WEBVTT - The Infra-Red Zone

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:24.080
<v Speaker 1>advice Leagues dot Com. Here's your host, Welcome to the show.

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>It is episode number four, season number twenty six of

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. I am Paul Churchy and my co

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:35.319
<v Speaker 1>host today are Brian Johnson Guillotine Leagues dot Com and

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:37.559
<v Speaker 1>Matt Harrison, who has just spun up a brand new

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>site called shock Fantasy dot Com. Yes, yes, we will

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>get you ready. It's we're hitting drafting season, guys. I'm

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of four email drafts right now. I

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>think it'd be three mail and one auction. It's you know,

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>there's I would call it ultimate drafting season. It's kind

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of been drafting season for a while Simus in the industry. Yes,

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>most people getting getting into it now. I think that's

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:05.839
<v Speaker 1>the first the first week where I feel like there's

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>really a lot of momentum happening with fantasy drafts. Were

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>here to get you ready in a wide variety of ways.

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk through some of the notes from training camps.

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>We will take one of the deep dive data points

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:21.199
<v Speaker 1>that we usually only have at our in person live

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy football training camp, which this year is not happening.

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:29.399
<v Speaker 1>That so lucky you guys who didn't come to training camp. Ever,

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>has there been a better spot for the sad trombon

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Sky than you know what it really is? It really

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 1>is sad. Where hey keep that sad warm up? Today? Okay,

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>good um, we will tell you about the the things

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that happened inside the five yard line that you need

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to know about. This is one of my favorite deep

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>analytical dives. We're gonna touch on every single team and

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>what they do inside the five and how that can

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>benefit your fantasy team. We've got three tough questions. Well,

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>identified the player as we like, but we hate their

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>average draft position, so we never end up with them.

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>And it's not that we just hate these guys, we

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 1>just won't pay their price. It's like love the player,

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>hate the game. It is kind of like that. Okay,

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:15.519
<v Speaker 1>And then at the end of the show, we'll have

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>our sleepers and Matt Harrison will tell you how to

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>capitalize on the first month of the season. I'm a

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:23.679
<v Speaker 1>big believer in fast starts. When you start three and one,

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>four and oh, four and one, five and oh, you've

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:31.959
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of roster equity going and life becomes

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot easier. You can start transitioning even at

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that point already to some advanced thinking. So lots to

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>get to over the course of the show. We begin

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>with notes from almost every team around the league, and Matt.

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:48.519
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with the Panthers. Russell o'koung, who we talked

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>about last week when we said he's considering retirement due

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to COVID. He's still not playing in camp because he's

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>dealing with some back issues as well. So something's lingering

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.959
<v Speaker 1>stuff with o'koung, and it's looking more and more likely

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>that he might not be ready for the beginning of

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the season or at all this year. You know, I'm

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>so nervous about the Panthers offense in general that I'm

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>having an increasingly hard time keeping Christian McCaffrey at pick

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>one oh one. I'm going to ruin that for you

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>in the schedule analysis part of the show, and I

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>hope that's right. Uh, Brian, Let's go to the Las

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Vegas Raiders. Yeah, not going to Oakland out of Raiders camp.

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Brian Edwards looks to be the guy over Henry Ruggs,

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>who was the first overall wide receiver taken in the draft.

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 1>We called that a mistake when they made it. So yeah,

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Bryan Edwards, if you're in redraft, if you're targeting a

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>rookie wide receiver, it's him, not Rugs and uh worth mentioning.

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>The Raiders are one of three teams in the running

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>for Jadeveon Clowney, the Titans and the Seahawks or the

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>other two. And that's worth mentioning because if I got

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Raiders on my team, I don't want their defense getting

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>any better. Well not if you have Josh Jacobs, because

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>you don't want the negative game script. So the defense

0:03:57.400 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>helped Josh terre point. Fair point there. But but they're

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>they're they might land Clowney. That would be a big

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>signing front who gets them in Green Bay? A. J.

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Dillon's the second round running back, drawing strong reviews. General

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>manager Brian Gudkuns compared him to Eddie Lacy this week

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>in a good way. Uh. Social media blew up with

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>photos of his herculean legs. I think that was mostly

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>due to the fact he was wearing Hooters shorts. They

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.919
<v Speaker 1>were they're tiny shorts have I think they're just tiny

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>on him. Uh. Aaron Rodgers also noted that A. J.

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Dillon's skills are great, but he needs to get caught

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>up on the playbook, which is pretty much true for

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Annie rookie and you know what for running backs, getting

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>caught up on the playbook is not hard. That will happen.

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Washington, Matt Bryce Love is getting reps

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>with the first team. So is Dwayne Haskins. By the way,

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>while Alex Smith returned to practice this week, he's not

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 1>yet part of eleven on eleven drills Alex Smith as

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of yet, so Haskins still at the one team. But

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Love is an interesting guy to keep kind of

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>on your cheek sheet. Put a little bullet next to him.

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>As Adrian Peterson ever taken a first team trading camp,

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 1>trading camp never and it never matters, by the way,

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>it was always ready to go. Someone will make any

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>difference here either. Let's go to Buffalo. Brian the Athletics

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Bills beat reporter Joe Paglia believes Zack Moss's role as

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:19.720
<v Speaker 1>being under sold and head coach Sean McDermott's already praising

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the past protection skills of Zack Moss. Now, some of

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you that have been listening to this show and our

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 1>podcast going back months have been hearing me to Zack Moss.

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>The rest of the world just now starting to catch up.

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>If you want Zack Moss, you can't rely on old

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>adp He's going earlier and earlier. In drafts I held

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>this past week, he went in pick with picks seven

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and eight in the first round in different draftskie draft.

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:51.359
<v Speaker 1>You cook him from one of the over cam akers

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and it was, by the way, is the happy trombone

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>like the precursor to the peacock? Like you haven't quite

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 1>You don't have the results yet to so you can

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>happy trombone. It looks it still looks good. The Texans,

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and updating a story from last week's segment, Kenny Stills

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>is now active in practicing. He's still the fourth wide

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>receiver in the pecking order, though Deshaun Watson, while we're

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>speaking of the receivers, says that Will Fuller is quote

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 1>going to ball out. M hm. That's good. Coach Bill

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>O'Brien says, Will Filler quote looks as good as he's

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 1>ever looked. Now, a lot of those words generally don't

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:35.479
<v Speaker 1>mean anything when they actually get to this point, you know,

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>actually start the season. But we, as we've talked about before,

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>if you give me sixteen games and Will Fuller, we're

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about guy who could easily be a top ten

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>ish wide receiver share. That's the kind of upside we get.

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Tampa Bay. Matt offensive tackle Tristan Worth's

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 1>has struggled mightily with the first team in practice so far. However,

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the real news, the Tampa Bay Bucks official website is

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:02.239
<v Speaker 1>saying the standout at camp is Ronald Jones. It's happening.

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh, I think Ronald Jones. It's I think

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt, at least based on we know right now.

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Jones is the back to half, which we as

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>we've discussed before. It all sounds good until his abysmal

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>pass block it gets Tom Brady killed, and then they

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>got to make a change. Brian. Let's go to Cleveland.

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>So Nick Chubb suffered a concussion. I don't recall many

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 1>training campncussions ever, but he's in concussion protocol right now.

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>It should be good for a week one and a

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>couple quote unquote should be ready for Week one guys

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that are very fantasy relevant or Jarvis hand Uh Landry

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>with a hip injury and starting center j C. Trader

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>with a knee injury. So the one guy who is

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>ready for Week one right now or appears to be

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>as O b J who looks pretty good. Classic, but yeah,

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>we had a monitor Chub Landry and j C. Tredder.

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Of course you want your starting center healthy for the

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:55.679
<v Speaker 1>start of Week one. In Kansas City, when Clyde Edwards

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Hlaire had to miss a day practice this week, it

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>was Darryl Williams who got the first team reps. It

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>was not DeAndre Washington. And this is an evolving battle

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that will will be worth watching throughout the preseason because

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that could be a potentially very valuable handcuff for Clyde Edwards. Lair,

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Detroit. Matt I saw a headline on

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>ESPN that said, carry on Johnson not dealing with injury. Yeah,

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>but he's not getting a ton of work in practice either,

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>And Matt Patricia said that was planned, which means he's

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the second team player right now. It's DeAndre Swift DeAndre

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Swift is going too late in draft. That guy, he's

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>so much better than carry On Johnson, so much healthier.

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 1>He's going to get the vast majority of the work there,

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I believe, Brian. Let's go to the New York Jets.

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Rookie wide receiver Denzel Mims, who was slated to start

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>on the outside opposite of Brashad Perriman, still sideline with

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a hamstring injury. Breshad Perriman pretty much unproven to me

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>still and most people, so. I like Jameson Crowder even more.

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I've touted him here multiple times, averaged eight targets. With

0:08:57.600 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a healthy Sam Donald, He's gonna be a PPR mon

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>certain Chris Herndon is lining up as a slot receiver,

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>outside receiver and tight end right now. I don't have

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>like any Chris Herndon right now in any of my

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>league's I'm kind of sad about it because not even

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>in your tight end only league, not even in my

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>tight end only league. Auction the league by the way,

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>with the big boys play. Let's go to the Rams.

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Josh Reynolds wide receivers all but locked up the third

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 1>receiver job over rookie Van Jefferson. The Rams play a

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:25.599
<v Speaker 1>lot of three receiver sets, and Reynold's gonna get a

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of playing time. Currently going off the board as

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver eighty three, and he's walking into Brandon Cook's role.

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna run Brandon Cooks routes and he's wide receiver

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>receiver eighty three for Josh Reynolds. Let's go to the

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Seahawks. Matt Um, you remember Philip Dorsett does a Seahawk.

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of weird, right, Yeah. Pete Carroll just said

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>he's the fastest guy they've ever had in camp. Dang,

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and they have Tyler Lockett, who, by the way, is

0:09:55.720 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>very fast like ever had ever Percy Harvin was pretty fast,

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>he said, like Philip Dorset's the fastest guy ever. Well,

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 1>it's fine, but if if he could, if you were

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>fast and could catch, he'd still be on his original team,

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>not his third. T K Metcalf, who like broke all

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the Combine records last year. Brian, Let's go to Denver.

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Broncos coach Vic Fangio said he anticipated both Melvin Gordon

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and Philip Lindsley quote playing enough where we don't really

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 1>have to designate a starter. Great, Yeah, that's what we'll

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>talk more about these guys when we go inside the

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 1>five later on Vikings. IRV Smith tight end getting a

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of first team playing time and is expected to

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 1>linep in the slot a lot more often. The Vikings

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 1>run a lot of two tight end sets and so

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>both he and Kyl Rudolf will be on the field

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 1>together often. So it looks like there's an opportunity for

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:42.079
<v Speaker 1>Irv Smith to get some extra reps from what we

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 1>saw last year, Matt, Let's go to Philadelphia. Miles Sanders

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>considered weak. Too weak, That's not good with an undisclosed

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>lower body injury. By the way, Boston Scott not Scott

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:56.839
<v Speaker 1>Fish at Boston Market. Uh, he's day to day with

0:10:56.880 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a lower body injury. Day to day is a little

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>better than week to week. So Corey Clement opened the

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>UH the practice yesterday is the first team runner with

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Elijah holy Field getting some first team reps to I

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't even think Elijah holy Field just canna end up

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in the league this year. Real deal holy Field Home,

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>it happens for him. Brian Miami, Uh, take her pantsop

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>charge stew beer. It appears to be the clear cut

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>starter about it. I know that's great. Well, I think

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you should be the starter definitely too. It looks good

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>though in camp. Sambiyah Fitzpatrick will start in Pittsburgh. It's

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>positive reviews on Ben Roethlisberger's arm and his return. Remember

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>he's thirty eight years old. It's coming up a major

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>elbow surgery with three torn ligaments in the elbow, but

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>people are noting good philosophy. Accuracy has been inconsistent, but

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>people are saying that it looks like the old arm

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>is there and it makes you wonder if maybe people

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>are sleeping on this offense a little bit. And he

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>finally conditioned in the off season too. It appears for

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the first time his career. How about that. Congrats, Let's

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>go to Dallas. Head coach Mike McCarthy was asked by

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.199
<v Speaker 1>a member of the press, what's Tony Pollard's useage you

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna be this year? Mike mccarth he said, I won't

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>discuss that because it's gonna be a lot. Yep. I'm

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>telling you people, if it was nothing, he would say,

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Zeke's our guy. He didn't want to discuss. Listen, I'm

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>telling you this is one of my biggest takes from

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>this offseason. Tony Pollode role is going to improve a lot.

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>We're going to negotiate an Empire League trade driving break here.

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested in that. Let's go to the Patriots. Brian

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Beat writer Mike Reese speculated that the team could deploy

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback rotation early in the season, and Belichick didn't

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>rule it out. But Jared Sidama by all nursing bad. Yeah,

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:34.959
<v Speaker 1>and he's nursing a leg injury. Uh, and I expect

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to practice much on Friday, Saturday, Sunday. Cam's still going

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to get the job. But there's of course, it's New England,

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>so they're muscling things up out there in San Francisco.

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Wide receiver Jalen Hurd went on went on I r

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>with a torn a c L and of course, as

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>you probably remember, Deebo Samuel nursing a foot injury as well,

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>so Brandon I was gonna start. Trent Taylor and Dante

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Pettis are also getting first team reps, and that looks

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that might be your starting route for Week one for

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the forty Niners. Let's go to the New York Giants.

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>You're in a league with kickers, Graham Gano just got

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>signed and they released Chandler Catons. Oh that's it, foul.

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:13.079
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Titans. Uh. Corey Davis, who was

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>on the publist, was quitted to practice on Monday. Running

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Back Darrington Evans rookie who should back up Derrick Henry

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 1>has fumbled twice already, So just play Derrick Henry every down.

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>And if they did, you b RB one overall in

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:29.199
<v Speaker 1>my mind, if you got like fifty six targets per year.

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 1>And the tight ends coach loves John H. Smith Church, Yeah, baby, John,

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I can't quiet yet, but I can, Yeah

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Smith Baby? Oh, why is your hand inside your shirt?

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I need to hand you this roll of paper towels.

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:54.599
<v Speaker 1>That was quite the look. In Baltimore, the media is

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>gushing over Mark Andrews. He's running through the second and

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 1>third levels of a very good Ravens defense, healthier than

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>last year, and with Hayden Hurst Atlanta. Everybody expects a

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>another leap from Mark Andrews this year. He is my

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>tight end number three, but I believe going off the

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>board of tighten four or five in most drafts right now, Matt, Matt,

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Atlanta. Really nice reports about Brian Hill

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and Cadre Allison. In practice, it seems like the Falcons

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>are prepping their fan base for their backups to take

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>over in the inevitable case that Todd Gurley is missing

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>time now, which is going to happen. And we've got

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Ido Smith who's still in that mix as well. Bengals

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Brian uh starting cornerback Trey Wayne, who you might remember

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of your local Minnesota here, underwent surgery to report report

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>repair a torn peck and is expected to miss most

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>of so that hurts the defense and kind of helps

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the offense outside of Joe Mixon Matt We go to

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Arizona for the Cardinals. DeAndre Hopkins missed a handful of

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>practices with a hamstring tweak, but he returned to the

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>field yesterday. And for the Jaguars, Brian rich Hill Armstead

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>activated from the COVID list, and he was a fifth

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>round rookie last year at a temple and he showed

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>some flashes and the this is worth mentioning because he

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>could push Leonard four Net. Yes, Jacksonville is on their way.

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>They're done with him essentially, so right kill Armstead is

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>worth the late round flyer right now, right, Matt, Chicago

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Bears will round out your final team ready for the

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>sounder chart. Nick Foles and Mitchell true Bisky are currently

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>alternating days as the starter in camp. Cordarrell Patterson, by

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the way, is sitting in on running back meetings. This

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>is his name. I'm telling you this is his best

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>position is running back. There that with that running backs

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>they've got, that's not you could be the best running

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>back on roster. Might be Chicago's gonna have the number

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>one pick next year, yes they are. The defense defense

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>is not good enough? All right, Brian, you know, wrap

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>up this lunacy of yours with the Chargers, please sort

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of such. Now that's a team, that's a team that

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>could be, that could have the first pick. No not.

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Their defense is pretty good too. Justin Jackson looks locked

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>into the back up running back role. We all love

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Austin Nichola, but keep your eye on Joshua Kelly. He's

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna usurp Jackson sooner than later. All right, there you go.

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>We've gone around almost all thirty two teams. A couple

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of teams didn't have much worth mentioning, and so you

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>know we care about your time and what actually matters

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>if you want to play the freshest new format and

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football. It's called the Guillotine League. Seventeen teams start

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the season and each week the low scoring team gets

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>eliminated and their entire roster goes to the waiver wire,

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>where pandemonium ensues. If you'd like to play along, go

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>to Guillotine leagues dot com. When we come back inside

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the five yard line, what's the one thing you need

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to know from every team inside the five yard line?

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>And why it's so important for you to know? When

0:16:44.400 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>we come back to Fantasy Football Weekly, Welcome back Fantasy

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. I am Paul Archie and my co host

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:16.479
<v Speaker 1>or Matt Harrison and Brian Johnson. Every year at our

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:21.479
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football training camp, a live event in Minneapolis, we

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>unveil what every team's tendencies are inside the five and

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 1>we should say them. Well, it's been my bit. Now

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you're passing the book. Now now you're making us do

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>your word. What the heck? We're dividing up three ways.

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk about every team and what they do

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>inside the five and why you should care? Well, why

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>should you care? Number one? That's where touchdowns are scored

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and breaking news. Fantasy players like touchdowns. It's easy fantasy

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:57.400
<v Speaker 1>points from inside the five. This is where great fantasy

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>players score, and they do so copiously inside the five. Now,

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're thinking to yourself, well, it's what about the

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>other yards? Blah blah blah. Here's the thing. I want

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:14.199
<v Speaker 1>you to think of a number. How many touchdowns do

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you think we're scored from inside the five last year?

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>To the infrared zone? You I kind of like infra

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>red zone. I like that. How many touchdowns were scored

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>inside the five? Put a number in your head? Nice?

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe it was more than one hundred more

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>than two hundred three three hundred touchdowns from inside the

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>five last year? No? The answer is five hundred four

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns were scored from inside the five yard line last

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:55.640
<v Speaker 1>year in the NFL? Five hundred four. Do you want

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a part of that on your fantasy team? As many

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>as possible on your fantasy All of them? Yeah? Well

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>all would be ideal. You'd have to a very large

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 1>roster to capture all of them. So a lot of touchdowns.

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't expect that many touchdowns. And the whole are

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you are you sure you didn't count all the touchdowns

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 1>from all year five four touchdowns, which is more than Matt.

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Gonna breakdown every team, I want to know, you're gonna

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>tell listeners the one thing that people need to know.

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna do each team. We're gonna start with Carolina

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>From inside the five. No team threw more passes inside

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the five yard line than the Panthers last season with

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight. And you'd think it was Christian mccaffy. I

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:44.400
<v Speaker 1>would think it was he only had three targets inside

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the five. The infrared zone threat was Curtis Samuel seven targets.

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember that working out too well. Five reception touchdowns.

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>On the year, he had four touchdowns from inside the

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:00.199
<v Speaker 1>infrared zone, which was tied for the most in the

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:05.199
<v Speaker 1>league for receptions for for touchdown receptions, yeah, very interesting,

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 1>tied with Julio Jones and Zach ERT's. Nice job. I

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have guess Julio Jones either because he scored a

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>few times. You wouldn't nicely done, Brian, What do people

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>need to know? Inside the five? From the Las Vegas Raiders,

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 1>Josh Jacobs had the eighth most attempts inside the infrared,

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and he turned those into the fourth most yards last

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 1>year and scored five touchdowns on his attempts. Now, if

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 1>he can see attempts like the Big Boys, the mccaffery's,

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Mixings of the world, we're talking right up

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>there one territory he he was, he was below them

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>in his attempts. But if he can see those and

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 1>what will be an improved offense. Most would think Josh

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>Jacobs might be a round one pick that's going in

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>round two. Raiders are a have one of the best

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>offensive lines in football too, so they should be very

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>effective there. And I'm glad you brought this up for

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>people that aren't familiar with deep inside the five stuff.

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>What you want from a good running back is right

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>around a fifty percent conversion rate for touchdowns on these

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:03.120
<v Speaker 1>area's inside the five. You want to see ten carries,

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>five touchdowns. That's what you're looking for in a for

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>an effective goal line style back. Let's go to the Packers.

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Last year, Aaron Jones had the sixth most carries from

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>inside the five, and he converted them for ten touchdowns,

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:17.959
<v Speaker 1>which was tied for the most in the league. So

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the question is what happens if a j Dillon gets

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>half of that that workload, does that does that strip

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 1>him of five touchdowns right there from last year and

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>really drop him down maybe a whole round or two

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>in production. And get this as a quick side note,

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the Green Bay wide receivers caught one pass all year

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:40.199
<v Speaker 1>from inside the five last season. Matt, Let's go to

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 1>the Washington football team. Uh, they only scored eleven times

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>from inside the five last year. That was bottom four

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>in the league. And they only had twelve running back

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>carries from inside the five. Adrian Peterson had seven of

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>those and the other five went to guys who are

0:21:55.400 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>no longer on the tape, so that's not touched to

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>glean there. Peterson is probably gonna get the goal line work,

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:06.719
<v Speaker 1>probably so, Brian. Let's go to the Buffalo Bills. So

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>last year Frank Gore oh was one of twelve Lord

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>God mort uh it carries inside the five yard line.

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:19.120
<v Speaker 1>He's clearly gone sadly for the New Jersey Jets. He's

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a Jet. But all those carries are going to queue

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:30.400
<v Speaker 1>it up. Charge Zack Moss baby, yes, Zack Man can't wait.

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Devin Singletary needs to be such an afterthought at this point,

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:36.360
<v Speaker 1>he only had three carries inside the ten yard line

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>last year. He's not touching the ball the money zone.

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>It's all Zack moss Man and Josh Allen, of course,

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>but more Zack moss and Josh. For the Texans, Deshaun

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Watson led the team in touchdowns from inside the five.

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 1>This is rushing, by the way, rushing touchdowns and I

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 1>had the five with five of them. Carlos Hyde had

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>just nine carries inside the five last year. So how

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:56.959
<v Speaker 1>does that maybe translate to David Johnson. Well, last year

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson got six carries in the five for Arizona

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and converted them to just two touchdowns. But for I'll

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 1>note for this in fairness to David Johnson for his career,

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>he's a fifty percent conversion back, and again that's the

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.959
<v Speaker 1>number we're really looking for. So David Johnson will get

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>those those Carlos hi to carries and more. Let's go

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:18.439
<v Speaker 1>to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. I got a lot to

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>chew on in this one. So Tampa was a top

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>five running team from inside the five with twenty seven

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>run plays called last year. So was the New England Patriots,

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>who had thirty three run plays called inside the five.

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Bring that up because Tom Brady is now the quarterback

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>in Tampa. Peyton Barber had ten of their carries, Dagnally

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 1>had seven of those carries, and Ronald Jones only had

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>four carries. So worrisome did they trust Roe Joe near

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the stripe? They should? All four of his carries went

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>first scores. Okay, well, that's a good sign. Also, Mike

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Evans was second in the league with eight infrared zone targets.

0:23:56.640 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 1>That seems good until you realize that Tom Brady he

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>was an awful thrower from inside the five. He went

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>four for twenty with only two touchdowns last year inside

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 1>the five. Let's go to the Cleveland Browns. Brian, Yeah,

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>this is glaring. Nick Chubb fifteen attempts inside the five

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:17.120
<v Speaker 1>for negative fourteen yards last year and just two touchdown. Yeah,

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't get it. I just you know the line

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>was banged up and it is revamped. I mentioned J. C.

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Treader the starting center might not go week one, he

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>should go. But Cream Hunt had one carry inside the

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 1>five convert into a three yard touchdown. Uh. We'll talk

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a little more about Chubb and Hunt later, but it

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 1>seems like hunting needs a little more work inside the five. Yeah, maybe,

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:38.640
<v Speaker 1>so you know, keep in mind they put a first

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:40.679
<v Speaker 1>round pick in an early first round pick at left

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 1>tackle of Jack Conklin is a right tackle, so the

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 1>line is improved. The efficacy of that line and inside

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 1>the five should be very good reminder. We're talking about

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the one thing you need to know for each team

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>inside the five yard line. For the Colts, head coach

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Frank Wright didn't mind using a lot of runners inside

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the five, which may end up frustrating fantasy owners a end.

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:05.199
<v Speaker 1>Last year, mac Hines, Williams, and Wilkins all got carries,

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 1>and even Jacoby percented five carries. And Jacoby percent is

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>not the most mobile fleet of foot quarterback. Yeah, but

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>he didn't have Jonathan Taylor last year. He did not,

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:15.159
<v Speaker 1>But I still think it goes to show where some

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 1>of his predilections lie. Let's go to the Detroit Lions.

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Man Marvin Jones had two touchdowns from inside the five

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>in one game against Minnesota last year, and that was

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the most exciting thing the Lions did from inside the five.

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>They're super boring. Carry On had ten carries and scored

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>only three times and he was their most utilized player

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:36.360
<v Speaker 1>inside the five. The second most touches went to Wes

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:42.439
<v Speaker 1>hillis not Peyton hillis No, Who's west hillis? I don't know, Okay,

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>some guy who got five carries from inside the five

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 1>last year for the Lions. Let's move on to the Jets. Uh.

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 1>They were dead last in red zone scoring attempts per

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>game at two point one and that's from the twenty

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>inn so from the five and end there wasn't a

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of action for the Jets. They were dead last

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 1>in Russia attempts sinside the five with nine rushes. That's

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>nine times they ran the ball in So Levy on

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Bell just feels like fool's gold to me at this point.

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City's last. For Kansas City last year, Lashawn McCoy

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>and Darryl Williams, not Damien Williams. Darryl Williams led the

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 1>team in rushes inside the five with thirteen of them.

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Those are all up for grabs this year in my mind.

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And oddly, get this, the Chiefs tied for the fewest

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:34.439
<v Speaker 1>touchdown passes from inside the five, which I guess is

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 1>just because Patrick Mahomes scores from farther away. Than does.

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I imagine that's part of it. But back to the

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 1>running backs just for a minute. This might be another

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>indication that Darry Williams got some sneaky value that maybe

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 1>most people don't realize. Let's go to the Seattle Seahawks.

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 1>The Seahawks were very balanced inside the infrared zone. Eight

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.680
<v Speaker 1>rushing touchdowns with Chris Carson getting five of them on

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>nine carries. Eight passing touchdowns, with no player having more

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>than two. So the combo of Jacob Hollister, will dis

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Lee and linebacker Nick Blore, they combined for half of

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the receiving touchdowns. Those canna all go to Greg Olsen.

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 1>This year for the Denver Broncos, what are they doing

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>inside the five? This is probably the most split backfield

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL right now, the toughest one to peg um.

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Philip Lindsay was great inside the five last year, eight

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:25.160
<v Speaker 1>carries fourteen yards for five touchdowns, and people think he's

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 1>just this tiny scat back like he's Trek Cohen and

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>he's not. And then Melvin Gordon, of course with the

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Chargers last year, who held out for the first four games,

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:34.880
<v Speaker 1>he ended up with the fifth most carries inside the five.

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.159
<v Speaker 1>With thirteen and his fifteen yards inside the five was

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>third most, so he was very effective as well. So

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:41.919
<v Speaker 1>what it boils down to is you take the cheaper

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>guy in Philip Lindsay and ADP. But this is like

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:46.679
<v Speaker 1>the most split down the middle backfield in the NFL

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 1>going into the season. In my opinion, Philip Lindsay's going

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>dirt cheap and a lot cheap. Too cheap. You know,

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>two years ago he was sensational, last year he was Matt.

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I think people are I think for where he's where

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>he's going. It's too late, all right. Let's go to

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the last Angelist rams who scored the most rushing touchdowns

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 1>from inside the five fifteen of them. Todd Gurley led

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the team by a wide margin, fifteen carries for eight

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in this year. All of those carries go to

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 1>my guy, Malcolm Brown. Alcolm Brown had eight carries four

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 1>five touchdowns last year. Malcolm Brown could be your sneaky

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 1>goal line back for the team that had the most

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>rushing touchdowns from inside the five last year. Take me

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Town Cantalons another late round sleeper running back, uh Matt

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Our final team of this segment where there's a two

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>segment deal inside the five? What does Philadelphia do inside

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the five? The Eagles had twenty five touchdowns from the

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 1>infrared zone, that was the most in the league last year,

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>And while Jordan Howard led the team on the ground

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>with five touchdowns on ten carries, don't necessarily think that

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>all goes to Miles Sanders. This year, Sanders converted six

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>carries for only two scores, while five ft six, two

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred three pound Boston Scott converted all four series inside

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the five. First time, I guess that he's the goal

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 1>line back Boston Scott. Maybe I don't, man, I'd have

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to believe it. I'd have to see it to believe it. Well,

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 1>we saw it four times last year. It doesn't seem

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>likely that that's the case, but maybe so. If you'd

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>like to get my cheat sheet with all my player rankings,

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 1>including some of these sleeper players were talking about, go

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to Guillotine league dot com. My cheet available for free

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Guillotine leagues dot com. When we came back the other

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 1>half of the NFL, what do they do inside the five?

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>And what are the tendencies and sleeper guys you can identify?

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 1>We all love touchdowns. We'll tell you how to find

0:29:39.160 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>him when we come back. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Paul Charchi and Matt Harrison Bryan Johnson with you, breaking

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>down what happens inside the five yard line last year,

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the total number of touchdowns scored inside the five five

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred four. It matters to know what teams do inside

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the five yard line. We've already identified about half of

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the team's last segment this segment, let's carry on, beginning

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>with the Miami Dolphins. Brian So the Dolphins only totaled

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>sixteen rush attempts inside the five last year. Ryan Fitzpatrick

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>was second on the that's my guy, Calen Blage. I'm

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>not so sure if Bellage is still on the team,

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>But of course there are new faces here with Jordan

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Howard and Matt Brita. But if you're looking for running

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>back action inside the five yard line, look at other teams.

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Basically well, based on what we've seen so far, Yeah,

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Howard's tempting. I would lean Howard over Brita if

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I was picking one, just because he seems to be

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the guy inside the five. He's built for it is

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>sneaky PPR guy. Though Vikings led the NFL, and handoffs

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>inside the five last year led the NFL thirty four

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 1>of them, also, by the way, known as double what

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Miami had for handoffs inside the five. Dalvin Cook lad

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>all runners with twenty one carries and his nine touchdowns

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 1>were third most. We do not expect that to change

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>in either front. Let's go to the Dallas Cowboys. Zeke

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>scored ten times on eighteen carries inside the five. That's

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 1>an excellent production. It is uh no Dallas pass catcher

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>had more than one target in the infrared zone except

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Jason Witten, who only had four. Dallas only ran eleven

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 1>pass plays inside the five. Let's go to the Saints.

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Two years ago, selling Sean Payton handed the ball to

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>his runners thirty times inside the five. That was two

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Last year twelve carries inside the five. That's it.

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 1>And Camara got eight carries. Mury Murray got just four.

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>And they combined from the five touchdowns and the year

0:31:57.840 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 1>before that, they run for twenty one times. I think

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>at Sean Payton probably views last I think that was

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that was an unusual event last year, and I think

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>those carries probably do end up coming back. Brian, Let's

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 1>go to the Patriots. The Patriots were second in running

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>back handoffs inside the five last year and ranked first

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and rushes overall over the past three years. But who's

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna get him? Sony Michelle, Lamar Miller. Here's it's not

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not Lamar Miller. That's what we know for sure

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>is it's what what if James White is a cow

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>this year? What if James White is a bell cow?

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 1>What if he just carries that team? He's thirty two

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 1>years old. We know what his role is. What if

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>he is What's that's absurd? Lamar Miller is the best

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 1>running back on that team right now. Okay, he's still

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 1>hanging on to Lamar Miller like you're hanging on to

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Matthews. You guys understand how offensive line works. Matt

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Giants. Say Kwan Barkley one a

0:32:56.920 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 1>bottom eight rushing attempts inside the five last year, one touchdown. Yeah,

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't right. The prior year eighteen carries only six touchdowns.

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>So in two years, twenty seven percent conversion race, it's

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 1>not possible. He's a bad goal line back. Meanwhile, Wayne

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Gallman seven carries for three touchdowns over the last two years.

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Is Wayne Gallman a better running back than say quant No,

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>but he might be a better goal line back than

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 1>say Kwan Berkley. God, that would be a kick in

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the shorts. Off it turns out he's just start getting

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 1>goal line carries to Wayne Gahlman. Don't do it. Let's

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>go to the Titans, Bryant. The Titans have the second

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 1>fewest pass attempts inside the understandably with Derrick Henry. But

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>but but you don't have to. They have weapons like

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 1>A J. Brown and John Smith. John Smith. We'll talk

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 1>about gas a little bit, all right if we must,

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>but understandably so. But it's gonna be a fun team

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to watch Tennessee watch out. I hear they were good

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 1>last year. Yeah they had. They beat a pretty good

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore team, I think, and pretty good Patriots team. The

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Steelers were as bad as any team running inside the

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:14.400
<v Speaker 1>five last year. No runner had more than five carries

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and none had more than two touchdowns. That's it. Interesting

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 1>note here Benny Snell had every Steelers carry inside the

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>five in from in the month of December last year,

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:29.479
<v Speaker 1>so they by the end of the year, and part

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 1>it was probably due to injury but at the end

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of the year they had gone to Benny Snell inside

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the five. I think that's could be a trend we'll

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>find out. Let's go to the Atlanta Falcons. Man. They

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:44.399
<v Speaker 1>only ran twenty seven total plays from inside the five

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 1>last year. That was fifth fewest in the league. Julio

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Jones had four targets, converted all of them to touchdowns. Hey,

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 1>let's do that some more. Yeah. By the way, Cadrey

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Allison was their goal line back last year. He had

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the most carries six carries, he had four touchdowns. Both

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:01.799
<v Speaker 1>led the team. So if Todd Gurley, who's a notoriously

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:05.440
<v Speaker 1>good goal line back, yes, if he goes down, Cadrea

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Allison might be kind of the sneaky running back to

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 1>play of the Falcons running backs. You know, I've tried

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:13.360
<v Speaker 1>playing this game about which Falcon do you want to

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:16.799
<v Speaker 1>go get behind Todd Gurley because Gurly's You're never gonna

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:18.840
<v Speaker 1>have a big workload and the threat of injury is

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 1>very real. I just I don't think there's a clear

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:24.359
<v Speaker 1>number two. I think I think the scenario is if

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Gurley is out, Cadrey Allison, at least you know he's

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:29.880
<v Speaker 1>going to get the goal line mark probably probably, but

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you know Smith was out for most of last year too,

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and it had he been there, may would have been him.

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Let's go just a throat to Hayden Hurst, Brian.

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to your team, the Bengals, My team, the

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Bengals Joe Mixon. We will first off, we mentioned the

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>conversion rate for touchdowns. Is that the five kind of

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the barometer we'd like to see. Mixon's five touchdowns on

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 1>eight team carries don't quite fit that criteria. He did

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 1>not thrive last year, and I think those opportunities go

0:35:57.080 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 1>down if a j Green can stay healthy. He was

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in the Tory target hog deep in the red zone

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:03.719
<v Speaker 1>in his prime, and he's still got some gas in

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the tank. So the little ding on mixing, but not

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:09.919
<v Speaker 1>not not a lot, a lot. Okay, let's go to

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the forty Niners. Frustrating lead. Kyle Shanahan gave eight different

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 1>players carries from inside the five. Kyle Jesus, Jesus, he

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 1>got one, Kyle check got one. How about shannahanigans? That's

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:27.319
<v Speaker 1>what that is? Those are. Tevin Coleman led the team

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 1>with nine, but he wasn't very effective with just three

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:32.720
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns on those carries inside the five. He also average

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:35.799
<v Speaker 1>point six yards per carry. Tevin Coleman did. I just

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:38.840
<v Speaker 1>don't think Coleman is very good, so I tend to

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 1>have an anti Coleman bias here. But I'll note that

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Tevin Coleman was given two carries in the playoffs from

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 1>inside the five and he scored twice, so he's probably

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the goal line guy. Yuck. All right, Let's go to

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals. Matt the Cards through twenty eight passes inside

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the five. That was tied for most in the league.

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:00.919
<v Speaker 1>And that's why Larry Fitzgerald led the league infrared zone

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 1>targets with ten. No other Cardinal lot had more than

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 1>one target inside the five. So how did Larry not

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:11.919
<v Speaker 1>score more? Yeah, I don't know. She Also, Kenyan Drake

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:14.319
<v Speaker 1>scored six times on eight carries inside the five. He's

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty good in the red zone, infrared zone, I should say,

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 1>as we like to say. Let's go to the Jacksonville Jaguars, Bryan.

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry Leonard Fournette, but we gotta rag on you

0:37:22.760 --> 0:37:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a little more minutes every every show. Eight carries for

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 1>for net inside the five for negative two yards. Uh.

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 1>He did have three touchdowns almost hit that mark, but

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:34.920
<v Speaker 1>those eight we're it for Jacksonville as a team. No

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 1>other team had had a WOUN player carry the ball

0:37:38.640 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 1>inside the five. It's all about the past for Jacksonville.

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:44.760
<v Speaker 1>It's Gardner, Minshew or bust. That's it. That is it again.

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:47.359
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about the things you need to know from

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:50.440
<v Speaker 1>every team when they're inside the five yard line, because

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that's where fantasy points come from. That's where the touchdowns

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:57.239
<v Speaker 1>are easiest, and the great fantasy players score from inside

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>the five. We've got a final handful of team to

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 1>talk through, including the Baltimore Ravens. The Ravens ran the

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:07.240
<v Speaker 1>ball inside the five more than any team thirty five times.

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 1>But I know what you're thinking. Lamar Jackson must have

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 1>been the reason why. Uh, He's only siphoned off seven

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of the thirty five carries. The rest went to running

0:38:16.280 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 1>backs Ravens. Still, even if you take out Lamar Jackson,

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens ran the fifth most rushes inside the five,

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>even without the seven from Lamar Jackson. Mark Ingram had

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 1>sixteen carries for eight touchdowns. Right at that mark. We

0:38:31.239 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 1>want to see the guy who's brutal Gus Edwards eight tries,

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:39.319
<v Speaker 1>zero touchdowns. That tells me J. K. Dobbins will get

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:41.719
<v Speaker 1>those same eight carries and he'll convert them to more

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:45.360
<v Speaker 1>than zero touchdowns. Ingram is a must target for me

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and guillotine leagues right now. Soft early schedule and that

0:38:48.880 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of usage early on the season. Yeah, I like

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the way that sounds. Um. I know we're only doing

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:56.840
<v Speaker 1>one thing for every team, but I'll mention this. We

0:38:56.880 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 1>have a little spare time here. Do you guys know

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 1>which raven lead the team in targets from inside the five?

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean you think it's Mark Andrews since he scored

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a ton, correct, And it is not Mark Andrews, Okay

0:39:08.960 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 1>aiden Hurst or Nick Boyle, Nick Boyle, Nick freaking boil

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and and he's still there. That's the package they use

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 1>that Nick Boyle actually plays. That's right, that's the boiled package.

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I think I'd rather be boiled. Let's go to our

0:39:23.440 --> 0:39:27.000
<v Speaker 1>final couple of teams. The Chicago Bears man David Montgomery

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:30.400
<v Speaker 1>had the third most carries in the league from inside

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the five. That's a lot for a guy who's not

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:36.279
<v Speaker 1>good at it. Yeah, he only converted five of them

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:38.920
<v Speaker 1>into touchdowns. That's the exact same amount as Joe Mixon

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:43.480
<v Speaker 1>um but they have no other option. And Mitchell true

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Bisky the sad trombone ski himself. He only completed seven

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 1>passes inside the five last year. That's very sad trombone Ski. Yep,

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that's that sounds really sad. That's our guy right there.

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:06.879
<v Speaker 1>It's it's not a It's not a real competition, is it.

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:10.840
<v Speaker 1>It shouldn't been Nick Foles and Sky. It can't be.

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I believe our final team is the Los Angeles Chargers

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Black l a C. So take Melvin Gordon's fifteen attempts

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:22.800
<v Speaker 1>inside the five last year, add them to Austin Ekelers

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 1>already existing nine nine times for Ekeler inside the five.

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 1>But no, that's that's my fault. I was slow. It's okay.

0:40:30.719 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't expecting to pull that off the cuff. But

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:34.919
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of usage inside the five yard line.

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 1>And of course, no more Melvin Gordon. So Austin Ekeler,

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:40.919
<v Speaker 1>We've said it here before, RB his potential, his name

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:42.680
<v Speaker 1>may come up again later in this show is his

0:40:42.800 --> 0:40:45.320
<v Speaker 1>name will for sure come up in the next segment.

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 1>How did we get through an entire segment? Of inside

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the five talk without vulture, the fantasy vulture. It's been

0:40:56.480 --> 0:41:00.800
<v Speaker 1>so long we have missed you, fantasy vulture. Have I?

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:05.319
<v Speaker 1>I have I missed the fantasy. Never of the birds

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:08.560
<v Speaker 1>in the fantasy community, the peacock is it's the preferred

0:41:08.600 --> 0:41:11.359
<v Speaker 1>we do. We have. We prefer the peacock because it's

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 1>usually good things have happened for us. But how about

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a little a J. Dillon. There you go, Dillon Fantasy

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:24.279
<v Speaker 1>vulture time could very well be the case. Um, while

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:28.880
<v Speaker 1>we're talking inside the five and refreshed listeners, memory Brian,

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 1>which team has run the ball more than any other

0:41:32.800 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 1>over the last three years? The New England Patriots, the Pats.

0:41:38.760 --> 0:41:45.120
<v Speaker 1>The highest drafted Patriots running back is James White. We

0:41:45.120 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 1>don't believe James White's gonna get those carries. After that,

0:41:48.880 --> 0:41:51.279
<v Speaker 1>it falls all the way to Sony Michelle at pick

0:41:51.400 --> 0:41:55.640
<v Speaker 1>one hundred eleven. Now, nobody has been harder on Sony

0:41:55.680 --> 0:42:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Walkman than I have. But oh no, all you have

0:42:01.360 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to do if you're gonna get that many carries from

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:06.160
<v Speaker 1>inside the five, all you have to do is fall forward.

0:42:06.200 --> 0:42:09.879
<v Speaker 1>For Pizze, Remember when you could fall forward and get

0:42:09.920 --> 0:42:13.239
<v Speaker 1>three yards? That was your nine tall new Ball have

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of carries, Sony Michelle. Would you rather have

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Sony Michelle going off the board at one hundred eleven,

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:25.800
<v Speaker 1>knowing there's all these carries coming for Patriots runners or

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Damien Harris, who many people, many people believe could end

0:42:31.520 --> 0:42:34.360
<v Speaker 1>up winning that job. There's a very notable and maybe

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and Harris is going off the board at one hundred.

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll take Lamar Miller. I will Lamar Miller's going off

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the board to pick two twenty four. I'm just gonna

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:49.399
<v Speaker 1>take James White. You can't take James I'm not gonna

0:42:49.400 --> 0:42:52.400
<v Speaker 1>get gold. I'm not I'm not taking In all fairness,

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:54.919
<v Speaker 1>in the past, there was Tom Brady, right, and Cam

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:58.719
<v Speaker 1>Newton kind of been a vulture inside the five for

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:02.880
<v Speaker 1>his running backs in the past. So now Lashawn McCoy

0:43:02.960 --> 0:43:05.920
<v Speaker 1>over his career switching gears. The Shawn McCoy over his

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:10.200
<v Speaker 1>career has been a major goal line factor. He was so,

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 1>he was so with the Eagles, he was so with

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bills, and then even in Kansas City last year.

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Now is he a potential guy to muck up the

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:26.200
<v Speaker 1>works in Tampa? Lashawn McCoy, No, only if it's snowing.

0:43:26.320 --> 0:43:29.600
<v Speaker 1>No one plays better than the snow. You know, I

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think it snows in Tampa a whole lot or

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:34.759
<v Speaker 1>anywhere else in the NFC South. If you're Bruce Arians

0:43:34.880 --> 0:43:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and you're looking at Ronald Jones and a rookie and

0:43:37.480 --> 0:43:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Keyshawn Vaughan and here is the veteran hands of Lashawn McCoy,

0:43:43.400 --> 0:43:45.719
<v Speaker 1>I could be that could be a sneaky situation that

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:49.240
<v Speaker 1>could end up torpedoing some of the value for Ronald Jones.

0:43:49.560 --> 0:43:53.399
<v Speaker 1>This conversation makes me uncomfortable. It's Dario, He's the guy

0:43:53.440 --> 0:43:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to own in Dampa Bay. It might be maybe he's

0:43:56.520 --> 0:44:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the new James White. Maybe that's James White South. We

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:03.319
<v Speaker 1>come back to Fantasy Football Weekly. Three tough questions you

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:04.880
<v Speaker 1>can play along see if you can go three and

0:44:04.920 --> 0:44:08.359
<v Speaker 1>oh and if you want to try out a guillotine league,

0:44:08.360 --> 0:44:11.399
<v Speaker 1>go to guillotine leagues dot Com. Play with seventeen other people.

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Try to be the last man standing when we cut

0:44:13.440 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a team every week of the season and send that

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 1>team's roster the waiver wire, where you get too bid

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:21.520
<v Speaker 1>on an entire roster of players. Guillotine leagues dot Com.

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Paul Charchy and Brian Johnson Matt Harrison with you back

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:48.080
<v Speaker 1>in moments. It's three tough questions on Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:44:49.320 --> 0:44:51.920
<v Speaker 1>This is where I Pepper my co host Brian Johnson

0:44:52.360 --> 0:44:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and Matt Harrison with three tough questions. That's the name

0:44:56.480 --> 0:44:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of the segment. You've got a dog name Pepper. Two.

0:44:58.840 --> 0:45:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I also have a dog name. Well, yeah, that's that's

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:05.279
<v Speaker 1>a long story. So that's that's tricky. We won't get

0:45:05.280 --> 0:45:07.759
<v Speaker 1>into it. Let's probably people probably don't want to hear

0:45:07.760 --> 0:45:12.000
<v Speaker 1>about my dog. Um. Yes, these are three tough questions.

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:13.640
<v Speaker 1>We encourage you to play along. See if you can

0:45:13.680 --> 0:45:17.640
<v Speaker 1>go three and oh with these tough question Number one

0:45:17.920 --> 0:45:21.600
<v Speaker 1>this year, what is the viability of an auction strategy

0:45:21.680 --> 0:45:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that refuses to bid more than on any player? Brian? Wait,

0:45:28.280 --> 0:45:33.799
<v Speaker 1>you're letting Brian go first. Um, what's envision? We're working

0:45:33.800 --> 0:45:36.279
<v Speaker 1>with a hundred dollar budget. That's the easiest math, at

0:45:36.320 --> 0:45:39.439
<v Speaker 1>least for me. You're not spending any more than nine

0:45:39.800 --> 0:45:43.239
<v Speaker 1>dollars on a player. Sounds about right, Brian. Um, so

0:45:44.000 --> 0:45:47.439
<v Speaker 1>this sounds like a good strategy when it comes to quarterbacks,

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:51.000
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers and tight ends. This is like the deepest

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:56.440
<v Speaker 1>pool of players I can remember amongst those dudes. But man,

0:45:57.520 --> 0:45:59.399
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of running backs out there, and

0:45:59.719 --> 0:46:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you gotta get at least one stud Bell cow in

0:46:02.680 --> 0:46:05.840
<v Speaker 1>your auction this year. And really I'm getting too and

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:10.000
<v Speaker 1>then just buying whatever I can because again, quarterbacks, wide

0:46:10.000 --> 0:46:12.000
<v Speaker 1>receivers and tight ends are so deep. So but to

0:46:12.160 --> 0:46:17.360
<v Speaker 1>land Christian McCaffrey even down to a Joe Mixing or

0:46:17.640 --> 0:46:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Josh Jacobs, you're talking thirty bucks in an auction. So no,

0:46:21.640 --> 0:46:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I I can't limit myself to uh cap per player

0:46:26.120 --> 0:46:30.560
<v Speaker 1>in auctions this year. Okay, Matt should auction? Should auction?

0:46:30.640 --> 0:46:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Is it a viable auction strategy to refuse a bit

0:46:33.520 --> 0:46:35.920
<v Speaker 1>more for any player? I feel like I have a

0:46:35.920 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 1>better chance of getting it right if I just agree

0:46:38.200 --> 0:46:40.000
<v Speaker 1>with my co host who in front of me, because

0:46:40.040 --> 0:46:42.759
<v Speaker 1>that's how it worked last week that week. I was

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:48.600
<v Speaker 1>not on the show last week. Yeah, okay, thanks um.

0:46:48.960 --> 0:46:51.400
<v Speaker 1>On my Shock Fantasy Redraft cheat sheet, I only have

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:54.840
<v Speaker 1>thirteen running backs and five wide receivers that nineteen dollars

0:46:54.880 --> 0:46:59.160
<v Speaker 1>or more than a cap. So if you're fine with

0:46:59.280 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 1>going into are with running backs like Jonathan Taylor, who

0:47:02.560 --> 0:47:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I like, Chris Carson Levy on Bell Leonard Fournett, David Johnson,

0:47:06.760 --> 0:47:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley as your top running back options. Then you're okay,

0:47:10.480 --> 0:47:12.759
<v Speaker 1>But personally, I'm not okay with that. I want at

0:47:12.840 --> 0:47:16.120
<v Speaker 1>least two the running backs that are over that threshold.

0:47:16.400 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm fine going with under ninetent at every other position,

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:21.160
<v Speaker 1>but not for running back. Oh, there's so many good

0:47:21.239 --> 0:47:23.440
<v Speaker 1>running backs. You guys are wrong. This is a perfect

0:47:23.520 --> 0:47:26.279
<v Speaker 1>vival strategy. There are so many good running backs in

0:47:26.280 --> 0:47:28.399
<v Speaker 1>that range. You identified some of them right there. I'm

0:47:28.440 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 1>happy to go to war with those guys. I'll go

0:47:30.040 --> 0:47:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to war with Rheem Mostert and James White and Leonard

0:47:32.440 --> 0:47:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Fournette and of course to the opposite. Absolutely we can

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:39.359
<v Speaker 1>do that, and nineteen dollars goes a long way. At

0:47:39.360 --> 0:47:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the other positions. At n I'm I'm looking at some

0:47:43.120 --> 0:47:46.200
<v Speaker 1>good wide receivers. I'm looking at maybe a Chris Godwin

0:47:46.280 --> 0:47:48.279
<v Speaker 1>or an A J. Brown or a Kenny Golladay. At

0:47:48.360 --> 0:47:51.239
<v Speaker 1>nine percent, I can get star players and all I

0:47:51.320 --> 0:47:53.920
<v Speaker 1>have to do is have second or second and a

0:47:53.960 --> 0:47:56.120
<v Speaker 1>half tier runners. That's an easy trade off to make.

0:47:56.560 --> 0:47:59.879
<v Speaker 1>It's the deepest draft I've ever seen, and you could

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:05.879
<v Speaker 1>absolutely perform a successful auction strategy that refused a bid

0:48:05.880 --> 0:48:10.759
<v Speaker 1>more tough question Number two. If I told you a

0:48:10.880 --> 0:48:14.200
<v Speaker 1>running back currently outside of the top ten by average

0:48:14.280 --> 0:48:19.000
<v Speaker 1>draft position would finish number one in Fantasy points at

0:48:19.000 --> 0:48:23.920
<v Speaker 1>his position, who would it be, Matt Well, you know,

0:48:23.960 --> 0:48:26.919
<v Speaker 1>it's Austin Ekeler, who's currently the thirteenth running back off

0:48:26.920 --> 0:48:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the board. And I gave you a bunch of stats

0:48:28.800 --> 0:48:31.040
<v Speaker 1>about this over the last two weeks. But here's a

0:48:31.040 --> 0:48:33.800
<v Speaker 1>couple of more that you might not have heard. Tyrod

0:48:33.840 --> 0:48:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Taylor's career average depth of target is in the nines.

0:48:37.040 --> 0:48:40.120
<v Speaker 1>When he was in Buffalo, LA, Shawn McCoy was seventh

0:48:40.120 --> 0:48:44.440
<v Speaker 1>in the league and running back receptions and sixteen he

0:48:44.480 --> 0:48:49.680
<v Speaker 1>was injured for most. Outside of CMCs otherworldly receiving stats,

0:48:49.719 --> 0:48:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Austin Ekeler had the second most targets in the league

0:48:52.160 --> 0:48:54.239
<v Speaker 1>last season among running backs with a hundred and four,

0:48:54.680 --> 0:48:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and Melvin Gordon had fifty two targets and those are

0:48:57.120 --> 0:49:00.960
<v Speaker 1>vacated targets. Ekeler led the running backs in the league

0:49:01.000 --> 0:49:04.560
<v Speaker 1>in forty plus yard receptions with three. He trailed McCaffrey

0:49:04.600 --> 0:49:09.719
<v Speaker 1>by only twelve receiving yards, and he topped CMCs touchdown

0:49:09.719 --> 0:49:13.080
<v Speaker 1>total with eight receiving touchdowns to McCaffrey's four. His average

0:49:13.120 --> 0:49:16.120
<v Speaker 1>depth of target, by the way, was one point to one.

0:49:16.760 --> 0:49:20.799
<v Speaker 1>His average yards per catch was ten point eight. Let

0:49:20.880 --> 0:49:23.840
<v Speaker 1>that sink in for a little bit. That's very impressive.

0:49:24.239 --> 0:49:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Austin Ekeler is your answer, Brian. If there's one running

0:49:27.280 --> 0:49:29.360
<v Speaker 1>back currently outside of the top ten that's going to

0:49:29.400 --> 0:49:32.520
<v Speaker 1>finish number one among all running backs, who is it?

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:35.919
<v Speaker 1>Ekeler certainly came to mind. Kenyan Drake was another guy.

0:49:36.000 --> 0:49:38.839
<v Speaker 1>Josh Jacobs I like, but I'm just gonna go with

0:49:38.920 --> 0:49:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Taylor of the Colts, who who ranked uh seventh

0:49:43.040 --> 0:49:45.040
<v Speaker 1>last year with a hundred and thirty three rushing yards

0:49:45.080 --> 0:49:47.560
<v Speaker 1>per game with a very pedestrian Marlon Mack and then

0:49:47.560 --> 0:49:50.880
<v Speaker 1>even Jonathan Williams late in the season. This is just

0:49:51.040 --> 0:49:54.879
<v Speaker 1>the ideal landing spot for Taylor. If Mac wasn't a thing,

0:49:55.320 --> 0:49:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Taylor would be a first round pick right now. You

0:49:58.040 --> 0:50:00.960
<v Speaker 1>might be going before c e H and uh. Really,

0:50:01.280 --> 0:50:03.879
<v Speaker 1>Taylor is gonna push Mac out of the picture sooner

0:50:03.920 --> 0:50:07.280
<v Speaker 1>than later. And the Colts running backs have the number

0:50:07.320 --> 0:50:11.400
<v Speaker 1>one strength of schedule for fantasy football. I mean the

0:50:11.440 --> 0:50:15.240
<v Speaker 1>two games against the Jaguars alone, Taylor is gonna finished

0:50:15.280 --> 0:50:20.120
<v Speaker 1>like RB on those numbers. So I'm feeling shades of

0:50:20.400 --> 0:50:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Marshall Falk as a rookie as a cult my first

0:50:23.040 --> 0:50:26.000
<v Speaker 1>year playing fantasy football. By the way, Marshall Falk is

0:50:26.000 --> 0:50:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a rookie led me to a title, and that's what

0:50:28.239 --> 0:50:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Taylor is gonna do. The correct answer is Austin Neckler.

0:50:33.719 --> 0:50:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Um Matt's already stolen so much thunder on Austin Neckler,

0:50:36.800 --> 0:50:39.080
<v Speaker 1>not just this show, but also prior shows. But let

0:50:39.080 --> 0:50:41.520
<v Speaker 1>me just remind people of his four games last year

0:50:41.520 --> 0:50:46.320
<v Speaker 1>without Melvin Gordon. Week one one hundred sixty five yards,

0:50:46.600 --> 0:50:51.160
<v Speaker 1>three touchdowns, eighteen total touches. We two frost to Neckler

0:50:51.280 --> 0:50:55.840
<v Speaker 1>last year one hundred twenty three yards, a touchdown, twenty

0:50:55.880 --> 0:51:01.640
<v Speaker 1>three touches. Week four, his bad game is eighty yards,

0:51:01.640 --> 0:51:05.319
<v Speaker 1>no touchdowns and only sixteen touches. And then in Week four,

0:51:05.360 --> 0:51:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the last game without Melvin Gordon, one twenty two total yards,

0:51:09.840 --> 0:51:14.399
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns and twenty three combo touches. If that's week

0:51:14.440 --> 0:51:18.399
<v Speaker 1>got anything like that coming for Austin Ekeler, he will

0:51:18.440 --> 0:51:22.600
<v Speaker 1>be the top scoring running back outside of the top ten.

0:51:24.480 --> 0:51:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Tough question number three. If I told you a wide

0:51:28.000 --> 0:51:30.840
<v Speaker 1>receiver currently outside of the top ten at his position

0:51:30.880 --> 0:51:33.680
<v Speaker 1>would finish number one in fantasy points. It is this season?

0:51:34.320 --> 0:51:38.919
<v Speaker 1>Who would it be? Brian Odell Beckham came to mind.

0:51:39.120 --> 0:51:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh I said, there's a lot of competition for targets

0:51:41.400 --> 0:51:44.759
<v Speaker 1>there um with Jarvis Landry, Austin Hooper and then the

0:51:44.800 --> 0:51:47.719
<v Speaker 1>two elite running backs also Allan Robinson I like, but

0:51:48.160 --> 0:51:51.480
<v Speaker 1>those quarterbacks in Chicago are absolute trash. So I'm not

0:51:51.520 --> 0:51:55.880
<v Speaker 1>liking a rob I'm going deeper and Matt no one

0:51:55.920 --> 0:51:57.520
<v Speaker 1>can see him. We should take a picture. At least

0:51:57.520 --> 0:52:00.440
<v Speaker 1>he's dressed like a blonde. Gardner minshore. I'll put the

0:52:00.520 --> 0:52:03.400
<v Speaker 1>mustache onto alright, and Art can take I'll take a

0:52:03.480 --> 0:52:07.480
<v Speaker 1>picture of this is this is thrilling radio of the mind.

0:52:07.920 --> 0:52:11.920
<v Speaker 1>And Uh it's DJ. It's DJ Shark, who is going

0:52:12.000 --> 0:52:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to be an absolute target. Hog could push two hundred

0:52:15.120 --> 0:52:17.520
<v Speaker 1>targets if he stays healthy. And when he was healthy

0:52:17.560 --> 0:52:20.479
<v Speaker 1>in weeks one through nine last season, he was wide

0:52:20.480 --> 0:52:24.239
<v Speaker 1>receiver three overall. And again love Gardner mintrew the the

0:52:24.320 --> 0:52:27.520
<v Speaker 1>third rated UH passer on passes of twenty plus yards

0:52:27.560 --> 0:52:31.879
<v Speaker 1>last season. He can play and Jacksonville, is this gonna

0:52:31.880 --> 0:52:34.440
<v Speaker 1>be chasing points all day long? Gonna pass the ball

0:52:34.560 --> 0:52:38.839
<v Speaker 1>seventy at the time. So I'm going deep. DJ char

0:52:39.080 --> 0:52:41.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, d J Chark. That's it's a quality angle

0:52:41.840 --> 0:52:43.520
<v Speaker 1>for a team that's gonna be playing from behind all

0:52:43.600 --> 0:52:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the time. Matt. If I told you a wide receiver

0:52:46.880 --> 0:52:49.920
<v Speaker 1>currently outside the top ten would finish number one in

0:52:50.040 --> 0:52:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy points at his position, who would it be? Well,

0:52:53.480 --> 0:52:56.879
<v Speaker 1>Brian's not wrong, but he's a little wrong. Um, he's

0:52:56.880 --> 0:52:59.440
<v Speaker 1>not wrong, He's just not right. It's A J. Brown,

0:52:59.560 --> 0:53:03.040
<v Speaker 1>who uh currently the sixteenth wide receiver off the board.

0:53:03.040 --> 0:53:06.120
<v Speaker 1>He finished eight in Fantasy points last year, and he

0:53:06.200 --> 0:53:09.880
<v Speaker 1>only had eighty four targets. The players who finished better

0:53:09.920 --> 0:53:13.319
<v Speaker 1>than him as a wide receiver last year averaged one

0:53:13.400 --> 0:53:17.959
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty seven targets. So let's play the extrapolation game.

0:53:18.160 --> 0:53:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we need some like game show music here,

0:53:20.640 --> 0:53:31.319
<v Speaker 1>like extrapolation game. Yeah, here it is WHOA at the time?

0:53:31.320 --> 0:53:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Machines as close as I've got. So let's give A J.

0:53:34.520 --> 0:53:37.759
<v Speaker 1>Brown a hundred and thirty seven targets. At last year's averages,

0:53:38.640 --> 0:53:42.640
<v Speaker 1>he'd come up with eighty five receptions seventeen hundred yards

0:53:42.719 --> 0:53:45.799
<v Speaker 1>and thirteen touchdowns seventeen hundred yards would be very good.

0:53:45.920 --> 0:53:48.759
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas finished with a hundred and forty nine receptions,

0:53:48.760 --> 0:53:52.239
<v Speaker 1>seventy five yards and nine scores. So if you give

0:53:52.280 --> 0:53:54.400
<v Speaker 1>A J. Brown the opportunity, he could definitely do it.

0:53:54.440 --> 0:53:56.479
<v Speaker 1>So here's the thing that almost came out of my mouth.

0:53:57.160 --> 0:53:59.840
<v Speaker 1>A J. Brown's no Michael Thomas, but you know what

0:54:00.360 --> 0:54:02.560
<v Speaker 1>he might be might be Michael Thomas. I mean, you

0:54:02.600 --> 0:54:06.440
<v Speaker 1>know he had an astounding rookie year. He might be

0:54:06.640 --> 0:54:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas for all we know. But it's the wrong answer.

0:54:12.400 --> 0:54:14.719
<v Speaker 1>You got the first one right, which is great. Cooper Cup,

0:54:15.400 --> 0:54:19.360
<v Speaker 1>last year's wide receiver four, who for whatever reason, is

0:54:19.360 --> 0:54:23.960
<v Speaker 1>going off the board as wide receiver fifteen. I'm baffled

0:54:23.960 --> 0:54:27.360
<v Speaker 1>by this. So here he is last year wide receiver

0:54:27.480 --> 0:54:31.840
<v Speaker 1>for in a bad year for Jared Goff. He was

0:54:32.160 --> 0:54:36.640
<v Speaker 1>second last year in touchdowns among wide receivers. He was

0:54:36.800 --> 0:54:39.360
<v Speaker 1>number one last year in red zone targets. So clearly

0:54:39.400 --> 0:54:41.080
<v Speaker 1>they trust him near the stripe. But as we just

0:54:41.120 --> 0:54:43.880
<v Speaker 1>talked about for the prior to segments, we love the

0:54:43.880 --> 0:54:49.120
<v Speaker 1>easy touchdowns near the goal line. That's re replicatable. On

0:54:49.280 --> 0:54:52.600
<v Speaker 1>old of this. For Cooper Cup, last year was his

0:54:52.719 --> 0:54:56.040
<v Speaker 1>first year off a c L surgery. He's got room

0:54:56.120 --> 0:54:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to be even better this year. Rams offensive lines improved

0:54:59.560 --> 0:55:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Jared Off, who, to Matt's credit, he recognized a wobbly

0:55:03.960 --> 0:55:06.600
<v Speaker 1>season as it was happening early in the year with

0:55:06.680 --> 0:55:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Jared Goff. I think Golf without all the pressure of

0:55:09.160 --> 0:55:12.239
<v Speaker 1>the new contract, has a better season, and Cooper cup

0:55:12.280 --> 0:55:14.560
<v Speaker 1>could easily go from wide receiver four last year to

0:55:14.640 --> 0:55:19.600
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver one this year. Or Goff's not good, I

0:55:19.719 --> 0:55:22.439
<v Speaker 1>can't rule that out frankly at this point, but I

0:55:22.480 --> 0:55:25.480
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna be all right. I think he's gonna

0:55:25.480 --> 0:55:28.360
<v Speaker 1>be okay. If you're starting a franchise right now, do

0:55:28.360 --> 0:55:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you want Jared Goff or Gardner Minshew? The fact that

0:55:33.640 --> 0:55:36.319
<v Speaker 1>you have to pause is not a good side. If

0:55:36.360 --> 0:55:39.279
<v Speaker 1>I if I have to work the contract in to

0:55:39.320 --> 0:55:42.120
<v Speaker 1>mens you for sure, but at the same cost it

0:55:42.160 --> 0:55:44.360
<v Speaker 1>would be it would be Jared Goff. How when we

0:55:44.400 --> 0:55:50.480
<v Speaker 1>come back players whom we like, we like the player

0:55:50.960 --> 0:55:55.120
<v Speaker 1>we hate the average draft position. These are players we

0:55:55.200 --> 0:55:58.239
<v Speaker 1>never end up drafting, but we still like them. Will

0:55:58.280 --> 0:56:01.000
<v Speaker 1>identify one at every position and weekend Back to Fantasy

0:56:01.000 --> 0:56:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. Welcome back to Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Ciargie

0:56:24.520 --> 0:56:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and from Guillotine leagues dot Com, Brian Johnson Guillotine Leagues

0:56:28.160 --> 0:56:31.080
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, and Matt Harrison tell people what's happening at

0:56:31.160 --> 0:56:35.680
<v Speaker 1>chock Fantasy Shock Fantasy cheat sheets, visuals, dashboards, everything you

0:56:35.760 --> 0:56:38.719
<v Speaker 1>need for your fantasy league and your draft coming up.

0:56:39.360 --> 0:56:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Uh twenty bucks for the full year if you use

0:56:42.320 --> 0:56:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the promo code f f W. That stands for Fantasy

0:56:46.040 --> 0:56:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly and this is the last week for that

0:56:49.160 --> 0:56:51.960
<v Speaker 1>promo code, so get in now, all right. These are

0:56:52.080 --> 0:56:56.160
<v Speaker 1>players that we like, players we like, but players we

0:56:56.280 --> 0:56:59.360
<v Speaker 1>never draft because we don't like the average draft position.

0:56:59.719 --> 0:57:02.279
<v Speaker 1>So a little bit different than just wow, I never

0:57:02.360 --> 0:57:05.239
<v Speaker 1>take that guy because he sucks. These are players who

0:57:05.280 --> 0:57:08.280
<v Speaker 1>are good players, but just where they're going in drafts

0:57:08.320 --> 0:57:12.839
<v Speaker 1>means we're not biting there. Matt, I would like I

0:57:12.880 --> 0:57:14.800
<v Speaker 1>would like you to begin, oh thank you. At the

0:57:14.840 --> 0:57:17.840
<v Speaker 1>quarterback position, who is the quarterback that you like but

0:57:17.920 --> 0:57:21.240
<v Speaker 1>hate the adp Kyler Murray in the sixth round. And

0:57:21.280 --> 0:57:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you can really put a bunch of names in this category,

0:57:23.640 --> 0:57:26.400
<v Speaker 1>like Dak Russell, Wilson, Shaun Watson, because this is more

0:57:26.440 --> 0:57:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of a philosophy thing. If you don't get Mahomes or

0:57:29.080 --> 0:57:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't get Lamar Jackson, in the early rounds, you

0:57:31.080 --> 0:57:35.360
<v Speaker 1>might as well wait. In ESPN scoring, Lamar Jackson scored

0:57:35.360 --> 0:57:38.320
<v Speaker 1>almost eighty more points last year than the next quarterback,

0:57:38.600 --> 0:57:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and Mahomes basically did the exact same thing in the

0:57:41.360 --> 0:57:45.040
<v Speaker 1>prior year in both cases. After that, there's a large

0:57:45.040 --> 0:57:47.800
<v Speaker 1>group of players in a really big tier together, so

0:57:47.880 --> 0:57:50.520
<v Speaker 1>there's not much of a difference between number two and

0:57:50.640 --> 0:57:54.640
<v Speaker 1>number fifteen on your list. So Matt Ryan, Ben Roethlisberger,

0:57:54.640 --> 0:57:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers, Jared Goff, and Josh Allen are all being

0:57:58.200 --> 0:58:00.680
<v Speaker 1>drafted outside the top five quarterback acts and the top

0:58:00.720 --> 0:58:04.200
<v Speaker 1>six rounds, but all have finished his top eight quarterbacks

0:58:04.200 --> 0:58:07.600
<v Speaker 1>in just the last two years, so there's consistently really

0:58:07.640 --> 0:58:10.560
<v Speaker 1>good quarterbacks to be had late. While Kyler Murray's trending up,

0:58:10.920 --> 0:58:12.880
<v Speaker 1>he's not the runner that Lamar Jackson is and he

0:58:12.920 --> 0:58:15.040
<v Speaker 1>never will be. And he's not the passer that Mahomes

0:58:15.120 --> 0:58:16.840
<v Speaker 1>is and he never will be. And if you're not

0:58:16.880 --> 0:58:19.640
<v Speaker 1>exceptional one of those two, you're probably not gonna outscore

0:58:19.680 --> 0:58:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the quarterbacks by eighty points. Brian, who

0:58:22.440 --> 0:58:25.120
<v Speaker 1>is the quarterback you like but hate the A D

0:58:25.280 --> 0:58:27.920
<v Speaker 1>p uh. Those that know me might be shocked here.

0:58:27.960 --> 0:58:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I like Daniel Jones from a fantasy perspective right now

0:58:31.280 --> 0:58:34.480
<v Speaker 1>going off the board at quarterback twelve. But the opening

0:58:34.560 --> 0:58:38.280
<v Speaker 1>four weeks are just absolutely brutal, brutal, brutal for Daniel,

0:58:38.320 --> 0:58:40.000
<v Speaker 1>so I do not want to draft him. I'll trade

0:58:40.000 --> 0:58:42.080
<v Speaker 1>for him later in the year. But he opens with Pittsburgh.

0:58:42.240 --> 0:58:45.240
<v Speaker 1>We only allowed twenty three passing touchdowns last year. Six

0:58:45.280 --> 0:58:47.160
<v Speaker 1>were in the first two games. That was before they

0:58:47.160 --> 0:58:50.360
<v Speaker 1>acquired Minca Minca Fitzpatrick. And then they get the Bears

0:58:50.400 --> 0:58:52.960
<v Speaker 1>only allowed seventeen passing touchdowns, then the forty Niners and

0:58:53.000 --> 0:58:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the Rams Rams obviously acquired Jalen Ramsey uh midpoint of

0:58:57.600 --> 0:59:00.600
<v Speaker 1>last season. That's just just an awful off stretch and

0:59:00.640 --> 0:59:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I want no part of Daniel Jones as my starting

0:59:02.960 --> 0:59:04.560
<v Speaker 1>quarterback for those for us four weeks, so I will

0:59:04.560 --> 0:59:06.919
<v Speaker 1>not draft him, but I will trade for him later.

0:59:07.240 --> 0:59:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I've got the player I like but hate the average

0:59:09.520 --> 0:59:13.080
<v Speaker 1>draft position at quarterback is Dak Prescott, who I like

0:59:13.240 --> 0:59:17.240
<v Speaker 1>very much. He's my number three ranked quarterback. I like him.

0:59:17.320 --> 0:59:20.720
<v Speaker 1>They got weapons everywhere, including the new wide receiver Ceedee Lamb,

0:59:20.760 --> 0:59:23.439
<v Speaker 1>breakout candidate tight end Blake Jarwin, and we talked about

0:59:23.600 --> 0:59:27.080
<v Speaker 1>last week but he just to Matt's point, he doesn't

0:59:27.080 --> 0:59:30.240
<v Speaker 1>have the Jackson Mahomes crazy upside, and I can get

0:59:30.280 --> 0:59:32.800
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks a lot like Dak Prescott a lot later like

0:59:32.840 --> 0:59:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan, four rounds later. So I'm not taking Dak Prescott,

0:59:37.960 --> 0:59:40.440
<v Speaker 1>even though I like him a lot. Matt. Let's go

0:59:40.440 --> 0:59:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to the running back position. Who is the running back

0:59:42.640 --> 0:59:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you like but hate the average draft position? It's Cam

0:59:46.040 --> 0:59:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Akers in the fifth round and last week, Uh, Malcolm

0:59:49.040 --> 0:59:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Brown is my sleeper the week because two things. Basically,

0:59:52.360 --> 0:59:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the Rams run a ton inside the red zone and

0:59:54.600 --> 0:59:57.840
<v Speaker 1>a ton inside the infrared zone, and Todd Gurley vacated

0:59:57.840 --> 1:00:00.120
<v Speaker 1>a ton of those touches. But Malcolm Brown is really

1:00:00.400 --> 1:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>good with the touches. He had again eight carries from

1:00:02.920 --> 1:00:06.040
<v Speaker 1>inside the five with five scores. So you're trying to

1:00:06.080 --> 1:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>trust a rookie running back who's a good player, you

1:00:08.920 --> 1:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>gotta take him in the fifth round. He's got a

1:00:11.320 --> 1:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>questionable goal line workload at best, and a backfield that

1:00:15.120 --> 1:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>is three or four deep. So I'm not taking Cam

1:00:17.400 --> 1:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Akers at all. Alright, cam Akers, actually I like the player.

1:00:21.280 --> 1:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just a bad landing spot for him

1:00:23.440 --> 1:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>right now. Okay, Brian who is the running back that

1:00:25.720 --> 1:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>you like but hate the average draft position. I really

1:00:28.800 --> 1:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>don't want to draft Nick Chubb this year, even though

1:00:30.960 --> 1:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I love him as a player. Right now going around

1:00:33.240 --> 1:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>eleventh overall as r B eight. I've already harped on

1:00:35.840 --> 1:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the red zone inefficiency from last year. That should improve

1:00:38.840 --> 1:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>with an improved line and probably some bad luck for

1:00:41.200 --> 1:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Chub last year. But I just cannot get past the

1:00:44.640 --> 1:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>fact that I think Kareem hunt is better than Nick Chubb.

1:00:48.160 --> 1:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubb's elite, but Kareem Hunts just a little bit

1:00:51.480 --> 1:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>elite tour and uh, guys like going the same range,

1:00:55.760 --> 1:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>like Josh Jacobs, Kenyan Drake, Austin Ekeler, There's not that

1:01:01.400 --> 1:01:05.320
<v Speaker 1>threat wooming behind of Kenyan Drake might have a sneaky threat.

1:01:06.280 --> 1:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Chase Edmonds is a real threat. You're correct there, I

1:01:09.320 --> 1:01:12.040
<v Speaker 1>retract that one. But that leads me into my guy.

1:01:12.640 --> 1:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>If I can transition to Kenyon Drake, who is the

1:01:15.560 --> 1:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>player I like but I hate his average draft position.

1:01:18.440 --> 1:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>He is going in the second round is running back

1:01:21.120 --> 1:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>nine good player? But does anybody think Kenyan Drake is

1:01:24.920 --> 1:01:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a great player filled with highlight reel game breaking ability.

1:01:30.520 --> 1:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>In the mid second round, I can get Lamar Jackson

1:01:32.800 --> 1:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>or Tyreek Hiller Austin Ekeler, who are just simply better explosive,

1:01:37.240 --> 1:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>highlights style players. And then the whole Chase Edmonds thing.

1:01:40.520 --> 1:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>It really worries me. Cliff. This week, head coach Cliff

1:01:44.040 --> 1:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Kingsbury said he's got two starting caliber runners. I don't

1:01:48.880 --> 1:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>want to hear that from about my second round pick.

1:01:50.800 --> 1:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>You kind of pooh pooed me last week on Chase

1:01:53.000 --> 1:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Edmonds just a little bit. I think I was just

1:01:56.040 --> 1:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>in the mood to poop who you don't take. Okay, yeah,

1:01:58.040 --> 1:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that was probably last week. Let's go to the wide

1:02:00.400 --> 1:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>receiver position, Matt who is the receiver you like but

1:02:03.600 --> 1:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>hate the average draft position. I'm staying with the same team.

1:02:06.000 --> 1:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>It's Robert Woods who you have to take in the

1:02:07.800 --> 1:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>fourth round. While the Rams passed at the seventh highest

1:02:11.160 --> 1:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>clip in the league last year, they were all very,

1:02:14.320 --> 1:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>very short, very safe throws. Jared Goff's average depth of

1:02:18.120 --> 1:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>target was eight point zero yards last year. That was

1:02:21.560 --> 1:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty six in the league, lower than Mason Rudolph, Mitch Truebisky,

1:02:26.160 --> 1:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Jacoby Brissette, Kyle Allen, and David Bloch. What about I

1:02:32.240 --> 1:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>think Duck's right in there, just has to be right

1:02:34.520 --> 1:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>in there. I think Duck was, Yeah, probably right in

1:02:37.040 --> 1:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that range. Woods only scored three touchdowns last year, two

1:02:40.360 --> 1:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>through the air, one on the ground, so you'd think

1:02:42.560 --> 1:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>an uptick is do But the Rams don't throw deep

1:02:45.920 --> 1:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and they don't throw the ball in the red zone.

1:02:47.760 --> 1:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>The Rams have been a top three team in red

1:02:49.680 --> 1:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>zone carries in each of Sean mcveigh's three seasons. Plus

1:02:52.720 --> 1:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Robert Woods was targeted only nine times within the red zone,

1:02:59.760 --> 1:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>head only one target inside the five. Compare that to

1:03:03.200 --> 1:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>eighteen red zone targets for Cooper Cup and nineteen red

1:03:06.600 --> 1:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>zone targets for Tyler Higbee. There's no way you can

1:03:09.640 --> 1:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>take Bob Woods in the fourth I didn't realize that

1:03:12.240 --> 1:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Higbey had so many targets. He's here, all right,

1:03:16.680 --> 1:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that's good to know. I'm kind of you kind of

1:03:18.680 --> 1:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>sold me on on Woods. I I just figured just

1:03:21.200 --> 1:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>through just your regression, he'll get back to seven eight touchdowns.

1:03:24.920 --> 1:03:28.080
<v Speaker 1>But maybe you're right, But looking at how many touchdowns

1:03:28.080 --> 1:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>he's scoring in the past, like six is like the

1:03:29.920 --> 1:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>high water mark. But that's that's your upside there, all right. Brian,

1:03:33.400 --> 1:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>who is the wide receiver you like but hate the

1:03:35.960 --> 1:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>average draft position. How can you not like DeAndre Hopkins

1:03:39.680 --> 1:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>but at wide receiver five going fourteenth overall, I hate

1:03:44.040 --> 1:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the adp um Arizona wide receivers actually finished with the

1:03:48.440 --> 1:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>third most receptions as a whole last year, more than

1:03:50.920 --> 1:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the Texans, So like, volume really isn't a concern there,

1:03:54.760 --> 1:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and Hopkins isn't necessarily making the wide receiver room more crowded.

1:03:58.640 --> 1:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>He's essentially replacing demure Bird, who's now a Patriot. But

1:04:02.840 --> 1:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>there's just so much more talent around DeAndre Hopkins now

1:04:05.480 --> 1:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>than when he was in Houston, outside of quarterback of course.

1:04:08.880 --> 1:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Um but that doesn't help hopkins case here. He's getting

1:04:11.320 --> 1:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>down graded quarterback from Murray to Deshaun Watson, and now

1:04:14.240 --> 1:04:17.600
<v Speaker 1>he has an elite ish running back and Kenyan Drake

1:04:17.760 --> 1:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and maybe Chase Edmunds behind him. Christian Kirk and Larry

1:04:20.960 --> 1:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Fitzgerald will certainly command targets and oh yeah, dan Arnold.

1:04:27.800 --> 1:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>That's why don't draft any Cardinals except for think Dan

1:04:32.920 --> 1:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Arnold is going to factor in end zone targets. You're delirious.

1:04:36.280 --> 1:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins is sure to disappoint, even though he is

1:04:38.880 --> 1:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>an awesome, awesome, football player, but avoid him into fantasy

1:04:41.960 --> 1:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>all right. Uh my, My receiver that I like but hate.

1:04:46.360 --> 1:04:50.439
<v Speaker 1>The average draft position is Carolina wide receiver d J. Moore.

1:04:50.600 --> 1:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Currently going off the board is wide receiver ten. I'm

1:04:53.520 --> 1:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>with you there. He is a good player with a

1:04:55.600 --> 1:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of natural athletic ability who made a big jump

1:04:58.360 --> 1:05:00.919
<v Speaker 1>forward last year despite the wobbly quarter backing of Kyle Allen.

1:05:00.920 --> 1:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>And I've heard this argument many times. If he can

1:05:02.800 --> 1:05:04.720
<v Speaker 1>do with Kyle Allen, he can do with Teddy Bridgewater.

1:05:05.680 --> 1:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>But Kenny, and I'm really nervous about this Caroline offense,

1:05:08.880 --> 1:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>new coaches, new schemes, massive offensive line worries, and Teddy

1:05:14.040 --> 1:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Bridgewater at the helm. We've repeatedly chronicled on this show.

1:05:19.240 --> 1:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Bridgewater's many limitations as a downfield passer. He is a

1:05:23.440 --> 1:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>dump off passer, averaging the second fewest completed air yards

1:05:27.520 --> 1:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>last year and the fewest intended air yards. His receivers

1:05:31.840 --> 1:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>have to turn and they have to turn short catches

1:05:35.520 --> 1:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>into long touchdowns. That's not easy to do. It's asking

1:05:39.560 --> 1:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and I think there's severe touchdown downside to

1:05:43.200 --> 1:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>all of the Panthers receivers because of what Teddy Bridgewater

1:05:47.080 --> 1:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>brings to the table and you look back through Teddy's

1:05:50.680 --> 1:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>box scores from when he started last season. The hundred

1:05:55.320 --> 1:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>seventy seventy yard game, the nine three yard game, the

1:05:57.960 --> 1:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>two hundred forty yard game, the one touch down to

1:06:00.320 --> 1:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>zero touchdowns. He's not an incapable quarterback, but he limits

1:06:04.800 --> 1:06:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the upside of his receivers enough that I'm not paying

1:06:07.080 --> 1:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>third round value on d J. Moore. I'm with you.

1:06:10.680 --> 1:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the tight end position. Who is the

1:06:12.960 --> 1:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>tight end that that you like but hate the average

1:06:15.480 --> 1:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>draft position and thus never end up drafting bt Um.

1:06:18.720 --> 1:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I like Evan Ingram, I don't like him in the

1:06:21.360 --> 1:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>seventh round. Evan Ingram has all of the abilities, like

1:06:25.240 --> 1:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the ability to get hurt in, the ability to wear

1:06:27.720 --> 1:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>sweatpants two games, the ability to watch from home and

1:06:31.160 --> 1:06:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the sidelines. What's most concerning is that there are other

1:06:35.240 --> 1:06:38.160
<v Speaker 1>weapons that are better than him in the red zone

1:06:38.200 --> 1:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>on his own team. Sterling Shepherd, Golden Tate, and Darius

1:06:41.000 --> 1:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Slayton all had better red zone numbers across the board,

1:06:44.640 --> 1:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and each of them is really good at contested catches.

1:06:47.080 --> 1:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Not to say Ingram is bad, but there's competition. He

1:06:50.200 --> 1:06:53.280
<v Speaker 1>gets hurt a Ton. The schedule is not good to

1:06:53.360 --> 1:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>open the season. I'll highlight that in a bit. Well,

1:06:55.960 --> 1:07:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Brian just did yeah, but yeah no, Evan ingram Um Brian.

1:07:02.160 --> 1:07:04.720
<v Speaker 1>The tight end that you like but hate the average

1:07:04.800 --> 1:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>draft position, and thus never end up ending up with

1:07:07.840 --> 1:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>like nay love. Of course I love Darren Waller, yes

1:07:11.520 --> 1:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you do. But right now at over pick sixty three

1:07:15.720 --> 1:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>overall at tight end five, I can't love Waller, who

1:07:18.880 --> 1:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>was tight end three in PPR leagues last year, led

1:07:21.400 --> 1:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders with a hundred and seventeen targets, ninety catches

1:07:24.920 --> 1:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and over eleven hundred yards. But remember Antonio Brown. Just

1:07:29.920 --> 1:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>remember Antonio Brown from last year. There were no wide

1:07:32.440 --> 1:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>receivers the Raiders, and now they have like eight, Yes,

1:07:35.720 --> 1:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and Foster Moreau was already stealing red zone targets from Waller.

1:07:38.560 --> 1:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Now Jason Witten is in toe uh tight end is

1:07:41.680 --> 1:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>this way too deep to reach for Waller this soon

1:07:44.680 --> 1:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>in draft? I'm sorry to say it. He is my

1:07:46.320 --> 1:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>number fifteen wide received our tight end, so obviously I'm

1:07:49.400 --> 1:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>not taking anywhere near his right now. The tight end

1:07:53.760 --> 1:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that I love but hate the average draft position is

1:07:56.000 --> 1:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>zach Ertz, Who's going at the end of the third

1:07:58.880 --> 1:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>round beginning of the fourth round. His tight end three

1:08:01.400 --> 1:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously an elite talent. And but if I'm spending an

1:08:04.880 --> 1:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>early round pick on tight end, it's not going to

1:08:07.520 --> 1:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>be the guy who's looking over his shoulder that I

1:08:09.520 --> 1:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>gotta worry about. George Kettle's one round more expensive and

1:08:12.480 --> 1:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I get the focal point of an entire team's offense.

1:08:16.000 --> 1:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Or alternately, I can wait one round and get Mark Andrews,

1:08:19.479 --> 1:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>who I like even better, and I've got rated one

1:08:21.280 --> 1:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>spot higher than zach Ertz. The last two years, zach

1:08:24.840 --> 1:08:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Ertz has been very productive, in part because all the

1:08:27.439 --> 1:08:30.639
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers have been hurt and they are again, and

1:08:30.640 --> 1:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>now they put that first rounder into Jalen reagor the

1:08:33.800 --> 1:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>other four receivers are returning, including Alston Jeffrey. At some point,

1:08:36.840 --> 1:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I just for where he's going. He's a great town,

1:08:39.240 --> 1:08:42.519
<v Speaker 1>zach ERT's awesome, but where he's being taken, I'm not.

1:08:42.680 --> 1:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I am not biting on zach Ertz. If you'd like

1:08:46.840 --> 1:08:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to try a Guillotine league, we encourage you to do so.

1:08:48.760 --> 1:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>You may know sixteen other people that want to play.

1:08:51.160 --> 1:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>You can go to Guillotine leagues dot com and join

1:08:53.120 --> 1:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a private league and will run your league Guillotine League style.

1:08:55.880 --> 1:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>If you don't know sixteen other people and you want

1:08:58.320 --> 1:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to just join a guillotine league, we have them for

1:09:00.320 --> 1:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>every price and prize point at guillotine leagues dot com.

1:09:04.280 --> 1:09:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Again with the Guillotine League, seventeen teams start the season.

1:09:06.880 --> 1:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Every week, the low scoring team gets cut and the

1:09:09.920 --> 1:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>entire roster goes the waiver wire where you get to

1:09:13.439 --> 1:09:18.879
<v Speaker 1>bid on some poor guys entire draft. Super fun Guillotine

1:09:19.040 --> 1:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Leagues dot com. More. Fantasy Football Weekly coming up next

1:09:46.800 --> 1:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and is the final segment of episode four, season twenty

1:09:51.400 --> 1:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>six of Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Charchion on Twitter at

1:09:55.880 --> 1:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Paul Charchion, Brian Johnson on Twitter at b t x

1:10:01.280 --> 1:10:06.639
<v Speaker 1>J like the annunciation, and Matt Harrison at Explosive Output

1:10:06.720 --> 1:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. We encourage you to follow us. Can also

1:10:09.880 --> 1:10:13.479
<v Speaker 1>follow guieting leagues at g L Chop g L Chop

1:10:13.720 --> 1:10:16.680
<v Speaker 1>for your guilleteaing league needs via Twitter as well. This

1:10:16.760 --> 1:10:19.599
<v Speaker 1>final segment. We always release our sleepers near the end

1:10:19.600 --> 1:10:23.639
<v Speaker 1>of the show. I have challenged Matt Harrison to provide

1:10:23.720 --> 1:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>us with data on the first month's schedule. Now Matt

1:10:28.840 --> 1:10:32.519
<v Speaker 1>and as listeners. Regular listeners know I care so much

1:10:32.560 --> 1:10:34.719
<v Speaker 1>more about the first month of the schedule than any

1:10:34.760 --> 1:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>other month because I want to get out to the

1:10:36.760 --> 1:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>fast start, because even if it's turns out, it's only

1:10:40.760 --> 1:10:42.519
<v Speaker 1>for the month of September and my players are gonna

1:10:42.520 --> 1:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>peter he out eventually. I want to know I've got

1:10:44.720 --> 1:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that option, I've got trade value because my players came

1:10:47.320 --> 1:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>out hot and I can trade away the guys that

1:10:49.160 --> 1:10:53.519
<v Speaker 1>have performed. I want to start the season three and one,

1:10:53.680 --> 1:10:55.320
<v Speaker 1>four and one, five and oh four and O. I

1:10:55.360 --> 1:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>want to start the season well, and that means I've

1:10:58.240 --> 1:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>asked you to help me with which teams have got

1:11:01.280 --> 1:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the easy and hard starts to the season, both through

1:11:05.120 --> 1:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the running game and the passing game. So the first

1:11:07.360 --> 1:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>thing I did is I use both the Football Outsiders

1:11:10.120 --> 1:11:12.919
<v Speaker 1>d v o A and Fantasy Stats against the position

1:11:12.960 --> 1:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>to kind of tabulate a more accurate defensive profile of

1:11:17.280 --> 1:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>these defenses. Thank god, you fantabulated. Absolutely not in front

1:11:22.160 --> 1:11:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of the kids, I hope, Nope, No, never in front

1:11:24.080 --> 1:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of the kids. Then I made some really pretty spreadsheets

1:11:26.720 --> 1:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>with color coded stuff on all of them, and they're

1:11:28.840 --> 1:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna be available at Chuck Fantasy promo code f f

1:11:32.080 --> 1:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>W gets you the year for twenty bucks. And um,

1:11:35.840 --> 1:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I started with the quarterback and wide receiver and they

1:11:38.320 --> 1:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of came out very similar this year. Um So

1:11:41.280 --> 1:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I just grouped them all together and let's start with

1:11:44.120 --> 1:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>three easy starts and then I'll give you three tough starts.

1:11:47.960 --> 1:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Easy start number one the Jacksonville Jaguars Gardner, Minshew, DJ Shark,

1:11:54.640 --> 1:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>d D Westbrook, Leavisca Channelt. Here's what they get Indie, Tennessee, Miami, Cincinnati,

1:12:01.760 --> 1:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and Houston in the first five weeks. Every one of

1:12:04.760 --> 1:12:08.679
<v Speaker 1>those defenses ranked in the bottom ten according to my metrics.

1:12:09.000 --> 1:12:11.599
<v Speaker 1>Then they get Detroit in week six, who is also

1:12:11.680 --> 1:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>bottom ten, then a bye, and then their schedule gets

1:12:14.920 --> 1:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>absolutely insane. So if you can go roll with the

1:12:18.080 --> 1:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Jaguars for the first six weeks, you're gonna look like

1:12:21.080 --> 1:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a genius. Then trade them all well and I need

1:12:25.080 --> 1:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I I will do that. Yeah, to me, that is

1:12:27.280 --> 1:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a totally viable strategy. Can I interject real quick? You

1:12:30.200 --> 1:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>should call your metrics your matrics, thank you? Uh second team,

1:12:39.080 --> 1:12:42.599
<v Speaker 1>You're ready ready for some ready some horn noises because

1:12:42.640 --> 1:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it's Chicago horn. Nick Foles and Sad trombone. Ski, you

1:12:47.320 --> 1:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>know what trombone is a horn? Right? Well, oh that

1:12:50.000 --> 1:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of horn. Yeah, cow Bell is not a horn charger.

1:12:54.479 --> 1:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I was just looking for a car horn. I have

1:12:56.479 --> 1:12:59.639
<v Speaker 1>a car horn here. So Nick Foles, Sad Drombone, Ski,

1:13:00.120 --> 1:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Allen Robinson, Anthony Miller. They get Detroit, the Giants, Atlanta, Indie,

1:13:06.040 --> 1:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and Tampa. All except Tampa ranked in the bottom ten.

1:13:09.880 --> 1:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Tampa was just outside of that. Overall, the Bears have

1:13:14.040 --> 1:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the easiest schedule on the season for passing in the

1:13:17.720 --> 1:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>league this year. It's once you get the full season in,

1:13:22.080 --> 1:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not that big of a variance. They all kind

1:13:24.280 --> 1:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of get close to average, but they have by the

1:13:27.280 --> 1:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Matt tricks, they have the easiest get all right, and

1:13:29.960 --> 1:13:33.559
<v Speaker 1>the third team with the easiest start for passers, uh,

1:13:33.680 --> 1:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. That's Jimmy g Brandon, Aiyuk, maybe Kendrick Borne,

1:13:39.880 --> 1:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a guy like maybe Deebo Samuel if he can make

1:13:43.000 --> 1:13:47.439
<v Speaker 1>it back um Arizona, the New York Jets, the New

1:13:47.520 --> 1:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>York Giants, Philly and Miami. So those are some bad secondaries.

1:13:52.560 --> 1:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Last yeah, so Zona. The Giants in Miami were the

1:13:56.000 --> 1:14:00.479
<v Speaker 1>bottom three teams in the league, followed by you know,

1:14:00.520 --> 1:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you got the other two teams in there that we're

1:14:02.360 --> 1:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>at blow average. This doesn't include the tight end position specifically,

1:14:06.439 --> 1:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>but George Kittle is going to have a few huge

1:14:08.320 --> 1:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>games in here too, because Arizona is in Week one.

1:14:11.360 --> 1:14:13.599
<v Speaker 1>I've got I've got a strong take, and I firmly

1:14:13.600 --> 1:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>believe George Kittle is gonna finish as a top five

1:14:16.160 --> 1:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver based on his PPR points. I'm I would

1:14:20.000 --> 1:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>take him over DeAndre hop anyone other than Davante Adams

1:14:23.040 --> 1:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>or Michael Thomas. I'd rather of George Kittle. I think.

1:14:25.120 --> 1:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go over to the tough starts, and

1:14:27.439 --> 1:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the toughest start of the season goes to the New

1:14:30.200 --> 1:14:34.799
<v Speaker 1>York Football Giants, including Danny Dimes, Sterling Shepherd, Darius Slayton,

1:14:34.840 --> 1:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and Golden Tate. Brian talked about it a little bit before. Pittsburgh, Chicago,

1:14:39.200 --> 1:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, l A, Rams, Dallas are the first five games,

1:14:43.280 --> 1:14:45.519
<v Speaker 1>although Dallas is secondary is gonna take a big step

1:14:45.560 --> 1:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>backwards this year, right they may? Yeah, the first three

1:14:47.880 --> 1:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>weeks are against top six past defenses, then Week four

1:14:51.040 --> 1:14:54.639
<v Speaker 1>against Jalen Ramsey. Their schedule does loosen up after that.

1:14:54.760 --> 1:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>But if you're investing in the Giants passing game. Wait

1:14:57.320 --> 1:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>until after week five. Okay, don't forget about Aaron don

1:15:00.000 --> 1:15:07.959
<v Speaker 1>Old either, he might be Uh. The Las Vegas Raiders

1:15:08.200 --> 1:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr, Henry Ruggs, Tyrelle Williams, Hunter, Renfroll, Brian Edwards,

1:15:12.880 --> 1:15:17.719
<v Speaker 1>UM Carolina, going New Orleans, New England, Buffalo, Kansas City

1:15:17.760 --> 1:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>are their first five weeks, and outside of that game

1:15:19.840 --> 1:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>against Carolina in Week one, that's a scary lineup in

1:15:23.280 --> 1:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>his team. Weeks three through five are against top ten

1:15:26.400 --> 1:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>past defenses. And notice I mentioned four wide receivers. This

1:15:30.400 --> 1:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>is a great opportunity for you to sit back watch

1:15:33.439 --> 1:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders group, see who gets the snaps, see who

1:15:36.120 --> 1:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>gets the targets, and then invest after week five when

1:15:39.200 --> 1:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>their schedule gets a little bit easier. Uh. Their stretcher

1:15:42.160 --> 1:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>run by the Way, is very nice the Raiders, so

1:15:45.680 --> 1:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on them in the second half of

1:15:47.000 --> 1:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the season. Finally, Houston Deshaun Watson, Brandon Cooks, will Fuller,

1:15:51.439 --> 1:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Randall Cobb, and Kenny Stills. They get Listen to this

1:15:55.439 --> 1:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>schedule Kansas City, Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Minnesota, Jacksonville to start off. Now,

1:16:02.920 --> 1:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville's not that Jacksonville is really bad and Minnesota secondaries

1:16:06.280 --> 1:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>without their number one, number two, and number three cornerbacks

1:16:08.800 --> 1:16:12.439
<v Speaker 1>from last year. So Mike Zimmer said, I'd never have

1:16:12.520 --> 1:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a bad defense, and he's right. He's pretty much right

1:16:15.640 --> 1:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>for top ten defenses to start the year. After that stretch,

1:16:18.400 --> 1:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the Texans only have three stoppers the rest of the

1:16:21.040 --> 1:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>way on their schedule, with nine very positive matchups from

1:16:24.320 --> 1:16:28.599
<v Speaker 1>Week five on. Alright, So that's your passing game all

1:16:28.680 --> 1:16:30.640
<v Speaker 1>wrapped up in a nutshell, all right. So those are

1:16:30.680 --> 1:16:34.519
<v Speaker 1>the three easy and the three hardest starts for passing game.

1:16:34.600 --> 1:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the running game. Who are the three

1:16:36.960 --> 1:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>easiest running game starts to the season. We alluded to

1:16:40.880 --> 1:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>this a little bit earlier, and and and Brian kind

1:16:42.920 --> 1:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>of nailed it here. Um, Baltimore and that's mark Ingram

1:16:45.960 --> 1:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and JK. Dobbins. They get Cleveland, Houston, Kansas City, Washington,

1:16:51.280 --> 1:16:54.639
<v Speaker 1>and Cincinnati, all of those teams ranked in the bottom

1:16:54.680 --> 1:16:58.719
<v Speaker 1>ten in Fantasy rush defense last year, yes, even Kansas City.

1:16:59.600 --> 1:17:02.080
<v Speaker 1>After that, they see a very tough stretch with four

1:17:02.200 --> 1:17:05.200
<v Speaker 1>top five rush defenses in their next seven games. So

1:17:05.439 --> 1:17:07.439
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna have a great start. But then it gets

1:17:07.520 --> 1:17:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Rocky uh New England is the second team. That's James White,

1:17:11.680 --> 1:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Sony Michelle, Lamar Miller, Damien Harris. They get Miami, Seattle,

1:17:17.800 --> 1:17:21.519
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas, Kansas City, and Denver Kansas City and the Raiders,

1:17:21.560 --> 1:17:25.040
<v Speaker 1>by the way, both top or sorry, both bottom ten

1:17:25.200 --> 1:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>in the league and pass receptions allowed to running backs,

1:17:28.360 --> 1:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>so keep an eye on James White right there. And

1:17:31.360 --> 1:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Miami gave up the third most yards to running backs

1:17:33.800 --> 1:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>last year, while Seattle gave up the second most rushing tds. Finally,

1:17:38.320 --> 1:17:43.599
<v Speaker 1>the last easy start is Atlanta Todd Gurley, Brian Hill,

1:17:43.920 --> 1:17:49.599
<v Speaker 1>Cadrey Allison maybe or some combination of all of them.

1:17:50.600 --> 1:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Very frustrating. They get Seattle, Dallas, Chicago, Green Bay Carolina. Dallas,

1:17:56.240 --> 1:17:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Chicago and Green Bay were middle of the road against

1:17:58.479 --> 1:18:01.479
<v Speaker 1>the run. However, Carol Line was the worst run defense

1:18:01.479 --> 1:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>in the league by a wide margin last year. You

1:18:04.000 --> 1:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>can stream against the Panthers all year long, especially on

1:18:07.280 --> 1:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a defense that lost Luke Keikley. So they're gonna be

1:18:10.760 --> 1:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>really bad against the run again this year. All right,

1:18:13.360 --> 1:18:15.880
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the tough starts on the running back side.

1:18:17.560 --> 1:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>First one Denver, Melvin Gordon and Philip Lindsay they get Tennessee, Pittsburgh, Tampa,

1:18:25.520 --> 1:18:28.519
<v Speaker 1>New York Jets, and New England in the first five weeks.

1:18:29.320 --> 1:18:31.479
<v Speaker 1>The Titans are their first week they were middle of

1:18:31.520 --> 1:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the pack, but the other four teams were elite top

1:18:34.360 --> 1:18:38.400
<v Speaker 1>six against the run. So invest in the Broncos backs

1:18:38.400 --> 1:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>for your playoff schedule where they get Carolina, Buffalo and

1:18:41.760 --> 1:18:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers. That's a lot better. Uh. The New York

1:18:45.240 --> 1:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Giants a tough start, Hey Kwon Barkley, I'm giving you

1:18:49.040 --> 1:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>guys negative stuff on s Kwon um and and of

1:18:53.040 --> 1:18:58.160
<v Speaker 1>course goal line specialist Wayne Gallman. Pittsburgh, Chicago, San Francisco,

1:18:58.280 --> 1:19:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the Rams and Dallas. Those are tough teams. Steelers, Rams,

1:19:01.760 --> 1:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Niners are all top ten against the run. Chicago and

1:19:03.880 --> 1:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Dallas are better than average. All of Sa Kwan's easy

1:19:06.840 --> 1:19:09.360
<v Speaker 1>weeks coming crunch time, though, he might win you a

1:19:09.400 --> 1:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of leagues this year, starting in Week twelve against

1:19:12.040 --> 1:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>since Seattle, Arizona, and Cleveland. But Baltimore in the championship

1:19:17.360 --> 1:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>week for Kwan, that's messy. That could be tricky, although

1:19:22.040 --> 1:19:26.559
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore Baltimore may have salted away home field by Week sixteen.

1:19:26.840 --> 1:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I think if there's one team that's going to run

1:19:28.800 --> 1:19:31.640
<v Speaker 1>away in the cities. Right there, there's a team that's

1:19:31.680 --> 1:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>going to run away with it. I think it's Baltimore. Okay,

1:19:34.080 --> 1:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>you should send out calendar invites like week after Week

1:19:36.800 --> 1:19:41.639
<v Speaker 1>five trademark ingram. Maybe I'll put that in the Shock

1:19:41.680 --> 1:19:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Slack channel, put reminders time to trade for X.

1:19:45.240 --> 1:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>All right. I think there's one one more a tough start,

1:19:49.080 --> 1:19:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and that is and this one. I love this one.

1:19:51.720 --> 1:19:56.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm just relishing right here, the Green Bay Packers Aaron Jones,

1:19:56.720 --> 1:19:59.479
<v Speaker 1>A J. Dillon, Jamal Williams. Here's what they get to

1:19:59.479 --> 1:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>start the year. Minnesota, Detroit, New Orleans, Atlanta bye week.

1:20:06.040 --> 1:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>That didn't sound all that hard. Vikings defensive line has

1:20:08.960 --> 1:20:13.599
<v Speaker 1>been ravaged with a variety off season losses. Saints and

1:20:13.640 --> 1:20:16.559
<v Speaker 1>Falcons were top ten against the run last year. This

1:20:16.920 --> 1:20:20.559
<v Speaker 1>plays perfectly into our anti Aaron Jones narrative. The week

1:20:20.640 --> 1:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>five by fits in with A. J. Dillon maybe getting

1:20:23.840 --> 1:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a look at more touches after that and getting worked

1:20:27.080 --> 1:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>into the offense more and more. But they do have

1:20:29.120 --> 1:20:31.519
<v Speaker 1>Tampa in Week six, and Tampa was the top run

1:20:31.560 --> 1:20:35.880
<v Speaker 1>defense last year, so they're bad through Week six. Well done, Matt,

1:20:35.920 --> 1:20:37.559
<v Speaker 1>I challenge you to come up with all this data

1:20:37.720 --> 1:20:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the first month scheduled, easy, the hard, and well well done.

1:20:42.360 --> 1:20:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for grinding all of that data. Let's go

1:20:45.439 --> 1:20:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to our sleepers. At the end of every show we

1:20:47.160 --> 1:20:50.880
<v Speaker 1>release our sleepers. We begin with Brian Johnson, who have

1:20:50.920 --> 1:20:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you got this week? Kind of on when you start

1:20:54.920 --> 1:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>with I have some enthusiasm for your sleeper, I'm going

1:21:01.120 --> 1:21:06.439
<v Speaker 1>to I'm getting there. But Corey Davis, well that that

1:21:06.720 --> 1:21:09.880
<v Speaker 1>is requisite of that reaction. In case you've forgotten, I

1:21:10.000 --> 1:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>forgot the NZ double as career receiving leader going into

1:21:14.120 --> 1:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the final year of his rookie contract. Were Western Michigan

1:21:18.080 --> 1:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Western Michigan? Were we still playing Western Michigan? Thanks for

1:21:21.880 --> 1:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>throwing that in there, And uh, you know, reigning on

1:21:25.000 --> 1:21:28.519
<v Speaker 1>my parade. Uh, injured last year to injury fully healthy

1:21:28.560 --> 1:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>now off the pub list And and really here's my argument,

1:21:32.600 --> 1:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>see DeVante Parker post hype sleeper paid off last year.

1:21:37.200 --> 1:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>If anyone's gonna do it, it's six foot three Corey Davis,

1:21:41.160 --> 1:21:44.360
<v Speaker 1>blue chip prospect. We'll have the best quarterback when he's

1:21:44.360 --> 1:21:47.720
<v Speaker 1>been healthy in his career. She said, yeah, Bryan Tann

1:21:47.800 --> 1:21:50.759
<v Speaker 1>health for twelve of the you know whatever, twelve fourteen

1:21:50.760 --> 1:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>games last year, and he was pretty much thrust into

1:21:53.360 --> 1:21:55.559
<v Speaker 1>an alpha dog role as a rookie. But now he's

1:21:55.560 --> 1:21:58.479
<v Speaker 1>at a J Brown John hu Smith to take off

1:21:59.680 --> 1:22:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and of was Derrick Henry to keep defenses honest. So

1:22:03.320 --> 1:22:06.639
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis, you basically get him the last pick these

1:22:06.720 --> 1:22:10.120
<v Speaker 1>days could pay off as a wide receiver to wide receiver.

1:22:10.280 --> 1:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Three uh certain points. Corey Davis going after board. His

1:22:12.680 --> 1:22:20.360
<v Speaker 1>player number two in draft um my sleeper is Paris Campbell,

1:22:20.920 --> 1:22:25.160
<v Speaker 1>second year wide receiver from Indianapolis. I was really optimistic

1:22:25.200 --> 1:22:27.360
<v Speaker 1>about Paris Campbell last year as a rookie, but he

1:22:27.400 --> 1:22:30.439
<v Speaker 1>suffered a horrific hand injury, just brutal that cost him

1:22:30.520 --> 1:22:34.160
<v Speaker 1>much of the season. I want to remind people at

1:22:34.200 --> 1:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the Combine last year, I guess that would have been

1:22:38.360 --> 1:22:43.559
<v Speaker 1>Combine he was a nine percentile Spark player. Four I

1:22:43.600 --> 1:22:46.439
<v Speaker 1>believe percentile Spark player at the Combine. He is a

1:22:46.479 --> 1:22:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Percy Harvin type receiver who is incredibly fast. He ran

1:22:49.920 --> 1:22:54.439
<v Speaker 1>a four three forty at the Combine. But he's also

1:22:54.520 --> 1:22:56.519
<v Speaker 1>strong and powerful and you do a lot of the catch.

1:22:56.720 --> 1:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Here is head coach Frank Wright on Paris Campbell last week.

1:23:00.040 --> 1:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Do your I don't know his voice and just did happen?

1:23:03.439 --> 1:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>It happens to be a lot like mine occgtionally very similar.

1:23:06.840 --> 1:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>He looks strong, fast, explosive, with good hands, and understands

1:23:10.080 --> 1:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the offense. And he's very consistent. Oh that sounded just

1:23:13.160 --> 1:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>like Frank Raig. Notably, I fool his wife on a

1:23:15.880 --> 1:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>regular basis. With that reminder, you know, Paris Campbell is

1:23:19.600 --> 1:23:21.719
<v Speaker 1>a second rounder last year, so they've got high draft

1:23:21.760 --> 1:23:24.439
<v Speaker 1>pick equity in him, and currently he's the number two

1:23:24.479 --> 1:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>target behind only t Y Hilton, and on that offense,

1:23:27.800 --> 1:23:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I like Paris Campbell currently going off the board in

1:23:31.479 --> 1:23:35.599
<v Speaker 1>round seventeen of Fantasy Drafts Undrafted. Now, Brian and I

1:23:35.640 --> 1:23:38.120
<v Speaker 1>are both in a we are in a slow auction

1:23:38.240 --> 1:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>right now, and Brian has got the high bid on

1:23:41.840 --> 1:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Paris Campbell and two dollars bawling. Should I bid up? Absolutely?

1:23:48.040 --> 1:23:50.360
<v Speaker 1>He feels like he should be worth at least three? Right?

1:23:50.720 --> 1:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Shut up, Matt? What do you think, Matt? I think

1:23:53.280 --> 1:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>at least put put in the bid of five on

1:23:55.400 --> 1:23:58.639
<v Speaker 1>the slow auction. I don't take Brian out for sure.

1:23:58.920 --> 1:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I I acquired Nick Chubb in that auction. The guy. Hey,

1:24:05.080 --> 1:24:09.160
<v Speaker 1>while you're making bids, why don't I give you my yes,

1:24:10.520 --> 1:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>my sleeper, Nicole Hardman of the Chiefs. It was only

1:24:13.680 --> 1:24:15.599
<v Speaker 1>a year ago that Hardman was looking like the guy

1:24:15.600 --> 1:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>who had just slot into that offense to replace Tyreek Hill.

1:24:19.400 --> 1:24:22.959
<v Speaker 1>They're similarly built for speed receivers. Hill had the fastest

1:24:22.960 --> 1:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>clock time in the NFL last year at twenty two

1:24:25.240 --> 1:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>point eight miles per hour when he chased down Damien

1:24:28.120 --> 1:24:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Williams on a touchdown run. Well, Hartman had the fastest

1:24:30.920 --> 1:24:33.639
<v Speaker 1>speed on a scoring play last year at twenty one

1:24:33.640 --> 1:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>point seven miles per hour. Hardman tied for the league

1:24:36.920 --> 1:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>lead in twenty five plus yard touchdown receptions last year

1:24:40.240 --> 1:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>with five. And he's entering year two in a Patrick

1:24:43.400 --> 1:24:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes offense and you don't have to draft him till

1:24:45.760 --> 1:24:48.479
<v Speaker 1>round nine. And he finished as the forty nine wide

1:24:48.479 --> 1:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>receiver in Fantasy last year, but he only had twenty

1:24:51.120 --> 1:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>six receptions. If you double that this year and give

1:24:53.760 --> 1:24:56.519
<v Speaker 1>him fifty two, which is about what Sammy Watkins had,

1:24:57.120 --> 1:24:59.639
<v Speaker 1>he'll easily go over a thousand yards and probably improve

1:24:59.720 --> 1:25:01.640
<v Speaker 1>on sick touchdowns that he had last year. Yeah, it's

1:25:01.680 --> 1:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>all about consistency and targets for Nicole Hardman, you know,

1:25:04.080 --> 1:25:06.519
<v Speaker 1>if they give him the targets, he has game breaking

1:25:06.560 --> 1:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>ability on almost every play. The problem was they just

1:25:10.000 --> 1:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't target him last year. I think twenty three targets

1:25:13.000 --> 1:25:17.640
<v Speaker 1>on the season. That's it. Well, receptions I hope he

1:25:17.680 --> 1:25:21.080
<v Speaker 1>had all right, thank you very much. Uh, if you

1:25:21.160 --> 1:25:22.719
<v Speaker 1>missed a part of the show, check of the podcast

1:25:24.080 --> 1:25:28.120
<v Speaker 1>one target. That's hard to do. Try all the podcast

1:25:28.200 --> 1:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. UM, you can get back and hear

1:25:32.160 --> 1:25:35.120
<v Speaker 1>all of the various segments, including are very valuable inside

1:25:35.160 --> 1:25:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the five two segments that we had earlier in this show.

1:25:38.200 --> 1:25:40.680
<v Speaker 1>We highly recommend you do that and also to check

1:25:40.680 --> 1:25:43.639
<v Speaker 1>out my cheat sheet available for free at Guillotine leagues

1:25:43.840 --> 1:25:46.919
<v Speaker 1>dot com. We'll be back next week for more Fantasy

1:25:46.960 --> 1:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. Don't. Fantasy Football Weekly is a production of

1:26:00.160 --> 1:26:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. For more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit

1:26:02.880 --> 1:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

1:26:05.960 --> 1:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows.