WEBVTT - What is an impossible color?

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Orgy. As an artist, do you have a favorite

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>color that you use for scientific cartoons or some colors

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>more sciency than others.

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, it depends on the science. I mean some science

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:20.280
<v Speaker 2>it's just more colorful than others.

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:22.600
<v Speaker 1>So then what's the color of physics?

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 2>It kind of depends on the topic too. If it's

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 2>about lasers, I might use red, or if it's about

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 2>the sun, I might use a yellow. I've used cian

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:32.519
<v Speaker 2>for particle physics.

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>What makes particle physics cian?

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. That just kind of would seem like

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:41.840
<v Speaker 2>fit to the topic at the time.

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:43.599
<v Speaker 1>It just gives you the blues.

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Or if it's a red hot topic, I might

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 2>go for a nice intense red. But for our books

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:49.880
<v Speaker 2>they usually go with purple.

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what's purple about our curiosity?

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 2>It's more about the process, you know. It's kind of

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 2>mentally bruising, I mean mentally enlightening.

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's position of both of those.

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 2>It's both blue and red, which makes purple. There you go. Hi,

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm Hoorham Mack, cartoonas and the author of Oliver's Great

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Big Universe.

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and a professor

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>at U see irvine, and my daughter tells me I

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:30.479
<v Speaker 1>can't see mad.

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:33.759
<v Speaker 2>WHOA, wait, does that mean that you can't get mad

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 2>or that you don't see the color red?

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes, As a parent of a stubborn toddler, I never

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>once got mad. Absolutely kept my cool every single moment.

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>She and I disagree a lot about what to call

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>various colors, and she's convinced I'm partially colorblind.

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 2>WHOA have you ever had it checked? Maybe it's true.

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 2>What does that mean? You can't tell colors apart? Or

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 2>you can't seek certain colors? But how do you know

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 2>you can't see them?

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>You can do these tests where you to see numbers

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>out of dots. But she just likes showing me lots

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of different shades and asking me to come up with

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>names of them. And I'm always like, I don't know

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 1>wild Mountain raspberry, and she's like, that's not red, it's

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>purple or something.

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Sounds like she just likes to disagree with you.

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think I raised her right.

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you raised her to make you read all the time.

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 2>But anyways, welcome to our podcast. Daniel and Jorge Explain

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 2>the Universe, a production of iHeartRadio, in.

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.959
<v Speaker 1>Which we try to pencil in an explanation for how

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the universe works. We try to color inside the lines

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and help you understand how this incredible, glittering, beautiful, bizarre

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and crazy cosmos actually works, how all those quantum mechanical

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:47.839
<v Speaker 1>little particles come together to emerge into this incredible experience

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that we all enjoy.

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 2>That's right. We try to paint a picture for you

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 2>of our amazing and beautiful universe, using all of the

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 2>hues of the rainbow to try to communicate to you

0:02:56.600 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 2>all the feelings and impressions that the universe has in

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:01.239
<v Speaker 2>us as a human race.

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>And in the end, science is trying to build a

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>bridge between our visceral experience what you actually feel is

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a conscious entity, and our mental picture of what's out

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>there in the universe, the mental model we're all putting

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>together trying to explain how the universe itself, absent from

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>our humanity, actually works. But in the end, we never

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>probe that deep reality independent of our senses. We're only

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>limited to understanding how it works as filtered by our

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>eyes and ears and fingertips and everything else.

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and as we look at the universe and filter

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 2>it through our eye. Sometimes it makes us red with

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 2>anger about the things we don't understand, or blue about

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 2>the things we may never understand, and sometimes maybe even

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 2>green and envy of maybe possible aliens out there that

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 2>have figured it out. Did it miss a color? Orange?

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Mass orange? For a nice glass of orange?

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Aren't you glad you made that pun?

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Nice?

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>All these things are part of our experience. The color

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>purple in your mind is not actually part of the universe,

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is just part of your experience of the universe. Somehow,

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>over the centuries and millennia, we have been able to

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>piece together a picture of how the universe out there

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>might actually work, perhaps independent of our senses, though of

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>course we won't know until those aliens come and talk

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to us about the colors they see in the universe.

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Do you think they're a colored line too? Like Daniel,

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 2>we think the answer to the universe is a light

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 2>shade of lavender summer breeze. And then we would end

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 2>up disagreeing about what that means.

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think whatever answer they have, my daughter will

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:34.840
<v Speaker 1>disagree with him. That's how I raised her.

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Let's not put her in the greeting committee.

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 1>I think we agree on that Oh my gosh. Yes,

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 1>let's not send Daniel's children to meet the aliens.

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, unless they start an intergalactic war.

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the colors are sacred to them, and if Hazel

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 1>disagrees about what's purple and what's red, she's going to

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:55.039
<v Speaker 1>really piss them off.

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, or they might disagree about the color hazel itself.

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Yeah, exactly why are.

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 2>You called hazel if you're not the color of a

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 2>hazel nut. That's it. Forget this human race. It doesn't

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 2>make any sense.

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't make any sense. You know, we named it

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>her hazel before we knew her. But she does turn

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>out to light the color hazel and hazel nuts, so

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a win.

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but how do you know she's actually seen the

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 2>color Hazel's hazel blind?

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>M hazel blind.

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Wow, it's all hazey to her, it is.

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>But we are fascinated by this concept of color, not

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 1>just because it's such a visceral part of our experience,

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>but because it's deeply connected to the physics of what's

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>happening out there in the universe. It tells us something

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>about how photons are wiggling, or how neutrinos are flying

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>through the universe if you're willing to apply red and

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:47.039
<v Speaker 1>blue shifts to them as well. So this concept of color,

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 1>what we see, what's out there in the universe, it's

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.799
<v Speaker 1>very confusing but also very illuminating about how the universe

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>actually works.

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's a lot of physics in light and in

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 2>all the colors. But then, as you said, it gets

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 2>filtered through our eyes and our brains, and sometimes what

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 2>we see is not quite what's out there, and maybe

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 2>there might be things out there that are maybe impossible

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 2>for us to experience.

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:11.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's right. We know that there are frequencies of

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>light the humans can never experience, but are there also

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>colors that are impossible to see?

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 2>So to the end podcast, we'll be tackling the question

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.600
<v Speaker 2>what is an impossible color?

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:29.919
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like a job for Tom Cruise.

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Dunt dunt dan da dunt dun.

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>This color will self destruct after you view it.

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 2>We need a movie in which Tom Cruise is a physicist. Yeah,

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 2>I mean he'd have to wear a lot of like

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 2>wigs and prosthetics. Of course, he can't look like Tom Cruise.

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:49.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's too sexy to be a physicist. Is that

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying? I didn't say that he violates some

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>physical law.

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 2>He's too orange.

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>He's definitely very physical, even if he's not a physicist,

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Right he doesn't.

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's right. Yeah. I wonder if he would do

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 2>his own stunts in a physics movie, Like would you

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 2>actually sit on the couch all day? I mean, that's

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 2>it's probably more dangerous and jumping off a cliff.

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Then you put all those professional nap stunters out of work.

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>You can just take naps on film as a wait.

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Wait, wait, that's a career. I can be a stunt

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 2>napper exactly.

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, there's a career for everything.

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 2>They're doing it all this time for free. Daniel.

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>You know that the sign of an advanced civilization is specialization, right,

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think once we've achieved stunt napping, we've reached

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the pinnacle of civilizations. The aliens will be impressed.

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh, they might even hire us to nap for them.

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Well there's a.

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Twist ending, but yeah, this is an interesting question, the

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 2>idea that there might be colors out there that are

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 2>impossible to create, to experience, to see, to generate what

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 2>side of the color spectrum.

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Are we Yeah, it's a complicated question. Because color is

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>intimately connected with frequency, and we think about it as

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>controlled by light, but really it's something inside our minds,

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>it's something generated by our brain. It's an experience, and

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the colors you experience in the end come from the

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>signals that travel up the optic nerve, which are not physical.

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>They're just interpreted by your brain. And so it's interesting

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to think about whether there are colors that cannot be

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>described by those signals.

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh boy, is this going to get into philosophy, Daniel, Like,

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 2>what colors can a bat see?

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>That's actually a great idea for paper. I'm gonna write

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that when we're done with this episode.

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what color is your bad wing?

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 1>Everything in the end is philosophy if you care about

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:35.839
<v Speaker 1>what it means. Right, So if you're going to answer

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the question what does that mean anyway? Then yeah, you're

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>getting into philosophy.

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 2>That sounds like a philosophical statement in itself, Daniel.

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>The philosophy of philosophy.

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you can get a phphphd in recursive philosophy in

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 2>computer science philosophical puzzles well, as usually. We were wondering

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 2>how many people had thought about this question of what

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 2>is an impossible color, and so as usual, Daniel went

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 2>out there to the Internet to ask people this question.

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much to everybody who answers these questions for

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. If you would like to hear your voice

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>on future episodes, please write to me two questions at

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 1>danielan Jorge dot com.

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 2>So think about it for a second. What do you

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 2>think is an impossible color? Here's what people had to say.

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.439
<v Speaker 4>So, color is just a construct of our brain decoding

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 4>the frequency of electiation. If you think about it and

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 4>imagine our rods and cones were tuned a little wider

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 4>and we could actually see an infrared and ultraviolet, and

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 4>colors we can't see would be associated with those frequencies.

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 4>So I guess every color associated with low frequency radio

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.079
<v Speaker 4>all the way to gamma rays would be impossible colors.

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 3>If color is just how we perceive different wavelengths of light,

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 3>and light can be in a huge range of wavelengths.

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 3>It has something to do with the limits of the

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 3>wavelength approaching either zero or infinity, where suddenly color doesn't

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 3>make any sense anymore.

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 5>An impossible color all very interesting. I'm going to say

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 5>some sort of combination of spectral outputs that are that

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 5>is a different spectral resolution than what our the receptors

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 5>of our eyes are able to something to do with

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 5>color metamerism.

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:28.439
<v Speaker 2>The interesting answers. I feel like nobody pitched the idea

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:31.959
<v Speaker 2>that maybe it's a color that's made out of plant based.

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Proteins vegan colors.

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Wow, yes, No, no animals or creatures were harmed in

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 2>the making of this color.

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I can't even imagine a way you might harm an

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>animal to make a color you're talking about, like, oh,

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>let's see red, We're going to spill something's blood. Like

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>it seems pretty unnecessary.

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 2>I think, Daniel, you just don't have this strong enough imagination.

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 2>But there are colors that are based on or traditionally

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 2>there are dyes that are based on like insects, like

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 2>insect juice.

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, okay, interesting, But.

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how vegans draw that line.

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:13.199
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're gonna have to have some of them

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast to answer the question.

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, sounds like good question for Katie. All right, well,

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 2>let's dig into this question of what an impossible color is.

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Whether it means we can't see it, we can't make it,

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 2>it can't exist in the universe. Let's figure it out.

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 2>So you know, what are the basics of light and color?

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so let's start outside the human brain before we

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>get into like signal processing and all that stuff, and

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>just begin with light. Right, Light we know is made

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of electromagnetic fields. There are ripples in electromagnetic fields, So

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>we have electrical fields that can be made by like

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>electrons and magnetic fields that have made my magnets. And

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>light is a coupling of the electric fields and the

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>magnetic fields together. Electric fields can induce magnetic fields, magnetic

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>fields can induce electric fields. Light is like this perfect

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>little packet where it's slashing back and forth between electric

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:04.079
<v Speaker 1>fields and magnetic fields in amazing harmony, and they can

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 1>propagate through the universe, this little oscillation of the fields.

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>And these oscillations have frequencies that have a wavelength, they

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>have a frequency that relates to their energy. So if

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you have a beam of light, for example, coming out

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of a flashlight, it's actually made out of little photons,

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and each photon has a specific energy which has a

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>specific wavelength and a specific frequency. So that's what light is, right,

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:27.839
<v Speaker 1>these packets of photons.

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 2>So I have this laser and I'm shooting it, and

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 2>there are photons coming out of it, and each photon

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 2>is like a wiggle in the electromagnetic field. Is that

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 2>what it is?

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, each photon is a wiggle in the electromagnetic field.

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:41.319
<v Speaker 2>But it's not a wiggle that's like propagating, like if

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 2>I throw a pebble in a pond. It's not spreading

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 2>out there like that, right, Like in a laser. These

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 2>things are going in a straight line.

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>These things are going in a straight line. And we

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>just did a really fun but very confusing episode about

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>how long is the photon? And if you didn't listen

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to that one, I.

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Was going to listen to it, but it's a little long.

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a light topic.

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.079
<v Speaker 1>And that tells you that real photons out there in

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the universe are a little packets. They have a length

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:09.839
<v Speaker 1>that's determined by the spread of the frequency. So in

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a sort of idealized sense, you can imagine every photon

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>has exactly one frequency. It's like a pure little packet

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of one energy, one wavelength, one frequency. But that's actually

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>mathematically very confusing because if it was like that, it

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>would be everywhere in the universe. And so to build

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>up a little packet that actually moves through the universe

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a little blob that stays together and flies through space.

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>You have to have a little bundle of frequencies, so

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, blue photon is like a little spread of

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>various blue frequencies, and a red photon is a little

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>packet of a handful of differently red frequencies.

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:44.199
<v Speaker 2>And they're all going at the same speed, which is

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:44.839
<v Speaker 2>the speed of light.

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, exactly, they all got the same speed even though

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>they have a different wavelength and a different frequency, and

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light is the same across the spectrum.

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>That's at least in our current theory. There are theories

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of physics like rainbow gravity, where different frequencies travel at

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>different speeds and you get like effects around the edges

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of black holes, but are in their current theory physics,

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>And according to all of our measurements, every photon travels

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 1>at the same.

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Speed, and the spectrum of frequencies that light can have,

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 2>it's basically one dimensional, right, Like there's only one knob

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 2>for the frequency of light.

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if you're going to think about a photon.

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 2>From zero to infinity, hmm, But it's just a line,

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 2>and if you were to draw a plot of it.

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, exactly, it's one dimensional. It's a great way to

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>think about it. And it is infinitely dense, right, there's

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>an infinite number of frequencies there. We think of these

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>things as like, oh, they're quantum mechanical, so it must

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>be discrete, must be broken up into chunks, right, But

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the reality is that free objects, even free electrons, are

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>not quantized in their energy levels. They're quantized in the

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>number of photons. Like you can't have one point seven

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>photons or two point two seven photons. You can have

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>one or two or nineteen. But each photon can have

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>any energy. There's no limitation, there's no quantitization, there's no

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>descritization of the energy spectrum. But yes, it is one

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>dimension all.

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 2>That you know of though, right, Like, is it possible

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 2>that maybe frequency is quantized as well.

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, in our current theory that's the case. There are

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>theories of quantum gravity in which like space is pixelated,

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>which would make like a minimum wavelength, and in that

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>case every distance is quantized. In our current theories, there's

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>no minimum frequency, but that doesn't actually really make sense

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>below like the plank length, where every photon would like

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>collapse into a black hole anyway, So it only really

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>applies up to a very very high energy, but much

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>higher than we could probe today.

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 2>All right, So that's the physics of it. Now let's

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 2>get into the biology of it. So when these photons

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 2>hit our eyes, they create and experience in our brains.

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think there's one step before that, which is reflection. Like,

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>let's imagine we're looking at a banana, right, why do

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>we see the banana as yellow? We see the banana

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>as yellow because white light hits the banana from the sun,

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and then some of it is absorbed and some of

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>it is reflected. You start with almost every frequency of

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>light you can see the banana, But then the banana

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>has chemicals in it and atoms, and those atoms prefer

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to absorb some colors and not absorb other colors. And

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>so when you see yellow as banana, that means that

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the wavelength of light that is being reflected is a

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>specific band in this case, like between five hundred and

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>seventy and five hundred and eighty nanometers. So you see

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>something as red, it's not because it's like absorbing the

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>red light, right, It's because it's reflecting the red light

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and absorbing everything else. But then yeah, it hits your eyeball,

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and those photons with a certain frequency are now going

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to be interacted with by your eye, which is like

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>basically little observational device.

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 2>But wait, the banana, So the banana absorbs all frequencies

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 2>except maybe the kinds that are my brain will interpret

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 2>as yellow.

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, not all frequencies, but all visible ones. Right, banana

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>can't necessarily absorb all X rays and gamma rays or infrared,

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>but in the visible spectrum and again, and not even

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>all of that, right, Like you see it yellow because

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>it's dominant in the yellow. It's never like intense and

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>yellow and zero in every other frequency. You know, it just.

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 2>Peaks unless it's like a perfect banana. Like, is it

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 2>possible to create a perfect banana that only reflects like

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 2>one frequency of yellow.

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>If you make a shade which only reflects one frequency

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of yellow, I think Hazel would call that perfect banana.

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:16.719
<v Speaker 1>That is a nice name for a yellow.

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Exact banana, yes.

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Exact scientific banana.

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So there's a reflection and also I mean there's

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:29.120
<v Speaker 2>filtering too. But while we're talking about it, like it right,

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 2>like if I have rose colored glasses, the world looks

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 2>rose to me. Because it's filtering out all frequencies except

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 2>the ones that I see is rose.

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, it's filtering. There's a reflection. All this affects

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 1>the frequencies that actually hit your eyeball. But I hear

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of confusion out there and the questions I

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>get from listeners about what makes something a color, whether

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>it's absorbing it or reflecting it, And so it's important

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to remember that the color is something that's in your

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 1>eye depends on the light that hits your eyeball. You

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>can only see something if it hits your eyeball. For example,

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>if a photon was flying in front of you your face,

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.199
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't see it right. If it just flies past you,

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't see like a little glowing blob going through

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>the universe. You imagine your visual perception is giving you

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>an accurate description of everything that's out there in the universe,

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>but you only see things that hit your eyeball. Photon

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that passes in front of you doesn't send any signals

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to you, so you don't see it right.

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Like if someone to my right shoots a laser to

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 2>my left, I won't see it. It has to be

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 2>they have to be shooting into my eye for me

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 2>to see the.

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Laser, yeah, or it has to hit dust particles along

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:31.159
<v Speaker 1>the way or air and ionize that and make a

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 1>glow or a reflection. Right, But a perfect laser in

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a vacuum you will not see until it slices your

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>head open.

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 2>The photons, ever, split into other photons.

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Photons can convert into electron positron pairs, which can then

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>interact with other stuff, like including other photons, and do

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>crazy stuff that differently could happen, and those could create

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>other photons, So that can happen, but it's quantum mechanically

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.399
<v Speaker 1>pretty rare. If you pass a photon through a special

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of non linear crystal, it can split into two

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 1>other photons. They use that for important experiments to like

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>detect single photons. But mostly photons just fly through the universe.

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>That's why we can see them after billions of years

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and across billions of light years. They're pretty reliable indicators

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of what emitted them.

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 2>All right, So photons can't have all these frequencies. Sometimes

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 2>they get filtered, or when they bounce off the things

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 2>they get some of them make it out of the

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 2>bounds and they sometimes hit our eyes, and then that's

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 2>our experience of seeing things.

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, and also our eyeballs do some filtering, right

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>to be experienced, the photon has to make it into

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the pupil and then through the lens and then all

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the way to the back of the retina where it

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:44.400
<v Speaker 1>can actually be interacted with. That's where there are these

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:47.879
<v Speaker 1>proteins which either turn on or turn off based on

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the frequency of light. So you have these like array

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of sensors in the back of your eyeballs which can

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>detect photons.

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.439
<v Speaker 2>Did you look into how that works? Like there's a

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:02.120
<v Speaker 2>molecule on the surface of the receptor there and then

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 2>it just gets activated and it wiggles, and then how

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 2>does that? Does it release a chemical or does it

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 2>create an action potential? How does it work?

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's actually really amazing. It's like a little machine

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 1>and it actually changes the protein's configuration when it absorbs

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the photon. It flips like almost a physical switch on

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>this chemical to change its configuration and that adds energy

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to it and then that's picked up by the optic nerve.

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>It's really kind of amazing chemistry. And you have these things.

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>They're scattered all over the back of your eye. Of course,

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>people know there's two different kinds. There's rods, which basically

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>give you black and white vision. They're sensitive across the spectrum.

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Wall what does that mean, Like any photon of any

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 2>frequency will activate them or not.

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not exactly flat across the spectrum. But essentially, yes,

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 1>they're not very frequency specific, they're not choosy. They're very

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 1>very sensitive. Yeah, they're not choosy, but they're very good

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>at picking out photons. They're much better than the cones.

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 1>So they're good for like at night, is there a

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>predator there or not? You don't really care if to

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>red or green. You just want to know if it's

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>something there.

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Basically gives the sense of like brightness or darkness.

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Yes, exactly, it's like black versus white. But then you

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>have these other sensors, these cones. There's three different kinds

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 1>of them. You have like six or seven million in

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 1>the back of each eyeball, and most of them are

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:20.640
<v Speaker 1>actually concentrated in a tiny little spot in the retina

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:23.199
<v Speaker 1>near the center of your vision. So you have like

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>color vision near the center of your eyeball, but mostly

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>black and white in the rest, which is fascinating and

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>each of these cones responds to a different frequency of light,

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:34.199
<v Speaker 1>so it has like a protein on it, and a

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>different protein for each kind. You have three different kinds,

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and those proteins are tuned to flip or to not

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>flip for different frequencies of light. So one of them

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:46.959
<v Speaker 1>mostly flips on for blue light, another one mostly flips

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:50.440
<v Speaker 1>on for green, another one flips on for like yellowish red.

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 2>Light, and it so did they sort of ignore the

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 2>other frequencies.

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 1>They don't exactly ignore them, right, They're not in very

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 1>narrow bands. So one of them does peak in the blue,

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>and one peaks in the green, and one peaks in

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the red. If you imagine, like, what's the probability for

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>this protein to flip based on the frequency of light, Well,

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the blue one will almost always flip for a blue one,

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>but it'll sometimes flip for a green one, though not

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>as reliably. And the red one will always flip for

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>a red one, and sometimes for a green one, and

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>occasionally even for a blue one. So they're a little

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:24.360
<v Speaker 1>bit overlapping. They're not like perfect bands.

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Right, They're fuzzy. They can each will react to a

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 2>certain range of frequencies where those freagancies are centered. It

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 2>kind of depends on the type of cone.

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. And so you have three of these, each

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 1>of which are centered at different places in the spectrum.

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 1>And then what your brain does is interpret the signals

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:43.239
<v Speaker 1>from these cones to figure out, oh, how blue was it. So,

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>for example, if you get a signal only from blue

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 1>cones and nothing from the red and the green one,

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 1>then you're like, Okay, that must have been pretty blue

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>in order to signal the blue ones and not signal

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the other ones. But if you get something that signals

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the blue one and the green one and not the

0:22:57.760 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>red one, then you're like, okay, it was blue green.

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 1>And so you can sort of triangulate where it is

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>on the spectrum by the ratios of how these things react.

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 2>Interesting. All right, Well let's get to this idea that

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 2>maybe there are colors that are impossible for us to

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 2>see even with our rods and cones. So let's dig

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 2>into that. But first let's take a quick break. All right,

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about color today, hopefully not getting too off color.

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 1>Depends on if you think philosophy is off color or not.

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>What is the color of philosophy?

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 2>WHOA, Well, that's getting a little purple there.

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I didn't mean to ask a lavender question.

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Well you don't have to yellow it, Daniel. All right, Well,

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:55.199
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about how we experience light, and so we

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 2>know that light are photons. They come in different frequencies.

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 2>There are frequencies from here to infinity. But our eyes

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 2>have these sensors that can detect photons around certain frequencies,

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 2>and those are the ones that generally we would associate

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 2>as red, green, and blue rightb RGB.

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 1>And it's fascinating that here we've transformed, as you said,

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>an infinite one dimensional spectrum. Photons could be anywhere along

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the spectrum. So now sort of this three D spectrum

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 1>RGB right, and the color that we perceive depends in

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>principle on the photon, but really it depends on the

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 1>signals from these neurons, which is in this three D

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 1>space of red, green, or blue. You get these signals

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 1>from these neurons, and once you experience is in your mind,

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:44.919
<v Speaker 1>it is just an interpretation of this point in this

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 1>three dimensional RGB space.

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 2>I guess maybe a question you could ask is like,

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 2>why are we doing it this way? Why are we

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 2>seeing the world this way? Why don't we just why

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 2>didn't evolution come up with this answer that can just

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 2>tell you what the frequency of light is.

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 1>That's fascinating question. And there are some close based on

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the variety of the way the color perception works in

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the animal kingdom, Like we know that we have these

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 1>three sensors, but there's nothing special about three. Like people

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>think of RGB as the fundamental basis of color, but

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>it's just so the way the human eye works. There

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>are critters out there with like eleven different sensors. The

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>mantis shrimp, I think has like fourteen, and there are

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>and there are species out there that can see a

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:28.159
<v Speaker 1>broader range or a narrower range of colors, just depends

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:31.199
<v Speaker 1>on what's more efficient. The fascinating thing is that the

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:34.159
<v Speaker 1>more sensors you have, the better you are typically of

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 1>being able to tell the difference between shades. So if

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you like really need to know the difference between dark

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>green and light green, you might evolve more sensors or

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>more sort of like processing power to be able to

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>distinguish these signals.

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess the more sensors you have, like kind

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 2>of like posts you put in the frequency spectrum, the

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 2>more you can tell things apart.

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes, like the mantis shrimp is famous for having like

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 1>fourteen different sensors. You might think, wow, they must see

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the world in really vivid color, but they have very

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>very few neurons to back it up behind that, so

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>it's like they have really really good hardware but terrible software.

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>So they might actually not experience more colors than we do,

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.679
<v Speaker 1>like the actual experience of a Manti strip. Who can

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>never know right until we write that paper. But I

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 1>think it takes both complex hardware and complex software to

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 1>experience a broad variety of colors.

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:27.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure those fourteen centers are doing something right, like

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 2>it's letting it discriminate a certain specific colors or certain

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 2>specific patterns. But maybe after that, it's just not like

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 2>the man district is not appreciating the color.

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>It depends a lot on the processing, right. You get

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.119
<v Speaker 1>these signals if you have very crude responses to them,

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>very crude like neural networks behind them to help you

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>know how to respond to them, very wide bins in

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 1>your response, for example, you could be wasting a lot

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>of that information.

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:56.879
<v Speaker 1>Imagine you have like a super excellent microphone and then a

0:26:57.000 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>terrible cable to store it in very low fidelity file

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 1>format could be very lossy. This is all very very speculative,

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of course, and there's experiments going on to try to

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>understand what mentis shrimp experience. But there are some humans

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that have more than three cones. They're called tetra worlds. Yeah,

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:21.239
<v Speaker 1>like mutants, Yes, mutants exactly, But there are people have

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 1>four different kinds of cones. When I first heard of that,

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:26.679
<v Speaker 1>I thought, WHOA, they must have a fourth color.

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:29.199
<v Speaker 2>How does that happen? Like they have a mutation that

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 2>produces a whole different fourth kind of cone.

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they're very rare. Then you can spot them, not

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 1>because they see a different color we think. It's not

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 1>like there's a fourth color that adds to RGB that

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>they can experience that we can't. It's just that they

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 1>tend to be better discriminating between colors, so like they

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 1>might pass a color blindness test that the rest of

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>us would fail. If you put like a really really

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 1>subtle difference between the greens and the blues, for example,

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 1>they might pick something out that other people can't.

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 2>You put like a Stamp athlete next to a Harvard athlete,

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 2>and you'd ask them like which one is which You'd

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:07.400
<v Speaker 2>be like, wait, what, they're the same? They just look red.

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 2>But you know, maybe a more discerning person might say,

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 2>oh no, that's a crimson, and then the other one's

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 2>like a wine red.

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.199
<v Speaker 1>Junior college red. Yeah exactly. Yeah, yeah, way to come

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 1>up with an example that's really relatable, I'm suing a

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of people have really struggled with their things.

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:29.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you put a banana slug next one

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:31.439
<v Speaker 2>and eater, is it the same yellow or not?

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's actually a really fun question because all

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the University of California campuses are blue and gold, but

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>they all have different shades of gold.

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Now, which one is more relatable? To exclude people who

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 2>don't live in California, or to exclude people who've never

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 2>heard of Stanford and Harvard?

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Let's hear from the listeners.

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna be like, you excluded everyone.

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Anyway. It's fascinating because the biological transformation of these photons

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>into optic signals puts us sort of like a distance

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 1>from the actual photon. Like what you're experiencing in your

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>mind is reaction to the optic nerve signals, not the

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>photon directly.

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, it lands in your cone and then the cone

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 2>generates the signal that then gets transmitted to your brain.

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly what you mean. But you could simulate that

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 1>signal without the photon, right, You create that same signal

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the optic nerve somehow without the photon, sort of the

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>matrix style. You can experience that color without a photon,

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 1>of that energy actually arriving on your optic nerve, and

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it tells you that. Like we say, photons have color,

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>we call them red photons or blue photons, but that's

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>not really accurate. The photons themselves don't have a color.

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>The color is in your mind. The photons have an energy,

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to have a frequency, to have a wavelength. The color

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 1>is just like your experience of the photon.

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, it's our brains trying to figure out

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 2>what that frequency is. It just that we came up

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 2>with a name for things like, oh, that's thirty point seven.

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Her have a prequancy light. We will call that yellow.

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Why not because we don't have decimal numbers back in

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 2>the day.

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>It's our brain trying to give us what it thinks

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 1>is a useful experience or what evolution has proven to

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>be a useful experience, the way that, like touching something

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 1>hot gives you a painful experience, turns out to be useful.

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Having these different experiences in your mind for these different

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>bands of frequencies turns out to be useful. But what's

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>fascinating is a sort of philosophical question of like, where

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>do these experiences themselves come from? And are they the same?

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, you put two people in black and white

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>rooms and raise them without color and describe colors to them.

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Could they come out of that room and identify red

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>versus blue versus green? Or is it purely captured in

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the innate experience and can never be described in any

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>other terms. There are fascinating philosophical questions.

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 2>I think it has been proven our brains have evolved to

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 2>react to certain colors in certain ways, right, Like green

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 2>usually has a calming effect, Red has a certain sort

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 2>of anxiety raising effect. Right is that kind of what

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 2>you mean, like our brains are cute to react to

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 2>startain colors or what.

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not familiar with those studies, though imagine it's probably

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>is true that there are emotional responses to various colors.

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, like the actual experience of the color,

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Like the red that you feel in your mind is

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>just an experience in your mind the way pain is right,

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Pain is like a reaction to heat, to damage, to temperature.

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Red is a reaction to certain frequencies of light hitting you.

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>But the light itself is not red, the way that,

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>like the heat from the burner, is not actually literally painful.

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 1>The pain is part of your experience of it.

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I guess, But I feel like maybe we're

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 2>sort of maybe confusing things by trying to get to philosophical.

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 2>It's basically just your brain trying to detect what's happening

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 2>in the world, right, Yeah.

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>It's your brain's interpretation of these signals. And you're right,

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Getting philosophical does always confuse things because you end up

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>with questions you can't answer and you don't know if

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:56.479
<v Speaker 1>they actually tat you anything.

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 2>So then let's get back to this topic of it.

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Maybe that there's a color that it's impossible for us

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 2>to see or to make we're both.

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. A few decades ago a theory developed about how

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>we experience color. It's actually slightly more complicated and actually

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>slightly simpler than what we just described. Instead of imagining

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that you get like three signals red, green, and blue

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>actually the way.

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 2>That but I guess maybe just from a very basic

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 2>level of course, our colors we can see, like we

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 2>can't see light up up on the infrared, and we

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 2>can't see light down or up in the ultraviolet. Right, Like,

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 2>there's a whole range of light frequencies, infinite range of

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 2>light frequencies that were our eyes just don't detect, Like

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 2>they just go through our eyes or they hit our

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 2>eyes and don't activate it.

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, absolutely, there are lots of frequencies of light

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that don't generate in the signal. I don't know if

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 1>those frequencies of light have a color though, right, color

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 1>is just our experience, and so you just don't assign

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 1>a color to those frequencies. So there are frequencies we

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>cannot see. I don't know if those frequencies have color.

0:32:57.240 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 2>What would you call a color?

0:32:59.040 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 4>Was it?

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Like if we have like a visual spectrum, right, Like,

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 2>there's a range of frequencies that our eyes can detect,

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 2>and so let's call color the light that is within

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 2>that range, the frequency of the light within that range.

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would say color is our response to frequencies

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of light within that range.

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I mean that sounds like an arbitrary definition. I

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 2>could also just posit colors the frequency of the light

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 2>that we can see, so.

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 1>That all works really well. If you think about individual

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 1>frequencies of light, it all makes sense. But you know,

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>we never see individual frequencies. You always see a mixture.

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 1>You see a little bit of this frequency, a little

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 1>bit of that frequency. And once we start thinking about

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 1>mixtures of frequencies, things get more complicated. And actually a

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 1>different theory of how we experience color emerged a few

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 1>decades ago. It's called opposing neuron theory. It says, instead

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of having like a three dimensional space RGB red, green,

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and blue one for each of these different kinds of cones,

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>actually we only really have two because we have opposing neurons.

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 1>That we have neus the fire more when light is

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>red and less when it's green. And we have another one,

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a blue versus yellow one that fires more when things

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:10.760
<v Speaker 1>are yellow and less when things are blue. So instead

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of happening like three dimensional information, our nerves have figured

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 1>out a way to incorporate this in just two dimensions,

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 1>like a green versus red axis and a blue versus

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.720
<v Speaker 1>yellow axis. It's still pulled out of the same cones,

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 1>but it's a little bit of processing there to like

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:29.320
<v Speaker 1>convert it into this red versus green and blue versus yellow.

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:32.279
<v Speaker 2>I think you're talking about what happens after it hits

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 2>your optic nerve and maybe after it goes up into

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 2>your like visual cortex, right, you're talking about like, you know,

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe your brain or evolution said, you know, maybe we

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 2>don't need three signals to figure out what color thing

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 2>the banana is or whether that's a spotted leopard or not. Like,

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:50.799
<v Speaker 2>maybe we can just instead of having three variables, maybe

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 2>we can just do with two variables, and maybe that's

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:55.720
<v Speaker 2>more efficient and faster and just enough to survive.

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. I'm not exactly sure where this happens, and

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you know where the brain technically ends and the optic

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 1>nerve begins. But yeah, this is part of the processing

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that happens in your brain. This is opposing neuron theory,

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and that means something really interesting because it means there's

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a loss of information, and it

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:16.400
<v Speaker 1>means that there are some colors which now cannot be

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:20.280
<v Speaker 1>described in this two dimensional plane. For example, a mixture

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:23.760
<v Speaker 1>of green and red. You have this one opposing neuron

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 1>which is supposed to fire more if it's red and

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 1>less if it's green. What does it do if you

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:32.479
<v Speaker 1>send it red and green? Right? Does it fire more

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 1>for the red and fire less for the green. It's

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 1>an ore system. It can tell you whether this light

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:40.839
<v Speaker 1>is red or is green. There's no response that that

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 1>neuron can make that says I see red and green.

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Wouldn't it fire like somewhere in between? Like neurons and

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:50.360
<v Speaker 2>code things by the frequency at which they, you know,

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 2>send signals, right, like little like Morse codes. So if

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 2>it's like doing red and for green, wouldn't like a

0:35:57.680 --> 0:35:59.280
<v Speaker 2>mixture give you something in between?

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:01.760
<v Speaker 1>You can see a color that's between red and green,

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 1>But you can't see like intense red and green simultaneously.

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh, you're talking about the intensity of things, not like

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:09.240
<v Speaker 2>which frequencies are present.

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 1>It's also true if this is fairly dim. But what

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 1>you can see is a color between red and green. Right,

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>If you see like something on the spectrum that's between

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:19.960
<v Speaker 1>red and green, it's like a yellow, then you can

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:22.319
<v Speaker 1>see that, and the response of the neuron will be

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 1>between its response for red and for green. If you

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 1>shine pure green and pure red on it. It's supposed

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:29.839
<v Speaker 1>to both trigger it and inhibit it, and it doesn't

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:32.239
<v Speaker 1>know how to communicate that there's no place on its

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:34.840
<v Speaker 1>response that means green and red.

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:39.359
<v Speaker 2>Now, as you said, this is a theory, are there

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 2>experiments back it up? Or like, do we know where

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 2>in the brain this is happening.

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 1>We don't know where in the brain this is happening.

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 1>And there's a controversial set of experiments. People were like,

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is it possible to see these things? What happens if

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 1>you put like strips of color near each other and

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:57.719
<v Speaker 1>ask people to like focus on the line between them.

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:00.080
<v Speaker 1>So they have these experiments that did originally in the

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 1>eighties where they put like strips of blue and strips

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:05.360
<v Speaker 1>of yellow next to each other, or strips of red

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and strips of green next to each other, and ask like,

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 1>what do you experience right at the edge? You know,

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:13.720
<v Speaker 1>where you're seeing like red and green at the same time.

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:16.840
<v Speaker 1>So there's this paper in eighties by these two guys,

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:19.839
<v Speaker 1>Crane and the Piantanita, and they claim to see these

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 1>impossible colors. They ask people to describe what color they

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 1>were seeing at the boundary, and it was like indescribable,

0:37:26.520 --> 0:37:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and so this paper was really controversial for a long time.

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 1>And then there were experiments two decades later at Dartmouth

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 1>in the mid two thousands that sort of disputed these

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 1>results and said, like, hmm, maybe people are just seeing

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of like an intermediate color. They're not simultaneously experiencing

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 1>what happens when you have red and green photons. It's

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:49.880
<v Speaker 1>just sort of like hard to describe. So this controversy

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 1>in the literature about whether this theory is right. There

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:55.399
<v Speaker 1>are other theories of how we experience color and whether

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 1>it's possible to see these colors in some way.

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:01.359
<v Speaker 2>So what do you mean by possible colors? You're talking

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 2>about like combinations of color that we can experience, Yeah, exactly,

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 2>that maybe our optic nerves are picking up because they're

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 2>definitely picking up something, but we just because of the

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 2>way that our brains have maybe streamlined and gotten rid

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 2>of certain information that doesn't think it needs now we

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 2>have kind of blind spots in the color spectrum.

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah exactly. And I read a really fascinating paper that

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:26.840
<v Speaker 1>suggested you might be able to experience this if you

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:30.240
<v Speaker 1>can come up with a way to like differently trigger

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:32.799
<v Speaker 1>different parts of your optic nerve. Like if you could

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 1>get some of these opposing neurons to respond to the

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 1>green light and some of them to respond to the

0:38:37.120 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 1>red light, then instead of all sending the same signal,

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you'd have some sending the green signal and some sending

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the red signal, both intensely, and then maybe your brain

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 1>would know how to interpret that, and we'd give you

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 1>this experience of this red green combination. That's one theory,

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:55.880
<v Speaker 1>And people argue, like, maybe that's what was happening in

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:59.279
<v Speaker 1>the eighty three experiments, that they somehow like parts of

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it were triggering this part of your nerve and other

0:39:01.040 --> 0:39:03.520
<v Speaker 1>parts are experiencing other parts of the nerve. But yeah,

0:39:03.560 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 1>it's about these mixtures of colors that we can't see.

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:08.800
<v Speaker 1>We can see all the pure colors, but these mixtures

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of colors we can't see.

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, I guess you would see them, you just wouldn't

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:15.920
<v Speaker 2>be able to maybe tell them apart from some of

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:16.880
<v Speaker 2>the primary colors.

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps this is novel color, which is a mixture of

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 1>these two which we do not have an experience of.

0:39:22.040 --> 0:39:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Because we think that the sensory mechanisms and the optical

0:39:25.920 --> 0:39:29.319
<v Speaker 1>nerve processing can't carry the information to describe it. The

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 1>loss of information means there's no way to encode it

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 1>basically in those signals.

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:38.239
<v Speaker 2>Now, do these impossible colors have a specific frequency or

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:40.840
<v Speaker 2>would you call it a different color because it's a

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 2>mix of different frequencies.

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeahs, see that's fascinating because we think about color as

0:39:45.200 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 1>associated with the frequency spectrum, right, and so pure frequencies

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:51.239
<v Speaker 1>we think of as pure colors, and that makes sense.

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 1>But here we're talking about combinations of different frequencies, like

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 1>shooting red and green photons or blue and yellow photons

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:01.359
<v Speaker 1>at you at the same time. And so that's why

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's helpful that separated the question of frequency

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and color, because color is what you experience in your mind,

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's not always connected to just one frequency. Like

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:13.239
<v Speaker 1>this red green color, whatever it is, that would be

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:16.640
<v Speaker 1>an experience in your mind, your brain's interpretation of seeing

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 1>both red frequency photons and green frequency photons at the

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 1>same time. You wouldn't experience red, you wouldn't experience green,

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:26.759
<v Speaker 1>you'd experience some red green thing we don't have a

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 1>word for.

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 2>I guess it kind of goes back to the question

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:33.240
<v Speaker 2>of like what is yellow like If we have sensors

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:36.440
<v Speaker 2>that the tech red, blue, and green. What is yellow?

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if you just think about the spectrum, right, yellow

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:42.720
<v Speaker 1>is the color that triggers the green and the red

0:40:42.840 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 1>about the same amount and doesn't trigger the blue.

0:40:46.040 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Like there's a specific frequency that will do that, right,

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:51.800
<v Speaker 2>I imagine mm hmm. Now you could call that frequency yellow.

0:40:51.880 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 2>But you can also kind of fool the eye into

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:57.719
<v Speaker 2>thinking of yellow by mixing frequencies. That's kind of what

0:40:57.760 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 2>your TV and your phone screen do.

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is specific frequency range that we know triggers

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the experience of yellow in your minds five hundred and

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:08.960
<v Speaker 1>seventy to five and eighty animeters. Absolutely, and you know

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the same way that there's like a cyan and there's

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a purple. You don't have a special cone for these things.

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:17.840
<v Speaker 1>There are brain creating an experience for this whole range

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of possible signals that it's getting.

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Right, And you can sort of fold it into thinking

0:41:22.320 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 2>of yellow by mixing frequencies, right. I mean like in

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:29.239
<v Speaker 2>your TV or your phone screen, there's only like three

0:41:29.280 --> 0:41:32.680
<v Speaker 2>kinds of LEDs in it, right, There's red, green, and

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 2>yellow ones. And so when you look at something yell

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 2>on your phone, it's not actually shooting yellow light, shooting

0:41:37.480 --> 0:41:40.719
<v Speaker 2>some combination of red, blue, and green that's making your

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:43.840
<v Speaker 2>brain think it's yellow. But there's also a frequency that

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:47.479
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't trigger that same Oh that's yellow. Anyways. The point

0:41:47.880 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 2>is that there are combinations of frequencies that maybe our

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:55.600
<v Speaker 2>brains are not designed to like trigger your consciousness of them.

0:41:56.080 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. There should be a unique experience for those combinations,

0:42:01.000 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 1>but the brain has nobody interpret it because it doesn't

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:06.480
<v Speaker 1>get a unique signal for those combinations. So we even

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:08.440
<v Speaker 1>like developed a unique experience.

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:11.919
<v Speaker 2>It's like you're blind to those colors kind of mm hmm, yeah,

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 2>like it just looks red to you. You're like Stanford,

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:17.719
<v Speaker 2>Harvard the irvine. I don't know, mm, it could be

0:42:17.760 --> 0:42:18.360
<v Speaker 2>any athlete.

0:42:18.440 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 1>There's two other sort of ways to think about impossible

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:24.240
<v Speaker 1>colors as well. There are colors that can't be generated

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 1>by any physical source, and then there's these things they

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>called chimerical colors.

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Interesting. All right, let's get into those impossible to make

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 2>colors and dig into what that means. But first let's

0:42:37.520 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 2>take another quick break. Are we getting very colorful today?

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Looking at all of the rainbow of ideas around the

0:42:57.160 --> 0:42:59.799
<v Speaker 2>concept of color and how we perceive it, and what

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:02.680
<v Speaker 2>is a color anyway, and what color is your been

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:03.839
<v Speaker 2>in it as well?

0:43:04.920 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Hey that's a personal question, man.

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:10.759
<v Speaker 2>WHOA Well, you just got really really purple there. I

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:14.680
<v Speaker 2>wasn't even thinking about that. I see what's on your mind,

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Daniel m lunch. Oh that's even racier.

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's steer back to physics.

0:43:22.760 --> 0:43:24.880
<v Speaker 2>But we talked about how maybe there are combinations the

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:28.320
<v Speaker 2>frequencies of light that we can't see, because really color

0:43:28.520 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 2>is our experience of how light hits her eye and

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:33.840
<v Speaker 2>sometimes sets of specific frequency maybe that's sometimes that's a

0:43:33.880 --> 0:43:36.880
<v Speaker 2>combination or the absence of certain frequencies. So color is

0:43:36.880 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 2>a complicated thing. But there are maybe combinations of frequencies

0:43:41.040 --> 0:43:44.000
<v Speaker 2>that we our brains are just not equipped to deteg

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:47.359
<v Speaker 2>unless maybe you're maybe trained to see them, or maybe

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:49.400
<v Speaker 2>you're one of these people born with extra sensors.

0:43:49.480 --> 0:43:51.759
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, it could be. And in the end, we

0:43:51.840 --> 0:43:55.319
<v Speaker 1>don't know what other people experience. We can just ask

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:58.719
<v Speaker 1>them to compare previous experience to current experience or to

0:43:58.800 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 1>some references, but we can't, you know, cross correlate across brains.

0:44:02.400 --> 0:44:04.560
<v Speaker 1>We don't know how to extract from inside the brain

0:44:05.040 --> 0:44:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the actual encoding of these things and interpret it in

0:44:08.000 --> 0:44:11.400
<v Speaker 1>any sort of objective way map from one brain to another.

0:44:12.640 --> 0:44:15.000
<v Speaker 1>In the end, it's frustrating, but we can try to

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:18.880
<v Speaker 1>reverse engineer the system and think about ways to experience

0:44:18.920 --> 0:44:22.120
<v Speaker 1>like weird colors or things that we can't experience. That's

0:44:22.120 --> 0:44:24.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun. And the system, the way it works,

0:44:24.320 --> 0:44:28.720
<v Speaker 1>because it has these overlapping responses, also creates these things

0:44:28.719 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 1>called imaginary colors, colors not that we can't experience, but

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:34.440
<v Speaker 1>that no physical source could generate.

0:44:34.800 --> 0:44:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, I think that's a question that I have

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:40.239
<v Speaker 2>from the beginning. Are there colors that are impossible to make?

0:44:40.640 --> 0:44:43.280
<v Speaker 2>But I guess to be clear, all colors are possible

0:44:43.320 --> 0:44:46.640
<v Speaker 2>in the universe, right, Like you can always stretch light

0:44:47.040 --> 0:44:50.400
<v Speaker 2>to be a certain color infinitely with infinite precision in

0:44:50.400 --> 0:44:50.920
<v Speaker 2>the universe.

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yes, all frequencies of light can exist out there

0:44:54.080 --> 0:44:57.440
<v Speaker 1>in the universe. But remember color is our experience in

0:44:57.480 --> 0:45:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the mind, and it's this interpretation of the the red, green,

0:45:00.600 --> 0:45:03.799
<v Speaker 1>and blue cones and then perhaps through these opposing neurons.

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:06.600
<v Speaker 1>But because those things overlap, there's a question of like

0:45:06.840 --> 0:45:10.800
<v Speaker 1>what would happen if you only triggered the green neuron

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:13.319
<v Speaker 1>right now, the green neuron and the red neuron are

0:45:13.480 --> 0:45:16.520
<v Speaker 1>almost overlapping. They're almost identical, Like there's a very small

0:45:16.560 --> 0:45:20.400
<v Speaker 1>shift between them. So any physical photon that hits your

0:45:20.400 --> 0:45:23.360
<v Speaker 1>eyeball that triggers the green is very likely going to

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:26.600
<v Speaker 1>trigger also some red ones. So you shoot like pure

0:45:26.640 --> 0:45:30.160
<v Speaker 1>green light at somebody's eyeball, some of those red cones

0:45:30.160 --> 0:45:32.120
<v Speaker 1>are also going to get triggered.

0:45:31.920 --> 0:45:33.719
<v Speaker 2>Right because I think what we said before is that

0:45:33.920 --> 0:45:36.360
<v Speaker 2>our cones are not perfect, right, Like, they don't just

0:45:36.400 --> 0:45:39.640
<v Speaker 2>respond to one frequency. They respond to a range of frequencies,

0:45:39.680 --> 0:45:43.040
<v Speaker 2>and in our eyes, those ranges kind of overlap, So

0:45:43.040 --> 0:45:45.600
<v Speaker 2>there are some frequencies that will activate both yes.

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:48.040
<v Speaker 1>And the red and the green in particular are very

0:45:48.080 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 1>close to each other. They respond almost the same way

0:45:50.600 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to different frequencies, and so like if you shoot something

0:45:53.600 --> 0:45:55.560
<v Speaker 1>right in the middle of the green, then the green

0:45:55.680 --> 0:45:57.640
<v Speaker 1>cone is always going to respond and the red cone

0:45:57.680 --> 0:45:59.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to respond. Like ninety percent of the time

0:46:00.200 --> 0:46:03.160
<v Speaker 1>was like further shifted down. But it makes you wonder,

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:06.480
<v Speaker 1>like what would happen if you could somehow just tweak

0:46:06.520 --> 0:46:08.759
<v Speaker 1>the cones. Don't worry about the light you're shooting at

0:46:08.760 --> 0:46:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it just somehow get only the green cone to respond

0:46:12.400 --> 0:46:14.799
<v Speaker 1>without the red cone responding.

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Like what would happen in your brain?

0:46:16.400 --> 0:46:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Yes, they call this hyper green, like the greeniest green

0:46:19.760 --> 0:46:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that you could experience without any pollution from the red.

0:46:23.000 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>In reality, it's essentially impossible to generate this using photons

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:31.080
<v Speaker 1>because all these photons will also stimulate that red cone.

0:46:31.440 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh you're talking about like it's an impossible experience of

0:46:34.600 --> 0:46:35.080
<v Speaker 2>that color.

0:46:35.200 --> 0:46:37.520
<v Speaker 1>We don't know that it's impossible. Like technically, if I

0:46:37.560 --> 0:46:41.640
<v Speaker 1>attached little electrodes to all the nerves behind the green

0:46:41.760 --> 0:46:45.480
<v Speaker 1>cones and stimulated them, then you would have this experience.

0:46:45.680 --> 0:46:47.719
<v Speaker 1>But I can't create a photon that would do the

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:48.239
<v Speaker 1>same thing.

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:50.439
<v Speaker 2>You mean, like, you can't create a photon that will

0:46:50.480 --> 0:46:53.359
<v Speaker 2>ignore the red cones, Yeah, and only hit the green

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:56.680
<v Speaker 2>cone exactly. Well, less you could somehow aim them really well.

0:46:56.520 --> 0:46:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, super precise lasers in the back of your

0:46:59.680 --> 0:47:03.120
<v Speaker 1>eye only hit those green cones. So it's possible, then, well,

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:05.360
<v Speaker 1>we think it's possible for it to happen. It's just

0:47:05.360 --> 0:47:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that there isn't a physical source we could make that

0:47:07.680 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 1>can do that. Yes, but that's the experience of hyper green.

0:47:11.160 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Right right, And it's probably the color of like mountain dew,

0:47:17.040 --> 0:47:18.799
<v Speaker 2>or like if you took a green highlighter and like

0:47:18.880 --> 0:47:21.040
<v Speaker 2>paint is sear the back of your eyeball.

0:47:23.520 --> 0:47:26.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so those are imaginary colors. Then there's another really

0:47:26.520 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 1>fun kind of color that you actually can experience.

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:31.040
<v Speaker 2>But I mean it's not just green, right, and it's

0:47:31.080 --> 0:47:33.600
<v Speaker 2>like all of them right, Like, it's probably possible to

0:47:33.760 --> 0:47:35.759
<v Speaker 2>create a hyper blue or a hyper red.

0:47:35.840 --> 0:47:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Mm hm.

0:47:36.560 --> 0:47:40.280
<v Speaker 1>It's trickier with green and red because those two response

0:47:40.320 --> 0:47:43.080
<v Speaker 1>curves are basically on top of each other, so it's

0:47:43.080 --> 0:47:45.880
<v Speaker 1>harder to separate. Blue is further away, so it's possible

0:47:45.920 --> 0:47:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to experience a purer blue than it is red or green.

0:47:49.840 --> 0:47:52.359
<v Speaker 1>But in principle, yes, these same things are true. Even

0:47:52.400 --> 0:47:55.600
<v Speaker 1>blue photons will stimulate a fraction of the green and

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:56.360
<v Speaker 1>red cones.

0:47:57.200 --> 0:48:00.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, So that's one kind of impossible color. You said,

0:48:00.600 --> 0:48:01.319
<v Speaker 2>there's another kind.

0:48:01.680 --> 0:48:05.960
<v Speaker 1>There's another category. These are called chimerical colors. These are

0:48:06.000 --> 0:48:09.279
<v Speaker 1>colors you experience if you change the way that your

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 1>cones respond. Remember, these are little biological machines and they

0:48:13.160 --> 0:48:15.319
<v Speaker 1>can sort of get tired. You know that if you

0:48:15.360 --> 0:48:17.240
<v Speaker 1>look at a really bright light and then look away,

0:48:17.280 --> 0:48:20.239
<v Speaker 1>for example, you still see it, right, that's because your

0:48:20.280 --> 0:48:23.359
<v Speaker 1>cones are tired and they're responding differently. Now there's something

0:48:23.480 --> 0:48:26.240
<v Speaker 1>like residual effect there. So for example, if you stare

0:48:26.280 --> 0:48:29.840
<v Speaker 1>at like really bright yellow light, it sort tires out

0:48:29.840 --> 0:48:32.960
<v Speaker 1>these opposing neurons. Then if you close your eye or

0:48:33.000 --> 0:48:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you look at something really really black, then you see

0:48:35.960 --> 0:48:39.279
<v Speaker 1>this blue response. There's no blue there. You're seeing a

0:48:39.320 --> 0:48:43.719
<v Speaker 1>reaction to tiring out your blue yellow neurons. And so

0:48:43.719 --> 0:48:47.160
<v Speaker 1>what you see is this super dark blue, this blue

0:48:47.160 --> 0:48:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that you otherwise could not experience because to experience it,

0:48:50.280 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you'd need to receive a bunch of blue photons and

0:48:52.680 --> 0:48:55.239
<v Speaker 1>that would make it brighter. So you see this like

0:48:55.400 --> 0:48:57.040
<v Speaker 1>impossibly dark blue.

0:48:57.719 --> 0:49:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Whoa couldn't you just sit in a room and shoot

0:49:01.120 --> 0:49:02.640
<v Speaker 2>blue photons at my eyeball?

0:49:02.880 --> 0:49:05.200
<v Speaker 1>You could do that, but then receiving those photons would

0:49:05.280 --> 0:49:07.920
<v Speaker 1>create an experience of a brighter blue, and if you

0:49:07.960 --> 0:49:09.800
<v Speaker 1>dial it down eventually you just wouldn't see anything. You

0:49:09.920 --> 0:49:12.440
<v Speaker 1>just see black. So this is like a blue you

0:49:12.440 --> 0:49:15.759
<v Speaker 1>can experience without receiving any photons.

0:49:15.480 --> 0:49:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Right, because you're basically doing the same thing as these

0:49:17.680 --> 0:49:20.600
<v Speaker 2>imaginary colors, right, you're sort of like knocking out your

0:49:20.640 --> 0:49:24.719
<v Speaker 2>perception of certain rods and cones right exactly.

0:49:24.800 --> 0:49:26.920
<v Speaker 1>And this is actually pretty easy to do. You just

0:49:27.000 --> 0:49:29.960
<v Speaker 1>go to like Wikipedia and google chimerical colors. They have

0:49:30.040 --> 0:49:32.719
<v Speaker 1>these templates, and you like staring a yellow dot and

0:49:32.760 --> 0:49:34.919
<v Speaker 1>then look at a black field and you can see

0:49:34.920 --> 0:49:37.319
<v Speaker 1>this blue which is different from just like a really

0:49:37.360 --> 0:49:40.240
<v Speaker 1>really dark blue. It's fascinating. It's called sticky and blue.

0:49:40.760 --> 0:49:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Whea, it's wild to think that, Like, if I'm just

0:49:43.480 --> 0:49:46.600
<v Speaker 2>staring at something yellow, like my brain and my eyeballs

0:49:46.600 --> 0:49:49.640
<v Speaker 2>and brains are constantly going yellow yellow, yellow, yell ye yellow,

0:49:50.200 --> 0:49:52.879
<v Speaker 2>and eventually just like I give up, forget it.

0:49:55.440 --> 0:49:57.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, then they're tired, and then the blue one's out right,

0:49:58.280 --> 0:50:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and then they're sort of like leaning or they're biased

0:50:00.719 --> 0:50:02.680
<v Speaker 1>against it. They're like exhausted, the yell the like, don't

0:50:02.680 --> 0:50:05.280
<v Speaker 1>show me any more yellow. We're leaning blue for a while,

0:50:05.520 --> 0:50:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're basically sending you blue information even though there's

0:50:08.480 --> 0:50:11.719
<v Speaker 1>nothing there. And so because there's no brightness to it,

0:50:11.760 --> 0:50:14.000
<v Speaker 1>but you're getting blue, your brain is like, well, I

0:50:14.080 --> 0:50:16.439
<v Speaker 1>got to give you something blue, but there's no brightness there,

0:50:16.440 --> 0:50:18.560
<v Speaker 1>So what do we do. Let's make the darkest blue

0:50:18.600 --> 0:50:21.080
<v Speaker 1>we can. So it's a very deep blue.

0:50:21.400 --> 0:50:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Does that mean that if I stare at a banana

0:50:23.360 --> 0:50:26.240
<v Speaker 2>long enough, it'll eventually look blue.

0:50:26.640 --> 0:50:28.879
<v Speaker 1>I think it means if you stare a banana long

0:50:28.960 --> 0:50:32.520
<v Speaker 1>enough and close your eyes, you'll see an impossibly blue banana.

0:50:32.600 --> 0:50:34.480
<v Speaker 2>I guess you won't see it because you won't be

0:50:34.520 --> 0:50:37.040
<v Speaker 2>like experiencing photons from the banana. It'll be like sort

0:50:37.040 --> 0:50:40.640
<v Speaker 2>of this lingering memory in your visual cortex of a

0:50:40.680 --> 0:50:41.280
<v Speaker 2>blue banana.

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you'll be experiencing a deep blue banana even though

0:50:44.520 --> 0:50:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you're not getting blue photons from the banana.

0:50:46.719 --> 0:50:50.520
<v Speaker 2>From the banana, Yeah, yeah, I guess it's all because

0:50:51.480 --> 0:50:54.719
<v Speaker 2>we have this kind of flawed bio logical machinery that's

0:50:54.800 --> 0:50:57.080
<v Speaker 2>trying to interpret with the frequency that we see in

0:50:57.120 --> 0:50:59.719
<v Speaker 2>the world. But maybe through revolution, it's done it in

0:50:59.719 --> 0:51:02.000
<v Speaker 2>a week way where you have these weird effects right

0:51:02.040 --> 0:51:05.840
<v Speaker 2>where we can see certain combinations or you know, we

0:51:05.880 --> 0:51:07.040
<v Speaker 2>see residual colors.

0:51:07.480 --> 0:51:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all of these colors in the end are brain's

0:51:09.920 --> 0:51:13.560
<v Speaker 1>interpretation of these signals, signals that are typically generated by

0:51:13.560 --> 0:51:16.840
<v Speaker 1>this experience or that experience. Back for in the corners

0:51:16.840 --> 0:51:18.879
<v Speaker 1>of this and the limitations of it, we can try

0:51:18.920 --> 0:51:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to get some understanding of what it means to see

0:51:21.160 --> 0:51:23.359
<v Speaker 1>color what it tells us about what's happening out there

0:51:23.360 --> 0:51:24.560
<v Speaker 1>in the universe.

0:51:25.680 --> 0:51:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Because I guess you know, as physicists or as scientists,

0:51:28.080 --> 0:51:30.480
<v Speaker 2>we can think about all the different frequencies of light.

0:51:30.719 --> 0:51:33.480
<v Speaker 2>But maybe if you're like a simple creature, you don't

0:51:33.520 --> 0:51:35.400
<v Speaker 2>need to know all that information, Like you don't need

0:51:35.440 --> 0:51:37.920
<v Speaker 2>to know whether something's ten point seven herds. You just

0:51:37.960 --> 0:51:40.520
<v Speaker 2>need to know, like, is this thing going to eat

0:51:40.560 --> 0:51:42.200
<v Speaker 2>me or not? That's in front of me? Is it red?

0:51:42.400 --> 0:51:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Is it the red kind that's going to eat me?

0:51:43.680 --> 0:51:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Or is it the blue kind that's going to not

0:51:45.239 --> 0:51:45.560
<v Speaker 2>eat me?

0:51:45.920 --> 0:51:48.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, And that's why some bees can see into

0:51:48.800 --> 0:51:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the ultraviolet because they have to despot the right kind

0:51:51.080 --> 0:51:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of flower. For example. That's probably why manti strimp have

0:51:54.320 --> 0:51:57.759
<v Speaker 1>super impressive hardware for ultrafast processing of this color and

0:51:57.800 --> 0:51:59.960
<v Speaker 1>then like mostly waste that information because the don't really

0:52:00.040 --> 0:52:02.680
<v Speaker 1>need to know specifically, they just needed fast processing.

0:52:04.440 --> 0:52:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Now, if a manta shrimp looked at a banana, would

0:52:06.520 --> 0:52:07.400
<v Speaker 2>it think it's a banana?

0:52:08.640 --> 0:52:10.560
<v Speaker 1>That's another philosophy of paper I want.

0:52:10.480 --> 0:52:13.920
<v Speaker 2>To write over to think, Oh, that's a nice digim

0:52:13.920 --> 0:52:14.520
<v Speaker 2>blue banana.

0:52:15.400 --> 0:52:17.160
<v Speaker 1>What is it like to be a manta strip eating

0:52:17.160 --> 0:52:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a banana.

0:52:17.880 --> 0:52:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Nobody knows that's the right feel. I'm pretty sure nobody

0:52:20.640 --> 0:52:21.640
<v Speaker 2>has published that paper.

0:52:24.480 --> 0:52:25.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to get on it.

0:52:28.040 --> 0:52:31.160
<v Speaker 2>All right. Well, the interesting discussion here about what color

0:52:31.320 --> 0:52:33.799
<v Speaker 2>is and what we can perceive. And you know, it

0:52:33.800 --> 0:52:38.279
<v Speaker 2>has a physical basis, but our brains the way it's evolved,

0:52:38.560 --> 0:52:42.440
<v Speaker 2>don't experience maybe the world the way physics has built it.

0:52:42.480 --> 0:52:44.440
<v Speaker 1>And it's important to remember that our experience in the

0:52:44.480 --> 0:52:47.799
<v Speaker 1>universe is always one step divorced from the reality of

0:52:47.880 --> 0:52:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the universe, which is, in the end, our interpretation of

0:52:50.680 --> 0:52:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a model we are building in our brain. Our a

0:52:53.320 --> 0:52:56.840
<v Speaker 1>direct experience is what we actually can count on. Everything

0:52:56.840 --> 0:52:58.120
<v Speaker 1>else is our interpretation.

0:52:58.320 --> 0:53:01.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and if that makes you red with anger or

0:53:01.320 --> 0:53:03.600
<v Speaker 2>blue with sadness, just close your eyes.

0:53:03.760 --> 0:53:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Don't yellow at us.

0:53:04.880 --> 0:53:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, imagine a more beautiful universe of colors. All right, Well,

0:53:10.080 --> 0:53:12.680
<v Speaker 2>we hope you enjoyed that. Thanks for joining us. See

0:53:12.680 --> 0:53:13.279
<v Speaker 2>you next time.

0:53:18.040 --> 0:53:20.920
<v Speaker 1>For more science and curiosity, come find us on social

0:53:20.960 --> 0:53:24.920
<v Speaker 1>media where we answer questions and post videos. We're on Twitter,

0:53:25.000 --> 0:53:28.640
<v Speaker 1>disc Org, Insta, and now TikTok. Thanks for listening, and

0:53:28.680 --> 0:53:31.440
<v Speaker 1>remember that Daniel and Jorge explain the universe is a

0:53:31.440 --> 0:53:36.040
<v Speaker 1>production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the

0:53:36.120 --> 0:53:40.279
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:53:40.320 --> 0:53:41.080
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.