WEBVTT - It Could Happen Here Weekly 255

0:00:01.870 --> 0:00:04.010
<v Speaker 1>Call zone media. Hey, everybody.

0:00:04.230 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Robert Evans here, and I wanted to let you know

0:00:06.380 --> 0:00:09.879
<v Speaker 2>this is a compilation episode. So every episode of the

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:13.700
<v Speaker 2>week that just happened is here in one convenient and

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:17.020
<v Speaker 2>with somewhat less ads package for you to listen to

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:19.340
<v Speaker 2>in a long stretch if you want. If you've been

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:21.390
<v Speaker 2>listening to the episodes every day this week, there's going

0:00:21.410 --> 0:00:23.430
<v Speaker 2>to be nothing new here for you, but you can

0:00:23.470 --> 0:00:24.410
<v Speaker 2>make your own decisions.

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:29.620
<v Speaker 1>Hello, everyone.

0:00:29.900 --> 0:00:32.060
<v Speaker 3>My name is Danal Kurd, and I'm a researcher and

0:00:32.100 --> 0:00:35.580
<v Speaker 3>analyst of Arab and Palestinian politics. Today, I want to

0:00:35.620 --> 0:00:38.370
<v Speaker 3>read remarks I gave at an event about higher education,

0:00:39.150 --> 0:00:42.410
<v Speaker 3>where I was invited to give the introductory remarks before

0:00:42.430 --> 0:00:44.650
<v Speaker 3>a panel of experts were going to speak on the

0:00:44.670 --> 0:00:47.430
<v Speaker 3>subject of higher ed around the world. And I was

0:00:47.510 --> 0:00:50.430
<v Speaker 3>asked specifically to talk about attacks on academic freedom here

0:00:50.450 --> 0:00:53.540
<v Speaker 3>in the United States. And I'm a good sport, always

0:00:53.580 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 3>happy to be of service.

0:00:54.540 --> 0:00:54.980
<v Speaker 1>So I did.

0:00:55.990 --> 0:01:00.550
<v Speaker 3>But then I was accused after my remarks of downplaying anti-Semitism.

0:01:01.430 --> 0:01:04.210
<v Speaker 3>So for this episode, I want to read those remarks

0:01:04.850 --> 0:01:07.610
<v Speaker 3>that I gave at this event. And then I'll explain

0:01:07.660 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 3>why that accusation that was leveled against me is so

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 3>insidious and harmful and outrageous and is part of a

0:01:14.260 --> 0:01:19.180
<v Speaker 3>broader problem of rampant anti-Palestinian racism in the United States. Okay,

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:22.300
<v Speaker 3>here are the remarks I made at that event. Thank

0:01:22.340 --> 0:01:24.860
<v Speaker 3>you all for attending this panel. I wanted to briefly

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:28.610
<v Speaker 3>situate this next discussion in the current political landscape and

0:01:28.650 --> 0:01:31.590
<v Speaker 3>give a quick rundown of what has been happening. The

0:01:31.630 --> 0:01:35.550
<v Speaker 3>news is so overwhelming, some of these details can be lost. First,

0:01:35.890 --> 0:01:37.510
<v Speaker 3>I think most of us have heard of the Trump

0:01:37.530 --> 0:01:41.450
<v Speaker 3>administration freezing funding for a number of universities. Many of

0:01:41.490 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 3>these universities have entered into negotiations with the administration and

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:48.580
<v Speaker 3>agreed to make changes to the curriculum and internal structures

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 3>in order to drop the investigations against them and release

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 3>that funding. For example, Columbia University agreed to pay the

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Trump administration $ 220 million, punish 70 of its students in

0:02:01.860 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 3>a variety of ways, including expulsion, and agreed to monitor

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:10.710
<v Speaker 3>and report their programs for, quote, unlawful DEI goals. One

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:12.990
<v Speaker 3>of the ways Columbia has agreed to monitor their own departments,

0:02:13.530 --> 0:02:16.870
<v Speaker 3>as The Intercept reported back in April, is by appointing

0:02:17.010 --> 0:02:19.950
<v Speaker 3>a vice provost in charge of ensuring a balanced curriculum,

0:02:20.370 --> 0:02:23.700
<v Speaker 3>that's in quotes, within the Middle Eastern, South Asian, and

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:27.380
<v Speaker 3>African Studies Department. So the faculty in that department will

0:02:27.419 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 3>no longer run the department. As the Middle East Studies Association,

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:35.130
<v Speaker 3>in a statement back in March 2025, noted, placing the

0:02:35.169 --> 0:02:40.010
<v Speaker 3>department under, quote, administrative receivership is a fundamental abrogation of

0:02:40.030 --> 0:02:44.900
<v Speaker 3>the autonomy of university governance. Like at Columbia, a lot

0:02:44.940 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 3>of these investigations and targeting of universities has focused on

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:52.700
<v Speaker 3>the presence of DEI programs and allegations of anti-Semitism. The

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 3>Trump administration has been aided by recent Supreme Court rulings,

0:02:56.260 --> 0:02:58.940
<v Speaker 3>particularly the cases of Students for Fair Admissions v. the

0:02:58.980 --> 0:03:02.100
<v Speaker 3>University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v.

0:03:02.139 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 4>Harvard.

0:03:03.220 --> 0:03:06.500
<v Speaker 3>These cases overturned the 2003 case of Greta v. Bollinger

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:10.620
<v Speaker 3>that had allowed higher education institutions to consider race in admissions.

0:03:11.830 --> 0:03:15.010
<v Speaker 3>Using this ruling, the Trump administration has gone after universities

0:03:15.510 --> 0:03:18.550
<v Speaker 3>with programs that assist students of color, as well as

0:03:18.610 --> 0:03:23.340
<v Speaker 3>initiatives focused on diversity. Allegations of anti-Semitism, especially in the

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.420
<v Speaker 3>wake of campus protests over the past two years, have

0:03:26.500 --> 0:03:29.980
<v Speaker 3>also been used to attack universities. The American Association of

0:03:30.060 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 3>University Professors, in partnership with the Middle East Studies Association,

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:38.420
<v Speaker 3>analyzed the data on the Title VI complaints around anti-Semitism,

0:03:39.060 --> 0:03:42.190
<v Speaker 3>which have indeed ballooned over the past two years. In

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:47.060
<v Speaker 3>their report titled, Discriminating Against Dissent, they found that most

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 3>government investigations of anti-Semitism, 78%, are prompted by complaints received

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:56.940
<v Speaker 3>from outside of university and college campuses, including from people

0:03:56.980 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 3>and organizations who have no relationship with the schools under investigation.

0:04:01.500 --> 0:04:04.250
<v Speaker 3>Of the 102 complaints filed with the Office of Civil

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:08.550
<v Speaker 3>Rights that the report analyzes, all but one focus on

0:04:08.630 --> 0:04:11.910
<v Speaker 3>speech critical of Israel. The report documents the surge in

0:04:11.950 --> 0:04:17.089
<v Speaker 3>investigations since October 7th, 2023, with more investigations opened in

0:04:17.130 --> 0:04:20.909
<v Speaker 3>the last two months of 2023, 25 investigations, than in

0:04:21.050 --> 0:04:26.330
<v Speaker 3>all previous years combined, 24 investigations. Investigations broke record numbers

0:04:26.380 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 3>in 2024, 39 investigations, and are on track to do

0:04:27.620 --> 0:04:29.890
<v Speaker 3>so again in 2025, with 38 investigations as of September 30th.

0:04:29.900 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 3>This was back in 2025. So the Trump administration has

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 3>used both of these things, DEI and anti-Semitism, to investigate universities.

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 3>At the same time, they have also attacked the National

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.940
<v Speaker 3>Science Foundation, the National Endowment for the Humanities, National Institutes

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 3>of Health, all federal funding sources for the majority of

0:04:53.940 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 3>research that happens at universities across disciplines, the natural sciences,

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:02.679
<v Speaker 3>social sciences, and humanities. The Trump administration has additionally attacked

0:05:02.740 --> 0:05:05.500
<v Speaker 3>foreign students and the processes by which they are able

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:07.940
<v Speaker 3>to get visas to study in the United States, which

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 3>is another way to get at a major revenue source

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:15.140
<v Speaker 3>for many universities. Finally, and most recently, the Trump administration

0:05:15.190 --> 0:05:17.930
<v Speaker 3>put together what they called the Compact for Academic Excellence

0:05:17.970 --> 0:05:22.970
<v Speaker 3>in Higher Education. This compact offers universities that sign preferential

0:05:23.010 --> 0:05:26.010
<v Speaker 3>treatment for federal research money in exchange for agreeing to

0:05:26.070 --> 0:05:30.930
<v Speaker 3>a list of conditions. Conditions include freezing tuition, capping international enrollment,

0:05:31.290 --> 0:05:35.130
<v Speaker 3>requiring the SAT, and limiting faculty speech on political issues.

0:05:36.210 --> 0:05:39.289
<v Speaker 3>Only one university thus far has indicated their willingness to sign,

0:05:39.930 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 3>the University of Texas at Austin, with most rejecting and

0:05:43.390 --> 0:05:47.659
<v Speaker 3>a few expressing reservations. Whatever you personally think of these trends,

0:05:47.900 --> 0:05:49.900
<v Speaker 3>I think what they make clear is that there is

0:05:49.940 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 3>a concerted effort to change the trajectory and scope of

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.420
<v Speaker 3>higher education in this country. And members of the Trump

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 3>administration have certainly made this explicitly clear. Vice President J.D. Vance,

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.160
<v Speaker 3>speaking to the National Conservatism Conference back in 2021, said, quote,

0:06:04.050 --> 0:06:06.630
<v Speaker 3>we have to honestly and aggressively attack the universities in

0:06:06.650 --> 0:06:10.850
<v Speaker 3>this country, and that, quote, universities are the enemy. So

0:06:11.070 --> 0:06:13.370
<v Speaker 3>this is the reality we are facing, and there is

0:06:13.390 --> 0:06:15.910
<v Speaker 3>an urgency in understanding how this impacts the quality of

0:06:15.950 --> 0:06:20.349
<v Speaker 3>education in American universities for students, the quality of faculty research,

0:06:20.930 --> 0:06:24.270
<v Speaker 3>the ability of universities to maintain their independence, and the

0:06:24.310 --> 0:06:39.350
<v Speaker 3>role of universities in generating social mobility for marginalized people. Okay,

0:06:39.370 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 3>so that's what I said in my introductory remarks before

0:06:42.650 --> 0:06:45.780
<v Speaker 3>I turned it over to the speakers. Again, I was

0:06:46.060 --> 0:06:51.659
<v Speaker 3>accused of downplaying anti-Semitism, and I was also likened to neo-Nazis.

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 5>Why?

0:06:52.779 --> 0:06:57.460
<v Speaker 3>For citing the report by the AAUP. In case people

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 3>don't know, this is a very insidious trope of anti-Palestinian racism,

0:07:02.500 --> 0:07:07.020
<v Speaker 3>often leveled at Palestinians. The idea that Palestinians are inherently

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:11.260
<v Speaker 3>anti-Semitic that they are akin to Nazis, that their identity

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:14.260
<v Speaker 3>is not a national one similar to every other nationality,

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:18.060
<v Speaker 3>but that Palestinian is a type of ideology centered on

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 3>the hatred of Jews. That is anti-Palestinian racism. UC Berkeley's

0:07:23.140 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Department of Ethnic Studies has a pretty useful video on

0:07:25.580 --> 0:07:29.650
<v Speaker 3>the subject, on how anti-Palestinian racism is predicated on the

0:07:29.710 --> 0:07:33.730
<v Speaker 3>assumption that Palestinians are a threat to public order, and

0:07:33.770 --> 0:07:37.350
<v Speaker 3>that it presupposes Palestinians, quote, do not enjoy the same

0:07:37.410 --> 0:07:42.050
<v Speaker 3>rights to safety, and flourishing as others. Now, this overlaps

0:07:42.290 --> 0:07:45.810
<v Speaker 3>with racism against Arabs and white supremacy against people of

0:07:45.870 --> 0:07:50.190
<v Speaker 3>color generally. It overlaps with Islamophobia, but it is also

0:07:50.270 --> 0:07:54.820
<v Speaker 3>something distinct. There's a large literature on this. Dina Hurwitz

0:07:54.900 --> 0:07:59.780
<v Speaker 3>and Walter White, writing for the American Bar Association, highlight how, quote,

0:08:00.460 --> 0:08:04.740
<v Speaker 3>anti-Palestinian racism may also be Islamophobic, but importantly, not all

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:07.770
<v Speaker 3>Palestinians or all Arabs are Muslim. Just as not all

0:08:07.810 --> 0:08:11.630
<v Speaker 3>Muslims are Arab, anti-Palestinian racism foments a distinct form of

0:08:11.690 --> 0:08:15.290
<v Speaker 3>discrimination faced by Palestinians and those advocating for Palestinian rights,

0:08:15.770 --> 0:08:20.770
<v Speaker 3>including non-Arabs and non-Muslims, for example Christians and Jews. Palestinians

0:08:20.810 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 3>and their advocates encounter anti-Palestinian racism and Islamophobia, regardless of

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:29.820
<v Speaker 3>whether they identify as secular, Muslim, Christian, Druze, or Jewish.

0:08:30.620 --> 0:08:30.980
<v Speaker 1>End quote.

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 3>The Arab Canadian Lawyers Association has a report also on

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 3>this subject titled Anti-Palestinian Racism, Naming, Framing, and Manifestations. And

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:44.959
<v Speaker 3>they define it right on the first page. Quote, Anti-Palestinian

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 3>racism is a form of anti-Arab racism that silences, excludes, erases, stereotypes, defames,

0:08:52.540 --> 0:08:57.839
<v Speaker 3>or dehumanizes Palestinians or their narratives. Anti-Palestinian racism takes various forms,

0:08:57.940 --> 0:09:02.689
<v Speaker 3>including denying the Nakba and justifying violence against Palestinians. failing

0:09:02.710 --> 0:09:06.730
<v Speaker 3>to acknowledge Palestinians as an indigenous people with a collective identity, belonging,

0:09:06.870 --> 0:09:10.450
<v Speaker 3>and rights in relation to occupied Palestine, erasing the human

0:09:10.470 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 3>rights and equal dignity and worth of Palestinians, excluding or

0:09:13.900 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 3>pressuring others to exclude Palestinian perspectives, Palestinians and their allies,

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 3>defaming Palestinians and their allies with slander, such as being

0:09:22.260 --> 0:09:28.089
<v Speaker 3>inherently anti-Semitic, a terrorist threat-slash-sympathizer, or opposed to democratic values.

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:33.100
<v Speaker 3>And finally, political scientists Yasmin Aboulaban and Abigail Bakan wrote

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 3>a helpful essay on the matter for the Project on

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:37.590
<v Speaker 3>Middle East Political Science, which I will link in the

0:09:37.620 --> 0:09:42.090
<v Speaker 3>show notes as well. They write, quote, Anti-Palestinian racism is

0:09:42.130 --> 0:09:44.150
<v Speaker 3>a form of racism which does not say its name.

0:09:44.910 --> 0:09:49.850
<v Speaker 3>Anti-Palestinian racism relies on various forms of coding to hide divisive,

0:09:50.010 --> 0:09:53.809
<v Speaker 3>undemocratic practices of exclusion in an age where overt racism

0:09:53.890 --> 0:09:57.110
<v Speaker 3>is considered ideologically distasteful. Now, they were writing a few

0:09:57.130 --> 0:09:59.970
<v Speaker 3>years ago, so I'm not sure how distasteful it remains.

0:10:00.940 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 3>But let me continue. Quote, The complexity is furthered in

0:10:04.220 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 3>that the language of anti-Semitism and Jewish suffering, language that

0:10:07.220 --> 0:10:10.660
<v Speaker 3>addresses systemic racism against the Jewish people, is a central

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 3>means through which to code anti-Palestinian racism and thereby suppress

0:10:15.020 --> 0:10:19.390
<v Speaker 3>claims for redress. I am currently, while recording this podcast

0:10:19.410 --> 0:10:21.630
<v Speaker 3>for you all, doing this thing where I'm going to

0:10:21.670 --> 0:10:25.150
<v Speaker 3>great lengths to prove that what I experienced isn't just

0:10:25.190 --> 0:10:28.069
<v Speaker 3>in my head. It isn't just me being overly sensitive.

0:10:28.809 --> 0:10:30.870
<v Speaker 3>That it isn't a situation where maybe the person who

0:10:30.910 --> 0:10:34.290
<v Speaker 3>complained had a good reason. That this was anti-Palestinian racism.

0:10:35.210 --> 0:10:37.770
<v Speaker 3>There is this huge body of work and so much

0:10:37.870 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 3>evidence outlining what anti-Palestinian racism is. There's even an argument

0:10:42.130 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 3>that it animates broader Islamophobia in the United States. And

0:10:45.179 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 3>it is a very real problem. But as Toni Morrison said, quote,

0:10:49.530 --> 0:10:53.420
<v Speaker 3>The function, the very serious function of racism, is distraction.

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 3>It keeps you from doing your work. It keeps you

0:10:56.580 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 3>explaining over and over again your reason for being. So

0:11:00.500 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 3>every time we take the accusation at face value and

0:11:03.340 --> 0:11:06.939
<v Speaker 3>launch into justifications, into mustering all the evidence that the

0:11:06.980 --> 0:11:11.489
<v Speaker 3>accusation is false, compiling the research and reports, that is

0:11:11.530 --> 0:11:14.810
<v Speaker 3>a waste of time. Arguably, even this episode is me

0:11:14.850 --> 0:11:18.630
<v Speaker 3>wasting my time in the way that racists intended. But

0:11:19.020 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 3>I also think there is an important function of discussing

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:25.650
<v Speaker 3>anti-Palestinian racism, both for this episode and for the broader discourse.

0:11:26.450 --> 0:11:30.170
<v Speaker 3>The function is to start more immediately identifying it, pointing

0:11:30.230 --> 0:11:33.030
<v Speaker 3>and calling it out, and distinguishing it as a separate

0:11:33.070 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 3>thing that Palestinians in this country face. Because for Palestinians

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.140
<v Speaker 3>in this country and a number of other countries, but

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:42.060
<v Speaker 3>I'm speaking about the United States here, the situation has

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.940
<v Speaker 3>gotten worse. And for Palestinian academics, which I can specifically

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.100
<v Speaker 3>speak to, the situation in higher education has gotten worse.

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 3>The Middle East Studies Association has launched something called the

0:11:52.500 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Academic Freedom Initiative, where they collect data on how institutions

0:11:56.020 --> 0:11:58.420
<v Speaker 3>of higher education are cracking down on their employees and

0:11:58.460 --> 0:12:01.770
<v Speaker 3>students in a variety of ways around the issue of Palestine.

0:12:02.610 --> 0:12:05.050
<v Speaker 3>And let's be clear, they weaponize the issue of Palestine

0:12:05.110 --> 0:12:09.650
<v Speaker 3>to take away faculty governance or any kind of independence,

0:12:10.510 --> 0:12:15.030
<v Speaker 3>whatever is left of it, on these campuses. So for example,

0:12:15.090 --> 0:12:20.390
<v Speaker 3>the Academic Freedom Initiative record 139 instances of employment retaliation.

0:12:20.429 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 3>So that's the universities retaliating against their employees. With 46%

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 3>of those who faced retaliation eventually terminated from employment altogether.

0:12:30.260 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 3>According to the latest update on their website, August 20th, 2026, 62%

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:40.500
<v Speaker 3>of Title VI investigations at universities about antisemitism were instigated

0:12:40.660 --> 0:12:45.130
<v Speaker 3>by outside actors outside the university. And out of 116

0:12:45.130 --> 0:12:51.569
<v Speaker 3>events that they record universities interfering with, events related to Palestine, 55%

0:12:51.570 --> 0:12:55.189
<v Speaker 3>were cancelled. This is the state of affairs in higher ed.

0:12:56.290 --> 0:13:00.210
<v Speaker 3>Anti-Palestinian racism is rampant. But it's also, of course, rampant

0:13:00.250 --> 0:13:03.860
<v Speaker 3>in other sectors and in our discourse. And last but

0:13:03.900 --> 0:13:08.439
<v Speaker 3>not least, this country's official policies. But allies can refuse

0:13:08.500 --> 0:13:11.180
<v Speaker 3>to allow this to go unchecked. and can start to

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:15.830
<v Speaker 3>insist that this kind of racism is identified and not tolerated. So,

0:13:16.610 --> 0:13:20.110
<v Speaker 3>the racists wanted me to waste my time. But hopefully

0:13:20.150 --> 0:13:22.650
<v Speaker 3>this can also be a call to action, to stand

0:13:22.710 --> 0:13:26.449
<v Speaker 3>up against anti-Palestinian racism more staunchly than before. Because we

0:13:26.490 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 3>need it. That's all I have for you today. Thanks

0:13:29.620 --> 0:13:29.980
<v Speaker 3>for listening.

0:13:41.170 --> 0:13:45.630
<v Speaker 6>The midterm elections are just two weeks away, with early

0:13:45.690 --> 0:13:50.510
<v Speaker 6>voting already underway. And this year, more than many others

0:13:50.590 --> 0:13:53.930
<v Speaker 6>in recent memory, there has been a plethora of attempts

0:13:54.010 --> 0:13:57.089
<v Speaker 6>to make it harder for you to vote, or making

0:13:57.130 --> 0:14:00.870
<v Speaker 6>it so your vote may not count the same way

0:14:00.990 --> 0:14:06.030
<v Speaker 6>it has before. Literally, in cases legislating whether Trump can

0:14:06.130 --> 0:14:10.410
<v Speaker 6>prevent mail-in ballots from being counted after Election Day, which...

0:14:10.809 --> 0:14:16.750
<v Speaker 6>he cannot, but also through partisan gerrymandering, mid-decade redistricting, and

0:14:17.070 --> 0:14:20.050
<v Speaker 6>the gutting of the Voting Rights Act, which has resulted

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:22.540
<v Speaker 6>in the votes of some Black Americans in the South

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:28.460
<v Speaker 6>being diluted across newly drawn districts. The president has promised

0:14:28.500 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 6>to give each U.S. citizen adult $ 5, 000 if Republicans maintain

0:14:34.020 --> 0:14:38.090
<v Speaker 6>control of Congress. And this past month, the White House

0:14:38.130 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 6>has used taxpayer dollars to broadcast pro-Trump campaign ads. About

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:47.820
<v Speaker 6>a week and a half ago, there was widely publicized

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:51.810
<v Speaker 6>photos of National Guard troops standing in front of ballot

0:14:51.850 --> 0:14:57.610
<v Speaker 6>drop boxes in Washington, D.C. Troops who National Guard officials

0:14:57.650 --> 0:15:01.670
<v Speaker 6>say were not stationed there to guard the ballot boxes.

0:15:02.550 --> 0:15:06.570
<v Speaker 6>But voter intimidation through the presence of military, federal agents,

0:15:06.670 --> 0:15:10.190
<v Speaker 6>or police officers at polling sites is a huge concern

0:15:10.350 --> 0:15:14.790
<v Speaker 6>going into these midterms, especially as ICE is detaining both

0:15:14.850 --> 0:15:19.370
<v Speaker 6>immigrants and U.S. citizens suspected of being immigrants at levels

0:15:19.550 --> 0:15:24.570
<v Speaker 6>never before seen. Earlier this year, the Michigan Republican Senate

0:15:24.590 --> 0:15:28.910
<v Speaker 6>candidate Mike Rogers, who's going up against Abdul El-Sayed, told

0:15:29.090 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 6>Kalamazoo County Republicans that he plans to recruit cops as, quote,

0:15:33.780 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 6>poll watchers, according to leaked audio from a GOP meeting.

0:15:39.030 --> 0:15:43.020
<v Speaker 6>also saying, quote, go ahead, try to intimidate them.

0:15:43.380 --> 0:15:46.700
<v Speaker 7>So we called the RNC early and said, hey, you know,

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:48.940
<v Speaker 7>if we're going to do this again, I don't want

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 7>to wake up at 3, you know, go to bed

0:15:50.940 --> 0:15:52.210
<v Speaker 7>at 2 a.m.

0:15:52.540 --> 0:15:54.229
<v Speaker 1>A winter and wake up at 4 a.m.

0:15:54.290 --> 0:15:56.630
<v Speaker 7>A loose, I'm kind of done with that.

0:15:57.390 --> 0:15:59.070
<v Speaker 1>And so in a van full of.

0:15:59.050 --> 0:16:01.310
<v Speaker 7>Ballots that shows up in the middle of the year,

0:16:01.390 --> 0:16:06.580
<v Speaker 7>which I wish didn't happen. So what we got them

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:09.260
<v Speaker 7>to commit to was they're going to have a healthy

0:16:09.660 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 7>voter integrity program. The fact that they've already hired a

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.630
<v Speaker 7>deputy told you how far ahead of the game.

0:16:16.270 --> 0:16:18.490
<v Speaker 1>We weren't that far before. And I've been telling them,

0:16:18.530 --> 0:16:18.930
<v Speaker 1>you know what?

0:16:19.130 --> 0:16:24.090
<v Speaker 7>Let's put retired or off-duty police officers as our poll

0:16:24.130 --> 0:16:32.180
<v Speaker 7>walkers in Detroit. Because go ahead, try to intimidate them. Please.

0:16:33.260 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>What's that? We're trying to find them.

0:16:35.180 --> 0:16:36.979
<v Speaker 7>I mean, they wouldn't be able to wear their uniforms,

0:16:37.020 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 7>but they would, you know, all you got to do

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:40.700
<v Speaker 7>is open your jacket and you see the badge on

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:41.380
<v Speaker 7>the belt, right?

0:16:42.140 --> 0:16:45.490
<v Speaker 6>Also notable in this leaked audio is how Mike Rogers

0:16:45.540 --> 0:16:49.710
<v Speaker 6>insinuates his last Senate race, which he lost to Alyssa Slotkin,

0:16:50.470 --> 0:16:54.490
<v Speaker 6>was stolen from him because of a van full of ballots.

0:16:55.450 --> 0:16:59.370
<v Speaker 6>It seems almost inevitable that if Republicans lose these midterms,

0:16:59.990 --> 0:17:02.930
<v Speaker 6>They will invent all sorts of election conspiracy theories and

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:08.060
<v Speaker 6>spread false claims of mass voter fraud to both contest

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:12.340
<v Speaker 6>these results and limit free and fair elections in the future.

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:16.489
<v Speaker 6>But this episode, I want to do an overview of

0:17:16.630 --> 0:17:20.110
<v Speaker 6>the way the Trump administration is currently trying to make

0:17:20.150 --> 0:17:22.730
<v Speaker 6>it harder to vote, what they have been able to

0:17:22.770 --> 0:17:25.970
<v Speaker 6>do before the midterms, and finally, what they could do

0:17:26.190 --> 0:17:30.810
<v Speaker 6>in the future. This is It Could Happen Here. I'm

0:17:30.910 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 6>your host, Garrison Davis. The big thing Trump wants, but

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 6>he'll probably never get, is the passage of the Save

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:45.180
<v Speaker 6>America Act, a bill that would require voters provide photo

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 6>ID and proof of citizenship to register to vote in

0:17:49.140 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 6>federal elections, not just a driver's license or even a

0:17:52.940 --> 0:17:57.830
<v Speaker 6>real ID card. This would disenfranchise over 20 million Americans.

0:17:58.380 --> 0:18:02.580
<v Speaker 6>who do not have citizenship documents like passports or birth

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:08.190
<v Speaker 6>certificates readily available. Trump's SAVE Act would also mandate regular

0:18:08.430 --> 0:18:13.189
<v Speaker 6>voter roll purges and aims to heavily restrict mail-in or

0:18:13.390 --> 0:18:17.900
<v Speaker 6>absentee voting. To quote the White House, quote, no mail-in

0:18:17.940 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 6>ballots except for illness, disability, military, or travel. Much of

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:29.179
<v Speaker 6>Trump's election ire has been directed at absentee or mail-in voting,

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:34.179
<v Speaker 6>despite this being the very method by which Trump himself

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 6>casts his ballot. I'm not going to focus on what

0:18:37.740 --> 0:18:41.820
<v Speaker 6>passing the Save America Act specifically would mean for U.S. elections,

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:45.200
<v Speaker 6>because it's just not very likely that this bill will

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 6>ever pass the Senate. But as Trump grew frustrated at

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 6>the Save Act being indefinitely stalled, he turned to other

0:18:54.560 --> 0:19:00.609
<v Speaker 6>means for similar ends. On March 31st, 2026, President Trump

0:19:00.650 --> 0:19:08.250
<v Speaker 6>signed Executive Order 14399, or Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity

0:19:08.490 --> 0:19:13.290
<v Speaker 6>in Federal Elections. This order was a test of executive

0:19:13.310 --> 0:19:18.430
<v Speaker 6>power by attempting to institute federal policies similar to provisions

0:19:18.530 --> 0:19:24.609
<v Speaker 6>within the SAVE Act, but through bypassing Congress entirely. In particular,

0:19:24.930 --> 0:19:29.300
<v Speaker 6>the order focused on two things, having DHS create, quote,

0:19:29.660 --> 0:19:35.120
<v Speaker 6>state citizenship lists, a list of individuals confirmed to be U.S.

0:19:35.180 --> 0:19:37.619
<v Speaker 6>citizens who will be above the age of 18 at

0:19:37.660 --> 0:19:40.400
<v Speaker 6>the time of an upcoming federal election and who maintain

0:19:40.460 --> 0:19:45.490
<v Speaker 6>residence in the subject state. And the order also directed

0:19:45.950 --> 0:19:49.830
<v Speaker 6>the United States Postal Service to, quote, initiate a proposed

0:19:49.850 --> 0:19:52.700
<v Speaker 6>reform tracking, and a new requirement that outbound absentee ballots

0:19:52.720 --> 0:20:09.199
<v Speaker 6>feature a unique barcode to facilitate tracking. and a provision

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:13.350
<v Speaker 6>specifying that the USPS would not transmit any mail-in or

0:20:13.510 --> 0:20:17.250
<v Speaker 6>absentee ballots for any individual who does not appear on

0:20:17.350 --> 0:20:24.060
<v Speaker 6>a federal state-by-state list of pre-verified voters. To create this list,

0:20:24.430 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 6>which may or may not be the same as the

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:30.980
<v Speaker 6>state citizenship list, the order keeps this kind of vague,

0:20:31.740 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 6>but to create this list, the Secretary of Homeland Security,

0:20:35.140 --> 0:20:38.950
<v Speaker 6>the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, and the Postmaster

0:20:39.030 --> 0:20:43.510
<v Speaker 6>General would coordinate to implement this executive order. According to

0:20:43.550 --> 0:20:47.650
<v Speaker 6>the order, states would be able to, quote, suggest modifications

0:20:48.150 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 6>to the Postal Service's state-specific mail-in and absentee participation list.

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:59.260
<v Speaker 6>So that all sounds bad, and a group of 23

0:20:59.260 --> 0:21:02.959
<v Speaker 6>states and the District of Columbia sued, alleging the executive

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:06.980
<v Speaker 6>order was unconstitutional and and violated separation of powers by

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 6>infringing on the state's authority to administer elections. In June,

0:21:11.619 --> 0:21:15.430
<v Speaker 6>a district court in Massachusetts agreed and blocked the order.

0:21:16.010 --> 0:21:19.770
<v Speaker 6>The Trump administration appealed to the Supreme Court, and in August,

0:21:19.950 --> 0:21:23.540
<v Speaker 6>the court issued an order on the shadow docket, with

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:28.900
<v Speaker 6>the conservative majority ruling 6-3, that the coalition of states

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:32.790
<v Speaker 6>and the district court lacked the legal authority to block

0:21:32.830 --> 0:21:36.729
<v Speaker 6>the order because no harm had yet come from the

0:21:36.790 --> 0:21:41.710
<v Speaker 6>executive order. So essentially, the Supreme Court lifted the lower

0:21:41.770 --> 0:21:45.410
<v Speaker 6>court's injunction, allowing Trump's executive order to go into effect,

0:21:46.150 --> 0:21:48.230
<v Speaker 6>because they thought it was just too soon for states

0:21:48.270 --> 0:21:52.149
<v Speaker 6>to file a challenge because the order hadn't yet gone

0:21:52.369 --> 0:21:55.730
<v Speaker 6>into effect, and so the plaintiffs hadn't yet to suffer

0:21:55.930 --> 0:22:01.070
<v Speaker 6>any injury. This was totally crazy and like totally defeats

0:22:01.630 --> 0:22:05.470
<v Speaker 6>the entire point of the shadow docket. The whole point

0:22:05.490 --> 0:22:09.609
<v Speaker 6>of the shadow docket or the emergency interim docket is

0:22:09.650 --> 0:22:13.970
<v Speaker 6>that there's potential of serious irreparable harm if the court

0:22:14.070 --> 0:22:18.830
<v Speaker 6>does not intervene. But in this ruling, the conservative majority

0:22:18.950 --> 0:22:23.690
<v Speaker 6>wrote that the state's supposed concrete injury was only a quote,

0:22:24.170 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 6>unduly long chain of inferences. So this ruling in August

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:33.460
<v Speaker 6>gave the Trump administration the green light to have DHS

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:38.830
<v Speaker 6>create and send state citizenship lists to each state 60

0:22:38.830 --> 0:22:43.189
<v Speaker 6>days ahead of the upcoming federal elections, cataloging each person

0:22:43.230 --> 0:22:47.590
<v Speaker 6>in every state who DHS believes is eligible to vote. Now,

0:22:47.750 --> 0:22:52.109
<v Speaker 6>the Supreme Court wrote, quote, states are not required to

0:22:52.250 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 6>use the lists, but this executive order also requires the

0:22:57.380 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 6>Attorney General to, quote, prioritize the investigation and, as appropriate,

0:23:02.020 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 6>the prosecution of state and local officials or any others

0:23:06.780 --> 0:23:12.060
<v Speaker 6>who issue federal ballots to ineligible voters. So Trump is

0:23:12.180 --> 0:23:17.890
<v Speaker 6>effectively compelling states to follow these DHS lists or else

0:23:18.030 --> 0:23:22.750
<v Speaker 6>they will face prosecution. In their ruling, the conservative majority

0:23:22.810 --> 0:23:26.310
<v Speaker 6>wrote that The lower court concluded states did suffer a

0:23:26.350 --> 0:23:30.699
<v Speaker 6>present injury because the order required them to, quote, begin

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:34.679
<v Speaker 6>planning now on how to comply with it. But, the

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:40.020
<v Speaker 6>Supreme Court wrote, states, quote, cannot manufacture standing merely by

0:23:40.220 --> 0:23:45.619
<v Speaker 6>inflicting harm on themselves based on their fears of hypothetical

0:23:46.140 --> 0:23:52.109
<v Speaker 6>future harm that is certainly not impending, unquote. Though, of course,

0:23:52.190 --> 0:23:56.229
<v Speaker 6>the conservative majority found that the government is, quote, likely

0:23:56.270 --> 0:24:00.890
<v Speaker 6>to suffer irreparable harm without a stay. And so the

0:24:00.950 --> 0:24:05.890
<v Speaker 6>stay was granted, lifting the injunction. But there was something

0:24:06.170 --> 0:24:10.870
<v Speaker 6>interesting at the end of this Supreme Court ruling. They wrote, quote,

0:24:11.350 --> 0:24:14.950
<v Speaker 6>the court's disposition on this application does not mean that

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 6>any measure taken by the government to implement the order

0:24:19.390 --> 0:24:24.629
<v Speaker 6>will necessarily be lawful. On that score, time will tell.

0:24:25.290 --> 0:24:28.510
<v Speaker 6>But the order itself does not harm the states, so

0:24:28.570 --> 0:24:31.610
<v Speaker 6>the district court lacked jurisdiction to bar the government from

0:24:31.670 --> 0:24:36.090
<v Speaker 6>trying to implement it. So the Supreme Court at least

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 6>insinuates there that the Trump administration may not necessarily lawfully

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:48.239
<v Speaker 6>implement this executive order, but in order for states to

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 6>file a challenge, the order has to at least partially

0:24:52.300 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 6>go into effect. When this ruling was issued, the Postal

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:01.810
<v Speaker 6>Service had not yet published their final rule implementing parts

0:25:01.869 --> 0:25:05.550
<v Speaker 6>of Trump's executive order. And so the court never addressed

0:25:05.570 --> 0:25:08.929
<v Speaker 6>the part of the executive order requiring the Postal Service

0:25:08.970 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 6>to review the eligibility of voters before transmitting their absentee ballots.

0:25:15.420 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 6>And again, following this idea that the state's lawsuit was premature,

0:25:21.020 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 6>the conservative majority wrote in the order, quote, if the

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 6>Postal Service's final rule harms the states, they may challenge

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:33.420
<v Speaker 6>that rule. And literally two days after the Supreme Court

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:38.060
<v Speaker 6>issued this order, the USPS published their new final rule

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:42.179
<v Speaker 6>amending the mailing standards regarding the transmission of mail-in or

0:25:42.330 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 6>absentee ballots for federal elections. Quote, The final rule introduces

0:25:47.900 --> 0:25:51.380
<v Speaker 6>new mail piece preparation requirements and data reporting standards for

0:25:51.460 --> 0:25:55.609
<v Speaker 6>federal ballot mail that must be satisfied prior to presenting

0:25:55.790 --> 0:26:01.430
<v Speaker 6>outbound federal ballot mail for acceptance into the mail stream, unquote.

0:26:02.250 --> 0:26:05.050
<v Speaker 6>As outlined in Trump's executive order, the Postal Service's final

0:26:05.090 --> 0:26:09.729
<v Speaker 6>rule would require states use new standardized mail-in ballot envelope

0:26:09.750 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 6>designs to be compatible with automated processing, display a consistent

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 6>election mail logo, and a unique intelligent mail barcode. But

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:25.350
<v Speaker 6>the rule also introduced a new digital quote federal ballot

0:26:25.420 --> 0:26:30.170
<v Speaker 6>mail portal that state and local election officials would have

0:26:30.210 --> 0:26:34.429
<v Speaker 6>to use to administer absentee ballots. Not only would this

0:26:34.530 --> 0:26:37.890
<v Speaker 6>portal be how state officials certified the design of their

0:26:37.950 --> 0:26:42.210
<v Speaker 6>standardized envelopes, but election officials would also have to upload

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 6>the name and address of each absentee or mail-in voter

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:50.850
<v Speaker 6>as found on the outbound federal ballot mail envelope, the

0:26:51.050 --> 0:26:55.010
<v Speaker 6>issuing state, and the intelligent mail barcode. This data would

0:26:55.050 --> 0:26:58.050
<v Speaker 6>have to be submitted to the portal, quote, prior to

0:26:58.090 --> 0:27:03.860
<v Speaker 6>presenting in outbound federal ballot mailing for acceptance. Rather than

0:27:03.890 --> 0:27:08.300
<v Speaker 6>the 60-day deadline in Trump's executive order, the Postal Service's

0:27:08.380 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 6>final rule recommends states upload this voter data into the

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 6>portal at least 30 days before the election. This, quote,

0:27:17.940 --> 0:27:25.060
<v Speaker 6>flexible 30-day timeline accommodates variations in state law, unquote. But importantly,

0:27:25.540 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 6>this voter data must be submitted to this new digital

0:27:29.180 --> 0:27:32.609
<v Speaker 6>portal before the Postal Service will accept.

0:27:32.510 --> 0:27:33.790
<v Speaker 1>Any mail-in ballots.

0:27:34.270 --> 0:27:38.670
<v Speaker 6>Quote, there should be minimal to no delay between a

0:27:38.810 --> 0:27:42.449
<v Speaker 6>portal upload and a mailer's ability to present the mailing

0:27:42.570 --> 0:27:47.410
<v Speaker 6>for acceptance. the Postal Service will generally not accept outbound

0:27:47.550 --> 0:27:52.389
<v Speaker 6>federal ballot mailings unless compliance with the new rules standards

0:27:52.609 --> 0:27:57.810
<v Speaker 6>has been verified, unquote. This new final rule did state

0:27:57.990 --> 0:28:00.970
<v Speaker 6>that the Postal Service would not play, quote, any role

0:28:01.410 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 6>in determining voter eligibility, maintaining voter rules, or counting ballots.

0:28:07.460 --> 0:28:12.619
<v Speaker 6>But the rule also states, quote, portal data will also

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:18.950
<v Speaker 6>be available, for verification purposes on a nationwide basis, unquote.

0:28:20.070 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 6>If some of that just sounds confusing, that's because it is.

0:28:25.710 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 6>The implementation of Trump's executive order in this final rule

0:28:29.820 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 6>was not very clear at all, did not follow proper protocol,

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 6>and resulted in whistleblowers from USPS coming forward with concerns

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:44.270
<v Speaker 6>about the implementation of this final rule. And though the

0:28:44.310 --> 0:28:48.590
<v Speaker 6>Supreme Court stayed one injunction blocking the implementation of the

0:28:48.630 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 6>executive order, a separate temporary restraining order prevented certain sections

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:58.260
<v Speaker 6>of this final rule from immediately going into effect. The

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 6>published final rule says that the Postal Service is ready

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:05.490
<v Speaker 6>to immediately implement these new standards in preparation for the

0:29:05.490 --> 0:29:08.330
<v Speaker 6>2026 election as soon as all of the lower court

0:29:08.390 --> 0:29:12.490
<v Speaker 6>injunctions are lifted. But a few days after the rule

0:29:12.510 --> 0:29:16.380
<v Speaker 6>was published, A coalition of 23 states again filed a lawsuit,

0:29:16.740 --> 0:29:20.500
<v Speaker 6>as instructed by the Supreme Court, and the same district

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:25.300
<v Speaker 6>court judge issued a new preliminary injunction. And then on

0:29:25.340 --> 0:29:30.550
<v Speaker 6>September 13th, a second federal judge also blocked the Postal

0:29:30.570 --> 0:29:36.270
<v Speaker 6>Service's newly adopted final rule. Trump appointee Judge Carl Nichols

0:29:36.810 --> 0:29:39.630
<v Speaker 6>found that the Postal Service lacked the authority to require

0:29:39.710 --> 0:29:43.820
<v Speaker 6>states submit a list of eligible voters to this online

0:29:43.900 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 6>portal and only transmit ballots to voters verified on the portal.

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:53.670
<v Speaker 6>Judge Nichols wrote that if the rule was implemented, there

0:29:53.690 --> 0:29:57.570
<v Speaker 6>would be a, quote, increased risk that a significant number

0:29:57.710 --> 0:30:02.850
<v Speaker 6>of otherwise appropriate absentee or mail-in ballots will ultimately not

0:30:02.930 --> 0:30:08.070
<v Speaker 6>be counted in the upcoming elections, unquote. And then just

0:30:08.190 --> 0:30:11.730
<v Speaker 6>a day later, the Supreme Court issued a shadow docket

0:30:11.790 --> 0:30:16.170
<v Speaker 6>ruling denying the Trump administration's request to lift the first

0:30:16.230 --> 0:30:20.100
<v Speaker 6>injunction blocking the implementation of the Postal Service's final rule,

0:30:20.860 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 6>finding that, quote, the government is unlikely to succeed on

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:28.460
<v Speaker 6>the merits of its challenge. And this appeared to be

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:33.830
<v Speaker 6>a 7-2 ruling, with Samuel Alito penning a dissent, which

0:30:33.870 --> 0:30:38.850
<v Speaker 6>was joined by Clarence Thomas. Though Brett Kavanaugh wrote a

0:30:39.270 --> 0:30:44.250
<v Speaker 6>one-paragraph concurring opinion agreeing to let the injunction against the

0:30:44.330 --> 0:30:49.330
<v Speaker 6>rule remain, though he suggested that the Postal Service may

0:30:49.590 --> 0:30:52.530
<v Speaker 6>have the authority to implement the rule in the future,

0:30:53.350 --> 0:30:57.890
<v Speaker 6>just not in the two months prior to an election, stating, quote,

0:30:58.590 --> 0:31:01.430
<v Speaker 6>In my view, based on the briefing the court has

0:31:01.470 --> 0:31:05.390
<v Speaker 6>received at this interim stage, there is at least a

0:31:05.490 --> 0:31:09.230
<v Speaker 6>fair prospect that the final rule falls within the Postal

0:31:09.270 --> 0:31:13.810
<v Speaker 6>Service's statutory authority. But applying the rule in the 2026

0:31:13.810 --> 0:31:17.709
<v Speaker 6>elections would be arbitrary and capricious in violation of the

0:31:17.790 --> 0:31:21.450
<v Speaker 6>Administrative Procedure Act because state and local officials do not

0:31:21.530 --> 0:31:25.610
<v Speaker 6>have sufficient time to reasonably implement the rule before the elections.

0:31:26.270 --> 0:31:29.330
<v Speaker 6>For that reason, I concur in the denial of the

0:31:29.490 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 6>application for stay, unquote. We'll come back to the future

0:31:35.210 --> 0:31:37.780
<v Speaker 6>implications of this ruling at the end of the episode.

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:54.380
<v Speaker 6>But first, here's some ads. Okay, we are back. Restricting

0:31:54.580 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 6>mail-in voting and this final rule from the Postal Service

0:31:58.540 --> 0:32:02.060
<v Speaker 6>is only one half of Trump's executive order. The other

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:07.110
<v Speaker 6>concerns the creation of state citizenship lists to verify voters.

0:32:08.110 --> 0:32:13.090
<v Speaker 6>The federal government does not have a centralized registry of citizens.

0:32:14.110 --> 0:32:19.220
<v Speaker 6>But since last year, DHS has been trying to retrofit

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:22.740
<v Speaker 6>something called the SAVE system into not to be confused

0:32:22.780 --> 0:32:26.380
<v Speaker 6>with the SAVE Act, though both aim to suppress voters.

0:32:27.420 --> 0:32:31.090
<v Speaker 6>But the DHS has been trying to expand this SAVE

0:32:31.190 --> 0:32:35.850
<v Speaker 6>system so it can be used to verify large batches

0:32:35.990 --> 0:32:39.810
<v Speaker 6>of voters by integrating data from other agencies like the

0:32:39.830 --> 0:32:45.300
<v Speaker 6>State Department and the Social Security Administration. SAVE, in this case,

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:52.290
<v Speaker 6>stands for Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements. It was created

0:32:52.350 --> 0:32:56.590
<v Speaker 6>in the 80s to verify the citizenship and immigration status

0:32:56.790 --> 0:33:01.790
<v Speaker 6>of people applying for public benefits like Medicaid and food stamps.

0:33:02.770 --> 0:33:07.330
<v Speaker 6>In March of 2025, Trump signed a different executive order

0:33:07.790 --> 0:33:13.010
<v Speaker 6>titled Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections, which

0:33:13.130 --> 0:33:16.770
<v Speaker 6>instructed DHS to put new systems into place to allow

0:33:16.990 --> 0:33:20.540
<v Speaker 6>state and local authorities to to verify the citizenship status

0:33:20.780 --> 0:33:25.180
<v Speaker 6>of those registered to vote, and directed the Social Security

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 6>Administration to make their records available to DHS for that purpose.

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:34.790
<v Speaker 6>So DHS began modifying the SAVE system by incorporating confidential

0:33:34.810 --> 0:33:39.050
<v Speaker 6>data from the Social Security Administration and altering the system

0:33:39.230 --> 0:33:43.770
<v Speaker 6>to allow authorities to conduct bulk searches of multiple individuals

0:33:44.030 --> 0:33:49.170
<v Speaker 6>at once. To date, 27 states already use the save

0:33:49.230 --> 0:33:54.230
<v Speaker 6>system to verify voters. And last year, some states began

0:33:54.310 --> 0:34:00.580
<v Speaker 6>testing the newly modified database. After Trump signed this election

0:34:00.620 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 6>integrity order last year, voting rights organizations sued and a

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:11.489
<v Speaker 6>district court blocked the order, finding that the overhauled save system, quote,

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:15.360
<v Speaker 6>trampled on the privacy rights of American citizens in a

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:19.500
<v Speaker 6>manner that threatens the sacred right to vote. But the

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 6>Trump administration went to the Supreme Court, asking them to

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 6>lift the district court's injunction, alleging that the government faced

0:34:28.540 --> 0:34:31.860
<v Speaker 6>irreparable harm if they weren't allowed to use the save

0:34:31.930 --> 0:34:36.630
<v Speaker 6>system to purge voter rolls. Without a full briefing or

0:34:36.810 --> 0:34:41.589
<v Speaker 6>oral argument, the conservative majority ruled 6-3, granting the stay.

0:34:42.390 --> 0:34:45.189
<v Speaker 6>clearing the way for Trump to implement the new safe

0:34:45.250 --> 0:34:49.890
<v Speaker 6>system and allow DHS to purge voter rolls. I talked

0:34:49.910 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 6>about this a little bit in an executive disorder episode

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 6>a few weeks ago. In the lawsuit that first prevented

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 6>the government from using this newly modified safe system, the

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 6>plaintiffs alleged that the integration of SSA, Social Security Administration data,

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:11.529
<v Speaker 6>violates multiple privacy protections. and that the use of the

0:35:11.570 --> 0:35:15.370
<v Speaker 6>data to purge voter rolls risks irreparable harm to voters

0:35:15.910 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 6>who are mistakenly removed from voter rolls due to inaccurate

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:25.420
<v Speaker 6>or out-of-date information in the databases that Save is using.

0:35:26.500 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 6>And this harm is not just hypothetical. When Texas began

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:36.540
<v Speaker 6>testing out the newly modified Save system last year, it

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:40.900
<v Speaker 6>had an error rate of over 20%. And part of

0:35:40.920 --> 0:35:44.360
<v Speaker 6>why the SAFE system is so inaccurate, especially now that

0:35:44.410 --> 0:35:49.290
<v Speaker 6>it's pulling from Social Security data, is because Social Security

0:35:49.310 --> 0:35:54.690
<v Speaker 6>Administration data does not necessarily reflect someone's current immigration or

0:35:54.790 --> 0:35:59.950
<v Speaker 6>citizenship status. For example, I was given an SSN as

0:35:59.989 --> 0:36:03.879
<v Speaker 6>a teenager after my family immigrated to the U.S., but

0:36:03.940 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 6>because I later acquired U.S. citizenship through one of my parents,

0:36:08.460 --> 0:36:12.020
<v Speaker 6>my Social Security number was does not correspond to my

0:36:12.140 --> 0:36:16.340
<v Speaker 6>citizenship status, and I often have to verify my citizenship

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:19.460
<v Speaker 6>status with a passport. It's also important to keep in

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 6>mind that Social Security Administration data is not just Social

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:27.750
<v Speaker 6>Security numbers, but also, quote, names, dates and places of birth,

0:36:28.250 --> 0:36:34.549
<v Speaker 6>citizenship indicators, death records, and information obtained while processing requests

0:36:34.850 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 6>for Social Security numbers, per the Supreme Court. So if

0:36:39.540 --> 0:36:44.800
<v Speaker 6>the save system flags someone or a search comes up inconclusive,

0:36:45.460 --> 0:36:49.450
<v Speaker 6>voters could be required to take additional affirmative steps to

0:36:49.590 --> 0:36:54.610
<v Speaker 6>prove their citizenship or naturalization, possibly within a very short

0:36:54.670 --> 0:36:59.310
<v Speaker 6>window or risk being removed from the voter rules and

0:36:59.750 --> 0:37:03.540
<v Speaker 6>unable to exercise their right to vote. In the short,

0:37:03.860 --> 0:37:08.840
<v Speaker 6>unsigned opinion, the conservative majority writes, quote, If the modified

0:37:08.910 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 6>SAVE program is unable to confirm that an individual is

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:15.799
<v Speaker 6>a citizen, the agency is required to contact the individual

0:37:16.180 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 6>and request that he provide proof of citizenship to register

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:25.320
<v Speaker 6>or remain registered to vote, unquote. In her dissent, Justice

0:37:25.390 --> 0:37:29.469
<v Speaker 6>Jackson echoed the concerns of the plaintiffs that the, quote,

0:37:29.950 --> 0:37:36.500
<v Speaker 6>staleness of Social Security Administration citizenship records risked disenfranchising recently

0:37:36.580 --> 0:37:41.089
<v Speaker 6>naturalized US citizens. And again, this is not some sort

0:37:41.140 --> 0:37:47.589
<v Speaker 6>of hypothetical harm. According to a ProPublica report from last February, quote,

0:37:48.070 --> 0:37:51.469
<v Speaker 6>DHS has had to correct information provided to at least

0:37:51.670 --> 0:37:58.800
<v Speaker 6>five states after Save misidentified some voters as non-citizens. And

0:37:58.989 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 6>per Jackson's dissent, in Texas, one woman had her voter

0:38:03.940 --> 0:38:08.890
<v Speaker 6>registration revoked completely without her knowledge, and two more had

0:38:08.930 --> 0:38:13.370
<v Speaker 6>to provide proof of citizenship to maintain registered voter status.

0:38:14.210 --> 0:38:15.629
<v Speaker 6>I really don't want to gloss over the fact that

0:38:15.890 --> 0:38:21.300
<v Speaker 6>already in Texas, a U.S. citizen was removed from voter

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 6>registration because of the save system without her knowledge. She

0:38:26.580 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 6>did not know that this happened. Imagine you walk up

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:33.700
<v Speaker 6>to the polling site ready to vote only to learn

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:38.130
<v Speaker 6>that that you've been removed from the voter rolls because

0:38:38.170 --> 0:38:43.810
<v Speaker 6>of DHS's janky verification system. That is actual irreparable harm,

0:38:44.430 --> 0:38:47.090
<v Speaker 6>but the majority opinion of the Supreme Court just didn't

0:38:47.150 --> 0:38:52.860
<v Speaker 6>consider this harm posed to lawful voters, but rather focused

0:38:52.940 --> 0:38:56.939
<v Speaker 6>on the harms the government could purportedly suffer if they

0:38:57.040 --> 0:39:01.540
<v Speaker 6>aren't allowed to use the revamped save system. The bulk

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:05.930
<v Speaker 6>of the majority opinion focuses on defending the legality of

0:39:06.010 --> 0:39:11.620
<v Speaker 6>DHS using what is otherwise protected confidential data from the

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:16.060
<v Speaker 6>Social Security Administration. In contrast with the District Court, the

0:39:16.100 --> 0:39:19.240
<v Speaker 6>Supreme Court agreed with the government's argument that a provision

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:24.770
<v Speaker 6>of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, Section 1373,

0:39:24.750 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 6>actually already granted DHS permission to access confidential SSA data. Thus,

0:39:34.060 --> 0:39:37.759
<v Speaker 6>the use of that data in the SAVE program does

0:39:37.860 --> 0:39:42.790
<v Speaker 6>not violate the privacy protections within the Social Security Act

0:39:43.010 --> 0:39:46.430
<v Speaker 6>or the Privacy Act. And I apologize for this getting

0:39:46.469 --> 0:39:51.299
<v Speaker 6>a little jargony, but I cannot... emphasize the magnitude of

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:57.970
<v Speaker 6>this enough, Section 1373 has never before been invoked this way,

0:39:58.550 --> 0:40:03.410
<v Speaker 6>and poses massive threats to privacy. I will lightly paraphrase

0:40:03.489 --> 0:40:11.140
<v Speaker 6>for clarity 8 U.S.C. 1373, quote, notwithstanding any other provision

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:16.180
<v Speaker 6>of federal, state, or local law no person, agency, government entity,

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:19.410
<v Speaker 6>or official may prohibit or in any way restrict any

0:40:19.469 --> 0:40:23.870
<v Speaker 6>government entity or official from sending or receiving information regarding

0:40:24.010 --> 0:40:28.549
<v Speaker 6>the citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any

0:40:28.610 --> 0:40:34.840
<v Speaker 6>individual to DHS. Now, because of that first bit on, quote,

0:40:35.280 --> 0:40:41.470
<v Speaker 6>notwithstanding other laws, the Supreme Court majority found that Section 1373, quote,

0:40:41.989 --> 0:40:48.250
<v Speaker 6>likely supersedes restrictions on disclosure elsewhere in the code. And thus,

0:40:48.450 --> 0:40:54.279
<v Speaker 6>DHS is authorized to request, receive, and send otherwise confidential

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:59.180
<v Speaker 6>information from the Social Security Administration. What the majority is

0:40:59.219 --> 0:41:02.940
<v Speaker 6>doing here is they're combining that notwithstanding clause with 1373

0:41:02.940 --> 0:41:08.930
<v Speaker 6>subsection C, which, quote, requires DHS to respond to inquiries

0:41:09.190 --> 0:41:13.870
<v Speaker 6>from state and local agencies seeking to verify or ascertain

0:41:14.230 --> 0:41:19.310
<v Speaker 6>the citizenship or immigration status of any individual. But as written,

0:41:19.730 --> 0:41:23.410
<v Speaker 6>that subsection does not require DHS to respond to requests

0:41:24.030 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 6>with confidential data from other agencies. It doesn't entitle them

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 6>to otherwise protected data. In her dissent, Jackson summarizes what

0:41:35.219 --> 0:41:41.150
<v Speaker 6>the majority's opinion here is. Quote, as the majority sees things,

0:41:41.450 --> 0:41:46.630
<v Speaker 6>Congress's prohibiting interference with the disclosure of information regarding citizenship

0:41:46.650 --> 0:41:52.820
<v Speaker 6>status to DHS necessarily authorizes DHS to request and receive

0:41:52.860 --> 0:41:58.280
<v Speaker 6>that information from the SSA regardless of whether some other

0:41:58.360 --> 0:42:05.259
<v Speaker 6>law prohibits disclosure. the majority thus treats Section 1373 as

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:09.920
<v Speaker 6>essentially overriding the limits that privacy laws impose on the

0:42:09.980 --> 0:42:16.290
<v Speaker 6>sharing of citizenship information with DHS, unquote. Now, Jackson calls

0:42:16.510 --> 0:42:21.290
<v Speaker 6>the majority's interpretation, quote, implausible, and accuses them of, quote,

0:42:21.450 --> 0:42:26.470
<v Speaker 6>misreading the statutory text in a few important ways. Mainly,

0:42:26.950 --> 0:42:31.879
<v Speaker 6>that these provisions don't empower citizens government agencies to take

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:38.020
<v Speaker 6>any affirmative action to overrule privacy protections, but rather they

0:42:38.120 --> 0:42:43.279
<v Speaker 6>bar government entities, officials, persons, or agencies from unlawfully prohibiting

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:49.549
<v Speaker 6>or restricting the exchange of citizenship information with DHS. To

0:42:49.630 --> 0:42:54.910
<v Speaker 6>quote Jackson, quote, these provisions do not affirmatively grant any power,

0:42:55.610 --> 0:43:00.870
<v Speaker 6>nor do they override any explicit statutory limits on information sharing. Rather,

0:43:01.150 --> 0:43:05.710
<v Speaker 6>both provisions bar government entities or employees from interfering with

0:43:05.950 --> 0:43:12.270
<v Speaker 6>otherwise lawful exchanges of citizenship information, notwithstanding that such interference

0:43:12.350 --> 0:43:15.709
<v Speaker 6>may be permitted under some other law. When a law

0:43:15.790 --> 0:43:21.170
<v Speaker 6>imposes an express restriction on disclosure, it is that law,

0:43:21.570 --> 0:43:26.770
<v Speaker 6>not an entity, official, person, or agency, that is doing the, quote,

0:43:26.890 --> 0:43:32.069
<v Speaker 6>prohibiting or, quote, restricting. In the majority's opinion, they have

0:43:32.090 --> 0:43:37.549
<v Speaker 6>a little footnote responding to Jackson's claim here, quote, the

0:43:37.590 --> 0:43:41.310
<v Speaker 6>distinction the dissent draws between laws and those tasked with

0:43:41.370 --> 0:43:47.469
<v Speaker 6>enforcing them is illusory. Prohibitions necessarily include invoking a law

0:43:47.840 --> 0:43:53.060
<v Speaker 6>to deny a request for or transfer of such information, unquote.

0:43:54.260 --> 0:43:59.720
<v Speaker 6>But this snarky little remark ignores that Other provisions in

0:43:59.910 --> 0:44:03.979
<v Speaker 6>the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act place, quote,

0:44:04.260 --> 0:44:10.560
<v Speaker 6>strict limits on what information SSA can disclose. And Jackson

0:44:10.800 --> 0:44:16.040
<v Speaker 6>notes that those limits would be pointless if Section 1373

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:20.610
<v Speaker 6>supersedes any and all privacy protections, as claimed by the

0:44:20.640 --> 0:44:25.180
<v Speaker 6>government and the Supreme Court majority. To quote Jackson, there

0:44:25.239 --> 0:44:28.880
<v Speaker 6>is no reason to believe that Congress meant to repeal

0:44:28.940 --> 0:44:34.529
<v Speaker 6>laws that would otherwise prohibit federal agencies from disclosing citizenship information.

0:44:35.230 --> 0:44:39.969
<v Speaker 6>Nothing in 1373 authorizes the modified save system or overrides

0:44:40.030 --> 0:44:44.160
<v Speaker 6>the provisions of the Social Security Act and the Privacy Act, unquote.

0:44:44.920 --> 0:44:50.680
<v Speaker 6>To bolster her argument, Jackson also notes that Bill Clinton's

0:44:50.780 --> 0:44:55.270
<v Speaker 6>Office of Legal Counsel said, shared this same interpretation of

0:44:55.330 --> 0:45:00.610
<v Speaker 6>Section 1373 all the way back in 1999, writing that

0:45:00.660 --> 0:45:04.960
<v Speaker 6>the section does, quote, not clearly invest government officials or

0:45:05.020 --> 0:45:09.879
<v Speaker 6>entities with the affirmative authority to disclose information in circumstances

0:45:09.940 --> 0:45:14.339
<v Speaker 6>where they would otherwise be prohibited from doing so by

0:45:14.360 --> 0:45:19.130
<v Speaker 6>a federal statute, unquote. And I go over all of

0:45:19.170 --> 0:45:24.969
<v Speaker 6>these details not to be Confusing or annoying, but because again,

0:45:25.030 --> 0:45:28.790
<v Speaker 6>this is a shadow docket ruling, meaning that this case

0:45:29.090 --> 0:45:33.029
<v Speaker 6>will likely be heard again by the Supreme Court, and

0:45:33.130 --> 0:45:47.180
<v Speaker 6>some of these justifications may matter in the future. So

0:45:47.200 --> 0:45:51.590
<v Speaker 6>as bad and frankly bullshit as this ruling is, According

0:45:51.610 --> 0:45:57.259
<v Speaker 6>to Jackson, it will, quote, likely have minimal short-term impact.

0:45:58.180 --> 0:46:02.899
<v Speaker 6>And that's because the National Voter Registration Act prohibits states from, quote,

0:46:03.360 --> 0:46:07.780
<v Speaker 6>systematically removing the names of ineligible voters from their rolls

0:46:08.020 --> 0:46:12.640
<v Speaker 6>in the 90 days prior to any primary or general election.

0:46:13.460 --> 0:46:16.350
<v Speaker 6>But this doesn't mean that it will have no impact

0:46:16.410 --> 0:46:19.350
<v Speaker 6>on the midterms, because the government is still allowed to

0:46:19.530 --> 0:46:25.260
<v Speaker 6>use the new save system, to conduct, quote, individualized inquiries

0:46:25.920 --> 0:46:30.640
<v Speaker 6>per the majority. Jackson writes that states will, quote, at

0:46:30.719 --> 0:46:37.049
<v Speaker 6>most conduct individualized voter rule maintenance using the modified save

0:46:37.120 --> 0:46:40.790
<v Speaker 6>system prior to the midterms. But at the end of

0:46:40.830 --> 0:46:44.730
<v Speaker 6>her dissent, she stresses, quote, the harm caused by burdening

0:46:44.850 --> 0:46:50.870
<v Speaker 6>or disenfranchising even a few lawful voters' outweighs the non-existent

0:46:50.930 --> 0:46:54.219
<v Speaker 6>harm that the government experiences when it is prevented from

0:46:54.340 --> 0:46:58.380
<v Speaker 6>taking an action that it likely lacks the authority to take.

0:46:59.540 --> 0:47:05.340
<v Speaker 6>For 2026, voter intimidation remains the biggest threat to elections.

0:47:06.050 --> 0:47:10.989
<v Speaker 6>Whether that's coming from Mike Rogers' personal goons or some

0:47:11.230 --> 0:47:16.180
<v Speaker 6>federal force near polling sites, be that National Guard or ICE.

0:47:17.219 --> 0:47:22.359
<v Speaker 6>which DHS officials have said won't patrol the polls, but

0:47:22.540 --> 0:47:26.720
<v Speaker 6>told the Associated Press, quote, if an active public safety

0:47:26.760 --> 0:47:30.920
<v Speaker 6>threat endangered a polling location, they may be arrested as

0:47:30.980 --> 0:47:36.330
<v Speaker 6>a result of that targeted enforcement action. With DHS also

0:47:36.410 --> 0:47:40.730
<v Speaker 6>saying they are, quote, laser focused on prosecuting and removing

0:47:40.810 --> 0:47:44.690
<v Speaker 6>aliens who vote and preventing the dilution of the votes

0:47:44.950 --> 0:47:45.670
<v Speaker 6>of U.S.

0:47:45.850 --> 0:47:46.330
<v Speaker 1>Citizens.

0:47:47.330 --> 0:47:51.589
<v Speaker 6>Beyond voter intimidation, the Trump administration and Republicans may also

0:47:51.650 --> 0:47:56.940
<v Speaker 6>attempt to delegitimize election results based on allegations of fraud.

0:47:57.580 --> 0:48:00.640
<v Speaker 6>And this is yet another way the new save system

0:48:00.860 --> 0:48:04.620
<v Speaker 6>could be of some use. Given its high error rate,

0:48:04.719 --> 0:48:08.270
<v Speaker 6>it's quite simple to inflate the number of votes that

0:48:08.330 --> 0:48:13.219
<v Speaker 6>are under suspicion of being fraudulently cast to if the

0:48:13.239 --> 0:48:17.340
<v Speaker 6>Trump administration gains access to cast ballots or voting machines

0:48:17.820 --> 0:48:21.260
<v Speaker 6>and tries to audit the results. They don't even need

0:48:21.280 --> 0:48:24.810
<v Speaker 6>to prove fraud. They just need to create an air

0:48:24.870 --> 0:48:29.550
<v Speaker 6>of uncertainty to manufacture a political crisis. And the SAVE

0:48:29.610 --> 0:48:34.270
<v Speaker 6>system can provide that uncertainty. But what really concerns me

0:48:34.410 --> 0:48:38.190
<v Speaker 6>is what could happen after the midterms, in the two

0:48:38.230 --> 0:48:42.320
<v Speaker 6>years before the 2028 election. there will be enough time

0:48:42.420 --> 0:48:46.920
<v Speaker 6>for the constitutionality of the Postal Service's final rule, with

0:48:46.940 --> 0:48:50.980
<v Speaker 6>the digital federal ballot mail portal and vague verification requirements,

0:48:51.620 --> 0:48:56.890
<v Speaker 6>to be fully litigated and potentially implemented. Supreme Court Justices

0:48:57.110 --> 0:49:00.330
<v Speaker 6>Alito and Thomas have already made it clear that they

0:49:00.430 --> 0:49:05.109
<v Speaker 6>want the rule implemented, and Kavanaugh seems sympathetic. Without the

0:49:05.290 --> 0:49:09.430
<v Speaker 6>time constraint of an impending election... where the rest of

0:49:09.489 --> 0:49:15.220
<v Speaker 6>the conservative justices stand on questions of constitutionality, delegating election authority,

0:49:15.300 --> 0:49:18.330
<v Speaker 6>and separation of powers as they relate to the Postal

0:49:18.350 --> 0:49:23.900
<v Speaker 6>Service's final rule, is not yet clear. And whenever they decide,

0:49:23.920 --> 0:49:27.140
<v Speaker 6>I do want to echo the opinion of Trump appointee

0:49:27.540 --> 0:49:31.580
<v Speaker 6>Judge Nichols that the USPS final rule poses a quote,

0:49:32.020 --> 0:49:36.740
<v Speaker 6>increased risk that a significant number of otherwise appropriate absentee

0:49:36.820 --> 0:49:41.089
<v Speaker 6>or mail-in ballots will will ultimately not be counted. If

0:49:41.170 --> 0:49:46.430
<v Speaker 6>the Republicans lose the midterms, which seems likely, Trump's general

0:49:46.530 --> 0:49:51.030
<v Speaker 6>power may be more limited. But that may also result

0:49:51.150 --> 0:49:55.550
<v Speaker 6>in his efforts being tailored to a few select issues

0:49:56.070 --> 0:50:00.350
<v Speaker 6>that he can direct his full executive power towards. And

0:50:00.650 --> 0:50:04.669
<v Speaker 6>the election issue has been a quite personal issue for

0:50:04.770 --> 0:50:08.160
<v Speaker 6>President Trump. I can't see him doing anything other than

0:50:08.320 --> 0:50:12.900
<v Speaker 6>doubling down on implementing the full extent of these executive orders,

0:50:13.680 --> 0:50:17.750
<v Speaker 6>including the, quote, state citizenship lists. But in terms of

0:50:17.790 --> 0:50:22.250
<v Speaker 6>something that can immediately happen right after the midterms, literally

0:50:22.310 --> 0:50:26.390
<v Speaker 6>the day after the election, states can start using DHS's

0:50:26.590 --> 0:50:31.620
<v Speaker 6>save system to purge voter rolls en masse by, quote unquote,

0:50:31.700 --> 0:50:36.859
<v Speaker 6>verifying large batches of voters. The only thing preventing that

0:50:36.900 --> 0:50:40.600
<v Speaker 6>right now is the 90-day prohibition on the quote-unquote systemic

0:50:40.660 --> 0:50:46.230
<v Speaker 6>removal before an election. On the question of save's legality,

0:50:46.910 --> 0:50:50.710
<v Speaker 6>the Supreme Court's conservative majority wrote that the challengers are

0:50:51.170 --> 0:50:54.810
<v Speaker 6>unlikely to prevail on the merits of their claims, even

0:50:54.830 --> 0:50:58.030
<v Speaker 6>though Jackson points out in her dissent that the majority

0:50:58.070 --> 0:51:03.360
<v Speaker 6>opinion breaks from previous interpretations of federal law and plainly

0:51:03.520 --> 0:51:08.170
<v Speaker 6>misreads the statutory text. reversing their decision may require an

0:51:09.130 --> 0:51:14.630
<v Speaker 6>entirely new Supreme Court. Retrofitting the save system to conduct

0:51:14.750 --> 0:51:20.270
<v Speaker 6>bulk searches of potentially ineligible voters is one part of

0:51:20.330 --> 0:51:25.850
<v Speaker 6>a much larger strategy. Since 2025, the Trump administration has

0:51:25.890 --> 0:51:29.160
<v Speaker 6>tried to gain access to states' voter rolls, with the

0:51:29.180 --> 0:51:33.460
<v Speaker 6>DOJ suing over 30 states for not complying with federal requests.

0:51:34.540 --> 0:51:38.900
<v Speaker 6>over a dozen states, mostly Republican-controlled states, have complied and

0:51:39.020 --> 0:51:42.900
<v Speaker 6>handed over their voter registration lists. For states that have

0:51:42.940 --> 0:51:46.239
<v Speaker 6>not complied, the Trump administration has employed multiple tactics to

0:51:46.300 --> 0:51:50.089
<v Speaker 6>try to gain access to their voting records, including by

0:51:50.350 --> 0:51:55.650
<v Speaker 6>just seizing them physically, like in Georgia. We don't know

0:51:55.690 --> 0:51:59.990
<v Speaker 6>if this was done with Save specifically, but this past summer,

0:52:00.250 --> 0:52:03.620
<v Speaker 6>DHS notified the state of Nevada that they had almost

0:52:03.620 --> 0:52:10.400
<v Speaker 6>16,000 non-citizens on their voter rolls. Then DHS said that

0:52:10.420 --> 0:52:15.470
<v Speaker 6>they were able to confirm at least 185 individual cases

0:52:15.550 --> 0:52:19.930
<v Speaker 6>of non-citizens registered to vote. But when state election officials

0:52:20.090 --> 0:52:22.850
<v Speaker 6>looked into these cases, they found that every one of

0:52:22.890 --> 0:52:26.600
<v Speaker 6>those 185 voters was actually a U.S.

0:52:26.640 --> 0:52:27.100
<v Speaker 1>Citizen.

0:52:28.120 --> 0:52:34.780
<v Speaker 6>Meanwhile, in Texas... save falsely flagged over 500 voters as non-citizens.

0:52:35.800 --> 0:52:41.040
<v Speaker 6>Simply put, having DHS try to determine the eligibility of U.S.

0:52:41.680 --> 0:52:45.610
<v Speaker 6>citizen voters doesn't seem like a good idea, and it

0:52:45.630 --> 0:52:48.830
<v Speaker 6>doesn't seem like they are very good at it. Except,

0:52:48.870 --> 0:52:52.089
<v Speaker 6>of course, this is precisely what DHS is setting out

0:52:52.130 --> 0:52:55.390
<v Speaker 6>to do, remove as many people from the voter rolls

0:52:55.610 --> 0:53:00.070
<v Speaker 6>as possible, whether or not they are actually eligible to vote.

0:53:00.950 --> 0:53:05.530
<v Speaker 6>The new save system would not only disenfranchise eligible voters

0:53:05.690 --> 0:53:10.290
<v Speaker 6>by removing them from voter rolls, potentially even without their knowledge,

0:53:10.410 --> 0:53:14.640
<v Speaker 6>like in Texas, but also in the age of ICE

0:53:14.760 --> 0:53:19.919
<v Speaker 6>mass deportations, The prospect that you as a voter could

0:53:20.000 --> 0:53:25.100
<v Speaker 6>be investigated or scrutinized by DHS based on your name

0:53:25.160 --> 0:53:30.260
<v Speaker 6>being flagged by some database could absolutely dissuade U.S. citizens

0:53:30.380 --> 0:53:35.450
<v Speaker 6>born or naturalized from registering to vote and exercising their

0:53:35.510 --> 0:53:39.469
<v Speaker 6>right to vote, especially if they live with or are

0:53:39.590 --> 0:53:45.609
<v Speaker 6>in proximity to undocumented immigrants. And that fear, that intimidation,

0:53:46.489 --> 0:53:50.270
<v Speaker 6>That is part of the point. If Stephen Miller can't

0:53:50.410 --> 0:53:54.630
<v Speaker 6>strip naturalized citizens of their right to vote, this is

0:53:54.690 --> 0:53:55.609
<v Speaker 6>his compromise.

0:54:07.380 --> 0:54:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everyone.

0:54:08.260 --> 0:54:14.859
<v Speaker 8>This is future Mick adding some stuff for less future Mick.

0:54:15.450 --> 0:54:18.940
<v Speaker 8>we'll be hearing most of during the podcast. This episode

0:54:18.960 --> 0:54:22.140
<v Speaker 8>took a pretty long while. I'm not sure how long

0:54:22.160 --> 0:54:25.200
<v Speaker 8>it will be in post-production, but for my own recording,

0:54:25.320 --> 0:54:29.160
<v Speaker 8>we talked for almost three hours, which is a lot. Therefore,

0:54:29.300 --> 0:54:32.799
<v Speaker 8>this episode will be cut into multiple pieces. Make sure

0:54:32.840 --> 0:54:36.140
<v Speaker 8>to start at part one. I'm sorry for any awkward

0:54:36.920 --> 0:54:40.879
<v Speaker 8>breaks in the post-production, but it was very hard to

0:54:41.060 --> 0:54:41.479
<v Speaker 8>keep that.

0:54:41.400 --> 0:54:47.710
<v Speaker 1>In mind while we were recording. Hope you enjoy it. Welcome, everyone.

0:54:47.830 --> 0:54:50.510
<v Speaker 8>Welcome to It Could Happen Here, the podcast of things

0:54:50.870 --> 0:54:53.989
<v Speaker 8>falling apart and possibly how to put them back a

0:54:54.260 --> 0:54:54.700
<v Speaker 8>little bit.

0:54:55.320 --> 0:54:56.010
<v Speaker 1>My name is Mick.

0:54:56.820 --> 0:55:00.460
<v Speaker 8>As expected, I'm here with James Stout because James is.

0:55:00.420 --> 0:55:01.399
<v Speaker 1>Always here with me.

0:55:02.000 --> 0:55:04.900
<v Speaker 8>But I'm also very happy to say hello to Molly Conger,

0:55:05.000 --> 0:55:06.560
<v Speaker 8>who's also agreed to join.

0:55:07.239 --> 0:55:10.300
<v Speaker 1>How are you guys doing? I'm great. I'm excited. I'm

0:55:10.340 --> 0:55:13.379
<v Speaker 1>pumped to learn about some weird Nazis. It's me and Molly,

0:55:13.420 --> 0:55:15.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's not an animal. So I guess some people

0:55:15.380 --> 0:55:17.950
<v Speaker 1>are already sad. I like doing podcasts with both of you,

0:55:17.989 --> 0:55:19.029
<v Speaker 1>so it's going to be fun.

0:55:19.969 --> 0:55:22.190
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking forward to whatever horrors we're about to learn.

0:55:23.150 --> 0:55:23.509
<v Speaker 1>Ah, yes.

0:55:24.130 --> 0:55:26.029
<v Speaker 8>I knew once I dove into this, I was like, okay,

0:55:26.050 --> 0:55:29.169
<v Speaker 8>I need to light the Molly signal and make sure

0:55:29.190 --> 0:55:30.669
<v Speaker 8>that I get you to come on as well.

0:55:30.690 --> 0:55:32.950
<v Speaker 4>You're about somebody else's Nazis for a change.

0:55:33.150 --> 0:55:33.910
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly.

0:55:33.930 --> 0:55:37.739
<v Speaker 8>Like European Nazis with whom you're probably much less familiar,

0:55:38.320 --> 0:55:42.700
<v Speaker 8>but probably no less horrifying. So what we'll be talking

0:55:42.739 --> 0:55:46.210
<v Speaker 8>about today is the Save Europe Act. What it is,

0:55:46.510 --> 0:55:49.810
<v Speaker 8>what kind of European mechanisms it tries to use to.

0:55:50.310 --> 0:55:51.590
<v Speaker 1>Push through horrible shit.

0:55:51.930 --> 0:55:52.930
<v Speaker 4>That sounds xenophobic.

0:55:54.070 --> 0:55:57.390
<v Speaker 1>Anytime people are wanting to save a thing, like nine

0:55:57.450 --> 0:55:59.569
<v Speaker 1>times out of ten, we've got to ask who they're

0:55:59.590 --> 0:56:01.730
<v Speaker 1>saving it from. And if it's the presence of people

0:56:01.770 --> 0:56:03.209
<v Speaker 1>who aren't white, that's... Why.

0:56:03.110 --> 0:56:04.270
<v Speaker 4>Do you think it needs to be saved?

0:56:04.370 --> 0:56:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:56:05.719 --> 0:56:07.960
<v Speaker 4>Are you worried about the dilution of Aryan blood?

0:56:07.980 --> 0:56:12.220
<v Speaker 1>Oh, you're so on point, Molly.

0:56:12.280 --> 0:56:12.980
<v Speaker 9>Oh, God.

0:56:13.000 --> 0:56:14.299
<v Speaker 1>You have no idea.

0:56:15.300 --> 0:56:17.660
<v Speaker 8>We're also going to look a bit at the people

0:56:17.739 --> 0:56:21.480
<v Speaker 8>who are orchestrating this because there are funny instances and

0:56:21.520 --> 0:56:25.719
<v Speaker 8>also horrifying instances. I've tried to make it a bit

0:56:25.760 --> 0:56:28.719
<v Speaker 8>of a mix of the two, but I'll be honest.

0:56:28.980 --> 0:56:32.080
<v Speaker 8>I've put this little project down a few times because

0:56:32.500 --> 0:56:34.779
<v Speaker 8>I just got angry about it. I need to make

0:56:34.820 --> 0:56:38.490
<v Speaker 8>jokes in order to make it palpable. Also, I have,

0:56:39.070 --> 0:56:42.090
<v Speaker 8>against my better judgment, decided to make a Blue Sky account.

0:56:42.330 --> 0:56:45.239
<v Speaker 8>So if anyone wants to reach me or If I

0:56:45.280 --> 0:56:48.759
<v Speaker 8>do stuff incorrectly, you can contact me there. It's at

0:56:49.020 --> 0:56:54.200
<v Speaker 8>two sober possums. Stop harassing James if I'm the one

0:56:54.260 --> 0:56:57.399
<v Speaker 8>you're mad at. Originally, I intended to have a little

0:56:57.480 --> 0:57:01.120
<v Speaker 8>fun opening, but over the course of this research, I

0:57:01.160 --> 0:57:05.279
<v Speaker 8>got upset and angry. After reading an in-depth report from

0:57:05.320 --> 0:57:08.930
<v Speaker 8>the Justice for Prosperity, it became clear that a bunch

0:57:08.969 --> 0:57:12.390
<v Speaker 8>of forthright enthusiasts can be funny when you just look

0:57:12.450 --> 0:57:16.590
<v Speaker 8>at it superficially. But the report suggests that more nefarious

0:57:16.650 --> 0:57:21.010
<v Speaker 8>people are, at the very least, facilitating profoundly racist and

0:57:21.050 --> 0:57:26.250
<v Speaker 8>anti-democratic movements. At worst, it's the rich and powerful deliberately

0:57:26.310 --> 0:57:30.780
<v Speaker 8>pushing Europe towards fascism and emboldening wannabe brown shirts to

0:57:30.800 --> 0:57:32.660
<v Speaker 8>commit more acts of violence for.

0:57:32.680 --> 0:57:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Again? Again, yeah.

0:57:35.840 --> 0:57:38.860
<v Speaker 8>And it gets better because it's for a democratic proposal

0:57:38.900 --> 0:57:43.189
<v Speaker 8>that was doomed from the very start. Like red shirt

0:57:43.250 --> 0:57:47.450
<v Speaker 8>in Star Trek doomed. Like that one teenage couple having

0:57:47.510 --> 0:57:51.510
<v Speaker 8>sex somewhere in a horror film doomed. It's like, I

0:57:51.550 --> 0:57:55.570
<v Speaker 8>can't exaggerate how doomed this was. So let's get going.

0:57:55.770 --> 0:57:57.530
<v Speaker 8>What is the Save Europe Act and who are the

0:57:57.570 --> 0:58:00.650
<v Speaker 8>ones behind it? According to their own website, the Save

0:58:00.710 --> 0:58:03.340
<v Speaker 8>Europe Act is the first ever campaign to launch a

0:58:03.410 --> 0:58:08.260
<v Speaker 8>patriotic European citizens initiative. We demand that the political elite

0:58:08.280 --> 0:58:12.060
<v Speaker 8>halt their replacement migration and secure our borders, and protect

0:58:12.080 --> 0:58:14.920
<v Speaker 8>the ethnocultural identity of European nations.

0:58:16.060 --> 0:58:16.419
<v Speaker 6>Oh dear.

0:58:17.220 --> 0:58:19.700
<v Speaker 4>My eyes are getting wider with every clause of that sentence.

0:58:20.040 --> 0:58:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, those are some trigger words.

0:58:22.110 --> 0:58:23.710
<v Speaker 4>Like those TikToks of like, you know, when you say

0:58:23.910 --> 0:58:25.470
<v Speaker 4>like a dog's favorite words, you say, you want to

0:58:25.490 --> 0:58:27.550
<v Speaker 4>go to the park? You want to get a treat?

0:58:27.610 --> 0:58:29.750
<v Speaker 4>And the dog gets like progressively more alarmed.

0:58:30.710 --> 0:58:33.130
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but then in a bad way. Yeah, that's me,

0:58:33.150 --> 0:58:36.300
<v Speaker 1>but negative. Okay, well, it's not getting any better.

0:58:37.110 --> 0:58:39.530
<v Speaker 8>So at first, we're going to dive into the Save

0:58:39.590 --> 0:58:42.130
<v Speaker 8>Europe Act itself, and then we're going to look at

0:58:42.150 --> 0:58:45.030
<v Speaker 8>the European Citizens Initiative.

0:58:45.720 --> 0:58:48.820
<v Speaker 4>So is that like a referendum, like a ballot initiative,

0:58:48.880 --> 0:58:52.180
<v Speaker 4>but for all of Europe? We're sorry, most of the

0:58:52.220 --> 0:58:54.200
<v Speaker 4>audience is American, so I'm going to be the token

0:58:54.280 --> 0:58:56.500
<v Speaker 4>dumb American here. I need you to explain to me

0:58:57.140 --> 0:58:57.560
<v Speaker 4>what's that.

0:58:58.040 --> 0:59:00.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll get there because I've laid it out.

0:59:01.100 --> 0:59:02.660
<v Speaker 4>Because Europe is not a country.

0:59:03.510 --> 0:59:04.110
<v Speaker 7>No, no, no.

0:59:04.140 --> 0:59:06.230
<v Speaker 1>Europe is a state of mind, Molly.

0:59:06.250 --> 0:59:06.630
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:59:08.180 --> 0:59:12.470
<v Speaker 1>And a band. Oh, really? is it the final countdown oh.

0:59:12.890 --> 0:59:16.080
<v Speaker 4>I've heard that at a sports event yeah i've.

0:59:16.010 --> 0:59:19.660
<v Speaker 8>Heard those words in the long long ago sometime but

0:59:19.680 --> 0:59:23.080
<v Speaker 8>okay to make it a bit more clear for molly.

0:59:22.860 --> 0:59:25.300
<v Speaker 4>Specifically for the americans.

0:59:25.200 --> 0:59:27.700
<v Speaker 8>I'm not american so i can't i can't like banter

0:59:27.740 --> 0:59:31.090
<v Speaker 8>like that It's a legislative request that has to be

0:59:31.130 --> 0:59:34.290
<v Speaker 8>considered by the EU if certain conditions are met.

0:59:34.930 --> 0:59:35.770
<v Speaker 1>In the grander.

0:59:35.470 --> 0:59:38.510
<v Speaker 8>Machine of the EU, a citizens' initiative is a way

0:59:38.550 --> 0:59:42.570
<v Speaker 8>for Europeans to directly influence laws through the collection of

0:59:42.640 --> 0:59:43.700
<v Speaker 8>support and signatures.

0:59:44.280 --> 0:59:46.280
<v Speaker 4>So they've got a big petition going. They've got all

0:59:46.300 --> 0:59:48.060
<v Speaker 4>the races in Europe to sign their petition.

0:59:48.080 --> 0:59:50.860
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, think of it like a petition on steroids or

0:59:50.920 --> 0:59:55.340
<v Speaker 8>a protest that, for a change, cannot simply be ignored

0:59:55.840 --> 0:59:59.460
<v Speaker 8>by the powers that be. The charter itself is barely

0:59:59.500 --> 1:00:02.030
<v Speaker 8>a three-minute read, but I thought it would still be

1:00:02.070 --> 1:00:05.010
<v Speaker 8>too lengthy and dull. So I'll skip the preamble and

1:00:05.030 --> 1:00:07.530
<v Speaker 8>move on to the core claims and demands that they make.

1:00:08.330 --> 1:00:11.070
<v Speaker 8>Should you have the desire or the masochism to want

1:00:11.110 --> 1:00:13.590
<v Speaker 8>to read it yourself, you can find it on their website.

1:00:14.290 --> 1:00:15.970
<v Speaker 8>It will be in the show notes together with all

1:00:16.070 --> 1:00:19.700
<v Speaker 8>the other sources I've had the misfortune of reading. So

1:00:19.740 --> 1:00:21.560
<v Speaker 8>this is part two of the charter.

1:00:21.580 --> 1:00:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I quote.

1:00:23.200 --> 1:00:26.880
<v Speaker 8>Acknowledging further that Article 22 of the Charter of Fundamental

1:00:26.920 --> 1:00:31.760
<v Speaker 8>Rights of the European Union requires the Union to respect cultural, religious,

1:00:31.840 --> 1:00:35.510
<v Speaker 8>and linguistic diversity, which must include the protection of the

1:00:35.550 --> 1:00:40.090
<v Speaker 8>historic cultures and traditions of Europe's nations against erosion through

1:00:40.150 --> 1:00:41.390
<v Speaker 8>demographic replacement.

1:00:41.770 --> 1:00:42.430
<v Speaker 1>Oh, there it is.

1:00:42.710 --> 1:00:46.690
<v Speaker 4>That's very clever. We want to respect the diversity of

1:00:46.750 --> 1:00:49.570
<v Speaker 4>our beautiful, all these different white cultures.

1:00:51.090 --> 1:00:51.490
<v Speaker 1>Exactly.

1:00:52.610 --> 1:00:53.210
<v Speaker 4>That's cute.

1:00:53.390 --> 1:00:56.130
<v Speaker 8>The first time that a fascist has used the word diversity,

1:00:56.250 --> 1:00:57.930
<v Speaker 8>not in a completely bad faith way.

1:00:57.950 --> 1:00:58.790
<v Speaker 6>Right.

1:00:59.470 --> 1:01:02.250
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's really cute of them. Just like there's so

1:01:02.270 --> 1:01:04.390
<v Speaker 4>much diversity of all the different whites.

1:01:05.390 --> 1:01:05.810
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yes.

1:01:06.350 --> 1:01:07.890
<v Speaker 4>We have to protect our cultural heritage.

1:01:07.950 --> 1:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Nothing but premium whites.

1:01:09.220 --> 1:01:14.420
<v Speaker 8>So at point three, testing how replacement migration, both legal

1:01:14.500 --> 1:01:18.110
<v Speaker 8>and illegal, over recent decades has violated that right. by

1:01:18.130 --> 1:01:22.530
<v Speaker 8>causing significant damage to the social cohesion, public services, security,

1:01:23.130 --> 1:01:27.110
<v Speaker 8>and ethnic and cultural continuity of the European nations, leading

1:01:27.160 --> 1:01:31.480
<v Speaker 8>to parallel societies, increased crime, and the marginalization of native

1:01:31.520 --> 1:01:36.760
<v Speaker 8>populations in their ancestral homelands. Come on! Anytime you hear

1:01:36.800 --> 1:01:39.680
<v Speaker 8>a fucking European white person using the word native or

1:01:39.720 --> 1:01:42.870
<v Speaker 8>indigenous to describe themselves, just tell them to fuck off.

1:01:43.330 --> 1:01:45.050
<v Speaker 8>Just the most puerile shit.

1:01:45.150 --> 1:01:45.570
<v Speaker 1>Come on.

1:01:46.180 --> 1:01:50.290
<v Speaker 4>I've been reading a lot of 20th century eugenics writing lately,

1:01:50.410 --> 1:01:54.110
<v Speaker 4>early 1900s. And every time they say, you know, he

1:01:54.150 --> 1:01:56.910
<v Speaker 4>was a Native American, I'm like, he was what? They

1:01:56.950 --> 1:01:58.810
<v Speaker 4>mean he was a white person whose family came here

1:01:58.830 --> 1:02:01.330
<v Speaker 4>in the 1700s. He was a Native American. That's not

1:02:01.390 --> 1:02:02.670
<v Speaker 4>how we use that phrase now.

1:02:02.990 --> 1:02:05.970
<v Speaker 1>This is still a giant problem in local journalism in

1:02:06.010 --> 1:02:08.470
<v Speaker 1>the United States. I remember I was writing for Pointer,

1:02:08.510 --> 1:02:12.010
<v Speaker 1>which if people aren't familiar, Pointer is like an institute

1:02:12.030 --> 1:02:15.860
<v Speaker 1>of journalism, I think. It's like a journal about journalism. Meta.

1:02:16.270 --> 1:02:19.490
<v Speaker 1>And I remember two reporters, I was writing about how

1:02:19.530 --> 1:02:22.530
<v Speaker 1>people just can't stop saying that cops overdosed on fentanyl.

1:02:22.550 --> 1:02:25.110
<v Speaker 1>When they didn't, they had a panic attack. This is

1:02:25.130 --> 1:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a problem. And it's a problem that it's apparently insurmountable

1:02:28.620 --> 1:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>for many local newspapers, including the San Diego Union Tribune.

1:02:32.060 --> 1:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Both reporters there called themselves San Diego natives. And like

1:02:36.280 --> 1:02:38.980
<v Speaker 1>the Native American Journalists Association style guide suggests that you

1:02:39.000 --> 1:02:42.270
<v Speaker 1>should generally put tribal affiliation afterwards. So I asked them

1:02:42.290 --> 1:02:46.439
<v Speaker 1>and they got very upset. But I genuinely, if you're

1:02:46.460 --> 1:02:48.700
<v Speaker 1>a person who makes a living with words and you're

1:02:49.060 --> 1:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>just a white person who was born somewhere and you're

1:02:51.380 --> 1:02:55.810
<v Speaker 1>using native, you're showing that you're incapable of using words accurately.

1:02:55.910 --> 1:02:58.090
<v Speaker 1>I think that should be disqualifying in itself if you're

1:02:58.110 --> 1:02:58.510
<v Speaker 1>a journalist.

1:02:58.530 --> 1:02:59.530
<v Speaker 4>You're bad at your job.

1:02:59.630 --> 1:03:01.110
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I find it really fucking annoying.

1:03:01.550 --> 1:03:03.410
<v Speaker 4>So it's interesting in that clause, right? So they're not

1:03:03.490 --> 1:03:06.890
<v Speaker 4>just upset about illegal immigration, right? They're not just upset

1:03:06.910 --> 1:03:10.300
<v Speaker 4>about refugees and asylum. They're saying legal and illegal. So

1:03:10.360 --> 1:03:13.290
<v Speaker 4>right from the jump, they're saying illegal. This is just

1:03:13.370 --> 1:03:15.450
<v Speaker 4>an ethnic thing. We just want everyone to be white.

1:03:15.730 --> 1:03:18.410
<v Speaker 4>There's not even pretending that's not about everyone being white.

1:03:18.630 --> 1:03:20.030
<v Speaker 1>It gets worse. Oh, good.

1:03:20.350 --> 1:03:20.530
<v Speaker 7>Good.

1:03:20.550 --> 1:03:21.950
<v Speaker 4>But it started very bad.

1:03:22.050 --> 1:03:23.390
<v Speaker 1>It started bad. Yeah.

1:03:24.170 --> 1:03:25.110
<v Speaker 4>They're not even pretending.

1:03:25.210 --> 1:03:25.550
<v Speaker 1>No, no.

1:03:25.570 --> 1:03:28.220
<v Speaker 8>You're starting like already knee deep in shit. And the

1:03:28.240 --> 1:03:30.860
<v Speaker 8>more you wade through like the sewer.

1:03:30.980 --> 1:03:33.240
<v Speaker 4>We started with the Nuremberg laws.

1:03:34.000 --> 1:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

1:03:34.840 --> 1:03:37.680
<v Speaker 4>It's kind of a heated first sentence.

1:03:38.120 --> 1:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>That was like genuinely one of my first thoughts.

1:03:40.380 --> 1:03:40.560
<v Speaker 7>Like.

1:03:41.350 --> 1:03:45.470
<v Speaker 8>Should shit go incredibly bad in Europe with shit like this,

1:03:45.530 --> 1:03:47.770
<v Speaker 8>then this is something that will be brought up in

1:03:48.660 --> 1:03:49.450
<v Speaker 8>whatever the new.

1:03:49.680 --> 1:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>In the tribunals. Yeah.

1:03:51.340 --> 1:03:51.740
<v Speaker 10>Oh, yeah.

1:03:52.090 --> 1:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, when they're writing the history book.

1:03:53.720 --> 1:03:54.720
<v Speaker 4>I have that thought often.

1:03:54.740 --> 1:03:54.820
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

1:03:55.500 --> 1:03:57.500
<v Speaker 4>I have that thought in my fantasies often.

1:03:57.980 --> 1:04:01.340
<v Speaker 1>Molly has a tribunals folder on her computer, which is...

1:04:01.280 --> 1:04:02.820
<v Speaker 1>She's got a whole hard drive now.

1:04:03.520 --> 1:04:05.980
<v Speaker 4>Look, when they come, when they're ready, I have files.

1:04:06.480 --> 1:04:07.040
<v Speaker 4>Just come get me.

1:04:07.520 --> 1:04:10.260
<v Speaker 1>You've got the receipts. Okay. Point four.

1:04:10.890 --> 1:04:13.970
<v Speaker 8>Underlying the urgency of the matter by acknowledging the imminent

1:04:14.010 --> 1:04:17.490
<v Speaker 8>reality that the native peoples of Europe risk becoming minority

1:04:17.530 --> 1:04:21.950
<v Speaker 8>populations in their own homelands if radical changes to the

1:04:22.010 --> 1:04:24.440
<v Speaker 8>asylum and migration system are not made.

1:04:25.060 --> 1:04:29.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry, like this level of just open bitching, like, oh,

1:04:30.020 --> 1:04:32.340
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry, you believe in great replacement conspiracy theories. Like,

1:04:32.380 --> 1:04:34.040
<v Speaker 4>that's embarrassing for you. That's embarrassing.

1:04:34.570 --> 1:04:38.470
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and this pathetic concern trolling, like, oh, we the

1:04:38.550 --> 1:04:43.090
<v Speaker 1>indigenous people are being colonized by people seeking fucking asylum.

1:04:43.650 --> 1:04:47.190
<v Speaker 4>Our beautiful, brave Teutonic ancestors are being replaced.

1:04:47.230 --> 1:04:47.690
<v Speaker 3>Grow up!

1:04:48.240 --> 1:04:51.030
<v Speaker 8>Like, I would accept it if they would just refer

1:04:51.070 --> 1:04:54.040
<v Speaker 8>it back to, like, the original Celts before, like, the

1:04:54.080 --> 1:04:56.380
<v Speaker 8>Christendom and the Romans came.

1:04:56.880 --> 1:05:00.310
<v Speaker 1>Like, yeah, sure, yeah, yeah. It's the people from Italy

1:05:00.330 --> 1:05:01.730
<v Speaker 1>that they're really mad about.

1:05:01.970 --> 1:05:07.360
<v Speaker 8>We need to fucking, like, praise Tutatis and Katurix again from, like,

1:05:07.380 --> 1:05:08.959
<v Speaker 8>the old Gallic days.

1:05:09.200 --> 1:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, I would respect that.

1:05:11.100 --> 1:05:13.860
<v Speaker 4>These probably are the same, like, fucking German neo-Nazis who

1:05:13.880 --> 1:05:15.820
<v Speaker 4>still celebrate, like, Arminius Day.

1:05:16.200 --> 1:05:18.470
<v Speaker 1>These are the same people who would also have, like,

1:05:18.780 --> 1:05:21.870
<v Speaker 1>done Africa Starts at the Pyrenees stuff not so long

1:05:21.910 --> 1:05:26.410
<v Speaker 1>ago and, like, absolutely excluded anyone from Iberia from being, like,

1:05:26.490 --> 1:05:29.610
<v Speaker 1>European or white, like, So, you know, maybe that's the

1:05:29.630 --> 1:05:30.810
<v Speaker 1>diversity they're talking about, maybe.

1:05:31.410 --> 1:05:35.890
<v Speaker 4>I do love that inter-white racism. Like, the really niche stuff, like,

1:05:35.950 --> 1:05:37.630
<v Speaker 4>are Macedonians white?

1:05:38.310 --> 1:05:42.850
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, being someone who was a historian of Iberia

1:05:42.870 --> 1:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>for much of my 20s, it's wild. It's wild shit

1:05:47.420 --> 1:05:50.420
<v Speaker 1>that you will see in, like, old-timey texts and from

1:05:50.480 --> 1:05:52.020
<v Speaker 1>old-timey people at history conferences.

1:05:52.660 --> 1:05:54.620
<v Speaker 4>Oh, I'm talking about stuff I've seen on Stonefront.

1:05:55.080 --> 1:05:58.970
<v Speaker 1>Oh, yeah, that's also... Could be the same people. Probably.

1:05:58.990 --> 1:06:03.270
<v Speaker 8>They'll probably be in contact through a telegram group.

1:06:04.550 --> 1:06:09.030
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, we keep interrupting the document. Yeah, we've ruined it.

1:06:09.200 --> 1:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>That's fine.

1:06:11.220 --> 1:06:14.540
<v Speaker 8>Point five, determining that migration does not solve the aging

1:06:14.580 --> 1:06:18.960
<v Speaker 8>population crisis, but instead places further strain on European welfare

1:06:19.020 --> 1:06:22.820
<v Speaker 8>systems and worsens the fundamental problem of low birth rates

1:06:22.970 --> 1:06:24.450
<v Speaker 8>among the native population.

1:06:25.390 --> 1:06:27.270
<v Speaker 4>I was hoping we would get to birth rates.

1:06:27.610 --> 1:06:27.910
<v Speaker 5>Good, good.

1:06:27.990 --> 1:06:29.650
<v Speaker 4>I'm surprised it took all the way to number five.

1:06:31.530 --> 1:06:34.070
<v Speaker 4>I mean, are you even a proper racist if you're

1:06:34.110 --> 1:06:36.750
<v Speaker 4>not concerned about the fecundity of ethnic women?

1:06:37.830 --> 1:06:38.390
<v Speaker 1>Probably.

1:06:38.410 --> 1:06:43.360
<v Speaker 4>They're very worried about being outbred.

1:06:43.660 --> 1:06:46.440
<v Speaker 8>Yes, but for some reason, all the women promoting this

1:06:46.540 --> 1:06:50.080
<v Speaker 8>are not having like 20 children within like their first

1:06:50.160 --> 1:06:53.720
<v Speaker 8>five years. So funny how they make exceptions for themselves

1:06:53.800 --> 1:06:56.300
<v Speaker 8>all the time. One thing of note that I found

1:06:56.340 --> 1:06:59.040
<v Speaker 8>is it points to about like the cultural, religious and

1:06:59.080 --> 1:07:04.520
<v Speaker 8>linguistic diversity, which, as I said before, fascists using diversity,

1:07:04.660 --> 1:07:07.840
<v Speaker 8>not entirely in bad faith, but also using it in

1:07:07.860 --> 1:07:08.400
<v Speaker 8>bad faith.

1:07:08.660 --> 1:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Right.

1:07:09.180 --> 1:07:12.620
<v Speaker 4>You know, all the different romance languages, but God forbid

1:07:12.640 --> 1:07:14.120
<v Speaker 4>we have too much diversity.

1:07:14.620 --> 1:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly.

1:07:16.040 --> 1:07:19.570
<v Speaker 8>But like that argument is so fucking stupid on its

1:07:19.660 --> 1:07:22.960
<v Speaker 8>face because like, first of all, is your faith in

1:07:23.000 --> 1:07:26.040
<v Speaker 8>your own culture and language so incredibly weak that like

1:07:26.140 --> 1:07:28.360
<v Speaker 8>the presence of any other is a threat?

1:07:29.470 --> 1:07:32.510
<v Speaker 4>I mean, they do keep a pretty strict hold on French.

1:07:34.230 --> 1:07:35.930
<v Speaker 4>They're very worried about it. Yeah, yeah.

1:07:36.010 --> 1:07:38.870
<v Speaker 1>The state is leaning on the scale in France. But

1:07:38.890 --> 1:07:42.110
<v Speaker 1>like the idea that the wonderful diversity of Romance languages

1:07:42.130 --> 1:07:44.070
<v Speaker 1>is great and should be celebrated and protected. But like,

1:07:44.430 --> 1:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>where the fuck do you think like all the words

1:07:46.300 --> 1:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that begin with AL in Spanish come from? It's not France. No.

1:07:50.500 --> 1:07:54.850
<v Speaker 8>Like, Or any word with SK in English is originally

1:07:54.870 --> 1:07:57.810
<v Speaker 8>some Scandinavian origins there.

1:07:58.310 --> 1:08:01.110
<v Speaker 4>Like this isn't the first time anyone came to Europe.

1:08:01.150 --> 1:08:01.850
<v Speaker 4>This isn't new.

1:08:02.190 --> 1:08:02.530
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

1:08:02.710 --> 1:08:02.910
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

1:08:02.930 --> 1:08:04.860
<v Speaker 1>People have been doing this for a minute. It's like

1:08:05.620 --> 1:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>if you are really good at like, probably not if

1:08:07.860 --> 1:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you're really good at throwing, but you can definitely swim

1:08:10.380 --> 1:08:14.140
<v Speaker 1>to North Africa from the European Union pretty easily. Well, yeah. Well,

1:08:14.160 --> 1:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>not easily. It'd be a pretty rough trip.

1:08:16.900 --> 1:08:20.689
<v Speaker 8>Between Spain and Morocco, I think it's the most doable.

1:08:20.979 --> 1:08:23.990
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah. I'm sure a human could do it. People

1:08:24.010 --> 1:08:28.250
<v Speaker 1>swim to France. No one knows why. To avoid Spain?

1:08:28.490 --> 1:08:30.269
<v Speaker 1>I think if they're going from the United Kingdom, so

1:08:30.330 --> 1:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>it would be... People do this as a physical insurance challenge. Okay.

1:08:35.380 --> 1:08:36.800
<v Speaker 4>I thought they stopped letting people do it.

1:08:37.470 --> 1:08:40.510
<v Speaker 1>Quite possibly. I've not been following. I just remember when

1:08:40.550 --> 1:08:41.790
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid, it would be a thing.

1:08:41.910 --> 1:08:42.550
<v Speaker 4>Oh, yeah.

1:08:42.590 --> 1:08:45.750
<v Speaker 1>They would like grease themselves and then swim the channel.

1:08:45.790 --> 1:08:45.910
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

1:08:45.990 --> 1:08:46.189
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

1:08:46.210 --> 1:08:50.010
<v Speaker 8>Well, I do respect the English fleeing away from England

1:08:50.050 --> 1:08:53.150
<v Speaker 8>to France where there's at least a proper cuisine present.

1:08:54.250 --> 1:08:57.510
<v Speaker 1>Damn. I'm sorry, James. I'm sorry.

1:08:57.530 --> 1:08:58.470
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah.

1:08:59.720 --> 1:09:02.160
<v Speaker 4>So have they gotten this ballot initiative or whatever you

1:09:02.180 --> 1:09:03.979
<v Speaker 4>guys call it in Europe? Have they gotten this to

1:09:04.020 --> 1:09:06.460
<v Speaker 4>be considered? Like, did they get enough support to force

1:09:06.479 --> 1:09:07.900
<v Speaker 4>someone to consider this seriously?

1:09:09.270 --> 1:09:13.370
<v Speaker 1>Yes and no. But we'll get there. But I love

1:09:13.470 --> 1:09:15.150
<v Speaker 1>that you're thinking ahead with me.

1:09:15.170 --> 1:09:17.750
<v Speaker 4>I just don't know how the government works over there,

1:09:17.950 --> 1:09:18.790
<v Speaker 4>to be so honest.

1:09:19.110 --> 1:09:19.850
<v Speaker 1>We don't either.

1:09:20.620 --> 1:09:21.479
<v Speaker 4>Barely know how our.

1:09:21.400 --> 1:09:24.620
<v Speaker 1>Government works oh barely i think is the correct answer

1:09:24.640 --> 1:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to that.

1:09:25.560 --> 1:09:29.460
<v Speaker 11>Yeah yeah yeah it doesn't if but i also still

1:09:29.479 --> 1:09:32.340
<v Speaker 11>wanted to point out like with with the back to

1:09:32.380 --> 1:09:35.900
<v Speaker 11>the initiative like what about migrants who speak air quotes

1:09:36.120 --> 1:09:40.400
<v Speaker 11>our languages or practice our quotes our religions large parts

1:09:40.439 --> 1:09:43.599
<v Speaker 11>of africa speak english or french or even portuguese it's

1:09:43.720 --> 1:09:46.050
<v Speaker 11>some areas yeah Well, a lot of.

1:09:46.030 --> 1:09:50.229
<v Speaker 4>Those people of African descent in those countries are from

1:09:50.350 --> 1:09:54.070
<v Speaker 4>countries that were colonized by the people who don't want

1:09:54.110 --> 1:09:54.429
<v Speaker 4>them there.

1:09:54.630 --> 1:09:54.910
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:09:55.270 --> 1:09:56.410
<v Speaker 4>We're like, why do you think there are so many

1:09:56.490 --> 1:09:59.430
<v Speaker 4>African people in France? And well, they all speak French,

1:09:59.470 --> 1:10:02.530
<v Speaker 4>don't they? How'd they get there? Consider your actions.

1:10:03.450 --> 1:10:06.150
<v Speaker 8>But that's exactly the point. Like if they're in Africa

1:10:06.189 --> 1:10:08.410
<v Speaker 8>and they already speak the language, do they make the cut?

1:10:08.830 --> 1:10:11.790
<v Speaker 4>Well, no, it sounds like under this initiative, no. So

1:10:11.810 --> 1:10:14.440
<v Speaker 4>much of what they're putting forward is bad faith, right?

1:10:14.450 --> 1:10:17.560
<v Speaker 4>They're like, oh, you know, it's about our cultural heritage,

1:10:18.580 --> 1:10:21.300
<v Speaker 4>our linguistic heritage. It's like, okay, well, what about people

1:10:21.340 --> 1:10:23.420
<v Speaker 4>who grew up in a French colony in Africa? Are

1:10:23.460 --> 1:10:25.640
<v Speaker 4>they not French? No, they're not white.

1:10:25.800 --> 1:10:28.719
<v Speaker 8>No, but that is exactly where it's leading.

1:10:29.100 --> 1:10:31.460
<v Speaker 1>And that's why, okay, they speak your language. They can

1:10:31.500 --> 1:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>have your religion. Is this enough?

1:10:33.220 --> 1:10:35.200
<v Speaker 4>Which is why this just sounds like the Nuremberg loss

1:10:35.240 --> 1:10:35.439
<v Speaker 4>to me.

1:10:36.780 --> 1:10:39.769
<v Speaker 8>Like, honestly, we shouldn't even engage with these arguments because

1:10:39.950 --> 1:10:43.490
<v Speaker 8>it just reduces any form of nuance or complexity to

1:10:43.510 --> 1:10:44.650
<v Speaker 8>the barest fucking minimum.

1:10:45.729 --> 1:10:48.750
<v Speaker 4>They wrote racism by committee. They made a very fancy

1:10:48.770 --> 1:10:50.950
<v Speaker 4>document to say we're very racist.

1:10:51.210 --> 1:10:51.350
<v Speaker 7>Oh.

1:10:52.270 --> 1:10:55.650
<v Speaker 8>Like, I checked the comments on the Save Europe website

1:10:55.689 --> 1:10:58.840
<v Speaker 8>when I was working on this and would not recommend.

1:10:58.860 --> 1:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I bet.

1:11:00.220 --> 1:11:00.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

1:11:01.240 --> 1:11:05.340
<v Speaker 1>Not great. But it's essentially just this bit. And we're

1:11:05.380 --> 1:11:05.860
<v Speaker 1>going through it.

1:11:06.300 --> 1:11:09.680
<v Speaker 8>Like point three again, their demands, it's just grafting the

1:11:09.720 --> 1:11:15.200
<v Speaker 8>great replacement theory, trying to get it considered under European law.

1:11:15.720 --> 1:11:18.060
<v Speaker 8>And if you consider how large Europe is and how

1:11:19.080 --> 1:11:23.160
<v Speaker 8>few people they would need to get this to be

1:11:23.220 --> 1:11:27.700
<v Speaker 8>considered is absolutely baffling. But we'll get there because I'm

1:11:27.840 --> 1:11:30.100
<v Speaker 8>trying to keep some sort of structure here.

1:11:30.600 --> 1:11:31.900
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, that's on me.

1:11:32.100 --> 1:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Now, I love how engaged you are, Molly.

1:11:34.280 --> 1:11:39.720
<v Speaker 8>So don't apologize. continue and also the whole notion of

1:11:39.939 --> 1:11:43.939
<v Speaker 8>demographic replacement in in countries that barely exist for 200

1:11:43.939 --> 1:11:47.860
<v Speaker 8>years can you call this like your ancestral homeland.

1:11:47.660 --> 1:11:49.240
<v Speaker 4>There was no italy 200 years ago there was no

1:11:49.340 --> 1:11:54.410
<v Speaker 4>germany 200 years ago like what grand historical narrative are

1:11:54.430 --> 1:11:57.790
<v Speaker 4>you pretending exists here yeah like if you're following that

1:11:57.830 --> 1:12:00.470
<v Speaker 4>lead then you must join my side with like we

1:12:00.490 --> 1:12:03.310
<v Speaker 4>need to be gaelic again and just return to like

1:12:03.330 --> 1:12:07.020
<v Speaker 4>our celtic forefathers before the romans dared to show up.

1:12:07.840 --> 1:12:10.760
<v Speaker 8>And then at least there would be some historical accuracy

1:12:10.800 --> 1:12:14.099
<v Speaker 8>to what they're claiming. But I dislike these people.

1:12:14.120 --> 1:12:16.040
<v Speaker 4>I think they're full of shit.

1:12:16.439 --> 1:12:19.879
<v Speaker 8>They very much are. So part three of the charter

1:12:19.979 --> 1:12:22.550
<v Speaker 8>is about the demands that these people have of Europe

1:12:22.660 --> 1:12:25.020
<v Speaker 8>and items they wish to see turned into law and policy.

1:12:25.439 --> 1:12:28.730
<v Speaker 8>We therefore demand that the European Commission exercise its right

1:12:28.750 --> 1:12:32.430
<v Speaker 8>of initiative under the treaties to propose and advance the

1:12:32.490 --> 1:12:37.430
<v Speaker 8>following legislative and policy measures without delay. Article 1.

1:12:37.430 --> 1:12:42.570
<v Speaker 1>Declare a formal moratorium on the new non-Western slash non-European

1:12:42.640 --> 1:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>immigration channels, including the suspension of asylum processes for economic

1:12:48.120 --> 1:12:51.979
<v Speaker 1>migrants and applicants from safe countries of origin, the halting

1:12:52.020 --> 1:12:56.620
<v Speaker 1>of new study and family reunification visas for non-Europeans, and

1:12:56.660 --> 1:13:01.020
<v Speaker 1>the strict limitation of legal migration channels until social cohesion

1:13:01.080 --> 1:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and cultural continuity in the member states are restored. That's

1:13:04.820 --> 1:13:05.500
<v Speaker 1>fucking mental.

1:13:05.860 --> 1:13:08.750
<v Speaker 4>We've done this before. We've done racist immigration quotas before.

1:13:08.850 --> 1:13:08.950
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:13:09.850 --> 1:13:12.970
<v Speaker 1>And just like good luck at your universities taking those

1:13:13.010 --> 1:13:15.690
<v Speaker 1>students from outside Europe. Let's see how that goes for you.

1:13:16.250 --> 1:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think they're printing money?

1:13:18.560 --> 1:13:20.360
<v Speaker 4>Oh, that's a problem in Europe, too.

1:13:20.420 --> 1:13:20.600
<v Speaker 6>I know.

1:13:20.620 --> 1:13:24.019
<v Speaker 4>So in American universities, like they're highly reliant on the

1:13:24.060 --> 1:13:25.700
<v Speaker 4>tuition dollars of international students.

1:13:25.720 --> 1:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>Is that the case.

1:13:26.439 --> 1:13:26.980
<v Speaker 4>In Europe as well?

1:13:27.860 --> 1:13:30.940
<v Speaker 1>Not to the American extent, but... Yeah, not to the

1:13:31.010 --> 1:13:34.030
<v Speaker 1>same extent. But work at universities in Europe long enough

1:13:34.050 --> 1:13:36.429
<v Speaker 1>and you'll be like, I see some of these folks.

1:13:37.570 --> 1:13:41.490
<v Speaker 8>European universities have largely also received budget cuts. So I

1:13:42.270 --> 1:13:45.350
<v Speaker 8>wouldn't be surprised if this is also happening in Europe,

1:13:45.370 --> 1:13:46.969
<v Speaker 8>but then to a lesser extent.

1:13:47.479 --> 1:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think the move towards the American model of education. Yeah. Sadly,

1:13:52.340 --> 1:13:54.660
<v Speaker 1>sadly upon all of us. Yeah, we're just four or

1:13:54.689 --> 1:13:58.970
<v Speaker 1>five years behind on America. In cultural waves. Well, I

1:13:58.990 --> 1:14:01.769
<v Speaker 1>don't know. You're leading the charge here with this. Yeah,

1:14:01.790 --> 1:14:05.150
<v Speaker 1>like even that haunted mannequin you have in the White House.

1:14:06.050 --> 1:14:08.710
<v Speaker 1>The bald one. The bald one. I forgot his name.

1:14:09.130 --> 1:14:09.750
<v Speaker 4>Stephen Miller?

1:14:10.090 --> 1:14:10.910
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that one.

1:14:12.450 --> 1:14:13.970
<v Speaker 4>Bald haunted doll. That's got to be him.

1:14:14.729 --> 1:14:16.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you narrowed it right down.

1:14:17.200 --> 1:14:20.160
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, but as far as I know, even Stephen Miller

1:14:20.200 --> 1:14:25.570
<v Speaker 8>hasn't put anything this explicitly great replacement into law. But

1:14:25.610 --> 1:14:27.110
<v Speaker 8>I'm no expert on America.

1:14:27.130 --> 1:14:31.710
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Miller will certainly say stuff that's very great replacement-y, right?

1:14:31.729 --> 1:14:35.309
<v Speaker 1>Like on his ex-account. But yeah, attempting to get this.

1:14:35.380 --> 1:14:38.080
<v Speaker 4>But in terms of legislative proposals, I mean, this is

1:14:38.120 --> 1:14:40.700
<v Speaker 4>giving 1920s immigration law, right?

1:14:41.380 --> 1:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:14:42.220 --> 1:14:44.540
<v Speaker 4>The sort of quotas that we set to keep essentially

1:14:44.580 --> 1:14:46.270
<v Speaker 4>Jews out of the United States in the 20s and 30s.

1:14:47.340 --> 1:14:50.979
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the Chinese Exclusion Act, which was like how our

1:14:51.020 --> 1:14:53.780
<v Speaker 1>immigration policy began in the United States. Not great.

1:14:54.860 --> 1:14:58.080
<v Speaker 4>So, yeah, we have done this before. It was during

1:14:58.100 --> 1:15:00.620
<v Speaker 4>the nadir of American race relations.

1:15:01.420 --> 1:15:04.320
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, Germany wants to chime in as well as of recent.

1:15:04.400 --> 1:15:07.060
<v Speaker 8>So going on a great path, guys.

1:15:07.600 --> 1:15:09.890
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, things are going pretty good there, right?

1:15:09.900 --> 1:15:10.589
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:15:10.900 --> 1:15:11.730
<v Speaker 4>Politically right now.

1:15:12.250 --> 1:15:15.650
<v Speaker 1>Yes. No, no, it's absolutely great. So we have four

1:15:15.670 --> 1:15:17.210
<v Speaker 1>more articles. Sorry.

1:15:17.540 --> 1:15:22.040
<v Speaker 8>Article two, I'm sorry, establish a fundamental reform of the

1:15:22.120 --> 1:15:25.380
<v Speaker 8>existing EU migration and asylum systems during the time of

1:15:25.420 --> 1:15:29.920
<v Speaker 8>this moratorium, including a total reform of the current migration framework,

1:15:30.380 --> 1:15:34.979
<v Speaker 8>focusing on external border protection, physical and technological barriers at

1:15:35.010 --> 1:15:39.110
<v Speaker 8>the frontiers, rapid screening and immediate return mechanisms.

1:15:39.189 --> 1:15:41.269
<v Speaker 4>Are they going to build a wall around Europe?

1:15:42.930 --> 1:15:46.550
<v Speaker 1>Europe already kills more people with its border than we do. Like,

1:15:46.750 --> 1:15:51.710
<v Speaker 1>Europe's physical border protection is the most murderous on the planet.

1:15:52.050 --> 1:15:52.310
<v Speaker 5>Oh, yeah.

1:15:52.470 --> 1:15:55.100
<v Speaker 1>They're not even very knowledgeable about the shit that they're

1:15:55.140 --> 1:15:55.900
<v Speaker 1>racist about.

1:15:56.240 --> 1:15:59.580
<v Speaker 8>It's probably worse than you think, because what they mean with, like,

1:15:59.620 --> 1:16:03.780
<v Speaker 8>the external border protection is also us. I think, James,

1:16:04.060 --> 1:16:06.490
<v Speaker 8>we talked a little bit about this, about when Trump

1:16:06.550 --> 1:16:08.089
<v Speaker 8>wanted to send migrants to Libya.

1:16:08.729 --> 1:16:09.570
<v Speaker 1>But there are just.

1:16:09.990 --> 1:16:14.040
<v Speaker 8>sort of European control zones within Africa. Like, a few

1:16:14.080 --> 1:16:17.860
<v Speaker 8>weeks ago, there was the migrants storming the gates in Spain,

1:16:18.140 --> 1:16:20.479
<v Speaker 8>and that was in Ceuta.

1:16:20.820 --> 1:16:21.809
<v Speaker 1>Ceuta. Thank you.

1:16:22.400 --> 1:16:25.250
<v Speaker 8>But that's the Spanish territory of Morocco.

1:16:25.729 --> 1:16:29.570
<v Speaker 1>What these people want is more Alan Curtis, right? Like,

1:16:29.650 --> 1:16:33.350
<v Speaker 1>more little dead children. Yeah. We just passed the 11th

1:16:33.410 --> 1:16:37.099
<v Speaker 1>anniversary of his death, right? It was in September 2015. But, like,

1:16:38.990 --> 1:16:41.189
<v Speaker 1>Either we've got far away from that, that you can

1:16:41.270 --> 1:16:45.330
<v Speaker 1>con people into talking about hard borders again and not

1:16:45.370 --> 1:16:50.189
<v Speaker 1>understanding that hard borders means dead children, or people remember

1:16:50.210 --> 1:16:51.790
<v Speaker 1>that and they think that that was a good thing,

1:16:51.830 --> 1:16:54.870
<v Speaker 1>that they'll stop people coming if we just kill a

1:16:54.910 --> 1:16:58.090
<v Speaker 1>few more little innocent kids like this. Because that's what

1:16:58.170 --> 1:17:01.850
<v Speaker 1>Europe's physical borders do, is that they drown children. Oh yeah,

1:17:01.910 --> 1:17:05.979
<v Speaker 1>Fortress Europe, the mortar is exclusively dead children.

1:17:06.560 --> 1:17:09.440
<v Speaker 8>Because also, I think it was in Hungary, from the

1:17:09.479 --> 1:17:11.590
<v Speaker 8>top of my head, where they had just like these

1:17:11.830 --> 1:17:16.290
<v Speaker 8>chain-linked fences with razor wire. And there was also the

1:17:16.330 --> 1:17:19.849
<v Speaker 8>lighthouse reports where they had people in literal dog kennels

1:17:19.930 --> 1:17:20.910
<v Speaker 8>or some shit.

1:17:21.689 --> 1:17:23.030
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Okay.

1:17:23.070 --> 1:17:25.130
<v Speaker 8>Let's rush a bit through this bit so we can

1:17:25.170 --> 1:17:25.990
<v Speaker 8>go to the funny bits.

1:17:26.330 --> 1:17:29.229
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. So I just looked this up and I spoiled

1:17:29.270 --> 1:17:30.970
<v Speaker 4>it for myself. And now I know who wrote this.

1:17:31.110 --> 1:17:31.330
<v Speaker 7>Okay.

1:17:31.350 --> 1:17:37.620
<v Speaker 1>Come on. Don't worry, guys, you'll get a live react

1:17:37.660 --> 1:17:40.420
<v Speaker 1>from me, listeners. Oh, I think there's stuff in here

1:17:40.439 --> 1:17:42.420
<v Speaker 1>that Molly does not yet know, so.

1:17:42.439 --> 1:17:44.350
<v Speaker 4>Oh, no, I just got one little peek and I

1:17:44.350 --> 1:17:45.970
<v Speaker 4>was like, I can't spoil it for myself anymore.

1:17:46.290 --> 1:17:47.010
<v Speaker 1>Okay, great.

1:17:47.570 --> 1:17:51.250
<v Speaker 8>Then Article 3 of the Act ensured a systematic and

1:17:51.290 --> 1:17:57.599
<v Speaker 8>accelerated return, re-migration in quotes, of illegally staying migrants, reject

1:17:57.660 --> 1:18:01.280
<v Speaker 8>asylum seekers, and persons who have committed criminal offenses or

1:18:01.380 --> 1:18:05.040
<v Speaker 8>pose a threat to public order. with full mutual recognition

1:18:05.120 --> 1:18:09.120
<v Speaker 8>of return decisions across the union and enhanced cooperation with

1:18:09.180 --> 1:18:10.820
<v Speaker 8>third countries for readmission.

1:18:11.600 --> 1:18:14.610
<v Speaker 1>Wow. Really at the Trump playbook on the last one.

1:18:15.390 --> 1:18:17.990
<v Speaker 8>I made some comments for myself here and it's mostly like,

1:18:18.410 --> 1:18:20.389
<v Speaker 8>how do you define this? How do you quote this?

1:18:20.470 --> 1:18:24.720
<v Speaker 8>How do you force third countries to cooperate? It's like,

1:18:25.729 --> 1:18:26.960
<v Speaker 8>you can't like.

1:18:27.080 --> 1:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah well this is a trump fantasy right like we'll

1:18:29.700 --> 1:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>use our economic power to lean on you to do

1:18:32.060 --> 1:18:35.120
<v Speaker 1>our crimes against humanity for us it's the sort of

1:18:35.320 --> 1:18:40.650
<v Speaker 1>might makes right approach to uh international relations our leaning

1:18:40.740 --> 1:18:43.450
<v Speaker 1>on other countries hasn't gone so well right like it

1:18:43.470 --> 1:18:45.430
<v Speaker 1>ain't gonna go better for the eu.

1:18:45.670 --> 1:18:48.410
<v Speaker 8>No because most of the countries that we send them

1:18:48.450 --> 1:18:51.220
<v Speaker 8>to don't want to engage in this process or don't

1:18:51.260 --> 1:18:54.380
<v Speaker 8>want them back. So how are you going to force

1:18:54.460 --> 1:18:57.100
<v Speaker 8>it unless we want to build some island in the

1:18:57.150 --> 1:19:00.110
<v Speaker 8>middle of the Mediterranean to put all the stateless people?

1:19:00.130 --> 1:19:01.669
<v Speaker 1>Don't give them any ideas.

1:19:02.030 --> 1:19:04.450
<v Speaker 4>Making a bunch of people stateless is not a really

1:19:04.490 --> 1:19:04.990
<v Speaker 4>bad sign.

1:19:06.360 --> 1:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>No, that's a sign of a healthy system.

1:19:09.479 --> 1:19:10.660
<v Speaker 4>Let's proceed.

1:19:11.100 --> 1:19:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Tragedy?

1:19:11.460 --> 1:19:11.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

1:19:12.460 --> 1:19:12.780
<v Speaker 1>Never.

1:19:13.380 --> 1:19:18.190
<v Speaker 8>Never in the history. Establish a harmonized EU-wide framework for

1:19:18.270 --> 1:19:24.510
<v Speaker 8>broader remigration, including voluntary and incentivized remigration measures for non-European

1:19:24.550 --> 1:19:29.310
<v Speaker 8>migrants who are unintegrated or constitute a serious cultural or

1:19:29.390 --> 1:19:31.030
<v Speaker 8>financial burden to member states.

1:19:31.689 --> 1:19:32.570
<v Speaker 4>Unintegrated.

1:19:33.229 --> 1:19:34.610
<v Speaker 1>Cultural burden.

1:19:34.850 --> 1:19:36.970
<v Speaker 4>They just don't look like I think they should look.

1:19:37.530 --> 1:19:41.070
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. To support the restoration of demographic balance.

1:19:41.910 --> 1:19:44.959
<v Speaker 4>This is obviously someone who's just really worried about Western culture.

1:19:45.400 --> 1:19:48.380
<v Speaker 4>Definitely not someone who's been a well-known neo-Nazi for more

1:19:48.400 --> 1:19:49.080
<v Speaker 4>than a decade.

1:19:49.439 --> 1:19:54.420
<v Speaker 8>Ah, now I know which name you read. That person

1:19:54.460 --> 1:19:56.700
<v Speaker 8>is an identitarian, Molly. Learn the difference.

1:19:57.310 --> 1:20:01.070
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, his involvement with the Aryan Jugend in Austria, there's

1:20:01.250 --> 1:20:02.150
<v Speaker 4>nothing to do with this.

1:20:03.290 --> 1:20:06.210
<v Speaker 8>Molly, are you really saying that Nazis come from Austria?

1:20:06.470 --> 1:20:07.430
<v Speaker 1>Please, read a history book.

1:20:07.450 --> 1:20:08.469
<v Speaker 4>Name me one example.

1:20:09.290 --> 1:20:14.410
<v Speaker 1>Exactly. Nothing bad politically ever came out of Austria. Maybe

1:20:14.450 --> 1:20:16.870
<v Speaker 1>we should replace them all. Maybe they're onto something here.

1:20:17.090 --> 1:20:19.110
<v Speaker 4>Maybe the replacement is going to be great.

1:20:21.070 --> 1:20:26.910
<v Speaker 8>If we replace them with literally anything. And the last one, because...

1:20:27.479 --> 1:20:32.160
<v Speaker 8>Jesus fucking Christ. Remove social welfare incentives and benefits that

1:20:32.220 --> 1:20:36.639
<v Speaker 8>function as pool factors for migration, including restrictions in accordance

1:20:36.700 --> 1:20:41.150
<v Speaker 8>with union law on access by non-citizens and recent migrants

1:20:41.390 --> 1:20:44.970
<v Speaker 8>to selected welfare benefits and support systems, so as to

1:20:45.010 --> 1:20:49.910
<v Speaker 8>reduce incentives for further migration, lessen the burden on European taxpayers,

1:20:50.350 --> 1:20:51.770
<v Speaker 8>and encourage re-migration.

1:20:52.340 --> 1:20:55.190
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, people are just coming there for the welfare

1:20:55.229 --> 1:20:58.590
<v Speaker 4>because it's like really good. They're risking drowning in the

1:20:58.689 --> 1:21:00.950
<v Speaker 4>sea because they really want to participate in the social

1:21:01.330 --> 1:21:03.560
<v Speaker 4>welfare system. And it's not because they're fleeing other forms

1:21:03.600 --> 1:21:04.180
<v Speaker 4>of violence.

1:21:04.780 --> 1:21:08.260
<v Speaker 1>No, no, they're paying money to the smugglers so they

1:21:08.280 --> 1:21:10.439
<v Speaker 1>can get to our welfare. Yeah, so they can be

1:21:10.479 --> 1:21:13.360
<v Speaker 1>on the dole because it's such a fucking great life.

1:21:13.900 --> 1:21:16.059
<v Speaker 4>And I'm sure there's no ulterior motive here where these

1:21:16.100 --> 1:21:18.160
<v Speaker 4>people actually want to cut welfare for everyone because they

1:21:18.200 --> 1:21:19.340
<v Speaker 4>also probably just hate poor people.

1:21:19.640 --> 1:21:23.830
<v Speaker 1>Oh, definitely. Definitely. There is some very rich people involved

1:21:23.910 --> 1:21:24.729
<v Speaker 1>in this as well.

1:21:25.210 --> 1:21:25.769
<v Speaker 4>You don't say.

1:21:25.790 --> 1:21:25.870
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

1:21:27.470 --> 1:21:31.009
<v Speaker 1>I do say. Shocking. It's an American plot twist.

1:21:31.750 --> 1:21:34.670
<v Speaker 8>So I think this is a good point to do

1:21:34.710 --> 1:21:38.000
<v Speaker 8>a very good impromptu ad break. Because this took a

1:21:38.020 --> 1:21:39.389
<v Speaker 8>bit longer than expected.

1:21:39.740 --> 1:21:41.290
<v Speaker 4>That's my fault.

1:21:41.330 --> 1:21:43.330
<v Speaker 1>This is what you get with me and Molly. This

1:21:43.390 --> 1:21:44.370
<v Speaker 1>is fucking chaos.

1:21:44.410 --> 1:21:46.870
<v Speaker 8>This is honestly why I do it. But I think

1:21:46.890 --> 1:21:48.070
<v Speaker 8>we all need a palate cleanser.

1:21:48.090 --> 1:21:49.970
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, enjoy these ads.

1:21:50.930 --> 1:21:54.620
<v Speaker 1>Probably not as horrible as the Save Europe Act. Oh,

1:21:54.630 --> 1:21:56.770
<v Speaker 1>you don't know some rich people. People don't get rich

1:21:56.790 --> 1:21:59.349
<v Speaker 1>without selling shit from advertisements. Yeah, that's true. You don't

1:21:59.370 --> 1:22:02.229
<v Speaker 1>know where that money's going. Yeah, let it be dick pills.

1:22:03.060 --> 1:22:15.799
<v Speaker 1>Fingers crossed. And we're back.

1:22:16.840 --> 1:22:21.900
<v Speaker 8>Cleansed from horrible shit that we'll continue onward with. So,

1:22:22.540 --> 1:22:25.720
<v Speaker 8>near the end of May this year, the two co-founders

1:22:25.800 --> 1:22:29.360
<v Speaker 8>of the Save Europe Act submitted the European Citizens Initiative.

1:22:30.010 --> 1:22:31.850
<v Speaker 8>Those names are Martin Selner.

1:22:31.870 --> 1:22:33.010
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah.

1:22:33.990 --> 1:22:39.680
<v Speaker 8>Molly's BFF, judging by her reaction. And my favorite country person,

1:22:40.240 --> 1:22:41.340
<v Speaker 8>Eva Vlaardingerbroek.

1:22:42.040 --> 1:22:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

1:22:42.300 --> 1:22:44.559
<v Speaker 4>I haven't heard of her. I'm looking forward to learning about...

1:22:44.900 --> 1:22:45.840
<v Speaker 4>Say that Dutch name again.

1:22:46.340 --> 1:22:46.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:22:46.500 --> 1:22:48.540
<v Speaker 1>Can we take a second pass at that surname?

1:22:49.080 --> 1:22:50.080
<v Speaker 4>Take a charge of that.

1:22:50.100 --> 1:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Vlaardingerbroek.

1:22:52.640 --> 1:22:53.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying that.

1:22:53.720 --> 1:22:55.780
<v Speaker 1>This is a language he has said we have to

1:22:55.840 --> 1:22:56.650
<v Speaker 1>fight to preserve.

1:22:56.810 --> 1:22:56.940
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:22:56.970 --> 1:22:57.050
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

1:22:57.970 --> 1:23:01.750
<v Speaker 4>Dutch is such a beautiful, beautiful language. It doesn't sound

1:23:01.770 --> 1:23:05.250
<v Speaker 4>like a German with a terrible head injury had 17 beers.

1:23:07.340 --> 1:23:08.180
<v Speaker 2>Sorry.

1:23:08.220 --> 1:23:10.540
<v Speaker 1>How did you know the origins of my beautiful language?

1:23:12.820 --> 1:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>It's like their origin.

1:23:16.200 --> 1:23:19.920
<v Speaker 8>It's still better than English because that's just like English,

1:23:20.280 --> 1:23:23.940
<v Speaker 8>French and Scandinavian and gay, like all thrown into a blunder.

1:23:24.540 --> 1:23:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, it's our indigenous language that we... Yeah, we're

1:23:28.560 --> 1:23:29.420
<v Speaker 1>Native Americans.

1:23:29.880 --> 1:23:30.939
<v Speaker 4>It's our indigenous language.

1:23:31.000 --> 1:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Indigenous British people, a country that famously was never colonized

1:23:34.820 --> 1:23:39.020
<v Speaker 1>or received migration from anywhere until about 1998.

1:23:39.020 --> 1:23:41.610
<v Speaker 4>That was the first time the culture was adulterated.

1:23:42.090 --> 1:23:44.010
<v Speaker 1>Because of woke. Famously true. Because of woke.

1:23:44.870 --> 1:23:47.310
<v Speaker 8>It does get me to another point because, like, James,

1:23:47.370 --> 1:23:50.110
<v Speaker 8>when I texted you about this, you already said, like,

1:23:50.310 --> 1:23:52.610
<v Speaker 8>people will not be able to pronounce her name. And

1:23:52.650 --> 1:23:55.430
<v Speaker 8>I jokingly said to you, like, we could, could just

1:23:55.490 --> 1:23:56.650
<v Speaker 8>call her Ava Brown.

1:23:57.310 --> 1:23:58.030
<v Speaker 4>Ava Brown shirt.

1:23:58.430 --> 1:24:03.300
<v Speaker 1>No, no, Ava Brown. Like, uh, the. Yeah, yeah, I know.

1:24:03.320 --> 1:24:05.900
<v Speaker 1>Hitler's girlfriend. I know. But I will not do that.

1:24:06.380 --> 1:24:08.420
<v Speaker 4>So if Vlardinger broke.

1:24:08.979 --> 1:24:11.540
<v Speaker 1>Put some more throat into it.

1:24:14.490 --> 1:24:16.930
<v Speaker 8>I will not do that because, well, in part because

1:24:16.970 --> 1:24:20.950
<v Speaker 8>libel laws exist, but much more importantly, I think it's

1:24:20.990 --> 1:24:25.030
<v Speaker 8>an unfair comparison. The original Eva Brau was just Hitler's wife,

1:24:25.450 --> 1:24:27.830
<v Speaker 8>and she had very little to do with politics or

1:24:27.910 --> 1:24:31.250
<v Speaker 8>policy or governance or anything else. She was asked or

1:24:31.290 --> 1:24:34.140
<v Speaker 8>instructed to leave any time business or politics came up.

1:24:34.770 --> 1:24:39.100
<v Speaker 8>And Vlaardingerbroek is much more involved in the political discourse and,

1:24:39.260 --> 1:24:42.939
<v Speaker 8>as the Save Europe Act shows, in theorizing and crafting policy.

1:24:43.660 --> 1:24:47.060
<v Speaker 8>So a much more apt but far less funny comparison

1:24:47.090 --> 1:24:50.430
<v Speaker 8>would be to call her Eva Goebbels or Eva Heydrich.

1:24:51.020 --> 1:24:53.080
<v Speaker 8>But that's just less funny. So I will just call

1:24:53.120 --> 1:24:55.200
<v Speaker 8>her Eva. We'll get to her.

1:24:56.000 --> 1:24:58.280
<v Speaker 4>So I've never heard of Eva. Martin Selner, just for the, well,

1:24:58.320 --> 1:25:00.240
<v Speaker 4>I was so excited that this is fucking Martin Selner.

1:25:00.979 --> 1:25:04.530
<v Speaker 4>He was involved with the American alt-right 10 years ago.

1:25:04.689 --> 1:25:07.250
<v Speaker 4>There was an attempt to sort of create bridges between

1:25:07.270 --> 1:25:12.230
<v Speaker 4>the American sort of burgeoning, sort of mainstreaming of neo-Nazis

1:25:12.290 --> 1:25:15.230
<v Speaker 4>into the sort of political right. There was attempts to

1:25:15.720 --> 1:25:19.910
<v Speaker 4>merge with the identitarian movements of France, and I guess

1:25:20.290 --> 1:25:23.830
<v Speaker 4>in Austria, where Martin Sellner is from. Identity Europa was

1:25:24.010 --> 1:25:27.450
<v Speaker 4>modeled after Generation Identity in France, which Martin Sellner also

1:25:27.490 --> 1:25:29.930
<v Speaker 4>modeled his group off of in Austria. And so there

1:25:29.950 --> 1:25:33.820
<v Speaker 4>were some connections there, like in 2017 when, oh, that

1:25:33.880 --> 1:25:37.620
<v Speaker 4>horrible bitch from Canada, Lauren Southern. Lauren Southern got detained

1:25:37.939 --> 1:25:40.040
<v Speaker 4>because she and Martin Sellner were on a boat that

1:25:40.080 --> 1:25:42.340
<v Speaker 4>was like trying to drown migrants in the sea.

1:25:42.500 --> 1:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>God, I'd forgotten about that.

1:25:44.060 --> 1:25:44.160
<v Speaker 6>Okay.

1:25:44.930 --> 1:25:48.430
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, we know this man. He's trying to drown migrants.

1:25:48.130 --> 1:25:51.219
<v Speaker 1>In the sea. Yeah, well, that answers my question about

1:25:51.810 --> 1:25:53.190
<v Speaker 1>what they meant by the borders.

1:25:53.680 --> 1:25:56.980
<v Speaker 8>But on the bright side, Molly, I do think Martin

1:25:57.000 --> 1:25:59.660
<v Speaker 8>Selner looks like a looks-maxing Richard Spencer.

1:26:00.420 --> 1:26:02.180
<v Speaker 4>Well, I don't know if you've seen Richard Spencer lately.

1:26:02.540 --> 1:26:03.660
<v Speaker 4>It's not hard to look better than that.

1:26:04.300 --> 1:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Looking like shit, brother. I missed my weekly Zoom call

1:26:07.120 --> 1:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>with him, so I'm not sure what's going on.

1:26:09.560 --> 1:26:11.460
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, divorce did not treat him well.

1:26:11.880 --> 1:26:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, good. He deserves it. Okay.

1:26:14.780 --> 1:26:18.100
<v Speaker 8>The European Citizens Initiative. At the time of writing, it

1:26:18.220 --> 1:26:21.439
<v Speaker 8>obtained about 740,000 signatures.

1:26:21.660 --> 1:26:22.910
<v Speaker 4>Oh, that's more than I would have preferred.

1:26:22.930 --> 1:26:26.430
<v Speaker 8>Well, there's sort of good news on that front later.

1:26:26.870 --> 1:26:30.650
<v Speaker 8>The system itself is less known among both Europeans and Americans.

1:26:31.390 --> 1:26:34.629
<v Speaker 8>And the rejection of the Safe Europe Act is incredibly

1:26:34.689 --> 1:26:38.210
<v Speaker 8>simple and dumb once you realize how it works. The

1:26:38.290 --> 1:26:42.000
<v Speaker 8>ECI is pretty much a mechanism for some diluted form

1:26:42.040 --> 1:26:46.180
<v Speaker 8>of direct democracy within the European Union. ECI proposals that

1:26:46.240 --> 1:26:49.460
<v Speaker 8>are accepted call directly on the European Council to propose

1:26:49.520 --> 1:26:54.440
<v Speaker 8>a legal act, usually a directive or legislation, on certain conditions.

1:26:54.939 --> 1:26:58.580
<v Speaker 8>One of them is that the petition reaches one million signatures.

1:26:59.000 --> 1:27:00.920
<v Speaker 4>Oh, so they didn't make it. So we don't have

1:27:00.939 --> 1:27:01.920
<v Speaker 4>to take this seriously at all.

1:27:02.360 --> 1:27:03.540
<v Speaker 1>We do, unfortunately.

1:27:03.560 --> 1:27:04.840
<v Speaker 4>Oh, we do.

1:27:05.880 --> 1:27:08.120
<v Speaker 1>When you've got three quarters of a million people signing

1:27:08.160 --> 1:27:10.430
<v Speaker 1>on to something as openly racist as this shit, I

1:27:10.470 --> 1:27:11.390
<v Speaker 1>think you do have to.

1:27:11.720 --> 1:27:12.860
<v Speaker 4>But like, it's not going to get voted on.

1:27:12.939 --> 1:27:15.460
<v Speaker 1>No, we'll get there. Okay.

1:27:16.180 --> 1:27:17.220
<v Speaker 4>Explain Europe to me.

1:27:18.280 --> 1:27:18.900
<v Speaker 1>Horribad.

1:27:19.220 --> 1:27:22.540
<v Speaker 8>So, point two, that those signatures are from at least

1:27:22.720 --> 1:27:26.640
<v Speaker 8>seven different member states with minimum amounts for each of

1:27:26.680 --> 1:27:28.200
<v Speaker 8>those seven or more states.

1:27:28.840 --> 1:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense.

1:27:29.340 --> 1:27:32.059
<v Speaker 4>You can't just get like a million racist Croatians design it.

1:27:32.360 --> 1:27:33.259
<v Speaker 1>No, exactly.

1:27:33.280 --> 1:27:34.980
<v Speaker 4>No offense to Croatia. You just do have a lot

1:27:35.010 --> 1:27:35.599
<v Speaker 4>of neo-Nazis.

1:27:35.870 --> 1:27:38.860
<v Speaker 8>Don't look into their streets. On top, there's also a

1:27:38.920 --> 1:27:42.360
<v Speaker 8>minimum amount of signatures that's needed per member state to

1:27:42.420 --> 1:27:45.620
<v Speaker 8>ensure there's broad support for an idea across the EU.

1:27:46.200 --> 1:27:48.230
<v Speaker 8>For example, you cannot have all the votes coming from

1:27:48.280 --> 1:27:51.510
<v Speaker 8>Germany and only six votes from other member states. The

1:27:51.530 --> 1:27:54.450
<v Speaker 8>minimums are based on the number of EU parliament members

1:27:55.090 --> 1:27:57.110
<v Speaker 8>multiplied by 750. For example, the Dutch must deliver 20,445

1:27:57.110 --> 1:28:08.160
<v Speaker 8>votes of this million, while Luxembourg only needs 4,230. So

1:28:08.180 --> 1:28:10.660
<v Speaker 8>just like some proportional representation there.

1:28:11.140 --> 1:28:11.280
<v Speaker 7>Right.

1:28:11.300 --> 1:28:14.280
<v Speaker 4>So all the European Union member states have to kind

1:28:14.340 --> 1:28:14.840
<v Speaker 4>of be on board.

1:28:15.500 --> 1:28:18.059
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Or at least enough of them. Yeah.

1:28:18.780 --> 1:28:19.009
<v Speaker 3>Right.

1:28:19.390 --> 1:28:21.009
<v Speaker 4>Like you can't get something through just because two or

1:28:21.050 --> 1:28:23.849
<v Speaker 4>three states are being nasty. That makes sense.

1:28:24.530 --> 1:28:24.769
<v Speaker 6>Yes.

1:28:25.450 --> 1:28:29.210
<v Speaker 8>And specifically because it is directed, it doesn't have to

1:28:29.250 --> 1:28:32.970
<v Speaker 8>go through like your national parliament and to be then

1:28:33.070 --> 1:28:36.330
<v Speaker 8>like thrown upwards towards the EU. This is directly between

1:28:36.370 --> 1:28:39.269
<v Speaker 8>the citizens. and the European Commission.

1:28:39.870 --> 1:28:41.630
<v Speaker 4>I guess I don't really know what the EU can

1:28:41.670 --> 1:28:44.110
<v Speaker 4>and cannot do. How much power would something passed by

1:28:44.140 --> 1:28:48.120
<v Speaker 4>at the EU level have to change the immigration laws

1:28:48.180 --> 1:28:48.900
<v Speaker 4>of a country?

1:28:49.479 --> 1:28:50.979
<v Speaker 1>I'm not smart enough to answer that.

1:28:51.420 --> 1:28:54.500
<v Speaker 4>In a universe where the EU does say, we're signing

1:28:54.600 --> 1:28:57.090
<v Speaker 4>on to this, this is real, we're doing it, Does

1:28:57.110 --> 1:28:59.800
<v Speaker 4>that supersede the immigration laws at the national level of

1:28:59.840 --> 1:29:02.700
<v Speaker 4>the member states? Can this even be something? I guess

1:29:02.740 --> 1:29:04.920
<v Speaker 4>is my question. I don't know with how the EU works,

1:29:04.939 --> 1:29:05.880
<v Speaker 4>to be so honest.

1:29:06.439 --> 1:29:08.760
<v Speaker 8>In any worst case scenario, how we see this happening

1:29:08.880 --> 1:29:12.410
<v Speaker 8>would be that it would get passed. I suppose that

1:29:12.430 --> 1:29:15.330
<v Speaker 8>then some form of like that legislation or directive will

1:29:15.370 --> 1:29:20.549
<v Speaker 8>be conjured up from the bowels of coccitis or whatever.

1:29:20.570 --> 1:29:20.639
<v Speaker 4>And.

1:29:22.350 --> 1:29:24.229
<v Speaker 8>Then it would have to be voted on within the

1:29:24.350 --> 1:29:28.030
<v Speaker 8>EU parliament. And should that for some reason happen, then

1:29:28.110 --> 1:29:30.870
<v Speaker 8>I think that would be a not insignificant amount of

1:29:30.950 --> 1:29:34.470
<v Speaker 8>power that the EU holds over individual member states. Because

1:29:34.490 --> 1:29:37.070
<v Speaker 8>we also do that for trade and for, you know,

1:29:37.130 --> 1:29:42.090
<v Speaker 8>regulating things across European borders. Like even for us, how

1:29:42.110 --> 1:29:45.870
<v Speaker 8>the EU functions exactly is shrouded in mystery.

1:29:46.110 --> 1:29:46.929
<v Speaker 4>It's a great mystery.

1:29:47.030 --> 1:29:47.450
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

1:29:47.970 --> 1:29:51.809
<v Speaker 1>They cooperate on migration, right? You see this with the

1:29:51.830 --> 1:29:55.670
<v Speaker 1>way the EU places its borders, the way that the

1:29:55.729 --> 1:30:01.300
<v Speaker 1>EU kind of takes something of a united front on

1:30:01.560 --> 1:30:03.620
<v Speaker 1>how it deals with things. And you saw this in

1:30:03.979 --> 1:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the beginnings of the Syrian civil war, right? You saw

1:30:06.220 --> 1:30:11.419
<v Speaker 1>Europe cooperating first to, in some cases, receive Syrian migrants

1:30:11.460 --> 1:30:15.429
<v Speaker 1>and in many cases to repel them violently. But states

1:30:15.470 --> 1:30:18.570
<v Speaker 1>also still would have sovereign to you, but like the

1:30:18.630 --> 1:30:21.179
<v Speaker 1>exact nature of their laws. It's not like the EU

1:30:21.229 --> 1:30:23.380
<v Speaker 1>can dictate what it takes to be a British, well,

1:30:23.400 --> 1:30:27.380
<v Speaker 1>a British bad example. Because they left. Yeah, sorry. Yeah,

1:30:27.580 --> 1:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and so did I. But the EU.

1:30:29.040 --> 1:30:33.920
<v Speaker 4>Can't say to France like, you can't admit any more immigrants.

1:30:33.620 --> 1:30:36.299
<v Speaker 1>Yeah or like we are obliging you to to remove

1:30:36.360 --> 1:30:40.100
<v Speaker 1>the citizenship or to like de-frenchify these people.

1:30:39.840 --> 1:30:42.019
<v Speaker 4>To outlaw the speaking of other languages as far.

1:30:41.939 --> 1:30:44.300
<v Speaker 1>As i'm aware yeah like that could be like giving

1:30:44.320 --> 1:30:46.240
<v Speaker 1>passes for the eu parliament then i guess there would

1:30:46.260 --> 1:30:48.140
<v Speaker 1>be like a set of principles that the states would

1:30:48.160 --> 1:30:50.439
<v Speaker 1>have to try and adhere to yes with their own

1:30:50.500 --> 1:30:53.270
<v Speaker 1>policies which they're not having trouble doing like they found

1:30:53.320 --> 1:30:56.519
<v Speaker 1>a lot of racists in germany recently apparently like uh Oh,

1:30:56.540 --> 1:30:58.760
<v Speaker 1>but we have them in the Netherlands as well. Don't worry.

1:30:58.979 --> 1:30:59.259
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:30:59.540 --> 1:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Britain's not immune from that either. It will shock people

1:31:01.420 --> 1:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to hear.

1:31:02.500 --> 1:31:05.230
<v Speaker 8>But to get back to Molly, I do think that

1:31:05.470 --> 1:31:08.229
<v Speaker 8>to a certain extent, the EU could put diplomatic or

1:31:08.290 --> 1:31:12.190
<v Speaker 8>economic pressure on member states to enforce something like this

1:31:12.290 --> 1:31:13.530
<v Speaker 8>or to nudge them.

1:31:13.890 --> 1:31:17.370
<v Speaker 4>Or like obliquely, like you would have to comply with certain,

1:31:17.910 --> 1:31:20.150
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, like language restrictions on things that are

1:31:20.210 --> 1:31:23.110
<v Speaker 4>involved in trade. And that would sort of obliquely enforce

1:31:23.650 --> 1:31:25.240
<v Speaker 4>restrictions at the national level.

1:31:25.710 --> 1:31:28.990
<v Speaker 8>Yes, but also I think this would heavily strain relations

1:31:29.030 --> 1:31:32.229
<v Speaker 8>between the EU and the member states because it is,

1:31:32.930 --> 1:31:34.650
<v Speaker 8>I don't want to call it authoritarian, but it is

1:31:34.689 --> 1:31:38.460
<v Speaker 8>a power, like a supernatural power that's sort of going

1:31:38.500 --> 1:31:41.780
<v Speaker 8>to tell countries what to do. And I can't imagine

1:31:41.840 --> 1:31:45.000
<v Speaker 8>if it is something as vile as this, that that

1:31:45.020 --> 1:31:45.800
<v Speaker 8>would go over well.

1:31:46.340 --> 1:31:49.260
<v Speaker 4>It's just, it's so funny to me that the nationalists

1:31:49.300 --> 1:31:52.370
<v Speaker 4>we have today, there's no nationalism there. Like a true

1:31:52.450 --> 1:31:54.269
<v Speaker 4>nationalist would find this abhorrent.

1:31:54.640 --> 1:31:55.939
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you completely.

1:31:56.200 --> 1:31:57.480
<v Speaker 4>Our nationalists can't even do it right.

1:31:57.820 --> 1:32:01.660
<v Speaker 8>But it's only nationalism if you hate certain people. Otherwise,

1:32:01.780 --> 1:32:05.140
<v Speaker 8>it's just being a rhino. I think you call them

1:32:05.200 --> 1:32:06.230
<v Speaker 8>in the United States.

1:32:07.270 --> 1:32:07.969
<v Speaker 4>A nino.

1:32:09.310 --> 1:32:12.110
<v Speaker 8>So to get back to the ECI. In the original

1:32:12.170 --> 1:32:15.970
<v Speaker 8>treaty that formalized this mechanism, it states several conditions that

1:32:16.330 --> 1:32:18.710
<v Speaker 8>the proposed act must adhere to.

1:32:18.900 --> 1:32:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Before it passes.

1:32:20.500 --> 1:32:24.610
<v Speaker 8>An initiative must be within the legal constraints of the EU. obviously,

1:32:25.210 --> 1:32:30.009
<v Speaker 8>and the initiative must not be, and I quote, manifestly abusive, frivolous,

1:32:30.150 --> 1:32:31.050
<v Speaker 8>or vexatious.

1:32:31.530 --> 1:32:34.790
<v Speaker 4>Okay, is this not manifestly abusive, frivolous, and vexatious?

1:32:34.810 --> 1:32:34.890
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

1:32:35.450 --> 1:32:39.309
<v Speaker 1>I read those sentences as legal code for no bullshit, please. Yeah,

1:32:39.330 --> 1:32:41.690
<v Speaker 1>but this is bullshit. Yeah, this is bullshit.

1:32:42.090 --> 1:32:42.230
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

1:32:43.130 --> 1:32:44.570
<v Speaker 4>This is manifestly abusive.

1:32:45.450 --> 1:32:47.610
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's the abusive one. I think they don't want

1:32:47.650 --> 1:32:52.380
<v Speaker 1>you doing one that's like so-and-so is ugly and has

1:32:52.600 --> 1:32:54.650
<v Speaker 1>a big nose or whatever they want.

1:32:54.810 --> 1:32:57.160
<v Speaker 4>But this is vexatious and frivolous.

1:32:57.939 --> 1:33:01.660
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's fucking vexing me, I can tell you. I'm vexed.

1:33:03.600 --> 1:33:05.580
<v Speaker 8>Well, then it's good that we're slowly getting to the

1:33:05.620 --> 1:33:09.130
<v Speaker 8>funnier parts of this. One of the more important things

1:33:09.170 --> 1:33:12.670
<v Speaker 8>that were in this statement from the European Commission, because

1:33:13.229 --> 1:33:16.530
<v Speaker 8>usually they all have to rule after the 1 million

1:33:16.570 --> 1:33:19.510
<v Speaker 8>votes has been met. They already ruled on this, but

1:33:19.610 --> 1:33:22.630
<v Speaker 8>not on its merits, but on the legality of it.

1:33:23.300 --> 1:33:26.960
<v Speaker 8>And I'll be quoting directly from the document here. Article

1:33:26.960 --> 1:33:29.979
<v Speaker 8>6.3 of the ECI states that the initiative is not

1:33:30.040 --> 1:33:33.420
<v Speaker 8>manifestly contrary to the values of the union as set

1:33:33.520 --> 1:33:36.000
<v Speaker 8>out in Article 2.1. And the rights and strides in

1:33:36.020 --> 1:33:39.500
<v Speaker 8>the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Essentially,

1:33:39.600 --> 1:33:42.860
<v Speaker 8>like whatever people want to pass and sign on to,

1:33:43.640 --> 1:33:46.900
<v Speaker 8>it can't violate European law. I think this is important

1:33:46.939 --> 1:33:48.550
<v Speaker 8>because proponents of.

1:33:48.510 --> 1:33:51.809
<v Speaker 1>The Safe Europe Act will say that this petition was

1:33:51.850 --> 1:33:55.469
<v Speaker 1>denied due to its politics and thus it's an anti-democratic ruling.

1:33:55.850 --> 1:33:58.330
<v Speaker 4>Oh, I'm being canceled. I'm being canceled. No, you just

1:33:58.350 --> 1:33:58.990
<v Speaker 4>didn't read the rules.

1:33:59.070 --> 1:33:59.990
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly.

1:34:00.290 --> 1:34:03.640
<v Speaker 8>There is like a Twitter clip somewhere of Eva and

1:34:03.700 --> 1:34:06.729
<v Speaker 8>Martin saying, discussing this it's like oh this is just

1:34:06.810 --> 1:34:12.019
<v Speaker 8>anti-democratic and no no it isn't ava you're a legal

1:34:12.110 --> 1:34:16.140
<v Speaker 8>philosopher you're smart enough to understand this yeah you've you've

1:34:16.220 --> 1:34:19.240
<v Speaker 8>never read the talkville yeah i'll say that like she

1:34:19.280 --> 1:34:21.179
<v Speaker 8>at least has credentials you know.

1:34:21.479 --> 1:34:24.519
<v Speaker 4>Right because this is disingenuous they know they but they

1:34:24.640 --> 1:34:27.620
<v Speaker 4>also know that it is very effective to say we're

1:34:27.660 --> 1:34:29.960
<v Speaker 4>being silenced because of how right we are but these

1:34:30.320 --> 1:34:32.460
<v Speaker 4>These mobs of people, the ones we think need to

1:34:32.479 --> 1:34:35.260
<v Speaker 4>be brought under control, they're stopping us from doing this

1:34:35.300 --> 1:34:39.760
<v Speaker 4>good thing. Like, that's a very effective form of this

1:34:39.820 --> 1:34:43.660
<v Speaker 4>particular kind of rhetoric. Doing it wrong and pretending you're

1:34:43.680 --> 1:34:46.360
<v Speaker 4>being silenced is more effective than actually doing it right.

1:34:46.390 --> 1:34:46.550
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:34:47.410 --> 1:34:47.809
<v Speaker 4>And easier.

1:34:48.729 --> 1:34:51.050
<v Speaker 8>That is the very scary part of, like, the Save

1:34:51.070 --> 1:34:55.269
<v Speaker 8>Europe Act. Because in the end, this is much more

1:34:55.330 --> 1:34:59.870
<v Speaker 8>about influencing the discourse and pushing the overtime window. Then

1:34:59.890 --> 1:35:00.809
<v Speaker 8>it is about anything else.

1:35:01.630 --> 1:35:04.290
<v Speaker 4>Right. If you can get the EU to even look

1:35:04.330 --> 1:35:06.929
<v Speaker 4>at your petition, you have legitimized that this is something

1:35:06.970 --> 1:35:08.950
<v Speaker 4>that belongs in the political sphere.

1:35:09.229 --> 1:35:09.450
<v Speaker 1>Right.

1:35:09.710 --> 1:35:09.910
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

1:35:10.290 --> 1:35:13.290
<v Speaker 1>You've moved it from storm front to in the middle

1:35:13.310 --> 1:35:14.130
<v Speaker 1>of the Overton window.

1:35:14.250 --> 1:35:16.440
<v Speaker 4>Like you're not just like a little fucking piss boy

1:35:16.570 --> 1:35:18.780
<v Speaker 4>on a ship screaming and crying because you want migrants

1:35:18.820 --> 1:35:21.460
<v Speaker 4>to drown in the sea. You're being considered by the

1:35:21.500 --> 1:35:22.120
<v Speaker 4>European Union.

1:35:22.400 --> 1:35:22.599
<v Speaker 6>Yes.

1:35:22.700 --> 1:35:26.320
<v Speaker 8>And for now, they've just tested its legal viability with

1:35:26.400 --> 1:35:27.059
<v Speaker 8>European law.

1:35:27.479 --> 1:35:31.560
<v Speaker 1>And we're like, nope, get out. which like the fascists.

1:35:31.200 --> 1:35:36.519
<v Speaker 8>Immediately claim as some sort of anti-democratic political violence against them.

1:35:37.150 --> 1:35:37.349
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:35:37.750 --> 1:35:41.229
<v Speaker 4>We're being silenced. We're being silenced. Probably by the Jews.

1:35:41.250 --> 1:35:43.349
<v Speaker 4>I mean, knowing Martin, I don't know if he says

1:35:43.390 --> 1:35:44.710
<v Speaker 4>it out loud anymore. He used to.

1:35:45.189 --> 1:35:47.950
<v Speaker 8>Like even in the statement, like the commission does not

1:35:48.020 --> 1:35:52.780
<v Speaker 8>analyze the policy merits at the stage of the eligibility check.

1:35:53.080 --> 1:35:53.180
<v Speaker 7>So.

1:35:54.229 --> 1:35:58.210
<v Speaker 8>In layman's terms, the proposed act is incompatible with existing

1:35:58.250 --> 1:35:59.389
<v Speaker 8>legal mumbo-jumbo.

1:36:00.270 --> 1:36:02.220
<v Speaker 4>I can file any lawsuit I want in court. I

1:36:02.240 --> 1:36:04.840
<v Speaker 4>could file a lawsuit saying that you put a spell

1:36:04.920 --> 1:36:08.400
<v Speaker 4>on my dog that made him racist. But I could

1:36:08.420 --> 1:36:09.700
<v Speaker 4>file that in court and the judge is not going

1:36:09.720 --> 1:36:11.780
<v Speaker 4>to rule on the facts of the case. He's just

1:36:11.800 --> 1:36:14.129
<v Speaker 4>going to throw it out because that's not a real...

1:36:13.900 --> 1:36:15.910
<v Speaker 4>You know what I mean? The ruling at that early

1:36:15.970 --> 1:36:20.290
<v Speaker 4>stage is just that, well, this isn't real. There's no standing.

1:36:20.310 --> 1:36:23.700
<v Speaker 4>There's no jurisdiction. This is not an actionable matter. So

1:36:23.720 --> 1:36:26.089
<v Speaker 4>they're not saying whether this is good or bad. They're

1:36:26.100 --> 1:36:28.110
<v Speaker 4>just saying this can't be here because they didn't meet

1:36:28.130 --> 1:36:28.970
<v Speaker 4>the legal requirements.

1:36:29.410 --> 1:36:33.370
<v Speaker 1>You're so succinct, Molly. I appreciate it.

1:36:33.390 --> 1:36:34.910
<v Speaker 4>I read a lot of lawsuits that are a lot

1:36:34.970 --> 1:36:36.380
<v Speaker 4>like this petition.

1:36:36.400 --> 1:36:37.099
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

1:36:37.360 --> 1:36:40.580
<v Speaker 1>Well, given that the Alex Jones lawsuit existed.

1:36:40.720 --> 1:36:42.460
<v Speaker 4>No, but when you throw something out at this early

1:36:42.479 --> 1:36:44.400
<v Speaker 4>stage and you have people say like, oh, I'm being

1:36:44.420 --> 1:36:46.860
<v Speaker 4>denied access to the system. No, it's that the system

1:36:46.900 --> 1:36:49.410
<v Speaker 4>looked at what you produced and said, this is fake.

1:36:49.430 --> 1:36:49.570
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

1:36:50.290 --> 1:36:52.570
<v Speaker 8>You have to wear a yellow sweater in order to

1:36:52.670 --> 1:36:56.410
<v Speaker 8>access this bit. You're not wearing a yellow sweater. Therefore,

1:36:56.450 --> 1:36:57.290
<v Speaker 8>you cannot come in.

1:36:57.590 --> 1:37:00.670
<v Speaker 4>You're not being silenced. You're just not participating in the

1:37:00.689 --> 1:37:01.639
<v Speaker 4>process properly.

1:37:02.260 --> 1:37:04.680
<v Speaker 8>For shits and giggles, if I read between the lines,

1:37:05.100 --> 1:37:07.200
<v Speaker 8>I think the commission itself was also a bit shocked

1:37:07.280 --> 1:37:09.960
<v Speaker 8>at it. Because in the same press release about this,

1:37:10.020 --> 1:37:13.860
<v Speaker 8>they state, the initiative must contain a genuine proposal and

1:37:13.900 --> 1:37:17.840
<v Speaker 8>not be used as a vehicle for offensive or caricatural messages.

1:37:18.540 --> 1:37:21.180
<v Speaker 8>Which I think is pretty sassy insofar as, like, legal

1:37:21.260 --> 1:37:24.880
<v Speaker 8>sassy just goes. They're essentially saying, like, the fuck you

1:37:24.900 --> 1:37:29.300
<v Speaker 8>doing is how I interpret it. There is, however, another

1:37:29.340 --> 1:37:32.600
<v Speaker 8>threshold that they fail to meet, which is that anyone

1:37:32.680 --> 1:37:34.420
<v Speaker 8>can sign an online petition.

1:37:34.439 --> 1:37:37.420
<v Speaker 4>Uh-oh, these weren't valid signatures.

1:37:37.700 --> 1:37:40.969
<v Speaker 8>Yes, there is no stopping you, the listener, from going

1:37:41.020 --> 1:37:44.550
<v Speaker 8>to a website right now, sign in, and, you know,

1:37:44.610 --> 1:37:45.670
<v Speaker 8>sign the Safe Europe Act.

1:37:45.729 --> 1:37:47.550
<v Speaker 4>But I'm not a citizen of the European Union.

1:37:48.090 --> 1:37:50.530
<v Speaker 1>But you can still sign it in a show of support.

1:37:50.950 --> 1:37:53.170
<v Speaker 4>But that wouldn't count towards the 1 million signatures that

1:37:53.210 --> 1:37:53.570
<v Speaker 4>they need.

1:37:54.150 --> 1:37:58.570
<v Speaker 8>We're coming close because different states could require different identification.

1:37:58.590 --> 1:38:03.110
<v Speaker 8>It can't be 10 people in a basement continuously making

1:38:03.170 --> 1:38:05.680
<v Speaker 8>new email addresses and re-signing the petition.

1:38:05.729 --> 1:38:06.450
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't work.

1:38:06.689 --> 1:38:09.760
<v Speaker 4>So how do they go about validating those? That sounds complex.

1:38:10.360 --> 1:38:14.300
<v Speaker 1>Not through how they're doing it right now. Because.

1:38:15.350 --> 1:38:17.929
<v Speaker 8>All you need is a name that can be checked

1:38:17.970 --> 1:38:19.570
<v Speaker 8>with an email address that can be checked.

1:38:19.590 --> 1:38:21.820
<v Speaker 4>Oh, so they're not validating them.

1:38:22.479 --> 1:38:25.620
<v Speaker 8>No, not in a way that would meet the criteria

1:38:25.800 --> 1:38:27.110
<v Speaker 8>set by the European Union.

1:38:27.610 --> 1:38:29.630
<v Speaker 4>So they knew they weren't doing this properly because that

1:38:29.650 --> 1:38:29.969
<v Speaker 4>was nevertheless.

1:38:30.100 --> 1:38:31.740
<v Speaker 1>Point. It was never the point.

1:38:32.000 --> 1:38:33.800
<v Speaker 4>Because if you were running an actual sort of political

1:38:33.860 --> 1:38:36.559
<v Speaker 4>campaign to get this thing advanced in a very serious way,

1:38:37.350 --> 1:38:39.450
<v Speaker 4>you would have been collecting valid signatures that you would

1:38:39.490 --> 1:38:42.170
<v Speaker 4>be able to validate if a legal challenge was brought.

1:38:42.729 --> 1:38:43.630
<v Speaker 4>And they didn't do that.

1:38:43.970 --> 1:38:44.190
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:38:44.210 --> 1:38:44.290
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

1:38:44.570 --> 1:38:47.809
<v Speaker 8>Yes, and you'd also put in safeguards to prevent people

1:38:47.830 --> 1:38:50.980
<v Speaker 8>from outside the EU from voting on this or signing it.

1:38:51.439 --> 1:38:52.900
<v Speaker 4>So this was never sincere?

1:38:53.080 --> 1:38:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely not.

1:38:54.120 --> 1:38:54.780
<v Speaker 4>That's shocking.

1:38:55.060 --> 1:38:56.300
<v Speaker 1>I am shocked and appalled.

1:38:57.160 --> 1:38:59.060
<v Speaker 4>A Nazi playing in my face?

1:38:59.820 --> 1:39:02.880
<v Speaker 8>Well, it gets better, Molly, because now there's a bunch

1:39:02.920 --> 1:39:04.560
<v Speaker 8>of names that I'm sure you'll recognize.

1:39:05.020 --> 1:39:05.519
<v Speaker 4>Oh, yes.

1:39:05.700 --> 1:39:09.580
<v Speaker 8>But there's also been American far-right agitators who have promoted

1:39:09.620 --> 1:39:10.299
<v Speaker 8>this on Twitter.

1:39:10.920 --> 1:39:13.020
<v Speaker 4>How many people signed it with the name Rudolph Hess?

1:39:13.439 --> 1:39:15.100
<v Speaker 4>At least 10, right? Do you have a list of

1:39:15.120 --> 1:39:16.380
<v Speaker 4>the signatures? I would love to look at them.

1:39:16.620 --> 1:39:19.340
<v Speaker 8>I'll send you the website in a bit, but I'm

1:39:19.360 --> 1:39:22.599
<v Speaker 8>not sure. But one of the very cool Americans who

1:39:22.640 --> 1:39:24.300
<v Speaker 8>promoted this was Benny Johnson.

1:39:24.810 --> 1:39:25.510
<v Speaker 4>No shit.

1:39:25.770 --> 1:39:26.189
<v Speaker 7>Oh, wow.

1:39:26.410 --> 1:39:26.710
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:39:26.729 --> 1:39:30.070
<v Speaker 8>He had one of the co-founders on his bigot cast

1:39:30.229 --> 1:39:33.570
<v Speaker 8>and even tweeted a link to the petition. I don't

1:39:33.610 --> 1:39:36.270
<v Speaker 8>know Benny Johnson, but I'm going to guess that his

1:39:36.390 --> 1:39:42.139
<v Speaker 8>audience is largely American. So, yeah, not really sure. How

1:39:42.189 --> 1:39:46.460
<v Speaker 8>much goods, signature-wise, that has done. But we can't rule

1:39:46.560 --> 1:39:49.519
<v Speaker 8>out that there's a bunch of Americans who have signed it.

1:39:49.700 --> 1:39:54.660
<v Speaker 8>And therefore, we don't know how many of those 750,000

1:39:54.660 --> 1:39:56.080
<v Speaker 8>are legitimate.

1:39:56.100 --> 1:39:58.700
<v Speaker 4>I would guess not a lot.

1:39:59.330 --> 1:40:02.730
<v Speaker 1>Genuinely, I don't know. I also don't think there's any

1:40:02.770 --> 1:40:04.150
<v Speaker 1>way to find out.

1:40:05.229 --> 1:40:07.170
<v Speaker 4>Exactly, because if they did not collect them in a

1:40:07.189 --> 1:40:10.189
<v Speaker 4>way that could be validated, they're not going to be.

1:40:10.670 --> 1:40:12.470
<v Speaker 4>This was a waste of time because it was never

1:40:12.490 --> 1:40:12.790
<v Speaker 4>the point.

1:40:12.870 --> 1:40:15.750
<v Speaker 1>Well, it wasn't a waste of time. It's just it's

1:40:15.850 --> 1:40:17.380
<v Speaker 1>not doing what it says on the tin.

1:40:18.320 --> 1:40:21.400
<v Speaker 4>Collecting valid signatures was never actually the goal or they

1:40:21.420 --> 1:40:23.400
<v Speaker 4>would have collected them in a way that would have

1:40:23.420 --> 1:40:24.000
<v Speaker 4>been functional.

1:40:24.340 --> 1:40:24.520
<v Speaker 6>Yes.

1:40:24.760 --> 1:40:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:40:25.720 --> 1:40:27.460
<v Speaker 4>Well, I can sign it right now. It's right at

1:40:27.479 --> 1:40:30.260
<v Speaker 4>the top of the page. Sign now.

1:40:30.520 --> 1:40:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Please do not do that.

1:40:32.080 --> 1:40:32.930
<v Speaker 4>I'm not going to do that.

1:40:33.350 --> 1:40:33.660
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.

1:40:34.550 --> 1:40:38.129
<v Speaker 8>Besides Benny, there were also others who did that, including

1:40:38.270 --> 1:40:40.650
<v Speaker 8>like friend of the pod, Jack Posobiec.

1:40:41.490 --> 1:40:41.889
<v Speaker 12>Oh, cool.

1:40:42.210 --> 1:40:47.450
<v Speaker 8>And Joey Manarino, who tweeted, everyone, no matter where they

1:40:47.490 --> 1:40:50.610
<v Speaker 8>are from, should go and sign this act. The momentum

1:40:50.650 --> 1:40:53.510
<v Speaker 8>for remigration is so real and it could absolutely be

1:40:53.550 --> 1:40:56.490
<v Speaker 8>pulled off if there is unity. Sign the act to

1:40:56.550 --> 1:40:57.290
<v Speaker 8>save Europe.

1:40:58.210 --> 1:41:00.950
<v Speaker 1>End quote. I wonder if Greg Bovino signed it. He's

1:41:00.970 --> 1:41:03.049
<v Speaker 1>been over there doing some remigration chats.

1:41:03.850 --> 1:41:06.770
<v Speaker 8>I'm sure he would enthusiastically sign it, but I didn't

1:41:06.850 --> 1:41:07.189
<v Speaker 8>see him.

1:41:07.650 --> 1:41:11.050
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. There's also like Lucy White, a Restore Britain candidate

1:41:11.070 --> 1:41:12.099
<v Speaker 1>who also signed it.

1:41:12.520 --> 1:41:14.280
<v Speaker 4>But she knows she doesn't live in the EU.

1:41:15.220 --> 1:41:17.400
<v Speaker 1>One can assume. One can assume.

1:41:18.360 --> 1:41:20.540
<v Speaker 8>And also, not to forget the worst thing that came

1:41:20.600 --> 1:41:24.590
<v Speaker 8>out of apartheid South Africa, Elon Musk, who also shared

1:41:24.650 --> 1:41:25.750
<v Speaker 8>a Save Europe video.

1:41:26.050 --> 1:41:26.849
<v Speaker 4>Bold statement.

1:41:26.930 --> 1:41:27.330
<v Speaker 1>Yes, bold.

1:41:27.689 --> 1:41:29.950
<v Speaker 4>Oh, wow, Victor Orban signed it. That was shocking.

1:41:30.010 --> 1:41:31.410
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no surprises there.

1:41:31.830 --> 1:41:32.730
<v Speaker 4>Really surprised there.

1:41:32.770 --> 1:41:33.510
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah.

1:41:33.650 --> 1:41:33.910
<v Speaker 6>Wow.

1:41:34.030 --> 1:41:37.360
<v Speaker 8>Like, if Midlife Crisis Edison tweets about this, then we

1:41:37.380 --> 1:41:38.719
<v Speaker 8>can safely assume that it has.

1:41:38.680 --> 1:41:40.939
<v Speaker 1>Reached at least millions of people worldwide.

1:41:41.500 --> 1:41:44.080
<v Speaker 8>But that still doesn't matter in terms of, like, the

1:41:44.120 --> 1:41:48.720
<v Speaker 8>act being passed, because, again... No way to validate this.

1:41:48.979 --> 1:41:50.439
<v Speaker 4>I just don't think there are a lot of Europeans

1:41:50.479 --> 1:41:53.330
<v Speaker 4>are watching. Not a lot of Europeans are watching Benny Johnson.

1:41:53.350 --> 1:41:53.750
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

1:41:53.790 --> 1:41:55.250
<v Speaker 4>I mean, not a lot of Americans are watching it.

1:41:55.310 --> 1:41:56.790
<v Speaker 4>Not a lot of people are watching it.

1:41:57.189 --> 1:41:58.330
<v Speaker 1>Nobody should watch him.

1:41:58.890 --> 1:42:02.229
<v Speaker 8>But this is what upsets me because this is so

1:42:02.430 --> 1:42:06.080
<v Speaker 8>incredibly doomed from the start. If you look at it

1:42:06.600 --> 1:42:10.200
<v Speaker 8>like this is seeing Bruce Wayne's parents walk at the

1:42:10.240 --> 1:42:14.190
<v Speaker 8>beginning of a Batman movie or like. Spider-Man's Uncle Ben

1:42:14.290 --> 1:42:19.030
<v Speaker 8>or Kenny from fucking South Park. You know it's going

1:42:19.070 --> 1:42:22.480
<v Speaker 8>to fail. You know they're going to die. For some reason,

1:42:22.520 --> 1:42:26.840
<v Speaker 8>these people have taped the corpses over mannequins and just

1:42:26.900 --> 1:42:31.090
<v Speaker 8>paraded them around as if there's still a possibility.

1:42:31.430 --> 1:42:35.759
<v Speaker 4>But they are sort of continuing to advance the agenda

1:42:35.770 --> 1:42:38.640
<v Speaker 4>that this is something that is up for legitimate debate

1:42:38.860 --> 1:42:42.420
<v Speaker 4>right that that preserving western culture is a is a

1:42:42.900 --> 1:42:46.960
<v Speaker 4>real political topic for debate right that like we need

1:42:47.000 --> 1:42:49.419
<v Speaker 4>to have debates on on the floor of the parliament

1:42:49.479 --> 1:42:52.220
<v Speaker 4>about whether or not we should all be speaking one language.

1:42:52.560 --> 1:42:54.080
<v Speaker 8>From the top of my head i didn't check this

1:42:54.120 --> 1:42:57.320
<v Speaker 8>i think europe has like 280 million people probably more

1:42:57.340 --> 1:43:01.599
<v Speaker 8>and You're so nationalistic yet you want to use this

1:43:01.660 --> 1:43:04.650
<v Speaker 8>shortcut of one million people to bypass like.

1:43:04.950 --> 1:43:07.890
<v Speaker 4>Your own national sovereignty. That's what I'm saying. Like this is.

1:43:07.950 --> 1:43:08.170
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:43:08.470 --> 1:43:13.370
<v Speaker 4>What kind of nationalism involves subverting national sovereignty, you fucking cucks?

1:43:13.850 --> 1:43:17.280
<v Speaker 8>This is what gets me because it is working in

1:43:17.460 --> 1:43:20.620
<v Speaker 8>terms of like public discourse and normalizing remigration.

1:43:20.640 --> 1:43:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it definitely is.

1:43:21.800 --> 1:43:24.600
<v Speaker 4>And that's Elon Musk's primary goal right now is just

1:43:24.820 --> 1:43:28.880
<v Speaker 4>normalizing this level of... of hitlerian discourse.

1:43:28.439 --> 1:43:30.620
<v Speaker 1>Yeah which he has successfully done right like.

1:43:30.500 --> 1:43:34.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah he's doing it every day yeah he's doing like

1:43:34.160 --> 1:43:36.320
<v Speaker 4>race and iq posting constantly.

1:43:36.200 --> 1:43:39.939
<v Speaker 8>Yeah nothing screams high iq as much as talking non-stop

1:43:39.979 --> 1:43:43.420
<v Speaker 8>about iq like everyone who has to tell you that

1:43:43.439 --> 1:43:47.580
<v Speaker 8>they're so fucking smart it's probably not yeah so.

1:43:47.920 --> 1:43:49.800
<v Speaker 4>Well that's why none of his rockets blow up because

1:43:49.820 --> 1:43:51.140
<v Speaker 4>he's so smart.

1:43:51.340 --> 1:43:53.519
<v Speaker 1>Don't look it up i'm sure he spent a great

1:43:53.560 --> 1:43:56.300
<v Speaker 1>deal of time designing those rockets personally as well not

1:43:57.189 --> 1:43:58.689
<v Speaker 1>posting 18 hours a day.

1:43:59.490 --> 1:44:03.310
<v Speaker 8>Well, I'll respect Jeff Bezos' rocket just because they look

1:44:03.350 --> 1:44:04.050
<v Speaker 8>more original.

1:44:04.490 --> 1:44:06.410
<v Speaker 4>I'll never respect Jeff Bezos, and no one can make me.

1:44:08.020 --> 1:44:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Fair point.

1:44:08.500 --> 1:44:10.559
<v Speaker 4>When I picture Jeff Bezos, the only thing I picture

1:44:10.920 --> 1:44:14.380
<v Speaker 4>is him on vacation with that, like, deep-V, like, unbuttoned

1:44:15.400 --> 1:44:19.040
<v Speaker 4>dress shirt with the roast iguana. That's the only thing

1:44:19.080 --> 1:44:20.360
<v Speaker 4>I think of when I think of Jeff Bezos. It's

1:44:20.380 --> 1:44:21.759
<v Speaker 4>him holding a roasted iguana.

1:44:21.920 --> 1:44:24.610
<v Speaker 8>Molly, I'm trying to focus on a podcast here. Stop

1:44:24.650 --> 1:44:30.480
<v Speaker 8>selling me this... graphic, erotic picture of Jeff Bezos. That's

1:44:30.520 --> 1:44:32.780
<v Speaker 8>not why we're here. We can do that on the

1:44:32.820 --> 1:44:33.620
<v Speaker 8>other podcast.

1:44:33.840 --> 1:44:35.860
<v Speaker 4>I think I'm combining two pictures in my mind. The

1:44:35.920 --> 1:44:38.380
<v Speaker 4>iguana picture, he doesn't have the unbuttoned vacation shirt.

1:44:38.439 --> 1:44:38.839
<v Speaker 7>Wow.

1:44:38.860 --> 1:44:40.870
<v Speaker 4>I guess I'm just inventing an image in my mind.

1:44:40.910 --> 1:44:42.530
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Molly's headcanon.

1:44:42.550 --> 1:44:44.170
<v Speaker 4>But the iguana pic is scary.

1:44:44.490 --> 1:44:45.810
<v Speaker 1>Well, the good thing is you can now invent it

1:44:45.870 --> 1:44:48.530
<v Speaker 1>on Grog. Cursed fan art.

1:44:48.830 --> 1:44:50.950
<v Speaker 4>No, it'll just make child porn of Jeff Bezos.

1:44:51.250 --> 1:44:54.879
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, his alive girl comments or texts.

1:44:57.380 --> 1:45:01.090
<v Speaker 4>I forgot about I Love You Alive, girl.

1:45:01.320 --> 1:45:05.390
<v Speaker 1>Oh, yeah. Soul is ghouls, the bunch of them.

1:45:05.930 --> 1:45:07.430
<v Speaker 4>So the signatures were fake?

1:45:08.050 --> 1:45:09.110
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, pretty much.

1:45:09.570 --> 1:45:12.410
<v Speaker 8>Could be 10 people in a basement with like a

1:45:12.470 --> 1:45:16.599
<v Speaker 8>supercomputer just generating clicks. We don't know, but I don't

1:45:16.640 --> 1:45:19.500
<v Speaker 8>think it'll even reach the million. But even if it did,

1:45:19.900 --> 1:45:23.780
<v Speaker 8>then the signatures would come in question. And yeah, just

1:45:24.120 --> 1:45:25.100
<v Speaker 8>absolutely doomed.

1:45:25.729 --> 1:45:28.550
<v Speaker 4>Well, actually, I hope they have to raise a bunch

1:45:28.590 --> 1:45:31.230
<v Speaker 4>of money from a bunch of fucking rubes to hire

1:45:31.290 --> 1:45:33.730
<v Speaker 4>someone to validate the signatures, which they won't be able

1:45:33.750 --> 1:45:35.010
<v Speaker 4>to do. I would love that.

1:45:35.050 --> 1:45:37.229
<v Speaker 8>There will be a lawyer out there who will... I mean,

1:45:37.250 --> 1:45:38.750
<v Speaker 8>if I had a law degree, I would take it

1:45:38.830 --> 1:45:39.969
<v Speaker 8>on just to get that money.

1:45:39.990 --> 1:45:40.650
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

1:45:41.030 --> 1:45:41.390
<v Speaker 1>Oh, yeah.

1:45:41.450 --> 1:45:44.640
<v Speaker 4>Someone's going to take this on. So, yeah, by all means,

1:45:44.689 --> 1:45:48.100
<v Speaker 4>start a fundraising campaign. Get money out of the pockets

1:45:48.220 --> 1:45:49.680
<v Speaker 4>of the dumbest racists in the world.

1:45:49.700 --> 1:45:50.269
<v Speaker 6>Go for it.

1:45:50.900 --> 1:45:54.140
<v Speaker 1>I should have gone for that law degree. But anyway,

1:45:54.479 --> 1:45:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I think.

1:45:55.290 --> 1:45:58.070
<v Speaker 8>We already discussed solar schools and we're going to be

1:45:58.110 --> 1:46:01.540
<v Speaker 8>discussing more of them. But first, I think the solar

1:46:01.560 --> 1:46:04.400
<v Speaker 8>schools that support this podcast.

1:46:05.280 --> 1:46:06.860
<v Speaker 1>Can I say that? Yeah, I think so.

1:46:06.979 --> 1:46:07.500
<v Speaker 4>You don't work here.

1:46:07.780 --> 1:46:08.139
<v Speaker 1>Perfect.

1:46:19.810 --> 1:46:22.950
<v Speaker 8>And we're back and we're exchanging the soulless ghouls for

1:46:22.979 --> 1:46:27.920
<v Speaker 8>the humanoid husks filled with unending appetite for atrocities. I

1:46:27.960 --> 1:46:30.220
<v Speaker 8>think we said all the nice things about the act itself,

1:46:30.979 --> 1:46:31.900
<v Speaker 8>even though I wish I could have.

1:46:31.880 --> 1:46:32.780
<v Speaker 1>Said less about it.

1:46:33.439 --> 1:46:36.380
<v Speaker 8>Unfortunately, just, this is just the Rivendell stop of our

1:46:36.460 --> 1:46:39.070
<v Speaker 8>quest to destroy the ring. And we have yet to

1:46:39.310 --> 1:46:43.269
<v Speaker 8>meet the spawns that have emerged from Minos, Morgul and Gorgorov.

1:46:43.970 --> 1:46:44.490
<v Speaker 4>Deep cut.

1:46:44.710 --> 1:46:45.030
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:46:45.430 --> 1:46:45.710
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

1:46:46.050 --> 1:46:49.800
<v Speaker 1>The three people that understand those references, uh, This one's

1:46:49.840 --> 1:46:50.100
<v Speaker 1>for you.

1:46:50.460 --> 1:46:54.740
<v Speaker 8>So first, we have the person you were giggling about, Bollie,

1:46:55.040 --> 1:46:58.940
<v Speaker 8>co-founder and hipster Nazi impersonator Martin Selner.

1:46:58.970 --> 1:47:02.250
<v Speaker 4>I haven't thought about Martin Selner in years. I'm so

1:47:02.290 --> 1:47:03.330
<v Speaker 4>surprised to see him here.

1:47:03.350 --> 1:47:06.590
<v Speaker 8>Who could have imagined that the country who produced the

1:47:06.630 --> 1:47:10.100
<v Speaker 8>most iconic Nazi would once again produce a Nazi?

1:47:10.110 --> 1:47:10.580
<v Speaker 1>The original.

1:47:10.640 --> 1:47:12.020
<v Speaker 4>The original. The original.

1:47:13.080 --> 1:47:15.960
<v Speaker 1>At least it's from the original sourcing material, you know?

1:47:15.979 --> 1:47:19.040
<v Speaker 4>Right, so by under EU laws, he can really be

1:47:19.120 --> 1:47:21.060
<v Speaker 4>a Nazi, right? Because, you know, it's like champagne.

1:47:21.229 --> 1:47:22.509
<v Speaker 1>Sure, yeah, it has to come from.

1:47:22.560 --> 1:47:23.770
<v Speaker 4>It comes from the original source.

1:47:24.070 --> 1:47:24.450
<v Speaker 11>Exactly.

1:47:24.770 --> 1:47:28.229
<v Speaker 8>If it's a Nazi stemming from anywhere in North Austria,

1:47:28.250 --> 1:47:33.290
<v Speaker 8>then we have to call them identitarians. Yep, sparkling identitarianism. Yeah,

1:47:33.330 --> 1:47:36.890
<v Speaker 8>that's the brand distinction. So, Selder seems to have been

1:47:37.110 --> 1:47:39.930
<v Speaker 8>pretty far right all of his life, becoming involved in

1:47:39.970 --> 1:47:43.229
<v Speaker 8>nationalist politics when he was a teenager. And being part

1:47:43.270 --> 1:47:46.690
<v Speaker 8>of the Austrian neo-Nazi scene. So before we get into

1:47:46.710 --> 1:47:49.229
<v Speaker 8>the good stuff, I want to read a small paragraph

1:47:49.270 --> 1:47:53.509
<v Speaker 8>from an article in Zeit Campus. It was published in

1:47:53.510 --> 1:47:58.189
<v Speaker 8>2017 before all the significant shit was released. But I

1:47:58.229 --> 1:48:00.350
<v Speaker 8>had to read this paragraph, so you'll have to listen

1:48:00.390 --> 1:48:03.370
<v Speaker 8>to it. Martin Sellner, who has a bachelor's degree in

1:48:03.410 --> 1:48:06.599
<v Speaker 8>philosophy and dropped out of law school, is something like

1:48:06.610 --> 1:48:10.120
<v Speaker 8>the Justin Bieber and Raynard Langhans of the new right-wing

1:48:10.200 --> 1:48:14.130
<v Speaker 8>radicalism in one person. A handsome young man with neatly

1:48:14.210 --> 1:48:18.020
<v Speaker 8>trimmed hair and a dreamy look, and a creative inventor

1:48:18.090 --> 1:48:22.740
<v Speaker 8>of media effective perhaps even somewhat dangerous protests.

1:48:22.880 --> 1:48:25.689
<v Speaker 4>You know maybe it's I don't know if it's discouraging

1:48:25.750 --> 1:48:27.910
<v Speaker 4>or comforting to know that your press do that, too.

1:48:27.939 --> 1:48:31.160
<v Speaker 4>The European press does that same thing. He's really racist,

1:48:31.200 --> 1:48:33.260
<v Speaker 4>but in like kind of a sexy way. Like, why

1:48:33.280 --> 1:48:37.120
<v Speaker 4>do they do that? What if Hitler was hot? He

1:48:37.200 --> 1:48:39.979
<v Speaker 4>washed his hair and I thought he would be dirty.

1:48:40.620 --> 1:48:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Like, he does look like a hipster. I mean, I'll

1:48:43.400 --> 1:48:44.150
<v Speaker 1>give them that one.

1:48:44.790 --> 1:48:47.350
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's like that New York Times article. You

1:48:47.590 --> 1:48:50.870
<v Speaker 4>probably remember this, James. It was in 2017 about Tony Hobater,

1:48:51.410 --> 1:48:53.250
<v Speaker 4>one of the second in command of the traditional worker party.

1:48:53.270 --> 1:48:53.809
<v Speaker 1>And it was like, yeah.

1:48:54.310 --> 1:48:56.950
<v Speaker 4>Just going on and on about like how interesting and

1:48:57.100 --> 1:49:00.480
<v Speaker 4>just what this interesting working class man kind of handsome

1:49:00.520 --> 1:49:01.900
<v Speaker 4>like he's a nazi.

1:49:01.820 --> 1:49:05.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a nazi yeah that's yeah this mysterious exotic nazi

1:49:06.400 --> 1:49:08.640
<v Speaker 1>or like the amount of like uh richard spent the

1:49:08.660 --> 1:49:11.280
<v Speaker 1>things but they were like but he wears a waistcoat

1:49:11.620 --> 1:49:14.360
<v Speaker 1>did you know he does his own bow tie that's

1:49:14.420 --> 1:49:17.309
<v Speaker 1>a nazi uh yeah that is a type of article

1:49:17.360 --> 1:49:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that uh It's just like the fentanyl thing. You just

1:49:19.760 --> 1:49:20.769
<v Speaker 1>can't stop people doing it.

1:49:21.060 --> 1:49:24.740
<v Speaker 8>Well, I would be impressed with any two-year-old being able

1:49:24.780 --> 1:49:25.760
<v Speaker 8>to do his own bow tie.

1:49:26.140 --> 1:49:28.940
<v Speaker 4>Actually, I don't think Richard Spencer can tie a bow tie.

1:49:29.360 --> 1:49:29.900
<v Speaker 1>Not anymore.

1:49:30.460 --> 1:49:34.059
<v Speaker 8>Anyway, back to Martin Sellner. At the age of 17,

1:49:34.060 --> 1:49:38.710
<v Speaker 8>he and another person placed stickers on a synagogue in Baden-by-Wien.

1:49:39.689 --> 1:49:43.050
<v Speaker 8>Stickers with the text LEGALIZE IT with the letters AJ

1:49:43.110 --> 1:49:43.450
<v Speaker 8>near it.

1:49:44.110 --> 1:49:48.389
<v Speaker 1>AJ in this case stands for Arische Jugend. Aryan youth.

1:49:49.189 --> 1:49:55.210
<v Speaker 1>And other stickers portrayed as swastika. Wow. That's illegal there. Yes.

1:49:55.250 --> 1:49:57.120
<v Speaker 4>Very state to state. So like in Virginia, it actually

1:49:57.140 --> 1:49:59.080
<v Speaker 4>would be illegal to place a swastika on a synagogue.

1:49:59.100 --> 1:50:02.040
<v Speaker 4>It's a class six felony. But I think in Austria

1:50:02.060 --> 1:50:03.880
<v Speaker 4>and Germany, it's like really illegal.

1:50:04.540 --> 1:50:07.559
<v Speaker 1>In Germany, any form of Nazi glorification.

1:50:08.310 --> 1:50:09.750
<v Speaker 4>You're not supposed to be doing that. They're kind of

1:50:09.790 --> 1:50:10.580
<v Speaker 4>sensitive about it.

1:50:10.790 --> 1:50:12.849
<v Speaker 8>You could probably find it on YouTube, but there's clips

1:50:12.870 --> 1:50:16.110
<v Speaker 8>of people just even for fun, doing like a Roman

1:50:16.150 --> 1:50:17.849
<v Speaker 8>salute in German public and be.

1:50:17.770 --> 1:50:18.540
<v Speaker 1>Arrested for it.

1:50:19.020 --> 1:50:23.139
<v Speaker 8>So, yeah, unfortunately, he was a minor because under European law,

1:50:23.380 --> 1:50:26.479
<v Speaker 8>like 17 years, still a minor. So I think that's

1:50:26.520 --> 1:50:29.269
<v Speaker 8>why he got off pretty scot-free. He had to do like,

1:50:29.280 --> 1:50:31.269
<v Speaker 8>I think, 100 hours of community service.

1:50:31.470 --> 1:50:32.490
<v Speaker 4>And he learned his lesson.

1:50:32.930 --> 1:50:33.210
<v Speaker 10>Yes.

1:50:33.830 --> 1:50:34.110
<v Speaker 1>Right?

1:50:34.390 --> 1:50:36.630
<v Speaker 8>Well, he didn't do anything wrong because this was a

1:50:36.670 --> 1:50:41.030
<v Speaker 8>response to the conviction of David Irving, a British Holocaust denier.

1:50:41.060 --> 1:50:41.140
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

1:50:42.640 --> 1:50:45.660
<v Speaker 1>Oh, God. There it is.

1:50:47.800 --> 1:50:48.280
<v Speaker 4>There it is.

1:50:48.300 --> 1:50:53.040
<v Speaker 1>For anyone not watching, Molly's almost in tears.

1:50:53.640 --> 1:50:54.060
<v Speaker 4>There it is.

1:50:54.080 --> 1:50:56.660
<v Speaker 1>We're hitting the highlights here, aren't we?

1:50:56.780 --> 1:50:59.420
<v Speaker 4>So he doesn't think the Holocaust happened. Because that's what

1:50:59.439 --> 1:51:00.560
<v Speaker 4>David Irving was in trouble for.

1:51:00.580 --> 1:51:08.550
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think Martin has genuine questions about... what happened

1:51:08.590 --> 1:51:11.050
<v Speaker 8>during the Holocaust in the same way that Alex Jones

1:51:11.090 --> 1:51:12.670
<v Speaker 8>had questions about Sandy Hook.

1:51:12.830 --> 1:51:13.890
<v Speaker 4>He's just asking questions.

1:51:14.270 --> 1:51:14.470
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

1:51:14.770 --> 1:51:17.670
<v Speaker 4>Unfortunately, he can't read because those questions have been answered.

1:51:17.710 --> 1:51:21.189
<v Speaker 8>You only need to open your eyes to see the answers.

1:51:21.470 --> 1:51:23.490
<v Speaker 4>He lived in Austria. You could go to one of

1:51:23.530 --> 1:51:24.070
<v Speaker 4>the camps.

1:51:24.290 --> 1:51:29.070
<v Speaker 1>Well, he actually did, Molly, because... Oh, no. At the

1:51:29.090 --> 1:51:30.990
<v Speaker 1>tender age... Yeah, I bet that went well.

1:51:31.010 --> 1:51:33.110
<v Speaker 4>And he behaved very normal there, right?

1:51:33.290 --> 1:51:34.950
<v Speaker 8>Well, it wasn't a camp, but at the age of 19,

1:51:34.930 --> 1:51:40.170
<v Speaker 8>he did help organize ways to hinder liberal demonstrations and

1:51:40.330 --> 1:51:46.880
<v Speaker 8>pilgrimages to Wehrmacht soldiers, brave sites, and hold memorial services

1:51:46.960 --> 1:51:47.360
<v Speaker 8>for them.

1:51:49.120 --> 1:51:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

1:51:51.240 --> 1:51:54.680
<v Speaker 8>He self-professes that he was a neo-Nazi until 2011. He

1:51:54.720 --> 1:51:56.860
<v Speaker 8>should have been 22 around that time. As of 2017,

1:51:56.840 --> 1:52:04.050
<v Speaker 8>he's also banned from carrying weapons. After an incident where

1:52:04.070 --> 1:52:08.130
<v Speaker 8>he pepper sprayed an alleged far-left activist during a.

1:52:08.130 --> 1:52:11.710
<v Speaker 1>Fight in Vienna. Which is funny because generally carrying weapons

1:52:11.790 --> 1:52:14.290
<v Speaker 1>is already illegal here. Yeah, that's what I was going

1:52:14.310 --> 1:52:19.210
<v Speaker 1>to say. So he double gets to not wear weapons,

1:52:19.570 --> 1:52:20.129
<v Speaker 1>I suppose.

1:52:20.450 --> 1:52:21.670
<v Speaker 4>He would get punished twice.

1:52:22.189 --> 1:52:25.830
<v Speaker 1>Oh, that would be good. Okay, Molly, brace yourself.

1:52:26.560 --> 1:52:34.420
<v Speaker 8>In early 2018, Martin Sellner received around $ 1, 700, € 1, 500, roughly

1:52:34.520 --> 1:52:40.440
<v Speaker 8>from Brenton Tarrant. Brenton Tarrant.

1:52:41.240 --> 1:52:42.019
<v Speaker 4>Received from?

1:52:42.400 --> 1:52:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Yes, received from.

1:52:44.020 --> 1:52:44.540
<v Speaker 4>What year?

1:52:45.160 --> 1:52:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Early 2018.

1:52:46.320 --> 1:52:48.599
<v Speaker 4>So before the Christchurch mosque shooting.

1:52:49.080 --> 1:52:49.340
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

1:52:49.500 --> 1:52:51.240
<v Speaker 4>That's very good.

1:52:52.060 --> 1:52:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah.

1:52:53.360 --> 1:52:58.299
<v Speaker 4>So his ideas about immigration... And presumably Islam were pretty similar,

1:52:58.320 --> 1:53:02.060
<v Speaker 4>I guess. And he was just showing support for a

1:53:02.060 --> 1:53:04.060
<v Speaker 4>guy whose ideas were very similar to his own. And

1:53:05.090 --> 1:53:08.170
<v Speaker 4>Martin is carrying out these same ideas by writing this

1:53:08.189 --> 1:53:10.890
<v Speaker 4>stupid little petition. And what Britton Tarrant did was he

1:53:11.050 --> 1:53:15.390
<v Speaker 4>murdered more than 50 people in two mosques. Yeah, it's...

1:53:15.890 --> 1:53:19.589
<v Speaker 4>Very good. That's a cool friend to have.

1:53:20.030 --> 1:53:23.410
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's always a good sign. It gets worse because...

1:53:23.090 --> 1:53:23.990
<v Speaker 1>It gets worse.

1:53:24.729 --> 1:53:28.309
<v Speaker 8>I looked it up, but Apparently, Tarrant was like planning

1:53:28.330 --> 1:53:30.710
<v Speaker 8>this attack for at least two years.

1:53:31.450 --> 1:53:34.900
<v Speaker 1>Self-proclaimed, by the way. So take that however you will.

1:53:35.229 --> 1:53:35.720
<v Speaker 1>But that means.

1:53:35.800 --> 1:53:38.420
<v Speaker 4>So in the planning phases of this mass murder, he thought,

1:53:38.600 --> 1:53:40.260
<v Speaker 4>part of my plan is going to be giving Martin

1:53:40.300 --> 1:53:46.680
<v Speaker 4>Sellner $ 1, 500.

1:53:43.180 --> 1:53:43.460
<v Speaker 5>Yes.

1:53:44.960 --> 1:53:46.080
<v Speaker 4>He should be banned from New Zealand.

1:53:46.700 --> 1:53:48.179
<v Speaker 1>We should exile him to the sun.

1:53:48.479 --> 1:53:50.940
<v Speaker 4>Because New Zealand is pretty sincere about their, about like

1:53:51.140 --> 1:53:54.400
<v Speaker 4>sort of quarantining... the existence of Brenton Tarrant. Like, it's

1:53:54.410 --> 1:53:56.939
<v Speaker 4>illegal to possess his manifesto there. Like, they should ban

1:53:56.979 --> 1:53:58.059
<v Speaker 4>Martin Sellner from the country.

1:53:58.400 --> 1:54:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Tarrant doesn't strike me as a very wealthy person.

1:54:00.800 --> 1:54:02.540
<v Speaker 4>That's a significant amount of money for him.

1:54:02.760 --> 1:54:05.950
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, highly committed to Sellner. It was.

1:54:05.970 --> 1:54:08.150
<v Speaker 8>And it was also, like, a significant amount of money

1:54:08.710 --> 1:54:12.550
<v Speaker 8>for Sellner because most donations were, like, on the high end, like,

1:54:12.550 --> 1:54:14.380
<v Speaker 8>100 to 100 euros.

1:54:14.939 --> 1:54:15.979
<v Speaker 4>That should have been a career ender.

1:54:16.430 --> 1:54:18.650
<v Speaker 8>Like anyone is free to send me money, but if

1:54:18.729 --> 1:54:21.750
<v Speaker 8>someone like this would send me money and I was

1:54:21.790 --> 1:54:25.229
<v Speaker 8>very committed to not being called a Nazi, this would

1:54:25.560 --> 1:54:27.760
<v Speaker 8>be a good time for some introspection.

1:54:27.780 --> 1:54:31.020
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, if somebody who really thinks you're doing a great

1:54:31.100 --> 1:54:34.340
<v Speaker 4>job and you have all the same ideas, but what

1:54:34.380 --> 1:54:36.980
<v Speaker 4>he does with those ideas is one of the largest

1:54:37.620 --> 1:54:39.940
<v Speaker 4>mass murders in recent years.

1:54:40.220 --> 1:54:41.260
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's... I don't know.

1:54:41.280 --> 1:54:42.700
<v Speaker 4>I think you got to think about that. I think

1:54:42.720 --> 1:54:43.560
<v Speaker 4>you got to think about that.

1:54:43.780 --> 1:54:48.790
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah. Give you pause for thought. Luckily, Molly, Selner

1:54:48.810 --> 1:54:51.370
<v Speaker 1>did nothing else to further incriminate himself.

1:54:51.910 --> 1:54:53.210
<v Speaker 4>And then he was normal after that, right?

1:54:53.670 --> 1:54:57.170
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, because it's not just this donation that is a

1:54:57.190 --> 1:54:59.590
<v Speaker 8>connection between the two of them. I'm quoting from a

1:54:59.650 --> 1:55:04.170
<v Speaker 8>piece by the Austrian outlet ORF. Selner and Tarrant had

1:55:04.210 --> 1:55:07.610
<v Speaker 8>exchanged praise via email. If you ever come to Vienna,

1:55:07.730 --> 1:55:09.520
<v Speaker 8>we have to go for a coffee or a beer,

1:55:09.600 --> 1:55:12.140
<v Speaker 8>says Selner. The same goes for you if you ever

1:55:12.180 --> 1:55:14.790
<v Speaker 8>come to Australia or New Zealand. We have people in

1:55:14.830 --> 1:55:17.150
<v Speaker 8>both countries who would like to host you in their home,

1:55:17.350 --> 1:55:18.530
<v Speaker 8>the Australian replied.

1:55:19.130 --> 1:55:19.350
<v Speaker 1>We?

1:55:19.930 --> 1:55:25.260
<v Speaker 8>According to ZIB2, the last email exchange took place in

1:55:25.310 --> 1:55:29.900
<v Speaker 8>July 2018. One day later, Tarrant booked vehicles and accommodation

1:55:29.980 --> 1:55:34.280
<v Speaker 8>in Austria. Whether the two actually met each other was,

1:55:34.760 --> 1:55:37.580
<v Speaker 8>according to that article, being investigated at the time. I

1:55:38.520 --> 1:55:43.220
<v Speaker 8>haven't been able to find confirmation because Tarrant is silent.

1:55:42.900 --> 1:55:43.400
<v Speaker 1>On the issue.

1:55:43.670 --> 1:55:46.670
<v Speaker 4>And that was a few months before the Christchurch shooting.

1:55:47.370 --> 1:55:47.730
<v Speaker 9>A year.

1:55:48.150 --> 1:55:49.490
<v Speaker 4>You said it was late 2018?

1:55:49.490 --> 1:55:49.730
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

1:55:49.750 --> 1:55:51.530
<v Speaker 4>Okay, yeah, like nine months, yeah.

1:55:51.970 --> 1:55:55.010
<v Speaker 8>But anyway, there's a non-zero chance that the two have

1:55:55.050 --> 1:55:58.210
<v Speaker 8>actually shook hands and met. There's no way to confirm

1:55:58.250 --> 1:56:01.490
<v Speaker 8>it unless one of them confirms it, which I don't

1:56:01.520 --> 1:56:02.600
<v Speaker 8>think will happen either way.

1:56:02.900 --> 1:56:08.000
<v Speaker 4>But still, anything short of a vigorous public disavowal is

1:56:08.020 --> 1:56:08.820
<v Speaker 4>very incriminating.

1:56:08.840 --> 1:56:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't even think that would be enough. No, it wouldn't.

1:56:12.220 --> 1:56:14.120
<v Speaker 4>It wouldn't be very convincing to me. but he hasn't

1:56:14.140 --> 1:56:14.580
<v Speaker 4>even done it.

1:56:14.760 --> 1:56:14.940
<v Speaker 1>No.

1:56:15.520 --> 1:56:17.860
<v Speaker 4>So this is just further evidence that this petition of

1:56:17.900 --> 1:56:20.190
<v Speaker 4>his is violence.

1:56:20.440 --> 1:56:22.089
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:56:22.320 --> 1:56:25.870
<v Speaker 4>This is on the sort of spectrum of the same

1:56:26.010 --> 1:56:28.590
<v Speaker 4>kind of violence, and it is in furtherance of advancing

1:56:28.610 --> 1:56:30.670
<v Speaker 4>the normalization of that kind of violence.

1:56:31.510 --> 1:56:31.770
<v Speaker 6>Yes.

1:56:31.990 --> 1:56:35.570
<v Speaker 8>And also like different kinds of violence, because even though

1:56:35.590 --> 1:56:40.090
<v Speaker 8>they mentioned like giving people incentives to remigrate, not everyone

1:56:40.150 --> 1:56:40.930
<v Speaker 8>is going to do that.

1:56:41.210 --> 1:56:43.770
<v Speaker 4>There is no peaceful way to create an ethnostate. If

1:56:43.810 --> 1:56:47.770
<v Speaker 4>your goal is an ethnostate, you understand from the outset

1:56:47.810 --> 1:56:51.530
<v Speaker 4>that there will be mass bloodshed because there's no peaceful ethnostate.

1:56:51.630 --> 1:56:54.250
<v Speaker 4>It's never happened and it never will. And they know that.

1:56:54.710 --> 1:56:57.300
<v Speaker 4>And I think it was Heimbach or Spencer who admitted

1:56:57.340 --> 1:57:03.360
<v Speaker 4>to that under oath. During the United Right civil trial,

1:57:03.380 --> 1:57:05.900
<v Speaker 4>they were talking. They're like, so when you say, you know,

1:57:05.920 --> 1:57:07.480
<v Speaker 4>we're going to have a peaceful ethnostate, it must have

1:57:07.500 --> 1:57:10.460
<v Speaker 4>been Heimbach. So I think it was from the TWP charter.

1:57:11.080 --> 1:57:13.380
<v Speaker 4>you know, about creating an ethnostate through peaceful means. And

1:57:13.440 --> 1:57:15.920
<v Speaker 4>he's like, yeah, I know that's not real.

1:57:16.960 --> 1:57:20.870
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's not a thing. I mean, like, at least

1:57:21.710 --> 1:57:24.770
<v Speaker 1>Selner is pretty open about this, right? Like, Selner was

1:57:24.850 --> 1:57:28.260
<v Speaker 1>one of the major hosts of the the remigration conference

1:57:28.280 --> 1:57:31.220
<v Speaker 1>that happened in may of this year that was still

1:57:31.240 --> 1:57:34.120
<v Speaker 1>this year right yeah yeah the portugal one in portugal

1:57:34.340 --> 1:57:37.690
<v Speaker 1>yeah like where they explicitly like talked with greg bovino

1:57:37.810 --> 1:57:40.170
<v Speaker 1>about like how they wanted to do this kind of

1:57:40.250 --> 1:57:43.210
<v Speaker 1>shit in europe i i've wrote about this at a

1:57:43.230 --> 1:57:46.070
<v Speaker 1>time but like you can you can see they made

1:57:46.090 --> 1:57:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the regular media stand outside uh and then harass them

1:57:49.420 --> 1:57:51.500
<v Speaker 1>with a drone while they're in the car park ah

1:57:51.740 --> 1:57:55.880
<v Speaker 1>but bovino did do some interviews with some right-wing blogs.

1:57:55.920 --> 1:57:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it seems like he did one interview and

1:57:57.600 --> 1:58:00.360
<v Speaker 1>multiple people translated it, because I don't think he was

1:58:00.390 --> 1:58:04.330
<v Speaker 1>talking to Breton nationalists specifically. But you can see them

1:58:04.510 --> 1:58:08.370
<v Speaker 1>openly discussing this. And this is May of 26, right?

1:58:08.410 --> 1:58:10.980
<v Speaker 1>This is renee good and alex pretty have been killed

1:58:11.000 --> 1:58:15.320
<v Speaker 1>a few months before like like this is when ice

1:58:15.680 --> 1:58:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and cbp were doing their violence most openly and you

1:58:19.310 --> 1:58:23.210
<v Speaker 1>can see these people including selma personally like literally clapping

1:58:23.250 --> 1:58:24.810
<v Speaker 1>for this and saying yeah this is what we need

1:58:24.850 --> 1:58:29.680
<v Speaker 1>we need more shit like this it's just disgusting vile

1:58:29.760 --> 1:58:32.060
<v Speaker 1>doesn't begin to cut it really.

1:58:31.880 --> 1:58:34.350
<v Speaker 4>We know what mass deportation looks like there's no way

1:58:34.360 --> 1:58:37.230
<v Speaker 4>to do it peacefully or bloodlessly no yeah.

1:58:37.430 --> 1:58:40.190
<v Speaker 8>But that is like there is an attempt to make

1:58:40.330 --> 1:58:43.830
<v Speaker 8>some sort of veneer possible where that could be if

1:58:43.850 --> 1:58:46.030
<v Speaker 8>you look at like how they phrased everything in.

1:58:45.950 --> 1:58:50.490
<v Speaker 4>The act economic incentives right like fuck you yep i

1:58:50.520 --> 1:58:53.220
<v Speaker 4>looked at this like like like an anthropologist because that

1:58:53.260 --> 1:58:56.950
<v Speaker 4>is one part of my background and Even if you're

1:58:56.970 --> 1:58:59.190
<v Speaker 4>going to say, OK, everyone's going to accept those incentives,

1:58:59.600 --> 1:59:03.120
<v Speaker 4>then we're still talking about people having to move, families

1:59:03.840 --> 1:59:07.760
<v Speaker 4>broken apart, communities broken apart, people having to upend their

1:59:07.800 --> 1:59:11.470
<v Speaker 4>entire lives, including the lives of their children. And why

1:59:11.480 --> 1:59:13.490
<v Speaker 4>did they come here in the first place? What were

1:59:13.510 --> 1:59:16.790
<v Speaker 4>they fleeing that they risked their lives to come here

1:59:16.910 --> 1:59:20.250
<v Speaker 4>in the first place? They're just ignoring like just an

1:59:20.450 --> 1:59:23.380
<v Speaker 4>avalanche of different pieces of structural violence.

1:59:23.400 --> 1:59:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:59:24.260 --> 1:59:27.060
<v Speaker 8>But that's exactly where I'm getting at. Even if you

1:59:27.100 --> 1:59:31.430
<v Speaker 8>could delude yourself into thinking that these people will leave voluntarily,

1:59:31.440 --> 1:59:35.570
<v Speaker 8>then think of the violence it is in and of

1:59:35.610 --> 1:59:38.930
<v Speaker 8>itself of having to uproot so many lives and start

1:59:39.030 --> 1:59:43.070
<v Speaker 8>all over again from square one at another place. Even

1:59:43.170 --> 1:59:47.490
<v Speaker 8>if no one resisted and everyone accepted that with stoicism,

1:59:47.950 --> 1:59:49.930
<v Speaker 8>it's still an inherently violent act.

1:59:50.490 --> 1:59:50.710
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:59:51.110 --> 1:59:55.960
<v Speaker 1>It tears communities apart. It tears families apart. There's no

1:59:56.000 --> 1:59:59.380
<v Speaker 1>way to do this, which is not deliberately hurting people

1:59:59.920 --> 2:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>for the crime, in that case, of not being white. Right.

2:00:02.940 --> 2:00:06.820
<v Speaker 4>And they're not just talking about immigrants. They're talking about

2:00:06.860 --> 2:00:09.810
<v Speaker 4>everyone who isn't white because they said legal and illegal immigration.

2:00:09.830 --> 2:00:14.750
<v Speaker 4>They're culturally threatening, culturally disruptive. They're just talking about people

2:00:14.770 --> 2:00:16.790
<v Speaker 4>they don't think belong. And some of those people they

2:00:16.810 --> 2:00:19.210
<v Speaker 4>don't think belong have been here for a very long time.

2:00:19.720 --> 2:00:22.260
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and they don't belong because of their skin color.

2:00:22.720 --> 2:00:26.640
<v Speaker 4>So there's nowhere to send them back to, even if

2:00:26.660 --> 2:00:28.140
<v Speaker 4>they would agree to your terms.

2:00:28.960 --> 2:00:34.590
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you can see it in the language of, when

2:00:34.610 --> 2:00:37.070
<v Speaker 1>we were looking at the tour that they did around Europe,

2:00:37.270 --> 2:00:42.310
<v Speaker 1>the open use of the Reconquista language, similar words in

2:00:42.350 --> 2:00:47.230
<v Speaker 1>other Iberian languages, the idea that we will violently expel

2:00:47.270 --> 2:00:51.950
<v Speaker 1>these people crusader style like the the idea that like

2:00:52.310 --> 2:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>uh spain without islam is not something fundamentally different to

2:00:56.160 --> 2:00:58.220
<v Speaker 1>what it is today right like that that exchange has

2:00:58.260 --> 2:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>not happened for as long as there has been spain

2:01:01.080 --> 2:01:02.180
<v Speaker 1>and before.

2:01:01.740 --> 2:01:06.240
<v Speaker 4>Right there's no there's no authentic spain to return to

2:01:06.260 --> 2:01:07.580
<v Speaker 4>the thing you're imagining was never.

2:01:07.520 --> 2:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Real exactly yeah it's laughable to suggest that like you

2:01:11.520 --> 2:01:14.130
<v Speaker 1>can have some kind of uh like like spain was

2:01:14.190 --> 2:01:18.290
<v Speaker 1>pure christendom and you know it's silly It really bums

2:01:18.350 --> 2:01:19.990
<v Speaker 1>me out to see the fucking, I mean, I know

2:01:20.010 --> 2:01:23.810
<v Speaker 1>that the Catalan right has become particularly relevant and Catalan

2:01:23.850 --> 2:01:27.290
<v Speaker 1>identitarianism is a big fucking problem. But like, it wasn't

2:01:27.330 --> 2:01:30.970
<v Speaker 1>always that way. And it's sad to see, like, I

2:01:31.270 --> 2:01:33.230
<v Speaker 1>think those people have already existed, but they look like

2:01:33.270 --> 2:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>everywhere else. They're gaining more of a foothold now. Great stuff.

2:01:37.040 --> 2:01:37.220
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:01:37.760 --> 2:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to some funny stuff.

2:01:39.760 --> 2:01:39.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:01:40.300 --> 2:01:41.020
<v Speaker 4>Give us the good stuff.

2:01:41.060 --> 2:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:01:42.400 --> 2:01:42.940
<v Speaker 8>We need that.

2:01:43.480 --> 2:01:43.660
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:01:44.380 --> 2:01:46.830
<v Speaker 8>To catch up real quick, like, I think it's safe

2:01:46.870 --> 2:01:51.110
<v Speaker 8>to say that Tarrant wasn't radicalized further during his last

2:01:51.130 --> 2:01:55.390
<v Speaker 8>known contact with Sellner and the day he committed his atrocities.

2:01:55.430 --> 2:01:55.690
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:01:56.130 --> 2:01:59.130
<v Speaker 8>Like if you're European and there's someone in your orbit

2:01:59.650 --> 2:02:03.430
<v Speaker 8>who thinks positively of the Save Europe Act, highlight this part.

2:02:03.750 --> 2:02:07.730
<v Speaker 8>Because two weeks after the shooting of the Christchurch, the

2:02:07.810 --> 2:02:11.450
<v Speaker 8>Austrian police raided Martin Sellner's house due to his connections

2:02:11.490 --> 2:02:12.030
<v Speaker 8>with Tarrant.

2:02:12.250 --> 2:02:12.350
<v Speaker 3>Good.

2:02:12.750 --> 2:02:13.050
<v Speaker 1>However.

2:02:13.600 --> 2:02:17.940
<v Speaker 8>The police waited 12 minutes before Selner opened the door.

2:02:18.740 --> 2:02:21.380
<v Speaker 8>They were knocking at his door for 12 minutes. There

2:02:21.440 --> 2:02:24.720
<v Speaker 8>is suspicion that he was warned beforehand about the impending raid,

2:02:25.280 --> 2:02:29.440
<v Speaker 8>as during those 12 minutes, he was deleting emails, screenshots,

2:02:29.510 --> 2:02:32.210
<v Speaker 8>and other proofs of his connection with Tarrant.

2:02:32.600 --> 2:02:35.080
<v Speaker 4>And they don't have subpoena power to get those emails

2:02:35.120 --> 2:02:38.060
<v Speaker 4>from somewhere else? Like deleting an email doesn't make it gone.

2:02:38.080 --> 2:02:39.780
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't disappear, yeah.

2:02:39.850 --> 2:02:42.370
<v Speaker 4>And honestly, at that point, deleting the email, you should

2:02:42.390 --> 2:02:43.950
<v Speaker 4>have been charged with destruction of evidence.

2:02:44.130 --> 2:02:45.790
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if the cops are literally knocking on your door

2:02:45.810 --> 2:02:49.470
<v Speaker 1>and you're deleting emails, A, those emails aren't disappearing.

2:02:49.510 --> 2:02:50.750
<v Speaker 4>In America, they charge you with that.

2:02:51.130 --> 2:02:53.110
<v Speaker 1>Well, in America, they wouldn't wait 12 minutes.

2:02:53.270 --> 2:02:54.790
<v Speaker 4>No, they wouldn't knock.

2:02:54.810 --> 2:02:56.830
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, your door wouldn't be a door anymore.

2:02:57.510 --> 2:03:00.170
<v Speaker 4>You would wake up at 3.45 a.m. and they would

2:03:00.210 --> 2:03:02.070
<v Speaker 4>already be having your computer in their hands.

2:03:03.340 --> 2:03:04.820
<v Speaker 1>Are you sure? Because he is white.

2:03:05.620 --> 2:03:06.140
<v Speaker 6>I don't know.

2:03:06.320 --> 2:03:07.860
<v Speaker 4>A warrant like this, I think they would do a

2:03:07.860 --> 2:03:08.280
<v Speaker 4>4 a.m.

2:03:08.320 --> 2:03:08.720
<v Speaker 7>No-knock.

2:03:09.360 --> 2:03:09.460
<v Speaker 3>Ah.

2:03:10.260 --> 2:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Cops... They love the 4 a.m.

2:03:12.480 --> 2:03:12.959
<v Speaker 13>No-knock.

2:03:13.000 --> 2:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Yeah.

2:03:14.640 --> 2:03:16.360
<v Speaker 4>I guess they probably don't do that in Europe because

2:03:16.400 --> 2:03:18.640
<v Speaker 4>not everyone has guns. That's why they do it in America,

2:03:18.660 --> 2:03:19.440
<v Speaker 4>because everyone has guns.

2:03:20.300 --> 2:03:20.500
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:03:21.420 --> 2:03:23.780
<v Speaker 1>Well, they do it because they enjoy doing it.

2:03:24.060 --> 2:03:25.580
<v Speaker 4>But they say it's because we all have guns.

2:03:26.000 --> 2:03:29.850
<v Speaker 1>Guns provide them with a justification, yeah. I'm sure it's

2:03:29.970 --> 2:03:31.110
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason.

2:03:31.680 --> 2:03:35.960
<v Speaker 8>But there was an investigation within the Austrian Justice Department

2:03:36.000 --> 2:03:38.140
<v Speaker 8>to see if they could find out who it was

2:03:38.160 --> 2:03:40.960
<v Speaker 8>that tipped him off, because it can be a coincidence

2:03:40.980 --> 2:03:44.020
<v Speaker 8>that the very same day he was deleting all that shit.

2:03:44.360 --> 2:03:46.540
<v Speaker 4>And did they not subpoena the emails from the provider?

2:03:46.560 --> 2:03:47.940
<v Speaker 4>Because you can get those.

2:03:48.440 --> 2:03:49.120
<v Speaker 6>They're not gone.

2:03:49.140 --> 2:03:52.820
<v Speaker 8>I haven't read about that. It didn't come up in

2:03:52.860 --> 2:03:56.510
<v Speaker 8>what I saw. I'm not sure. Around the same time, though,

2:03:56.870 --> 2:03:58.710
<v Speaker 8>his travel permit to the U.S.

2:03:58.750 --> 2:03:59.430
<v Speaker 1>Was canceled.

2:04:00.170 --> 2:04:03.150
<v Speaker 8>And therefore he could not meet with his fiancée, Brittany Pettibone.

2:04:03.410 --> 2:04:04.089
<v Speaker 4>That's right.

2:04:04.410 --> 2:04:06.930
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. They're married. They're married. They have a child.

2:04:06.970 --> 2:04:09.590
<v Speaker 4>He's married to an American far-right conspiracy theorist.

2:04:09.650 --> 2:04:10.290
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:04:10.450 --> 2:04:10.970
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know that.

2:04:11.030 --> 2:04:14.150
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, white nationalist and conspiracy theorist.

2:04:14.690 --> 2:04:19.190
<v Speaker 1>Also does some Treadwife content, because, of course... Well, what

2:04:19.220 --> 2:04:20.780
<v Speaker 1>else would she do now? Of course, yeah.

2:04:20.800 --> 2:04:22.080
<v Speaker 4>All their avenues are closed.

2:04:22.360 --> 2:04:22.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:04:23.040 --> 2:04:25.540
<v Speaker 8>And, oh, I forgot this bit. I think this might

2:04:25.580 --> 2:04:28.800
<v Speaker 8>also help you understand, Molly. Later in 2019, then.

2:04:30.340 --> 2:04:34.520
<v Speaker 8>Austrian police expanded the searches of Selner's property. However, Selner

2:04:34.600 --> 2:04:37.730
<v Speaker 8>did file several complaints and a judge ruled that multiple

2:04:37.790 --> 2:04:40.790
<v Speaker 8>actions taken by Austrian authorities were deemed to be unlawful.

2:04:41.250 --> 2:04:43.090
<v Speaker 4>Oh, that's right. You guys have like civil rights and stuff.

2:04:43.210 --> 2:04:49.220
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And look what it got us. Maybe

2:04:49.260 --> 2:04:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the Safe Europe Act isn't so bad after all. Maybe

2:04:51.960 --> 2:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>we need to get less civil rights.

2:04:54.520 --> 2:04:55.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm not signing on to that.

2:04:55.840 --> 2:04:58.790
<v Speaker 8>I can't help but be cynical. Well, to sum up

2:04:58.850 --> 2:05:03.320
<v Speaker 8>everything about Martin Sellner, uncool person, would not have a

2:05:03.340 --> 2:05:03.780
<v Speaker 8>beer with him.

2:05:04.560 --> 2:05:06.860
<v Speaker 4>I know. And this is like if Richard Spencer was

2:05:06.900 --> 2:05:09.000
<v Speaker 4>trying to get a constitutional amendment passed.

2:05:09.220 --> 2:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:05:09.780 --> 2:05:11.900
<v Speaker 4>You don't have to look further into it. You're like, oh,

2:05:11.940 --> 2:05:14.260
<v Speaker 4>that's some like dumb Nazi stuff. This is like a

2:05:14.300 --> 2:05:16.690
<v Speaker 4>washed up Nazi from 10 years ago trying to get

2:05:16.730 --> 2:05:18.970
<v Speaker 4>back in the news by doing some more dumb Nazi stuff. Like,

2:05:19.310 --> 2:05:21.230
<v Speaker 4>you don't need to take it seriously. I mean, I

2:05:21.250 --> 2:05:23.350
<v Speaker 4>need to take it seriously on a broader scale. I mean,

2:05:23.370 --> 2:05:26.010
<v Speaker 4>you don't need to engage seriously in the text of

2:05:26.050 --> 2:05:30.110
<v Speaker 4>the petition because it is not sincere. But like, as

2:05:30.230 --> 2:05:31.970
<v Speaker 4>soon as I saw his name, I was like, oh,

2:05:31.980 --> 2:05:33.420
<v Speaker 4>that's a washed up Nazi from 10 years ago.

2:05:34.270 --> 2:05:37.140
<v Speaker 1>He's not washed up anymore. He's been trying very hard

2:05:37.180 --> 2:05:41.020
<v Speaker 1>with this re-migration stuff to like, to like glom on

2:05:41.140 --> 2:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to this sort of Trumpist.

2:05:44.040 --> 2:05:46.660
<v Speaker 4>Like this is a known quantity. This isn't a mystery.

2:05:46.880 --> 2:05:47.270
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

2:05:47.360 --> 2:05:47.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:05:47.620 --> 2:05:49.390
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, we're not like, oh, this guy has

2:05:49.430 --> 2:05:51.890
<v Speaker 1>some real concerns about his community and neighborhood.

2:05:51.990 --> 2:05:52.130
<v Speaker 3>No.

2:05:52.210 --> 2:05:54.450
<v Speaker 4>And this man is engaging with the political process in

2:05:54.470 --> 2:05:56.530
<v Speaker 4>a sincere and earnest way. No, it's a Nazi.

2:05:56.570 --> 2:05:56.670
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:05:57.110 --> 2:05:57.250
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:05:58.250 --> 2:06:00.510
<v Speaker 8>Even though he says, like, he might have not been

2:06:00.550 --> 2:06:03.310
<v Speaker 8>a neo-Nazi if the identitarian movement had existed when he

2:06:03.350 --> 2:06:05.630
<v Speaker 8>was younger. I don't believe that.

2:06:05.990 --> 2:06:09.610
<v Speaker 4>The identitarians are white supremacist fascist movement.

2:06:09.760 --> 2:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I love that. If we'd had another thing to call

2:06:12.200 --> 2:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>my Nazism, I wouldn't have done the Nazi shit because

2:06:14.740 --> 2:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that's explicitly illegal. Yeah.

2:06:17.800 --> 2:06:19.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that swastika stuff I used to be into, I

2:06:19.940 --> 2:06:21.930
<v Speaker 4>still believe all the same stuff, but I wouldn't have

2:06:21.940 --> 2:06:24.110
<v Speaker 4>used the embarrassing branding if I'd been smarter.

2:06:24.530 --> 2:06:24.950
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:06:25.210 --> 2:06:26.550
<v Speaker 6>Fuck off. Yeah.

2:06:27.130 --> 2:06:30.820
<v Speaker 8>And after this, we're going to speak of the fascist counterpart,

2:06:30.860 --> 2:06:34.560
<v Speaker 8>the fascist Barbie doll, Eva Laerdingerbroek.

2:06:34.660 --> 2:06:51.410
<v Speaker 1>Oh, great. Or Eva Heidrich, if that's easier on the tongue. Hi, everyone.

2:06:51.430 --> 2:06:54.210
<v Speaker 1>This is future Mick.

2:06:55.420 --> 2:06:59.140
<v Speaker 8>Adding some stuff for less future Mick, who you'll be

2:06:59.180 --> 2:07:03.260
<v Speaker 8>hearing most of during the podcast. This episode took a

2:07:03.300 --> 2:07:05.790
<v Speaker 8>pretty long while. I'm not sure how long it will

2:07:05.830 --> 2:07:09.090
<v Speaker 8>be in post-production, but for my own recording, we talked

2:07:09.130 --> 2:07:12.810
<v Speaker 8>for almost three hours, which is a lot. Therefore, this

2:07:12.850 --> 2:07:16.300
<v Speaker 8>episode will be cut into multiple pieces. Make sure to

2:07:16.340 --> 2:07:20.660
<v Speaker 8>start at part one. I'm sorry for any awkward breaks

2:07:20.980 --> 2:07:24.860
<v Speaker 8>in the post-production, but... It was very hard to keep that.

2:07:24.760 --> 2:07:27.390
<v Speaker 1>In mind while we were recording. Hope you enjoy it.

2:07:30.500 --> 2:07:33.060
<v Speaker 8>And we're back. And we're going to speak of the

2:07:33.100 --> 2:07:34.840
<v Speaker 8>fascist Barbie doll that Molly.

2:07:34.560 --> 2:07:35.380
<v Speaker 1>Knows nothing about.

2:07:36.460 --> 2:07:37.140
<v Speaker 4>Say the name again.

2:07:37.160 --> 2:07:39.680
<v Speaker 8>Eva Vlaardingerbroek.

2:07:40.220 --> 2:07:42.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the American mouth simply can't make those sounds.

2:07:42.420 --> 2:07:44.620
<v Speaker 1>Eva Heidrich. You can do that.

2:07:45.920 --> 2:07:48.980
<v Speaker 8>Because, you know, we already compared it to the Nuremberg Law.

2:07:49.020 --> 2:07:51.320
<v Speaker 8>So we might as well drag the Heidrich and the

2:07:51.360 --> 2:07:54.590
<v Speaker 8>Wannsee conference in it as well. So I wouldn't be

2:07:54.630 --> 2:07:56.950
<v Speaker 8>surprised if this was written at a lake house somewhere.

2:07:57.670 --> 2:08:02.600
<v Speaker 8>So Eva Vlaringenbroek is this. shield maiden of the far right.

2:08:03.060 --> 2:08:05.700
<v Speaker 8>That's an actual title she uses in her Twitter bio.

2:08:07.300 --> 2:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Great.

2:08:08.360 --> 2:08:08.980
<v Speaker 4>That sucks.

2:08:09.760 --> 2:08:12.560
<v Speaker 8>It was used as an insult by a columnist and

2:08:12.620 --> 2:08:15.420
<v Speaker 8>she cleverly adopted it into her brand.

2:08:16.000 --> 2:08:19.100
<v Speaker 4>That's not a very good insult. Like, of course she

2:08:19.140 --> 2:08:19.740
<v Speaker 4>liked that.

2:08:20.300 --> 2:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, you're giving her what she wants.

2:08:22.780 --> 2:08:27.180
<v Speaker 8>I'm not going to defend our columnist, ever. I should

2:08:27.220 --> 2:08:30.840
<v Speaker 8>note that she is significantly more, like, clean than our

2:08:30.880 --> 2:08:31.839
<v Speaker 8>boy Martin Sellner.

2:08:31.860 --> 2:08:33.900
<v Speaker 4>No swastika-related arrests?

2:08:34.160 --> 2:08:35.980
<v Speaker 1>Exactly. Exactly.

2:08:36.360 --> 2:08:40.620
<v Speaker 8>Or, like, any ties to neo-Nazis or figures as unsavory as.

2:08:40.580 --> 2:08:41.900
<v Speaker 1>The Christchurch shooter.

2:08:42.340 --> 2:08:43.040
<v Speaker 4>That we know about.

2:08:43.360 --> 2:08:44.220
<v Speaker 1>That we know about.

2:08:44.900 --> 2:08:48.290
<v Speaker 8>She does have a master's in encyclopedia and philosophy of law.

2:08:49.160 --> 2:08:51.040
<v Speaker 8>During her studies, she became more.

2:08:50.940 --> 2:08:55.940
<v Speaker 1>Active with the Dutch conspiracy slash fascist party Forum for Democracy.

2:08:56.830 --> 2:08:59.510
<v Speaker 1>With them, she also partook in an internship at their

2:08:59.630 --> 2:09:03.170
<v Speaker 1>faction in Brussels. After that, she worked as a lecturer,

2:09:03.730 --> 2:09:06.010
<v Speaker 1>which she later gave up to join the Dutch parliament

2:09:06.390 --> 2:09:09.890
<v Speaker 1>as a member of said fascist party. She would later

2:09:09.970 --> 2:09:13.370
<v Speaker 1>quit this after a political fallout with party leader Thierry

2:09:13.470 --> 2:09:17.130
<v Speaker 1>Baudet and the League of Group Chats of their youth party,

2:09:17.170 --> 2:09:20.130
<v Speaker 1>which were distasteful, to say the least.

2:09:20.850 --> 2:09:25.480
<v Speaker 8>To women, to minorities. I don't need to explain how

2:09:25.500 --> 2:09:28.140
<v Speaker 8>this group chat looked like. You can make an educated

2:09:28.160 --> 2:09:29.260
<v Speaker 8>guess and be correct.

2:09:29.700 --> 2:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, any time the group chat to a right

2:09:33.280 --> 2:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>party youth group get leaked, it's not going to be

2:09:35.520 --> 2:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>wholesome shit.

2:09:36.300 --> 2:09:36.800
<v Speaker 14>Is it?

2:09:36.840 --> 2:09:38.420
<v Speaker 4>No, that happens here every now and again. We know

2:09:38.440 --> 2:09:39.080
<v Speaker 4>what those look like.

2:09:39.140 --> 2:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>It happens everywhere. Don't be in chats at all.

2:09:43.540 --> 2:09:45.260
<v Speaker 8>Don't do it.

2:09:45.320 --> 2:09:46.220
<v Speaker 1>A small detour.

2:09:46.660 --> 2:09:48.920
<v Speaker 8>A few months ago, there was like on the subreddit,

2:09:49.280 --> 2:09:52.420
<v Speaker 8>a discussion on which Dutch bastard should be covered. And

2:09:52.480 --> 2:09:54.060
<v Speaker 8>everyone said it should be Geert Wilders.

2:09:54.820 --> 2:09:55.690
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

2:09:55.730 --> 2:09:56.440
<v Speaker 4>That was what name?

2:09:56.510 --> 2:09:57.610
<v Speaker 1>Geert Wilders.

2:09:58.270 --> 2:09:59.310
<v Speaker 4>That's how you say that?

2:09:59.710 --> 2:10:03.950
<v Speaker 1>Yes. Yeah. Go give it a cry, Molly. Go see

2:10:03.970 --> 2:10:05.230
<v Speaker 1>where you, where were you at with it?

2:10:05.250 --> 2:10:05.370
<v Speaker 6>No.

2:10:05.680 --> 2:10:07.180
<v Speaker 1>Okay. We've lost Molly.

2:10:07.600 --> 2:10:12.270
<v Speaker 8>But anyway, like, I strongly disagree with that because Wilders

2:10:12.310 --> 2:10:15.070
<v Speaker 8>is also like an overt fascist, but he's not funny.

2:10:15.390 --> 2:10:18.070
<v Speaker 8>Like there's no funny behind the bastards to do about it.

2:10:18.550 --> 2:10:20.910
<v Speaker 4>Sometimes there's no jokes you could make about the fascist.

2:10:21.110 --> 2:10:21.290
<v Speaker 5>No.

2:10:21.970 --> 2:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean, the comedy about him lends itself to

2:10:24.720 --> 2:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a visual medium.

2:10:26.660 --> 2:10:26.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:10:26.900 --> 2:10:29.140
<v Speaker 1>That's what I will say. He looks like Sonic the

2:10:29.180 --> 2:10:30.020
<v Speaker 1>fucking hedgehog.

2:10:30.200 --> 2:10:30.340
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:10:30.780 --> 2:10:33.700
<v Speaker 8>But Cherry Mother is really funny. Like he's also a fascist,

2:10:33.760 --> 2:10:36.970
<v Speaker 8>but he was assaulted in public multiple times. He was

2:10:37.010 --> 2:10:38.470
<v Speaker 8>hit in the face with an umbrella.

2:10:38.490 --> 2:10:38.570
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:10:39.760 --> 2:10:44.350
<v Speaker 1>That's a European way of going about it. I respect that. Yeah,

2:10:44.450 --> 2:10:46.290
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a Ukrainian national.

2:10:46.310 --> 2:10:47.970
<v Speaker 4>They don't have guns. They have to be creative.

2:10:47.990 --> 2:10:52.500
<v Speaker 8>It was caught on tape. So that's really funny. You

2:10:52.520 --> 2:10:55.920
<v Speaker 8>can make a more funny episode about him. He had

2:10:55.960 --> 2:10:59.660
<v Speaker 8>a motion in our parliament for the humane treatment of

2:10:59.840 --> 2:11:02.130
<v Speaker 8>Andrew Tate when he was arrested in Romania.

2:11:02.150 --> 2:11:04.540
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Okay.

2:11:04.840 --> 2:11:07.620
<v Speaker 4>Because he's always been, I'm sure, a passionate defender of

2:11:07.690 --> 2:11:10.730
<v Speaker 4>prisoner civil rights, right? That's something he's always been interested in.

2:11:11.010 --> 2:11:13.830
<v Speaker 1>Loves to advocate. He was also very passionate about consent,

2:11:13.850 --> 2:11:16.290
<v Speaker 1>saying that when women say no, they actually want you

2:11:16.350 --> 2:11:17.110
<v Speaker 1>to go on.

2:11:17.330 --> 2:11:17.710
<v Speaker 6>Oh, dear.

2:11:18.030 --> 2:11:20.850
<v Speaker 1>Also on camera. So, great figure.

2:11:21.130 --> 2:11:24.910
<v Speaker 8>Anyway, details aside, during the waves, this fallout between Ava

2:11:24.980 --> 2:11:29.500
<v Speaker 8>and Baudet was caused. He would retaliate by repeatedly mentioning

2:11:29.540 --> 2:11:33.460
<v Speaker 8>their relationship publicly. which forced her hand to denounce it

2:11:33.560 --> 2:11:36.400
<v Speaker 8>as being just a few dates after which their fling ended.

2:11:36.420 --> 2:11:41.540
<v Speaker 8>Eva would later tell Das Telegraf, Cherry knew how scared

2:11:41.580 --> 2:11:43.770
<v Speaker 8>I was of this coming out. If it gets out,

2:11:44.010 --> 2:11:47.290
<v Speaker 8>you don't owe anything you've achieved to yourself. What I

2:11:47.330 --> 2:11:50.550
<v Speaker 8>feared happened. I was the resentful ex, and even more

2:11:50.610 --> 2:11:52.610
<v Speaker 8>blatant sexist remarks poured in.

2:11:53.510 --> 2:11:56.720
<v Speaker 4>Oh no. Did she not know sexism could happen to her?

2:11:56.740 --> 2:11:59.860
<v Speaker 4>This happens to far-right influencers all the time. Like, it

2:11:59.880 --> 2:12:02.890
<v Speaker 4>happened to Lauren Southern, and maybe Brittany Pettibone too, but

2:12:02.930 --> 2:12:05.890
<v Speaker 4>like these women in this movement, they're like, I didn't

2:12:05.910 --> 2:12:08.550
<v Speaker 4>know they were going to be sexist to me. Girl,

2:12:08.570 --> 2:12:09.610
<v Speaker 4>you're at a Nazi party.

2:12:10.030 --> 2:12:13.250
<v Speaker 8>Maybe I'm giving her too much sympathy, but.

2:12:13.610 --> 2:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>You are. Probably.

2:12:15.180 --> 2:12:17.740
<v Speaker 8>But like this entire piece is heavily colored by my

2:12:17.780 --> 2:12:19.920
<v Speaker 8>own opinion, but I'm also trying to sometimes be a

2:12:19.960 --> 2:12:23.940
<v Speaker 8>bit more distant with it. But clearly she received some

2:12:23.960 --> 2:12:27.480
<v Speaker 8>pretty harsh comments that were dripping with sexism during the fallout.

2:12:27.580 --> 2:12:29.600
<v Speaker 4>No doubt that she did. I'm not saying that's good

2:12:29.620 --> 2:12:32.520
<v Speaker 4>or that it's acceptable, but like, What did you think

2:12:32.580 --> 2:12:35.320
<v Speaker 4>would happen when you laid down with dogs?

2:12:35.440 --> 2:12:38.440
<v Speaker 1>That is very fair, but I also want to say

2:12:38.860 --> 2:12:40.270
<v Speaker 1>her womanhood was very.

2:12:40.350 --> 2:12:42.650
<v Speaker 4>I just want to exterminate people I don't like. I

2:12:42.690 --> 2:12:45.010
<v Speaker 4>didn't know anyone would be mean to me. I guess

2:12:45.030 --> 2:12:45.550
<v Speaker 4>I'm just mean.

2:12:46.950 --> 2:12:48.010
<v Speaker 1>Your words, not mine.

2:12:49.810 --> 2:12:53.580
<v Speaker 8>I'm still trying to have a... For this specific instance,

2:12:53.620 --> 2:12:58.060
<v Speaker 8>have some sort of sympathy for her because... Her relationship

2:12:58.120 --> 2:13:01.350
<v Speaker 8>and her womanhood were essentially, like, weaponized against her in

2:13:01.390 --> 2:13:03.370
<v Speaker 8>a way to incite that sexism.

2:13:04.230 --> 2:13:06.970
<v Speaker 4>And she would know nothing about weaponizing people's identities against

2:13:07.010 --> 2:13:09.390
<v Speaker 4>them to produce any kind of violent result?

2:13:09.510 --> 2:13:12.630
<v Speaker 8>No, like, she's a horrible person with horrible politics. Like,

2:13:12.730 --> 2:13:13.970
<v Speaker 8>I'm not denying any of that, but.

2:13:14.010 --> 2:13:15.690
<v Speaker 4>No, I'm not saying it's good or acceptable that these

2:13:15.710 --> 2:13:18.840
<v Speaker 4>things happen to these women. It's just, like, what... Do

2:13:18.860 --> 2:13:22.400
<v Speaker 4>you not see that that's what you're doing to others?

2:13:22.520 --> 2:13:25.580
<v Speaker 1>I think there isn't enough introspection for that, but.

2:13:26.180 --> 2:13:27.320
<v Speaker 4>No, there's not, no.

2:13:27.440 --> 2:13:28.220
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, no.

2:13:28.560 --> 2:13:30.460
<v Speaker 4>Well, no, because they think that bad things should not

2:13:30.500 --> 2:13:33.780
<v Speaker 4>happen to them because they're fully human and the people

2:13:33.800 --> 2:13:34.760
<v Speaker 4>they're doing it to aren't.

2:13:35.640 --> 2:13:38.210
<v Speaker 1>Right. Like, if you're going to draw lines around humanity,

2:13:38.230 --> 2:13:40.950
<v Speaker 1>don't find yourself surprised when the line is drawn and

2:13:40.990 --> 2:13:41.890
<v Speaker 1>you're on the other side of it.

2:13:42.490 --> 2:13:45.570
<v Speaker 4>And, like, the underpinning of so many of these ideas

2:13:46.910 --> 2:13:49.850
<v Speaker 4>heavily relies on misogyny, too. Like, you know, you're not

2:13:49.870 --> 2:13:52.450
<v Speaker 4>just going to do fascism and white supremacy and xenophobia

2:13:52.800 --> 2:13:56.280
<v Speaker 4>and immigration restriction without... Those guys are misogynists too, babe.

2:13:56.760 --> 2:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>That's very true.

2:13:58.540 --> 2:14:01.480
<v Speaker 8>I think I was mostly just trying to find my

2:14:01.560 --> 2:14:05.500
<v Speaker 8>own moral line in there. Like, two horrible people, but still,

2:14:05.560 --> 2:14:05.780
<v Speaker 8>I would.

2:14:06.720 --> 2:14:07.250
<v Speaker 1>Somewhere... Nah.

2:14:08.550 --> 2:14:09.950
<v Speaker 4>I'm just always surprised they're surprised.

2:14:11.010 --> 2:14:14.270
<v Speaker 8>It's the line, I couldn't believe the leopards eating my

2:14:14.330 --> 2:14:19.050
<v Speaker 8>face happened after voting for the leopards eating faces party.

2:14:19.210 --> 2:14:21.830
<v Speaker 8>For instance, the way I still think it's fucked up

2:14:21.980 --> 2:14:25.440
<v Speaker 8>that it happened that way to her. And maybe sympathy

2:14:25.500 --> 2:14:28.560
<v Speaker 8>is going too far, but I think that's for each

2:14:28.580 --> 2:14:32.420
<v Speaker 8>to their own to decide upon. But to go back

2:14:32.460 --> 2:14:35.980
<v Speaker 8>more to funnier stuff, my first breakthrough in political activism

2:14:36.020 --> 2:14:39.790
<v Speaker 8>was in December of 2019, when the Dutch newspaper Het

2:14:39.850 --> 2:14:45.190
<v Speaker 8>Parool published that opinion piece that we mentioned earlier, criticizing

2:14:45.230 --> 2:14:48.670
<v Speaker 8>her anti-feminist speech at the Forum for Democracy Party Congress.

2:14:49.270 --> 2:14:51.690
<v Speaker 8>Her disdain for modern feminism could also be seen in

2:14:51.730 --> 2:14:55.710
<v Speaker 8>her master thesis titled The contractualization of sex in the

2:14:55.750 --> 2:14:56.470
<v Speaker 8>Me Too era.

2:14:56.670 --> 2:14:59.850
<v Speaker 4>If you think feminism is damaging to society, why do

2:14:59.890 --> 2:15:02.310
<v Speaker 4>you think you deserve the benefits of feminism?

2:15:04.410 --> 2:15:04.910
<v Speaker 1>Because.

2:15:05.930 --> 2:15:06.450
<v Speaker 4>Because.

2:15:06.970 --> 2:15:07.470
<v Speaker 1>Probably.

2:15:07.490 --> 2:15:11.750
<v Speaker 8>And this is where she gets funny again a bit.

2:15:12.210 --> 2:15:15.680
<v Speaker 8>Because unfortunately, I couldn't find her full thesis because I

2:15:15.720 --> 2:15:18.940
<v Speaker 8>had looked for it. I was curious because she completed

2:15:18.960 --> 2:15:20.780
<v Speaker 8>it with honors. So I was like, okay, I want

2:15:20.820 --> 2:15:22.100
<v Speaker 8>to know what this looks like.

2:15:22.120 --> 2:15:22.620
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's good.

2:15:23.080 --> 2:15:24.340
<v Speaker 4>Change my mind, Eva.

2:15:24.480 --> 2:15:27.940
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, share it on Twitter. She did, however, post an

2:15:27.980 --> 2:15:31.440
<v Speaker 8>essay in English on her Twitter account, which drew heavily

2:15:31.720 --> 2:15:35.970
<v Speaker 8>on her thesis. And to be a bit fair and balanced,

2:15:36.530 --> 2:15:37.490
<v Speaker 8>it's not horrible.

2:15:37.870 --> 2:15:40.010
<v Speaker 4>I'll be the judge of that. Let me see it.

2:15:40.450 --> 2:15:43.710
<v Speaker 8>Well, for the most part, it's just concerns about a social.

2:15:45.280 --> 2:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>structure such as consent being codified into.

2:15:48.120 --> 2:15:50.370
<v Speaker 4>Law so she's saying rape should be legal.

2:15:50.350 --> 2:15:53.930
<v Speaker 8>That that's not what she is explicitly saying but she

2:15:53.950 --> 2:15:57.450
<v Speaker 8>does seem to see consent as exclusively like a contract

2:15:57.490 --> 2:15:59.650
<v Speaker 8>between two people rather than like an.

2:15:59.650 --> 2:16:02.610
<v Speaker 4>Agreement i mean their petition is explicitly saying something very

2:16:02.670 --> 2:16:04.570
<v Speaker 4>different than what it actually means i don't think we

2:16:04.590 --> 2:16:07.390
<v Speaker 4>have to take these people at their word oh yeah

2:16:07.990 --> 2:16:11.190
<v Speaker 4>i'm not gonna take a fascist at her word that's

2:16:11.230 --> 2:16:12.750
<v Speaker 4>not what i'm in the business of doing.

2:16:13.030 --> 2:16:16.670
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm feeling like I'm very uncritical.

2:16:16.690 --> 2:16:19.190
<v Speaker 4>No, you're just much nicer than I am.

2:16:19.810 --> 2:16:21.300
<v Speaker 1>Again, your words.

2:16:22.080 --> 2:16:24.100
<v Speaker 4>And you live in a country with much stricter libel laws.

2:16:24.980 --> 2:16:26.740
<v Speaker 1>That's also true.

2:16:27.040 --> 2:16:30.620
<v Speaker 8>I think there should be room for good faith debate

2:16:30.780 --> 2:16:34.279
<v Speaker 8>on this codification into law and possible side effects.

2:16:34.300 --> 2:16:35.379
<v Speaker 4>Sure, but she doesn't.

2:16:35.400 --> 2:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>No, no, she absolutely doesn't.

2:16:38.100 --> 2:16:41.320
<v Speaker 4>The existence of good faith debate Sure, I'll concede to that.

2:16:41.379 --> 2:16:43.440
<v Speaker 4>We can have a good faith debate on the legal

2:16:43.580 --> 2:16:47.360
<v Speaker 4>structure of consent. I wouldn't say there should be no

2:16:47.410 --> 2:16:49.850
<v Speaker 4>legal structure for it because that just means rape is legal.

2:16:50.470 --> 2:16:52.770
<v Speaker 4>But the thing is, is I'm not going to engage

2:16:52.810 --> 2:16:55.210
<v Speaker 4>in a good faith debate with her because she isn't.

2:16:55.790 --> 2:16:58.430
<v Speaker 4>Because she isn't and she knows it. And so by

2:16:58.490 --> 2:17:02.769
<v Speaker 4>allowing room for good faith debate with people like Eva

2:17:02.790 --> 2:17:07.060
<v Speaker 4>for blah, blah, blah, blah, You are opening the door

2:17:07.760 --> 2:17:11.459
<v Speaker 4>for this, right? You are making room for her bad

2:17:11.500 --> 2:17:15.019
<v Speaker 4>faith argument that is essentially just rape should be legal,

2:17:15.500 --> 2:17:17.060
<v Speaker 4>but it shouldn't happen to nice girls like me.

2:17:17.120 --> 2:17:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

2:17:17.760 --> 2:17:21.810
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah. It's not bad faith. It ends in bad shit.

2:17:21.870 --> 2:17:22.570
<v Speaker 4>No, it's bad faith.

2:17:22.730 --> 2:17:25.330
<v Speaker 1>It is. It is explicitly in bad faith.

2:17:25.350 --> 2:17:29.720
<v Speaker 8>Molly, hold your horses because I've got here like the

2:17:29.770 --> 2:17:33.000
<v Speaker 8>last one and a half paragraphs of that piece. As

2:17:33.120 --> 2:17:36.560
<v Speaker 8>kind as I was for like the preceding paragraphs, I'm

2:17:36.580 --> 2:17:38.320
<v Speaker 8>going to be as blunt about the last one.

2:17:38.840 --> 2:17:40.640
<v Speaker 1>It's absolute bonkers.

2:17:41.180 --> 2:17:42.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking forward to it.

2:17:42.600 --> 2:17:44.959
<v Speaker 1>This is not like even going from zero to a hundred.

2:17:45.000 --> 2:17:45.310
<v Speaker 1>This is.

2:17:45.980 --> 2:17:48.990
<v Speaker 8>zero to a thousand in the span of a couple sentences.

2:17:49.810 --> 2:17:52.850
<v Speaker 8>Quoting this from her essay, which was posted on Twitter

2:17:53.410 --> 2:17:57.109
<v Speaker 8>on April 29th, 2026, for those who want to see

2:17:57.150 --> 2:18:00.709
<v Speaker 8>it for themselves. To compensate for the legal uncertainty this

2:18:00.770 --> 2:18:03.920
<v Speaker 8>law will create, people will seek refuge in contracts, which

2:18:03.950 --> 2:18:06.800
<v Speaker 8>can now simply be downloaded via mobile apps such as

2:18:07.060 --> 2:18:11.050
<v Speaker 8>LegalFling and have a direct legal effect. Although the desire

2:18:11.070 --> 2:18:14.090
<v Speaker 8>to create a consent culture may stem from good intentions,

2:18:14.590 --> 2:18:18.170
<v Speaker 8>this consent culture has unforeseen consequences that pose a danger

2:18:18.209 --> 2:18:19.570
<v Speaker 8>to romance and freedom.

2:18:19.970 --> 2:18:23.529
<v Speaker 1>Oh, fuck off. Okay. Always interesting to see what the

2:18:23.570 --> 2:18:29.790
<v Speaker 1>libertarians want. I'm using libertarian in the American sense here, right?

2:18:29.910 --> 2:18:34.029
<v Speaker 1>Want the states to not take an interest in. This

2:18:34.090 --> 2:18:36.250
<v Speaker 1>same person who wants the state to take an interest

2:18:36.290 --> 2:18:40.310
<v Speaker 1>in tearing people's lives apart. doesn't think the state belongs

2:18:40.470 --> 2:18:42.629
<v Speaker 1>in determining what is and is not consent because we

2:18:42.670 --> 2:18:46.110
<v Speaker 1>have an app for that. Fuck off. James, I'll heavily

2:18:46.129 --> 2:18:47.070
<v Speaker 1>disagree with you here.

2:18:47.450 --> 2:18:50.390
<v Speaker 8>Nothing is more romantic than when I want to engage

2:18:50.490 --> 2:18:54.510
<v Speaker 8>in some adult fun with a partner than having an

2:18:54.730 --> 2:18:57.770
<v Speaker 8>app to sign a literal contract on what is and

2:18:57.830 --> 2:18:58.820
<v Speaker 8>isn't acceptable.

2:18:59.080 --> 2:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>You know AI drafts a contract. You know chat GPT

2:19:02.260 --> 2:19:04.099
<v Speaker 1>is getting up in there and putting some weird shit

2:19:04.120 --> 2:19:04.940
<v Speaker 1>in your contract.

2:19:05.060 --> 2:19:06.560
<v Speaker 4>And this is such a tired thing.

2:19:06.600 --> 2:19:06.810
<v Speaker 6>Like, I.

2:19:07.310 --> 2:19:08.850
<v Speaker 4>you know, showing my age here, but when I was

2:19:08.870 --> 2:19:11.769
<v Speaker 4>in college 20 years ago and we had these, you know,

2:19:11.850 --> 2:19:15.290
<v Speaker 4>mandatory trainings on like, what is consent? Like, don't get

2:19:15.350 --> 2:19:18.529
<v Speaker 4>raped at a party. And guys would say, like these

2:19:18.530 --> 2:19:20.379
<v Speaker 4>18 year old guys would say shit like, oh, I'm

2:19:20.400 --> 2:19:24.030
<v Speaker 4>going to have her sign a contract. This is like tired,

2:19:24.350 --> 2:19:27.060
<v Speaker 4>dumb shit that guys who rape people say.

2:19:27.080 --> 2:19:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't even done, but I'm glad for your passion, Molly.

2:19:30.959 --> 2:19:31.780
<v Speaker 4>Okay, carry on.

2:19:32.300 --> 2:19:34.920
<v Speaker 8>Suppose such a contract is signed. How do we know

2:19:34.980 --> 2:19:37.709
<v Speaker 8>for certain that it was not signed under coercion? or,

2:19:37.770 --> 2:19:40.890
<v Speaker 8>for example, under the influence of alcohol and or drugs?

2:19:41.470 --> 2:19:42.770
<v Speaker 8>And what if a woman signs that.

2:19:42.850 --> 2:19:46.980
<v Speaker 4>Right, those are the same questions about consent we already have. Coercion, alcohol.

2:19:47.420 --> 2:19:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but now we have an app. But now there's

2:19:49.300 --> 2:19:52.900
<v Speaker 1>an app. Yeah, so then to solve all of those questions, right?

2:19:52.920 --> 2:19:55.820
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, now it's about the legality of such a contract

2:19:55.860 --> 2:19:57.340
<v Speaker 8>instead of the legality of.

2:19:57.480 --> 2:19:59.100
<v Speaker 4>Instead of the legality of rape.

2:19:59.700 --> 2:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you've made a get out of jail free card app.

2:20:03.260 --> 2:20:05.759
<v Speaker 1>That's what she seems to think. That's literally the phrase

2:20:05.800 --> 2:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>she uses. What if a woman signs at 11 p.m.

2:20:08.840 --> 2:20:12.350
<v Speaker 1>but changes her mind at 11.10 p.m. and her partner

2:20:12.450 --> 2:20:14.629
<v Speaker 1>acts in bad faith? Then he rapes her and he

2:20:14.650 --> 2:20:17.369
<v Speaker 1>has a get out of jail free card. After all,

2:20:17.790 --> 2:20:22.470
<v Speaker 1>she signed a contract, so no one will believe her anymore, right? Oh, wait,

2:20:22.490 --> 2:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>so she's not proposing the app contract. No, no, no.

2:20:25.459 --> 2:20:26.560
<v Speaker 4>She's saying it wouldn't work.

2:20:27.020 --> 2:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh, my apologies.

2:20:28.400 --> 2:20:30.460
<v Speaker 4>So she's saying there just should be no legal concept

2:20:30.500 --> 2:20:31.560
<v Speaker 4>of consent at all.

2:20:31.660 --> 2:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>She's just against the concept of consent. I mean, one

2:20:34.620 --> 2:20:38.009
<v Speaker 1>consent can be withdrawn. It's like it's not the fucking

2:20:38.070 --> 2:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>like end game argument that. a 12-year-old Reddit user might

2:20:42.360 --> 2:20:44.440
<v Speaker 1>think it is. Like, I was still not done with this.

2:20:44.459 --> 2:20:45.920
<v Speaker 4>This is an essay a moron would write.

2:20:46.020 --> 2:20:49.450
<v Speaker 1>Oh, oh, Molly, Molly. This is the sort of shit that, like,

2:20:50.670 --> 2:20:55.030
<v Speaker 1>I have graded some essays of, like, undergraduate and even, like,

2:20:55.129 --> 2:20:58.270
<v Speaker 1>postgraduate students, and, like, this is the kind of puerile

2:20:58.330 --> 2:21:02.720
<v Speaker 1>shit that, like, anyone who's going through, like, a serious

2:21:02.780 --> 2:21:05.580
<v Speaker 1>attempt to be a serious writer should be fucking, like,

2:21:06.900 --> 2:21:08.220
<v Speaker 1>I know, like, whack-a-mole.

2:21:08.560 --> 2:21:11.430
<v Speaker 4>Like, All of the points in this essay came up

2:21:11.790 --> 2:21:15.090
<v Speaker 4>in my mandatory don't rate people training in college in 2007.

2:21:15.090 --> 2:21:19.330
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like this is like the logic of like a

2:21:19.390 --> 2:21:21.850
<v Speaker 1>frat guy trying to be funny.

2:21:22.730 --> 2:21:26.630
<v Speaker 8>First, she sees consent as like exclusively contractual. And I

2:21:26.670 --> 2:21:28.090
<v Speaker 8>think that's where she goes.

2:21:28.190 --> 2:21:29.129
<v Speaker 4>That's very romantic.

2:21:29.170 --> 2:21:33.030
<v Speaker 1>Yes. Also, I wasn't done because that was not the

2:21:33.070 --> 2:21:33.990
<v Speaker 1>bonkers part.

2:21:34.550 --> 2:21:34.910
<v Speaker 6>Oh, OK.

2:21:34.990 --> 2:21:37.480
<v Speaker 4>Oh, the last sentence is phenomenal. You're going to love this, James.

2:21:38.180 --> 2:21:40.100
<v Speaker 1>Okay, great. Yeah, hit me.

2:21:41.120 --> 2:21:43.140
<v Speaker 8>Okay, after all, she signed a contract, so no one

2:21:43.160 --> 2:21:45.970
<v Speaker 8>will believe her anymore, right? Solutions to this kind of

2:21:46.020 --> 2:21:48.510
<v Speaker 8>problem will not be found in anything other than even

2:21:48.550 --> 2:21:51.890
<v Speaker 8>more rules and even more government interference. What is the

2:21:51.930 --> 2:21:55.629
<v Speaker 8>next step? Cameras in the bedroom or a civil servant

2:21:55.709 --> 2:21:59.430
<v Speaker 8>standing beside your bed? This new sexual offense law creates

2:21:59.510 --> 2:22:03.170
<v Speaker 8>more problems than it solves. All of this legal uncertainty,

2:22:03.550 --> 2:22:07.330
<v Speaker 8>the erosion of the presumption of innocence, the extinguishing of romance...

2:22:08.290 --> 2:22:10.590
<v Speaker 8>indicates that we should not even want to crack the

2:22:10.629 --> 2:22:13.030
<v Speaker 8>door open to this Orwellian nightmare.

2:22:13.209 --> 2:22:13.669
<v Speaker 10>No!

2:22:14.030 --> 2:22:14.750
<v Speaker 1>Every time!

2:22:15.110 --> 2:22:15.510
<v Speaker 7>No!

2:22:15.530 --> 2:22:18.680
<v Speaker 1>No door! Every time! I knew it was coming. I

2:22:19.060 --> 2:22:20.940
<v Speaker 1>knew it was coming and I'm still angry.

2:22:20.959 --> 2:22:23.760
<v Speaker 4>What is it, 1984?

2:22:23.760 --> 2:22:26.800
<v Speaker 8>It may still sound abstract to you, but ask yourself

2:22:26.840 --> 2:22:29.140
<v Speaker 8>the following question in all seriousness.

2:22:29.600 --> 2:22:30.340
<v Speaker 1>I'm serious.

2:22:30.920 --> 2:22:34.529
<v Speaker 8>How many totalitarian regimes in history can you name that

2:22:34.570 --> 2:22:36.850
<v Speaker 8>went so far as to write rules and laws?

2:22:37.370 --> 2:22:40.930
<v Speaker 1>Dictating how people must behave in the bedroom. The question

2:22:41.090 --> 2:22:42.060
<v Speaker 1>answers itself.

2:22:42.590 --> 2:22:45.080
<v Speaker 4>Making rape illegal basically makes you Hitler.

2:22:46.300 --> 2:22:49.880
<v Speaker 1>This is insane. The same person who wants the state

2:22:49.920 --> 2:22:53.300
<v Speaker 1>to fucking kick people out for not being white. It's

2:22:53.340 --> 2:22:56.110
<v Speaker 1>a little too far if they're policing rape, though, isn't it?

2:22:56.260 --> 2:23:00.630
<v Speaker 1>That should be something we settle amongst ourselves. They always

2:23:00.709 --> 2:23:03.750
<v Speaker 1>do this, and I find it so fucking annoying. Obviously,

2:23:03.770 --> 2:23:05.490
<v Speaker 1>the most annoying thing here is not being wrong about

2:23:05.510 --> 2:23:09.580
<v Speaker 1>George Orwell, who had some fucking issues with consent himself.

2:23:10.740 --> 2:23:14.120
<v Speaker 1>But God, it pisses... The whole thing, it's just... It's

2:23:14.180 --> 2:23:15.019
<v Speaker 1>so puerile.

2:23:15.200 --> 2:23:17.620
<v Speaker 4>This would be better if she did let ChatGPT write it.

2:23:18.120 --> 2:23:21.490
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Now I'm wondering how this person... If this is

2:23:21.550 --> 2:23:24.310
<v Speaker 1>a topic she explored for her master's degree... We do

2:23:24.330 --> 2:23:26.270
<v Speaker 1>need to find the thesis. If they also let ChatGPT

2:23:26.330 --> 2:23:30.570
<v Speaker 1>grade it, is what I'm wondering. Because, like Molly said,

2:23:30.629 --> 2:23:33.939
<v Speaker 1>if you worked in education... Like, I've been in higher

2:23:34.000 --> 2:23:39.110
<v Speaker 1>education for 20 years. And yeah, you've heard this shit

2:23:39.390 --> 2:23:42.390
<v Speaker 1>from an 18-year-old guy whose shirt doesn't have sleeves for

2:23:42.410 --> 2:23:45.070
<v Speaker 1>the most part, right? And like, I wear a lot

2:23:45.090 --> 2:23:48.050
<v Speaker 1>of sleeveless shirts myself. Like, that's fine. But there's a

2:23:48.090 --> 2:23:50.140
<v Speaker 1>type of dude who's been saying this shit to you

2:23:50.640 --> 2:23:54.380
<v Speaker 1>every September since you started talking about this shit, right?

2:23:54.459 --> 2:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>And like, just because a lady wrote it in a

2:23:57.320 --> 2:23:59.460
<v Speaker 1>fucking thesis doesn't make it any less dumb.

2:23:59.480 --> 2:24:00.580
<v Speaker 4>Well, this is actually a Twitter post.

2:24:00.600 --> 2:24:00.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:24:02.850 --> 2:24:04.770
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, that makes more sense. That makes a lot

2:24:04.790 --> 2:24:05.070
<v Speaker 1>more sense.

2:24:05.110 --> 2:24:06.230
<v Speaker 4>If this is drawn from her thesis.

2:24:06.270 --> 2:24:08.550
<v Speaker 1>If that's a line of argumentation she went with.

2:24:08.650 --> 2:24:11.300
<v Speaker 4>If this is the quality of thinking in her master's thesis,

2:24:11.640 --> 2:24:13.240
<v Speaker 4>I actually do really want to see it now. We

2:24:13.260 --> 2:24:13.720
<v Speaker 4>have to find it.

2:24:13.740 --> 2:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Where did she do her master's thesis? Leiden University. Okay.

2:24:18.660 --> 2:24:22.500
<v Speaker 1>Did she make a significant donation at any point to

2:24:22.959 --> 2:24:23.940
<v Speaker 1>Leiden University?

2:24:23.959 --> 2:24:27.050
<v Speaker 8>Well, like, if we're detouring already, there is, like, a

2:24:27.100 --> 2:24:31.230
<v Speaker 8>prominent supporter of the fascist party who teaches at Leiden

2:24:31.270 --> 2:24:31.789
<v Speaker 8>Law School.

2:24:32.050 --> 2:24:32.209
<v Speaker 7>So.

2:24:32.760 --> 2:24:33.020
<v Speaker 1>Great.

2:24:33.379 --> 2:24:36.270
<v Speaker 8>And that's also where Chetty Baudet, who we mentioned earlier,

2:24:36.810 --> 2:24:41.380
<v Speaker 8>did his promotion research, which was also incredibly bad to

2:24:41.400 --> 2:24:43.959
<v Speaker 8>the point that one of the people graded it said,

2:24:44.260 --> 2:24:45.560
<v Speaker 8>you should not get a PhD.

2:24:45.650 --> 2:24:48.900
<v Speaker 1>This is like... For anyone who doesn't know... Yeah, that

2:24:48.940 --> 2:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't happen very often. You defending your PhD is mostly

2:24:53.060 --> 2:24:56.820
<v Speaker 1>a formality? Yeah, like, you might get some difficult questions.

2:24:56.980 --> 2:24:57.240
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:24:57.459 --> 2:25:01.200
<v Speaker 1>But people who go into their defense normally expect to

2:25:01.260 --> 2:25:05.360
<v Speaker 1>leave with a PhD, right? Like, if your shit's so bad... And, like,

2:25:05.500 --> 2:25:08.620
<v Speaker 1>if they don't tell you about it before you get

2:25:08.780 --> 2:25:12.140
<v Speaker 1>to the exam, it's because they really don't like you

2:25:12.180 --> 2:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>very much, right? Like, if you've got to that point

2:25:14.940 --> 2:25:18.660
<v Speaker 1>where you're having your you're defending with your committee and

2:25:18.720 --> 2:25:21.940
<v Speaker 1>they haven't been like, hey, this is really bad. You

2:25:21.959 --> 2:25:25.300
<v Speaker 1>need to rewrite this. You have made an enemy.

2:25:26.260 --> 2:25:29.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I guess done is good enough in most cases.

2:25:29.440 --> 2:25:30.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah.

2:25:30.100 --> 2:25:33.550
<v Speaker 4>Because I don't have occasion to read very many theses

2:25:33.610 --> 2:25:37.250
<v Speaker 4>or dissertations, but every time I do, I'm surprised that

2:25:37.310 --> 2:25:40.030
<v Speaker 4>it worked. You know what I mean? I did a

2:25:40.050 --> 2:25:43.190
<v Speaker 4>close reading of... There was a Holocaust denier who died

2:25:43.209 --> 2:25:44.690
<v Speaker 4>in a murder-suicide. He killed his wife.

2:25:45.570 --> 2:25:45.930
<v Speaker 1>And his.

2:25:46.770 --> 2:25:48.609
<v Speaker 4>history thesis was one of the worst things i've ever

2:25:48.650 --> 2:25:51.029
<v Speaker 4>read and i was so surprised and a bunch of

2:25:51.080 --> 2:25:53.279
<v Speaker 4>listeners wrote in to my my show email to say

2:25:53.420 --> 2:25:55.420
<v Speaker 4>oh no that's it's pretty normal for a thesis to

2:25:55.440 --> 2:25:56.939
<v Speaker 4>be just absolute dog shit.

2:25:57.500 --> 2:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah i don't want to i don't want to take

2:25:59.040 --> 2:26:02.140
<v Speaker 1>that one as a representative sample uh but they do

2:26:02.200 --> 2:26:04.019
<v Speaker 1>say your thesis should be the first draft of your

2:26:04.040 --> 2:26:06.369
<v Speaker 1>book or your dissertation if you're in the u.s and

2:26:06.690 --> 2:26:09.170
<v Speaker 1>uh i it's really easy if you're in grad school

2:26:09.190 --> 2:26:11.330
<v Speaker 1>to get way too wrapped up in making it perfect

2:26:11.890 --> 2:26:14.709
<v Speaker 1>but also some people still manage to uh do some

2:26:14.750 --> 2:26:18.070
<v Speaker 1>nazi shit and I'm glad that someone held the line.

2:26:18.950 --> 2:26:21.240
<v Speaker 4>Like all of his citations were to David Irving books

2:26:21.300 --> 2:26:22.900
<v Speaker 4>and like they still gave him the degree.

2:26:23.480 --> 2:26:27.060
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's a couple of info citations.

2:26:27.120 --> 2:26:29.940
<v Speaker 4>Citation, author's email with David Irving.

2:26:31.020 --> 2:26:33.300
<v Speaker 1>Maybe David Icke gets in there for some like real

2:26:33.320 --> 2:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>old school credibility.

2:26:34.780 --> 2:26:37.770
<v Speaker 8>I had a professor during my master's and at some

2:26:37.830 --> 2:26:41.250
<v Speaker 8>point he said, like all of your master theses will

2:26:41.310 --> 2:26:44.810
<v Speaker 8>probably be shit. And that's fine because the master thesis

2:26:44.850 --> 2:26:45.730
<v Speaker 8>is for you to learn.

2:26:47.190 --> 2:26:49.250
<v Speaker 1>There's value to having a piece of writing that doesn't

2:26:49.290 --> 2:26:51.690
<v Speaker 1>have to be perfect. And I'm sure if I looked

2:26:51.740 --> 2:26:53.879
<v Speaker 1>at lots of academics who I deeply respect and read

2:26:53.900 --> 2:26:57.660
<v Speaker 1>their master's thesis or their PhD dissertation, I would be

2:26:57.740 --> 2:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>able to witness their growth. And that would give me

2:26:59.820 --> 2:27:02.580
<v Speaker 1>hope as an academic that we can all get better.

2:27:02.660 --> 2:27:05.040
<v Speaker 4>But it sounds like she didn't learn much because this

2:27:05.140 --> 2:27:06.820
<v Speaker 4>essay is something a moron would write.

2:27:06.840 --> 2:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. Oh, no. The Orwell mention because like... Anyone

2:27:10.760 --> 2:27:13.250
<v Speaker 1>mentioning Orwell in a piece of academic writing needs to.

2:27:13.310 --> 2:27:14.260
<v Speaker 4>Are you a teenager?

2:27:14.580 --> 2:27:16.920
<v Speaker 8>No, but like Orwell did have some pretty good opinions

2:27:17.010 --> 2:27:19.470
<v Speaker 8>on how to deal with fascists, you know? So I

2:27:19.490 --> 2:27:21.550
<v Speaker 8>find it ironic that a fascist is quoting it.

2:27:22.410 --> 2:27:23.470
<v Speaker 4>Because she hasn't read it.

2:27:23.950 --> 2:27:28.370
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, many such cases, right? Yeah, exactly. She's engaged with

2:27:28.370 --> 2:27:31.170
<v Speaker 1>1984 through cultural memes in the same way fucking Elon

2:27:31.209 --> 2:27:36.510
<v Speaker 1>Musk has. I read Dorian Linksey's book about Orwell writing

2:27:36.670 --> 2:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>in 1984 recently, and the amount of his life, that

2:27:40.080 --> 2:27:43.820
<v Speaker 1>he spent after animal farm being like no you guys

2:27:43.840 --> 2:27:46.380
<v Speaker 1>don't fucking understand it that's not what i meant please

2:27:46.440 --> 2:27:50.470
<v Speaker 1>stop it specifically with americans but on a much broader

2:27:50.490 --> 2:27:53.410
<v Speaker 1>scale the amount of time he spent like trying to

2:27:53.610 --> 2:27:56.770
<v Speaker 1>refuse interviews being like no i'm a like i'm a

2:27:56.810 --> 2:27:59.050
<v Speaker 1>man of the left and that is a group And

2:27:59.080 --> 2:28:00.930
<v Speaker 1>like that I remain or something was one that he

2:28:00.950 --> 2:28:03.830
<v Speaker 1>wrote in a letter refusing an interview. But the poor

2:28:03.890 --> 2:28:06.830
<v Speaker 1>guy spent his dying days being like, you motherfuckers haven't

2:28:06.870 --> 2:28:11.050
<v Speaker 1>understood my book, you stupid pricks. And every year they

2:28:11.110 --> 2:28:13.670
<v Speaker 1>dig him up and do the same shit.

2:28:13.950 --> 2:28:15.830
<v Speaker 4>That must be absolute torture for him.

2:28:15.870 --> 2:28:17.529
<v Speaker 1>Like the rat's pill from the Matrix.

2:28:17.770 --> 2:28:19.310
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to use a Ouija board to tell George

2:28:19.410 --> 2:28:21.810
<v Speaker 4>Orwell about Alex Jones.

2:28:21.830 --> 2:28:24.000
<v Speaker 1>The guy has suffered enough, Molly.

2:28:24.900 --> 2:28:29.789
<v Speaker 4>The answer to 1984 is 1776. one of alex's favorite

2:28:29.810 --> 2:28:30.870
<v Speaker 4>lines ah.

2:28:31.690 --> 2:28:34.129
<v Speaker 1>I know that god just there's an inside joke i

2:28:34.150 --> 2:28:36.629
<v Speaker 1>love that her body goes on a rant her camera

2:28:36.650 --> 2:28:39.170
<v Speaker 1>like automatically zooms in a little bit and it just

2:28:39.220 --> 2:28:43.320
<v Speaker 1>gets extra ominous yeah you get like she's doing it

2:28:43.360 --> 2:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that's it that's an old alex jones trick actually get

2:28:45.879 --> 2:28:58.690
<v Speaker 1>them forehead veins to pop To try to get us

2:28:58.750 --> 2:29:00.470
<v Speaker 1>back on track again. Sorry.

2:29:00.920 --> 2:29:04.880
<v Speaker 8>Like, she's very much into the same, like, female nationalism

2:29:05.180 --> 2:29:08.560
<v Speaker 8>that we discussed with also you, Molly, during the Quentin

2:29:08.580 --> 2:29:09.599
<v Speaker 8>Derank episodes.

2:29:09.620 --> 2:29:12.240
<v Speaker 4>But without any feminism or proper nationalism.

2:29:12.260 --> 2:29:16.570
<v Speaker 8>No, it's, again, all feminism is we need to stop

2:29:16.610 --> 2:29:18.869
<v Speaker 8>being raped by migrants and then everything is solved.

2:29:19.430 --> 2:29:20.150
<v Speaker 1>Which is not the case.

2:29:20.170 --> 2:29:22.310
<v Speaker 4>No, we just should be raped by our husbands, I guess,

2:29:22.370 --> 2:29:24.210
<v Speaker 4>is her argument. I don't want to be raped by

2:29:24.250 --> 2:29:25.689
<v Speaker 4>an immigrant. I want to be raped by a husband.

2:29:25.720 --> 2:29:27.690
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's... As is tradition.

2:29:27.770 --> 2:29:30.630
<v Speaker 8>She would probably agree that that would be fine or

2:29:30.690 --> 2:29:32.590
<v Speaker 8>deny that that such a thing is possible.

2:29:32.610 --> 2:29:33.350
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think.

2:29:33.570 --> 2:29:34.250
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, more likely.

2:29:34.590 --> 2:29:35.370
<v Speaker 1>But it's a contract.

2:29:35.890 --> 2:29:36.129
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:29:36.670 --> 2:29:39.270
<v Speaker 8>Anyway, some of the listeners may also have had the

2:29:39.290 --> 2:29:42.190
<v Speaker 8>misfortune of seeing Eva on the Tucker Carlson show.

2:29:42.709 --> 2:29:43.610
<v Speaker 4>He knows how to pick them.

2:29:43.740 --> 2:29:44.170
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

2:29:44.660 --> 2:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>At the moment, she is.

2:29:45.820 --> 2:29:51.810
<v Speaker 8>Married to Francesco Gargalo di Castellantini. a Roman-based lawyer who

2:29:51.890 --> 2:29:56.129
<v Speaker 8>is descended from a long line of Italian noblemen. He's

2:29:56.170 --> 2:29:59.510
<v Speaker 8>a constitutional lawyer who practices in a number of countries

2:30:00.129 --> 2:30:03.870
<v Speaker 8>and recently defended a woman who in 2021 refused to

2:30:03.910 --> 2:30:07.070
<v Speaker 8>take a PCR test when she traveled from Spain to Norway.

2:30:09.110 --> 2:30:14.770
<v Speaker 4>God, the Venn diagram. I want the government to be

2:30:14.850 --> 2:30:18.449
<v Speaker 4>powerful enough to rip apart families and sink boats full

2:30:18.480 --> 2:30:20.860
<v Speaker 4>of children in the sea. But I don't want the

2:30:20.910 --> 2:30:22.869
<v Speaker 4>government to be able to make me put a swab

2:30:22.910 --> 2:30:26.130
<v Speaker 4>in my nose to prove I don't have a deadly disease.

2:30:26.650 --> 2:30:29.650
<v Speaker 8>Cool and normal stuff. I don't want to be surprised,

2:30:29.770 --> 2:30:33.910
<v Speaker 8>and I'm not, but also I am. Further, she spoke

2:30:34.190 --> 2:30:37.730
<v Speaker 8>at multiple Unite the Kingdom rallies in the UK, including

2:30:37.770 --> 2:30:42.760
<v Speaker 8>in the September of 2025 one, where she encouraged attendees

2:30:42.800 --> 2:30:46.020
<v Speaker 8>to stand up to their governments. Protests ended in violence.

2:30:46.020 --> 2:30:50.480
<v Speaker 8>26 police officers injured and 24 people arrested, according to

2:30:50.500 --> 2:30:53.260
<v Speaker 8>the Daily Mail. It does, however, not mention if the

2:30:53.320 --> 2:30:56.490
<v Speaker 8>police were there in their professional capacity or not, which

2:30:56.580 --> 2:31:00.070
<v Speaker 8>I think is a meaningful distinction to make there. This

2:31:00.129 --> 2:31:02.609
<v Speaker 8>incident also led her to from being barred from the

2:31:02.750 --> 2:31:06.750
<v Speaker 8>UK as her presence was not considered conductive to the

2:31:06.810 --> 2:31:11.420
<v Speaker 8>public good. After this, she labeled Keir Starmer a tyrant.

2:31:12.320 --> 2:31:14.480
<v Speaker 8>If anyone has ever seen an interview with Keir Starmer,

2:31:14.500 --> 2:31:17.260
<v Speaker 8>you know this is untrue because Keir Starmer is the

2:31:17.340 --> 2:31:19.660
<v Speaker 8>dark crevice where charisma goes to die.

2:31:20.080 --> 2:31:22.779
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he lacks a charisma for fascism.

2:31:23.320 --> 2:31:29.240
<v Speaker 8>For anything. He is the most bland, flavorless politician you've

2:31:29.300 --> 2:31:31.800
<v Speaker 8>ever seen. I don't want to slander Keir Starmer because

2:31:31.840 --> 2:31:34.280
<v Speaker 8>I would like to visit the UK at some point again.

2:31:34.680 --> 2:31:36.640
<v Speaker 1>But not that. The demand.

2:31:36.720 --> 2:31:39.920
<v Speaker 4>Calling a British politician a little bit bland is not slander.

2:31:40.860 --> 2:31:44.910
<v Speaker 1>Well, we got Andy Burnham now who... played the Smiths

2:31:45.209 --> 2:31:48.550
<v Speaker 1>to a group of soldiers in Ukraine on a guitar recently.

2:31:48.750 --> 2:31:49.150
<v Speaker 4>Why?

2:31:52.150 --> 2:31:54.730
<v Speaker 1>It's the most British thing that anyone's ever done. He

2:31:56.350 --> 2:32:00.660
<v Speaker 1>was visiting Ukrainian soldiers. Was he trying to cheer them up?

2:32:00.760 --> 2:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>That's what I can't understand. Doing a morale trip and

2:32:03.980 --> 2:32:06.340
<v Speaker 1>being like, here's a sad song written by a really

2:32:06.379 --> 2:32:09.570
<v Speaker 1>annoying guy. I like the Smiths, but Morris is a prick.

2:32:09.590 --> 2:32:10.650
<v Speaker 1>I think we can all acknowledge that.

2:32:11.070 --> 2:32:14.209
<v Speaker 8>Maybe that's proof he's on Russia's side trying to incite

2:32:14.290 --> 2:32:15.230
<v Speaker 8>mass suicide.

2:32:15.250 --> 2:32:15.890
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, trying to.

2:32:15.870 --> 2:32:17.269
<v Speaker 4>Demoralize the troops.

2:32:19.370 --> 2:32:20.369
<v Speaker 1>It's a song about suicide.

2:32:20.390 --> 2:32:21.869
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I heard you were having a hard day. Why

2:32:22.030 --> 2:32:23.890
<v Speaker 4>don't you enjoy some Morrissey?

2:32:24.290 --> 2:32:29.050
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, his heaven knows I'm miserable. You have to be

2:32:29.090 --> 2:32:33.280
<v Speaker 1>as miserable as I am, so I'm playing this song. Okay.

2:32:33.680 --> 2:32:35.420
<v Speaker 8>That was all the fun stuff I had on the

2:32:35.459 --> 2:32:39.480
<v Speaker 8>fascist shield maiden, to be honest. Still some funny stuff

2:32:39.540 --> 2:32:41.959
<v Speaker 8>in there, but also... Jesus fucking Christ.

2:32:42.780 --> 2:32:45.640
<v Speaker 4>But unsurprising on all fronts. These people are exactly what

2:32:45.660 --> 2:32:46.620
<v Speaker 4>he would expect them to be.

2:32:47.340 --> 2:32:50.050
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I'm not even surprised that she married a nobleman.

2:32:50.840 --> 2:32:53.150
<v Speaker 4>No, that's classic fascism stuff. Love that for her.

2:32:53.190 --> 2:32:58.150
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah. All of this. Italian nobles, famously unproblematic.

2:32:58.450 --> 2:33:01.470
<v Speaker 4>It's like Colin Jordan marrying the Dior heiress. Like, okay,

2:33:01.510 --> 2:33:01.950
<v Speaker 4>I got it.

2:33:02.129 --> 2:33:03.410
<v Speaker 1>I got it.

2:33:03.430 --> 2:33:05.769
<v Speaker 8>There is one more composed golem that we have to

2:33:05.830 --> 2:33:08.539
<v Speaker 8>talk about. And this one takes great effort in remaining

2:33:08.580 --> 2:33:11.150
<v Speaker 8>more behind the scenes. I'm curious if you guys heard

2:33:11.170 --> 2:33:13.540
<v Speaker 8>of him. That applies to both his role in pulling

2:33:13.720 --> 2:33:16.539
<v Speaker 8>Europe even further to the right, but also his personal life.

2:33:17.320 --> 2:33:20.740
<v Speaker 8>It is the chairman of the World Congress for the Family,

2:33:20.760 --> 2:33:25.850
<v Speaker 8>hailing from the United States, Mr. Brian Stephen Brown.

2:33:26.230 --> 2:33:30.930
<v Speaker 4>I've never heard of Brian. He sounds very boring. Just

2:33:30.950 --> 2:33:35.380
<v Speaker 4>like a garden variety, like a weird pervert. Brian Stephen Brown.

2:33:35.400 --> 2:33:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he has a Wikipedia page. Oh, okay.

2:33:38.620 --> 2:33:43.010
<v Speaker 4>I recognize the symbol on the podium where he is here. Now, oh,

2:33:43.070 --> 2:33:44.870
<v Speaker 4>he's the National Organization for Marriage guy.

2:33:44.930 --> 2:33:47.129
<v Speaker 1>Yes. I think I wrote it down wrong in my

2:33:47.170 --> 2:33:48.370
<v Speaker 1>script then. No, he's both.

2:33:48.430 --> 2:33:50.129
<v Speaker 4>It's the World Congress of Families I've never heard of.

2:33:50.140 --> 2:33:52.500
<v Speaker 4>The National Organization for Marriage. That's a classic.

2:33:53.200 --> 2:33:56.259
<v Speaker 1>Now, I'll consider this feedback on my script writing.

2:33:56.890 --> 2:33:58.550
<v Speaker 4>Oh, no, it's just that's that's the hate group I'm

2:33:58.590 --> 2:34:00.709
<v Speaker 4>familiar with of the hate groups he's affiliated with.

2:34:00.750 --> 2:34:04.130
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, there is more hate groups that he's affiliated with

2:34:04.170 --> 2:34:05.300
<v Speaker 8>than we could name.

2:34:05.640 --> 2:34:06.100
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot.

2:34:06.740 --> 2:34:09.480
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, America is full of these like vague sounding

2:34:09.560 --> 2:34:13.400
<v Speaker 4>foundations for the focus on the family, the family, Congress, world,

2:34:13.940 --> 2:34:15.959
<v Speaker 4>wives and babies or whatever. Like it's just like this

2:34:16.220 --> 2:34:20.910
<v Speaker 4>word salad basically about weird white natalism and hating gay

2:34:20.950 --> 2:34:23.280
<v Speaker 4>people and immigration. It's just sort of a grab bag,

2:34:23.300 --> 2:34:25.019
<v Speaker 4>like whatever part of that you're into.

2:34:25.420 --> 2:34:29.090
<v Speaker 8>So the Justice for Prosperity report that I used earlier

2:34:29.110 --> 2:34:33.050
<v Speaker 8>states that the World Congress for Families is an ultra-conservative

2:34:33.190 --> 2:34:37.910
<v Speaker 8>and transnational anti-rights network that opposes all the things you

2:34:38.030 --> 2:34:42.030
<v Speaker 8>imagine it opposes. Abortion, same-sex marriage. It was labeled a

2:34:42.070 --> 2:34:45.420
<v Speaker 8>hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Brown is

2:34:45.459 --> 2:34:48.960
<v Speaker 8>also on the board of Citizen Go, a Spanish anti-abortion

2:34:49.040 --> 2:34:54.130
<v Speaker 8>and anti-LGBT advocacy group. In fact, if you needed just

2:34:54.190 --> 2:34:56.609
<v Speaker 8>a little bit more evidence of the type of bastard

2:34:56.629 --> 2:35:00.400
<v Speaker 8>he is, he physically stood in the Russian Duma as

2:35:00.480 --> 2:35:03.520
<v Speaker 8>it passed the anti-gay bill legislation.

2:35:03.560 --> 2:35:03.779
<v Speaker 7>Great.

2:35:04.459 --> 2:35:07.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I've seen that picture as well.

2:35:07.540 --> 2:35:07.959
<v Speaker 7>Oh, wow.

2:35:08.620 --> 2:35:10.520
<v Speaker 4>He looks exactly like you think he's going to look.

2:35:10.600 --> 2:35:14.539
<v Speaker 1>It's like a hairy thumb. Yeah, this isn't a surprise

2:35:14.580 --> 2:35:18.449
<v Speaker 1>to me. Like an otter or something? Like a bald otter? Yeah.

2:35:18.709 --> 2:35:20.070
<v Speaker 1>Mole rat is what I'm thinking of.

2:35:20.870 --> 2:35:23.270
<v Speaker 4>Wait, so what's our American homophobe got to do with this?

2:35:23.810 --> 2:35:25.570
<v Speaker 4>I got distracted looking at how weird he looks.

2:35:25.930 --> 2:35:27.730
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's understandable.

2:35:28.490 --> 2:35:31.890
<v Speaker 8>We'll get there first, because he was not only just

2:35:31.990 --> 2:35:36.910
<v Speaker 8>at the Duma for that legislation to pass. After he

2:35:36.950 --> 2:35:40.470
<v Speaker 8>was present at that legislation passing, he was also repeatedly

2:35:40.530 --> 2:35:44.370
<v Speaker 8>returned to Russia to chat with his buddies, Konstantin Maloviev

2:35:44.870 --> 2:35:49.129
<v Speaker 8>and his right-hand man, Alexei Komov, allies of Putin.

2:35:49.870 --> 2:35:53.340
<v Speaker 1>Well, What do they chat about? Probably about how great

2:35:53.360 --> 2:35:55.780
<v Speaker 1>it is not to have polonium in your underwear or

2:35:55.860 --> 2:36:01.240
<v Speaker 1>how dangerous falling out of a basement window is. I'm guessing.

2:36:01.360 --> 2:36:01.940
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

2:36:02.560 --> 2:36:04.080
<v Speaker 8>And I don't want to know because I don't want

2:36:04.140 --> 2:36:08.310
<v Speaker 8>either of those things to happen to me. But Malaviv

2:36:08.350 --> 2:36:11.270
<v Speaker 8>has been on both the EU and US sanctions list

2:36:11.490 --> 2:36:14.970
<v Speaker 8>since 2014 for arming pro-Russian separatists.

2:36:15.610 --> 2:36:16.090
<v Speaker 1>Oh, cool.

2:36:16.610 --> 2:36:18.410
<v Speaker 4>So not a guy you should really be hanging out with.

2:36:19.040 --> 2:36:21.039
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this is the through line, but it

2:36:21.080 --> 2:36:23.199
<v Speaker 1>gets worse. It gets worse.

2:36:23.230 --> 2:36:27.770
<v Speaker 8>He also helped finance regular conferences that merge multiple pro-family groups.

2:36:28.450 --> 2:36:33.190
<v Speaker 8>Read pro-family as anti-abortion, anti-LGBT. Yeah, pro-family is a bold.

2:36:33.230 --> 2:36:35.030
<v Speaker 4>Pro exactly what kind of family?

2:36:35.500 --> 2:36:41.360
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, anti-self-determination. And through this process, allegedly, they also extend

2:36:41.400 --> 2:36:46.330
<v Speaker 8>the influence of Russian geopolitical policy into other countries. Other

2:36:46.370 --> 2:36:50.110
<v Speaker 8>investigations from Justice for Prosperity also identified him as the

2:36:50.190 --> 2:36:55.680
<v Speaker 8>primary coordinator and fundraiser behind the systemic deportations and relocation

2:36:55.720 --> 2:36:59.400
<v Speaker 8>of Ukrainian children through his St. Basil the Great Foundation.

2:36:59.660 --> 2:37:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Jesus. Under the aptly chosen name, Happy Childhood.

2:37:04.959 --> 2:37:05.440
<v Speaker 4>Fuck me.

2:37:06.080 --> 2:37:06.260
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:37:06.680 --> 2:37:10.630
<v Speaker 1>And, like, I also want to mention, because, James, we

2:37:11.190 --> 2:37:12.270
<v Speaker 1>also had a chat about this.

2:37:12.290 --> 2:37:13.050
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

2:37:13.170 --> 2:37:17.900
<v Speaker 8>Forcefully displacing or relocating children... That's one of the things

2:37:17.920 --> 2:37:19.150
<v Speaker 8>that's a genocide.

2:37:19.330 --> 2:37:19.570
<v Speaker 7>Yes.

2:37:19.760 --> 2:37:22.269
<v Speaker 4>That's in the UN definition of a genocide.

2:37:22.290 --> 2:37:22.730
<v Speaker 14>Yeah.

2:37:22.790 --> 2:37:25.670
<v Speaker 1>But it has to specifically be children.

2:37:26.190 --> 2:37:30.640
<v Speaker 8>So like the quasi-Nuremberg laws that we read earlier. are

2:37:30.700 --> 2:37:36.199
<v Speaker 8>technically not genocidal because it's not explicitly children. But one

2:37:36.300 --> 2:37:39.760
<v Speaker 8>could imagine what it would be if you followed their

2:37:39.830 --> 2:37:41.690
<v Speaker 8>policies to their logical conclusion.

2:37:41.870 --> 2:37:42.410
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:37:43.470 --> 2:37:45.890
<v Speaker 8>But Brown is also involved with the Safe Europe Act.

2:37:46.390 --> 2:37:49.750
<v Speaker 8>He was present at the first demonstration in Brussels. But

2:37:49.790 --> 2:37:51.570
<v Speaker 8>his true involvement is much more.

2:37:51.480 --> 2:37:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Behind the scenes.

2:37:52.820 --> 2:37:58.740
<v Speaker 8>He co-owns a digital infrastructure company called AlternCloud, self-described as

2:37:58.920 --> 2:38:03.019
<v Speaker 8>infrastructure as a service. Donations and other forms of digital

2:38:03.040 --> 2:38:06.970
<v Speaker 8>infrastructure are moving through this, which originate either in the

2:38:07.010 --> 2:38:10.490
<v Speaker 8>Save Europe Act, the donations I mean then, or people

2:38:10.510 --> 2:38:13.830
<v Speaker 8>that like the initiative. And AlternCloud itself is also not

2:38:13.850 --> 2:38:16.030
<v Speaker 8>shy about showcasing their political leanings.

2:38:16.700 --> 2:38:18.140
<v Speaker 1>I'm quoting from their website.

2:38:18.790 --> 2:38:21.230
<v Speaker 8>We are excited to report we are now the digital

2:38:21.270 --> 2:38:26.110
<v Speaker 8>backbone of businesses, organizations, websites, and apps across America and Europe.

2:38:26.910 --> 2:38:32.160
<v Speaker 8>Current clients include conservative organizations like No Next Row, Never

2:38:32.240 --> 2:38:37.839
<v Speaker 8>News Impact, conservative and Catholic news organizations such as InfoCatho,

2:38:38.300 --> 2:38:43.120
<v Speaker 8>La Salon Beige, and Les Forts Vérités, family advocacy nonprofits

2:38:43.180 --> 2:38:47.610
<v Speaker 8>like International Organization for the Family, And tech companies such

2:38:47.650 --> 2:38:51.940
<v Speaker 8>as Titanium Secure, Tech IG, and Ad Hoc Capital.

2:38:52.459 --> 2:38:54.740
<v Speaker 4>I love that they can just call it family advocacy

2:38:54.760 --> 2:38:58.459
<v Speaker 4>when what it is is like violent homophobia and transphobia

2:38:58.500 --> 2:39:00.980
<v Speaker 4>and anti-women's rights, anti-abortion.

2:39:01.080 --> 2:39:02.500
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're just a hate group.

2:39:02.950 --> 2:39:06.450
<v Speaker 4>Family advocacy for a very particular kind of family and

2:39:06.570 --> 2:39:08.150
<v Speaker 4>everyone else can fuck off and die.

2:39:08.170 --> 2:39:10.610
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I'll say this much. At least he lives to

2:39:10.650 --> 2:39:13.290
<v Speaker 1>his values because allegedly he has nine children.

2:39:13.450 --> 2:39:14.160
<v Speaker 4>His poor wife.

2:39:14.629 --> 2:39:17.709
<v Speaker 1>Oh, yes, 100%. Yeah, those poor children.

2:39:17.730 --> 2:39:21.750
<v Speaker 8>So, the names mentioned earlier, we can already safely assume

2:39:21.810 --> 2:39:24.830
<v Speaker 8>just what kind of clientele our alternate cloud likes to

2:39:24.850 --> 2:39:27.590
<v Speaker 8>engage with. But what I find most disturbing is that

2:39:27.640 --> 2:39:31.500
<v Speaker 8>he's clearly a very influential person of who we know

2:39:31.560 --> 2:39:34.859
<v Speaker 8>very little. Say what you will about Musk or Zuckerberg

2:39:34.920 --> 2:39:38.220
<v Speaker 8>or Bezos. At least we know what kind of crepuscular

2:39:38.340 --> 2:39:39.460
<v Speaker 8>crotch goblins they are.

2:39:39.900 --> 2:39:42.959
<v Speaker 4>No, but the more effective guys are not making so

2:39:43.000 --> 2:39:43.940
<v Speaker 4>much fucking noise.

2:39:44.740 --> 2:39:48.170
<v Speaker 1>That is what scares me about him. Like, at that end,

2:39:48.200 --> 2:39:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the picture you shared.

2:39:49.510 --> 2:39:50.330
<v Speaker 4>Not a handsome man.

2:39:50.350 --> 2:39:50.410
<v Speaker 5>No.

2:39:51.370 --> 2:39:52.810
<v Speaker 1>Would not want to wake up to that.

2:39:53.350 --> 2:39:55.530
<v Speaker 4>Would not want to make nine children with that.

2:39:56.830 --> 2:39:58.730
<v Speaker 1>Well, we don't know if his wife had any say.

2:39:59.230 --> 2:40:00.029
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:40:00.330 --> 2:40:01.609
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, I guess if he's signing on to

2:40:01.660 --> 2:40:03.640
<v Speaker 4>do business with a woman who thinks rape should be legal.

2:40:03.660 --> 2:40:06.900
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Or, like, Russian genocide enjoyers.

2:40:07.180 --> 2:40:07.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

2:40:07.879 --> 2:40:09.120
<v Speaker 4>He's not huge on women's rights.

2:40:09.140 --> 2:40:09.340
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:40:09.879 --> 2:40:10.940
<v Speaker 1>Like, he's just.

2:40:11.500 --> 2:40:14.539
<v Speaker 8>Sort of a connection point or a nexus for like

2:40:14.620 --> 2:40:20.320
<v Speaker 8>Kremlin affiliates, European identitarian groups, the American Christian rights, and

2:40:20.340 --> 2:40:24.720
<v Speaker 8>like similar anti-rights groups with like these conferences that his

2:40:24.780 --> 2:40:26.750
<v Speaker 8>contacts also finance.

2:40:28.120 --> 2:40:30.010
<v Speaker 1>That's all I have on him because there's just not

2:40:30.070 --> 2:40:30.789
<v Speaker 1>much to find.

2:40:31.390 --> 2:40:33.110
<v Speaker 4>Well, now I'm curious. I'm going to keep looking.

2:40:34.070 --> 2:40:37.470
<v Speaker 1>Let me know if you find something. Okay. It is

2:40:37.510 --> 2:40:40.070
<v Speaker 1>always interesting to find these guys who are pulling the

2:40:40.090 --> 2:40:45.789
<v Speaker 1>strings and funding these giant hate campaigns, right? They very

2:40:45.850 --> 2:40:52.560
<v Speaker 1>successfully astroturf these as like ground level, especially like we

2:40:52.580 --> 2:40:55.420
<v Speaker 1>see this all over the world with anti-migrant shit, right? Like, oh,

2:40:55.459 --> 2:40:56.660
<v Speaker 1>the people are rising up.

2:40:56.840 --> 2:40:57.920
<v Speaker 4>There's 750,000 signatures on this petition.

2:40:57.940 --> 2:40:58.100
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:40:58.140 --> 2:40:58.379
<v Speaker 7>Right?

2:40:58.400 --> 2:40:58.699
<v Speaker 5>Slash names.

2:40:58.720 --> 2:41:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Like there are 750,000 marks on my piece of paper.

2:41:00.980 --> 2:41:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

2:41:05.160 --> 2:41:07.660
<v Speaker 1>But like the British far right does this all the time, right?

2:41:07.700 --> 2:41:10.619
<v Speaker 1>They're like, oh, Britain desperately wants to have an independence day,

2:41:10.959 --> 2:41:13.280
<v Speaker 1>which is largely overlooking the fact that people who have

2:41:13.330 --> 2:41:15.750
<v Speaker 1>independence days generally do so because Britain colonized them.

2:41:15.890 --> 2:41:17.470
<v Speaker 4>Because they're independent from Britain now.

2:41:17.610 --> 2:41:20.210
<v Speaker 1>From Britain, yeah. Who is Britain going to be independent from?

2:41:20.370 --> 2:41:23.850
<v Speaker 1>Like Brussels? Come on, fuck off. Like, yeah, the famously

2:41:23.910 --> 2:41:26.060
<v Speaker 1>belligerent colonization of the Belgians.

2:41:26.090 --> 2:41:28.100
<v Speaker 4>Oh, like they want their own 4th of July? That's

2:41:28.140 --> 2:41:28.660
<v Speaker 4>so cute.

2:41:28.680 --> 2:41:28.980
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, right.

2:41:29.000 --> 2:41:29.859
<v Speaker 1>That's cute.

2:41:30.459 --> 2:41:32.830
<v Speaker 4>Just do the king's birthday or whatever the fuck you

2:41:32.840 --> 2:41:33.500
<v Speaker 4>guys are into.

2:41:33.950 --> 2:41:35.770
<v Speaker 1>We have a day. We have a day on the

2:41:35.970 --> 2:41:39.410
<v Speaker 1>5th of November when we let off fireworks because, in

2:41:39.430 --> 2:41:41.370
<v Speaker 1>a very British way, it is a day that people

2:41:41.410 --> 2:41:42.900
<v Speaker 1>like to burn a Catholic in effigy.

2:41:42.920 --> 2:41:44.740
<v Speaker 4>I don't like that.

2:41:45.459 --> 2:41:49.380
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, it's actually not great. But like they have

2:41:49.540 --> 2:41:55.850
<v Speaker 1>very successfully astroturfed their hate as like a popular uprising.

2:41:55.950 --> 2:41:59.010
<v Speaker 1>And that is why they have been able to get

2:41:59.510 --> 2:42:01.580
<v Speaker 1>some electoral support for it.

2:42:01.990 --> 2:42:02.209
<v Speaker 7>Right.

2:42:02.290 --> 2:42:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Like I was literally skeeting, I believe is the correct verb.

2:42:07.220 --> 2:42:08.140
<v Speaker 4>I don't think we're saying that.

2:42:08.320 --> 2:42:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Are we not saying it?

2:42:09.220 --> 2:42:09.420
<v Speaker 7>Okay.

2:42:09.480 --> 2:42:13.310
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Posting. I was posting. Let's use a generic term.

2:42:13.870 --> 2:42:16.350
<v Speaker 1>I was posting today a poll of British people who

2:42:16.370 --> 2:42:18.490
<v Speaker 1>think London has a poll of people, I should say,

2:42:18.510 --> 2:42:22.150
<v Speaker 1>who think London has no go areas. It's fucking ludicrous.

2:42:22.190 --> 2:42:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Like of big cities, London is like super safe. I

2:42:27.180 --> 2:42:30.240
<v Speaker 1>have gone all over London, like walking or on my bicycle.

2:42:30.680 --> 2:42:32.120
<v Speaker 4>And so that's that thing where white people think that

2:42:32.160 --> 2:42:34.540
<v Speaker 4>there are some neighborhoods that like they'll be murdered by

2:42:34.600 --> 2:42:35.619
<v Speaker 4>immigrants if they go there.

2:42:35.640 --> 2:42:35.720
<v Speaker 14>Yeah.

2:42:36.400 --> 2:42:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, the construct that exists in the right

2:42:38.920 --> 2:42:40.760
<v Speaker 1>wing mind is that like there are areas that are

2:42:40.780 --> 2:42:43.380
<v Speaker 1>like under Sharia law in so much as that is

2:42:43.459 --> 2:42:43.980
<v Speaker 1>a thing.

2:42:44.060 --> 2:42:46.120
<v Speaker 4>The whole neighborhoods of London under Sharia law.

2:42:46.160 --> 2:42:46.459
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:42:46.640 --> 2:42:48.240
<v Speaker 4>Going by the Ayatollah even probably.

2:42:48.260 --> 2:42:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. The IRGC in the form of the Quds

2:42:51.120 --> 2:42:53.900
<v Speaker 1>Force is patrolling. They're such babies.

2:42:53.940 --> 2:42:55.000
<v Speaker 4>They're such babies.

2:42:55.220 --> 2:42:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like this is being scared of anything that isn't.

2:42:57.840 --> 2:43:00.120
<v Speaker 4>Like a woman in a hijab looked at you and

2:43:00.160 --> 2:43:01.860
<v Speaker 4>you thought you were going to get beheaded by ISIS.

2:43:01.890 --> 2:43:02.470
<v Speaker 4>Like grow up.

2:43:03.270 --> 2:43:06.330
<v Speaker 1>Yeah like also if you're really worried about isis you

2:43:06.350 --> 2:43:08.410
<v Speaker 1>know you could have gone to fight with the yep

2:43:08.430 --> 2:43:10.610
<v Speaker 1>it gave more than a decade but you.

2:43:10.570 --> 2:43:13.009
<v Speaker 8>Didn't i've been to london and i've had a very

2:43:13.190 --> 2:43:18.110
<v Speaker 8>pleasant cigarette smoke with a homeless person and never felt threatened.

2:43:18.450 --> 2:43:21.150
<v Speaker 1>Yeah london's like i've walked all around london i've uh

2:43:21.270 --> 2:43:24.160
<v Speaker 1>literally just wandered into mosques in london because like i

2:43:24.190 --> 2:43:27.119
<v Speaker 1>come from a very small village right i mean have

2:43:27.360 --> 2:43:30.140
<v Speaker 1>a mosque in my tiny village and uh i've been

2:43:30.160 --> 2:43:31.420
<v Speaker 1>to some mosques and i like them so i want

2:43:31.440 --> 2:43:34.540
<v Speaker 1>to check out other ones like not a fucking problem

2:43:34.600 --> 2:43:35.820
<v Speaker 1>people will be nice to you.

2:43:36.040 --> 2:43:38.420
<v Speaker 4>I mean i think it's projection right like they want

2:43:38.480 --> 2:43:40.780
<v Speaker 4>to hurt these people so they assume that those people

2:43:40.820 --> 2:43:41.779
<v Speaker 4>want to hurt them.

2:43:41.920 --> 2:43:43.710
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yes i think that's probably a fair it's that

2:43:43.790 --> 2:43:44.370
<v Speaker 1>it's that what is.

2:43:44.350 --> 2:43:46.050
<v Speaker 4>That thomas jefferson thing you know we have the wolf

2:43:46.090 --> 2:43:48.390
<v Speaker 4>by the ear we can't let him go if we

2:43:48.430 --> 2:43:50.390
<v Speaker 4>let the immigrants have rights they'll do to us what

2:43:50.430 --> 2:43:53.570
<v Speaker 4>we've done to them yeah well yeah like jefferson was

2:43:53.590 --> 2:43:56.010
<v Speaker 4>saying that about the slaves but yes the principle.

2:43:55.740 --> 2:43:58.289
<v Speaker 1>Holds If you live your whole life by the clash

2:43:58.330 --> 2:44:03.090
<v Speaker 1>of civilizations narrative, then it's impossible to understand the world

2:44:03.129 --> 2:44:05.250
<v Speaker 1>in any other way, right? Because you see yourself as

2:44:05.310 --> 2:44:07.609
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally opposed to people who are different from you.

2:44:08.110 --> 2:44:09.890
<v Speaker 4>But not everyone sucks as bad as you do.

2:44:10.250 --> 2:44:13.810
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. In fact, most people are not pieces of shit.

2:44:14.310 --> 2:44:15.830
<v Speaker 1>Maybe if we're looking to kick some people out, we

2:44:15.850 --> 2:44:17.950
<v Speaker 1>could start with the fucking names on the petition. That

2:44:17.970 --> 2:44:18.810
<v Speaker 1>would be a good start.

2:44:19.590 --> 2:44:20.850
<v Speaker 4>The ones of them who are even real.

2:44:21.010 --> 2:44:23.189
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean, I don't think the state should be...

2:44:24.010 --> 2:44:25.670
<v Speaker 1>Telling anyone from their family, to be clear, I don't

2:44:25.690 --> 2:44:27.539
<v Speaker 1>think it's funny when someone gets deported. I don't care

2:44:27.560 --> 2:44:30.320
<v Speaker 1>if they're a bad person. I find the laughing about

2:44:30.340 --> 2:44:33.720
<v Speaker 1>people who don't like being deported deeply frustrating, actually, because

2:44:33.780 --> 2:44:37.980
<v Speaker 1>we should abolish ICE and DHS and the whole deportation machine.

2:44:39.180 --> 2:44:42.400
<v Speaker 1>And Europe while we're at it. Yeah, sure.

2:44:42.600 --> 2:44:44.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, in the grand scheme of history, most of

2:44:44.360 --> 2:44:46.700
<v Speaker 4>those countries are just a blip on the radar. Just

2:44:46.760 --> 2:44:47.589
<v Speaker 4>abolish Germany.

2:44:49.920 --> 2:44:52.490
<v Speaker 8>I could support that. But I do want to piggyback

2:44:52.530 --> 2:44:55.630
<v Speaker 8>a little bit on what you just said about the astroturfing, James,

2:44:56.070 --> 2:45:00.490
<v Speaker 8>because the last bit of my script regards the discourse

2:45:00.550 --> 2:45:03.350
<v Speaker 8>and violence that has happened in the Netherlands in the

2:45:03.410 --> 2:45:08.629
<v Speaker 8>past few months, like downright terrorist attacks. But a lot

2:45:08.670 --> 2:45:13.230
<v Speaker 8>of these local anti-immigrant protests, at least in the Netherlands,

2:45:13.830 --> 2:45:17.010
<v Speaker 8>a core part is the defense groups that the three

2:45:17.050 --> 2:45:20.420
<v Speaker 8>of us spoke about. They just go to small municipalities,

2:45:20.920 --> 2:45:25.740
<v Speaker 8>stir shit up and make this whole anti-immigration sentiment seem

2:45:25.820 --> 2:45:31.020
<v Speaker 8>so much bigger than it actually is. It's people taking

2:45:31.060 --> 2:45:33.080
<v Speaker 8>a day off of work to go protest in some

2:45:33.360 --> 2:45:37.459
<v Speaker 8>municipality that they don't live in and do violence and

2:45:37.480 --> 2:45:39.839
<v Speaker 8>then claim like, oh, look at all these violent immigrants.

2:45:40.459 --> 2:45:43.940
<v Speaker 8>Don't look at me throwing heavy fireworks at people, which

2:45:44.000 --> 2:45:47.230
<v Speaker 8>is a thing. I've had fireworks thrown at me. By

2:45:47.250 --> 2:45:48.490
<v Speaker 8>those people, it's not fun.

2:45:48.790 --> 2:45:51.949
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. It's preferable to being shot, I suppose, but.

2:45:52.170 --> 2:45:52.490
<v Speaker 5>You know.

2:45:53.090 --> 2:45:53.789
<v Speaker 4>That's a low bar.

2:45:53.810 --> 2:45:56.150
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's still deeply unenjoyable.

2:45:56.830 --> 2:45:57.010
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

2:45:57.570 --> 2:46:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Also, like, our communities are so intertwined, even more so

2:46:02.020 --> 2:46:04.720
<v Speaker 1>than the US, right? Like, we don't have, in much

2:46:04.780 --> 2:46:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of Europe, this long history of redlining and using capitalism

2:46:10.580 --> 2:46:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to do racial segregation. To an extent, we still have, like,

2:46:14.480 --> 2:46:17.910
<v Speaker 1>neighbourhoods where people will want to live around services that

2:46:17.930 --> 2:46:19.390
<v Speaker 1>they like to access, right? If you like to go

2:46:19.450 --> 2:46:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to the mosque, it makes sense to live relatively near

2:46:21.540 --> 2:46:25.220
<v Speaker 1>to the mosque. If you want to go to the Gurdwara,

2:46:25.260 --> 2:46:28.820
<v Speaker 1>same thing, right? But, like, the idea that you could

2:46:28.879 --> 2:46:32.390
<v Speaker 1>tear these communities apart is just so fucking... Like, it's

2:46:32.570 --> 2:46:36.330
<v Speaker 1>complete pie-in-the-sky shit from people whose, like, entire politics is

2:46:36.370 --> 2:46:39.589
<v Speaker 1>informed by the internet and watching what's happening in America.

2:46:40.270 --> 2:46:45.100
<v Speaker 1>You could no more, like, tear immigrants... from European cities

2:46:45.200 --> 2:46:48.119
<v Speaker 1>and have them function, then you could be like, all right,

2:46:48.160 --> 2:46:50.940
<v Speaker 1>we're doing away with everyone who was born on an

2:46:51.040 --> 2:46:54.910
<v Speaker 1>even-numbered day. Our fucking society doesn't function without each other.

2:46:55.770 --> 2:46:58.350
<v Speaker 4>And again, you just fall into this trap of how

2:46:58.390 --> 2:47:01.010
<v Speaker 4>are we defining this? Who are you talking about exactly?

2:47:01.090 --> 2:47:02.449
<v Speaker 4>How far back are you going?

2:47:02.650 --> 2:47:05.230
<v Speaker 1>Who counts? Yeah, I mean, it seems like what they

2:47:05.250 --> 2:47:08.209
<v Speaker 1>want is like the apartheid thing, right? Which even apartheid

2:47:08.230 --> 2:47:10.660
<v Speaker 1>got into its own questions of how do we define...

2:47:10.260 --> 2:47:11.010
<v Speaker 1>People's race.

2:47:11.010 --> 2:47:14.459
<v Speaker 4>It became very messy and the government was deciding people's

2:47:14.459 --> 2:47:16.379
<v Speaker 4>race with you know without their input and it was

2:47:16.700 --> 2:47:18.280
<v Speaker 4>it was not a great situation.

2:47:18.420 --> 2:47:21.780
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah but like the uh the idea that our

2:47:21.820 --> 2:47:26.940
<v Speaker 1>society could function without people who aren't white or even

2:47:26.990 --> 2:47:29.370
<v Speaker 1>people who have arrived in one or two generations ago

2:47:29.450 --> 2:47:32.990
<v Speaker 1>it's just pure and ridiculous like these people fucking suck

2:47:33.050 --> 2:47:35.890
<v Speaker 1>i don't know like things like unserious people.

2:47:36.240 --> 2:47:38.789
<v Speaker 8>On a previous job of mine, I met this woman

2:47:38.830 --> 2:47:41.129
<v Speaker 8>from Afghanistan and she was allowed to move to the

2:47:41.170 --> 2:47:44.690
<v Speaker 8>Netherlands because she worked, I think, for like NATO or

2:47:44.790 --> 2:47:48.650
<v Speaker 8>an NGO. Because we all were also involved in Afghanistan,

2:47:48.709 --> 2:47:52.840
<v Speaker 8>of course. And she was so incredibly pleasant to work with.

2:47:53.540 --> 2:47:55.920
<v Speaker 8>All Dutch people speak English pretty much as a rule.

2:47:56.420 --> 2:47:58.920
<v Speaker 8>So if someone doesn't speak Dutch very well, we tend

2:47:58.940 --> 2:48:02.050
<v Speaker 8>to like immediately turn to English. And she was very

2:48:02.090 --> 2:48:05.010
<v Speaker 8>much like, Please talk Dutch to me. I want to

2:48:05.050 --> 2:48:06.470
<v Speaker 8>work here in a different job.

2:48:06.670 --> 2:48:09.070
<v Speaker 4>That's so brave of her to want to learn Dutch.

2:48:09.310 --> 2:48:13.650
<v Speaker 1>Yes. I tried to discourage her. It did not work.

2:48:14.709 --> 2:48:15.570
<v Speaker 1>Garbage language.

2:48:16.629 --> 2:48:20.789
<v Speaker 8>I'd rather have a hundred of her than whatever pathetic

2:48:21.290 --> 2:48:27.300
<v Speaker 8>defense groups or whatever racist shit. Because she's actually contributing

2:48:27.379 --> 2:48:30.240
<v Speaker 8>and trying her very best. And these people are just

2:48:30.280 --> 2:48:35.349
<v Speaker 8>out there, you know, stirring shit up the fascists but

2:48:35.790 --> 2:48:38.910
<v Speaker 8>much respect to that particular woman she won't hear this

2:48:38.970 --> 2:48:40.610
<v Speaker 8>but beside the point.

2:48:40.709 --> 2:48:42.770
<v Speaker 4>No but there are hundreds of thousands of people just

2:48:42.810 --> 2:48:44.360
<v Speaker 4>like her right contributing to their.

2:48:44.270 --> 2:48:47.940
<v Speaker 2>Communities yeah exactly yeah that was it was very valuable

2:48:48.080 --> 2:48:50.340
<v Speaker 2>work at the time uh what we did what we

2:48:50.379 --> 2:48:53.160
<v Speaker 2>did like it was necessary it was necessary.

2:48:53.100 --> 2:48:54.420
<v Speaker 4>Even if the work that she was doing was not

2:48:54.920 --> 2:48:57.180
<v Speaker 4>valuable to humanity on a broader scale like there are

2:48:57.300 --> 2:49:00.360
<v Speaker 4>hundreds of thousands of people like that woman who've gone

2:49:00.400 --> 2:49:02.820
<v Speaker 4>to a place where they were not born and contributed

2:49:02.860 --> 2:49:05.670
<v Speaker 4>to a community and that's just not part of the

2:49:05.709 --> 2:49:07.830
<v Speaker 4>conversation for these people because they don't care because they

2:49:07.850 --> 2:49:10.770
<v Speaker 4>don't see people like her as human beings.

2:49:10.910 --> 2:49:13.209
<v Speaker 1>Yeah and also because they're not part of their communities

2:49:13.290 --> 2:49:16.160
<v Speaker 1>right because they're odious pieces of shit like all their

2:49:16.180 --> 2:49:19.449
<v Speaker 1>friends are on storm front or what have you Because

2:49:19.530 --> 2:49:21.840
<v Speaker 1>no one wants to be around hateful bigots like this.

2:49:21.900 --> 2:49:24.960
<v Speaker 4>No, they're in a Twitter space going, yes, exactly, to

2:49:25.000 --> 2:49:25.400
<v Speaker 4>each other.

2:49:25.420 --> 2:49:25.500
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:49:25.920 --> 2:49:27.760
<v Speaker 4>But they don't have real world community.

2:49:28.260 --> 2:49:31.120
<v Speaker 1>This perspective doesn't survive contact with the outside world.

2:49:31.410 --> 2:49:33.630
<v Speaker 4>No, but they're trying to force it on all of

2:49:33.709 --> 2:49:38.110
<v Speaker 4>us through bullshit like this, by shoehorning this discourse into

2:49:38.150 --> 2:49:41.230
<v Speaker 4>respectable places and hoping some of that respectability rubs off

2:49:41.330 --> 2:49:41.520
<v Speaker 4>on it.

2:49:42.290 --> 2:49:44.660
<v Speaker 1>You're so succinct, Molly. I'm jealous.

2:49:55.900 --> 2:49:59.280
<v Speaker 8>To get back to the last bit, because ultimately the

2:49:59.300 --> 2:50:01.760
<v Speaker 8>entirety of the Save Europe Act is exactly what you

2:50:01.800 --> 2:50:06.000
<v Speaker 8>just said. It's shoehorning it in, making it normal to

2:50:06.050 --> 2:50:11.450
<v Speaker 8>have seemingly civil conversations around something that is, no matter

2:50:11.510 --> 2:50:15.129
<v Speaker 8>which way you turn a phrase, it's inherently violent in

2:50:15.190 --> 2:50:20.670
<v Speaker 8>multiple ways. To people who don't deserve it and have

2:50:20.709 --> 2:50:24.410
<v Speaker 8>done nothing but trying to exist in a different place.

2:50:24.970 --> 2:50:27.010
<v Speaker 4>No, but if they can make us all have this

2:50:27.090 --> 2:50:32.490
<v Speaker 4>conversation in our respectable avenues of civil discourse, then it

2:50:32.530 --> 2:50:34.810
<v Speaker 4>becomes a normal thing that we have to talk about.

2:50:34.830 --> 2:50:36.410
<v Speaker 4>And if we have to talk about it, maybe more

2:50:36.470 --> 2:50:39.609
<v Speaker 4>people will be convinced by it. Whereas if you relegate

2:50:39.629 --> 2:50:42.610
<v Speaker 4>this shit to Stormfront, where it belongs, normal people aren't

2:50:42.709 --> 2:50:45.110
<v Speaker 4>coming into contact with it and becoming convinced by it

2:50:45.410 --> 2:50:47.630
<v Speaker 4>or tricked into it or mainstreaming it.

2:50:47.750 --> 2:50:47.910
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:50:48.890 --> 2:50:54.050
<v Speaker 8>On October 7th, 2004, Ava tweeted the following. So cool,

2:50:54.090 --> 2:50:57.109
<v Speaker 8>this timeline of the main accounts pushing the remigration debate

2:50:57.170 --> 2:50:59.769
<v Speaker 8>on Axe this year. Proud to be on the list

2:50:59.790 --> 2:51:04.970
<v Speaker 8>with Alternative for Deutschland, Martin Selner, Elon Musk, Renaud Camus

2:51:05.070 --> 2:51:08.480
<v Speaker 8>and Donald Trump. Together, we're pushing the Overton window in

2:51:08.540 --> 2:51:09.080
<v Speaker 8>real time.

2:51:09.420 --> 2:51:11.129
<v Speaker 1>So she knows what she's doing.

2:51:11.150 --> 2:51:12.050
<v Speaker 8>A hundred percent.

2:51:12.190 --> 2:51:15.170
<v Speaker 4>Not only does she know, she said it. She knows

2:51:15.209 --> 2:51:16.910
<v Speaker 4>what she's doing, but she's not smart enough to know

2:51:16.950 --> 2:51:18.130
<v Speaker 4>she shouldn't tell you she knows.

2:51:19.470 --> 2:51:19.629
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:51:20.110 --> 2:51:22.879
<v Speaker 4>You're not supposed to say, I know all I'm doing

2:51:22.920 --> 2:51:25.500
<v Speaker 4>is pushing the Overton window. I'm here to throw a

2:51:25.540 --> 2:51:27.220
<v Speaker 4>brick through the Overton fucking window.

2:51:27.240 --> 2:51:30.220
<v Speaker 1>Girl, shut up. My job is to push you all

2:51:30.240 --> 2:51:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to the right.

2:51:31.379 --> 2:51:34.080
<v Speaker 4>My job is to defenestrate you through the Overton window.

2:51:34.100 --> 2:51:34.180
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:51:36.550 --> 2:51:39.610
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would say that talking about the Overton window, right,

2:51:39.629 --> 2:51:41.070
<v Speaker 1>and talking about this being a list on Twitter is

2:51:41.110 --> 2:51:44.029
<v Speaker 1>a perfect illustration of how the alienation that people feel

2:51:44.129 --> 2:51:46.950
<v Speaker 1>under capitalism has made them so vulnerable to this shit.

2:51:47.590 --> 2:51:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Because I understand that it is fucking hard for people

2:51:50.959 --> 2:51:54.020
<v Speaker 1>in Europe as it is here, right? Existing as a

2:51:54.100 --> 2:51:57.300
<v Speaker 1>working person is fucking hard. Paying your bills is hard.

2:51:57.640 --> 2:52:01.170
<v Speaker 1>It's not getting any easier, especially now that petrol slash

2:52:01.200 --> 2:52:05.940
<v Speaker 1>gas is even more expensive. But like, Because people are

2:52:05.980 --> 2:52:10.060
<v Speaker 1>increasingly alienated, it's easier and easier to do this scapegoating bullshit.

2:52:10.760 --> 2:52:13.300
<v Speaker 1>It just happens that we've found someone who's stupid enough

2:52:13.320 --> 2:52:16.939
<v Speaker 1>to basically say that. But that is the basis of

2:52:17.000 --> 2:52:20.310
<v Speaker 1>the entire right around the world right now, is blaming

2:52:20.340 --> 2:52:22.890
<v Speaker 1>the things that capitalism has done to us on people

2:52:22.930 --> 2:52:25.090
<v Speaker 1>who have suffered more under capitalism than anyone.

2:52:25.410 --> 2:52:29.090
<v Speaker 4>And Elon Musk's ownership of Twitter has made spreading that

2:52:29.170 --> 2:52:33.080
<v Speaker 4>message so much easier than it would have been otherwise.

2:52:33.600 --> 2:52:37.760
<v Speaker 4>But he's like, he's algorithmically boosting and disseminating this at

2:52:37.940 --> 2:52:39.700
<v Speaker 4>a scale that's previously unheard of.

2:52:40.070 --> 2:52:40.279
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:52:40.440 --> 2:52:41.830
<v Speaker 4>For these kinds of ideas.

2:52:42.470 --> 2:52:45.970
<v Speaker 1>Especially when you've got so many journalists on Twitter so much.

2:52:46.410 --> 2:52:48.670
<v Speaker 1>Like that's where they get a sense of the debate. Yeah.

2:52:49.070 --> 2:52:52.130
<v Speaker 4>There yeah and because these journalists are so used to

2:52:52.190 --> 2:52:54.690
<v Speaker 4>pulling their stories from just like shit they saw on

2:52:54.730 --> 2:52:57.230
<v Speaker 4>twitter yeah that they think these ideas must be very

2:52:57.270 --> 2:53:00.000
<v Speaker 4>popular we must engage with them we must write a

2:53:00.160 --> 2:53:03.160
<v Speaker 4>million fucking stories about these posts we saw on twitter

2:53:03.500 --> 2:53:07.379
<v Speaker 4>because they obviously represent a very important discourse for society

2:53:07.420 --> 2:53:10.240
<v Speaker 4>right now and they don't they don't stop doing it.

2:53:10.760 --> 2:53:14.359
<v Speaker 8>Yeah Speaking of journalists, please follow me on Blue Sky

2:53:14.540 --> 2:53:21.000
<v Speaker 8>at Two Sober Possums if you want to criticize my poor.

2:53:20.800 --> 2:53:21.940
<v Speaker 1>Attempt at journalism.

2:53:22.420 --> 2:53:24.390
<v Speaker 8>But yeah, I wanted to take this last bit to

2:53:24.410 --> 2:53:28.470
<v Speaker 8>highlight some instances of political violence in the Netherlands. All

2:53:28.490 --> 2:53:33.129
<v Speaker 8>of these incidents happened between late April and now, this year.

2:53:33.350 --> 2:53:33.830
<v Speaker 1>Oh my God.

2:53:34.530 --> 2:53:37.570
<v Speaker 8>I'm not attributing it to the Safe Europe Act because

2:53:38.330 --> 2:53:41.820
<v Speaker 8>the discourse has been toxic for a while now. But

2:53:42.140 --> 2:53:45.440
<v Speaker 8>I also can say that it has a non-zero effect

2:53:45.980 --> 2:53:49.340
<v Speaker 8>because maybe I've had my head in the sand for years,

2:53:49.910 --> 2:53:53.490
<v Speaker 8>but this level of violence is pretty unheard of here.

2:53:53.930 --> 2:53:55.550
<v Speaker 4>And it's all part of the same sort of ambient

2:53:56.110 --> 2:53:59.010
<v Speaker 4>raising of the temperature on this topic. And they know

2:53:59.030 --> 2:54:01.010
<v Speaker 4>they're contributing to that. So, of course, you can't say

2:54:01.050 --> 2:54:04.470
<v Speaker 4>they're directly responsible for these attacks. They're not directing them,

2:54:05.070 --> 2:54:07.289
<v Speaker 4>but they're raising the temperature and they know this contributes

2:54:07.330 --> 2:54:09.940
<v Speaker 4>to that. Especially, I don't know, a guy who received

2:54:09.980 --> 2:54:13.000
<v Speaker 4>a large sum of money from Brenton Tarrant shortly before

2:54:13.060 --> 2:54:15.660
<v Speaker 4>he murdered 51 people in two mosques in New Zealand.

2:54:15.800 --> 2:54:17.359
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. Maybe they know what they're doing.

2:54:17.379 --> 2:54:19.430
<v Speaker 1>Anyway. Okay.

2:54:19.930 --> 2:54:22.690
<v Speaker 8>I'm not going too deeply into these instances because then

2:54:22.750 --> 2:54:25.750
<v Speaker 8>we'd have, like, we'll add another hour or two to

2:54:25.850 --> 2:54:28.449
<v Speaker 8>this already long recording session.

2:54:28.570 --> 2:54:28.869
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:54:29.270 --> 2:54:32.340
<v Speaker 8>I'm also sorry for all the Dutch words because our

2:54:32.379 --> 2:54:34.240
<v Speaker 8>towns are not named in English words.

2:54:34.860 --> 2:54:35.020
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

2:54:35.500 --> 2:54:39.490
<v Speaker 8>So, the town of Loosdrecht. There was going to be

2:54:39.790 --> 2:54:44.709
<v Speaker 8>a migrant center there. Severe destruction at the old municipal building,

2:54:44.990 --> 2:54:48.450
<v Speaker 8>which was used to house them. Doors and windows destroyed

2:54:49.010 --> 2:54:52.390
<v Speaker 8>near the end of April. In early May, also in Loosdrecht,

2:54:52.550 --> 2:54:55.430
<v Speaker 8>the same building caught on fire due to torches and

2:54:55.480 --> 2:54:57.260
<v Speaker 8>heavy fireworks being thrown at it.

2:54:57.900 --> 2:54:58.379
<v Speaker 6>Jesus.

2:54:58.440 --> 2:55:02.699
<v Speaker 1>Migrants were inside this building when it caught on fire.

2:55:02.980 --> 2:55:03.119
<v Speaker 7>Fuck.

2:55:03.860 --> 2:55:07.390
<v Speaker 1>To my knowledge the harm to people was minimal or

2:55:07.430 --> 2:55:11.690
<v Speaker 1>non-existent but still they threw fireworks and torches to the

2:55:11.750 --> 2:55:16.490
<v Speaker 1>point that this building caught on fire yeah the psychological damage.

2:55:16.190 --> 2:55:19.220
<v Speaker 8>Is still very real yeah okay this is my personal

2:55:19.250 --> 2:55:23.459
<v Speaker 8>little tangent but our prime minister has not called these

2:55:23.540 --> 2:55:28.140
<v Speaker 8>things terrorism well by any definition of the word this

2:55:28.200 --> 2:55:31.920
<v Speaker 8>is fucking terrorism yeah like this is political violence and

2:55:32.320 --> 2:55:34.910
<v Speaker 8>used to either scare people away or scare people into

2:55:34.940 --> 2:55:37.770
<v Speaker 8>submission and bypassing the democratic.

2:55:37.370 --> 2:55:39.270
<v Speaker 1>Process in the meantime.

2:55:39.690 --> 2:55:43.109
<v Speaker 8>So also in early May in the town of Engelen,

2:55:43.930 --> 2:55:48.129
<v Speaker 8>an explosion caused by heavy fireworks destroyed mainly glass windows

2:55:48.310 --> 2:55:52.820
<v Speaker 8>at a center for underage migrants. Further, houses and carts

2:55:53.040 --> 2:55:58.480
<v Speaker 8>of either pro-migration citizens, note not activists, just citizens with

2:55:58.500 --> 2:56:02.390
<v Speaker 8>an opinion, were vandalized with slurs and threats. One of

2:56:02.430 --> 2:56:06.230
<v Speaker 8>the cars was stolen and driven into a body of water. Again,

2:56:06.510 --> 2:56:10.470
<v Speaker 8>this was minor vandalism. Not minor, this was vandalism.

2:56:10.570 --> 2:56:12.270
<v Speaker 1>According to our PM.

2:56:12.820 --> 2:56:15.420
<v Speaker 8>Among the targets were people who were not even explicitly

2:56:15.480 --> 2:56:18.860
<v Speaker 8>in favor of having this center, but simply stated that

2:56:18.879 --> 2:56:21.460
<v Speaker 8>they had the desire to have a good faith debate

2:56:21.500 --> 2:56:28.379
<v Speaker 8>and conversation around it, which is reasonable. May 13th, Loosdrecht again. Again,

2:56:28.459 --> 2:56:31.619
<v Speaker 8>torches and fireworks everywhere. the fire department had to come

2:56:31.680 --> 2:56:35.350
<v Speaker 8>in at that time. Also May 13th in another town

2:56:35.410 --> 2:56:40.810
<v Speaker 8>called Appeldoorn, riots for five consecutive days, including abuse of

2:56:40.890 --> 2:56:44.820
<v Speaker 8>police and security. Later in May, fireworks were thrown through

2:56:44.840 --> 2:56:47.240
<v Speaker 8>the windows of the municipal building and theater in the

2:56:47.280 --> 2:56:51.560
<v Speaker 8>town of IJsselstein, the town of Uithjeist at roughly the

2:56:51.600 --> 2:56:55.750
<v Speaker 8>same time. A explosive constructed out of fireworks was thrown

2:56:56.100 --> 2:57:00.040
<v Speaker 8>through the window during a municipal meeting. And this was

2:57:00.120 --> 2:57:03.550
<v Speaker 8>part of a larger set of violent incidents, again, mainly

2:57:03.570 --> 2:57:08.750
<v Speaker 8>involving like torches and fireworks. June 18th, a pipe bomb

2:57:08.950 --> 2:57:12.220
<v Speaker 8>was found at a migrant center in nunen the explosive

2:57:12.340 --> 2:57:14.300
<v Speaker 8>ordnance unit had to cut had to be a cold

2:57:14.340 --> 2:57:17.080
<v Speaker 8>in in order to clean it up windows were broken

2:57:17.120 --> 2:57:20.580
<v Speaker 8>and a small fire broke out this was the third

2:57:20.620 --> 2:57:24.850
<v Speaker 8>instance of destruction at this particular building not great I've

2:57:24.900 --> 2:57:28.640
<v Speaker 8>witnessed some of these people protesting, and I'm using the

2:57:28.900 --> 2:57:33.940
<v Speaker 8>heaviest air quotes possible there. It's just fucking hooligans wanting

2:57:33.959 --> 2:57:38.240
<v Speaker 8>to riot. Racist fucking hooligans as well. The Save Europe

2:57:38.300 --> 2:57:40.960
<v Speaker 8>Act is not explicitly calling for this.

2:57:41.580 --> 2:57:42.260
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't have to.

2:57:42.320 --> 2:57:43.100
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't have to.

2:57:43.300 --> 2:57:45.800
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't have to, and they know that.

2:57:45.879 --> 2:57:47.240
<v Speaker 1>It's laying the groundwork.

2:57:47.260 --> 2:57:50.220
<v Speaker 4>They know it's more effective for them to just raise

2:57:50.260 --> 2:57:52.940
<v Speaker 4>the temperature and put the implication out there.

2:57:53.720 --> 2:57:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then wave their hands in the air and say, oh,

2:57:56.660 --> 2:57:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how this happened.

2:57:58.780 --> 2:58:01.039
<v Speaker 4>I didn't say that. I never said they should do that.

2:58:01.440 --> 2:58:04.400
<v Speaker 1>But you know. No, you didn't give these people a

2:58:04.459 --> 2:58:05.599
<v Speaker 1>baby kicking class.

2:58:05.680 --> 2:58:08.720
<v Speaker 4>There's no proof Hitler called for the industrialized mass murder

2:58:08.760 --> 2:58:11.759
<v Speaker 4>of the Jews. There's no proof that Hitler explicitly directed

2:58:11.800 --> 2:58:13.860
<v Speaker 4>for the Holocaust to happen, is there? But he's still

2:58:13.900 --> 2:58:14.830
<v Speaker 4>responsible for it.

2:58:15.200 --> 2:58:17.980
<v Speaker 1>That's what they're going for, right? They're going for like

2:58:18.740 --> 2:58:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a structuralist approach. To mass violence against migrants, like creating

2:58:24.379 --> 2:58:26.100
<v Speaker 1>a structure where it takes care of itself.

2:58:26.160 --> 2:58:29.000
<v Speaker 4>You create the conditions where it becomes inevitable.

2:58:29.370 --> 2:58:31.810
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And then you deny responsibility.

2:58:32.050 --> 2:58:34.449
<v Speaker 8>You're not giving them the baby kicking class, but you're

2:58:34.490 --> 2:58:37.450
<v Speaker 8>giving them a bunch of babies and pointing them towards

2:58:37.510 --> 2:58:40.310
<v Speaker 8>the building where they teach the baby kicking class.

2:58:40.980 --> 2:58:44.039
<v Speaker 4>Again, there's a reason it matters so much that he

2:58:44.080 --> 2:58:46.860
<v Speaker 4>was emailing back and forth with Brent and Tarrant because

2:58:46.879 --> 2:58:49.800
<v Speaker 4>they have the exact same ideas about what the problem is.

2:58:50.440 --> 2:58:54.810
<v Speaker 4>They are just personally going about different versions of the solution.

2:58:54.830 --> 2:58:55.590
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:58:56.470 --> 2:59:00.310
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, that was the most horrifying thing about it. And also,

2:59:00.730 --> 2:59:02.870
<v Speaker 8>I'm so disappointed in so much media here in the

2:59:02.910 --> 2:59:06.590
<v Speaker 8>Netherlands that any time they even mention Martin Sellner, the

2:59:06.690 --> 2:59:08.740
<v Speaker 8>best they can do is that he received that donation.

2:59:09.250 --> 2:59:12.760
<v Speaker 8>But nothing about, oh, he destroyed evidence of his contact

2:59:12.800 --> 2:59:16.010
<v Speaker 8>with him. He possibly would have met him. they agreed

2:59:16.110 --> 2:59:19.230
<v Speaker 8>on stuff while tarrant was radical enough to plan and

2:59:19.310 --> 2:59:23.550
<v Speaker 8>it's like a fucking massacre it's lazy journalism yeah like

2:59:23.770 --> 2:59:25.970
<v Speaker 8>i'm sure i make plenty mistakes but i'm also not

2:59:26.150 --> 2:59:28.060
<v Speaker 8>making my living out of it or claiming that i'm

2:59:28.250 --> 2:59:32.080
<v Speaker 8>super great at it but yeah you you could at

2:59:32.120 --> 2:59:36.060
<v Speaker 8>least pretend you're going beyond something as surface level as

2:59:37.000 --> 2:59:40.359
<v Speaker 8>oh he made a donation okay fair that's it It's like, no,

2:59:40.379 --> 2:59:44.310
<v Speaker 8>these guys were ideologically aligned enough to possibly meet.

2:59:44.760 --> 2:59:48.070
<v Speaker 4>And that is a very explicit and obvious connection, right?

2:59:48.110 --> 2:59:51.410
<v Speaker 4>But all these other attacks and these people being burned

2:59:51.450 --> 2:59:56.410
<v Speaker 4>in buildings, that's the same relationship, just without the exchange

2:59:56.450 --> 2:59:56.789
<v Speaker 4>of money.

2:59:57.209 --> 3:00:00.590
<v Speaker 8>You can only tell people that some people will finally

3:00:00.629 --> 3:00:04.450
<v Speaker 8>come to kill them unless they come into action, which

3:00:04.530 --> 3:00:07.890
<v Speaker 8>is not a legal thing. Not provable in the court

3:00:07.930 --> 3:00:10.010
<v Speaker 8>of law inciting people to do violence.

3:00:10.470 --> 3:00:13.590
<v Speaker 4>And I'm not arguing legal liability. I'm not arguing legal liability.

3:00:13.610 --> 3:00:17.370
<v Speaker 4>I'm just saying there is a moral and ideological culpability here.

3:00:17.410 --> 3:00:21.390
<v Speaker 4>That there is a visible relationship between these things that

3:00:21.430 --> 3:00:25.010
<v Speaker 4>exists outside the framework of legal culpability, legal liability here.

3:00:25.030 --> 3:00:28.830
<v Speaker 4>But there is a relationship between these events. And they

3:00:28.920 --> 3:00:31.129
<v Speaker 4>know that. And we need to be honest about it.

3:00:31.260 --> 3:00:35.100
<v Speaker 1>It's a moral culpability. I hate the facade.

3:00:35.530 --> 3:00:37.930
<v Speaker 8>That they put up like oh this is all anti-democratic

3:00:37.950 --> 3:00:40.970
<v Speaker 8>that they cancelled it and uh they're just out for

3:00:41.010 --> 3:00:44.400
<v Speaker 8>us like i i hate that i even have to

3:00:44.560 --> 3:00:46.330
<v Speaker 8>sort of engage on their terms.

3:00:46.400 --> 3:00:49.180
<v Speaker 4>You don't that's the beauty of it you don't.

3:00:49.360 --> 3:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah you don't you don't yeah you don't have

3:00:51.420 --> 3:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to debate these people in their like debate where they

3:00:54.820 --> 3:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>don't acknowledge facts like no.

3:00:56.760 --> 3:01:00.379
<v Speaker 8>But also look oh also broader because they have a platform.

3:01:00.500 --> 3:01:03.379
<v Speaker 8>They can say things and you can ignore it, but

3:01:03.440 --> 3:01:05.430
<v Speaker 8>other people who enjoy it will read it.

3:01:05.420 --> 3:01:05.600
<v Speaker 5>Right.

3:01:05.620 --> 3:01:07.530
<v Speaker 4>And I'm not saying ignore it and it will go away.

3:01:07.570 --> 3:01:11.349
<v Speaker 4>I'm just saying engaging with the existence of these ideas

3:01:11.709 --> 3:01:14.010
<v Speaker 4>does not mean you have to engage with what they

3:01:14.070 --> 3:01:17.330
<v Speaker 4>are saying in the way that they want you to.

3:01:17.370 --> 3:01:19.140
<v Speaker 4>You don't have to engage in a good faith debate

3:01:19.190 --> 3:01:23.640
<v Speaker 4>with them, with their ideas, with their stated purpose. You

3:01:23.660 --> 3:01:26.560
<v Speaker 4>can engage with the idea that you know is underneath.

3:01:26.140 --> 3:01:29.400
<v Speaker 8>Of But I mean, more in the sense of like

3:01:29.980 --> 3:01:34.039
<v Speaker 8>engaging with it on a, in the discourse, because other

3:01:34.080 --> 3:01:36.340
<v Speaker 8>people will pick up on the ideas. And if you

3:01:36.360 --> 3:01:39.620
<v Speaker 8>want to have trying to have a civil conversation with

3:01:39.660 --> 3:01:43.640
<v Speaker 8>people who've been influenced by the ideas, then like indirectly,

3:01:43.680 --> 3:01:46.290
<v Speaker 8>you still have to engage with them. And even that

3:01:46.370 --> 3:01:51.050
<v Speaker 8>is becoming difficult because they become these two like different realities.

3:01:51.810 --> 3:01:51.970
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

3:01:52.820 --> 3:01:56.100
<v Speaker 4>Because they're not interested in having a debate with you.

3:01:57.459 --> 3:02:01.039
<v Speaker 4>At the risk of reading another long quote, this reminds

3:02:01.060 --> 3:02:03.379
<v Speaker 4>me of something that I come back to a lot

3:02:03.600 --> 3:02:06.080
<v Speaker 4>in this particular debate, in this debate of do we

3:02:06.120 --> 3:02:07.949
<v Speaker 4>have to engage with them? Do we have to debate them?

3:02:08.990 --> 3:02:11.810
<v Speaker 4>The answer is no. And the question has been answered.

3:02:11.870 --> 3:02:15.670
<v Speaker 4>So Sartre wrote an essay in 1946. So in post-war France,

3:02:16.310 --> 3:02:19.340
<v Speaker 4>Nazis had occupied France and there were a lot of

3:02:19.350 --> 3:02:22.420
<v Speaker 4>Nazi sympathizers. The essay was called The Anti-Semite and Jew.

3:02:23.290 --> 3:02:25.470
<v Speaker 4>And this is a passage that I come back to

3:02:25.530 --> 3:02:30.209
<v Speaker 4>a lot for this particular question. Never believe that anti-Semites

3:02:30.250 --> 3:02:33.970
<v Speaker 4>are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They

3:02:34.030 --> 3:02:37.570
<v Speaker 4>know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But

3:02:37.590 --> 3:02:40.580
<v Speaker 4>they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who

3:02:40.610 --> 3:02:44.260
<v Speaker 4>is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words.

3:02:45.080 --> 3:02:48.060
<v Speaker 4>The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like

3:02:48.100 --> 3:02:50.720
<v Speaker 4>to play with their discourse, for by giving ridiculous reasons,

3:02:51.040 --> 3:02:55.150
<v Speaker 4>they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in

3:02:55.270 --> 3:02:58.029
<v Speaker 4>acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade

3:02:58.090 --> 3:03:03.630
<v Speaker 4>by sound argument, but to intimidate and disconcert. They don't

3:03:03.650 --> 3:03:06.430
<v Speaker 4>want to debate you. They want to change the terms

3:03:06.490 --> 3:03:08.269
<v Speaker 4>of what that debate looks like.

3:03:08.590 --> 3:03:09.260
<v Speaker 1>So don't do it.

3:03:09.840 --> 3:03:12.420
<v Speaker 4>Don't do it. The question is, the question asked and answered.

3:03:13.500 --> 3:03:15.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like we don't have to engage them on terms

3:03:15.720 --> 3:03:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of their choosing where they get to define the very

3:03:18.900 --> 3:03:22.900
<v Speaker 1>like outlines of reality, which as you said, make results

3:03:22.940 --> 3:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>in something which is completely distinct from actual reality. And

3:03:25.760 --> 3:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not worth arguing with someone. I think the Sartre

3:03:29.400 --> 3:03:32.230
<v Speaker 1>quote would be a good place to finish up because

3:03:32.280 --> 3:03:35.150
<v Speaker 1>I think that's probably the most pertinent thing people could

3:03:35.190 --> 3:03:36.890
<v Speaker 1>take from this. I hope you all are not having

3:03:36.930 --> 3:03:38.250
<v Speaker 1>to debate this with your families.

3:03:38.830 --> 3:03:42.430
<v Speaker 4>So engage with, engage with the idea, take the threat seriously.

3:03:42.840 --> 3:03:45.160
<v Speaker 4>But you don't have to engage with the guy trying

3:03:45.220 --> 3:03:47.640
<v Speaker 4>to engage with you on a debate. Don't let him

3:03:47.700 --> 3:03:48.279
<v Speaker 4>set the terms.

3:03:48.780 --> 3:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Now, I fear I've come off a bit wrong there, but.

3:03:51.720 --> 3:03:54.670
<v Speaker 4>I'm not arguing with you. This is, again, like for

3:03:54.700 --> 3:03:56.550
<v Speaker 4>the listener, because I think this is a place a

3:03:56.590 --> 3:03:59.410
<v Speaker 4>lot of people find themselves like, well, this guy is wrong.

3:03:59.450 --> 3:04:01.350
<v Speaker 4>He's saying these things that are incorrect. I should have

3:04:01.370 --> 3:04:04.310
<v Speaker 4>a factual debate with him. And that's what he wants.

3:04:04.530 --> 3:04:07.530
<v Speaker 4>It's very tempting. And it may feel like the right

3:04:07.570 --> 3:04:11.129
<v Speaker 4>thing to do, but you can't win. No matter how

3:04:11.209 --> 3:04:12.990
<v Speaker 4>right you are, no matter how wrong he is, you

3:04:13.010 --> 3:04:15.360
<v Speaker 4>will not win this debate because that's not the point.

3:04:16.100 --> 3:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it is always worth reinforcing this, especially

3:04:19.440 --> 3:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>with this show. We have so many people who are

3:04:21.260 --> 3:04:24.100
<v Speaker 1>so new to this and they haven't been doing this

3:04:24.140 --> 3:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>for 10, 15, 20 years. And it can seem.

3:04:27.920 --> 3:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh, let's go on x.com and I'll tell them they're

3:04:29.660 --> 3:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>wrong and it'll be fine. But like, yeah, you're playing

3:04:32.360 --> 3:04:35.260
<v Speaker 1>in the Nazi sandbox and they get to choose like

3:04:35.300 --> 3:04:37.020
<v Speaker 1>how big the box is and what the sand looks like.

3:04:37.080 --> 3:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to go well for you.

3:04:39.320 --> 3:04:41.879
<v Speaker 4>And they want to have that argument with you because

3:04:41.920 --> 3:04:44.720
<v Speaker 4>the louder the argument is, the more people will hear

3:04:44.760 --> 3:04:47.119
<v Speaker 4>it and the more people will be exposed to the

3:04:47.280 --> 3:04:48.760
<v Speaker 4>unserious shit that they are saying.

3:04:48.940 --> 3:04:49.150
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

3:04:49.410 --> 3:04:51.030
<v Speaker 1>It dignifies them with a response.

3:04:51.550 --> 3:04:53.250
<v Speaker 4>It makes it look like something worth arguing about.

3:04:54.100 --> 3:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>It's playing chess with a pigeon.

3:04:55.959 --> 3:04:58.680
<v Speaker 8>No matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon

3:04:58.720 --> 3:05:01.359
<v Speaker 8>will strut around on the board, knock over the pieces,

3:05:01.540 --> 3:05:05.420
<v Speaker 8>take a big shit on the board, and strut around.

3:05:05.220 --> 3:05:06.140
<v Speaker 1>Like it's victorious.

3:05:07.000 --> 3:05:09.800
<v Speaker 4>And now the headline is, pigeon plays chess.

3:05:10.120 --> 3:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that impressive?

3:05:11.040 --> 3:05:13.539
<v Speaker 4>The pigeon, even if he didn't win, isn't it amazing

3:05:13.560 --> 3:05:14.120
<v Speaker 4>that he played?

3:05:15.840 --> 3:05:18.060
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to find a nice void to scream in

3:05:18.300 --> 3:05:19.380
<v Speaker 1>for a good minute.

3:05:20.480 --> 3:05:20.820
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

3:05:21.800 --> 3:05:22.740
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Dr.

3:05:22.780 --> 3:05:24.680
<v Speaker 8>James Stout, anything you want to plug.

3:05:25.379 --> 3:05:25.679
<v Speaker 4>Dr.

3:05:25.720 --> 3:05:26.119
<v Speaker 3>Stout.

3:05:26.200 --> 3:05:31.330
<v Speaker 1>Dr. Stout, yes. Yeah. Having shat on dissertations. Molly, you

3:05:31.370 --> 3:05:33.410
<v Speaker 1>have a show where we could learn more about Nazis

3:05:33.470 --> 3:05:35.330
<v Speaker 1>and the stupid shit they go after, wouldn't you?

3:05:35.490 --> 3:05:38.410
<v Speaker 4>Oh my gosh. Actually, the reason I'm so passionate about

3:05:38.470 --> 3:05:40.130
<v Speaker 4>not arguing with these people on their terms is because

3:05:40.150 --> 3:05:42.820
<v Speaker 4>I've been writing a lot about race science and eugenics lately.

3:05:42.860 --> 3:05:46.000
<v Speaker 4>And so this sort of Trojan horsing this argument into

3:05:46.020 --> 3:05:48.720
<v Speaker 4>the discourse in bad faith is something I'm very mad

3:05:48.760 --> 3:05:50.199
<v Speaker 4>about this week because I just read a bunch of

3:05:50.240 --> 3:05:53.120
<v Speaker 4>books about race science. So if you want to hear

3:05:53.140 --> 3:05:54.699
<v Speaker 4>about that, if you want to hear the fruit of

3:05:54.750 --> 3:05:57.890
<v Speaker 4>that frustration, you can listen to Weird Little Guys wherever

3:05:57.930 --> 3:05:58.870
<v Speaker 4>you get your podcasts.

3:05:59.690 --> 3:06:00.090
<v Speaker 7>Oh, yeah.

3:06:01.030 --> 3:06:04.060
<v Speaker 1>I have a podcast called Natural Causes where, unfortunately, I

3:06:04.640 --> 3:06:07.900
<v Speaker 1>have made four episodes and I have already had to

3:06:07.940 --> 3:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>confront the scope of the fucking Neo-Rhodesians.

3:06:10.959 --> 3:06:11.860
<v Speaker 4>They're everywhere.

3:06:12.520 --> 3:06:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, the Washington State National Guard responding to the

3:06:15.860 --> 3:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>little giant fire specifically, I guess.

3:06:17.980 --> 3:06:21.360
<v Speaker 4>For a country that never existed, wasn't very big, and

3:06:21.470 --> 3:06:24.129
<v Speaker 4>only pretended to exist for a couple of years, if

3:06:24.150 --> 3:06:26.230
<v Speaker 4>you're looking at Nazi shit, they just keep coming back.

3:06:26.830 --> 3:06:30.709
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, also, if you're responding to a large fire, and

3:06:30.750 --> 3:06:34.300
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking, which white nationalist flag should I take? That

3:06:34.350 --> 3:06:37.779
<v Speaker 1>is probably the least appropriate, right? Like, if we consider

3:06:37.820 --> 3:06:38.340
<v Speaker 1>how Rhodesia ended.

3:06:38.360 --> 3:06:40.379
<v Speaker 4>What would you say would be the most appropriate white

3:06:40.420 --> 3:06:41.100
<v Speaker 4>nationalist flag?

3:06:41.440 --> 3:06:44.140
<v Speaker 1>One of the, surely one of the repurposed Viking ones,

3:06:44.160 --> 3:06:45.940
<v Speaker 1>because they love to fire, right? Like if I was

3:06:45.990 --> 3:06:48.449
<v Speaker 1>going that route. Good answer, good answer. Yeah, thank you.

3:06:48.490 --> 3:06:51.050
<v Speaker 1>I think about this a lot. Yeah, if you work

3:06:51.110 --> 3:06:53.030
<v Speaker 1>for the Seattle Times, you can listen to my podcast,

3:06:53.070 --> 3:06:57.189
<v Speaker 1>deal my story and not attribute it. If you're anyone else, yeah,

3:06:57.209 --> 3:06:58.830
<v Speaker 1>you can listen to my podcast and hear about how

3:06:58.879 --> 3:06:59.820
<v Speaker 1>going outside is political.

3:07:00.980 --> 3:07:04.820
<v Speaker 8>I don't have any other podcasts. I try to keep

3:07:04.860 --> 3:07:06.990
<v Speaker 8>my mental health somewhat intact.

3:07:07.270 --> 3:07:09.150
<v Speaker 1>What a way to live. I'm so happy for you.

3:07:09.270 --> 3:07:10.530
<v Speaker 1>Insofar as that's possible.

3:07:10.550 --> 3:07:10.619
<v Speaker 6>Wow.

3:07:13.570 --> 3:07:14.630
<v Speaker 4>Sick burn on us, James.

3:07:14.709 --> 3:07:18.170
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, owned again. I just have a much less tolerance

3:07:18.230 --> 3:07:21.070
<v Speaker 1>for this than you guys. You're much better at it.

3:07:21.709 --> 3:07:22.370
<v Speaker 1>It's broken us.

3:07:22.510 --> 3:07:25.660
<v Speaker 8>So if you want to contact me for some reason,

3:07:26.250 --> 3:07:28.820
<v Speaker 8>it's now on Blue Sky at Two Sober Possums.

3:07:29.440 --> 3:07:31.540
<v Speaker 1>For the love of God, don't ask me for feed pics.

3:07:32.000 --> 3:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I will not send them. And confront fascists in a

3:07:35.780 --> 3:07:38.300
<v Speaker 1>peaceful way when they gather, I suppose.

3:07:38.940 --> 3:07:54.530
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. This is It Could Happen Here, Executive Disorder, our

3:07:54.550 --> 3:07:56.970
<v Speaker 6>weekly newscast covering what's happening in the White House, the

3:07:57.050 --> 3:08:00.380
<v Speaker 6>crumbling world, and what this means for you. I'm Garrison Davis.

3:08:00.400 --> 3:08:04.670
<v Speaker 6>Today I'm joined by James Stout, Mia Wong, and Robert Evans.

3:08:04.920 --> 3:08:07.960
<v Speaker 6>This episode we are covering the week of October 14th

3:08:08.100 --> 3:08:09.859
<v Speaker 6>to October 21st.

3:08:10.740 --> 3:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Diva down.

3:08:12.560 --> 3:08:16.660
<v Speaker 6>I am sad to report the new White House press secretary,

3:08:17.100 --> 3:08:21.350
<v Speaker 6>Katie Zachariah, Was fired after just five days on the job.

3:08:21.370 --> 3:08:21.830
<v Speaker 7>R.I.P.

3:08:21.910 --> 3:08:24.070
<v Speaker 2>You guys can't see it, but I'm pouring a 40

3:08:24.070 --> 3:08:25.170
<v Speaker 2>out for her right now.

3:08:25.310 --> 3:08:27.410
<v Speaker 1>It is all over my floor. This is going to

3:08:27.430 --> 3:08:28.490
<v Speaker 1>cause damage to the wood.

3:08:29.090 --> 3:08:30.430
<v Speaker 6>This is half a Scaramucci.

3:08:31.250 --> 3:08:34.170
<v Speaker 1>Is it half? I thought it was 70% of a Scaramucci.

3:08:34.350 --> 3:08:36.379
<v Speaker 6>Half a Scaramucci. Scaramucci was 10 days.

3:08:36.820 --> 3:08:38.440
<v Speaker 1>She was five days. She was only for five. I

3:08:38.500 --> 3:08:40.099
<v Speaker 1>heard seven for some reason.

3:08:41.060 --> 3:08:41.360
<v Speaker 12>Good to know.

3:08:42.290 --> 3:08:45.769
<v Speaker 6>Maybe it's that Scaramucci did more press conferences because she

3:08:45.830 --> 3:08:47.570
<v Speaker 6>only did one press conference.

3:08:47.690 --> 3:08:51.530
<v Speaker 1>That's all it took. Before being fired. That's all it took.

3:08:52.310 --> 3:08:54.550
<v Speaker 1>To give a sense, I was camping without signal for

3:08:54.570 --> 3:08:56.650
<v Speaker 1>the entire duration of her career and didn't know who

3:08:56.690 --> 3:09:01.750
<v Speaker 1>she was. You missed an entire press secretary? Yes. I

3:09:01.790 --> 3:09:04.590
<v Speaker 1>am a journalist who covers this shit and I completely

3:09:04.629 --> 3:09:05.130
<v Speaker 1>missed her.

3:09:06.250 --> 3:09:10.300
<v Speaker 6>Her firing came after poor reception to her first performance.

3:09:11.050 --> 3:09:15.120
<v Speaker 6>and reporting scrutinizing her claims about being a lawyer, despite

3:09:15.200 --> 3:09:20.859
<v Speaker 6>not passing the bar exam. Trump told her, quote, Honestly,

3:09:21.040 --> 3:09:25.279
<v Speaker 6>if I were you, I'd reconsider. Is this for you, Katie?

3:09:25.660 --> 3:09:28.840
<v Speaker 6>Because honestly, you don't need this, unquote.

3:09:29.770 --> 3:09:30.449
<v Speaker 1>She sure doesn't.

3:09:30.950 --> 3:09:35.090
<v Speaker 6>One of the funniest Trump exchanges I've ever read.

3:09:35.390 --> 3:09:39.010
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, wow, really coming in with empathy. Is this for you, Katie?

3:09:39.250 --> 3:09:40.010
<v Speaker 1>You don't need this.

3:09:41.250 --> 3:09:42.929
<v Speaker 13>Trump channeling HR manager.

3:09:43.379 --> 3:09:44.080
<v Speaker 4>It's incredible.

3:09:44.110 --> 3:09:48.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, no, he's handling this very delicately by most accounts.

3:09:48.920 --> 3:09:52.300
<v Speaker 6>Politico reported that Trump told the White House officials Katie had, quote,

3:09:52.400 --> 3:09:55.900
<v Speaker 6>no talent and shouldn't be on TV. But the White

3:09:55.940 --> 3:09:59.519
<v Speaker 6>House disputes this. And the White House says that she is, quote,

3:09:59.879 --> 3:10:04.400
<v Speaker 6>transitioning to a new role, though Katie said on Twitter

3:10:04.440 --> 3:10:07.000
<v Speaker 6>it was, quote, an honor to work for Trump in

3:10:07.040 --> 3:10:09.680
<v Speaker 6>the past tense. So who knows what she's going to

3:10:09.700 --> 3:10:12.900
<v Speaker 6>be up to in the future sure incredible but yeah

3:10:12.920 --> 3:10:14.780
<v Speaker 6>no we have lost out on a lot of potential

3:10:14.840 --> 3:10:17.170
<v Speaker 6>content in the future so pour one out for all

3:10:17.180 --> 3:10:20.210
<v Speaker 6>the all the podcasters out there who is relying on

3:10:20.750 --> 3:10:24.090
<v Speaker 6>years of press conferences to mine content.

3:10:24.470 --> 3:10:27.150
<v Speaker 1>Yeah Saturday Night Live's got to be really fucking scrambling

3:10:27.270 --> 3:10:29.789
<v Speaker 1>after that oh my god yeah damn.

3:10:29.650 --> 3:10:32.990
<v Speaker 2>Yeah I mean you know sometimes a beautiful thing comes

3:10:33.030 --> 3:10:34.590
<v Speaker 2>into your life and it's just there for a little

3:10:34.610 --> 3:10:36.430
<v Speaker 2>while and all we can do is enjoy the time

3:10:36.470 --> 3:10:37.890
<v Speaker 2>we had together with what's her.

3:10:37.810 --> 3:10:40.070
<v Speaker 6>Name Yeah, what's her name?

3:10:40.670 --> 3:10:42.270
<v Speaker 1>I know her name, man. Like I said, I was

3:10:42.310 --> 3:10:43.190
<v Speaker 1>camping the whole time.

3:10:44.110 --> 3:10:46.310
<v Speaker 13>Luckily for us, we have so many things to cover,

3:10:46.430 --> 3:10:52.780
<v Speaker 13>so we'll be fine. Everyone else, in danger. Us, deluged.

3:10:54.120 --> 3:10:57.120
<v Speaker 6>Speaking of other things to cover, threatening letters containing a

3:10:57.160 --> 3:11:00.019
<v Speaker 6>mysterious white powder have been sent to the offices of

3:11:00.100 --> 3:11:04.109
<v Speaker 6>over three dozen congressional representatives and election offices across at

3:11:04.150 --> 3:11:07.760
<v Speaker 6>least 32 states. At least one of these letters, sent

3:11:07.820 --> 3:11:11.990
<v Speaker 6>to Democratic Congresswoman Hillary Scholten of Michigan, made a quote,

3:11:12.410 --> 3:11:16.810
<v Speaker 6>direct and specific reference to an impending civil war beginning

3:11:17.050 --> 3:11:22.060
<v Speaker 6>after the election, according to the Congresswoman. And interestingly, according

3:11:22.240 --> 3:11:26.599
<v Speaker 6>to Scholten, the letter claimed to be from the Democratic

3:11:26.720 --> 3:11:31.780
<v Speaker 6>Socialists of America. Yeah. So I guess they're kind of

3:11:32.340 --> 3:11:37.420
<v Speaker 6>moving beyond labor organizing and electoral reform towards some much

3:11:37.459 --> 3:11:40.840
<v Speaker 6>more interesting tactics. This, of course, is not true. The

3:11:40.860 --> 3:11:45.320
<v Speaker 6>DSA did not send letters containing mysterious white powder, the

3:11:45.360 --> 3:11:48.750
<v Speaker 6>implication being it could be anthrax. It has not been

3:11:48.810 --> 3:11:53.010
<v Speaker 6>found to be anthrax or dangerous. Usually when letters are

3:11:53.050 --> 3:11:57.750
<v Speaker 6>received containing white powder, that is the sort of implicit threat. Nice.

3:11:57.820 --> 3:11:58.000
<v Speaker 5>Nice.

3:11:58.010 --> 3:11:58.250
<v Speaker 1>Nice. Nice.

3:12:20.760 --> 3:12:24.420
<v Speaker 6>The DSA has allowed extremists in its movement, which not

3:12:24.560 --> 3:12:28.470
<v Speaker 6>only allow, but justify violence as a viable means to

3:12:28.530 --> 3:12:29.789
<v Speaker 6>achieve political ends.

3:12:30.070 --> 3:12:30.690
<v Speaker 1>Unquote.

3:12:31.450 --> 3:12:34.150
<v Speaker 13>Man, this sort of kicked out all my friends who

3:12:34.190 --> 3:12:36.650
<v Speaker 13>were doing, who were being street medics. Like, come on.

3:12:36.850 --> 3:12:38.770
<v Speaker 1>They don't got the juice for it. I mean, it's

3:12:38.790 --> 3:12:39.570
<v Speaker 1>not even the juice.

3:12:39.610 --> 3:12:42.530
<v Speaker 6>Like, no one in the DSA is doing anthrax letters.

3:12:42.610 --> 3:12:43.420
<v Speaker 1>Come on.

3:12:43.430 --> 3:12:43.660
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

3:12:43.690 --> 3:12:44.500
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

3:12:45.910 --> 3:12:49.480
<v Speaker 6>DSA told CBS, quote, Needless to say, we are not

3:12:49.540 --> 3:12:51.560
<v Speaker 6>involved with these letters and we are glad to learn

3:12:51.580 --> 3:12:53.379
<v Speaker 6>no one was harmed, unquote.

3:12:53.660 --> 3:12:54.520
<v Speaker 1>What are we doing here?

3:12:55.560 --> 3:12:55.820
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

3:12:56.459 --> 3:12:59.340
<v Speaker 2>If a bunch of amateurs with no like chemical and

3:12:59.360 --> 3:13:03.900
<v Speaker 2>biological weapons experience were attempting to distribute anthrax around the country,

3:13:03.920 --> 3:13:06.279
<v Speaker 2>you would hear about it first when they infected themselves

3:13:06.320 --> 3:13:07.060
<v Speaker 2>with anthrax.

3:13:07.280 --> 3:13:10.250
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. That would be the story.

3:13:10.260 --> 3:13:10.340
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

3:13:10.890 --> 3:13:13.410
<v Speaker 13>You know, like it's worth mentioning, like, yeah, like this

3:13:13.470 --> 3:13:17.109
<v Speaker 13>is a fairly common right wing tactic. This is not

3:13:17.150 --> 3:13:19.550
<v Speaker 13>a thing where even you're sort of like, I don't know,

3:13:19.590 --> 3:13:22.110
<v Speaker 13>you're like 1970s, like Red Brigades guys who are like

3:13:22.129 --> 3:13:23.270
<v Speaker 13>kidnapping people off the streets.

3:13:23.290 --> 3:13:24.970
<v Speaker 1>Like they didn't do this.

3:13:25.530 --> 3:13:29.420
<v Speaker 2>No, because it's really hard and dangerous. It's really hard

3:13:29.480 --> 3:13:30.200
<v Speaker 2>and dangerous.

3:13:30.220 --> 3:13:34.260
<v Speaker 1>It's very much giving like learned about terrorism in the 1990s,

3:13:34.310 --> 3:13:37.290
<v Speaker 1>hasn't paid much attention since and decided to do a hoax.

3:13:37.950 --> 3:13:41.379
<v Speaker 1>Early 2000s, but yeah. Yeah, yeah. Yeah, sure, early 2000s.

3:13:41.430 --> 3:13:45.269
<v Speaker 1>Come on. I don't know, such a weird option to

3:13:45.290 --> 3:13:48.060
<v Speaker 1>go with anthrax. I guess there are other white powders,

3:13:48.080 --> 3:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>so it's kind of an easy one to go with.

3:13:50.459 --> 3:13:52.980
<v Speaker 6>I mean, yeah, they're just mailing a white powder.

3:13:53.000 --> 3:13:56.199
<v Speaker 1>They're not mailing anthrax, right? It's just flour or something.

3:13:56.459 --> 3:13:59.050
<v Speaker 1>It's a low-effort hoax, sure, yeah. Yeah.

3:13:59.490 --> 3:14:01.610
<v Speaker 2>There's all sorts of white powders out there.

3:14:01.810 --> 3:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>There sure are. Powdered sugar.

3:14:04.360 --> 3:14:07.720
<v Speaker 2>The Germans have this fake cocaine that's not intoxicating that

3:14:07.760 --> 3:14:09.580
<v Speaker 2>comes in this little glass thing.

3:14:09.840 --> 3:14:11.710
<v Speaker 1>If you just want to snort something, it's cute.

3:14:12.070 --> 3:14:12.370
<v Speaker 6>Oh, wow.

3:14:12.930 --> 3:14:15.330
<v Speaker 1>Snuff. No, it's not snuff. There's no drug in it

3:14:15.370 --> 3:14:18.370
<v Speaker 1>at all. It's just basically like mint. Just like talcum powder.

3:14:18.390 --> 3:14:21.070
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's just like something you can snort if you

3:14:21.090 --> 3:14:21.930
<v Speaker 2>really need to snort.

3:14:22.110 --> 3:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>If your nose needs that stimulation. Germany's quite the place.

3:14:25.980 --> 3:14:26.180
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

3:14:26.620 --> 3:14:27.300
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Germans.

3:14:27.840 --> 3:14:28.080
<v Speaker 7>Mm-hmm.

3:14:28.840 --> 3:14:31.420
<v Speaker 1>So I heard from someone in Northern California this week,

3:14:31.580 --> 3:14:34.620
<v Speaker 1>and it's a pretty credible source, that ICE agents have

3:14:34.640 --> 3:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>been seen outside the Sutter County Veterans Hall in Yuba City,

3:14:38.520 --> 3:14:41.180
<v Speaker 1>which is a polling place. I didn't see any evidence

3:14:41.200 --> 3:14:43.580
<v Speaker 1>that they were making detentions there or of people there

3:14:43.950 --> 3:14:46.970
<v Speaker 1>or whether they were just using that as a staging area.

3:14:46.990 --> 3:14:49.970
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. But this is something I'm really hyper

3:14:50.350 --> 3:14:53.950
<v Speaker 1>focused on in the weeks coming up to this midterm election. Secondly,

3:14:54.090 --> 3:14:59.269
<v Speaker 1>DHS is leaving TPS recipients from Ukraine, Sudan, and Limbo.

3:14:59.629 --> 3:15:03.530
<v Speaker 1>It's not renewing their TPS, but it's not cancelling it either.

3:15:04.290 --> 3:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>So TPS generally is already a status which has to

3:15:07.270 --> 3:15:10.260
<v Speaker 1>be renewed on a very fixed and short timeline, right?

3:15:10.280 --> 3:15:12.420
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't give people much permanence to begin with.

3:15:12.900 --> 3:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>But at this point, they have even less permanence, right?

3:15:15.200 --> 3:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>It makes it very hard for them to know what

3:15:19.180 --> 3:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to do next. We saw... What happened to Haitian communities

3:15:23.280 --> 3:15:26.500
<v Speaker 1>after the removal of that TPS, right? Yeah. Part of

3:15:26.540 --> 3:15:28.879
<v Speaker 1>me wonders is if this is just like a, um,

3:15:29.459 --> 3:15:32.700
<v Speaker 1>like a rate limiting thing for DHS, like they're still

3:15:32.750 --> 3:15:35.990
<v Speaker 1>going hard on the TPS is they've already canceled and like,

3:15:36.030 --> 3:15:38.810
<v Speaker 1>maybe they want to sort of divide and conquer with their,

3:15:39.090 --> 3:15:42.330
<v Speaker 1>with their surges in different communities. Or if it's a

3:15:42.350 --> 3:15:45.810
<v Speaker 1>pre midterm thing, because, uh, it is still somewhat unpopular

3:15:45.850 --> 3:15:49.310
<v Speaker 1>to go after Ukraine. Next, I have CNN reporting that

3:15:49.370 --> 3:15:53.379
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Defense is loaning an active denial system

3:15:53.440 --> 3:15:56.540
<v Speaker 1>to CBP. This thing is often called a heat ray.

3:15:57.160 --> 3:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>The idea, of course, is that CBP might use it

3:15:59.100 --> 3:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>at the border for areas of high migrant traffic. They

3:16:01.520 --> 3:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>have experimented with this before. And what's interesting is that

3:16:04.780 --> 3:16:07.890
<v Speaker 1>the Pentagon seem to have refused to have their people

3:16:07.930 --> 3:16:11.650
<v Speaker 1>run the system or develop training tactics and procedures to

3:16:11.810 --> 3:16:14.750
<v Speaker 1>use with the system. This is in line with how

3:16:14.770 --> 3:16:17.580
<v Speaker 1>the Pentagon has previously approached this. They had these for

3:16:17.600 --> 3:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>like almost two decades and they took them to Afghanistan,

3:16:21.520 --> 3:16:25.010
<v Speaker 1>but they never used them. I'm guessing they never used

3:16:25.050 --> 3:16:28.550
<v Speaker 1>them because some jag somewhere was like, yeah, that's looking,

3:16:28.750 --> 3:16:32.310
<v Speaker 1>that's giving war crimes. It's not a new technology, right?

3:16:32.590 --> 3:16:35.530
<v Speaker 1>It's they've never really been able to find a place

3:16:35.570 --> 3:16:38.830
<v Speaker 1>where they felt. And, uh, for, for younger folks, they

3:16:38.850 --> 3:16:40.609
<v Speaker 1>did some shit during the war on terror, which is

3:16:40.650 --> 3:16:44.330
<v Speaker 1>generally considered to be a flagrant violation of international law,

3:16:44.830 --> 3:16:48.670
<v Speaker 1>but they didn't do this. CBP has evaluated it before

3:16:48.730 --> 3:16:51.519
<v Speaker 1>too in the El Centro sector, when Rodney Scott, who's

3:16:51.560 --> 3:16:55.439
<v Speaker 1>now CBP commissioner, was there. El Centro sector, of course,

3:16:55.580 --> 3:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>is ground zero for this shit, right? Greg Bovino, LHG

3:16:58.400 --> 3:17:02.230
<v Speaker 1>patrol agent there. Obviously, this comes with massive human rights concerns,

3:17:02.310 --> 3:17:04.710
<v Speaker 1>as well as international law concerns. If you're using some

3:17:04.790 --> 3:17:07.010
<v Speaker 1>kind of heat ray to attack people who are not

3:17:07.090 --> 3:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, it's The obvious other issue here

3:17:10.320 --> 3:17:12.060
<v Speaker 1>is that we have fires all the fucking time at

3:17:12.080 --> 3:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the border and turning on a heat ray is probably

3:17:14.740 --> 3:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a great way to have more of them. I guess

3:17:16.860 --> 3:17:19.690
<v Speaker 1>an interesting development, and this is right before we recorded, Hegsex,

3:17:20.230 --> 3:17:22.930
<v Speaker 1>one of his deputy chiefs of staff, Patrick Weaver, used

3:17:23.030 --> 3:17:25.270
<v Speaker 1>to be an advisor to Hegsex. He's bumped around a

3:17:25.310 --> 3:17:29.690
<v Speaker 1>bunch of like Executive branch appointments, he posted, quote, the

3:17:29.730 --> 3:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>border is now a military installation and a battle lab

3:17:32.270 --> 3:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>for testing new systems to include directed energy weapons. The

3:17:35.840 --> 3:17:38.500
<v Speaker 1>border is locked down. And then he posted a picture

3:17:38.520 --> 3:17:41.420
<v Speaker 1>of the story. Just want to point out that, like, again,

3:17:41.520 --> 3:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not Department of Defense staff using this. It would

3:17:44.820 --> 3:17:47.119
<v Speaker 1>be CBP and CBP would have to develop a whole

3:17:47.140 --> 3:17:49.160
<v Speaker 1>set of training tactics and procedures to do it before

3:17:49.200 --> 3:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>they used it. Last time they did it, they, they

3:17:52.020 --> 3:17:53.970
<v Speaker 1>decided basically the juice wasn't worth the squeeze.

3:17:54.050 --> 3:17:54.250
<v Speaker 7>Right.

3:17:54.280 --> 3:17:56.250
<v Speaker 1>And especially in the El Centro sector at that time,

3:17:56.270 --> 3:17:59.369
<v Speaker 1>people were coming through a lot of irrigation canals and

3:17:59.790 --> 3:18:03.629
<v Speaker 1>the chances of somebody drowning large number of people drowning

3:18:03.690 --> 3:18:05.290
<v Speaker 1>because you use this on them in a place where

3:18:05.330 --> 3:18:09.260
<v Speaker 1>they're already in danger. Obviously they decided not to use it.

3:18:09.590 --> 3:18:10.930
<v Speaker 1>So we'll keep an eye on that, I guess.

3:18:11.780 --> 3:18:15.820
<v Speaker 6>This has also a very interesting like imperial boomerang effect

3:18:15.879 --> 3:18:19.379
<v Speaker 6>of military technology then being used to the border. And

3:18:19.400 --> 3:18:22.440
<v Speaker 6>then as we've seen across the country, that also increases

3:18:22.459 --> 3:18:26.960
<v Speaker 6>the possibility of border patrol using this technology against American citizens. Yeah.

3:18:27.000 --> 3:18:29.940
<v Speaker 6>Doing like crowd control, like in Portland in 2020, where

3:18:29.959 --> 3:18:34.400
<v Speaker 6>they used a very specific LRAD that induced, you know,

3:18:34.900 --> 3:18:38.000
<v Speaker 6>piercing headaches. The idea of this technology getting, you know,

3:18:38.300 --> 3:18:42.230
<v Speaker 6>closer and closer to being used in within our national borders.

3:18:42.310 --> 3:18:44.470
<v Speaker 6>I mean, as bad as it is that it exists,

3:18:44.510 --> 3:18:46.350
<v Speaker 6>as bad as it is that CBP could use it

3:18:46.370 --> 3:18:48.869
<v Speaker 6>at the border itself, which is its whole issue, this

3:18:48.890 --> 3:18:51.490
<v Speaker 6>also kind of shows the tendency of this sort of

3:18:51.550 --> 3:18:54.670
<v Speaker 6>development to get closer and closer to the imperial core.

3:18:54.690 --> 3:18:57.530
<v Speaker 1>To the metropole, yeah. And I think that that's towards

3:18:57.550 --> 3:19:00.150
<v Speaker 1>the end of the earth, right? Like Miller's book, Empire Borders,

3:19:00.170 --> 3:19:02.210
<v Speaker 1>I don't know when that came out, but he talks

3:19:02.290 --> 3:19:07.070
<v Speaker 1>about the US-Palestine border, the direct pathway, testing systems on

3:19:07.110 --> 3:19:10.050
<v Speaker 1>Palestinian people to selling them to Border Patrol. And then,

3:19:10.090 --> 3:19:12.520
<v Speaker 1>as you say, to them finding their way into the metropole.

3:19:12.560 --> 3:19:15.100
<v Speaker 1>The whole country is experiencing now what we have experienced

3:19:15.140 --> 3:19:17.680
<v Speaker 1>at the border, which is the state is either hostile

3:19:18.120 --> 3:19:22.190
<v Speaker 1>or completely absent. And talking of that, in Pensacola, where

3:19:22.209 --> 3:19:25.369
<v Speaker 1>people are working to repair from storm damage, I saw

3:19:25.410 --> 3:19:27.970
<v Speaker 1>that ICE had come to arrest two roofers who were

3:19:28.030 --> 3:19:31.380
<v Speaker 1>working to repair that storm damage. What you expect from

3:19:31.400 --> 3:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the federal government is FEMA. FEMA is pretty much on

3:19:34.780 --> 3:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>its knees right now, but ICE has swallowed up all

3:19:38.040 --> 3:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>that funding, gobbled it up, and it's there. I think

3:19:41.320 --> 3:19:44.060
<v Speaker 1>it resulted in like a, we're not coming down from

3:19:44.100 --> 3:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the roof and eventually ICE leaving, which has happened in

3:19:46.640 --> 3:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>several cases specifically with roofers, right? Good for them. Glad

3:19:49.740 --> 3:19:52.940
<v Speaker 1>they didn't get caught. Yeah, talking of weird DHS shit,

3:19:53.310 --> 3:19:55.709
<v Speaker 1>the United States Coast Guard has released a bizarre promo

3:19:55.730 --> 3:19:58.830
<v Speaker 1>video detailing their work in San Diego, which features... I

3:19:58.850 --> 3:20:00.810
<v Speaker 1>think I would describe it as an emo cover of

3:20:00.910 --> 3:20:05.129
<v Speaker 1>Pink Pony Club by Chapel Roan. What? It's real weird.

3:20:05.310 --> 3:20:05.590
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

3:20:05.850 --> 3:20:08.330
<v Speaker 1>We can listen to it, but we don't have to. No,

3:20:08.410 --> 3:20:08.770
<v Speaker 1>I'm good.

3:20:08.850 --> 3:20:09.910
<v Speaker 6>I'm good.

3:20:09.950 --> 3:20:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Continuing in their trend of like trolling intellectual property, right? Finally,

3:20:16.320 --> 3:20:20.580
<v Speaker 1>the Junto Miema is continuing to flounder in its assault

3:20:20.640 --> 3:20:25.020
<v Speaker 1>on Rakhine or Arakas state It's sort of continuing with

3:20:25.060 --> 3:20:27.720
<v Speaker 1>its major tactical philosophy, which seems to be doing World

3:20:27.740 --> 3:20:30.879
<v Speaker 1>War II shit in 2026. This time they've gone with

3:20:30.920 --> 3:20:35.360
<v Speaker 1>an imposed amphibious assault. They're trying to stop the Arakan

3:20:35.620 --> 3:20:39.010
<v Speaker 1>army's offensive on Sitwe and the way they've done that

3:20:39.110 --> 3:20:43.410
<v Speaker 1>is like big landing crafts full of conscripts, which has

3:20:43.470 --> 3:20:47.050
<v Speaker 1>resulted in massive casualties, right? There's been a bunch of

3:20:47.090 --> 3:20:49.980
<v Speaker 1>reporting over the last few months on how these big

3:20:50.110 --> 3:20:54.110
<v Speaker 1>hunter offensive work and it seems to be like straight

3:20:54.170 --> 3:20:58.750
<v Speaker 1>up human wave attacks at which the officers, at least

3:20:58.770 --> 3:21:01.610
<v Speaker 1>the higher ranking officers, the officers who would plan such

3:21:01.650 --> 3:21:04.670
<v Speaker 1>an operation are not present. And then any of the

3:21:05.209 --> 3:21:07.250
<v Speaker 1>NCOs or officers who are present, like their role is

3:21:07.330 --> 3:21:11.610
<v Speaker 1>not to think tactically and adapt. It's to enforce discipline

3:21:11.650 --> 3:21:15.410
<v Speaker 1>and continue enforcing the plan, even as everybody's dying. So yeah,

3:21:15.570 --> 3:21:18.970
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty brutal scene for conscripts in Myanmar right now.

3:21:20.160 --> 3:21:23.810
<v Speaker 6>Early voting has begun in Texas, and this past week,

3:21:23.890 --> 3:21:27.470
<v Speaker 6>in the lead-up to the election, pamphlets have been mailed

3:21:27.590 --> 3:21:31.790
<v Speaker 6>to households across Texas from a group identified as the, quote,

3:21:32.270 --> 3:21:37.690
<v Speaker 6>Texas Transgender Student Union. These pamphlets were addressed to students

3:21:37.840 --> 3:21:42.280
<v Speaker 6>in the household and contained resources for LGBTQ youth and

3:21:42.420 --> 3:21:47.170
<v Speaker 6>a guide on how trans teens can emancipate themselves. These

3:21:47.209 --> 3:21:51.750
<v Speaker 6>mailers have sparked outrage among conservatives, and that appears to

3:21:51.850 --> 3:21:56.960
<v Speaker 6>have been the point. This, quote, Texas Transgender Student Union

3:21:57.700 --> 3:22:03.080
<v Speaker 6>doesn't actually exist, or at least didn't exist until last month,

3:22:03.680 --> 3:22:06.660
<v Speaker 6>when a group by that name registered as an LLC

3:22:06.840 --> 3:22:09.619
<v Speaker 6>in Wyoming, according to Business Records.

3:22:10.180 --> 3:22:10.320
<v Speaker 7>Wait!

3:22:11.150 --> 3:22:14.010
<v Speaker 1>That's an LLC in Wyoming. Okay. Hell yeah. Great stuff

3:22:14.030 --> 3:22:14.470
<v Speaker 1>happening here.

3:22:14.629 --> 3:22:19.080
<v Speaker 6>This is not a real student advocacy group in Texas.

3:22:19.160 --> 3:22:23.220
<v Speaker 6>This is an op. This pamphlet does include some resources

3:22:23.420 --> 3:22:27.640
<v Speaker 6>from TENT. That's Transgender Education Network of Texas, which is

3:22:27.680 --> 3:22:30.840
<v Speaker 6>a real advocacy group. But they were not involved in

3:22:30.879 --> 3:22:34.510
<v Speaker 6>the making of this mailer, nor do they have emancipation resources.

3:22:35.150 --> 3:22:38.810
<v Speaker 6>TENT has since faced a huge wave of harassment and threats.

3:22:39.430 --> 3:22:43.169
<v Speaker 6>following the mailing out of this pamphlet. The Texas Tribune

3:22:43.430 --> 3:22:46.510
<v Speaker 6>traced the mailer ID of two pamphlets to a mail

3:22:46.550 --> 3:22:51.790
<v Speaker 6>tracking company called Snailworks, who the National Republican Congressional Committee

3:22:52.250 --> 3:22:55.390
<v Speaker 6>has paid almost $ 60, 000 over the past two years for

3:22:55.450 --> 3:22:59.590
<v Speaker 6>mailing services, according to a federal election commission search of

3:22:59.650 --> 3:23:04.830
<v Speaker 6>campaign finance records. Stephen Manicelli is currently kind of running

3:23:04.870 --> 3:23:07.830
<v Speaker 6>this lead down and trying to figure out exactly where

3:23:07.870 --> 3:23:10.510
<v Speaker 6>this mailer has like come from. He's been like live

3:23:10.560 --> 3:23:14.080
<v Speaker 6>tweeting his investigation. We don't know tons yet, but if

3:23:14.100 --> 3:23:17.300
<v Speaker 6>you want an update on it, check out our correspondent,

3:23:17.320 --> 3:23:20.480
<v Speaker 6>Steven Monticelli on social media. He'll probably have some more

3:23:20.520 --> 3:23:23.360
<v Speaker 6>info about where exactly this letter came from and who

3:23:23.379 --> 3:23:27.440
<v Speaker 6>might be behind it. Texas Smith County Republican precinct chair,

3:23:27.600 --> 3:23:30.310
<v Speaker 6>Sarah Fields posted a picture of one of these mailers

3:23:30.430 --> 3:23:33.670
<v Speaker 6>that she received and wrote, people are getting pissed. Let

3:23:33.690 --> 3:23:36.090
<v Speaker 6>this be a reminder to take your anger to the

3:23:36.170 --> 3:23:41.180
<v Speaker 6>voting booth. though a later follow-up post noted the suspicious

3:23:41.320 --> 3:23:45.140
<v Speaker 6>origin of these pamphlets. Quote, I just checked my messages.

3:23:45.440 --> 3:23:49.000
<v Speaker 6>No less than 100 parents had messaged me. Enraged over

3:23:49.020 --> 3:23:52.130
<v Speaker 6>the mailers. Is this an op? If it is, it's

3:23:52.270 --> 3:23:56.030
<v Speaker 6>not okay. It even gives tips on how to get emancipated.

3:23:56.290 --> 3:23:56.850
<v Speaker 1>Unquote.

3:23:57.650 --> 3:24:00.029
<v Speaker 6>So it appears that this mailer was sent out specifically

3:24:00.110 --> 3:24:04.269
<v Speaker 6>just to make people mad. Some Texans upset enough to

3:24:04.350 --> 3:24:08.160
<v Speaker 6>go to the polls. trying to mobilize anti-trans sentiment to

3:24:08.200 --> 3:24:10.279
<v Speaker 6>get them to vote for the Republicans.

3:24:11.320 --> 3:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's an extension of a theme, I guess.

3:24:14.940 --> 3:24:20.199
<v Speaker 6>In some other, I guess, transgender-related news, earlier this month,

3:24:20.240 --> 3:24:22.660
<v Speaker 6>the New York City Health Department announced a plan to

3:24:22.740 --> 3:24:26.340
<v Speaker 6>spend $ 9 million to provide gender-affirming care to minors after

3:24:26.360 --> 3:24:29.190
<v Speaker 6>two hospitals in the city, NYU Langone and Mount Sinai,

3:24:29.270 --> 3:24:32.250
<v Speaker 6>caved to pressure from the Trump administration and cut services

3:24:32.290 --> 3:24:35.080
<v Speaker 6>to trans youth. This funding is set to go into

3:24:35.140 --> 3:24:39.170
<v Speaker 6>effect early next year, likely partnering with Callen-Lorde, which is

3:24:39.230 --> 3:24:43.610
<v Speaker 6>a local LGBTQ hospital system in the city. And as

3:24:43.690 --> 3:24:47.270
<v Speaker 6>of the day of recording this, Wednesday, October 21st, the

3:24:47.310 --> 3:24:50.550
<v Speaker 6>Supreme Court, at least temporarily, blocked the Trump administration from

3:24:50.629 --> 3:24:55.120
<v Speaker 6>denying gender-affirming care to trans prisoners. This was just a

3:24:55.260 --> 3:25:00.160
<v Speaker 6>two-sentence unsigned order, which leaves in place a previous court

3:25:00.240 --> 3:25:04.040
<v Speaker 6>order from a U.S. district judge in D.C., which originally

3:25:04.080 --> 3:25:06.940
<v Speaker 6>blocked the Bureau of Prisons' new policy going into effect,

3:25:07.500 --> 3:25:12.609
<v Speaker 6>which would have taken away trans prisoners' gender-affirming care, including

3:25:12.709 --> 3:25:17.209
<v Speaker 6>their health care. The second sentence of this two-sentence order

3:25:17.270 --> 3:25:20.270
<v Speaker 6>from the Supreme Court reads, quote, Meaning that these two

3:25:20.310 --> 3:25:23.109
<v Speaker 6>justices would have let the new anti-trans policy from the

3:25:23.170 --> 3:25:33.080
<v Speaker 6>Bureau of Prisons go into effect. So the fact that

3:25:33.160 --> 3:25:35.780
<v Speaker 6>those two are singled out is interesting. You could interpret

3:25:35.800 --> 3:25:40.110
<v Speaker 6>this possibly as like a 7-2 ruling, but there's really

3:25:40.170 --> 3:25:43.510
<v Speaker 6>no legal justification given. It's just two sentences. It's the

3:25:43.570 --> 3:25:47.250
<v Speaker 6>shortest shadow docket ruling I've seen. We'll see what happens

3:25:47.510 --> 3:25:49.950
<v Speaker 6>going forward. Yeah, glad we got a good one.

3:25:49.980 --> 3:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we got another small thing that literally broke while

3:25:53.800 --> 3:25:54.540
<v Speaker 1>we were doing this.

3:25:55.180 --> 3:25:55.420
<v Speaker 6>Great.

3:25:56.170 --> 3:26:00.780
<v Speaker 1>So San Diego City Council Committee voted on Wednesday to

3:26:00.879 --> 3:26:07.550
<v Speaker 1>rescind the ALPR use policy. That doesn't take ALPRs like completely...

3:26:07.500 --> 3:26:09.700
<v Speaker 1>out in San Diego, it means that any future contract

3:26:10.060 --> 3:26:12.180
<v Speaker 1>would have to go through the whole process again, right?

3:26:12.200 --> 3:26:13.700
<v Speaker 1>Including this like a privacy review board.

3:26:14.020 --> 3:26:16.390
<v Speaker 6>That is automated license plate readers.

3:26:16.550 --> 3:26:19.289
<v Speaker 1>Readers, yeah, flock cameras in the colloquial, but in this

3:26:19.350 --> 3:26:22.129
<v Speaker 1>case and other analogs, right? A lot of places said,

3:26:22.170 --> 3:26:23.950
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, we're counseling flock and then gone to Axon

3:26:23.990 --> 3:26:25.410
<v Speaker 1>or another provider. Switch to Axon.

3:26:25.570 --> 3:26:26.370
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that's the move.

3:26:26.530 --> 3:26:31.730
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Bravely, Mayor Todd Gloria has immediately stepped in to

3:26:31.770 --> 3:26:35.820
<v Speaker 1>put himself between the flock cameras and the people of

3:26:35.879 --> 3:26:37.990
<v Speaker 1>San Diego. Like the hero he is.

3:26:38.110 --> 3:26:41.220
<v Speaker 6>Todd Gloria has cloned himself and has personally standing in

3:26:41.340 --> 3:26:43.760
<v Speaker 6>front of every license plate reader.

3:26:44.400 --> 3:26:48.770
<v Speaker 1>Most useful thing he's ever done. And Todd Gloria is watching. Wait,

3:26:49.010 --> 3:26:51.449
<v Speaker 1>would that work? Are clones people? Could we just do

3:26:51.490 --> 3:26:53.930
<v Speaker 1>that with the flock cameras? They're just twins. I don't know,

3:26:53.950 --> 3:26:56.570
<v Speaker 1>somebody get to work on that. A flock of Todds.

3:26:56.650 --> 3:26:59.090
<v Speaker 2>Instead of a digital twin, everybody just has a clone

3:26:59.110 --> 3:27:02.590
<v Speaker 2>twin that stands in front of the flock cameras.

3:27:02.950 --> 3:27:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Just constantly flipping them off. Yeah, Todd said, automated license

3:27:06.700 --> 3:27:09.199
<v Speaker 1>plate readers are helping San Diego police solve serious crimes,

3:27:09.260 --> 3:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>cover stolen vehicles and property and locate missing people. Taking

3:27:12.320 --> 3:27:13.900
<v Speaker 1>this proven tool away from our officers will be a

3:27:13.920 --> 3:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>serious mistake and a step backwards for public safety. Shut

3:27:16.580 --> 3:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the fuck up, told Gloria. A number of people in

3:27:20.200 --> 3:27:23.820
<v Speaker 1>San Diego have been wrongly arrested and detained because of

3:27:23.860 --> 3:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>flock cameras, right? People will remember that San Diego police

3:27:28.300 --> 3:27:32.619
<v Speaker 1>had the vehicle description and number plate for the people

3:27:32.660 --> 3:27:35.780
<v Speaker 1>who shot up the Islamic Center of San Diego, the mosque, right?

3:27:36.020 --> 3:27:40.180
<v Speaker 1>For hours. And they did fuck all. Not one of

3:27:40.240 --> 3:27:43.420
<v Speaker 1>the cops engaged those people, right? The only person who

3:27:43.459 --> 3:27:45.980
<v Speaker 1>stepped up, who kept that community safe were people who

3:27:46.020 --> 3:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>were already at that mosque, two of whom died in

3:27:49.860 --> 3:27:52.820
<v Speaker 1>the act of stopping the shooter, killing more people. Surveillance

3:27:52.879 --> 3:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>is not safety. That is not the same thing. And

3:27:55.080 --> 3:27:57.970
<v Speaker 1>it is particularly pathetic for our mayor, right? Who was

3:27:58.550 --> 3:28:01.690
<v Speaker 1>shouted down at a press conference that night at the

3:28:01.790 --> 3:28:05.030
<v Speaker 1>ICSD to attempt to lie about this when he has

3:28:05.190 --> 3:28:08.700
<v Speaker 1>failed our city so badly. fuck this guy. There is

3:28:08.740 --> 3:28:10.580
<v Speaker 1>very little nice I have to say about Todd Gloria.

3:28:11.420 --> 3:28:15.510
<v Speaker 1>Let's move on, I guess, to other contract shit. ICE

3:28:15.590 --> 3:28:18.990
<v Speaker 1>has issued a no-bid extension to the contract that I'm

3:28:19.050 --> 3:28:22.870
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure it's Aumentum Services has to keep running East Montana.

3:28:22.890 --> 3:28:25.230
<v Speaker 1>I know what the company is called. I'm guessing that's

3:28:25.250 --> 3:28:27.210
<v Speaker 1>how they pronounce it. It could be Aumentum, but I

3:28:27.650 --> 3:28:30.820
<v Speaker 1>don't really care. In the justification, they say, quote, Aumentum

3:28:30.900 --> 3:28:34.640
<v Speaker 1>owns and controls key facility infrastructure and operational assets at

3:28:34.700 --> 3:28:39.110
<v Speaker 1>Camp East Montana. These assets include temporary housing units, security systems, generators,

3:28:39.170 --> 3:28:42.490
<v Speaker 1>food service equipment, and other infrastructure necessary to operate this facility.

3:28:43.110 --> 3:28:47.770
<v Speaker 1>Because of this ownership and operational control, Amentum uniquely possesses

3:28:47.850 --> 3:28:51.100
<v Speaker 1>the ability to continue services without a break in performance.

3:28:51.220 --> 3:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>No other vendor can assume responsibility for the facility and

3:28:54.200 --> 3:28:58.480
<v Speaker 1>provide the required services without substantial transition time, duplicity cost,

3:28:58.620 --> 3:29:03.679
<v Speaker 1>operational disruption, and unacceptable risk to detainee welfare and mission continuity.

3:29:04.420 --> 3:29:06.310
<v Speaker 1>They then go on to mention the Office of the

3:29:06.330 --> 3:29:09.870
<v Speaker 1>Inspector General report on the horrific conditions there, including three

3:29:09.910 --> 3:29:12.609
<v Speaker 1>deaths and the destruction of evidence in one of those cases.

3:29:13.430 --> 3:29:16.170
<v Speaker 1>They say, quote, recent oversight by the ICE Office of

3:29:16.240 --> 3:29:20.500
<v Speaker 1>Detention Oversight yielded a preliminary report identifying more findings, the

3:29:20.560 --> 3:29:23.660
<v Speaker 1>circumstances created and contributed to a need for immediate contractual

3:29:23.760 --> 3:29:27.359
<v Speaker 1>action to protect any detainees and staff and ensure performance

3:29:27.400 --> 3:29:31.709
<v Speaker 1>under ICE standards. So they are renewing and extending this

3:29:31.770 --> 3:29:37.030
<v Speaker 1>contract for this agency, which is remarkably bad among ICE contractors,

3:29:37.400 --> 3:29:43.000
<v Speaker 1>among immigration detention. This contract is vast. It has a

3:29:43.040 --> 3:29:45.779
<v Speaker 1>base period of seven months, followed by a 12-month option,

3:29:45.860 --> 3:29:49.430
<v Speaker 1>and then two six-month options. The payout for these, and

3:29:49.450 --> 3:29:52.129
<v Speaker 1>then there's quite a lot of redactions in this, a

3:29:52.150 --> 3:29:55.500
<v Speaker 1>redacted item on the budget, combined with all these extensions,

3:29:55.570 --> 3:30:00.410
<v Speaker 1>would together be $ 2. 8 billion. Jesus. Yeah, this is for

3:30:00.450 --> 3:30:04.830
<v Speaker 1>a tent camp, right, on a military base. So, like,

3:30:04.870 --> 3:30:09.640
<v Speaker 1>these people are not having to build buildings. They have

3:30:09.660 --> 3:30:11.300
<v Speaker 1>to maintain their tent camp, right? But they also don't

3:30:11.800 --> 3:30:14.300
<v Speaker 1>own the land. Like, they're doing this as a contractor

3:30:14.480 --> 3:30:16.480
<v Speaker 1>on a military base. That's crazy.

3:30:16.500 --> 3:30:19.080
<v Speaker 6>I mean, you're left to wonder how much of this

3:30:19.120 --> 3:30:23.000
<v Speaker 6>whole thing is, like, state subsidies for, like, allies for

3:30:23.020 --> 3:30:24.540
<v Speaker 6>the republican party or like.

3:30:24.379 --> 3:30:27.539
<v Speaker 2>It's it's just it seems i mean that's a lot

3:30:27.580 --> 3:30:28.039
<v Speaker 2>of stuff.

3:30:27.879 --> 3:30:30.810
<v Speaker 6>Yeah beyond the morality of like what's going on it

3:30:30.830 --> 3:30:33.510
<v Speaker 6>seems like a wildly inefficient use of funds.

3:30:33.290 --> 3:30:35.610
<v Speaker 1>Yeah well what's particularly remarkable i don't think amentum had

3:30:35.709 --> 3:30:37.470
<v Speaker 1>ever we've reported on this before but i'm pretty sure

3:30:37.490 --> 3:30:39.550
<v Speaker 1>at the time we reported that they they this isn't

3:30:39.570 --> 3:30:42.170
<v Speaker 1>what they do or they hadn't done this before this

3:30:42.209 --> 3:30:44.090
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the biggest contract by orders of

3:30:44.140 --> 3:30:48.379
<v Speaker 1>magnitude they've ever had also the monthly rate escalates from

3:30:48.379 --> 3:30:50.600
<v Speaker 1>68 million a month to 97 million a month.

3:30:52.640 --> 3:30:53.920
<v Speaker 6>Whoa.

3:30:53.940 --> 3:30:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, maybe Trump's just going to go after it

3:30:55.820 --> 3:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a bit more with inflation. Maybe he's going to invade

3:30:59.120 --> 3:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>some more places and make oil and everything's going to

3:31:01.980 --> 3:31:04.480
<v Speaker 1>get more expensive. Maybe that's what they're predicting. But it

3:31:04.520 --> 3:31:09.590
<v Speaker 1>could also be that they plan to scale up this facility, right? Yeah. Yeah,

3:31:09.690 --> 3:31:14.550
<v Speaker 1>it is remarkable. This one hasn't had as much reporting,

3:31:14.590 --> 3:31:16.110
<v Speaker 1>I don't think, as some of the geo group and

3:31:16.150 --> 3:31:18.790
<v Speaker 1>core civic facilities because it's harder to rent, because it's

3:31:18.990 --> 3:31:22.370
<v Speaker 1>harder for people to protest outside. Often we find out

3:31:22.410 --> 3:31:25.410
<v Speaker 1>about things by like either migrants shouting them out over

3:31:25.430 --> 3:31:28.830
<v Speaker 1>the walls or like writing notes and tossing them out.

3:31:29.400 --> 3:31:31.779
<v Speaker 1>So we haven't heard as much about this, but like

3:31:31.860 --> 3:31:34.859
<v Speaker 1>the conditions we have heard in that report were horrific.

3:31:35.360 --> 3:31:38.619
<v Speaker 1>And nonetheless, these guys are about to net massive bounty.

3:31:39.600 --> 3:31:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Talking of bounties, is it time for us to make

3:31:43.400 --> 3:31:44.879
<v Speaker 1>some money with an advertising break?

3:31:45.440 --> 3:31:46.140
<v Speaker 6>I'm afraid of this.

3:31:46.500 --> 3:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

3:31:47.580 --> 3:31:47.780
<v Speaker 7>Nice.

3:32:00.100 --> 3:32:04.379
<v Speaker 2>And we're back. So first, kind of a quick story.

3:32:04.400 --> 3:32:06.390
<v Speaker 2>This is actually a huge story. It might wind up

3:32:06.420 --> 3:32:09.070
<v Speaker 2>being one of the biggest ones we've covered in the

3:32:09.110 --> 3:32:11.010
<v Speaker 2>last few months. But at the moment, there's just not

3:32:11.050 --> 3:32:13.470
<v Speaker 2>a ton out in terms of like knowing what the

3:32:13.510 --> 3:32:16.310
<v Speaker 2>consequences are going to be. But there was a massive

3:32:16.510 --> 3:32:21.250
<v Speaker 2>vulnerability revealed in PHP this week. PHP, which stands for

3:32:21.270 --> 3:32:24.300
<v Speaker 2>personal homepage, is a scripting language used to develop websites,

3:32:24.800 --> 3:32:26.880
<v Speaker 2>like most of the websites in one way or another.

3:32:26.900 --> 3:32:29.240
<v Speaker 2>I think like 70% of the internet these days relies

3:32:29.300 --> 3:32:32.340
<v Speaker 2>on PHP in some way, you know, aspects of the

3:32:32.379 --> 3:32:36.039
<v Speaker 2>website or whatever, like I still use it. WordPress uses

3:32:36.060 --> 3:32:38.970
<v Speaker 2>it heavily. So do platforms like Drupal and Magneto. It

3:32:38.990 --> 3:32:41.189
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't be too far off to view PHP as a

3:32:41.250 --> 3:32:44.800
<v Speaker 2>foundation level of the modern internet. Late Tuesday, a massive

3:32:44.820 --> 3:32:48.630
<v Speaker 2>vulnerability was discovered in PHP by AI Systems. Two vulnerabilities

3:32:48.709 --> 3:32:51.289
<v Speaker 2>actually were found, and without getting technical, these could provide

3:32:51.350 --> 3:32:53.250
<v Speaker 2>bad actors with a way to run whatever code they

3:32:53.270 --> 3:32:56.510
<v Speaker 2>want on an affected server without even logging in. One

3:32:56.550 --> 3:32:58.330
<v Speaker 2>thing a bad actor could do with this is create

3:32:58.350 --> 3:33:00.770
<v Speaker 2>a backdoor or edit the content of a website to

3:33:00.790 --> 3:33:04.830
<v Speaker 2>embed malicious code. This is a tremendously, like, broad-reaching and

3:33:04.900 --> 3:33:08.620
<v Speaker 2>severe vulnerability. Now, when stuff like this gets found, the

3:33:08.700 --> 3:33:11.640
<v Speaker 2>ideal thing to do is to inform the people who

3:33:11.680 --> 3:33:15.820
<v Speaker 2>maintain PHP or whatever, or whatever thing a vulnerability has

3:33:15.840 --> 3:33:18.640
<v Speaker 2>been found in so they can patch it before it

3:33:18.700 --> 3:33:21.680
<v Speaker 2>becomes known to everybody that there's this massive vulnerability. But

3:33:21.700 --> 3:33:24.780
<v Speaker 2>that's not what happened. The vulnerability was leaked hours before

3:33:24.820 --> 3:33:26.820
<v Speaker 2>the patch came out. The patch was set for Wednesday.

3:33:27.379 --> 3:33:30.580
<v Speaker 2>And on Tuesday, like late afternoon, early evening, everyone knew

3:33:30.600 --> 3:33:33.330
<v Speaker 2>that there was a vulnerability. And so every major website

3:33:33.350 --> 3:33:36.330
<v Speaker 2>on the planet scrambled taking themselves down or disabling PHP

3:33:36.370 --> 3:33:39.210
<v Speaker 2>related parts of the website and applying emergency fixes. Like

3:33:39.230 --> 3:33:41.430
<v Speaker 2>the Netherlands, like a bunch of government websites went down.

3:33:41.790 --> 3:33:45.320
<v Speaker 2>4chan was down. A bunch of like very large and

3:33:45.360 --> 3:33:48.400
<v Speaker 2>influential websites were down, including a lot of government sites.

3:33:48.879 --> 3:33:51.480
<v Speaker 2>You've probably noticed this to some extent. I want to

3:33:51.500 --> 3:33:54.520
<v Speaker 2>quote now from an article by Malwarebyte Labs. So it's

3:33:54.540 --> 3:33:56.860
<v Speaker 2>way too early to know what the long-term impacts of

3:33:56.959 --> 3:33:59.730
<v Speaker 2>all these vulnerabilities and of the hacks that are going

3:33:59.750 --> 3:34:01.930
<v Speaker 2>to be carried out as a result of these vulnerabilities

3:34:01.950 --> 3:34:03.610
<v Speaker 2>will be, but this is a big story. You should

3:34:03.629 --> 3:34:05.269
<v Speaker 2>expect to hear a lot more in the near future.

3:34:05.290 --> 3:34:22.310
<v Speaker 2>This is an example of how You know, one of

3:34:22.330 --> 3:34:25.220
<v Speaker 2>the things these AI tools have done is that hacking

3:34:25.240 --> 3:34:28.400
<v Speaker 2>has always involved a lot of automated stuff like running

3:34:28.440 --> 3:34:31.180
<v Speaker 2>scripts and whatnot to search for vulnerabilities. And AI has

3:34:31.250 --> 3:34:35.310
<v Speaker 2>allowed us to supercharge the speed at which vulnerabilities are

3:34:35.370 --> 3:34:39.129
<v Speaker 2>found and exploited. And so shit like this is going

3:34:39.150 --> 3:34:41.720
<v Speaker 2>to become much more common. This is all part of, like,

3:34:41.780 --> 3:34:44.400
<v Speaker 2>the decreasing reliability with which we'll all be able to

3:34:44.520 --> 3:34:47.900
<v Speaker 2>access and utilize the Internet safely. And, yeah, it's just

3:34:47.940 --> 3:34:49.540
<v Speaker 2>kind of worth keeping an eye on this, even though

3:34:49.660 --> 3:34:51.859
<v Speaker 2>it's not clear what the fallout entirely is going to

3:34:51.879 --> 3:34:52.480
<v Speaker 2>be at this point.

3:34:52.600 --> 3:34:53.380
<v Speaker 1>Scary.

3:34:54.040 --> 3:34:56.300
<v Speaker 2>But everybody you know in digital security says this is

3:34:56.360 --> 3:34:57.099
<v Speaker 2>a very big deal.

3:34:57.680 --> 3:35:01.610
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's real bad. Heads on a swivel. Family.

3:35:02.310 --> 3:35:05.750
<v Speaker 2>So moving outside of the Internet and over to a

3:35:05.790 --> 3:35:08.210
<v Speaker 2>place that has no Internet, let's talk about Canada.

3:35:08.250 --> 3:35:10.230
<v Speaker 1>Garrison, is that accurate? Does Canada not have the Internet?

3:35:10.700 --> 3:35:11.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, man.

3:35:12.200 --> 3:35:14.010
<v Speaker 1>You don't know. Okay, that's good. Good to know. That's

3:35:14.030 --> 3:35:15.699
<v Speaker 1>our Canadian correspondent, Garrison Davis.

3:35:15.720 --> 3:35:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Thanks.

3:35:16.260 --> 3:35:16.380
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

3:35:19.670 --> 3:35:21.850
<v Speaker 1>Few months. So yeah, yeah. If you can text me,

3:35:21.870 --> 3:35:23.869
<v Speaker 1>we'll know there's internet. Well, actually, that's not the internet.

3:35:24.170 --> 3:35:25.129
<v Speaker 1>That's good. That's good.

3:35:25.270 --> 3:35:27.250
<v Speaker 2>Those of you who pay attention to the most important

3:35:27.290 --> 3:35:29.730
<v Speaker 2>goings on of our neighbors to the north, and I mean, Canadians,

3:35:29.800 --> 3:35:32.500
<v Speaker 2>not Yankees, for our southern listeners, know that the province

3:35:32.540 --> 3:35:34.940
<v Speaker 2>of Alberta just held a referendum on whether or not

3:35:34.980 --> 3:35:38.240
<v Speaker 2>to hold a binding referendum on separating from Canada. And

3:35:38.340 --> 3:35:41.439
<v Speaker 2>the separatists failed, just like in Star Wars. Also, like

3:35:41.500 --> 3:35:43.879
<v Speaker 2>in Star Wars, the roots of the Alberta secession movement

3:35:43.920 --> 3:35:46.320
<v Speaker 2>have a lot to do with complex issues of trade,

3:35:46.400 --> 3:35:51.269
<v Speaker 2>particularly the oil and gas trade. In 1969, only about 5%

3:35:51.270 --> 3:35:55.330
<v Speaker 2>of Albertans expressed interest in discussing separation from Canada during

3:35:55.370 --> 3:35:59.330
<v Speaker 2>a provincial poll. But then came the 1970s and the

3:35:59.330 --> 3:36:01.410
<v Speaker 2>1973 oil crisis, which was sparked by the Yom Kippur

3:36:01.450 --> 3:36:04.350
<v Speaker 2>War and then OPEC getting big mad. OPEC got really

3:36:04.370 --> 3:36:06.150
<v Speaker 2>mad a couple of times in the 70s. And there

3:36:06.170 --> 3:36:08.640
<v Speaker 2>were a bunch of fuel shocks. If you grew up

3:36:08.900 --> 3:36:10.740
<v Speaker 2>in like the time most of the people in this

3:36:10.760 --> 3:36:12.780
<v Speaker 2>podcast did and you went to like an elementary or

3:36:12.820 --> 3:36:14.600
<v Speaker 2>a middle school or any kind of public school that

3:36:14.640 --> 3:36:17.599
<v Speaker 2>had no windows, that's because it was probably built around

3:36:17.640 --> 3:36:19.940
<v Speaker 2>this period. And they were like desperate to find ways

3:36:19.959 --> 3:36:21.720
<v Speaker 2>to reduce heating and cooling costs.

3:36:21.780 --> 3:36:21.860
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

3:36:23.170 --> 3:36:23.620
<v Speaker 10>Amazing.

3:36:23.780 --> 3:36:26.910
<v Speaker 2>And another impact that those fuel shocks had was that

3:36:27.050 --> 3:36:29.770
<v Speaker 2>it caused a lot of North America to go like, well,

3:36:29.890 --> 3:36:32.080
<v Speaker 2>I guess we have to exploit our own oil reserves

3:36:32.220 --> 3:36:34.320
<v Speaker 2>much more because we cannot rely on the stuff we

3:36:34.360 --> 3:36:37.140
<v Speaker 2>had been relying on. This helped spur massive and rapid

3:36:37.200 --> 3:36:39.619
<v Speaker 2>growth in the North American oil sector, obviously across the

3:36:39.660 --> 3:36:41.860
<v Speaker 2>United States, but in Canada as well. This was a

3:36:42.000 --> 3:36:44.980
<v Speaker 2>big deal in Canada because Alberta happens to be one

3:36:45.000 --> 3:36:48.000
<v Speaker 2>of the most oil-rich places on planet Earth. The province

3:36:48.060 --> 3:36:50.959
<v Speaker 2>alone has the fourth highest proven reserves of oil on

3:36:51.020 --> 3:36:54.379
<v Speaker 2>planet Earth, according to a 2025 report by a consulting firm,

3:36:54.400 --> 3:36:57.700
<v Speaker 2>McDaniel &amp; Associates. And we actually didn't– like this is

3:36:57.760 --> 3:36:59.880
<v Speaker 2>actually a change in terms of what we knew about

3:36:59.940 --> 3:37:02.900
<v Speaker 2>Alberta's oil reserves. They keep going up as we like

3:37:03.070 --> 3:37:06.120
<v Speaker 2>figure out how to get better at– it's a mix of–

3:37:06.420 --> 3:37:09.600
<v Speaker 2>hydraulic fracking and better science and whatnot, but they're getting

3:37:09.640 --> 3:37:12.660
<v Speaker 2>better at finding out and exploiting how much oil there

3:37:12.720 --> 3:37:15.840
<v Speaker 2>is in Alberta. About 2 million more barrels of oil

3:37:15.879 --> 3:37:18.199
<v Speaker 2>were recently discovered in Alberta thanks to a mix of

3:37:18.220 --> 3:37:21.199
<v Speaker 2>hydraulic fracturing and new technology for drilling wells. Per a

3:37:21.220 --> 3:37:24.119
<v Speaker 2>write-up by the Bow Report, oil sands production has grown

3:37:24.160 --> 3:37:27.400
<v Speaker 2>substantially in the past decade, up 70% from 2 million

3:37:27.420 --> 3:37:30.039
<v Speaker 2>to 3.4 million barrels per day. The growth of several

3:37:30.080 --> 3:37:33.000
<v Speaker 2>projects has increased confidence in the commercial viability of developing

3:37:33.050 --> 3:37:36.840
<v Speaker 2>additional lands. Now, this is significant for a couple of reasons,

3:37:36.959 --> 3:37:38.780
<v Speaker 2>but one thing that has grown over the past few

3:37:38.820 --> 3:37:43.800
<v Speaker 2>decades alongside Alberta's proven oil reserves is secessionist or separatist sentiment.

3:37:44.240 --> 3:37:47.300
<v Speaker 2>There are different opinions among those people about what should

3:37:47.360 --> 3:37:50.340
<v Speaker 2>be done when and if Alberta separates, but a decent

3:37:50.360 --> 3:37:52.740
<v Speaker 2>chunk of them do support joining the United States.

3:37:53.200 --> 3:37:53.870
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think it.

3:37:53.840 --> 3:37:56.290
<v Speaker 2>Takes a lot of imagining to wonder why some people

3:37:56.350 --> 3:37:58.590
<v Speaker 2>in the charge of the United States government right now

3:37:58.970 --> 3:38:02.710
<v Speaker 2>might support that. To continue with that Beau Report analysis,

3:38:03.090 --> 3:38:05.850
<v Speaker 2>since the shale revolution in 2008, there's been a massive

3:38:05.890 --> 3:38:07.879
<v Speaker 2>growth from North America, and the rest of the world

3:38:08.000 --> 3:38:11.010
<v Speaker 2>hasn't grown oil production. we're now seeing that the tight

3:38:11.050 --> 3:38:13.330
<v Speaker 2>plays in the U.S. aren't infinite and are showing signs

3:38:13.370 --> 3:38:16.429
<v Speaker 2>of plateauing. Specifically, when we look at the United States'

3:38:16.490 --> 3:38:19.119
<v Speaker 2>largest oil play, the Permian, it has essentially been flat

3:38:19.180 --> 3:38:23.260
<v Speaker 2>at 5.5 million barrels per day since December of 2023.

3:38:23.260 --> 3:38:26.539
<v Speaker 2>Flat production from the Permian is contrary to the previous decade,

3:38:26.580 --> 3:38:28.840
<v Speaker 2>where we saw tight oil production grow by half a

3:38:28.900 --> 3:38:31.980
<v Speaker 2>million barrels per day per year. Oil demand has gone

3:38:32.020 --> 3:38:33.940
<v Speaker 2>up by about a million barrels a day per year

3:38:33.990 --> 3:38:35.710
<v Speaker 2>for the last several decades, and at this point we

3:38:35.730 --> 3:38:37.650
<v Speaker 2>do expect that to continue, at least in the very

3:38:37.709 --> 3:38:40.860
<v Speaker 2>near term. Given the growing demand for oil and stagnation

3:38:40.900 --> 3:38:43.640
<v Speaker 2>in supply growth since the shale revolution, it's expected that

3:38:43.680 --> 3:38:47.140
<v Speaker 2>Alberta's oil sands reserves will become increasingly critical. As global

3:38:47.240 --> 3:38:49.760
<v Speaker 2>oil demand continues to rise and with limited growth and

3:38:49.800 --> 3:38:52.620
<v Speaker 2>production from other sources, oil sands reserves will be relied

3:38:52.670 --> 3:38:56.230
<v Speaker 2>upon more heavily. So Alberta is one of the places

3:38:56.270 --> 3:38:59.130
<v Speaker 2>in North America that we keep finding more oil. And

3:38:59.390 --> 3:39:02.450
<v Speaker 2>as we start to plateau in the United States, people

3:39:02.530 --> 3:39:05.460
<v Speaker 2>in the U.S. government, particularly the Trump administration, are looking

3:39:05.480 --> 3:39:08.880
<v Speaker 2>at Alberta as a potential crucial resource for the future.

3:39:09.820 --> 3:39:12.420
<v Speaker 2>So while there's a lot of wackiness around the Alberta

3:39:12.440 --> 3:39:15.040
<v Speaker 2>secession movement, as there is with any secession movement in

3:39:15.060 --> 3:39:18.820
<v Speaker 2>the U.S. or in Canada, there's also major geopolitical implications

3:39:18.860 --> 3:39:22.099
<v Speaker 2>behind the mere discussion of Albertan independence. And the prize

3:39:22.160 --> 3:39:24.640
<v Speaker 2>of Albertan oil was considered well worth some scheming by

3:39:24.680 --> 3:39:28.350
<v Speaker 2>people in the Trump administration. The movement had gotten supercharged

3:39:28.420 --> 3:39:31.580
<v Speaker 2>first during a conflict in the early 1980s between then

3:39:31.660 --> 3:39:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau and the Albertan Premier Peter Lougheed,

3:39:35.340 --> 3:39:38.840
<v Speaker 2>who disagreed about how fair Canada's revenue-sharing energy policy was.

3:39:39.340 --> 3:39:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Trudeau argued that the federal government needed to control Canada's

3:39:42.600 --> 3:39:45.360
<v Speaker 2>natural resources and sought to impose further taxes on oil

3:39:45.400 --> 3:39:48.679
<v Speaker 2>and gas revenues. Lougheed threatened to cut production in response

3:39:48.720 --> 3:39:52.940
<v Speaker 2>to new taxes. 49% of respondents in a 1981 poll

3:39:52.959 --> 3:39:55.980
<v Speaker 2>by the Canada West Foundation agreed that Western Canadians benefited

3:39:56.120 --> 3:39:59.000
<v Speaker 2>so little from membership in the Canadian state that independence

3:39:59.060 --> 3:40:01.670
<v Speaker 2>made sense. And in the decades since, the issue has

3:40:01.700 --> 3:40:05.430
<v Speaker 2>remained bubbling in the background, like crude. It was ignited

3:40:05.470 --> 3:40:08.430
<v Speaker 2>in the modern era in 2015, when Pierre Trudeau's son

3:40:08.530 --> 3:40:11.290
<v Speaker 2>Justin became the Prime Minister. And to make a long

3:40:11.310 --> 3:40:13.490
<v Speaker 2>story short, over the last several years, things have really

3:40:13.550 --> 3:40:16.600
<v Speaker 2>come to a head. separatist parties who had attracted like

3:40:16.700 --> 3:40:19.380
<v Speaker 2>one or 2% of the vote previously were supercharged by

3:40:19.459 --> 3:40:23.140
<v Speaker 2>COVID-19 restrictions. And then the fact that Trump's been launching

3:40:23.180 --> 3:40:25.600
<v Speaker 2>a trade war and talking about making Canada the 51st state,

3:40:25.980 --> 3:40:27.940
<v Speaker 2>that's also helped kind of clamp down on some of

3:40:27.959 --> 3:40:29.699
<v Speaker 2>the separatist sentiment. It's a big part of what Prime

3:40:29.730 --> 3:40:32.970
<v Speaker 2>Minister Carney has used to sort of like argue that

3:40:33.070 --> 3:40:35.670
<v Speaker 2>Canadians need to stand together in this time. And he's

3:40:35.730 --> 3:40:39.170
<v Speaker 2>right that the separatist movement is being like deliberately pushed

3:40:39.629 --> 3:40:42.250
<v Speaker 2>by a whole bunch of people in the United States. Now, obviously,

3:40:42.270 --> 3:40:45.320
<v Speaker 2>the most direct reason why this referendum came about is

3:40:45.379 --> 3:40:48.880
<v Speaker 2>because in May, Albertan Premier Danielle Smith announced that the

3:40:49.000 --> 3:40:51.900
<v Speaker 2>independence question would come to a vote. She supported a

3:40:52.000 --> 3:40:55.080
<v Speaker 2>unified Canada, but was willing to have a referendum vote

3:40:55.120 --> 3:40:58.360
<v Speaker 2>because over 300,000 Albertans had signed a petition asking for

3:40:58.390 --> 3:41:01.450
<v Speaker 2>a referendum. The petition's signatures had been gathered after a

3:41:01.490 --> 3:41:05.210
<v Speaker 2>mass town hall campaign by pro-separation citizens. It was blocked

3:41:05.250 --> 3:41:07.930
<v Speaker 2>by a court for reasons to do with Indigenous rights initially,

3:41:07.970 --> 3:41:10.709
<v Speaker 2>but was allowed to go through. Voters in this referendum

3:41:10.730 --> 3:41:12.810
<v Speaker 2>had a number of choices to make, not just as

3:41:12.830 --> 3:41:15.410
<v Speaker 2>to whether or not to do a binding referendum, although

3:41:15.450 --> 3:41:17.080
<v Speaker 2>first they did have to choose, do we remain with

3:41:17.110 --> 3:41:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Canada or do we start the process of holding a

3:41:19.340 --> 3:41:23.290
<v Speaker 2>binding separation referendum? But, per the BBC, quote, There are

3:41:23.330 --> 3:41:25.269
<v Speaker 2>nine other questions that have been put to voters, though

3:41:25.290 --> 3:41:27.470
<v Speaker 2>they have been overshadowed by the one on independence. They

3:41:27.510 --> 3:41:30.690
<v Speaker 2>deal with two main topics, immigration and constitutional matters. For

3:41:30.709 --> 3:41:32.610
<v Speaker 2>the most part, all of them seek to ask Albertans

3:41:32.650 --> 3:41:36.420
<v Speaker 2>about options to gain autonomy from Ottawa. Voters were also asked,

3:41:36.440 --> 3:41:38.760
<v Speaker 2>for example, if they wanted more control on immigration and

3:41:38.800 --> 3:41:41.379
<v Speaker 2>whether people should have to provide proof of citizenship to vote.

3:41:42.290 --> 3:41:42.530
<v Speaker 7>U.S.

3:41:42.570 --> 3:41:45.490
<v Speaker 2>Interests repeatedly attempted to influence the election in a number

3:41:45.530 --> 3:41:48.570
<v Speaker 2>of ways. A write-up in Maclean's documents how U.S. Treasury

3:41:48.610 --> 3:41:51.750
<v Speaker 2>Secretary Scott Besant held an interview with Jack Posobiec where

3:41:51.770 --> 3:41:53.650
<v Speaker 2>he said, I think we should let them come down

3:41:53.690 --> 3:41:56.290
<v Speaker 2>into the U.S. Alberta is a natural partner for the U.S.

3:41:56.490 --> 3:41:58.410
<v Speaker 2>Rumor that they may have a referendum on whether they

3:41:58.450 --> 3:41:59.410
<v Speaker 2>want to stay in the U.S.

3:41:59.490 --> 3:41:59.830
<v Speaker 1>Or not.

3:42:00.540 --> 3:42:03.259
<v Speaker 2>This was taken very seriously by Canadians as a statement

3:42:03.280 --> 3:42:06.260
<v Speaker 2>of U.S. support for intervention in Canadian politics. Consistent with

3:42:06.280 --> 3:42:10.480
<v Speaker 2>the 2025 national security strategy our regime released, which revealed

3:42:10.560 --> 3:42:13.260
<v Speaker 2>what's known as the Trump corollary to the Monroe Doctrine.

3:42:13.360 --> 3:42:14.320
<v Speaker 1>The Donro Doctrine?

3:42:14.680 --> 3:42:14.900
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

3:42:15.240 --> 3:42:17.760
<v Speaker 2>This, per the White House, put Canada in the U.S.

3:42:17.800 --> 3:42:22.280
<v Speaker 2>sphere of influence. As McLean's wrote, quote, The document was

3:42:22.320 --> 3:42:24.600
<v Speaker 2>read with dread in Ottawa. The strategy has, of course,

3:42:24.740 --> 3:42:27.140
<v Speaker 2>played out in rhetoric and policy. The administration wants a

3:42:27.200 --> 3:42:30.459
<v Speaker 2>say on Canada's trade agreements. It wants specialized access to resources,

3:42:30.560 --> 3:42:33.000
<v Speaker 2>and it has zero regard for notions of sovereignty, except,

3:42:33.120 --> 3:42:35.490
<v Speaker 2>it seems, when it comes to Alberta. Now, the most

3:42:35.570 --> 3:42:37.890
<v Speaker 2>direct U.S. influence in this whole process so far has

3:42:37.930 --> 3:42:43.310
<v Speaker 2>been online. Tons of MAGA-affiliated accounts pushed Albertan secession. Benny

3:42:43.370 --> 3:42:48.030
<v Speaker 2>Johnson suggested taking Alberta militarily. Stephen Crowder supported Albertan statehood.

3:42:48.090 --> 3:42:51.760
<v Speaker 2>All sorts of stupid shit. A McGill study found pro-independence

3:42:51.800 --> 3:42:56.060
<v Speaker 2>accounts on social media outperformed anti-independence accounts by an eight

3:42:56.100 --> 3:42:59.920
<v Speaker 2>to one ratio, which is pretty clear evidence of interference

3:42:59.959 --> 3:43:03.880
<v Speaker 2>by social media companies, I would say. Right before the referendum,

3:43:04.000 --> 3:43:07.350
<v Speaker 2>Public Interest Alberta called for an inquiry into foreign interference

3:43:07.450 --> 3:43:10.830
<v Speaker 2>in Alberta's secession referendum after it was found that Albertan

3:43:10.910 --> 3:43:14.870
<v Speaker 2>separatist leaders held a meeting with U.S. Republican political strategists

3:43:15.070 --> 3:43:18.600
<v Speaker 2>in the province about how to push the referendum. This

3:43:18.680 --> 3:43:21.480
<v Speaker 2>is all very fucked up and Canadians should be pissed

3:43:21.540 --> 3:43:24.200
<v Speaker 2>at us. The good news is that for now, things

3:43:24.220 --> 3:43:26.890
<v Speaker 2>did not go MAGA's way, did not go the Trump

3:43:26.930 --> 3:43:31.070
<v Speaker 2>administration's way. Albertans voted overwhelmingly to stay part of Canada.

3:43:31.170 --> 3:43:33.570
<v Speaker 2>Nearly 2 million people cast their ballots and so far

3:43:33.590 --> 3:43:34.990
<v Speaker 2>about 75% of them.

3:43:34.910 --> 3:43:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Look to have supported remaining Canadian.

3:43:37.500 --> 3:43:39.440
<v Speaker 2>I think we'll be continuing to cover aspects of this

3:43:39.480 --> 3:43:41.040
<v Speaker 2>in the future, but that's what you need to know

3:43:41.080 --> 3:43:41.380
<v Speaker 2>right now.

3:43:42.040 --> 3:43:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Nice. Anything to add, Gare?

3:43:44.879 --> 3:43:48.060
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I'm glad that Alberta voted to not have a

3:43:48.120 --> 3:43:49.699
<v Speaker 6>vote on whether to leave Canada.

3:43:49.720 --> 3:43:50.099
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

3:43:50.760 --> 3:43:55.300
<v Speaker 6>Unfortunately, though, some of the more confusingly worded referendum questions

3:43:55.400 --> 3:44:00.300
<v Speaker 6>on stuff like immigration were not as unanimous. The early

3:44:00.379 --> 3:44:04.400
<v Speaker 6>count on a bunch of those immigration questions leans, yes,

3:44:04.560 --> 3:44:09.760
<v Speaker 6>in favor of pursuing more restrictions, but the margins on

3:44:09.900 --> 3:44:14.160
<v Speaker 6>those are pretty small and votes from cities like Edmonton

3:44:14.200 --> 3:44:18.330
<v Speaker 6>and Calgary are still coming in. and could theoretically switch

3:44:18.370 --> 3:44:21.410
<v Speaker 6>those over, but they'd have to go up a couple percent.

3:44:22.230 --> 3:44:25.250
<v Speaker 6>Some of the other questions on changes to the Constitution

3:44:25.690 --> 3:44:29.470
<v Speaker 6>have already flipped from yes to no, as we've been

3:44:29.490 --> 3:44:33.670
<v Speaker 6>getting in more results from the cities. But these other

3:44:33.690 --> 3:44:37.270
<v Speaker 6>questions are pretty close. We don't have full results quite yet.

3:44:37.970 --> 3:44:42.110
<v Speaker 6>So although U.S. interference did not produce the result on

3:44:42.190 --> 3:44:46.720
<v Speaker 6>separation that MAGA may have wanted, the type of immigration

3:44:46.930 --> 3:44:51.000
<v Speaker 6>rhetoric that spreads on social media is not, you know,

3:44:51.160 --> 3:44:53.379
<v Speaker 6>unique to the United States or really any kind of

3:44:53.440 --> 3:44:57.940
<v Speaker 6>quote unquote Western country right now. There's pretty ugly stuff everywhere.

3:44:57.959 --> 3:45:01.540
<v Speaker 6>But yeah, in terms of the separation referendum, that all

3:45:02.240 --> 3:45:04.200
<v Speaker 6>lines up with what I've been reading in the old

3:45:04.260 --> 3:45:09.190
<v Speaker 6>CBC and what I've been talking with my family about. Because, yeah,

3:45:09.430 --> 3:45:10.090
<v Speaker 6>they've been voting.

3:45:11.070 --> 3:45:11.530
<v Speaker 1>They're voting.

3:45:11.550 --> 3:45:13.010
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, Canada, I'm going to give you the

3:45:13.070 --> 3:45:16.790
<v Speaker 2>same advice I give every country these days. Invest in

3:45:16.870 --> 3:45:18.350
<v Speaker 2>long-range missile defenses.

3:45:19.240 --> 3:45:24.340
<v Speaker 6>Well, I don't know if that's the best use of

3:45:24.560 --> 3:45:25.560
<v Speaker 6>Canadian state money.

3:45:25.580 --> 3:45:31.130
<v Speaker 1>It might be. There are some countries that really do

3:45:31.150 --> 3:45:31.670
<v Speaker 1>like this.

3:45:32.230 --> 3:45:36.070
<v Speaker 6>But no, I mean, Alberta really is the heart of

3:45:36.129 --> 3:45:39.240
<v Speaker 6>the kind of conservative movement in Canada right now. This

3:45:39.300 --> 3:45:42.240
<v Speaker 6>is where, like, you know, like the... The trucker convoy

3:45:42.440 --> 3:45:46.540
<v Speaker 6>was organized, all of those. All those many years ago.

3:45:46.560 --> 3:45:49.460
<v Speaker 2>It is one of three provinces I've heard described as

3:45:49.500 --> 3:45:50.340
<v Speaker 2>Canada's Texas.

3:45:50.700 --> 3:45:54.110
<v Speaker 6>It is. That's the only one that's accurate, right? People

3:45:54.129 --> 3:45:56.670
<v Speaker 6>could say maybe Manitoba or Saskatchewan.

3:45:56.690 --> 3:45:57.189
<v Speaker 1>They're lying.

3:45:57.209 --> 3:45:59.090
<v Speaker 6>Those are obviously Midwest states.

3:45:59.430 --> 3:46:01.650
<v Speaker 2>Nova Scotia's got a little bit of Texas in it,

3:46:01.770 --> 3:46:05.590
<v Speaker 2>but only a little. No, it's definitely Alberta. I mean,

3:46:05.850 --> 3:46:09.690
<v Speaker 2>my family lives surrounded by oil derricks. It's quite incredible.

3:46:09.720 --> 3:46:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Mm-hmm.

3:46:10.950 --> 3:46:16.830
<v Speaker 6>Should we stick to non-US countries and pivot to Mia Wong?

3:46:17.410 --> 3:46:20.379
<v Speaker 13>So speaking of places where people are pissed off at

3:46:20.400 --> 3:46:23.519
<v Speaker 13>the Trump administration, we are moving to our dispatches from

3:46:23.560 --> 3:46:27.640
<v Speaker 13>a world in revolt. And we're moving first to Albania,

3:46:28.520 --> 3:46:35.090
<v Speaker 13>which has seen staggeringly large protests over the last roughly

3:46:35.250 --> 3:46:39.350
<v Speaker 13>a week. It's very difficult to get good numbers on

3:46:39.770 --> 3:46:43.820
<v Speaker 13>how big the Albanian protests are. I will say just

3:46:43.930 --> 3:46:47.220
<v Speaker 13>off the top as a indication of how successful they've been,

3:46:47.240 --> 3:46:49.860
<v Speaker 13>they lit the Supreme Court on fire. They lit part

3:46:49.920 --> 3:46:54.099
<v Speaker 13>of the Albanian Central Bank on fire. So the protests

3:46:54.120 --> 3:46:56.480
<v Speaker 13>that have rocked Albania over the last week are a

3:46:56.580 --> 3:47:03.290
<v Speaker 13>massive escalation of ongoing protests over a basically city-sized seaside

3:47:03.690 --> 3:47:07.350
<v Speaker 13>real estate development tied to Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump,

3:47:08.010 --> 3:47:11.350
<v Speaker 13>whose firm Affinity Partners. Okay, so this is where it

3:47:11.370 --> 3:47:15.789
<v Speaker 13>gets murky because they've been granted special investment status by

3:47:15.810 --> 3:47:21.010
<v Speaker 13>the government. They also talked about this development project. There's

3:47:21.030 --> 3:47:23.050
<v Speaker 13>a video, I think, on Instagram of them talking about

3:47:23.070 --> 3:47:24.670
<v Speaker 13>it and how they discovered this place when they went

3:47:24.690 --> 3:47:29.039
<v Speaker 13>on vacation. It's kind of unclear exactly the extent to

3:47:29.060 --> 3:47:30.200
<v Speaker 13>which they are involved in it.

3:47:30.879 --> 3:47:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

3:47:31.320 --> 3:47:33.680
<v Speaker 13>No one seems to exactly know how closely tied they're in.

3:47:33.700 --> 3:47:36.070
<v Speaker 13>I've seen some reports, like the rumor is that they're

3:47:36.090 --> 3:47:39.570
<v Speaker 13>just straight up selling it to Kushner's firm, right? This

3:47:39.670 --> 3:47:42.250
<v Speaker 13>development is going to be built on a wildlife reserve

3:47:42.290 --> 3:47:44.530
<v Speaker 13>that is home to a whole bunch of animals like

3:47:44.590 --> 3:47:48.450
<v Speaker 13>sea turtles and importantly, a bunch of flamingos, which has

3:47:48.510 --> 3:47:50.789
<v Speaker 13>led to this, you know, these protests, the original version

3:47:50.830 --> 3:47:53.790
<v Speaker 13>of these protests being dubbed the Flamingo Revolution.

3:47:53.810 --> 3:47:54.390
<v Speaker 3>Nice.

3:47:54.910 --> 3:47:58.539
<v Speaker 13>But- The protests kicked into a higher gear in the

3:47:58.600 --> 3:48:02.180
<v Speaker 13>last week. As I mentioned before, the protesters have been

3:48:02.220 --> 3:48:05.240
<v Speaker 13>extremely successful in combating security forces. Again, they lit the

3:48:05.260 --> 3:48:08.800
<v Speaker 13>Supreme Court on fire. They have spread rapidly across the country.

3:48:09.360 --> 3:48:14.260
<v Speaker 13>Albania's nominally socialist party president has blamed conservatives and also

3:48:14.320 --> 3:48:20.650
<v Speaker 13>Iran for fomenting the protests. But this rings somewhat hollow,

3:48:20.709 --> 3:48:23.690
<v Speaker 13>given that a very prominent young member of his own party,

3:48:23.730 --> 3:48:26.770
<v Speaker 13>who he had handpicked to run... at like age 25,

3:48:26.770 --> 3:48:29.370
<v Speaker 13>also joined the protest during the original phase of it.

3:48:30.310 --> 3:48:33.710
<v Speaker 13>And the intensification of these protests and their expansion from

3:48:34.470 --> 3:48:37.570
<v Speaker 13>being sort of solely about this real estate development to

3:48:37.629 --> 3:48:39.810
<v Speaker 13>being about the things that all the rest of the

3:48:39.850 --> 3:48:44.510
<v Speaker 13>uprisings are about, which is to say unemployment, terrible education,

3:48:45.430 --> 3:48:49.640
<v Speaker 13>bad economic prospects, are very directly linked to the other

3:48:49.700 --> 3:48:54.890
<v Speaker 13>uprisings in France, Spain, India, and other places. People are

3:48:54.990 --> 3:48:57.930
<v Speaker 13>directly inspired when you read interviews of them in the streets.

3:48:57.970 --> 3:49:00.590
<v Speaker 13>They're directly inspired by what... I don't know if I

3:49:00.640 --> 3:49:03.640
<v Speaker 13>like the name, the Gen Z revolt, but that's kind

3:49:03.660 --> 3:49:05.740
<v Speaker 13>of what it's being called. Yeah, and there is this

3:49:05.920 --> 3:49:12.040
<v Speaker 13>massive generational conflict element of these protests. Yeah, although again,

3:49:12.080 --> 3:49:14.259
<v Speaker 13>it's worth noting that a lot of the people involved

3:49:14.300 --> 3:49:17.020
<v Speaker 13>in this are a lot older than that. I think

3:49:17.860 --> 3:49:21.060
<v Speaker 13>part of what's happening is like... It's like the students

3:49:21.080 --> 3:49:22.620
<v Speaker 13>who are the first people to take the street and

3:49:22.680 --> 3:49:24.560
<v Speaker 13>then everyone else goes with them.

3:49:24.580 --> 3:49:27.120
<v Speaker 1>And that tends to be the case like generally, right?

3:49:27.440 --> 3:49:30.580
<v Speaker 1>Like it's generally young people who are just a bit

3:49:30.620 --> 3:49:34.640
<v Speaker 1>less risk averse and who tend to do those things.

3:49:34.940 --> 3:49:38.520
<v Speaker 1>They have less stake in ways continuing exactly how they are.

3:49:38.540 --> 3:49:39.260
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

3:49:39.390 --> 3:49:41.070
<v Speaker 1>And more to gain, right? Like they have the rest

3:49:41.100 --> 3:49:42.340
<v Speaker 1>of their lives to deal with this shit.

3:49:42.500 --> 3:49:42.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

3:49:43.070 --> 3:49:43.230
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

3:49:44.050 --> 3:49:46.230
<v Speaker 13>And, you know, I think this is actually very encouraging

3:49:46.270 --> 3:49:50.410
<v Speaker 13>that you're seeing very, very deliberate sort of tying of

3:49:50.450 --> 3:49:52.450
<v Speaker 13>these protests to the protests going on in other countries

3:49:53.370 --> 3:49:56.610
<v Speaker 13>in a way that wasn't really true of like the 2018, 2019,

3:49:56.610 --> 3:49:59.400
<v Speaker 13>2020 wave of protests. And it harkens back to the

3:49:59.440 --> 3:50:02.080
<v Speaker 13>sort of internationalism of 2011, where you would have things

3:50:02.140 --> 3:50:06.040
<v Speaker 13>like protesters who were occupying Tucker Square would be like

3:50:06.180 --> 3:50:10.450
<v Speaker 13>ordering pizzas for striking teachers in Wisconsin. Like that kind of,

3:50:10.550 --> 3:50:14.730
<v Speaker 13>this is closer, not fully there, but closer to that

3:50:14.770 --> 3:50:17.930
<v Speaker 13>kind of era of solidarity between these movements. And a

3:50:17.970 --> 3:50:20.310
<v Speaker 13>lot of that is because the people taking the streets

3:50:20.370 --> 3:50:23.870
<v Speaker 13>are seeing the same economic conditions everywhere and are seeing

3:50:23.950 --> 3:50:30.800
<v Speaker 13>people go fight. And that helps to break the passivity

3:50:30.820 --> 3:50:33.260
<v Speaker 13>of the hour and get people into the streets. Speaking

3:50:33.280 --> 3:50:35.520
<v Speaker 13>of getting people into the streets, we're going to turn

3:50:35.560 --> 3:50:39.600
<v Speaker 13>from Albania to France, where the question in France for

3:50:39.640 --> 3:50:43.810
<v Speaker 13>the last few weeks had been fairly simple. The question was,

3:50:44.050 --> 3:50:46.310
<v Speaker 13>will the rest of French society join the French students

3:50:46.330 --> 3:50:48.690
<v Speaker 13>in the streets, or would they let the student movement.

3:50:48.690 --> 3:50:49.350
<v Speaker 1>Be crushed alone?

3:50:50.330 --> 3:50:54.730
<v Speaker 13>And this weekend, to its credit, French society issued a

3:50:54.750 --> 3:50:57.910
<v Speaker 13>fairly resounding answer. Yes, we are going to go into

3:50:57.930 --> 3:51:01.210
<v Speaker 13>the streets. And the result of that was, over the weekend,

3:51:01.310 --> 3:51:05.170
<v Speaker 13>France saw the largest protest the country has seen since

3:51:05.400 --> 3:51:08.839
<v Speaker 13>at minimum the peak of the Gilets Jaunes Yellow Vest uprising.

3:51:09.730 --> 3:51:14.550
<v Speaker 13>possibly larger and it's been defined by a level of

3:51:14.630 --> 3:51:17.830
<v Speaker 13>militancy that even in a nation defined by the riot

3:51:18.470 --> 3:51:21.260
<v Speaker 13>is almost more characteristic of a small revolution than a

3:51:21.300 --> 3:51:22.480
<v Speaker 13>large protest.

3:51:22.830 --> 3:51:26.060
<v Speaker 1>The gilets jaunes like they've set up a whole website

3:51:26.740 --> 3:51:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to convene people to protest and they have another one

3:51:29.180 --> 3:51:30.900
<v Speaker 1>coming up on the 24th.

3:51:30.980 --> 3:51:33.220
<v Speaker 13>Yeah yeah and that that's part of what's been happening

3:51:33.240 --> 3:51:37.020
<v Speaker 13>here is that you know The student protests survived long

3:51:37.080 --> 3:51:39.140
<v Speaker 13>enough for the dates that the yellow vests had set up.

3:51:39.300 --> 3:51:43.870
<v Speaker 13>And what this has caused is a huge swath of

3:51:43.930 --> 3:51:46.810
<v Speaker 13>both the French left and the French working class out there.

3:51:47.230 --> 3:51:50.510
<v Speaker 13>You're seeing everyone from, like, proles in, like, you know,

3:51:50.570 --> 3:51:53.650
<v Speaker 13>French territories in Réunion and Guadalupe, where, like, in Guadalupe,

3:51:53.670 --> 3:51:56.710
<v Speaker 13>people seem to be, like, shooting at police stations and stuff, to,

3:51:56.810 --> 3:51:58.430
<v Speaker 13>you know, you have the remains of the yellow vests.

3:51:58.980 --> 3:52:01.340
<v Speaker 13>And in something that is genuinely sort of remarkable for

3:52:01.360 --> 3:52:05.270
<v Speaker 13>French society, you're seeing... Both the white and non-white French

3:52:05.310 --> 3:52:07.530
<v Speaker 13>working classes go out at the same time, which is

3:52:07.550 --> 3:52:10.070
<v Speaker 13>something that very, very rarely happens. Usually when one segment

3:52:10.110 --> 3:52:12.150
<v Speaker 13>goes out, the other one doesn't. So if you look

3:52:12.170 --> 3:52:17.250
<v Speaker 13>at the riots in 2023 against police killings, were probably

3:52:17.290 --> 3:52:22.060
<v Speaker 13>the most militant street movement you've seen in France in ages.

3:52:22.960 --> 3:52:25.720
<v Speaker 13>But it was just the non-white workers going out. And

3:52:25.820 --> 3:52:28.580
<v Speaker 13>this time it's been both, partially because the student movement

3:52:29.240 --> 3:52:32.179
<v Speaker 13>was born in a bunch of working class suburbs of Paris,

3:52:32.220 --> 3:52:34.570
<v Speaker 13>but then spread to the rest of Paris and the

3:52:34.610 --> 3:52:36.970
<v Speaker 13>rest of the country, you've been seeing a sort of

3:52:37.010 --> 3:52:40.070
<v Speaker 13>alliance here in a way that you haven't in a

3:52:40.110 --> 3:52:43.700
<v Speaker 13>long time. And the consequence of this is that when

3:52:44.280 --> 3:52:47.600
<v Speaker 13>enough of the French working class goes out together, you

3:52:47.620 --> 3:52:49.260
<v Speaker 13>can start doing the thing that they're doing right now,

3:52:49.300 --> 3:52:52.620
<v Speaker 13>which is burning down city halls. And you can see this,

3:52:52.660 --> 3:52:55.740
<v Speaker 13>when you read accounts from people on the ground, it

3:52:55.760 --> 3:53:00.460
<v Speaker 13>doesn't read like an account of even a pretty militant

3:53:00.500 --> 3:53:03.060
<v Speaker 13>French protest. It reads like something out of 1848. You're

3:53:03.240 --> 3:53:06.380
<v Speaker 13>reading things like, quote, thousands of people are in the

3:53:06.400 --> 3:53:10.600
<v Speaker 13>Elise district setting up barricades. These are the largest mobilizations

3:53:10.620 --> 3:53:14.710
<v Speaker 13>we've seen this decade. It's hard to get good numbers

3:53:14.730 --> 3:53:17.770
<v Speaker 13>of the peak of the Gilets Jaunes. The government is

3:53:17.830 --> 3:53:21.850
<v Speaker 13>estimating 500,000. The unions estimate 800,000, which I think is

3:53:21.870 --> 3:53:25.400
<v Speaker 13>much closer. I've seen estimates up into the millions. This

3:53:25.440 --> 3:53:27.280
<v Speaker 13>was also a massive shock to the government. The government

3:53:27.300 --> 3:53:29.400
<v Speaker 13>had been projecting that about 100,000 people would come out.

3:53:29.440 --> 3:53:31.580
<v Speaker 13>They were projecting the movement was about to die. And

3:53:31.600 --> 3:53:35.470
<v Speaker 13>then suddenly, you know, eight to 10 times as many

3:53:35.510 --> 3:53:37.350
<v Speaker 13>people as the government thought was going to be out

3:53:37.410 --> 3:53:41.070
<v Speaker 13>came out. And this is also surprising to some extent

3:53:41.210 --> 3:53:44.730
<v Speaker 13>in that this uprising differs a lot from the last

3:53:44.790 --> 3:53:47.470
<v Speaker 13>half decade of anti-austerity protests and general strikes, right? There

3:53:47.490 --> 3:53:50.970
<v Speaker 13>have been a lot of general strikes in the last

3:53:51.650 --> 3:53:54.480
<v Speaker 13>half a decade, but The call for this didn't come

3:53:54.580 --> 3:53:58.210
<v Speaker 13>out from the unions. It came out from a whole

3:53:58.270 --> 3:54:00.650
<v Speaker 13>bunch of decentralized networks, including the sort of yellow vest things,

3:54:00.690 --> 3:54:02.470
<v Speaker 13>including the student movement networks. And because of that, it

3:54:02.510 --> 3:54:05.710
<v Speaker 13>was able to put into the streets almost an order

3:54:05.770 --> 3:54:07.690
<v Speaker 13>of magnitude more people than anyone else has been able

3:54:07.730 --> 3:54:11.060
<v Speaker 13>to call out. And it puts the French state in

3:54:11.080 --> 3:54:13.580
<v Speaker 13>a somewhat difficult position because there isn't really a force

3:54:13.620 --> 3:54:15.880
<v Speaker 13>that can just rein the protests in, in a way

3:54:15.920 --> 3:54:17.960
<v Speaker 13>that you had with the French, with the general strikes,

3:54:17.980 --> 3:54:20.480
<v Speaker 13>where you can negotiate with the unions and There's just

3:54:20.520 --> 3:54:22.840
<v Speaker 13>an unbelievable number of extremely angry people in the streets,

3:54:22.920 --> 3:54:26.320
<v Speaker 13>and we're going to see how the protest continues to

3:54:26.380 --> 3:54:29.890
<v Speaker 13>escalate this weekend. I'm going to move to a couple

3:54:30.130 --> 3:54:35.110
<v Speaker 13>of kind of small ones. So in Tunisia, we had

3:54:35.130 --> 3:54:41.020
<v Speaker 13>Tunisia's largest union calling a pretty large anti-government protest, which

3:54:41.060 --> 3:54:45.160
<v Speaker 13>is pretty notable because Tunisia has been under the rule

3:54:45.360 --> 3:54:49.720
<v Speaker 13>of effectively a dictator who came in promising to sort

3:54:49.740 --> 3:54:53.440
<v Speaker 13>of like end the rampant corruption and unemployment of the

3:54:53.460 --> 3:54:57.460
<v Speaker 13>sort of post-revolutionary Indonesia. That hasn't happened. But Said has

3:54:57.480 --> 3:55:00.580
<v Speaker 13>been like incredibly effective at repressing protests and repressing opposition.

3:55:00.970 --> 3:55:03.310
<v Speaker 13>And this is the largest group, like group of people

3:55:03.330 --> 3:55:05.750
<v Speaker 13>anyone's been able to put in the streets in basically

3:55:05.770 --> 3:55:07.490
<v Speaker 13>since he came to power. So we're going to be

3:55:07.510 --> 3:55:10.410
<v Speaker 13>monitoring what's happening there. It's also worth mentioning what's going

3:55:10.470 --> 3:55:15.190
<v Speaker 13>on in Italy, where there have been some small protests

3:55:15.210 --> 3:55:19.050
<v Speaker 13>and In the north, I say small, very effective, but

3:55:19.110 --> 3:55:22.130
<v Speaker 13>small protests in the north that like managed to sack

3:55:22.170 --> 3:55:25.190
<v Speaker 13>a whole bunch of Milan shopping district, which pissed off

3:55:25.210 --> 3:55:27.850
<v Speaker 13>the government enormously. So there's a troop deployment going on

3:55:27.870 --> 3:55:32.210
<v Speaker 13>in Milan. But I think more interestingly are the protests

3:55:32.230 --> 3:55:34.250
<v Speaker 13>happening in the south at the same time where there's

3:55:34.290 --> 3:55:37.350
<v Speaker 13>a set of roadblocks that are being maintained as part

3:55:37.370 --> 3:55:40.030
<v Speaker 13>of a truckers protest over sort of rising diesel. Diesel

3:55:40.050 --> 3:55:44.290
<v Speaker 13>prices are skyrocketing. Just there just isn't diesel to buy.

3:55:45.550 --> 3:55:48.430
<v Speaker 13>which means that a bunch of the trucking sector that

3:55:48.510 --> 3:55:52.200
<v Speaker 13>fuels the export economy of the agricultural parts of southern

3:55:52.280 --> 3:55:56.100
<v Speaker 13>Italy are collapsing because the truckers who are independent contractors

3:55:56.240 --> 3:56:01.000
<v Speaker 13>can't afford diesel. And that's been crushing their industry. And

3:56:01.020 --> 3:56:02.820
<v Speaker 13>so we're starting to see blockades of the roads leading

3:56:02.840 --> 3:56:05.400
<v Speaker 13>up to ports. And that's something that I think can

3:56:05.480 --> 3:56:07.920
<v Speaker 13>escalate because there just has not really been a government

3:56:07.940 --> 3:56:12.040
<v Speaker 13>solution to these problems. Finally, I want to talk about Indonesia,

3:56:12.640 --> 3:56:15.440
<v Speaker 13>where on Tuesday the 19th, or yesterday as we were

3:56:15.460 --> 3:56:20.080
<v Speaker 13>recording this, protests sort of begun in earnest against the

3:56:20.120 --> 3:56:24.790
<v Speaker 13>country's increasingly embattled right-wing president, Prabowo Subianto, who is a

3:56:24.830 --> 3:56:28.110
<v Speaker 13>former general and a former minister of defense and who

3:56:28.170 --> 3:56:32.270
<v Speaker 13>came in on a very sort of like right-wing military

3:56:32.290 --> 3:56:35.930
<v Speaker 13>fascist platform. Subianto has come under fire, and I use

3:56:35.950 --> 3:56:38.130
<v Speaker 13>that term quite literally here, for his failure to even

3:56:38.230 --> 3:56:42.080
<v Speaker 13>vaguely contain a massive series of wildfires in Sumatra and

3:56:42.110 --> 3:56:46.960
<v Speaker 13>Borneo that have been going on since July. So this

3:56:47.000 --> 3:56:49.200
<v Speaker 13>is not a situation where people are mad at the

3:56:49.240 --> 3:56:51.980
<v Speaker 13>government for not being able to control the weather. These

3:56:52.040 --> 3:56:55.740
<v Speaker 13>fires have been going on for four months, and they

3:56:55.780 --> 3:56:58.580
<v Speaker 13>have covered not just Indonesia, but a broad swath of

3:56:58.620 --> 3:57:02.230
<v Speaker 13>the entire region in these clouds of toxic smoke. And

3:57:02.250 --> 3:57:05.470
<v Speaker 13>I mean, these clouds of toxic smoke are reaching Vietnam, right?

3:57:05.510 --> 3:57:07.210
<v Speaker 13>And this has been going on for four months now,

3:57:07.250 --> 3:57:08.770
<v Speaker 13>and the government has not been able to put them out.

3:57:08.870 --> 3:57:12.210
<v Speaker 13>People are extremely pissed. I'm going to quote here from

3:57:12.230 --> 3:57:15.150
<v Speaker 13>Arab News, quote, the Ministry of Health, this is just

3:57:15.190 --> 3:57:18.070
<v Speaker 13>in Indonesia, The Ministry of Health has recorded at least

3:57:18.070 --> 3:57:22.670
<v Speaker 13>277,000 cases of acute respiratory infection related to the fires

3:57:22.710 --> 3:57:27.310
<v Speaker 13>so far, of which 60,000 are children under five. So

3:57:27.530 --> 3:57:30.470
<v Speaker 13>this has pushed people into the streets in the last

3:57:30.650 --> 3:57:33.660
<v Speaker 13>couple of days. Again, this is a set of protests

3:57:33.680 --> 3:57:37.700
<v Speaker 13>that begun with students like hearkening to the student protests

3:57:37.960 --> 3:57:40.630
<v Speaker 13>across the world. The government has said it will deploy

3:57:40.630 --> 3:57:44.690
<v Speaker 13>9000 police officers to crush the protests. It's unclear exactly

3:57:44.750 --> 3:57:47.510
<v Speaker 13>how this is going to go because we're in effectively

3:57:47.560 --> 3:57:50.300
<v Speaker 13>day two of them as we're recording. Yeah, and we

3:57:50.340 --> 3:57:52.540
<v Speaker 13>will keep you informed as that situation unfolds.

3:57:53.360 --> 3:57:55.640
<v Speaker 6>Let's go on one more ad break and then return

3:57:55.740 --> 3:57:57.620
<v Speaker 6>for two more important stories.

3:58:08.770 --> 3:58:12.930
<v Speaker 1>So talking of like a world on fire. Yeah. Let's

3:58:12.990 --> 3:58:17.190
<v Speaker 1>talk about Iran and Ukraine, right? So the UK MTO's report,

3:58:17.270 --> 3:58:20.570
<v Speaker 1>Maritime Trade Office, I believe, indicated that the Maritime Reporting

3:58:20.630 --> 3:58:23.740
<v Speaker 1>Agency has struggled to, I'm just going to quote from it,

3:58:24.050 --> 3:58:28.000
<v Speaker 1>struggling to accurately report true numbers of attacks with majority

3:58:28.020 --> 3:58:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of vessels refusing to report to UK MTO. And then

3:58:31.800 --> 3:58:34.560
<v Speaker 1>in that bullet point, UK MTO is aware via other

3:58:34.600 --> 3:58:38.540
<v Speaker 1>sources of incidents but constrained on reporting through lack of verification.

3:58:39.250 --> 3:58:42.350
<v Speaker 1>Despite this, they recorded more than a dozen attacks last week.

3:58:43.070 --> 3:58:46.550
<v Speaker 1>And they recorded that transit to the strait was 70% lower,

3:58:46.570 --> 3:58:50.310
<v Speaker 1>straight from Hormuz, obviously, than pre-conflict levels. While a lot

3:58:50.330 --> 3:58:53.930
<v Speaker 1>of oil is moving through that east-west Saudi pipeline that

3:58:53.990 --> 3:58:57.510
<v Speaker 1>bypasses straight from Hormuz, it seems the move in Hormuz

3:58:57.560 --> 3:58:59.980
<v Speaker 1>right now is to use smaller craft to offload to

3:59:00.030 --> 3:59:04.400
<v Speaker 1>larger vessels. This, of course, is all happening at the

3:59:04.460 --> 3:59:09.570
<v Speaker 1>same time that Ukraine has continued to use Long-range drone

3:59:09.610 --> 3:59:13.950
<v Speaker 1>attacks to batter Russian fuel infrastructure launched a bunch of

3:59:14.010 --> 3:59:18.060
<v Speaker 1>larger scale operations over the weekend. And it appears that

3:59:18.120 --> 3:59:21.420
<v Speaker 1>the world's most divorced man is not happy about this.

3:59:21.800 --> 3:59:24.890
<v Speaker 1>That's Elon Musk, if you're not familiar. Elon Musk has

3:59:24.950 --> 3:59:29.110
<v Speaker 1>been gating the speed at which Ukraine can remain connected

3:59:29.130 --> 3:59:32.150
<v Speaker 1>to the internet through his Starshield system. He started doing

3:59:32.190 --> 3:59:36.530
<v Speaker 1>this about the 14th of October, which was last Wednesday

3:59:36.570 --> 3:59:40.030
<v Speaker 1>for you listening on Friday. This has serious impacts for

3:59:40.090 --> 3:59:44.220
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainian drone offensives. According to posts by Ukrainian officials on Telegram,

3:59:44.240 --> 3:59:48.020
<v Speaker 1>they weren't warned about this. They already can't use the

3:59:48.100 --> 3:59:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Starshield itself in Russian territory and But for other operations,

3:59:53.100 --> 3:59:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it seems that they've been limited to connecting at speeds

3:59:56.580 --> 4:00:00.780
<v Speaker 1>below 100 miles an hour, 160 kph. This 100 mile

4:00:00.860 --> 4:00:02.670
<v Speaker 1>an hour limit seems to be something that they've now

4:00:02.700 --> 4:00:04.970
<v Speaker 1>arrived at. But when this was first happening, people were

4:00:04.990 --> 4:00:08.770
<v Speaker 1>experiencing connectivity issues even slower than that. So it's not

4:00:08.810 --> 4:00:12.870
<v Speaker 1>uncommon for drones to be equipped with a terminal, like

4:00:13.110 --> 4:00:16.790
<v Speaker 1>a Star Shield or Starlink terminal, to either function as

4:00:16.830 --> 4:00:19.820
<v Speaker 1>a relay or in some cases, like the actual drone

4:00:19.850 --> 4:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that engages the russians will have a terminal on it

4:00:23.360 --> 4:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>they also use them on interceptor drones i'm not entirely

4:00:26.240 --> 4:00:28.780
<v Speaker 1>clear how like i i can guess but i'm not

4:00:28.820 --> 4:00:31.340
<v Speaker 1>going to think like guess in public someone knows i'd

4:00:31.360 --> 4:00:34.860
<v Speaker 1>love to hear cool zone tips at proton.me if you're

4:00:34.880 --> 4:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>not familiar with star shield star shield is a gov

4:00:38.600 --> 4:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>slash military version of star link sometimes it has access

4:00:42.060 --> 4:00:46.220
<v Speaker 1>to faster speeds certain specific satellites they're not entirely interchangeable

4:00:46.280 --> 4:00:50.220
<v Speaker 1>but Starshield can use that Starlink network kind of plus,

4:00:50.420 --> 4:00:54.250
<v Speaker 1>I guess. Ukraine has a couple of things. It has

4:00:54.330 --> 4:00:59.250
<v Speaker 1>Starshield and then it has a registry of Ukraine Ministry

4:00:59.290 --> 4:01:03.250
<v Speaker 1>of Defense Starlink terminals, which seems to be a separate thing, right?

4:01:03.270 --> 4:01:05.390
<v Speaker 1>But like when it took a long time, but eventually

4:01:05.450 --> 4:01:09.130
<v Speaker 1>Starlink turned off support for the Starlink terminals that Russians

4:01:09.150 --> 4:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>were using, right? And it seems that they have this registry,

4:01:11.940 --> 4:01:16.790
<v Speaker 1>which is oftentimes units in Ukraine will either fundraise purchase

4:01:16.910 --> 4:01:19.330
<v Speaker 1>or have donated to them a Starlink terminal and then

4:01:19.350 --> 4:01:21.390
<v Speaker 1>they can go to the Ministry of Defense and be like, hey,

4:01:21.410 --> 4:01:23.410
<v Speaker 1>can you add this to your list? And then it's

4:01:23.450 --> 4:01:27.870
<v Speaker 1>treated differently by the company as opposed to like, and

4:01:27.910 --> 4:01:31.590
<v Speaker 1>I guess the deal there is to avoid Russians buying it.

4:01:31.630 --> 4:01:33.850
<v Speaker 1>They don't want to be supportive of Russia invading Ukraine,

4:01:33.870 --> 4:01:38.170
<v Speaker 1>at least in that way. On X.com, the Everything website,

4:01:38.310 --> 4:01:41.030
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk claimed that, quote, Starshield systems are owned and

4:01:41.070 --> 4:01:43.950
<v Speaker 1>controlled by the US government. Any limits on speed or

4:01:44.070 --> 4:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>usage are decided by the US military and ultimately POTUS. Starlink,

4:01:48.220 --> 4:01:52.620
<v Speaker 1>of course, is a commercial service owned by SpaceX. I'm

4:01:52.640 --> 4:01:56.500
<v Speaker 1>continuing quote from Musk here. Usage of Starlink is limited

4:01:56.580 --> 4:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to civilian or defense activities cannot be used for offensive

4:01:59.250 --> 4:02:02.270
<v Speaker 1>military action as doing so would be inappropriate for a

4:02:02.290 --> 4:02:06.510
<v Speaker 1>commercial company. On the 17th of October, Marco Rubio then

4:02:06.550 --> 4:02:09.190
<v Speaker 1>went on to claim that Ukraine does not have Starshield.

4:02:09.490 --> 4:02:10.830
<v Speaker 3>On Starshield, what's going on?

4:02:10.870 --> 4:02:12.170
<v Speaker 10>Because Elon Musk said.

4:02:12.110 --> 4:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>It's up to the president.

4:02:13.420 --> 4:02:17.910
<v Speaker 9>Well, Starshield or Starlink? Well, yeah, I know it's confusing.

4:02:18.190 --> 4:02:23.530
<v Speaker 9>So Starlink is a commercial product. And so it's regulated

4:02:23.610 --> 4:02:26.270
<v Speaker 9>and handled as a commercial product. Star Shield is a

4:02:26.310 --> 4:02:30.600
<v Speaker 9>defense product, a military product. And as I said, I mean,

4:02:30.660 --> 4:02:34.620
<v Speaker 9>that is something that we have a military, United States

4:02:34.660 --> 4:02:38.080
<v Speaker 9>military uses. It's not at this moment available to Ukraine.

4:02:38.100 --> 4:02:40.660
<v Speaker 9>And that's under conversation. It's under discussion right now about

4:02:40.700 --> 4:02:41.340
<v Speaker 9>how they would want.

4:02:41.240 --> 4:02:41.620
<v Speaker 6>To use it.

4:02:41.900 --> 4:02:43.280
<v Speaker 10>No, but did the U.S.

4:02:43.300 --> 4:02:44.860
<v Speaker 1>Have anything to do with it not working in Ukraine

4:02:44.880 --> 4:02:45.260
<v Speaker 1>at the moment?

4:02:45.280 --> 4:02:46.300
<v Speaker 3>Zelensky said it was deliberate.

4:02:46.320 --> 4:02:48.600
<v Speaker 9>Well, I don't know what Zelensky said. I'm not sure

4:02:48.620 --> 4:02:51.270
<v Speaker 9>Zelensky knows what he's talking about, but it wasn't deliberate.

4:02:51.290 --> 4:02:53.410
<v Speaker 9>We had nothing to do with it. The United States,

4:02:53.450 --> 4:02:56.450
<v Speaker 9>nobody ordered that Starlink speed to be slowed down.

4:02:57.550 --> 4:03:00.630
<v Speaker 1>So, subsequently, the Wall Street Journal reported that, quote, a

4:03:00.690 --> 4:03:03.610
<v Speaker 1>person familiar with the situation said Musk talked to multiple

4:03:03.660 --> 4:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>senior administration officials, including with Trump, before imposing the new

4:03:07.740 --> 4:03:11.030
<v Speaker 1>speed cap. which Ukrainian officials said had allowed Russian missiles

4:03:11.050 --> 4:03:14.290
<v Speaker 1>to evade their defensive. Tensions between the United States and

4:03:14.380 --> 4:03:18.620
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine are really growing right now. Zelensky has claimed that

4:03:18.660 --> 4:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration has cut intelligence support, which has resulted in

4:03:21.520 --> 4:03:24.750
<v Speaker 1>failing to track missile strikes into Ukraine. Trump has claimed

4:03:24.770 --> 4:03:28.340
<v Speaker 1>the US still shares intelligence, but he went on to say... We've.

4:03:28.240 --> 4:03:29.440
<v Speaker 10>Given a lot to Ukraine.

4:03:29.980 --> 4:03:30.500
<v Speaker 1>You know what?

4:03:30.560 --> 4:03:33.970
<v Speaker 10>We've given a lot to Ukraine. They've given nothing to us.

4:03:34.420 --> 4:03:39.350
<v Speaker 10>Remember that. We've given hundreds of billions of dollars. I

4:03:39.410 --> 4:03:42.110
<v Speaker 10>gave the javelins to Ukraine when he knocked out. That

4:03:42.130 --> 4:03:44.610
<v Speaker 10>was me. Obama gave him pillows.

4:03:45.170 --> 4:03:46.130
<v Speaker 1>You know the expression?

4:03:46.230 --> 4:03:50.170
<v Speaker 10>Obama gave him sheets and pillows. Trump gave him the javelins.

4:03:50.210 --> 4:03:52.970
<v Speaker 10>So don't tell me about Ukraine. We've given a lot

4:03:52.990 --> 4:03:55.320
<v Speaker 10>to Ukraine. They've given us nothing.

4:03:55.900 --> 4:03:59.460
<v Speaker 1>So Trump being pretty combative there, this seems to obviously

4:03:59.480 --> 4:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>be ignoring the minerals deal. People will remember the very

4:04:03.740 --> 4:04:08.390
<v Speaker 1>infamous Trump-Vance Zelensky meeting at the White House, which resulted

4:04:08.410 --> 4:04:12.030
<v Speaker 1>in this minerals deal. Trump has also repeatedly tried to

4:04:12.110 --> 4:04:14.410
<v Speaker 1>blame Zelensky for diesel prices.

4:04:14.930 --> 4:04:17.070
<v Speaker 5>I want Zelensky to stop and I want Putin. Now,

4:04:17.110 --> 4:04:21.520
<v Speaker 5>if you tell me that Zelensky... is again shooting at refineries,

4:04:22.100 --> 4:04:24.960
<v Speaker 5>all he's doing is making the world oil price higher.

4:04:25.140 --> 4:04:25.900
<v Speaker 1>And he is doing that.

4:04:26.160 --> 4:04:29.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think that's a disgrace. There's plenty of other targets.

4:04:29.540 --> 4:04:31.100
<v Speaker 5>They don't have to hit. There are a lot of

4:04:31.160 --> 4:04:34.180
<v Speaker 5>targets that you can hit. But when you shoot at

4:04:34.240 --> 4:04:37.700
<v Speaker 5>diesel refineries where you make diesel oil, and we need that,

4:04:38.200 --> 4:04:41.510
<v Speaker 5>and the world needs that, then he's not doing a

4:04:41.550 --> 4:04:42.630
<v Speaker 5>good service for the world.

4:04:43.110 --> 4:04:45.710
<v Speaker 1>Failure of the convention in the English language to use

4:04:45.810 --> 4:04:49.330
<v Speaker 1>one's voice going up to indicate a question. Which is great.

4:04:49.830 --> 4:04:53.620
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the far bigger issue is that Trump has

4:04:53.640 --> 4:04:56.300
<v Speaker 1>started a war with Iran, right? Which is the major issue.

4:04:56.340 --> 4:04:56.580
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

4:04:56.600 --> 4:05:00.050
<v Speaker 1>That's the actual reason it's a diesel shortage. I want

4:05:00.090 --> 4:05:02.270
<v Speaker 1>to play this clip, though, because he really went in

4:05:02.330 --> 4:05:03.490
<v Speaker 1>on Zelensky on Monday.

4:05:03.950 --> 4:05:07.050
<v Speaker 10>I think it's time for somebody else to negotiate on

4:05:07.090 --> 4:05:11.470
<v Speaker 10>behalf of Ukraine. Because what's happened? Very little land has moved,

4:05:11.910 --> 4:05:15.660
<v Speaker 10>but a million people, a tremendous number of people are dead.

4:05:16.080 --> 4:05:19.620
<v Speaker 10>They're losing their male population. Ukraine could have had this

4:05:19.680 --> 4:05:21.940
<v Speaker 10>thing settled a long time ago. If he would have

4:05:21.960 --> 4:05:25.140
<v Speaker 10>listened to me, and you remember the Oval Office, he

4:05:25.180 --> 4:05:28.060
<v Speaker 10>would have had this settled a long time ago. Maybe

4:05:28.120 --> 4:05:31.860
<v Speaker 10>it's time for Zelensky to get somebody else to negotiate.

4:05:32.980 --> 4:05:33.100
<v Speaker 6>So.

4:05:34.400 --> 4:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>It seems that this is Trump's move going into the midterm, right?

4:05:39.500 --> 4:05:42.600
<v Speaker 1>It's that among other things that he's tried to do

4:05:42.700 --> 4:05:47.210
<v Speaker 1>to draw attention from what's happening to fuel prices because

4:05:47.290 --> 4:05:51.030
<v Speaker 1>of his war in Iran, he's now trying to blame Zelensky.

4:05:51.530 --> 4:05:53.790
<v Speaker 1>Just to wrap up on Starlink, Starlink is a reality

4:05:54.110 --> 4:05:57.130
<v Speaker 1>of war everywhere today. It's used in Myanmar and in

4:05:57.230 --> 4:05:59.950
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine and all over the world. And this has the

4:06:00.030 --> 4:06:04.590
<v Speaker 1>really unfortunate effect of making so many people directly reliant

4:06:04.670 --> 4:06:09.770
<v Speaker 1>on Elon Musk specifically. It's a massive structural problem in

4:06:10.560 --> 4:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>conflict everywhere today that Elon Musk, especially in cases where

4:06:14.300 --> 4:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>there's not Starshield, where it's just Starlink, the commercial product,

4:06:18.090 --> 4:06:21.270
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk has the ability to turn off the connection

4:06:21.410 --> 4:06:24.190
<v Speaker 1>to the outside world of so many places and movements.

4:06:24.830 --> 4:06:27.350
<v Speaker 1>I'd be naive if I said I expected this to

4:06:27.370 --> 4:06:29.710
<v Speaker 1>be the last time we saw that. But yep, that's

4:06:29.730 --> 4:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>what I got on Conflict Today.

4:06:33.340 --> 4:06:36.600
<v Speaker 6>For our last story, let's return to this show's namesake

4:06:36.660 --> 4:06:41.240
<v Speaker 6>and discuss a new executive order. On Monday, First Lady

4:06:41.260 --> 4:06:44.420
<v Speaker 6>Melania Trump made a rare public appearance with her husband,

4:06:45.130 --> 4:06:48.660
<v Speaker 6>to announce the creation of a new women's health division

4:06:49.200 --> 4:06:53.660
<v Speaker 6>within the NIH, the National Institutes of Health. According to

4:06:53.680 --> 4:06:56.340
<v Speaker 6>Health and Human Services, Trump created this new division via

4:06:56.420 --> 4:07:17.170
<v Speaker 6>executive order, And this order also established a, quote, White

4:07:17.230 --> 4:07:22.770
<v Speaker 6>House Women's Health Task Force, which, according to Trump, will, quote,

4:07:23.090 --> 4:07:27.030
<v Speaker 6>mobilize the entire federal government to coordinate action focused on

4:07:27.110 --> 4:07:31.620
<v Speaker 6>improving women's health. Here is the president announcing who will

4:07:31.740 --> 4:07:33.980
<v Speaker 6>run the Women's Health Task Force.

4:07:34.800 --> 4:07:37.860
<v Speaker 12>And this task force will be led by Secretary of

4:07:37.920 --> 4:07:39.830
<v Speaker 12>Health and Human Services, Robert F.

4:07:39.860 --> 4:07:40.280
<v Speaker 6>Kennedy.

4:07:40.300 --> 4:07:40.980
<v Speaker 1>That's a big one.

4:07:41.970 --> 4:07:45.250
<v Speaker 12>And he's been fantastic, I have to tell you. He's

4:07:45.270 --> 4:07:48.790
<v Speaker 12>a little different. We understand that, don't we? Cheryl, do

4:07:48.830 --> 4:07:52.320
<v Speaker 12>we understand? He is a little different. But that's what

4:07:52.380 --> 4:07:55.730
<v Speaker 12>makes him good, I think. I'll let you know about it.

4:07:57.140 --> 4:07:58.200
<v Speaker 12>That's what makes him good.

4:07:59.960 --> 4:08:00.340
<v Speaker 1>I think.

4:08:01.120 --> 4:08:02.330
<v Speaker 6>I'll let you know about it.

4:08:03.230 --> 4:08:07.970
<v Speaker 1>Very reassuring. Very reassuring stuff. Ringing endorsement for the dude

4:08:08.050 --> 4:08:09.530
<v Speaker 1>in charge of the women's health program.

4:08:10.410 --> 4:08:12.970
<v Speaker 6>Now, this task force will also be co-chaired by Chief

4:08:12.990 --> 4:08:16.950
<v Speaker 6>of Staff Susie Willis, and the task force will also

4:08:17.090 --> 4:08:21.790
<v Speaker 6>include Pete Hegseth, among other cabinet members, though Hegseth is

4:08:21.870 --> 4:08:26.450
<v Speaker 6>the first one mentioned in the order. So, real star-studded

4:08:26.510 --> 4:08:28.310
<v Speaker 6>cast there in charge of women's health.

4:08:28.770 --> 4:08:29.240
<v Speaker 7>Jesus.

4:08:29.850 --> 4:08:30.580
<v Speaker 1>Great stuff.

4:08:31.550 --> 4:08:35.110
<v Speaker 6>I'll read from the executive order, quote, My administration is

4:08:35.190 --> 4:08:39.420
<v Speaker 6>committed to ensuring that American women are receiving the best

4:08:39.620 --> 4:08:44.500
<v Speaker 6>scientifically supported medical advice in the world, unquote. Now, the

4:08:44.620 --> 4:08:47.900
<v Speaker 6>NIH already has an Office of Research on Women's Health

4:08:48.000 --> 4:08:51.570
<v Speaker 6>and has since the 90s, so it's unclear how the

4:08:51.610 --> 4:08:55.690
<v Speaker 6>work of this division will differ from the office. To

4:08:55.770 --> 4:09:01.520
<v Speaker 6>quote the New York Times, quote, Alina Salganikov, The co-chairwoman

4:09:01.640 --> 4:09:04.440
<v Speaker 6>of the committee that produced the 2024 National Academy of

4:09:04.480 --> 4:09:09.260
<v Speaker 6>Medicine report on quote, ending unequal treatment, questioned how the

4:09:09.310 --> 4:09:12.930
<v Speaker 6>new division would set research priorities and wondered whether it

4:09:12.950 --> 4:09:15.310
<v Speaker 6>would end up focusing on the interests of the Make

4:09:15.370 --> 4:09:20.390
<v Speaker 6>America Healthy Again movement, like non-hormonal approaches to contraception and

4:09:20.450 --> 4:09:24.780
<v Speaker 6>fertility awareness, for example. Quote, If you have a fixed

4:09:24.840 --> 4:09:27.200
<v Speaker 6>amount of money and you're going to invest in new research,

4:09:27.660 --> 4:09:30.360
<v Speaker 6>what are the trade-offs? What are you not funding in

4:09:30.400 --> 4:09:31.760
<v Speaker 6>order to fund these new studies?

4:09:32.320 --> 4:09:32.980
<v Speaker 1>Said Ms.

4:09:33.080 --> 4:09:36.600
<v Speaker 6>Selganikoff, who now directs the Women's Health Policy Program at

4:09:36.620 --> 4:09:42.980
<v Speaker 6>the non-profit health research organization KFF. Unquote. The questionable priorities

4:09:43.040 --> 4:09:47.170
<v Speaker 6>of this division is not the only issue. Trump's new

4:09:47.250 --> 4:09:51.730
<v Speaker 6>order does not secure or promise any research funding. And

4:09:51.770 --> 4:09:58.140
<v Speaker 6>just last month, Trump cut $ 810 million from HHS. This

4:09:58.170 --> 4:10:02.340
<v Speaker 6>was funding that was already pre-approved by Congress. During the

4:10:02.380 --> 4:10:06.400
<v Speaker 6>wave of Doge cuts last year, HHS slashed funding for

4:10:06.440 --> 4:10:10.350
<v Speaker 6>the Women's Health Initiative, a decades-long ongoing study focused on

4:10:10.370 --> 4:10:13.830
<v Speaker 6>women's health, aging, menopause, and the effects of hormone therapy.

4:10:14.510 --> 4:10:18.470
<v Speaker 6>After public pushback, funds for the initiative were reinstated, but

4:10:18.690 --> 4:10:22.550
<v Speaker 6>the massive cuts to the NIH... still have negatively impacted

4:10:22.590 --> 4:10:26.270
<v Speaker 6>research into women's health. Trump has cut or froze.

4:10:26.070 --> 4:10:28.110
<v Speaker 1>Over $ 3.

4:10:26.870 --> 4:10:31.550
<v Speaker 6>Billion in previously approved research grants, $ 2. 3 billion of which

4:10:31.810 --> 4:10:36.870
<v Speaker 6>from the NIH, and Trump's 2026 budget proposal sought to

4:10:36.950 --> 4:10:41.970
<v Speaker 6>slash the NIH budget by 41%, a cut of almost

4:10:41.970 --> 4:10:48.170
<v Speaker 6>$ 20 billion. Since Trump took office, NIH has been rewarding

4:10:48.240 --> 4:10:53.690
<v Speaker 6>grants much, much more slowly. with HHS, the Office of

4:10:53.750 --> 4:10:58.160
<v Speaker 6>Management and Budget, or the White House flagging certain awards

4:10:58.250 --> 4:11:02.640
<v Speaker 6>as quote, not acceptable, according to former NIH director Jennifer

4:11:02.680 --> 4:11:07.720
<v Speaker 6>Toyer in an interview with NPR. Toyer explained how this

4:11:07.820 --> 4:11:11.920
<v Speaker 6>interference from the White House has continued even after Doge quote,

4:11:12.160 --> 4:11:15.550
<v Speaker 6>went away, but the other systems had been put in

4:11:15.610 --> 4:11:19.000
<v Speaker 6>place to do the same function, unquote. I think this

4:11:19.020 --> 4:11:20.760
<v Speaker 6>is something that doesn't get reported on enough, even though

4:11:20.860 --> 4:11:25.180
<v Speaker 6>Doge doesn't exist in name the same way it did

4:11:25.220 --> 4:11:28.300
<v Speaker 6>in the early months of the Trump administration. A lot

4:11:28.320 --> 4:11:31.180
<v Speaker 6>of those same sorts of policies are being done by

4:11:31.620 --> 4:11:35.530
<v Speaker 6>other institutions, other departments, other agencies, especially the Office of

4:11:35.570 --> 4:11:36.290
<v Speaker 6>Management and Budget.

4:11:38.210 --> 4:11:41.150
<v Speaker 1>They've learned this, right? It's the same with, we don't

4:11:41.190 --> 4:11:44.390
<v Speaker 1>have Greg Bovino anymore, but we still have massive ICE detentions.

4:11:44.590 --> 4:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>They've learned you can't do it quite as loud and proud.

4:11:48.110 --> 4:11:51.270
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, they can shut down the most sort of obviously

4:11:51.350 --> 4:11:56.300
<v Speaker 6>obstructive and disagreeable parts while still doing the same stuff,

4:11:56.360 --> 4:11:57.100
<v Speaker 6>just quieter.

4:11:57.180 --> 4:11:57.380
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

4:11:58.100 --> 4:12:00.980
<v Speaker 6>According to the Washington Post, in fiscal year 2025, there

4:12:01.020 --> 4:12:05.240
<v Speaker 6>was a 31% drop in the number of NIH-funded projects

4:12:05.320 --> 4:12:07.260
<v Speaker 6>that included the word woman.

4:12:07.980 --> 4:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Oof.

4:12:08.980 --> 4:12:12.100
<v Speaker 6>An analysis by NPR found that between fiscal year 2024

4:12:12.100 --> 4:12:18.080
<v Speaker 6>and 2025, Research areas that lost NIH funding included women's health,

4:12:18.400 --> 4:12:20.620
<v Speaker 6>which was down almost $ 300 million.

4:12:20.640 --> 4:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Jesus.

4:12:22.520 --> 4:12:27.700
<v Speaker 6>Cervical cancer vaccine research, down $ 6 million. Stem cell research

4:12:27.780 --> 4:12:31.929
<v Speaker 6>on umbilical cord, blood, and the placenta, down $ 6 million.

4:12:32.430 --> 4:12:36.490
<v Speaker 6>And quote, violence against women research, which was down $ 2 million.

4:12:37.110 --> 4:12:40.190
<v Speaker 6>Not to mention the other sort of health disparity cuts

4:12:40.870 --> 4:12:46.310
<v Speaker 6>in regards to minority populations. Last July, HHS imposed new

4:12:46.350 --> 4:12:49.900
<v Speaker 6>conditions on Title X funding to align the program with

4:12:50.060 --> 4:12:54.040
<v Speaker 6>conservative values. Title X is the only federal grant program

4:12:54.080 --> 4:12:58.480
<v Speaker 6>dedicated specifically to family planning, providing birth control, STI testing,

4:12:59.060 --> 4:13:03.000
<v Speaker 6>and related preventative health services. According to New York Attorney

4:13:03.020 --> 4:13:06.090
<v Speaker 6>General Letitia James, who led a coalition of 22 other

4:13:06.150 --> 4:13:10.170
<v Speaker 6>states in suing to block the changes, to qualify for

4:13:10.210 --> 4:13:13.460
<v Speaker 6>Title X funding under Trump, applicants would be required to

4:13:13.500 --> 4:13:17.110
<v Speaker 6>align their programs, quote, with a sweeping set of political

4:13:17.170 --> 4:13:21.270
<v Speaker 6>priorities as a condition of receiving or keeping federal funds.

4:13:22.110 --> 4:13:27.190
<v Speaker 6>The priorities include eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion practices, excluding

4:13:27.230 --> 4:13:31.390
<v Speaker 6>and stigmatizing transgender people, discouraging the use of contraception in

4:13:31.490 --> 4:13:36.100
<v Speaker 6>favor of natural family planning, and requiring clinics to counsel

4:13:36.220 --> 4:13:39.760
<v Speaker 6>all patients toward marriage and parenthood, unquote.

4:13:40.140 --> 4:13:45.110
<v Speaker 1>Jesus Christ. insane stuff yeah yeah this is like uh

4:13:45.590 --> 4:13:47.790
<v Speaker 1>we've spoken on this show before about romania you know

4:13:47.810 --> 4:13:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and their natalist policies like uh i don't know that

4:13:51.580 --> 4:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>shit scares me a lot.

4:13:53.020 --> 4:13:57.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah so the idea of hhs robert f kennedy jr

4:13:58.120 --> 4:14:01.400
<v Speaker 6>and friends being put in charge of a new women's

4:14:01.460 --> 4:14:05.550
<v Speaker 6>health initiative and task force not very reassuring to say

4:14:05.590 --> 4:14:09.180
<v Speaker 6>the least no Trump's executive order also revokes a Biden

4:14:09.280 --> 4:14:13.500
<v Speaker 6>memorandum and an executive order from 2024 to quote, advance

4:14:13.560 --> 4:14:17.440
<v Speaker 6>women's health research and innovation. The memo established the first

4:14:17.580 --> 4:14:21.620
<v Speaker 6>ever White House initiative on women's health research. And following

4:14:21.670 --> 4:14:25.950
<v Speaker 6>Biden's executive order, the NIH dedicated $ 200 million to close

4:14:25.990 --> 4:14:30.130
<v Speaker 6>the women's research gap. Biden then requested $ 12 billion from Congress,

4:14:30.730 --> 4:14:34.490
<v Speaker 6>and ultimately the administration invested about $ 1 billion into women's

4:14:34.510 --> 4:14:38.040
<v Speaker 6>health research in just 10 months. So, the sort of

4:14:38.360 --> 4:14:41.540
<v Speaker 6>novel aspects of this announcement from Trump is just cribbing

4:14:41.600 --> 4:14:45.220
<v Speaker 6>something Biden already tried to do and actually provided funding for,

4:14:45.900 --> 4:14:49.080
<v Speaker 6>while Trump's version has no funding, is in the wake

4:14:49.140 --> 4:14:52.470
<v Speaker 6>of hundreds of millions of dollars in cuts to funding

4:14:52.570 --> 4:14:56.400
<v Speaker 6>for women's research, and is in control of Robert F.

4:14:56.410 --> 4:14:57.110
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy Jr.

4:14:57.690 --> 4:14:59.170
<v Speaker 6>So, not great, to.

4:14:59.130 --> 4:15:01.690
<v Speaker 1>Say the least. Yeah, really, really bad.

4:15:02.090 --> 4:15:03.590
<v Speaker 2>It's... Yeah.

4:15:05.570 --> 4:15:08.230
<v Speaker 6>Other reporting from the Times has noted how this announcement

4:15:08.310 --> 4:15:11.610
<v Speaker 6>is just weeks away from the midterms and Trump is

4:15:11.750 --> 4:15:16.050
<v Speaker 6>polling at like 30% among women. And this could be

4:15:16.110 --> 4:15:19.820
<v Speaker 6>some sort of ploy to get some more support for

4:15:19.840 --> 4:15:22.780
<v Speaker 6>the administration going into the midterms. I don't know if

4:15:22.820 --> 4:15:25.900
<v Speaker 6>that's part of the intent, but the timing has been highlighted.

4:15:26.300 --> 4:15:29.060
<v Speaker 1>Great stuff. It seems such a weird one to go

4:15:29.120 --> 4:15:31.530
<v Speaker 1>for before the midterms because you're giving a massive middle

4:15:31.550 --> 4:15:35.550
<v Speaker 1>finger to half the population. Slightly more than half. But

4:15:35.650 --> 4:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>who am I? Previously, this has been a successful tactic

4:15:39.660 --> 4:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>for them. Yeah.

4:15:42.900 --> 4:15:46.730
<v Speaker 6>Well, that does it for us, I believe. Here at

4:15:46.790 --> 4:15:47.650
<v Speaker 6>It Could Happen Here.

4:15:48.390 --> 4:15:52.150
<v Speaker 1>Sweet. Would you like... to email us? You can do so.

4:15:52.230 --> 4:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>It's coolzontips at proton.me. Still, occasionally a marketing company email

4:15:57.080 --> 4:16:00.740
<v Speaker 1>will sneak through and earn a ban for its entire

4:16:00.780 --> 4:16:02.179
<v Speaker 1>domain name. Oh, I did.

4:16:02.280 --> 4:16:05.640
<v Speaker 6>I did actually specifically request marketing companies to send emails

4:16:05.660 --> 4:16:07.440
<v Speaker 6>to that address last week when you were out, James.

4:16:07.480 --> 4:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Fantastic.

4:16:08.280 --> 4:16:08.480
<v Speaker 7>So.

4:16:09.110 --> 4:16:12.310
<v Speaker 1>That might be my bad. I tried to stop. Fantastic.

4:16:12.370 --> 4:16:13.110
<v Speaker 1>I tried to stop him.

4:16:13.130 --> 4:16:13.230
<v Speaker 6>Great.

4:16:13.410 --> 4:16:16.150
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, thank you. I look forward to hearing more about

4:16:16.190 --> 4:16:19.350
<v Speaker 1>how your fucking book about investing is going to make

4:16:19.380 --> 4:16:21.740
<v Speaker 1>you a great fucking guest on our podcast and that

4:16:21.750 --> 4:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you haven't sent this to everyone else who has a podcast.

4:16:24.800 --> 4:16:25.060
<v Speaker 7>Great.

4:16:25.760 --> 4:16:28.260
<v Speaker 2>Let's just clip out James saying I look forward to

4:16:28.280 --> 4:16:31.380
<v Speaker 2>hearing more and then throw that in every future episode

4:16:31.480 --> 4:16:33.759
<v Speaker 2>along with a link to the email.

4:16:33.880 --> 4:16:34.500
<v Speaker 6>Oh, God.

4:16:35.440 --> 4:16:36.740
<v Speaker 13>Put a trans girl on your couch.

4:16:37.000 --> 4:16:38.180
<v Speaker 6>We reported the news.

4:16:42.420 --> 4:16:43.340
<v Speaker 1>Be reported the news.

4:16:48.930 --> 4:16:52.050
<v Speaker 2>Hey, we'll be back Monday with more episodes every week

4:16:52.110 --> 4:16:53.950
<v Speaker 2>from now until the heat death of the universe.

4:16:54.830 --> 4:16:57.270
<v Speaker 14>It Could Happen Here is a production of Cool Zone Media.

4:16:57.470 --> 4:17:01.850
<v Speaker 14>For more podcasts from Cool Zone Media, visit our website, coolzonemedia.com,

4:17:02.270 --> 4:17:05.090
<v Speaker 14>or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

4:17:05.430 --> 4:17:08.250
<v Speaker 14>or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can now find

4:17:08.290 --> 4:17:11.210
<v Speaker 14>sources for It Could Happen Here listed directly in episode descriptions.

4:17:11.700 --> 4:17:12.410
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening.