Speaker 1: You are entering the Freedom Huge. Two sheriff's stepanese ambushed
Speaker 1: in LA and some protesters celebrate that they were shot.
Speaker 1: Biden blames all of this on guns. A knife attacker
Speaker 1: in Pennsylvania also causes riots. Will Democrats concede if they
Speaker 1: lose an NFL opening day kneeling it happens. This is
Speaker 1: the bus Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is
Speaker 1: to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no
Speaker 1: mistake American great, You're a great American Again, the buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show begins analysts, He's a great guy. Now, welcome
Speaker 1: everybody to the buck Sexton Show. Thank you very much
Speaker 1: for being here. I gotta tell you there's a little
Speaker 1: bit of a momentum, a little bit of excitement right
Speaker 1: now for those of us who work in the news
Speaker 1: media and political commentary, right wing talk, whatever you want
Speaker 1: to call it, because the election you can almost you
Speaker 1: can almost smell it, you can almost taste this election.
Speaker 1: It's coming up. It's gonna be here very soon. And
Speaker 1: I've gotta tell you right now, Donald Trump has everything
Speaker 1: that he needs. It has all been set up by
Speaker 1: events so that Trump can in fact win four more
Speaker 1: years I'm not saying he will. I believe that it's
Speaker 1: very possible, but he might be able to pull this
Speaker 1: off despite the fact that twenty twenty was just a
Speaker 1: tough year, a bad year for the whole world, not
Speaker 1: just for America. But one of the major reasons for
Speaker 1: this is that the Democrats have embraced this BLM movement. Now,
Speaker 1: I've got to tell you, I'm proud of the fact
Speaker 1: that this show was never bending to need a BLM, never,
Speaker 1: oh yeah, let's do the police reforce. Who was telling
Speaker 1: you back in June that police reform and you know,
Speaker 1: trying to pass a new holiday or to change some statues,
Speaker 1: that any of this was gonna do anything to make
Speaker 1: this country better, right, I certainly was not saying that
Speaker 1: bending the knee on any of that stuff was the
Speaker 1: way to go. This show stood firm on this because
Speaker 1: I knew what was going to happen. I could see
Speaker 1: it coming. I didn't want to go out like a whimp.
Speaker 1: No matter what, this show, We're not going to be
Speaker 1: whimps here. But my god, there were so many Remember
Speaker 1: those huge companies who bent the knee, begged forgiveness and
Speaker 1: tried to brainwash their own employees to appease BLM. Well,
Speaker 1: they pandered to an evil Marxist movement based on lies,
Speaker 1: division and resentment. Oh oh, what happened to all of
Speaker 1: the BLM Instagram virtue signaling? Remember the black squares that
Speaker 1: everybody's putting up on Instagram. So much, so much cowardice, stupidity, sanctimoniousness, recklessness,
Speaker 1: And now here we are. We're five months into BLMS resurgence.
Speaker 1: There's not a single positive outcome from the movement unless
Speaker 1: letting celebrities, journalists, and pro athletes show off for their
Speaker 1: friends on social media is considered a really important thing.
Speaker 1: But there have been lots of deaths, riots, arson, assault
Speaker 1: and theft, though plenty of that, plenty of that. Now
Speaker 1: we can judge the movement by what it did, not
Speaker 1: what it pretended to be about. And finally, the Democrats,
Speaker 1: the pandering, pathetic national news media lying to you at
Speaker 1: every stage every phase of these riots and this movement.
Speaker 1: Now they're at least temporarily on defense because exactly what
Speaker 1: I have been telling you all along would happen has happen.
Speaker 1: You had two Los Angeles County Sheriff's deputies recently out
Speaker 1: of the academy. But two people just beginning their careers
Speaker 1: in law enforcement, man and a woman shot while sitting
Speaker 1: in their patrol car. A black male suspect went up
Speaker 1: to the vehicle and shot them absolutely no reason, absolutely
Speaker 1: know anything other than their cops. Why would someone do
Speaker 1: this to law enforcement in this country? Why would someone
Speaker 1: take it upon themselves to try to assassinate two police
Speaker 1: officers sitting in a parked vehicle like this. Well, my friends,
Speaker 1: we've seen this happen before. It's just not surprising. This
Speaker 1: was just like this ambush of LAPD officers was just
Speaker 1: like the assassin a nation of NYPD officers Ramos and
Speaker 1: lou in twenty fourteen, also by a BLM supporter. Oh,
Speaker 1: we don't know what this guy trusts me when they
Speaker 1: catch him, guarantee you, guarantee you. When they go on
Speaker 1: a social media accounts everything else, you'll see a lot
Speaker 1: of hashtag BLM a radical from within the tradition of
Speaker 1: a radical Marxist movement that is based in a lie that,
Speaker 1: if it were true, would justify violence against police. That's
Speaker 1: why it's so dangerous. That's why this is so corrosive.
Speaker 1: The vicious hatred of cops which is central to BLM,
Speaker 1: has horrific consequences. Yet again, every coward in the media
Speaker 1: and Democrat politician who pandered to the ignorant, angry mobs
Speaker 1: at the expense of our police should be ashamed. But
Speaker 1: it's about justice, they said, No, it's not, and it
Speaker 1: never was. This is just like what we saw in
Speaker 1: New York. It's just like what happened in Dallas, where
Speaker 1: you had a BLM supporter kill five members of the
Speaker 1: Dallas Police Department. Just run around assassinating cops. There was
Speaker 1: no struggle. This wasn't a fleeing felon trying to get
Speaker 1: away with a crime, as if that's a death penalty
Speaker 1: offense in and of itself. But there's no rationalization for
Speaker 1: this whatsoever, even for a criminal. The only reason for
Speaker 1: this is that our national news media, much of many
Speaker 1: of the most important and powerful companies in the country,
Speaker 1: and the Democrat Party went along with this, this moral
Speaker 1: panic about all the racism and our policing. Oh, it's
Speaker 1: also racist. They're killing unarmed black men for sport, that's
Speaker 1: what they say. That's the line. It's out of racism
Speaker 1: that police just some days they're like, you know what,
Speaker 1: I'm going to kill a black man because I feel
Speaker 1: like it, and I'll get away with it and it
Speaker 1: won't ruin my life, and it's not a monstrous thing
Speaker 1: to do. That is the central lie behind all of this,
Speaker 1: and just millions of morons went along with it. Oh,
Speaker 1: the tens of thousands of them protesting in the streets.
Speaker 1: Where about justice? No, you're not, you're idiots. Facts don't
Speaker 1: matter to you. Reason, logic, these things don't matter. Just emotion.
Speaker 1: It's emotion. It's people who are psychologically unstable, quite honestly,
Speaker 1: that are looking for something to latch onto, and the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party provides them with that. Oh, be a Democrat,
Speaker 1: then you're a good person. And here's this little sub
Speaker 1: movement of the Democrat Party called BLM, And you're a
Speaker 1: righteous fighter for civil rights if you go march in
Speaker 1: the streets for this and provide cover for the rioters
Speaker 1: and the looters. Oh, only ninety three percent of the protest,
Speaker 1: they say, or ninety three percent we're peaceful. Seven percent
Speaker 1: were violent. If you spend seven percent of your day
Speaker 1: and violence, you're like the most violent person on planet Earth. Okay,
Speaker 1: we've seen all the different tricks, we've seen what the
Speaker 1: medias tried to do. And as if it wasn't horrific enough,
Speaker 1: as if it wasn't evil enough, that you had someone who, yes,
Speaker 1: I am, I am analyzing this. We don't have the
Speaker 1: data yet, we don't have the it's quite obvious that
Speaker 1: this person hates cops and wanted to kill cops because
Speaker 1: of what he's hearing all the time every day in
Speaker 1: the media, every day in pop culture. The cops are
Speaker 1: evil and they're killing black men for sport because of racism.
Speaker 1: There's no other reason for this, there's no there was
Speaker 1: no other explanation. If there was another explanation, or at
Speaker 1: least say it could be this, it could be that.
Speaker 1: I can't even think of what it is. And we've
Speaker 1: seen this before, we've seen the patterns. We didn't understand
Speaker 1: what's going on here. We understand what is happening. But
Speaker 1: as if that wasn't ugly. And by the way, the
Speaker 1: sheriff's deputies right now are are expected to survive, so
Speaker 1: thank god, looks like they're going to be okay. But
Speaker 1: as if that wasn't bad enough, you had BLM supporters
Speaker 1: outside the hospital where these police officers. This was in
Speaker 1: South Central Los Angeles or in Compton, and you had
Speaker 1: BLM supporters videotaping themselves outside the hospital yelling things to
Speaker 1: these cops who were shot sitting in their patrol car,
Speaker 1: like y'all gonna die one by one. This ain't gonna stop.
Speaker 1: That's right. The BLM supporting Biden voting mob gathered outside
Speaker 1: a hospital. Maybe it was a half a dozen people.
Speaker 1: It does doesn't matter. Can you can you imagine if
Speaker 1: a half dozen Trump supporters gathered outside of of one
Speaker 1: of these shootings that BLM talks about all the time,
Speaker 1: and was gathering outside outside the hospital where Jacob Blake
Speaker 1: was was, you know, currently being treated, and we're saying
Speaker 1: that this was a great thing and he got what
Speaker 1: he deserved. And it's all you'd hear about for a
Speaker 1: month in the media. All you'd hear about about a
Speaker 1: half a dozen likely Democrat BLM supporters gather outside and
Speaker 1: say and are cheering for this. They are cheering for
Speaker 1: officers who have been shot to die. They're not they're
Speaker 1: not hoping for a speedy recovery. They're hoping for the opposite.
Speaker 1: They want them to die. They're laughing about this, that
Speaker 1: they think this is funny which side of the political
Speaker 1: aisle supports this creates this? Which side of the political
Speaker 1: aisle has made their bed now and has to sleep
Speaker 1: in it? When it comes to BLM, we know it's
Speaker 1: the Democrats, It's the Biden voters, the pandering, the racial division.
Speaker 1: Trump has broken them psychologically and emotionally, and they're so
Speaker 1: desperate for some kind of moral high ground that they
Speaker 1: went along with this Marxist fraud again. And what has
Speaker 1: it done? People have died, there have been riots, arson looting, stores,
Speaker 1: destroyed businesses, broken into ended shut down afterwards for what
Speaker 1: doesn't help any community. Crime is going up across the
Speaker 1: country and cities, particularly in minority areas of major cities.
Speaker 1: So what was this all about? What were all the
Speaker 1: black Squares on Instagram and all the you know, hashtag
Speaker 1: this and hashtag that in support of BLM? What did
Speaker 1: that accomplish? Do the people that really thought that that
Speaker 1: was moral and righteous? And just do they feel good
Speaker 1: about themselves now? If they do, they're delusional. They're delusional.
Speaker 1: The Democrats are going to do everything they can. They're
Speaker 1: like people, They're like toddlers caught in a lie where
Speaker 1: they will not face the consequence there just gonna keep
Speaker 1: lying and lying and lying until somebody finally just brings
Speaker 1: down the wrath and righteous fury of a higher power
Speaker 1: upon them. The Democrats are just gonna lie, They're gonna say,
Speaker 1: oh no, this isn't what happened, This is not what
Speaker 1: you've seen, this is not the reality. No it is.
Speaker 1: Now we live in a country where police are shot
Speaker 1: for no reason other than being police, because there are
Speaker 1: people out there who believe the mainstream talking points of
Speaker 1: the media on the Democrat Party. And then after those
Speaker 1: cops are shot and clinging to life, there are random
Speaker 1: Biden voters who gather outside the hospital saying, yeah, that's right,
Speaker 1: those people should die. Savage barbarism. And that's what rooting
Speaker 1: for police to die is, savage barbarism. Do you see
Speaker 1: anyone who is on the right, who is ideologically conservative
Speaker 1: doing this? Ever, No, you do not. Why is that
Speaker 1: there's no moral equivalence here between the two sides. The
Speaker 1: left has completely embraced a corrupt, distorted, insidious, immoral philosophy
Speaker 1: here with BLM, and it may in fact cost them
Speaker 1: the election. And the only way we can really achieve
Speaker 1: justice for all the destruction, all the misery and pain
Speaker 1: and suffering and lies that these people have told for
Speaker 1: months is to defeat them in this election. They have
Speaker 1: earned with BLM alone, the Democrats have earned every second
Speaker 1: of four more years of President Donald J. Trump. You're
Speaker 1: in this is the Bucksex and Show podcast. So mine
Speaker 1: wants to apease domestic terrist and my plan is to
Speaker 1: arrest domestic terrorists. And we also believe that if you
Speaker 1: murder a police officer, you should receive the death penalty. Absolutely.
Speaker 1: The President is laying out the very clear choice that
Speaker 1: the American people have, where you can either support the
Speaker 1: political party that believes in pandering, in placating, supporting, openly
Speaker 1: allying with this anti cop movement, because that's really what
Speaker 1: it is, or you could support a political party that,
Speaker 1: as imperfect as it may be, does at least have
Speaker 1: some of the clear moral questions of our day. Correct,
Speaker 1: the police are the good guys and gals, The police
Speaker 1: are the good team and all of this there what
Speaker 1: keeps us safe? There, what prevents us from having the
Speaker 1: kinds of anarchy and violence in the streets that we've
Speaker 1: started to see a little bit of here and there
Speaker 1: in cities across America. But would be so much worse.
Speaker 1: But as if it wasn't just clarifying enough over the
Speaker 1: weekend that BLM was freaking out over a whole bunch
Speaker 1: of different issues, as they tend to do. You also
Speaker 1: had in addition to that, right, you had the protesters
Speaker 1: outside the hospital. You had the kneeling, the NFL kneeling,
Speaker 1: which you'll get into. But you had this incident in Lancaster,
Speaker 1: Pennsylvania that was utterly mind blowing. Okay, here you had
Speaker 1: and the Lancaster PD did the right thing. The Lancaster
Speaker 1: PD released the body camera footage right away because they
Speaker 1: recognized that if this got out, there might be a
Speaker 1: real problem here, right, there might be a real issue.
Speaker 1: I'm rather rather if the story got out without the
Speaker 1: attendant body camp footage. And here's what you see. It's
Speaker 1: it's very clear. There's a police officer's call to a
Speaker 1: domestic disturbance call, all right, and it's all very clear
Speaker 1: the body camera. A guy named Ricardo Munos, who had
Speaker 1: attacked people before, was a criminal, who would attacked people
Speaker 1: with a knife before, and he comes running out, it's
Speaker 1: all on video, running out of this home in Lancaster
Speaker 1: at the police officer who runs away from him and
Speaker 1: only turns when and when he has to because the
Speaker 1: guy has a knife raised to stab him. The police
Speaker 1: posted this bodycam video. This is as clear a use
Speaker 1: of Ford situation as possible. Let me be very clear,
Speaker 1: Ricardo Muno's, under our law, deserve to be shot by
Speaker 1: this law enforcement officer. If you try to stab someone
Speaker 1: who is anyone but a cop in particular, and you
Speaker 1: get shot, that's your fault. Now you could say it's
Speaker 1: the guys and they talked about he's on the I
Speaker 1: believe he's on the spectrum. He's emotionally or psychologically has problems.
Speaker 1: That's that's a shame and that's sad. But you can't
Speaker 1: try to stab someone to death. Do you know what
Speaker 1: BLM did over the weekend? Do you know what BLM
Speaker 1: did in response to all of this rioted? That's right,
Speaker 1: there was rioting at Lancaster, Pennsylvania because a cop shot
Speaker 1: a guy who ran out of a house with a knife.
Speaker 1: It's on video. There's no question ran out with a
Speaker 1: knife trying to stab a police officer running at him
Speaker 1: with the knife raised. It looks like something out of
Speaker 1: a training video and a police shoot house. I've done
Speaker 1: this training before, and this is the shoot him as
Speaker 1: many times as you have to to stop the threat
Speaker 1: portion of that training. And yet that's not what the
Speaker 1: BLM protesters are willing to take from as it's not
Speaker 1: what they're willing to say. You know, that's a circumstance
Speaker 1: that continues to just it's it's mind blowing that we
Speaker 1: are now seeing them look at situations that could be
Speaker 1: the textbook case of legitimate police use of forth and
Speaker 1: saying no, we're going to riot anyway. That's BLM. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to the SWAT. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. What
Speaker 1: has been the Democrat response to the shootings over the weekend.
Speaker 1: There are a lot of shootings we could be talking
Speaker 1: about dozens of people shot in Chicago. Shootings are still
Speaker 1: at a very high rate compared to last year in
Speaker 1: New York. But talking about these two sheriff's deputies who
Speaker 1: were almost murdered by someone, and then the people cheering
Speaker 1: for the cops to actually die in the hospital and
Speaker 1: telling other cops standing outside the hospital that you should
Speaker 1: die too, does anyone really find this to be surprising?
Speaker 1: Given what we're told all the time about police, given
Speaker 1: that we have multi millionaire celebrities who think that this
Speaker 1: is a movement they should be supporting. Does anyone else
Speaker 1: find that to be problematic? Given what we're seeing, this
Speaker 1: was all entirely This is playing out exactly the way
Speaker 1: it did before in twenty fourteen, twenty fifteen, the original
Speaker 1: BLM movement. There is nothing about this is that is surprising.
Speaker 1: The only thing that some of us look at and
Speaker 1: find truly stunning is I think how much corporate America
Speaker 1: decided that they would go along with this. That's the
Speaker 1: only aspect of this that is a little bit different.
Speaker 1: Last time, perhaps they were supported, but now it was
Speaker 1: all just bend the knee, beg for forgiveness, reach down
Speaker 1: to the ground, kiss the floors, say I'm so sorry BLM.
Speaker 1: Please don't boycott us any thing, to be on your
Speaker 1: good side. But now they've shot some cops, or at
Speaker 1: least some cops have been shot by somebody who I've
Speaker 1: yet to hear of another rationalization or explanation for why
Speaker 1: I but do this other than BLM. Now they've got
Speaker 1: a problem on their hands. So what does Biden immediately
Speaker 1: focus on what does Biden want to talk to everybody about. Oh,
Speaker 1: that's right, gun control, weapons of war. That's the that's
Speaker 1: the latest from Joe Biden about this. That that's going
Speaker 1: to stop this. Let's have another useless conversation where Democrats
Speaker 1: pretend like there's any hope of getting guns out of
Speaker 1: the hands of all criminals in this country. The Vice
Speaker 1: President tweeted, weapons of war have no place in our communities.
Speaker 1: We need to ban assault weapons and high capacity magazines.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm sorry, but earlier Biden called the shooting unconscionable,
Speaker 1: and I have to say, this is it. It's unconscionable.
Speaker 1: That's true. But Democrats don't get to pretend that they
Speaker 1: haven't played a role in all this, including Joe Biden, right,
Speaker 1: including the biggest voices in the media and the national
Speaker 1: news media. Matt Walsh tweeted this out. I've retweeted because
Speaker 1: I agree with them. You have helped to spread this
Speaker 1: is in response to Joe Biden saying this cold blooded
Speaker 1: shooting is unconscionable. Walsh tweeted, you have helped to spread
Speaker 1: the baseless lie that racist police are hunting black people.
Speaker 1: You have not stood for law enforcement and instead of
Speaker 1: signed with the scumbag criminals, you're responsible for this. You're disgusting, spineless, fraudulent, hypocrite. Yes, amen,
Speaker 1: absolutely totally agree. And look, you know this is really
Speaker 1: exposing the difference between the left and the right on
Speaker 1: law enforcement and on what kind of communities, what kind
Speaker 1: of society we should be living in. I mean, right now,
Speaker 1: from what you saw on Lancaster and if you haven't
Speaker 1: seen the video, you should. You should see it. It's disturbing,
Speaker 1: but you should understand how absurd this BLM movement is.
Speaker 1: People are rioting because a guy got shot because her
Speaker 1: he had already had a criminal history of stabbing people
Speaker 1: with knives in the past, and he runs out to
Speaker 1: stab a cop during a domestic violence call or domestic
Speaker 1: dispute call, and you get shot and they riot? What
Speaker 1: do they? I mean? Apparently BLM rioters believe that social
Speaker 1: justice means cops should allow themselves to be stabbed to
Speaker 1: death with a knife by a criminal lunatic. Otherwise though,
Speaker 1: they're guilty of oppression and systemic racism. Yeah, that's where
Speaker 1: we are now. The extremes that we used to talk about,
Speaker 1: what if somebody pulls a knife on a cop. Can
Speaker 1: they use violence? Then BLM says no, No, if the
Speaker 1: person that shot is a minority, if it's a white
Speaker 1: guy who tries to stab a cop. The right conservatives
Speaker 1: Trump will say, yeah, it doesn't matter what color you are.
Speaker 1: If you try to stab a cop, you are going
Speaker 1: to get shot, and that's justified. It's it's not to say,
Speaker 1: it's not celebrated. It's not a happy thing. It's always
Speaker 1: a tragedy, but it's justified. They reject all this. Of course,
Speaker 1: they've created this false narrative and they'll stick to it
Speaker 1: at all costs. Do you think that the fraudulent millionaire
Speaker 1: journos on anchors over at CNN, you think that they
Speaker 1: feel badly about any of the stuff that's happening to
Speaker 1: this country, about the division, about the divisiveness. No, they
Speaker 1: don't care. They actually think that they are the good
Speaker 1: guys in this equation. They think the political movement that
Speaker 1: they support. Sure, there are some people who are a
Speaker 1: part of it who but that's there are radicals in
Speaker 1: every movement. They'll say. Now they'll turn around and say
Speaker 1: Trump's a Russian asset and they're doing all of the
Speaker 1: things I have to tell you I wish I had
Speaker 1: written out I've said it here on the show, but
Speaker 1: I've been thinking about if I had written out what
Speaker 1: I thought the left's anti Trump attack plan would be. Um,
Speaker 1: you know what the playbook would be. You know, I've
Speaker 1: gotten it all right. They're gonna pull out the Russia stuff.
Speaker 1: They're they're gonna use all the old attacks. Plus they're
Speaker 1: gonna say COVID is all his fault. You know, They're
Speaker 1: just they're gonna do and they're gonna be prepared. We'll
Speaker 1: talk more about this is be prepared for lawfare against
Speaker 1: the election result, which increasingly I think is we should
Speaker 1: expect this. This is going to happen. But we'll get
Speaker 1: into that more in a little bit. Um, I mean
Speaker 1: this is this is the country's choice right now. There
Speaker 1: are two cops who were shot, another cop almost stabbed
Speaker 1: to death. Think about that. I mean, this cop, this
Speaker 1: CoP's got a family, wants to go home to his
Speaker 1: family every night, wants to live, doesn't want to be
Speaker 1: stabbed to death. Is doing his jobs, serving his community,
Speaker 1: and some guy runs at him with a raised butcher knife,
Speaker 1: trying to stab him, and he runs away. The cop
Speaker 1: tries to not have to use his weapon, shoots the guy,
Speaker 1: and people riot over this, So that that's now the more,
Speaker 1: that's now the moral decision of BLM. That if, if you,
Speaker 1: if a cop has to use lethal force to defend himself,
Speaker 1: even if it's entirely justified, anyone who believes in BLM
Speaker 1: has a right to go break into strangers stores, steal
Speaker 1: their stuff, burn down property, threaten people in the streets,
Speaker 1: and attack other police officers. That's that's now the movement
Speaker 1: the Democrats support. That's what the country has been through
Speaker 1: months of riots around right, These are riots about about
Speaker 1: what about ending racism? It seems like there was a
Speaker 1: lot of resentment in these riots, a lot of anger
Speaker 1: and rage really just directed at Trump and all of
Speaker 1: his supporters, but it was wrapped up in this pretense of, oh,
Speaker 1: it's about unarmed black men being killed by cops, which
Speaker 1: is happening all the time, actually happens very very rarely.
Speaker 1: Doesn't matter, They don't care if it happened once, they
Speaker 1: would still be talking about this night. You know, if
Speaker 1: next year there were one black man who was unarmed
Speaker 1: killed by police, they there would still be rioters who
Speaker 1: think they're justified because of the history of oppression, you see,
Speaker 1: because of all the times in the past, so it
Speaker 1: never ends, it never stops. It's not about moral action today.
Speaker 1: It's not about what's fair, what's just right now, it's
Speaker 1: what some people feel like. Remember the Democrats all about
Speaker 1: the feels, all about feelings. But here's your choice. Police
Speaker 1: are attacked, shot, riots are happening, and just over the weekend,
Speaker 1: Biden sweets weapons of war have no place in our communities.
Speaker 1: We need to ban assault weapons and high capacity magazines.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's almost like it's almost like a tweet
Speaker 1: robot or something put this out. Well, I guess it's
Speaker 1: probably Biden's staff, so it is a tweet robot in
Speaker 1: a sense, ban assault weapons. The guy who shot the
Speaker 1: two compss on video used to pistol. Banning assault weapons
Speaker 1: would do nothing high capacity magazines. You don't need a
Speaker 1: high capacity magazine when you can walk up to a
Speaker 1: window and shoot two cops who are sitting there peacefully
Speaker 1: doing their jobs. What does that have to do with anything?
Speaker 1: And on the President's side, he responds to this shooting
Speaker 1: quote animals that must be hit hard end quote. Do
Speaker 1: your choice, America, which one of these people is serious?
Speaker 1: About keeping you in your community safe. Which one of
Speaker 1: these people is serious about protecting all life, all lives
Speaker 1: in this country. It's not Joe Biden. That much is
Speaker 1: very clear. You're in the Freedom hunt. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. They're not protest is their anarchists.
Speaker 1: They're agitators and the rioters who are they? They're people
Speaker 1: that in many cases are paid and then they're stupid kids.
Speaker 1: Pay people that we're looking at right now. If we're
Speaker 1: looking at him right now, you're telling no, not yet,
Speaker 1: but I'll you'll be going to be finding out pretty soon. Look,
Speaker 1: they're stupid people too, because they'll be overthrown as soon
Speaker 1: as they get their wish. These people don't respect them.
Speaker 1: They're just using them money. These are super liberal people
Speaker 1: that have money and they're helping these anarchists and their
Speaker 1: agitators and their dangers. The super labs who live in
Speaker 1: mansions and ultra high end apartments in either gated communities
Speaker 1: or fancy doorman buildings depending on the city or the
Speaker 1: area of the country, live in the The lib elites
Speaker 1: who support all this stuff in so many ways are
Speaker 1: really the most odious of all because they do so
Speaker 1: for their own reasons of moral preening. Look at me,
Speaker 1: Look at how good I am, looking at virtuous I am.
Speaker 1: You know, people in their mansions in Greenwich, Connecticut. Oh,
Speaker 1: I'm so supportive of BLM. What a what an idiot
Speaker 1: fraud one would have to be? Yeah, sure, sure. The
Speaker 1: same Libs who make sure their children go to the
Speaker 1: most elite, least diverse private schools possible. Those those same
Speaker 1: people are the ones that are always talking about how
Speaker 1: much they support BLM. Oh gosh, it's almost like they're
Speaker 1: huge hypocrites and there they live in constant terror of
Speaker 1: being found out for being such utter frauds. But Trump said,
Speaker 1: as they're looking into them. I hope that's true. Friends.
Speaker 1: I mean, I've I've lost all hope. As I told
Speaker 1: you well, I never had any hope, but I've I've
Speaker 1: now come to the conclusion that I've been right along
Speaker 1: with the Durham pro it's really just not going to
Speaker 1: do anything. Nothing's going to come from it. I've been
Speaker 1: saying it for many, many, many months now. And I
Speaker 1: wonder when they say they're looking into the funding sources,
Speaker 1: I mean they might be looking into it, but not
Speaker 1: willing to really do anything about it. You know, we
Speaker 1: always back down to the other side on these things.
Speaker 1: We always say, oh, it would be too disruptive if
Speaker 1: the DOJ really held them accountable, it would be too
Speaker 1: problematic if we decided to punish them for what they've
Speaker 1: done wrong, even though they deserve it. They'll be so
Speaker 1: upset if we do that. And so that's why I
Speaker 1: just I don't think that we're going to see any
Speaker 1: any justice when it comes to that. I don't think
Speaker 1: we're going to see anyone who has been funding or
Speaker 1: assisting these They'll say they were assisting peaceful protests. It's
Speaker 1: not their fault. If it turned into riots. Man, it's
Speaker 1: not their fault. If all of a sudden they're burning
Speaker 1: down buildings and doing bad stuff, then what's next year?
Speaker 1: The NFL. I didn't watch any of it. I did
Speaker 1: watch a very excellent and I would recommend that some
Speaker 1: of you consider it consider it more. I did watch tennis,
Speaker 1: the US Open, that's right, the Open of the US Baby,
Speaker 1: the most patriotic American tennis tournament. I did watch it,
Speaker 1: and it was an excellent match. And there was no
Speaker 1: BLM stuff at least in the match that I saw.
Speaker 1: None of that, Although I do know that the Woman's Champion,
Speaker 1: Naomi Osaka, has made a big deal about about BLM,
Speaker 1: but I just can't handle all this stuff with the NFL.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry what I also love them people. Now the
Speaker 1: new line is how do you not know what they're
Speaker 1: protesting for? At this point, I'm sorry, what are we
Speaker 1: gonna say? Justice? They're protesting because of the bad things
Speaker 1: that happen in the world. I'm protesting badness during the
Speaker 1: national anthem. Oh, I'm protesting racism during the national anthem.
Speaker 1: So you're using the clear disrespect of your nation to
Speaker 1: draw attention to yourself. And then when you're proaching on well,
Speaker 1: what do you what is your problem? What do you want?
Speaker 1: It's Oh, it's it's this very broad, amorphous concept that
Speaker 1: will never entirely go away, so I can always complain
Speaker 1: about it. There's always an excuse for agitation whenever I
Speaker 1: want to agitate. I'm completely and utterly disgusted by this NFL.
Speaker 1: It really it's NFL and NBA right now are the
Speaker 1: two leagues that have been the worst when it comes
Speaker 1: to all of this. And I don't think that anyone
Speaker 1: should hold back. I think that we should speak honestly
Speaker 1: about what we're what we're seeing here, what this is
Speaker 1: all about their ungrateful millionaire celebrity cowards. Oh, I don't
Speaker 1: want to be the one online team is getting weird
Speaker 1: looks in the locker room. So I'll bend the need too,
Speaker 1: even though I know this is nonsense. Okay, Yeah, some
Speaker 1: people do a lot for their country being a football player. Uh,
Speaker 1: that's that's a very lucky it's a very privileged position.
Speaker 1: You know, a lot of Americans, I think, believe that
Speaker 1: professional athletes, because of the teamwork and discipline involved in
Speaker 1: reaching that level, we're just going to be a higher
Speaker 1: character than say Hollywood actors with their absurd lib politics.
Speaker 1: I think that illusion is being shattered, at least for
Speaker 1: the NFL and f NBA. I think they're overpaid brats,
Speaker 1: and I think that they their ratings should crater and
Speaker 1: people should express their displeasure. This is entertainment. We don't
Speaker 1: need any of these things. This is to make us,
Speaker 1: you know, feel joy and relaxation and forget about our problems.
Speaker 1: It's not time for a lecture from under educated, overpaid babies.
Speaker 1: That's how I feel about it. I don't know. I
Speaker 1: mean if other people feel differently. That's fine. They're allowed
Speaker 1: to watch it, but I would not advocate. I'm not
Speaker 1: watching any of it, and I did used to watch
Speaker 1: the NFL, and I will not anymore. I thought the
Speaker 1: NBA has been kind of garbage for years now. But
Speaker 1: did any of the entire Washington football team that was
Speaker 1: kneeling together? Did any of them take a knee or
Speaker 1: make any public statement on that field for the two
Speaker 1: cops ambushed and shot who were struggling for their lives
Speaker 1: during that game? Of course not, because you see, the
Speaker 1: NFL doesn't protest in solidarity with honorable and courageous cops.
Speaker 1: But they've got plenty of support for felons who resist arrest,
Speaker 1: don't they, As well as felons who put on a
Speaker 1: football uniform. It's plenty of that too, and yet we
Speaker 1: are supposed to think of them as heroes. You know,
Speaker 1: we all knew right away how many NFL or NBA
Speaker 1: players would take a knee or show solidarity on their
Speaker 1: jerseys for the ambushed LA Sheriff's deputies. The answer was zero,
Speaker 1: because so many of those ungrateful, under educated fools deserve
Speaker 1: nothing but contempt for their social justice stances. We all
Speaker 1: get to make a choice. Your friends, we all got
Speaker 1: to We all get to answer the question, which side
Speaker 1: of this are you on? Morality, law ordered decency, a
Speaker 1: society that believes in individuals as individuals, every person judged
Speaker 1: by their character the color of their skin irrelevant, or
Speaker 1: a society of endless division and police hatred and racial demagoguery.
Speaker 1: We all get to make the choice. Democrats are on
Speaker 1: one side, Republicans are on the other choice. Thanks for
Speaker 1: listening to the buses and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe
Speaker 1: on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. Get ready for a very troubling reality of
Speaker 1: this election cycle. And it's that this election is unlikely
Speaker 1: to be over on the night the votes are cast, irrespective,
Speaker 1: And this is the part you really have to get
Speaker 1: ready for. Irrespective of what the actual voting is doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: It doesn't unless you have some massive Trump landslide. Even then,
Speaker 1: I've got to tell you. Even then, I've got to
Speaker 1: tell you it's probably going to turn into lawfare. They're
Speaker 1: going to fight it out in the courts. There are
Speaker 1: multiple mechanisms, and Democrats have already put in place I
Speaker 1: want to walk you through what people are talking about
Speaker 1: now as a possible soft coup attempt. Two point zero
Speaker 1: wouldn't be the first time, right, the coup that may
Speaker 1: yet come. There was the Michael Anton piece in the
Speaker 1: American mind about this. I've been talking about a coup
Speaker 1: coming possibly for months. The way they'll try to engineer this,
Speaker 1: the mechanism for this, all of it, right, and you
Speaker 1: see you add all this up. The mail in ballot voting,
Speaker 1: you take that, you take the Russia narrative or Russia's
Speaker 1: trying to do things again. We'll get to that. And
Speaker 1: now you have the story that the polls all show
Speaker 1: Biden winning. This is what I'm telling you what the
Speaker 1: Democrat mentality is all show Biden winning. And so if
Speaker 1: come election night, Democrats end up with another surprise, oh,
Speaker 1: just like twenty sixteen and looks like Trump is going
Speaker 1: to be the president for four more years, They've already
Speaker 1: built the narrative. They can easily just say no, don't believe,
Speaker 1: we don't believe it. We don't believe it's true. Trump
Speaker 1: didn't win. The mail in ballots are still being counted
Speaker 1: from all these states that have allowed unsecured loose ballots
Speaker 1: is floating around there. Who knows how many are in
Speaker 1: the mail? Who knows if they send out millions, they
Speaker 1: only need perhaps a couple of hundred thousand to even
Speaker 1: be sent in any capacity to claim that we can't know,
Speaker 1: so then they extend it out and it also then
Speaker 1: creates a delay because well, what about what about postmarking
Speaker 1: the next day? Are they gonna be able to count
Speaker 1: these anywhere? Are they gonna fight? Are they gonna say?
Speaker 1: You know, there's endless shenanigans that they can try. And
Speaker 1: I do think that we need to be prepared for that.
Speaker 1: I think that they're preparing for it. I think that
Speaker 1: this is what we're seeing happening right now. They simply
Speaker 1: can't process it. I'm gonna tell you this team, if
Speaker 1: we lose this election, and we might, we might as
Speaker 1: crazy as I know, I know, don't don't flip your
Speaker 1: station or stop the podcast. If we lose this election,
Speaker 1: it's going to it's going to be bad. There are
Speaker 1: lots of words, bad words i'd like to use about
Speaker 1: what that would make me feel, like a lot of blankly, blanking,
Speaker 1: blanking blank. But if we lose, okay, maybe the country's lost.
Speaker 1: I don't know, but we keep fighting. We rally, we
Speaker 1: do what we can, and we go down fighting one
Speaker 1: way or the other, and we enjoy every day we've
Speaker 1: got because every day above ground is better than the alternative.
Speaker 1: That's the attitude if libs, if Democrats lose this election,
Speaker 1: they will turn into shrieking puddles of emotional refuse on
Speaker 1: the ground. They're not going to be able to handle it.
Speaker 1: And they've they already know this because everything they think
Speaker 1: about themselves, it's so deeply personal for them. You know,
Speaker 1: if someone can convince me that they have a better
Speaker 1: argument than what I have thought for a long time,
Speaker 1: if they really can convince me and go, WHOA, Okay,
Speaker 1: oh guess I was wrong about that, you know, always
Speaker 1: open to that possibility, and I have changed my mind
Speaker 1: on things over time. Heck, I was worried that Trump
Speaker 1: was going to be completely in over his head during
Speaker 1: the primary as president, supported him in the general election.
Speaker 1: See I'm honest about that. A lot of other people
Speaker 1: who are like, oh, I love Mark or Rubio so much,
Speaker 1: all right, Donald Trump? Now they're all you know, people
Speaker 1: who called Trump, I don't know, an idiot. For example,
Speaker 1: on the radio, show and now suck up to him
Speaker 1: every chance that they get. I don't know, I don't
Speaker 1: know who did that. You could probably look it up
Speaker 1: on the in the interwebs. There's somebody out there, and
Speaker 1: there are people that pretend, I tell you the truth.
Speaker 1: I thought that Trump would have a hard time with this,
Speaker 1: and he's been an excellent president, and he's shown us
Speaker 1: from day one that he is a fighter and that
Speaker 1: he is trying to do his best for the American people.
Speaker 1: And you know, if you're not willing to admit that
Speaker 1: you miss missanalyze something, or you know, you're not a
Speaker 1: good analyst, if you misunderstood something and you won't change
Speaker 1: your mind, I mean, then you're just an ideologue. You're
Speaker 1: not actually a person who's engaging with the facts. That
Speaker 1: is the definition of the modern Democrat Party right now.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter what the facts are, it doesn't matter
Speaker 1: what the reality of our country is. Right now, they've
Speaker 1: already they've already set it up so that it's impossible
Speaker 1: for Trump to get a clean win, and that's the
Speaker 1: goal of all this. In fact, they even got a
Speaker 1: step further over the weekend. There was this piece that
Speaker 1: I saw in the Atlantic which is one of the
Speaker 1: more supposedly intellectually snobbish, although they write a lot of
Speaker 1: garbage and have a lot of pseudo intellectuals that write
Speaker 1: for it. I mean, it's really a lot of people
Speaker 1: that aren't nearly as bright as they think they are.
Speaker 1: They just echo what other libs, what other libs want,
Speaker 1: and break out a thesaurus when they're writing their essays.
Speaker 1: But here we go. I've got to show you. I've
Speaker 1: got to tell you about this one. This is a
Speaker 1: particularly galling are particularly galling circumstance here, Shadi Hamid, that's
Speaker 1: right in the Atlantic quote, I argue that even strictly
Speaker 1: law and order republican and have an interest in Biden winning,
Speaker 1: if Biden loses, mass unrest is more unlikely because the
Speaker 1: Left will have more difficulty accepting the results. Wait, that's
Speaker 1: not that doesn't make sense. If Biden loses, mass unrest
Speaker 1: is they mean if Biden wins, mass unrest is more unlikely. Anyway.
Speaker 1: The piece is about how Democrats won't be able to concede.
Speaker 1: That's the title of the the piece, And what they're saying
Speaker 1: is that, look, guys, if you want the country to
Speaker 1: return to normal, you gotta vote for Biden. You gotta
Speaker 1: vote for Biden because otherwise we're just getta get crazier
Speaker 1: and crazier. We can't handle it. I mean, some Democrats
Speaker 1: are actually going so far as to say that. Now
Speaker 1: they're telling you this. They're saying, look, you see all
Speaker 1: these protests that you think this is bad, Now, just
Speaker 1: wait until we get into a position where we feel
Speaker 1: like there's no future because we're completely nuts and we're
Speaker 1: ripping the Basically, this is Democrats saying, if Biden doesn't win,
Speaker 1: we're going to rip the country apart. So let's all
Speaker 1: vote for Biden. This is what the pitch has turned into.
Speaker 1: That does that a line up with the overall Democrat
Speaker 1: messaging on this? Of course it does. This is not
Speaker 1: surprising in the least, right does that line? Of course
Speaker 1: it lines up with this. This is the implied threat along.
Speaker 1: This is the coercive component of BLM. That's why they're
Speaker 1: going out and yelling at old people in the streets
Speaker 1: with loudspeakers and ruining people's dinners and lunches, and yelling
Speaker 1: at them in restaurants and showing up outside public officials
Speaker 1: homes and waking people up in the middle of the night,
Speaker 1: and this is all coercion. It's all meant to spread
Speaker 1: the psychosis that the Libs live in because Trump is president.
Speaker 1: The rest of us are like, country is fine, country's
Speaker 1: actually you know, yeah, COVID's been bad, but we're dealing it.
Speaker 1: We're almost we're dealing with it. We're almost through it.
Speaker 1: It wasn't Trump's fault, as much as they try to pretend.
Speaker 1: It is absurd and things are okay. We're not fighting
Speaker 1: some horrible war. We don't have plans getting blown out
Speaker 1: of the stop out of the sky by terrorists. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, the economy's recovering. You know, the administration is
Speaker 1: trying to get money out to people in businesses, and
Speaker 1: you know, we want to reopen and we want our
Speaker 1: lives back. What's the big problem with Trump? The border
Speaker 1: issue has calmed down for now. I mean, we haven't
Speaker 1: set all the legal immigration yet, but the border issue
Speaker 1: is not in the same emergency situation that it was,
Speaker 1: and yeah, here we are. They think that if Trump
Speaker 1: is elected that the country is over. They've created a
Speaker 1: narrative of existential durest for the nation if the sitting
Speaker 1: president is re elected. It's like they learned nothing. They
Speaker 1: acted like the country was going to be destroyed if
Speaker 1: once Trump won, because I didn't think that was really possible.
Speaker 1: Now Here we are, four years in, country is doing fine,
Speaker 1: Country is not destroyed. People are fine. People aren't getting
Speaker 1: marched off into you know, into camp and being told
Speaker 1: to break rocks with mallets because they voted for Democrats. Again,
Speaker 1: there's none of these horrible things. There's no fascism, they
Speaker 1: haven't suspended election, all these things we've been told. He's
Speaker 1: not actually a puppet of Putinal though they still say
Speaker 1: that like complete morons. But now it's just the same
Speaker 1: thing all over again. But it's even worse. It's it's
Speaker 1: exaggerated in their minds. The threat is even greater we've had.
Speaker 1: A normal person would see Trump is president for four years,
Speaker 1: the country hasn't fallen apart, He hasn't destroyed the nation.
Speaker 1: So now let's understand that if he's president for four
Speaker 1: more years and we have the continuation of what we've seen,
Speaker 1: things are going to be fine. That's what a normal
Speaker 1: person would do with just with those facts. What Democrats
Speaker 1: do is, oh my gosh, see he is destroying the nation.
Speaker 1: And if we can't live if he does four more years.
Speaker 1: Oh no, they really do believe this stuff. I used
Speaker 1: to think that it was largely theatrics for viewers and
Speaker 1: just because it was useful propaganda. But no, these Democrats,
Speaker 1: these lives are not such talented actors. A lot of
Speaker 1: them really believe this, friends, and that means they're willing
Speaker 1: to go to the most extreme length imaginable to not
Speaker 1: just try to defeat the president, which they still could do,
Speaker 1: but to steal the election from him if he wins.
Speaker 1: And now they're even telling you Biden better win or else.
Speaker 1: That's considered a pitch for Biden to get more votes. Hey, guys,
Speaker 1: if Joe Biden doesn't win this election, country might just
Speaker 1: get burned down, you know, burned down in a big
Speaker 1: smoldering heat because of all the rioting Democrats out there.
Speaker 1: So let's all come together and avoid that by voting
Speaker 1: for Biden. That's what the Peace in the Atlantic is saying.
Speaker 1: They may not be able to concede. They may not
Speaker 1: be it. This is a from a Democrat, folks, He's
Speaker 1: a Democrat writing, and he's admitting Democrats will not be
Speaker 1: able to psychological process this. They've they've gotten so frenzied.
Speaker 1: They're so surrounded with their their MSNBC and their tweets
Speaker 1: from celebrities and all their friends who all are so
Speaker 1: woke in the whole, the whole mess, all this nonsense.
Speaker 1: Can't just take a deep breath, take a step back,
Speaker 1: and go hold on a second. Trump hasn't murdered millions
Speaker 1: of people. Trump isn't destroying the country. He's not a
Speaker 1: racing all freedoms. He's not a fascist. He's not a racist,
Speaker 1: as much as they like to say he is. Maybe
Speaker 1: they could just take a breath, take a chill, and
Speaker 1: accept that, or at least think about the prospect that
Speaker 1: the Democrats have. The Left have bad ideas that don't work.
Speaker 1: They're illogical, history shows they fail, and they're irresponsible and
Speaker 1: utterly emotional and childish in how they deal in American
Speaker 1: politics these days. So maybe a little bit of reflection
Speaker 1: and a little bit of chill we'll take. The Democrats
Speaker 1: are very long way, but instead they are going to
Speaker 1: take the amp not just to eleven, even though it
Speaker 1: only goes to ten, They're going to find a way
Speaker 1: to take it to twelve, and they're gonna blast out
Speaker 1: everybody's ear drums. They will completely lose their minds, and
Speaker 1: they think that's a reason to vote for Biden. You're
Speaker 1: in the freedom mind. This is the Buck Sex and
Speaker 1: Show podcast because he put the most vicious ad on
Speaker 1: television that I've ever seen. Do you know what I'm
Speaker 1: talking about? Where I'm standing over the graves of our
Speaker 1: fallen warriors, are fallen heroes. These are great people, the
Speaker 1: greatest people there are. And I'm standing over there, and
Speaker 1: they have some sleeves bag reporter from a third rate
Speaker 1: magazine having some source quoting me saying I won't even
Speaker 1: use the term, but saying bad things. And there's nobody
Speaker 1: that loves our military, respects it and the people more
Speaker 1: than me. And they took and I didn't even ask.
Speaker 1: We had twenty five people that were witnesses that are
Speaker 1: on the record already that have said that never took place.
Speaker 1: It never took place, what they said. And yet pathetic Joe,
Speaker 1: and He's a pathetic human being to allow that to happen.
Speaker 1: Twenty five people on the record saying the Atlantic story
Speaker 1: didn't take place, and yet we still have to hear
Speaker 1: that the president hates the military. That was never a
Speaker 1: credible story. The president has disdained for the military. Let
Speaker 1: me say something of a guys like Trump, because he's
Speaker 1: a New Yorker like me. And there's a there's a
Speaker 1: certain nobs, a little sarcastic, aggressive mentality and personality that
Speaker 1: New Yorkers tend to have. Right, So, Producer Mark has
Speaker 1: a little bit of it. I've got a little bit
Speaker 1: of it. No, there's just a we gotta way, We
Speaker 1: got a way of being here. And Trump definitely has
Speaker 1: Trump's from queens. He's a queen's boy. I'm a Manhattan boy.
Speaker 1: Trump is a queen's boy. Actually, Producer Mark, you're a
Speaker 1: queen's boy, aren't you. I am a queen's boy. There
Speaker 1: we go exactly. You know, queen's guys like love, family,
Speaker 1: good food. And you don't want to push him too far,
Speaker 1: don't You don't want to push him too far. It's
Speaker 1: it's a bad, bad place to go. And you don't
Speaker 1: want to try to rip them off either. They don't
Speaker 1: like they don't like anyone playing games. You know, Manhattan
Speaker 1: is a little similar, except we spend a little more
Speaker 1: time out of the country club. Same idea though, same
Speaker 1: basic mentality. And here's the thing, there's no way that Trump.
Speaker 1: If there's any group of people in the world that
Speaker 1: the president of the United States, while he's president and
Speaker 1: before his president clearly respects, it's our combat veterans, it's
Speaker 1: our airman soldiers, it's our Navy, Marines, air Force, Army.
Speaker 1: All right, there's and so that's why the story. But
Speaker 1: they're so desperate to come up with some way to
Speaker 1: siphon off that strong veteran support for Trump. But they're
Speaker 1: just they're just going with this. They're just going with us. Yeah,
Speaker 1: So that the president said that his generals are a
Speaker 1: bunch of women. General generals are allowed to be criticized, okay,
Speaker 1: And generals are no longer on the front lines. They're
Speaker 1: not in combat. So if the president, if the commander
Speaker 1: in chief has some harsh words for his generals, guess
Speaker 1: what he's allowed to. But he respects the men and
Speaker 1: women who put on the uniform, who serve their country
Speaker 1: every day, who do it for very little pay, at
Speaker 1: a lot of personal costs and at risk of their lives,
Speaker 1: because they love this country, because they're patriots. This president
Speaker 1: respects those people. There's absolutely no reason to believe otherwise. Okay, Yeah,
Speaker 1: there are there are people that use their service or
Speaker 1: someone else's service as I try to a weapon to
Speaker 1: attack the president politically, and he's going to respond this guy, Look,
Speaker 1: is the Democrat line really that he he hates the
Speaker 1: military and the military is just not smart enough to
Speaker 1: figure it out. The people in the military who support
Speaker 1: or Trump, they just don't realize. Usually you don't like
Speaker 1: people that disdain you and think that you're losers, right, So,
Speaker 1: who really has disdained for the military. The news media,
Speaker 1: the press, they do, they always have had it. How
Speaker 1: many you know how many journals who are running around
Speaker 1: You're like, oh my gosh, yeah, the military. I don't
Speaker 1: know if that's for me or any kind of service
Speaker 1: to their country. Tons of them. Who writes stories. Who's
Speaker 1: the first people that want to tell everybody about how
Speaker 1: there was a civilian casualty incident with the military? You know,
Speaker 1: who ran wild with as as front page abu grabe
Speaker 1: stories every day just to fame the entire military because
Speaker 1: there were some people who were doing bad things. The journalists.
Speaker 1: So I just think it's interesting that that they really
Speaker 1: are doing what the psychologists would call projection here. Trump
Speaker 1: doesn't hate the military, but if there's anybody that doesn't
Speaker 1: have due respect for the military. It's not all journalists,
Speaker 1: and there are journalists who are former military and I
Speaker 1: know that, but a lot of live media people really
Speaker 1: think that the military's a bunch of you know, unsophisticated,
Speaker 1: under educated. You know, they really do have that attitude
Speaker 1: about it. And I think it's I think it's so
Speaker 1: clear they're trying to push this onto Trump and it's
Speaker 1: all just nonsense. Um, what are we seeing with these
Speaker 1: fires out in California? You know, they often talk about
Speaker 1: Trump as a as a fascist. I'll give you an
Speaker 1: example of what a fascist demagogue actually sounds like. And
Speaker 1: here's a hint. Not Trump, but out on the West
Speaker 1: Coast there is someone who I do believe also has
Speaker 1: presidential aspirations, who may not really think of himself as
Speaker 1: a fascist, but it certainly does a good impression of
Speaker 1: an enviro fascist when given the opportunity. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to The Bust. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the
Speaker 1: iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcast. The
Speaker 1: heat though over the entire West Coast, United States, when
Speaker 1: you have temperatures, record breaking temperatures, record droughts, and you've
Speaker 1: got something else at play, and that's exactly what the
Speaker 1: scientists have been predicting for half a century. It is
Speaker 1: here now, California, folks, is America fast forward. What we're
Speaker 1: experiencing right here is coming to community all across the
Speaker 1: United States America, unless we get our act together on
Speaker 1: climate change, unless we disabuse ourselves of all the bs
Speaker 1: that's being spewed by a very small group of people
Speaker 1: that have an ideological reason to advance the cause of
Speaker 1: a nineteenth century spramework and solution. We're not going back
Speaker 1: to the nineteenth century. We're not apologists to that status quo.
Speaker 1: We believe in the fresh air of progress versus the
Speaker 1: stale air ephesus stale air normalcy. California is America fast forward.
Speaker 1: I certainly hope not. California was a beautiful I mean,
Speaker 1: it's let's just let's take a step back for a moment.
Speaker 1: California is one of the most men along the coast
Speaker 1: the interior. I'm sure that's some nice places, but let's
Speaker 1: be honest. So we spend most of your time around
Speaker 1: along the coast is where you're talking about the beautiful stuff,
Speaker 1: and California is one of the most geographically fortunate places
Speaker 1: in the world. You know, you get around Big Sir,
Speaker 1: and you're up in Monterey area, and even you get
Speaker 1: down the coast. I mean I drove from La to
Speaker 1: San Diego a couple of years back. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: just gorgeous, incredibly bountiful for I mean, the coastline, the
Speaker 1: access to the Pacific Ocean. They've got wonderful vineyards. I mean, look,
Speaker 1: I'm not trying to do an ad for the state
Speaker 1: of California. I'm just trying to bring up that Democrats
Speaker 1: largely with the help of illegal immigration, right, legal imrants
Speaker 1: come in and then they have children here, and then
Speaker 1: those illegal immigrants those households and to vote Democrats. And
Speaker 1: when the children grow up, they vote Democrat. And you know,
Speaker 1: that's how they've flipped it. So it's just the bluest
Speaker 1: of blue states. Now, California was a reliably Republican state.
Speaker 1: California had Governor Ronald Reagan, gave us Reagan and was
Speaker 1: going red up until I think the hw Bush presidency
Speaker 1: in national elections. So it wasn't it wasn't that long
Speaker 1: ago that California was a play Look, it was the
Speaker 1: American dream. I grew up in the in the late
Speaker 1: eighties in the early nineties, and it was like every
Speaker 1: movie I saw was based in I know, that's where
Speaker 1: the studios where it was all based in California. And
Speaker 1: the ideal existence, it seemed to the American teenager circa
Speaker 1: nineteen eighty eight, was to live in you know, the
Speaker 1: live in a house in California within striking distance of
Speaker 1: the ocean, and learn how to surf and skateboard. Like
Speaker 1: this was the ideal and the weather's perfect, and there's
Speaker 1: all these beautiful people. And now Democrats have been in
Speaker 1: charge charge entirely for let's call it, the last last
Speaker 1: twenty to thirty years, and they're ruining it. They're they're
Speaker 1: ruining it. Okay, the state is going through ruination. I
Speaker 1: was out in La a year ago and I spent
Speaker 1: I spent I've spent weeks and weeks in LA in
Speaker 1: the last few years. And everyone that I was talking
Speaker 1: to was a native, was like, look, I love this place.
Speaker 1: But it's just there are people, you know, there's there's
Speaker 1: vagrance urinating in the street all over the place, and
Speaker 1: there's ten cities, and the traffic is nightmarish, and there
Speaker 1: are power outages because they don't know how to end
Speaker 1: they don't know how to keep the electrical grid going.
Speaker 1: And you know, the the petty quality of life crimes
Speaker 1: are terrible. You know, this is all this stuff that's happening,
Speaker 1: all these things that are going on, and sure enough,
Speaker 1: sure enough, the state is finally falling apart. And now
Speaker 1: you have these wildfires, which this is not the first
Speaker 1: time in recent years we've had also major fires. I
Speaker 1: think there are a few million acres that are either
Speaker 1: burning or have been burned. And it's not just California's California,
Speaker 1: it's Oregon and Washington State. These are primarily and uninhabited,
Speaker 1: but you know, wooded areas and the fires are really
Speaker 1: bad and they are out of out of control right now.
Speaker 1: And what are we told is the only answer to
Speaker 1: this climate change? I sit here and I want to
Speaker 1: ask the question, what natural disaster at this point is
Speaker 1: not attributable to a liberal, to a democrat, What natural
Speaker 1: disaster is not attributable to climate change? Now? In this
Speaker 1: current environment anything? Is there anything that we can say
Speaker 1: hurricanes climate change, wildfires, climate change, go down, the floods,
Speaker 1: climate change, mudslides, climate change. Now you just look at
Speaker 1: all this stuff. You say, Okay, now, let's just put
Speaker 1: aside for a second that that seems just very simplistic
Speaker 1: and it's thinking. And if you're wondering how much warmer
Speaker 1: they keep they keep saying it's the desiccation of forests,
Speaker 1: which is a fancy way of saying dry forests. Okay,
Speaker 1: they love to say desiccation of forest because it sounds sciency.
Speaker 1: Dry forests heat dry. There you go. The desiccation of
Speaker 1: forests has created greater risks for these for these forests
Speaker 1: there have been the past. And that's okay, Well, how
Speaker 1: much warmer we're really talking about? You know Gavin Newsom
Speaker 1: there who's telling you remember California, And in a sense
Speaker 1: he's right. California is the future of the whole country
Speaker 1: if the Democrats have their way, rolling blackouts, quality of life, plummeting,
Speaker 1: super high taxes, flight from the state. And and for
Speaker 1: those who are saying, oh, but look at Silicon Valley,
Speaker 1: when did Silicon Valley really going the nineties? Right? Hollywood
Speaker 1: is a legacy institution that happened to be in LA
Speaker 1: but stretching way back to when LA or at least
Speaker 1: when California was still often in Republican hands. It takes
Speaker 1: time to ruin a place, and you can and there's
Speaker 1: often a period where you can just be essentially milking
Speaker 1: the cow before you end up killing the cow right,
Speaker 1: And that's what Democrats do in these places, these states,
Speaker 1: New York, California, they get fat and happy. You know,
Speaker 1: there used to be kind of Rockefeller Republicans. There was
Speaker 1: a little bit more of a There were some serious
Speaker 1: periods of time in New York State's history when it
Speaker 1: was certainly more conservative in its leanings than it is now.
Speaker 1: But in California is a perfect example of the rapid
Speaker 1: change that you get when the left wing takes over.
Speaker 1: But they're showing you now the results of their policies.
Speaker 1: When the mayor, Mayor Garcetti as a tell people, yeah,
Speaker 1: turn turn your thermostats. I think it was seventy eight degrees.
Speaker 1: A seventy eighth degree house is really warm, folks. Papa
Speaker 1: Buck's going to be sweating a whole lot in a
Speaker 1: seventy eight degree house. But here we are. Continue to
Speaker 1: look at this, continue to think, well, what's the answer. Oh,
Speaker 1: there's only one answer. There's only one answer. Tom Stier,
Speaker 1: he who doth own only one tie despite being a billionaire.
Speaker 1: He gives you his answer, Play six. This is a
Speaker 1: global problem. Look, this is crying out for national and
Speaker 1: international leadership. What's the number one thing we can do
Speaker 1: is elect a different president who's going to recognize the problem,
Speaker 1: deal with it forcefully at home, deal with it forcefully overseas.
Speaker 1: That's actually the only solution we have to this problem,
Speaker 1: and is honest to god, Joe Biden, Joe Biden, is
Speaker 1: a solution to climate change. That's day they really believe that. Right, Trump,
Speaker 1: they said, couldn't build a wall, which actually the wall
Speaker 1: they've had about two hundred and fifty miles built, about
Speaker 1: three hundred miles according to Chief Scott of the Border Patrol,
Speaker 1: roughly three hundred miles currently being built. Two hundred fifty
Speaker 1: miles built. You're looking at about and there's pretty short
Speaker 1: period of time here from from today it'll be five
Speaker 1: six hundred miles of wall. But building a wall is impossible.
Speaker 1: Changing the global climate, that's that's just requires leadership. That's
Speaker 1: where the Democrats want you to think. Now, that's their
Speaker 1: their belief. Friends, this is entirely unserious, and then it's
Speaker 1: a serious threat to our economy to our way of life.
Speaker 1: But this proposition that if only we took climate change
Speaker 1: more seriously, we wouldn't have forest fires, we wouldn't have hurricanes.
Speaker 1: Are we going to invade China and shut down all
Speaker 1: their factories and change all their environmental practices. Are we
Speaker 1: going to tell India, sorry, no more cars? Global leadership?
Speaker 1: What is that? Even the Paris Climate Accord, which is
Speaker 1: what democrats point to big is a big pile and nothing.
Speaker 1: There's no enforcement mechanism. It's all kind of self reported
Speaker 1: and self graded. And yeah, sure, we're doing a great
Speaker 1: job limited carmate emissions. Let's go to a fancy meeting.
Speaker 1: We'll all sit around and talk to each other about
Speaker 1: how we are leading on the climate. No great, really fancy,
Speaker 1: really really wonderful stuff. But this is a religious belief, friends,
Speaker 1: So it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter what evidence I show.
Speaker 1: Doesn't matter that the average temperature in California now is
Speaker 1: compared to decades ago. I think it's one or two
Speaker 1: degrees warmer. You know, that's what we're talking. That's what
Speaker 1: climate change really says, that the climate may be a
Speaker 1: degree or two warmer on average in the next fifty
Speaker 1: to one hundred years. I think it's also worth noting
Speaker 1: that we've seen the scientific community, which is a very
Speaker 1: broad and really useless term, but we've seen the scientific
Speaker 1: community use modeling to tell us how many people are
Speaker 1: going to die from COVID nineteen, like the IHM models
Speaker 1: to the University of Washington, sponsored by Bill Gates. And
Speaker 1: they've been wrong, not just in advance of the numbers,
Speaker 1: they've been wrong like a week before. They can't predict squat.
Speaker 1: They're wrong and wrong again on an issue of urgent
Speaker 1: life and death national importance. They were way off, way off.
Speaker 1: But the scientific community, again broad term, it doesn't really
Speaker 1: mean all that much, wants you to think that they
Speaker 1: can tell you what the average global temperature change will
Speaker 1: be in fifty to one hundred years based on the
Speaker 1: change in what is accounts for. I think it's less
Speaker 1: than two percent of the atmosphere. That's that's what they're
Speaker 1: telling you. It's stunning, it's unbelievable, but it's a religious
Speaker 1: belief for people who think they're too smart for religion.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. Point zero four percent of the atmosphere CO
Speaker 1: two point zero four percent of the atmosphere, So they're
Speaker 1: telling you that a change in the composition of point
Speaker 1: zero four percent of the atmosphere is going to destroy
Speaker 1: all life as we know it, based on their models.
Speaker 1: And if you have questions about this, and in the meantime,
Speaker 1: you still want your air condition to work, and you're
Speaker 1: a refrigerator to stay on, and you want I mean,
Speaker 1: California has mismanaged its water usage, has mismanaged its forest,
Speaker 1: has mismanaged its electricity because instead of looking at these
Speaker 1: issues for what they are, they have all these external
Speaker 1: beliefs of the climate change religion that influence everything else
Speaker 1: they're doing. Talk to anyone who knows land development, Talk
Speaker 1: to anyone in real estate in California. It's a nightmare
Speaker 1: of regulations of environmentalist groups funded by people like Styre,
Speaker 1: who you know, they get to live in a twenty
Speaker 1: million dollar mansion in Malibu overlooking the ocean. And tell
Speaker 1: all those dirty, poor people in the California interior, turn
Speaker 1: off your refrigerator, turn off your air conditioning. How dare
Speaker 1: you do you realize what you're doing to the climate.
Speaker 1: These people are arrogant frauds, and yet that's the it's
Speaker 1: a central ethos of the Democrat Party now and if
Speaker 1: you if you question this, they look at you like
Speaker 1: you're nuts, even though what that I that I've said
Speaker 1: to you here is in any way it should be
Speaker 1: in any way controversial. And yes, they have been unwilling
Speaker 1: to allow for management of forests because they don't they
Speaker 1: lived forest should be entirely untouched, so that the forestry
Speaker 1: management system is terrible, which means that there's a lot
Speaker 1: more undergrowth, which means it burns a lot faster and
Speaker 1: hotter than it normally would. They don't know what they're doing, friends,
Speaker 1: They don't know what they're doing, but they know you're
Speaker 1: wrong if you question it. And Gavin Newsom's you're to
Speaker 1: tell you they want to control the power you use
Speaker 1: in your home, the appliances, everything about your life because
Speaker 1: of climate change could come under the control of these
Speaker 1: religious zealots of the worship Earth religion. And Gavin Newsom
Speaker 1: saying this has coming too the whole country. If you
Speaker 1: just let the Democrats do what they want, doesn't sound
Speaker 1: like a good thing to me. Friends, you're in the
Speaker 1: freedom hud. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast.
Speaker 1: I listened to fire for Nals. Not the President of
Speaker 1: the United States or a politician. When it comes to
Speaker 1: actually what causes these fires, it's been very clear that
Speaker 1: years of drought as we're seeing, whether it's too much
Speaker 1: water and too much rain in parts of our country
Speaker 1: right now or too little, this is climate change. And
Speaker 1: this is an administration that's put its head in the sand.
Speaker 1: While we have Democratic and Republican mayors across the country
Speaker 1: stepping up to do their part. This is an administration
Speaker 1: a president who wants to withdraw from the Paris Climate
Speaker 1: Accords later this year, the only country in the world
Speaker 1: to do so. Talk to a firefighter if you think
Speaker 1: that climate change isn't real, and it seems like this
Speaker 1: administration the last vestiges of the flat earth society of
Speaker 1: this generation. We need real action. We need to actually
Speaker 1: reduce the carbon emissions that we have, and we need
Speaker 1: to make sure we can manage that water. And this
Speaker 1: is not about just forced management or raking. Anybody who
Speaker 1: lives here in California's insulted by that, quite frankly, and
Speaker 1: he keeps perpetrating this line. Meanwhile, if you go to
Speaker 1: the sand, just go chronicle. We'll even publish. This is
Speaker 1: climate change worse than californ When your freest or is
Speaker 1: it poor forest management both. So Garcetti's accusing the President
Speaker 1: of lying for pointing out the forest management in California
Speaker 1: is terrible, when the experts that Garcetti sites are like, yeah, no,
Speaker 1: the forest management's terrible. Maybe the changing climate, whether it's
Speaker 1: from CO two or not, right, maybe the changing climate
Speaker 1: is playing a role. Climate is always playing a role.
Speaker 1: This is liberals can't think. Their brains can't wrap around this,
Speaker 1: that the climate the world is not a stable climate always.
Speaker 1: It's not always staying at the same temperature. It's constantly influx,
Speaker 1: it's constantly changing. It's like a chaos system. You don't
Speaker 1: know what's going to happen, what's coming with it's constantly
Speaker 1: changing over time. So of course there's climate change, But
Speaker 1: is it this crisis that they're making it out to be.
Speaker 1: There's been a century of mismanaging Sierra Nevada forests. Nevada forests,
Speaker 1: pardon me, that is impacting all of California right now.
Speaker 1: Forest management is a major part of the problem, according
Speaker 1: to people whose jobs are to fight fires. But when
Speaker 1: Democrats talk about it, they say the president's just lying
Speaker 1: because they're nuts, because they it doesn't matter They'll say
Speaker 1: whatever they have to say as long as it allows
Speaker 1: them to do what they want and keep the popular,
Speaker 1: unwashed masses in place. Richard Grinnell went after Pelosio on
Speaker 1: this one. This is the Democrat ethos. Now, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: tell you everything you have to do, and then I'm
Speaker 1: gonna do different things that if you question it, you're
Speaker 1: not about science. Play five. Let me let me tell
Speaker 1: you one thing that I learned about being in Washington,
Speaker 1: d C. There's a whole group of people in Washington,
Speaker 1: d C. Who hate the outsider. They have their own rules.
Speaker 1: You see. Their rules allow them to go to San
Speaker 1: Francisco get their hair done, and then they demand an
Speaker 1: apology from you for not keeping a secret. The whole
Speaker 1: town works on secrets, back room deals. They spoon feed
Speaker 1: you information, they keep information from you, indeed they do.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the buses and show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app for wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. Some good signs in the polling,
Speaker 1: at least for those of us who are hoping the
Speaker 1: President Trump does get four more years. What are these
Speaker 1: dynamics as they're playing out, especially when it comes to
Speaker 1: Hispanic community. We've got director of strategic Communications for the
Speaker 1: Trump campaign, Mark Lotter with us now. Mark, thanks for
Speaker 1: making the time. I know you're busy. Oh thanks for
Speaker 1: having me, Buck. So what are we seeing here with
Speaker 1: the surge and Hispanic support for Trump? Where is it?
Speaker 1: How much of there is it? And why do you
Speaker 1: think it's happening? Well? And there's been some recent public
Speaker 1: polling that shows that Joe Biden is significantly underperforming even
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton in Florida among his band and Latino voters.
Speaker 1: Of course, that's a state that Donald Trump won in
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen. So if he's doing worse than that very
Speaker 1: key demographic, I think it's one of the reasons why
Speaker 1: you saw him scramble to send Kamala Harris down there
Speaker 1: last week. He's heading there later this week, and they're
Speaker 1: even trying to tap Michael Bloomberg to see if he
Speaker 1: can go buy an election for them down in the
Speaker 1: state of Florida. But it doesn't really matter how much
Speaker 1: money they have to spend when you have Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: really bad message, it's not gonna work. One hundred million
Speaker 1: dollars is what I saw the Bloomberg's willing to spend
Speaker 1: just in the state of Florida. Of course, we're not
Speaker 1: going to hear Democrats complain about big money in politics
Speaker 1: when it comes to that, right, but one hundred million
Speaker 1: dollars state of Florida, which is going to be the
Speaker 1: biggest spend, I think without the desired results. Since Jeff
Speaker 1: Bush spent about one hundred million dollars to get what
Speaker 1: was it a few delegates didn't go so well, right,
Speaker 1: And Michael Bloomberg proved it himself. He spent a billion
Speaker 1: dollars and didn't get anything out of it in the
Speaker 1: primary process. It just shows you can't buy an election
Speaker 1: if your message is so bad and horribly flawed. And
Speaker 1: when you look at Joe Biden's plans for four trillion
Speaker 1: dollars in new taxes and the Green raw Deal, or
Speaker 1: his history of being soft on Cuba, soft on the
Speaker 1: dictatorship in Venezuela, it's not going to resonate. No matter
Speaker 1: how much money Michael Bloomberg wants to waste, he's still
Speaker 1: not going to make any inroads in Florida. What can
Speaker 1: you tell us about And we're speaking to Mark Ladder,
Speaker 1: director of Strategic communications for the Trump campaign, Mark, what
Speaker 1: can you tell us about the whatever you've seen, because
Speaker 1: because here's the theory, and I think it's a pretty
Speaker 1: sound one, that the reason there's been a change in
Speaker 1: tone even before the horrific shooting of two Los Angeles
Speaker 1: County Sheriff's deputies over the weekend. But there was a
Speaker 1: change last week or two, i'd say, from some Democrats
Speaker 1: about just how extremely supportive of BLM they're willing to be.
Speaker 1: And people have said this is because the public polling
Speaker 1: has turned against them. What can you tell us about
Speaker 1: how this issue, you know, from just a political strategy perspective,
Speaker 1: is now a liability. It seems like it's just to
Speaker 1: become a liability for Democrats in swing states, not in
Speaker 1: New York and California. Well, it really is a huge
Speaker 1: We've seen a huge shift in the polls, and I
Speaker 1: think it's a lot to do with the violence, the arson,
Speaker 1: the rioting, looting, shootings, and homicides that we've seen in
Speaker 1: so many Democrat run cities and states, and the Democrats
Speaker 1: failure for months to even condemn it and come out
Speaker 1: opposed to it. I mean, Joe Biden called police the
Speaker 1: enemy Kamala Harris compared them to the clan, and as
Speaker 1: I travel around the country that I hear the exact opposite.
Speaker 1: And I hear so many people who even say, look,
Speaker 1: they've had a history of maybe being down the middle
Speaker 1: and voting Democrat in the past, and they just shake
Speaker 1: their heads when they see those kinds of things because
Speaker 1: they know that the men and women who put on
Speaker 1: the uniform and that badge and go out every day
Speaker 1: to respond to your nine one one emergency, they're the
Speaker 1: best of us, and we need more police, not less police.
Speaker 1: And so I've we've seen this happening in the battleground states,
Speaker 1: but we've also seen it happen in on traditionally Republican
Speaker 1: or not traditionally Republican constituencies. It's really having an impact
Speaker 1: on Joe Biden in the black community in the suburbs,
Speaker 1: which he's counting on, because they don't want to see
Speaker 1: a soft on crime pro protester movement, which is really
Speaker 1: what the Democrats have become. Mark Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida seemed
Speaker 1: like the Big three. There are other critical states. I
Speaker 1: know you and the campaign are going to be putting
Speaker 1: a lot of effort and energy into But tell me
Speaker 1: specifically about about what the strategy is to get to
Speaker 1: get those wins wracked up. We just talked about Florida,
Speaker 1: but what are we doing in Pennsylvania. My good friend
Speaker 1: Sean Parnell's running in a tight congressional race out there.
Speaker 1: He's talking about the dynamics at play in Ohio. It
Speaker 1: feels like if Trump wins those two plus Florida, we're
Speaker 1: good to go. Well so the so in Pennsylvania. It's
Speaker 1: definitely a message about the economy, especially in western Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1: In fact, I was with the Vice president last week,
Speaker 1: as John Ronell, at an event last week in that district,
Speaker 1: and it's a when you talk about you, Joe Biden
Speaker 1: and his open embrace of ending fracking, being against fracking,
Speaker 1: and then he has to come out and try to
Speaker 1: distance himself from it because he again sees the numbers
Speaker 1: are starting to trend away from him. And as we
Speaker 1: look at across the country, we see it's not just
Speaker 1: about fracking. It's about energy independence. And you can look
Speaker 1: no further than the mayor of Los Angeles a few
Speaker 1: weeks ago telling people to turn up their air conditioning
Speaker 1: to seventy eight. Turn off their lights and TVs at
Speaker 1: three o'clock in the afternoon because there's going to be blackouts.
Speaker 1: That is a preview of what Joe Biden's America is
Speaker 1: going to be. And then you go to places like
Speaker 1: western or western Pennsylvania, eastern Ohio and other states where
Speaker 1: fracking is really big. Now we're talking about hundreds of
Speaker 1: thousands of jobs that are going to be eliminated. And
Speaker 1: for a campaign that's hoping to make strides from Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's standpoint, telling one hundred thousand people they're going to
Speaker 1: be out of jobs in Pennsylvania and Texas and eastern
Speaker 1: Ohio and other places, that's not going to be a
Speaker 1: winning message. Are you seeing undersampling in some of the
Speaker 1: public national polls? Undersampling of Republicans? Is that I see
Speaker 1: a lot of people in conservative media that point to
Speaker 1: this as a concern. You know, I'm just wondering, is
Speaker 1: that something that you all would agree with that there
Speaker 1: is that some of the polling looks to be skewed
Speaker 1: a little bit, or do you just worry about your
Speaker 1: internal polling and keep fighting the fight you're in. Well,
Speaker 1: I mean, obviously we gave a better tab on our
Speaker 1: internal numbers because we were right in twenty sixteen, they
Speaker 1: were wrong, and we think they're wrong again. But it
Speaker 1: is true there is a massive underreporting going on in
Speaker 1: many of these national polls. I don't think they learned
Speaker 1: the lessons from twenty sixteen about how to identify what
Speaker 1: the electric is going to look like and to make
Speaker 1: matters worse. When you understample Republicans, and there's no question
Speaker 1: that Republicans are the more energetic voters for their candidate
Speaker 1: than Democrats are for Joe Biden, you're just magnifying that impact.
Speaker 1: So you're under reporting the people who are most likely
Speaker 1: to come out and vote for their candidate. I've said
Speaker 1: it in the past. These polsters that are doing this
Speaker 1: are either incompetent or they're corrupt because they either can't
Speaker 1: figure out their mistakes, or they're intentionally trying to create
Speaker 1: a narrative to depress Republican voters, to make them think
Speaker 1: that the race is lost when it absolutely is not lost.
Speaker 1: In fact, I would say, you know, we are ahead
Speaker 1: of where we needed to be, and we're ahead of
Speaker 1: where we were in sixteen, and we're ahead where we
Speaker 1: need to be to get to seventy if you had
Speaker 1: to pick. I was asked over the weekend if there's
Speaker 1: one state that was blue the last time that you
Speaker 1: think could realistically go red this time, and maybe you
Speaker 1: can give me a two or three. But you know,
Speaker 1: so I'm not asking for because obviously, if you win,
Speaker 1: would you one last time? Congratulations? Four more years, right?
Speaker 1: But I'm just if we're going to run up the
Speaker 1: scoreboard a little bit, what state would you think right
Speaker 1: now that had been just narrowly blue in twenty sixteen
Speaker 1: to this time around we could flit Well, I think
Speaker 1: there's three top candidates there. Minnesota, absolutely, we've seen it.
Speaker 1: The President only lost it by a point and a
Speaker 1: half in twenty sixteen. And even just a few weeks ago,
Speaker 1: you saw a number of Democrat former Democrat mayors in
Speaker 1: what's called the Iron Range in Minnesota come out and
Speaker 1: say they're supporting President Trump because he supports the workers
Speaker 1: in their communities. And so I think that one's a
Speaker 1: top target. I would believe that New Hampshire would be
Speaker 1: a target. It's only about twenty six hundred votes that
Speaker 1: the President lost that in in twenty sixteen. And then
Speaker 1: Nevada as well, because you'll see the president. Obviously he's
Speaker 1: in Nevada right now. But one of the big differences
Speaker 1: in Nevada is, obviously they are so economically driven, and
Speaker 1: when you have a platform like Joe Biden's to raise
Speaker 1: taxes by four trillion dollars, let's four trillion dollars, people
Speaker 1: don't have to spend at the resorts and casinos and
Speaker 1: amenities in Los ange Vegas and in Reno. But it's
Speaker 1: also huge because companies aren't going to have those of
Speaker 1: that money that they can spend at conferences and conventions,
Speaker 1: which are really a driving force in Nevada, Nevada and
Speaker 1: in Florida's tourism based industries. And the violence that you're
Speaker 1: seeing in cities across the country, the surgeon violence, the
Speaker 1: anarchy in the streets. The Biden campaign doesn't seem like
Speaker 1: it has a clear message about this. What is the
Speaker 1: Trump campaign? How does the Trump campaign describe the Biden choice? Here?
Speaker 1: They're between a rock and a hard place of their
Speaker 1: own making. When they decided to align themselves with the
Speaker 1: radicals of the Democrat Party, the BLM and the folks
Speaker 1: who are out there rioting arson looting, well, they put
Speaker 1: themselves at odds with the police with the majority of Americans,
Speaker 1: and they stayed there for months on end. And it
Speaker 1: should really tell a lot of folks something. When you
Speaker 1: have the largest police organizations in our country, whether it's
Speaker 1: the National Fraternal Order of Police NYPD, Chicago Police, Texas
Speaker 1: Police Associations, Southern police organizations, they are all coming out
Speaker 1: in support of this president because they know he's standing
Speaker 1: with them and that what we can do more than
Speaker 1: one thing at a time. We can root out injustice,
Speaker 1: we can improve training where it needs to be improved,
Speaker 1: but it doesn't mean we defund the police and or
Speaker 1: turn our attention against the men and women in blue.
Speaker 1: We got to stand with them and help them and
Speaker 1: defend them, not defund them. I think it puts them
Speaker 1: in a bad position, especially in places like Minnesota, like
Speaker 1: Wisconsin who have seen this violence up close, and I
Speaker 1: think it will it will reverberate across many other communities.
Speaker 1: Speaking the director of strategic communications for the Trump campaign,
Speaker 1: Mark Lauter, Mark, I'm watching this whole issue of the
Speaker 1: Democrats preparing to not concede, planning to not concede very closely.
Speaker 1: I think it would be foolish to ignore that some
Speaker 1: of the biggest voices in the Democrat Party have been
Speaker 1: saying openly, I mean, this isn't some conspiracy theory that
Speaker 1: people reading about in the comments section of a website somewhere.
Speaker 1: This seems like there's a movement underway, you know, top
Speaker 1: writers on the left, people with big platforms, Hillary Clinton herself.
Speaker 1: How is the campaign viewing this and preparing for what
Speaker 1: could quickly go from a victory at the polls to
Speaker 1: a battlefield in the courts. Well, we're ready to fight
Speaker 1: that battle, and we are already fighting it in every
Speaker 1: state where we see Democrats trying to exceed the letter
Speaker 1: of the law and change to these very dangerous unsecured
Speaker 1: voting by male mechanisms which are ripe for fraud and abuse.
Speaker 1: And we'll continue to have that fight. But also in
Speaker 1: a way, I would tell you that it's actually energizing
Speaker 1: the Republican base because we need to know and everyone
Speaker 1: out there needs to know that the best way we
Speaker 1: can guarantee that the Democrats won't cheat and steal this
Speaker 1: election away from the president is to have such a
Speaker 1: huge margin of victory they can't cheat and steal this
Speaker 1: away from the president. And so I think in a
Speaker 1: way it's bringing a lot of a lot more people
Speaker 1: to the polls. It's making sure that everyone out there
Speaker 1: is talking to all their friends and neighbors and making
Speaker 1: sure they get to the polls, because that's the only
Speaker 1: way we're gonna be able to stop it if that's
Speaker 1: what they choose to do. From the Trump campaign, Mark Latter, Mark,
Speaker 1: good good luck, good work, and please come back soon. Thanks.
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom mind. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Look here this is asked and answer Jake. Look,
Speaker 1: here's the thing. He was not honest with you guys people.
Speaker 1: They're not answering the question. You're not honest with the
Speaker 1: American people. CNN is not honest with them. CNN. You
Speaker 1: want to go there. I mean, I say, you're not
Speaker 1: answering the question. Here's here's thank Thank you, Peter Tomorrow.
Speaker 1: Thank we just played to answer. You didn't answer. You
Speaker 1: didn't answer the ques answer. No, you can't say that
Speaker 1: I didn't answer the question impeatedly. Jake, you just did.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much. I appreciate your time today. Thank
Speaker 1: you so much. And I would just like to remind
Speaker 1: the people watching. I am reminded that the United States
Speaker 1: has less than five percent of the world's population, and
Speaker 1: the United States has more than twenty percent of the
Speaker 1: world's coronavirus deaths. I just want to remind America, and
Speaker 1: I'm a fake journalist who pretends to be objective and
Speaker 1: does the bidding of the DNC. There's that too. How
Speaker 1: about how about this jake? There are big parts of
Speaker 1: the world where there have been basically no COVID cases reported,
Speaker 1: and we don't even know why. Sub Saharan Africa very
Speaker 1: little COVID. Why is that? We don't know. Nobody really
Speaker 1: has a good explanation for it. Do you know that
Speaker 1: if you were to adjust for population, Spain now has
Speaker 1: about thirty thousand deaths and is having big spikes, daily
Speaker 1: spikes in cases, but they have masks. Oh, it didn't
Speaker 1: change anything, did it. If you adjust for population, the
Speaker 1: US is about six times the size of Spain. A
Speaker 1: little more than that. Guess what six times thirty is
Speaker 1: one hundred and eighty. Guess how many deaths we have
Speaker 1: in the US from COVID About one hundred and what
Speaker 1: is it? One hundred? I need two hundred thousand right now,
Speaker 1: and we have a much less healthy I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: say it. America's number one in so many great ways,
Speaker 1: but we have a very unhealthy population when it comes
Speaker 1: to hypertension, obesity, and a bunch of these ailments that
Speaker 1: are the worst possible thing to add into the mix
Speaker 1: when you get COVID. So we are basically right along
Speaker 1: where we did, better than Italy, We're right along with Spain,
Speaker 1: better than the UK. But why why do we have
Speaker 1: you know, we have twenty percent of the COVID deaths
Speaker 1: or whatever it is for the cases is meaningless. They
Speaker 1: can keep talking about this all day, but they've also
Speaker 1: stopped because cases are going way down. Now, going way
Speaker 1: down cases is meaningless. A lot of countries didn't test
Speaker 1: as much while they were going through their outbreak and
Speaker 1: started testing. Really, there's there's a cycle that this goes through.
Speaker 1: All the data shows you this this thing jumps. Now,
Speaker 1: not every jump is the same because of a population
Speaker 1: susceptibility to it, pre existing immunity to it, population density.
Speaker 1: But it gets into a commune and there's about an
Speaker 1: eight week up and then down that it goes through.
Speaker 1: Or you can believe that New York City is so
Speaker 1: much smarter and more responsible than all these other places
Speaker 1: in the country that had their spikes in the summer.
Speaker 1: But that's a lie, and that would be a stupid
Speaker 1: thing to think, but people do want to think that.
Speaker 1: And of course New York's. New York's version of dealing
Speaker 1: with the virus was heard immunity by accident, with the
Speaker 1: maximum exposure to the highest risk people up front, and
Speaker 1: then the most draconian lockdowns possible afterwards. We did everything
Speaker 1: wrong in New York. Everything we did in New York
Speaker 1: with this virus. Now that we can actually look at
Speaker 1: it and look at the data, look at the timelines,
Speaker 1: it's as though we were trying to do the worst
Speaker 1: possible job here. Other states, Florida, Texas much better outcomes
Speaker 1: than we had with this. But the media can't accept
Speaker 1: that that. They want to just keep saying that Trump
Speaker 1: is the worst Trump caused the virus. Trump is awful
Speaker 1: and it's all Trump's fault. And to do that they
Speaker 1: have to suppress data that's right in front of their faces.
Speaker 1: I also got to tell you, this guy Fauci is
Speaker 1: really annoying, doesn't have anything worthwhile to say. Ever, remember
Speaker 1: when we were all told, oh, wash your hands, that's
Speaker 1: gonna say it. Do you even hear about hand washing anymore. Really, Oh,
Speaker 1: because it's an aerosolized virus. But we were told to
Speaker 1: why if you don't wash your hand. People were washing
Speaker 1: their hands until they were red and raw to save
Speaker 1: themselves in the virus. That was the public health guidance,
Speaker 1: and it was don't wear a mask, and then it
Speaker 1: was maybe wear a mask and outs. You better wear
Speaker 1: a mask, and outs wear a mask outside. I mean,
Speaker 1: all the stuff we've been through the public health policy
Speaker 1: community has been a catastrophic failure during this whole thing.
Speaker 1: Nothing to add, not helpful. Oh, we need all the ventilators.
Speaker 1: Just kidding. No, we don't. Oh we need all the
Speaker 1: extra hospital capacity, just kidding. No, we don't wear masks. Oh,
Speaker 1: we said don't wear mask before. Yeah. Now, if you
Speaker 1: don't loseen to us, you're an idiot. Here's what Fauci says,
Speaker 1: Play eleven. That response, in my part was in response
Speaker 1: to a question that someone asked, when can we actually
Speaker 1: get back to normal as we know it, normal, including
Speaker 1: with impunity going into a movie theater which is indoors
Speaker 1: and enclosed. And I said what I've been saying all along,
Speaker 1: that I believe that we will have a vaccine that
Speaker 1: will be available by the end of this year at
Speaker 1: the beginning of next year. But by the time you
Speaker 1: mobilize the distribution of the vaccinations and you get the
Speaker 1: majority or more of the population vaccinated and protected, that's
Speaker 1: likely not going to happen till the mid or end
Speaker 1: of twenty twenty one. So in direct response to that
Speaker 1: person's question, I said, if you're talking about getting back
Speaker 1: to a degree of normality which resembles where we were
Speaker 1: prior to COVID, it's going to be well into twenty
Speaker 1: twenty one, maybe even towards the end of twenty twenty one.
Speaker 1: Another year of this, this abject fool doesn't look at
Speaker 1: anything that's actually happening with the data, doesn't look at
Speaker 1: the trends. Another year of this. Just now we've gone
Speaker 1: to lockdown beyond vaccine, not even lockdown two vaccine, which
Speaker 1: they admitted was crazy. Now it's lockdown beyond vaccine. These
Speaker 1: people are morons. They should not be listened to anymore.
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna say it on policy. They don't know
Speaker 1: what the hell they're talking about. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: The bus Esson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts.
Speaker 1: The iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts. Liberty,
Speaker 1: Truth and Great Hair. Feel those funky beats. It's time
Speaker 1: for roll call, Roll call time, everybody. Indeed, let's get
Speaker 1: to a Facebook dot com Slashbuck Sex and Team Buck
Speaker 1: and iHeartMedia dot com if you want to send us
Speaker 1: an email and remember, if you're not already, please follow
Speaker 1: me on Instagram. Follow me for the political hot takes
Speaker 1: or the Telula photos. So actually, this week, I looks
Speaker 1: like I might have Telula my parents French bulldog, and Percy,
Speaker 1: my brother's Pomeranian I got. I'm on double doggy duty
Speaker 1: this week. Bruce and Mark, get ready for all those photos.
Speaker 1: It's gonna be fun. It's like I'm running a kennel
Speaker 1: over here. Yeah. Do you even have enough room in
Speaker 1: your apartment for two dogs? No? But I mean we'll
Speaker 1: give you more fun than snuggling with two dogs on
Speaker 1: the couch while I watched I agree with you. Whenever
Speaker 1: I get a house, I'm gonna have more than one dog. No, no, right,
Speaker 1: I'm just saying no. No. It's very snugging here for it.
Speaker 1: But they're tiny. The Pomeranian is like fits in your palm.
Speaker 1: I'm it's named for Pomerania, which is in Northern Europe,
Speaker 1: the province of Pomerny. But I think it's in Germany, right,
Speaker 1: But is it in Germany or is it? Yeah, I
Speaker 1: think it's in Germany. But they're very small. They're very
Speaker 1: feisty little dogs. Though they look like little, tiny baby wolves.
Speaker 1: That's the toughest thing that I could say about them. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they're very fluffy looking at something. They're very fluffy looking, yes,
Speaker 1: but they're very sweet. They're a lot of fun. So
Speaker 1: I'm gonna have double dog duty this week. And you
Speaker 1: know what I did over the weekend, Producer Mark It's
Speaker 1: now Princess got me in gear for it. I went
Speaker 1: to the gym. Wow. Oh yeah. It was a little
Speaker 1: bit like if you did a montage of the State
Speaker 1: Puff marshmallow Man trying to do like a marathon and
Speaker 1: lift some weights and all this at the same time.
Speaker 1: It was just like, oh my Bawny hurts. It was
Speaker 1: not you basically described every time I've gone to the
Speaker 1: gym in my life. I mean I did, I've I've
Speaker 1: been gymless for seven months and I just I couldn't.
Speaker 1: I tried to do the guy that would do the
Speaker 1: push up, but it felt too much like being in
Speaker 1: a prison. I just couldn't do it. And I gotta
Speaker 1: tell you the gym. It was great to be back
Speaker 1: in the gym. Technically I was supposed to be wearing
Speaker 1: a face mask. Can either confirm nor deny whether when
Speaker 1: the gym is empty and I'm in there, I still
Speaker 1: wear a face mask because it's so stupid. It's an
Speaker 1: empty room. I don't understand what I'm doing in there anyway.
Speaker 1: But oh oh, I was walking. I was like, my
Speaker 1: back hurts, my shoulders hurt. It all hurt. It'll hurt it.
Speaker 1: It all hurt all of a sudden. It always hurts
Speaker 1: the first time, but you know, once you get in
Speaker 1: the rhythm, it'll stop hurting. Oh man, my booty is sore.
Speaker 1: What did you do? Squats? Yeah? You start? You don't
Speaker 1: never start with squats. But it was like lightweight though,
Speaker 1: But still feel it's good. But hopefully give me till
Speaker 1: Christmas time. I might be able to fit into my
Speaker 1: old suits, which would be really nice. That would be
Speaker 1: really helpful if you ever have an event that you
Speaker 1: need a suit again. Yeah, I think the I think
Speaker 1: that men's fashion has forever change. Now, I think that
Speaker 1: people are gonna say suits. I've been saying this, you know,
Speaker 1: I've been saying a long suits are not comfortable. I
Speaker 1: don't care if it's tailor made for you. They're just
Speaker 1: not that comfortable. Nobody wants to wear a dress shirt
Speaker 1: with a jacket on top of it and a tie
Speaker 1: around their neck. It's not comfortable. So just putting that out.
Speaker 1: I agree, it's awful. I've said goodbye to the tie,
Speaker 1: and I have a great tie collection. It used to
Speaker 1: collect those things. I spent way too much money on ties.
Speaker 1: But I've said goodbye to the tie and it's never
Speaker 1: coming back. And also, uncomfortable dress shows is you know,
Speaker 1: comfortable feet the success I'm sorry, the secret to a
Speaker 1: successful life? So nah, it seems like a new self
Speaker 1: help book coming from but Sexton soon. It might have
Speaker 1: to happen. It might have to happen. Oh cuts, No,
Speaker 1: that's the one we want. We want roll Call? Where
Speaker 1: did that go? I forgot there? We go? Here we
Speaker 1: go roll Call. Thank you everybody as always for writing
Speaker 1: in with roll Call. We do appreciate it. It's one
Speaker 1: of my favorite parts of the show. Okay, Jay wait. Also, oh,
Speaker 1: wait before I get a roll call. I got distracted again.
Speaker 1: I watched binge watch with the Snow Princess Cobra Kai
Speaker 1: over the weekend. It's awesome and I didn't think it
Speaker 1: would be good, and it's actually really good. Have you
Speaker 1: seen this? I don't even know what it is. It's
Speaker 1: on Netflix. It's kind of the not a sequel. It's
Speaker 1: like a twenty or thirty years later follow up to
Speaker 1: the Karate Kid series with the original Karate Kid um
Speaker 1: main actors, and it's like now they're adults, and it's great.
Speaker 1: It's really good. Actually, I thought it would be cheesy
Speaker 1: and ridiculous. It turned out pretty well. I might have
Speaker 1: to watch that you Mark, you would actually like this.
Speaker 1: You've said that about a lot of things, though. Have
Speaker 1: what have I told you would like? That's true. I
Speaker 1: never get around to watching anything that you wow. Wow.
Speaker 1: I don't get around to watching things that I want
Speaker 1: to watch on air Nolah. Well, anyway, I would put
Speaker 1: from my rex for you. I would put Cobra Kai
Speaker 1: at the top of your list. And I think missus
Speaker 1: Mark would like it too. All right, Yeah, I'm just saying,
Speaker 1: you know, and a thirty minute episodes man, and it's
Speaker 1: on Netflix. It's free. How can you go wrong here?
Speaker 1: She doesn't like watching anything else though in the show
Speaker 1: we're currently watching. That's the problems. What are you watching
Speaker 1: right now? We're rewatching Grey's Anatomy. Oh dude, I know,
Speaker 1: producer Mark. It's like you're drinking a big bucket of estrogen.
Speaker 1: But she's only here on weekends, so like, I get
Speaker 1: to do what I want during the week at least. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we gotta get you to start playing Call of Duty
Speaker 1: so that you, me and Jesse Kelly can all play
Speaker 1: on the same Call of Duty team. I consider it.
Speaker 1: I have the PlayStation online. Dude, you should get it.
Speaker 1: Tell you it's great. All right, all right? A roll call,
Speaker 1: Roll call? All right, everybody? Jay Buck. A while back,
Speaker 1: a listener wrote it and suggested suggested Trump do airport
Speaker 1: hangar rallies. Cheap, convenient, no need to coordinate caravans to
Speaker 1: and from the airport. Just land, get out, speak, climb aboard,
Speaker 1: climb back aboard. I guess Trump was listening that day,
Speaker 1: because now he's doing just that, and it's awesome. I'm
Speaker 1: glad that Trump actually listens to real experts. I remember
Speaker 1: for years thinking man. If I was ever president, I'd
Speaker 1: listen to Rush every day. I didn't know about you
Speaker 1: at that time, but now I'd easily add you to
Speaker 1: the list. Finally, we have an everyman in the White House. Yeah,
Speaker 1: he's a billionaire, but he's like a down to earth
Speaker 1: guy who just happened to become a success but didn't
Speaker 1: let the glory get to his head. Keep up the work.
Speaker 1: Shield's high. Well, Jay, thank you so much, and I
Speaker 1: agree that we got a down to earth guy with
Speaker 1: this president who really has He does have I guess
Speaker 1: what you'd call the common touch. He does have an
Speaker 1: ability to just to relate to people. It's one thing
Speaker 1: that Democrat politicians like Hillary Clinton, for example, do not have,
Speaker 1: do not have at all. So yeah, I agree. Chris writes,
Speaker 1: Hey there, bucking Mark. I've been a long time listener
Speaker 1: at California Union iron Worker Local four three three easily
Speaker 1: moved to Idaho, which so far, in my opinion, is
Speaker 1: the best thing I've ever done, aside from marrying my
Speaker 1: wonderful wife and having my two beautiful daughters. I passed
Speaker 1: the buck as much as I possibly can, and have
Speaker 1: even had the pleasure of hearing you read role call
Speaker 1: from people I've passed the Buck too. Well, that's awesome, Chris,
Speaker 1: thank you so much. We really appreciate that. I've listened
Speaker 1: to a lot of different conservative based podcasts, and I
Speaker 1: have to say the Buck Sexton Show is by far
Speaker 1: the greatest producer. Mark. Can we can we like adopt
Speaker 1: Chris or something and we need to use this for
Speaker 1: promos or something. Can we like make him a you know,
Speaker 1: honorary like Freedom Hut. You know, I don't know, everyone
Speaker 1: listens to the Freedom We gotta think of like some
Speaker 1: cool thing we could call every one of our listeners
Speaker 1: as an honorary member of the Freedom Hut. Buck. No,
Speaker 1: they're all in the Freedom Hup. But we gotta like
Speaker 1: the Freedom Hunt, you know, grand you know, maybe no
Speaker 1: not fan, something like, you know, like they're cool. I
Speaker 1: don't know, something something awesome. I don't know, Seal Team
Speaker 1: Freedom Hut something like that, something that's like yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: all right, anyway, we'll do that. We'll do the branding
Speaker 1: another day. I just want to comment on Mark's assessment
Speaker 1: of the Kansas City Houston Thursday night opener, and I
Speaker 1: agree that the crowd booing their moment of solidarity was
Speaker 1: in poor taste. But I do disagree in his stance
Speaker 1: about Houston staying in the locker room during the national anthem.
Speaker 1: I truly believe that our nation's flag, as well as
Speaker 1: the national anthem, should be something to be respected by
Speaker 1: every proud American across the country. And to see an
Speaker 1: individual such as J. J. Watt, whom I've always had
Speaker 1: great respect for and all of his charities in previous
Speaker 1: patriotism was just very saddening. I did lose a lot
Speaker 1: of respect for him. Anyways, I love and respect the
Speaker 1: work you do, so please continue, and I'll obviously hold
Speaker 1: my shield high. Well, Chris, that was a great role
Speaker 1: call man. Thank you so much for writing in. And Look,
Speaker 1: I don't want to sit here and spend my time
Speaker 1: trashing professional athletes. I think that what they've what they've
Speaker 1: been able to do is obviously remarkable. They're very well
Speaker 1: compensated for it. They lead incredibly you know, rarefied and
Speaker 1: special lives, and and they've earned it. I mean, they
Speaker 1: worked very hard. Look, I just like to point out though,
Speaker 1: that a lot of these guys, you know, the difference,
Speaker 1: the difference between most Division three college athletes and most
Speaker 1: professional athletes. People want off and say this, but just
Speaker 1: a lot of it's just god given talent. I know
Speaker 1: plenty of people that were or even even a D
Speaker 1: one athlete in a pro It's not they're not working
Speaker 1: really hard in the gym. It's just some people have
Speaker 1: more God given gifts than others in the in these sports,
Speaker 1: in these areas. You know, Lebron James was, I mean,
Speaker 1: how it was even winning a Pro Mark seventeen eighteen eighteen,
Speaker 1: Lebron James was on the cover of Sports Illustrated. I
Speaker 1: think he was fifteen or sixteen years old. Yeah, he
Speaker 1: was in high school. Yeah, so it no not taking
Speaker 1: I'm not taking anything away from the man in terms
Speaker 1: of his ability. Obviously, he's probably the best living basketball
Speaker 1: player and probably top five, maybe top three all time.
Speaker 1: I still think M. Mj is the greatest of all time.
Speaker 1: But he he was gifted. It's a gift from God.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's amazing what this guy had, this ability
Speaker 1: to play the sport at that level at such a
Speaker 1: young age. And I just think that there's a lack
Speaker 1: of gratitude and a lack of you know where they
Speaker 1: always talk so much on the left about it being inclusive.
Speaker 1: Why aren't these NFL players. It feels like they're extending
Speaker 1: a middle finger to the part of the country that
Speaker 1: doesn't see BLM the same way they do. Instead of saying, hey, guys,
Speaker 1: we we want to bring everybody in. We're all in
Speaker 1: this together, we all want justice, it feels divisive, it
Speaker 1: feels oppositional. So I just wish, I wish that wasn't
Speaker 1: the case, because I mean, I think the first professional
Speaker 1: athlete who has real standing in his sport who stands
Speaker 1: up and says, you know, we really need to focus
Speaker 1: on unity and safe communities and intact families and promoting
Speaker 1: you know, hard work and good citizenship, and you know
Speaker 1: that there is such an such an outpouring of support
Speaker 1: for this doesn't even have you know, some people say, oh,
Speaker 1: what about who was the guy who did this special
Speaker 1: the kneeling the special Not not the kneeling, um the
Speaker 1: special pose. I mean Tim Tebow, right, oh yeah, tebowing. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but he tebowing, That's what I was saying, not not
Speaker 1: kneeling Tebow. Well, I guess a Tebow is kind of
Speaker 1: a kneel. But you forget aneal Um. You know, he's
Speaker 1: a he seemed like a really good, wholesome guy. But
Speaker 1: because he was viewed as very Christian, therefore he was
Speaker 1: very right wing, and there was this whole backlash. I
Speaker 1: just think he sucked. That's why I hated him. Didn't
Speaker 1: he win some big games? Oh? He won some. He
Speaker 1: was a college quarterback, he had no I have the
Speaker 1: same arm as Tim Tebow. Then he tried to play
Speaker 1: baseball in some sort of farce ridiculous. Wow, I have
Speaker 1: I have no problem with Tim Tebow the person. I
Speaker 1: think he's a very good, charitable person, good human. I
Speaker 1: just think he's a terrible athlete. But didn't he win
Speaker 1: a whole bunch of NFL games that were Yeah, he
Speaker 1: had one season where he had a miracle run kind
Speaker 1: of thing, but he didn't, you know, And then every
Speaker 1: team he went to after that he was terrible. Mm,
Speaker 1: he's bad. Sorry. Sorry for the Tim Tebow lovers up
Speaker 1: saying he's a good person. I think he's not a
Speaker 1: good football player and definitely a terrible baseball player. Correct
Speaker 1: all your hate messages to producer Mark. We got plenty
Speaker 1: of those this weekend. Come on, DJ Buck. I was
Speaker 1: thinking of some good ways for the government to incentivize
Speaker 1: people to get the vaccine when available. I realize it'll
Speaker 1: be a highly polarized vaccine, and even I an arden
Speaker 1: Trump supporter, I'm a little leery about wanting to get
Speaker 1: it right away. At least, however, I realize that eventually
Speaker 1: it will be an important factor for us to get
Speaker 1: back to normal and normals also in the best interest
Speaker 1: of the federal government. But for the federal government to
Speaker 1: require Americans to be vaccinated I think might be a
Speaker 1: step too far, especially in our current political climate, regardless
Speaker 1: of who wins the election. In compromise, maybe the federal
Speaker 1: government could offer two to five year tax breaks for
Speaker 1: families willing to get the vaccine when it becomes widely available. Really,
Speaker 1: I'm just trying to think of ways that would convince
Speaker 1: me that the vaccine is worth It would be one way,
Speaker 1: for sure, thoughts um tax breaks for families willing to
Speaker 1: get the vaccine. Huh, Well, look, I t I appreciate
Speaker 1: where you're coming from on this one. I just think
Speaker 1: we gotta see what the what the data we gotta
Speaker 1: Fauchi this one. We gotta see what the data is. No,
Speaker 1: but really, we gotta see if they think the vaccine
Speaker 1: is highly effective and highly safe team. I'll just tell
Speaker 1: you this. I'll probably get it just because I want
Speaker 1: to be able to be around my of my parents
Speaker 1: without and and other you know, senior senior aged people
Speaker 1: without putting them at any undue risk of contracting. If
Speaker 1: it were just me, I mean I got I don't know.
Speaker 1: I would not get vaccine at all. I don't not
Speaker 1: worried about this thing. I'll see when it comes out.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you. I'll tell you. I always tell you, guys,
Speaker 1: the truth. I'll tell you if I find up saying, Okay,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna get this vaccine, but I want to read
Speaker 1: about it, see what it is, see what the studies say.
Speaker 1: You're in. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast more
Speaker 1: roll call Todd Buck. I nearly spit out my drink
Speaker 1: when I heard the SoundBite you played of cocaine Mitch
Speaker 1: throwing down the gauntlet. He is definitely the man. Honestly,
Speaker 1: is there another Republican who can talk smack the way
Speaker 1: he does. He just let it all hang out without
Speaker 1: fear of repudiation or condemnation. When he declared a quote
Speaker 1: at this point, it is just silly season on the
Speaker 1: Democrat side. I've replayed that line about half a dozen
Speaker 1: times now. I don't mean to laugh, honestly, but I
Speaker 1: can't help myself. I respect mister McConnell. Lacy says something
Speaker 1: shill time, my friend, well Todd. We gotta we gotta
Speaker 1: somebody who's ready to go to bat for Mitch McConnell
Speaker 1: in this audience. Look cocaine. Mitch. He's establishment, but sometimes
Speaker 1: he is a mean, lean judge confirmation machine. And no
Speaker 1: matter what you think of Mitch on trade, on immigration,
Speaker 1: on judges, this guy is getting it done and that matters.
Speaker 1: It's important, and he's he makes no apologies for it
Speaker 1: to the Democrats who are always trying to slow the
Speaker 1: whole thing down. Adam, Hey, Mark, regarding your commentary about
Speaker 1: how the NYPD should not be enforcing mask orders, I
Speaker 1: can tell you there are many of my fellow officers
Speaker 1: here in California on the same page. We've had a
Speaker 1: few co workers get the China virus and agree that
Speaker 1: this has been blown way out of proportion. All we
Speaker 1: want is to people to take a chill pill and
Speaker 1: let people live their lives and take risk management into
Speaker 1: their own hands. God bless Adam. Absolutely, I've been regularly
Speaker 1: tuning in or listening to podcasts on my way home
Speaker 1: after shifts. Since you took over the America Now slot
Speaker 1: here in Monterey for the last few years, shields hie
Speaker 1: and stay safe from the left, I mean West Coast well, Adam,
Speaker 1: thanks so much, man. Yeah. No, Now there is no
Speaker 1: America Now that is long buried and gone. It is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show. So that's what happened when the
Speaker 1: Buckster took over. And I'm so glad you've been here
Speaker 1: for that, and thank you for listening. And great to
Speaker 1: have members of our highly valued, respected, appreciated law enforcement
Speaker 1: community across the country listening into this show. All right,
Speaker 1: we are we are on team law enforcement here as
Speaker 1: much as anybody could ever be. Barbara, Hey, love you, Buck,
Speaker 1: but don't disparage Schenectady. Some of us live here would
Speaker 1: never vote for Biden. Did I did I make fun
Speaker 1: of Schenectady? Apparently? Oh? I think I said that Biden
Speaker 1: was like being in Delaware, was like being the mayor
Speaker 1: of Schenectady. I didn't. I didn't disparage Schenectady. I'm just
Speaker 1: I was just picking a random, relatively small city. I
Speaker 1: think that's what happened. I don't even know enough about
Speaker 1: that Schenectady to make fun of it. And I love
Speaker 1: Team Buck Schenectady so well, now you've made Team Bucks
Speaker 1: Senectedy very angry. Well, now I apologize and extended a
Speaker 1: hand in continued Freedom Hunt friendship because I love them.
Speaker 1: I think this lady is now Team producer Mark fair Enough.
Speaker 1: Everybody passed the Buck. Make sure someone new listens to
Speaker 1: the show This week. It's on Spotify, the iHeart App,
Speaker 1: and Apple Podcast until tomorrow. Shi'll Hide