WEBVTT - Civil Rights Division Upended and Lawyers Exit

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Law with June Grosse from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 2>The new head of the Justice Department Civil Rights Division

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 2>is upending the mission of the division, which traditionally has

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:21.760
<v Speaker 2>been to protect Americans against discrimination based on race, color, religion, sets,

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 2>and national origin. Harmeit Dillon has abandoned landmark civil rights

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 2>settlements and has changed the division's focus to combating anti semitism,

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 2>rooting out anti Christian bias, fighting diversity initiatives, and protecting

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 2>gun rights. It's led to a mass exodus of attorneys

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:45.840
<v Speaker 2>from the division. In an interview with conservative commentator Glenn Beck,

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Dylan said that more than one hundred division attorneys out

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 2>of three hundred and eighty have already said they'll leave.

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 3>I think that's fine, because we don't want people in

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 3>the federal government who feel like it's their pet project

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 3>to go personute police departments based on statistical evidence, or

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 3>persecute people praying outside abortion facilities instead of doing violence.

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:12.039
<v Speaker 3>That's not the job here. The job here is to

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:15.960
<v Speaker 3>enforce the federal civil rights laws, not woke ideology.

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Joining Me is Bloomberg Law, reporter Suzanne Mognac start by

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 2>telling us about the history of this division and its purpose.

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 4>The Civil Rights Division is part of the Justice Department

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 4>that was created in nineteen fifty seven as part of

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 4>the Civil Rights Act that year, and it was really

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 4>originally at its time intended to protect the right to vote.

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 4>This is a big problem in SOLF at the time

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 4>with protecting black residents from being blocked from the polls,

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 4>and that was sort of the original mission of the unit. Obviously,

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 4>now it's expanded and it enforces all of the civil

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 4>rights laws that protect people from being discriminated against based

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 4>on their sex, their gender, disability, religion, etc.

0:01:55.480 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Are they dropping any existing litigation or settlements by the

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 2>prior administration?

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 5>Are they dropping anything?

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 4>Quite a lot, Yes, they're dropping a lot. We've seen

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 4>withdrawals of consent decrees and just you know, removing themselves

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 4>from pending litigation. In a lot of different areas that

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 4>the Biden era Civil Rights Division had handled, One notable

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:20.519
<v Speaker 4>one that got quite a lot of traction was an

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 4>environmental case actually that had been focused on sewage issues

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 4>in Black Delta and Alabama, where residents have been found

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 4>to have been discriminated against by their county because they

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 4>didn't have proper sewage systems, and it had created a

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 4>health risk for residents in those communities, and that was

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 4>something that the Trump administrations decided to withdraw from that settlement.

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 4>And so we've really just seen a lot of withdrawals

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 4>of settlements but just don't align with what the Trump

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 4>administration's missions are when it comes to the types of

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 4>civil rights that they're interested in enforcing.

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 2>In that Alabama case, the settlement had already been reached, right,

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:59.239
<v Speaker 2>that's correct, So now what is the general new mission statement?

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 4>The Justice Department had actually sent out new mission statements

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 4>for the civil rights divisions different sections. To take it broadly,

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 4>a lot of the common threads that we saw throughout

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 4>the new section mission statements were a focus on anti semitism,

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.919
<v Speaker 4>really specifically on college campuses, but focus on protecting women

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 4>from quote unquote gender ideology, and really specifically what that

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 4>is is preventing transgender women from participating in women's sports.

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 4>And we're also seeing just a focus on opposing DEI

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 4>and that's obviously an issue that we've seen kind of

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 4>throughout the new Trump administration. Diversity equity and inclusion efforts

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 4>that we might see in universities or elsewhere.

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Like the Housing and Civil Enforcement section, What did they

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 2>do and what are they now going to do?

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 4>So Housing and Civil Enforcement primarily would take on the

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 4>Fair Housing Act, which is a civil rights statue that

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 4>prevents discrimination and housing. So, for example, refusing to rent

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 4>an apartment to somebody because of their race would be

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 4>a classic example of housing discrimination that they would go after.

0:03:57.400 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 4>What we saw in the new Mission statement was actually

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 4>no made of the Fairhousing Act, and I think that

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 4>was something that was significant for people following was that

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 4>landmark civil rights law in housing is not even mentioned

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 4>as a priority, and it's misinstatement. And said, I think

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 4>what we're going to see a lot of from this

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 4>section is religious land use issues, so churches who want

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 4>to get a permit or something for a certain amount

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 4>of land and that they're claiming that they're being discriminated against,

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 4>which has always been a mission of that section, to

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 4>be clear, But I think we're going to see more

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 4>of a focus on religious institutions in helping discrimination really,

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 4>particularly probably Christian institutions, since anti Christian bias is actually

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 4>another tenant that we've seen kind of throughout the different

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 4>sections as a core mission for this division.

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 2>But the division has always handled cases involving anti Christian bias.

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 4>Anti Christian bias with any religious bias has always been

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 4>within the mandate of Civil Rights Division, and absolutely in

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 4>instances of anti Christian bias in the past, we would

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 4>have seen prior administrations take those on. What I heard

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 4>from a lot of former Justice Department officials who came

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 4>from this division was that the New Times administration was

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 4>somewhat of an outcome oriented approach when it comes to

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 4>these issues. So I spoke to one former division official

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 4>who told me that when they wanted to take a

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:11.479
<v Speaker 4>look at religious discrimination issues, they didn't start with a religion.

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 4>They went around the country and talk to different communities

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 4>to try to learn which religions they felt had been

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 4>most affected at the time. This was during the Obama administration.

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 4>He said. The research said them that Islamophobia was actually

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 4>one of the most significant religious discrimination issues at that time.

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 4>And so I've been Anti Christian Bias task Force for example,

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:30.919
<v Speaker 4>it was something that had happened recently. It shows that

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 4>they're really interested in probing anti Christian bias, but it

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 4>doesn't necessarily say that that is the most prevalent iss

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 4>you have religious discrimination. So of course you know, I

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 4>haven't done this market research as a reporter, I could

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 4>not tell you, you know, exactly why that anti Christian bias

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.919
<v Speaker 4>stacks up against other religions. People can maybe take a

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 4>guest to face on their own communities that which they're

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 4>seeing the most of. But I just think it sort

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 4>of says something that they're starting with that I'm starting

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 4>with anti Christians as opposed to, you know, maybe taking

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.159
<v Speaker 4>a broader look and seeing where were the problems are.

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's some criticism that former Justice Department

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 4>officials have had as they take a look at this,

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 4>that perhaps they're going in with an ideology that they're

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 4>wanting to play out as opposed to going in with

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 4>a problem and seeing where it is.

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 2>There's also the Educational Opportunities Section, which used to ensure

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 2>that educational facilities are not discriminating against minorities.

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:23.239
<v Speaker 5>What is its mission now?

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 4>So a huge part of what I think the new

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 4>mission will be on the Educational Opportunity section is going

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 4>to be a lot of transgender athletes and sports, and

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 4>anti semitism on college campuses. These are issues for the

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 4>Trump administration. More broadly, we've seen the Department of Education

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 4>initiating investigations or sending letters to universities regarding investigations into

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 4>anti Semitism on college campuses. Justice Department has opened one

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 4>into the University of California on this issue for example. Obviously,

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 4>we've seen this crack down very broadly. I mean, the

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 4>State's Department has revoked visas from students who were involved

0:06:56.600 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 4>in protests against the Israel Homos war. And that's a

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 4>broad priority for the administration, and I think it's really

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 4>going to play out in this Educational Opportunities section of

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 4>the Civil Rights Division when it comes to seeing it

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 4>as a religious discrimination issue. And then of course the

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 4>transgender issue I think will also be a big one

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 4>for that division. With college sports, there's been a lot

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 4>of pushback on the right on the idea of transgender

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 4>women participating in women's sports is being unfair to non

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 4>transgender women, and so I think that's an issue that

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 4>we can expect this division and in the Education section

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 4>to really be taking on.

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 2>And then the Special Litigation Section, what did that do

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 2>and what does it do now?

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 4>So the Special Litigation Section does take on a lot.

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 4>They have a fairly broad mandate. Some of the cases

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 4>that we've seen them do in the past are police

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 4>brutality cases, cases for people who are incarcerated. We've also

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 4>seen them take on space SAX cases, which are free

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 4>to have access to clinic entrances. And so this is

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 4>for example, would be protesters blocking people from entering abortion

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 4>clinics for example. We certainly are not going to expect

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 4>to see a law of enforcement of Face Act on

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 4>abortion protesters for life protesters outside of clinics. Specifically, in

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 4>the new mission statements, they indicated that they do not

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 4>want to see disparate treatment of pro life protesters, prayer

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 4>visuals outside of abortion clinics, et cetera. That's something we've

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 4>heard the political appointee Harmet Dillon has ever seen the division.

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 4>That's something we've heard her say. So I think that's

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 4>something we're going to see a lot less of. One

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 4>investigation that we've seen from the special Litigation section that's

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 4>very new, I'm told for this division is actually one

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 4>into gun rights. We've seen that section take on the

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 4>Los Angeles Sheriff's Department on processing delays with concealed carry

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 4>permits and whether that's an issue of discrimination. And so,

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 4>while you know this is still within the broad mission

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 4>of the Special Litigation Section. We haven't really seen civil

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 4>rights be used for gun rights. So that's just kind

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 4>of a new, I guess interpretation of the dissection's mandate,

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 4>but also part of the Trump administration's broader mission. Like

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.959
<v Speaker 4>they've made clear that Second Amendment right to bear arms

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 4>is an important one for them.

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 2>So, I mean, you have the Civil Rights Division litigating

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:11.239
<v Speaker 2>basically against transgender women, litigating about delays in processing gun permits.

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 2>One employee you talked, you said, they're demolishing the Civil

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Rights Division and repurposing it for something it's not meant

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 2>to do. Are they basically abandoning almost everything the Civil

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Rights Division was known for, like you know, police brutality

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 2>cases or discrimination against minorities. It seems like it's just

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 2>a totally different focus.

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 4>It does appear though, that may be the direction that's going.

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.599
<v Speaker 4>I think racial discrimination cases in particular, it seem like

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 4>they're going to be deprioritized as something I'm really hearing

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 4>across the board, and we've seen it in action. We've

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 4>seen them withdraw settlements in racial discrimination cases. One of

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 4>the first things that we saw this division do a

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 4>few months ago was to withdraw settlements in racial discrimination

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 4>cases against police departments regarding incidents past, and so I

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 4>think sure that racial discrimination is going to be a

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 4>lower priority for this division, and we're going to see

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 4>more focus on the issues that we talked about on

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 4>anti Semitism, anti transgender and I DEI. And yes, that

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 4>is a radical departure, I'm told from what that division

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:16.839
<v Speaker 4>has been doing in the past. And so what we're

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 4>seeing out of that is just like widespread exodus of

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 4>career officials who have devoted their lives and careers to

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 4>civil rights enforcement, who just really don't see the current

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 4>mission as in line with their values and how they

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 4>see civil rights enforcement and how it should be.

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:34.839
<v Speaker 2>And how many division attorneys have said they're leaving.

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 4>We're still waiting on those exact final numbers. Employees had

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 4>until April twenty eighth to let the division leaders know

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 4>if they wanted to take the differred resignation offers. This

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 4>was the second offer, second opportunity they had to take

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 4>somewhat of a buyout where they could go on leave

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 4>for a few months and then formally separate in the fall.

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:53.679
<v Speaker 4>So we're still remains to be seen on exactly the

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 4>damage that's going to be done. But Harmie Dillon went

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 4>on a podcast over the weekend and said she expected

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 4>over a hundred attorneys out of that three hundred something

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 4>attorney section to leave, which is significant, And obviously you

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 4>know there's still a couple of days for people to

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 4>get those requests in. Maybe not all have been approved.

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 4>I think it's very possible, maybe even likely from what

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm hearing that it may be well over one hundred employees.

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 4>I think half is absolutely within the realm of possibility.

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Are these career attorneys resigning themselves or are they being

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:24.679
<v Speaker 2>pushed out?

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 4>It's a mix. We saw a flu of reassignments, quite

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 4>a few section chiefs, section deputy chiefs of the various

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 4>section we've talked about who were reassigned to complaint education

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 4>or FOYA offices, which we're seen as a lower tier

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 4>of work. I think for a lot of those people,

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:42.959
<v Speaker 4>and that certainly with an effort to push them out

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 4>by reassigning them to something different that they didn't sign

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 4>up to do. I think a lot of these people

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 4>are going to see the writing on the wall and

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 4>take the deferred resignation offer. And some of those people

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 4>who take the deferred resignation, weren't reassigned. They just maybe

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 4>see what the division is doing and it's not what

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 4>they want to be doing, so they've decided best to

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 4>go take the out now. So it's sort of a mix,

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 4>and we've seen that across the board of the Justice Department.

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 4>That will see some leaders be given a reassignment that's

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 4>maybe seen as less appealing. And when sometimes I think

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 4>when somebody's boss or longtime manager is reassigned or decides

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 4>to leave, they can create a morale issue below them,

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 4>and a lot of the people who maybe work under

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 4>them and have really respected their work might fee less

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 4>inclined to stay.

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 2>I found your story really eye opening, Suzanne, thanks so

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:28.959
<v Speaker 2>much for joining me tonight. That's Bloomberg Law reporter Suzanne Monnac.

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:33.679
<v Speaker 2>The American legal system is being tested during President Donald

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 2>Trump's first one hundred days in office and unprecedented blits

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 2>of lawsuits filed against the administration's policies more than two

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 2>hundred lawsuits in courts across the country over just about

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 2>every aspect of his agenda, from spending to immigration to

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 2>firing of federal workers and government officials. Trump has complained

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:00.559
<v Speaker 2>about the judges who are keeping him from carrying out

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 2>his agenda. Here in an interview with ABC News yesterday,

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 2>we have to be treated fairly by judges, and we're

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 2>not being treated fairly by all judges. Critics say the

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration has not been following all court orders, and

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:21.239
<v Speaker 2>a Supreme Court showdown over the president's powers appears inevitable.

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Joining me is Dave Ehrenberg, former Palm Beach County state attorney.

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 5>Dave Trump is.

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Averaging about two lawsuits filed against his administration for every

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 2>day he's been in office. That's unprecedented.

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 6>This is because President Trump has decided to govern by

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 6>executive order as opposed to do the normal thing of

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 6>going to Congress and getting your agenda adopted. So for

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 6>people who think he's acting like a king, perhaps, but

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 6>I think it's a sign of weakness that he can't

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 6>act like a president and get your agenda through the

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 6>legislative branch. FDR did. And the reason why Trump is

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 6>doing this is because he's got a razor thin majority

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 6>of Republicans in the House, knowing that it would be

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:12.560
<v Speaker 6>really difficult to pass on this very controversial legislation through

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 6>and the filibuster in the Senate would block his legislation

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 6>as well, So he is trying to go over the

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 6>heads of Congress, and he's being assisted by the fact

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 6>that Congress has advocated its role as a separate, coequal

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 6>branch of government. So it's up to the judiciary to

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 6>stand firm and to provide the checks and balances that

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 6>a democracy requires, and so far they have, they have

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 6>provided the guardrails. So that's why you're seeing so many lawsuits.

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 6>That's why you're seeing so many laws in court for Trump.

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 6>That would change if he decided to govern through legislation

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 6>rather than executive order, but there's no sign he's going

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 6>to stop.

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 2>There are cases in all different areas. There is you know,

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 2>government spending and DEI policies and all kinds of things.

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 2>The cases that have gotten the most attention are the

0:14:57.600 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 2>immigration cases.

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 5>Why do you think there is so many cases in

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 5>that area?

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is it because they're testing how far they can.

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 6>Go to his top priority? So immigration is the most

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 6>important issue for him, and he knows that's the reason

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 6>why he got elected. So he got elected for two reasons.

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 6>Inflation in the southern border, immigration, and so far he

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 6>has not been able to lower prices because the president

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 6>has very little to do with inflation, although his positive

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 6>caused increase in prices through tariffs. So he's relying instead

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 6>on the southern border and immigration, and so he's been

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 6>extra aggressive on that issue because that's his bread and butter.

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 6>But in so doing he is running a foul of

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 6>due process because the president is not a king. And

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 6>even though this obscure Alien Enemies Act from the eighteenth

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 6>century exists, it is rarely invoked, and when it is invoked,

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 6>it doesn't give the present unilateral authority to deport anyone

0:15:55.560 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 6>without due process. And the courts are reminding him of that. Now, Trump,

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 6>instead of just abiding by court rulings, is trying to

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 6>evade them. Importantly, he has not said that he has

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 6>openly defined court rulings, and I think that's important. That's

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 6>why I don't believe we're in a constitutional crisis. Yet

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 6>the day that he says I'm going to defy the

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 6>court's rulings, that's when it's coo, that's when we have

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 6>a constitutional crisis. But that day hasn't come yet. He's

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 6>paying lip service to it. He's saying he's abiding by

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 6>court rulings even though he's playing games with him. But

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 6>still the fact that he is saying he respects the

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 6>Supreme Court and will abide by the rulings does mean something.

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and Trump did say that he follows the laws

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 2>again today in the Oval Office when he was asked

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 2>about the case of the marilynd Man Kilmar Arbrego Garcia,

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 2>who was mistakenly deported to l Salvador.

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 6>I haven't spoken to him.

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 2>I really leave that to the lawyers, and I take

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 2>my advice from Pam and everybody that has very much involved.

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 2>They know the laws, and we followed the laws exactly.

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 2>One of the first judges that Trump has all doubt

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 2>is the chief judge in the DC Courts, Judge James Boseburg,

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 2>and he's the one that oversaw that high profile challenge

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 2>to the deportation flights of Venezuelans to El Salvador. Trump

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 2>has called him highly conflicted, a troublemaker and agitator, a

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 2>grand standard, and even a radical left lunatic. He's used

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 2>some of those similar names against judges who were in

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 2>charge of the cases. The criminal case is against him.

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 2>What does it do to have though the President calling

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:37.640
<v Speaker 2>judges a radical left lunatic and calling for their impeachment.

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 6>Well, it got the admonition from Chief Justice Roberts. Chief

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 6>Office Roberts rarely speaks out on stuff like this, but

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 6>he did saying that if you disagree with the judges ruling,

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 6>the recourse is not to try to impeace the judge,

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 6>and by implication, not to bass the judge, but to

0:17:55.720 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 6>appeal the judge. And that meant something because because Trump

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 6>knows that his bread is buttered by the Supreme Court,

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 6>that's who gave him unprecedented immunity. That's a big reason

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:11.120
<v Speaker 6>why he was elected. He was able to avoid criminal

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 6>trial during the campaign, So he owes the Supreme Court

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 6>a lot, and that's why he didn't push back when

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 6>Chief Justice Roberts scolded him. So, although it is a

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 6>very maga thing to bash judges, you haven't seen it

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:30.199
<v Speaker 6>as vitriolic as it seemed to go. Right now, it

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 6>seems like the rhetoric has died off a little bit,

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 6>and I think that's because Chief Justice Roberts had to

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 6>step in and remind Trump that he is out of line.

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 6>And Trump, who's purely transactional, does not want to upset

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 6>the Chief Justice of the most important court in the land.

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 2>So Judge Bosberg, actually two judges are investigating whether the

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:57.399
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration defied their orders. As you say, Trump repeatedly

0:18:57.480 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 2>says he always obeys court orders.

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:02.360
<v Speaker 5>But when the government.

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 2>Flew those Venezuelans to El Salvador, Judge Boseburg paused the

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 2>deportations and told the government to turn the planes around.

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 2>He ruled on April sixteenth that the government demonstrated a

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 2>willful disregard for his order for not turning the flights

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 2>or ordering their return from l Salvador, and that none

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 2>of their responses have been satisfactory. So Judge Bosburg could

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 2>be on the way to finding someone in the Trump

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 2>administration in contempt.

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 6>Could be. So far, no one has been found in

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:38.919
<v Speaker 6>the content. But what has happened is that the US

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 6>Supreme Court, in extraordinary ruling on a Saturday at one am,

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:47.439
<v Speaker 6>came in and put the kebash on Trump's deportations of

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 6>Venezuelans to El Salvador. And that was even though the

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 6>case really hadn't come to the Supreme Court, and the

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:56.360
<v Speaker 6>Supreme Court stepped in without really clear jurisdiction, even though

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 6>the appellate court, the lower Court, the Circuit had not

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 6>even ruled, So that to me showed that the Supreme

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 6>Court isn't messing around, that they actually believed that Trump

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 6>was going to violate Bozburg's order, that Trump was dumbing

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.439
<v Speaker 6>his nose at the judiciary, and so they had to

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 6>step in. And so Trump is at risk of losing

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:17.959
<v Speaker 6>the Supreme Court he needs so badly because he's Tustas

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 6>Roberts and amy Cony Barrett are the two most important justices,

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 6>and in that Saturday one am ruling, it was not

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 6>only they who ruled to halt the deportations, but also

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:32.919
<v Speaker 6>Kavanaugh and Corse. It so all three justices appointed by

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 6>Trump ruled against the Trump administration. And so that's why

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 6>it's more than just holding Trump in contempt in his

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:44.120
<v Speaker 6>administration and contempt. It's also actions like we saw at

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:46.679
<v Speaker 6>one am on Saturday by the Supreme Court that shows

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:48.120
<v Speaker 6>that the courts are pushing back.

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's just say Judge Bozburg finds a Trump administration official

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 2>in contempt, I mean, what would really happen? Couldn't Trump

0:20:57.400 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 2>pardon anyone charged with contempt?

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 6>Yes, criminal contempt. Trump could step in, but he can

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 6>also just disregard the court's order. I mean, the court's

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 6>orders are enforced by the Martial Service, and the martial

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 6>Service is under the executive branch, and so be up

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 6>to the Department of Justice to go along, and you

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 6>have to believe that they won't. Now, there are some

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 6>rare cases where the court could appoint like a local

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 6>sheriff to round someone up, but I think that's not

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 6>going to happen. Could Trump step in and mess around

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 6>with it, Yes, that's a federal crime. He could pardon someone.

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 6>But really the big stick that the court holds is

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 6>really in the court of public opinion. The public overwhelming

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 6>opposes disobeying court rulings. They don't want to see the

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:47.640
<v Speaker 6>executive branch disobeying the court ruling. And now we'll hurt

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 6>Trump in the court of public opinion. Plus, as I mentioned,

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 6>the Supreme Court could come in and just say no,

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 6>no more, We're going to stop all your deportations for now.

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 6>Even if we don't have jurisdiction, we're going to step in.

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 6>So that's a punishment itself. Now if we go down

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 6>further and say, well, what if Trump just says that

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 6>now we're going to defy the Supreme Court, Well, that's

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 6>the conserttional crisis, that's the coup, and I don't think

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 6>the public would tolerate that.

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, an overwhelming majority of Americans believe the Trump administration

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 2>should follow court orders. According to a poll from Pew

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Research that came out last week. Most Americans seventy eight

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 2>percent say the Trump administration has to follow lower court orders,

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 2>and eighty eight percent say the administration has to follow

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court rulings.

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 5>And Dave, what do you.

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 2>Think about the Attorney General Pam Bondi making frequent appearances

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 2>on Fox criticizing court orders and judges. I've never seen

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 2>an AG behave like that, you know, I have.

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 6>Been surprised at the dialogue coming from DOJ. I've never

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 6>seen an attorney general on the cable news shows like that.

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 6>But there's nothing that says you can't. This is the

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 6>Trump administration norms. So although we've never seen it before,

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 6>there's nothing illegal about it. It's just something that we're

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 6>not used to. And even though I know her very well,

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 6>she and I have different political views, and I always

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 6>knew I'd be disagreeing with a lot of the things

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.439
<v Speaker 6>that she was going to do. But as far as

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 6>whether this is just wrong for her to go on

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 6>to me. Now, no, I mean, she's taken a very

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 6>transparent way to talk about things in front of millions

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:29.399
<v Speaker 6>of people, But the dialogue that comes out of it

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 6>is very partisan. It's very pro Trump. But the voters

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 6>chose a Trump loyalist who be attorney general when they

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 6>voted for Trump. The other alternative was Kamala Harris, who

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 6>ran on in part the independence of the attorney general

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 6>and the independence of the judiciary, and she lost. And

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 6>so elections have consequences, and that's the reason why we

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 6>shouldn't be too surprised to see Trump's attorney general on

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 6>Fox News and serving essentially as the president's lawyer. He

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 6>campaigned on that. He said he wanted that I could

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 6>have been a lot worse. You could have had Matt Gates,

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 6>who I believe would have locked up Donald Trump's political

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 6>enemies for political purposes.

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:10.679
<v Speaker 2>Talk about stress on the system. Coming up next, the

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 2>deportation case that won't go away. This is bloomberg. One

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 2>legal battle against the Trump administration seems to have eclipsed

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 2>the others. The wrongful deportation of kilmore Arbrigo Garcia to

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:28.199
<v Speaker 2>l Salvador. The Trump administration has said in the past

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 2>that they have no power or plans to bring Garcia back,

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:36.360
<v Speaker 2>but according to several reports, Secretary of State Marco Rubio

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 2>has been in touch with l Salvador's president about Garcia. However,

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 2>during a cabinet meeting today, Rubio refused to discuss whether

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 2>there's been any such contact.

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, I will never tell you that, and you know

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 1>who also, I'll never tell any judge because the conduct

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of our foreign policy belongs to the President of the

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 1>United States and the executive branch, not some judge. So

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>we will conduct foreign policy appropriately if we need to.

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 5>But I'll never.

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Discussing, and no one will over her to make us discussing.

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>That's how foreign policy works.

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.919
<v Speaker 2>I've been talking to Dave Ehrenberg, former Palm Beach County

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 2>State Attorney. Dave.

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 5>The judge had.

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 2>A demand for the government to share evidence about Garcia.

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 2>She put that off until April thirtieth because it seems

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 2>like the government may be coming around on that.

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 6>So that case is still muddled because you have the

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 6>US President and the Secretary of State and the Attorney

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:32.439
<v Speaker 6>General saying that it's out of our hands. It's up

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 6>to the president ofl Salvador. But it's clear that if

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 6>Trump wanted a Bregio Garcia back, he would be on

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.439
<v Speaker 6>the next plane back in first class if that was

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 6>their request. After all, the Trump administration in the United

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:49.199
<v Speaker 6>States government is paying for his incarceration. We're paying for

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 6>El Salvador keeping these individuals behind bars. And Christy Nome,

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 6>the Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, said that El

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 6>Salvador's prison is a in our toolbox. Well, if it's

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 6>one of our tools, you can use those tools and

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 6>you can use it to fix things. So I think

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 6>ultimately the courts are going to have to get a

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 6>little more specific about pushing the United States government to

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 6>get Abrego Garcia back. The Supreme Court softened the language

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 6>of the district court and said, instead of effectuating his return,

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 6>they need to facilitate it. Facilitate is not as strong

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 6>of a word as effectuating it. So the Supreme Court

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 6>tried to get everyone together unanimously, which it did nine

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 6>zero ruling saying kumbaya and say, okay, can we all

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 6>at least live with the facilitating language. But that relies

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 6>on the good faith of the Trump ministration. So when

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 6>the Trump administration says, yeah, facilitate means we'll send a

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 6>plane if the presidentl Salvador deports him, and he's not

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:46.919
<v Speaker 6>going to do so, so what are we going to do?

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 6>That's not good enough for the Supreme Court. That is

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 6>a reason I believe the Supreme Court stepped in in

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 6>this extraordinary Saturday one am ruling. This was their way

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:58.679
<v Speaker 6>to say, we don't trust you anymore. So the ball

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 6>is going to be in the trumpdministration's court, and Judge

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 6>Zinnis is also getting impatient.

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:10.119
<v Speaker 2>Trump has already filed eleven emergency requests with the Supreme Court,

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 2>which is more than that during the combined sixteen years

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:17.640
<v Speaker 2>of George W. Bush and Barack Obama's administrations. And we're

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 2>still waiting for the court to rule or decide whether

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 2>to take a lot of those cases.

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 6>So there's a lot going on in the shadow docket.

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 6>So we'll see. I mean, we've never been down this

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 6>road before. We've never seen this kind of thing before,

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 6>and so that's why I'm not surprised that the Supreme

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 6>Court does things that we've never seen before.

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:35.639
<v Speaker 2>So now let's talk about the tariff situation and the

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 2>Democratic Ags, A group of Democratic AGS are suing Trump

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 2>over the tariff, saying they have upended the constitutional order

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 2>and brought chaos to the American economy. There are several

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 2>suits over the tariff. So why would the AGS bother

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 2>to sue.

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:56.199
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's a coalition. You have Democratic ags and you

0:27:56.280 --> 0:28:01.160
<v Speaker 6>have from the business community. They're suing because Trump, if

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 6>he wants to impose tariffs, needs to go to Congress.

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 6>But there is a law similar to the Alien Enemies Act.

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 6>There's a law from the seventies that permits a president

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 6>to put on emergency punishment emergency sanctions on governments that

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 6>are rogue. But it does not say in that law

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:25.879
<v Speaker 6>that terriffs are a possibility. It's not a sanctioned listed

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.160
<v Speaker 6>in the list of sanctions in that law. So number one,

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:31.199
<v Speaker 6>the lawsuit says, even if you invoke this law in

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 6>case of emergency, you can't use terrorists. That's not an

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:37.640
<v Speaker 6>arrow in your quiver according to the statue. And number two,

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 6>is it really an emergency? Is it an emergency a

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 6>crisis situation when you are trying to overturn decades of

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 6>trade and balances. If you have a problem with the

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 6>American policy or something has been going on for decades.

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 6>That's not a crisis emergency. It's not like you have

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 6>to have emergency powers. You have to go to Congress

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 6>and change policy. So I think that these attorneys general

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 6>have a very good argument. I think that their lawsuit

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 6>will prevail, at least in part, to slow down these tariffs.

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 6>Trump will have to go to Congress if he wants

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:11.239
<v Speaker 6>to get them through, but Congress doesn't want them. They

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 6>see how damaging these things are. Maybe one day we'll

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 6>have a Congress that actually works, that actually doesn't just

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 6>emasculate itself. But for now, the Congress is just scared

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 6>to do anything. But that day could change once prices

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 6>go way up and Trump's poll numbers go way down.

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 2>They're arguing that this is effectively massive taxes on Americans.

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 6>It definitely is. I mean, these tariffs are not paid

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 6>by foreign governments. They're paid by the importers, and the

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 6>importers pass it along to the consumers. And you saw

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 6>how Amazon wanted its consumers, its customers to know why

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 6>all of a sudden prices are going up, and they

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 6>were going to list it as here is the cost

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 6>of tariffs. And then Trump called Jeff Bezos and say,

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 6>how dare you? And then Jeff Bezos did what a

0:29:57.240 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 6>lot of billionaires and big law firms have been doing lately,

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 6>and and so they will not report the specific itemized

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 6>tariff costs. But the public is not stupid when their

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 6>goods go up. There's only so much blame you can

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 6>give to Joe Biden and DEI and all these other things.

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 6>At some point people are gonna put two and two

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 6>together and know that it's because of terror policy. Why

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 6>all of a sudden the stuff that they need that's

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 6>being imported from other countries is now much more expensive.

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 2>A White House spokesman said the Democrats are prioritizing a

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 2>witch hunt against President Trump over protecting the safety and

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 2>well being of their constituents. But any lawsuit could take

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 2>months or even years, and it would come likely after

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 2>the ninety day pause.

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 6>Courts could act more quickly. Think it is a strategy,

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 6>as you know, for Trump and Maggot, to delay, delay, delay,

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 6>But I think the courts are onto them. They've been

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 6>through this before.

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 2>So you're in Florida, let's talk about your governor Ron DeSantis,

0:30:57.400 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 2>who's term limited and he's promoted his wife to be

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 2>the next governor, and that.

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 6>Is setting up a showdown between the DeSantis wing of

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 6>the party in Florida and the Trump wing of the

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 6>party because Trump has endorsed Byron Donald's, a mega congressman,

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 6>to be the next governor. And that's why the knives

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 6>are out for Casey DeSantis. She has a charity, the

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 6>Hope Foundation of Florida, that allegedly received a ten million

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 6>dollar donation from Senteen, a medicaid provider, a vendor who

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 6>overcharged the state and so as part of their penalty,

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 6>they had to pay a certain amount to the state

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 6>and ten million dollars of that went to Hope Foundation,

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 6>and then a ten million dollar donation went from the

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 6>Hope Foundation to tax controlled by DeSantis's people to run

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 6>ads against the marijuana referendum that was on the ballot,

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 6>and the marijuana referendum lost in a close election. And

0:31:57.240 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 6>people are saying, well, it is not illegal to take

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 6>money was meant for the state's medicaid program and put

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 6>it into your own political coffers. The DeSantis folks are

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 6>saying that was extra money, that was an extra contribution

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 6>that was not part of the medicaid penalty. And the

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 6>Republicans are doing a lot of the investigation here. He

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 6>may be wondering, why are the Republicans investigating this? Because

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 6>Ron DeSantis is a lame duck. His term ends in

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty six, he can't run for governor again. There's

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 6>not a lot of good feelings amongst Republicans towards the

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 6>governor who has rules with an iron fist, and now

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 6>that he's a lame duck, they're getting some revenge and press.

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 6>Most importantly, Donald Trump runs the Republican Party nationally and

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 6>in Florida, and they want to please the Boss, so

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 6>they're going to side with him and Byron. Donald's over Ron.

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 6>In case of Dystantus, this whole controversy was not generated

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:58.719
<v Speaker 6>by Democrats. There aren't enough democrats in Tallahassee in our

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 6>government to make us think about things. And it was

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 6>not caused by the press corps. The press corps has

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 6>been decimated in Tallahassee. This was created by fellow Republicans

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 6>and that's why DeSantis keeps looking over his shoulder to

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 6>see who's gonna stab in the back next.

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 5>Is he still popular among Floridians?

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think he would get re elected to a

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 6>third term if he ran. I do think so. I

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 6>think he's not as popular as he was, but I think,

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, Florida's a red state, and I think he

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 6>is still somewhat popular. But Donald Trump is more popular,

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 6>and Donald Trump's choice would normally beat Rond De Santa's

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 6>choice in a party primary. And when you add this

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 6>growing scandal which has damaged Casey DeSantis and Ron De Santis,

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 6>then I think the chances of Casey de Satan's becoming

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 6>governor are getting smaller by the day. She has not

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 6>announced that she's running for governor yet, but she's trying

0:33:57.640 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 6>to get through this controversy, which really had caught them

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 6>flat foot. I don't think they expected this. They had

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 6>never dealt with anything like this in their entire time

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 6>in office. They didn't care what the Democrats said, they

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 6>didn't care what the press said. But this is different.

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 6>This is coming from their side of the aisle. So

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:14.839
<v Speaker 6>he's calling out Republicans for being Rhinos, he's calling them

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 6>out to being fake Republicans. He can't believe what's happening

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 6>to him, but it's just reality of politics. If there's

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 6>blood in the water, the people who who really resented

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 6>you for years they're going to come out and exploit

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 6>that situation. They see it, they see that blood in

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 6>the water, and all of a sudden, they're coming out

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 6>of the woodwork to go fishing. I think that's a

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 6>consistent metaphor, but leave it up to the listeners.

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Always interesting to talk to you, Dave, Thanks so much.

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:45.799
<v Speaker 2>That's Dave Ehrenberg, former Palm Beach County State Attorney. And

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 2>that's it for this edition of The Bloomberg Law Show.

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Remember you can always get the latest legal news on

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 2>our Bloomberg Law Podcast. You can find them on Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 2>and at www dot Bloomberg dot com, slash podcast, Slash Law,

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 2>and remember to tune into The Bloomberg Law Show every

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:06.719
<v Speaker 2>week night at ten pm Wall Street Time. I'm June

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Grosso and you're listening to Bloomberg