WEBVTT - Boeing CEO’s Comeback Plan for 2024 Takes a Hit Five Days In

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg business Week inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Don't call it a come back, all right.

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 3>So we were talking, certainly the risk trade is on,

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 3>and it does feel like we're seeing fairly broad based

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 3>buying in today's trade. But if you take a look

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 3>at Boeing, Tim, it's definitely a different tone. Boeing shares

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 3>are definitely down.

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, six and a half percent as we speak. Investors

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 4>offloading shares, they're absorbing. The shares are a possible fallout

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 4>from this weekend's accident, bowing stock slumping the most in

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 4>more than a year, this after its seven thirty seven

0:00:56.680 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 4>Max nine model has been temporarily grounded by authorities following

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:03.279
<v Speaker 4>a January fifth incident that was Friday night involving a

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.559
<v Speaker 4>recently delivered plane. So, Carol, here's what we know about

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 4>the company and its biggest the biggest US exporter, the

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 4>seven thirty seven Max aircraft is a crucial cash cow

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 4>for Boeing, and we continue to report out and digest

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 4>the details.

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:16.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we certainly do. So let's get to it with

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg News aerospace reporter Julie Johnson. She has been on

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 3>it for us throughout the day, in the morning, all

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 3>of it as it was happening on Zoom from Chicago.

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 3>So Julie, a lot coming out. What's the latest in

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 3>terms of what we know about exactly what happened?

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so just to review the facts really quickly, super

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:45.199
<v Speaker 5>close scary call Friday night with the Alaska airplane where

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 5>it's called a door plug, but it's a section of

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 5>fuselage blew out a few minutes after the plane took

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 5>off from Portland. Fortunately nobody was killed, nobody was sitting

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 5>next to the section of bailed or it might have

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 5>been a different store. So what we don't so that's

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 5>we know that, and what we don't know is why

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 5>and how the NTSB is on that case. But it

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 5>has revived all these very damaging narratives around Max, the

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 5>Boeing's but working so hard to put to rest following

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:28.519
<v Speaker 5>two crashes in twenty eighteen and twenty nineteen and a grounding.

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 5>And this is their prize plane. I mean, it's really

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 5>the driver the engine for the company. And so the

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 5>reputational hit is significant for Boeing and it probably is

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 5>going to be longer lasting with this incident.

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 4>What do you mean by that? Longer lasting than this incident?

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 4>Do you mean that? Because I just got to tell

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 4>you from personal experience. I when we covered as you did, Julie,

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 4>the seven thirty seven Max issues following the two crashes

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 4>just a few years ago, Wow, there were so many

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 4>people who were like, I'm never going to fly on

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:11.639
<v Speaker 4>one of those things, never ever, ever, And now three

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:14.519
<v Speaker 4>different variants of the seven thirty seven Max are taking

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:18.119
<v Speaker 4>many different flights every single day without a consumer seeming.

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 5>To care, right, And so I'm not actually thinking about

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 5>the just to be clear, I'm thinking more from a

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:32.679
<v Speaker 5>regulatory perspective and customer sales and also Boeings. This is

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 5>a huge year for Boeing in terms of getting its

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 5>factories in order, and this also plays into this damaging

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 5>narrative to customers that Boeing's got a flawed product and

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 5>quality problems that they can't get a handle on. And

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 5>do I really want to go down that path with

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 5>this aircraft? I mean, that's where it's damaging.

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 4>So one more point there, real quick, Julie. Yeah, do

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 4>these airlines really have a choice when it comes to

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 4>the air line they buy. There are two companies that

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 4>make these, right, that make planes like this, Airbus, right,

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 4>and there's Boeing And Airbus has the A three twenty

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 4>family that competes with the seven thirty seven Max. But

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, aren't the switching costs incredibly high, like totally

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 4>training new pilots and everything.

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, they are, they are. And and also Airbus is

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 5>sold out through the end of the decade by and large.

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 5>Boeing large, you know, has a big backlog on this

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 5>plane as well, So switching is not an easy thing.

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 5>But a lot of airlines have mixed plans, and so

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 5>maybe you start to tilt your orders more to air

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 5>Bus down the line. So that's that's that's the big,

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 5>big unknown. In terms of this actual incident, there are

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:51.559
<v Speaker 5>some very intriguing clues that the NTSB is sorting through,

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 5>and including a main maintenance visit before the plane went

0:04:55.960 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 5>into service. So, I mean, and so often with these accidents,

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 5>what we think is the conventional wisdom, you know, a

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 5>day or two afterwards winds up being not the case

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 5>at all. So I the inspections are underway on the

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, dis fleet, and they could be back in

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 5>the skies within a day or two. And this is

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 5>and so from that perspective, this could start to receive

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:27.359
<v Speaker 5>very quickly too.

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 3>But it's the reputational, yeah, which is a huge which

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 3>I want to get into. But help help us be

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 3>smart because you know, you know this world. So we

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 3>hear seven thirty seven Max and you know, the hairs

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 3>of my necho up and I think about, you know,

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 3>the two deadly crashes, the seven thirty seven Max crashes

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 3>about five years ago, right, that totally shook confidence in

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 3>the company. And I think I remember Tim and I

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 3>like when they came back and were like what plane

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 3>is it?

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 6>Like?

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Do we want to be on a seven thirty seven Max?

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 3>This is a Model nine? How big? I mean, this

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 3>is such an important, as we said, a crucial cash

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:02.160
<v Speaker 3>cow for Boeing. How big is it in terms of

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 3>Boeing's business it's balance sheet? How big is it in

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 3>terms of the airlines that we watch so carefully that

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 3>that need new planes or have new planes of the

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 3>ILK if you will, among their fleet?

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, And I'm so sorry. I should have those numbers

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 5>at my fingertips, and I don't. But in terms of

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 5>contributing to revenues of profit, I think it's in the

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 5>neighborhood of thirty percent of you know, the companies. The

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 5>money that keeps Boeing running comes through this aircraft.

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 3>And that's for uh yeah, keep going, sorry, but.

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, anyway, it's far and away Boeing's biggest sellers is

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 5>a really important plane on the consumer perspective. I'm a

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 5>little bit jaded because I've just seen this play out

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 5>time and time again over the years, and everybody says, oh, Max,

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 5>no way, you know. Or before it was the seven

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 5>eighty seventh Dreamliner, for a very brief period, we had

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 5>some some hinky crashes involving some airbus planes, you know,

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 5>before social media really got going. But the fact is

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 5>that you offer people better pricing and they quickly, I

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 5>hate to say it, but the concerns seemed to fade,

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 5>and you're most people cannot tell, you know, Steff on

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 5>board a plane. They can't tell an airbus from a

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 5>Boeing from an old generation seven thirty seven to a manage,

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 5>they all they look and feel verysome If you're a traveler.

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 3>So that's they're not Stanevik who like before we even

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 3>go together, if we're flying somewhere for work is like,

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, we're flying a bohl blah blah blah blah,

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 3>and he'll know all the details and it'll be like

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 3>where you want to sit and where you you do

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 3>You're it's.

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 4>Really well, you know, when you're on like a plane

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 4>like this. The airbus is a little wider and if

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 4>you're an economy you can really feel it. Anyway, we

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 4>can get Julie and I can talk about that offline,

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 4>which we do sometimes. So Julie, Uh, when you when

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 4>you think about in all seriousness here, I was really

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 4>surprised to hear you say that this these could be

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 4>back in the skies this week. I mean, Paul Sweeney

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 4>is set to take one of these planes to Aruba

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 4>later this week. He talked about it on air earlier

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 4>today and I said, no way, Paul, there's no way

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 4>they're going to fly this on Friday. Am I going

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 4>to be eating my words?

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 3>I think so wow?

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 5>He just uh they So the design that's in question

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:36.479
<v Speaker 5>right now, this door plug or this this component that's

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 5>that's being scrutinized. It's been in Boeing planes since two

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 5>thousand and six and and there's never been a failure

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 5>like this. And there was another plug on the plane

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 5>that was intact. So that's code for an installation problem

0:08:56.320 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 5>or a maintenance error. And it's if it were a

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 5>design flaw, and the NTSB is looking at everything, by

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 5>the way, So but if it is, if it were

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 5>design flaw, that would be a lengthy grounding and and

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 5>it's not looking that way. FAA, you know, has signed

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 5>off on these maintenance procedures that are only h it's

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:24.439
<v Speaker 5>like four to eight hours.

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 4>So do you think it do you think it could

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 4>be coincidental that it's on A seven thirty seven Max

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:30.679
<v Speaker 4>and not if these plugs have been used or these

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 4>plugs only used on seven thirty sevens, they're not.

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 5>Just used on seven thirty seven's. Airbots also has similar

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 5>plugs their own design on the larger A three twenty family. Okay,

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 5>so it's it's not a it's not some crazy new concept,

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 5>but it could be a if.

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 4>It's let's say it is a maintenance issue very briefly,

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 4>a maintenance issue or an installation issue, then then it's

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:56.560
<v Speaker 4>kind of coincidental that it's on a seven thirty seven

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 4>Max and not on a different plane.

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, exactly exactly. And and then the questions are also complicated,

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 5>and it's like, well, Boeing tests all of its aircraft really,

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:16.199
<v Speaker 5>you know, for everything, and the FAA is right over

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 5>looking over their shoulder. FAA signs off on everything on

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 5>a new plane right now, their inspectors are on site.

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 5>So it's like, well, how on earth did you miss

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 5>something that caused this depress pressurization. And so so if

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 5>it turns out that it's Boeing, they're going to have

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 5>to go back and have a real come to Jesus

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 5>moment and with their procedures. If it's not a bowing moment,

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 5>if it was, you know, happened after the plane left bowing,

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 5>then that's a totally different matter. And it's just a horrible,

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 5>horrible coincidence.

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, certainly something I know you'll be all over Bloomberg

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 3>News aerop Aerospace Report. Julie Johnson on ZU from Chicago.

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 3>Shares of Boeing by the way down six point six percent.

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Radio.

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:10.959
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch US

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern Listen on

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business app,

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>or watch US Live on YouTube.

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 3>I feel like we should be playing It's the End

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 3>of the World as we know it, because it.

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 4>Just feels like it might be on the list there.

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 3>The amount of risks that are out there are just

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 3>kind of freaking me out here in this new year.

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not like someone's like, h chicken little, but

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 3>it just feels like we just talked about climate change

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 3>and it's expected to get hotter than even last year.

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 4>And then there's, of course the geopolitical concerns that we've

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 4>been highlighting as we closed out twenty twenty three and

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:49.439
<v Speaker 4>kicked off twenty twenty four. I mean, you know, look

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:52.719
<v Speaker 4>at shares of Mask today falling because they denied that

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 4>they've reached an agreement with Huthy's to stop attacking ships

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 4>going through the Red Sea.

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 3>The business impact already happening.

0:11:58.440 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 3>When it comes to risks over all, engaging and analyzing

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 3>their impact, the Eurasia Group is always a go to

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 3>and the companies report on top risks predictions for twenty

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 3>twenty four puts to a year of grave concern. So

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 3>let's get into it and to some of the risks

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 3>with Eurasia Group Chairman Clip Kupchin. He is at the

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg News Bureau in Washington, d C. Cliffs. So nice

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 3>to have you here with Tim and myself. I want

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 3>to say welcome and happy new year, but I feel

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 3>like it might not be a good year. There's lots

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 3>of reasons out there. Is that a fair assessment? And

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 3>is it more than any other year in recent time?

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 3>We just dealt with a global pandemic a few years ago,

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, go back in eight we had a global

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 3>financial crisis. We've had some really big things that we've

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 3>had to deal with as an individual, as an American,

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 3>as a global citizen.

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 6>I think what separates this year from recent years is

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 6>the number of wars going on. We have two kinetic

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:58.599
<v Speaker 6>wars going on Ukraine and Israel Amas and that's a

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 6>lot of wars. I think we have to have ourselves

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:03.959
<v Speaker 6>why to kinetic wars. But in addition, and the way

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:05.959
<v Speaker 6>we like to think about this report, there's really three wars.

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 6>It's the two I've mentioned and about to begin is

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 6>the US against itself, which in many many ways will

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 6>be the world's more serious war because it pertains to

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 6>the world's low remaining superpower. Three wars with no guard rails,

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 6>three wars that we think have no leaders that can

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 6>really fix the problem, and three wars where the two

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 6>sides don't even necessarily agree what the war's over. And

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 6>that's really pertains the United States. So yeah, I think

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 6>risk is a thing that we always worry about, but

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 6>this year it's got a real edge to it.

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 4>Does it feel like investors are ignoring the risk out there?

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we're almost at all time highs on the

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 4>S and P five hundred right now.

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 6>I think on the potential for escalation in the Middle East,

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 6>there's a bit of a head and the sand thing

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 6>going on. I mean, for instance, I would be surprised

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:01.199
<v Speaker 6>if the US did and hit the Houthi's pretty soon

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 6>in Ena. Wow, how's Iran going to react? You know,

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 6>they'll think they'll do much, but I sure hope they don't.

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 6>I think that's one aspect in which investors have their

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 6>head in the sand. But the bigger one is what's

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 6>about to go on in this country. We're about to

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 6>see President Trump get the nomination in a couple of months,

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 6>and then you know, we're in a new era. We're

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 6>in an era where he gets the media, he controls

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 6>the funding, he controls the TV. You'll pressure on Biden

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 6>to do something on Iran because Trump will be to

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 6>the weight of the right of him on Iran. The

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 6>Ukrainians are going to wonder if they're ever going to

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 6>see another dollar from this country again, which I think

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 6>is a very good question. So I think the main

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 6>risk that at least over the medium term, you US

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 6>isn't going to tank anytime soon. But if we see

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 6>another Trump presidency, I think everybody's going to ask themselves,

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 6>is the US good for its promises? Is the US

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 6>the haven the safe haven for money that has spent

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 6>since the Second World War? Those kinds of questions They're

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 6>going to be.

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Honest, Cliff, I've got to say, you know, this whole

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 3>idea of the US, you know, basically at war with

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 3>itself against itself, and really the division and questioning American democracy,

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 3>And I do wonder what happens on the other side.

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 3>And we're a young nation still, right, and I look

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 3>at some of the older countries, there are oftentimes where

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 3>they're questioning kind of what is going on internally? Is

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 3>there something from history that you think we can draw

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 3>upon to kind of figure out and say, well, this

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 3>is kind of normal in a young country's history, and

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 3>try to figure out and maybe make some conclusions about

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 3>where it goes from here.

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 6>I can't think of a democracy. Look, I mean this

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 6>is kind of unique. You know, we have a guy

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 6>running for president in a democracy who tried to curtail

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 6>to be nice to him democracy. Last time we saw

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 6>this movie, I think the only analogy, and it's not

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 6>from distant history, but what happened to Hungary after Victor

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 6>orbon really got his mits around it? Well, you know,

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 6>he's Hungarian democracy? Ever going to rebound? Polish democracy? Did

0:15:57.120 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 6>Hungarian democracy? I don't know. I don't know. So there's

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 6>a real question as to how much we can absorb,

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 6>how much damage the US can take the second time around.

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 6>I don't think history is a very good guy, because

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 6>this is really very ahistorical and rather unpresidented.

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 4>What would be your message to politicians because I think

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 3>I think that people.

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 4>Within Trump's party, I've been very surprised to see the

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 4>way that they've rallied around President Trump after January sixth,

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty one. There are many many politicians out there,

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 4>including those running against him, who would support him to

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 4>be the nominee. What would your message be to these

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 4>folks who studied at some of the nations in the

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 4>world's most premier colleges and universities, who have law degrees,

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 4>who see no problem with another Trump administration.

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 6>First, I would say, don't take what you have for

0:16:56.480 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 6>granted anymore. This is a very fragile democracy that was

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 6>invented by a bunch of geniuses. When you think of

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 6>how they sort of controlled human nature and the greed

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 6>that's within all of us, but set up these hunks

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 6>of balances, and no, we can really get away with it.

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 6>But it's fragile, and it's fragile to a huckster, to

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 6>a really good politician like Donald Trump, who can you know, kirk,

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 6>who can feed, who can feed scared people and make

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 6>them induce them to vote for him. So I would

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 6>tell politicians to to sort of get real and be

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 6>very jealous of what you have, first of all. But secondly,

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 6>I think the rest of us here have to really respect.

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:46.360
<v Speaker 6>Wouldn't be the word, but be very cognizant of what's

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 6>going on in this country. That you know, I go

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 6>home to Wisconsin. When I go home to central Wisconsin

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 6>and talk to people and of the vote for Donald Trump,

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 6>and these are church going, god fearing, good people. Give

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 6>them their money. I give it all back in the morning.

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 6>They're very honest people. They're scared, they're misguided, they get

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 6>bad information. But I think all of us have to

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 6>sort of see this guy's legitimate and then sort of

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 6>look within ourselves and say, how did we get here?

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 6>Because we're not a very good were not a very

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 6>good place.

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 3>I felt that way about the uprising and the siege

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 3>at the Capitol, Like I want to understand these people,

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 3>Why are they doing this? Why are they I kind

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 3>of want to understand why someone thinks that way. I

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 3>don't walk around in their shoes, and they don't walk

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 3>around in my shoes, but I kind of want to

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 3>understand how do we do that?

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:33.640
<v Speaker 5>Though?

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Where people in terms of how they get their information,

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:41.719
<v Speaker 3>it is often a chosen source, one source, which can

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 3>lead to kind of this vacuum, and it can potentially

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 3>be a vacuum of misinformation.

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:49.199
<v Speaker 6>Well, we all got to make an effort, and I

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 6>didn't you join you today, come on to radio or

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 6>tell stories. But I'm going to share one quick second

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.159
<v Speaker 6>one with you. So I was on vacation during COVID.

0:18:56.480 --> 0:19:00.439
<v Speaker 6>It was in West Virginia, and I called the Central

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 6>Committee of the Republican Party of Xyz County. It was

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 6>a real county and it was a real conservative and

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 6>I kept my fifteen year old son. We met with

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 6>him for lunch and it was the most fascinating three

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 6>hours I think I've had in a long long time.

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 6>These far right Republicans felt like they had succeeded from America,

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 6>felt like nobody in Washington cared what they thought about.

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:20.919
<v Speaker 6>And they said I was first person in Washington that'd

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 6>ever seen. And I think there's an actual conversation to

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 6>be had somewhere. Nobody's trying. These aren't necessarily bad people,

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 6>they're scared people. But I think there's got to be

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 6>some kind of trust between these two poles that are

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 6>just widening and widening and widening. There's got to be

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 6>someplace in the middle where we can have a conversation.

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 6>Because we all are decent people, we all come from

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 6>the same founding fathers, but nobody's trying right now. We're

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 6>all just getting further and further into our nativistic corner.

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 6>So the trend line's not good. I don't think it's inevitable,

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:49.640
<v Speaker 6>but it's not good.

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, you may have not come on to tell stories,

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 3>but we certainly wish you did, because we feel like

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 3>it's very realistic now in terms of what's going on

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 3>and really resonate in place to some of the risks.

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 3>As you say, the number one risk that you guys

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 3>have identified as the US versus itself, which is just wild,

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 3>come back soon, come back. So do you think we'll

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 3>get twenty seconds come out in a better way or

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 3>it's fifty to fifty at this point.

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 6>Well, let me say that there are really good stories

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 6>out there, and Mexico after O Shinbaum is going to

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:28.360
<v Speaker 6>be I think a really good president of Mexico, mode's

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 6>going to get re elected. India is headed in a

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 6>good direction. There are good stories, and I think we

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 6>should you know, next time I come back, maybe we

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 6>can do the good news because there's good news.

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 3>All right, Okay, promise, promise you open invitation, so appreciate it.

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:46.400
<v Speaker 3>You raise your group chairman, Cliff Kupchin joining us from

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 3>our bureau in Washington, DC.

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:52.919
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App, and YouTube. You can also listen

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. Oooh the wear

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that outside is frightful, but the fire is so delightful.

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>And since we've no place to go, let it snow,

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 1>let it snow, let it snow.

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, De Martin for you, everybody, let it snow, Let

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 3>it snow. You might have played that around the holidays,

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 3>but you know, we thought maybe a storm this past

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 3>weekend might have brought us a little snow. It didn't

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 3>for those of us here in the New York metro.

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 3>So maybe further out west in New Jersey, but not much.

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Our ground's certainly too warm and to make anything stick.

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:43.399
<v Speaker 3>But it's very different him from what I grew up with,

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 3>and I grew up just outside New York City.

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:46.120
<v Speaker 4>I know it bums you out.

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 3>You love snow, I love big time.

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 4>Also skiing out west, you saw the pictures from December.

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 4>There was very little snow in places that typically have

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 4>lots of snow. We saw selloff in Velle Resorts stock

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 4>last week actually as after a downgrade as a result

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 4>of that. Bloomberger Opinions. Mark Gonglof notes that storms will

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 4>keep happening, but the long term trend is warmer winters

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 4>with less snowfall, which will bring severe consequences such as

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 4>water shortages and lost economic activity. We love reading Mark,

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 4>even though sometimes Mark it's not so happy, but we

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:18.120
<v Speaker 4>always end on a high note.

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 4>Mark is Bloomberg Opinion edaries with us here in our

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Interactive Brookers Studio. You can read Mark's story and

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 4>more from Bloomberg Opinion on the Bloomberg or at Bloomberg

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 4>dot com slash Opinion. It's not pretty, Mark, because when

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:34.639
<v Speaker 4>you think about snowfall, it's connected to a lot when

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 4>it comes to our ecosystem and our economy.

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:40.879
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I'm the opposite of Carol. I really can't stand snow.

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 7>But the more I studied snow, the more I realized

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 7>how much we're going to miss it when it's gone.

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:47.880
<v Speaker 7>It does so many things for the economy. It's about

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 7>a twenty billion dollar industry, the sort of ski, winter snow,

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 7>winter sports, adventure industry, tourism. But beyond that, it also

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 7>the snowpack in the mountains. It melts slowly and so

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 7>it provides key water sources during like the spring and

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 7>summer months, and particularly out west where they're maybe going

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 7>through a drought or this will provide them the water

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:15.479
<v Speaker 7>they need. So there's not a lot of snow, they

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 7>don't get that much water. It's important for biodiversity. Plants

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 7>and animals love it. Winter wheat needs it, fruit and

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 7>nut trees need it. I could go on and on

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 7>about all the things that snow does beyond just look

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 7>good and bring back, you know, feelings of nostalgia. But

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 7>it's also it is kind of a bummer just generally,

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 7>I think, just to see it change, and it has

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 7>already changed over the decades. There's just less snow generally,

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 7>the snow seasons are shorter, and that trend looks set

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 7>to continue well.

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, I mean we used to build igloos and

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 3>you know, tunnels, and it's just kind of crazy. We

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 3>just had so much snow and it stayed with us

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 3>for weeks, if not months, it didn't go away. Having

0:23:56.880 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 3>said that, you know, this idea, I always think about Mark,

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, years ago, people just you talk about water

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 3>being some precious important commodity that we could run out of,

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 3>and I feel like, maybe not, but it feels like

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 3>we are certainly having conversations around that for certain areas

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 3>of either our country or just around the world.

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 7>For sure, the Colorado River and California and so much

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 7>Panama Canal. Well, there's that, you know, And I've just

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 7>been talking about the US so far. But this also

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:29.159
<v Speaker 7>applies to Europe. We've seen rivers running dry in Europe.

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:31.679
<v Speaker 7>They also depend on a lot of snow melt. This

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 7>goes all the way across to China, but particularly in

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 7>the northern hemisphere. And unfortunately, the colder the places are,

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 7>the warmer, the faster they're warming, and winter is warming

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 7>faster than other seasons, and colder places are warming faster.

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 7>Now some of these colder places will still get snow

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 7>because one of the weird things about climate change is

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 7>that the atmosphere holds more water because it's generally warmer,

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 7>and so if you're far far north and you get

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 7>a storm, you'll get dumped with a lot of snow.

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 7>The Great Lakes end up Chicago get end up Dump

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 7>with a bunch of snow because the Great Lakes won't freeze,

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 7>but that causes lake effects snow to be heavier. So

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 7>it does weird things. But overall the trend is less

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 7>of this stuff, and so we need to plan ahead

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 7>for that. We need to figure out how we're what

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 7>we're going to do.

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:17.880
<v Speaker 3>And we're doing that right. Well, sorry, we'll starcasm, right.

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean unfortunately. I mean we are to some extent.

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 7>I mean we're in the Colorado River area, those states

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 7>and the federal government are trying to bang out agreements

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 7>to use less water. Arizona is, you know, taking present

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 7>care of its precious water. So there are on the

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 7>local level things that we're trying to do, But the

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 7>biggest thing that we need to do is to sort

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:43.120
<v Speaker 7>of put the brakes on heating up the planet. And

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 7>that is moving a little more slowly.

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Are we doing that?

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 6>Mark?

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 7>Are we heating up the planet? Are we not eating?

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 7>Are we putting the brakes on heating We're we're tapping

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 7>the brakes gently when we really kind of need to

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 7>be slamming them. I think, yeah, well, you know.

0:25:57.880 --> 0:25:59.959
<v Speaker 3>I was just thinking about, like Mark story than we

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:01.679
<v Speaker 3>that other story that you and I like we're floating

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 3>around with that, how scientists are already getting ready for

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 3>a record breaking heat once again this year.

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So Mark, connect that to us to climate when

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 4>we think about temperature and weather and climate, because I

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:12.959
<v Speaker 4>think there's a lot of confusion out there, Like if

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 4>there's a big storm this year here in New York,

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.679
<v Speaker 4>guarantee you'll have people on Twitter who are saying and

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 4>politicians even who will come out and say yeah, Trump

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 4>Trump has done this in past years saying, oh, where's

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 4>you know, where's the global warming? Yeah, that sort of thing.

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 4>So to make the connection for us talk about the trend.

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:30.439
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and I've gotten them in my email inbox all

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 7>day to day. You know, hey, it's snowed here by me,

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 7>I mean that the thing is that you know, it

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 7>snowed like a foot in upstate New York. It's it's

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 7>still going to snow next. This year could be the

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:42.399
<v Speaker 7>hottest year on record because partly because we have an

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 7>El Nino weather pattern going on, the weather is crazy

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 7>and it's unpredictable, and climbing is very chaotic and complex.

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 7>So you have to look at very long term trends,

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 7>and so yes, we could hit a record high in

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 7>temperatures this year and then go back down next year

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:58.440
<v Speaker 7>when Lenina comes back or whatever, and we could have

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 7>big snowstorms and the these things will keep happening. But

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:04.120
<v Speaker 7>the thing is that they're going to happen less often

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:09.120
<v Speaker 7>and the weather will become more chaotic. But you can

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:12.919
<v Speaker 7>look at the long term trends and see less snowpack,

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 7>less snow when it falls, heavier snow when it falls

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 7>because it's just wetter, more rain. You can look across

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:21.679
<v Speaker 7>the United States and see more rain than snow. Just

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 7>on and on with those things that you see, and

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 7>the global temperature is also creeping up steadily when you

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 7>look at the averages over the long term.

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:31.879
<v Speaker 3>I think the trends are so clear. So when you

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 3>think about policy and smart policy, how does it have

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 3>to be developed? Is it state by state or does

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 3>there need to be kind of a federal You look

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 3>at the United States to say, hey, folks, and there

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:43.479
<v Speaker 3>is I'm sure, but I mean even in a deeper

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:47.120
<v Speaker 3>way of saying, we've got to think about this as

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 3>a nation in terms of where water supplies are or

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 3>where there aren't or where there's going to be significant changes.

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean it's a whole of economy kind of solution,

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 7>and you know, you have to have government providing some incentives.

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 7>You know, the green energy industry, you know, renewables evs,

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 7>they all have a certain amount of momentum and they

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:06.639
<v Speaker 7>are growing, and there is the if we want to

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 7>get toward more positive stuff. You know, there is possible

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:11.679
<v Speaker 7>for like hockey stick like growth in these things, but

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 7>they often need assistance or encouragement from bigger governments. And

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 7>that could be state governments like California, which is obviously

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 7>would by itself would be one of the biggest economies

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:25.120
<v Speaker 7>in the world, but the federal the US government, all

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 7>of these things are sort of working together to sort

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 7>of provide these incentives to help get private money involved

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 7>too for these solutions.

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 3>Does it make you worried, Well.

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 7>For sure, yes, it makes me worried. But again, I

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 7>guess if I'm trying to be optimistic about it, it makes

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 7>a lot of people worried, and it's making a lot

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 7>more people worried now than it did maybe ten years ago.

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 7>And so you are seeing more money and more attention

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 7>going to these things, and when people when people see

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 7>the effects firsthand, when we see wildfire smoke in the

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 7>streets and we you know, we can't breathe and we're

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 7>running out of water. People, it sorts to focus people's minds,

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 7>sort of focuses people's minds on solutions.

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 4>You talk about that a lot, Carol, that you know,

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 4>over the summer, seeing those red skies like with something visceral,

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 4>you know. But I don't know if it makes us

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 4>change our behavior, maybe it makes us change the way

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 4>we vote. I don't know.

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 3>I still don't have an av Yeah.

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but you also didn't buy a new car in

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 4>the least.

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 3>That's true.

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 7>They're very expensive. And so it's problem when problems like

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 7>this we need to solve.

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 3>Come back soon because I know that this is something

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 3>we certainly interested in. We know the audience is Bloomberg Opinions,

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 3>Mark on left joining us here in studio. This is Bloomberg,

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 3>Brother Marc.

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 6>A journal.

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 5>But you let me drive?

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 4>Oh no, no, no, no, dry please, I want to drive.

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 6>It's a good question.

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>This is the drive to the clothes thing. Well by

0:29:57.000 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Don on Bloomberg Radio.

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 3>All right, everybody, we've got about eighteen minutes left in

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 3>today's trading session. But we've got stocks at their best

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 3>levels of the session, as you heard from Charlie, at

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 3>more than two percent on the Nasdaq, a three hundred

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 3>and nine point gain in the DAW up more than

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 3>two hundred points, and one point four percent higher on

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 3>the S and P five hundred. Everything is awesome to

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 3>is that?

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Is that true?

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean a little sarcas.

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I know.

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, we're going to talk about it later when we

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 3>talk with the Eurasia Group, right, because they've.

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 4>Got everything is not awesome should be the title of

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 4>their twenty twenty four note. There are a lot of

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 4>risks out there.

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 3>You goo to run for your bunker.

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 4>Hey, let's see what Michael Sheldon is thinking about all this.

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 4>He's executive director and chief investment officer at High Tower

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 4>RDM Financial Group. Michael joins us on Zoom from Westport, Connecticut.

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 4>Once again, Happy New Year, Michael. I think I can

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 4>still say that we haven't spoken in a few weeks.

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 4>How are you?

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 5>Thank to you?

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you?

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 4>How are you thinking about this?

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 5>Well?

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 2>I think it's nice to see the market rally here

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 2>after a couple of days of profit taking. I think

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 2>sort of looking ahead to twenty twenty four, they're certainly

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 2>going to be a number of twists and turns, But

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 2>I think the bigger picture for US is, for example,

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 2>going into twenty twenty three, most most economists investors were

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 2>not so optimistic. They were looking for maybe a recession

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 2>or a downturn in the economy, but that really didn't

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 2>play out. The economy and the markets were extremely resilient

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 2>last year, although the rally was really led by a

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 2>few stocks until later in the year. But I think

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 2>heading into twenty twenty four, I think more investors are

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:25.719
<v Speaker 2>sort of moving on, moving into the camp that we

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 2>could ultimately pull off a soft landing. So right now

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 2>we're in the glass half full sort of category as

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:34.719
<v Speaker 2>opposed to the glass half empty, And there are certainly

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 2>some positives out there, but obviously there are some head

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Windso where it's early in.

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 3>The year so far, it is early in the year

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 3>so far, certainly no doubt about it. And yet I

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 3>feel like there's some interesting offerings out there for investors,

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 3>and I want to kind of run it by you

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 3>in terms of what your investors are asking you about

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 3>and what you would kind of say. We just talked

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 3>about a spot bitcoin etf IF and when everything goes

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 3>through interns the approval, will you be recommending that to

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 3>your investors? And are your clients and investors asking you

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 3>about it.

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 2>We haven't had too many questions about bitcoin, to be honest.

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Occasionally from time to time. It's not something we've really

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 2>gotten involved in. I think for bitcoin, it's it's always

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 2>been tough to sort of get your head around how

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 2>to value that.

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 3>Amen, hallelujah, totally in that camp.

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, you got to do is to free casters, Michael.

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 4>You got to take the free cash flows from bitcoin,

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:29.959
<v Speaker 4>and then you've got to find the discount. Right, it's

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 4>pretty Oh wait the lot come to you for that.

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 3>So no, you're not getting a lot of questions about

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 3>it now.

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 2>We really haven't. I think for us, we're financial advisors,

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 2>so I mean, ultimately it comes down to we're dealing

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 2>with high network individuals. We put together a financial plan,

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 2>we figure out the rate of return they need to

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 2>meet their long term investment objectives. And our job is

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 2>to build diversified portfolios. And we don't want to stick

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 2>our neck out too far. But over time, stocks have

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 2>tended to be the best way for investors to build wealth.

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 2>So we want to diversified portfolios, and that's sort of

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 2>how we're looking at this year.

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Will that diversification include private equity. Blackstone raising one point

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 3>three billion for its first private equity fund for rich individuals,

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 3>so achieving one of the biggest initial halls for a

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 3>fund of its kind despite a delayed launch. We've had

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot of conversations about folks wanting to kind of

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 3>democratize access to private equity. Is that something that you

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 3>would recommend that there's a place in a portfolio for

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 3>your investors and are they asking about that?

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 2>So most of what we do is individual stocks, mutual funds,

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 2>and ETFs, but for clients where appropriate, for high network

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 2>clients of a certain level, where they can afford the

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 2>illiquidity that comes with alternate private investments or alternative investments,

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 2>we do market those either private equity, private real estate,

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 2>hedge funds. But again it's client by client where appropriate,

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of these products do have illiquidity, so

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 2>that's something you have to be aware of.

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 4>What about Apple, How are you thinking about Apple right now?

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 4>It's actually hired today by more than two percent. Jefferies

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 4>though out with a note that says iPhone sales in

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 4>China are set to fall double digits. A lot of

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 4>concerns about China, a lot of concerns about slowing revenue

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 4>growth for the company. How are you thinking about it?

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 4>Would you recommend it?

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 3>Two downgrades last week?

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 2>We well, well, I apologize, but we're not allowed to

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 2>mention individual stocks. But what I would tell you is

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:19.320
<v Speaker 2>that we have held that in our portfolio, probably for

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:22.799
<v Speaker 2>more than a decade along and we're big believers in technology.

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:25.239
<v Speaker 2>We own many of the large megacaps, so in a

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of our in a number of our portfolios we

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 2>held I think four of the seven megacap companies from

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:33.279
<v Speaker 2>that did so well last year. So many of our

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 2>clients are benefiting from the AI and the technology. We

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 2>do believe in technology over the long haul. I think

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:41.719
<v Speaker 2>AI is probably in the early innings. In terms of

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 2>individual stocks, it's sort of case by case, but clients

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 2>should have a fairly healthy waiting and technology because that

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 2>represents the growth part of many client portfolios.

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's interesting too, because I do feel like some

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 3>of the conversations we had at the end of last year,

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 3>despite everybody saying okay, magnificent seven. You've had your run.

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 3>It's time for broadening out. We did see a broadening

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 3>out late last year, and I think it's safe to

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 3>say to some extent continuing to this year. But they

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:09.239
<v Speaker 3>also did say it doesn't mean you pair back on

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 3>those magnificent seven because, as you just said, that's the

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 3>growth part of our economy.

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean one of the things we try and talk

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:19.759
<v Speaker 2>with our clients about it's time in the market, not

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:22.840
<v Speaker 2>timing the market that really helps you build wealth over time.

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 2>So I mean some of these stocks, some of these

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 2>large KEP technology stocks, are going to have pullbacks from

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 2>time to time, but trying to time the short term

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 2>swings in these stocks is really very difficult. I think

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 2>you really want to have some exposure in tech and

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 2>try and find the areas within technology broadly that will

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 2>do well over time.

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 4>So that said, if you missed the rally that we

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 4>saw at the end of twenty twenty three, you've got

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 4>a client who has cash to deploy. How do you

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 4>deploy that?

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, there are a couple of options. We're relatively optimistic

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:55.799
<v Speaker 2>for this year. You've had the unemployment rate below four

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 2>percent for twenty three straight months, wages continue to rise.

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Lation is coming down. Corporate profits were flat last year

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 2>and they're currently forecast to be up about ten percent

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 2>this year. So I think there are some reasons to

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:11.760
<v Speaker 2>be positive. There are certainly some headwinds. Geopolitical events around

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:14.479
<v Speaker 2>the world are one of them. Valuations are not cheap.

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 2>One of the big question marks really is the timing

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 2>and how many rate hikes or rate cuts excuse me,

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:21.799
<v Speaker 2>we'll get from the Fed this year. But I think

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:25.320
<v Speaker 2>overall they're probably at this point more positive than negative.

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 2>So for clients that are very nervous but looking to

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 2>get into the market, you could what we call dollar

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:32.319
<v Speaker 2>cost average, So you start to put some money into

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 2>the market now, maybe wait a month or three months

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 2>and add some additional money. If you're looking out many

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:40.719
<v Speaker 2>many years, ten years, twenty years, thirty years, really trying

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 2>to time the market is not worth the effort on that.

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:46.400
<v Speaker 2>But again, it all does come down to an individual's

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 2>financial plan.

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Hey, one last question, as we talked about the broadening

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 3>out of the rally, you shared with us some notes

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:53.399
<v Speaker 3>We've talked about this with our Gina Martin Adams. I mean,

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:56.920
<v Speaker 3>we are looking at ninety one percent of the stocks

0:36:56.920 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 3>in the S ANDP. We're above the fifty day moving

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:01.720
<v Speaker 3>average at the start of this year seventy seven percent.

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 3>We're above their two hundred day moving average. You share

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:05.919
<v Speaker 3>that data with us. We've had some similar from Gina

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:08.760
<v Speaker 3>thirty seconds left here that broadening out is a healthy

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:11.400
<v Speaker 3>sign as long as we don't get recession real quickly.

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that. I think that definitely is a

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:15.839
<v Speaker 2>healthy sign. If we continued the way we were last

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 2>year with a small number of stocks outperforming the market,

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:21.439
<v Speaker 2>I think that would limit the markets upside we've seen.

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:24.319
<v Speaker 2>Adding to what you said where we've had several days

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:27.479
<v Speaker 2>where the advancing versus declining stocks has been above five

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 2>to one, and until things get really exuberant, I think overall, well,

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 2>that can be short term anti climatic, this type of behavior.

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Longer term, I think it's healthier for the market.

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 3>All right, great check in covered a lot of ground.

0:37:39.680 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 3>Michael Sheldon, thank you so much. Happy new year for

0:37:41.640 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 3>me as well. Executive Director, chief investment Officer at High

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:47.320
<v Speaker 3>Tower RDM Financial. On Zoom from Westport, Connecticut.

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. A little lot

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of Apple, Spotify and anywhere else you get your podcast.

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern on

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us live every

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:08.560
<v Speaker 1>weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal