is dB MF home.

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 6>So it goes across futures products, So it could be rates,

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 6>it could be equities, it could be commodities, and basically

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 6>it should have an uncorrelated exposure to the S and

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 6>B five hundred or the broad equity markets.

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 3>For the most part, when everything's awful, this thing will

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 3>do really well. In twenty twenty two, this thing had

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 3>a billion dollars because it generally goes up.

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 2>It has short positions, so.

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 3>DBMF it won't go up a ton, but relative to

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 3>everything else in the crapper, it'll be up pop probably,

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 3>and so that's when alts will finally get their day

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 3>in the sun.

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 2>But it's rare.

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 3>The equities are so good that these tickers just like

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 3>they have a year now and then.

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 2>But I see what you mean.

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 3>This is if you if you're like one of these,

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 3>like something's gonna go wrong, that one would be a

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 3>good one to look at.

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 1>All, right, Eric, your final one.

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 3>This is going to close. This is a good finale.

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 3>I thought about how to close this.

0:32:57.280 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 4>If it's crypto, I'm just gonna it's not.

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 3>But it's equally annoying to you because if this ETF

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 3>is a hit, I think he will retire from the industry.

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 3>He's always says that he's like, because always is it,

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 3>mister Beest follows from ETF, I'm retiring.

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 2>This is close to that.

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, ufod this is the tuttle Capital UFO disclosure AI

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 3>powered ETF. Okay, what does this do? Okay, I'm gonna

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 3>read straight from the perspectus here. That hasn't launched yet,

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 3>but it will probably twenty twenty six or Q one.

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 3>It has a basket of companies that the advisor believes

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 3>have potential exposure to advanced or reverse engineered alien technology,

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 3>spurred by government disclosures about UFOs and alleged advanced technology.

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:44.239
<v Speaker 3>So basically, if you look at polymarket, there's all these

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 3>odds going up that the Trump Administration's gonna release information

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 3>on UFOs very soon, and this is going to take

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 3>that information that they got from aliens and it's gonna say,

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna buy the companies that take that tech and

0:33:57.320 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 3>like build stuff here with the alien tech. So it's

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 3>an alien tech tech etf okay, and it uses AI

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 3>to pick the stocks. So it's like, I mean, honestly,

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 3>if this thing is over a billion dollars this time

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 3>next year, I think I think that this will be

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 3>curtains for Ethan oh Man.

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 4>But this is such an Eric pick.

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 3>I just think this is like that, this is this

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 3>is I always say, the tent keeps expanding. This is

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.239
<v Speaker 3>like pushing this head far out on one wing of

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 3>the tent.

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know even how to respond to that.

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:29.800
<v Speaker 6>I mean, there is a lot of rumbling about Congress.

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:31.479
<v Speaker 6>They're doing a bunch of stuff, like trying to figure

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 6>out what's going on. But these you know, aircraft of

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:35.800
<v Speaker 6>unknown origins, sof.

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>So you can invest in anything. So what has to

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:38.360
<v Speaker 1>happen for this to launch?

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's only equity. So really, Matt just has

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 3>to Matt Tuttle has to explain the prospectives.

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Here's why I picked them.

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 3>So it could launch even if there isn't any disclosure,

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 3>like it can just say, you know, it can figure

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 3>it out. So I think that it will launch regardless.

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 3>But if if polymarket is onto something, the odds spike

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 3>because I thought someone in the Trump administration was actually

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 3>buying the about whether Trump will release something in twenty

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:07.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty five. We'll see if that worked out. But basically

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 3>it's the information coming out that the tech companies will

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 3>then use. Now I'm going to tell you right now,

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 3>I actually.

0:35:14.400 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Don't think there's anything such thing as aliens like I don't.

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 3>I just don't think it exists. That doesn't mean the

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 3>ETF shouldn't exist. I'm a very free market capitalist, but

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 3>I just think it's interesting that the thematic area in particular,

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:28.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, this is really pushing the envelope. I remember

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 3>when people mocked. I remember tweeting out the filing for

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 3>the video game ETF, and I remember everyone was like

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 3>dumping on it, like oh, this is the top and

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:38.759
<v Speaker 3>they were just crapping on it. That's pretty normal sounding now,

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:43.240
<v Speaker 3>like so we would say today's sattire is tomorrow's ETF,

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 3>and this is an example.

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to twenty six.

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Now one real quick thing. This is a fun this

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 2>is a really interesting notjel.

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Matt Tuttle may not actually launch this. He may actually

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 3>be on his own island somewhere because he has the

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:58.919
<v Speaker 3>ticker SPCX for this back etf he launched, he may

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:02.799
<v Speaker 3>sell that to Elon for SpaceX, the way Matt will

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 3>Hershey sold Meta to Mark Zuckerberg for an unders allegedly allegedly,

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 3>And so if Matt Tuttle quits the business randomly, he

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 3>might quit before this even launches if he gets enough

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:13.800
<v Speaker 3>pyday from Elon.

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:14.879
<v Speaker 2>You heard it here first.

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 1>All plenty to watch in twenty twenty six. Athanasios James,

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us on Trillions. Thanks for

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:30.239
<v Speaker 1>having me Yeah, thanks for having me on. Thanks for

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 1>listening to Trillions. Until next time. You can find us

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg terminal, Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:39.279
<v Speaker 1>or wherever else you like to listen. We'd love to

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 1>hear from you. Hit us up on social. Trillions is

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 1>produced by Magnus Hendrickson and Ryan Kessler. Amy Keane is

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 1>our executive producer. Sage Bomman is ahead of Bloomberg Podcast Bye,