WEBVTT - Invention: The Guillotine

0:00:00.000 --> 0:00:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey everybody, this is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick.

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Can say, we're bringing you a special treat, an episode

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of our brand new other podcast, Invention. That's right. It

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>is an exploration of human techno history, one invention at

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a time, new inventions, old inventions, ancient inventions. Each episode

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a different exploration. We're so excited about this new show.

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:22.920
<v Speaker 1>We think you're gonna love it. We really hope you do.

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 1>But the really important thing is don't just listen to

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>this episode. Go wherever you can and click subscribe. Get

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>yourself subscribed so you will get future episodes when they

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>come out, and they will be publishing every Monday. That's right.

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>And if you need a little help subscribing, I will

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>make sure that the landing page for this episode is

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff to Blow your Mind. Dot com has some links

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>out to some of the bigger sites, so where you

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 1>can definitely subscribe, and then once you've you've subscribed to Invention,

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>you can rate and review Invention as well. You know,

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>if you want to consider us releasing a brand new podcast,

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a free podcast at no cost to you, sort of

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>our Christmas gift to you, you can give us a

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>gift in return, and it's clicking that subscribe button. Don't

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:04.759
<v Speaker 1>just listen, subscribe, that's right, And the gift we're giving

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>you is this episode about the guillotine, and so much

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 1>more to come, like there's gonna be an episode on

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>sunglasses in the future, an episode on roads. I'm hoping

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to do one on the saxophone. The sky is the limit.

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>And then of course you guys will get to inform

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:19.479
<v Speaker 1>what we're recording as well, so we hope you enjoy

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>our exploration of the guillotine. Hey, welcome to Invention. I'm

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. And you might know

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Robert and I from our other show Stuff to Blow

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>your Mind, our other show in the How Stuff Works Network.

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>But today you apparently have somehow wandered into our brand

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>new Curiosity Store of Inventions, where we explore human ingenuity

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>for good, for ill, all of the stuff that comes

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>out of our imaginations and becomes the technology we use

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>every day or maybe just read about in history books. Yes,

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the how load halls of technological, systematic and cultural invention,

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the very human machines, customs and systems that altered the

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 1>course of history and today we're talking about one of

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the most useful inventions of all time. It's got to

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>be the and Robert. Before I say it, do you

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>say it like a French guy's name, or like what

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a fish breathes with? I go with guillotine because it

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>sounds a little more like an open face sandwich that way,

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and also it has the the gee has more of

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a sound to it. Yeah, I like how it sounds

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the minotar the guillotine. But but apparently

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>guillotine in English is also somewhat acceptable pronunciation. I don't

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>think there's a firm ruling one way or another from

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the lords of English pronunciation. Now, one thing is for

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>certain as we we ventured into this world of the guillotine.

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Beheadings themselves are just a time honored way for one

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>human being to kill another. It's a wound that still

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:57.119
<v Speaker 1>can't be repaired, and it is, without questions, certain death. Now,

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>one thing I was thinking about to illustrate this is

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>what would you even say is the quote cause of

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>death in a beheading so well, blood loss, loss of

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>oxygen to the brain. Basically, it just cuts off. It

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>cuts off your all your plumbing systems from all of

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>your your your your thinking systems. Yeah, it makes it

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>makes you think about how often when you hear phrases

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>like clinically dead, that can refer to something about circulation,

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>like the cessation of the heartbeat. Um. But yeah, so

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>when you separate the head from the body, I guess

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you've got to be really rigorous about what you mean

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>by dead though I guess it also happens pretty quickly

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>so you don't have to worry about it too much.

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, all the blood comes out of the head,

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>immediate loss of blood pressure, which means the brain can't

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>get oxygen, which means the brain can't work. Yeah, and

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>it's something that's just cemented in our mythology as well, right,

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you want to kill a vampire, you wanna

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>kill a medusa, you want to kill a highlander, what

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>do you do? You cut their head off? There is

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>something just supernaturally potent about this form of death. Well,

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's absolutely true, and you see that in

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of archaeological finds of beheadings from human history.

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Like here's a kind of strange fact. A lot of

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>times when you find beheaded humans from ages past, there

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>appears to be evidence that the people were beheaded posthumously.

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Why did that happen? There are a lot of ways

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:16.599
<v Speaker 1>you could explain it. I mean that you would take

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a dead person and cut off their head. Maybe there's

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>some sort of ritual function going on here, might be

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a human sacrifice. Maybe there's some kind of symbolic form

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of justice being done, if it's the corps of a

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>criminal or an enemy or something. But a lot of

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 1>times it appears like it might be a form of

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>apotropaic magic, the kind of magic you would use to

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 1>ward off evil or bad spirits, in the same way

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 1>that you might find a skeleton from hundreds of years

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 1>ago with an iron rod driven through its hard or

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>with a brick in its mouth, and say the tombs

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>underneath Venice. Yeah, there's like a dismantling of the the

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 1>individual that that seems evident in these acts um you know,

0:04:55.720 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and we see acts of ritual decapitation dating back thousands

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of years. For instance, there's evidence in Brazil that dates

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>back to at least nine thousand BC, and it's uh.

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>In it, we find a human skull draped and amputated,

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:14.280
<v Speaker 1>hands palm side down, covering the face as if as

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>if in grief. That's from place called Lapa Dosanto in

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh in South America and Brazil, and a lot of

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>bones have been discovered there. And it's not always easy

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to determine how to read the intention behind what you

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>see in these people. But yeah, there were all kinds

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of forms of of apparently posthumous mutilation going on in

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the way these bones are arranged. For example, sometimes you'll

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>find skulls, they're full of finger bones inside the skulls.

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>What was going on? What made the people want to

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>do that? It seems like it may well have formed

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 1>some kind of magical intention, but what was it? Indeed,

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 1>we can only guess now. Another kind of significance that

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>beheading has often had in the ancient world was that

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>it was one of the many forms of execution practiced,

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of course, in ancient Greece and home Uh. And in fact,

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 1>our terms decapitation and capital punishment both come from the

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Latin from capit meaning head, so like capital punishment is

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 1>punishment of the head, or that you you pay, you

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>pay for a crime with your head by separating it

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>from the other stuff. And there's some evidence that the

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 1>ancient Greeks and Romans viewed beheading as not a particularly

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:27.600
<v Speaker 1>harsh punishment, but more as a particularly noble and honorable

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>form of execution, and you see strains of this thinking

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>carried into much more recent times, like when beheading was

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>deployed as an execution method throughout the history of England.

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Not always, but it was most often reserved for the aristocracy,

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>while common criminals might more often be killed in what

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>was considered a less dignified way like hanging. Yeah, I mean, obviously,

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>beheadings in general have probably been occurring as long as

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>we've had weapons fine enough to inflict the blow. Uh,

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, as long as we had you know, some

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>thing that couldn't knock or cut a head off. And

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>then when you start looking at these, uh, the use

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of the of of a sword or an axe and execution,

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of it comes down to the

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>craftsmanship of that weapon, but also the skill of the

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>individual using it. Yeah, that's that's a real kicker, isn't it.

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I Mean, when you contract somebody to do a job

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>for you, a lot of times if you don't have

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a previous relationship with them, you know, you don't know

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>what kind of work they're gonna do you want to

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>find those people you can trust, but it's hard to

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>find a trustworthy the executioner that you know is going

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to cut your head off right right, Like you've really

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>got to put yourself in the in the shoes of

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the condemned here right. Uh. You know, obviously you don't

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>want to be stoned to death. You know, you don't

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>want to be thrown into that burlap sack with two

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>wild animals and thrown into the river. You would probably

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>prefer a nice, clean beheading, but nobody wants a less

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>than perfect beheading. If the local warlord is doing it,

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's one thing. Uh, you know, unless, however,

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you're worried about the war lord inflicting an intentionally less

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>than perfect stroke out of personal malice. If if it's

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a professional executioner that's doing the honors, well that's either

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>really good or really bad, depending on how you look

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>at it. Like the idea of a trained specialist doing

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the d that sounds good. But on the other hand,

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>at death via the sort of person who either seeks

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>this line of work out or is not suited for

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>any other form of labor, that's a little uh frightening.

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I would say, Plus, do you really want to be

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>toward the bottom of an executioner's list for the day

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>after they're tired from swinging that big old axe, like

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>it's your turn on Friday afternoon? Yeah, like you kind

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>of I want to be up there. I would want

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to be up there first, let him get that that

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>first blow in on me. I must admit I don't

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>think I'd ever much considered the horrors of a weak

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:48.199
<v Speaker 1>strike from the executioner until Game of Thrones came around,

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and then I suddenly began to think, like, oh, yes,

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>this could go very wrong. But George R. Martin did

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>not make up this concept obviously, of of being weak.

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 1>It's swinging the execution or sword or the acts. History

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>is replete with stories of botched beheadings, and they are

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>horrific and unfortunately sometimes kind of funny. I want to

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>tell you a couple. This one is not so funny.

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>This concerns Mary, the Queen of Scots. So during the

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>reign of Protestant Queen Elizabeth the First of England in

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the sixteenth century, there was obviously a lot of anxiety

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>about succession because Elizabeth had been born to King Henry

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the Eighth and his second wife, Anne Boleyn, after Henry's

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>first marriage to Catherine of Aragon had been annulled, and

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously lots of people at the time, especially some Catholics,

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>had opinions about that right. And Elizabeth's cousin, Mary Stewart,

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>was born to James the fifth of Scotland, who was

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 1>descended from a legitimate royal line, and so many Catholic

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>supporters thought, well, maybe Mary actually has a more legitimate

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 1>claim to the throne than Elizabeth does. And so Mary

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:57.959
<v Speaker 1>was eventually implicated in an assassination plot against Elizabeth in

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>fifteen eighty six, at least she was a rigedly involved

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>in it, and she was sentenced to execution in seven.

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 1>So you've got Mary Stewart, Mary Queen of Scott's, going

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to her execution, and the story goes that she's blindfolded

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and she gets helped to the block and the executioner,

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 1>wearing all black, raises up his axe to kill her,

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>but instead of cutting through her neck, he misses and

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>he hits her on the head. And then some report

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that she murmurs Sweet Jesus in shock before the executioner

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>raises his ax a second time, and then strikes again

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 1>and still fails to cut her head off completely, and

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>finally he quote just sawed through what remained of her neck.

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>That's that's that's rough for Mary. Yeah, and this is

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is presumed main event beheading here, so right,

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>this is before a royal audience, right, so this would

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>have to be either an act of just just just

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>an utterly inneped executioner or one that is intentionally doing

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a bad job out of mouth. It's like there seems

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to be very little room in between. It's hard to

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>under stand what happened here because you know, we only

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>have accounts from the time, which may not even be

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>fully reliable. We're relying on what people told us they

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>saw there, right, And there could be some objective in

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>crafting a version of the tale that sounds more in

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>apt than it actually was. But it actually gets worse

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>because apparently so it's described sometimes that the executioner appeared

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:22.079
<v Speaker 1>horrified at what was going on. But the headsman, after

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>he got her head off, he took hold of the

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>severed head and he held it up in front of

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the crowd so he could hold up the severed head

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and say God save Queen Elizabeth. But he grasped Mary's

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:33.559
<v Speaker 1>head by the hair, and it turned out the hair

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>was a wig, so the head fell down and rolled away,

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>leaving him holding only a hacked up, bloody wig while

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>proclaiming his true queen. And then another part of the story,

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe not to be believed, is that after Mary's

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>head rolled away, her lips kept moving as if she

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>was talking or praying. Okay, some of that sounds like

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>it might have been embellished, but it also sounds like

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>this guy was a real hack, no pun intended. Well,

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I got an even worse hack for you, because there

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.839
<v Speaker 1>was a seventeenth since three English executioner named jack Ketch

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>catch spelled like ketchup, catch yeah, or like what's the

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>kid in the Pokemon's. I have no idea. Our very

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>knowledgeable producer Paul just tells me it is ash ketch Um.

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess he's got to catch him, all right. It's

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>like jack ketch him right, the horror writerer. That's what

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>comes to my mind. I don't well anyway, this is

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>jack Ketch K E T C H so Jack Ketch

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>birthday unknown died in sixty six, who was notorious for

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:36.559
<v Speaker 1>being a complete screw up at his job and bungling executions.

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:40.959
<v Speaker 1>A couple of examples. In six three, Ketch performed the

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>beheading of William, Lord Russell, who was convicted for treason

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 1>in his role of in his role in the Rye

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>House plot, which was against King Charles the second of England,

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and Catches beheading of Russell was reportedly just this clumsy horror,

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>with Ketch whacking Russell again and again with the axe,

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>but repeatedly failing to get his head off. And apparently

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>after this, Catch defended himself by complaining that Russell wouldn't

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>hold still, and then you got the second one. Later, James,

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Duke of Monmouth, he went to the block for the

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Monmouth Rebellion of six five, and he tried to pay

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:20.319
<v Speaker 1>Catch not to screw up his execution. He's recorded as saying, quote,

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>here are six guineas for you, pray, do your business well.

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Do not serve me as you did my lord Russell.

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I have heard you struck him three or four times.

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Then Monmouth gave three more guineas to his servant who

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>was standing nearby, and told his servant to pay Catch

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>only if Catch did the beheading correctly. And then Catch

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>said I hope I shall. Then Monmouth asked to feel

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the axe blade, and he did, and he complained that

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 1>this is too dull, and Catch said, no, it's sharp enough,

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>it'll be heavy enough. So Monmouth got down in place

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to accept his fate, and Catch brought the axe down

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 1>on Monmouth. And at this point it is reported that

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>after he got hit, Monmouth lifted his head up and

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>turned around and glared at Catch angrily. Then he got

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>back down so Ketch could hit him again, and Catch

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>hit him several more times, failing each time to be

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>head him. Then Catch got frustrated and tried to walk

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>away and quit in the middle of the execution, while

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Monmouth was still alive. But the crowd yelled at him

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and told him to go back and finish it, so

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>finally he went back. After some more blows and the

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>use of a knife, he finally managed to get the

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>duke's head off. Well that's awful, Like this guy is

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a true hack. I wonder if that's where the word

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>hat comes from. Perhaps, uh yeah, But so you had

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>people whose job it was to administer what I guess

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to be the more humane form of execution

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>at the time. I mean, this is different than being

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, tortured and hanged and drawn and quartered

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and all that. But he this is obviously not going

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the way it's supposed to. And if we're going inspired

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>by the Greek and Roman model, something is obviously wrong

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>here at Like, not only is it unnecessarily painful, this

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>does not really seem like an honorable death. This seems humiliating. Yeah,

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing noble about this. You know. This is not

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a finely craft instrument wielded by a by and by

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>an expert practitioner. This is just a clumsy exercise and horror.

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>But what if mechanical controls could be set in place

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the same level of perfection, regardless of whoever you know,

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>happens to be wearing the hood, how tired they are,

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>what sort of weapon they're using, or what sort of

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>six stuff they're into. A machine that cannot get tired,

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it can't hesitate or engage in unfair punishment. It's not

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna judge you based on your your royal or commoner status.

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>A good blade, some gravity, and a simple frame with

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a necklock, well that would be the guillotine. All right,

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take a quick break and when we come back,

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we will discuss some precursors to the guillotine and the

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>tea itself. Alright, we're back. So the guillotine of late

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>eighteenth century France, which I'm sure you've heard about before,

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>that was involved in the French Revolution, the Reign of Terror,

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the first French Republic. That guillotine was not the first

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>human head removal machine, not by a long shot. And

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>we're not saying it was. You know that it was

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>predated by people swinging in axe or a sword with

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>their hands. Of course it was. But there were organized

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>machines for doing this job more efficiently and in a

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>more consistent way before the guillotine was instituted in France, right,

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and and they worked along the same principles. They maybe

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>they weren't quite as refined, but essentially the idea was

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>there that we should say that it was only in

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the aftermath of the French Revolution that people began referring

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to decapitation machines as guillotines. That's where the name comes from. Yes,

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>they had equally less refined names. They had more grizzly names.

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>One find. We'll meet a couple in a moment. So

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>as for who invented the first general decapitation machine, this

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>is totally unknown, lost to history, and in fact, we

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>don't even know for sure how many societies used a

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 1>device like this. There there are a lot of tales,

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>but many of these tales might not even be true.

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>We don't know for sure, right, And then how often

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>is the individual uh celebrated for creating such a thing

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 1>as we'll discover the naming of the guillotine, and it

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really relate to the individual or individuals that created it, right.

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of people who create execution devices

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be associated with and when you find

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 1>the people who do want to be associated with them

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>or don't mind, you've got to kind of wonder about

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>those people. But um, So, there are a couple of

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>known mechanical beheading devices from England that predated the French guillotine,

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and one is known as the Halifax Gibbet. So the

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>how Halifax is a town in West Yorkshire in England,

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and it had this infamous beheading machine known as the

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>Halifax Gibbet, which was allegedly used mostly to punish petty theft,

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>so people would steal some small sum of money or

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>something worth not very much, some cloth or something, and

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 1>into the Halifax Gibbet they would go. It was described

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>in an eighteen thirty seven history by an author named

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>William White in the following way quote. The executions always

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 1>took place on the Great Market day in order to

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 1>strike the more terror into the neighborhood. When the criminal

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>was brought to the gibbet, which stood a little way

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>out of the town, where part of the stone platform

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.679
<v Speaker 1>may still be seen on Gibbet Hill. The execution was

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>performed by means of an engine, which was raised upon

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>a platform four ft high and thirteen feet square, faced

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>on every side with stone, and ascended by a flight

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>of steps. In the middle of this platform was placed

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>two upright pieces of timber fifteen feet high, joined at

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:54.679
<v Speaker 1>the top by a transverse beam. Within these was a

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 1>square block of wood four ft and a half long,

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>which moved up and down by means of grooves made

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 1>for that purpose. To the lower part of the sliding

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.719
<v Speaker 1>block was fastened in iron axe of the weight of

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>seven pounds and twelve ounces. The axe, thus fixed, was

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>drawn up to the top by a cord and pulley.

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the cord was a pin, which,

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>being fixed to the block, kept it suspended till the

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>moment of execution. When the culprit, having placed his head

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>on the block, the pin was withdrawn and his head

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>was instantly severed from his body. If the offender was

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>condemned for stealing an ox, a sheep, or a horse,

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the end of the rope was fastened to the beast, which,

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>being driven, pulled out the pin and thus became the executioner.

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 1>In other cases, the bailiff for his servant cut the

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>rope and allowed the axe to descend. It's a little

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:50.680
<v Speaker 1>unnecessary complexity involving fim animals, but otherwise the basic principles

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:52.640
<v Speaker 1>of the guillotine as we've come to know it. Yeah,

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>it's more or less there there. There might be some

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>design refinements we come on later, but this is the idea.

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a reliable, bowl, consistent machine that's not going

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to mess up. Right. And of course it doesn't sound

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 1>like it was necessarily a custom blade, or maybe it was,

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's very much based on the design of an

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 1>axe blade. Yeah, and when you see illustrations, it looks

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>like just a large axe head on the bottom of

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>a huge wooden block. Uh So, this beheading machine of

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Halifax was famous enough that the English poet John Taylor

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>referenced it alongside the notoriously tough police of Kingston upon

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Hull in a poem uh that that I thought was

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. He writes, there is a proverb and a

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>prayer with all that we may not to Three strange

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>places fall from Hull, from Halifax, from Hell. 'tis thus

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:45.120
<v Speaker 1>from all these three good Lord deliver us at Halifax.

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>The law so sharp doth deal that whoso more than

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>one threepence doth steal. They have a lynn that wondrous,

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>quick and well, since thieves all headless unto Heaven or Hell.

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 1>From Hell, each man says, Lord, deliver me, because from

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Hell can no redemption be Men may escape from Hull

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and Halifax, but sure in Hell there is a heavier tax.

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>It sounds pretty grim. Well. I like how it's sort

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of captures two themes there. One is that how the

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Halifax jibbit is deadly and something to be feared, but

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>it also contrasts it with the supposed tortures of Hell,

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess, again emphasizing that, well, it's not as torturous

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>as many of the other methods that are being used. Yeah,

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>he's almost describing it like it's a like it's a

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>plane ticket to to greater rewards or suffering, depending on

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:39.199
<v Speaker 1>how one supernatural revenge fantasy is playing out here. But

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, I like that it is to

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a certain extent farm animals, uh, you know. Notwithstanding, it

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:50.440
<v Speaker 1>is to a certain extent saving the horrors of an

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:55.160
<v Speaker 1>afterlife for those imagined afterlife and not trying to um

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>embody them too much in the act of execution itself. Yeah. Now,

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 1>whether that's a actually a good thing or not, we

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>can discuss later. But it does seem to be there's

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 1>at least there's at least a superficial kind of humaneness

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 1>to write, even though it seems to be being lumped

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 1>on people who committing extremely pent crimes and not and

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>no matter what you think, really probably deserving of death.

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>But there's some strange stories about how people reacted to

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>what happened with at the Halifax Gibbet. The story in

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Wright tells a legend quote of a countrywoman who

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>was writing by the Gibbet on her hampers to the

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>market just at the execution of a criminal when the

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>axe chopped his neck through with such force that the

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>head jumped into one of her hampers, or as others say,

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>seized her apron with the teeth and they're stuck for

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>some time. I don't believe that's true, or at least

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:51.919
<v Speaker 1>the teeth. I don't believe. Again, we're coming back to

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the sort of inherent comedy. I mean, it's true gallows humor,

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 1>uh that comes with beheading executions. But there's an interesting

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>observation from the Halifax historian John Crabtree, who has a

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of attitude about what stories like this mean. He writes, quote,

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 1>it is useless employing words about this fair, but the

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>circumstance may serve to show with what apathy the country

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>people regarded this mode of punishment. Their minds were evidently

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:24.919
<v Speaker 1>hardened by such exhibitions, and the fact develops the inadequacy

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of such awful administrations of justice to produce that proper

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>moral and salutary effect which might have been anticipated. Such scenes,

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>often repeated, appear to harden rather than soften, to stupefy

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>rather than awaken the sensibilities of man's nature. And I

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>think we should come back to that thought later on. Indeed,

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>all right, so what else do we have in terms

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>of proto guillotine machines. Well, a quicker story is just

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a copy essentially of the Halifax jibbitt, known as the

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Scottish Maiden. So James Douglas, the fourth Earl of Morton,

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>who is the ruler of Scotland from fifteen seventy two

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen seventy eight, he was alleged at some point

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 1>to have introduced the decapitation machine to his country of Scots,

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>inspired by the Halifax gibbet. Allegedly, he at some point

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>traveled through Halifax and he was so inspired by the

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>gibbet that he thought, well, I should share this same

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>technology with my countrymen. So a similar machine was built

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>out of oak, and it could be transported around the

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 1>country to perform beheadings wherever. But it was often accepting

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the condemned at Edinburgh, and according to the National Museums

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of Scotland, crimes that could get you sent to the

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Scottish Maiden included murder, incest, stealing, treason, adultery, forgery and robbery.

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>But there's an ironic twist. So James Douglas, the Earl

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>fourth Earl of Morton, was a supporter of James the sixth,

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and Morton opposed the Catholic faction of Mary, Queen of

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Scott's who he discussed earlier, Mary Stewart, and he was

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>eventually implicated in a plot to murder Mary's second husband,

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:01.159
<v Speaker 1>Lord Darnley, and was put to death in June one,

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>decapitated by the Scottish maiden that he brought to Scotland. Ah,

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>there's your poetic justice, and legends of that kind will

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:13.679
<v Speaker 1>appear again and again in this episode. Actually, well, yes,

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and even beyond this episode, because this isn't that a

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>common theme? The man destroyed by his own invention, by

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>his own machine. It happens enough in the movies that

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you should think it happens more often in reality. Though

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>in the movies it's especially common when that invention is

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>some kind of hybrid animal, like I created a shark ape,

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know it swings from the trees, taking bites

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 1>out of people who could have known my shark ape

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>would turn on me, And yet it always happens. Alright, So,

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>as we've been discussing, there were similar devices already used

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:48.879
<v Speaker 1>in Europe and had been for centuries before the guillotine

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 1>came around. But the individual who is often credited as

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the inventor of the guillotine is a French surgeon and

0:25:56.119 --> 0:26:02.120
<v Speaker 1>physiologist Antoine Louis who lives seventy three through sev Yeah,

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>he is often credited as the inventor, though based on

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>what I was reading, it appears to me was maybe

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:10.919
<v Speaker 1>designed by some sort of committee of which Louis was

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the leader. Right, And this is actually all the more fitting,

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>uh when we really get to the heart of the

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>guillotine here, because it is this, this thing that is

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>it is this utilization of technology and this there's a

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 1>there's an air of civility to it. Uh. This this

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 1>taking something that is kind of that is rather barbaric

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and making it a little less so. Well, it's bureaucratic violence. Yes,

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it very much embodies the idea of retributed violence by

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the state, taken out of the emotional hands of the

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>single executioner and placed into the hands of a disembodied

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>machine that is created by a committee through drafts. Yes,

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have another episode that we're recording this

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>week on vending machines, and it's amazing this the similarities

0:26:55.840 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>involved here, This this these sometimes these struggles over what

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>exactly is happening when a machine does the bidding of

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a human. If a machine is vindan, say, blasphemous literature,

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>as we discussed in this other episode, then who is

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 1>it fault foresaid literature sale and uh. And there's a

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 1>sense of that here too. It's like the bureaucracy has

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>condemned you to death. The machine is actually doing the execution.

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 1>We're just merely, you know, pushing the button, pulling the string,

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, to carry out this judgment. Right, But we

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:30.159
<v Speaker 1>do at least have Antoine Louis to associate with the

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>creation of the machine, even if it wasn't just him alone,

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>but because of his association with it, it was often

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>early on it was called names, not the guillotine yet,

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 1>but names like the Louisette or the louis Zone, which

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have as much of a ring to it. Oh,

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:48.199
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like it. I could see executions by

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the Louisette. Yeah, I guess it would have grown on us.

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 1>But at any rate, later it definitely came to be

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:59.159
<v Speaker 1>named after Joseph Ignace Guillotan, who lived seventeen thirty eight

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:03.439
<v Speaker 1>through eighteen four team. He was a physician. Uh, he

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 1>was a National Assembly member, and he played a major

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:10.160
<v Speaker 1>role in passing legislation that made death by machine the law.

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:13.640
<v Speaker 1>The loose idea here is that it would this kind

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of legislation would provide the best possible version of beheading

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to all classes of society. And we do have to

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>point out that, despite some urban legends out there, uh,

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Guillotine himself was not killed by his own machine. And

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't actually a huge fan of execution either. It's

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 1>not like he was a huge execution enthusiasts. Well, no,

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:38.720
<v Speaker 1>exactly the opposite. Guilloton opposed the death penalty. He wanted

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the abolition of the death penalty, but he didn't think

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that he could accomplish that directly. Right, this seemed the

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>best reasonable next step. Right, It's like, if I can't

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 1>we can't eradicate it, we're going to have it. We

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>might as well make it clean and uh and fair

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to all involved. According to a popular legend, Guillotan was

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>born when his pregnant mother was out walking one day

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and she overheard the screams of a condemned criminal being

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>broken on the wheel and breaking on the wheel was

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, a classic death by torture type method where

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a person would be stretched out on a wheel in

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 1>a kind of starfish post and they'd have their limbs

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>broken with an iron rod or with a club, just

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>insane brutality. So he was very much opposed to that

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing, not only just the bar the barbaric

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>nature of the execution, but the public nature of the

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 1>idea that that women and children, uh, just innocent bystanders

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>might just walk through town and witness such such horror.

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:41.479
<v Speaker 1>So he was thinking, maybe if less children end up

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>watching this, the better, Yes, and make it. Yeah, it's

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 1>more systematic, it's more you know, the act itself is

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>less flashy, and then we're just gonna make it less

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 1>for performance. So Gia Tom was not out there lobbying

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to get this machine named after his family. No, no,

0:29:57.640 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>it just it ended up sticking. Now a cool lit

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>fact here that sounds like something right out of an

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Allan Moore comic book. But along with Benjamin Franklin, H.

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Guillotine investigated the work of Franz Mesmer of Mesmerism, you know,

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the the the form of hypnotism that we had back

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>in the day, uh, and they investigated him on behalf

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of King Louis, the League of Extraordinary Gentleman exactly. So

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 1>another way of thinking, you alluded to this a minute ago,

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Robert like the idea that it would be the best

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>method for all the classes. So another way of thinking

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 1>about the motivation for the institution of the guillotine at

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>this time in history was that it supposedly extended the

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>democratic and egalitarian principles of the French Revolution to common criminals,

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>essentially extending them the courtesy of the honorable beheading that

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>was more often reserved for nobles and aristocrats instead of

0:30:57.400 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>more shameful and common and painful deaths like hanging, burning,

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>or breaking on the wheel, which you were more likely

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to get if you were just some lower class petty criminal. Now,

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 1>as for the idea Guillotin had, thinking that this would

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>shield children from the gruesome practice of execution, Unfortunately this

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 1>did not work out. I was reading a section from

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a book called Children's Toys of by Gone Days, A

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 1>History of playthings of all people's from prehistoric times to

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the nineteenth century by Carl Grober, published in nineteen and

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the author writes, quote, the worst monstrosity of the kind

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>was the outcome of the French Revolution, which indeed was

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>over rich in aberrations of taste. The toy shops put

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>on the market little guillotines with which little patriots could

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>be head figures of aristocrats. They're still survives some specimens

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of this pretty and diverting machine, one of which bears

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the date seventeen ninety four, and he's got an illustration.

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>These were not models, but pure toys. And in proof

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of this we have the king's evidence from one whom

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>we should never suspect of wishing to give so bloodthirsty

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a toy to his little son. And here the author

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 1>is speaking of the romantic poet Johann wolf Kan von Gta.

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 1>So Gruber tells the story and that in December sevente

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Girta wrote a letter to his mother and Frankfort, asking

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>if she would buy a toy guillotine for his little son.

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>And she replied, dear son, anything I can do to

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>please you is gladly done and gives me joy. But

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 1>to buy such an infamous implement of murder, that I

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 1>will not do at any price. If I had authority,

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the maker should be put in the stocks, and I

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>would have the machine publicly burnt by the common executioner.

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>And I guess this is sort of the seventeen nineties

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>equivalent of like asking your grandmother to buy you a

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>copy of Doom for Christmas in the nineteen nineties. Yeah, well,

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad that you brought up Doom here. And just

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 1>because it's it's easy for us to look back on

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 1>this account and think, oh, these children of a more

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, barbarous age. But go to any toy store

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and look at the machine gun based toys that are

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>on display. There. All the various guns, like true true

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>murder weapons, um, not even methods of bureaucratic execution, but

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>weapons of just wanton violence. Uh, these are all represented

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>in toys even today. Uh. Likewise, I can't help but

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 1>think back on how much I wanted the slime pit

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>when I was a kid. This was a master's of

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the universe. Place set the device and basically you would

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 1>lock he man or some other figure into the machine

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and it was like shaped like a skull, and then

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>it would dump slime on top of the head of

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the poor hero. And it was I think that maybe

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the actual lore of it was like I would make

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 1>them mutate or something. But it was very much Uh,

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 1>it was very much like a guillotine, except instead of

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a blade, it was slime. It was like, clearly an

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>instrument of execution, of of ritualized death for your toys.

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 1>So you're arranging an execution for he man exactly. So

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the idea of a toy guillotine. It makes

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:09.280
<v Speaker 1>perfect sense. Uh, we can't. We can only distance ourselves

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 1>from such an idea so much. Though. I also have

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to wonder I somehow detect between the lines. This could

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 1>have been one of those situations where and Robert, I

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 1>bet you're familiar with this, where a dad buys or

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>requests a toy for his child because secretly he wants

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to play. Uh. In fact, Gerta wrote in faust quote

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:34.439
<v Speaker 1>ages no second childhood age makes plain children. We were

0:34:34.800 --> 0:34:39.839
<v Speaker 1>true children. We remain again much like it is today. Now.

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 1>We mentioned that Guillaton was responsible for introducing legislation that

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 1>would eventually lead the French National Assembly to say, okay,

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 1>we're only going to be killing people by beheading machine.

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Now that that's that's going to be the new method

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of execution. That's what's humane, that's what the state should

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>be up to and so I think in just a

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 1>minute we should turn to the sheen itself. But I

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:04.720
<v Speaker 1>just wanted quickly before we do that, to discuss where

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it is that this rumor came from. The guillotam was

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:11.760
<v Speaker 1>killed by the machine that he recommended putting in place

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:15.400
<v Speaker 1>for executions in France, and I think I know maybe

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a few threads of where the story came from. Obviously,

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 1>we had that ironic story of the Earl of Morton earlier, right,

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 1>so we can see how that might have influenced confused

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the telling, right. But then there are a couple of

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 1>other examples. So Dr Antoine Louis, the secretary of the

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:33.319
<v Speaker 1>Academy of Medicine and physician to King Louis, the one

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:36.840
<v Speaker 1>who we talked about earlier, chairing that committee that designed

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the device. He was actually temporarily condemned to die in

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:45.359
<v Speaker 1>the machine that he designed or helped design, though he

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:48.759
<v Speaker 1>escaped this fate basically during a change of power, So

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 1>he narrowly escaped going to the guillotine himself. And then

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>King Louis the sixteenth, who was interested in mechanical engineering,

0:35:56.480 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 1>is said to have made refinements to the design of

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the guillotine like recommending an angled blade while he was

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 1>still in power, before the device was eventually turned on

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the king himself and on his wife Marie Antoinette. And

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 1>so there's another kind of like creator and then killed

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 1>by his creation. Irony there since he apparently or at

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 1>least allegedly offered refinements to the design. All right, Well,

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:20.759
<v Speaker 1>on that note, we're gonna take one more break, and

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 1>when we come back, we'll discuss the machine itself in

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 1>more detail, and we'll also discuss its legacy. All right,

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>we're back. So now we're at the machine itself, the

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:37.840
<v Speaker 1>French guillotine of the seventeen eighties and onward. And the

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 1>question is was it actually built? Well, of course it was.

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:43.359
<v Speaker 1>This one was definitely built. Some of the inventions were

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 1>discussing on this show, you know, maybe didn't get out

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of the blueprint phase. This definitely saw action. So, after

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:53.839
<v Speaker 1>the legal standard of execution by machine was approved by

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 1>the National Assembly in the construction of the machine was

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:02.840
<v Speaker 1>delegated to a politician named Pierre Louis red Areo, who

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:05.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm always going to struggle with that name, so I'll

0:37:05.480 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 1>just call him Pierre here. Uh. He apparently had trouble

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 1>finding a contractor who could build the machine since no

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:14.439
<v Speaker 1>one wanted their name associated with it, and eventually found

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:17.319
<v Speaker 1>a taker is a taker from Germany, and so the

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 1>guillotine was constructed by a German harpsichord maker named Tobias Schmidt.

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Apparently he also supplied a leather sack that would catch heads.

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:29.360
<v Speaker 1>And now you can you just gotta wonder about Tobias.

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I can just imagine the scenario. It's like, so, honey,

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 1>what are you working on today? I get this new

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:37.399
<v Speaker 1>contracted it pays well, it's gonna really help us out

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 1>next month. Oh who are you putting a hots harpsichord

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:43.439
<v Speaker 1>of chord for? Well, it's not quite a harpsichord. Well,

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:46.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm just imagining in his shop while he's working on

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:50.919
<v Speaker 1>the guillotine that harpsichord music is constantly playing Dan Dan

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Dean Dan Dan dy. Anyway, according to the memoirs of

0:37:54.960 --> 0:38:00.399
<v Speaker 1>the French executioner Enrie Clement Sans Song in eighteen seven six,

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 1>since On came from a line of a long line

0:38:03.520 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of executioners, and he so he has these memoirs about

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 1>his family's exploits, cutting off heads and performing executions in France,

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 1>and his memoirs are considered probably only partially reliable, but

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:18.240
<v Speaker 1>his up close description of the workings of the guillotine

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:20.799
<v Speaker 1>is fairly straightforward. So I see, I feel like he's

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:23.479
<v Speaker 1>probably on the right track here, all right, I'm gonna

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>read part of this and I'm gonna I'm gonna go

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 1>for an executioner's voice. Here do it. On a scaffold

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 1>from seven to eight feet high, two parallel bars are

0:38:31.719 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 1>made fast in one end. Their top part is united

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:38.520
<v Speaker 1>by a strong crossbar. To this crossbar is added a

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 1>thick iron ring, and which is past a rope which

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 1>fixes and retains a ram. This is perpendicularly armed with

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a sharp and broad blade, which gradually becomes broader on

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:52.279
<v Speaker 1>all its surface, so then instead of striking perpendicularly, it

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 1>strikes sideways, so that there is not an inch of

0:38:55.200 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the blade that does not serve. The ram ways from pounds,

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and its weight is doubled. When it begins to slide down.

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:06.319
<v Speaker 1>It is enclosed in the groove of the bars. A

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:09.280
<v Speaker 1>spring makes it fast to the left bar. A band

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of iron descends along the outside of the same bar,

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and the handle is locked to a ring with a padlock.

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:18.840
<v Speaker 1>So that no accident is possible, and the weight only

0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:23.360
<v Speaker 1>falls when the executioner interferes to a way plank. Strong

0:39:23.440 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 1>straps are fastened by which the criminal is attached under

0:39:26.680 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the armpits and over the legs, so that the body

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:32.800
<v Speaker 1>cannot move as soon as the way plank goes down.

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:36.200
<v Speaker 1>The head being between the bars, is supported by a

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 1>rounded crossbar. The executioner's assistants lower another rounded crossbar, the

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 1>head being thus grooved in a perfect circle, which prevents

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:49.720
<v Speaker 1>it from moving in any way. This precaution is indispensable

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 1>in regard to the terrible inconveniences of fear. The executioner

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 1>then touches the spring. The whole affair is done so

0:39:57.160 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 1>quickly that only the thump of the blade when it

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 1>slide down and forms the spectators that the culprit is

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 1>no longer of the living. The head falls into a

0:40:06.200 --> 0:40:08.879
<v Speaker 1>basket full of brand and the body is pushed into

0:40:08.920 --> 0:40:14.120
<v Speaker 1>another wicker basket line with very thick leather. That's a

0:40:14.200 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 1>heck of a rating, Robert, Yeah, that was going to

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:20.959
<v Speaker 1>do a number on my throat. But I'm sorry. Maybe

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I should have taken part of it, but I was

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:25.360
<v Speaker 1>just enjoying listening to your Henri Clement. Well, there's a

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 1>precision in his in his description of the act that

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I felt like I had to had to capture now obviously,

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:35.799
<v Speaker 1>so he's described how the device works now, but they

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:37.959
<v Speaker 1>had to test it out before they can make sure

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:41.279
<v Speaker 1>to try it on a human, right, So you know,

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:43.280
<v Speaker 1>you always wonder like, how do you test a guillotine?

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 1>You put a watermelon in there, do you gallagher it? Well,

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I suppose you could, but it's kind of a waste

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:49.839
<v Speaker 1>of a good melon, and ultimately you want to test

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:51.920
<v Speaker 1>it on the real thing, right, So they use dead bodies.

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, also farm animals like sheep and calves. Yeah,

0:40:55.480 --> 0:40:57.239
<v Speaker 1>because you just I mean, it makes sense you want

0:40:57.280 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to make sure you're cutting through actual vertebrate tissue there

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and most notably the neck. And then on a officials

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:10.439
<v Speaker 1>installed and used the guillotine for the first time. Right.

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:13.120
<v Speaker 1>So the first victim of the French guillotine was Nicholas

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Jacques Beltier who was a highwayman, and he was executed

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 1>where the machine was erected at the Plas de grev

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:23.319
<v Speaker 1>And they're so a large crowd came out, obviously to

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 1>witness the first execution by the new machine, but it

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 1>was reported that the crowd was somewhat unimpressed, and they

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:33.839
<v Speaker 1>found the efficiency of the killing less entertaining than the

0:41:33.840 --> 0:41:36.399
<v Speaker 1>forms of execution they were used to, even the more

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:40.759
<v Speaker 1>classic beheadings. Nevertheless, over time, the executions that the guillotine

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 1>became a very popular spectator event during the reign of Terror,

0:41:44.640 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know, in generally afterwards when the guillotine was used,

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:50.279
<v Speaker 1>people would show up to watch. So we see a

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:54.920
<v Speaker 1>little success here. Like it was clearly less dramatic, uh,

0:41:54.960 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, there was less theater in the act. And

0:41:57.640 --> 0:41:59.680
<v Speaker 1>yet at the same time, a few things are more

0:41:59.760 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 1>drum mattic in life than the ending of a life

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:05.359
<v Speaker 1>like this is the people. You can understand why people

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:08.600
<v Speaker 1>would still turn out even if you had made things

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a little more precise. Now, putting aside the question, I

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:14.400
<v Speaker 1>guess what we can talk talk about in a minute

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of or whether it's ever humane to just execute somebody,

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:23.319
<v Speaker 1>was it actually true that the guillotine was a more refined,

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:27.279
<v Speaker 1>more humane version of execution than what came before? Was it?

0:42:27.360 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Was it an improvement if you were somebody who was

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:33.960
<v Speaker 1>interested in reducing the suffering of humankind, yeah, I mean

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:37.359
<v Speaker 1>you could again, you could say the concept is inherently controversial,

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:40.480
<v Speaker 1>but still others took issue with just how humane it was.

0:42:40.640 --> 0:42:45.120
<v Speaker 1>So op Prussian doctor Samuel Thomas summer Ing, who lives

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:48.200
<v Speaker 1>seventeen fifty five through eighteen thirty he studied the cadavers

0:42:48.200 --> 0:42:50.879
<v Speaker 1>of guillotine victims, and he argued that severed heads were

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:54.320
<v Speaker 1>still capable feeling and since, and he wrote an essay

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:58.080
<v Speaker 1>on this in seventeen nine. So he he was something

0:42:58.080 --> 0:43:00.960
<v Speaker 1>of a poly math. In addition to naming the twelve

0:43:01.000 --> 0:43:04.960
<v Speaker 1>pairs of cranial nerves, he also invented a telegraphic system

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and made discoveries in paleontology, specifically with the pterodactyl fossils.

0:43:09.560 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 1>They're not dinosaurs, folks, that's a different thing. So this

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:15.759
<v Speaker 1>was you know, this was not just this wasn't just

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 1>some crazy guy coming up and sanah, the heads are

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:21.960
<v Speaker 1>still alive. You know, he was he was making a

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 1>an expert argument that, like, I'm not sure that this

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 1>is great what we're doing. Maybe it's a little it's

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:29.799
<v Speaker 1>almost a little too precise. Yeah. The core takeaway of

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 1>his essay on the humanity of the guiatain was that

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:35.240
<v Speaker 1>we can't rule out that it's possible that a severed

0:43:35.280 --> 0:43:39.720
<v Speaker 1>head could still be having experience, could experience being severed.

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Now we knew, And there were a lot of tales

0:43:41.800 --> 0:43:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of this happening, right of people running to check out

0:43:45.120 --> 0:43:49.359
<v Speaker 1>the heads of the decapitated, in various doctors checking in

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and seeing what was going on with the eyes. And

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:53.759
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of interest in this in determining what,

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:56.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, what happens to consciousness at death, like this

0:43:56.920 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 1>was a perfect clinical exercise for for weighing in on it. Yeah,

0:44:02.000 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the classic tales about this thin get repeated the most

0:44:04.640 --> 0:44:09.040
<v Speaker 1>often are like seeing someone's cheeks flush with anger when

0:44:09.080 --> 0:44:12.239
<v Speaker 1>they behold someone, or who's someone who mocks them or

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 1>something like that, or or who slaps them in the face,

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:19.120
<v Speaker 1>or thinking that that I severed head would be like

0:44:19.640 --> 0:44:24.120
<v Speaker 1>looking at people as if it recognized them, something like that. Yeah,

0:44:24.120 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and obviously there's a lot of indelishment with these stories,

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:28.120
<v Speaker 1>but we don't know how much to trust them. Yeah,

0:44:28.120 --> 0:44:29.480
<v Speaker 1>we really don't know how much to trust them. But

0:44:29.520 --> 0:44:33.279
<v Speaker 1>we do know today that that any kind of activity

0:44:33.400 --> 0:44:36.320
<v Speaker 1>scene in the heads after death, most of this is

0:44:36.320 --> 0:44:41.279
<v Speaker 1>going to be reflective twitching of muscles. So um, basically,

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 1>coma and brain death are probably gonna occur within two

0:44:45.560 --> 0:44:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to three seconds of decapitation due to interruption of blood

0:44:49.680 --> 0:44:52.560
<v Speaker 1>flow to the brain. So just the massive sudden drop

0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:56.319
<v Speaker 1>in blood pressure, Yeah, that's gonna be Yeah. So any

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:59.680
<v Speaker 1>tales of like, you know, confronting the head, having any

0:44:59.760 --> 0:45:03.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of like moment of human uh contact, even it

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just in the eyes. Uh, it's pretty clear that

0:45:05.960 --> 0:45:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that is all just embellishment of stories or just wishful

0:45:10.120 --> 0:45:12.799
<v Speaker 1>thinking on the part of the observer. So what is

0:45:12.880 --> 0:45:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the legacy of this machine, this this machine of bureaucratic violence.

0:45:17.080 --> 0:45:19.279
<v Speaker 1>And if we try to look at it from with

0:45:19.360 --> 0:45:22.160
<v Speaker 1>our perspective, from today, with our hindsight, and you know,

0:45:22.200 --> 0:45:24.359
<v Speaker 1>with with the kind of value judgments we would make,

0:45:24.480 --> 0:45:27.560
<v Speaker 1>was the guillotine a step forward or a step backward?

0:45:27.760 --> 0:45:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Was it as uh Giatan envisioned a more humane way

0:45:32.920 --> 0:45:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of doing business when the state was just you know,

0:45:35.520 --> 0:45:38.839
<v Speaker 1>couldn't be convinced not to kill people, or did it

0:45:39.239 --> 0:45:42.840
<v Speaker 1>perhaps enable a worse state of affairs where more people

0:45:42.880 --> 0:45:45.640
<v Speaker 1>could be sent to their deaths with impunity than would

0:45:45.680 --> 0:45:48.000
<v Speaker 1>have been the case otherwise. Yeah, I think you could

0:45:48.000 --> 0:45:50.120
<v Speaker 1>probably go either way on it. I mean, one thing

0:45:50.200 --> 0:45:52.279
<v Speaker 1>is for certain. It it changed the way executions were

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:55.319
<v Speaker 1>performed in France for nearly two hundred years. It was

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:58.440
<v Speaker 1>actually used in France up until nineteen seventy seven, that's

0:45:58.440 --> 0:46:02.240
<v Speaker 1>when the last execution occur via guillotine, before the outlying

0:46:02.239 --> 0:46:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of capital punishment in one it also took on symbolic way.

0:46:06.440 --> 0:46:08.799
<v Speaker 1>It's just this this symbol of the reign of terror

0:46:08.880 --> 0:46:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps to a larger extent, a symbol of systematically

0:46:12.440 --> 0:46:16.160
<v Speaker 1>violent rebellion. Yeah. I read one author point out, certainly

0:46:16.160 --> 0:46:19.000
<v Speaker 1>not in defending the guillotine or the use of the guillotine,

0:46:19.040 --> 0:46:21.440
<v Speaker 1>but it just pointing out a kind of strange irony

0:46:21.480 --> 0:46:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that the guillotine now to us symbolizes this this horror,

0:46:26.040 --> 0:46:29.880
<v Speaker 1>this horror period of bureaucratic violence, which it certainly was.

0:46:30.320 --> 0:46:31.759
<v Speaker 1>But we look at that and we think of that

0:46:31.800 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 1>period as a reign of terror. But don't think the

0:46:34.560 --> 0:46:37.839
<v Speaker 1>same way say about the Napoleonic Wars, which killed far

0:46:38.000 --> 0:46:40.759
<v Speaker 1>more people than the guillotine ever did. Not that that

0:46:40.800 --> 0:46:43.879
<v Speaker 1>makes the killings of the guillotine any less horrific. It's true, now,

0:46:44.120 --> 0:46:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you know. One the one thing about the weirdness of

0:46:46.520 --> 0:46:49.319
<v Speaker 1>this whole situation that stands out. I mean, aside from

0:46:49.360 --> 0:46:52.960
<v Speaker 1>just the inherently weird nature of of a beheading machine

0:46:53.360 --> 0:46:56.560
<v Speaker 1>machine that cuts off heads, there is still something highly

0:46:56.600 --> 0:46:59.560
<v Speaker 1>symbolic going on here. I think to the means of

0:46:59.560 --> 0:47:03.200
<v Speaker 1>an exit usition, and you'll typically see an expression of

0:47:03.200 --> 0:47:07.440
<v Speaker 1>of power involved. Say it's a physical strength or you know,

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:13.319
<v Speaker 1>vengeful spirit or increasingly a culture's greatest technological achievements. Isn't

0:47:13.320 --> 0:47:16.640
<v Speaker 1>it weird to think about how these methods climb the

0:47:16.680 --> 0:47:20.680
<v Speaker 1>tree of developing technology? So starting with varying levels of

0:47:20.680 --> 0:47:25.440
<v Speaker 1>tool proficiency, you know, axes and swords, weapons, weapon crafting,

0:47:25.719 --> 0:47:30.440
<v Speaker 1>then we go into gunpowder, uh, you know, firing squads, electricity,

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:33.239
<v Speaker 1>and the electric chair. It is weird to trace through

0:47:33.280 --> 0:47:36.800
<v Speaker 1>history execution methods just sort of like tracking with whatever

0:47:36.920 --> 0:47:41.719
<v Speaker 1>is the most interesting new technology we have available. Yeah, chemicals, pharmaceuticals,

0:47:41.800 --> 0:47:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, why an electric chair? That is just such

0:47:45.160 --> 0:47:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a strange idea to even come up with. French philosopher

0:47:50.840 --> 0:47:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Michelle Fuco he weighed in on this, and he pointed

0:47:54.520 --> 0:47:58.440
<v Speaker 1>out that penal technology is of course an expression of power,

0:47:58.520 --> 0:48:00.440
<v Speaker 1>but we also have to dwell in the fact that

0:48:00.560 --> 0:48:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it does this through everyday technology, ubiquitous technology. So if

0:48:05.680 --> 0:48:08.439
<v Speaker 1>it's something like electricity or even you know or even

0:48:08.600 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, pharmaceuticals, chemicals. Uh, it's it's taking aspects of

0:48:13.600 --> 0:48:18.000
<v Speaker 1>everyday life and turning them into the the system, the

0:48:18.040 --> 0:48:21.759
<v Speaker 1>tool of of justice. So like our everyday use of

0:48:21.920 --> 0:48:25.719
<v Speaker 1>energy and the consumer economy, a constant reminder of the

0:48:25.760 --> 0:48:28.720
<v Speaker 1>methods of death that the state can inflict upon people

0:48:28.760 --> 0:48:32.279
<v Speaker 1>if they if they don't stay in line exactly. Now,

0:48:32.480 --> 0:48:35.319
<v Speaker 1>one small area of the legacy of the guillotine comes

0:48:35.360 --> 0:48:38.440
<v Speaker 1>down to its use in medical terminology. So there are

0:48:38.480 --> 0:48:41.680
<v Speaker 1>two primary means of amputation. Um in terms of like

0:48:41.719 --> 0:48:44.480
<v Speaker 1>amputating a limb or what have you. You have flap

0:48:44.520 --> 0:48:47.480
<v Speaker 1>amputations in which flaps of flesh are left so that

0:48:47.520 --> 0:48:51.440
<v Speaker 1>you can fold them and close the stump of the wound.

0:48:51.640 --> 0:48:54.279
<v Speaker 1>And then there are guillotine amputations, which which are more

0:48:54.280 --> 0:48:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of a straight down affair with no immediate concerns for

0:48:56.920 --> 0:49:01.880
<v Speaker 1>flap tissue. So in guillotine amputation, it's more about cutting

0:49:01.880 --> 0:49:05.360
<v Speaker 1>out infected tissue and making sure drainage of proper drainage occurs,

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and then secondary surgery is performed to create the flap

0:49:09.320 --> 0:49:12.280
<v Speaker 1>tissue to close everything off into a stump. But obviously

0:49:12.320 --> 0:49:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that's like a secondary appellation, like you wouldn't you wouldn't

0:49:15.480 --> 0:49:19.040
<v Speaker 1>have called that guillotine cutting in the surgical since before

0:49:19.080 --> 0:49:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the guillotine, right, But it is certainly an example where

0:49:21.600 --> 0:49:25.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're you, you encounter this terminology now in in

0:49:26.120 --> 0:49:29.399
<v Speaker 1>medical science and uh, and it stems from the use

0:49:29.440 --> 0:49:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of this execution device. That being said, there's a lot

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of medical terminology that stems from various weapons and so forth.

0:49:36.360 --> 0:49:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Of course, so I want to come back to this

0:49:39.080 --> 0:49:42.319
<v Speaker 1>question that we've been teasing throughout where you can't help

0:49:42.320 --> 0:49:47.120
<v Speaker 1>but wonder if Josephine Guioton pushed us in exactly the

0:49:47.239 --> 0:49:51.280
<v Speaker 1>wrong direction, if he was actually against the death penalty

0:49:51.360 --> 0:49:56.319
<v Speaker 1>and trying to institute more humane treatment of criminals. You know,

0:49:56.719 --> 0:50:00.800
<v Speaker 1>it's hard not to notice that by sanitizing a horrible act,

0:50:01.400 --> 0:50:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it often seems like you make the act easier to

0:50:04.560 --> 0:50:07.400
<v Speaker 1>carry out. And I mean, just think about how this

0:50:07.440 --> 0:50:11.000
<v Speaker 1>applies to modern methods of state sanctioned killing, everything from

0:50:11.080 --> 0:50:16.280
<v Speaker 1>lethal injection to drone strikes. Does the sanitizing and distancing

0:50:16.360 --> 0:50:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and depersonalization opportunity provided by lethal technology encourage us to

0:50:23.680 --> 0:50:28.600
<v Speaker 1>make ourselves able to kill more while feeling less about it. Yeah,

0:50:28.719 --> 0:50:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, ultimately, is the the botched execution that we've

0:50:33.160 --> 0:50:37.120
<v Speaker 1>discussed already, Are those not maybe a more honest depiction

0:50:37.160 --> 0:50:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of what's going on? This this this fallible, um barbaric

0:50:42.040 --> 0:50:47.239
<v Speaker 1>human effort, not this uh precision of the holy blameless machine. Well,

0:50:47.280 --> 0:50:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously we're not going to sit here and

0:50:49.400 --> 0:50:53.359
<v Speaker 1>advocate brutal botched executions with Jack Catch hacking at us

0:50:53.360 --> 0:50:56.680
<v Speaker 1>with a sword or an axe. But yeah, at least

0:50:56.680 --> 0:50:59.560
<v Speaker 1>with that, I'm not saying that's preferable, But I do

0:50:59.600 --> 0:51:02.000
<v Speaker 1>see what you're saying that it's at least there you're

0:51:02.000 --> 0:51:05.520
<v Speaker 1>acknowledging that something brutal and weird is going on, and

0:51:05.560 --> 0:51:07.799
<v Speaker 1>you can't just you know, clean it up in your

0:51:07.800 --> 0:51:10.840
<v Speaker 1>mind and ignore it because you're hearing the screams and

0:51:10.880 --> 0:51:14.000
<v Speaker 1>it's splattering on you, and it's so brutal that it's

0:51:14.000 --> 0:51:16.920
<v Speaker 1>almost funny. You know. It's interesting. You know, in this

0:51:16.960 --> 0:51:20.279
<v Speaker 1>show we talk about innovation and inventions and how how

0:51:20.320 --> 0:51:23.920
<v Speaker 1>they change the world, and and so often you see

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:26.319
<v Speaker 1>that that people have to look back and try to

0:51:26.400 --> 0:51:29.920
<v Speaker 1>figure out what changed and how it changed us. Uh,

0:51:30.000 --> 0:51:33.239
<v Speaker 1>And here we are hundreds of years later looking back

0:51:33.280 --> 0:51:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and saying, well, what did the guillotine mean? What did

0:51:36.239 --> 0:51:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it do? And what are the ultimate ramifications of this advancement. Well,

0:51:42.040 --> 0:51:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I positive that maybe one takeaway from it is that

0:51:45.760 --> 0:51:48.359
<v Speaker 1>the truth is it has showed us that there is

0:51:48.400 --> 0:51:52.320
<v Speaker 1>no good or clean or sanitary way to kill a person,

0:51:52.960 --> 0:51:55.759
<v Speaker 1>and any belief that there is, in fact turns out

0:51:55.800 --> 0:51:59.799
<v Speaker 1>to be a kind of brutalizing and dehumanizing illusion. All

0:52:00.120 --> 0:52:02.719
<v Speaker 1>So that's it for this week's episode of Invention. If

0:52:02.719 --> 0:52:04.239
<v Speaker 1>you want to learn more about the show and check

0:52:04.239 --> 0:52:07.799
<v Speaker 1>out other episodes, head on over to our website invention

0:52:07.960 --> 0:52:12.160
<v Speaker 1>pod dot com. Big thanks to Scott Benjamin for research

0:52:12.160 --> 0:52:16.040
<v Speaker 1>assistance with this episode, Thanks to our audio producer Torii Harrison.

0:52:16.280 --> 0:52:18.000
<v Speaker 1>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:52:18.080 --> 0:52:20.880
<v Speaker 1>directly with feedback on this episode or any other, to

0:52:20.920 --> 0:52:23.480
<v Speaker 1>suggest a topic for the future, or just to say hi,

0:52:23.640 --> 0:52:25.319
<v Speaker 1>let us know how you found out about the show

0:52:26.080 --> 0:52:28.120
<v Speaker 1>where you listen from all that kind of stuff, you

0:52:28.120 --> 0:52:49.680
<v Speaker 1>can email us at contact at invention pod dot com.