WEBVTT - Way-Too-Early Masters Storylines for 2026

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset. When

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>And when I find my.

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Ball in a fried egg Friday egg, the dreaded Frida Egg,

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Friday Frida Egg brid Egg, fridagg bride egg, Lie.

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm about ready to run off of the hump course.

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to another edition of the Friday Golf Podcast.

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 4>I am your host, Andy Johnson. Today I'm super excited.

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 4>I am joined by Friday Golf's Kevin van Valkenberg and

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 4>Joseph Lamania. We are doing our monthly check in where

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 4>we will just kind of bat around a bunch of

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 4>topics on pro golf. We recorded this on Friday of

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 4>last week and now we are two for two and

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty six of having pre recorded deep discussions about

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 4>Chris got her Up and Chris got her Up then

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 4>going on to win, so just you know these conversations.

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 4>It was kind of an in depth conversation about got

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 4>her Up did happen before he won this week, which

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 4>probably only adds fuel to the fire of what we

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 4>were talking about with Chris gotterr Up, who is now

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 4>the fifth rank player in the world of golf, which

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 4>is pretty wild crazy ascension over the last eighteen months

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:39.119
<v Speaker 4>for got her up. Obviously a ton of talent. So

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 4>before we get to that, today's podcast is brought to

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 4>you by our friends over at golf Genius. They are

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 4>who we use for our event series. Is a software

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 4>that's made our lives as people who run events all

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 4>over the country all year long, much easier. It's Golf's

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 4>most powerful and trusted on course GPS scoring, statistics and

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 4>auto shot tracking. They have more than five million active users.

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 4>They are just constantly adding features and bells and whistles

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 4>beyond just the typical scoring so they provide real time

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 4>GPS distances for more than forty seven thousand courses. They

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 4>track accurate distances per club, provide automated stats unless you

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 4>review your track shots post round in see your strokes

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 4>gained analysis. So check out the free edition of golf

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 4>Genius in the Apple Store or Google Play and upgrade

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 4>for all the unique, powerful features of golf shot Pro

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 4>Thanks to our friends at golf Genius. As always, we

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:44.919
<v Speaker 4>love partnering with them and they have some awesome kind

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 4>of more golfer facing tools now than just the stuff

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 4>that we use for our events. All right, check them

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 4>out at Golf Genius. All right, let's get to Kevin

0:02:54.800 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 4>and Joseph. All right, Joseph, Kevin excited to gather here

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 4>in February.

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 5>We've got a a fun theme. I wanted to get

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 5>out ahead of this.

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 4>I always, you know, I like, I like the block

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 4>of being the first podcast to do way too early

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 4>Masters storylines. Hell, I wanted to do this The way

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 4>I kind of viewed this as is in a vein

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 4>of like what am I watching the next couple of weeks.

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 5>We've got kind of a murderer's.

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 4>Row of events coming up with with Pebble and and

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 4>and riv and then you go down to Florida and

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 4>you're in the heat of Masters prep. So I wanted to, uh,

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 4>kind of get this on the blocks. And obviously you

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 4>have players. I guess you know. One thing I didn't

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 4>know that we were going to talk about until yesterday

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 4>was is the Master's the second major now?

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 5>Because the PGA Tour says it is?

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 4>And do you guys have any takes on the on

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 4>the PGA Tour's new marketing slogan that this is major

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 4>for the players?

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 6>I saw where Shane Ryan reached out to the PJ

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 6>Tour and was like, hey, guys, like, what's going on here?

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Like what are you hinting at? And their response was basically.

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 6>Like, oh, you know, people have always thought it was

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 6>like really a major competition, So we'll let the you know,

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 6>we'll let the masses decide what they think or whatnot. So,

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 6>you know, just that kind of cutesy wink wink thing

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 6>I find. Listen, I've been on this block for a

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 6>long time. The majors are made up designation, Like there

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 6>is no like there. Since there's no governing body in sports,

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 6>you can't really like have someone decide what is or

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 6>isn't a major. Essentially, what got decided as being what

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 6>is or isn't a major was decided by Arnold Palmer

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 6>and a bunch of media people that Arnold Palmer was

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 6>friendly with, namely like the Pittsburgh Post Gazette sports editor.

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 6>Paper doesn't even exist anymore, unfortunately, So it's like, it's

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 6>it's silly to me to be like, how daries on

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 6>this as major? Andy, I know you're on. The Western

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 6>Lam was always or the Western Open was always a major.

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 6>You know, Walter Hagen won five of those so it's

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 6>not like you know that what has and has been

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 6>a major hasn't been malleable throughout history. So I guess,

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 6>like what I think the PGA attorney to do is

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 6>just put together another blog cabin and wine and dinahs

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 6>and us media types and make us decide what is

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 6>or is it a major?

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 2>Kevin, I understand that the definition is malleable and has been.

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 2>We need to hold the line.

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 5>This is not a major.

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 2>Live golfers aren't even allowed to play, and this is

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:38.239
<v Speaker 2>not a major championship. And I think my biggest issue

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 2>with trying to do it, if people seriously want to

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 2>try to do it, is that you can't then retroactively

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 2>give people majors when they were playing back nines not

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 2>knowing it was a major, and the pressure that's involved

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 2>in trying to win a major. I understand that's been

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 2>done before, but we cannot let it happen, and we

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 2>need to hold the line. Four is it also just

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 2>a good number. We do not need a fifth.

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 6>It all is perfect to agreement, Joseph, there is no

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 6>other need for majors. Sorry, PJ Tour, you missed out

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 6>like you never should have. Let the PJA of Americas

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 6>break off, you should have broke off. You made a decision,

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 6>now own that forever pulled the line.

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, but then Don Raya would be the president

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 4>of the PGA Tour right now. The I agree. I

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 4>agree with the premise. I think the hardest part about

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 4>winning a major is the back nine, and no back

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 4>nine represents that more than I guess the National where

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:36.039
<v Speaker 4>people just like collapse and or people just can't get

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:39.479
<v Speaker 4>out of the out of the blocks because the the

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 4>pressure and the expectations and the you know, anticipation. I

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 4>think there's something about, you know, the beyond the players,

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 4>whether they deserve to be a major or not. You

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 4>don't just get to announce that you are the first major, too,

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 4>Like there's something about the order, and there is something

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:06.359
<v Speaker 4>extra about the Masters because of the first major from

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 4>the you know Open or what used to be the

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 4>PGA in August.

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 5>That eight month wait.

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 4>Actually adds to the pressure on the first te of

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 4>the Masters because somebody hasn't felt that major feel in

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 4>eight months.

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 5>That adds to.

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 4>The layers of the Masters, and that's another reason why

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 4>the players can't just be a major. Interestingly enough, I

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 4>think something that that comes to light with the with

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 4>the PGA, and I didn't expect to get here in

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 4>this podcast with the PGA moving or with the PGA

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 4>moving on to new CEO, Terry Clark is hired. And

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 4>while the PGA Tour is kind of, you know, really

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 4>heavily throwing around the scarcity schedule, and from things that

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 4>I've gathered this the schedule would yield potentially a early

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 4>August finish with a singular finishing event, no playoffs. All

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 4>of a sudden, this opens the door wide back open

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 4>for the PGA Championship to move back to August. It

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 4>is actually of the rotating venues. You know, when you

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 4>look at the American rotating venues, it's the one that

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 4>has the most free dates versus the US Open, which

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 4>is kind of locked in till twenty fifty on where

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 4>it's going. And that would open the door to I

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 4>think like they've been kind of picking through scraps of

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 4>venues that work for them in May. That would open

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 4>the door for a lot of really interesting venues. And

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 4>if the tour ended their season, it's like a final

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 4>event and then you have a Major after that.

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 5>I think that's actually kind of compelling for golf.

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 2>One question on that would be maybe this shouldn't be

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 2>the end all be all, but like PGA Frisco August

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 2>at PGA Frisco is not a good time to host

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 2>that tournament. And I don't know, maybe that means that

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 2>PJ Frisco isn't a heavily featured golf course in the

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 2>PGA Championship future venue list, which would be totally fine

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 2>with me. But that would seem like kind of a

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:27.239
<v Speaker 2>big issue that they were so committed to that facility

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 2>and I thought that was a big part of their

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 2>future plans. Like, so you're going to try to host

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 2>a tournament in Dallas in August, like that would not

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 2>go well?

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 6>What if PJ Frisco becomes the neome of the PGA, uh,

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 6>you know of America just a sunk costs.

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>You tried, it didn't work.

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 6>Now you just need to walk away from it, you know,

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 6>like the embarrassment is what it is, like you did,

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 6>it just didn't work.

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 4>I believe there's only one PGA Championship awarded to Frisco

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 4>and it is next year.

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so I'm writing a level it could.

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 4>Be a solvable situation. It's you know, I think there

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 4>is a you know, in terms of some wisdom that

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 4>Seth Waw bestowed on the general golf public when he

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 4>was the CEO of the PGA, he described the process

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 4>of locking in dates into the twenty fifties as quote

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 4>unquote irresponsible.

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 5>And this is, you know, if they.

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 4>Were to potentially move back to August or consider it,

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:35.719
<v Speaker 4>the the fact that they have a free schedule is

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:40.679
<v Speaker 4>very compelling and just you know, to give listeners an idea.

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 4>You know, we're we're we just hosted at Quail Hollow,

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 4>we had Valhalla the year before. Venues that are all

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 4>of a sudden open for the PGA if they go

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 4>back to August chamber Spay.

0:10:57.720 --> 0:10:59.839
<v Speaker 5>I think a prime time.

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 4>Augus guest event at at Chambers Bay, where you're deciding

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:10.199
<v Speaker 4>a champion and watching pivotal weekend rounds at nine pm

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:16.199
<v Speaker 4>Eastern would be very popular in a dead zone of sports.

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 4>You also open up, you know, the renovated Madina three,

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 4>which we will we will see this year at the

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 4>President's Cup. I think that's going to be one of

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 4>the more compelling PGA or you know, championship golf courses

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 4>of the next thirty years.

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 5>There's no real space for it for a US Open.

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 4>It's a huge media market Chicago obviously, then you get

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 4>the likes of Aaron Hills in Whistling Straits. Furthermore, like

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 4>when you think about sheer population density, the number of

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 4>people within four to five hours of those places that

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 4>can attend, and what a great time to host in

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 4>that area. So I think that is a fascinating topic

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 4>of discussion for the PGA. And while we're talking about

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, this is all done by the PGA Tours, uh,

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, marketing campaign.

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, I just I.

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 4>Think the this is Yeah, I didn't really expect this

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 4>year to be a year where you have these huge

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 4>underlying stories that are happening in the background of the

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 4>golf that aren't you know, really around live. It's more

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 4>around what does the PGA Tour look like moving forward?

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 4>Because I think everybody expects to see wholesale changes and

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 4>then how does everything fall around that. And I think

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 4>the PGA, you know, with the with their new CEO

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 4>of Terry Clark, is kind of a lynch pin here.

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 2>The other part of all that that I don't know

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 2>that really got brought up. Somebody can check me on this,

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 2>but the college football schedule just also got altered for

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 2>next year, and I believe now is supposed to the

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 2>final is what the weekend before the super Bowl. So

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 2>if the PGA Tour was thinking about still because people

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 2>have said that the Tory week this week still would

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.719
<v Speaker 2>have worked the week before the super Bowl. But now

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 2>if that would be possibly competing with college football, the

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 2>college football final, I wouldn't think that's something that Brian

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Rolapp wanted to would want to steer into. So I

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 2>would maybe be further amo for starting the season after

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 2>the super Bowl. I don't know, but I thought that

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 2>that was probably a relevant announcement with the college football

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 2>finally getting I don't know, Ken if you have any

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:29.719
<v Speaker 2>thoughts on that.

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I just wonder so much how how much of

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 6>a winning strategy is to just be like, oh, we're

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 6>so worried about football, like we got to keep away

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 6>from football. Like I kind of feel like, differentiate your product,

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 6>you know, make it, you know. Maybe so it's not

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:46.959
<v Speaker 6>specifically lined up in terms of the exact same broadcast window,

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 6>but you know, sometimes golf can be a good like

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 6>entree to the actual football like later in the afternoon

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 6>or evening, like maybe just find ways to not go

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 6>directly up against it, but don't don't be so scared

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 6>of it that you're gonna alter your entire schedule just

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 6>to avoid it. I just say Andy Chambers Bay was

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 6>number one on my draft picks of of PJ venues

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 6>that I would like to see return.

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, uh, it.

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 6>Got a raw deal and I just really want to

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 6>see something come back there because I think it's a

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 6>cool venue for pros.

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you just you just think about what they can

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 4>do in August, and it would be incredible. And it's

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 4>just you know, there's some venues in and listen like

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 4>they they almost need to lean in that, Hey, we

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 4>aren't the we aren't the us GA.

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 5>We know we're not the us GA. We aren't going

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 5>to get the top flight.

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 4>But are there other venues that make a ton of

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 4>sense for us UH to go do because of markets?

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 4>And one that just got discarded with you know, no

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 4>second chance is Chamber Spae. You know, I think they're

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 4>they're super thirsty for for pro golf, high level of

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 4>pro golf. And you know what a great you know,

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 4>kind of tell vision product. When you think about it,

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 4>you know, it's it's it's a waterfront, uh late late

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 4>broadcast window golf like that.

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 5>That is a great combination. Let's get to.

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 4>The way too early Masters storylines. As I said, I

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 4>think this is a way to kind of a way

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 4>you can kind of view a lens. I think, like

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 4>if you think about other sports, like you're constantly talking

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 4>about regular season and and does this work for the

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 4>postseason or is this a recipe that can get you

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 4>to the super Bowl? You know, it's always viewed through

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 4>the lens of of of majors, and with the Masters

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 4>less than two months away, this is this is the

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 4>time to start to think about about stuff. And uh,

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm curious what uh what are what are some storylines? Joseph,

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 4>Why don't you lead us off?

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, yeah, it's fun to zag a little bit,

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 2>but I think we'd have to We have stars, Scott Scheffler.

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 5>I want to let him down because I knew I

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 5>didn't need a list them.

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's more fun to start with somebody a little

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 2>more off the board, which I'm sure we'll get to.

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 2>But the more I think about it, I think Scotty

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Scheffler finishes his career with at least four Masters, Like

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 2>I think a fifth is very in range. He has

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 2>completely dominated. It's a golf course that is so perfectly

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 2>well suited for him. And I don't know, I've been

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 2>thinking a little bit about the combination everyone talks about,

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 2>like iron play and short game and the little power. Yeah,

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 2>we know that. I think the ability to control your

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 2>driver the way Scotty does and hit really high ballflight

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 2>pure iron shots is a combination that not that many

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 2>golfers have. I think a lot of guys can hit

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 2>the really high iron shots, but then they're not always

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 2>the most in control of their golf ball off the tee.

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 2>It is such a rare combination to have both of

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 2>those things that, Like, I think Rory's a great example

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 2>where when he's driving it well, like we know he

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 2>can win the Masters, but obviously the driver can get

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 2>a little bit away from him, and so he has

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 2>that high, towering ball flight, but sometimes it gets a

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 2>little bit out of control.

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Scotty has just.

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 2>This unique combination of having both those skills plus a

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 2>world class short game. He's gonna be one of the

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:22.399
<v Speaker 2>strongest favorites we've had at a Master's in a long time.

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:25.479
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, I don't think anybody should be anywhere close

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 2>to Scotty right now. Despite sure of a bad round,

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 2>we're recording this during the waste management. I don't think

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 2>that bad round. He played men a whole lot. He's like,

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 2>it's not going to be fifty to fifty. But I

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 2>think there's a very good chance Scotti Scheffler's winning his

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:40.919
<v Speaker 2>third Masters in April.

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 6>I look, I think he's I might go over Joseph

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 6>even on five jackets, Like I think we're really I mean,

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 6>he's thirty, like crazy, you know, probably twelve more years,

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 6>thirty more years of legitimate Masters like contention where he

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 6>would be among the favorites, if not the favorite, it'd

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 6>be the favorite probably for the next five to six years,

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 6>barring any kind of injury. And it just said, no,

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 6>course is set up better for him just in terms

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 6>of great iron play, great short game to recover putting

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 6>is kind of uh, you know, minimized, but even still

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 6>like he's a very good putter now. So yeah, I

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 6>think we could be looking at like it's probably like

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 6>Nicholas's record of eighteen is out of like range, but

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 6>I think six masters.

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, maybe that's that's with more realistic than you'd think.

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I I mean, you think about like the crop

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 4>of real challengers right now, it's kind of weak. I

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 4>think like there is like a world where where Scotty's

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 4>kind of like choked some players out, you know, and

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 4>he's had had this this effect and impact on golf

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 4>where people have size tried to to chase things to

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 4>improve because of the bar that Scotty has set and

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 4>maybe has had some negative impacts. I'll jump in here

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 4>one of my big stories I'm kind of watching right now.

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to just call them the down bad group.

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 4>Players with very lofty expectations from the general public, media

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 4>appears themselves, who are not performing at the level that

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 4>we would expect at this point in their career. I

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 4>have in this group Ludwig who's taken a clear step back,

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:45.120
<v Speaker 4>and it's it's very early. So you know, my kind

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 4>of framing of this is like one of these guys,

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 4>which ones of these guys are going to show life

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 4>so that they can be a first page Masters betting

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 4>favorite in the sense of a real challenger.

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 5>And all of.

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 4>These players I think need a kind of like a

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 4>seismic directional shift from what we've seen to feel that way.

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 4>So I've got Ludwig, who's obviously contended the two Masters.

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 4>He's played in real contention, Xanderschoffley, Colin Morikawa, who is

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 4>a ace at Augusta National tremendous track record, but also

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 4>is playing You know, I would say the worst golf

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 4>of his career, Victor Hovlin and Jordan Speed, which one

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:39.199
<v Speaker 4>of these players is going to flash and show some

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 4>sort of life. And I think, like I put Speed

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 4>kind of on the very end of this list.

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 5>I threw him on here.

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Joseph's face you thought you were.

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 5>I just threw him on here.

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:56.679
<v Speaker 4>You know, the track record had Augustus good even with

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 4>recent bad things. But like, if Jordan Speed moderately good golf,

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:05.439
<v Speaker 4>you're going to start to hear the Augusta things. And

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:09.479
<v Speaker 4>he's shown he can compete even when he's playing poorly.

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh on, Joseph, He's shown he can compete Augusta.

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 5>There's so many there's probably twenty.

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Bad golf Lash year he was top fifteen.

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, talking about winning, I think there's probably twenty names

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 2>that are winning. But this thing before Jordan Speed, But

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 2>go on.

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 4>But anyways, so I this is that down bad group,

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:29.640
<v Speaker 4>but it ties to Scotti where like you look at

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 4>the OWGR or you look at Data Golf or wherever

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 4>you wherever you want to get your new your your

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 4>news and your rankings for from you know, I know,

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 4>our live our live listenership, would you know probably has

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 4>some other form of ranking service they want us to

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 4>look at. But like you look at the contenders, like

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 4>the in terms of like who's playing the best golf,

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 4>and you know, with Xander being on this list, like

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 4>Xander's playing right now and I don't you know this,

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 4>He's playing as if he's the forty fifth best player

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 4>in the world.

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 2>What, he looks bad right now.

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 4>And you start to look at the list and it's like, okay,

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 4>so there's Rory obviously, but then it's it's forty five

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 4>year old Justin Rose. There's Tommy Fleetwood, Major list, Tommy Fleetwood,

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 4>Russell Henley who's not going to win the Masters. I'm

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 4>just gonna put that out there. He's not going to

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:33.920
<v Speaker 4>win the Masters. Bob McIntyre, nice player, JJ Spawn, Ben

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 4>Griffin who's never played a Masters. Justin Thomas is obviously hurt.

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 4>Then you get to Harris English, Sepstraka, Alex Norin like

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 4>you know, The next person who I'm intrigued by and

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 4>would I would say, is an intriguing player to.

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 5>Watch right now is Hideki Matsuhama.

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 4>But you know, you start to look at this list

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 4>and and one of the things that Scott He's done

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 4>is that three years years ago you look at the

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 4>top ten in the world and you're like, this is stacked,

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 4>Like what a great time to be a golf fan,

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 4>what sublime young talents are in the sport, And right

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 4>now you look at it, and I don't I don't

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 4>know if this is directly tied, but it seems to

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 4>me that while Scott He's ascended, there are ben some

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:23.959
<v Speaker 4>players that have flat out self destructed.

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 6>Do you think the two are related or do you

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 6>think that it is Actually I think they are. Really

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 6>you hinted at that, and I would I would be

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 6>interested to unpack that a little bit more. Just I mean, look,

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 6>the one conversation, though, I think would lend evidence that

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 6>what I would point to is like Marikawa just being

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 6>like completely baffled, you know, not Lasher's matches, but the

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:45.400
<v Speaker 6>year before about like, hey, I've got to hit five

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 6>iron into like the fifth hole. He's hitting eight iron

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 6>like that's just an impossible ask for me.

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:51.880
<v Speaker 1>And you know, did.

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 6>Markaua has he been trying to sort of gain a

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 6>little distance a little bit And that's why the short

0:23:56.440 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 6>game looks horrendous right now. Is is just kind ofgleck that

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:02.719
<v Speaker 6>or lost the plot with that, Like I don't know,

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I would be interesting to see if you

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:08.199
<v Speaker 6>guys think how closely tied together those Scotty's ascendants is

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 6>with the regression.

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 4>I think it absolutely is, because what is you know,

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:22.400
<v Speaker 4>the interesting aspect of Scotty's process and persona is it's

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 4>like just business as usual. You know, we have a

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 4>we have like a you know, a saying that's becoming

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 4>prolific within our company of like run the damn ball.

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 4>Scotty's process has run the damn ball personified. Like he

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 4>just wakes up and he says, we're going to half

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 4>back dive and it's like I'm going to do my

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 4>grip work. You know, it's it's well popularized. We've talked

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 4>about this on the spot a ton. This simple process

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 4>that he just does over and over and over and

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 4>over again, and he's just reinforcing his golfer DNA over

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:58.360
<v Speaker 4>and over and over and over over again, and this

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 4>golfer DNA has over whelmed his peers, overwhelmed them. And

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 4>what I think it's done to them is it has

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 4>forced them to try and get out of their golfer

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 4>DNA to to reach a level that they aren't at,

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 4>and that's where you're seeing some of this regression come from.

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:23.160
<v Speaker 4>I think Xander's a unique case with this group of

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 4>like there was an injury, but at the time at

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:30.640
<v Speaker 4>that at the time of the injury, really you were like, wow,

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 4>like Xander, you know, Scotti's one, but Xander's two, and

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 4>look at this like skill set that like really is

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:43.919
<v Speaker 4>comparable to Scotty in some regards. I think these a

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:46.160
<v Speaker 4>lot of these other guys, and I mean Jordan Speedt's

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:50.439
<v Speaker 4>like the quintessential of this, like has just basically lost

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 4>his fingerprint as a golfer over the years.

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 5>But you look at the other guys.

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 4>With Morikawa, I don't really know what's going on with Ludwig,

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 4>but you know, Victor is his own kind of basket

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 4>of trying to search for that dragon. You know that's

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 4>gonna like trying to slay the dragon constantly. In the

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 4>New One, he got to the top of the game

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 4>with the FedEx Cup, where you know people are like,

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 4>this guy might be the best.

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 5>Player in the world, but he's still searching for something else.

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 4>I think that they're the world golf rankings and what's

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 4>happened to the top flight who we believe the top

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 4>flight contenders. It's just so many have fallen off that

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 4>it lends me to believe that Scotty has had to

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 4>do something with it.

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 6>What's issue about that theory, Andy, is like you look

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 6>at like Fleetwood and Rose, who've kind of been at

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:48.199
<v Speaker 6>maybe the raised their level a little bit, is that

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 6>they were kind of established and who they were before

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 6>Scotty ever appeared on the scene, unlike some of those

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 6>sort of you know, younger guys who are of his generation.

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:58.160
<v Speaker 6>I think you could make a connection of like, hey,

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 6>those guys kind of knew what they're DNA was and

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:03.640
<v Speaker 6>they didn't really mess with it just because the next

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 6>Tiger arrived.

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 4>It's it's actually fascinating, right You think about like who's

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:15.120
<v Speaker 4>raised their profile the most, and it's Russell Henley, Tommy Fleetwood, and.

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 5>Justin Rose.

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 4>A forty five year old Russell Henley's got to be

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 4>like thirty eight off the top of my head, Younger

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 4>thirty six or thirty seven, Fleetwood thirty six or thirty seven,

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 4>all you know, and then Bob McIntyre's kind of the

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 4>outlier here, but it is I'm fascinated by what Scottie's

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 4>psychological impact is on golf right now. That might be

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 4>the most, you know, the most un you can't you

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:58.159
<v Speaker 4>can't statistically prove what he's doing, but all signs point

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 4>to he is overwhelming people.

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:03.640
<v Speaker 6>Rory might be the only thing keeping him from going

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:06.439
<v Speaker 6>like secretary at the Secretariat at the Belmont, Like if

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 6>Rory's flay falls off all of a sudden, the gap

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 6>between Scotty and everybody else is going to be so

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 6>vast like it, Yeah, I don't know, but people even

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:17.360
<v Speaker 6>showing up at major so that that gay.

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 4>That that's where you can get kind of tantalized of

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 4>Xander two years ago, twenty twenty four, Xander because he

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 4>had he didn't have Rory pop in the bat, but

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 4>he there's so few guys that mix. Like what Rory

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 4>can do to Scotty when you watch them play together

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 4>is it's like, Okay, Scotty is.

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 5>Unbelievable.

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 4>Approaching the Green but Rory's really good when he's on

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 4>approaching the green and he's hitting from twenty five or

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 4>thirty yards ahead. Xander reached this apex in twenty twenty

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 4>four because he wasn't as long as Rory, but he

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 4>was in the in the discussion, you know, he's hidden

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 4>one eighty one eighties consistently ball speed numbers, and that

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 4>he's mixing. I'm also a top ten iron player in

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 4>the world. With that, I have a great short game,

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:22.080
<v Speaker 4>and I'm a great putter like he's mixed. Yeah, if

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 4>you think about the blueprint for beating Scotty at this point,

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 4>we've seen I ironically like no names beat him, which

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 4>is very actually tiger like. Like you think about who

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 4>won the Houston Open over him a couple of years ago, Yeager,

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeger beat him, which is like, uh, but where you've

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 4>seen I think where the blueprint to beating Scottie is is.

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 5>You do have to overwhelm him a little bit off

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 5>the tee.

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 4>You have to earn your advantage there to get the

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 4>shorter club to approach with and say, hey, Scotty's unbelievable

0:29:58.360 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 4>with an eight iron in.

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 5>His hand, but I can match that with a wedge

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 5>in my hand.

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 2>You kind of need him to have a bad putting

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 2>week like that is, if he has a good putting week,

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we're anybody else really has a chance

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 2>of winning this year's Masters. But the overall theory Andy

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 2>is interesting. I do think you have to look at

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 2>it case by case, like maybe this will age poorly.

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 2>And I'm sort of not on an island, but I

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 2>think the Ludwig is regressing storyline is being way overblown

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 2>right now. He had a really bad week at Tory,

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 2>but the back half of last year Ludwig was pretty good.

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 2>A lot of it is on the DP World Tour,

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 2>but Ludviig's still twenty six, and we talk all the

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 2>time on this podcast about the best players hitting their

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 2>strides between twenty seven and thirty five. Ludwig has now

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 2>finished in the top ten of both of the first

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 2>two Masters he's played in, and he's just now hitting

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 2>that peak where we start to expect more consistent results.

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 2>So like in Ludwig's case, I actually don't think. I

0:30:57.600 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 2>don't think the wow he's on the downturn and we're

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 2>seeing and decline is going to age super well. Like

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 2>I think six months from now, we're going to be

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 2>having a very different conversation about love big so Xander, Yeah, injury,

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 2>like I think it is case by case. And the

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 2>one other name I don't think you mentioned is John Rahm,

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 2>who I think has a very good chance of winning

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 2>the Masters outside of Scotty. So is it Scotty's dominance

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 2>that we've seen a little bit of regression from some

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 2>of these guys, or is Scotty just so much better

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 2>than everybody else that it looks like that when these

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 2>golfers aren't actually getting appreciably worse, Like I think John

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 2>ram has gotten a little worse. Xander's definitely gotten a

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 2>little worse post injury. But like Kevin's saying, like Tommy

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Fleetwood's playing the best golf he's ever played, Rory Plat

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 2>has elevated his level last year, I don't know that

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 2>it's true that everybody's getting dissuaded by what Scotty's doing.

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 6>You know, Joseph, your loving point reminds me of something

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 6>my football reporting days, where I used to cover the

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 6>Ravens and was read a lot about Joe Flacco, And

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, there's always a debate about this flack elite

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 6>is flacko progressing whatever. And remember asking John Harbor about

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 6>something once and he was like, you know, you guys

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 6>think of progression as like a chart that like it

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 6>just kind of goes up like this, but in reality,

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 6>it's more like a staircase, like it goes up and

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 6>then it flattens, and it goes up, and it flattens

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 6>and it goes up. So you know what our expectations

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 6>for for Ludvig are probably going like that, but the

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 6>reality is is like he took that leap and maybe

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 6>like we're sort of in one of those brief flat

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 6>lines where it kind of is going to go up

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 6>again in a little bit. And look, you're right, nobody

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 6>seems like a better course fit for the Masters than him,

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 6>and a lot of its from early results, so we

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 6>could see that sort of flip all of a sudden,

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 6>it's like, oh, Ludvig's back, when really, you know, we

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 6>just were kind of in one of those little lulls.

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 2>And like JJ Spahn had a breakout year. Was he

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 2>thirty four last year, like we're talking Ludvig's twenty six.

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Like I do think there needs to be a little

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 2>more grace with us getting a little bit reacting super

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:00.120
<v Speaker 2>strongly to what we saw in an event in January.

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Like the whole conversation around the Masters is going to

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 2>change after the players and golfers are going to start

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 2>to turn it on a little bit. I wonder, Andy

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:10.800
<v Speaker 2>to your theory about like broader themes influencing play if

0:33:10.840 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 2>the new schedule in a little bit more of an

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 2>off season is going to lead to some slower starts

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 2>into us overreacting to some January February results. I think

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 2>love thing could have this thing turned around within three

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 2>weeks and we won't even remember what happened to Tory Pines.

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 4>It's like the trend of players not playing preseason football

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 4>and then they come out week one and look a

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 4>little sloppy, and it's like, well, like how much stock

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 4>do you want to put into week one and week two?

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 4>Fair analogy, Kevin, what's your first what's kind of your

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 4>first storyline you want to hit on?

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 6>I kind of want to think about, like, is Chris

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 6>got her up emerging to be.

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 5>On my way?

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 6>I figured you guys might have that on one, but like,

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 6>this is someone who's aggressive, who's just a really good

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 6>driver of really good iron player, has a lot of

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 6>different shots, can shape the ball different different ways, you know,

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 6>and as young and to where you're like, holy shit,

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 6>like this might be you know, the beginning of something

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 6>really great. And you know, I think like that Scottish

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 6>Open win last year was sort of like a like whoa, like, oh,

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 6>this is a real player. This isn't just like a

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:17.399
<v Speaker 6>you know, a you know, a fluke here. I mean

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 6>that this is someone who can play on real golf courses,

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 6>you know, re Renaissance Club notwithstanding, but this is someone

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 6>who can play in a lot of different weather and

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 6>I think just he's kind of the player I'm in

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 6>some ways most interested in this season early on, because

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 6>like now we're reaching part like okay, like you're going

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:36.879
<v Speaker 6>to be in all the majors, can you contend in one?

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 6>Like I don't know if winning one is a realistic thing,

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:41.759
<v Speaker 6>but he's good enough to contend that great at part

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 6>rush too yeah oh yeah.

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 4>Just as like a you know, just a side and

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 4>I know Scotty had an awful first round, but you know,

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:57.800
<v Speaker 4>you talk about ascension and getting Scottish Open. He stares

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:00.279
<v Speaker 4>down Rory in a final round and wins. You know,

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 4>it's a big time, big time round, less consequential round,

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 4>but still you know you are kind of a player

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:11.720
<v Speaker 4>de joure of the early season.

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 5>What does that earn you?

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 4>In Scottsdale in the first round pairing with Scottie Shuffler

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:22.839
<v Speaker 4>and you go out and beat him by ten? Guy,

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:27.399
<v Speaker 4>I think the guy has the most importantly, Like all

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 4>these guys have incredible traits, incredible talents. I think the

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:35.760
<v Speaker 4>thing that I like about got Her Up the most

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 4>is the attitude and the effective I know I belong

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:45.359
<v Speaker 4>here and I am this good. You know, there is

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 4>what I feel like with got Her Up that shines

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 4>through the most beyond just the power the sheer traits

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 4>is he seems to believe he belongs in any moment

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:58.920
<v Speaker 4>that he finds himself on the golf course.

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:03.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you. Something I was working on that I

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 2>had put out this week was looking at early major success.

0:36:06.440 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 2>It was a thing I was focused on with within

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 2>the context of Ludwig, but looking at guys over the

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 2>past like fifteen sixteen years who in their first full

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:17.799
<v Speaker 2>season of majors and I just said full season being

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 2>they played at least two Because I didn't want these

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:22.800
<v Speaker 2>random like they started as an amateur three years before

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 2>they actually started playing major. So first season with at

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 2>least two majors, how did guys do it? And you

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 2>go and look at who had early success in majors,

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 2>and almost all of them have gone on to do

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 2>something impressive to win, Like the top five names are

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:39.880
<v Speaker 2>will z Ala Taurus who then got hurt. So it's

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:42.319
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of it. That's a sad one. Morikawa

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 2>who won multiple Scottie right comes out has immediate major success.

0:36:46.920 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Obviously we know what scott He's gone on to do.

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Jason Day, it's another person who pops up goes on

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:54.359
<v Speaker 2>to be the world number one. Last year was Chris

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:56.759
<v Speaker 2>Gottrup's first year where he played at least two and

0:36:56.800 --> 0:36:59.240
<v Speaker 2>he had the second best but at least by strokes

0:36:59.239 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 2>gain from a strokes gain standpoint, second best performance of

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 2>any player last year who played in at least a

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:07.799
<v Speaker 2>weekend or two weekends. I might have written, but it

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 2>was Scottie number one at three and a half strokes around,

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:11.880
<v Speaker 2>and then it was Chris Gottrup at two and a

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 2>half strokes around. Played well at Oakmont and as you mentioned,

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Andy like was involved late at Port Rush, So it

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 2>might be just staring us right in the face that

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:23.400
<v Speaker 2>the guys who show this at an early age, especially

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 2>who have projectable skills with the ball striking. He's a

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:29.799
<v Speaker 2>great driver the golf ball, really good iron player. It

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of gets like, wait, why not Chris Gotter up,

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Like it might be just be an obvious one that's

0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 2>looking us right in the face that of course he's

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:36.919
<v Speaker 2>going to play well in majors this year.

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 4>That's kind of how I felt last fall. I feel

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 4>like Joseph, we did something on breakout players last fall,

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 4>and I think I've said, like, I think Chris gotterup

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:49.080
<v Speaker 4>ends up being a top ten.

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 5>Player in the world, top twelve player in the world.

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:54.879
<v Speaker 4>And I do think that it is staring us right

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 4>in the face, like this is a guy that goes

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 4>anywhere in the game, translates, and then he has the

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 4>mentality like not scared.

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 5>I think like I you know, listen like.

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 4>I I've you know, over the years, you get to

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:15.600
<v Speaker 4>know guys that have accomplished a lot in the game,

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 4>and you know, you resoundingly, resoundingly like you end up

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 4>in conversations talking about people that maybe never got to

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 4>where you thought they would get to or win one

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:32.399
<v Speaker 4>of the things that you thought they would want. And oftentimes,

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 4>what I've found in talking to the best of the

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:40.359
<v Speaker 4>best is that their common response is, you know that

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:44.359
<v Speaker 4>guy just doesn't have it that in the moment, you

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 4>see it on their face, and and I think that

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 4>is like an underrated It's it's you can't really synthesize it.

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:00.160
<v Speaker 4>But it's so different than all the other sports in

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:03.240
<v Speaker 4>a way, like people like you see this late in

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 4>an NBA game or a college basketball game where it

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:10.240
<v Speaker 4>becomes non reactionary and guy misses late game free throws

0:39:10.320 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 4>and then they're choke artist.

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:11.839
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:39:12.840 --> 0:39:16.279
<v Speaker 4>The thing with golf is like every shot has that

0:39:16.400 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 4>period of time, and that insurmountable pressure that you feel

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 4>just gets heavier and heavier the later you go into

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 4>a tournament, and and it is just not getting off

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 4>the bus on Sunday, right. And you see this happen

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 4>time and time at some events. And I think Rory

0:39:34.120 --> 0:39:38.880
<v Speaker 4>probably would talk eloquently about his struggles at Augusta National,

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:42.200
<v Speaker 4>and in many years he didn't. People were like, why

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 4>can't he get started well? Because you feel this immense

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:51.239
<v Speaker 4>pressure that makes it you know, He talked about this

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 4>year with like the first tea, like there's the most

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 4>nervous I've been ever, Like some players in their makeup

0:39:59.280 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 4>cannot hand that. And I think that's where you see

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 4>slow starts to majors. What you highlighted on. Chris Goddrup

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 4>played last year his two biggest tournaments as a professional,

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:15.439
<v Speaker 4>in the US Open and the Open Championship, and people

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 4>will huff and puff about, Oh, you guys are I

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:20.320
<v Speaker 4>think he finished T twenty three or T sixteen in

0:40:20.360 --> 0:40:21.719
<v Speaker 4>the US Open, T twenty three.

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:24.640
<v Speaker 5>Ye people are, oh, oh T twenty three, Like.

0:40:24.640 --> 0:40:27.279
<v Speaker 4>You guys are. This is his first major as a pro.

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:31.480
<v Speaker 4>I believe, maybe second.

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:34.839
<v Speaker 2>I think he had started one. I'll have it up once.

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:37.759
<v Speaker 5>But anyways, like at a time he played in this

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:38.399
<v Speaker 5>is his third.

0:40:38.520 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 2>He played in the US Open in twenty twenty two,

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 2>one PGA in twenty twenty four, and then this was

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:46.000
<v Speaker 2>just it was really his first start as being like

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 2>an established.

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:50.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you come out and you you I think I

0:40:50.520 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 4>believe he led the field and driving and he and

0:40:53.719 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 4>it's just like part of this, like he plays this

0:40:56.040 --> 0:40:56.880
<v Speaker 4>stretch of golf.

0:40:58.360 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 5>I think he has it is my greater point.

0:41:04.560 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 2>I guess the question would be the short game, right, like,

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, I don't know that we know. I mean,

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 2>his short game numbers are actually pretty good looking through

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:15.280
<v Speaker 2>it now it's his debut, if you want a nitpick,

0:41:16.120 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 2>we do see a little underperformance and players master's debut.

0:41:19.680 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 2>So like maybe, but to Andy, to your point about

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 2>not being overwhelmed, I think that could be a mitigating factor.

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:26.799
<v Speaker 2>There a little bit that he won't show up and

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 2>be completely awestruck by everything he's seeing, like he might

0:41:30.000 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 2>just be a gamer and ready to play it. So yeah,

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:34.239
<v Speaker 2>I think it might be staring us right in the face.

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:37.279
<v Speaker 6>Speaking of people who do not feel like gamers at

0:41:37.280 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 6>the moment, Andy, like, would you buy or sell more

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:43.520
<v Speaker 6>Kawa going forward? In the just idea of like we're

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:45.919
<v Speaker 6>going to see a bounce back. I mean I don't

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:47.920
<v Speaker 6>love the like, oh, you know he won his team

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:50.640
<v Speaker 6>majors during COVID, there was no actual pressure, like you know,

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:53.080
<v Speaker 6>there's still pressure of like you know, you're coming down

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 6>the back night of a major.

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I think some of that is overblown.

0:41:55.200 --> 0:41:58.239
<v Speaker 6>But if we are talking about like do you have

0:41:58.320 --> 0:41:59.880
<v Speaker 6>it in the moment when you don't have to be

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 6>actionary when you have to think through your shots, Like

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:06.839
<v Speaker 6>is some of that overwhelming Marikaua now to where he's

0:42:06.920 --> 0:42:09.800
<v Speaker 6>just sort of scrambled on certain things where his limitations

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:11.239
<v Speaker 6>are starting to show up more and more.

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:22.880
<v Speaker 4>I think it's a puzzling situation with Colin Marikawa. The

0:42:22.920 --> 0:42:25.840
<v Speaker 4>clip that obviously went viral early the week of the

0:42:25.880 --> 0:42:35.240
<v Speaker 4>Phoenix Open with him chipping is alarming. I think chipping

0:42:35.440 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 4>short game struggles for the best players in the world

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 4>befuddle me completely.

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:46.040
<v Speaker 5>I do not understand short game.

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:49.800
<v Speaker 4>If you want to be a competent short game player,

0:42:51.120 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 4>all you need to do is be fundamentally sound and

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:59.759
<v Speaker 4>be able to read the lies. And I think that

0:43:00.800 --> 0:43:05.319
<v Speaker 4>the crazy thing about Morikawa, and you can just see

0:43:05.320 --> 0:43:09.200
<v Speaker 4>it clear as day on that chip, is this is

0:43:10.040 --> 0:43:14.960
<v Speaker 4>a guy that's won to majors. He has been routinely

0:43:15.000 --> 0:43:17.279
<v Speaker 4>one of the five best players in the world, and

0:43:17.360 --> 0:43:23.640
<v Speaker 4>the fundamentals look awful on the chipping, and I think

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 4>we've seen this, like having a bad short game that

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 4>you can't trust is a recipe for coming up short

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:35.920
<v Speaker 4>in major championships because you are eventually going to have

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:37.840
<v Speaker 4>to get up and down. You're going to have to

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 4>save those critical pars and winning majors is totally about

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:49.800
<v Speaker 4>keeping your momentum pointed forward. And oftentimes the par saves

0:43:49.840 --> 0:43:53.000
<v Speaker 4>from hairy situations that you get up and down because

0:43:53.040 --> 0:43:54.600
<v Speaker 4>you know you can dump it over here and it

0:43:54.680 --> 0:43:58.399
<v Speaker 4>might not be the easiest chip, but it's doable. Are

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:01.040
<v Speaker 4>the things. I mean, that's what makes Scotty magic. Like

0:44:01.080 --> 0:44:05.319
<v Speaker 4>you could look at Scotty and his majors and so

0:44:05.640 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 4>often the pivotal moment and you think about like the

0:44:09.239 --> 0:44:11.799
<v Speaker 4>obvious one, the clearest day one was when he chipped

0:44:11.840 --> 0:44:14.520
<v Speaker 4>into the Masters on the third hole. But you go

0:44:14.640 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 4>to last year at Port Rush, there was you know,

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:20.520
<v Speaker 4>in the in the final round, he's just trying to

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 4>nail down the door.

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:23.240
<v Speaker 5>There were up and downs.

0:44:23.480 --> 0:44:27.879
<v Speaker 4>I you know that that lead that fueled that kept

0:44:27.960 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 4>him out in front. You know, there's always these chippens.

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 4>To me, that's one of the things that goes underrated

0:44:35.719 --> 0:44:38.919
<v Speaker 4>about Rory McElroy. If you watch Pinehurst when he didn't

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:42.279
<v Speaker 4>get it done in the middle part of the of

0:44:42.320 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 4>his final round, there were extraordinary up and downs that

0:44:45.600 --> 0:44:48.040
<v Speaker 4>kept him in it when he was kind of hairy.

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:50.839
<v Speaker 4>So anyways, I think, like with more Kawa, I don't

0:44:50.880 --> 0:44:54.080
<v Speaker 4>know I kind of thought he was going to rebound

0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:56.960
<v Speaker 4>this year. But I mean, if you can't figure out,

0:44:57.000 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 4>like I don't understand how you haven't found a coach

0:44:59.560 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 4>that can get you fundamentally sound on the short game

0:45:02.000 --> 0:45:03.960
<v Speaker 4>when your job is to play professional golf.

0:45:05.640 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Just would add his putting has also been horrendous the

0:45:09.160 --> 0:45:11.520
<v Speaker 2>last year. And when you're talking about a player who

0:45:11.600 --> 0:45:15.200
<v Speaker 2>already is a little bit limited speed wise, he's he's

0:45:15.239 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 2>not like Russell Henley lanth off the tea, but he's

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 2>he's giving up distance to the top guys and has

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:23.000
<v Speaker 2>multiple other holes in his game the short game. You're

0:45:23.000 --> 0:45:27.359
<v Speaker 2>referencing Andy and his putter has been awful since last year.

0:45:28.000 --> 0:45:30.160
<v Speaker 2>That you have to be incredible. He has to put

0:45:30.160 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 2>on like the one of the best iron displays to

0:45:33.040 --> 0:45:35.920
<v Speaker 2>be playing from behind guys. It's just it feels like

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:37.720
<v Speaker 2>there's too much that has to go right for Colin

0:45:37.719 --> 0:45:38.800
<v Speaker 2>to be a serious contender.

0:45:39.880 --> 0:45:41.920
<v Speaker 6>I think we thought, you know, this is a generational

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:43.839
<v Speaker 6>iron player. You know he's, oh, he has the same

0:45:43.880 --> 0:45:45.799
<v Speaker 6>dispersion with a six iron that most people have with

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:48.279
<v Speaker 6>a nine iron. All that talk, like, yeah, we thought

0:45:48.320 --> 0:45:50.800
<v Speaker 6>that that was going to make him be a contender.

0:45:50.880 --> 0:45:51.240
<v Speaker 5>Forever.

0:45:51.640 --> 0:45:53.920
<v Speaker 6>We just didn't sort of see that these other holes

0:45:54.000 --> 0:45:57.160
<v Speaker 6>might emerge within his game. But I I may I

0:45:57.280 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 6>was wondering kind of at the Ryder Cup, like, is

0:45:59.120 --> 0:46:02.160
<v Speaker 6>this the last team make American team that we see

0:46:02.160 --> 0:46:04.120
<v Speaker 6>markw make for you know?

0:46:04.400 --> 0:46:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Ever maybe like, yeah, it's it's.

0:46:07.600 --> 0:46:10.239
<v Speaker 6>Kind of harsh to put it that way, but look,

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:12.360
<v Speaker 6>we're talking about like a lot of younger guys are

0:46:12.800 --> 0:46:14.919
<v Speaker 6>going to sort of start to put more pressure on him.

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:18.600
<v Speaker 6>And would you right now like take Colin Mark Howe

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:22.600
<v Speaker 6>over Pearson Coudi or Michael Thorbjornsen on the President's Cup, Like,

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:25.320
<v Speaker 6>I think that would be an insane sort of decision

0:46:25.520 --> 0:46:28.439
<v Speaker 6>to to do what the Americans have often done, which

0:46:28.480 --> 0:46:30.560
<v Speaker 6>is like sort of, well pick the guys who have

0:46:30.600 --> 0:46:32.919
<v Speaker 6>experience as opposed to like pick the guys who are,

0:46:33.440 --> 0:46:36.239
<v Speaker 6>you know, like the next coming. And I feel like

0:46:36.920 --> 0:46:38.799
<v Speaker 6>there's a good chance that the game is sort of

0:46:38.840 --> 0:46:39.920
<v Speaker 6>starting to slip.

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:40.520
<v Speaker 1>From markwa Now.

0:46:40.560 --> 0:46:42.879
<v Speaker 6>Look, we could look dumb when he finishes T ten

0:46:42.960 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 6>and Augusta or I could look dumb, but it just

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:47.719
<v Speaker 6>doesn't feel like it's trending in the right direction now.

0:46:48.200 --> 0:46:52.120
<v Speaker 4>Joseph, I don't know if you've done any data analysis

0:46:52.160 --> 0:46:54.440
<v Speaker 4>on this, but i'd i'd be you know, this is

0:46:54.480 --> 0:46:56.680
<v Speaker 4>prescient with Brooks right now.

0:46:58.840 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Putting related.

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:04.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm just curious if the numbers beare this out

0:47:04.600 --> 0:47:06.839
<v Speaker 4>because I think this is just like you know, if

0:47:06.880 --> 0:47:08.120
<v Speaker 4>you've been.

0:47:08.200 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 5>Intertwined in the golf in golf, you kind of know this.

0:47:12.200 --> 0:47:16.920
<v Speaker 4>But I think something we don't put enough credence to

0:47:17.120 --> 0:47:20.080
<v Speaker 4>is that putting gets just exponentially harder as you age.

0:47:20.600 --> 0:47:22.720
<v Speaker 4>You don't have the nerves, you don't have the naive

0:47:23.280 --> 0:47:26.920
<v Speaker 4>you don't have like the naive approach it.

0:47:26.880 --> 0:47:29.480
<v Speaker 5>It is kind of part of golf that gets.

0:47:29.719 --> 0:47:34.880
<v Speaker 4>Harder when you enter your thirties and forties, and and

0:47:34.960 --> 0:47:38.400
<v Speaker 4>I think you see skills deteriorate, and we've seen skills

0:47:38.440 --> 0:47:42.440
<v Speaker 4>deteriorate historically, Like it gets harder to be a great putter.

0:47:42.760 --> 0:47:44.920
<v Speaker 4>And I think a lot of it is like you

0:47:45.000 --> 0:47:50.359
<v Speaker 4>lose your innocence, as Padrick Harrington would say, and like

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:53.239
<v Speaker 4>you know, you listen to you listen to Rory talk

0:47:53.280 --> 0:47:56.400
<v Speaker 4>about chasing the feeling when we had him on the

0:47:56.400 --> 0:47:59.080
<v Speaker 4>shotgun start where he's like, I was trying to chase

0:47:59.120 --> 0:48:02.040
<v Speaker 4>that youthful ex uberants, like that that spirit and that

0:48:02.120 --> 0:48:06.360
<v Speaker 4>love of the game and that care free attitude. You remember,

0:48:06.520 --> 0:48:08.799
<v Speaker 4>do you remember when when people putted it with the

0:48:08.840 --> 0:48:11.799
<v Speaker 4>pins in and during COVID and with the rule change

0:48:11.800 --> 0:48:14.400
<v Speaker 4>and Adam Scott you know, got off to a great

0:48:14.400 --> 0:48:17.080
<v Speaker 4>start he had and people asked him like about putting

0:48:17.080 --> 0:48:18.920
<v Speaker 4>with the pin in and He's like, it just reminds

0:48:19.000 --> 0:48:21.160
<v Speaker 4>me of being a kid on the putting green and

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:24.719
<v Speaker 4>putting into those little the you know, the little mini

0:48:24.800 --> 0:48:29.920
<v Speaker 4>size flags on a putting green. Putting is is like

0:48:30.920 --> 0:48:33.840
<v Speaker 4>so much harder. When you get older, you think about

0:48:33.880 --> 0:48:37.640
<v Speaker 4>more stuff. When you get older, you're more aware and

0:48:37.680 --> 0:48:41.000
<v Speaker 4>that you know, with with with what you said about

0:48:41.040 --> 0:48:45.000
<v Speaker 4>Colin's putting, you know, also deteriorating that he was never

0:48:45.040 --> 0:48:45.960
<v Speaker 4>a natural putter.

0:48:48.360 --> 0:48:50.879
<v Speaker 2>My mind's going a lot of directions now. I think, yes,

0:48:50.920 --> 0:48:54.440
<v Speaker 2>I believe it is born out that you get worse

0:48:54.800 --> 0:48:56.320
<v Speaker 2>and putting as you age, but I would think that

0:48:56.360 --> 0:48:58.319
<v Speaker 2>would be I think most of that happens after the

0:48:58.360 --> 0:49:00.719
<v Speaker 2>ages that Colin is currently. Yeah, Like I think that's

0:49:00.760 --> 0:49:04.319
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about somebody in their late thirties. I also

0:49:04.320 --> 0:49:07.400
<v Speaker 2>wonder how technique factors into some of this too, and

0:49:07.520 --> 0:49:12.440
<v Speaker 2>that is there something technical happening as Colin's trying to

0:49:12.440 --> 0:49:15.440
<v Speaker 2>work out his ball striking that then like manifests itself

0:49:15.440 --> 0:49:16.200
<v Speaker 2>in his putting.

0:49:17.160 --> 0:49:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:49:17.600 --> 0:49:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Luke Kurdanin had just put out an awesome video about

0:49:20.040 --> 0:49:23.120
<v Speaker 2>how Justin Rose's full swing impacts his putting and how

0:49:23.200 --> 0:49:25.920
<v Speaker 2>changing to the claw has taken his putting to a

0:49:25.920 --> 0:49:28.520
<v Speaker 2>new level. Like just the interaction between what you're trying

0:49:28.600 --> 0:49:31.080
<v Speaker 2>to do with your ball striking and how that impacts

0:49:31.080 --> 0:49:33.880
<v Speaker 2>your putting. I wouldn't be shocked if something's happening like

0:49:33.880 --> 0:49:37.600
<v Speaker 2>that with Colin. So I don't know, but it doesn't

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:38.359
<v Speaker 2>look good right now.

0:49:39.080 --> 0:49:40.120
<v Speaker 6>You know what I always think about it is the

0:49:40.160 --> 0:49:43.320
<v Speaker 6>one exception to that, Andy is there our boy Phil Nicholson,

0:49:43.520 --> 0:49:45.800
<v Speaker 6>who got like his best putting years were from like

0:49:45.840 --> 0:49:49.000
<v Speaker 6>two thousand and five to two thousand, like fifteen. He

0:49:49.160 --> 0:49:51.640
<v Speaker 6>got to be like a significantly better putter by going

0:49:51.640 --> 0:49:54.040
<v Speaker 6>to that claw thing or whatever he did then then

0:49:54.080 --> 0:49:55.800
<v Speaker 6>what he was when he was younger.

0:49:55.880 --> 0:49:58.240
<v Speaker 1>But like that, you're right last.

0:49:58.160 --> 0:50:03.879
<v Speaker 4>Night, propose to sure did Phil get more delusional as

0:50:03.880 --> 0:50:07.960
<v Speaker 4>he aged less self aware?

0:50:11.680 --> 0:50:13.120
<v Speaker 1>You know what? You might be?

0:50:13.160 --> 0:50:18.000
<v Speaker 6>Honest, Some them there just further and further into the

0:50:18.000 --> 0:50:21.239
<v Speaker 6>realm of fantasy. But you're right, like the greats are

0:50:21.280 --> 0:50:23.160
<v Speaker 6>riddled with a lot of guys who just lost it.

0:50:23.480 --> 0:50:23.719
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:50:23.880 --> 0:50:27.799
<v Speaker 6>Tom Watson famously like just kind of completely forgot how

0:50:27.800 --> 0:50:30.960
<v Speaker 6>to put into his thirties when he was like truly,

0:50:31.719 --> 0:50:33.719
<v Speaker 6>you know what, it could have been one of the

0:50:33.760 --> 0:50:36.360
<v Speaker 6>all time greats if he had putted better through his

0:50:36.360 --> 0:50:37.720
<v Speaker 6>his thirties and early forties.

0:50:38.160 --> 0:50:40.160
<v Speaker 1>And Palmer kind of lost his putting.

0:50:39.920 --> 0:50:42.400
<v Speaker 6>Stroke too, Like there's a lot of stories like that

0:50:42.440 --> 0:50:44.040
<v Speaker 6>where guys just lost their nerve.

0:50:44.719 --> 0:50:46.040
<v Speaker 2>I think the part I would want to really drill

0:50:46.040 --> 0:50:48.319
<v Speaker 2>into is is that losing your innocence and all this

0:50:48.840 --> 0:50:50.680
<v Speaker 2>mental stuff which I wouldn't want to dismiss, like I

0:50:50.719 --> 0:50:54.480
<v Speaker 2>think could be could also be like the your vision

0:50:54.719 --> 0:50:58.279
<v Speaker 2>and like little things that like that that can make

0:50:58.320 --> 0:51:01.920
<v Speaker 2>a big difference, like you're trying to fast twitch fibers

0:51:01.920 --> 0:51:04.040
<v Speaker 2>and stuff, and we I love just in general the

0:51:04.080 --> 0:51:06.680
<v Speaker 2>topic and golf of Andy. I know you talk about

0:51:06.680 --> 0:51:09.319
<v Speaker 2>this a lot, Like one part of your game, you

0:51:09.360 --> 0:51:11.600
<v Speaker 2>swing a certain way that helps you get driver, but

0:51:11.640 --> 0:51:13.399
<v Speaker 2>it makes you struggle with your wedge, Like is there

0:51:13.400 --> 0:51:15.920
<v Speaker 2>something that as you age, it is very difficult to

0:51:15.920 --> 0:51:19.800
<v Speaker 2>cling to good ball striking while also having the steady

0:51:19.880 --> 0:51:22.600
<v Speaker 2>parts of putting. And I don't know the answer to that,

0:51:22.680 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 2>but I think it is true that you get worse.

0:51:24.480 --> 0:51:27.439
<v Speaker 4>I think that you know, this is an underrated part

0:51:27.480 --> 0:51:33.920
<v Speaker 4>of Scotty's putting transformation. Underratedly impressive part of Scotty's putting

0:51:33.920 --> 0:51:37.719
<v Speaker 4>transformation is that we have seen I mean, once you

0:51:38.120 --> 0:51:41.360
<v Speaker 4>feel the pressure of the putter as a great ball striker,

0:51:41.440 --> 0:51:44.399
<v Speaker 4>one of the things is that everybody is everybody lives

0:51:44.440 --> 0:51:47.600
<v Speaker 4>under this warped expectation that they should make more puts

0:51:47.600 --> 0:51:51.759
<v Speaker 4>than they should and a lot of those putts live

0:51:52.000 --> 0:51:55.960
<v Speaker 4>in the world where elite elite ball strikers hit approach

0:51:55.960 --> 0:51:59.600
<v Speaker 4>shots to a lot and they can tend a lot.

0:51:59.640 --> 0:52:03.200
<v Speaker 4>They're on TV a lot, so you notoriously see them

0:52:03.280 --> 0:52:05.640
<v Speaker 4>missing a lot of putts and a lot of putts

0:52:05.680 --> 0:52:08.239
<v Speaker 4>that like that, there's like a weight to that, and

0:52:08.320 --> 0:52:11.239
<v Speaker 4>we saw it. I think like the poster boys for

0:52:11.280 --> 0:52:15.359
<v Speaker 4>this is Adam Scott and Sergio Garcia, Lee Westwood through

0:52:15.400 --> 0:52:18.200
<v Speaker 4>the years, like these are the guys where it's like god,

0:52:18.239 --> 0:52:21.839
<v Speaker 4>they aren't they but they also just put themselves into

0:52:21.880 --> 0:52:25.160
<v Speaker 4>that zone where you're where you're statistically not supposed to

0:52:25.160 --> 0:52:27.520
<v Speaker 4>make this putt, but it looks like you you know,

0:52:27.600 --> 0:52:31.320
<v Speaker 4>it's another chance, it's another opportunity in that makeable range.

0:52:31.320 --> 0:52:33.879
<v Speaker 4>And that's one of the amazing things with the work

0:52:33.880 --> 0:52:35.840
<v Speaker 4>that Scotty's done with the putter to get it back

0:52:37.200 --> 0:52:39.759
<v Speaker 4>on the tracks is like God, he just he has

0:52:39.840 --> 0:52:43.319
<v Speaker 4>these putts that are from an expectation standpoint, like the

0:52:43.320 --> 0:52:46.000
<v Speaker 4>ones that tricked your mind and lead to frustration.

0:52:48.160 --> 0:52:50.520
<v Speaker 2>I also think Andy, on top of that, it is

0:52:50.560 --> 0:52:53.960
<v Speaker 2>harder to make a putt under pressure, and when you're

0:52:54.000 --> 0:52:56.840
<v Speaker 2>in contention, you're having to put more under pressure. And

0:52:56.880 --> 0:52:58.480
<v Speaker 2>I also think this ties into what we saw at

0:52:58.480 --> 0:53:02.319
<v Speaker 2>the Ryder Cup last year and people just saying that, Wow, team, Team,

0:53:02.360 --> 0:53:04.560
<v Speaker 2>you're up put so much better than the US did.

0:53:04.600 --> 0:53:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Like I think when you struggle to put, we do

0:53:08.200 --> 0:53:10.960
<v Speaker 2>see that more under pressure. And I think that is

0:53:11.000 --> 0:53:13.400
<v Speaker 2>not just this little myth that's thrown around you standing

0:53:13.440 --> 0:53:16.640
<v Speaker 2>over a nine foot or late on Sunday. It is

0:53:16.719 --> 0:53:18.920
<v Speaker 2>totally different than Sunday morning when you go out T

0:53:19.120 --> 0:53:20.319
<v Speaker 2>forty five and you rock it.

0:53:20.320 --> 0:53:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Up to T eighteen.

0:53:21.360 --> 0:53:23.799
<v Speaker 2>So I would also there's more to it just than

0:53:23.840 --> 0:53:26.360
<v Speaker 2>the consistently hitting shots on TV. I think there's actually

0:53:26.400 --> 0:53:28.319
<v Speaker 2>another underlying reason there I.

0:53:28.320 --> 0:53:33.720
<v Speaker 4>Would point out too, the ones that are blessed, there

0:53:33.880 --> 0:53:39.120
<v Speaker 4>is something that pressure does that that can that can

0:53:39.160 --> 0:53:43.200
<v Speaker 4>actually make everything simpler, which is a you know, and

0:53:43.320 --> 0:53:45.400
<v Speaker 4>it goes to what we were talking about with like

0:53:46.080 --> 0:53:49.640
<v Speaker 4>you know, some guys have it, that just have the

0:53:49.760 --> 0:53:53.520
<v Speaker 4>knack and the moment in golf, and it's like when

0:53:53.600 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 4>the pressure heightens, it actually slows everything down and allows

0:53:59.080 --> 0:54:02.640
<v Speaker 4>people to get into tunnel, which is it's a magical skill.

0:54:02.880 --> 0:54:05.560
<v Speaker 5>It's a it's you know, in In.

0:54:06.640 --> 0:54:09.600
<v Speaker 4>I think there's probably like a lot of former athletes

0:54:10.200 --> 0:54:12.719
<v Speaker 4>that are listening that probably are nodding their head. Is

0:54:12.800 --> 0:54:16.000
<v Speaker 4>like those moments in time when you get there are

0:54:16.280 --> 0:54:18.600
<v Speaker 4>and and for there are some people that are so

0:54:18.760 --> 0:54:21.480
<v Speaker 4>gifted on the greens and I and I'm thinking about like,

0:54:21.920 --> 0:54:24.839
<v Speaker 4>you know, it's what cam Young said after the Ryder Cup.

0:54:24.880 --> 0:54:28.160
<v Speaker 4>You know Justin Rose started doing Justin Rose things like

0:54:28.200 --> 0:54:34.000
<v Speaker 4>that is someone that seemingly in the moment on the greens,

0:54:34.680 --> 0:54:39.120
<v Speaker 4>things seem to slow down and he he executes and

0:54:39.120 --> 0:54:41.960
<v Speaker 4>he makes these putts that you know, you you just

0:54:42.080 --> 0:54:45.840
<v Speaker 4>don't expect to see people repeatedly do in the highest

0:54:45.840 --> 0:54:46.400
<v Speaker 4>of stakes.

0:54:47.040 --> 0:54:50.239
<v Speaker 6>So I would like for that reason, like if I

0:54:50.280 --> 0:54:52.160
<v Speaker 6>had a wish list for this year, it would be

0:54:52.239 --> 0:54:55.439
<v Speaker 6>that Bryson would contend with Scotty in a major. Because

0:54:55.480 --> 0:54:58.640
<v Speaker 6>Bryson's a really good pressure putter. He's shown it like

0:54:58.680 --> 0:55:01.799
<v Speaker 6>in majors that got up and down everywhere in that

0:55:01.880 --> 0:55:05.200
<v Speaker 6>Pinehurst US Open, and I think that would be fun.

0:55:05.320 --> 0:55:08.080
<v Speaker 6>Like one of the things that does kind of unnerve

0:55:08.120 --> 0:55:10.560
<v Speaker 6>Scotty is when putts start, you know, not going in

0:55:10.600 --> 0:55:13.719
<v Speaker 6>for him, and that's when the emotion that he you know,

0:55:13.800 --> 0:55:16.799
<v Speaker 6>took years to kind of overcome and learn to sort

0:55:16.840 --> 0:55:18.520
<v Speaker 6>of be even keel, Like you can still see it

0:55:18.520 --> 0:55:21.640
<v Speaker 6>where he's like wanting to snap his wedge over his

0:55:21.800 --> 0:55:25.680
<v Speaker 6>knee in Phoenix because he's having a crap day. Like

0:55:25.800 --> 0:55:27.600
<v Speaker 6>if you could get someone who would really put that

0:55:27.719 --> 0:55:29.880
<v Speaker 6>kind of pressure on Scotty and keep making putts, keep

0:55:29.920 --> 0:55:33.000
<v Speaker 6>making putts, they could make for really compelling back nine

0:55:33.000 --> 0:55:35.319
<v Speaker 6>of a major. And I think we've seen Rory, you know,

0:55:36.520 --> 0:55:39.239
<v Speaker 6>play great against Bryson. I want to see Bryson play

0:55:39.280 --> 0:55:41.439
<v Speaker 6>great against Scotty. I want to see rom like throw

0:55:41.719 --> 0:55:44.000
<v Speaker 6>lightning bolts back and forth with Scotty. I think that

0:55:44.000 --> 0:55:45.839
<v Speaker 6>that would be high on my wish list for this year.

0:55:46.640 --> 0:55:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, Andy started this pod by saying that the premise

0:55:49.719 --> 0:55:52.920
<v Speaker 2>was things to watch over the first few months in

0:55:53.000 --> 0:55:55.400
<v Speaker 2>anticipation of the Masters, to see who might be a contender.

0:55:55.480 --> 0:55:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Not I think if you're gonna we're going to talk

0:55:57.000 --> 0:56:01.520
<v Speaker 2>about that specific topic, like watching what Bryson's iron how

0:56:01.560 --> 0:56:03.719
<v Speaker 2>his iron play looks at the beginning half of this

0:56:03.840 --> 0:56:06.360
<v Speaker 2>year leading into the Masters. It's a little harder to

0:56:06.400 --> 0:56:09.560
<v Speaker 2>see on live, but that is a huge story. That's

0:56:09.560 --> 0:56:11.720
<v Speaker 2>what kept him from winning Majors last year. His iron

0:56:11.719 --> 0:56:15.000
<v Speaker 2>play was not good. He was missing left it happened

0:56:15.000 --> 0:56:17.560
<v Speaker 2>at Quail Hollow. He overturned some irons. So I do

0:56:17.600 --> 0:56:20.120
<v Speaker 2>think that's a big storyline, A skill related storyline to

0:56:20.120 --> 0:56:22.080
<v Speaker 2>watch this year is if Bryson's irons look pretty good

0:56:22.120 --> 0:56:25.320
<v Speaker 2>going into the Masters, totally changes his outlook as a player,

0:56:25.400 --> 0:56:27.040
<v Speaker 2>versus if we see what we saw last year.

0:56:27.880 --> 0:56:31.360
<v Speaker 4>I think Bryson's one of these storylines. As you said,

0:56:31.400 --> 0:56:37.200
<v Speaker 4>to watch, He's obviously gone from you know what's wrong

0:56:37.239 --> 0:56:40.280
<v Speaker 4>with Bryson at Augusta. You know the parse sixty seven

0:56:41.360 --> 0:56:45.560
<v Speaker 4>us said fried Egg. We're tracking, you know, Bryson versus

0:56:45.719 --> 0:56:48.799
<v Speaker 4>legends of the Masters when they're you know, playing out

0:56:48.840 --> 0:56:54.400
<v Speaker 4>their final days Sandy Lyle, you know, like versus Bryson,

0:56:54.840 --> 0:56:58.759
<v Speaker 4>one of the great tilts of all time. Now it's

0:56:59.200 --> 0:57:04.040
<v Speaker 4>the last three years been pretty good. Last year, you know,

0:57:04.080 --> 0:57:08.760
<v Speaker 4>he's he's you know, fifty fifty four hole or fifty

0:57:08.800 --> 0:57:10.480
<v Speaker 4>six holes into the Masters and it all of a

0:57:10.480 --> 0:57:12.760
<v Speaker 4>sudden looks like he is going to win the tournament.

0:57:14.560 --> 0:57:19.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm very very that is a big storyline for this

0:57:19.240 --> 0:57:21.800
<v Speaker 4>year is what's the Forum going in? Obviously there's a

0:57:21.840 --> 0:57:24.080
<v Speaker 4>lot of you know, there's always going to be a

0:57:24.080 --> 0:57:28.280
<v Speaker 4>lot of drama, interest and around Bryson. I think that's

0:57:28.440 --> 0:57:31.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, whether it's the equipment right now, it's the

0:57:31.320 --> 0:57:34.520
<v Speaker 4>live contract situation and what he's going to do next year,

0:57:35.320 --> 0:57:38.840
<v Speaker 4>but playing some some quality golf before the Masters, and

0:57:38.880 --> 0:57:42.000
<v Speaker 4>then I would expect to see him, you know, right there?

0:57:43.280 --> 0:57:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Can we talk about somebody else? You mentioned that if

0:57:45.720 --> 0:57:48.320
<v Speaker 2>it isn't story of one a, it certainly should be

0:57:48.400 --> 0:57:53.560
<v Speaker 2>right there. You want to talk putting transformations. Scotti's is

0:57:53.600 --> 0:57:57.120
<v Speaker 2>the second best of the modern era camp. I do

0:57:57.120 --> 0:57:59.880
<v Speaker 2>think it's worth spending a minute talking about Cameron Young.

0:58:00.400 --> 0:58:02.200
<v Speaker 2>And I'm not just saying that because that's a long

0:58:02.320 --> 0:58:05.040
<v Speaker 2>running bit that I've always been very pro Cam Young,

0:58:05.120 --> 0:58:08.960
<v Speaker 2>but he's going to be thrown around often as somebody

0:58:09.000 --> 0:58:11.040
<v Speaker 2>who could win the Masters, like leading into it, I

0:58:11.080 --> 0:58:13.680
<v Speaker 2>think in all types gambling previews, you will hear his

0:58:13.800 --> 0:58:18.480
<v Speaker 2>name consistently, and I think it is absolutely warranted and

0:58:18.560 --> 0:58:20.880
<v Speaker 2>what he has done with his potter. I've been watching

0:58:21.360 --> 0:58:23.280
<v Speaker 2>his Phoenix Open first two rounds. He's been in a

0:58:23.280 --> 0:58:26.200
<v Speaker 2>featured group, and it is unbelievable how different of a

0:58:26.240 --> 0:58:29.160
<v Speaker 2>potter Cameron Young is now, and that he's not having

0:58:29.240 --> 0:58:32.160
<v Speaker 2>his best ball striking day and from fifteen feet eighteen

0:58:32.240 --> 0:58:35.240
<v Speaker 2>feet like he's consistently making them or at least scaring

0:58:35.280 --> 0:58:38.520
<v Speaker 2>the hole. So I do think all jokes aside about

0:58:38.520 --> 0:58:40.720
<v Speaker 2>it being a bit that in thinking Cameron Young is

0:58:40.720 --> 0:58:43.640
<v Speaker 2>going to win at some point, he is a really

0:58:43.840 --> 0:58:45.560
<v Speaker 2>good name to keep an eye on and watch his

0:58:45.600 --> 0:58:48.080
<v Speaker 2>iron play, kind of like Bryson's going into this tournament,

0:58:48.120 --> 0:58:53.040
<v Speaker 2>going into Augusta. He's played the Masters four times. First

0:58:53.120 --> 0:58:55.520
<v Speaker 2>year missed the cut, second two year top tens, and

0:58:55.560 --> 0:58:59.440
<v Speaker 2>then the last year his fourth year, was really struggling

0:58:59.480 --> 0:59:01.840
<v Speaker 2>with his game in the spring and missed the cut.

0:59:01.960 --> 0:59:05.280
<v Speaker 2>But another person that pops up on that early major

0:59:05.360 --> 0:59:09.240
<v Speaker 2>success type of leaderboard that I referenced earlier. I mean

0:59:09.280 --> 0:59:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Cam Young has had what four or five top tens

0:59:12.160 --> 0:59:15.160
<v Speaker 2>and majors already in his career. He's he is somebody

0:59:15.160 --> 0:59:16.640
<v Speaker 2>wh should keep an eye on it. It's not a

0:59:17.160 --> 0:59:18.880
<v Speaker 2>there are a lot of long shots that'll get thrown around.

0:59:18.880 --> 0:59:20.760
<v Speaker 2>I think that probably don't have much of a chance

0:59:20.760 --> 0:59:23.280
<v Speaker 2>of winning. Like I think Brooks's chance of winning very

0:59:23.400 --> 0:59:25.360
<v Speaker 2>very low. Cam Young has a real chance of winning

0:59:25.360 --> 0:59:25.880
<v Speaker 2>this Masters.

0:59:28.520 --> 0:59:31.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, listen, I think him and got her

0:59:31.640 --> 0:59:36.520
<v Speaker 4>up probably stories young young up and comers. How they'll

0:59:36.960 --> 0:59:38.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, I don't think, you know, I think Cam

0:59:38.520 --> 0:59:42.240
<v Speaker 4>Young's probably passed the up and comer stage. It's you know,

0:59:42.360 --> 0:59:46.640
<v Speaker 4>he's reaching his his prime. And where does he get

0:59:46.680 --> 0:59:49.600
<v Speaker 4>to is a is a compelling question, you know. I'd

0:59:49.640 --> 0:59:51.280
<v Speaker 4>like to point out he has a one percent win

0:59:51.360 --> 0:59:55.840
<v Speaker 4>percentage on the PGA Tour. That being said, if you

0:59:55.920 --> 0:59:59.800
<v Speaker 4>look at this major success rate, like in terms of

1:00:00.360 --> 1:00:02.960
<v Speaker 4>he's one of the ten, probably the ten best players

1:00:03.000 --> 1:00:04.880
<v Speaker 4>in majors over the last five years, is that safe

1:00:04.920 --> 1:00:05.200
<v Speaker 4>to say?

1:00:06.320 --> 1:00:06.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

1:00:06.520 --> 1:00:07.960
<v Speaker 2>And he was did a lot of that being a

1:00:08.040 --> 1:00:10.320
<v Speaker 2>terrible putter, and now he's legitimately a good putter, Like

1:00:10.360 --> 1:00:13.080
<v Speaker 2>that is a He's a totally different player than Liverpool.

1:00:14.240 --> 1:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>You know what, I love Joseph Is.

1:00:15.320 --> 1:00:17.840
<v Speaker 6>I was standing not far away from this when this happened,

1:00:18.440 --> 1:00:22.960
<v Speaker 6>is at when Brian Harmon won his Open championship.

1:00:23.440 --> 1:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, Cam Young finished I think eighth that year

1:00:26.280 --> 1:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and final Dylan what's that?

1:00:28.760 --> 1:00:30.439
<v Speaker 2>He was in the final pairing did not send?

1:00:30.480 --> 1:00:33.680
<v Speaker 6>It not go well right, and and Dylan the Scherk

1:00:33.760 --> 1:00:35.240
<v Speaker 6>kind of grabbed him and was like, hey, you know,

1:00:35.640 --> 1:00:36.480
<v Speaker 6>what do you feel about this?

1:00:36.560 --> 1:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Like your first top ten in a major? How you feel?

1:00:38.400 --> 1:00:41.480
<v Speaker 6>And Cam Young was like, it means nothing, It means

1:00:41.640 --> 1:00:45.640
<v Speaker 6>absolutely nothing. I am kind of disgusted with the way

1:00:45.680 --> 1:00:48.000
<v Speaker 6>that it went. And I was just like, man, this

1:00:48.040 --> 1:00:51.360
<v Speaker 6>is someone who has much higher expectations for himself than

1:00:51.400 --> 1:00:53.080
<v Speaker 6>I had. I was like, oh, like, you know, didn't

1:00:53.120 --> 1:00:54.720
<v Speaker 6>you know in the final pairing didn't maybe go is

1:00:54.760 --> 1:00:57.080
<v Speaker 6>what you'd hoped, but you know, you still can build

1:00:57.080 --> 1:00:59.200
<v Speaker 6>off this first top ten to major. No, he was

1:00:59.280 --> 1:01:01.600
<v Speaker 6>just very dead and I thought like that kind of

1:01:01.600 --> 1:01:05.680
<v Speaker 6>shows like he's still really like wanting to figure this out.

1:01:05.720 --> 1:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>And I thought that was kind of a cool moment.

1:01:08.240 --> 1:01:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Think he's on the list of people who has a

1:01:09.640 --> 1:01:12.320
<v Speaker 2>little it factor, and we saw that at Best Page.

1:01:14.000 --> 1:01:17.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna just throw out this is my always uh,

1:01:17.880 --> 1:01:20.560
<v Speaker 4>I'll always be a defender of this, especially as I

1:01:20.720 --> 1:01:25.880
<v Speaker 4>enter this bracket of this age group. The old can

1:01:25.960 --> 1:01:30.000
<v Speaker 4>an old sneak out a major. I'm looking at Justin Rose,

1:01:30.360 --> 1:01:34.400
<v Speaker 4>Sergio Garcia, Adam Scott, and I'm gonna throw one more

1:01:34.520 --> 1:01:37.640
<v Speaker 4>name in the ring this year who has entered this

1:01:37.800 --> 1:01:42.600
<v Speaker 4>lexicon A con of of of great Augusta national players.

1:01:43.200 --> 1:01:43.800
<v Speaker 5>Jason Day.

1:01:46.240 --> 1:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>How old is Jason Day?

1:01:47.360 --> 1:01:50.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he's an old, thirty eight, thirty eight, thirty eight,

1:01:50.280 --> 1:01:53.880
<v Speaker 4>He's officially crossed across this threshold. Is there a way

1:01:53.920 --> 1:01:56.640
<v Speaker 4>that one of these guys could just sneak sneak a master,

1:01:56.880 --> 1:02:00.320
<v Speaker 4>steal a masters? I think like the two turns that

1:02:00.400 --> 1:02:02.960
<v Speaker 4>set up the best for these guys are our Augusta

1:02:03.640 --> 1:02:08.240
<v Speaker 4>and you know, small field, big time course history advantage

1:02:08.280 --> 1:02:11.280
<v Speaker 4>where you know the course, you can, you understand it,

1:02:11.320 --> 1:02:13.760
<v Speaker 4>you don't get overwhelmed by the moment. You you know

1:02:13.840 --> 1:02:17.760
<v Speaker 4>where you pick your spots. And the Open Championship.

1:02:18.400 --> 1:02:21.440
<v Speaker 5>To me, these are kind of.

1:02:21.400 --> 1:02:26.280
<v Speaker 4>The four the four players where you just want you know,

1:02:26.360 --> 1:02:30.400
<v Speaker 4>and you know Sergio maybe not on everybody's radar. But

1:02:30.920 --> 1:02:36.400
<v Speaker 4>as a nostalgic youth watching the Tiger Sergio duels and

1:02:36.440 --> 1:02:40.920
<v Speaker 4>the Sergio always coming up short throughout my lifetime, these

1:02:40.960 --> 1:02:44.480
<v Speaker 4>are just guys that I I just want. I want

1:02:44.480 --> 1:02:49.760
<v Speaker 4>them to get one more, one more, and I would

1:02:49.840 --> 1:02:52.120
<v Speaker 4>love to see it. I think obviously Justin Rose is

1:02:52.120 --> 1:02:53.800
<v Speaker 4>going to be on everybody's bingo card.

1:02:54.400 --> 1:02:55.440
<v Speaker 5>Uh.

1:02:55.480 --> 1:02:58.720
<v Speaker 4>But these other, these other three can they can they

1:02:58.760 --> 1:03:01.920
<v Speaker 4>find something in the next couple of weeks. Jason Day

1:03:01.920 --> 1:03:04.000
<v Speaker 4>obviously got off to a great start on the year.

1:03:04.800 --> 1:03:09.520
<v Speaker 4>Can they find something that gives them real hope at

1:03:09.560 --> 1:03:10.720
<v Speaker 4>the Masters?

1:03:12.280 --> 1:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>No?

1:03:13.160 --> 1:03:16.720
<v Speaker 5>No, I want to believe.

1:03:16.720 --> 1:03:18.240
<v Speaker 6>I want to be with the Andy, but I just

1:03:18.880 --> 1:03:21.960
<v Speaker 6>I don't see Sergio being able to do it. I mean,

1:03:21.960 --> 1:03:25.120
<v Speaker 6>obviously Rose, I think there's a real that's the best

1:03:25.200 --> 1:03:27.840
<v Speaker 6>chance of all right. I think Adam Scott's chance came

1:03:27.880 --> 1:03:31.360
<v Speaker 6>and went at Oakmont. You really only get one last

1:03:31.520 --> 1:03:35.880
<v Speaker 6>kind of great ride as a late forties guy, like

1:03:35.920 --> 1:03:39.280
<v Speaker 6>you're climbing to contention. That was Adam Scott's like a

1:03:39.560 --> 1:03:42.880
<v Speaker 6>very normal round, you know, a even par round wins

1:03:42.880 --> 1:03:45.400
<v Speaker 6>that major championship for Adam Scott, and it's like such

1:03:45.440 --> 1:03:48.439
<v Speaker 6>a career validation. You know, I wanted that so bad

1:03:48.480 --> 1:03:51.080
<v Speaker 6>for him, but I think that that came and went.

1:03:51.160 --> 1:03:54.800
<v Speaker 6>I honestly would say I have more faith in like

1:03:54.880 --> 1:03:58.240
<v Speaker 6>Dustin Johnson finding something for a weekend at an Open

1:03:58.320 --> 1:04:01.360
<v Speaker 6>Championship or at a Master's then I do like a

1:04:01.440 --> 1:04:04.680
<v Speaker 6>Sergio or Adam Scott being able to make putts down

1:04:04.680 --> 1:04:07.400
<v Speaker 6>the stretch. Like there's still a lot of talent in

1:04:07.480 --> 1:04:10.720
<v Speaker 6>Dustin Johnson. He's not as long comparative lead to the

1:04:10.720 --> 1:04:13.320
<v Speaker 6>field as he once was, but you know, this is

1:04:13.320 --> 1:04:16.840
<v Speaker 6>someone who's contented in Open championships before. Like I could see,

1:04:16.920 --> 1:04:19.480
<v Speaker 6>you know, Birkdale being an interesting sort of setup for him,

1:04:19.640 --> 1:04:23.720
<v Speaker 6>and you know it's obviously his major. He's not in

1:04:23.880 --> 1:04:28.360
<v Speaker 6>all the majors that much further going on, so you know,

1:04:28.400 --> 1:04:31.160
<v Speaker 6>it probably is like his time might be running out

1:04:31.200 --> 1:04:34.080
<v Speaker 6>in the sense of other than the Masters, where he's

1:04:34.120 --> 1:04:36.000
<v Speaker 6>going to be in for another, you know, twenty years.

1:04:36.000 --> 1:04:39.800
<v Speaker 6>But this is I still like DJ's chances better than Sergio's.

1:04:39.840 --> 1:04:43.640
<v Speaker 6>I just don't see it happened in for Sergio. A

1:04:43.640 --> 1:04:45.640
<v Speaker 6>lot of stuff had to go right for Sergio to

1:04:45.720 --> 1:04:48.920
<v Speaker 6>get that one. Talk about someone who maybe didn't have

1:04:49.000 --> 1:04:51.680
<v Speaker 6>it in those moments in a lot of ways. I

1:04:51.760 --> 1:04:53.560
<v Speaker 6>just don't see the stars aligning for that.

1:04:53.640 --> 1:04:58.640
<v Speaker 4>Again, I think the unknown with DJ is what does

1:04:58.760 --> 1:05:03.520
<v Speaker 4>does Miguel to to energize him as a player, you know,

1:05:03.600 --> 1:05:09.240
<v Speaker 4>the addition to of to the four aces maybe.

1:05:10.680 --> 1:05:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Could be We've never seen the effect that having Miguel

1:05:13.960 --> 1:05:17.640
<v Speaker 2>t Whenna on your team has on a player. True

1:05:17.640 --> 1:05:20.560
<v Speaker 2>who can say situation No, I don't think. I think

1:05:20.680 --> 1:05:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Justin Rose is a legit contender.

1:05:22.760 --> 1:05:23.080
<v Speaker 5>Andy.

1:05:23.160 --> 1:05:26.360
<v Speaker 2>I think Adam Scott. I worry that, like that's an

1:05:26.440 --> 1:05:29.040
<v Speaker 2>underrated storyline for the year, not just the Masters, Like

1:05:29.120 --> 1:05:32.120
<v Speaker 2>is Adam Scott kind of done? Which would be really sad?

1:05:32.600 --> 1:05:36.880
<v Speaker 2>But his last year outside of Oakmont was not super promising.

1:05:36.960 --> 1:05:39.320
<v Speaker 2>And I do worry a little bit that we don't

1:05:39.320 --> 1:05:40.960
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of time left with Adam Scott.

1:05:43.440 --> 1:05:46.320
<v Speaker 5>What's uh, what's the you know one thing?

1:05:46.960 --> 1:05:49.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if anybody will matches the consecutive majors

1:05:49.960 --> 1:05:55.400
<v Speaker 4>that Adam Scott's rolling down and anytime soon? What's the

1:05:56.040 --> 1:05:58.920
<v Speaker 4>what emptying out the notebook, any any last thing you

1:05:58.920 --> 1:06:04.040
<v Speaker 4>guys want to get in here? There's one player we

1:06:04.080 --> 1:06:04.920
<v Speaker 4>haven't talked about.

1:06:08.280 --> 1:06:11.440
<v Speaker 6>Good question, I think, I mean, look, I kind of

1:06:11.480 --> 1:06:13.520
<v Speaker 6>just because I like him so much as a person.

1:06:13.560 --> 1:06:16.040
<v Speaker 6>I'm really hoping for a Max Homa bounce back a

1:06:16.080 --> 1:06:19.120
<v Speaker 6>little bit. You know, he's played okay in the first

1:06:19.120 --> 1:06:21.080
<v Speaker 6>start of the season. I know, Joseph, Yeah, you're you're

1:06:21.280 --> 1:06:25.400
<v Speaker 6>reluctant to see it. I mean, look, he was a

1:06:25.680 --> 1:06:28.479
<v Speaker 6>top ten player, you know, a couple of years ago,

1:06:28.680 --> 1:06:31.160
<v Speaker 6>and is he a top thirty player?

1:06:31.320 --> 1:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Like is?

1:06:31.800 --> 1:06:34.080
<v Speaker 6>I think, you know, that might be a more realistic

1:06:34.120 --> 1:06:37.040
<v Speaker 6>ceiling to what it is. He certainly says that he's

1:06:37.120 --> 1:06:39.880
<v Speaker 6>kind of rebuilt things and feels really good, feels comfortable

1:06:40.400 --> 1:06:42.680
<v Speaker 6>putting the club in certain positions now that he didn't

1:06:43.040 --> 1:06:47.000
<v Speaker 6>last year. Like his comeback is you know, kind of

1:06:47.080 --> 1:06:48.880
<v Speaker 6>just as interesting, if not more so to me than

1:06:48.920 --> 1:06:53.520
<v Speaker 6>speak I'm not take away like the you know, personal

1:06:53.600 --> 1:06:55.480
<v Speaker 6>sort of love I have for him. You know, I'm

1:06:55.480 --> 1:06:59.280
<v Speaker 6>not super convinced that this is a realistic thing, but

1:06:59.760 --> 1:07:04.400
<v Speaker 6>I'm rooting for it. And you know, maybe having played

1:07:04.400 --> 1:07:08.160
<v Speaker 6>well at Augusta in the past, like could show some

1:07:08.200 --> 1:07:10.680
<v Speaker 6>signs there. If he builds gets in some confidence and

1:07:10.680 --> 1:07:12.840
<v Speaker 6>builds on that, maybe we're trying it in the right direction.

1:07:14.320 --> 1:07:16.680
<v Speaker 2>I'll throw one like real long shot, but I think

1:07:16.680 --> 1:07:18.840
<v Speaker 2>somebody that is interesting to pay attention to in the

1:07:18.840 --> 1:07:21.720
<v Speaker 2>early half of the PGA Tour season is Rasmus Nyerguard Peterson,

1:07:22.200 --> 1:07:25.560
<v Speaker 2>who had a really impressive win in Australia back in

1:07:25.760 --> 1:07:30.080
<v Speaker 2>the off season. Not the off season, but some people

1:07:30.160 --> 1:07:32.280
<v Speaker 2>I really respect think very highly of his game. And

1:07:32.320 --> 1:07:34.440
<v Speaker 2>he's another guy that came out to some success last

1:07:34.520 --> 1:07:36.400
<v Speaker 2>year in majors. He played well at Oakmont, believe he

1:07:36.440 --> 1:07:43.040
<v Speaker 2>finished what T twelve, really good ball striker and he's

1:07:43.120 --> 1:07:46.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of ascending on that similar he's twenty six, similar

1:07:46.800 --> 1:07:49.720
<v Speaker 2>age to Chris got her Up. I just think he's

1:07:49.760 --> 1:07:51.800
<v Speaker 2>somebody to keep an eye on. Is a real long shot.

1:07:51.840 --> 1:07:53.760
<v Speaker 2>He got in via his win at the Australian Open

1:07:53.760 --> 1:07:57.520
<v Speaker 2>in December and yeah T twelve at Oakmont last year,

1:07:57.560 --> 1:08:00.720
<v Speaker 2>like early major success, pretty big unknown, but there are

1:08:00.720 --> 1:08:02.680
<v Speaker 2>worse names you could pick. I think he has a

1:08:02.680 --> 1:08:04.080
<v Speaker 2>better chance of winning than a lot of people that

1:08:04.160 --> 1:08:04.920
<v Speaker 2>get floated around.

1:08:05.720 --> 1:08:08.480
<v Speaker 6>I'll just like a real quick notebook dump Andy, I'll

1:08:08.520 --> 1:08:10.440
<v Speaker 6>just throw out I mean I mentioned theor Barenson and

1:08:10.520 --> 1:08:14.280
<v Speaker 6>Pierson Coudie obviously like they're young talented people like but

1:08:14.400 --> 1:08:16.680
<v Speaker 6>Michael Kim, like winning the French Open, you know, is

1:08:16.720 --> 1:08:20.400
<v Speaker 6>Michael Kim like a top fifteen American player. I mean,

1:08:20.439 --> 1:08:22.720
<v Speaker 6>I think you could make the case that he might be.

1:08:23.680 --> 1:08:25.519
<v Speaker 6>So I don't know, like if we can build a

1:08:25.560 --> 1:08:27.840
<v Speaker 6>little bit on that, But you know, he he played

1:08:27.840 --> 1:08:30.400
<v Speaker 6>pretty darn well throughout the course of last year, and

1:08:30.439 --> 1:08:33.479
<v Speaker 6>I think that there's a chance that you know, again,

1:08:33.520 --> 1:08:35.000
<v Speaker 6>he's a top thirty player in the world.

1:08:35.080 --> 1:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Is that his ceiling? Maybe, but maybe there's you know.

1:08:38.080 --> 1:08:40.120
<v Speaker 6>Some some times to flash a little bit in there

1:08:40.160 --> 1:08:42.280
<v Speaker 6>and win a couple of events.

1:08:43.800 --> 1:08:49.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna address. We haven't talked about Rory McElroy entering

1:08:49.400 --> 1:08:54.200
<v Speaker 4>a Master's for the first time without without the the

1:08:54.640 --> 1:08:59.680
<v Speaker 4>no Masters win hanging over him. Is there any do

1:08:59.760 --> 1:09:05.160
<v Speaker 4>we have have any any sort of thoughts on is

1:09:05.240 --> 1:09:07.840
<v Speaker 4>Rory freed up? Is this going to be kind of

1:09:07.840 --> 1:09:12.639
<v Speaker 4>a celebratory Masters? What do you want to see from

1:09:12.720 --> 1:09:14.400
<v Speaker 4>Rory the next eight weeks?

1:09:15.680 --> 1:09:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Really good iron play? I think, I mean the so yeah,

1:09:22.439 --> 1:09:24.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the Potter was incredible last year. It's like

1:09:24.320 --> 1:09:26.840
<v Speaker 2>one of the most slept on stories of last year

1:09:26.880 --> 1:09:29.040
<v Speaker 2>that Rory took his putting in to just a completely

1:09:29.040 --> 1:09:32.040
<v Speaker 2>different level. He's always you know, he's going to have power.

1:09:32.080 --> 1:09:34.479
<v Speaker 2>We know that, like, hopefully the driver looks decent, But

1:09:35.640 --> 1:09:37.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know my expectations for I don't know what

1:09:37.400 --> 1:09:39.400
<v Speaker 2>to expect of Rory this year. I think probably why

1:09:39.400 --> 1:09:41.240
<v Speaker 2>he wasn't one of my top storylines, Like I could

1:09:41.280 --> 1:09:45.559
<v Speaker 2>completely see a little bit of a down year, celebratory year.

1:09:45.640 --> 1:09:49.360
<v Speaker 2>The Champions Dinner is going to be an unbelievable event

1:09:49.560 --> 1:09:51.240
<v Speaker 2>that people are going to be going nuts about. I

1:09:51.280 --> 1:09:53.880
<v Speaker 2>can only imagine what that will be like for Rory emotionally,

1:09:54.000 --> 1:09:56.960
<v Speaker 2>right before starting the Masters, I could see a big letdown,

1:09:57.520 --> 1:09:59.479
<v Speaker 2>but at the same time, like he's the only person

1:09:59.520 --> 1:10:02.240
<v Speaker 2>that has been doing this consistently for nearly twenty years,

1:10:02.240 --> 1:10:05.439
<v Speaker 2>and it feels stupid to discount that Rory McElroy like

1:10:05.479 --> 1:10:07.439
<v Speaker 2>could be in the mix on Sunday. So I think

1:10:07.479 --> 1:10:10.360
<v Speaker 2>my expectations are kind of low, and I think it's

1:10:10.400 --> 1:10:12.840
<v Speaker 2>really hard to go through what the emotions that he

1:10:12.920 --> 1:10:15.400
<v Speaker 2>will go through the days leading into the Masters and

1:10:15.439 --> 1:10:17.760
<v Speaker 2>then turn it on for a player that's been inconsistent

1:10:17.920 --> 1:10:21.599
<v Speaker 2>at times at Augusta. But I wouldn't Yeah, I don't

1:10:21.600 --> 1:10:23.800
<v Speaker 2>want to be too dismissive. I'd say my expectations are

1:10:23.840 --> 1:10:24.280
<v Speaker 2>fairly low.

1:10:24.360 --> 1:10:26.840
<v Speaker 6>Though they was talking about like peaking at the right

1:10:26.840 --> 1:10:29.679
<v Speaker 6>moments and swimming like I'm tapering. Oh no, I'm peaking

1:10:30.120 --> 1:10:32.320
<v Speaker 6>like I'd like to see him peak at the right moment.

1:10:32.360 --> 1:10:35.120
<v Speaker 6>So I don't really care what happens with Pebble, don't

1:10:35.120 --> 1:10:37.599
<v Speaker 6>really care what happens with the players. Already crossed those

1:10:37.600 --> 1:10:39.120
<v Speaker 6>things off his list last year. It seems like it

1:10:39.120 --> 1:10:41.720
<v Speaker 6>would be hard emotionally to get up for those things

1:10:41.760 --> 1:10:44.360
<v Speaker 6>again when you just accomplish them. But I would like

1:10:44.720 --> 1:10:47.080
<v Speaker 6>him to sort of really dial it in as we

1:10:47.280 --> 1:10:50.200
<v Speaker 6>kind of glide into the Masters, and if not the Masters,

1:10:50.200 --> 1:10:53.479
<v Speaker 6>then a little bit beyond right, like he a major

1:10:54.320 --> 1:10:56.960
<v Speaker 6>on Adding another major to the total would be I

1:10:57.000 --> 1:10:59.200
<v Speaker 6>think a great year, no matter what happened for Rory,

1:10:59.200 --> 1:11:02.559
<v Speaker 6>because nothing else is kind of really relevant in terms

1:11:02.560 --> 1:11:06.439
<v Speaker 6>of how we'll view him historically. So however it goes

1:11:06.439 --> 1:11:08.280
<v Speaker 6>this year, as long as one of those wins, one

1:11:08.320 --> 1:11:11.640
<v Speaker 6>of those peaks results in a major, it's a success.

1:11:12.360 --> 1:11:16.200
<v Speaker 4>You know, you look at his career, I think you

1:11:16.240 --> 1:11:20.960
<v Speaker 4>can reliably count on five more good years, really good

1:11:21.080 --> 1:11:25.639
<v Speaker 4>elite years that would put him at a you know,

1:11:25.680 --> 1:11:29.080
<v Speaker 4>you think about if you get Rory to forty in

1:11:29.880 --> 1:11:32.760
<v Speaker 4>relative form in what I mean by that top five

1:11:32.840 --> 1:11:36.800
<v Speaker 4>player in the world, you look at a career of

1:11:36.840 --> 1:11:42.040
<v Speaker 4>a twenty year top five in the world career that's

1:11:42.240 --> 1:11:45.080
<v Speaker 4>just not going to exist very often in the post

1:11:45.120 --> 1:11:47.519
<v Speaker 4>pro v one four hundred and sixty cc.

1:11:47.520 --> 1:11:49.880
<v Speaker 5>Driver head era of golf.

1:11:51.080 --> 1:11:56.840
<v Speaker 4>And if that major total gets to six, seven or

1:11:56.920 --> 1:12:00.519
<v Speaker 4>eight in that period of time, he have one of

1:12:00.520 --> 1:12:01.880
<v Speaker 4>the greatest careers of all time.

1:12:02.840 --> 1:12:06.280
<v Speaker 5>Obviously, there's going to be a lot of retro.

1:12:07.640 --> 1:12:11.040
<v Speaker 4>Active look backs of of Rory's year last year. There

1:12:11.120 --> 1:12:13.840
<v Speaker 4>is going to be a lot of I think the

1:12:13.840 --> 1:12:17.000
<v Speaker 4>the feeling on the grounds of the Master is going

1:12:17.000 --> 1:12:20.280
<v Speaker 4>to be very festive because of the you know, last

1:12:20.320 --> 1:12:25.960
<v Speaker 4>year result. If he's able to compartmentalized and and and

1:12:26.080 --> 1:12:29.840
<v Speaker 4>kind of put it in get into gear and into

1:12:29.880 --> 1:12:36.439
<v Speaker 4>the tournament again, I'm I'm fascinated about how, you know,

1:12:36.520 --> 1:12:39.840
<v Speaker 4>we might what we might see, and obviously, you know,

1:12:39.920 --> 1:12:42.680
<v Speaker 4>having those good memories to go back from, even in

1:12:42.720 --> 1:12:45.599
<v Speaker 4>a tournament which he won completely in his own way.

1:12:46.080 --> 1:12:50.559
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's totally unique, you know, recipe for winning

1:12:50.560 --> 1:12:56.200
<v Speaker 4>at Augusta National with large amounts of mental mistakes, but

1:12:56.360 --> 1:12:59.200
<v Speaker 4>also with you know, some of the most extraordinary shots

1:12:59.200 --> 1:13:04.920
<v Speaker 4>we've seen on or pressure of any player. So I think, listen,

1:13:04.960 --> 1:13:09.280
<v Speaker 4>I think we need to see a lot of contention.

1:13:09.800 --> 1:13:13.280
<v Speaker 4>Is the blueprint is last year, a lot of contention

1:13:13.680 --> 1:13:15.120
<v Speaker 4>leading into the Masters.

1:13:15.840 --> 1:13:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Just to your point, Andy, because you mentioned his longevity,

1:13:19.120 --> 1:13:21.679
<v Speaker 2>I was looking it up as you were saying that, Yeah,

1:13:21.680 --> 1:13:25.479
<v Speaker 2>if Rory can, he has finished every year since two

1:13:25.520 --> 1:13:28.280
<v Speaker 2>thousand and nine with at least one top ten in

1:13:28.320 --> 1:13:31.000
<v Speaker 2>a major championship. If he extends that through twenty twenty eight,

1:13:31.040 --> 1:13:33.559
<v Speaker 2>he'll be the only player besides Jack Nicholas to ever

1:13:33.640 --> 1:13:36.200
<v Speaker 2>do that in the strokeplay era. So I mean, just

1:13:36.320 --> 1:13:41.519
<v Speaker 2>like a remarkable level of consistency for twenty years to

1:13:41.600 --> 1:13:44.320
<v Speaker 2>be competitive every year, year in and year out. So yeah,

1:13:44.320 --> 1:13:45.560
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't seem inconceivable.

1:13:45.880 --> 1:13:48.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean you look at it. It's like I think

1:13:48.240 --> 1:13:52.960
<v Speaker 4>it was the Ryder Cup at Whistling Straits. It's like,

1:13:54.240 --> 1:13:59.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't think he's been outside owgr top fifteen since

1:13:59.800 --> 1:14:02.519
<v Speaker 4>the maybe the ankle injury that he had with with

1:14:02.560 --> 1:14:10.400
<v Speaker 4>the soccer. He is a crazy, crazy career and I

1:14:10.400 --> 1:14:13.519
<v Speaker 4>think like, yeah, we're we're in the We're in the

1:14:13.640 --> 1:14:17.920
<v Speaker 4>kind of the final chapter, and I'm really excited to see,

1:14:18.560 --> 1:14:22.160
<v Speaker 4>you know what, what's written down you know, I.

1:14:22.120 --> 1:14:23.560
<v Speaker 6>Just looked it up and I was surprised to see this,

1:14:23.640 --> 1:14:26.840
<v Speaker 6>But in twenty twenty one he actually dropped to sixteenth.

1:14:26.880 --> 1:14:29.200
<v Speaker 5>That was right around the Ryder Cup.

1:14:29.040 --> 1:14:32.320
<v Speaker 6>Right, Yeah, following a streak of eleven years inside the

1:14:32.320 --> 1:14:33.000
<v Speaker 6>top fifteen.

1:14:34.640 --> 1:14:36.360
<v Speaker 5>It's insane, it's crazy.

1:14:36.640 --> 1:14:40.320
<v Speaker 4>So that's obviously big story for the for the year.

1:14:40.880 --> 1:14:41.320
<v Speaker 5>Gentlemen.

1:14:41.800 --> 1:14:46.000
<v Speaker 4>Thank you. You know, we we had a second segment.

1:14:46.080 --> 1:14:50.520
<v Speaker 4>We'll just we'll just save that for another time. We'll

1:14:50.640 --> 1:14:54.080
<v Speaker 4>chat soon. Joseph, You've got, you know, a lot of

1:14:54.120 --> 1:14:57.800
<v Speaker 4>stuff coming out down the pipe. Kevin, you will be

1:14:57.920 --> 1:15:02.080
<v Speaker 4>out on the road at Riviera in the near future.

1:15:02.479 --> 1:15:03.799
<v Speaker 5>Anything you guys want to plug.

1:15:06.240 --> 1:15:08.519
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, just if you're a listener of this podcast, please

1:15:08.600 --> 1:15:10.040
<v Speaker 6>sign up for the Friday newsletter.

1:15:10.120 --> 1:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we're really cooking and humming.

1:15:12.479 --> 1:15:15.640
<v Speaker 6>Joseph Scott great analysis of the tournaments every week, and

1:15:16.680 --> 1:15:20.760
<v Speaker 6>Brennan and I are sprinkling in here things here and there.

1:15:20.800 --> 1:15:24.519
<v Speaker 6>You got Garrett, got Meg got Andy occasionally drop some

1:15:24.560 --> 1:15:30.160
<v Speaker 6>insights of knowledge. So please, I think we're really we're

1:15:30.240 --> 1:15:34.400
<v Speaker 6>just even we're on the staircase ascension at the of

1:15:34.479 --> 1:15:35.680
<v Speaker 6>the newsletter.

1:15:35.760 --> 1:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>We're just keep going up.

1:15:37.720 --> 1:15:39.240
<v Speaker 2>I think the only other thing that all three of

1:15:39.280 --> 1:15:41.599
<v Speaker 2>us have been working on in a couple others. Keep

1:15:41.600 --> 1:15:46.080
<v Speaker 2>your eyes peeled maybe for some anonymous type of feedback

1:15:46.120 --> 1:15:49.240
<v Speaker 2>we've gotten from some players in the game that may

1:15:49.240 --> 1:15:50.120
<v Speaker 2>be coming out soon.

1:15:51.560 --> 1:16:05.000
<v Speaker 3>Hell yeah, all right, thank you for listening to another

1:16:05.280 --> 1:16:07.160
<v Speaker 3>edition of the Friday Golf Podcast.

1:16:07.280 --> 1:16:08.960
<v Speaker 5>We will be back next week.

1:16:09.120 --> 1:16:12.960
<v Speaker 4>Obviously, we've got the Pebble Beach and Riviera. We're kind

1:16:13.000 --> 1:16:15.799
<v Speaker 4>of in the murderers row here of early season golf,

1:16:17.160 --> 1:16:19.599
<v Speaker 4>and we will chat with you next week. Big thanks

1:16:19.640 --> 1:16:28.920
<v Speaker 4>to p J Clark for putting together this episode.