Speaker 1: We have a big election coming up, so what is
Speaker 1: the state of the election and how good the Republicans
Speaker 1: look going into the midterms. Plus, the Biden crime family
Speaker 1: is in serious trouble with new contracts that came from
Speaker 1: a whistle blower, and Stacy Abrahams is wanting people to
Speaker 1: vote for her, saying she can fix your economic problems
Speaker 1: as long as you have an abortion. This is verdict
Speaker 1: with Ted Cruz Center. It's nice to be with you
Speaker 1: again today, and we've got a lot to talk about,
Speaker 1: including this shocking letter from Center. Grassley, you know him well,
Speaker 1: you'll work with him. It is a letter and I'm
Speaker 1: going to read a little bit because it's so shocking
Speaker 1: what has come out. This letter contains a contract they're
Speaker 1: saying is signed by Hunter Biden and James Biden, which
Speaker 1: I think is also a very important asterist that if
Speaker 1: you're taking notes, start writing right now because this is
Speaker 1: something we've kind of been waiting for. We knew there
Speaker 1: was corruption with a Biden family, we know it goes
Speaker 1: back decades with James Biden, and then they brought in
Speaker 1: Hunter in essence be about amen. But now we've got
Speaker 1: a contract and what it says here is there was
Speaker 1: an arrangement. There was a contract signed by Hunter and
Speaker 1: James Biden and three other business associates. Part of the
Speaker 1: arrangement was to funnel five million dollars from Chinese communist
Speaker 1: government agencies two Hunter and James Biden specifically, here's the kicker.
Speaker 1: What is the most shocking is the compensation package was
Speaker 1: purposely designed. The whistle blowers are saying to Grassley to
Speaker 1: compensate Hunter and James Biden for all the work they
Speaker 1: did only after Joe Biden left the vice presidency. Your
Speaker 1: initial reaction to this whistle blower, Look, I think the
Speaker 1: facts in this letter are deeply, deeply concerning. We talked
Speaker 1: at an earlier podcast about how the announcement or the leaks,
Speaker 1: rather the concerted leaks that they're getting ready to indict
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden, are all focused on the personal stuff. They're
Speaker 1: all focused on the drug use, they're all focused on
Speaker 1: the gun issue. Those are real crimes, Those are crimes
Speaker 1: that need to be prosecuted. But I'm concerned that that
Speaker 1: is a smokescreen to divert from what the real question is.
Speaker 1: The reason. You know, if Hunter Biden were some schmoe
Speaker 1: most people, it would not be a matter of public
Speaker 1: concern whether or not the guy wrestled with addiction, as
Speaker 1: he clearly has the reason, it's relevant and it's important nationally.
Speaker 1: Is Hunter Biden, on the face of it, is involved
Speaker 1: an official corruption with his father, with his father when
Speaker 1: he was vice president, and potentially with his father today
Speaker 1: when he's president. And this letter that Chuck Grasslely sent, So,
Speaker 1: Chuck is my colleague on the Judiciary Committee. If Republicans
Speaker 1: take a majority in the Senate, Chuck will be the
Speaker 1: chairman of the Judiciary Committee. Chuck and I have served
Speaker 1: together on that committee for ten years. I am confident
Speaker 1: when we have a majority, which I think we will
Speaker 1: in January, that we will have hearings on this topic
Speaker 1: because the Biden Department of Justice desperately is trying to
Speaker 1: cover it up. Here's what Chuck Grassly said. He says
Speaker 1: that I've got evidence now that Hunter Biden and James
Speaker 1: Biden and James is Joe's brother, Hunter's uncle met with
Speaker 1: nationals connected to the Chinese Communist government. That's a pretty
Speaker 1: big deal, Like you're meeting with Chinese Communist government officials
Speaker 1: and what are you meeting about? Not by accident, this
Speaker 1: is on purpose deliberate to have a financial relationship with
Speaker 1: Communist Chinese individuals, and they negotiate. According to the summary,
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden, James Biden, and their business associates created a
Speaker 1: joint venture, so you go into business. Let's go into
Speaker 1: business with the Chinese communist government. A joint venture that
Speaker 1: would served as a vehicle to accomplish that financial compensation,
Speaker 1: and that arrangement was made sometime after a meeting in
Speaker 1: Miami between Hunter Biden and CFC officials in February twenty seventeen.
Speaker 1: According to the summary, that vehicle was called Sinohawk, which
Speaker 1: was owned fifty percent by Oneida Holdings and fifty percent
Speaker 1: by Hudson West. According to the summary, one was made
Speaker 1: of five evenly divided LLC's. Look, when people are trying
Speaker 1: to hide money, they create lots of LLC's. You know
Speaker 1: it's called money laundering, right, what do they do? One
Speaker 1: for each business associate, So everyone gets their own LLC,
Speaker 1: including Hunter Biden and James Biden. However, according to the summary,
Speaker 1: ten percent of Hunter Biden's interest was to be held
Speaker 1: for Joe Biden. This is the line we all have
Speaker 1: heard now, ten percent for the big guy. Right, and
Speaker 1: this is in writing in an actual contract. This isn't
Speaker 1: an email which we had the emails from Hunter Biden's laptop,
Speaker 1: so people understand this. It said ten percent of the
Speaker 1: Big Guy. We also have Tony bob Olenski who has
Speaker 1: now done not one, but two interviews, and we know
Speaker 1: that his contact was Tim Tebow with the FBI now
Speaker 1: disgraced FBI agent who was burying all the information on Hunter,
Speaker 1: James and Joe Biden's business dealings. This is clearly where
Speaker 1: the whistleblowers are coming forward saying this is what he
Speaker 1: was burying. Is not only is it just the idea,
Speaker 1: there's no longer just the idea of the Big Guy
Speaker 1: is a possibility. It's now in a contract basically set
Speaker 1: in stone, and you can divide the parts up and
Speaker 1: it matches up to ten percent for Joe Biden. Well,
Speaker 1: and if you look at the signature page, which which
Speaker 1: will also put up the signature page, you look at
Speaker 1: the top, there's a signature from Hunter Biden with unter
Speaker 1: signature right underneath it a signature from Jim Biden. So
Speaker 1: you've got the president's brother and the president's son or
Speaker 1: the first two signatories and then the fifth signatory is
Speaker 1: Tony Babbaluski Babballynski. So you literally got the guy who's
Speaker 1: telling us this was corrupt sign the contract with their
Speaker 1: names on it, and what were the terms of it, Well,
Speaker 1: the terms of it the way they were getting paid.
Speaker 1: It was an unsecured five million dollar loan. Must be
Speaker 1: nice if someone will loan you five million dollars. I
Speaker 1: gotta pause, you explain to people, because there's a lot
Speaker 1: of people that may not realize how unbelievable it is
Speaker 1: to have an unsecured five million dollars loan. If I
Speaker 1: went out, you went out, we got a contract, we
Speaker 1: would have to back it up with some sort of
Speaker 1: collateral bag. That's normal in the business. You gotta have
Speaker 1: something beaut just randomly hand you five grand. They get
Speaker 1: all this with nothing. Look if you or I walked
Speaker 1: into a bag and said, hey, would you lend me
Speaker 1: five million dollars, I'm not gonna put anything off. I'm
Speaker 1: not gonna put my house up, I'm not gonna put
Speaker 1: any stocks up, I'm not gonna put any collateral up.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm just relying on my good looks and charm.
Speaker 1: And did I mention Daddy as Vice President of the
Speaker 1: United States. Was it was that part of the conversation,
Speaker 1: and they said, oh great, you know, sure, here's five
Speaker 1: million dollars, no collateral. But it's worse. Look, a five
Speaker 1: million dollars unsecured loan is called a sweetheart deal. But
Speaker 1: what follows is an unsecured five million dollars loan quote
Speaker 1: intended to be forgivable from CEFC in twenty seventeen. In
Speaker 1: other words, it's not alone, it's a gift. We're going
Speaker 1: to give you five million dollars. We're gonna forgive the loan.
Speaker 1: It ain't alone if they forgive it. Yeah, and twenty seventeen,
Speaker 1: why was that date picked? Oh yeah, that's immediately after
Speaker 1: Joe Biden stops being Vice President of the United States.
Speaker 1: Now fast forward. The letter further says that the Chinese
Speaker 1: were slow in paying, and James Biden considered calling the
Speaker 1: CFC officials and threatening to withdraw Biden family support from
Speaker 1: future deals so the wouldn't pay. In translation, that is,
Speaker 1: you think that the bidens are going to keep being played,
Speaker 1: you better give us as cash that we asked you
Speaker 1: basically to delay, right, so we get paid. After he
Speaker 1: leaves the Vice presidency, and if you don't give it
Speaker 1: to us, then we're gonna stop giving you what you
Speaker 1: want from the Biden crime family. We will withdraw Biden
Speaker 1: family support. And it ain't complicated who they're talking about.
Speaker 1: Nobody cares about Hunter's support. They care about the big guy.
Speaker 1: And it turns out that their fit apparently worked because
Speaker 1: public bank records show that Hunter Biden James Biden profited
Speaker 1: from a five million dollar wire from a company connected
Speaker 1: to the CFC the Chinese Communist in August of twenty seventeen.
Speaker 1: So they threw a fifth, they got the five million dollars.
Speaker 1: Let me tell you a question that apparently the bidendj
Speaker 1: has no interest in. Did Joe Biden get his ten percent?
Speaker 1: Did he get five hundred thousand dollars from the Chinese Communist?
Speaker 1: And what did he do for the Chinese Communist for
Speaker 1: that five hundred thousand dollars? And what, for that matter,
Speaker 1: did Joe Biden do for his son and his brother
Speaker 1: to get five million dollars. All of this talk about
Speaker 1: the drug stuff is designed to cover up and hide what,
Speaker 1: at this point seems to be screaming indications of pay
Speaker 1: to play, and in fact Grassley continues to say, based
Speaker 1: on the allegations provided to my office, the information provided
Speaker 1: by mister Bobolenski formed a sufficient basis to open a
Speaker 1: full field investigation on pay to play grounds. That means
Speaker 1: give my son or my brother five million dollars or
Speaker 1: I as vice president will not do what you want
Speaker 1: on public policy. That's called bribery and you do hard
Speaker 1: time for that. And apparently the Biden DOJ has no
Speaker 1: interest in examining that. I've called on Merritt Garland repeatedly
Speaker 1: appoint a special counsel because the partisan hacks that had
Speaker 1: been put in charge of this, Yeah, it can't be
Speaker 1: trusted me. There's no reason that you should trust him,
Speaker 1: and they demonstrated that. Let me ask you this, when
Speaker 1: when we had Timothy Tebow right, who sat down with
Speaker 1: Tommy Bobolenski. He was the first big whistle and he
Speaker 1: was a great quarterback by the way. Yeah, you know
Speaker 1: when that name came out, you know, timpo Tibo was
Speaker 1: sitting at home going why why did this guy have
Speaker 1: to have the same from your name as me? Why
Speaker 1: on earth? But when you had Tony Bobolenski who came
Speaker 1: out and he was the first whistle war weeks before
Speaker 1: the election, the presidential election. He then, immediately after he
Speaker 1: does the big press conference, gets called by the FBI.
Speaker 1: He comes in, he tells his story, He gives him phones,
Speaker 1: he gives them, you know, encrypted messages, He gives them everything,
Speaker 1: He gives them documents, he gives them apparently some of
Speaker 1: these business deals are talking about today. Yeah, with his
Speaker 1: signature on it says I want you to know all this,
Speaker 1: and they say, God name Tim Tebow is going to
Speaker 1: be your point of contact. He never talks to him,
Speaker 1: never follows up. And we know that immediately Tim Tebow
Speaker 1: went into trying to say that everything that he brought
Speaker 1: to the FBI was immediately discredited so it be shut
Speaker 1: down and never used against him. And we know that
Speaker 1: Tebo is a hard Democrat partisan who was publicly, deeply political,
Speaker 1: incredibly critical of Donald Trump, was host on public on
Speaker 1: social media critical of Donald Trump. He didn't hide it
Speaker 1: at all. I mean, it's look, it's part of and
Speaker 1: we've talked about my book coming out next week, Justice Corrupted.
Speaker 1: Go buy the book. But it is about exactly that.
Speaker 1: It is about the hard partisans who burrowed into senior
Speaker 1: positions at the Department of Justice and the FBI, and
Speaker 1: who then corrupted the administration of Justice. And in this instance,
Speaker 1: what the facts on the face of it scream out
Speaker 1: loud is the FBI deliberately buried this information. Why not
Speaker 1: because they don't care about about the kids drug use,
Speaker 1: which is what Biden wants to claim it's about. And
Speaker 1: the media and the media is even more complicit. The
Speaker 1: question here is Joe Biden's corruption on pay to play
Speaker 1: and bribery. And as best I can tell, no reporter
Speaker 1: bothers to ask him about it. They ask him to
Speaker 1: his favorite ice cream flavor. Sure, well, and let's play
Speaker 1: that because a week ago we played the clip of
Speaker 1: basically the one question that hunters are Joe Biden's been
Speaker 1: asked about his son. He immediately goes back to he
Speaker 1: was a drug addic. Because overcome this, I love him,
Speaker 1: I'm so proud of him, and I want to play
Speaker 1: it again because I want you to understand the media
Speaker 1: knew this story, I have no doubt when they were
Speaker 1: sitting there and had the opportunity to ask the present
Speaker 1: about it. They understand this is not even about Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden anymore. This is about a direct connection between the
Speaker 1: Vice president selling access to the United States government and
Speaker 1: then getting back pay for it, designed orchestrated, signed and
Speaker 1: sealed after he leaves the vice presidency, and the media
Speaker 1: still goes back to the hunter Biden simple question. Take
Speaker 1: a look at this. Well, First of all, I'm proud
Speaker 1: of my son. This is a kid who got not
Speaker 1: a kid, he's a grown man. He got hooked on
Speaker 1: like many families have had happened hooked on drugs. He's
Speaker 1: overcome that, he's established a new life. He is. I'm
Speaker 1: confident that he is. What he says and does are
Speaker 1: consistent with what happens. And for example, he wrote a
Speaker 1: book about his problems and straightforward about it. I'm proud
Speaker 1: of him. He came along and said, by the way,
Speaker 1: this thing about a gun, I didn't know anything about it.
Speaker 1: But turns out that when he made my application to
Speaker 1: purchase a gun, what happened was he stay, I guess
Speaker 1: you get asked. I don't guess. You get asked the
Speaker 1: question are you on drugs? You use drugs? He said no,
Speaker 1: and he wrote about saying no his book. So I
Speaker 1: have gave confidence in my son. I love him, and
Speaker 1: he's on the straight and arrow, and he has been
Speaker 1: for a couple of years now, and I'm just so
Speaker 1: proud of him. Senator, you and I have great compassion
Speaker 1: view of the deal with addiction. Yeah, and that was
Speaker 1: a great moment for the President to look like a father.
Speaker 1: Which what makes me angry about that is that is
Speaker 1: the last question the media should have asked him if
Speaker 1: they were going to ask him any questions, because they
Speaker 1: have enough now on the president to say what did
Speaker 1: you know and when did you know it? About the
Speaker 1: business deals with your brother, the contracts with your brother,
Speaker 1: and the business deals with your son. It shouldn't even
Speaker 1: be about Hunter Biden anymore. It should be about, hey,
Speaker 1: you knew about this, and you knew you were getting
Speaker 1: paid when you left the vice presidency, and yet no
Speaker 1: one's asked him that question. Well, unfortunately, that's not an accident.
Speaker 1: That's deliberate. Listen, I under stand why Joe Biden answered
Speaker 1: that question. That is political spin where you want to
Speaker 1: find the most sympathetic context to explain this, and addiction
Speaker 1: is horrific. Look, most families in America have dealt with addiction.
Speaker 1: My older sister, Mariam died of an overdose. I've seen
Speaker 1: it in my family. You've probably seen it in your family.
Speaker 1: Most families have seen people struggling with addiction. It's a
Speaker 1: terrible thing. But CNN was doing the interview there, they
Speaker 1: knew exactly what they were doing. It's not that they're
Speaker 1: bad at being journalists, that they're not trying to be journalist.
Speaker 1: They are propagandists, and so they're giving him the opportunity
Speaker 1: to explain this just as compassion for your son that
Speaker 1: fell on hard times and was struggling with the demons
Speaker 1: of addiction. They don't ask did you cash the check,
Speaker 1: did you get the five hundred thousand? Did the ten
Speaker 1: percent come to you? They don't ask what did your
Speaker 1: son and your brother do to be worth five million
Speaker 1: dollars to the Chinese Communist? They don't ask what did
Speaker 1: the Chinese Communist want you to do to make it
Speaker 1: worth it to them to give your son and brother
Speaker 1: five million dollars. By the way, they also don't ask
Speaker 1: about Barisma, which was the Ukrainian natural gas company that
Speaker 1: paid Hunter Biden a million dollars a year, even though
Speaker 1: he doesn't speak Ukrainian, doesn't know anything about oil and gas.
Speaker 1: They don't ask, well, what did you do to make
Speaker 1: it worthwhile to Hunter Biden. We actually know what he
Speaker 1: did because the owner of Barisma was being investigated by
Speaker 1: a prosecutor in the Ukrainian government. The guy paying Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden was being investigated by a prosecutor. Unsurprisingly, this Ukrainian
Speaker 1: oligarch didn't want to be investigated and miraculously, in fact,
Speaker 1: I'm going to use a phrase, son of a bitch. Yeah,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden actually did something that really really helped. We've
Speaker 1: got guy paying Hunter Biden the million bucks a year.
Speaker 1: We got to play that clip because this was the
Speaker 1: old Joe Biden, the arrogant ghaki I'm above the law
Speaker 1: moment and he sits there and laughs about the power
Speaker 1: and control we had over Ukraine. He was the head
Speaker 1: lead guy on He said it not me, Yeah, on Ukraine.
Speaker 1: I went over there and said, you're not getting American
Speaker 1: dollars until you get rid of the guy that's investigating
Speaker 1: my son's company and brags about it on camera. Take
Speaker 1: a look, I said, I'm telling you're not getting a
Speaker 1: billion dollars. I said, you're not getting a billion. I'm
Speaker 1: would be leaving here, and I think it was what
Speaker 1: six hours. I look as I'm leaving six hours. If
Speaker 1: the prosecutors not fired, you're not getting the money. Oh son,
Speaker 1: I'm a bitch got fired. So that is, on its
Speaker 1: face a term we actually learned right at the beginning
Speaker 1: of Verdict, when Verdict launched, that's called a quid pro quote.
Speaker 1: There's no dispute, that's a quid pro quote. Joe Biden
Speaker 1: just told us, he said, I am holding up one
Speaker 1: billion dollars of aid from the United States taxpayers to
Speaker 1: the government of Ukraine. And that amount of money in Ukraine,
Speaker 1: just so people understand a ton that's like a trillion,
Speaker 1: half trillion in America. That is significant to the point
Speaker 1: where of course they would say I'll fire whoever you
Speaker 1: want me to, because they needed that money so desperately,
Speaker 1: especially at that moment in time. And I got to say, look,
Speaker 1: if you look at this Number one, why is the
Speaker 1: sitting vice president Obama had made Biden the point person
Speaker 1: on Ukraine. Why is the sitting vice president going and
Speaker 1: extorting a foreign government to fire a prosecutor investigating corruption
Speaker 1: in Ukraine? And why does the corporate media in the
Speaker 1: Department of Justice has zero interest in saying, well, is
Speaker 1: there any potential corruption on Biden's part. We know that
Speaker 1: Hunter made a million bucks a year with no expertise whatsoever.
Speaker 1: But you know what, no one's ever asked prior to
Speaker 1: that sweetheart deal, how much was Joe Biden giving his
Speaker 1: son Hunter every year? Look, his son Hunter was troubled,
Speaker 1: had real problems. I'd be willing to wager a large
Speaker 1: sum of money that Joe, as a loving dad, Hunter
Speaker 1: was a real and ongoing financial burden on him that
Speaker 1: he was paying. He was covering costs like his son,
Speaker 1: and not three grand or five grand. This could be
Speaker 1: thirty grand, forty grand, fifty grand on a semi regular basis.
Speaker 1: We don't know, Yeah, because nobody has ever bothered to
Speaker 1: answer that question, Which brings me to the catalysts of
Speaker 1: the long now investigation Hunter Biden, and specifically as tax issues.
Speaker 1: I wonder now the reason why he hasn't been indicted
Speaker 1: yet is because they don't want to indict him on
Speaker 1: tax issues because they know his taxes will tie his father,
Speaker 1: the President of United States of America, back to these
Speaker 1: types of business deals and money that can then be
Speaker 1: directly linked to the sitting president United States of America.
Speaker 1: Do you think there's a chance that's why they've held
Speaker 1: out for over two years. Look, I think that is
Speaker 1: certainly one of the reasons they're dragging their feet. By
Speaker 1: the way, I mentioned Sinohawk the company. If you look
Speaker 1: at at who Joe Biden as president has sold oil
Speaker 1: from the strategic petroleum reserve too, it is that company.
Speaker 1: The only company that got designated oil going overseas that
Speaker 1: we know of so far, and all the strategic oil
Speaker 1: reserves going over is the exact company which Hunter Biden.
Speaker 1: They claim he divested, right, but they never demonstrated that
Speaker 1: it was still on their It's still on their filings,
Speaker 1: and he is in fact a owner in the company.
Speaker 1: And it's nobody. You know, the old question what did
Speaker 1: you know and when did you know it? Or or
Speaker 1: to use another u Watergate analogy, follow the money. Yeah, um,
Speaker 1: there is an amazing lack of interest on anyone in
Speaker 1: the corporate media to follow the money. And it's not
Speaker 1: by accident. They don't want to know where the money
Speaker 1: went because their job is protect the big guy. They
Speaker 1: are flax for the big guy. They're not journalists, they
Speaker 1: are they are his defenders. And so they're there dissipating
Speaker 1: with the White House and trying to shift this all
Speaker 1: to a guy struggling with addiction has nothing to do.
Speaker 1: I'll say it again, I think you grow means it's
Speaker 1: no longer about Hunter Biden. It's now about the president
Speaker 1: and his corruption. And it's not did he know it
Speaker 1: and Wendy know it? It's how much did you get?
Speaker 1: We know you knew it, we know you're a part
Speaker 1: of it. We know you're meeting with the Busines associates.
Speaker 1: It's clearly that you work with Grassley, and I don't
Speaker 1: rarely see him get this fired up. You read the
Speaker 1: letter like I did. I am confident we will have
Speaker 1: I hope multiple hearings examining exactly this question. I can
Speaker 1: promise you in judiciary now, if the Democrats keep the majority,
Speaker 1: we will not have a single hearing on it. Why
Speaker 1: because none of the Democrats care. If Joe Biden is corrupted,
Speaker 1: it is literally being paid hundreds of thousands d dollars
Speaker 1: or even millions of dollars by communists China. They do
Speaker 1: not care. They will not examine it. They will cover
Speaker 1: it up. You want to talk about one of the
Speaker 1: stakes of the election, It is actually examining what appears
Speaker 1: to be prima facia evidence of a pay to play corruption.
Speaker 1: It makes me want to get to the issue the
Speaker 1: election real quick. You've been on the bus tour. We're
Speaker 1: weeks away from the election. One of the cool things
Speaker 1: that you did is a senator getting in the game
Speaker 1: every time we have an election cycle, not saying hey,
Speaker 1: I'm not running right now, I'm going to chill and
Speaker 1: enjoy this. You seem to double down when you're not
Speaker 1: on the ballot and help people get elected. You did this,
Speaker 1: and a lot of people might not know the history
Speaker 1: of this, but you actually did the twenty five for
Speaker 1: twenty back in the twenty twenty cycle. You've done it
Speaker 1: again this time. And there are some key races that
Speaker 1: are going to decide who controls Congress. And that's why
Speaker 1: you've been on this bus tour. Talk about some of
Speaker 1: those races that people should be paying attention to. Number
Speaker 1: one and two that especially an election, if you want
Speaker 1: to know how things are going to go, if we're
Speaker 1: gonna keep control of the House and the Senate, everybody
Speaker 1: wants to know that. How do you watch on election night? Well,
Speaker 1: let me say, let me explain what we've been doing
Speaker 1: with the House for the last two cycles. So two
Speaker 1: years ago I launched an initiative that we called twenty
Speaker 1: five for twenty And what I did is selected twenty
Speaker 1: five candidates for the House of Representatives and I endorsed them,
Speaker 1: I campaigned for them. Twenty three of them were challengers,
Speaker 1: so twenty three of them were not incumbents. They were
Speaker 1: either running for open seats, so they were running against
Speaker 1: Democrat incumbents. And I raised money for them. Raised about
Speaker 1: three and a half million dollars for those twenty five candidates,
Speaker 1: all in hard money, money that I didn't spend, I
Speaker 1: didn't keep. I sent it to them so they can
Speaker 1: spend it on their campaigns. Of those twenty five candidates,
Speaker 1: fourteen of them one, which is a huge number if
Speaker 1: you understand campaign politics, and you didn't pick races to
Speaker 1: you know, prop yourself up and say, oh, we went
Speaker 1: fourteen for fourteen. You went after races where we needed
Speaker 1: to win, and pick the hard races, not the automatic
Speaker 1: w so you look like, oh, I picked eighteen winners. Well,
Speaker 1: and in particular, what I'm looking for is the strongest
Speaker 1: conservatives who can win. And so that's an intersection of
Speaker 1: two things. Who can win matters if you're the best
Speaker 1: candidate on earth. But it's a D plus twenty district.
Speaker 1: God love you, but I'm not going to ask people
Speaker 1: to invest in tilting at windmills. The stakes in the
Speaker 1: country are too damn high to mess around. But what
Speaker 1: I'm looking for is people that they can win, but
Speaker 1: be when they get there, they're going to be real leaders.
Speaker 1: They're going to be fighters, They're gonna do something. They're
Speaker 1: not just going to be sheep in the herd, but
Speaker 1: they're going to stand and fight. And so we're trying
Speaker 1: to find the strongest conservatives, and we had a number
Speaker 1: of donors who would say, look, Ted, I trust you
Speaker 1: if you identify these guys that they're going to be
Speaker 1: real leaders and fighters. I'm all in. Two years ago,
Speaker 1: we won fourteen out of the twenty five. If we
Speaker 1: had won six more, we would have taken control of
Speaker 1: the House two years ago and all of the disastrous
Speaker 1: legislation that's been rammed through would have been stopped. So
Speaker 1: we came close to keeping Nancy Pelosi from being Speaker.
Speaker 1: This year, I'm doing it again. We're doing it. It's
Speaker 1: called twenty five for twenty two because apparently I'm really
Speaker 1: bad at naming things. But we picked twenty five candidates
Speaker 1: and same thing, endorsed them, campaign for them. So many
Speaker 1: of the stops on the bus tour are supporting the
Speaker 1: candidates that are in the twenty for twenty two. And
Speaker 1: again we've raised millions of dollars for these candidates. Now
Speaker 1: there are a lot of them that are really exciting.
Speaker 1: So one group that is in it. It is a
Speaker 1: total of six Latinas who are running who are all
Speaker 1: Republican nominees. Three in South Texas, Myra Flores, Monica Dela Cruz,
Speaker 1: Cassie Garcia. These are in areas, by the way, they've
Speaker 1: been controlled by Democrats for decades, longer than I've been alive,
Speaker 1: and that's why they've gotten so much national media attention.
Speaker 1: You saw this long before the media was talking about it,
Speaker 1: and now they have the funding to actually put up
Speaker 1: a legitimate fight in these democratic districts, which I think
Speaker 1: is the coolest part of election. I is going to
Speaker 1: be watching these races. That's exactly right. And you look
Speaker 1: at a canary in the coal mine. Was a few
Speaker 1: month ago. Remember we had a special election in Texas
Speaker 1: and it was for the district it's along the Gulf
Speaker 1: coast from just south of Corpus Christi all the way
Speaker 1: down to Brownsville. Brownsville is the southern tip of Texas,
Speaker 1: right along the border with Mexico. That is a district
Speaker 1: that has not had a Republican since eighteen seventy one. Wow,
Speaker 1: it's a long time. Yeah. They had a special election
Speaker 1: elected a Republican. Her name is Myra Flora. She's an
Speaker 1: Hispanic woman. She's the first woman actually born in Mexico
Speaker 1: elected to the US House of Representatives. Myra is Latina.
Speaker 1: She's a conservative Republican. This district is the most Hispanic
Speaker 1: district in the country at a four hundred and thirty five,
Speaker 1: The most Hispanic district just elected Republican. The district next
Speaker 1: to her, Monica Dela Cruz, is running there. That districts
Speaker 1: has not had a Republican and over one hundred years.
Speaker 1: I believe Monica is going to win in November. The
Speaker 1: district next to her has not had a Republican and
Speaker 1: over a hundred years. I believe Cassie Garcia is gonna win.
Speaker 1: I think there's a very good chance we wake up
Speaker 1: the day after election Day and all of the Real
Speaker 1: Grand Valley, all of South Texas is represented by Republicans
Speaker 1: and Hispanic women. By the way, two of the three
Speaker 1: are married to Border patrol agents. Both Myra and Cassie
Speaker 1: are married to border patrol age. And that's why they ran.
Speaker 1: People need to understand this. They ran because they saw
Speaker 1: the carnage, they saw the lawlessness, they saw the death,
Speaker 1: they saw the destruction, they saw the human trafficking, they
Speaker 1: saw the fetnal, all the things that I think some
Speaker 1: people just kind of you know, they hear it so
Speaker 1: often you forget that's real human beings affected. They're witnessing
Speaker 1: it every day and their husbands are coming home telling
Speaker 1: them what they saw that day. And the husbands, I
Speaker 1: think it's pretty clear agree on one thing. We're losing
Speaker 1: because of the policies of the Biden administration. They are
Speaker 1: not allowed to win ever a day out there. I
Speaker 1: don't know if they've had a good day since Biden
Speaker 1: became present, because we've handcuffed our border patrol agents. And
Speaker 1: that's why their wives are now running for office. So
Speaker 1: that's exactly right South Texas. They see the misery firsthand,
Speaker 1: but it's not just the three of them. Also included
Speaker 1: in the group where Catalina laff who's running in a
Speaker 1: suburb of Chicago up in Illinois, Anna Polina Luna who's
Speaker 1: running in Tampa, and Yes Lee Vega who's running in Virginia.
Speaker 1: I had all six of them to just north of Houston,
Speaker 1: to the Woodlands for a fundraiser. Six Republican nominees, all beautiful,
Speaker 1: all brilliant, all Latinas, all fireballs. I just shut up
Speaker 1: and got out of the way. We raised over a
Speaker 1: million dollars just for those six candidates. And I am
Speaker 1: so all in that this opportunity is a generational game changer.
Speaker 1: That when you have arrogant Democrats like Nancy Pelosi or
Speaker 1: Adam Schiff saying illegal immigration is not a problem, when
Speaker 1: you suddenly have a bunch of fiery Latinas who live
Speaker 1: on the southern borders say you are full of crapping,
Speaker 1: don't screws because we live there, it is. I could
Speaker 1: not be more excited. So the group that's six of them,
Speaker 1: We've got candidates across the country who are Look. John
Speaker 1: Gibbs in Michigan, African American man went to Harvard and Stanford,
Speaker 1: was a missionary in Japan. Is smart is principle? I
Speaker 1: think he's got a real good shot at winning the role.
Speaker 1: In Michigan right there's a very tight race right now
Speaker 1: we're seeing with Whitmer, which I think is going to
Speaker 1: be very interesting to watch an election as well. But
Speaker 1: you can see the people there are looking at Republican
Speaker 1: candidates like they never had before statewide. So in the
Speaker 1: next two weeks, I'm doing a rally with Yes Leavegan
Speaker 1: in Virginia, I'm doing a rally with John Gibbs in Michigan.
Speaker 1: And we're also like Michigan is a state, as you noted,
Speaker 1: that has a big gubernatorial race. We're trying to focus
Speaker 1: these also in races that have either a big gubernatorial
Speaker 1: race or a big Senate race, so you get a
Speaker 1: double whammy. And John Gibbs is someone who look the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party plays the race cards so much to see
Speaker 1: a strong conservative black man representing Michigan working class who's
Speaker 1: smart and educated. Another Canada, I'm supporting Jennifer Ruth Green,
Speaker 1: African American woman Air Force Academy graduate leader, has been
Speaker 1: decades in the Air Force. She's smart, She's got a
Speaker 1: master's from Liberty University. We did a retreat with these
Speaker 1: twenty five candidates and our investors. In the middle of
Speaker 1: the retreat, Jennifer Ruth and John Gibbs begin speaking fluently
Speaker 1: in Japan, in Japanese, and it was wonderful. You're looking
Speaker 1: at the Left doesn't know how to handle smart conservative minorities.
Speaker 1: They claim we don't exist. I'm trying to change the
Speaker 1: face of the party. I'm trying to bring in people
Speaker 1: who will be fundamental warriors. I'll give another one, Eli Crane.
Speaker 1: Eli Crane was a Navy seal, had five combat deployments,
Speaker 1: is smart, is principled. He's running in Arizona. He's going
Speaker 1: to defeat an incumbent Democrat. I did a big rally
Speaker 1: for Eli. He is a warrior, and so we're doing
Speaker 1: this across the country. I think there are Caroline Leavitt
Speaker 1: up in New Hampshire, young woman, twenty six years old.
Speaker 1: If and when she wins, she will be the youngest
Speaker 1: woman ever elected to Congress, which I love that she
Speaker 1: worked in the Trump White House. She's blonde, beautiful, smart,
Speaker 1: grew up in New Hampshire, went to college in New Hampshire,
Speaker 1: played VARs. The only time you've ever said, like Trump,
Speaker 1: by the way, would you just describe her? Which really
Speaker 1: makes me laugh. Well, I'm beautiful and smart. Can't you
Speaker 1: see if I got a campaign trail for her? I
Speaker 1: love it very point yeah. I mean, look, he understands marketing,
Speaker 1: and you want a candidate who who is exciting and
Speaker 1: who is next generation. By the way, I'll tell you
Speaker 1: Caroline Leavitt was a candidate who in the primary was
Speaker 1: running against a very moderate candidate who had been Chris
Speaker 1: Christie's executive director in the state. Republican leadership in Washington
Speaker 1: spent five million dollars trying to beat her. Wow, because
Speaker 1: they didn't want a strong conservative in that race. I
Speaker 1: went up and supported her, did a big rally for
Speaker 1: the day before the primary election. She won, shocked everyone.
Speaker 1: I think she's got a good shot at winning in November.
Speaker 1: But but all of these are designed to elect the
Speaker 1: next generation of leaders. So that look I hear all
Speaker 1: the time as I travel the country. How come Republican
Speaker 1: leadership isn't more conservative? How Come it's not more conservative
Speaker 1: in the House. How come it's not more conservative in
Speaker 1: the Senate. Here's my standard answer. If you want leadership
Speaker 1: to be more conservative, the single best way is elect
Speaker 1: strong conservative warriors to Congress. Why because leadership reflects the conference.
Speaker 1: Leadership reflects their members. If their members are a bunch
Speaker 1: of squishes, they're beship's going to be a squish. If
Speaker 1: you have warriors that say, we're not going to to
Speaker 1: to lie down. Look, one of the first fights we're
Speaker 1: going to have is to defund the eighty seven thousand
Speaker 1: new IRS agents, to say we will not fund them.
Speaker 1: You're not going to harass the American people, and we're
Speaker 1: going to put that money into securing the border. Now,
Speaker 1: they're gonna be wobbly Republicans that say, oh, don't have
Speaker 1: that fight. No, we're scared of that fight. The more
Speaker 1: strong Republicans we elect, the more conservatives we elect, the
Speaker 1: more likely the party is going to be to have
Speaker 1: backbone to fight fights that matter. You mentioned this and
Speaker 1: we got about ten minutes left, but I think it's
Speaker 1: really important we take a moment. There's a race. I'm
Speaker 1: concerned about a guy that I love, spent some time
Speaker 1: with him at the NA convention in Houston, who I'm
Speaker 1: rooting for. He's a good friend of yours, Mike Lee.
Speaker 1: I'm worried he's in trouble there. You and I talked
Speaker 1: about this before the show. Today, and people need to
Speaker 1: realize he needs money and he needs people to invest
Speaker 1: in this. And this is a Senate race that we
Speaker 1: do not want to lose because Mike Lee is a
Speaker 1: guy that stands for life. He stands up for the
Speaker 1: Second Amendment. He's one of the kindest men I think
Speaker 1: I've ever met in the Senate. You would probably agree
Speaker 1: with that, and he needs some help right now. Look,
Speaker 1: that is absolutely right, Mike is He is by far
Speaker 1: my best friend in the Senate. He is a rock
Speaker 1: rib principled conservative. He's a constitutionalist. He loves the Constitution.
Speaker 1: I think he's the only guest we've had twice on
Speaker 1: Verdict who's joined us on this podcast in the past.
Speaker 1: He is someone who does not shy away from a fight.
Speaker 1: And I got to tell you, in the Senate that
Speaker 1: is extremely rare. I don't think I can count on
Speaker 1: one hand the number of Senators about whom that is true.
Speaker 1: He's not afraid of standing up to Democrats, he's not
Speaker 1: afraid of standing up to the press, he's not afraid
Speaker 1: of standing up to our own party. That is exceptionally rare.
Speaker 1: Now you might say, okay, look, Utah's bright red. How
Speaker 1: possibly could Mike Lee be in jeopardy, and the reason
Speaker 1: is the Democrats have done something really devious and dishonest.
Speaker 1: The candidate who's running is Evan McMullin. Remember the guy
Speaker 1: who ran as an independent against Trump in twenty sixteen. Well,
Speaker 1: he's still claiming to run as an independent, and the
Speaker 1: Democrats in Utah decided not to run a candidate, so
Speaker 1: there's no Democrat on the ballot. The Utah Democrat Party
Speaker 1: then endorsed Evan McMullan, so he has the support of
Speaker 1: the of the Democrats. Not only that, he's using Act Blue,
Speaker 1: the fundraising mechanism, to raise money from all the leftists
Speaker 1: and socialists across the country. They're flooding cash and the
Speaker 1: majority of his fundraising has come from out of state,
Speaker 1: and it's it's hard leftist. It is people who want
Speaker 1: the country to continue on the path we are now.
Speaker 1: He spent there was just reporting that came out. He
Speaker 1: spent over one point six million dollars from his campaign
Speaker 1: paying all these Democrat consultants and operatives. Because that's who's
Speaker 1: running his campaign, is the left wing. But here's why
Speaker 1: it's dishonest. Their strategy is to get all the Democrats
Speaker 1: in Utah and their significant number of them, and then
Speaker 1: just convince five or ten percent of the moderate Republicans,
Speaker 1: the ones who maybe don't like Donald Trump or maybe
Speaker 1: wouldn't vote for a Democrat if it has a D
Speaker 1: next his name, but it has an eye independent you
Speaker 1: feel are about it, and they feel like, oh, he
Speaker 1: seems nice. Look at the end of the day, he
Speaker 1: is not nice. He's lying to the people of the
Speaker 1: state of Utah. And in particular, let me give you
Speaker 1: the scenario that really underscores the stakes of this race.
Speaker 1: We could end up the day after election day with
Speaker 1: fifty Democrats, or rather with fifty Republicans and forty nine Democrats.
Speaker 1: That's an easy, easy outcome. And let's say McMullan wins.
Speaker 1: If that happens, McMullen will decide who the next majority
Speaker 1: leader the Senate is. Now he's playing this game. He
Speaker 1: said he will not vote for Mitch McConnell under any circumstances.
Speaker 1: He will not vote for Mitch McConnell. But he's playing
Speaker 1: this game up. I'm not gonna caucus with anybody. I'm
Speaker 1: just gonna be my own independent soul. Yeah, that is
Speaker 1: utter and complete garbage because he will. And this is
Speaker 1: where he's playing a game because he thinks the voters
Speaker 1: don't understand how it works. If we have a fifty
Speaker 1: forty nine Senate, he will either do nothing, which I
Speaker 1: doubt which he won't do, in which case Republicans will
Speaker 1: have the majority, or he will vote and give the
Speaker 1: majority to Chuck Schumer. And that's the reality. Either way,
Speaker 1: it's a choice. And given that the people voting for
Speaker 1: him or Democrats, the people funding him or Democrats, the
Speaker 1: people he's paying, or Democrats that he's running against Republicans.
Speaker 1: And by the way, he voted for Joe Biden. It
Speaker 1: is one hundred percent. It's not even ninety nine percent.
Speaker 1: It is one hundred percent that if he is the
Speaker 1: decisive vote, he will vote for and decide Chuck Schumer's
Speaker 1: the majority leader. He will decide Bernie Sanders is the
Speaker 1: chairman of the Budget Committee. He will put Elizabeth Warren
Speaker 1: in power. He will put every leftist in the Senate
Speaker 1: and power. He will ensure that Dick Durbin remains chairman
Speaker 1: of the Judiciary Committee. That means Chuck Grassley doesn't. That
Speaker 1: means we will have not a single hearing on Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden or Joe Biden's corruption and McMullen is trying to
Speaker 1: fool the voters in Utah. I gotta tell you, the
Speaker 1: polling has shown this is really, really close. So I
Speaker 1: very rarely do this on the podcast, but I'm going
Speaker 1: to ask our listeners go to leef Senate dot com
Speaker 1: leef Senate dot com make a contribution. If Mike loses,
Speaker 1: it is difficult to Jenna could go off the rails
Speaker 1: for this country. From our standpoint, it could literally keep
Speaker 1: us on the disastrous path we've been for the last
Speaker 1: two years. But even beyond that, if we sit back
Speaker 1: and allow a constitutional conservative warrior like Mike Lee to
Speaker 1: be taken out by deceptive lies, shame on us. And
Speaker 1: so I'll tell you Mike is part of the twenty
Speaker 1: five for twenty. I've never had a senator as part
Speaker 1: of it, but I think that the stakes are that
Speaker 1: high that anyone who cares about this fight for freedom
Speaker 1: ought to go and do everything they can. If you know,
Speaker 1: friends in Utah, it really is important because it's deceptive
Speaker 1: what they're doing to the voters in Utah. I can't
Speaker 1: finish today's show Center without asking about it. Another issue,
Speaker 1: one of the most perverted and sick comments I think
Speaker 1: I've ever seen from Stacy Abrahams, the woman who still
Speaker 1: hasn't conceded her election loss last time, who said this
Speaker 1: about inflation the economy, connecting it to abortion. Take a look.
Speaker 1: But let's be clear, having children is why you're worried
Speaker 1: about your price for gas. It's why you're concerned about
Speaker 1: how much food costs for women. This is not a
Speaker 1: reductive issue. You can't divorce being forced to hear unwanted
Speaker 1: pregnancy from the economic realities of having a child. To
Speaker 1: be clear, she's saying that if you are struggling under
Speaker 1: our economy, under bide inflation, just kill off your unborn
Speaker 1: children and that will fix the problem. Look, I gotta
Speaker 1: say I watched that clip and I'm just I'm really sad.
Speaker 1: The Democrat Party has gotten so extreme that it is
Speaker 1: now not their position, as Bill Clinton said that abortion
Speaker 1: should be safe, legal, and rare. It is their position
Speaker 1: that abortion is a good thing, is a wonderful thing,
Speaker 1: that you should celebrate abortion. She's sitting there saying, Hey,
Speaker 1: you're struggling with inflation, just get an abortion, that'd be great.
Speaker 1: They're actively encouraging abortion, saying well, look, Biden hurt the
Speaker 1: economy so much. I got a great solution, just don't
Speaker 1: have kids. Like that is where do you draw the line. Right,
Speaker 1: you lose your job and you're pregnant, you just look
Speaker 1: at your wife and say, hey, we got to kill
Speaker 1: this kid off because of our finances. That's how little
Speaker 1: you value life. And I think that's what it came
Speaker 1: back to you. To me, it was this is how
Speaker 1: little she values life. And now they're openly talking about
Speaker 1: it that way. It is where today's Democrat Party has
Speaker 1: gotten so extreme. And look, Stacey Abrams represents the id
Speaker 1: of the Democrat Party. You know, not too long ago,
Speaker 1: one of the Star Trek shows cast her as the
Speaker 1: president of Planet Earth, because that's like the intersection of
Speaker 1: Hollywood leftist fantasies. But today's radical left they view abortion.
Speaker 1: Every abortion is something to be celebrated, dancing in the street.
Speaker 1: Stacy Abrahams apparently is not remotely concerned that every year
Speaker 1: in North New York City, more African American babies are
Speaker 1: aborted than are born. That's a heartbreaking statistic. And it
Speaker 1: was one thing for the Democrat Party to say, gosh,
Speaker 1: we more an abortion too, but we think it should
Speaker 1: be available as a choice. I don't agree with that,
Speaker 1: but I understand that where they are today is to
Speaker 1: celebrate it and to be urging people this is what
Speaker 1: you should do. That that really shows the corruption. And
Speaker 1: part of it is most Democrat campaigns are funded in
Speaker 1: significant ways by Planned Parenthood, and planned Parenthood makes billions
Speaker 1: of dollars in the abortion industry. It is their industry,
Speaker 1: and they are interested. Their financial incentives is the more
Speaker 1: abortions that happen, the more money they make. And you
Speaker 1: see now the Democrat politicians their funding is essentially saying
Speaker 1: the same thing. That's really it's tragic and the Overton
Speaker 1: window has moved in a horrible way. Let your friends
Speaker 1: know in Georgia. I say it at the end of
Speaker 1: the show every week number one. Share this podcast with
Speaker 1: your family and friends, especially people in Georgia. In Utah
Speaker 1: with Mike Lee. Makes you give to his campaign this week,
Speaker 1: as you mentioned, write us a five star review because
Speaker 1: when you do it helps us on the charts reach
Speaker 1: more conservatives out there. Makes you do that, hit that
Speaker 1: subscriber download button and center. We'll see you back here
Speaker 1: in a couple of days.