WEBVTT - Scary Movie (2000)

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:04.600
<v Speaker 1>On the Bechdelcast, the questions asked if movies have women

0:00:04.680 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and them, are all their discussions just boyfriends and husbands,

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>or do they have individualism? The patriarchy? Zefphnbast start changing

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>with the Bechdel Cast.

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Hello, and welcome to the Bechdel Cast, the show where

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 2>we examine movies through an intersectional feminist lens, using the

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Bechdel test simply as a jumping off point. Caitlin popping

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 2>in here to say that this week we are unlocking

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 2>a Patreon aka Matreon episode on Scary Movie, the first

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 2>one from the year two thousand, since the new one

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 2>is coming out very soon. We released this on the

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 2>Matreon around this time last year as part of a

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 2>theme called spoof Tember, if I'm remembering correctly, in which

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 2>we covered Scary Movie and Young Frankenstein. So here is

0:00:55.440 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 2>that unlocked episode on Scary Movie. Enjoy Del Cast, Jamie,

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 2>do you like Scary Movie?

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Was?

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay?

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 2>That part was funny. That do you remember the do

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 2>you know what that's referencing?

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a Budweiser commercial, right, yeah, okay, yeah there. I

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:22.199
<v Speaker 1>had to check a bunch of references in this, although

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>some of them it's like James vander Beacon a window. Yeah,

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I know what that means. Mm hmm, yeah, I know

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>what that means. Unfortunately, there were some things I feel like,

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>as we go through this, maybe we can help each

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:37.320
<v Speaker 1>other figure out. Because there are most of the references

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 1>I got, there were a few that I was like, well,

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure that people knew what this was at the time.

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 2>I yeah, I was a sentient teen Yeah.

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Year this came out, you were the target audience.

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I really was. Unfortunately, so we're covering scary movie. Uh, Matrons,

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 2>this was your number one by a landslide, number one.

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely weirdos No. I feel like I was talking with

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Gret about it this morning. I think we talked about

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it too, where it's like you guys wanted us to

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>have the exact conversation we're about to have, which is,

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>what the fuck you got? Why did we have to

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:20.839
<v Speaker 1>watch this? What if?

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Twist? We loved it, We love scary movie.

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:27.959
<v Speaker 1>Actually it is a feminist mustapiece. I thought it was

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>so fa I was looking. I was trying to figure

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 1>out just like how the cast of this movie felt

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:36.119
<v Speaker 1>about having worked on it, particularly Regina Hall, because you're

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>like the get her out of here. They're like, we

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>need to airlift Regina Hall out of this horrible movie.

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>But that this was like sort of a big break

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>roll for her, and so she did one of those

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I forget what magazine it is, but it's like the

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>career retrospective video. Yeah, and scary movie is the first

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>thing she talks about, and she's very polite about it.

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>She was like, yeah, that like my she mentions, because

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about, like, I think, the various failures of

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>this movie and some successes. I will say there were

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>some things that made me laugh.

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 2>There were a couple funny jokes. I'll admit it.

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>The nine one one white woman in trouble joke, very funny.

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 2>Was up.

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>It really was like many jokes in this movie just

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>repeating a joke that had previously been made. But I laughed, sure, Becauzam,

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I laughed, sure, But that was more just because they

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>said something. Anyways, So Regina Hall was she was like, yeah,

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>so I you know, I got the chance to do

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>this part, and my manager or agent or whoever, was like,

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>probably don't do this because this is like a super

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>stereotyped black woman character. I think that she called it

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a loud girl character, which I'd never heard it in

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that way before. But yeah, like she's like, it's a

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>loud girl character. You're going to get type cast as this,

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>like I will didn't do it, And Regina Hall was like,

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>She's like, and now I really understood what they meant.

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>But like she she took the role because A it

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>was a role, and B because she was a big

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>fan of the Waynes Brothers, which is I'm sure while

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people were in this movie. And and

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize that this movie was more financially successful

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 1>than the movie that it's based on, Scream. I mean,

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>both are wildly successful. And I know what you did

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>last summer, but only for like ten minutes. Weirdly, I

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>thought it's.

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 2>Definitely way more parodying Scream.

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but Scream obviously came out in ninety six, made

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>for fifteen million dollars, made one hundred and seventy three

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. Hello, scary movie made for nineteen million dollars,

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>made two hundred and seventy eight million dollars. Wild unjust

0:04:56.440 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>unjust Yeah, sorry, anyways, I just I I didn't know

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 1>Regina Hall was in this and I was like upset

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>for her and Anna Faris Anna Faris. I feel like

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>she said a very interesting career where you're just like,

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>is anyone ever gonna let her cook? Is anyone ever

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna let this woman cook? Or anyways?

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Ah Okay, I'm yelling, oh, well, what's your history with this?

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Had you seen it before? No?

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:31.559
<v Speaker 1>I had not seen it. I had seen clips of

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen a scary movie all the way through,

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>but I feel like these movies often find second lives

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 1>in There were scenes I recognized because they were like

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>posted on like early YouTube or whatever, or I think

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I definitely remember whatever scary movie because luckily this is

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 1>streaming on Paramount Plus right now. And I was like,

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>should I watch scary movie too? It's not streaming, okay, whatever,

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>h well.

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 2>It is on Hoopla and I did watch it for this.

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 2>I have like one to two notes on it. It's okay,

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 2>but I only rewatched it because not to interrupt your

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 2>history with it. But you're fine, it's there.

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>There isn't any I mean, I saw it in clips.

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I just I was always gonna say, is I remember

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the one is scary movie too? The one that references

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the ring I remember the clipt from The Ring, I

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think, so that must be Regina Hall fighting the

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:23.720
<v Speaker 1>girl from the Ring? What oppen?

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that must be Scary Movie three or beyond, because

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 2>there are I think five of.

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 1>These total, and the original cast is like basically in

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the first four, which is why like they they I'm

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure they kept Regina Hall until Scary Movie four.

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Poor Regina what Anyways?

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I had seen this movie before it came out

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 2>in two thousand and I was thirteen or fourteen, so yeah,

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 2>the target demo totally. And I think I saw this

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 2>before I saw a Scream, So.

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I've seen a lot of letterbox reviews to that effect,

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>which is like kind of fun it was.

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I wish it had been the other way around,

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 2>but sure, I can't fix it now. And I think

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 2>I only saw a Scary movie once prior or Oh no,

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 2>I did actually rewatch it when we covered Scream just

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 2>to see, and I think I just had a little

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 2>just a couple comments about how it's like so bad

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 2>and every horrible joke that you can think of is made.

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I didn't realize exactly how like beat for because

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I didn't watch Scary movie too. I watched Scream immediately after,

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and which was helpful because I hadn't seen I hadn't

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>seen Scream for like a year or something like I

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>usually watch it every Halloween. But just like literally seen

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to scene there is reused dialogue, which that one point

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>they call attention.

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 2>To in Scary Movie. Yeah, you're just like this sucks,

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 2>this is so lazy and oh god this Yeah, this

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 2>movie is truly really punishing. But so in two thousand

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 2>and one, when Scary Movie two came out, for some reason,

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 2>I was slightly more attached to that one. I had

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 2>seen that probably three or four times in the early

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 2>two thousands. We're saying, I think probably once in theaters

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 2>and then I'm guessing like I would like go to

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 2>a friend's house for a hang and we would put

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 2>it on. I don't know, but I have like more

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 2>memories from that one. I kind of didn't really remember

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 2>anything from Scary Movie. They're all horrible. I don't think

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:40.839
<v Speaker 2>I've seen any of the sequels beyond Scary Movie two.

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's fair. Yeah, I've like it's just

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:47.679
<v Speaker 1>all like although I mean, okay, positive things I can

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>say about this movie. Also, the Waynes brothers. They're historic figures,

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>right like, they're ye who have made stuff I really like.

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>For example, Hollywood Shuffle movie we've covered on this very shows.

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>It was directed by Robert Townsend, but it was co

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>written by Keenan Ivry Wayns. He created in living color,

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>which is like an iconic comedy series. This was I

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize scary movie, whether we like it as a

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>movie or not, was the highest grossing movie by a

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>black director for years until a different bad movie displaced it,

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:32.079
<v Speaker 1>Fantastic Four in two thousand and five. Jessica Alba Fantastic.

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Four, Yeah, directed by Tim's story. Yeah. Also he I

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 2>mean he worked a ton with any More, like all

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 2>this stuff right like I so, I guess listeners, when

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 2>you're setting your expectations, this is not a takedown of

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 2>the Waynes brother writ large Right, they're complicated figures, but

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 2>they are also like just like iconic comedians. I would

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 2>say that this genre specifically is maybe the genre that

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 2>is set to age the absolutely the worst of almost

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:06.079
<v Speaker 2>any movie genre, because not only is the hu more

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 2>very offensive and dated, so were the references.

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.199
<v Speaker 1>So if so, if you like, we're not the target

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>audience for this movie. You're just like, I feel like

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm being punished and I don't know what they're fucking

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about.

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 2>So there's a reference in Scary Movie Too, where there's

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 2>like this hole it's horrible, but the tires on a

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 2>wheelchair are Firestone tires. Do you remember the whole scandal

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 2>around Firestone tires? Not really two thousands? No, exactly exactly.

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>What is it?

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 2>I remember, I'm kind of curious, just that they were

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:46.439
<v Speaker 2>horribly made, and like cars kept getting in horrible accidents

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 2>because like the tires would basically fall apart or like

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 2>catch on fire or something while they were driving. Whoa,

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 2>And so there's a reference to that in Scary Movie Too.

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 2>I did not know that to your point, No one

0:10:58.280 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 2>remembers that.

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>No except for me. Also, there's a continuing on on

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the Wayne's brother train, because there's just so many brothers.

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Wayne's brother also wrote and directed a movie we will

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>be covering on the show. It's just like the recording

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>time keeps getting postponed. White white Ken and Ivory Wayne's

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is not you know, at the top of he's not

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:20.959
<v Speaker 1>one of the white.

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Chicks, and who can forget major pain for that?

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Did I ever tell you I've never seen Major Pain,

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>but my freshman year of college, we had a cardboard

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>cutout of him in my room. My ROOMT had a

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.959
<v Speaker 1>cardboard cutout of Major Pain. So he was, in fact

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the first person I saw when I woke Well, not

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>a part, he's cardboard, but like, h yeah, Damon Waynes

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 1>was the first thing I saw when I woke up. Wow.

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 2>And then you've got Damon Wayne's junior yup of New Girl,

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Fame and others.

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood Dynasty. Yeah, there's there. I think their generation of

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Wayne's in Hollywood. Now I'm not totally sure.

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Well there's like there are like ten siblings, yes, because

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 2>it's like Keenan Ivory Wayne's and Sean Wayns and Marlon

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Wayns are all brothers.

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Is Damon Wayne's a cousin?

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Like I googled Wayne's family tree? Okay, let me where's

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 2>the tab?

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Starting to feel very Game of Thrones, like you have

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to there's charts.

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 2>So Dwayne Waynes is a writer and film composer. He's

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 2>the eldest. Then Keenan Ivory Waynes is the second eldest.

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.959
<v Speaker 2>There's Deirdre who's a screenwriter and producer.

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know there was a Wayne's sister.

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Wow, Yeah, there's another. There's Kimberly and actor and.

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Writer Kimberly never mind because she's she's in some of

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>their stuff.

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's Elvira. She has worked as a writer's assistant

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 2>and a writer. Okay, There's Nadya, who the little blurb

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 2>about her has primarily stayed out of the spotlight.

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Good for her.

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 2>There's DeVaughn, also largely kept her life private. There's Sean.

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I like that the girls. The girls are generally like no,

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>thank you, not interested, like good for you, good for you.

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Sean born in nineteen seventy one and Marlon born in

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 2>seventy two, versus their elder brother Keenan born in nineteen

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 2>fifty eight and Damon Senior born in nineteen sixty. So yeah,

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 2>there's like many siblings many years apart.

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>But Keenan's guy. I always think of him as like

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of the elder because it's like his younger brothers

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>are in his stuff. He was involved in Eddie Murphy

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 1>raw like he's I feel like he's the I don't

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>know they's So it's we could do a whole Wayne's

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>family history show basically, right, Yeah, and I also I

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>was like, which Wayne's brother was it Marlon's last year.

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>In spite of the fact that we will see some

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>very you know, transphobic and homophobic jokes in Scary Movie,

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I do feel like it is worth mentioning that a

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago. I don't know if his son

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>said it publicly or if he has asked about it,

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>but he has a trans son who he has been

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>extremely publicly vocally supportive of, which I thought was really

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>nice to. You know, people can grow. So while Marlon

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Wayne's you know, as we'll talk about, had a hand

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>in writing some pretty horrifically transphobic and homophobic jokes in

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the year two thousand, I, you know, again just couching

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>it in people grow. We're talking about the year two

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand and it's not going to feel good.

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 2>It certainly is not.

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>So Yeah, your history is you saw it when it

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>came out, But you're more of a scary movie too, head.

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, technically yes, But also I've I've left these

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 2>movies in the path. I haven't seen any of them

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 2>since like probably two thousand and three, fair enough, but yeah,

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 2>for some reason, Scary Movie two was the one which

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 2>is mostly a parody of Oh.

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Do they always choose like one movie to basically

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>rip off pretty much?

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and then maybe there will be like kind of

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 2>a side plot or like a secondary movie that they'll

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 2>pull from, But it seems to be like mostly one movie, Yeah,

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 2>the Haunting from nineteen ninety nine, although the opening sequence

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 2>of Scary Movie two is an Exorcist parody.

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>They love the Exorcist because it's also heavily round. I mean,

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess it is like one of the most iconic

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>horror movies, but it's not recent at all, So I

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>was like, why is it.

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 2>They also love Titanic. Yeah, because there's a Titanic reference

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 2>in Scary Movie and Scary Movie two.

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was a pretty clever, dark but well

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>execution almostad too. They're okay, there's just there's just a lot.

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot going on. Yeah, this movie wants to

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>be screamed so bad, and this is the crux of

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>it that I know. I'm like, in no way the

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>first person to make this observation. We've talked about over text,

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>but like, why would you parody Scream when Scream is

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a satire of horror movies? It's a hat on a

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>hat it does. So I feel like any or most

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of at least if you're looking at this from a

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>critical standpoint, which I know you're not supposed to, but

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>we're doing it anyway.

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 2>It's our job.

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>But that's our job. That's what you pay us the

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>five dollars for. But you know, like I feel like

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>most of the attempts to, like Scream in particular, it

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>just like falls apart really quickly because it's like Scream

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>is already it would make more sense to do, you know,

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>an ursus parody or a sixth sense parody, or like

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a movie that is at its core sincere not that Scream,

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean and Scream. So that was what I did

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 1>instead of watching scary movie too. I rewatched Scream. We've

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>covered it on the show before. It's a classic. It's great,

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, has its flaws, certainly, but like it is

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>clearly commenting on horror tropes, which I feel like the

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>second trilogy does even.

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:35.120
<v Speaker 2>More in like pretty I think clever and astute ways,

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:39.120
<v Speaker 2>something that scary movie you know, utterly fails to do.

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And it's not even like rewatching Scream, I mean it's

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:45.640
<v Speaker 1>high drama. Like you love the characters, but like it's

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>not subtle about what it's doing, like it's it's tell

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>but you know, the scary movie really challenges whatnot subtle

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>can look like. Yeah, I don't know, do you have

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>anything else? I guess, oh the last whatever positive contextual

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>thing that I will say about this movie and also

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:07.719
<v Speaker 1>what they make scherioh Terry do in this movie. I

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>love Schario Terry, Like can we not make her do that? Anyways,

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>but that this movie's success and again feel about this

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>way you will basically revived this genre like the like

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:29.159
<v Speaker 1>super spoofy summer movie and that like continued throughout the

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>two thousands, like with this franchise, but also with you know,

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>epic movie vampires.

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 2>Suck blah blah blah, like those movies got another teen

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 2>movie totally.

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Like there there were stuff like this in the

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>eighties and nineties and not saying there were the most

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>baseballs you know, like but in general, like it feels

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 1>like these kinds of movies had a huge moment in

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 1>like the seventies and then again in the two thousands.

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 2>I forget if it was epic movie or there were

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 2>a hand full of ones like this where they were

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 2>just like, let's take a pretty broad genre and then

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 2>call it something movie. I don't remember if it was

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 2>epic movie or something similar, but I walked out of it.

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 2>I went to go see in the theater and I

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 2>was like, this is so bad. It's like one of

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:19.679
<v Speaker 2>the few movies I've ever walked out of. I so

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 2>to say, do you remember the first movie you walked

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 2>out of? I did, and it might have been that.

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Really, it made me feel so powerful the first movie

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I walked out of, and like in retrospect, I was like, Okay,

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 1>that was a little dramatic. But I walked out of

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>bas Lerman's Great Gatsby.

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:37.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean visual cacophony.

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I said, enough is enough, enough is enough. I think

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I was being like a little like, this isn't like

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the book, Like you know, I was being a dork.

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:48.199
<v Speaker 1>But you know what I did did I said what

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I said, And I remember that when I did it,

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>I was wearing a Monster's University hat. So it still

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>was like kind of humiliating. Anyway, that's hilarious, adult woman.

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 2>I almost walked out of bos Lherman's el this because

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:04.719
<v Speaker 2>that to me was very people. Oh you know what,

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 2>I think it was disaster movie that I walked out

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 2>of two thousand and eight.

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh I remember, Yes, I mean that felt barely justified.

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I like, I don't know, I don't know.

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. The last thing I'll say before we dive into

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 2>the recap is that something that would have probably made

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 2>more sense to bring up on the Young Frankenstein episode,

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 2>because we were talking about our relationship with spoof and parody,

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 2>I forgot to mention that I made a student film

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 2>which was a parody. I think I mentioned it on

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 2>the show before. But it's called Car Wars Return of

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 2>the Jetta. Wait, I don't rememberich is awesome. I think

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 2>we can.

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>All agree, okay, no notes, it.

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:54.679
<v Speaker 2>Was okay, so because my friend had a beat up

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 2>Volkswagen Jetta, and so I was just like, can I

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 2>use your car slash? Will you be in my my

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 2>little movie?

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 1>That's sweet? I love that. I Also, I guess I

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>should have for my context, I should have mentioned for

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>all the shit I'm about to talk. You know, I

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>wrote on Robot Chicken for two seasons, so look, so look,

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>am I above this clearly not? Clearly not? I wrote

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 1>on robot Chicken for two seasons. For like five dollars cumulatively,

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>So like, you know.

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 2>But pretty good parody sketches on that.

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I agree.

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 2>I've always been a fan of that show I Gritty.

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>That was my favorite that I got away with I

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Gritty guys, come on, come on, you gotta watch I Gritty. Yeah,

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that was like God, that was like seven or eight

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>years ago now, so even the ones that I am

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>proud of still feel a little dated. One was like,

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>uh about what was that Remy Mallick show, Mister Robot. Yeah,

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I did a mister Robot parody that at the time

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>did numbers. But now someone would be like, huh, what

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.679
<v Speaker 1>do you mean by that? Anyways? Yeah, am I am?

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I above obvious pairs. No, no, I paid my rent

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>for a little while.

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeh.

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>But but I will say, having been in rooms of

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 1>that nature, what you do find is constantly fighting against

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>jokes that are not dissimilar to the ones that appear

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>in this movie, because I feel like parody can be

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>super fun, as you like, your short film is an

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:28.919
<v Speaker 1>example of that. I Gritty, It's an example of gritty.

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Wait, let me just say one more thing. Also, Okay,

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 2>so I Gritty, Tanya, mister Robot, I Robot remember that.

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Makes you think, it makes you think, sorry, wait what

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>was that? I there was like one robot because the

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>catch I read that, I was like, oh, that didn't

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:48.439
<v Speaker 1>even have anything to do with anything. It was a

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:52.239
<v Speaker 1>fake commercial for like Cheetoh, like what to do when

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>you've been fingered by a guy who just ate Cheetos? Anyways,

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>So that wasn't a parody as much as just something

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that was on my mind at the time.

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 2>That was original content.

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 1>That's IP, that's IP anyway, whoa oh. But just like

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the fact that, like I don't know, this genre is possible.

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>It's possible to write really funny stuff. It's always gonna

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 1>rely on you know, the viewer knowing what the reference

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 1>is for the most part, although some people's aw scary

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>movie and then so I'll scream. So it's like, if

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:29.360
<v Speaker 1>it's strong enough, it can it can stand on its own.

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Usually you need to know the reference. But it really

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>does open itself up to like some of the like

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>nastiest prejudices at the time. I'm thinking of the time

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:39.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Robot Chicken writer's room when I had got

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>into a full on argument and I won't get specific

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.239
<v Speaker 1>about who I was talking to but this was in

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:54.159
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen nineteen about whether Elon Musk was cool or not,

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and he really was like, what do you hate rockets?

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>I was like, no, I hate Nazis and then he

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>was like, you're being dramatic and anyways, so these are

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>this is the tenor of this. However, this movie, I

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I would be really surprised if there wasn't

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>like a punch up room for movies like this. That's

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>something that as a writer I'm always like curious about,

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:19.920
<v Speaker 1>because you know whatever, for listeners that aren't aware, there's

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 1>usually for usually on comedy movies, a lot of the

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>time on kids movies, once a script is complete, they

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>will hire a group of writers or comedians to come

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 1>in for a couple of days and just pitch jokes

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that like aren't quite working. I've done one of these

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>rooms before. They're fun, but you don't get any credit,

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>like I think sometimes people get thank yous or whatever.

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:45.479
<v Speaker 1>So I wouldn't be surprised if that happened here. But

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>as far as the credited writers, there's Sean and Marlon

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Wains the brother of course is directing, Buddy Johnson and

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Phil Bowman, which I like who are these men? And

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 1>those are those are the names of old men to.

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Me, they were writers on The Wayne Brothers Show, so

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 2>that's probably why they got pulled into this.

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Which was one of the other jokes that made me laugh.

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen The Waynes Brothers show, but during the

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:18.679
<v Speaker 1>stab scene, just the like, oh, and the Wayne Brothers

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>is a really good show. We didn't even get a

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:24.199
<v Speaker 1>parting episode or whatever. That's fun. That's fun. They're not

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the weird credits. The weird credits are Jason Friedberg and

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Seltzer, who get a credit because of a WGA

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 1>rule in spite of not having written on the movie

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>at all. They just were like, what if we parodied Scream?

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>A very lucrative decision for them to pitch the most

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.400
<v Speaker 1>obvious idea ever and then other people write the movie.

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 2>Because Here's what happened from what I understand. According to

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 2>scholarly journal Wikipedia, so the Waynes Brothers and then Buddy,

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Buddy and Phil were developing the script for Scary Movie,

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 2>which was originally called something like Scream if you still know,

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 2>oh what I did last Halloween or something.

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think the only way it could be more

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:10.120
<v Speaker 1>dated would be and also that Scream was almost called

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>scary movie is kind of a fun thing.

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 2>So they were developing that script at the same time Miramax,

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 2>because yep, this movie was produced by Bob and Harvey Weinstein.

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 1>It isn't that interesting time every time a movie opens

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>with that, you're like, well, wow, or we're off to

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a bad start.

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Right, So Miramax was developing a different spoof of Scream

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 2>that Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer were writing, and I

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 2>don't know if they just sort of like decided to

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 2>combine efforts or what exactly, but that's basically why, Yeah,

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Friedberg and Seltzer have writing credits on Scary Movie, even

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:54.439
<v Speaker 2>though I don't think they worked on any draft of

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:55.639
<v Speaker 2>this script.

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 1>The lesson being, if you're a Hollywood writer, just start

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>pitching the most obvious shit around town and eventually you'll

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>start making passive income off of it. Right, Good for them.

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I also something that could so like we were talking

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:13.439
<v Speaker 1>about this movie is clearly ripping off Scream and I

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:15.639
<v Speaker 1>Know you did last summer, which I kind of forgot.

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:18.159
<v Speaker 1>I know, we talked about it when we covered I

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Know what You did last Summer. More recently, we're both

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 1>written by the same guy. They're both written by Kevin Williamson.

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 1>And what a fascinating cultural figure he is, indeed, because

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:32.679
<v Speaker 1>he also created Dawson's Creek, which is referenced in the

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>movie that is parodying two of his movies.

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Wow, it's all connected. Her web connects them all.

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Kevin's web connects them all. I'm I'm always rooting for

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Kevin for obvious reasons.

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Anyone likes Kevin Kevin le mignon.

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that is really kind of it, That's the whole reason.

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>But but yeah, so I was like, Wow, there's just

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:02.439
<v Speaker 1>so many layers of Kevin and Williamson in this damn movie.

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Although I do think, I know.

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 2>What you did last Summer is corny, it kind of sucks,

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 2>but what can you do it an you do? But

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:13.159
<v Speaker 2>Scream rocks and it didn't need to be parodied, and

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:16.639
<v Speaker 2>it makes no sense that it was, and yet scary

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 2>moving one And yet should I do the recap?

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess? So, I mean, yeah, it's basically Scream but worse.

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, yeah, I guess like spoilers for Scream because

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 2>most of the same twists that happen in Scream also

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 2>happened in this movie. So if you haven't seen Scream,

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 2>it's about to be spoiled more or less. Okay, So

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 2>the movie opens much the same way Scream opens, where

0:28:57.120 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 2>like the ghost face killer calls a woman. The character's

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:05.719
<v Speaker 2>name is Drew played by Carmen Electra formerly played by

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Drew Barrymore in Scream.

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Wow. The subtle reference to the text poor carbon Electra

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>in this day like poor I mean, but every time

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you see an actor, just think we're saying poor them.

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:18.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly.

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 2>So the killer calls her and asks her about scary movies,

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 2>and then he shows up and starts chasing her stabs

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 2>her in the chest.

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>This is truly like I forgot until I rewatch Scream

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>beat for beat for beat for beat the exact same scene,

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to the point where I kind of forgot that the

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Drew Barrymore's character's parents come home at this exact moment

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in this one. The mother's giving the father RoadHead ha haha,

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>something that I don't know. I just am like, that

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't happen. There's so much RoadHead in this movie. I

0:29:57.280 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>was like, stop telling teenagers that RoadHead is a thing.

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>It is not a thing. I've done it twice and

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it was scary and they always crashed the car. It's scary.

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Don't give RoadHead. Don't be like people scary movie or

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 1>me and the there's two different points in this movie.

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry Carmen Electra in her first five seconds that

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 1>was green. Oops. I farted, Okay, like there it just

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>for no reason, just for let's have a fart. Same

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>thing with Anna Faris at some point where.

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 2>It's like, oh, she farts in the bathtub.

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah what why not? I don't know. I like why not?

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>But also why I'm being a snob, but also why,

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>but also why? And it's only women, Like why are

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>women farting? It feels fetishy?

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Anyways, it could well or it could be really thoughtful

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 2>representation to show the women fart too. I don't fart, Okay,

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 2>I've never fried. Yeah, me either. I don't know what

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking about.

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing.

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Anything to not talk about this movie. Okay, I know,

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 2>all right, So this this sequence happens. Yeah, cut to

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 2>a teen girl named Cindy played by Anna Ferris.

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Now eagle eyed viewers keep in mind the character that's

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>based on his named Sidney, whereas her name is Cindy whoa.

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 1>So the parallels are subtle, but stay with us. Also,

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 1>young young Anna Ferris. Did you see the story about

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:32.719
<v Speaker 1>how she ended up in this movie? Kind of?

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 2>I sort of forget it already.

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think I don't know that much about Anna

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Ferris as a person other than I think she's like

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a really good comic actor who has almost exclusively been

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>in movies that have aged very poorly, and I would

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>like to see her in a movie that isn't I Weirdly,

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the last time I was visiting producer of this very show, Sophie,

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>we rewatched The House Bunny for some reason. Uh huh

0:31:58.280 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 1>does not age well?

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 2>I've never seen it.

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>It's well, it does not age well. That's but like

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Anna Faris is a very very talented actor. I feel

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>like she I know she was like early to podcasting.

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>She was married to Chris Pratt at one point, a

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 1>lot going on, and he.

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Has been very very ablest about the child they have together.

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, she seems I've listened to her podcast

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times. She seems genuinely great. And I

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know at what point or maybe Chris Pratt came

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 1>with a broken brain. But clearly he got like famous

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and his brain broke or something, and he's awful to

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>their kid. It seems like he was awful to her. Anyways.

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I think she's very interesting and this was her first

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 1>It might have been her first one of her first

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>roles and definitely her first big role. But yeah, it

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 1>like happened sort of. She had just like graduated from

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>college and she was gonna go to London, and then

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 1>they were like, wait, just take one audition in la

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and then and then it was this, and then she

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 1>she had to be in them. I kep saying it

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 1>had to like that she was four. I don't like,

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>but she was in the first flour yikes too well. Anyways,

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I like her. Her and Regina Hall. I just am

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>like they should make a different movie together. Agree, I

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 1>would watch it.

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Let's write something for them, Okay, Okay, So we meet Cindy.

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 2>She's in her bedroom. Her boyfriend Bobby climbed through her

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 2>window and he's horny, horny, horny, and he wants to

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 2>have sex, but she's a virgin and she wants to wait,

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 2>thus initiating her entire arc. And we'll talk about that later.

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Not the electric fence underwear. Just nasty business, are we going?

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess we couldn't reference every offensive joke

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 1>in the movie, but I'm just gonna single out the

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>ones that upset me them up. Sure, Sure, the electric

0:33:51.280 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 1>fence underwear. I was upset by her dad being friends

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 1>with Pablo Escobar and being a drug trafficker. I guess

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I was neutral on that. I don't like the joke, shrug,

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>but there is funny. I don't know, like, I don't

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 1>know what it's again. I was like, I was trying

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 1>to figure out, you know, where they were going with that,

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 1>but it just sort of seemed like so there would

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 1>be a guy being like, don't look at the drug

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 1>or whatever.

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 2>I think it's hashtag random humor.

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 1>It's and in two thousand room from the hashtag. I mean,

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:26.319
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it really gets cooked in the back

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>half of the two thousands. That's when we have the

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 1>finger mustaches. We get these get pretty pretty thorny in

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the random apartment. But yeah, this is this is it begins.

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 2>It begins. Okay, So we cut to the next day

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 2>at school, we meet Cindy's friends Brenda played by Regina Holl.

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Brenda's brother Shorty played by Marlon Wayne's.

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 1>And just for what it's worth, so most of the

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 1>characters and scholarly journal Wikipedia, they let you know which

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>character becomes which character. Billy Loomis Bobby Prince. I mean

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that's literally a one to one. He's often saying the

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 1>exact same dialogue as Billy Loomis. It's I think he's

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 1>maybe the most poorly realized character all of all of them,

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:21.439
<v Speaker 1>and at the end he's gay. They literally give him

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the last name Prince because he's also sort of based

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 1>on a Freddie Prince Junior character. Right whatever, Shorty is

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be the Jamie Kennedy character in Scream. Regina

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Hall is supposed to be. I picked out the Brandy

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:40.759
<v Speaker 1>character from I Know What You Did Last Summer, but

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:44.799
<v Speaker 1>also I guess a Jada Pinkett Smith character from Scream two,

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 1>which I have not seen.

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Uh huh. Anyways, okay, so those are those characters. Then

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 2>we also meet Buffy, a friend of Cindy's, played by

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Shannon Elizabeth.

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what that's a reference to.

0:35:57.440 --> 0:35:59.959
<v Speaker 2>No idea hard to say. Is there a famous buzz

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 2>teen character.

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:04.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's in the nineties based on a character played

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>by Sarah Michelle Geller. Also, I felt like that was

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 1>more based on the Rose McGowan character, and I hate

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 1>how they talk about her. I hate how they talk

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 1>about her. It felt like the way it was written

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 1>was intended. I mean, and maybe I'm wrong, but it

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 1>just felt like, so the way she's introduced is so

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 1>aggressively hateful of like that, like floody girl has no

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 1>respect for herself. And it felt to me, based on

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>how Rose McGowan was talked about in that time, it

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 1>felt like a direct missive at her, not even at

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that character. It pissed me off quite frankly.

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 2>It's very pissy. Yeah, so Buffy's boyfriend Greg, okay, whatever,

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 2>he's heavy with Greg.

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>He's yeah, many many such Gregs.

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know fucking the actor who plays him.

0:36:57.000 --> 0:36:57.799
<v Speaker 2>I didn't write it down.

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Lachlan Munroe. Oh, very expensive sounding name. What else has

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>he done? He's in White Chicks also, Oh and he

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 1>was in Riverdale. Okay, that's interesting, Okay whatever. Next we

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 1>meet Ray played by Sean Wayns, who is also Brenda's boyfriend.

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 1>But there's all these constant jokes that he's actually gay. Literally,

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:26.799
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's there's a scene the sequence where

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:28.399
<v Speaker 1>they're ripping off I Know what you did last summer,

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 1>which happens for about ten minutes and then kind of

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 1>really doesn't come back up her again. I don't think

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 1>that fifteen seconds passes without there being a gay joke

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:39.759
<v Speaker 1>from from or at this character. Yes, in the same

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 1>way that like all the entire LGBT community is presented

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:52.360
<v Speaker 1>in this movie as predators, freaks exactly, Yes, like creeps, predators, whatever,

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Just like all of these broad stereotypes that it's really

0:37:56.120 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 1>unpleasant to revisit of like, well, if someone is gay

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:03.319
<v Speaker 1>there attracted to every man they see, like you're like,

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>ah yeah, nasty, and and also like ends up by extension,

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 1>like the Regina Hall character being constantly like made a

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 1>joke of of like how does she not know? And

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 1>like whatever it.

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:21.319
<v Speaker 2>It sucks so bad. Okay. So they're all hanging out

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:24.880
<v Speaker 2>together at school and word has spread about their classmate

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Drew having been murdered. The press is on campus, including

0:38:29.680 --> 0:38:34.160
<v Speaker 2>a reporter named Gail Hailstorm played by Cherio Terry.

0:38:34.239 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 1>They didn't even change the name. They didn't even change

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the name of that character. Yeah, they changed the spelling.

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Chario terry. Not fair.

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Not fair. So the teens are wondering if Drew's death

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:54.359
<v Speaker 2>had something to do with them accidentally killing a man

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:56.480
<v Speaker 2>last year, and this is when we get the flashback

0:38:56.560 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 2>that's a direct reference to I Know what You Did

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:03.320
<v Speaker 2>last summer where they hit a man with their car,

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:07.960
<v Speaker 2>dump him in the sea and agree to never tell

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 2>anyone about it, although Cindy's like, I don't know, maybe

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:12.320
<v Speaker 2>we should tell the police.

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 1>It's so weird because I feel like you could take

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that sequence out of the movie and nothing would change.

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:39:17.520 --> 0:39:20.279
<v Speaker 1>But there was one joke, okay, there was one joke

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I liked in that sequence where the guy is fine,

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, and he's like, oh good, no worries. I

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 1>was like, okay, this is like a fun studio comedy

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:33.400
<v Speaker 1>joke where that But then of course the Ray character

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 1>is like, I'll grab his ass. You're like, what there

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:39.920
<v Speaker 1>is okay?

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, okay. So we cut back to

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:47.080
<v Speaker 2>the present. The reporter Gail approaches a character named Officer

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Doofy to try to get more information about Drew's murder,

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 2>and we will talk about all of the very ablest

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 2>things that are happening around this.

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Gundar fucking believable. I mean, and this is this character

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:05.720
<v Speaker 1>is directly and offensively mapped on the David Arquette character

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:09.719
<v Speaker 1>from Scream, whose officer Dewey get it?

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Whoa Yeah anyway, Okay. Meanwhile, at school, the ghostface killer

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:24.240
<v Speaker 2>is kind of like lurking around. He's leaving notes for Cindy.

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 2>He leaves a photo for Greg, which is like this

0:40:28.160 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 2>extended small penis joke. Then there's a scene where Buffy

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 2>is participating in a beauty pageant and the killer murders

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:46.759
<v Speaker 2>Greg as he's watching his girlfriend like be in the

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 2>beauty pageant. Actually, I kind of like that joke too,

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 2>where it's like she will now do a dramatic reading

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 2>and she like gives this performance which is just reacting

0:40:57.160 --> 0:41:02.120
<v Speaker 2>to seeing her boyfriend. Right, yeah, it works. Yeah, more

0:41:02.160 --> 0:41:06.399
<v Speaker 2>stuff like that, please, less of all the other horrible stuff.

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Or you know, just don't make the movie.

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Just don't make the movie was a completely movie necessary?

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:12.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay.

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 2>So then she witnesses her boyfriend Greg being murdered. At home,

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Cindy gets a call from the killer who is inside

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 2>her house and he attacks her, but then the cops

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 2>show up and her boyfriend Bobby shows up and he

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:36.040
<v Speaker 2>has like the killer's knife and phone and gloves on him,

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:40.799
<v Speaker 2>so he seems very suspicious and is arrested. So then

0:41:40.880 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Sydney not Sydney, that's the Scream character Cindy. Cindy goes

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 2>to spend the night with Buffy and then she gets

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:53.480
<v Speaker 2>another phone call from the killer, so it seems like,

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:56.719
<v Speaker 2>oh no, they locked up the wrong guy. And of

0:41:56.760 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 2>course this also happens in Scream. So any drum had

0:42:00.200 --> 0:42:03.719
<v Speaker 2>attention that you might be expecting from a movie while

0:42:03.719 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 2>it's not really there because you already know what happens

0:42:06.040 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 2>because they did it.

0:42:07.440 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 1>And also you don't like one of the big successes

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 1>of Cream.

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:16.279
<v Speaker 2>Five Cream, what is it? I?

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh, man, I liked five Cream And maybe maybe it's

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:24.080
<v Speaker 1>because I just I ride for Jenna Ortega, I have

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a crush on Jack Quaid. That movie works for me. Anyways.

0:42:29.600 --> 0:42:32.640
<v Speaker 1>One of the successes of Scream is that it's clearly

0:42:32.800 --> 0:42:35.319
<v Speaker 1>like commenting on stuff, but it still manages to like

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 1>write characters that you care about for sure. Cannot be said.

0:42:40.400 --> 0:42:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Cannot be said, especially because our final girl character the

0:42:43.840 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 1>movie hates her. There is a running joke, well I

0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:52.000
<v Speaker 1>would say it. I think it happens she's physically thrown

0:42:52.040 --> 0:42:57.160
<v Speaker 1>around by various characters Cindy in multiple points. Yeah, Cindy, Yeah,

0:42:57.560 --> 0:42:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's supposed to like build. I think that the

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>three is like the first one is, you know, she's

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:04.400
<v Speaker 1>like pushed a little bit. The second one she's like

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 1>body slammed you hear bones crack. Oh yeah, and then

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 1>later she's blasted into the ceiling with come, which is

0:43:11.120 --> 0:43:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the least pleasant things I've ever

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:17.400
<v Speaker 1>seen committed to film. Yeah, it's clearly a mannequin. But

0:43:17.560 --> 0:43:17.960
<v Speaker 1>like this.

0:43:18.000 --> 0:43:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Happens again in Scary Movie too, during the scene the

0:43:23.360 --> 0:43:26.920
<v Speaker 2>references Titanic, and so that feels like a crime.

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:31.399
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like, yeah, I Regina Hall luckily. I mean,

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:33.319
<v Speaker 1>I want to see her in War, but I feel

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:36.480
<v Speaker 1>like Regina Hall has been able to escape this type

0:43:36.520 --> 0:43:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of movie. I just feel like someone someone, someone Hollywood

0:43:41.440 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 1>elite listening to our show, someone rescue Anna Faris from

0:43:45.360 --> 0:43:47.640
<v Speaker 1>this type of movie. It's just not fair.

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:53.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Okay, So anyway, the killer calls Cindy, so she's like, oh, no,

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:57.319
<v Speaker 2>it couldn't have been my boyfriend because he's in jail now,

0:43:57.400 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 2>So who's calling me? And Bobby is released. Meanwhile, for

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:07.880
<v Speaker 2>some reason, Buffy does not believe that the killer is

0:44:08.000 --> 0:44:12.240
<v Speaker 2>harassing Cindy, even though Buffy saw her boyfriend get murdered

0:44:12.239 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 2>by the killer. Yeah, but this movie isn't interested in

0:44:15.719 --> 0:44:20.000
<v Speaker 2>allowing women to have thoughts or logic.

0:44:20.239 --> 0:44:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I literally do think, yeah, that they were just like

0:44:22.600 --> 0:44:27.759
<v Speaker 1>Bimbo and they cast who, by all accounts, seems to

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:31.560
<v Speaker 1>be a lovely person. She's a huge animal rights advocate.

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:37.239
<v Speaker 1>But Shannon Elizabeth, who plays this character, was like, I

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:41.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't know this because I wasn't horny at the time,

0:44:41.880 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 1>but you know, she was, like I guess, considered like

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a sex symbol of the time. She's also in the

0:44:47.040 --> 0:44:50.520
<v Speaker 1>American Pie movies, so I feel like even having her

0:44:50.880 --> 0:44:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in this kind of role was sort of meant to

0:44:53.520 --> 0:44:56.800
<v Speaker 1>signal like, don't take this character seriously for sure, which

0:44:57.080 --> 0:44:58.360
<v Speaker 1>is horrible.

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, she's the character in America and Pie who And

0:45:02.000 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 2>I forget exactly how this plays out in that movie

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:07.080
<v Speaker 2>because not that I'm ever gonna fucking revisit.

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:10.320
<v Speaker 1>That, but like, I totally wiped it from my memory.

0:45:10.360 --> 0:45:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember a single.

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Thing it again. It was unfortunately a movie that I

0:45:15.800 --> 0:45:19.040
<v Speaker 2>was the target demo for when it came out, so yeah,

0:45:19.160 --> 0:45:21.840
<v Speaker 2>I was familiar with it. But uh, like the big

0:45:21.880 --> 0:45:26.520
<v Speaker 2>scene with her is when she's like undressing in front

0:45:26.760 --> 0:45:30.680
<v Speaker 2>of a webcam, but I think doesn't know oh, because

0:45:30.920 --> 0:45:35.080
<v Speaker 2>the Jason Biggs character, like, God, she's like, whatever, change

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:37.120
<v Speaker 2>clothes in my room, and then he like sets up

0:45:37.120 --> 0:45:42.239
<v Speaker 2>a webcam that's like broadcasting video of her undressing, which

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:45.520
<v Speaker 2>she does not know about, and like broadcasting it to

0:45:45.600 --> 0:45:48.560
<v Speaker 2>like everyone at school. And it's so it's like extremely

0:45:48.600 --> 0:45:52.400
<v Speaker 2>exploitative and horrible, and that's like what made her famous.

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:53.480
<v Speaker 2>That's what she's famous for.

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:55.879
<v Speaker 1>We've and we've talked about this multiple times in the show,

0:45:55.920 --> 0:45:59.439
<v Speaker 1>but I really do feel like the late nineties into

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the early two thousands was one of the low points

0:46:02.440 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 1>for representation of women in general, which is wild, but

0:46:07.280 --> 0:46:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I really do think it was like done better in

0:46:09.680 --> 0:46:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the eighties and the seventies.

0:46:12.600 --> 0:46:14.680
<v Speaker 2>I kept thinking as I was watching this that this

0:46:15.120 --> 0:46:21.280
<v Speaker 2>movie is just like very emblematic of what American culture

0:46:21.960 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 2>thought was edgy comedy. Yeah at that time, Like this

0:46:27.280 --> 0:46:30.120
<v Speaker 2>is just like you need a reference point, like this

0:46:30.280 --> 0:46:34.120
<v Speaker 2>is it. This is what we thought was good and funny.

0:46:34.000 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Right, And it's like and it bears out because it

0:46:36.680 --> 0:46:39.839
<v Speaker 1>was like one of the most successful comedies like ever.

0:46:40.400 --> 0:46:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it's so weird, especially after having covered

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:47.439
<v Speaker 1>Young Frankenstein, a movie that came out nearly thirty years

0:46:47.480 --> 0:46:51.840
<v Speaker 1>before this one. You know, there we had plenty of

0:46:52.040 --> 0:46:55.040
<v Speaker 1>notes about it, and women do not play a you know,

0:46:55.160 --> 0:46:57.759
<v Speaker 1>or anyone but sis, men don't play a significant role

0:46:57.800 --> 0:47:00.400
<v Speaker 1>in the movie. But it's still there's far less to

0:47:00.440 --> 0:47:03.839
<v Speaker 1>talk about than this. It's just wild, not to say

0:47:03.880 --> 0:47:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess like tempering that with I'm sure

0:47:08.239 --> 0:47:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that there were plenty of broad comedies in the seventies

0:47:10.840 --> 0:47:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that were offensive in the way that this is, but

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:16.600
<v Speaker 1>this is like one of the definitive comedies of the

0:47:16.640 --> 0:47:19.240
<v Speaker 1>early two thousands, And what does that say.

0:47:21.080 --> 0:47:24.680
<v Speaker 2>I also just to take another little tangent here to

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 2>prep to prepare for the new Naked Gun movie, which

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:32.040
<v Speaker 2>I do think I'll see. But I was hanging out

0:47:32.080 --> 0:47:33.680
<v Speaker 2>with Brian the other night and he was like, let's

0:47:33.680 --> 0:47:36.120
<v Speaker 2>watch the first Naked Gun and I was like, sure,

0:47:36.239 --> 0:47:38.319
<v Speaker 2>I'll rewatch it, and then I realized I was like,

0:47:38.320 --> 0:47:40.960
<v Speaker 2>wait a minute, I've never seen this. My point is

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:46.400
<v Speaker 2>that it's not, you know, a beacon of representation or

0:47:46.400 --> 0:47:49.360
<v Speaker 2>inclusivity or anything like that. I mean, O. J. Simpson

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:51.879
<v Speaker 2>is in the movie for crying out on but it's

0:47:51.920 --> 0:47:56.160
<v Speaker 2>actually pretty funny, Like I was, like the jokes, most

0:47:56.160 --> 0:47:59.600
<v Speaker 2>of the jokes are not wildly problematic, and most of

0:47:59.640 --> 0:48:04.720
<v Speaker 2>them are like pretty funny, goofy, like spoofy slapstick stuff.

0:48:05.040 --> 0:48:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Sure, I feel the same way. I mean, I guess

0:48:06.960 --> 0:48:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen it in a long time, but like Airplane,

0:48:09.000 --> 0:48:11.359
<v Speaker 1>I feel playing in the same category there.

0:48:11.440 --> 0:48:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, right, So it's very possible to like do a

0:48:15.520 --> 0:48:20.719
<v Speaker 2>silly spoof that isn't horrendously problematic.

0:48:20.960 --> 0:48:22.759
<v Speaker 1>But I think it gets back to what you're saying

0:48:22.800 --> 0:48:25.160
<v Speaker 1>where it's like it's a clear part of this movie's

0:48:25.200 --> 0:48:29.359
<v Speaker 1>agenda to be edgy, which I would say is not

0:48:29.680 --> 0:48:32.920
<v Speaker 1>really true of those other movies, like their number one

0:48:33.000 --> 0:48:36.960
<v Speaker 1>goal is for it to be funny, where I've like this,

0:48:36.960 --> 0:48:40.279
<v Speaker 1>this movie's number one goal is to be edgy to teenagers,

0:48:41.080 --> 0:48:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and it does appear that it was successful. But is

0:48:44.520 --> 0:48:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that a worthy goal?

0:48:47.680 --> 0:48:52.160
<v Speaker 2>I would say no. No. So the Buffy character is

0:48:52.239 --> 0:48:56.880
<v Speaker 2>like mocking her friend Cindy, being like, oh, you silly goose,

0:48:57.200 --> 0:49:02.360
<v Speaker 2>You're lying about being hers by a murderer. He's not

0:49:02.440 --> 0:49:07.480
<v Speaker 2>even real. And then the killer goes after Buffy and

0:49:07.560 --> 0:49:08.200
<v Speaker 2>murders her.

0:49:08.680 --> 0:49:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, she is a bimbo, so of course she's gotta go. Yes.

0:49:13.719 --> 0:49:17.759
<v Speaker 2>We cut to Brenda and Ray at the movies. They're

0:49:17.800 --> 0:49:22.000
<v Speaker 2>watching Shakespeare in Love, which is kind of hilarious to.

0:49:21.960 --> 0:49:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Me, so bizarre because it's like they would have had

0:49:25.480 --> 0:49:28.759
<v Speaker 1>to have gotten the rights for that. I'm curious what

0:49:28.800 --> 0:49:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the story behind that is. Yeah, I didn't hate that joke,

0:49:31.040 --> 0:49:34.120
<v Speaker 1>but I was just like, how did they make that? Oh?

0:49:34.200 --> 0:49:37.600
<v Speaker 1>You know what, I'm pretty sure that that's a Miramax movie.

0:49:37.840 --> 0:49:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh Okay, that's almost certainly what it was, because there's

0:49:40.800 --> 0:49:45.040
<v Speaker 1>all of that really unfortunate, disgusting. I mean, there's a

0:49:45.080 --> 0:49:47.799
<v Speaker 1>lot of anecdotes about Harvey Weinstein connected to Shakespeare in Love,

0:49:47.840 --> 0:49:52.239
<v Speaker 1>where basically he bought that movie oscars and also I

0:49:52.400 --> 0:49:57.880
<v Speaker 1>believe harassed Gwyneth Paltrow Miscoop herself. Anyways, I'm guessing that

0:49:57.880 --> 0:50:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that's what it is. Is that is, I wouldn't surprised

0:50:00.480 --> 0:50:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that was the Weinstein brothers just doing a random victory

0:50:03.360 --> 0:50:07.200
<v Speaker 1>lap for a bunch of oscars that they purchased.

0:50:08.000 --> 0:50:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that said, I do like the movie Shakespeare in Love.

0:50:11.880 --> 0:50:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen it. I've never seen it. It should

0:50:14.040 --> 0:50:14.399
<v Speaker 1>be covered.

0:50:14.440 --> 0:50:16.719
<v Speaker 2>I've seen it in a while. I think we'd have

0:50:16.760 --> 0:50:17.840
<v Speaker 2>some stuff to talk about.

0:50:17.960 --> 0:50:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yeah, I'm down.

0:50:19.960 --> 0:50:23.399
<v Speaker 2>In any case, Ray and Brenda are watching Shakespeare in Love.

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Ray goes into the bathroom and gets stabbed in the

0:50:29.239 --> 0:50:34.480
<v Speaker 2>head by a penis you know what what?

0:50:34.960 --> 0:50:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I obviously wrote that down, But this movie is so

0:50:39.560 --> 0:50:42.440
<v Speaker 1>full to the broom with stuff like that that I

0:50:42.600 --> 0:50:45.719
<v Speaker 1>honestly kind of forgot already that that happens.

0:50:46.120 --> 0:50:51.400
<v Speaker 2>That happens. And then while this is happening, Brenda is

0:50:51.760 --> 0:50:57.640
<v Speaker 2>in a very like caricaturish stereotypical way, is loudly talking

0:50:57.719 --> 0:51:00.720
<v Speaker 2>throughout the movie, and the audience around her is getting

0:51:00.840 --> 0:51:04.799
<v Speaker 2>very annoyed, so they all stab and kill her. And

0:51:04.880 --> 0:51:07.600
<v Speaker 2>this entire sequence is a reference to Scream two.

0:51:08.000 --> 0:51:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I see. Okay, I did not know that. Yeah, that

0:51:13.719 --> 0:51:16.319
<v Speaker 1>that I like that. I'm glad that there is that

0:51:16.400 --> 0:51:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Regina Hall brief interview clip about it. I wasn't able

0:51:19.560 --> 0:51:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to find her talking about scary movie very much elsewhere,

0:51:22.040 --> 0:51:26.319
<v Speaker 1>which is fair. But that's like the like loud girl

0:51:26.400 --> 0:51:30.160
<v Speaker 1>stereotype that she's talking about, right, and I don't know.

0:51:30.200 --> 0:51:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's like, in some ways, I'm like, I,

0:51:33.400 --> 0:51:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm a white girl. I don't feel like

0:51:35.480 --> 0:51:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it's my place to criticize necessarily. But also I think,

0:51:39.800 --> 0:51:43.000
<v Speaker 1>like listening to Regina Hall talk about like that is

0:51:43.080 --> 0:51:47.000
<v Speaker 1>very telling. So yeah, I'm gonna say I'm gonna say it.

0:51:47.280 --> 0:51:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that sucks. I think it sucks. It sucks.

0:51:49.960 --> 0:51:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, Okay. So at Cindy's house, meanwhile, a party

0:51:58.680 --> 0:52:04.360
<v Speaker 2>is happening and the killer goes after a woman in

0:52:04.480 --> 0:52:08.720
<v Speaker 2>the garage and she's killed by the garage door, which

0:52:08.960 --> 0:52:12.760
<v Speaker 2>is another direct reference to a scene from the first

0:52:12.960 --> 0:52:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Scream movie, except this time it's very fat phobic.

0:52:17.600 --> 0:52:17.759
<v Speaker 3>Hm.

0:52:18.800 --> 0:52:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Because they had to get that in as well.

0:52:21.600 --> 0:52:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're like, it seems like they just had a

0:52:23.920 --> 0:52:26.759
<v Speaker 2>checklist for I mean, honestly.

0:52:26.880 --> 0:52:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Because at some point you're like, well, I mean, at

0:52:29.280 --> 0:52:31.880
<v Speaker 1>some point I remember thinking, I'm like, I'm waiting for

0:52:32.000 --> 0:52:35.239
<v Speaker 1>a transphobic joke. Oh, and I didn't have to wait long.

0:52:35.760 --> 0:52:39.839
<v Speaker 2>Nope, did I even include that in? Oh I don't

0:52:39.880 --> 0:52:42.720
<v Speaker 2>even include that scene in the recap because I just

0:52:42.719 --> 0:52:43.880
<v Speaker 2>wanted to barrel pasted.

0:52:44.040 --> 0:52:48.719
<v Speaker 1>But because most well, yeah, I mean I don't even

0:52:48.800 --> 0:52:53.640
<v Speaker 1>remember at what point in the movie that happens, because again,

0:52:53.680 --> 0:52:58.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just very random. It's a scene. It's just Okay.

0:52:58.480 --> 0:53:01.880
<v Speaker 1>The character's name is miss Man, and yeah, that's the

0:53:01.920 --> 0:53:06.120
<v Speaker 1>brain power level we're working with here, played by Jane.

0:53:06.200 --> 0:53:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how to say her last name, Jane.

0:53:08.520 --> 0:53:10.239
<v Speaker 2>Not enough trick of vowels in it.

0:53:10.880 --> 0:53:13.439
<v Speaker 1>Missing a vowel, is what I would say to Jane. Yeah,

0:53:13.480 --> 0:53:18.279
<v Speaker 1>but Jane is a bodybuilder in real life. But I

0:53:18.600 --> 0:53:22.440
<v Speaker 1>feel like we're supposed to interpret her character as a

0:53:22.520 --> 0:53:27.080
<v Speaker 1>trans woman, do you like, due to the character miss.

0:53:26.840 --> 0:53:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Man and the character having testicals and a penis.

0:53:31.920 --> 0:53:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's just like a horrific transphobic joke that the

0:53:36.480 --> 0:53:39.960
<v Speaker 1>more I learned about, the worse it gets somehow.

0:53:39.840 --> 0:53:43.359
<v Speaker 2>Because at first she's the joke is that she's a

0:53:44.080 --> 0:53:51.919
<v Speaker 2>stereotypical gym teacher like predatory lesbian with masculine features who

0:53:52.000 --> 0:53:55.600
<v Speaker 2>is like preying on her students. Then the joke becomes

0:53:56.320 --> 0:54:00.879
<v Speaker 2>that she's a trans woman whose testicles are hanging out

0:54:00.920 --> 0:54:06.200
<v Speaker 2>of her underwear, and everything about it is horrific, And again.

0:54:05.960 --> 0:54:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Like in a similar vein, I think it's somehow worse,

0:54:10.080 --> 0:54:13.120
<v Speaker 1>but in a similar vein to the repeated homophobic joke

0:54:13.160 --> 0:54:16.840
<v Speaker 1>with Ray that Ray is attracted to every man he

0:54:16.880 --> 0:54:20.640
<v Speaker 1>meets and will assault every man he meets if given

0:54:20.680 --> 0:54:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity. The same logic is put onto the only

0:54:26.600 --> 0:54:29.680
<v Speaker 1>canonically trans character also played by a SIS actor, Like

0:54:29.960 --> 0:54:32.720
<v Speaker 1>just it's it's a nightmare. And I also really feel

0:54:32.800 --> 0:54:37.440
<v Speaker 1>for Jane Tricca in this scenario too, because she's a

0:54:37.480 --> 0:54:41.480
<v Speaker 1>professional athlete. This is her first movie appearance she's ever

0:54:41.560 --> 0:54:45.439
<v Speaker 1>been in, and you know, it's just like it's it's

0:54:45.680 --> 0:54:48.840
<v Speaker 1>horrifically transphobic first and foremost. And I also think it

0:54:49.000 --> 0:54:54.720
<v Speaker 1>just like says a lot of anytime you see a woman, sis,

0:54:54.760 --> 0:54:59.000
<v Speaker 1>trans whatever that is strong, it is made a joke

0:54:59.040 --> 0:55:01.879
<v Speaker 1>of and I definitely hate that. And yeah, I think

0:55:01.880 --> 0:55:04.960
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting, well that have we ever talked about the

0:55:05.320 --> 0:55:08.520
<v Speaker 1>predatory gym teacher trope on this show because it is

0:55:08.560 --> 0:55:11.959
<v Speaker 1>such a thing and I think it does like run

0:55:12.120 --> 0:55:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the spectrum of gender as well. But I think, like,

0:55:14.800 --> 0:55:18.080
<v Speaker 1>like you're saying, if the character is coded as a woman,

0:55:18.200 --> 0:55:20.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a predatory lesbian. But I'm also thinking of the

0:55:20.400 --> 0:55:27.879
<v Speaker 1>coach from Mean Girls as like a predatory man, and yeah,

0:55:27.920 --> 0:55:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking of Sue Sylvester. You know, like you're just

0:55:31.719 --> 0:55:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you're just thinking of a lot of characters, and Sue

0:55:34.160 --> 0:55:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Sylvester is an icon, Make no mistake, She's a legend.

0:55:38.320 --> 0:55:42.239
<v Speaker 1>She's a problematic legend. But there's the trope, you know.

0:55:42.640 --> 0:55:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Yea, Jane Trica, I'll just read you a list of

0:55:46.600 --> 0:55:51.560
<v Speaker 2>the names of characters she has played in movies. In

0:55:51.600 --> 0:55:57.360
<v Speaker 2>addition to Miss Man and her character, she's played a

0:55:57.440 --> 0:56:03.880
<v Speaker 2>character named buff Babe bodybuilder guard Amazon, which I'm guessing

0:56:03.920 --> 0:56:07.920
<v Speaker 2>refers to like wonder Woman and a tall Amazon woman

0:56:08.080 --> 0:56:14.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of thing. Yeah, hospital security and bull Dyke number two. Like, so,

0:56:15.160 --> 0:56:17.359
<v Speaker 2>if you're wondering if she has been type.

0:56:17.040 --> 0:56:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Cast, yes, a yes, I would say yes, certainly. Yes.

0:56:22.840 --> 0:56:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I will say. One of her cooler roles is she's

0:56:27.080 --> 0:56:30.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Telephone music video with Lady Gaga and Beyonce.

0:56:30.920 --> 0:56:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I watched the cliff because I was like, where is

0:56:32.480 --> 0:56:35.399
<v Speaker 1>she in that? She's one of the prison guards who

0:56:35.440 --> 0:56:38.839
<v Speaker 1>like brings Lady Gaga into the prison in that so,

0:56:39.760 --> 0:56:43.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, at least after all this fucking bullshit she

0:56:43.840 --> 0:56:46.719
<v Speaker 1>had to deal with, she got to hang out with

0:56:46.800 --> 0:56:49.319
<v Speaker 1>Lady Gaga. Yeah, I guess that. I guess that's my

0:56:49.400 --> 0:56:52.600
<v Speaker 1>whole feeling there. But I was like just relieved to

0:56:52.640 --> 0:56:55.400
<v Speaker 1>see like someone on this list of collaborators who am

0:56:55.400 --> 0:56:58.279
<v Speaker 1>like Oho, it seems like probably was respectful and kind

0:56:58.320 --> 0:56:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to her.

0:56:59.280 --> 0:56:59.640
<v Speaker 2>I hope.

0:56:59.640 --> 0:57:02.239
<v Speaker 1>So also she is on Who's line? That's kind of fun.

0:57:02.480 --> 0:57:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah she did. She made a cameo appearance as

0:57:05.239 --> 0:57:07.440
<v Speaker 1>herself on the Drew Carey Show. I'd be curious to

0:57:07.440 --> 0:57:09.600
<v Speaker 1>know how she's framed, but she appears at herself and

0:57:09.680 --> 0:57:11.960
<v Speaker 1>then apparently she and she and Drew hit it off

0:57:12.000 --> 0:57:14.520
<v Speaker 1>because she was on whose line a couple times in

0:57:14.560 --> 0:57:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the early two thousands, no kidding, and she was on

0:57:17.920 --> 0:57:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Tim and Eric at one point. I don't feel it

0:57:20.080 --> 0:57:23.320
<v Speaker 1>as so, you know, I I don't know, I don't know.

0:57:23.400 --> 0:57:27.600
<v Speaker 1>She's Jane come on the show. But yeah, she does

0:57:27.640 --> 0:57:30.080
<v Speaker 1>not return to this Gary movie franchise after this, and

0:57:30.480 --> 0:57:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad for it because it's just like, that joke

0:57:33.760 --> 0:57:37.000
<v Speaker 1>is offensive, but it's offensive on far more levels than

0:57:37.040 --> 0:57:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I even understood one. So yeah, and as with many

0:57:41.800 --> 0:57:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of the jokes at age horrifically with this movie, it

0:57:44.560 --> 0:57:46.400
<v Speaker 1>has no bearing on the plot and could have been

0:57:46.560 --> 0:57:47.040
<v Speaker 1>taken out.

0:57:47.440 --> 0:57:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, Yeah, other things that could have been taken out.

0:57:52.120 --> 0:57:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Is the storyline where Cindy is like, I don't know,

0:57:57.480 --> 0:58:01.560
<v Speaker 2>should I have sex with my boyfriend who keeps trying

0:58:01.600 --> 0:58:06.480
<v Speaker 2>to assault me. She decides at the party after drinking

0:58:06.720 --> 0:58:08.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot, and so we can, you know, we'll talk

0:58:08.600 --> 0:58:11.440
<v Speaker 2>all about this. But she is finally ready to have

0:58:11.520 --> 0:58:16.320
<v Speaker 2>sex with Bobby, so she and him go to her room. Meanwhile,

0:58:16.400 --> 0:58:21.120
<v Speaker 2>the Killer is busy smoking weed with Shorty and his

0:58:21.360 --> 0:58:22.200
<v Speaker 2>stoner friends.

0:58:22.600 --> 0:58:24.600
<v Speaker 1>This is the main scene I knew from this movie.

0:58:24.640 --> 0:58:27.360
<v Speaker 1>It's like, okay because I remember seeing it like Halloween stores,

0:58:27.360 --> 0:58:29.240
<v Speaker 1>they'd be the ghost face mask and then the stoner

0:58:29.280 --> 0:58:30.040
<v Speaker 1>GHEs face.

0:58:29.880 --> 0:58:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Mask, right, yeah, so he's he's just having a fun

0:58:35.440 --> 0:58:41.560
<v Speaker 2>time and then he accidentally kills a bunch of the stoners. Sure,

0:58:41.880 --> 0:58:45.040
<v Speaker 2>and then I guess he's like, oh right, I have

0:58:45.160 --> 0:58:47.680
<v Speaker 2>to continue the plot of the movie. So then he

0:58:47.720 --> 0:58:52.880
<v Speaker 2>comes into Cindy's room after she and Bobby have had sex,

0:58:53.360 --> 0:58:57.920
<v Speaker 2>and it seems like the Killer stabs Bobby. But twist,

0:58:58.520 --> 0:59:02.000
<v Speaker 2>it's the same ending as and there are two killers.

0:59:02.120 --> 0:59:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I was so like, really really, and then they do

0:59:07.440 --> 0:59:10.280
<v Speaker 1>add their own twist, But it's maybe the worst piece

0:59:10.320 --> 0:59:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of friend ever committed to film.

0:59:12.000 --> 0:59:16.120
<v Speaker 2>The twist is that Bobby is gay and has been

0:59:16.600 --> 0:59:18.360
<v Speaker 2>I guess this whole time, and then.

0:59:18.400 --> 0:59:22.320
<v Speaker 1>That Ray isn't is not gay, Okay.

0:59:22.080 --> 0:59:24.800
<v Speaker 2>So we just don't really know what's happening about that.

0:59:25.320 --> 0:59:27.800
<v Speaker 1>So we're laughing and it's funny.

0:59:29.360 --> 0:59:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay. So so they're working in cahoots, Bobby and Ray,

0:59:33.840 --> 0:59:36.520
<v Speaker 2>and they're doing the thing where they're like, okay, we

0:59:36.600 --> 0:59:39.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of have to like frame someone else, so we

0:59:39.200 --> 0:59:43.200
<v Speaker 2>have to stab each other. Ray stabs Bobby, but then

0:59:43.400 --> 0:59:48.320
<v Speaker 2>a third ghost face killer shows up and stabs Ray.

0:59:49.400 --> 0:59:52.800
<v Speaker 2>So those guys are dead now. And then this other

0:59:52.840 --> 0:59:56.120
<v Speaker 2>ghost face killer tries to kill Cindy. There's a whole

0:59:56.240 --> 0:59:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Matrix reference where they're like battling each other.

1:00:00.080 --> 1:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I remember seeing clips of this. The number of bad

1:00:04.640 --> 1:00:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Matrix parities done in the years after the Matrix is

1:00:09.000 --> 1:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>just like also as wild that like this movie came

1:00:11.800 --> 1:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>out because The Matrix came out in ninety nine. This

1:00:15.080 --> 1:00:17.439
<v Speaker 1>movie came out in I mean, I know this movie

1:00:17.520 --> 1:00:20.439
<v Speaker 1>was like made in just a couple of months, right,

1:00:20.560 --> 1:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>But if nothing else, the joke was topical. The joke sucks,

1:00:25.120 --> 1:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>but it was it was you know, the turnaround time

1:00:28.400 --> 1:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is pretty impressive.

1:00:29.920 --> 1:00:33.920
<v Speaker 2>I agree, you know what matrix reference in a movie

1:00:33.920 --> 1:00:38.320
<v Speaker 2>that comes out after the matrix is good? What Shrek.

1:00:39.520 --> 1:00:42.880
<v Speaker 1>So true? I'm so glad you said that. I feel

1:00:42.920 --> 1:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>better now.

1:00:43.680 --> 1:00:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, Just ignore the matrix reference in scary movie.

1:00:48.120 --> 1:00:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Think about the matrix reference in Shrek one.

1:00:51.000 --> 1:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes, which is tasteful and really impressive because it came

1:00:54.160 --> 1:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>out two years later and it was animated. Yeah, so

1:00:56.760 --> 1:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>in a way even more impressive. There you go.

1:01:01.120 --> 1:01:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, So this third ghost face killer, he like, escapes

1:01:07.680 --> 1:01:11.680
<v Speaker 2>and presumably he's the person who the teens accidentally hit

1:01:11.760 --> 1:01:17.240
<v Speaker 2>with their car last year. So the sheriff questions Cindy.

1:01:18.400 --> 1:01:21.600
<v Speaker 2>She tells him about like, oh, yeah, it's probably this

1:01:21.680 --> 1:01:24.880
<v Speaker 2>guy who we dumped in the ocean, and the sheriff

1:01:24.960 --> 1:01:27.440
<v Speaker 2>is like, no, we found that guy. We found his

1:01:27.520 --> 1:01:30.720
<v Speaker 2>dead body, so the killer has to be someone else.

1:01:31.480 --> 1:01:38.040
<v Speaker 2>And then Cindy realizes its officer Doofy. There's a Usual

1:01:38.080 --> 1:01:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Suspects reference where Doofy changes his gait, his appearance, his

1:01:43.840 --> 1:01:44.680
<v Speaker 2>way of speaking.

1:01:44.840 --> 1:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh I didn't know what that was a reference to.

1:01:46.760 --> 1:01:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's Usual Suspects. And now he's like cool and

1:01:51.040 --> 1:02:05.000
<v Speaker 2>sexy question mark and he escapes with Gail Hailstorm. The end.

1:02:08.600 --> 1:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think let's just talk about Officer Doofy right now,

1:02:12.080 --> 1:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>because it's just it is really awful, obviously because it

1:02:18.560 --> 1:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is a one of the most broad offensive performances of

1:02:25.480 --> 1:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a developmentally disabled character like ever committed, played by an

1:02:30.800 --> 1:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>actor who is not developmentally disabled, a guy named Dave

1:02:35.680 --> 1:02:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Sheridan whatever. I don't know who this guy is, but

1:02:42.320 --> 1:02:46.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's horrible and also not unusual for this time.

1:02:46.520 --> 1:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it is important to mention across genres.

1:02:50.040 --> 1:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it was still in the two thousands and

1:02:53.480 --> 1:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>throughout the film prior to this time. This is I

1:02:56.360 --> 1:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>think one of the more offensive displays of this trope,

1:03:00.040 --> 1:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>but actors playing developmentally disabled characters was very normal at

1:03:06.480 --> 1:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>this time. I think that the reason it's more offensive

1:03:08.720 --> 1:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>in this case is because it is in this like

1:03:10.880 --> 1:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>edgy broad comedy. But I'm also thinking of movies like

1:03:14.280 --> 1:03:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I Am Sam, which came out with Sean Penn around

1:03:16.680 --> 1:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>this time. I'm thinking about True Confessions with Shilah buff

1:03:20.920 --> 1:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I think about even going back Rauh, Dustin Hoffman and

1:03:23.760 --> 1:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>rain Man. I mean, like there is.

1:03:25.200 --> 1:03:27.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean Forrest Gumpchorrest Gump.

1:03:28.280 --> 1:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>It was considered I think in the drama category it

1:03:31.440 --> 1:03:35.479
<v Speaker 1>was considered oscar bait to do this oh very long time.

1:03:35.600 --> 1:03:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that is very true.

1:03:37.000 --> 1:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>And in this case, obviously Dave Sheridan is not going

1:03:40.840 --> 1:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>for an oscar with this performance. He's just being extremely

1:03:46.080 --> 1:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>offensive and the whole I mean, and just humiliating the

1:03:49.840 --> 1:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>character in every way you could possibly imagine. They're humiliating him,

1:03:55.040 --> 1:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>like hygienically, they're humiliating him sexually, and also the predatory

1:04:00.720 --> 1:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>nature of the Shoreio Terry character in this like is

1:04:04.000 --> 1:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>just above and beyond. And then to learn that this

1:04:07.640 --> 1:04:11.479
<v Speaker 1>was all done in service of the twist being he's

1:04:11.600 --> 1:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>not actually developmentally disabled, which, on top of it being offensive,

1:04:16.120 --> 1:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>makes no sense because he's Buffy. He's been Buffy's brother

1:04:19.800 --> 1:04:23.480
<v Speaker 1>his entire life, Like, what do you mean He's been

1:04:23.960 --> 1:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>undercover for the plot of Scary Movie his entire life, right,

1:04:28.720 --> 1:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't make sense. Like, so, on top of being

1:04:31.600 --> 1:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>offensive and bad for two thousand offensive, it also makes

1:04:36.680 --> 1:04:37.840
<v Speaker 1>no sense, like.

1:04:38.120 --> 1:04:45.280
<v Speaker 2>It's utterly nonsensical, as are most of the jokes in

1:04:45.320 --> 1:04:49.320
<v Speaker 2>the movie, which are also incredibly problematic. I mean, yeah,

1:04:49.880 --> 1:04:53.600
<v Speaker 2>it's just it's exhausting in Scary Movie too.

1:04:54.440 --> 1:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>What's what's he in Gilbert Gray? Sorry, I just thought

1:04:57.280 --> 1:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of another. Oh yeah, sorry, could you oh correct? In

1:05:01.680 --> 1:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Scary Movie two, ableism is also leaned into with a

1:05:09.040 --> 1:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>David Cross character and a Chris Elliott character. Interesting, and

1:05:14.560 --> 1:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>so many jokes are made at both of their expenses

1:05:18.320 --> 1:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>in really horrifying ways. But yeah, I mean I didn't

1:05:23.320 --> 1:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>even write down a whole lot of specifics. I just

1:05:25.760 --> 1:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of went through the list of like I unfortunately did.

1:05:29.200 --> 1:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I just wanted to sort of close out

1:05:32.440 --> 1:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the discussion of Officer doofy. What it comes back to

1:05:37.400 --> 1:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>is like, like we've talked about, and I think as

1:05:41.560 --> 1:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>has become more standard practice, although not perfect, in the

1:05:47.040 --> 1:05:51.479
<v Speaker 1>last ten to fifteen years, is that disabled actors should

1:05:51.520 --> 1:05:55.480
<v Speaker 1>be playing disabled characters. And we've seen that in I mean,

1:05:55.640 --> 1:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the movie that comes immediately to mind is Coda, and

1:05:59.080 --> 1:06:01.959
<v Speaker 1>I know that, like unfortunately it's a Shilah buff movie.

1:06:01.960 --> 1:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>But The Peanut Butter Falcon is another movie. But a

1:06:06.000 --> 1:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>disabled actor would never want to be in this movie

1:06:09.120 --> 1:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>because the part is specifically written to punch down at them.

1:06:13.080 --> 1:06:15.439
<v Speaker 1>And so it's like there is this twohund or going

1:06:15.480 --> 1:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>on where first of all, it's clear that the production

1:06:17.800 --> 1:06:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of this movie would never consider hiring a disabled actor.

1:06:22.000 --> 1:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>And on top of that, they've written a part that

1:06:25.200 --> 1:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>is so offensive that a disabled actor would very likely

1:06:28.440 --> 1:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>never want to play it. So it's just like, I

1:06:31.520 --> 1:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know it's creating it like reminds me of in

1:06:34.560 --> 1:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>different ways, but like in terms of inclusivity, how can

1:06:39.480 --> 1:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>a movie like this be inclusive when it is such

1:06:43.360 --> 1:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a hostile environment creatively, right, where Like I've felt this

1:06:48.520 --> 1:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>way in different writers rooms I've been in right where

1:06:51.840 --> 1:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>it's like, oh, this is this movie is or this

1:06:54.160 --> 1:06:57.160
<v Speaker 1>this room is heavily white men, especially like the further

1:06:57.240 --> 1:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>back you go, and you're like, okay, like the should

1:07:00.560 --> 1:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>be more diversity in this room. But how could there

1:07:03.600 --> 1:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>be more diversity in this room when it's so hostile

1:07:07.440 --> 1:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to people who aren't white men? Like if I'm a

1:07:09.440 --> 1:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>white girl and I'm struggling in here, how Like it's

1:07:12.320 --> 1:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>just like, I don't know it. I feel like it

1:07:15.200 --> 1:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>really speaks to a very particular kind of comedy that

1:07:19.040 --> 1:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>is just like with some exceptions, And again I'm saying

1:07:22.720 --> 1:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>this about the two thousands, Wayne's brother world, right, but

1:07:28.320 --> 1:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>like it's just it's hostile for sure.

1:07:30.920 --> 1:07:35.480
<v Speaker 2>I hate it and not that you'd really know based

1:07:35.520 --> 1:07:43.320
<v Speaker 2>on how certain characters are written and portrayed in the movie.

1:07:43.720 --> 1:07:47.320
<v Speaker 2>But this is a movie that's written and directed by

1:07:47.880 --> 1:07:52.040
<v Speaker 2>black filmmakers. And as we already talked about with the

1:07:52.600 --> 1:07:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Brenda character, and I would also say with the shorty character,

1:07:58.400 --> 1:08:05.320
<v Speaker 2>still like lean into stereotypes about black characters.

1:08:04.640 --> 1:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Which I think is like, I would be curious because

1:08:07.520 --> 1:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think. I don't know. Again, two white people

1:08:10.400 --> 1:08:14.120
<v Speaker 1>tell me so, grain of salt. But again, like this

1:08:14.280 --> 1:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>with this Regina Hall clip, she does reference that. She's like,

1:08:17.920 --> 1:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, part of the reason she decided to do

1:08:20.160 --> 1:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Scary movie was because it was a parody, and so

1:08:23.760 --> 1:08:27.559
<v Speaker 1>I think in her estimation at the time, she's like, well, yes,

1:08:27.640 --> 1:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>this is a very broad stereotype of black characters, but

1:08:32.000 --> 1:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it's being written and directed by black creators, and it's

1:08:37.080 --> 1:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be a parody of this broad character we

1:08:42.040 --> 1:08:44.679
<v Speaker 1>see all the time, including in both of the movies.

1:08:44.720 --> 1:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>This movie is ripping off, which point fairly taken. But

1:08:49.600 --> 1:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>if that is the intention, which I totally believe it

1:08:52.360 --> 1:08:56.519
<v Speaker 1>could be, it's not successful because it's not subverting anything.

1:08:56.720 --> 1:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>It's just doing it right. Worse right, like it's doing

1:09:00.439 --> 1:09:03.439
<v Speaker 1>it worse. So how is that? I don't know where

1:09:03.439 --> 1:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>it's like, And again you get like shades of commentary

1:09:06.880 --> 1:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that like the Wayne's brothers are fucking famously gray at

1:09:10.880 --> 1:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>like Hollywood shuffle dude. Like I think like the two

1:09:14.000 --> 1:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>jokes that felt like it wasn't just copy pasting a

1:09:18.040 --> 1:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>stereotype was the Titanic slash Amistad two joke, which if

1:09:24.000 --> 1:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you haven't seen the movie first and foremost don't, but

1:09:29.439 --> 1:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>basically you see black characters saying I'm the King of

1:09:32.800 --> 1:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the World a law Jack Dawson, and then it's revealed

1:09:36.439 --> 1:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that it's on the Amistad a slave ship. Dark joke,

1:09:40.360 --> 1:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>but clearly trying to say something in the same way

1:09:44.200 --> 1:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that like the in one of the many shot for

1:09:48.439 --> 1:09:52.879
<v Speaker 1>shot parodies of Scream where Cindy has to like input,

1:09:52.920 --> 1:09:55.759
<v Speaker 1>like what's your emergency and she puts in white women

1:09:55.800 --> 1:10:00.799
<v Speaker 1>in trouble cut two cops, twelve cruisers like that it's funny,

1:10:00.920 --> 1:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's like saying something. But the way that

1:10:03.760 --> 1:10:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Brenda's character is written, like what is it doing if

1:10:07.520 --> 1:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>not just the stereotype, Like it's not meaningfully subverting it

1:10:11.960 --> 1:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>in any way, which is frustrating because you know that

1:10:14.840 --> 1:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the Waynes brothers can and have done that, so why

1:10:20.320 --> 1:10:23.200
<v Speaker 1>not here, And also especially with like the only black

1:10:23.200 --> 1:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>women in the movie, as Regina Hall, like I'm just like, ugh,

1:10:28.720 --> 1:10:32.599
<v Speaker 1>it sucks, it sucks. And then yeah, Ray's character is

1:10:33.040 --> 1:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I think generally more they're the oh well, all of

1:10:36.920 --> 1:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the gay jokes are are Ray. I can't even too

1:10:41.720 --> 1:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>many to remember, too many to remember, but they're they're

1:10:45.000 --> 1:10:50.439
<v Speaker 1>written to threaten other characters. They're written to humiliate Regina

1:10:50.479 --> 1:10:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Hall's character, and that's generally what they're there to do,

1:10:55.920 --> 1:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and to imply that he just will do sexual things

1:11:02.280 --> 1:11:05.559
<v Speaker 1>to people without their consent, the finger and the butt

1:11:05.640 --> 1:11:06.639
<v Speaker 1>in the car, like.

1:11:06.720 --> 1:11:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so it is horrible stuff like that. It is

1:11:12.920 --> 1:11:17.000
<v Speaker 2>just like the general over sexualization of women between Carmen

1:11:17.080 --> 1:11:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Electra at the beginning of the movie and then the

1:11:19.400 --> 1:11:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Shannon Elizabeth character throughout the rest of the movie.

1:11:23.040 --> 1:11:25.840
<v Speaker 1>And then the Anna Faris character too, Like the Anna

1:11:25.920 --> 1:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Faris character is treated horribly and like you know, there,

1:11:31.479 --> 1:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>yes the bombshell quote unquote characters, characters interesting way that

1:11:35.920 --> 1:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Anna Faris would later herself play but isn't playing in

1:11:39.360 --> 1:11:43.479
<v Speaker 1>this movie because she's either was originally brunette or is

1:11:43.520 --> 1:11:45.719
<v Speaker 1>wearing a brunette wig. I actually don't know which because

1:11:45.760 --> 1:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>she was late she's now famously blonde, but who knows.

1:11:48.600 --> 1:11:50.639
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if it's like a die job.

1:11:51.400 --> 1:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Hard to say, but she's playing the Sydney character who

1:11:55.600 --> 1:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>in the Kevin Williamson script is like not ready to

1:11:59.280 --> 1:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>lose her frigay whatever, which is commenting on Final Girl tropes.

1:12:06.080 --> 1:12:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Uh right, Like that is the point of that character.

1:12:10.160 --> 1:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>But this movie is just like, well, what if we

1:12:12.439 --> 1:12:16.680
<v Speaker 1>took that and made her not comment on anything but

1:12:16.720 --> 1:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>be a prude who we don't like, someone who is

1:12:20.479 --> 1:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>physically assaulted, someone who does lose her virginity when extremely

1:12:25.160 --> 1:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>drunk and gets blasted to the ceiling by com uh

1:12:29.320 --> 1:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>it just like she's yeah, the Cindy character, I don't

1:12:32.920 --> 1:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it was maybe just because and

1:12:36.280 --> 1:12:38.559
<v Speaker 1>this is doesn't speak while either of like the Kermin

1:12:38.640 --> 1:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Electric character. Everything they can do with her in five

1:12:42.200 --> 1:12:45.439
<v Speaker 1>minutes they do in a way that is also commenting

1:12:45.479 --> 1:12:47.719
<v Speaker 1>on her own career because you have the bay watchment whatever.

1:12:47.920 --> 1:12:50.600
<v Speaker 2>And then she gets stabbed in the chest and like

1:12:51.120 --> 1:12:56.800
<v Speaker 2>a silicone implant is pulled out and like that's a

1:12:56.960 --> 1:12:58.679
<v Speaker 2>joke and sucks.

1:12:58.840 --> 1:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>It fucking sucks, But I yeah, I mean down to

1:13:01.760 --> 1:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>like I think that for me, like of all of

1:13:05.960 --> 1:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the misguided and actively hostile things that this movie does,

1:13:10.240 --> 1:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the treatment of the final girl's very telling

1:13:13.200 --> 1:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>because that is like such a horror movie classic and

1:13:16.840 --> 1:13:20.560
<v Speaker 1>something that like Scream famously handles pretty well.

1:13:20.680 --> 1:13:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Right because the Cindy character does have sex, and the

1:13:26.320 --> 1:13:32.080
<v Speaker 2>trope of any sexually active woman has to be murdered

1:13:32.080 --> 1:13:35.560
<v Speaker 2>in a slash suer movie that gets subverted in Scream

1:13:35.680 --> 1:13:39.080
<v Speaker 2>because she has sex and she survives and it's.

1:13:38.920 --> 1:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>But the last shot of the movie is Cindy getting

1:13:41.320 --> 1:13:44.559
<v Speaker 1>hit by a card, right like it's just like it.

1:13:44.600 --> 1:13:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Also, it just seems that either scary movie doesn't understand

1:13:48.680 --> 1:13:51.400
<v Speaker 2>what trope was being subverted in Scream, or they don't

1:13:51.439 --> 1:13:52.880
<v Speaker 2>care because they're just.

1:13:52.800 --> 1:13:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Like I would guess it's the it's the latter because

1:13:55.680 --> 1:13:57.839
<v Speaker 1>I think that they're just like going for the edgiest

1:13:57.920 --> 1:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>laugh available at any given moment, because it's like these

1:14:01.200 --> 1:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>are smart writers, like there is so it's I just it.

1:14:06.320 --> 1:14:08.479
<v Speaker 1>I yeah, I feel like the the litmus test for

1:14:08.520 --> 1:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>how this movie works, it sort of hangs in like

1:14:11.160 --> 1:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>how this indie character is treated and she's treated like

1:14:15.280 --> 1:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a body, Like she's just treated like a body the

1:14:18.439 --> 1:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>entire time, and it sucks.

1:14:22.720 --> 1:14:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean again with her whole arc where she's

1:14:28.520 --> 1:14:33.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, deciding whether or not or if and when

1:14:33.439 --> 1:14:36.040
<v Speaker 2>she's going to feel ready to have sex for the

1:14:36.040 --> 1:14:39.799
<v Speaker 2>first time. Like a story about a teen girl coming

1:14:39.880 --> 1:14:47.600
<v Speaker 2>into her like sexual readiness can be a very compelling story,

1:14:47.760 --> 1:14:51.040
<v Speaker 2>but the movie doesn't handle this with any kind of nuance.

1:14:51.280 --> 1:14:52.360
<v Speaker 2>So much of it is.

1:14:52.520 --> 1:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Because the movie hates women like them and for it

1:14:56.120 --> 1:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>not to be like old school Bechtel cast, But like,

1:14:58.600 --> 1:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>how else do you possibly just ribe the attitude towards

1:15:01.800 --> 1:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>women in this movie? They just hate. The movie hates

1:15:05.200 --> 1:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, do the Wayne's brothers hate women? I hope not,

1:15:08.200 --> 1:15:09.719
<v Speaker 1>but this movie definitely does.

1:15:10.880 --> 1:15:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yes, And with other examples we see too, where

1:15:16.640 --> 1:15:22.360
<v Speaker 2>it's jokes that are disparaging of women who are sex workers.

1:15:23.560 --> 1:15:27.040
<v Speaker 2>The yeah, I remember that all the times that like

1:15:27.320 --> 1:15:30.720
<v Speaker 2>the Cindy character like gets the shit beaten out of

1:15:30.720 --> 1:15:34.280
<v Speaker 2>her by a man, and that's the joke.

1:15:34.200 --> 1:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Right, that's like a runner, that's the runner, And it

1:15:36.560 --> 1:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>like peaks with her getting like come blasted or whatever.

1:15:43.040 --> 1:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>It's just really really nasty.

1:15:45.400 --> 1:15:47.040
<v Speaker 2>It's really nasty.

1:15:46.720 --> 1:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>And this is our protagonist, Like the movie hates its protagonist.

1:15:52.400 --> 1:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>What else do you need to know?

1:15:54.080 --> 1:15:57.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I did make note of a few jokes that

1:15:57.760 --> 1:16:03.000
<v Speaker 2>I was like, okay, yeah, sheate the comedy in this.

1:16:03.640 --> 1:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so they're okay.

1:16:05.240 --> 1:16:08.840
<v Speaker 2>The first one, I think it starts out seeming like, oh,

1:16:08.880 --> 1:16:12.160
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna say something here, but then it just kidding

1:16:12.479 --> 1:16:16.760
<v Speaker 2>where Buffy and Cindy and Brenda have like linked up

1:16:17.280 --> 1:16:20.679
<v Speaker 2>and they're like walking around the campus of their school

1:16:20.800 --> 1:16:23.720
<v Speaker 2>or whatever, and Buffy is saying, oh, you know, I

1:16:23.800 --> 1:16:27.080
<v Speaker 2>just want to like help people and feed hungry people,

1:16:27.720 --> 1:16:31.080
<v Speaker 2>and then the character who is coded as an unhoused

1:16:31.280 --> 1:16:35.280
<v Speaker 2>man approaches them and asks them for a dollar. Buffy

1:16:35.320 --> 1:16:37.840
<v Speaker 2>screams after she has just said, like I want to

1:16:37.880 --> 1:16:40.400
<v Speaker 2>help feed hungry people, but she's like, oh, get away

1:16:40.400 --> 1:16:43.680
<v Speaker 2>from me. So it seems like, okay, that's commentary on

1:16:43.800 --> 1:16:46.760
<v Speaker 2>the way that people tend to treat unhoused people and

1:16:46.840 --> 1:16:51.800
<v Speaker 2>dehumanize them and be unwilling to help them. Cindy is

1:16:51.840 --> 1:16:54.160
<v Speaker 2>then like no, no, no, can't you see he's hungry

1:16:54.680 --> 1:16:58.040
<v Speaker 2>and she gives him a sandwich and We're like, okay,

1:16:58.160 --> 1:17:01.560
<v Speaker 2>that that could have been something. But then the unhoused

1:17:01.600 --> 1:17:04.599
<v Speaker 2>man says, I said I wanted a dollar, you bitch,

1:17:04.720 --> 1:17:07.760
<v Speaker 2>and then throws the sandwich at bad.

1:17:08.240 --> 1:17:08.320
<v Speaker 3>So.

1:17:08.840 --> 1:17:12.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Which plays into all of these nasty stereotypes around

1:17:12.600 --> 1:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>on house people is that they are you know, hostile

1:17:16.360 --> 1:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and misogynist and horrible. I think, what is the I mean,

1:17:22.000 --> 1:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not the commentary is bad fundamentally, I do

1:17:25.400 --> 1:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>think that, and they're not trying to do this, but

1:17:28.120 --> 1:17:31.599
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's like if you're trying, if you're

1:17:31.840 --> 1:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>speaking with an unhoused person and you're trying to figure out, like,

1:17:35.080 --> 1:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, what she should have done there is ask

1:17:37.880 --> 1:17:41.519
<v Speaker 1>them what they need, like what can I help you with?

1:17:41.760 --> 1:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Versus like because I know that there's just like a

1:17:44.640 --> 1:17:49.160
<v Speaker 1>billion stories of like you know, someone who needs help

1:17:49.280 --> 1:17:52.680
<v Speaker 1>with male who needs help with their ID, and then

1:17:52.800 --> 1:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, like some well intentioned person who is not

1:17:55.920 --> 1:17:58.400
<v Speaker 1>listening gives them a granola bar and calls it a day,

1:17:58.439 --> 1:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, I'm an amazing person. So it's like there,

1:18:00.800 --> 1:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, again, there was an opportunity for a joke

1:18:04.840 --> 1:18:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that was not punching down at an unhoused character, and

1:18:08.800 --> 1:18:12.879
<v Speaker 1>that could even have been like commenting on Anna Faris's

1:18:12.960 --> 1:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>character of like thinking she was doing a good thing

1:18:15.400 --> 1:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>while also demonstrating that she wasn't listening and was sort

1:18:18.240 --> 1:18:21.599
<v Speaker 1>of doing that more for herself then for the person

1:18:21.640 --> 1:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>she was talking to. But again, kind of a pointless

1:18:24.080 --> 1:18:26.439
<v Speaker 1>thing to bring up because that's clearly not what they

1:18:26.439 --> 1:18:31.599
<v Speaker 1>were trying to do. Yeah, and it never comes back. Yeah,

1:18:31.640 --> 1:18:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that that was almost interesting with the Shannon

1:18:34.400 --> 1:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth thing, but then it like undercuts its own commentary immediately.

1:18:41.439 --> 1:18:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Sure, and then you have the Bobby character, who a

1:18:45.160 --> 1:18:49.040
<v Speaker 2>bunch of stereotypes about, you know, people living in poverty

1:18:49.240 --> 1:18:55.719
<v Speaker 2>are deployed here where he lives in like a rundown

1:18:56.000 --> 1:18:57.360
<v Speaker 2>trailer and.

1:18:57.520 --> 1:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>The next door to the school. Also, I was like,

1:19:00.400 --> 1:19:02.479
<v Speaker 1>on time, there's so many jokes in this movie that,

1:19:02.600 --> 1:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>on top of being offensive, are also confusing, where it's

1:19:05.880 --> 1:19:07.680
<v Speaker 1>like what is like.

1:19:08.240 --> 1:19:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Huh, It's confusing. And also he's like he's an abusive person.

1:19:13.560 --> 1:19:19.000
<v Speaker 2>He yeah, is constantly wearing his girlfriend Cindy down and

1:19:19.040 --> 1:19:24.639
<v Speaker 2>trying to pressure her into performing sexual acts for him

1:19:24.680 --> 1:19:26.600
<v Speaker 2>and all this stuff. So yeah, just a lot of

1:19:26.680 --> 1:19:28.960
<v Speaker 2>nasty stuff. The jokes that I do that I do

1:19:29.080 --> 1:19:32.040
<v Speaker 2>like because there are a handful early on the characters

1:19:32.040 --> 1:19:35.200
<v Speaker 2>are like, if this were a horror movie, they'd cast

1:19:35.280 --> 1:19:38.320
<v Speaker 2>people in their late twenties and early thirties to play us.

1:19:38.360 --> 1:19:41.360
<v Speaker 2>And then it's visibly a cast of people in their

1:19:41.439 --> 1:19:42.519
<v Speaker 2>late twenties and thirties.

1:19:43.320 --> 1:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Thirties feels generous for a couple.

1:19:47.240 --> 1:19:54.080
<v Speaker 2>The scene where I think it's after Buffy has died

1:19:54.200 --> 1:19:58.519
<v Speaker 2>or something like. The joke is that Cindy and Bobby

1:19:58.920 --> 1:20:01.960
<v Speaker 2>are talking a about someone and you assume that it's

1:20:02.080 --> 1:20:04.880
<v Speaker 2>one of their friends, maybe Buffy, maybe someone. But they're like,

1:20:05.200 --> 1:20:08.840
<v Speaker 2>she's gone and she's not coming back. And Bobby's like,

1:20:09.240 --> 1:20:11.320
<v Speaker 2>that was over a year ago. You have to move on.

1:20:12.080 --> 1:20:15.879
<v Speaker 2>And then Cindy says, but Ginger was such an important

1:20:15.920 --> 1:20:17.280
<v Speaker 2>member of the Spice Girls.

1:20:18.160 --> 1:20:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I'm laughing.

1:20:21.320 --> 1:20:22.120
<v Speaker 2>That's a funny joke.

1:20:22.160 --> 1:20:23.360
<v Speaker 1>That's funny. That's funny.

1:20:23.439 --> 1:20:27.240
<v Speaker 2>The scene where the woman goes into the garage to

1:20:27.240 --> 1:20:30.800
<v Speaker 2>get more beer. Obviously, again there's a lot of fat

1:20:30.800 --> 1:20:33.840
<v Speaker 2>phobia surrounding this character, and.

1:20:33.720 --> 1:20:36.120
<v Speaker 1>If you could even call them a character, because who

1:20:36.240 --> 1:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is this person?

1:20:37.720 --> 1:20:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, she she kind of makes a joke about that.

1:20:39.439 --> 1:20:41.759
<v Speaker 2>She's like, come on, I'm just a day player, yeah,

1:20:41.800 --> 1:20:44.920
<v Speaker 2>which oh yeah, yeah, funny, funny. And then upon her

1:20:44.960 --> 1:20:48.160
<v Speaker 2>first going into the garage, there's some disturbance and then

1:20:48.200 --> 1:20:50.320
<v Speaker 2>it's revealed to be a cat and she's like, oh, kitty,

1:20:50.320 --> 1:20:52.080
<v Speaker 2>you scared me. And then there's another one and then

1:20:52.120 --> 1:20:55.599
<v Speaker 2>there's a horse there. Yeah, she says, you scared me. Funny.

1:20:56.040 --> 1:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>That felt like a very like mel Brooksy kind of.

1:20:58.840 --> 1:21:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Joke totally, as does the joke where Cindy and Bobby

1:21:04.000 --> 1:21:06.720
<v Speaker 2>are in her bedroom. She says, it's not as though

1:21:06.760 --> 1:21:10.760
<v Speaker 2>this is a movie, and he's like, it is a movie. See,

1:21:10.800 --> 1:21:13.880
<v Speaker 2>there's the sound guy, there's the script supervisor.

1:21:13.680 --> 1:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>The same thing, but they bump the camera does a

1:21:16.439 --> 1:21:17.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, bumps into her.

1:21:17.560 --> 1:21:23.559
<v Speaker 2>Which are okay, two jokes literally from Spaceballs, where a

1:21:23.600 --> 1:21:28.559
<v Speaker 2>camera like pulls into far and like bonks the Rick

1:21:28.680 --> 1:21:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Morana's character on the head. And then there's another.

1:21:31.880 --> 1:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>That's the reason I have to watch Spaceballs is because

1:21:34.360 --> 1:21:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I have a forever crash on.

1:21:36.280 --> 1:21:38.639
<v Speaker 2>Rick moranis well you know who else is in it,

1:21:38.760 --> 1:21:43.400
<v Speaker 2>John Candy, also Bill Pullman and also Joan Rivers. It's

1:21:43.400 --> 1:21:44.120
<v Speaker 2>a great cast.

1:21:44.280 --> 1:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So that's like a lot of crushes. That's a lot.

1:21:47.360 --> 1:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot wow, Bill Pullman, and then there and

1:21:50.600 --> 1:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>then there's the Bill Pullman too, I know, all right.

1:21:54.040 --> 1:21:58.479
<v Speaker 2>And then there's also a scene in Spaceballs where they

1:21:58.520 --> 1:22:00.639
<v Speaker 2>have to figure out what to do next, so they

1:22:00.720 --> 1:22:04.760
<v Speaker 2>consult the script of Spaceballs. Okay, and that's funny.

1:22:04.479 --> 1:22:08.599
<v Speaker 1>Okay, fun okay, fine, you learn it's fun anyway.

1:22:08.760 --> 1:22:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Every other joke though, in Scary movie is the most offensive,

1:22:12.800 --> 1:22:16.479
<v Speaker 2>reductive piece of shit you couldn't even possibly think of.

1:22:16.960 --> 1:22:20.360
<v Speaker 1>It sucks. It sucks, you know. Even if it is

1:22:20.479 --> 1:22:24.759
<v Speaker 1>the most successful Wayne Brothers raunchy comedy, it is also

1:22:24.840 --> 1:22:27.639
<v Speaker 1>the most brain dead one because I haven't watched White

1:22:27.680 --> 1:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Girls in many years. But it's it's saying something, you know,

1:22:31.360 --> 1:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>like there isn't there's just like I think that the

1:22:34.720 --> 1:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>real issue with this movie is like that there is

1:22:38.360 --> 1:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>no agenda and it doesn't feel like the movie has

1:22:44.040 --> 1:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a particular fondness for I mean, I think part of

1:22:47.040 --> 1:22:49.640
<v Speaker 1>why if we're talking about like the differences between this

1:22:49.720 --> 1:22:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and Young Frankenstein, obviously there's a lot, but I feel

1:22:52.400 --> 1:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of why even the more badly aging

1:22:57.240 --> 1:23:01.120
<v Speaker 1>elements of Young Frankenstein at its or you can tell

1:23:01.320 --> 1:23:03.679
<v Speaker 1>that it was made by someone who has a lot

1:23:03.720 --> 1:23:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of affection for the source material. I do not feel

1:23:07.240 --> 1:23:09.479
<v Speaker 1>this here, but I do not feel this here. I

1:23:09.479 --> 1:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>feel like they like horror movies, but especially because the

1:23:13.040 --> 1:23:16.719
<v Speaker 1>movies they ripping off are so recent. It just doesn't

1:23:16.760 --> 1:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's because of how the joke that wins

1:23:21.320 --> 1:23:24.040
<v Speaker 1>or that ends up in the final script is never

1:23:24.640 --> 1:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>what is in conversation with the source material. It's always like,

1:23:27.360 --> 1:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>what is the most edgy thing we could do in

1:23:29.439 --> 1:23:33.960
<v Speaker 1>this moment. It just feels ultimately like there, from moment

1:23:34.040 --> 1:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to moment, they're not really thinking about the source material

1:23:37.080 --> 1:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>at all. They're just like regurgitating it in a more

1:23:40.880 --> 1:23:44.759
<v Speaker 1>offensive way where you know, Young Frankenstein, as we talked about,

1:23:44.800 --> 1:23:48.559
<v Speaker 1>like not not all of it works, but you can

1:23:48.640 --> 1:23:52.479
<v Speaker 1>tell at very least that like mel Brooks is thinking

1:23:52.640 --> 1:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>about the Frankenstein story, which again is like such a

1:23:57.080 --> 1:23:59.439
<v Speaker 1>low bar to clear. But it just like in this

1:23:59.520 --> 1:24:02.920
<v Speaker 1>movie that is at times a shot for shot, word

1:24:02.960 --> 1:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>for word parody of Scream, it doesn't feel like they

1:24:05.960 --> 1:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>care about what Scream was trying to do. Like there's

1:24:10.080 --> 1:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and and the fact that you know this Sydney Cindy

1:24:13.439 --> 1:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>stand in they hate this character they're beating the shit

1:24:17.320 --> 1:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>out of her and like really not making much of

1:24:20.360 --> 1:24:23.880
<v Speaker 1>an effort outside of I would say Anna Faris's performance

1:24:23.960 --> 1:24:27.559
<v Speaker 1>to try to endear us to her, what is it

1:24:27.680 --> 1:24:30.599
<v Speaker 1>for in that case? Like, I guess it really comes

1:24:30.600 --> 1:24:32.759
<v Speaker 1>down to, like what is the function of a movie

1:24:32.800 --> 1:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>like this? And the answer is, most likely don't think

1:24:36.000 --> 1:24:39.479
<v Speaker 1>too hard about it, like to make money. Yeah, it's

1:24:39.520 --> 1:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a commercial endeavor. I mean, I wouldn't be surprised if

1:24:42.040 --> 1:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>this is like, you know, if you're thinking logistically or

1:24:45.120 --> 1:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the Waynes Brothers. You know, their show just got canceled

1:24:48.000 --> 1:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and like, you know, there's a big disappointment. Yeah, maybe

1:24:51.120 --> 1:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you do take the big swing and go for the

1:24:53.080 --> 1:24:57.920
<v Speaker 1>big you know, brain dead studio comedy to you know,

1:24:58.040 --> 1:25:00.920
<v Speaker 1>keep yourself in the game. Its streats rategically makes a

1:25:00.960 --> 1:25:05.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of sense, but it just feels so I don't know.

1:25:05.560 --> 1:25:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say devoid of passion. It's clear that, like

1:25:08.880 --> 1:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it seems like people are generally having fun making this

1:25:11.840 --> 1:25:16.639
<v Speaker 1>terrible movie, but it just feel there's just a void

1:25:16.880 --> 1:25:19.880
<v Speaker 1>about it. It feels like you're saying, it feels very

1:25:20.000 --> 1:25:24.240
<v Speaker 1>very very very commercial, which isn't always a bad thing,

1:25:24.840 --> 1:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>but in this case is because it is not saying anything.

1:25:28.640 --> 1:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>It seems to have very little affection for its source material,

1:25:36.400 --> 1:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and you know, is actively seeking to offend in a

1:25:41.280 --> 1:25:43.679
<v Speaker 1>way that I mean that people still do now unfortunately,

1:25:43.760 --> 1:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>where it's like how many shitty edge lord comics you know,

1:25:47.960 --> 1:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>become infuriated when they're like, oh, you can't laugh at that,

1:25:52.439 --> 1:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, well it wasn't funny, like you know,

1:25:55.320 --> 1:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>our choosing edginess. Well, this isn't the case for the

1:25:59.800 --> 1:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Way Brothers, like we're There's a lot I'm thinking of

1:26:01.800 --> 1:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>like a bunch of edge large comics who who go

1:26:04.040 --> 1:26:07.040
<v Speaker 1>edgy because they never were funny and now they and

1:26:07.080 --> 1:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>they need to manufacture a reason why no one is laughing,

1:26:10.560 --> 1:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>which is tragic, but many such cases. But the Winds

1:26:14.160 --> 1:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Brothers are funny, So why are they doing this? I

1:26:17.000 --> 1:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's like commercial, like it's money, a really kind

1:26:21.840 --> 1:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of gross way to make a lot of money. I

1:26:24.880 --> 1:26:26.120
<v Speaker 1>think I agree.

1:26:26.680 --> 1:26:31.639
<v Speaker 2>I was looking up how this movie was reviewed at

1:26:31.640 --> 1:26:37.960
<v Speaker 2>the time, and it was generally not super favorably, where

1:26:38.200 --> 1:26:41.519
<v Speaker 2>a lot of critics pointed out the like crude and

1:26:41.640 --> 1:26:47.480
<v Speaker 2>tasteless humor, although some of them were like, well, despite

1:26:47.520 --> 1:26:52.519
<v Speaker 2>that I still lived left loved it, such as a

1:26:52.640 --> 1:26:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Variety critic named Joe Leyden was basically like, yeah, you know,

1:27:00.240 --> 1:27:05.519
<v Speaker 2>there's certainly no political correctness here, and the like limits

1:27:05.560 --> 1:27:11.200
<v Speaker 2>of our rated respectability are stretched, if not shredded, but

1:27:11.240 --> 1:27:16.120
<v Speaker 2>then says, but you'll laugh until you're ashamed of yourself.

1:27:16.320 --> 1:27:20.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, which honestly, in two thousand, like people were

1:27:20.240 --> 1:27:20.760
<v Speaker 2>like that guy.

1:27:20.840 --> 1:27:23.559
<v Speaker 1>But also it seems like that is true, and like

1:27:23.640 --> 1:27:26.880
<v Speaker 1>it's so very a sign of the times that like

1:27:27.080 --> 1:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>it was so widely acceptable. And I think that, like

1:27:33.920 --> 1:27:41.640
<v Speaker 1>in that review alone like speaks to how male reviews

1:27:41.680 --> 1:27:45.120
<v Speaker 1>are and how directly and not to say that women

1:27:45.160 --> 1:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't see and enjoy this movie. You don't make two

1:27:48.200 --> 1:27:51.799
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventy eight million dollars, you know, for nothing,

1:27:52.080 --> 1:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>But but I do feel it's like it's so clear

1:27:54.800 --> 1:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>who the intended audience of this movie is, and it's men.

1:27:59.439 --> 1:28:03.920
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, just like what a strangle holds the young

1:28:04.000 --> 1:28:08.920
<v Speaker 1>male demographic had on movies and culture at most points

1:28:08.920 --> 1:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in history. But I think again, just like there's something

1:28:11.080 --> 1:28:13.680
<v Speaker 1>about the late nineties early two thousands is just like

1:28:13.920 --> 1:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>so completely egregious in this department right where like literally

1:28:20.160 --> 1:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>she gets blasted to the wall with come, I can't.

1:28:24.760 --> 1:28:27.559
<v Speaker 1>I can't say it can't. I first stay so upsetting.

1:28:28.000 --> 1:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I found it so upseting. There it was Grant walked in.

1:28:31.200 --> 1:28:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Greg came home for work last night while I was

1:28:33.160 --> 1:28:35.160
<v Speaker 1>watching that scene. He's like, suck.

1:28:35.800 --> 1:28:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Like it's like I'm at work right now, I mean,

1:28:43.560 --> 1:28:48.320
<v Speaker 2>speaking from experience, the target, yeah, is like who who's

1:28:48.360 --> 1:28:51.880
<v Speaker 2>gonna Who's gonna laugh at these jokes? It's probably gonna

1:28:51.920 --> 1:28:56.720
<v Speaker 2>be like teen boys and because of the world centers

1:28:56.760 --> 1:29:00.639
<v Speaker 2>everything around them and caters to them. Like I was like, well,

1:29:01.600 --> 1:29:04.040
<v Speaker 2>all my friends are going to the like it was

1:29:04.600 --> 1:29:07.720
<v Speaker 2>like I'll go along. And I probably fucking laughed at

1:29:07.720 --> 1:29:10.160
<v Speaker 2>the time. I don't remember. Again, I was laughing at

1:29:10.240 --> 1:29:13.519
<v Speaker 2>scary movie too, I guess enough to see it three

1:29:13.640 --> 1:29:14.519
<v Speaker 2>times or whatever.

1:29:14.920 --> 1:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>And there's nothing The thing is like that there's I

1:29:17.360 --> 1:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>mean whatever is part of what our shows about, Like

1:29:19.360 --> 1:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing wrong with that. I feel like what is

1:29:21.720 --> 1:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>so because I think of like I'm trying to think of,

1:29:24.400 --> 1:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>like what my real definitive, Like this movie hates women

1:29:28.520 --> 1:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and I called it one of my favorites for a

1:29:30.320 --> 1:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>long time. There's plenty of them, but like how much

1:29:33.880 --> 1:29:36.639
<v Speaker 1>of that is a symptom of like how we were

1:29:36.720 --> 1:29:39.599
<v Speaker 1>conditioned to see ourselves at that time and.

1:29:39.600 --> 1:29:41.639
<v Speaker 2>Right, because like if there is a movie that's quote

1:29:41.680 --> 1:29:46.360
<v Speaker 2>unquote for chicks, like a rom com, it's not as

1:29:46.360 --> 1:29:48.640
<v Speaker 2>though men were like, sure, I'll go with my like

1:29:49.040 --> 1:29:53.599
<v Speaker 2>you know, girl friend migal pals to that movie. They

1:29:53.640 --> 1:29:56.920
<v Speaker 2>would have no interest in that. But it was like, well.

1:29:57.479 --> 1:30:00.360
<v Speaker 1>That has kind of changed overtime too, which a shit,

1:30:00.640 --> 1:30:04.240
<v Speaker 1>yeah yeah, but it was like the idea is like, well,

1:30:04.280 --> 1:30:08.439
<v Speaker 1>what activity appeals to the men in the group, right,

1:30:08.520 --> 1:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>regardless of your taste or gender or whatever.

1:30:11.560 --> 1:30:13.719
<v Speaker 2>You're You're like, well, this is what we're doing because

1:30:13.760 --> 1:30:16.639
<v Speaker 2>that's what the boys want to do. And I saw

1:30:16.680 --> 1:30:19.840
<v Speaker 2>so many movies that way. But totally going back to

1:30:19.880 --> 1:30:29.960
<v Speaker 2>the reviews are sometimes friend, sometimes enemy. Roger Ebert our.

1:30:27.920 --> 1:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Friend of me. What did he have to say?

1:30:29.520 --> 1:30:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh, well, he gave the film three out of four stars, incorrigible.

1:30:35.920 --> 1:30:39.960
<v Speaker 2>He says that it quote delivers the goods and called

1:30:40.240 --> 1:30:47.280
<v Speaker 2>scary movie a raucous satirical attack on slasher movies. And

1:30:47.320 --> 1:30:51.640
<v Speaker 2>it's like, sir, do you mean scream because sure, but

1:30:52.000 --> 1:30:56.519
<v Speaker 2>if you're talking about scary movie, that's really incorrect.

1:30:56.160 --> 1:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Really really weird. Yeah, I wonder if to what extent

1:31:00.080 --> 1:31:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like, was he because I could see at

1:31:02.320 --> 1:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the time, like, if you were just a fan of

1:31:04.800 --> 1:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the Waynes Brothers, maybe you would give this movie the

1:31:08.200 --> 1:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>benefit of the doubt. And there's definitely a movie that

1:31:11.240 --> 1:31:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I've that's a jump to Roger Ebert, right whatever, Like,

1:31:16.560 --> 1:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>but I'm like trying to think of like what could

1:31:19.439 --> 1:31:22.559
<v Speaker 1>he possibly be on about. Like there's people who I've

1:31:22.680 --> 1:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>been like, oh, this must be commentary because otherwise this

1:31:25.439 --> 1:31:30.559
<v Speaker 1>is horrible. But like I don't know, I don't know. Yeah,

1:31:30.720 --> 1:31:33.479
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a no, babe, that's a no. You

1:31:33.560 --> 1:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>were wrong.

1:31:34.320 --> 1:31:37.800
<v Speaker 2>He was wrong on that one. I don't really have

1:31:37.880 --> 1:31:40.960
<v Speaker 2>a whole lot else to say. I don't really want

1:31:41.000 --> 1:31:42.680
<v Speaker 2>to talk about this movie anymore.

1:31:42.840 --> 1:31:46.120
<v Speaker 1>It's really actually so unpleasant And.

1:31:46.200 --> 1:31:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Ma, trans why did you do this?

1:31:48.520 --> 1:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I hope you I hope this is what you want. Oh.

1:31:51.000 --> 1:31:54.080
<v Speaker 1>The last thing that I noticed that this is unfortunately

1:31:54.320 --> 1:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the one joke that I thought aged horrifically. Well. Did

1:32:00.320 --> 1:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>you catch one of Regina Hall's first lines is about

1:32:04.680 --> 1:32:08.679
<v Speaker 1>a party that underage girls were at at Ditty's house. Yeah,

1:32:08.800 --> 1:32:11.599
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, this joke is twenty five years old

1:32:11.920 --> 1:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and he's in court now. Yeah, so yeah, that was

1:32:15.200 --> 1:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>something I picked up on. Yeah, I think we could

1:32:20.080 --> 1:32:22.759
<v Speaker 1>keep going. I mean, they just there's a million tiny

1:32:22.840 --> 1:32:24.880
<v Speaker 1>jokes that have no bearing on the plot because there

1:32:24.920 --> 1:32:26.519
<v Speaker 1>is no plot because the plot is screamed.

1:32:26.920 --> 1:32:30.640
<v Speaker 2>A joke that like trivializes suicide real close until the

1:32:30.720 --> 1:32:31.719
<v Speaker 2>roofies wore off.

1:32:31.800 --> 1:32:35.040
<v Speaker 1>That's another one that, like the the carbon electric character,

1:32:35.280 --> 1:32:37.120
<v Speaker 1>it's I forget which of the fucking.

1:32:37.520 --> 1:32:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Dufist guys, it's the Shorty character.

1:32:40.240 --> 1:32:40.559
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

1:32:40.680 --> 1:32:45.760
<v Speaker 2>There are several jokes about adults praying on teenagers, and

1:32:46.280 --> 1:32:48.280
<v Speaker 2>there's a really weird joke at the very end of

1:32:48.320 --> 1:32:53.320
<v Speaker 2>the movie where Cindy's dad, who I forget the name

1:32:53.320 --> 1:32:55.639
<v Speaker 2>of that actor, but he's in Groundhog Day. I recognize

1:32:55.680 --> 1:32:58.479
<v Speaker 2>him from that. But he says something like he's like,

1:32:58.520 --> 1:33:02.240
<v Speaker 2>did you get any of your girlfriend's numbers for me?

1:33:03.040 --> 1:33:06.760
<v Speaker 2>And she's like, no, they all died, not like no,

1:33:07.080 --> 1:33:09.800
<v Speaker 2>you shouldn't be fucking praying on team.

1:33:10.000 --> 1:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>But it's like the movie knows exactly what it's doing there,

1:33:12.400 --> 1:33:13.439
<v Speaker 1>like it's not I don't know.

1:33:13.720 --> 1:33:16.439
<v Speaker 2>But then he says to his own daughter, yeah, as

1:33:16.439 --> 1:33:18.760
<v Speaker 2>she's like leaving to go off with the sheriff for

1:33:18.880 --> 1:33:22.680
<v Speaker 2>questioning or whatever. He's like, call me the way that

1:33:22.960 --> 1:33:26.680
<v Speaker 2>you would say to a character that you're romantically interested in.

1:33:27.280 --> 1:33:28.000
<v Speaker 2>He's like call me.

1:33:28.280 --> 1:33:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh, It's like, yeah, what are you talking about?

1:33:30.000 --> 1:33:30.759
<v Speaker 2>That's your daughter?

1:33:30.960 --> 1:33:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh I guess I didn't take it that way. Oh

1:33:33.040 --> 1:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>really I would like, I guess I did. I mean

1:33:35.240 --> 1:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I could, yeah, maybe that, But I mean by the

1:33:37.960 --> 1:33:39.200
<v Speaker 1>end of the movie, I was just.

1:33:39.080 --> 1:33:45.439
<v Speaker 3>Like like just letting it wash behind me, like it

1:33:45.600 --> 1:33:48.160
<v Speaker 3>just it just Yeah, I'm going through my list of

1:33:48.240 --> 1:33:50.000
<v Speaker 3>jokes I hated.

1:33:50.080 --> 1:33:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh when she gets hit on by the cop, that

1:33:52.320 --> 1:33:55.559
<v Speaker 1>was another like adult praying on a kid. Ye, let's

1:33:55.600 --> 1:34:00.040
<v Speaker 1>see what else? Yeah? Uh Gail uh, fat shaming and

1:34:00.720 --> 1:34:06.559
<v Speaker 1>various racist bullying of her cameraman. They parody that moment

1:34:06.640 --> 1:34:09.920
<v Speaker 1>between Sydney and Gail weathers that is a great moment

1:34:10.040 --> 1:34:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and scream in the worst most annoying way possible, where

1:34:14.120 --> 1:34:17.839
<v Speaker 1>literally Gail just shouts at Cindy, your ass looks fat

1:34:17.920 --> 1:34:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and then she and then Cindy punches her in the face.

1:34:20.120 --> 1:34:23.639
<v Speaker 1>You're like, that's one of the Bessie then scream how

1:34:23.720 --> 1:34:27.280
<v Speaker 1>dare they how dare they do that dare. What else

1:34:27.320 --> 1:34:30.400
<v Speaker 1>do we got? Oh? The one of the jokes I

1:34:30.479 --> 1:34:33.320
<v Speaker 1>did know from this movie was the Blair Witch joke

1:34:33.439 --> 1:34:37.160
<v Speaker 1>with the horrible cgi snot bubble that looks like CGI

1:34:37.400 --> 1:34:40.519
<v Speaker 1>that sucked? What else do we got? What else do

1:34:40.560 --> 1:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>we got? So many bad?

1:34:43.360 --> 1:34:43.519
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

1:34:43.600 --> 1:34:46.840
<v Speaker 1>This one is just a bad joke. They make out

1:34:46.880 --> 1:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and then their tongues get tied together like it's Roger

1:34:49.240 --> 1:34:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Rabbit or something. What the fuck was that all about?

1:34:51.520 --> 1:34:52.799
<v Speaker 2>Shrug? Oh?

1:34:52.840 --> 1:34:55.439
<v Speaker 1>And then the and then and then when they do

1:34:55.520 --> 1:34:58.320
<v Speaker 1>have sex, which is problematic as it is, she's like,

1:34:58.360 --> 1:35:00.639
<v Speaker 1>I've been waiting for this for a long time, which

1:35:00.720 --> 1:35:05.080
<v Speaker 1>they demonstrate by having her have like gigantic pubes that

1:35:05.120 --> 1:35:10.439
<v Speaker 1>he has to change saw and I was like, bury

1:35:10.479 --> 1:35:16.880
<v Speaker 1>yourself alive for that one. That one was really bad. Uh. Yeah,

1:35:17.200 --> 1:35:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that was my That was my list of jokes. We

1:35:19.120 --> 1:35:21.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't get to that. I hated.

1:35:23.080 --> 1:35:25.479
<v Speaker 2>So nasty this movie.

1:35:25.560 --> 1:35:29.439
<v Speaker 1>It is just move filed under a movie with dark aura.

1:35:29.880 --> 1:35:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I think I gotta start making a letterbox list of that,

1:35:32.400 --> 1:35:34.600
<v Speaker 1>because this and Sixteen.

1:35:34.320 --> 1:35:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Candles are started.

1:35:37.520 --> 1:35:40.120
<v Speaker 1>The immediate movies that come to mind with movies with

1:35:40.160 --> 1:35:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the dark aura.

1:35:41.800 --> 1:35:46.880
<v Speaker 2>I would add, Oh, actually, the Fairly Brother speaking, going

1:35:46.920 --> 1:35:50.479
<v Speaker 2>back to our conversation about ableism and movies, they are

1:35:50.520 --> 1:35:54.720
<v Speaker 2>obsessed with it. Yeah, and there's something about Mary. I

1:35:54.760 --> 1:35:55.560
<v Speaker 2>would also.

1:35:55.840 --> 1:35:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Include oh, yes, movie with a dark aura. Yeah. And

1:35:59.080 --> 1:36:02.639
<v Speaker 1>then weren't the fair the ones that like one an

1:36:02.760 --> 1:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Oscar for the Green Book?

1:36:05.240 --> 1:36:05.559
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

1:36:05.920 --> 1:36:08.519
<v Speaker 1>I literally I think I was like so annoying about

1:36:08.520 --> 1:36:09.880
<v Speaker 1>it at the time that I gave a quote to

1:36:09.920 --> 1:36:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Post in spite of having no power at all.

1:36:12.640 --> 1:36:18.519
<v Speaker 1>But I really despised that moment in movies post Me Too,

1:36:18.680 --> 1:36:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Like two years post Me Too, we talked about this

1:36:20.400 --> 1:36:25.480
<v Speaker 1>on the show, where all of the you know, misogynists

1:36:25.520 --> 1:36:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to start directors of these big broad comedies of the

1:36:30.439 --> 1:36:32.840
<v Speaker 1>nineties and two thousands, all of a sudden made their

1:36:32.920 --> 1:36:36.639
<v Speaker 1>woman movie or made their like commentary movie and started

1:36:36.680 --> 1:36:38.800
<v Speaker 1>winning fucking Oscars for it. There was also what was

1:36:38.800 --> 1:36:42.439
<v Speaker 1>that that Fox News movie that sucked ass?

1:36:42.439 --> 1:36:43.599
<v Speaker 2>Oh bomb show.

1:36:43.920 --> 1:36:48.559
<v Speaker 1>That Joker, the Fairly Brothers waiting for Green Book. It's

1:36:48.560 --> 1:36:53.280
<v Speaker 1>like just opportunistic bullshit. None of the movies hold up.

1:36:53.280 --> 1:36:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I know people do like Joker, that's their business whatever,

1:36:56.040 --> 1:36:59.320
<v Speaker 1>but like any of the like, I get it. I

1:36:59.680 --> 1:37:02.480
<v Speaker 1>really want to cover that on the show. Someday, just overall,

1:37:03.160 --> 1:37:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to like, now that it's there's been enough time,

1:37:06.120 --> 1:37:08.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe I should just write about it or something, But

1:37:08.479 --> 1:37:10.880
<v Speaker 1>like really pulling together that period of like two or

1:37:10.960 --> 1:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>three years post b two where it was men processing

1:37:16.040 --> 1:37:22.280
<v Speaker 1>their feelings about feeling bad they portrayed women and then

1:37:22.320 --> 1:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>calling it feminism and winning Oscars and what the fuck

1:37:25.040 --> 1:37:29.200
<v Speaker 1>was that all about? I hated that it was.

1:37:29.439 --> 1:37:33.599
<v Speaker 2>It was bad. Does scary movie past the Bechdel test?

1:37:34.439 --> 1:37:35.479
<v Speaker 1>That can't be true.

1:37:35.680 --> 1:37:37.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I didn't pay attention.

1:37:37.400 --> 1:37:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Let me double check.

1:37:38.120 --> 1:37:38.960
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't be bothered.

1:37:39.160 --> 1:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Let me double check scholarly Journal, Bechdel test dot com.

1:37:43.280 --> 1:37:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this is just a waste of my

1:37:45.000 --> 1:37:47.760
<v Speaker 1>one human life. Like, of course, wait, scary movie, but

1:37:48.120 --> 1:37:49.960
<v Speaker 1>oh okay Bechdel test.

1:37:50.640 --> 1:37:53.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean I could see Cindy and Buffy or Cindy

1:37:54.000 --> 1:37:58.880
<v Speaker 2>and Brenda maybe talking about something.

1:38:01.200 --> 1:38:03.960
<v Speaker 1>It might I don't know it might, but let's just

1:38:04.000 --> 1:38:04.799
<v Speaker 1>say it doesn't.

1:38:05.200 --> 1:38:09.439
<v Speaker 2>Spiritually, No, yeah, spiritually, this movie hates women. So even

1:38:09.439 --> 1:38:12.080
<v Speaker 2>if its technically pass, who cares?

1:38:12.320 --> 1:38:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, wait it does technically pass. Let's see. Let's see, well,

1:38:17.080 --> 1:38:21.040
<v Speaker 1>let's see if it passes our version of test. Because

1:38:21.040 --> 1:38:24.599
<v Speaker 1>this is from Wow, really really going above and beyond

1:38:24.600 --> 1:38:26.559
<v Speaker 1>this week. This is from a listical from twenty twenty

1:38:26.560 --> 1:38:30.360
<v Speaker 1>two on Entertainment Weekly dot com. Movies you wouldn't expect

1:38:30.360 --> 1:38:34.200
<v Speaker 1>passed the Buckel test, but do thank you really helpful. Okay,

1:38:35.000 --> 1:38:38.120
<v Speaker 1>scary movie. All it says is the scariest thing about

1:38:38.120 --> 1:38:40.920
<v Speaker 1>this movie is it passes the Buckdel test. Okay, I

1:38:40.920 --> 1:38:41.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know.

1:38:42.080 --> 1:38:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Sure, let's go with that. But also nipplescale wise negative

1:38:48.560 --> 1:38:50.720
<v Speaker 2>five negative a million.

1:38:50.400 --> 1:38:53.559
<v Speaker 1>Negative a million, adding it to the list of movies

1:38:53.600 --> 1:38:58.679
<v Speaker 1>with a dark aura. They're far better Wayne's Brothers movies

1:38:58.840 --> 1:39:02.519
<v Speaker 1>TV shows is set to watch, just watch Hollywood Shuffle,

1:39:02.640 --> 1:39:05.599
<v Speaker 1>watch White Chicks, like you know, just just don't watch this.

1:39:06.200 --> 1:39:07.960
<v Speaker 2>No, I still have never seen White Chicks.

1:39:08.240 --> 1:39:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen it since I was a kid, so

1:39:09.840 --> 1:39:12.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe don't see it. I don't know. I saw

1:39:12.360 --> 1:39:14.559
<v Speaker 1>what it came out. Anyways, at least that movie is

1:39:14.640 --> 1:39:16.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to do something. This movie is trying to make

1:39:16.880 --> 1:39:20.280
<v Speaker 1>money and it was successful at it, and they tend

1:39:20.400 --> 1:39:24.679
<v Speaker 1>to be very bleak movies to watch later on because

1:39:24.720 --> 1:39:29.120
<v Speaker 1>it just feels somewhat craven and wish it was.

1:39:29.120 --> 1:39:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Wes craven who directed Scream?

1:39:31.840 --> 1:39:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Who directed Scream? Anyways, this movie's obsessed with Kevin Williamson.

1:39:37.720 --> 1:39:39.919
<v Speaker 1>I tried to find out if he had ever commented

1:39:39.960 --> 1:39:44.320
<v Speaker 1>on its existence, and iconically he has never acknowledged its existence,

1:39:44.640 --> 1:39:47.400
<v Speaker 1>even though they did better than all of his movies,

1:39:47.400 --> 1:39:51.240
<v Speaker 1>which is also, you know, an affront. Anyways, if I

1:39:51.320 --> 1:39:53.840
<v Speaker 1>had nipples, I would give them to Jane Trica, but

1:39:54.000 --> 1:39:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't.

1:39:59.439 --> 1:40:02.960
<v Speaker 2>And there you have it, our unlocked episode on Scary Movie.

1:40:03.439 --> 1:40:08.320
<v Speaker 2>For other still locked up behind the paywall episodes, which

1:40:08.439 --> 1:40:12.439
<v Speaker 2>is most of our Matreon content. You can subscribe to

1:40:12.560 --> 1:40:16.559
<v Speaker 2>that at patreon dot com slash Bechtel Cast. It's five

1:40:16.600 --> 1:40:19.439
<v Speaker 2>dollars a month, which gets you two bonus episodes every

1:40:19.479 --> 1:40:23.479
<v Speaker 2>single month, plus access to our back catalog of over

1:40:23.560 --> 1:40:28.360
<v Speaker 2>two hundred episodes. So scoot over there, do the right thing,

1:40:28.640 --> 1:40:32.479
<v Speaker 2>become a matron. You won't regret it, and we will

1:40:32.479 --> 1:40:35.639
<v Speaker 2>be back next week with a brand new episode, so

1:40:35.840 --> 1:40:37.120
<v Speaker 2>we will see you then.

1:40:40.400 --> 1:40:43.760
<v Speaker 1>The Bechdel Cast is a production of iHeartMedia, hosted and

1:40:43.840 --> 1:40:46.080
<v Speaker 1>produced by me Jamie Loftus and.

1:40:46.120 --> 1:40:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Me Caitlyn Durante. The podcast is also produced by Sophie

1:40:49.920 --> 1:40:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Lichtermann and.

1:40:51.080 --> 1:40:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Edited by Caitlyn Durrante. Ever heard of them?

1:40:53.880 --> 1:40:57.320
<v Speaker 2>That's me and our logo and merch and all of

1:40:57.360 --> 1:41:01.080
<v Speaker 2>our artwork in fact are designed by Jamie Loftus ever

1:41:01.120 --> 1:41:01.599
<v Speaker 2>heard of her?

1:41:01.800 --> 1:41:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh My God? And our theme song, by the way,

1:41:04.920 --> 1:41:06.680
<v Speaker 1>was composed by Mike Kaplan.

1:41:06.560 --> 1:41:08.800
<v Speaker 2>With vocals by Katherine Voskrasinski.

1:41:09.200 --> 1:41:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Iconic and especial thanks to the one and only Aristotle Ascevedo.

1:41:14.200 --> 1:41:18.000
<v Speaker 2>For more information about the podcast, please visit Linktree Slash

1:41:18.000 --> 1:41:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Spectelcast