WEBVTT - Disney's Subscriber Miss and Google Cloud's AI Plans

0:00:01.639 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>From the heart where Innovation, Money and power. Collie in

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Vallet NBN. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde.

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 2>And Ed Ludlove.

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Heyde of Bloomberg's World headquarters in New York

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 3>and Imed Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:34.200
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, we break down Disney's results. As the media

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 3>giant takes a hit amid the battle for streaming dominance class.

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 5>We'll bring you my conversations from Google io and here

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 5>from the SAP CEO as the company's team up with

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 5>Google Cloud to maximize AI usage, and.

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft announcing it's freezing salaries this year. As the tech

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 3>giant looks to navigate economic uncertainty, we'll bring you the

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 3>details so much more this hour. And the market too

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 3>is trying to navigate economic concertainty at the moment. War

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 3>is about the debt ceiling, worries about the ongoing concerns

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 3>around US banks, and yet tech in outperforms. We're up

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 3>only a tenth of a percent and managed to shake

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 3>off some of the nerves and the rest of the

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 3>market at the moment, we're up just some fifteen points. Now,

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 3>there was economic data that the jobless claim showed some

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:18.759
<v Speaker 3>worry about the slowing in the jobs market, inflatory pressure

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 3>dialing back a little bit when it comes to producer prices,

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 3>the two year yield is coming down on that perhaps

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.320
<v Speaker 3>fall down in the inflationary pressure. But does this mean

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 3>some sort of restrastionary environment? That is probably the watchword

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 3>for today. We're look at KBW bank index under pressure

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 3>with of course pack West the one that we look

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 3>at front and center. Let's stal it on AND's of

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:37.479
<v Speaker 3>cour's happening in terms of the desire to get into

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 3>a haven means the dollar is going higher, it means

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 3>crypto is going lower off by two and a half percent.

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 3>So Bitcoin currently training at twenty seven thousand on the

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 3>day ed. But go into some of the micro the

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 3>earnings and the like.

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, actually, outside of earnings, there's quite a lot of newsflow.

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 4>There's driving these moves.

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 5>Peloton a recall of two point two million bits. We're

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 5>going to get into that late in the show with

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 5>Bloomber's Mark Gunman. But at one point in the session

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 5>that's stock at a record low. It's having an impact.

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 5>Alphabet pair of Google up significantly five percent, biggest jump

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 5>since the first week of February.

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 4>It's trading at August high.

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 5>The market like what it heard about what they're doing

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 5>in the field of AI, and we will hear more

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 5>about that as well. Interesting that some of its peers

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 5>in the AI space, Microsoft and Video a little softer,

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 5>both of them down around to both of them down

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 5>around eight tenths of one percent. Disney is the big

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 5>mover to the downside, and that one is on earnings

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 5>and miss on subscribers and profit in the current period

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 5>a loss will be wider or widening from the past quarter.

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 5>It's interesting because they're still on track to meet that

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 5>cost reduction goal, but there are some worrying signs about

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 5>the cost of streaming. It's streaming or nothing, so let's

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 5>stick with Disney. Bringing bloombergs Chris Palmery from LA That

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 5>subscriber miss Chris was quite interesting because it seems to

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 5>be showing the impact of bringing in an AD supported

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.639
<v Speaker 5>tier in the quarter gone right.

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 6>I mean, some people would argue a cheaper air supported

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 6>a tier would bring in new subscribers, but need out

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 6>for the second quarter has lost Disney plus subscribers overall.

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 4>That's partly with.

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 6>When they introduced the new tier, they really raised the

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 6>cost of the ad free version thirty eight percent, and

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 6>so I think you're definitely seeing some people canceled for

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 6>that reason, and there's concern now have we peaked in

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 6>streaming penetration.

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 4>That's that obviously is worrisome.

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 3>Christy McCarthy, the CFO, though, trying to cast this as

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 3>a blit when it comes to increased spending from a

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 3>marketing perspective, Chris, why don't investor sort of seeing it

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 3>as that.

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 6>Well, you know, that's the thing is that there's been

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 6>so much focus in the last few months and less

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 6>on subscriber growth in these companies and more on let's

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 6>ring profits from this, but now this seems to be

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 6>now a focus on both as well. It's going to

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 6>be difficult. There was a lot of things on the

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 6>call to ponder suggestions. For example, that Dieiger now lights

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 6>the WHO streaming service, wants to keep to that and

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 6>that which means they'll have to buy out the one

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 6>third of WHO that they done. There's also a big

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 6>write off on content that they're now no longer putting

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 6>on the services.

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 4>So at the same time they're talking.

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 6>About raising the cost of the Disney Plus service, they're

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 6>reducing the programming on it, so there's a lot of

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 6>uncertainty and streaming right now.

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 4>And also, I.

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Mean the people who've left from the streaming unit as well,

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 3>the fact that all at the same time they are

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 3>thinking about costs, they are cutting into their labor, into

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 3>their talent pool, and a large lot of that comes

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 3>from the people who actually launched Disney Plus right right, And.

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 6>You know, overall we're in the midst of Disney's in

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 6>the midst of a seven thousand person reduction, hoping to

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 6>say five and a.

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 4>Half million billion dollars in costs.

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 6>You know, this was not the maximum quarter for that.

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 6>It'll be the current one where a lot of the

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 6>people were let go. But there wasn't a lot of discussion.

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 6>They said they're on progress to meet those targets, but

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 6>not a lot of discussion about how much they're really saving.

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 6>And we'll see this year. So that's another concern. The

0:04:57.880 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 6>discussion across.

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 5>Spinningbek Television Radio Morning is whether Disney is a technology

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 5>company or if it's a media and entertainment company.

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 4>And it's interesting the.

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 5>Bright Spot Chris the Park's business technology company that operates

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 5>a park's business.

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 6>Well, they would certainly like to think that they're technologically savvy.

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 6>You know, they have all these you know, you can

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 6>order online, everything's you know, through your app nowadays you're

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 6>you know, you pay a little extra ZiT the app

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 6>and you can cut the line on the rides.

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 4>So there's a whole lot going on there.

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 6>But yeah, but basically this is an experiential business.

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 6>And you know it's certainly in the future we'll all

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 6>be watching things online. But you know, it depends on

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 6>you know, really human interaction to to make those great

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 6>movies and TV shows work. So you know, I would

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 6>put Disney in the media and entertainment category more than tech.

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 7>And Chris, did they mention AI, Yes, it was a

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 7>discussion of that, And you know, I don't think that

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 7>there's there's there seems to be agreement in Hollywood that

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 7>this is not going to completely replace the screenwriter and

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 7>and so we'll see how that plays out in negotiations

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 7>with the writers strike because the writers want that sort

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 7>of in writing.

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, thanks for bringing it back to all things Hollywood

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 3>that you cover as well, Chris, how mary brilliant breakdown

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 3>on what's happening with Disney, and let's talk a little

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 3>bit more about how AI is uphending the way in

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 3>which people are thinking about investing in tech and otherwise

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 3>in the moment, please to just dive into the markets

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:29.280
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more with Sylvia Jablonski. She's to find

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 3>CTF CEO CIO overseeing what nine hundred million dollars in

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 3>assets under management and some of your ETFs really catering

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 3>to the focus on AI at the moment, Sylvia, And

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 3>do you worry that there's hype priced in or are

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:44.160
<v Speaker 3>we underestimating the amount of change and the amount of

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 3>well value that can be found.

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 8>Oh, good wording and great to be here with you today. Well,

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 8>I think that we're you know, I think the rise

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 8>in the stack price this year is you know, perhaps

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 8>on some of the zuber ands over AI. But don't

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 8>forget that twenty twenty too. It's very much a tech

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 8>recession here. So I think a lot of that is

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 8>catch up and then the inertia behind the AI build

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 8>out is something that you know, helped propel gains. But

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 8>I do think it's underestimated. I do think that tech

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 8>has a long way to go, and you know, with

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 8>that comes some other components of tech like semiconductor companies.

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:21.679
<v Speaker 8>For example, AI is just beginning and it's been around

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 8>for a couple of decades, but it is now just

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 8>sort of coming to fruition and becoming monetizable. So if

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 8>you think about what AI can change, it's pretty much

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 8>every sector out there, everything from healthcare you know, robotic surgery,

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 8>research to defense, you know, precise information targeting things like that, banks,

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 8>accuratetit risk, you know, preventing.

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 9>SBB types of crisses.

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 8>So we're just at the beginning of what is going

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 8>to be a major innovation in the way that we

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 8>use technology for the next decade to come.

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 3>It was interesting and yesterday when we had Scale AI

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 3>on and he was saying there's a lot of AI

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 3>tourists is what he's calling them, not much actually being

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 3>applied in the market right here right now. But are

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 3>you thinking along the hype or the reality side of things?

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think it's interesting in your case, Sylvia, because

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 5>Defiance operates the Defiance quantum etf right, real emphasis on

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 5>those companies' best position to take advantage of developments and

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 5>machine learning and quantum computing.

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 4>It's not performed as well.

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:21.679
<v Speaker 5>Here today is an as that one hundred down thirty

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 5>percent last year. What within that basket has worked well

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 5>for you and what has let you down.

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 4>Well?

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 9>So we kind of look at it a little bit differently.

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 9>I think what we try to you know, the way we.

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 8>Try to really cater this product and build this product

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 8>is to give investors access to everything that has to

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 8>do with the future of technology, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 8>So in order to do that, you have to include

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 8>the big generals that are performing well, like the Apples

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 8>and Microsoft's you know, ibms NA videos on the semiconductor side,

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 8>and then you also have to include some of the

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 8>smaller companies like Amberella for example, that will be part

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 8>of the you know, the visual aspect of it.

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 9>So there are a lot of things that have to

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 9>happen in order for AI to work right.

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 8>You need to be able to gather data, you need

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 8>to be able to process data. You need a computer

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 8>that's fast enough to do it. So that's you know,

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 8>that's why it's called quantum, right. Quantum computing and the

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 8>speed to sort of process and use all of the

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 8>data is really the key to.

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:20.679
<v Speaker 9>All of this working right.

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 8>And we already hear the criticisms of that that you

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 8>know AI or you know the initial Bard presentations.

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 9>About bad data, right, so you need all of that.

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 8>So what performed badly well, you know, high interest rates

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 8>and small cap growth stocks perform badly. But when they

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 8>do really, really well is when this innovation truly starts

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 8>to you know, transform industries and take off interest rates

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 8>start coming down, and then you get the whole basket performance.

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 8>For you put the hedge right now or the top

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 8>leading tech companies that are guiding it forward.

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:51.719
<v Speaker 5>Defines quantum ETF up around twelve percent year today. I

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:53.319
<v Speaker 5>think the a's that one hundreds up and twenty two

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 5>percent of something single names. What are the companies that

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 5>excite you most of what you just outlined?

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so I mean for now, just because of the

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:06.839
<v Speaker 8>type of market environment you know we're in, I'm sort

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 8>of sensitive to that. So I'll kind of give you

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 8>the obvious ones. I think Microsoft, I think Google, Apple, Amazon, Navidia,

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 8>A M D on semiconductor. You know, all of these

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 8>companies I name first because right now, they have balance sheets,

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 8>they have cash, they can invest in R and D,

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 8>they can do M and A acquisitions, and you know,

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 8>take over companies like in the case of you know,

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 8>Microsoft big investment in open.

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 9>Ai to get chat GBT going, right.

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 8>So I think that right now they're the companies that

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 8>are going to be sort of the performers and this

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 8>you know, kind of the safest place to sit.

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:40.439
<v Speaker 9>But some of the smaller.

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 8>Plays out there, I think again, like an umbrella we

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 8>just haven't heard about for a really long time, or

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 8>Eve going to pound here. You know, you saw them

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 8>crush earnings. I think these companies are going to start

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 8>coming to the forefront in the.

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 9>Next couple of years as they.

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 8>You know, kind of improve and exceed expectations with their

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 8>innovations that they're working on.

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.719
<v Speaker 3>And Sylvia taking a more macro perspective, can those light

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 3>now aims outperform even if we see growth continue to

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 3>even slow down if we worry that we do hit

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 3>some sort of recessionary environment because the jury seems to

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 3>be out as to whether the tech is some sort

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 3>of safety play in this environment or whether it is

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 3>beholden to macrowing economic environments.

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think it's a great question.

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 8>And I think that all of the you know, major

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 8>kind of indices and sectors and the top performing stocks

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 8>in those sectors are susceptible to what happens in the

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 8>macro environment. And you know, that feels like an obvious answer,

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:32.199
<v Speaker 8>but it's sort of not. I mean, we have a

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 8>unique situation now where we have a FED that has

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 8>you know, kept hitting the gas pedal and rising rates

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 8>and slowing down growth. So there are very few companies

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 8>that can truly, truly withstand that and come out.

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 9>With you know, double digit performance.

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 8>But we have to believe that we're getting towards the

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:47.559
<v Speaker 8>end of that.

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 9>You know, we saw a PPI member.

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 8>It looks like inflation is coming down across all sides CPI, PPI,

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 8>we're seeing, you know, kind of grow slow. So if

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 8>the FED kind of gives us a little bit of

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 8>relief there and these companies that have stood all of

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 8>this can now actually start to spend and increase and

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 8>speed up there R and.

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 9>D and roll out.

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 8>You know, I think it will be a different story,

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 8>and I think tech will need the market. We need

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 8>tech right. We don't have enough people filling jobs. We

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 8>don't have enough factories that can you know, kind of

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:18.319
<v Speaker 8>meet the supply and demand function out there. We had

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 8>so many inventory issues. So tech solves all of this.

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 8>So if anything, the need for tech and increase of

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 8>spending there is going to increase.

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 3>And what about you know, we talk a lot about

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 3>the FED, which is a central bag to the world.

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 4>What about world stocks?

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 3>So what about I looked at Quantum has orangine there

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 3>of course the French company Airbus. How much are you

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 3>thinking about positioning yourself globally? Are there winners in Asia

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 3>as well that you want to be owning?

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 9>Yeah?

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely, And this is very much a global story, right,

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 8>I mean it's it's been, you know, very much discussed

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 8>that the US isn't a race towards artificial intelligence, for example,

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 8>versus China.

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:55.959
<v Speaker 9>So you are going to.

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 8>Have some companies in China that are leading the charge there,

0:12:58.280 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 8>and you're going to have some companies in the US

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 8>that are, you know, kind of catching up there. But

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 8>over all, the ideas to get this global exposure to

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 8>the top companies that are investing in machine learning, AI

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 8>and quantum computing.

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 5>All right, thanks to Sylvia Jablonski's CEO and CIL the

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 5>defiant ETFs.

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 4>Good to see.

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 10>We take a number of steps to try and increase

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 10>the factuality of the information.

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>The first that we do is we train our models.

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 10>To actually understand what is the information on the web

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 10>that corroborates it, that backs up the information, and if

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 10>we can't corroborate it, then we will not output.

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 4>It, and you just won't show We just want to

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:40.199
<v Speaker 4>do the US.

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 10>We won't show a piece of information. And if we

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 10>think a particular query is unsafe, it's harmful, then we

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 10>will also not provide an AI power.

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 5>At Snapshot, Liz Read Carolina, twenty year veteran of Google,

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 5>we wanted to know what search with generative AI looks like.

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 5>They went on stage and demoed it and it became

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 5>really clear what it actually looks like to the consumer.

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 3>But what's so interesting about the path that Alphabet and

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 3>Google are taking is a cautious one that almost sort

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 3>of the antiphasis to the way in which Microsoft has

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 3>folded it in with being they're really aware that this

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:17.559
<v Speaker 3>can't go wrong. I thought it was interesting that they're

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 3>calling it a lab.

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 5>Yes, so just like with BARD, they will do a

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 5>waitlisted slow roll out for access testing initially, but we

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 5>also saw how it relates to docs and sheets and

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 5>everyday things that people use.

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 4>And you look at the market reaction. They've really cheered it.

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 5>So slow rollout, but substantive evidence of progress. Here's another

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 5>Google story for you. By the way, Caroline, SAP and

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 5>Google Cloud just announced an extensive expansion of their partnership

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 5>to make enterprise data more open and valuable and to

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 5>advance enterprise AI development. I spoke all about that with

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 5>the Google Cloud CEO Thomas Currian and the SAP CEO

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 5>Christian Client earlier this week.

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 11>Have a listen, sales teams can sell the new offering.

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 11>It will happen, you know, on one paper, with one

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 11>commercial offering, so we actually simplifying it. And actually for us,

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 11>it was actually very important that it comes with an

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 11>attractive price because this has.

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 4>To be a win win win situations.

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 11>Of course, yeah, we want to give our customers more

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 11>reasons to go to SAP and Google, but of course

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 11>we also want to offer this new solution at a

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 11>very attractive price point.

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 5>And Thomas, we come to you and ask how does

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 5>Google Cloud make money from this arrangement?

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Most importantly, I would say, what's the value that customers

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 2>get out of this? Customers get the value they can

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 2>improve their understanding of customer, of their end customers or helping,

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 2>for example, Reschmall in the luxury industry, do that customers

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 2>can improve the way they manage inventory. The work that

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 2>are two organizations that done at home depot, customers can

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 2>be more recise in responding. For example, if you're e

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 2>commerce company and you're making commitments to deliver products on time,

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 2>as we've done with Marcado Libre, customers can plan better

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 2>as our two organizations have helped Motiformed. So the value

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 2>that we both bring is helping people use their business

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 2>systems SAP and Google cloud their data and to transform

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 2>the way that this of customers and manage their business.

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 2>That's what drives value and that's what brings customers to

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 2>both of us.

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 5>Christian In the competitive landscape for corporate applications, you look

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 5>at what Microsoft's done to move early to bring AI

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 5>into corporate applications. I'm thinking about of course Dynamics three

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 5>sixty five Copilot is one example. How much of this

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 5>arrangement is you being conscious of that competitive landscape right now?

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 11>And a good piece is at a lot of partners,

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 11>especially in AI, they are reaching out to SAP because

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 11>I feel a lot of companies have one challenge today

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:13.439
<v Speaker 11>they are buying AI technology, but what about adoption? And

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 11>now thick about it, eighty percent of the world's transactions

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 11>are touched by an SEP system. So if you're going

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 11>to embed machine learning and going forward generative AI in

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 11>our products, you're immediately going to see high adoption and

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 11>you immediately unfold a lot of value for the customers

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 11>in their business processes. And this is why we are

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 11>so excited about AI and about this partnership, because you

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 11>also need high quality data to really pring AI to

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 11>the next level.

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 5>And to that point, Thomas, both parties are expressing confidence

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 5>that open data cloud is going to basically spur innovation

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 5>in the field of AI.

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 4>What does that look like.

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 2>First of all, we've fundamentally believe data has a critical

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 2>asset for a company, and it's both SAPA and Google's

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 2>joint belief that that should be open so people can

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 2>use whatever tools they want to access the data. Second,

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 2>we are unlocking data and simplifying the use of that

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 2>data in the context of business processes that large customers have.

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the world's largest, most sophisticated companies in virtually

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 2>every industry round SAP, many are using Google Cloud. The

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 2>combination is unlocking how AI is applied every day. Think

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 2>about a merchandising manager in e commerce trying to figure

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:44.640
<v Speaker 2>out how much inventory and what product do I maintain

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 2>in what location? A supply chain manager trying to figure

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 2>out where do I need to put capacity in which country.

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.439
<v Speaker 2>Every one of those customers and many more will be

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 2>able to use our joint solution to open up how

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 2>AI is going to help them every day in their

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 2>day to day work.

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, on that note, Thomas, are there any specific verticals

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 5>where you expect this relationship with SAP to help you

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:14.719
<v Speaker 5>do better than AWS and azure?

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, we have very strong partnerships in many verticals manufacturing, automotive, retail, healthcare,

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 2>supply chain, and logistics. These are all different industries in

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 2>which we work very closely with the SAP team. There

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 2>are a super strategic partner with us, not just in

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 2>how we bring solutions to customers, but also in the

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 2>deep engineering collaboration and every step as we evolve our

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 2>offerings together. We think it'll bring value and competitive differentiation.

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Just a brilliant interview and really assessing how this is

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 3>going to impact enterprise. Google House CEO there as well

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 3>as the SAP CEO ed.

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, there was an interesting one to conduct as well.

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:02.880
<v Speaker 5>Between two big name CEOs are coming up. Microsoft buckling

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 5>down on the costs during a time of mounting economic uncertainty.

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 5>More of the changes to work as salary's coming up next.

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 4>Karen, And this is an interesting one.

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Another company we're watching at Chinese company JD dot com

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 3>e commerce giant Okay just announced that it's relatively recent

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 3>CEO is actually gonna be retiring already, although a long

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 3>term person at the business, handing over the reins to

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 3>a female CFO. As this is a company that is

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 3>struggling with a focus on profitability at this moment. Shares

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 3>spiking up more than three percent corn of sales. Earnings

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 3>actually did beat and the estimates. It's a slowdown when

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 3>they managed to beat what the street had anticipated. From

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 3>New York from San Francisco, this is a bloomberg. It's

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:00.360
<v Speaker 3>time now for talking tech. First up, Honheim reports its

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.360
<v Speaker 3>third straight quarterly profit miss look. It's the company that's

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 3>the main assembler for most of Apple's signature devices. It's

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 3>a rebound in the iPhone sales last quarter just failed

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 3>to offset the weakness and the overall smartphone market. Meanwhile,

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 3>SoftBank's Vision Fund look as we're losing money again. That's

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 3>despite the rebound in tech stocks here in the United States.

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 3>The unit lost about two billion dollars in March. From

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 3>March even, and its investments in startups in particular, the

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 3>private company has fallen about ninety percent during the year. Meanwhile,

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 3>though the firms are unit that posted some record revenue

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 3>on a quarter a union basis, but some mixed results.

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 3>That's a SoftBank pairs to take that chip designer public

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 3>plus Microsoft. It's freezing pay for all full time workers

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 3>this year for what it says to help navigate macroeconomic uncertainty. However,

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 3>it will consider raising rates for hourly workers. It's the

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 3>latest US tech leader to really tighten its belt for

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 3>investments in other areas.

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 4>En Yeah, we're going to go to Disney next.

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 5>I'm looking at the shares down the most since November,

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 5>subscriber miss widening loss.

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 4>We've got to get to that conversation. This is Bloomberg.

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 9>Welcome back to Bluemare Technology.

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Hyde in New York and our.

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 5>Meed Lovelow and San Francisco News data earnings. We better

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 5>get a check in on these markets when it comes

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 5>to the technology sector. Actually and a's that one hundred

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 5>slightly outperforming up three tens percent relative to a slightly

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 5>down market. But there's underperformance in chip stocks. A part

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 5>of that some names giving up recent gains, some moving

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 5>to the downside. Maybe some repositioning on who the leading horses.

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 4>In the AI race.

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 5>Interesting as well as to look at the yield on

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 5>US ten years softer buy around six and a half

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 5>basis point seven basis points three point three seven percent

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 5>Bitcoin as well, we're going back towards twenty seven thousand

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 5>US dollars per token. That was a level we were

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 5>at at the end of March. We've lost some momentum

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 5>when it comes to the biggest cryptocurrency by market cap.

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 4>In the equity there is one clear move.

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.439
<v Speaker 5>To the downside, and that is Disney, dropping by the

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 5>most since November. Is subscribe a miss and looking at

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 5>a widening loss, which the company describes as a blip.

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 4>It's all streaming, Carrie, The story is streaming.

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 5>No matter how much we wanted to talk about parks

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 5>and whether this is a tech company or a media

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 5>and entertainment company, we are talking about streaming, and.

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about the tech angle with none other than

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Rich Greenfield. He's in the house here in New York

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 3>Lightshed Partners. Of course, I mean you said it. We

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 3>made it in to talk about this today because you

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 3>don't often see a juggernaut like this move eight percent

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 3>of the downside.

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 12>This is a pretty big move for Disney, and I

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 12>think you're seeing sort of the whole media.

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Sectors under a lot of pressure.

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 12>And it's because the traditional, the core business of many

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 12>of these media companies are broadcasting cable networks, and you're

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 12>just seeing those businesses really really struggle. I mean, cord

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 12>cutting is accelerating. You're you know, you're seeing that from

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 12>all of the major players, whether that's Comcast or Charter.

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 12>You've seen it with Issue, just seeing really a real

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 12>acceleration in cord cutting, meeting high single digits.

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing companies like Comcasts have double.

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 12>Digit declines in their video subscriber businesses. That's having a

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 12>real impact on companies like Disney. You saw it at

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 12>Paramount last week with a huge move to the downside,

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 12>and Paramount forced them to cut their dividend. All of

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:22.680
<v Speaker 12>these companies are struggling with what is the future there,

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 12>because remember streaming, they're losing money.

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they're cutting the losses as you.

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 12>Just profiled, which is good, but their core businesses are

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 12>facing more and more headwinds where revenues both subscription revenue

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 12>and advertising revenue are going down and their cost structures

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 12>are going up, and their only choice is to massively

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 12>cut costs. And that's what you're seeing across the board

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:43.120
<v Speaker 12>and media now.

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Or indeed charge us more when we do get addicted

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 3>to sentence of screen mass The overall view of Disney

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 3>Plus is charge them for it or get good advertising.

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 12>I think Disney Plus is very similar to what you're

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 12>seeing out of w Warner Brothers, Discovery WBD. You're seeing

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 12>similar strategies of both company wanted to be Netflix, Like

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 12>their goal was to take on and be Netflix, meaning

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 12>a little bit of something for everyone. It was not

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 12>just HBO within HBO Max now called Max. I think

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 12>with Disney they were trying to be a little bit

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:15.400
<v Speaker 12>of everything, really broadened out the programming, and I think

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:18.439
<v Speaker 12>what you're seeing now is really a contraction back to

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 12>what their core is. HBO is really centering back on HBO.

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:24.919
<v Speaker 12>Disney is sort of saying we're going to cut a

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 12>billion and a half of content out of the pipeline

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:30.439
<v Speaker 12>as well as on the service itself. They just aren't

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 12>equipped really financially to go compete at the level of

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 12>what Netflix is trying to do globally. I think it's

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 12>actually a very very bullish sign for anyone looking at

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 12>this space.

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>You should be buying Netflix this morning.

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 12>I mean, that is the career takeaway is that Netflix

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 12>is increasingly quote unquote one.

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 5>Rich consolidation of platforms. The combination of Hulu and Disney Plus.

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 5>This is what Bobaga had to say. There seems to

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 5>be real value in general having general entertainment combined with

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:04.959
<v Speaker 5>Disney Plus and if ultimately Hulu's that solution with botish

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 5>about that?

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 4>Ay boitish about that?

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 12>Well, it's really interesting, honestly, because ed just a few

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 12>months ago Iiger was talking about how general entertainment was

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:19.399
<v Speaker 12>undifferentiated sort of you know, sort of calling into question

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 12>the future of Hulu. They had retained that in usent

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 12>Bank to look at selling Hulu. My guess is they

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 12>couldn't find a buyer for Hulu, and they realized that

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 12>they really have no choice other than to absorb it,

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 12>and so I think and they're also looking at Disney

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:34.360
<v Speaker 12>Plus slowing, and so they're looking at broadening the content out.

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 12>But remember what they announced last night is not really

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 12>a combination of Disney Plus and Hulu. If you subscribe

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 12>to both, you'll see a Hulu tile inside of Disney Plus.

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 12>You won't even get all of the content that's on

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 12>Hulu inside of that Disney Plus tile. You'll have to

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 12>go to the Hulu app for all of the content.

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:54.879
<v Speaker 12>But it really I think the key trigger is this

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 12>essentially is a signed to Wall Street into the broader

0:26:57.720 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 12>media industry.

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Disney knows they're going to be buying Hulu.

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 12>It's probably going to cost them at a minimum nine billion,

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 12>but probably ten, eleven, twelve or thirteen billion dollars to

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 12>buy comcasts out of their Hulu stake, and I think

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:12.880
<v Speaker 12>that's also adding to the pressure on Disney stock because

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 12>it's another financial burden that's coming over the course of

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:16.640
<v Speaker 12>the next twelve.

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Or eighteen months.

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 5>Rich are Star Wars fans out there in the audience

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 5>will notice they're going into May the fourth there were

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 5>in platform and out platform ads about all of the

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 5>content that was coming relating to that may the fourth

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 5>be with you date? Was that the shifting marketing costs

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 5>that the CFO blamed a widening loss on.

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:38.400
<v Speaker 12>Look, I think one of the big questions for Disney

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 12>this is broader than just your question on Star Wars.

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 12>A lot of the core franchises have not been firing

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:46.920
<v Speaker 12>on all cylinders. I mean, look, even Guardians of the Galaxy,

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:50.159
<v Speaker 12>very well reviewed third film is clearly doing worse than

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 12>the second film. There is really questions, you know, you

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:56.679
<v Speaker 12>saw it with Black Panther like, Disney's having trouble both

0:27:56.760 --> 0:28:00.200
<v Speaker 12>in their sort of live action film making with their

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 12>major franchises as well as animation. I mean, animation is

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 12>probably the story no one's talking enough about. I mean,

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:10.400
<v Speaker 12>last night on the call, Bob Iger congratulated Universal, a competitor,

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 12>on their animation success with Super Mario. The lifeblood of

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 12>Disney is animation, and ed think about what was the

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 12>last Disney animated movie that.

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>People were really excited about.

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 12>It's been years now, and they're really getting beaten to

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 12>the punch day after day by Universal. And I think

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 12>it's a problem for Disney. And I think it's what Iiger.

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:32.120
<v Speaker 12>I think more than anything, Iiger is slowing down production,

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 12>focusing on quality over quantity. So it's absolutely the right

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 12>decision for Iger to do. The problem is, it's not

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 12>a quick fix. Last time, when he came in originally

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 12>to Disney the very first time, what did he do.

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 12>What was his quick fix was buying Pixar. There's no

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 12>quick fix. It takes years to turn around animation and

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 12>even just content. More broadly, you don't just change your

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 12>movie schedule overnight. And so this is I think sort

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 12>of what you're seeing in terms of investors. They're becoming

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 12>aware that the fix for Disney is going to take time.

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 5>Fantasia nineteen forty. To answer your question, Caroline, what Disney

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 5>faces is problems in common with the rest of the industry,

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 5>one of them being a writer's strike in Hollywood.

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and to that end, costly labor at a time

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 3>where they need people to be writing just rich How

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 3>much is that? Obviously we're seeing overall people worrying about

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 3>writers strike, about the cost of labor, about trying to

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 3>tintrim down. Is this something that affects Disney in particular

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 3>that we spoke about it.

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 12>On the Well, I think you should think about all

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 12>of these companies are losing leave off Netflix, which is

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 12>making billions in you know, ebitdah and free cash flow.

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 12>But all of the other legacy media companies, whether it's

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 12>Disney or paramount ors, Comcast, NBCUniversal, they're losing not a billion,

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 12>they're losing billions on streaming. So anything that slows production

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 12>is actually, in the short term financially on.

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>A cash basis, is actually good for them.

0:29:57.000 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 12>I meaning they will lose less money this year because

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 12>of a long strike. That's sort of perverse, but that's

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 12>essentially what's actually good for these companies on a cash basis.

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 12>The problem is, and I think this is the obvious one,

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 12>a long writer strike clearly is going to impact linear television.

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Come the fall.

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 12>You may not see a lot of your favorite shows

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 12>on air because you need writers for these shows on

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 12>linear TV for people that are still watching linear TV.

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 12>And yes, it's shrunk a lot, but it's still a

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 12>pretty big business for these companies financially, and so that's

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 12>going to have an impact.

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Plus, if the strike goes on long.

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 12>Enough, meaning the fall September October, then you start to

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 12>actually start to impact how much content is on these

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 12>streaming services, and that could also be a problem for

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 12>these companies in terms of keeping subscribers. You saw people

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 12>were clearly frustrated with Disney losing subscribers. Not a big

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 12>number in the US, but lost a little bit of

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 12>their subscriber base last night. That's something they haven't sort

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 12>of seen from Disney in the past.

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 3>There are more immediate headline gramming lines for us to

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 3>focus on with Disney today. But AI did get its

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 3>way there a bit, and it feeds into the right

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 3>to strike and what they're worried about at the moment.

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 3>Is AI in any way you going to help hendags need?

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 3>Do you think is something to be talking about.

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 12>Look, I think AI is a category, is something that

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 12>can help production. Obviously, there's ways that it can speed production,

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 12>certainly if you think about what you can do with

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 12>it creatively. I actually think for most of the media industry,

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:22.719
<v Speaker 12>I think AI is certainly a risk in the short term,

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 12>not because of piracy. I actually think about what the

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 12>greatest risk of AI right now is imagine the quality

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 12>of content on YouTube, on TikTok, on Instagram reels.

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 1>The better that content.

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 12>We're in a war for time, if you think about

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 12>everything is a war for time. If all of a sudden,

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 12>the content that some random person can create on their

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 12>own and put up on TikTok, or create their own newscast,

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 12>whatever it may be. Like, all of that creates competition

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 12>for eyeballs. And I think when you're talking about advertising,

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 12>you're already seeing the impact that things like Netflix are

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 12>having on taking ad dollars away from traditional media.

0:31:57.240 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, next week's the big TV up front.

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 12>Now imagine the quality of sort of user generated content

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 12>getting meaningfully better or rich.

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 4>That's what I do, wor Rich.

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 5>Let's go back then to our question of the day,

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 5>which is is Disney a technology company or is it

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 5>just simply a media and entertainment company.

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 4>Very quickly, I.

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Would say it's neither. Disney's an IP company.

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 12>They're probably the best historically at creating IP and monetizing

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 12>it through the flywheel of all of Disney's engines. The

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 12>challenge is their IP hasn't been as good and the

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 12>reason you're seeing, look what happened with their consumer products

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 12>business last night, down dramatically year over year. I think

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 12>the creative engines of Disney not are bad. Certainly, I

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 12>think a lot of other companies would love to have

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 12>disney struggles, right, because their struggles are still better than

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 12>a lot of other companies, but relative to where Disney's

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 12>been over the last five years, Certainly, if you think

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 12>about Iiger's first run where he sort of went off

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 12>into the sunset with this incredible run in twenty nineteen,

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 12>Disney is certainly not firing.

0:32:57.240 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 1>At that level creatively that they were back.

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 12>In nineteen, and I think that's what investors are concerned

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 12>about and looking for them to turn around.

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 5>All right, rach Greenfield Likeshed Partners. Thank you very much

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 5>for your time.

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me, Caroline.

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm still psyched about seeing Little Mermaid. Meanwhile, coming up

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 3>the impact of China US relations on tech investing in

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 3>the US and abroad. We're going to discuss at all.

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Mitchell green from lead Edge Capital is going to be next.

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Also that we want to keep a close sign what's

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 3>happening in the world of banking.

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 9>Pack West.

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 3>It does indeed, lend areas in SF and deposits falling

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 3>nine point five percent last week after we reported that

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 3>the Lendo was in talks for potential investors. That the

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 3>anxiety around the US banking system is still fresh.

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg.

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 13>American shine of a lot of common interest climate, nuclear pliferation,

0:34:03.080 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 13>anti terrorism, global stability, you know, and we have differences.

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:10.720
<v Speaker 13>You know, we're capitalist, they're not, you know, and it's okay,

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 13>we could short that out, but we need to keep

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 13>the Western alliances together, not just around war and Ukraine,

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 13>but around strategic economic or leaderships including trade.

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 5>That was JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Diamond there talking

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 5>about the global landscape and the context of rising tensions

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 5>between China and the US. This comment comes as US

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 5>National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan sat down with China's top

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 5>diplomat Wang Yi in Vienna earlier today, as the White

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 5>House is seeking to keep relations from getting worse that

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 5>according to a US official, I want to go deeper

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 5>on China in today's VC Spotlight with Mitchell Green, CEO

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:54.359
<v Speaker 5>of lead Edge Capital five billion dollars in assets under management.

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:57.720
<v Speaker 5>You are a VC who has been bullish on China.

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 5>When you hear Jamie Diamond and the news flow of

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:05.320
<v Speaker 5>the day, do you remain bullish on China?

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:10.280
<v Speaker 14>I think long term we are bullish, you know, predicting that.

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:11.839
<v Speaker 14>Thanks so much for having me on. By the way,

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:15.840
<v Speaker 14>I think long term. We definitely are bullish. Your term,

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 14>like I think it's going to be, will be bumpy.

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 14>It's continued to be bumpy. But I think we would

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:22.880
<v Speaker 14>also you know, look, we are not I am not

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 14>going to come out here and pontificate about the macro

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:29.879
<v Speaker 14>and you foreign relations with you know, countries around the world.

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 15>That's pretty much the last thing we are experts on.

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 14>But I do think an open dialogue between our countries,

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 14>and I think it is important that both countries realize

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:43.400
<v Speaker 14>that both of us need each other, and you know,

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 14>and you know, a military council would be absolutely horrible

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:47.760
<v Speaker 14>for both countries.

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:51.719
<v Speaker 5>You were an investor pre IPO in Ali Baba, and

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:53.840
<v Speaker 5>there is a debate, at least in the conversations that

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 5>I'm having out here in Silicon Valley in your industry

0:35:57.480 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 5>about not just whether you should put capital into Chinese

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:04.440
<v Speaker 5>domicile startups, but if you should take money from Chinese

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:05.840
<v Speaker 5>China based LPs.

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 4>Where do you sit in that debate?

0:36:08.960 --> 0:36:12.319
<v Speaker 14>We we would definitely be willing to take capital from

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 14>We do not have any actually I take it back,

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:18.880
<v Speaker 14>we have one Asian LP, but we would take additional

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 14>capital like our companies, you know, which are primarily North

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 14>American Europe based, so that we obviously we're investors in

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:27.279
<v Speaker 14>Alibab and we have an investment in byte Dance and

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 14>and financial like you know, just like we would we

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:33.399
<v Speaker 14>want to have in our next fund which are raised

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:34.799
<v Speaker 14>in a few years, we want to have more Middle

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:37.799
<v Speaker 14>Eastern LPs. I would see nothing wrong with that. In

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 14>Chinese LPs or Korean LPs and things like that. There

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:43.279
<v Speaker 14>are there are some challenges in some of these other

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:47.280
<v Speaker 14>countries in Asia with getting money out of the country,

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 14>so they need to have been like you know, they

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 14>need to have the right structures in place. But like

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 14>I have nothing philosophically against it at all. Probably the opposite,

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 14>I'd love to have.

0:36:57.280 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 3>Mitchell, what about just the ecosystem which we build here

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 3>in the US or indeed in Asia or Europe, the

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:09.880
<v Speaker 3>regulatory building blocks being built fast enough enough or with

0:37:10.000 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 3>indeed enough focus and knowledge behind them. We think about

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:17.920
<v Speaker 3>cryptos startups being frustrated. We think about AI startups looking

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:20.800
<v Speaker 3>for leadership when it comes to the guard rails already

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:22.760
<v Speaker 3>in place. Do you feel that we've got that safely

0:37:22.760 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 3>in the US to thrive in the startup scene.

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 14>I think what's interesting is that regulation in China happens

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 14>like extremely fast, and it's like, you know, like decisions

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 14>are made by a very small group of people and

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 14>made very quickly. You know, the largest tech companies in

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 14>the United States, you know, sure hold a lot of

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:47.280
<v Speaker 14>market power and can dictate which companies you know, fail

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 14>and succeed, and you know what companies pay.

0:37:50.120 --> 0:37:52.040
<v Speaker 15>And small companies they can make it. You know, they

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 15>can make distribution.

0:37:53.560 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 14>Distribution is very tight nowadays in terms of you know,

0:37:57.120 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 14>there's only a handful of big internet companies that are

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 14>all small save smaller companies need to try to get

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 14>distribution through to grow. The Chinese government just like put

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 14>a kebash on it with with with you know, ten

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 14>Cent and Ali Baba like just decided this wasn't like

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 14>a ten year debate, which is going.

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 15>To happen in the United States. There is a lot

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 15>more regulation that.

0:38:15.239 --> 0:38:18.319
<v Speaker 14>Is needed around all this cryptocurrencies.

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:21.279
<v Speaker 15>You know, we're pretty bearish on a lot of these things.

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 14>I think they're here to stay, but I think somebod

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 14>these don't have real use cases where I think the

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:27.400
<v Speaker 14>Chinese have done actually.

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 15>A pretty good job with a lot of the regular

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:29.720
<v Speaker 15>regulatory things.

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:32.719
<v Speaker 14>AI is going to AI is going to open up

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:33.880
<v Speaker 14>a whole new can of worms.

0:38:34.200 --> 0:38:35.400
<v Speaker 15>My guess is they will.

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:38.319
<v Speaker 14>Figure out how you know, I Joe China has run

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 14>like a corporation the US. I mean, I just invite

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:45.000
<v Speaker 14>you to watch congressional hearings about Facebook and TikTok.

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 15>And you know it is.

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 14>It is quite amazing, and I think we have a

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:50.400
<v Speaker 14>lot of but I think it's going to take a

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 14>while for regulatory frameworks to come into place, given the

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:57.440
<v Speaker 14>lack of knowledge it appears and people you know in Washington.

0:38:57.640 --> 0:39:01.280
<v Speaker 3>So despite that lack of AI regulation as it stands,

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 3>are you backing founders coming to you at the moment

0:39:03.719 --> 0:39:06.320
<v Speaker 3>looking to build in the artificial intelligence space? What you

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 3>make of the rate at which companies are sort of

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:10.760
<v Speaker 3>dubbing themselves an AI business?

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:16.200
<v Speaker 14>So all these hype cycles like come and go, right,

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:18.319
<v Speaker 14>Remember a few years ago everybody said we'd have self

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:21.920
<v Speaker 14>driving cars and you know, you know, taxis, ubers and

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 14>everything would disappear. Pretty sure, I still drive to the office,

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:27.799
<v Speaker 14>and I bet you do as well. AI is going

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:30.040
<v Speaker 14>to change the worlds. You know, like if you call

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:32.919
<v Speaker 14>a Delta Airlines call center, there's no reason you should

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 14>sit on hold for forty five minutes to just get

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 14>somebody who you know, probably has to get somebody else.

0:39:37.280 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 15>To help you. Ninety five percent of that can be

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 15>solved to the computers.

0:39:40.480 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 14>Coding is going to dramatically change, you know, email, all this,

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:45.879
<v Speaker 14>All these things are going to change.

0:39:46.160 --> 0:39:48.320
<v Speaker 15>It's just going to take longer than people think.

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:51.400
<v Speaker 14>But absolutely, Like we're in business ward, a lot of

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 14>these companies are still quite small, and we tend to

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 14>invest in companies with like, you know, ten million to

0:39:57.000 --> 0:39:59.880
<v Speaker 14>two hundred million of revenues. But absolutely in bessem are

0:39:59.880 --> 0:40:02.440
<v Speaker 14>just announced they're going to put bestmer Venture Partners just

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:04.239
<v Speaker 14>announced they want to put a billion dollars in the

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 14>like startups in the space.

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:08.719
<v Speaker 5>Make sure given the size of your target companies. I

0:40:08.760 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 5>want to ask you about venture debt. Bloomberg writing about

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:15.360
<v Speaker 5>the data this morning, the venture debt has gone from

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 5>record levels last year to twenty seventeen levels in the

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 5>first quarter of this year. How closely do you track that?

0:40:24.680 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 15>You could have said the same thing for venture funding

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:27.400
<v Speaker 15>financing too.

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:31.520
<v Speaker 14>Look, we've lost in you know, not long ago, and

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:33.880
<v Speaker 14>I don't know if it was late late March, early April,

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 14>like Silicon Valley Bank was a major provider of venture debt.

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 14>Obviously the shell exists, but it's been acquired, so we'll

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:45.240
<v Speaker 14>see v As.

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:48.919
<v Speaker 15>Venture financing is down, venture debt will also be down.

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:51.279
<v Speaker 15>These things come in cycles.

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:54.800
<v Speaker 14>Like I think it's frankly like if you liked investing

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:59.759
<v Speaker 14>in software, Internet, AI, growth businesses, healthcare businesses and two

0:40:59.760 --> 0:41:03.719
<v Speaker 14>the nineteen in twenty twenty, Yeah, sure, just like if

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 14>you liked.

0:41:04.040 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 15>Him in two thousand and six, two thousand and seven.

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:07.759
<v Speaker 14>The way you made a lot of money, he was

0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:09.719
<v Speaker 14>doing it in two thousand and nine and twenty ten.

0:41:09.880 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 14>Like we think the next couple of years of least

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:14.840
<v Speaker 14>some of the best vintages in like you know, growth

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 14>equity and venture over the next you know, just because

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:18.880
<v Speaker 14>the best time of invest is in a recession.

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:21.560
<v Speaker 3>Keep it on being persistent, Mitchell Green me, thank you

0:41:21.640 --> 0:41:31.839
<v Speaker 3>so much. See lead edge capsule there, I'm now what's

0:41:31.840 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 3>going Viral shares a peloton falling the MoWest point in

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 3>almost seven months. That's after the fitness company recalled get

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 3>this two point two million bikes due to a safety

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:42.920
<v Speaker 3>hazard with the seat. Mark German break it down for

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 3>us again, another knock.

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, thank you was always for having me. This is

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:50.239
<v Speaker 16>the fourth recall in the history of Peloton, right, this

0:41:50.280 --> 0:41:53.479
<v Speaker 16>is less significant than the treadmill Peloton recall a couple

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 16>of years ago where people actually died because of the device.

0:41:57.000 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 16>This is an issue with the seat post on the bike,

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:02.000
<v Speaker 16>so that is the metal part that attaches the seat

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:04.080
<v Speaker 16>sort of the saddle on the bike that you sit

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:06.920
<v Speaker 16>on well using it to the actual core frame of

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:09.880
<v Speaker 16>the bike and in some cases the weld joint that

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 16>area could break off and you could fall off the bike.

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 16>There have been a few dozen cases. There have been

0:42:15.560 --> 0:42:19.440
<v Speaker 16>a few injuries. Some bruises are mentioned. The most significant

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:22.759
<v Speaker 16>injury that was mentioned is a fractured risk. Obviously, none

0:42:22.800 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 16>of that is good. Peloton and the US Commission that

0:42:26.680 --> 0:42:30.239
<v Speaker 16>handles Products Safety today announce the recall two point two

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:31.759
<v Speaker 16>million units in the.

0:42:31.800 --> 0:42:32.760
<v Speaker 4>US and Canada.

0:42:33.480 --> 0:42:36.319
<v Speaker 16>They're offering an ad home fix, a replacement part, and

0:42:36.360 --> 0:42:38.399
<v Speaker 16>a video for you to replace it yourself. But as

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:41.160
<v Speaker 16>of now, if you have an impacted bike, these are

0:42:41.160 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 16>the original bikes. They're recommending you stop using it until

0:42:43.560 --> 0:42:44.480
<v Speaker 16>the fix is installed.

0:42:45.440 --> 0:42:47.880
<v Speaker 5>Right, and it doesn't impact owners in the UK, Germany

0:42:48.000 --> 0:42:51.680
<v Speaker 5>or Australia. Our thanks to Bloomberg's Mark German. All right,

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:54.839
<v Speaker 5>so that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology, Caroline, Yeah, you.

0:42:54.800 --> 0:42:56.799
<v Speaker 3>Do not want to forget about our podcast. They catch

0:42:56.840 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 3>up on all of it on the Terminal, online, on Apple, Spotify.

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:03.000
<v Speaker 3>iHeart from New York. From San Francisco, this is a

0:43:03.000 --> 0:43:03.480
<v Speaker 3>Breenberg

0:43:06.440 --> 0:43:06.480
<v Speaker 10>H