WEBVTT - The 100th Episode 'Strictly Business' Retrospective

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Strictly Business, Varieties weekly podcast featuring conversations with

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>industry leaders about the business of media and entertainment. I'm

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Wallenstein, and I'm here to say this will be

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>no ordinary episode. It's our one hundred installment of this podcast,

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 1>which began way back on April three. To mark this milestone,

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I and my esteemed podcast partner, Cynthia Littleton, business editor

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>at Variety, have decided to take a look back at

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>some of the most memorable moments on Strictly Business. If

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you're new to this podcast, we think you'll find it

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a great way to get to know us, and if

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you're a returning listener, you hope you'll enjoy this stroll

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>down memory lane. Now here's Cynthia with her first highlight.

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Hello from Cynthia and thanks for listening to this special

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>episode of Strictly Business. One of the interviews I chased

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>hard last year was the first sit down with Dana

0:00:55.960 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Walden after Disney completed its acquisition of Century Balks in

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>March nineteen. I've known Dana a long time and I

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>definitely leaned on that to persuade her to do her

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>first major interview in front of a crowd at Variety's

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:15.320
<v Speaker 1>annual TV Summit in Los Angeles in June nineteen. Dana

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>has long been one of the most powerful executives in television.

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>She had no shortage of opportunities when the surprise sale

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of Fox came down. I wanted to know why she

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>chose such an extremely high profile and high pressure job

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of leading Disney's TV Studios and ABC. You know, when

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I looked around and thought about companies which are fundamentally

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the phone company, a cable company, a retail company, um,

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>companies where the tech started the businesses and then the

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>creativity was acquired. Culturally, I think those companies are always

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be very different from a company that's been

0:01:56.120 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>about storytelling for almost a hundred years and all started

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>by a mouse. As often said, yeah, absolutely, let me

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>ask you in the in the process of you know,

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>making that decision, and and once you were you know,

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>once once the industry was you know, was surprised to

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>learn that the Murdocks were, uh, you know, considering open

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to considering a sale. Did during that period, did did

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the changes in the industry Did they crystallize in your

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>mind in a different way when you knew that you know, Fox,

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>which was you know, I mean it was such a

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>shock because it was such a robust business rouper. It

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>was a buyer, not a seller. Was that did you?

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Did you? Was that process a learning process for what

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you just described, like where you see the company going,

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, the industry going, yeah, no question. And you know,

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Rupert disrupted again. I mean, I think the

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>narrative around is he a buyer or a seller? You know,

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>he was a buyer at the time that people weren't

0:02:55.680 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>acquiring you know, enormous station groups, or eyeing a studio,

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>or launching a competitor to the broadcast networks, or acquiring

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the NFL on a pretty spectacular scale. That was disruptive

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>at that time. I think what was disruptive, you know,

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand eighteen was him making an extraordinary deal

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:25.519
<v Speaker 1>to sell his company. And I do I do feel

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>like our company got the benefit of seeing what the

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>shortcomings are of the various streaming competitors, you know, what

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>we can do that might be better, and again doing

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it at a scale that's kind of undeniable. This is

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>going or is now arguably the biggest content company in

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the business, with you know, the second largest streaming platform

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in the business, with an incredibly robust plan to launch

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Disney Plus, which is you know you. I'm sure you're

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>at investor Day and you just saw this incredible collection

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of beloved brands and content and original programming again situated

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:18.119
<v Speaker 1>really to win and having the ability to look at,

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of the missteps of our competitors. All

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of those things came together relatively quickly, but they all

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>made great sense. If I had to pick one executive

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I find the most fascinating to talk to, it's got

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to be former HBO CEO Richard Plepler. He's responsible for

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>some of the greatest series in TV history, but that's

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>not why I regard him as the consummate showman. This

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>guy puts on a show every time he opens his mouth.

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>When I sat down with him in the Streaming Wars

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>had barely begun, so it was a treatback then to

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 1>hear him survey competitive field just beginning to take shape.

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>And it's even more interest thing to look back on

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that conversation because now he's fighting for a different side

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in the streaming Wars, having launched a new production company

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 1>with a first look deal at one of HBO's rivals

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple TV plus. I understand your bullishness, but let's take

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a step back and say the reality is the undeniable.

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>The undeniable reality is is the competitive landscape you're facing

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>right now is like nothing you've ever seen. Netflix alone

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>spending at probably you know, possibly double what you guys

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>are doing on just original content, not talking about licensing.

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Amazon right behind them, Apple coming. Your incumbent competitors like

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Showtime and Stars aren't fading fast anytime soon. So how

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>are you going to be able to compete, especially when

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you're being outspent by a lot of these new players,

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 1>not a lot, you know, our brand um is a

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>magnet for talented people in the creative community. I feel

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>like Ted Surrando says the same thing. Well he he,

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>he does, and he's welcome to say it, and there's

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 1>some truth to it. And they do very good work.

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 1>And I've said publicly and I'm I've said it to

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.479
<v Speaker 1>them directly. Anybody who doesn't tip their hat to what

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>those guys have accomplished in the last seven ten years,

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:20.720
<v Speaker 1>it just isn't being fair. They've done a terrific job.

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>This is not binary. Doesn't mean there isn't going to

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>be a good show on Netflix or a good show

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon. None of that has interfered with our growth,

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think the proof is in the pudding. Um. Again,

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 1>despite the intensity of this competition, we grew more last

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>year than in any year in our history, and we're

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>growing and on track for terrific double digit sub revenue

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>growth this year as well. So wouldn't you say, our

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>game well and curate quality, and we will continue to grow.

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not a zero sum game. I was exactly That

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>was the exact phrase I was gonna use. Don't you

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>think even if you manage to do well while competitor

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>B does very well, that competitor F, G and H

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>may actually fall out. Aren't we in this consolidating world

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>coming to a place where well, the lower brands are

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>not going to make it? Listen, I do think that. Um,

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>if you just look at your own lives and you

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>look at you know, you have only a certain amount

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>of leisure time, a certain amount of time you can

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>watch movies, watch television beyond the computer you make, you make,

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>you make judgments, you make picks, and Um, the key

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>for us is to keep the halo on our brand

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>so that when people do have discretionary time, they are

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>comfortable that we are fulfilling our promise to deliver excells

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and they come. They might not love everything, but they

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.679
<v Speaker 1>certainly think that for fifteen dollars a month, three thousand

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>hours of library, the wide range of programming which we

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>make for Hollywood movie studios, people end up saying, you

0:07:55.000 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>know what, that's a pretty good price value proposition. David

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Zaslov is one of the most accessible media CEOs and

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the most articulate about where he thinks the

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>content business is heading. David is competitive, but also thoughtful

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>about the industry and how he sizes up the competitive landscape.

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>He's learned a lot over the years from John Malone,

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the legendary media investor who has a big personal stake

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and discovery. When Zaslov used the M word early on

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in this interview at his New York office in November

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eighteen, my ears perked up. We were having

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.679
<v Speaker 1>quite a run as a traditional media company. When I say,

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>we were more cable and free to air around the world. Um,

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I've been here for twelve years, and for the first

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>seven years we had a you know, an extraordinary run

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>both in the market and growth growth around the world

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and here in the US. UM. But I remember a

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>conversation I had with John Malone five years ago. Our

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 1>channels were growing double digit around the world in terms

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:05.719
<v Speaker 1>of viewership and uh, and our performance was strong. Our

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>company had grown, stock had grown from about twelve dollars

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:14.079
<v Speaker 1>to eighty or eighty five dollars, so we really felt

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:16.559
<v Speaker 1>like we were in stride. And John and I talked

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>about the future and uh. He turned to me and

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>he said, Okay, we've grown all of our share. Um,

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>how well would we do if people could watch anything?

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>And I thought for a moment, and I said, uh,

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:38.679
<v Speaker 1>We've made a lot of progress in the last seven years.

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>We went from five percent of viewership in the US

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to thirteen And I said, I think we'd probably be

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>back to five because a lot of our content, it's

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>great quality content, but it's second choice a lot of it,

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and our brands aren't strong enough. And so it was

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that day five years ago that we began the fight

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to change ourselves from a tradition media company to add

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a global I P company, And we started to change

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the kind of content that we bought produced, and we

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>changed the way we looked at our brands and UH.

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>That journey got us into sports in Europe, where we

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>bought Eurosport two to three sports channels. It was one

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons we bought the Olympics. In each case,

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.319
<v Speaker 1>the question was not how would this do at eight

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>o'clock at night, but as this content that people would

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>watch if they could watch anything. And in the last

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>year or two it's gotten really a more a tougher question,

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>which is will people pay for this content before they'll

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 1>pay for dinner. That's why we bought the rights to

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:51.559
<v Speaker 1>the PGA Tour everywhere in the world outside the US. UH,

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>that's why we bought most of the cycling in Europe

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and most and all the majors in tennis, and that's

0:10:56.320 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>why we're doubling down and continuing to invest aggressively with

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:04.839
<v Speaker 1>Oprah and candidly. That's why we bought Scripts and this

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>has been a great growth here. But we were a

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>misunderstood company because when we bought Scripts, people thought we

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>bought Scripts to get more linear channels and to get synergy.

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>We saw Scripts as an I P company that hadn't

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>been really UH, that hadn't been taken advantage of globally.

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>So we saw it as food, home, cooking, travel and

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and uh and do it yourself. They owned all that

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>content and hadn't been used globally. But but not just

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>as a linear play. But in the new world, when

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you look at food, when you look at home, aren't

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>people gonna want to consume content around those genres everywhere

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>in the world on all devices and so um, it's

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 1>been five years and we got a long way to

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:56.719
<v Speaker 1>go and a lot to learn, but we are in

0:11:56.920 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>We made a real I think, uh, we've had some

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 1>some real acceleration in in changing the way our company

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>is seen and saying and the way our content is

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 1>consumed here in the US and around the world. And

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that's why I think our Stakas has has really improved.

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 1>We get a lot of executives and creatives on this podcast,

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>but every once in a while we also make time

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:29.839
<v Speaker 1>for talent. Tyra Banks, Steve Harvey, and Gabrielle Union are

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>just a few names you'll recognize. But true to the

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>strictly business brand, we didn't talk to these people so

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 1>they could promote their latest projects or tell us who

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>they're dating. Let's be honest, there's way too many media

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>outlets covering that what we hear less about is the

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>business side of celebrity, And what we learned in the

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>occasional conversation with performers on this podcast is that many

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of them are every bit the entrepreneur that they are artists,

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>and at a time when the paychecks aren't what they

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>used to be for Hollywood talent, men of them have

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:04.559
<v Speaker 1>carved out lucrative side hustles inside and outside of entertainment.

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>It was something that began dawning on me in the

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>very first episode of Strictly Business when I sat down

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>with one of Hollywood's most bankable actors, Kevin Hart, who

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>spoke pretty bluntly about his aspirations to not just act,

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>but build out an empire. So it sounds like you're

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 1>kind of in the middle of this journey in terms

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 1>of the empire that you're building. I mean, where does

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it go next or there? Or what mountains are you

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>looking to conquer? Areas of content you haven't even gone

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to yet. Man, Well, I mean, look, I'm I'm The

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>goal of being a mogul was a real one, you know.

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 1>I want to be a mogul. I want to be

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a billionaire. I want to get to a point where

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you look back and you go, damn, this is a

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>little dirty kid from Philadelphia that had no idea, uh

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, where his life was going to go. And

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>once I got an anklet of what I could do,

0:13:57.360 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I made a decision to give it a hundred percent.

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I got forty people on staff right now. You know

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 1>when I look up and I'm responsible for people's lives

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and livelihoods, and that's a That's a big thing to me,

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that I know that I'm in position to

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:15.559
<v Speaker 1>do that, and that these people believe in this vision.

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>These people are giving me a hundred percent because they

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>say we're gonna follow you, keV into the will's fall off,

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>because the passion behind your drive and dream is real.

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>To me, that's the biggest thing in the world. So

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, when I when I have these meetings with

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>my team, with my staff, I'm not just selling you

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>on today's work. I'm selling you on the future of

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>what we can be. Heartbeat Productions will be a big partner.

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Heartbeat Productions will do big studio work. Heartbeat Productions will

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>be tomorrow's future company when it comes to development and

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and producing for for any type of film, from comedy

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to to you know your dramas. I want to do

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>it all. I can't sit back and watch other people

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>be said cessful and give me a blueprint and not

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>do it. I just can't. I have too many relationships

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>where they let me know how they got there, from

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Oprah to Thailer, to jay Z to Ellen. I have

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>too many people in front of me that are doing

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>too many amazing things that say this is how I

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>did it. For me not to do it. The media

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and entertainment marketplace has transformed into the land of the

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>giants over the past twenty years, but every business has

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to start small at some point. I'm always interested to

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>hear from entrepreneurs and independent operators about how they're able

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to compete against giant conglomerates in a world whereas we know,

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>size matters. Romancanna, CEO of Shaun Combs's Revolt Media company,

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>was blunt about the uphill climb of running an independent,

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>single cable channel. Revolt TV was born as part of

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a wave of upstart Cape channels in two thousand thirteen,

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>when Comcast had to give carriage deals to independent and

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>minority owned channels on its cable systems as a condition

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of allowing Comcast to buy NBCUniversal. That sounds like a

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>good way to nurture new and diverse owners in the

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>TV marketplace, but in reality, it's not that simple. As

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of explained in August two thousand nineteen, it all

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>started with the right thinking, and you know, we're grateful

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>for that. We wouldn't exist but for that. So so

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>absolutely is the answer. But you know, I think the

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>challenges is that the idea of trying to embrace diversity

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and creating an equal opportunity playing field for voices to

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>proliferate really runs into a problem when it's the first

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>step of a hundred step race that is unlocked, but

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the next steps still needs support. So we don't have

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>full distribution on on most systems comp class Comcast included

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 1>UM and we'd love to have that, but that you know,

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>these companies are struggling with their own um you know,

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>metrics as they measure their basic packages and their extended

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:15.239
<v Speaker 1>basic packages. And for us to then compete on an

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>on an equal playing field with companies that have got

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>better distribution, have been around longer, have have better leverage

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the portfolios that they're part of. You know,

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that becomes a tough story. It's that, you know, if

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 1>if we want to support diversity of voices in any

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>way and in any platform, it can't always just be

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>step one and then to be measured by the same

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>measuring sticks of companies that have been around for longer,

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>in better times and have made it past step one

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>into step seventy three. Um, Yet we will get the well,

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, your traffic compared to you know MTVS traffic,

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not it's not a fair comparison at this moment

0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 1>in time, and if you measure us by that stick,

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>we will always fail for the next number of years.

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>So if we really want diversity, what are the measuring

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>tools we're using to allow these voices to grow and

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>then truly compete um in a very difficult world of competition.

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's tough out there, and we understand that.

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 1>We just we want a shot at it. Before we

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 1>continue with this retrospective, I want to tell you about

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>an upcoming variety event. Would you and your team like

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to be the first to learn emerging trends shaping the

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>entertainment industry's largest marketing campaigns On March, Varieties Entertainment Marketing

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Summit is bringing together top cmos and digital leaders from

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:43.439
<v Speaker 1>brands like Disney, Hbo, Instagram and more to discuss how

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>their revolutionary ideas have changed the landscape of Hollywood. With

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 1>panels that explore the future of omni channel marketing and

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>modern formulas to connect with audiences, you will have a

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>one of a kind opportunity to listen in on thought

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 1>provoking discussions that are immediately affecting your industry. Visit Variety

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 1>dot com Slash Marketing Summit to register you and your

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>team today and see you on March. Now, let's get

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 1>back to the podcast. Strictly, business tries to stay on

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>top of the latest developments in the industry, but sometimes

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the industry can move faster than we do. That's what

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>happened in June when just twenty four hours before I

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>was going to release an episode featuring an interview with

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Condon Nast Entertainment CEO Don Ostrov, she announced she had

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 1>left Conde Nast for a big new job at Spotify.

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>We published the interview anyway, of course, and in truth

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the challenges she spoke of adapting to digital media after

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a long career in TV proved just as relevant to

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>her now that she's in yet another very different world

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>creating audio programming. Your career, you spend most of the

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>time shepherding these traditional long form things, and now you're saying,

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you're programming to a platform where the old rules just

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>don't apply. So how are you learn in the new rules?

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>It has been an m b A for me, I

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>mean it, and it's so humbling because honestly, I came

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>into this opportunity thinking I can do this because if

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you have success on traditional and you you know, gossip

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 1>Girl at one point was the biggest show in the country, right,

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>every young person talked about it, you know, read everything

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that they could get their hands on about about our cast. Um.

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>But it really was eye opening to understand that the

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>way in which we make the content for the digital

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 1>space has nothing to do with the way we would

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>create television ideas. Um. You know, it's it. There's there's

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 1>a understanding of what the viewer expectation is when they're

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:45.199
<v Speaker 1>watching content on any one of those platforms, and you

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 1>have to really adhere to be either a format that

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>is the expectation, or a storytelling style or a way

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in which you shoot something that really does help determ

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 1>and if something is going to be a success or

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>not and qualities quality, So it has to be good

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and has to be worthy of people's time. But it

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:07.880
<v Speaker 1>really is very very specific about how the storyteller and

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 1>how the the director really does bring that story to

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>life on those platforms. Christina Wayne is a well regarded

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>TV producer who made her name in the creative community

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 1>when she was the top development executive at a MC.

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>When you green light the pilots for Madmen and Breaking Bad,

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you get a reputation as having an eye for quality.

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I was pleasantly surprised in this interview from October when

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Christina opened up about how hard it is to sell

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>shows despite the enormous increase in the overall demand for content.

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>It takes an industry insider to get beyond the surface

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>hype around peak TV. In our conversation, Christina touched on

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the real problems of working in a frenzied market with

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>unsustainable levels of money and capital chasing talent and producers.

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 1>So all of a sudden, a bunch of new buyers

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>came to the market and we would take stuff out

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and over the first two years of having my company,

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>we sold pretty much everything we took to the market.

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>There were about i'd say thirteen fourteen shows that we

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.479
<v Speaker 1>took out and they all went into development. Not all

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 1>of them got made, but um, one or two of

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.399
<v Speaker 1>them got made, which is kind of the ratio. You

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 1>have one out of ten usually is your ratio of

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>what you're hoping for the last two years of being

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a producer. Now, with all the platforms, there is such

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 1>a huge demand for content that one would assume that

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>being a producer would make my life much easier. It's

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>actually made it more difficult. What has happened is that

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.959
<v Speaker 1>TV is such an incredible medium now. It is so

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 1>high level the programming that's being made. You have every

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>A list showrunner, actor, director coming with their passion project.

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>So I often find myself waiting to take out a

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>show to the buyers and you have Germo del Toro

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:05.239
<v Speaker 1>sitting in the waiting room, you have George Clooney, you

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>have every single top level person who's you know, Garmo

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>had just won an Academy Award, and you're sitting there going, oh, yeah,

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 1>my little great show, Um, what do we have. So

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it definitely has become more difficult. And I have noticed

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that unless you package your show to the nth degree,

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:28.640
<v Speaker 1>it does not sell. You're talking about soup Ton's with writers, showrunner,

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>star director, the whole. You don't necessarily need a line

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>producer because they can always hire that, because that's not

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be You need somebody competent, but they're not

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>going to look at that as the sort of bells

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and whistles of must make TV. And so right now

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the game is straight to series orders with a list talent.

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you see that with Reese Witherspoon's company,

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you see that with all of these packages now that

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:57.159
<v Speaker 1>are going out. Um, and so I have now moved

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 1>from being focused solely on develop Lipman to also being

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a packager, which really was never that was always an

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>agent's job, and so it has really sort of taken

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>over what I do, and UM, I do it, and

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>thankfully I've been in the business long enough that it's

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>not impossible, but it certainly is not what I came

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to the business to do. So it's quite different than

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 1>when I started. The fun thing about looking back at

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:32.399
<v Speaker 1>the past one episodes is that sometimes there are exchanges

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you have with an interview subject that seemed unremarkable in

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 1>the moment but turned out to be pretty damn significant

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in retrospect. I didn't think much of the time about

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 1>the answers given to the very last questions I asked

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:47.679
<v Speaker 1>Erica Nardini, CEO of one of the hottest sensations in

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:51.199
<v Speaker 1>media right now, bar Stool Sports. When I interviewed her

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 1>last October, considering barstool recently sold a minority stake of

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>its company to a gambling operation, she was given me

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 1>pretty latent clues about where her company's future lay, And

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>at the time, those clues went right over my head.

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Is it possible that to get that big you need

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>to be acquired by the Disney's or Viacoms of the world.

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Is that the endgame? I don't know, what you know,

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Dave and I always laugh about this, which is people say,

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, what's your five year plan? What's the seven

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>year plan? And we always say, we don't know. Um.

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's not to say we're not strategic, nor to

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>say that we're not thoughtful about where we want to

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>go or what we want to do. But what I

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>think we are at our core is really passionate and

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 1>opportunistic so you know, yes, would we like guns money

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and steal from a big media company to be in

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and around our business. Definitely. The things we could do

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to drive linear the things we can do to grow personalities,

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the things we can do to create brands, I think

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>is unparalleled. Um that said, you know, we're profitable company now,

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.199
<v Speaker 1>We're growing incredibly quickly. We are at the top of

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>our game in the fields that we are in. I

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 1>also see a path where we grow independently pretty successfully.

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I think it's a long way of

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>saying we don't know what the future holds. We're incredibly

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 1>open to what that future looks like. Well that's the

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>last question. Where else are you guys going to go

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 1>that we need to pay attention to going into You

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:24.360
<v Speaker 1>need to pay attention to sports betting. So I think

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that we will be a force in sports betting, in

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the type of content we create, in the way we

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>create it, in the level of passion and originality, and

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>in what we do. So sports betting is a place

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you should definitely look out for us. Globalization is a

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>big buzzword in entertainment these days. Every CEO will tell

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you that future growth is largely coming from outside the US.

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 1>But what does that mean on a granular level for

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:58.919
<v Speaker 1>content focused executives in the US entertainment industry. I had

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:01.360
<v Speaker 1>heard about an initial David End Them All Shine North

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>America to incorporate Spanish language program development from Mexico and

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>other non US markets into the same core team in

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood that handles the company's English language offerings. I made

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 1>a point of getting End Them All Shine North America's CEO,

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Chris Abrego down for the podcast so we could talk

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>about his approach in detail. One thing we really did

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>was to work much like we did with even our

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>subsidiaries here in the US, we really kind of had

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to flow through um in terms of how we operated.

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>So with truly original or fifty one minds are authentic,

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:36.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, we brought them the formats that we had

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:38.479
<v Speaker 1>from us that if we weren't going to work on them,

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>it didn't make sense for North America. We would then

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:44.880
<v Speaker 1>funnel them to these guys, especially if it made sense

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:48.159
<v Speaker 1>in their specific relationships and buyers. We thought, if that

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 1>strategy is working so well, and truly Originals have so

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>much success, and trifly one minds having much success, why

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't we apply that just because it's another country doesn't

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>mean with the treated different. And and it seems simple enough,

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 1>but everyone you talk to they want to treat this

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>minute you say in Mexico. They think different department, different group,

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>different part of the company. And it was hard to

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>fight that and even internally, but we we worked hard

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to integrate it and make it just part of our business,

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:17.360
<v Speaker 1>so much that when we closed the deal with boom Dog,

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.239
<v Speaker 1>two things happened. We took the entire senior staff here

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to Mexico City for a week and integrated the companies.

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>And so they met there. They're kind of their parents,

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and there are other people who shared similar responsibilities, and

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:33.639
<v Speaker 1>we shared advance practices. And to the here at Animal

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Shine UH in North Hollywood, they start taking Spanish classes,

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 1>so everyone so you can check. Now there's a lot

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of Spanish speakers in this company. Now, you know, think

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>about our in our business affairs. So we've brought in,

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, people who obviously are bilingual, and for both

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>contracts and working with legal people in Mexico, we don't

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>We obviously recognize that it's two different countries and there's

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>certain laws and certain practices that we have to adhere

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to UH, in which we want to be aware of.

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 1>But when you get below that in terms of creative process,

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of pitching characters, casting, finding the best producer

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that you know, because for us, the one thing that

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that we do really well in em Shine

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>is we stay focused on We know that the most

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 1>important things who's making the show. It's one thing that

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 1>who's selling it, it's one thing who created it, but

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it really we focus on who's making it. Undoubtedly that

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>comes from your background as a producer in the trenches

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>with you know, sleeves rolled up making the show. Yeah,

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 1>it really it's like who's going to be on set

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and delivering this story and these characters and driving this

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>narrative or this competition whatever the show might be about.

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we're focused on. And that's actually becoming

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>our biggest challenge in these in these other territories, including Brazil,

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 1>is UH finding more of those people who can do

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that premium content. It's been a real honor to have

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the biggest names in the business on our podcast,

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>but honestly, that's not what interests me most when I'm

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>picking people to interview. Don't get me wrong. CEOs are

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>nice to talk to, but we've also had c t

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 1>o s to talk about technology, CFOs to talk finance.

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>We've had several interviews with heads of marketing at companies

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>like Marvel, Viacom, and HBO. Maybe these role players aren't

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the most glamorous types to read about in the headlines,

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>but Strictly Business is just as much about the role players,

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>because it's through them we can drill down into all

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the many different pieces that make up the media machine.

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm also proud of the way Strictly Business often looks

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 1>past the usual suspects in TV, film and tech to

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 1>find interview subjects from industries you may not be exposed

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to as much like radio, publishing, video games. I can

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 1>honestly say doing this podcast is brought in my horizons,

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and I hope it's done the same for our listeners.

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>For example, the last interview I want to highlight in

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 1>this episode may have been the most obscure one I

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>did in the entire run of Strictly busines this st

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 1>X Entertainments Virtual Reality division, which was actually shut down

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 1>not long after the interview aired. Listen to this and

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 1>you won't be surprised why the VR division might be

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>in the basement or something. It's it's sort of like

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>if it's even there, it's you know, it's an experimental

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>part of the company where it's it's really about the

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>marketing assets that they could create versus the original content opportunity.

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>And also how can we actually build a business around

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>this new medium and utilize all the best, you know,

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:38.719
<v Speaker 1>facets of of what we have to offer as a studio.

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 1>And so for us, that was a really strong proposition. Well,

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, I can understand why other studios

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>may treat this is am more let's call it marginal

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>pursuit as I see it, and we could talk about

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 1>it if you disagree. The market for VR entertainment is

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 1>not quite there, even by the most i'd say charitable assessment.

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 1>So any company like STX that put serious investment in this,

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>there's risk that there's just not a market there for

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that content. Is that assessment off base? I think it's

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a it's a fair assessment. But you know, the level

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of investment that we're making is actually very responsible. I

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>think what we're not doing is going out on day

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>one and just spending a ton of money and hoping

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get our money back. We spent a

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of time early on UM developing thoughtful strategies and

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a business plan around this. We knew that we in

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 1>in in pursuing original content, original VR movies. It wasn't

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be free content. We knew we had to

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>monetize the content right, and so we had to really

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>look at how how big is this market? How big

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is this market going to be? In twelve months twenty

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>four months, Thanks for joining us to revisit some of

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the great interviews we've enjoyed doing on the Strictly Business

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>podcast for the past two years. After all this time,

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I must admit I feel like I'm just getting started.

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 1>But as for this episode, we're coming to a close.

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank Cynthia for being a great podcast

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>partner and thanks to you, our loyal listeners. We love

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to hear from you and hope you'll be sticking around

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 1>for the next one episodes. H