WEBVTT - SpaceX Sends Civilians Into Space 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. You know, we had

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a rocket go into space last night, and I always

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>love that kind of stuff. I'm gonna sucker for that.

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I grew up with the Apollo program and all that

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. My mom, who is she's older than you, though, Paul,

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>but she gets terry when she watches it. There's this

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>big nostall jobund it and I think, I know, I

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:39.560
<v Speaker 1>think there's value, but anyway, it's it's it's very cool.

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>But this is completely commercial flight, so very cool. Ed Ludlow,

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>he's our West Coast correspondent. He covers rockets and all

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff. I don't know what he does

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>for a living, but apparently he's in Cape Canaveral, Florida. Ed.

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>What can you tell us about this flight? I'm talking

0:00:55.640 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>this is really a commercial flight. There's no astronauts or anything. Yeah,

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>this is an all civilian crew. Um. The mission commander

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>is a chap called Jarediazingman, who's the CEO of a

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>thin tech company shift for payments, and he's a billionaire,

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>so you know, we're kind of continuing this theme. He's

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:15.759
<v Speaker 1>funding the mission. But the other three crew members are

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>genuine civilians, you know, they're not professional astronauts, and they're

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>currently orbiting Earth at altitude of three hundred and sixty miles.

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's further than the International Space Station, is

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>further than the Hubble telescope even and it's actually the

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:35.320
<v Speaker 1>furthest that SpaceX has ever sent. It's Dragon spacecraft. So

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of a real landmark mission for not

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 1>just commercial space flight, but human spaceflight. You know, you

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>don't have to be a decorated astronaut with a with

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>an Air Force back history to make it. You can

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>go to space now being an everyday joe. So let's

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about the everyday joe. And when will this officially

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>really start to ramp up and is it monthly, quarterly, weekly?

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>What can we expect that's the top question. You know,

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX are really supplied and strained Benji Reid, who's one

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>of the directors of the company, spoke to me about

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>this the day before the launch, but that you know,

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>they have around four to six flights potentially in um.

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>But the demand is there, they say, you know, there

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:26.799
<v Speaker 1>is a list of willing, paying customers. I think there's

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>still massive question marks about the economics of this. You know,

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 1>on this occasion, you have one billionaire. Okay, guys, he's

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.839
<v Speaker 1>a modest billionaire, just a couple of billions, but he's

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:39.399
<v Speaker 1>paying for it with his checkbook. And and that's really

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the question that SpaceX has not been able to answer.

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>In fact, they haven't answered me. I've asked going forward,

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>who pays for this? You know, does it rely on philanthropy?

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Does it rely on SpaceX kind of discounting trip? Is

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>this done through lotteries? You know, things like that, And

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>we really don't know for now. It does really seem

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>like a rich man's sport. What are these four passengers,

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess, I guess I don't call them astronauts. What

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>are these passengers doing up there for three days? Yeah? Well,

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>what I always say is this that they Dragon Capsule

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 1>is Philly autonomous. You know, it's in orbit, but you know,

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 1>largely it powers itself and can be controlled from ground

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>control by SpaceX. But if something goes wrong, they have

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>had five to six months of intense training, two different

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>scenarios to react and deal with that. But you know,

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:32.519
<v Speaker 1>largely they're up there to the experience. I don't know

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 1>if you guys remember the image, but when they send

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Dragon up to the International Space Station, the nose cone

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>opens up, and that is this the zone that docks

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>with I S. S. But they don't need to dot

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>with BASS. So when the nose cone opened this time around,

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>it revealed this beautifully curved, thick glass window, so they'll

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>be taking time to look out of it, look back

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>down at Earth, look out into space. One of the passengers,

0:03:56.640 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>or one of the civilian astronauts, is somebody called Haley

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>after No. She is a cancer survivor who went on

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to be a physicians assistant at St. Jude, who are

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>actually this mission is raising money for St. Jude. The

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>aim is two million, but she is technically the medical

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>officer on this trip, and she'll be doing biological physiological

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:22.480
<v Speaker 1>experiments on her crewmates while they're in orbit for three days.

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, they'll be moving around the cabin. And and

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>as you know, I've been telling people, Chris Ambroski, who

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>is the mission specialist, he won his seat because his

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>buddy won the seat in a lottery or a wrap

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>or lottery. He didn't want to go, so he gave

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>his his seat to Chris. And Chris has taken a

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>ukulele with him, so he'll be discovering what it's like

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to play a string instrument in space and rootcap for

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>us here there. And you know the inner workings of

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the top three you mentioned Virgin Clactic and SpaceX and

0:04:55.760 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Blue Origin and the inherent maybe friendly competition though if

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 1>one succeeds, then we all can succeed. Where are we

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>in wanting to be the first, wanting to be the best,

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>but also knowing that multiple players in this market in

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the end actually could be better. Yeah, I think you

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>know the main voice in all of this is NASA. Right.

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX is success today was born out of the commercial

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 1>crew program, which NASHA put in place a decade ago

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>because simply the public sector funded space programs weren't working.

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Shuttle program ultimately was shut down. And

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>NASA's view on this is that competition is good, and

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the private sector is good. They had no involvement in

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>this mission, They did not fund it, they did not

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>take part in the training or the risk assessment. But

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>they think that it's a really substantive step forward. So

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that's one part of it. But to be completely frank,

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX is so ahead of the game compared with the

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>rest of the players. Um, you know, basically SpaceX sends

0:05:56.600 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>two thirds of all payloads sent from all of it

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that includes everyone, private sector, government payloads. You know, they

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>dominate that industry, not because they have some kind of monopoly,

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>but because they simply are just the best at it.

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, they have they can fly with such regularity

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>because their technology is the best. And the final thing

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I would say is that it's unequivocal across the investment community,

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>NASA aerospace engineers. This mission is such a much bigger

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>deal than what we saw from Bezos and Branson. It

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:30.279
<v Speaker 1>is an order of magnitude more difficult and risky. What

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:34.239
<v Speaker 1>they have done real quickly, how did they get back?

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Did they splash down in the ocean? Allah the Apollo astronauts,

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.919
<v Speaker 1>how did they get back? Yeah, exactly. So there are

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>several target zones off the coast of Florida. It's completely

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>weather dependent the timing and exact location, but the dragon

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.359
<v Speaker 1>capsule can orient itself so that the Earth's gravitational pool

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>brings it back down through as atmosphere. The flat bottom

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:56.679
<v Speaker 1>slows it down with air resistance, and then it uses

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a series of parachutes and by the time it does

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>splash down is just a few miles an hour. Nice

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and gentle Edla Low, thank you so much for joining us.

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Nice and gentle Ed La West Coast corresponding for Bloomberg News.

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>He is down in Cape Canaveral bringing us live reporting

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>on this really really cool space mission SpaceX. And I

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>like how Ed framed aft force order of magnitude more

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.119
<v Speaker 1>difficult than and then what we saw from just recently

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>from Richard Branson and uh and uh Jeff Bezos. Yeah, no,

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Ed is great. He he knows the stuff inside it

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>out and always brings us some perspective along with some humor. Well,

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we have read on the screen, but it's been an

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>odd week, you know, one day up, the next day down,

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the next day up. So no real direction here at

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>least uh for this week. As people come back and

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of get focused on this market in September. Let's

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>bring in David coudla Uh. He is founder, CEO, and

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>chief investment strategists at main Staate Capital. We have about

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>three point eight billion dollars under management. David, thanks so

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us here. You know, market feels a

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>little directction lists here. Where do you think the next

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>five to move is a lot of folks feel like

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>it's to the downside. Good morning, Paul. Yeah, it definitely

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>seems like the market is uh just uh mandering, meandering sideways.

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>We've had seven of the last nine days have been

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>negative days for the index, but Pete de trough intra

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>day that's only a little over two percent declined. So

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not the extreme volatility that some mighty expect in

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.839
<v Speaker 1>September October or we've been waiting for for so long.

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>H this has been a very non volatile year for

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the market, indexes, for stocks in general. I think that

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>though that as we worked through this, I think the

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:47.199
<v Speaker 1>direction for the market through year end is higher um

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and higher by as much as another four or five six.

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>And is that based on fundamentals or fomo? Well, certainly

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>fomo has been uh an important factor and in this

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>boolmarket all the way through certainly, um, you know by

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:08.959
<v Speaker 1>this time last year as we came off the bear

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>market lows in March. But you know, when we when

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>we look at where we're at in the cycle, uh,

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and there is questions about the economy, there's questions about what.

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've had downward revisions by the Fed, Atlanta

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Fed and their GDP forecast, by a lot of the

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>big banks in their GDP forecasts. But we've still got

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>an economy that's growing. We've got the risk of inflation.

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:36.599
<v Speaker 1>But our latest number, uh, the inflation was down a

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Import prices came in down three tenths of

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a percent. That's the lowest in a year, or the

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:50.559
<v Speaker 1>first decline in a year. So we're importing less inflation.

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>So uh, you know that when we when we net

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that all out, though, I believe that we we still

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>have hired for the market to go based on fundamentals,

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>based on also our belief, not the consensus belief, but

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 1>our belief that FED tightening or FED tapering is not

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>coming as soon as as many might expect. Because it

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>seems like, you know, again we did get some hawkish

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>views on tapering from the FED recently. Yet the as

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, as you just mentioned, the markets only off

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:23.839
<v Speaker 1>a couple of percent from it's high. So if you're

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a bull, you could take that as a pretty decent sign.

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Is that how you think about it? Yeah, And the

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 1>other thing that we're maybe at a non consensus view

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>on also is the UH where we are with COVID

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>UH and where we're going. You know, we I've probably

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>heard five times over the last five weeks that that

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the delta variant has peaked, but yet we've got the

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:52.679
<v Speaker 1>news UH here this week that the state of Iowa

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>is rationing hospital beds. Who would have thought at this

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>point in the pandemic any where in the US we'd

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>be rationing hospital beds deciding who's going to get treatment

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>or not. So, you know, the way we look at

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>it is we're only another variant away from that having

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:15.679
<v Speaker 1>even further economic impacts, impacts on the supply chain, and

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, those are things that the FED will consider

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and when they do or don't taper, and there's just

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>so much so with the amount of liquidity that's out

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>there billion a month, there's so much liquidity. I think

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that's why we haven't seen any significant downstrokes, downside volatility

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of the market, and the trend continues to be higher.

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.319
<v Speaker 1>I am curious what queues you're taking from the bond

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>market with spread still so tight relative to historical standards? Again,

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>does that sound like fundamentals or is this excess yield taking? Well,

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the question is what kind of signals can

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>we take from the bond market at all these days? Uh?

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, how can we have a tenure yield tenure

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>treasury yield trading around one point when inflation is at

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>five point three or five point four percent? Use the

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>tailor role, use any role. Um We've talked about a lot.

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh you know that doesn't that doesn't make sense. Uh.

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>So you know, bond yields are so much influenced by

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>uh the artificial factor, the intervention of the ft. We

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>think it's more telling of what the fet is doing

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>than what it can give us in terms of good

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>signals about the economy. Valuation, where are we are you concerned?

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Valuations are stretched, but they're stretched in a low interest

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>rate environment. As I said, the tenure trading down around

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:52.319
<v Speaker 1>one point three percent, So we think we can still

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 1>have multiple expansion in the US. But you know, one

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>thing that we're looking at is is uh is. We're

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>looking abroad because what we've seen now is if we

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>look at the M s c I All Country Index,

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>x US basically has developed countries. We're um that index

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.719
<v Speaker 1>is trading at a thirty point five pc discount to

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the S and P five hundred. That's the highest ever.

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>So we're also looking abroad to foreign opportunities in Europe,

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 1>in Japan to both diversify our portfolio for overall risk

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>mitigation and as a tactical opportunity for our performance going forward. Interesting.

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, David, thank you so much for joining us again.

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>We always appreciate getting your thoughts. David Coudla, founder, CEO,

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and chief investment strategist of Mainstay Compital Management. Interesting takeaway,

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of looking at the outside the US for

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>opportunities and seeing evaluation play there. Let's talk crypto here.

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess one of the issues for a lot of

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>folks that I talked to, you know, just kind of

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>cocktail conversation, is I hear all about this crypto stuff bitcoin,

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>How do I get exposure to it? How do I

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>invest in it? Let's check in with Ian Billina founder

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and CEO of Token Metrics uh In. You're also the

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>author of the book Crypto Investing Guide, How to invest

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>in Bitcoin, Defy n f T S and more so Ian.

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>When people come up to you at a cocktail party

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and say, how do I invest in crypto? I feel

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>like I should have some percentage of my portfolio in crypto.

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>What's your go to response? I'll throw all thanks for

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>having me good to responses. Because it is a new

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>asset class, it is riskier than other asset classes. However

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that there is an opportunity for more upsite. What I

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>typically till that is, start by investor with what you're

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>willing to lose, whether that's one percent of your net worth,

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>whether that's five percent of your net worth, but whatever

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you invested to crypto, make sure you're willing to lose

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>this because um outside but there's also lots of downside

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>with crypto investing, and just then that's why we haven't

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>book published recently. As you mentioned, see if we can,

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're we've got a kind of a

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>choppy line there, so we're gonna see if we can

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>improve that. Uh And if we can, we'll come back

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to you I'm just looking at bitcoin here. Today XPT

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>is the symbol forty seven thousand, three and sixty eight

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars or three seventy dollars per token off about one

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>point one percent today dig up to fifty two tho uh.

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's got a support tailor, I mean for the

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>technical folks out there for bitcoin of about thirty thousand

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars per token that's been tested several times, but it

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>bounced really nicely off of that thirty thousand the last

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>time I got up to dollars per token. Yeah, and

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of interesting conversations. We spoke with

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Eric Balcunas are pretty expert yesterday Bloomberg Intelligence, and he

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>twice now was pretty strongly put his money on a

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin or a crypto et F by around mid October

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>or so, that sec Gary Gensler, and I'm not going

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to get into all the craziness that Eric valtun Is

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>can do so well, but the Securities Act of thirty

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>four versus forty, and Eric was saying, Gary Gensler prefers one,

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and so this way they can get through the e

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>t F this way, and you know, that could be

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a huge catalyst for this market as well. Eric was saying, Yeah,

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be really interesting. We have in Billina back,

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>founder and CEO of Token Metrics, So and again you

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of start off by saying, how do you invest

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>in this and you do it carefully. How important do

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you think getting an e t F, a bitcoin et

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>F or crypto e t F will be to the

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>growth of this market. I think it will be huge

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>because it will be an avenue for people to slowly

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>passively invest in to crypto assets. And I think it

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>would be really the welcoming of institutional investors and people

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>with the full one case the pension funds being able

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to investen to crypto without having to become experts in crypto.

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk to us about institutional investors when they

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>come in. Does it help legitimize the market? You've had

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Steve Cohen, I think, say that he's getting in because

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>his son told him all about it. Ray Dalio said

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that cash is trash and he's sort of dipping around

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>lightly in crypto. Do all of those headlines help legitimize

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the market. Yes, absolutely, because see if I look at

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>institutional investors for guidance in terms of where it go

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>for new asset classes. So when they see smart money

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>entering the space because a validation, because people comfort that

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>crypto assets are here to start a long term of

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 1>smart money is entering the space. Alright, So again Ian,

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have actually on the Bloomberg terminal c

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 1>r yp is a functions kind of the monitor for

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 1>all things crypto and what trades out there right now,

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be you know, one of the it's bitcoin,

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:52.119
<v Speaker 1>it's ethereum. Is that kind of where people should be

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>focused on at this point as they wait for potentially

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in et f Yes, but what's really been taking off

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>recently you have been layer one protocols essentially new block

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>change similar to etherium and bitcoin, but with different use cases.

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:12.400
<v Speaker 1>So as of recently, projects like Avalanche, Salona, algorand all

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:14.719
<v Speaker 1>these different projects, I've been getting lots of interest from

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>smart money from instance, from our institutions, and these could

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>be a possible ahead versus bitcoin and ethereum, although there's

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:26.400
<v Speaker 1>still pretty nascent as as technologies. What did El Salvador

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks ago the first country to adopt this

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>as sort of a legitimate currency, if you will, What

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 1>did that teach us? If anything? It taught us that

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>it's possible, it's possible for a country, a government, a

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>central bank too to bring in bitcoin, a new, a

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>new particular currency into its economy. And it's really now

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:50.199
<v Speaker 1>building out the model for other countries to follow. So,

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 1>for example, parag lines in other countries are looking to

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>possibly replicate what what what has been done by El Salvador.

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>But even with the volatility, mean, did they show us

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>it really like a currency is the right way instead

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of a store of value, even with all the volatility.

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I think why now is still an experiment. Uh, A

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of means to be seen in terms of what

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>happens next. UM. For example, I was speaking to to

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the minister of finance of a country in Africa and

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 1>they're saying they're funny challenging to bring in the currency

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:22.919
<v Speaker 1>to Represa Entrency. However, there would be open to bringing

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>in digital assets and seeing how they um are taken

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:29.439
<v Speaker 1>on by the country while still having control. So I

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>think right now other countries are seeing what's going on

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:33.199
<v Speaker 1>over there and trying to learn and see if that

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 1>can be replicated in their own economies. All right, and

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us there. Ian Billina,

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>founder and CEO of Token Metrics, kind of getting a

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>update on kind of this crypto market. Again, a lot

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.719
<v Speaker 1>of folks are thinking about how they should get some exposure,

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 1>and Ian suggesting, you know, very small percentage, one or

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>two percent. Perhaps your portfolio be prepared to lose that

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:55.640
<v Speaker 1>all given the volatility that we're seeing in these early

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:58.199
<v Speaker 1>stages of crypto. But again, a lot of interest out

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 1>there and a lot of folks are really waiting for

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 1>that e t F to come, So we will certainly

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>stay on top of this story. More to come. This

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. Some pretty good retail sales numbers we got

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>this morning. Let's break them down with Angie Slonki uh,

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>National director US Retail for Collier's joining us on the

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>phone from San Francisco. Angie, thanks so much for joining, sir,

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 1>love to just get your thoughts here. Uh, you know

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:25.919
<v Speaker 1>your knee deep in all things retail. What did you

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:29.679
<v Speaker 1>take away from this morning's numbers? Oh it was I

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 1>was more than thrilled. I have to say. The retail

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>positivity and the momentum that we've seen from the beginning

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of the year has been great, but we are starting

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to normalize. One thing to know every person is spending

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>an additional two sixty dollars as of last month, so

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:48.400
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit of spend. So I'm excited to see

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:53.119
<v Speaker 1>these trends. Is the spend sustainable? We all know that

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the data show us the consumer most consumers got more

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.880
<v Speaker 1>wealthy in the pandemic. You think about the savings, So

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 1>is that sustainable going forward? I don't think it will.

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll start to see some sort of normalization towards the

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 1>end of the year, although positive. Um, as we we

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:16.959
<v Speaker 1>hit the end of exit, we'll start to see a normalization.

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I think what will happen is things will start to

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>reset and it will start to flatten out. I think

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>our biggest concern right now in terms of retail is

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the slow down in terms of global manufacturing, and that

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>will hurt us. So we're already seeing challenges in retail

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>where retailers are starting to face a lack of merchandise

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>in stores. So of course that will automatically also take

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>place online as well. So and you here in New

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 1>York City, Bloomberg HQ here on Elecington Avenue, uh all

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the retail shops between fifty eight and fifty ninth Street

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>on Lexington with the exception of one small little Swiss

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:03.959
<v Speaker 1>chocolate store, they're all empty. And we were talking some

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 1>big box retailers. Give us a sense of how you

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:10.640
<v Speaker 1>think physical retailing will come back here as we get

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to the other side of this pandemic. Definitely. You know,

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:16.959
<v Speaker 1>we've actually it was interesting to um, we've done some

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 1>research in house. What we've actually seen from a big

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 1>box perspective is actual growth, but growth in secondary markets.

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>UM in the suburbs. As we've all been hearing in

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:33.199
<v Speaker 1>the reports lately, they work from home mindset continues to

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, pretty pretty much be stable, and therefore a

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of these big box operators are looking at, you know,

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>identifying locations pretty much outside of some of the denser

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>city So the recovery will come back to Lexington, to

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, Union Square, San Francisco. It's just going to

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 1>be a slower recovery. Yeah. Interesting. We certainly are hoping,

0:22:56.680 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>at least for our neighborhood here that that is the case.

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about some of the seasonality that we

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:06.719
<v Speaker 1>might see in these numbers. A lot of this was

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 1>anticipation of back to school. I was speaking with the

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>executive director of the Port of Long beach yesterday saying

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that you have to start shopping now for Christmas because

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>your fifty ships off the coast and we can't stalk

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>shelves fast enough. How were the shelves on back to school?

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 1>How do you see that plane out during the holiday

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>season coming up? Yeah, that's the real challenge, UM. And

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>we're already hearing from many of our retailers that we

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>work with that these the supply chain, the merchandise that's

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>still sitting out UM is delaying product delivery and it

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>is being delayed anywhere from three to four to five months,

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>which is causing you know, this kind of pent up demand.

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>But yet this frustration from the customer's point of view.

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:58.680
<v Speaker 1>So their challenge with oh my goodness, how how early

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 1>do I need to buy from my holiday shopping? UM?

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 1>I just read this, which is really fascinating to me.

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Apparently the disruption and supply chain UM as it relates

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:13.399
<v Speaker 1>to artificial Christmas trees is causing pricing to skyrocket up

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>by So we're seeing this across every level of merchandise,

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:25.120
<v Speaker 1>whether it's shoes, apparel, you name it, furniture. The delays

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 1>are just exponential and are people going to sit back

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and wait. This is they're they're forced to at this

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 1>point about the labor Aie, it seems like every restaurant

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you walk by or go into says we need workers. Um,

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>how are the restaurants dealing with the labor shortage. It's

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>really challenging. Their limiting their menus, they're shortening their hours

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and due to the purely because of labor issues. They're

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>also you know, at this point, some of the smaller

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>restaurant groups that are more I would not you know,

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>not your nationals or regionals or st writing to not

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>only increase their hourly wages beyond the minimum wage, but

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 1>also giving bonuses in order to attract um. We're also

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>starting to see people tap into high schools and asking,

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the sixteen year olds to see how they

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>can intern slash learn a new skill set in order

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to help the labor issues out we're faced in pretty

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>much most markets. Yeah, we're seeing that across the Boarder

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:32.479
<v Speaker 1>hearing that across the board as well from a lot

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 1>of industries. Angie Solanki, National director US Retail for Colleige Or,

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us, Thanks for listening

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>to interviews of Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three.

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Put on false Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:57.479
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio