WEBVTT - Mortgage Rates, Markets, COP27, and World Cup (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Let's round table this

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>thing because I don't know where these markets are going.

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where the economy is going. I don't

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>know where the Fund of Reserve is going. So I

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>need some smart people to kind of kind of bring

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 1>it together. Vince Signarella, global macro strategist at Bloomberg News,

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>joins us uh and Jennifer Lee, senior economist the managing

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>director at BEMO Capital Markets, joins us as well. Jennifer,

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna start with you here. Um, I guess Mike

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>have many questions. One of my questions is, all right,

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I get it where you are either in or we're

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>going into recession. Like a lot of people, just tell

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 1>me how long it's going to be, how deep it's

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be. Is there any way to kind of gauge

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that at this point? Oh, good morning. You know what, UM,

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that's still the million. The other question, UM,

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>we continue to stand by our mild recession call. UM

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>for now. Of course we're going to take it, and

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll quote all the different central bankers out there, especially

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>GUARD on a day to day meeting by meeting basis. UM.

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>But we're still looking for, you know, the downturn to

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 1>hit in the first half of UM and then a

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:22.839
<v Speaker 1>mild rebound in the second half, averaging zero point zero

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>percent growth for all. This is for the US and

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>for Canada as well. UM. I've been pretty surprised actually

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that after like what three and fifty basis points or

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>whatever of remix, the US economy is still moving forward. UM.

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:39.839
<v Speaker 1>And it shows how resilience everything is. And it looks

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>like they're gonna keep hiking. I mean, they keep telling

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:45.479
<v Speaker 1>us they're not going to pause, they're not going to pivot. Vince,

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about the latest UM, you know

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Bowlard charts showing that we need to be between five

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and seven percent for a restrictive economy, sorry, restrictive rates.

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I just don't doubt it. To be honest with you,

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I remember many years ago, I I was speaking with silly,

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>said President Closter, And I asked, I was starting to

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>ask him a question about whether or not he goes

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>into a supermarket, and he abruptly interrupted and said, I do.

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>When I've seen the price of cereal. I wonder if

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that's the case with Bullard, because we're seeing in commodity prices. Well,

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>he famously, um, you know, ordered a bicycle that he

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>then couldn't get because the supply chain issues, and when

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>it was finally delivered, he was given a two up charge. Um,

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>So he's worried about that. Maybe maybe that's paint at

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:35.799
<v Speaker 1>his point of view, because when I look at energy prices, uh,

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>in particular, they're telling me, uh that exactly what Jennifer

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>said that in a procession is coming U probably for

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter at least, perhaps the first two quarters

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of next year. But dude, when you look at c P,

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I what in the hell like you got to do

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>something right? Seven point seven or cent. Yeah, but it

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>takes time for inflation to come down, and inflation expectations

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:01.359
<v Speaker 1>are starting to drop if you if you look at

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>what crew futures versus inflation expectations for one year out

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in the University of Michigan. They're tied at the hip.

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>And when with these crew futures coming down, I'm going

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>to suggest to you that when we see the next

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:17.239
<v Speaker 1>few mission one year inflation expectations, they're gonna come down. Also,

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>we're going into a holiday driving season and guess only

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>in futures dropping, we're going into the winter and all

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the entire energy complex is dropping precipitously. At w t

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I down four percent this morning. That doesn't strike me

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>as there's real strong demand out there for the consumer.

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Monket And and Jennifer, you know, we were just kind

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>of getting through the bulk of the earnings releases from

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the big retailers, and again my takeaway,

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it seems like maybe with the exception of Target, pretty

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>strong out there, the consumer seems in pretty decent position.

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about the consumer um? It's you're right,

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>And I was actually a little bit heartened by something

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>that that James Bullard said earlier this week that who

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>is mentioning the bullish factors for the economy, And he

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>said he started like state flush, state government savings and

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>he's still constituent continued to sit excess household savings and

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>still high household wealth, and that's I think this is

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>where it's all coming from. And you know, you're still

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>seeing wage increases that we're trying to avoid that whole

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:20.160
<v Speaker 1>wage price spiral thing. But I think that's the plus side,

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>even though yes, that's insulationary. But on the plus side,

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, at least consumers are making money, at least

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>they have a job and they're making a city income

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and be you know a hundred times where resibu is

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>going the other way. But so, why do we see

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.600
<v Speaker 1>crude prices coming down? Is the concern that consumers are

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna stop spending on oil next year? Is it more

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 1>of a global story? Obviously it's a fungible commodity and

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 1>it trades around the world. I mean, I don't think

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>we're doing any less driving. I think I've heard people

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>say this is gonna be a very busy Thanksgiving season.

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking my brand new Chevy Silverado z R two

0:04:55.960 --> 0:05:01.840
<v Speaker 1>back to Ohio with a six point two leader V eight.

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 1>It's naturally aspirated. I get thirteen point four miles a gallon,

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:08.039
<v Speaker 1>and I'm excited for that trip. So, so why is energy?

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Why are oil prices dropping? I think it's still looking forward,

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:15.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean because yours are still spending, um obviously, but

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 1>just looking at the data, but obviously the pace has

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:20.479
<v Speaker 1>slowed and they're not going to continue spending at this

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>current rate. And hence this is why you know we're

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 1>looking for that downtren in the first half. UM. And

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>with all prices. I mean that's this morning. But you

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>know we've seen this week that it can be extremely

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>volatile and you can't just scout Russia obviously ever from

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 1>the mix, so they can just say one thing and

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>boom you can see what oil prices heading higher again. UM.

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's more you know, looking ahead, UM,

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the coming slow down and things have started to slow,

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>but they're gonna slow more meaningfully in the new year. UM.

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Just given that we've seen such high prices, still high inflation,

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>not even though it's coming off the peak, still too

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>high for any for anyone's liking. And that's what's going

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to that's what's prompting. I think energy prices, the weaker

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:00.720
<v Speaker 1>weight on energy prices even thirty seconds have we seen

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>peak US dollar? I think? So, I think when you

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:09.039
<v Speaker 1>see a bit in risk in the spud correlating UM

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>within inverse. Uh. Dollar. I like stocks higher going into

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 1>next year and into the end of this year. Uh

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 1>and I think that will that'll see the dollar all

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>over all. Right, Vin's good stuff. We appreciated Vin Signarella,

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>macro strategist for Bloomberg News, and Jennifer Lee, senior economist

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>and managing director BEMO. That's Bank of Montreal all for

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the folks. I've been in this game a while BMO

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Capital Markets. We appreciate that good stuff. Here and again, Matt,

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>here's my gasoline chart. You know, it's my Paul Sweeney

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Personal Inflation gauge daily national average gasoline prices for regular

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 1>unleaded three dollars and seventy cents. We're getting down to

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>almost the low that we touched, you know, back in September.

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 1>So gasoline rolling over. You called out the w t

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I crude. We've got a seven handle in their seventy

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 1>eight dollars fifty five cents. Uh. So that's your energy

0:06:56.880 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>complex prices coming into the mortgage markets, interest rates, you know,

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>coming down, and I'm looking at that, you know, the

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>ten year you know Treasury it's three point seven nine percent.

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>We were well over four percent, four and a half percent.

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>So what does it mean for the mortgage markets? Am

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I gonna get a better deal in the mortgage biz

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Erica Heidelberg. She's a mortgage backed security see strategist for

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence and she joins us live here on the

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg in Active Broker Studio. So Erica just talked to

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>us about the state of the mortgage market today. Well,

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>in terms of mortgage rates. Uh, last Thursday, after the

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>CPI print, we saw the biggest one day fall in

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>secondary mortgage market rates in history, fifty four basis points.

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>About half of that was because rates fell, about half

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>of that was because spreads tightened, both of them kind

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of a relief rally, you know, thinking that the Fed

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>probably will slow down their rate of increases. So, um,

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:55.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, good news for homeowners. Uh, you know, still

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>at six sixty according to the Friday Max survey rate

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>this week. So it's not like buyer if you're already

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>locked in, right, home own buyers specifically, yeah, or if

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you want to sell us, good news right, because a

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of people have been having difficulty selling since the

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>buyers can't get good rates locked in. Yeah, I mean

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that the point that I'm kind of trying to make

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely good for you know, the housing market some degree,

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>but we're so far above where you know, homeowners, home buyers,

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>anybody's used to having to take out a mortgage that

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's at this point going to move

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the needle at all for very many people. Um, even

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that huge drop, even that huge drop. At some point,

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>people get used to these rates, right. All of our parents,

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure have told us I used to pay for

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a mortgage right, um, which seems unbelievable now, but there

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>was a generation of people that locked in those rates. Yeah.

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>For for those who are able to afford to take

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>out mortgages at these levels, it's probably not even that

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>big a deal because they can actually refinance of rates

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>do fall, and you know, who knows where we's are going.

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think a lot of people don't necessarily expect

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>us to stay quite this high. But for other homeowners

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>or home buyers, sorry getting that confused. For other home buyers,

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>they can no longer afford the type of house they

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>were looking for at all, especially first time home buyers.

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>So one of the interests you right off, by the way,

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>because you can deduct your interest payments, right, but only

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 1>up to a certain amount. Right, It's limited at this point. Um, yeah,

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that the salt tax you're trying to No, not the salt.

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.839
<v Speaker 1>We're still praying every night. I kneel down next to

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 1>my bed praying for the salt deduction. But that's a

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>different You can still deduct, and I can even deduct

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>my mortgage interest. But I think there is a limit. Um,

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you can only deduct mortgage interest. I believe up to

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>seven yeah, seven on a loan of yeah, and I

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>think even there it's capped. I know, you know, personally,

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I think at this point we're limited to the standard

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>deduction between the but the salt tax, you know, getting

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:56.959
<v Speaker 1>taken away, and you know we don't owe that much

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>interest left on the mortgage. Is the Federal Reserve buy mortgages,

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>selling mortgages? Doing nothing? What are they doing in a

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>mortgage market? Right? So the Federal Reserve almost exactly a

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>year ago declared that they were going to taper their

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>buying of mortgage backed securities. They then we invested paydowns

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>uh through June, um and even some through the summer,

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:18.559
<v Speaker 1>even though they technically were letting the portfolio start to

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>run off. Ironically, even though they announced that they were

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>going to start withdrawing from the mortgage market a year ago,

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>their portfolio is the exact same size it was a

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>year ago, because they grew it again through you know,

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.319
<v Speaker 1>June basically, and then it began to shrink from then.

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>So what's interesting though, is without even having to have

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 1>changed the size of their portfolio, rates or of course,

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, tire, even with last week's sell off, I'm sorry,

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>last week's rally and mortgage spreads are significantly wider, and

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the housing market is an entirely different place right now.

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:55.959
<v Speaker 1>We had existing home sales out this morning. Ninth straight

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 1>month of decline in home sales, fourth straight month of

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>decline in median home prices from the existing home sales,

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>although part of that seasonals, but it's still um you know,

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 1>we've gone from a twenty percent year of year change,

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>we're now down to about a six percent year of

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>year change. So obviously a lot of softening and again

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>fourth straight month actually you know, a decrease in price

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>in that in that index. What's building like right now

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>in terms of putting up new uh UM stock, Well,

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>home builders are pretty depressed at this point. Uh you know,

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I forget what the last number of I think it

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>was like thirty three or something like that, where it's

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>a diffusion index, and that means that two thirds of

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the home builders I got that right, whatever, more than

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>more than half of the home builders are pessimistic about

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 1>future building. That optimistic housing starts have been coming down

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:50.559
<v Speaker 1>consistently in single family housing. But the interesting counter trend

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>there is that multi family housing starts are increasing. So

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a recognition that a lot of um

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>potential home buyers are actally gonna have to go into

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the rental market, right because those people we were talking

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>about who are going to have difficulties swinging and mortgage

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>payments with rates at these levels, are gonna have to

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:11.839
<v Speaker 1>rent instead. And that's why I heard a read guy

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.559
<v Speaker 1>telling me the other day they're they're still building big

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 1>multi family housing and and to your point to there

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>are still a lot of homes under construction and a

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of new homes coming online which should help also

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>at the supply. Didn't mad dynamic normalization? All right? Erica,

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. We appreciate it as always. Erica Heidelberg,

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>NBAS strategist, Bloomberg intelligent, just joining us live here in

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio, two days away from the

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>World Cup beginning in Doha. And they pulled and they

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>from undreag pulled the beer rug right out from under

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>all the folks that want to enjoy a cold one. Uh.

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 1>We want to break this down. This is the World Cup,

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>this is huge. We all know this is a global

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>sporting event. We have some great assets to talk to here,

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 1>some people that really know what's going on. Simone Foxman,

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 1>she's a reporter for Bloomberg Television and News and she

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:07.839
<v Speaker 1>is based in Cutter. That's how I pronounce it, um

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and I know you do. And we have Ira Jersey,

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>he's Bloomberg Interstrate strategist. Why do we have him on

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 1>because he actually owns a soccer team. He's actually into

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>this whole thing of soccer. I don't get it, but

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>he's all in. Simone, Let's start with you here. I

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>guess the news on the last twenty four hours coming

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:29.199
<v Speaker 1>out of Cutter is no Budweiser beer in the stadiums.

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 1>How's that playing over there? Especially since they promised it

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 1>for so long people who bought tickets planned on drinking

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>at the game, right, Yeah, well they were are always

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be curtailed, and if I may, it's technically

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>cut um. But I know most folks can't. Uh it's

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>hard to say for most English speakers. But yeah, so

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>so we have these rules in place. They were announced

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>in September. You can drink within the stadium perimeter, not

0:13:57.360 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the stance themselves. You can drink within the stadium perim

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>or for three hours ahead of the game. Uh, then

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you go to the game, then you come back and

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>you can drink for another hour and you'd only be

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>able to drink buzz light. But yeah, this is a

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>bit of uh well at the very last minute decision,

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>certainly to ban alcohol entirely. I mean, alcohol is a

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>flashpoint issue here. It is something that you know, taboo

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>under in the conservative Muslim culture. I've caught the people

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>do drink, but it's in limited spaces. Only certain people

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>can actually um buy alcohol and and at specific places.

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's not surprising that this is an issue. What

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I think is surprising is the fact that this is

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>forty eight hours ahead of the World Cup and we're

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>still making these you and can I just jump in here, Um, Yeah,

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I was last month when I was

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>on a trip to London to visit some of my

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>team there. I did go to a Premier League game

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and I thought it was interesting that, Um, at Premier

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>League venues you're not allowed to drink in the stands either. Um,

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>so it's not completely on process because nobody trusts British

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>people with alcohol. Well no, no, there was plenty of

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>drinking going on before the game in the hallways outside.

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Don't get me wrong. I'm just saying, like in the

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>stands they weren't allowed to have alcohol. So so I

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know, if you know. Part of that I think

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>is just the the you know, over indulgence number one

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and number two, just you know, things like like maybe

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:26.359
<v Speaker 1>making a mess. So so I think for some Europeans

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it won't be particularly unusual to have to imbibe prior

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to the matches and then go into the stands. You know, UM,

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>feeling pretty good? Can you smoke? Simone? Can you smoking?

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>It says no, I don't think so. But you know,

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>honestly I have I don't know the answer to that, Hey, Simone,

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you and your colleague ad faith Nayer. If I get

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>there right, wrote a fantastic story today on the Bloomberg

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>terminal about what guitar built for the most expensive World

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Cup ever. Just about some of the huge numbers associated

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>with this. Well, the big number here, according to Bloomberg

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>get Intelligence, is three hundred billion dollars. That's the amount

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of money that the government has spent, not just on stadiums.

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Actually stadiums are a pretty small piece of this overall, um,

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>but spent on infrastructure in preparation for the World Cup.

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>So things like a brand new metro system, an entire

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>new metro system in the last twelve years at brand

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>new city called Blue Sale that was underway a little bit,

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's something that's been continue to be built. UM.

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>And newport and expansion of the airport. All of these things,

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>um were things that Cutter wanted to do anyway, but

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the timeline was really sped up as preparation for the

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>World Cup. Stadiums again small piece of that, about ten

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>billion of that overall three billion dollar figure. Huge, huge,

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>But how much money does the World Cup pull in?

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you? Do you have any of the figures here?

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I know you're too quickly just following the rates market, UM,

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's big business. Right. Obviously, um, if Qatar was

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 1>willing to bribe FIFA with I don't know how much

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>it costs them to to get to get the World Cup,

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>but it must have been pretty pretty expensive. How much

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>does the whole thing generate? Yeah, so I mean it's

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>similar to something like the Olympics, where you're going to

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>be driving significant amount of tourism revenue and um you know,

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 1>things like like rental. And it's also an opportunity you

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>go to think about a place like Brazil when they

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>hosted a few years ago, a couple of tournaments ago. UM,

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 1>it's an opportunity for you to highlight what you have

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.679
<v Speaker 1>in terms of tourism and it and it gives usually

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 1>good vibes for UH for a particular countries. So so

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that's where this whole idea of sports washing comes in,

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>where you know, countries host these big events that maybe

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 1>don't have the um you know, don't necessarily have what

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>what you know, Westerners would consider you know, good civil

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>rights or or um UH or governments that are free

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 1>and democratic, but it allows you to highlight what you

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>do have in terms of tourism, infrastructure. You know, whether

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>or not you know cutter is going to be one

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of the great places that's going to benefit from from

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:11.439
<v Speaker 1>that from having the World Cup. I'm not sure a

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of people that I've talked to about this, we're

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, pretty disappointed. It was going to be in

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the winter, right, This isn't a normal time. Usually it's

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 1>a summer event, um somewhere, we're you know, May through

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>um late May through through July event as opposed to

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, now in the middle of what is in

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>most most countries, this is the middle of their soccer

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.439
<v Speaker 1>seasons for their their club sports. So um, so this

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>is really not a particularly good time to be having this.

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 1>From a it's not a particularly good place obviously, right,

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, who would have chosen Qatar for the World

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Cup had it not been for massive injections of liquidity

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 1>into his bank account? Someone? Are they playing? Just let

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>me take a little bit of issue with that though.

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is a development story for this country

0:18:57.000 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>for sure, and from a FISA's perspective, and in corruption

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>allegations aside. You know, their desire is to expand football

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>into new parts of the world. That's why we're going

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 1>to see a mainly US focused the World Cup come six.

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 1>But also you know where else and Mina is actually

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to cobble together that kind of funds,

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the kind of infrastructure that you need in order to

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to host a World Cup. You're really looking

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>at the Gulf. Yes, the Gulf has its own ambitions,

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 1>but here the ambition is to build a non oil economy,

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to move away um from hydro carbon. And so for them,

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that's why this three billion dollars, this makes a lot

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of sense. So are they going to host the Winter

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Olympics next? Saudi Arabia is actually gonna host the Asian

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Winter Games. I've I've forgotten the year here. I believe

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.159
<v Speaker 1>it's tight, but someone's gonna call me and tell me

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm wrong. But believe it or not, Yes, I believe

0:19:56.880 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>it Saudi Arabia. Believe it all right some And thank

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. Really appreciate getting uh

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>your time here. Simone Foxman, she's in Doha. She covers

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that part of the world for Bloomberg News and Bloomberg Television,

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>so it's great to get her on feats on the

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>ground type of reporting there. And we got our Jersey.

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>He's Bloomberg Interest Rate strategist but he is our expert

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>for all things football slash soccer, and uh, please take

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>a look at Simone's article on the Bloomberg trompins from

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>shirts on Bloomberg dot com. It gives you anything if

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you have a terminal in front of you and I

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:32.959
<v Speaker 1>big take, and I big take. It's good stuff and

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 1>great reporting. So check it out on Bloomberg dot com

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>slash A big take. All right, let's check in and

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 1>get a real, real overview what's going on in the

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 1>retail space. We've had a lot of retailers report earnings

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>over the last several days. We want to bring in

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Punham Goyle. She's a senior analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence that

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:53.199
<v Speaker 1>covers all things retail. So, Punham, what are some of

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>your takeaways? And look like some decent numbers out of

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the likes of the Gap and foot locker

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and raw stores. Consumers pretty good? Uh, consumer is not

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. I think they're okay. I think I think

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>our expectations had been muted, so compared to muted expectations

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of results are definitely better. Um. I think it comes

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>back to inventory really here, when I look at the

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>earnings that I've been out over the last week. UM,

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you are seeing inventory getting better aligned with demand, which

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I think is the plus point here, especially heading into

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>holiday when you know you want to kind of control

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 1>the markdowns even though we know it will be very promotional.

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>That was probably most promising to me through a lot

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of these earnings. We had raw stores last night, and

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:36.919
<v Speaker 1>there it was about inventory control. They were able to,

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, cut back on their inventories drastically. They were

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>up I believe about over fifty at the end of

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 1>second quarter and now down now just up less than

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>ten percent. So really big inventory improvements is overseeing. So

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot of retailers are at least positively surprising the

0:21:55.720 --> 0:22:02.159
<v Speaker 1>markets UM from Walmart UM to Ross stores. And we

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>also have a lot of like Athletic and at leisure

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>brands doing well. But Target has done the opposite. What's

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:11.439
<v Speaker 1>wrong with them versus the rest versus everyone else? You know,

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>it's given what we've seen out of everyone else, and

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>when I look at Target, it's it's a bit surprising

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 1>to what's happening there, But I think it may have

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to It goes back to inventory because compared to Walmart,

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you can argue that, you know, Target is more discretionary,

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>which it is because half of Walmart fills do come

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>from consumables. But then when you see gaps doing okay,

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you see Macy's doing okay, Ross, t j X are

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 1>all doing okay. But I think the expectations for Exami

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>were much lower than they weren't than they were for

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>a Target. So I do think Target UM just needs

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to work through its inventory position and then you know,

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 1>people still love Tarj. It's still it's still a favorite brand.

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Hey put them Black Friday, Cyber Monday. I know they're

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:55.919
<v Speaker 1>not as big as they once were for retailers, but

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>still it's a big deal. It's a big data point.

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>What are you expecting? Lots of discounts, So if you

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>have shopping lists, shop on Black Friday. UM retailers have

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>way too mench inventory on hand. There will be promotions.

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's in a bid to gain market share, and consumers

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>are looking to spend as they're crunched for cash. This

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 1>holiday season. They will be spending more over the five

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>day holiday weekend than they did last year. UM. We

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>think overall online sales will be good, but they will

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>be focused largely on Cyber Monday and overall holiday The

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>online sales gains will moderate to single digit levels versus

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>double digits in the past multiple years that I've watched it.

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>How how how close attention do you pay to pump

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>prices because for a lot of these big box stores,

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>gasoline sales are also um, you know in play. Yeah. Absolutely.

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean lower fuel prices as a plus going into

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the holiday season as people can fill up their tank

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and now worry about having to drive out a little

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to get their shopping needs. Matt Um. So lower fuel

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:02.360
<v Speaker 1>price you talked about earlier, I think is a positive

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>right now for consumer spending. So on Black Friday, put

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 1>them where are you going to be? I Am going

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to be at the Freehold mall and stores nearby, checking

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 1>out to all the deals as always so I used to.

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'll drive by the I'll drive by, not

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>going the Short Hills mall. I'm just expecting, fully expecting it.

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>The parking lots to be packed. Am I going to

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>see that? I think you will, because remember people haven't

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 1>been out to stores for a long time, right because

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic, So it's just that urge. We're seeing

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:33.919
<v Speaker 1>the revival of stories this year, and I think that

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 1>trend will continue. And also they're looking for deals, so

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>they'll if there's only store specific deals this year, which

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen the full deal calendar yet, then that

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>will draw people to stories. All right, good stuff. As always,

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>this is Punham's time of year, the big shopping season.

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.199
<v Speaker 1>She's got it all covered for us. UH put them

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Boyle Bloomberg Intelligence. She covers all things retail for b I.

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:58.360
<v Speaker 1>She's been doing it for decades. We poached her from

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:00.959
<v Speaker 1>Goldman Sachs way back in the when we were building

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 1>UH Bloomberg Intelligence, so she's been here since the beginning.

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>We always appreciate getting her perspective. And literally the Black Friday,

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>she along with all a lot of other Wall Street

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 1>retail animals, they literally go to the stores that just

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of see what's you know, how many people are there,

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>what kind of products are moving, what kind of promotions

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 1>are being offered. Uh, that's kind of feeds on the

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 1>ground kind of research. So that's good stuff, and we'll

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>look forward to reading Plutom's research well. COP twenty seven.

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>The United Nations Environmental Conference in Egypt wrapping up today

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>after a two weeks get together, so always a good

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>time to talk about the environment and kind of what

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>businesses are and what they're doing to deal with environmental issues.

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>So we thought we'd check in with a VJ. Mathri Pragata.

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>He's a president CEO of Montrose Environmental Group. That's a

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>New York Stock Exchange list a company m e G

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>is the symbol we can put into your Bloomberg terminal.

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:59.400
<v Speaker 1>But most notably he is a graduate of the Duke University,

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:01.920
<v Speaker 1>so good for him. I guess he couldn't get into

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the Duke Business School, so we went to some place

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:06.959
<v Speaker 1>called work for the NBA. So pretty good stuff there.

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Hey v Jus what you guys at Montrose are doing

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>these days? Hey Matt, Hey Paul, it's wonderful to talk

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to you guys. UM uh and uh in another Duke

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>grad it's uh, it's wonderful to hear that. UM. We are,

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're an environmental company. We we create environmental solutions,

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and so we are right in the throes of UM

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>working on issues related to greenhouse gas measurement mitigation for

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 1>our clients, which you know you started with talking about

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 1>cop um. We're helping treat water to get it back

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>to communities. UM, it's it's an incredible time to be

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>in this space. It's really exciting. So what exactly do

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you do, because that's a very broad environmental company, could

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>mean so many different things. Um, what's the day to

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:55.920
<v Speaker 1>day business? Yes, I'll give you. I'll give you a

0:26:55.960 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of examples. We um. We were one of the pioneers,

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>early adopters of optical gas imaging, which is a way

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to use cameras to see methane methane emissions right, which

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>is an odorless and colorless gas. So our teams go

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>out and help our clients understand what's being emitted. It's

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:17.399
<v Speaker 1>a better, cheaper, fastor way of doing it that we

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 1>then report out on that for them, which helps them

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:24.199
<v Speaker 1>reduce their emissions footprint, which is obviously very topical. And

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the recent methane rule that came out last Friday has

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>now adopted that as the best system of emissions reduction.

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's an example of something we've been doing for

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>years that has material implications for broader climate objectives. V

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>J talked to us about kind of your clients and

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>how they view their impact on the environment. Has it

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 1>changed are they is it becoming more front and center

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 1>for them? Is it something their board is pushing for.

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 1>How is that. I would point out to our listeners

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that you have a lot of clients who were probably

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 1>previously big environmental sinners and you help them, um, you know,

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:08.920
<v Speaker 1>recover oil and chemical companies, utilities, etcetera. Yeah, it's great,

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a great point. I mean we worked, we worked

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:14.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot with industry, and you know, our philosophy has

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 1>always been that the environment's an interconnected organism and we're

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 1>all participants in this right when we uh drive to work,

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>when we go visit family, we interact with all the

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>products that these companies produce. UM. And so it's an

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:30.640
<v Speaker 1>interconnected whole. And so yes, we are working with them

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to become better stewards of the environment, and they've been

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 1>deeply engaged. It's been really interesting to watch. Just Montrose

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>is a you know, a ten tennis year old company.

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Even over the courts of the last decade. Uh, the

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>environmental agenda has just become front and center in ways

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I never expected. Um, it is front and center for

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 1>boards and C suites, investors and the markets have really

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>pushed on this. Uh. There's E s G commitments, and

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 1>then obviously the regulatory landscape has been evolving really rapidly

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 1>UM across multiple administrations and political UM parties across the world.

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's it feels like a very dynamic and attractive

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>spot for us to be in as a business. So

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>where are you guys investing in your capital? Where do

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you guys see the growth going forward? Yeah, so we've

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 1>we are long on the broader greenhouse gas measurement and

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>mitigation space. I mentioned we were kind of early adopters

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 1>of optical gas imaging. We're working with partners to develop

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>methane sensors to plug into our software programs so people

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 1>can see in real time what they're emitting. UM. We

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 1>are forward leaning on helping manage UH and mitigate emissions

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>from abandoned wells. UM. We've recently filed for some intellectual

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 1>property on carbon capture technology. We've been one of the

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 1>leaders in UM the treatment of the forever chemicals, removing

0:29:57.040 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that from water and getting that back to communities made

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>some doable progress. It's a large part of why the

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>business is really growing as rapidly as it is right now. UM.

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 1>We take agricultural waste, we make negative carbon intensity energy

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>out of it. UM. The list goes on and on.

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>But we are. We're kind of having a great time

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>working on what I would consider some of the world's

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>most pressing issues. What uh you're you're not a nonprofit?

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're out there to make money, right, Um, Well,

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>if listeners could think, oh, but this must be a nonprofit,

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>but you're you know, you're trading on the New York

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Stock Exchange right now about forty five dollars share a

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit more, um, And like most companies, you know,

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you had peaked at the end of one have come

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 1>down with the rest of the market, but you've you've

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>climbed considerably double or triple what you were at the

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>beginning of UM. Tell us about the financial side of

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the company we are. Um, gosh, where do you want

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 1>me to start? I mean the yes, we went public

0:30:56.120 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>in July. How did you get that done? Uh? We

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>we I don't know. It's a good question. It's it's

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a blur. Um. That was obviously a really challenging time man, Paul,

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 1>with the pandemic, but for what fifteen dollars a share

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and now you're trading at three x that? Yeah, Yeah,

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 1>it's been it's been a crazy ride. Um. But most

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 1>people seem to focus more on the fact that we

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>were kind of at seventy five at the end of

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 1>last year, UM, and now we're down to investors. Are

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 1>investors have been great, We've got all the big institutionals

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 1>who have been really supportive. But yeah, the business. You know, look,

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>we UM we were UH an entirely US based company

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:37.959
<v Speaker 1>five six years ago. We're now in Northern Europe, Canada,

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>United States, Australia. You know, we're we went from people

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to now approaching three thousand. The business has more than

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>doubled UM since we went public. UM. We're very cash

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 1>generative UM, which has allowed us to kind of put

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 1>capital into research and development, which is where a lot

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 1>of the things I mentioned earlier have come up. UM.

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's been it's been a it's been a challenging ride, uh,

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 1>not to say the least, especially with this macroeconomic backdrop

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and some of the geopolitical stuff going on. UM. But

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, candidly, perhaps we're luckier than we are smart.

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 1>We're in the right place at the right time. I

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>don't see the broader desire to solve these environmental problems

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>go anytime soon, and that's a large part of what

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 1>gets me excited every day, all right, VJ. Good stuff.

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate getting some of your time now. You guys

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 1>are busy over there in a growing company. VJ. MA

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>three Pragada. He's a president CEO of Montrose Environmental Group

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>there in New York's exchange traded company. And MS Mary E. G.

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller. On ball Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 1>pt Sweeney Before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:32:57.840 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 1>worldwide at Bloomberg Radio