WEBVTT - Ep 180 Food Dyes: It’s all marketing

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Blue Smarties were dropped in two thousand and five, only

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to return in two thousand and eight as a distinctly

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>less blue M and ms have come under attack for

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:12.559
<v Speaker 1>their use of red, yellow, and blue artificial dyes. Green

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Ketchup was a revelation for Hines when it was introduced

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand. At its launch, then Global Ketchup manager

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Casey Kelly said the company was on track to ship

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>in the first ninety days what we thought we would

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>sell in the first year. This thing has taken on

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a momentum of its own, Kelly said, illustrating with his

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>use of the term this thing the sinister fascination with

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>a new inappropriately colored sauce. Soon there was orange Ketchup

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and purple Ketchup, and teal and blue and pink. But

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:45.559
<v Speaker 1>it didn't last. Hines withdrew those product lines in two

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand and six, and the world was left with plain

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:51.480
<v Speaker 1>old red Ketchup. It might well have been the last

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>hurrah of a generation's rainbow of nonsense food. We might

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>be healthier for it, but we are less colorful too.

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>So next time you stroll down the bland cereal or

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>snack aisle, spare a thought for the proud chemical factories

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>where scientists in white coats once injected a vast pallette

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 1>of colors into everyday foods. Imagine what we could have

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:15.960
<v Speaker 1>been eating by now, Rainbow bread, yellow steak, pink cheese.

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Imagine now a gray factory, a decaying factory, windows long

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>since smashed, roof and disrepair. A laboratory full of test

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>tubes and conical flasks lying on their sides. A solitary cheeto,

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 1>proudly orange blown past in an icy wind. A flash

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of color among the dreary scene. It briefly lifts the

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>spirits before getting caught up in the dust, doomed to

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 1>fade and fester. Imagine this and lament.

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:31.959
<v Speaker 2>You cannot be serious.

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I know, it's the most dramatic render. Like I just

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>love all of the imagery of that, so I.

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Do too, I mean, and like, I really don't think

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 2>that it is serious.

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 3>But it's not. It's not serious at all.

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 2>I am not the audience. Like, I'm just thinking my

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 2>favorite cereal these days, you know, historically crackling o brand,

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 2>but these days just plain.

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Brand, not even crackling out. I love a brand cereal.

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>That, by the way, was excerpt from an article in

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the Guardian from twenty fifteen by Adam Gabbat, and I

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>just loved the imagery of it.

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 3>I love a cinnamon too's crunch.

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I know we've talked about this before, but yeah, I

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>haven't checked lately to see what colors are involved.

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 2>That's fair, That's fair. I mean I think a surprising

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 2>number of things do have artificial food colorance. Absolutely, and

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 2>it's possible that some of the brands that I have

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 2>purchased over the past few years absolutely.

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 3>Do, very very likely. In fact, great ketch up. Hi,

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm Aaron Welsh and I'm Erin Alman Updyke And this.

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Is this podcast will kill you?

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Can you guess? We're talking about food dies today?

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 2>We are this? Oh I'm excited for this one, are you?

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 2>I am? Because it's just it's a fun.

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 4>Little story, okay, And it forced me to evaluate the

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 4>feelings that I have about food dies and maybe form

0:03:58.760 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 4>some of those feelings.

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 3>Do you want to tell me about those feelings?

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 2>We can do that that later on.

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, okay, yeah, yeah, well.

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Get I'm sure that there will be plenty of time

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 2>to get into the various feelings that we have about

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 2>these things. These things substances.

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 3>I can't. Yeah, it's gonna be it's gonna be fun.

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna focus mostly on the synthetic food dies.

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, cold tar dies.

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Coltar dies now mostly manufactured from petroleum. Yeah, it's gonna

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>if let's just get into it, shout into it.

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 2>First things First.

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 3>It's quarantine any time it is.

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 2>What are we drinking this week?

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>We could drink nothing other than over the rainbow? So

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>many meanings to that.

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:43.919
<v Speaker 2>So many And of course this is food dies episode,

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 2>like what are we supposed to not do? Blue currosol?

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>No, there was only one choice and it was blue currosole.

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>And there is only one other choice, and it must

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 1>include Marachino cherries. So, Aaron, you want to tell us

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>what's in it? I do?

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 4>I do.

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 2>It has of blue curasol, as we have discussed, it

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:07.839
<v Speaker 2>has rum, it has cream of coconut, pineapple juice. Uh

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 2>and uh yeah, marishio cherries. It's a blended bev.

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like a little blue situation.

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 2>It is a beautiful drink, which is the purpose that

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:20.600
<v Speaker 2>food does.

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:25.480
<v Speaker 3>The point t L d R yep, yeah, t LDL

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 3>we learned, t LDL.

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 2>We will post the full recipe for over the Rainbow

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 2>on our website but also especially on our social media channel,

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 2>So make sure you're following us.

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, check it out. We're trying to do these like videos,

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 3>yeah things these days.

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 2>It's real taken some getting used to.

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 3>Give for it. Come and tell us how much you

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 3>like them. You still like button? You know?

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yeah, yeah yeah.

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 1>And if you're not following us yet on social media,

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>please we'd love it if you did that. Also, if

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you haven't yet rated and reviewed and subscribed on wherever

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you like to listen. Is it on iHeart podcasts? Is

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 1>it on Apple Podcasts? Is it Spotify? I don't know,

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>but just you know, do the things YouTube were there,

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and we have a website, this podcast we Kill You

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>dot com.

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 3>There's lots of things on it. Check it out.

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Wow, nicely done, Thank you, nicely done.

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 3>To get in there.

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 2>I guess there's nothing else that we need to do

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 2>before we get started.

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you're starting right.

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.039
<v Speaker 2>Sure? Okay, I guess did we talk about this?

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought I think we talked about it one time

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>briefly a long time ago, and I was like, man, okay,

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any All my stuff is like current

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 1>events so I don't really have a biology section to

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>tell you about.

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 3>So all right, can we learn about the history of food?

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Don let's do it? Wow? How fun?

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 3>Okay, but totally forgot, totally scripted.

0:06:54.920 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Let's take a quick break and get started. It's Saturday morning,

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 2>and do you feel like cooking a big old breakfast, eggs, pancakes, bacon,

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, the whole shebang. Yeah, But when you pull

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 2>out that pack of bacon shoved into the back of

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 2>your fridge for who knows how long, you notice that

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 2>it looks kind of off, like it's awfully gray, a

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 2>little bit brown. Better not. It's Wednesday evening and you're

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 2>in the produce section of your grocery store, picking through

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 2>the clamshells of strawberries, trying to find the one that

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 2>has the and juiciest looking fruits, while also keeping an

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 2>eye up for any signs of mold. It's Friday morning,

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 2>and you're eyeing the bananas you got at the beginning

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 2>of the week, trying to decide whether the last of

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 2>the bunch is still snackworthy or if they're destined as

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 2>ingredient in banana bread. How yellow or speckled do you

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 2>like your bananas on the scale of things.

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 3>This is a question, is a real question.

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, much less speckled.

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Like, oh see, I like I like a speckled very

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 3>I knew.

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>This about us, that we have different banana preferences. No,

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I like mine, not.

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Green, but like just after wow, that's too that's too

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 2>too much for me.

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I liked it.

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 2>I liked it, but it's just it's a preference.

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's how I feel about the browns.

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>But actually, once they start to have like more than

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a couple, I'm like, it's just too soft.

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 3>It's the texture.

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 2>See, I like that texture.

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 3>Then they go banana bread.

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:58.959
<v Speaker 2>I love that. Yeah. For many of us, taste begins

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 2>not with our mouth off our taste buds, but with

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 2>our eyes. Our visual perception of food has a powerful

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 2>influence over the way that we taste that food, even

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 2>acting as a deciding factor in whether or not we're

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 2>willing to eat something like speckled bananas. Yeah, like this.

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Hide the broccoli in the mac and cheese. It's not

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna go well exactly.

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 2>This link between vision and taste, along with smell, is

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 2>evolutionarily ingrained. Our ability to evaluate food quality based on

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 2>its appearance might help us select the most nutritious foods,

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 2>like the ripest strawberries, or avoid food that is spoiled

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 2>or poisonous, like that gray bacon or moldy bread. But

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 2>it's also learned over our lives, we develop strong preferences

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 2>for foods or expectations for taste, based on their appearance.

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Yellow pudding signals lemon or banana flavor. Anything else would

0:09:57.240 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 2>be weird.

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Right, right, I imagine like yellow strawberry pudding.

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Right, that would be weird.

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 2>It would be jarring. Yeah, light green ice cream, probably

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 2>mint or pisaccio. It would be alarming. I guess maybe

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 2>alarming is not quite the right word, but it would

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 2>be a shock if you got a scoop of green

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 2>ice cream and found out that it was actually orange flavored,

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 2>like you took your first little bite or lift. Yeah, yeah, strange.

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Our expectations of the way that food should taste can

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 2>be so powerful that they can lead to disgust or

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 2>aversion if the reality does not match those expectations, like

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 2>pepsi discovered in nineteen ninety three. When they're highly anticipated,

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 2>clear pepsi completely flopped. Yeah, clear soda should taste citrusy, right,

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 2>like that is what a clear soda means, right, even

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 2>though or I guess cream soda, but even though the brown.

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:56.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah cream soda, cream soada, Actually it's at least like

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a light brown.

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're right, it's like slightly tan. Yeah, to indicate

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.559
<v Speaker 2>that it's not cru right, I'm a lie. But the

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 2>brown of cola comes from coloring. Seven up, which is

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 2>a clear soda, was initially dyed brown until they removed

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 2>the dye to distinguish it from other sodas. That's like

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 2>a marketing tactic. Yeah. And then of course, like in

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 2>the first hand account, Green and Purple Ketchup, I remember

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:26.959
<v Speaker 2>that my brothers loved green Ketchup. They were so psyched

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 2>about it, and I was disgusted. I was like, I

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 2>can't eat it.

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I babysat for a family who I remember very distinctly

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>bought at one point blue and pink margarine like squeezable butter. Yeah,

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and it was like, you know, like Barbie pink and

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>like if there's an equivalent of Barbie pink and blue,

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:50.119
<v Speaker 1>it was like very blue and pink.

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Jump scare, Like that's not for butter. I'm not into it.

0:11:57.200 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 3>Into it.

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the power of preference the power of Yeah. But

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 2>one study demonstrated how strong these expectations can influence our,

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:12.319
<v Speaker 2>you know, overall feelings. When the study they fed participants

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 2>at dinner that consisted of steak, peas, and French fries,

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 2>but the people who were doing the conducting the study

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 2>altered the lighting so that participants couldn't see that the

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 2>steak was actually dyed blue, the peas were dyed red,

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 2>and the French fries were dyed green. And when they

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 2>put the normal lighting back into place so that people

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:39.079
<v Speaker 2>could actually see the true colors of what they had eaten,

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 2>some people were so disgusted that they got ill. They

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:42.439
<v Speaker 2>got sick.

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Wow, Like they ate it just fine. They were like, yes,

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>this was tasty. Then they saw it and they were like.

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 2>Who yeah, exactly. But it wasn't just like these colors alone,

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 2>like we've encountered blue candy or popsicles before. It was

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 2>even though blue is like, as I saw somewhere, like

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 2>the not very common color that we find in nature

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 2>for food, and so it tends to be reserved for

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 2>like fun foods to the foods. Yeah, yeah, but it

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 2>was this mismatch between expectation and reality. The relationship between

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 2>vision and food color is evolutionarily rooted. Trichromatic color vision

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:28.319
<v Speaker 2>may have evolved to help us detect red fruits against

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 2>green foliage or to see snakes. Check out our snake

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 2>venom episode from years back.

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, and our color vision episode and our color vision episode.

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 2>But oh yeah, that is I was like car else

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 2>did we talk about that? Yeah, But it's also something

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 2>that we learn and grow preferences for, starting in early childhood.

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 2>And these preferences, of course greatly affect which foods we

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 2>might select or find appetizing, which has made them a

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 2>very relevant issue for those producing the foods, who might

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 2>opt to add a bit more of this or of

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 2>that color to enhance the appeal of their product. So

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 2>that you pick the pink filet of farm raised salmon

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 2>that actually gets this pink color not from the carotenoids

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 2>in the food that wild salmon eat, but from dyes,

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 2>or you pick the orangeist orange whose skin might actually

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 2>be dyed to saturate the natural orange coloring. And it

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 2>might seem like the controversy surrounding food dies is a

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 2>fairly recent one, at least within the past few decades,

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 2>and growing in volume every year, but in fact it

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 2>dates back millennia, and at the heart of it, the

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 2>arguments against artificial food colorants have fallen into the same

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 2>two categories throughout that entire time, deception and toxicity. Before

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 2>we go back to ancient Egypt, I want to make

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 2>a quick note about the language that I'll be using

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 2>to talk about food dies, because there are so many

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 2>different descriptors for these yes, and so since this episode

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 2>mostly focuses on coal tar dies or synthetic dies, I'm

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 2>calling these synthetic dyes. And if I say natural dyes,

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 2>which I know the word natural meanings meaningless, it's not great.

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm referring to the dyes derived from nature, plants or

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 2>animals like those little cochineal insects used to make red

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 2>food dye or saffron which comes from plants, And any

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 2>coloring or dye added to food I'm calling artificial.

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>That's the perfect and exactly how I was going to

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>do it.

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Airs.

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad we're on the same page.

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Excellent, Okay, back to ancient Egypt. Yes, even millennial old

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 2>papyri describe colorants added to medicines.

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but the first conclusive evidence or like written descriptions

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 2>that humans added artificial dyes to food. Food comes from

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 2>ancient Greece and Rome. Dyes were added to wine to

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 2>make them look more robust, have bigger body, stronger bodies, yeah,

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 2>well rounded by I don't know how you'd talk about wine.

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Darker colors, yummier wine.

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:19.479
<v Speaker 2>There you go, exactly. And then there were things like saffron,

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 2>squid ink, paprika, turmeric, beets, etc. So these like naturally

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 2>derived colors that were added to various foods. These colors

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 2>often carried with them additional meaning. So for instance, the

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 2>rarer the colorant like saffron, the more it was valued

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 2>or considered to have more nutritious qualities. Often, certain colors

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 2>were associated with wealth or royalty or divine healing. You

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 2>could easily imagine that someone might judge up their cake

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 2>or wine with a sprinkling of natural colorant, which is

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 2>exactly what some bakers did in England in the Middle Ages,

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 2>teaching us that natural does not necessarily mean better. Oh yes,

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 2>white flower at the time was considered top tier, but

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 2>if a baker couldn't get their hands on white flower,

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 2>they resorted to adding lime, chalk or crushed bones. So

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 2>their bread would turn out white.

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh, crush bones. I know, who's bones.

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 2>That's a great question. I do not know, do not know.

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Does it matter?

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 3>No, it doesn't. But I'm just curious like you.

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I mean I not regulated, that's for certain. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 2>And this practice actually inspired one of the oldest laws

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:47.640
<v Speaker 2>against food adulteration in the late thirteenth century. Quote, If

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 2>any default shall be found in the bread of a

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 2>baker in the city the first time, let him be

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 2>drawn upon a hurdle from the guildhall to his own house,

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:58.959
<v Speaker 2>through the great street, where there be most people assembled,

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 2>and through the streets which are most dirty, with the

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 2>faulty loaf hanging from his neck. That's the first offense.

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 3>That's the first off A second, oh my.

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.239
<v Speaker 2>Gosh, there had to be not only a second, but

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 2>also a third.

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 3>You're right, dear.

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 2>If a second time he shall be found committing the

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 2>same offense, let him be drawn from the guildhall through

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 2>the great street of cheap to the pillory, and let

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 2>him be put upon the pillary and remain there at

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 2>least one hour in the day. And the third time

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 2>that such default shall be found, he shall be drawn

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 2>and the oven shall be pulled down and the baker

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 2>made to forswear the trade in the city forever.

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh my gosh, three strikes and you're out totally.

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 2>That's where baseball got the idea. Don't laugh at my

0:18:56.359 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 2>terrible jokes. Yeah, it's not, Oh my gosh. Other laws

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 2>that I guess later were repealed based on your story

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 2>of babysitting prohibited coloring butter.

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, this was margarine technically.

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, the margarine thing later became I didn't even go

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:18.680
<v Speaker 2>into it, but this whole episode could have been about

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 2>the margarine wars and like coloring margarine and you know,

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 2>could restaurants be allowed to serve margarine under the you know,

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 2>but pretend like it was butter.

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh, there was like butter in the handy margarine exactly.

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 2>Fascinating Well, because like yellow coloring in margarine. Margarine is

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:40.479
<v Speaker 2>not naturally yellow. No, it's like crystal exactly, and so

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 2>adding yellow makes it look like butter, and so it's

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 2>like it kind of toes a line of deceitful marketing practices,

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 2>are deceitful food practices? Yeah?

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Interesting, yep.

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 2>And there were other laws that prohibited adding colors to

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:59.199
<v Speaker 2>pastries that made it look like they contained eggs because

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 2>they'd These laws were designed to protect consumers from deceitful

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 2>sales as well as poisonous additives, and so there definitely

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 2>was some awareness of the addition of dyes and other

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 2>substances to foods and drinks to enhance color or impart flavor,

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 2>and the potential danger inherent in those practices, but things

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 2>remained fairly under control until the seventeen hundreds and into

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 2>the eighteen hundreds, and this is when increasing trade and

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 2>long distance travel encouraged people to look for ways to

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 2>keep food fresher and looking tastier over longer periods of time.

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Vividly colored foods came to represent the quote unquote success

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 2>of colonialism, since saturated and bright colors were more likely

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 2>to be found outside of the sooty streets of Charles

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Dickens London, such as in India, the jewel of the

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Crown of the British Empire, and the demand for these

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 2>brighter colors from quote unquote exotic lands rose. The Industrial

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Revolution only deepened this need for food enhancement, as people

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 2>moved to cities where food had to be transported into

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 2>where it had to have a longer shelf life and

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 2>where demand for year round availability was high, and at

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 2>the same time it provided a means to develop new

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 2>preservatives and colorance through the growth of science and technology.

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Whether these substances were safe was of secondary importance. As

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:34.919
<v Speaker 2>long as they kept the pickles of vivid green and

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:38.360
<v Speaker 2>the coffee grounds nice and dark, it was a okay.

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Even if that vivid green was achieved through copper or

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 2>the coffee color gotten through beef blood for example. Yeah,

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:54.400
<v Speaker 2>that's just a problem for future the future producers.

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Just feel like that wouldn't taste good.

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that was that mattered.

0:21:58.720 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 2>I bought it right, like you already paid for.

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 3>It, Okay, Yeah, yep.

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 2>But this, like you know, quote unquote future problem was

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 2>actually the not very distant future, as it would turn out.

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 2>As early as eighteen twenty, chemists were ringing the warning

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 2>bell for the increasing use of harmful dyes in food products,

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 2>but it was largely unheated in much of Europe. Even

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 2>if it was heated, chemists were faced with the substantial

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 2>challenge of identifying which compounds were toxic and at what

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 2>levels they were toxic. That's pretty key, right, you know,

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Dose is in the poison? How much lead in your

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 2>cayenne is safe?

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Like, hey, that one?

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 2>We know?

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 3>None? Yeah?

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 2>How much arsenic in your candy yet? None? Yeah?

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Easy?

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 2>But things were going to get even more challenging in

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 2>the second half of the nineteenth century with the explosion

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 2>of coal tar dyes. In eighteen fifty six, eighteen year

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 2>old English chemist William Henry Perkin was tasked with creating

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 2>a synthetic alternative treatment for malaria to replace quinine, which

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 2>comes from Sinchona Park and was expensive and difficult to get.

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 2>He didn't succeed, but he did stumble upon a different

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 2>breakthrough that would revolutionize food and fashion an industry. In

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 2>one of his experiments with anoline, which came from coal tar,

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:29.959
<v Speaker 2>he noticed that swirling inside his flask was a vivid

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:35.640
<v Speaker 2>purplish color, which he later called mauvine. Perkin immediately saw

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 2>the potential this could have as a die and enlisted

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 2>the help of his friend and his brother to scale

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 2>up production. He applied for a patent. This is an

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 2>eighteen year old kid, I love this Wow. Left the

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:52.120
<v Speaker 2>academic lab, gathered funds to start a factory, and changed

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 2>industrial chemistry and the pharmaceutical industry forever. Wow, this is

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 2>basically what kickstarted the dye industry. And this so the

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 2>dye industry. I find this fascinating because it's like a

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 2>really kind of fun, fun, full circle story where you know,

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 2>it started out looking for a replacement for quinine, So

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 2>it started out with a pharmaceutical goal goal, right, and

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 2>then it turned into this massive dye industry. But then

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 2>the dye industry also had still kept its foot in

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 2>like the pharmaceutical ventures, which is why you have you know,

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Bayer producing, which was started as a dye company producing aspirin.

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, and then a lot of these like later

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 2>then started to develop medications for you know, cancer drugs

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 2>and other types of medications that.

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 3>All started as die, that all started to die.

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 2>So do you remember back in our aceidominifin paracetamol episode

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 2>and we were like, yeah, these two dudes founded accidentally

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:00.160
<v Speaker 2>because they were looking at coal tar dye. Wh who

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 2>knows why were they doing that? My god, That's why

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 2>I finally realized.

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Wow, yeah, it is full circle. That's so interesting, and

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean it kind of makes sense when it's just

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>like we're just over here doing chemistry and trying to

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:16.439
<v Speaker 1>figure out what these We're doing chemistry stuff and seeing

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 1>what kind of chemistry chemicals we can make and then

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>what we can do with them.

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 2>It's so I mean, like maybe I just don't know

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 2>enough about the biochemistry of coal tar.

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:28.159
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. Yeah, but like, why is it so

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 3>pharmacologically active? No clue? Great question. Maybe we should do

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 3>a whole episode on it.

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean we kind of are. Oh I'm not okay,

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Well anyway, that yeah, future episode, that episode, yeah, okay.

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:48.120
<v Speaker 2>But going back to mauvine, Mauvine became I hope I'm

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 2>saying that right. Question. It became the first widely produced

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:56.879
<v Speaker 2>commercial synthetic dye, and within a few years of its development,

0:25:57.000 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 2>it was the color to wear the of the season.

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Clothes had been dyed with natural dyes before, but mauvine

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 2>was much more vivid, color, fast, and importantly, fairly inexpensive

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 2>to produce, since coltar is a byproduct of the gas industry.

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:18.360
<v Speaker 2>As Carolyn Cobblt, who's the author of this book, Rainbow

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Palette puts it, quote, in a seemingly alchemical act of transmutation,

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 2>they synthesized the molecules of coal tar from dead dark

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 2>matter that had laid for centuries in the depths of

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:36.719
<v Speaker 2>the Earth into new substances that would transfigure society and science. Quote.

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 2>I also just I don't have this in my notes,

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 2>but I just like the word natural. I think this

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 2>just goes to show how meaningless it is because coltar

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:49.880
<v Speaker 2>comes from the earth right as well.

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:53.160
<v Speaker 1>It's just dead dinosaurs and stuff. Yeah, just like really

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>really deep down there.

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and the word now, I mean minerals are counted

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>as natural dyes as well too.

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:02.679
<v Speaker 3>Lead would be a.

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Natural die, would be counted as a natural dye. Like,

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the word does not have meaning. And I'll die into

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the problems with that when we talk about how we

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:15.399
<v Speaker 1>regulate synthetic versus quote unquote natural dies today later Yeah.

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, yeah, it's a it's a mess the word

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 2>natural is. Yeah. But the invention of coltar dies was

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 2>like finding the Philosopher's Stone, only instead of turning mercury

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 2>into gold, chemists turned coal tar into a rainbow of colors. Wow.

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 2>At first, the explosion in coal tar dies seemed like

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:37.919
<v Speaker 2>a testament to the promise of science. We can make

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 2>the world more beautiful, more appealing, more dimensional with this

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:43.919
<v Speaker 2>array of colors. Now, available.

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 3>Songs and poems were written.

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 2>About these dies, how but soon the cracks began to

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 2>show these dyes clearly weren't as inert as the chemist claimed,

0:27:56.320 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 2>and some were downright toxic. Initially, Mauvene and the other

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:03.719
<v Speaker 2>coal tar dyes that followed were mostly used to dye fabrics,

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 2>but eventually manufacturers began putting them in food, and this

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 2>allowed people to more readily make the connection that some

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 2>of these dyes could be harmful. It was a faster

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 2>sort of intake and toxicity to ingest versus top of one.

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 3>You're just touching it. Yeah, yeah.

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 2>And so began a pushback against the widespread use of

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:27.439
<v Speaker 2>these dyes. And it's important here. I feel like I'm

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 2>always saying this, but like it is important to put

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:33.440
<v Speaker 2>this pushback in the broader context of food regulation around

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 2>this time, say the eighteen eighties or so, because food

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:40.959
<v Speaker 2>dyes were just one issue of many facing the food industry.

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 2>More people living in cities, more food trucked in, more

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 2>food spoiling, more preservatives and other questionable substances added to foods.

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 2>And when I say preservatives, I mean early preservatives that

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 2>were not well tested. Combine this with less oversight and regulation.

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 2>You've got a disaster on your hands.

0:28:57.880 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, yeah.

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 2>People were cinnamon that was really ground brick dust, arsenic

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 2>dyed candy, milk adulterated with formaldehyde, and who knows what else.

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like all the things that we've talked about

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 2>before on the podcast.

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's actually amazing to me how many times this

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>has come up on the podcast, like in so many

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 1>different episodes.

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 2>So many different episodes.

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>This time period was not great for food regulation, no, no,

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think it really did kind of illustrate how

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>when you don't have any framework in place to evaluate

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and experts, like declared experts, to make these decisions, you're

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a mess on your hands because there are

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>so many different competing interests, right, and like, at the

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 1>bottom line of it, it is manufacturers and people who

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 1>are selling us this food whose goal is profit right.

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 3>They are not going to be the ones looking out

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 3>for the safety of their food, no of this of

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 3>the consumer. That's not their job. Their job is to

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 3>make money.

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Yep. Okay, I mean essentially, in this time period, what

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 2>you were paying for you weren't really getting, and what

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 2>you were really getting was making you sick. Health overall

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 2>during the Industrial Revolution deteriorated in many ways, especially for

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 2>the working classes who spent long hours in factories, inhaling

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 2>toxic dust, living in close quarters, breathing in tuberculosis and

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 2>other respiratory infections, and drinking raw milk, consuming the microbes

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 2>that would sicken them and kill their children. Germ theory

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 2>was catching on, but overall, this quote unquote degeneration was

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 2>blamed on modern society and industrialization, and adulterated foods we're

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 2>seen as playing an outsized part in this. Fresh food

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 2>was a rare commodity for much of the working class,

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 2>and inexpensive sugar and adulterated foods were far more accessible.

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 2>By the late eighteen hundreds, one third of recipes in

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 2>a standard American cookbook were for puddings and cakes.

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, I mean this is not a sugar episode.

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Maybe someday, but I bring this up or like, I

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:20.719
<v Speaker 2>wanted to share that statistic because it demonstrates a shift

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 2>in the types of foods that people could afford, which

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 2>tended to be adulterated and cheap, and what they were

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 2>wanting to make with that food, And many people blamed

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 2>that shift for what they saw as the degeneration of society. Okay,

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 2>so it was like, we have this massive change in

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 2>the food that people are eating, especially the working classes,

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 2>and that is what is causing the downfall of society.

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 2>That is what is leading to the tire rate of tuberculosis,

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:04.719
<v Speaker 2>that is what is leading to you know, children in

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, working in factories.

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't really know that is the root cause.

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 2>That was one of the root causes. Yeah, artificial food

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 2>dies were part of that shift, included to deceive the consumer.

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 2>So like this bright red strawberry jam is totally strawberries,

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 2>trust me by it. It's definitely not apples dyed red

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 2>with sometimes the side effect of making people sick. I mean,

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 2>clearly some type of regulation was needed, but what across

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 2>the board. Regulators like Harvey Wiley I've discussed many times

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 2>now on the podcast, had a really difficult time drawing

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 2>up guidelines for food adulteration, let alone getting people on

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 2>board and enforcing these regulations. Part of the challenge for

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:53.719
<v Speaker 2>food dies was determining which were safe to consume and

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 2>in what quantities, because at the time, there was no

0:32:57.200 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 2>standardization in the chemical makeup of these dies or any

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 2>agreement on the names for them, so dye companies would

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 2>sell dies under different names and compositions to food manufacturers

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 2>who really had no guidance on how much to put in.

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 2>It was just like, I don't know, this is butter yellow.

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what its chemical name is. How about

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 2>half a gram per ten pounds or something like that.

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:21.480
<v Speaker 3>It looks like the yellow that you want it to

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 3>be exactly.

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And chemists had no way of detecting specific dyes

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 2>or their concentrations. The technology just was not there yet.

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Color standardization was in its infancy, which I've never really

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 2>thought about, but color standardization was a.

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Big part of this interesting because it was like what

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 3>yellow is?

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 2>This? Is this butter yellow? Is this a different type

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 2>of yellow?

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 3>Having like a naming system and everything? Yeah, pantone? Is

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 3>that what it is?

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Pantone?

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I really don't know what I'm talking about.

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 2>But the other thing is that analytical chemistry was just

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 2>starting out and really grew in part out of the

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 2>need for food and drug regulation during this period. Interesting

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 2>to be able to test things and be like that's

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 2>what the substance is, that's how much there is in here?

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:11.839
<v Speaker 3>Okay?

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And so The testing of individual dies for their

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:22.879
<v Speaker 2>safety was crudely done, mostly through animal studies, like how

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 2>should it be administered? Should it be oral? Should it

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 2>be injected? Which animal do you want to test? A rat? Mouse,

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 2>guinea pig, from whatever? Beagle? I don't know if they

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:38.239
<v Speaker 2>were testing beagles back then, probably at what concentration does

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 2>this rat die? At? What point does it cause neurotoxic

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:45.879
<v Speaker 2>symptoms in a mouse? Like more nuanced health outcomes weren't

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 2>really considered, and results were generally quite mixed. Some studies

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 2>found a dye to be completely safe, while others found

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 2>it to be toxic, and were the results even applicable

0:34:55.680 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 2>to humans. Sometimes chemists experimented on themselves, including that a

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 2>die was non toxic across the board if they did

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:06.320
<v Speaker 2>not experience what they considered to be significant side effects, okay,

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 2>And then there was like what if the die is

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 2>interacting with something else, another ingredient in the food, in

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:15.919
<v Speaker 2>the food? Yeah? Whatever the method of testing, The only

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 2>consistent thing was how inconsistent the results were. Consensus of

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:25.759
<v Speaker 2>safety among chemists, politicians, consumers, producers, and retailers was a

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 2>pipe dream. Different countries handled this in different ways. Some

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:33.320
<v Speaker 2>took an approach that was kind of like considered safe

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 2>until found toxic, so they would like ban harmful dyes,

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 2>but everything else was kind of like free for all, okay,

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:44.799
<v Speaker 2>while others, including the US, allowed a shortlist of quote

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 2>unquote safe dies. So seven were included in the nineteen

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 2>oh six Pure Food and Drug Act that could be

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 2>added to food and had to be included on the label.

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 2>And so this is when I talk about these safe dies,

0:35:56.239 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm specifically referring to the cooltar dies. Seven. Yeah. And

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:06.240
<v Speaker 2>in effect, this act that identified the seven safe dies

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 2>transformed these dyes from adulterance to ingredients. Wiley, who orchestrated

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 2>this act, later said that he regretted including dies because

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:20.399
<v Speaker 2>he felt that, regardless of their safety, artificial colorants were

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 2>deceitful to the public just across the board. Interesting but

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 2>safety testing of these dies continued over the next decades

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 2>and into today, and some were removed from the list.

0:36:32.880 --> 0:36:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Others have been added. Demand for more transparency in the

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 2>twentieth century led to additional regulations in the US that

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 2>required manufacturers to list ingredients by their chemical name or

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 2>by the nomenclature created by the FDA. So this led

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 2>to things like FD and C yellow number six, and

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 2>so that means like that yellow number six. Then FD

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 2>and C refers to it being permitted to be used

0:36:56.120 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 2>in food, drug and cosmetics, and then there are other

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:00.839
<v Speaker 2>ones that are just in like drugs and cosmetics and

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 2>so on. The unintended consequence of this was that such

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 2>scientific sounding names made people more wary of their food,

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 2>not reassured as to its safety, and over the following decades,

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 2>lawsuits were brought forward, court challenges were heard, and legislation

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 2>was introduced or changed to accommodate new information about the

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 2>safety of these dies or when and where they can

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:29.440
<v Speaker 2>be used without being considered deceitful to the consumer, like

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:35.279
<v Speaker 2>margarine in a restaurant. Right, this is a constantly evolving landscape,

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:38.319
<v Speaker 2>and you could do textbooks about like the different regulations

0:37:38.800 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 2>and each individual die over the history of the second

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 2>half of the twentieth century alone. And so Aarin, I

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:48.799
<v Speaker 2>knew that you were going to like deep dive on

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:52.360
<v Speaker 2>the current concerns with artificial colorance, and so I didn't

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 2>go too deep into that literature perfect, But I was

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:59.320
<v Speaker 2>curious about the origin of this purported link between hyperactivity

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 2>or eighty eight and food dies. And I know you're

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:03.480
<v Speaker 2>going to talk a little bit more about this, but

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:06.880
<v Speaker 2>it turns out it emerged in the nineteen seventies after

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 2>an allergist named Benjamin fine Gold published a book describing

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 2>his observation that symptoms of hyperactivity were reduced when children

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:18.279
<v Speaker 2>were fed a diet that did not have artificial food

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 2>additives and dies and other things. And he named this

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 2>the fine Gold diet.

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:24.360
<v Speaker 3>Or the Kaiser permanente diet or the Kaiser.

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Permanente diet yep. And it made a big splash. It

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 2>was very big news. A lot of people were very

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 2>interested in this, and as and the scientific community was

0:38:34.480 --> 0:38:37.920
<v Speaker 2>absolutely interested. They immediately set out to further investigate this

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 2>possible link. And I won't do any spoilers because I

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:43.279
<v Speaker 2>know you're going to take us through all of that

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:45.719
<v Speaker 2>and sort of like the past few decades and the

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:48.880
<v Speaker 2>current landscape of what's happening with food dives today, and

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:52.839
<v Speaker 2>so I'm going to stop here and when it comes

0:38:52.880 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 2>to like the history of food dies, okay, But I

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:59.360
<v Speaker 2>did want to share a few thoughts that I found

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 2>myself have when putting together this episode. And this is

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 2>without me knowing what you're about to tell me, and

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:07.239
<v Speaker 2>I can't wait.

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's what I'm most excited about because then I'm

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 1>going to tell you my feelings, because that's how I

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 1>was going to start my part.

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 3>So it's kind of perfect.

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, it's feelings time. Yeah, okay, feelings. But yeah, it

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 2>turns out that I have more feelings about this than

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:26.840
<v Speaker 2>I realize. I mean, I think the bottom line is

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:28.719
<v Speaker 2>that like kind of like we talked about, it's not

0:39:28.760 --> 0:39:32.800
<v Speaker 2>that deep. But at the same time, the bottom line

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:36.759
<v Speaker 2>as I see it, is that artificial dies, whether synthetic

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:41.720
<v Speaker 2>or quote unquote natural, in part no nutrition to food.

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:46.760
<v Speaker 2>They're there for aesthetics. Many of us have been raised

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 2>to expect apples to be shiny and unbruised, tomatoes to

0:39:51.000 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 2>be giant and red and juicy, salmon to be a lovely,

0:39:55.320 --> 0:40:02.360
<v Speaker 2>pinky orange. Imperfection will not be tolerated. These expectations have

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 2>been formed, in part by the widespread use of artificial dyes.

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Do you remember in The Wizard of Oz when the

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:12.240
<v Speaker 2>film switches to color and you can feel the world

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:17.240
<v Speaker 2>getting bigger, like more beautiful, more real. You and I, Aaron,

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:21.839
<v Speaker 2>like many others, grew up in technicolor oz. We don't

0:40:21.880 --> 0:40:24.400
<v Speaker 2>know what it's like to exist in monochrome Kansas with

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 2>bruised apples and pale oranges, and frankly, it takes them

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:32.080
<v Speaker 2>getting used to. Which isn't to say that we shouldn't right.

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:36.240
<v Speaker 2>To be honest, I don't think I have heard any

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:43.440
<v Speaker 2>convincing argument for keeping food dies natural or synthetic. I

0:40:43.600 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 2>just haven't it, Aaron.

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to interrupt your flow because it's so good,

0:40:52.080 --> 0:40:55.759
<v Speaker 1>but and you can take it one step further, because

0:40:55.800 --> 0:40:58.759
<v Speaker 1>you said they have food dies in part no nutritional value.

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:02.760
<v Speaker 1>They also do not extend the shelf life of our foods.

0:41:03.200 --> 0:41:05.800
<v Speaker 1>They do not make our foods more cost effective, unless

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:08.319
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about the comparison of synthetic dyes, which are

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 1>more cost effective than so called natural dyes, which are

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:14.880
<v Speaker 1>much more labor intensive and expensive and not as potent.

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 3>So you have potentially ecologically damaging Yeah, exactly so.

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:23.800
<v Speaker 1>But no, there is literally no benefit to our health

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 1>or our pocketbooks in any way, shape or form when

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 1>it comes to food dies.

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:31.799
<v Speaker 3>Their only purpose is to make us want to eat

0:41:31.840 --> 0:41:33.920
<v Speaker 3>things more because they look better.

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Because they'll look better.

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I genuinely feel like at this point I have no

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:43.640
<v Speaker 1>skin in this game, Like we take them all out, great,

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:46.399
<v Speaker 1>no problem. We keep them there as long as they're

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:48.920
<v Speaker 1>safety testing. Great, yeah, no problem.

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 2>That's how I feel like, Yeah, since we use them,

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 2>we should keep evaluating every die included in food and

0:41:56.520 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 2>we jingle. We do keep evaluating. We should continue to

0:41:59.800 --> 0:42:02.800
<v Speaker 2>weigh the cost and the benefits, including who is paying

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 2>the cost and who receives the benefit. And we should

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:10.080
<v Speaker 2>not assume that replacing synthetic dies with natural ones solves

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:13.400
<v Speaker 2>the issue. Just because something is derived from a plant

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:16.760
<v Speaker 2>rather than cold tar does not make it inherently healthier.

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 2>We just did an episode on Strict nine, which comes

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 2>from a plant, is not used as a die, but still.

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:28.799
<v Speaker 1>Like this is the exact This is the conclusion of

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:31.279
<v Speaker 1>the end of this episode as well too. So we

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:38.240
<v Speaker 1>could honestly step here, don't, but we could.

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 2>It's like all food, drug, and cosmetic dies should continue

0:42:43.680 --> 0:42:45.400
<v Speaker 2>to be held at the standard that they are, and

0:42:45.440 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 2>we should be wary of companies that claim superiority or

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 2>better better nutrition because of quote unquote natural ingredients. And

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 2>so I just like, I don't know, I think to

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 2>place this in the current context of like the arguments

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:05.280
<v Speaker 2>today It's like I want there to be the reason

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:09.160
<v Speaker 2>that we should take out food dives is because it

0:43:09.200 --> 0:43:13.399
<v Speaker 2>doesn't impart nutritional value and if it harms, if there

0:43:13.400 --> 0:43:15.640
<v Speaker 2>are harms, then we should take them out. But like

0:43:16.480 --> 0:43:19.359
<v Speaker 2>I just it doesn't make sense to me, and I

0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:23.359
<v Speaker 2>am open to hearing reasons to keep food dies in,

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:26.240
<v Speaker 2>but I did not come across any in my reading.

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:26.759
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:43:26.840 --> 0:43:28.920
<v Speaker 1>It's also what I think is really interesting, Aaron, is

0:43:28.920 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that you brought up that in the past there was

0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:37.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot more it seems like emphasis on the idea

0:43:37.440 --> 0:43:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that these food dies were deceptive in a way. Yes,

0:43:41.320 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 1>right they are, and today but today that's not the

0:43:44.719 --> 0:43:49.680
<v Speaker 1>conversation that's going on. The conversation is only surrounding only

0:43:49.760 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 1>surrounding the synthetic dies. There's really not conversation ongoing about

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:57.399
<v Speaker 1>the natural dyes, which is a problem, yep. And it's

0:43:57.440 --> 0:44:01.879
<v Speaker 1>only around the potential for health harms which I'll get

0:44:01.920 --> 0:44:08.239
<v Speaker 1>into that come with these synthetic dyes. And there is

0:44:08.360 --> 0:44:12.440
<v Speaker 1>no discussion on going about the fact that this is

0:44:12.520 --> 0:44:14.920
<v Speaker 1>still a form of You could look at this as

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:17.879
<v Speaker 1>a form of deception, especially like you were saying, Aaron,

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the way that we market these so called natural dyes.

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:24.200
<v Speaker 1>A lot of companies are really leaning into that in

0:44:24.239 --> 0:44:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a way that makes you assume that a food is

0:44:27.040 --> 0:44:29.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be healthier for you because it is dyed

0:44:29.719 --> 0:44:33.200
<v Speaker 1>with natural colorance, right, and there's still artificial.

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Colorance just derived from natural sources.

0:44:35.200 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 2>And the labeling requirements are very different too.

0:44:37.840 --> 0:44:39.279
<v Speaker 3>I can't can we get into it? Yeah?

0:44:39.360 --> 0:44:40.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, let's do that.

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:45:06.320 --> 0:45:11.080
<v Speaker 1>So what I'm gonna get into is how these things

0:45:11.160 --> 0:45:14.480
<v Speaker 1>are currently regulated in the US and in other countries.

0:45:14.480 --> 0:45:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Because the amount of mis and disinformation out there about

0:45:17.719 --> 0:45:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the way that food dies are regulated in the US

0:45:19.600 --> 0:45:23.000
<v Speaker 1>versus that you is astounding course. So I'm gonna give

0:45:23.040 --> 0:45:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you the truth. And what is the data that exists,

0:45:27.480 --> 0:45:30.160
<v Speaker 1>especially for these synthetic diyes, on what harms they could

0:45:30.200 --> 0:45:32.680
<v Speaker 1>potentially be causing, and what are we doing about it?

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:34.239
<v Speaker 3>What is the future going to look like?

0:45:34.360 --> 0:45:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm thrilled.

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:37.839
<v Speaker 3>Good.

0:45:37.920 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Just to bring us up to speed from where you

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of left us off, Aaron in the like mid

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:46.360
<v Speaker 1>to nineteen hundreds ish in the nineteen late nineteen fifties

0:45:46.360 --> 0:45:50.160
<v Speaker 1>early nineteen sixties, there was over two hundred food dies,

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:56.279
<v Speaker 1>natural and synthetic that were like approved for use, and

0:45:56.360 --> 0:45:58.759
<v Speaker 1>at that point people were like, this feels wrong, there's

0:45:58.800 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 1>too much.

0:45:59.239 --> 0:46:00.160
<v Speaker 3>We need more data.

0:46:00.200 --> 0:46:04.240
<v Speaker 1>So at that point the FDA undertook reviews of all

0:46:04.520 --> 0:46:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of those colorants and reevaluated them. And since that time

0:46:08.360 --> 0:46:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the list has been whittled down, I think, and I

0:46:11.400 --> 0:46:13.320
<v Speaker 1>wish I had written the exact number down, but I

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:17.279
<v Speaker 1>think it's around twenty eight quote unquote naturally derived food

0:46:17.320 --> 0:46:21.160
<v Speaker 1>dies and nine synthetic dyes that are approved in the

0:46:21.280 --> 0:46:24.520
<v Speaker 1>US currently, And the nine is an asterisk, it's actually eight.

0:46:24.600 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 3>But let's get there, okay.

0:46:27.040 --> 0:46:31.080
<v Speaker 1>The way that food dies are regulated today is that

0:46:31.160 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 1>they have to be specifically approved for use before they

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:40.360
<v Speaker 1>are allowed to be used as a colorant, which means

0:46:41.320 --> 0:46:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that regardless of the source coltar, petroleum meaning synthetic dye

0:46:45.880 --> 0:46:51.080
<v Speaker 1>or natural vegetable mineral bugs, whatever, it has to be approved.

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:54.879
<v Speaker 1>The FDA has to receive safety data to be able

0:46:54.920 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to consider the properties of that die, consider the amount

0:46:58.800 --> 0:47:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of that dye that somebody might be consuming in their foods,

0:47:02.600 --> 0:47:07.600
<v Speaker 1>any possible health effects, impurities or byproducts that might be

0:47:07.800 --> 0:47:10.480
<v Speaker 1>in the die as a result of the manufacturing process,

0:47:11.120 --> 0:47:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and then the FDA and the European Food Safety Administration

0:47:15.080 --> 0:47:17.960
<v Speaker 1>does the exact same thing in Europe. They set an

0:47:18.000 --> 0:47:21.560
<v Speaker 1>appropriate level of use determination for every single one of

0:47:21.600 --> 0:47:24.960
<v Speaker 1>these food dies, and then they set limits on what

0:47:25.160 --> 0:47:29.600
<v Speaker 1>specific foods these dyes or cosmetics or drugs that these

0:47:29.680 --> 0:47:32.360
<v Speaker 1>dyes can be used in the maximum amount that you

0:47:32.400 --> 0:47:38.000
<v Speaker 1>can use, et cetera. There is no generally Recognized as

0:47:38.080 --> 0:47:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Safe or GRAS provision for color additives, which means that

0:47:43.239 --> 0:47:46.440
<v Speaker 1>our color additives, any color additives that are in our foods,

0:47:46.440 --> 0:47:49.320
<v Speaker 1>are more tightly regulated than a lot of other stuff

0:47:49.680 --> 0:47:52.799
<v Speaker 1>that is in our foods and our drugs and our

0:47:52.840 --> 0:47:57.680
<v Speaker 1>cosmetics and our supplements. Okay, because remember so many things

0:47:57.680 --> 0:48:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that are in supplements fall under this g category. That

0:48:02.080 --> 0:48:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is not true for food colorance no matter where they

0:48:05.120 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>come from. In the US, these types of color additives

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:12.799
<v Speaker 1>that we all can call artificial colorance are split into

0:48:12.880 --> 0:48:15.200
<v Speaker 1>those two groups that we've mentioned a few times now,

0:48:15.280 --> 0:48:19.719
<v Speaker 1>synthetic meaning derived from coltar or now petroleum, and so

0:48:19.840 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 1>called natural dyes. But the way that they're actually labeled

0:48:22.640 --> 0:48:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in the US is that the synthetic dyes are called

0:48:27.360 --> 0:48:32.080
<v Speaker 1>certification required, and all of the other dyes that are

0:48:32.120 --> 0:48:37.719
<v Speaker 1>come from natural sources are exempt from certification. So what

0:48:37.760 --> 0:48:40.400
<v Speaker 1>does that mean. Yeah, they all still have to have

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:46.319
<v Speaker 1>safety data, but synthetic dyes are subject to batch certification,

0:48:46.520 --> 0:48:50.120
<v Speaker 1>which means that manufacturers of these dyes have to send

0:48:50.160 --> 0:48:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a sample from every single batch of the dye or

0:48:54.040 --> 0:48:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the pigment that they are making to the FDA for

0:48:57.400 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the FDA to analyze it. What the FDA is going

0:49:01.200 --> 0:49:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to analyze it for is purity and the presence of

0:49:03.960 --> 0:49:07.080
<v Speaker 1>any impurities in the dye. They're going to analyze it

0:49:07.120 --> 0:49:11.600
<v Speaker 1>for heavy metals, for moisture, for any unreacted intermediates, because

0:49:12.080 --> 0:49:15.279
<v Speaker 1>with the production of these synthetic dyes, especially a lot

0:49:15.280 --> 0:49:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of times the intermediates in the reaction do have data

0:49:18.960 --> 0:49:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of harm. So that's one of the reasons that a

0:49:21.520 --> 0:49:24.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of people don't like these synthetic dyes specifically, is

0:49:24.320 --> 0:49:27.839
<v Speaker 1>because the chemical process that it takes to make that

0:49:28.000 --> 0:49:32.919
<v Speaker 1>the intermediates can be toxic, including causing cancer, and so

0:49:33.200 --> 0:49:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the FDA has to bat certify every single batch of

0:49:37.560 --> 0:49:40.360
<v Speaker 1>these synthetic colorants before they can be used in our foods.

0:49:40.920 --> 0:49:44.080
<v Speaker 2>I just find this really interesting that synthetic dyes are

0:49:44.080 --> 0:49:46.560
<v Speaker 2>subject to this, but natural dyes are not. When if

0:49:46.600 --> 0:49:50.080
<v Speaker 2>you're deriving this from natural sources like a plant. Plants

0:49:50.400 --> 0:49:55.160
<v Speaker 2>individually vary so substantially in what they are made of

0:49:55.360 --> 0:49:59.919
<v Speaker 2>and the concentrations of various correct compounds.

0:49:59.400 --> 0:50:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Correct correct and all vegetable fruit, animal, mineral, natural based

0:50:05.680 --> 0:50:09.440
<v Speaker 1>colorants are exempt from this certification process, which means that

0:50:09.520 --> 0:50:12.520
<v Speaker 1>nobody other than the manufacturer, who should be following good

0:50:12.520 --> 0:50:17.200
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing practices hopefully, are the only ones that are testing them.

0:50:17.360 --> 0:50:20.080
<v Speaker 1>They do again have to provide safety data before they

0:50:20.080 --> 0:50:23.920
<v Speaker 1>can be certified for use, but there's no oversight process

0:50:24.000 --> 0:50:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of the manufacturing of those colorants because they are exempt

0:50:28.239 --> 0:50:33.959
<v Speaker 1>from certification. Also, that means that synthetic colors have very

0:50:34.080 --> 0:50:38.280
<v Speaker 1>explicit ways that they have to be identified on our labels.

0:50:38.320 --> 0:50:41.359
<v Speaker 1>On our food labels, like you mentioned aaron, they have

0:50:41.440 --> 0:50:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to list FD and C yellow number five, right, because

0:50:46.640 --> 0:50:51.800
<v Speaker 1>those are batches that have been approved for use. Exempt

0:50:51.840 --> 0:50:55.600
<v Speaker 1>colors do not have to be explicitly identified in the US.

0:50:56.080 --> 0:50:58.920
<v Speaker 1>They can actually just be listed as added color or

0:50:59.040 --> 0:51:01.080
<v Speaker 1>artificial color, like you don't even have to say the

0:51:01.120 --> 0:51:04.279
<v Speaker 1>exact thing that's in there, yeah, Or sometimes it can

0:51:04.320 --> 0:51:06.839
<v Speaker 1>be listed under a whole bunch of different names, right,

0:51:06.880 --> 0:51:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Because some different colorants actually have a bunch of different

0:51:10.280 --> 0:51:13.799
<v Speaker 1>like common names that people use, and so you might

0:51:13.880 --> 0:51:17.120
<v Speaker 1>have one colorant that has multiple different names, so you'd

0:51:17.160 --> 0:51:18.960
<v Speaker 1>have to be able to identify all the different names

0:51:18.960 --> 0:51:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that it has. In the EU, the regulation for labeling

0:51:24.600 --> 0:51:28.560
<v Speaker 1>in things is different. And every single food additive, whether

0:51:28.600 --> 0:51:32.319
<v Speaker 1>it's a colorant or like a preservative or other food additives,

0:51:32.960 --> 0:51:35.520
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a synthetic dye or whether it's a naturally

0:51:35.560 --> 0:51:39.640
<v Speaker 1>drived dye, it has what's called an E number, so

0:51:39.680 --> 0:51:42.759
<v Speaker 1>like E one two three, E one O two, E

0:51:42.760 --> 0:51:43.440
<v Speaker 1>one thirty.

0:51:43.239 --> 0:51:46.240
<v Speaker 3>Nine, blah blah blah, everything, every single thing, Okay.

0:51:46.320 --> 0:51:49.160
<v Speaker 1>And that means you know, quote unquote natural colorants that

0:51:49.239 --> 0:51:53.880
<v Speaker 1>we might list as paprika or you know, beat dehydrated beats,

0:51:53.920 --> 0:51:56.239
<v Speaker 1>they would list as E. I didn't I don't know

0:51:56.280 --> 0:51:58.319
<v Speaker 1>the numbers of those, but that's what they would list

0:51:58.360 --> 0:52:01.359
<v Speaker 1>it as if it was used as a colorant. So

0:52:02.440 --> 0:52:05.279
<v Speaker 1>that is one difference is in the labeling that we

0:52:05.400 --> 0:52:07.280
<v Speaker 1>have here in the US versus the EU.

0:52:07.480 --> 0:52:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, right, let us.

0:52:09.920 --> 0:52:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Focus a little bit more specifically on these synthetic dyes. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:52:15.040 --> 0:52:18.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of different like chemical groupings of them.

0:52:18.640 --> 0:52:21.000
<v Speaker 1>If you're looking at like the chemical structure. They're all

0:52:21.040 --> 0:52:25.200
<v Speaker 1>derived from coltart or now a days, mostly from petroleum.

0:52:25.800 --> 0:52:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Most of the dyes that we use in the US

0:52:28.800 --> 0:52:31.920
<v Speaker 1>fall into the AZO dyes group, which means that they're

0:52:31.960 --> 0:52:35.680
<v Speaker 1>like usually these like carbon rings and then they've got

0:52:35.680 --> 0:52:38.239
<v Speaker 1>two nitrogen groups that are double bonded together. That's what

0:52:38.320 --> 0:52:41.480
<v Speaker 1>makes them an AZO. Okay, but there are I know

0:52:41.960 --> 0:52:44.200
<v Speaker 1>there's other groups as well too. But there are in

0:52:44.239 --> 0:52:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the US only eight slash nine ish of these that

0:52:49.080 --> 0:52:56.240
<v Speaker 1>are currently permitted for use for food in the US. Yeah,

0:52:56.280 --> 0:52:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and they are. I will list them for you so

0:52:58.440 --> 0:53:01.799
<v Speaker 1>we can talk about each one in specif wow, I know,

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:02.719
<v Speaker 1>because there's the true a.

0:53:02.719 --> 0:53:03.239
<v Speaker 3>Lot of them.

0:53:04.680 --> 0:53:07.279
<v Speaker 1>So we've got FD and C they all have that

0:53:07.520 --> 0:53:12.360
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning. Blue number one, Blue number two, Green

0:53:12.440 --> 0:53:17.520
<v Speaker 1>number three, Yellow number five, most famous, yellow number six,

0:53:18.040 --> 0:53:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and red forty. And that's only what six right there.

0:53:23.360 --> 0:53:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Those are the.

0:53:23.960 --> 0:53:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Ones that we are eating because those are the ones

0:53:27.120 --> 0:53:29.279
<v Speaker 1>that are really used in the US.

0:53:29.520 --> 0:53:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay, the other two are not used.

0:53:32.560 --> 0:53:33.400
<v Speaker 3>There's a couple more.

0:53:33.560 --> 0:53:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Let me tell you about them, because these are also

0:53:35.719 --> 0:53:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the subject of some like the April twenty second press

0:53:41.160 --> 0:53:43.800
<v Speaker 1>release that the FDA came out with has some information

0:53:43.800 --> 0:53:47.160
<v Speaker 1>about some of these, so let's get into it. There's

0:53:47.239 --> 0:53:51.040
<v Speaker 1>two more that are likely going to be banned very soon,

0:53:51.800 --> 0:53:55.759
<v Speaker 1>but they are still allowed right now. One of them

0:53:55.880 --> 0:54:00.880
<v Speaker 1>is called citrus Red number two. This is allowed in

0:54:00.920 --> 0:54:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the US, it's banned in the EU. It is only

0:54:05.719 --> 0:54:09.040
<v Speaker 1>permitted to be used at really low concentrations. I think

0:54:09.080 --> 0:54:11.400
<v Speaker 1>it's like less than two parts per million on the

0:54:11.760 --> 0:54:16.960
<v Speaker 1>outside of oranges. This is so specific erin that are

0:54:17.040 --> 0:54:19.879
<v Speaker 1>not meant for juicing or processing.

0:54:20.000 --> 0:54:24.399
<v Speaker 2>Okay. Yeah. Also, I did not know that oranges could

0:54:24.440 --> 0:54:24.920
<v Speaker 2>be dyed.

0:54:25.120 --> 0:54:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Me neither.

0:54:25.880 --> 0:54:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay. It's so disappointed at everything, Like I'm just like

0:54:29.840 --> 0:54:30.959
<v Speaker 2>do why, Like.

0:54:31.320 --> 0:54:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And it's not super common apparently what I saw,

0:54:34.520 --> 0:54:36.960
<v Speaker 1>it's mostly only in Florida oranges. I don't know if

0:54:37.000 --> 0:54:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that is just like that's where they use it more,

0:54:39.280 --> 0:54:43.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's not used very commonly. It's only permitted because,

0:54:43.480 --> 0:54:45.960
<v Speaker 1>again the FDA sets very strict regulations on the amount

0:54:46.000 --> 0:54:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that you can use and what foods you can use

0:54:47.880 --> 0:54:50.320
<v Speaker 1>it in and in what context. So it is only

0:54:50.360 --> 0:54:53.320
<v Speaker 1>permitted on the outside of oranges that are meant for consumption,

0:54:53.680 --> 0:54:55.359
<v Speaker 1>where you're not eating.

0:54:55.200 --> 0:54:56.440
<v Speaker 3>The outside of that orange.

0:54:56.640 --> 0:54:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Right, right.

0:54:57.800 --> 0:55:02.600
<v Speaker 1>And this is a controversial die because there is some

0:55:02.680 --> 0:55:05.440
<v Speaker 1>data at higher concentrations than two parts per million, but

0:55:05.480 --> 0:55:09.000
<v Speaker 1>there is some data of cancer. I think it's bladder cancers,

0:55:09.040 --> 0:55:12.600
<v Speaker 1>mostly in mice and rats. And so that is one

0:55:12.640 --> 0:55:15.719
<v Speaker 1>that the FDA has recently announced that they are planning

0:55:15.840 --> 0:55:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to They have not yet, but they are planning to

0:55:18.960 --> 0:55:23.160
<v Speaker 1>revoke the authorization for Citrus red number two in the

0:55:23.200 --> 0:55:27.280
<v Speaker 1>coming months. Presumably there's another one that is still technically

0:55:27.280 --> 0:55:29.399
<v Speaker 1>approved for use that.

0:55:29.400 --> 0:55:30.040
<v Speaker 3>I just find.

0:55:30.800 --> 0:55:33.200
<v Speaker 1>This is where you just get like, this is just silly.

0:55:33.360 --> 0:55:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's called orange B and it is technically still

0:55:39.080 --> 0:55:43.640
<v Speaker 1>on the approved list only for use in hot dog casings.

0:55:45.040 --> 0:55:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god.

0:55:46.440 --> 0:55:50.360
<v Speaker 3>But it gets better. It has not been used since

0:55:50.480 --> 0:55:51.600
<v Speaker 3>nineteen seventy eight.

0:55:53.000 --> 0:55:55.759
<v Speaker 2>What's being used in hot dog casings today? I don't know.

0:55:55.920 --> 0:56:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Erin probably read forty okay, and like yellow number five, go,

0:56:00.360 --> 0:56:00.800
<v Speaker 1>what are.

0:56:00.640 --> 0:56:02.040
<v Speaker 2>You using your hot dogs?

0:56:02.400 --> 0:56:05.080
<v Speaker 3>Costco's all naturally, Aaron, they're using paprika.

0:56:06.360 --> 0:56:07.520
<v Speaker 2>But know that for a fact?

0:56:07.640 --> 0:56:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, I don't, but I would guess. But but

0:56:12.239 --> 0:56:15.600
<v Speaker 1>so this is one that in the nineteen sixties, when

0:56:15.920 --> 0:56:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the FDA was reviewing all these things, they actually recommended

0:56:19.040 --> 0:56:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it was in like nineteen sixty six or

0:56:20.920 --> 0:56:23.880
<v Speaker 1>seventy something. They were like, yeah, we should probably revoke

0:56:23.960 --> 0:56:26.520
<v Speaker 1>orange be because like there's some data that it's probably

0:56:26.719 --> 0:56:30.160
<v Speaker 1>carcinogenic and it's on a list of probable carcinogens. But

0:56:30.520 --> 0:56:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the one and only company that was using orange b

0:56:34.880 --> 0:56:37.879
<v Speaker 1>for their hot dog casings stopped manufacturing them. So then

0:56:37.880 --> 0:56:41.719
<v Speaker 1>the FDA was like, mah, just never followed through on

0:56:41.840 --> 0:56:43.080
<v Speaker 1>my probably.

0:56:42.880 --> 0:56:45.799
<v Speaker 2>How to file the paperwork. That sounds exhausting, like this

0:56:45.840 --> 0:56:48.279
<v Speaker 2>is pointless. I've got other things to do on this

0:56:48.360 --> 0:56:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Friday afternoon.

0:56:49.200 --> 0:56:51.399
<v Speaker 1>So that's the only reason that it is still on

0:56:51.440 --> 0:56:54.919
<v Speaker 1>the technically approved list, which is just so silly.

0:56:55.960 --> 0:56:58.640
<v Speaker 2>That I've I've rolled my eyes like now eight times

0:56:58.640 --> 0:57:00.400
<v Speaker 2>and they're starting to become strange from me.

0:57:00.600 --> 0:57:00.680
<v Speaker 4>No.

0:57:01.080 --> 0:57:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, there's probably gonna be a little more of that. Yeah, yeah,

0:57:03.560 --> 0:57:07.120
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, So that one is also now actually going

0:57:07.160 --> 0:57:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to be banned supposedly in the next few months, but

0:57:10.520 --> 0:57:12.759
<v Speaker 1>again it has not been used. No one has been

0:57:12.800 --> 0:57:16.640
<v Speaker 1>eating orange Bee since nineteen seventy eight, unless you're eating

0:57:16.680 --> 0:57:17.520
<v Speaker 1>really old hot dogs.

0:57:17.560 --> 0:57:18.840
<v Speaker 3>I guess someone somewhere.

0:57:19.840 --> 0:57:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Now there's a ninth one that is now banned, but

0:57:23.840 --> 0:57:27.200
<v Speaker 1>it might still be in existence because the manufacturers have

0:57:27.240 --> 0:57:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years to actually remove it from their products,

0:57:30.360 --> 0:57:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and that is RED number three. Red number three was

0:57:33.560 --> 0:57:37.000
<v Speaker 1>banned officially in January of this year, twenty twenty five,

0:57:37.160 --> 0:57:39.480
<v Speaker 1>so it's in the process of being phased out.

0:57:39.680 --> 0:57:41.000
<v Speaker 3>The reason that it was.

0:57:41.040 --> 0:57:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Banned is because of data on the increased risk of

0:57:46.400 --> 0:57:50.959
<v Speaker 1>thyroid tumors in and I think it's specifically in male rats.

0:57:52.040 --> 0:57:56.720
<v Speaker 1>There is no evidence that directly links RED three to

0:57:56.880 --> 0:58:01.600
<v Speaker 1>causing cancer in humans, but because of this what's called

0:58:01.600 --> 0:58:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the Delaney Provision, which was what went into effect in

0:58:04.320 --> 0:58:09.560
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty by the FDA, any evidence of the cancer

0:58:09.680 --> 0:58:13.760
<v Speaker 1>causing properties of any food dye means.

0:58:13.480 --> 0:58:14.760
<v Speaker 3>It should be pulled.

0:58:15.200 --> 0:58:17.959
<v Speaker 2>Right even in that is like you know, one in

0:58:18.360 --> 0:58:21.720
<v Speaker 2>one billion lifetime risk of cancer or something like that.

0:58:21.840 --> 0:58:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, even if it's only in animal studies like

0:58:24.720 --> 0:58:25.200
<v Speaker 1>et cetera.

0:58:26.040 --> 0:58:28.240
<v Speaker 3>So Red number three is now.

0:58:28.040 --> 0:58:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Banned and companies have to phase it out as of

0:58:31.440 --> 0:58:34.400
<v Speaker 1>now by twenty twenty seven for food and twenty twenty

0:58:34.440 --> 0:58:39.680
<v Speaker 1>eight for drugs, although the FDA has requested that manufacturers

0:58:39.720 --> 0:58:42.600
<v Speaker 1>do this on a speedier timeline, So we'll see if

0:58:42.600 --> 0:58:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that happens.

0:58:44.640 --> 0:58:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay. Now, of the other.

0:58:48.040 --> 0:58:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Six blue one and two, green three, yellow five, yellow

0:58:50.720 --> 0:58:55.000
<v Speaker 1>six and red forty, ninety percent of our synthetic dye

0:58:55.080 --> 0:58:58.880
<v Speaker 1>consumption comes from just three colors yellow.

0:58:58.680 --> 0:59:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Number five, yellow number six and red forty.

0:59:03.680 --> 0:59:04.200
<v Speaker 2>I like that.

0:59:04.480 --> 0:59:07.800
<v Speaker 3>I do like that, and I added pink because I

0:59:07.920 --> 0:59:08.160
<v Speaker 3>like it.

0:59:08.480 --> 0:59:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So those are the three dyes that are ninety

0:59:12.320 --> 0:59:14.560
<v Speaker 1>percent of our synthetic dye consumption. We don't really need

0:59:14.600 --> 0:59:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to use green that much because we can make it

0:59:16.600 --> 0:59:19.120
<v Speaker 1>from yellow and blue, and then we use blue one

0:59:19.160 --> 0:59:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and two sometimes. So just looking at what is approved,

0:59:24.160 --> 0:59:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to address another misconception that always comes up

0:59:27.280 --> 0:59:29.800
<v Speaker 1>in talking about these when we look at the regulations

0:59:29.800 --> 0:59:33.320
<v Speaker 1>in the US versus Europe, these dyes are not banned

0:59:33.440 --> 0:59:38.120
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. People online love to say that all these

0:59:38.200 --> 0:59:41.120
<v Speaker 1>dyes are not allowed in Europe, and that is one

0:59:41.200 --> 0:59:45.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent untrue. Is it just a labeling discrepancy, yes, Aaron,

0:59:46.040 --> 0:59:48.840
<v Speaker 1>like I said, the European Food Safety Administration, which is

0:59:48.840 --> 0:59:52.320
<v Speaker 1>their version of the FDA, has different labeling requirements. The

0:59:52.560 --> 0:59:56.840
<v Speaker 1>only synthetic dye of those six that are used, so

0:59:57.200 --> 0:59:59.800
<v Speaker 1>citrus number two and orange bee are not allowed in

0:59:59.840 --> 1:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the EU red number three still is, so it's banned

1:00:04.200 --> 1:00:06.480
<v Speaker 1>now in the US. It's still allowed in the EU,

1:00:06.600 --> 1:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>though only in Marischino cherries.

1:00:09.040 --> 1:00:09.800
<v Speaker 3>I believe.

1:00:11.280 --> 1:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>The only synthetic dye though that's approved in the US,

1:00:14.200 --> 1:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that's banned in the EU is green number three, So

1:00:17.800 --> 1:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that is banned in the EU, but it's allowed.

1:00:20.120 --> 1:00:20.920
<v Speaker 3>Here in the US.

1:00:21.920 --> 1:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>There are three other synthetic dyes Cochineal red, Ponceau four

1:00:28.640 --> 1:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and quinn Alone yellow that are approved for use in

1:00:31.640 --> 1:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the EU but are banned in the US. Okay, And

1:00:36.160 --> 1:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that the reason that people say this is

1:00:37.920 --> 1:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>just because they don't understand how labeling laws work, like

1:00:40.760 --> 1:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the U system is logical and ours is not. And

1:00:43.920 --> 1:00:47.200
<v Speaker 1>so yellow number five is called E one O two,

1:00:47.480 --> 1:00:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Red number forty is called E one twenty nine, Yellow

1:00:49.960 --> 1:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>number six is E one ten. They're all allowed now

1:00:54.240 --> 1:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about the hyperactivity stuff, which we'll I'll

1:00:58.720 --> 1:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>get into, I swear eventually. There are some other differences

1:01:02.320 --> 1:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>in labeling laws in the EU and the UK that

1:01:04.800 --> 1:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I think has probably led to differences in the way

1:01:08.560 --> 1:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that artificial and specifically synthetic dies are perceived in the

1:01:13.240 --> 1:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>EU and the UK, which has led to companies choosing

1:01:17.880 --> 1:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>to manufacture with more of the natural dyes than the

1:01:20.680 --> 1:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>synthetic dies.

1:01:21.760 --> 1:01:25.560
<v Speaker 2>I have a question about just dies die use in general.

1:01:25.640 --> 1:01:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Give it to me, like what proportion of Okay, the

1:01:30.520 --> 1:01:33.600
<v Speaker 2>bottom line is, I'm trying to ask what the difference

1:01:33.640 --> 1:01:37.480
<v Speaker 2>in die consumption, artificial die consumption is in the US

1:01:37.600 --> 1:01:42.280
<v Speaker 2>versus the EU overall, like our great questions, greater concentrations used?

1:01:42.320 --> 1:01:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Do more foods have dyes in one place versus another?

1:01:45.480 --> 1:01:46.000
<v Speaker 2>You know what I mean?

1:01:46.080 --> 1:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Like, yeah, that's a really good question. I don't have

1:01:48.000 --> 1:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't have like hard data on that, okay at all.

1:01:51.800 --> 1:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>The EFSA, the European Food Safety Administration, sets their acceptable

1:01:57.880 --> 1:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>daily limits similar way that the FDA does. They might

1:02:01.760 --> 1:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>have different they might come to different conclusions based on

1:02:04.560 --> 1:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the safety data. And the EFSA recently went through and

1:02:08.880 --> 1:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>reevaluated all of their adis in the last like ten

1:02:12.680 --> 1:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years since like twenty ten ish I think, And

1:02:16.440 --> 1:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>so that was like a big process that they undertook.

1:02:21.440 --> 1:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I don't know if we have good data

1:02:24.520 --> 1:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>honestly on the differences in consumption. I think anecdotally, there

1:02:29.720 --> 1:02:32.640
<v Speaker 1>seems to be more of a shift towards natural guyes

1:02:32.960 --> 1:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>in the EU and the UK compared to in the US,

1:02:36.720 --> 1:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think it might come down to some of

1:02:38.040 --> 1:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>these labeling differences. So let's get more into the health

1:02:40.800 --> 1:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>data so that we can look at those labeling differences

1:02:43.600 --> 1:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and why those might exist. There's two big categories of

1:02:47.680 --> 1:02:51.360
<v Speaker 1>potential for harm that the literature mostly focuses on, and

1:02:51.400 --> 1:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that is the risks of cancer and hyperactivity in kits.

1:02:57.520 --> 1:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>And so there's also, though I'll say, and this is

1:03:00.680 --> 1:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I think really important and often underappreciated, there's also the

1:03:05.360 --> 1:03:10.240
<v Speaker 1>potential for hypersensitivity reactions aka allergic reactions. And there's evidence

1:03:10.280 --> 1:03:13.439
<v Speaker 1>that some of these synthetic dyes yellow five, possibly also

1:03:13.520 --> 1:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>red forty can cause allergic reactions in some people. Natural

1:03:18.440 --> 1:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>dyes can also cause allergic reactions. A lot of these

1:03:22.240 --> 1:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>natural dyes actually can cause allergic reactions as well.

1:03:24.960 --> 1:03:27.680
<v Speaker 3>And they're not as clearly labeled, which is also trickier.

1:03:27.760 --> 1:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, right in the US, they're not actually labeled, and

1:03:31.200 --> 1:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>so that is tricky because if you have these natural dyes,

1:03:33.840 --> 1:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>like a natto extract is one that definitely can cause

1:03:36.040 --> 1:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>hypersensitivity reactions, but that doesn't necessarily have to be on

1:03:38.880 --> 1:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a label. That's a problem, but let's focus on the

1:03:42.240 --> 1:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>cancer part and the hyperactivity part. And the cancer part

1:03:44.840 --> 1:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>is kind of short because I already mentioned the big

1:03:47.280 --> 1:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>ones that we know have some associated information or data

1:03:51.880 --> 1:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that suggests an increased risk of cancer, and those are

1:03:54.160 --> 1:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the dyes that have since been either banned or are

1:03:57.920 --> 1:04:01.919
<v Speaker 1>on the chopping block. So Orange b Citrus, Red number two,

1:04:02.720 --> 1:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and Red number three. Again, none of these have data

1:04:07.400 --> 1:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>for cancer in humans, although I think that Citrus red

1:04:11.200 --> 1:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>number two is on like the IARC list of potentially

1:04:16.240 --> 1:04:20.640
<v Speaker 1>carcinogenic in humans. But all of these are now either

1:04:20.760 --> 1:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>banned or in theory will be banned soon in theory

1:04:25.200 --> 1:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>by the FDA. Okay, for the other dies that exist

1:04:29.160 --> 1:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that are still approved, the other synthetic dyes, there's not

1:04:33.360 --> 1:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>any real data of cancer in these. So there's very

1:04:39.760 --> 1:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>limited and pretty controversial evidence of reticulo endothelial cancers in

1:04:45.800 --> 1:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>mice but not rats for Red number forty. And it

1:04:48.720 --> 1:04:50.720
<v Speaker 1>seems like this data is like based on a lot

1:04:50.800 --> 1:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of these studies are honestly just not great. Yeah, so

1:04:54.960 --> 1:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a problem in and of itself, right. There was

1:04:58.560 --> 1:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a study in Blue number two that was like maybe

1:05:02.240 --> 1:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>an increased risk of bladder or brain tumors in rats.

1:05:05.520 --> 1:05:07.720
<v Speaker 1>But again it was like not a great study, so

1:05:07.760 --> 1:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>people were like, maybe it's not accurate with green number three,

1:05:11.800 --> 1:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>there's no evidence of carcinogenicity, Yellow number five, Yellow number six,

1:05:15.440 --> 1:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>no evidence of carcinogenicity. There's a colorant called Amorants, which

1:05:20.160 --> 1:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>is red number two in the US or E one

1:05:22.560 --> 1:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty three in the EU, that is now banned in

1:05:25.040 --> 1:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the US that did have some increased risk of tumors

1:05:27.840 --> 1:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>in female rats, so that's why it's banned here. It's

1:05:30.720 --> 1:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>still permitted for use in glass a cherries in the

1:05:33.760 --> 1:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>EU and the UK okay, okay, lots of cherries. So overall, like,

1:05:39.520 --> 1:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>there are studies that have looked at the risks of cancer,

1:05:43.880 --> 1:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>mostly in mice and rats, in each of these synthetic dyes,

1:05:48.520 --> 1:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and the evidence is not does not show an increased

1:05:53.280 --> 1:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>risk of cancer for these Thus far might that change

1:05:56.640 --> 1:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>in the future perhaps, But the big one, and of

1:06:00.280 --> 1:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>course that gets I think the most press is not cancer.

1:06:03.680 --> 1:06:04.680
<v Speaker 1>It's hyperactivity.

1:06:04.960 --> 1:06:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so erin.

1:06:10.640 --> 1:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>We will need to do ADHD someday, Yeah, we will,

1:06:15.080 --> 1:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>It's on our list. But the idea that food colorants

1:06:21.240 --> 1:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>might be related to ADHD or hyperactivity stems like you

1:06:25.160 --> 1:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Aaron from studies that date back to the nineteen

1:06:28.280 --> 1:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>seventies that were conducted by a guy named Fine Gold.

1:06:32.360 --> 1:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>What he did was he put kids who had hyperactivity

1:06:36.800 --> 1:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if it was technically diagnosed as

1:06:39.280 --> 1:06:40.840
<v Speaker 1>ADHD at the time.

1:06:41.000 --> 1:06:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Not sure what the criteria were, yeah, because.

1:06:42.920 --> 1:06:44.959
<v Speaker 1>That they have changed over time, but in any case,

1:06:45.040 --> 1:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>kids who had hyperactivity, put them on pretty restrictive diets,

1:06:50.760 --> 1:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>quite restrictive, very restrictive kind of elimination diets where they

1:06:54.200 --> 1:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>had no artificial colors, no artificial flavors, no preservatives, right,

1:07:00.240 --> 1:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a very limited diet. And he saw that on this

1:07:04.000 --> 1:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>restrictive diet, kids had a reduction in their hyperactivity symptoms.

1:07:10.240 --> 1:07:12.960
<v Speaker 2>And this was was this self assessed? Was this subject?

1:07:13.120 --> 1:07:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Was this parental?

1:07:16.120 --> 1:07:18.440
<v Speaker 3>This is a really great question. Yeah, great question.

1:07:18.520 --> 1:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I did not read his study, and so I don't

1:07:21.360 --> 1:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what his exact metrics were, but that study

1:07:26.360 --> 1:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and that book that he published sparked decades of research

1:07:29.840 --> 1:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>into diet and ADHD. Food colorance was one part of

1:07:35.800 --> 1:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>those restrictive diets, and so since then people have also said, okay, well,

1:07:41.640 --> 1:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>if we want to parse out food colorance specifically, then

1:07:45.560 --> 1:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>we actually have to look at kind of controlled trials

1:07:48.880 --> 1:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>where we expose people to food colorance, we expose kids

1:07:52.240 --> 1:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to food colorance and.

1:07:53.480 --> 1:07:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Look for behaviors Jesus Yeah, Okay.

1:07:56.360 --> 1:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to just kind of summarize these last

1:07:59.080 --> 1:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>few decades of days great, leaning heavily on some recent

1:08:03.080 --> 1:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>meta analyzes that have been conducted to look at all

1:08:06.120 --> 1:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>of this. The basic summary is this, there is some

1:08:10.600 --> 1:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>evidence that some kids might have an increase in symptoms

1:08:15.800 --> 1:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>related to ADHD, like inattentiveness, fidgeting, impulsivity, over activity, and

1:08:23.960 --> 1:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>other symptoms that we see with ADHD with exposure to

1:08:28.240 --> 1:08:31.759
<v Speaker 1>synthetic food colorings. So I want to be very clear

1:08:31.920 --> 1:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>about what this data shows and what it does not

1:08:34.840 --> 1:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>show because it's important.

1:08:37.200 --> 1:08:38.040
<v Speaker 3>There are no.

1:08:38.160 --> 1:08:43.639
<v Speaker 1>Studies that are providing any evidence of a causal relationship.

1:08:43.920 --> 1:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>So there is nothing that shows that food dies or

1:08:46.920 --> 1:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>other additives for that matter, are what are causing ADHD.

1:08:52.200 --> 1:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>ADHD is a condition that has really strong genetic components

1:08:55.280 --> 1:08:57.679
<v Speaker 1>that we don't fully understand, and there are likely these

1:08:57.760 --> 1:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>like gene by environment interactions and environmental triggers. There's a

1:09:01.400 --> 1:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>really wide spectrum of symptoms. There's not evidence that food

1:09:05.080 --> 1:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>dies are causing ADHD, But there is evidence that for

1:09:09.200 --> 1:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>some kids, some of who might have a diagnosis of

1:09:12.720 --> 1:09:17.679
<v Speaker 1>ADHD and some of who might not, exposure to some

1:09:17.800 --> 1:09:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of these synthetic colorants might worsen some of those hyperactivity symptoms. Okay,

1:09:23.560 --> 1:09:26.559
<v Speaker 1>and this seems to be the most pronounced in younger kids. Now,

1:09:26.600 --> 1:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you asked, Aaron, how are we measuring this? Is it

1:09:29.439 --> 1:09:31.719
<v Speaker 1>based on parental is it based on blah blah blah.

1:09:32.200 --> 1:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>There's a really wide range of that. And because these studies,

1:09:35.960 --> 1:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and there's a number of them, and they've been done

1:09:38.240 --> 1:09:42.439
<v Speaker 1>over the last few decades, but they're not a ton

1:09:42.479 --> 1:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of standardization in the way that all of these studies

1:09:44.960 --> 1:09:47.719
<v Speaker 1>are done. So in some of these studies, you actually

1:09:47.760 --> 1:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>can't disentangle the effects of food colorant from a preservative

1:09:52.040 --> 1:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>called sodium benzoate that they've used in a lot of

1:09:55.160 --> 1:09:58.799
<v Speaker 1>these studies. So some of those like you see in effect.

1:09:58.800 --> 1:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>But is it the sodium bende or is it the colorant?

1:10:01.320 --> 1:10:04.479
<v Speaker 1>We don't know for sure. Some of these studies only

1:10:04.520 --> 1:10:08.479
<v Speaker 1>show significant effects of increased hyperactivity when we look at

1:10:08.479 --> 1:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>parental reports, but not when we look at teacher observations

1:10:12.760 --> 1:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>or clinic observations.

1:10:14.120 --> 1:10:16.840
<v Speaker 2>And these are like double blind studies.

1:10:16.479 --> 1:10:19.599
<v Speaker 3>Or most of them are. They're blinded, and they're.

1:10:19.360 --> 1:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Crossover studies, Okay, the good ones. And so that means

1:10:22.280 --> 1:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that you're exposing a kid to you have them go

1:10:25.080 --> 1:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>on a restrictive diet, ideally so that they're not being

1:10:28.160 --> 1:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>exposed to food color in their regular diets. And then

1:10:30.920 --> 1:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you're giving them usually a juice that has either preservative

1:10:35.160 --> 1:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>or food coloring or both, either one or a mixture.

1:10:40.120 --> 1:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's another issue is that a lot of these

1:10:42.200 --> 1:10:45.599
<v Speaker 1>studies look at mixtures of food colorance. Many of the mixtures,

1:10:45.600 --> 1:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>because many of these studies were done in the UK,

1:10:47.920 --> 1:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>many of the mixtures contain food colorants that are not

1:10:50.920 --> 1:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>approved for use in the US, So some of those

1:10:53.080 --> 1:10:54.599
<v Speaker 1>scithetic colorance that we don't use.

1:10:54.640 --> 1:10:57.759
<v Speaker 2>So we don't know, like I like, the specific food

1:10:57.800 --> 1:10:59.639
<v Speaker 2>dies that might be associated with.

1:10:59.520 --> 1:11:02.519
<v Speaker 1>This yellow Number five is the most implicated. It's the

1:11:02.560 --> 1:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>one that's had the most studies on a single food colorant,

1:11:05.160 --> 1:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of them look at a combination, so

1:11:06.960 --> 1:11:08.680
<v Speaker 1>we don't know for the other food colorants.

1:11:08.880 --> 1:11:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Gotcha.

1:11:09.920 --> 1:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>And then yeah, so then you expose the kid, you

1:11:11.920 --> 1:11:14.519
<v Speaker 1>have them drink this drink that either has food coloring

1:11:14.560 --> 1:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>or doesn't. You observe them. You do these clinic observations.

1:11:17.600 --> 1:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Parental reports are given and then you do a wash

1:11:20.840 --> 1:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>out period and then you give them something else that

1:11:22.840 --> 1:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have it, and vice versa. So you randomize them

1:11:25.280 --> 1:11:27.439
<v Speaker 1>to whether they receive that first or whether we receive

1:11:27.479 --> 1:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that second, and you observe them at both times. Okay,

1:11:30.920 --> 1:11:33.599
<v Speaker 1>some of these studies, they only really saw an effect

1:11:33.720 --> 1:11:36.200
<v Speaker 1>in kids who maybe had a history of atopy, so

1:11:36.280 --> 1:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>like allergies or asthma or something. And in nearly all

1:11:40.439 --> 1:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>of these studies, the effect sizes are pretty small, so

1:11:44.000 --> 1:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at and effects sizes are hard to like interpret,

1:11:47.680 --> 1:11:51.479
<v Speaker 1>but overall it's like a small increase in these symptoms

1:11:51.479 --> 1:11:55.519
<v Speaker 1>of hyperactivity. Okay, but that's you know, even a small

1:11:55.560 --> 1:11:58.560
<v Speaker 1>increase in hyperactivity in kids. If you're talking about like

1:11:58.600 --> 1:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a classroom full of kids, that could have a huge effect.

1:12:01.560 --> 1:12:05.920
<v Speaker 2>And so just so I understand this is if you

1:12:06.360 --> 1:12:09.240
<v Speaker 2>if a kid has been diagnosed with ADHD or not,

1:12:09.880 --> 1:12:13.880
<v Speaker 2>this is a deviation, This is an increase in the

1:12:13.920 --> 1:12:19.000
<v Speaker 2>symptoms of hyperactivities specifically, yes, and so by putting them

1:12:19.040 --> 1:12:24.160
<v Speaker 2>on an elimination diet, it's not going to cure ADHD,

1:12:24.160 --> 1:12:26.920
<v Speaker 2>it's not going to lead to an alleviation of symptoms.

1:12:27.120 --> 1:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, that is what the fine goal data shows, and

1:12:31.800 --> 1:12:34.519
<v Speaker 1>that is what a lot of these restrictive diets show that, Yes,

1:12:34.600 --> 1:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>if you take away food dies, you put a kind

1:12:37.439 --> 1:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>on a restrictive diet, you can improve their symptoms.

1:12:39.960 --> 1:12:40.560
<v Speaker 3>OKHD.

1:12:40.680 --> 1:12:44.080
<v Speaker 2>So it's not just like food dies lead to increased

1:12:44.080 --> 1:12:48.000
<v Speaker 2>symptoms or food dies are associated with increased symptoms, but

1:12:48.040 --> 1:12:50.920
<v Speaker 2>it's also that a complete elimination of food dies will

1:12:50.960 --> 1:12:52.120
<v Speaker 2>cause alleviation.

1:12:52.640 --> 1:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Correct, Yes, And so one of the meta analyzes specifically

1:12:56.520 --> 1:13:00.120
<v Speaker 1>looking at kids with ADHD suggested that it's about how

1:13:00.320 --> 1:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe eight percent of kids with ADHD have symptoms that

1:13:04.800 --> 1:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>are related to synthetic food colorance was what their estimate

1:13:08.080 --> 1:13:13.519
<v Speaker 1>was overall. So that is what the data shows. And

1:13:13.560 --> 1:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>because of this data, and because of how much we've

1:13:15.920 --> 1:13:18.720
<v Speaker 1>had over the last few years in the EU, and

1:13:18.880 --> 1:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I believe also in the UK, foods that include some

1:13:23.160 --> 1:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of these synthetic colorants, especially yellow number five and some

1:13:26.120 --> 1:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of the others too that we don't use in the

1:13:28.040 --> 1:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>US have to include a warning label on the food

1:13:32.479 --> 1:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>that says, quote may have an adverse effect on activity

1:13:37.320 --> 1:13:41.639
<v Speaker 1>and attention in children end quote, and that I don't

1:13:41.680 --> 1:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>know the exact year that that went into effect, but

1:13:44.520 --> 1:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I very much suspect that that has contributed to this

1:13:49.560 --> 1:13:53.639
<v Speaker 1>shift that we see in the EU towards natural food

1:13:53.680 --> 1:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>dies rather than synthetic food dice.

1:13:57.080 --> 1:13:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Have similar studies been performed on natural food dice?

1:14:00.400 --> 1:14:02.959
<v Speaker 3>Not that I found erin that's interesting.

1:14:03.200 --> 1:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>It is because the restrictive diets are no artificial colorants,

1:14:07.200 --> 1:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>which includes artificial colorance derived from natural sources.

1:14:11.920 --> 1:14:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, And what would the possible mechanism of action be?

1:14:16.600 --> 1:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I knew that you were gonna ask that, so I

1:14:18.080 --> 1:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>have a tiny little paragraph.

1:14:19.600 --> 1:14:21.320
<v Speaker 3>To tell you. We don't know.

1:14:21.479 --> 1:14:21.839
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

1:14:24.120 --> 1:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>The studies that have tried to look into this have

1:14:26.479 --> 1:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>not all come to the same conclusions.

1:14:28.600 --> 1:14:28.960
<v Speaker 3>Obviously.

1:14:29.000 --> 1:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>They're also all based on like mouse and rat studies,

1:14:31.080 --> 1:14:34.559
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty limiting. There's maybe some suggestion like is

1:14:34.560 --> 1:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>it because these are pro inflammatory in some way? Is

1:14:38.400 --> 1:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it actually the metabolites from these dyes? Is it some

1:14:41.840 --> 1:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>like gut brain.

1:14:43.040 --> 1:14:44.559
<v Speaker 3>Axis type of stuff.

1:14:44.880 --> 1:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>The bottom line is we don't know what the possible

1:14:47.400 --> 1:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>mechanism could be here, So it's all based on this,

1:14:50.240 --> 1:14:54.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, like these these studies looking just at kids,

1:14:54.520 --> 1:14:58.439
<v Speaker 1>and again also no data in adults that there's any

1:14:58.880 --> 1:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>issues with hyperactivity, not that adults don't have ADHD, but

1:15:03.200 --> 1:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>nobody's done those studies. Nobody's looking at adults.

1:15:06.800 --> 1:15:08.599
<v Speaker 2>What's what is the degree of impact?

1:15:08.800 --> 1:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's it is a small effect and it is

1:15:12.400 --> 1:15:15.599
<v Speaker 1>not all kids with ADHD, and I think that that's

1:15:15.600 --> 1:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the most important part. So none of these studies and

1:15:18.760 --> 1:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>like the kind of community at large in terms of

1:15:22.040 --> 1:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>how we treat ADHD does not suggest restrictive diets as

1:15:26.200 --> 1:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a cure. It's not a cure for ADHD. Okay, yeah,

1:15:29.360 --> 1:15:33.439
<v Speaker 1>point blank, But there is some data that for some

1:15:33.760 --> 1:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>kids a reduction in their exposure to these synthetic colorants

1:15:40.400 --> 1:15:43.559
<v Speaker 1>and maybe other food additives. And again there's like there's

1:15:43.600 --> 1:15:45.639
<v Speaker 1>more data that needs to be out there, right, because

1:15:45.680 --> 1:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>it's especially when we're looking at like kids with ADHD

1:15:48.800 --> 1:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>being put on these restrictive diets, it's way more than

1:15:51.479 --> 1:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>just the food colorance. So there is a lot more

1:15:55.080 --> 1:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>like data that needs to be parsed out in that,

1:15:58.439 --> 1:15:59.759
<v Speaker 1>and there are a lot of people that are working

1:15:59.760 --> 1:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>on that. So I'm not here saying that you know,

1:16:02.200 --> 1:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>eliminating food dies is a cure for ADHD. That is

1:16:04.680 --> 1:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>not the case and that is not what the data shows, right,

1:16:08.120 --> 1:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>But there is an increase in hyperactivity symptoms for some

1:16:12.240 --> 1:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>kids with exposure to some of these synthetic dies.

1:16:16.840 --> 1:16:17.600
<v Speaker 2>How interesting.

1:16:17.960 --> 1:16:20.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's interesting, and it's like really hard to know,

1:16:20.640 --> 1:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Like what do we make of it?

1:16:22.240 --> 1:16:22.439
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:16:23.000 --> 1:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>What do we do about that? What percentage of the

1:16:25.840 --> 1:16:28.559
<v Speaker 1>population has to be effective? For the FDA to say

1:16:28.560 --> 1:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that we think that this constitutes a harm and therefore

1:16:31.439 --> 1:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>these should be banned. The EU and the UK have

1:16:35.280 --> 1:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>not banned them. They've decided that what they're going to

1:16:38.120 --> 1:16:40.559
<v Speaker 1>do is put a warning label so that consumers can decide.

1:16:40.600 --> 1:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't want my kid to have this

1:16:42.160 --> 1:16:44.439
<v Speaker 1>because I am worried that they might have an increase

1:16:44.479 --> 1:16:48.799
<v Speaker 1>in difficulties with activity and attention. So it's the question

1:16:48.880 --> 1:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>is how do you decide this? And that's not for

1:16:50.960 --> 1:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>us to answer, it's for the fdata answer. What the

1:16:53.439 --> 1:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>FDA has decided that they're going to do, according to

1:16:56.400 --> 1:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>their press release from April of twenty twenty five, is

1:17:00.280 --> 1:17:04.519
<v Speaker 1>ask nicely that manufacturers please stop using these synthetic dyes

1:17:04.560 --> 1:17:07.799
<v Speaker 1>and instead switch to natural dyes. That's what they said,

1:17:08.040 --> 1:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of the press about this was like

1:17:10.760 --> 1:17:12.479
<v Speaker 1>FDA banning synthetic dies.

1:17:12.520 --> 1:17:15.360
<v Speaker 3>It has not, so it was just like a hey,

1:17:16.280 --> 1:17:17.040
<v Speaker 3>would you mind.

1:17:17.320 --> 1:17:19.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if it's not a problem, you're doing well.

1:17:19.840 --> 1:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>They're asking manufacturers to stop question yeah, these other synthetic

1:17:24.240 --> 1:17:28.519
<v Speaker 1>dyes red number forty, yellow five, yellow six, blue one

1:17:28.560 --> 1:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and two green three, and they're saying will you please,

1:17:31.160 --> 1:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>And the manufacturers apparently are like, yeah, sure, but they've

1:17:34.320 --> 1:17:37.640
<v Speaker 1>apparently said yeah sure before. By the way, this is hilarious.

1:17:37.960 --> 1:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>In twenty I think it was twenty sixteen, General Mills,

1:17:40.280 --> 1:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>who makes Tricks, was like, we're going to switch to

1:17:43.160 --> 1:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>natural food dies because that's what our consumers want. So

1:17:45.240 --> 1:17:47.559
<v Speaker 1>they switch Tricks to be natural food dies and everyone

1:17:47.800 --> 1:17:49.519
<v Speaker 1>hated it and they were pissed.

1:17:49.640 --> 1:17:51.320
<v Speaker 3>So in twenty seventeen they switched back.

1:17:51.560 --> 1:17:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean like this, this is what I was saying,

1:17:54.439 --> 1:17:56.439
<v Speaker 2>is that like it's going to take some getting used to,

1:17:56.520 --> 1:17:59.080
<v Speaker 2>and I feel like it needs to happen across the

1:17:59.120 --> 1:18:01.519
<v Speaker 2>board if it's going to and otherwise companies will not

1:18:01.560 --> 1:18:02.160
<v Speaker 2>be on board.

1:18:03.120 --> 1:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, and here's the other thing that I think is

1:18:05.479 --> 1:18:07.920
<v Speaker 1>really important that we need to remember as we're talking

1:18:07.920 --> 1:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>about all of this and the thing that made me

1:18:09.880 --> 1:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the most, like I guess frustrated with this episode. We've

1:18:16.280 --> 1:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>said already food dyes serve no purpose other than to

1:18:20.800 --> 1:18:22.479
<v Speaker 1>make our food look better and make us want to

1:18:22.479 --> 1:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>eat more. Manufacturers have a really strong reason to want

1:18:27.240 --> 1:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to keep as many as cheap and as potent, right like,

1:18:32.280 --> 1:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>so you use as little as possible food dyes available

1:18:36.400 --> 1:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>so that they can keep consumers happy and have us

1:18:38.800 --> 1:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>buy their product instead of someone else's. The FDA absolutely

1:18:43.880 --> 1:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>should have very strict requirements and regulations on what can

1:18:47.800 --> 1:18:51.479
<v Speaker 1>be approved as a food dye, whether it is derived

1:18:51.600 --> 1:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>from a beat or a beetle's.

1:18:53.439 --> 1:18:55.799
<v Speaker 3>Butt, or petroleum totally.

1:18:56.160 --> 1:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>And that means that the FDA needs to be empowered

1:19:00.240 --> 1:19:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to do this. They have to have the budget, the

1:19:02.720 --> 1:19:07.439
<v Speaker 1>human power, the expertise, the expertise to be testing these dyes,

1:19:07.479 --> 1:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to be reviewing these studies whether they are natural or synthetic,

1:19:13.360 --> 1:19:17.599
<v Speaker 1>And we as consumers should expect a really high degree

1:19:17.680 --> 1:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of safety testing and scientific grigor Because the risk benefit

1:19:21.400 --> 1:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>ratio has no benefit, our risk tolerance should be very low.

1:19:24.880 --> 1:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>This all makes sense, right, But we can first of

1:19:28.320 --> 1:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>all do that without distorting the data that exists right,

1:19:31.280 --> 1:19:34.200
<v Speaker 1>without lying about what's approved here in the US versus

1:19:34.200 --> 1:19:34.599
<v Speaker 1>the UK.

1:19:34.960 --> 1:19:37.200
<v Speaker 2>That's what I think bothers me about this, or like

1:19:37.320 --> 1:19:40.720
<v Speaker 2>I was trying to articulate, like I want this. I

1:19:40.720 --> 1:19:43.799
<v Speaker 2>want these decisions to be made for the right reasons, exact,

1:19:43.880 --> 1:19:45.480
<v Speaker 2>evidence based reasons.

1:19:45.640 --> 1:19:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Right.

1:19:45.920 --> 1:19:49.120
<v Speaker 1>We can do that without making blatant statements that dies

1:19:49.160 --> 1:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>are poisoning us, right, and with recognizing that natural food

1:19:54.080 --> 1:19:57.479
<v Speaker 1>dies are not free from risk. These also need to

1:19:57.520 --> 1:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>have their safety profiles adequately addressed and right now. The

1:20:01.160 --> 1:20:04.559
<v Speaker 1>FDA has announced in this press release in April that

1:20:04.600 --> 1:20:07.360
<v Speaker 1>they are going to expedite the approval process of at

1:20:07.439 --> 1:20:10.360
<v Speaker 1>least four new natural based food.

1:20:10.160 --> 1:20:11.559
<v Speaker 2>Dies because they're natural.

1:20:11.720 --> 1:20:12.759
<v Speaker 3>Because they're natural.

1:20:13.240 --> 1:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>So what it feels like we are doing with food

1:20:16.000 --> 1:20:18.120
<v Speaker 1>dyes is the same thing that we have done with

1:20:18.200 --> 1:20:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other issues that we've talked about this

1:20:20.400 --> 1:20:24.200
<v Speaker 1>season already. We are pinpointing a single aspect in this

1:20:24.280 --> 1:20:27.120
<v Speaker 1>case of our food system, and we are demonizing it.

1:20:27.600 --> 1:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>We are pinpointing something that seems bad because it's synthetic

1:20:31.680 --> 1:20:34.439
<v Speaker 1>or it's not natural, and we're putting all of our

1:20:34.439 --> 1:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>focus and blame on this one thing, synthetic food dies,

1:20:37.760 --> 1:20:41.759
<v Speaker 1>instead of looking at the bigger picture, and the bigger picture,

1:20:41.800 --> 1:20:44.280
<v Speaker 1>if we really take a step back, is that these

1:20:44.479 --> 1:20:48.400
<v Speaker 1>food dyes, synthetic or natural, are predominantly found in our

1:20:48.560 --> 1:20:52.679
<v Speaker 1>ultra processed foods, which account in the US for sixty

1:20:52.760 --> 1:20:57.120
<v Speaker 1>percent of our diet. And ultra processed foods are more

1:20:57.280 --> 1:21:01.640
<v Speaker 1>energy dense and way less nutrient vs Packing more calories

1:21:01.680 --> 1:21:05.479
<v Speaker 1>and less nutrition than unprocessed or minimally processed foods. And

1:21:05.600 --> 1:21:09.880
<v Speaker 1>yet these are less expensive per calorie, less expensive per

1:21:09.920 --> 1:21:13.439
<v Speaker 1>gram of food, and their cost has increased less over

1:21:13.520 --> 1:21:17.799
<v Speaker 1>time compared to the cost of unprocessed or minimally processed foods.

1:21:17.880 --> 1:21:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Hello eggs versus eggos right now, right right, So why

1:21:22.840 --> 1:21:26.160
<v Speaker 1>can't we focus more on this? Switching our food dies

1:21:26.200 --> 1:21:29.680
<v Speaker 1>from red forty to dehydrated beats or yellow five to

1:21:29.760 --> 1:21:32.360
<v Speaker 1>turmeric is not going to change anything about our health

1:21:32.400 --> 1:21:35.479
<v Speaker 1>if we're all still eating lucky charms and tricks for breakfast.

1:21:35.520 --> 1:21:37.640
<v Speaker 1>It just like feels like a distraction.

1:21:39.600 --> 1:21:42.800
<v Speaker 2>You know it is, And I feel like there is

1:21:42.880 --> 1:21:47.559
<v Speaker 2>so much it's such a complicated topic because there's so

1:21:47.760 --> 1:21:49.880
<v Speaker 2>much to it. There's so much to it.

1:21:50.080 --> 1:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And like you said, Aaron, I hadn't even really

1:21:52.080 --> 1:21:55.559
<v Speaker 1>like articulated what you said about this. As we start

1:21:55.560 --> 1:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>switching to quote unquote natural, that's a whole new marketing

1:21:58.320 --> 1:22:01.400
<v Speaker 1>gamut for companies. Right, Oh, this is healthier. Oh if

1:22:01.400 --> 1:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I look at a label and it says it's got

1:22:03.600 --> 1:22:06.160
<v Speaker 1>beats in it, now my kid.

1:22:06.000 --> 1:22:07.160
<v Speaker 3>Is eating beats. No they're not.

1:22:07.479 --> 1:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>It's just a colorant. It's not beats.

1:22:10.600 --> 1:22:13.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean it is. It is just a marketing. It is.

1:22:13.520 --> 1:22:15.639
<v Speaker 2>It's all. It's all marketing. I mean, that's the thing.

1:22:15.800 --> 1:22:19.160
<v Speaker 2>And and it's a it's a shape because like I

1:22:19.160 --> 1:22:21.680
<v Speaker 2>don't know, I love color is huge. I think it

1:22:21.760 --> 1:22:24.800
<v Speaker 2>is human to love color and to want to enrich

1:22:24.920 --> 1:22:26.439
<v Speaker 2>our world with color.

1:22:27.360 --> 1:22:29.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, look at your shirt, Ook at my shirt,

1:22:29.240 --> 1:22:31.000
<v Speaker 3>look at my nail shirt.

1:22:31.080 --> 1:22:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but I think that Yeah, there needs to be

1:22:35.040 --> 1:22:38.680
<v Speaker 2>real consideration with where we are using that color and

1:22:38.920 --> 1:22:41.200
<v Speaker 2>why we are using that color when it comes to

1:22:41.240 --> 1:22:42.799
<v Speaker 2>the foods that we consume.

1:22:45.160 --> 1:22:46.880
<v Speaker 1>So if you would like to read way more about

1:22:46.880 --> 1:22:48.920
<v Speaker 1>where we got all of this information from, let us

1:22:48.960 --> 1:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>tell you.

1:22:49.520 --> 1:22:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Let us tell you. Okay, I have I have a

1:22:51.560 --> 1:22:53.280
<v Speaker 2>bunch of sources, but I'm going to shut up too

1:22:53.400 --> 1:22:56.639
<v Speaker 2>right now. One is a book called a Rainbow Palette.

1:22:56.640 --> 1:22:59.720
<v Speaker 2>How Chemical Dyes change the West Relationship with Food by

1:22:59.720 --> 1:23:03.559
<v Speaker 2>Carol Uncoppled And another is a paper from two thousand

1:23:03.600 --> 1:23:07.560
<v Speaker 2>and nine by Burrows titled Palette of Our Palettes, A

1:23:07.600 --> 1:23:09.919
<v Speaker 2>Brief History of Food coloring and its regulation.

1:23:10.520 --> 1:23:14.639
<v Speaker 1>Love it I relied very heavily on the actual FDA

1:23:14.760 --> 1:23:18.599
<v Speaker 1>websites and the EFSA websites to tell me about how

1:23:18.640 --> 1:23:21.559
<v Speaker 1>these colors are regulated and what they do. But there

1:23:21.560 --> 1:23:25.120
<v Speaker 1>also was a paper from twenty seventeen by Letto at

1:23:25.160 --> 1:23:29.479
<v Speaker 1>All that was titled Comparison of Food Color Regulations in

1:23:29.520 --> 1:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the EU and the US A review of current provisions.

1:23:32.880 --> 1:23:37.400
<v Speaker 1>And then the meta analyzes. There was a lot of them,

1:23:37.560 --> 1:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and like bigger studies looking. There was one that was

1:23:41.160 --> 1:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>by Cobby Luski and Jacobsen from twenty twelve called the

1:23:45.760 --> 1:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Toxicology of Food Dyes.

1:23:47.920 --> 1:23:49.240
<v Speaker 3>There was a really great.

1:23:49.040 --> 1:23:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Meta analysis from nig at All twenty twelve titled meta

1:23:53.200 --> 1:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Analysis of Attention deficit Hyperactivity Disorder or Attention deficit hyperactivity

1:23:57.240 --> 1:24:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Disorder Symptoms, Restriction diet and Synthetic food color it is,

1:24:00.560 --> 1:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and there were several others that were more recent as well,

1:24:03.280 --> 1:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>both on restrictive diets as well as food colorantce and

1:24:07.120 --> 1:24:08.559
<v Speaker 1>I have some data to back up what I said

1:24:08.600 --> 1:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>about ultra processed foods at the end too. So you

1:24:11.040 --> 1:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>can find sources from this episode and all of our

1:24:14.240 --> 1:24:17.120
<v Speaker 1>episodes on our website, this podcast will Kill You dot

1:24:17.160 --> 1:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>com under the episodes tab.

1:24:18.920 --> 1:24:21.439
<v Speaker 2>Thank you to Bloodmobile for providing the music for this

1:24:21.520 --> 1:24:23.440
<v Speaker 2>episode and all of our episodes.

1:24:23.720 --> 1:24:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank you to Tom and Leanna and Brent and Pete

1:24:28.360 --> 1:24:31.679
<v Speaker 1>and Mike and Jess and everyone else, everyone at exactly

1:24:31.760 --> 1:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>right for everything that you do helping us make these episodes.

1:24:35.040 --> 1:24:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, thank you, and thank you to you listeners.

1:24:38.080 --> 1:24:40.719
<v Speaker 3>We hope that you enjoyed this episode.

1:24:40.880 --> 1:24:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Learn something tell us, tell us.

1:24:43.000 --> 1:24:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Please, how do you feel about food?

1:24:45.160 --> 1:24:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Gus?

1:24:45.360 --> 1:24:48.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm really curious what the like non not just the

1:24:48.320 --> 1:24:51.439
<v Speaker 3>internet consensus is. Yeah, so tell us.

1:24:51.800 --> 1:24:54.400
<v Speaker 2>And a special thank you to our patrons. Of course,

1:24:55.000 --> 1:24:58.160
<v Speaker 2>we appreciate your support so so very much.

1:24:58.560 --> 1:25:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we do, thank you so so much much. Well,

1:25:01.400 --> 1:25:04.640
<v Speaker 3>until next time, wash your hands, you filthy animals.

1:25:10.200 --> 1:25:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Um um

1:25:28.840 --> 1:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Um