WEBVTT - Top 5 Needle Drops (Pt. 2)

0:00:21.285 --> 0:00:25.515
<v Speaker 1>Film Spotting is presented by Regal Unlimited, the all-you-can-watch movie

0:00:25.575 --> 0:00:28.395
<v Speaker 1>subscription pass that pays for itself in just two visits.

0:00:28.935 --> 0:00:32.895
<v Speaker 1>See any standard 2D movie, anytime, with no blackout dates

0:00:32.975 --> 0:00:35.754
<v Speaker 1>or restrictions. Sign up now on the Regal app or

0:00:35.894 --> 0:00:38.735
<v Speaker 1>at the link in our description and use code FILMSPOT26

0:00:38.875 --> 0:00:40.145
<v Speaker 1>to receive 15% off.

0:00:45.864 --> 0:00:47.805
<v Speaker 2>What kind of a show are you guys putting on

0:00:47.845 --> 0:00:48.325
<v Speaker 2>here today?

0:00:48.465 --> 0:00:49.505
<v Speaker 1>You're not interested in art?

0:00:49.685 --> 0:00:49.865
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:00:50.114 --> 0:00:51.335
<v Speaker 4>Well, look, we're going to do this thing.

0:00:51.355 --> 0:00:52.595
<v Speaker 5>We're going to have a conversation.

0:00:55.215 --> 0:00:57.535
<v Speaker 3>Hey, film spotters, Adam and Josh here.

0:00:57.735 --> 0:01:01.374
<v Speaker 5>It is time for part two of our top five

0:01:01.475 --> 0:01:04.895
<v Speaker 5>movie needle drops. Josh, I think we've had everybody on

0:01:05.015 --> 0:01:07.385
<v Speaker 5>pins and needles anticipating.

0:01:08.025 --> 0:01:08.445
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure.

0:01:08.584 --> 0:01:10.725
<v Speaker 5>Three through one. I mean, it was such a tease.

0:01:11.105 --> 0:01:17.185
<v Speaker 5>Hopefully it was some good conversation, some illuminating, insights about

0:01:17.985 --> 0:01:22.145
<v Speaker 5>some great scenes, some great music. Maybe illuminating is too

0:01:22.164 --> 0:01:24.735
<v Speaker 5>strong a word. It's what we strive for occasionally here

0:01:24.795 --> 0:01:27.335
<v Speaker 5>on Film Spotting, but we've still got the best ahead

0:01:27.354 --> 0:01:27.574
<v Speaker 5>of us.

0:01:28.414 --> 0:01:31.774
<v Speaker 1>We've got The B-side. We've offered a double album of

0:01:31.815 --> 0:01:35.014
<v Speaker 1>film spotting this week. And I don't know, are B-sides

0:01:35.074 --> 0:01:37.515
<v Speaker 1>considered usually better or a letdown?

0:01:37.535 --> 0:01:39.524
<v Speaker 3>Usually the throwaways, I think. I know.

0:01:39.535 --> 0:01:42.745
<v Speaker 1>So it's the opposite. Let's not say B-side. Let's say

0:01:42.785 --> 0:01:44.145
<v Speaker 1>double album, okay?

0:01:44.164 --> 0:01:44.804
<v Speaker 3>Double album.

0:01:45.065 --> 0:01:46.524
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Let's go that.

0:01:47.265 --> 0:01:51.065
<v Speaker 5>And this double album, every tune is a banger. Every

0:01:51.105 --> 0:01:54.575
<v Speaker 5>track is a banger with this one. 15 tracks, or

0:01:55.355 --> 0:01:57.355
<v Speaker 5>I'll give you a little spoiler, only.

0:01:57.355 --> 0:01:58.925
<v Speaker 3>14 tracks.

0:01:58.985 --> 0:02:03.185
<v Speaker 5>My math is bad. 14 tracks, I think, because we

0:02:03.225 --> 0:02:07.415
<v Speaker 5>do share. There is a shared choice coming up here

0:02:08.055 --> 0:02:10.855
<v Speaker 5>in a bit. We did give you part one picks

0:02:10.915 --> 0:02:12.995
<v Speaker 5>five through four a couple of days ago. You can

0:02:13.035 --> 0:02:15.255
<v Speaker 5>find that in the film spotting feed. You can also

0:02:15.295 --> 0:02:18.195
<v Speaker 5>hear a recommendation of the new movie. It ends a

0:02:18.255 --> 0:02:22.215
<v Speaker 5>golden brick contender now. We shared the poll results for

0:02:22.275 --> 0:02:26.915
<v Speaker 5>the best third movie by a director. And since 2020,

0:02:26.915 --> 0:02:30.435
<v Speaker 5>we should also stipulate, we also announced a new poll

0:02:31.075 --> 0:02:35.424
<v Speaker 5>where we want to know who's the best 90s movie villain.

0:02:35.704 --> 0:02:38.045
<v Speaker 5>We think it's obvious. I haven't looked at the results yet.

0:02:38.105 --> 0:02:40.385
<v Speaker 5>We'll see if our listeners agree, Josh, that it is

0:02:40.445 --> 0:02:44.704
<v Speaker 5>in fact obvious. So let's now go to Rico. Let's

0:02:44.745 --> 0:02:47.484
<v Speaker 5>go to the two of us. And here are three

0:02:47.755 --> 0:02:48.195
<v Speaker 5>through one.

0:02:48.605 --> 0:02:54.065
<v Speaker 3>Needle drops. Rico, you're number three.

0:02:54.225 --> 0:02:55.005
<v Speaker 1>Here we go.

0:02:55.544 --> 0:03:00.285
<v Speaker 2>Number three. This one, it's almost too obvious, but I

0:03:00.345 --> 0:03:02.894
<v Speaker 2>also like, I think maybe the reason, the way that

0:03:02.935 --> 0:03:05.014
<v Speaker 2>I was picking this, I never really talked about what

0:03:05.035 --> 0:03:07.255
<v Speaker 2>my parameters were, just like the things that moved me

0:03:07.915 --> 0:03:11.715
<v Speaker 2>that I really, and nothing beats the, well, two things

0:03:11.755 --> 0:03:13.174
<v Speaker 2>beat this because we've got two more on our list,

0:03:13.215 --> 0:03:16.075
<v Speaker 2>but almost nothing beats this, which is the use of

0:03:16.155 --> 0:03:24.524
<v Speaker 2>trouble by Cat Stevens in Harold and Maude. One of

0:03:24.544 --> 0:03:28.005
<v Speaker 2>the great soundtracks ever. And a movie that I saw

0:03:28.144 --> 0:03:31.065
<v Speaker 2>probably like a lot of people, you know, in repertory,

0:03:31.644 --> 0:03:33.975
<v Speaker 2>you know, it was in a place in Pittsburgh called

0:03:34.035 --> 0:03:37.575
<v Speaker 2>the Pittsburgh Playhouse that had a different movie every night.

0:03:37.975 --> 0:03:40.675
<v Speaker 2>And Harold and Maude was one of the perennial favorites,

0:03:40.755 --> 0:03:44.095
<v Speaker 2>along with things like Monty Python and the Holy Grail and,

0:03:44.715 --> 0:03:47.975
<v Speaker 2>you know, The Graduate, things like that. But that was

0:03:48.015 --> 0:03:51.475
<v Speaker 2>probably the first time I'd ever heard Cat Stevens. And

0:03:51.515 --> 0:03:53.535
<v Speaker 2>it seemed, first of all, is that so many of

0:03:53.595 --> 0:03:56.255
<v Speaker 2>his songs, even though they were written in the 70s, feel,

0:03:56.355 --> 0:04:00.615
<v Speaker 2>in some cases late 60s, still feel so modern to me.

0:04:01.155 --> 0:04:04.034
<v Speaker 2>They're these perfect, they're not like, you know, in that era,

0:04:04.055 --> 0:04:05.615
<v Speaker 2>there was a lot of epics. There was a lot

0:04:05.655 --> 0:04:08.475
<v Speaker 2>of prog going on. These were just like these perfect

0:04:08.515 --> 0:04:12.295
<v Speaker 2>little pop gems. And there's like 10,000 of them in

0:04:12.345 --> 0:04:16.205
<v Speaker 2>this movie. And that one is the most heartbreaking. Should

0:04:16.225 --> 0:04:18.625
<v Speaker 2>I say what it is for those who somehow listen

0:04:18.645 --> 0:04:20.605
<v Speaker 2>to the show and haven't seen Harold and Maude? Because

0:04:20.625 --> 0:04:22.555
<v Speaker 2>it is a pretty big spoiler. It's like right at

0:04:22.575 --> 0:04:22.875
<v Speaker 2>the end.

0:04:23.755 --> 0:04:25.234
<v Speaker 3>I think you've given them enough warning.

0:04:25.415 --> 0:04:27.175
<v Speaker 2>Turn it off if you must. So, you know, Harold

0:04:27.215 --> 0:04:30.455
<v Speaker 2>and Maude, of course, about a May-December romance between young

0:04:30.495 --> 0:04:36.395
<v Speaker 2>Harold and octogenarian Maude. At the end, he thinks that

0:04:36.415 --> 0:04:39.635
<v Speaker 2>he's going to marry this woman. And he's also a

0:04:39.654 --> 0:04:42.475
<v Speaker 2>guy who's ironically been obsessed with death, and she's given

0:04:42.515 --> 0:04:45.895
<v Speaker 2>him a reason to really love life. And he goes

0:04:45.935 --> 0:04:48.374
<v Speaker 2>to her house thinking that he's going to marry this person,

0:04:48.495 --> 0:04:51.315
<v Speaker 2>and she reveals that she's decided on her birthday to

0:04:51.935 --> 0:04:55.525
<v Speaker 2>take pills and end her life. And in one of

0:04:55.545 --> 0:04:58.985
<v Speaker 2>the great cuts ever, he looks at her for forever

0:04:59.045 --> 0:05:00.964
<v Speaker 2>and ever and ever when she tells him that she's

0:05:00.985 --> 0:05:03.585
<v Speaker 2>done this. And he just says, what? And at the

0:05:03.865 --> 0:05:07.625
<v Speaker 2>second that he says it, it cuts to an ambulance.

0:05:08.205 --> 0:05:11.175
<v Speaker 2>And him not wanting her to die. And that song

0:05:11.205 --> 0:05:14.395
<v Speaker 2>by Cat Stevens starts playing. And it's a very obvious

0:05:14.415 --> 0:05:17.835
<v Speaker 2>song to play. It's about trouble. Oh, trouble. Trouble, move

0:05:17.875 --> 0:05:21.315
<v Speaker 2>from me. In some ways, it's a really obvious choice

0:05:21.375 --> 0:05:23.885
<v Speaker 2>if you're going to be soundtracking your entire movie with

0:05:23.945 --> 0:05:27.705
<v Speaker 2>Cat Stevens. But it's also just so freaking beautiful. And

0:05:27.725 --> 0:05:30.565
<v Speaker 2>I think if my memory serves, you can't even hear

0:05:30.665 --> 0:05:35.055
<v Speaker 2>the siren. It's just the music. You know, the actual...

0:05:35.555 --> 0:05:38.575
<v Speaker 2>Details of what happens almost don't matter. What matters is

0:05:38.635 --> 0:05:44.195
<v Speaker 2>how truly sad this is. And it continues through the sequence.

0:05:44.315 --> 0:05:47.515
<v Speaker 2>She has passed away. The doctor comes out. You can't

0:05:47.575 --> 0:05:50.125
<v Speaker 2>hear what's being said, but you know that she's actually died.

0:05:50.545 --> 0:05:53.265
<v Speaker 2>He goes and gets into his car. It seems like

0:05:53.325 --> 0:05:55.565
<v Speaker 2>he's going to kill himself by driving off the edge

0:05:55.585 --> 0:05:58.345
<v Speaker 2>of a cliff. And just as he's about to drive

0:05:58.365 --> 0:06:00.544
<v Speaker 2>off the edge of a cliff and the song ends...

0:06:01.695 --> 0:06:03.195
<v Speaker 2>The car goes over the edge of the cliff, but

0:06:03.235 --> 0:06:05.075
<v Speaker 2>we reveal that he jumped free and he did not

0:06:05.115 --> 0:06:06.395
<v Speaker 2>go over the edge of the cliff. And he's just

0:06:06.415 --> 0:06:10.534
<v Speaker 2>standing there holding a banjo. It's the saddest moment followed

0:06:10.575 --> 0:06:15.455
<v Speaker 2>by the most hopeful moment ever. And just thinking about

0:06:15.495 --> 0:06:17.655
<v Speaker 2>it makes the hairs on the back of my neck

0:06:18.105 --> 0:06:21.604
<v Speaker 2>stand on end pretty hard to top. And by the way,

0:06:21.885 --> 0:06:27.525
<v Speaker 2>Cameron Crowe was responsible for re-releasing that album in its entirety.

0:06:27.605 --> 0:06:31.455
<v Speaker 2>That soundtrack was often truncated. And I think it was

0:06:31.475 --> 0:06:34.095
<v Speaker 2>back in the 90s, Cameron Crowe, of all people, decided

0:06:34.115 --> 0:06:37.714
<v Speaker 2>that he was going to get the full soundtrack reissued.

0:06:37.755 --> 0:06:40.325
<v Speaker 2>And there's just tons and tons of great music on that.

0:06:40.445 --> 0:06:42.965
<v Speaker 2>Since then, it's also been reissued with everything. But I

0:06:43.005 --> 0:06:44.705
<v Speaker 2>just want to say that Cameron Crowe agrees with me.

0:06:46.185 --> 0:06:46.805
<v Speaker 3>As he should.

0:06:46.825 --> 0:06:50.285
<v Speaker 5>And how about just the fact that you could do

0:06:50.325 --> 0:06:53.605
<v Speaker 5>an entire top five of uses of Cat Stevens songs

0:06:53.645 --> 0:06:54.065
<v Speaker 5>in movies?

0:06:54.185 --> 0:06:54.345
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:06:54.464 --> 0:06:55.844
<v Speaker 3>Because you would have.

0:06:56.275 --> 0:06:57.635
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Rushmore has two of them.

0:06:57.654 --> 0:06:59.555
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, this is maybe an incomplete list, but

0:06:59.615 --> 0:07:02.715
<v Speaker 5>not only do you have Trouble, of course, you have

0:07:02.915 --> 0:07:04.534
<v Speaker 5>From Harold and Maude, If You Want to Sing Out,

0:07:04.594 --> 0:07:09.225
<v Speaker 5>Sing Out, which is also great. Rushmore, The Wind, fantastic.

0:07:10.025 --> 0:07:12.005
<v Speaker 5>Maybe not that great of a movie, but Father and

0:07:12.065 --> 0:07:14.605
<v Speaker 5>Son in Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2.

0:07:14.605 --> 0:07:16.065
<v Speaker 3>Wild World, my favorite.

0:07:16.085 --> 0:07:16.505
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing.

0:07:16.525 --> 0:07:20.965
<v Speaker 5>Cat Stevens song. Peace Train in Almost Famous and The Holdovers.

0:07:21.065 --> 0:07:24.355
<v Speaker 5>There are probably others. The Wind is also in The Holdovers.

0:07:24.375 --> 0:07:24.715
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:07:25.125 --> 0:07:28.255
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Rushmore. I think Rushmore has Here Comes My Baby.

0:07:28.315 --> 0:07:29.795
<v Speaker 1>That's his too, right? Here Comes My Baby too. So

0:07:30.495 --> 0:07:34.375
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Cat Stevens certainly was played as I

0:07:34.395 --> 0:07:37.895
<v Speaker 1>was growing up. You know, my parents had those records,

0:07:38.815 --> 0:07:42.175
<v Speaker 1>but I think my movie experience of his music was

0:07:42.255 --> 0:07:45.975
<v Speaker 1>probably Rushmore first. I came sadly late to Harold and Maude,

0:07:45.995 --> 0:07:48.395
<v Speaker 1>which of course is, you know, has been noted as

0:07:48.445 --> 0:07:51.445
<v Speaker 1>a huge influence on Wes Anderson. So it makes complete

0:07:51.485 --> 0:07:57.775
<v Speaker 1>sense that he would use two of Steven's songs in Rushmore. But, um, yeah,

0:07:57.895 --> 0:08:00.385
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, the wind was a tempting in

0:08:01.445 --> 0:08:03.325
<v Speaker 1>Rushmore was a tempting choice for me, but I went

0:08:03.345 --> 0:08:07.105
<v Speaker 1>another Wes Anderson direction. Um, as we'll get to, we'll

0:08:07.125 --> 0:08:11.245
<v Speaker 1>get to not going to go there for my number three. However, um,

0:08:11.645 --> 0:08:15.315
<v Speaker 1>let me make another choice first. And that is going

0:08:15.375 --> 0:08:20.935
<v Speaker 1>to be, uh, from killer of sheep, the Charles Burnett film. Um,

0:08:21.015 --> 0:08:25.005
<v Speaker 1>the song is this bitter earth. sung by Dinah Washington.

0:08:25.065 --> 0:08:29.015
<v Speaker 1>This is Burnett's 1978 masterwork set in the Watts neighborhood

0:08:29.255 --> 0:08:33.655
<v Speaker 1>of LA. Basically follows a husband, a father. He's a

0:08:33.695 --> 0:08:37.215
<v Speaker 1>slaughterhouse worker. He puts in these long hours working. He

0:08:37.275 --> 0:08:43.295
<v Speaker 1>notably avoids taking illegal shortcuts to make money. And yet

0:08:43.735 --> 0:08:48.845
<v Speaker 1>the American dream, he just can't get it. He can't

0:08:48.905 --> 0:08:54.345
<v Speaker 1>grasp it. The movie itself, famously couldn't get distribution for

0:08:54.365 --> 0:08:57.484
<v Speaker 1>years precisely because of the music. Burnett couldn't secure the

0:08:57.545 --> 0:09:00.205
<v Speaker 1>rights to all the music that he uses here. And

0:09:00.265 --> 0:09:02.944
<v Speaker 1>it's so key to what the film does. So it's

0:09:03.025 --> 0:09:07.334
<v Speaker 1>understandable that he had to fight this battle because in

0:09:07.355 --> 0:09:10.655
<v Speaker 1>addition to Dinah Washington, the movie employs Paul Robeson, Earth,

0:09:10.695 --> 0:09:14.835
<v Speaker 1>Wind &amp; Fire, Rachmaninoff, Gershwin. The needle drop that I'm

0:09:14.875 --> 0:09:17.965
<v Speaker 1>going with though is Dinah Washington with This Better Earth.

0:09:18.105 --> 0:09:21.444
<v Speaker 1>And this plays... As the husband and wife, they're played

0:09:21.465 --> 0:09:26.185
<v Speaker 1>by Henry Gale Sanders and Casey Moore. They're dancing. They're actually,

0:09:26.525 --> 0:09:31.035
<v Speaker 1>they're almost like just kind of slowly, softly swaying in

0:09:31.735 --> 0:09:36.494
<v Speaker 1>the room of their apartment. They're against this window that's glowing.

0:09:37.115 --> 0:09:42.094
<v Speaker 1>So it's this sadly beautiful image because it should be romantic.

0:09:42.255 --> 0:09:45.985
<v Speaker 1>It should be sentimental. But here's where the song's title

0:09:46.245 --> 0:09:50.115
<v Speaker 1>comes in and how the song just, you know, sounds,

0:09:50.395 --> 0:09:53.834
<v Speaker 1>it's about, partly about life feeling like a dead end.

0:09:53.895 --> 0:09:56.655
<v Speaker 1>You know, the world being stacked against you.

0:09:57.515 --> 0:10:09.655
<v Speaker 4>This bitter earth. Well, what a fruit it bears.

0:10:11.075 --> 0:10:15.345
<v Speaker 1>Burnett uses this long extended fixed take. for this, to

0:10:15.405 --> 0:10:17.244
<v Speaker 1>let the music play out, to let them be in

0:10:17.285 --> 0:10:20.065
<v Speaker 1>the moment together and not interrupt it, interrupt it with

0:10:20.125 --> 0:10:25.415
<v Speaker 1>any edits. It's interesting, like more is moving more than

0:10:25.515 --> 0:10:29.665
<v Speaker 1>Sanders is. She's trying to caress him and he's not responding.

0:10:29.725 --> 0:10:33.105
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like he's this statue floating in the air

0:10:33.165 --> 0:10:37.045
<v Speaker 1>more than he's fully embracing the music. And sure enough,

0:10:37.225 --> 0:10:40.535
<v Speaker 1>when the song ends, she tries to kiss him Some more.

0:10:40.695 --> 0:10:43.365
<v Speaker 1>And he just kind of peels himself away and walks

0:10:43.465 --> 0:10:47.964
<v Speaker 1>off screen. So it's a deeply sad moment. It's deeply moving.

0:10:48.505 --> 0:10:51.145
<v Speaker 1>And I would say this is like a complimentary example.

0:10:51.225 --> 0:10:54.925
<v Speaker 1>It's just perfectly complimented by the use of this bitter earth.

0:10:55.905 --> 0:10:58.755
<v Speaker 5>In some ways, based on your description of the track, Josh,

0:10:58.795 --> 0:11:03.715
<v Speaker 5>maybe one that is complimentary with the song I'm going

0:11:03.735 --> 0:11:07.555
<v Speaker 5>to talk about next. And you were just mentioning Wes Anderson.

0:11:08.495 --> 0:11:10.155
<v Speaker 5>not going to go with the wind, a song I

0:11:10.415 --> 0:11:14.104
<v Speaker 5>was very familiar with. So not a discovery for me here.

0:11:14.465 --> 0:11:17.585
<v Speaker 5>And we know the Royal Tenenbaums is out, still definitely

0:11:17.865 --> 0:11:20.844
<v Speaker 5>dozens to choose from. And while I know most of

0:11:20.885 --> 0:11:24.255
<v Speaker 5>the songs I've heard in Wes Anderson's films, there are

0:11:24.314 --> 0:11:29.495
<v Speaker 5>still occasions where he surprises me. And ironically, I'm going

0:11:29.535 --> 0:11:33.444
<v Speaker 5>with the needle drop from a relative disappointment because I,

0:11:33.775 --> 0:11:36.365
<v Speaker 5>I still, I liked the movie when I saw it,

0:11:36.465 --> 0:11:39.185
<v Speaker 5>but it is, it is second from the bottom on

0:11:39.225 --> 0:11:43.084
<v Speaker 5>my Wes Anderson ranked list. And the only, the asterisk

0:11:43.145 --> 0:11:46.325
<v Speaker 5>I have to put here is it is the only

0:11:46.365 --> 0:11:49.765
<v Speaker 5>Wes Anderson film that I haven't revisited. It's the only

0:11:49.845 --> 0:11:52.665
<v Speaker 5>one I've seen once that I saw, I saw it

0:11:52.705 --> 0:11:57.545
<v Speaker 5>in the theater and that is it. Maybe since Josh,

0:11:57.585 --> 0:12:01.115
<v Speaker 5>we have Subsequently to this movie coming out, we have

0:12:01.135 --> 0:12:05.535
<v Speaker 5>done a Satyajit Ray marathon, and I am now a

0:12:05.695 --> 0:12:09.675
<v Speaker 5>real appreciator of his work. Maybe I will appreciate this

0:12:09.845 --> 0:12:15.385
<v Speaker 5>film more. The film is The Darjeeling Limited, and the

0:12:15.465 --> 0:12:19.344
<v Speaker 5>song accompanies, and it's my only choice, it accompanies an

0:12:19.425 --> 0:12:24.715
<v Speaker 5>opening sequence. Yeah, of course, I knew the kinks. I

0:12:24.975 --> 0:12:28.265
<v Speaker 5>had heard Lola before. I'd heard You Really Got Me

0:12:28.804 --> 0:12:32.984
<v Speaker 5>a million times on the radio. I'm pretty sure I

0:12:33.005 --> 0:12:38.045
<v Speaker 5>had never heard another kink song behind those two. And

0:12:38.205 --> 0:12:42.074
<v Speaker 5>in this scene, the opening of the Darjeeling Limited, a

0:12:42.155 --> 0:12:46.215
<v Speaker 5>train is leaving. We're in India. A train is departing

0:12:46.235 --> 0:12:51.255
<v Speaker 5>the station. Bill Murray is running after it. That's my train.

0:12:51.314 --> 0:12:55.575
<v Speaker 5>He's late. He's trying to chase it down. And There's

0:12:55.635 --> 0:12:59.735
<v Speaker 5>traditional music playing. It's fairly quiet on the soundtrack. And

0:12:59.755 --> 0:13:02.824
<v Speaker 5>then all of a sudden, as we see Bill Murray running,

0:13:03.765 --> 0:13:06.705
<v Speaker 5>it's in close-up, in profile. And then we see Adrian

0:13:06.745 --> 0:13:10.665
<v Speaker 5>Brody's character, Peter, appear in the frame running alongside him.

0:13:11.445 --> 0:13:14.094
<v Speaker 5>And on the next cut, it's so good. It's a

0:13:14.184 --> 0:13:17.494
<v Speaker 5>wide shot. And the train is on the left of

0:13:17.875 --> 0:13:20.815
<v Speaker 5>the frame and the empty space on the right. The

0:13:21.515 --> 0:13:24.175
<v Speaker 5>guitar chords of the song come in this time tomorrow.

0:13:24.934 --> 0:13:30.245
<v Speaker 5>And we get the glorious Andersonian combination of Britpop and

0:13:30.285 --> 0:13:42.344
<v Speaker 5>slow motion. It's Brody running towards and eventually, unlike Murray,

0:13:43.025 --> 0:13:48.845
<v Speaker 5>successfully getting on board the train. As Ray Davies intones

0:13:48.905 --> 0:13:52.074
<v Speaker 5>this time tomorrow, where will we be? On a spaceship

0:13:52.125 --> 0:13:55.844
<v Speaker 5>somewhere sailing across an empty sea. this time tomorrow, what

0:13:55.905 --> 0:13:56.525
<v Speaker 5>will we know?

0:13:57.105 --> 0:13:57.865
<v Speaker 3>It's folky.

0:13:58.564 --> 0:14:03.045
<v Speaker 5>It's catchy as hell. I remember sitting in the theater thinking, yeah,

0:14:03.064 --> 0:14:06.985
<v Speaker 5>it seems British, but I can't completely place it. I

0:14:07.025 --> 0:14:09.125
<v Speaker 5>definitely didn't know that it was the kinks for sure.

0:14:09.765 --> 0:14:11.864
<v Speaker 5>I did know that as soon as the movie was over,

0:14:11.885 --> 0:14:14.405
<v Speaker 5>I was going to have to figure out how I

0:14:14.455 --> 0:14:18.535
<v Speaker 5>could hear this song again. I was instantly in love

0:14:19.275 --> 0:14:24.355
<v Speaker 5>with that track. And beyond that, it's just... It's not

0:14:24.375 --> 0:14:28.255
<v Speaker 5>just Andersonian perfection. The reason why it works so well

0:14:28.795 --> 0:14:31.735
<v Speaker 5>with that scene. Here's where I'll just start out saying

0:14:31.875 --> 0:14:36.215
<v Speaker 5>it is to the earlier criteria you mentioned, Josh, why

0:14:36.255 --> 0:14:39.115
<v Speaker 5>it complements the scene so well. This is a movie

0:14:39.155 --> 0:14:43.275
<v Speaker 5>about characters on a journey in a strange land. And

0:14:44.335 --> 0:14:46.635
<v Speaker 5>we're all like this at the beginning of any trip,

0:14:47.595 --> 0:14:50.435
<v Speaker 5>especially in a strange land, but especially one where if

0:14:50.455 --> 0:14:54.445
<v Speaker 5>we're like them, we're reuniting. with people that maybe we

0:14:54.485 --> 0:14:56.965
<v Speaker 5>haven't seen in a long time or we're estranged from.

0:14:57.345 --> 0:15:02.285
<v Speaker 5>They're considering it a spiritual journey. They're assigning mystical powers

0:15:02.385 --> 0:15:10.795
<v Speaker 5>to this location. And they're wishful. They're hopeful. So where

0:15:10.835 --> 0:15:14.935
<v Speaker 5>will we be? All these possibilities, right? They're imagining themselves

0:15:15.015 --> 0:15:19.104
<v Speaker 5>on a spaceship somewhere, leaving the sun behind you. But then,

0:15:19.565 --> 0:15:23.565
<v Speaker 5>This is Wes Anderson. So you read between the lines

0:15:23.645 --> 0:15:26.405
<v Speaker 5>or even some of the text and it's so tinged

0:15:26.465 --> 0:15:31.485
<v Speaker 5>with regret. The clouds sadly pass by me. Will we

0:15:31.525 --> 0:15:35.145
<v Speaker 5>still be here watching an in-flight movie show seven miles

0:15:35.225 --> 0:15:37.465
<v Speaker 5>below me? I can see the world and it ain't

0:15:37.525 --> 0:15:41.225
<v Speaker 5>so big at all. Is that comforting that the world

0:15:41.265 --> 0:15:44.185
<v Speaker 5>ain't so big at all? Is it comforting to realize

0:15:44.225 --> 0:15:46.985
<v Speaker 5>that or is it actually kind of disheartening? that it

0:15:47.005 --> 0:15:49.725
<v Speaker 5>ain't so big that there aren't maybe as many possibilities

0:15:50.025 --> 0:15:53.095
<v Speaker 5>that your life is actually more limited than you thought it,

0:15:53.365 --> 0:15:54.185
<v Speaker 5>it could.

0:15:54.045 --> 0:15:54.865
<v Speaker 3>Be or should be.

0:15:55.365 --> 0:15:56.865
<v Speaker 5>You know, you don't, you don't need to be an

0:15:57.825 --> 0:16:01.095
<v Speaker 5>A plus English major to get all that, but I

0:16:01.295 --> 0:16:04.555
<v Speaker 5>I'm sure that Wes Anderson also knew his, his kinks lore.

0:16:04.615 --> 0:16:07.775
<v Speaker 5>I looked this up after, after doing all this prep,

0:16:07.815 --> 0:16:11.355
<v Speaker 5>I was like, I wonder, I wonder what Wes Anderson said.

0:16:11.415 --> 0:16:13.955
<v Speaker 5>If he said anything about picking this song, couldn't find anything.

0:16:14.345 --> 0:16:16.925
<v Speaker 5>I wonder what Ray Davies said about writing this song.

0:16:17.765 --> 0:16:20.715
<v Speaker 5>Tell me if there could be a more appropriate song

0:16:20.755 --> 0:16:25.255
<v Speaker 5>for this movie or maybe any Wes Anderson movie based

0:16:25.375 --> 0:16:28.985
<v Speaker 5>on what Ray Davies said about it. He said, I

0:16:29.085 --> 0:16:32.265
<v Speaker 5>felt that I'd lost contact with my family because I'd

0:16:32.285 --> 0:16:34.985
<v Speaker 5>been in a pop music bubble for five years and

0:16:35.025 --> 0:16:37.665
<v Speaker 5>I didn't know the people around me anymore. This time

0:16:37.745 --> 0:16:41.765
<v Speaker 5>tomorrow was about transience and an ephemeral world. clouds and

0:16:41.805 --> 0:16:43.715
<v Speaker 5>where do we play tomorrow and what am i doing

0:16:43.755 --> 0:16:46.515
<v Speaker 5>as a person tomorrow it's a floating song and i

0:16:46.575 --> 0:16:49.515
<v Speaker 5>was floating into a different era going with the flow

0:16:49.555 --> 0:16:51.795
<v Speaker 5>for a while until i work out where i want

0:16:51.855 --> 0:16:56.255
<v Speaker 5>to be and that says it all but just it

0:16:56.295 --> 0:16:58.855
<v Speaker 5>is a poppy song it's a catchy song it's so

0:16:58.995 --> 0:17:03.475
<v Speaker 5>upbeat it's live like wes anderson's films themselves it's lively

0:17:03.635 --> 0:17:06.875
<v Speaker 5>it's colorful it's energetic and at the core.

0:17:06.595 --> 0:17:08.155
<v Speaker 2>Of it it's so this is also the nature of

0:17:08.195 --> 0:17:09.735
<v Speaker 2>travel this is another travel.

0:17:09.415 --> 0:17:12.955
<v Speaker 1>Yeah and that That contrast between the poppy, the upbeat

0:17:12.995 --> 0:17:15.505
<v Speaker 1>nature and the use of slow motion here is also

0:17:16.145 --> 0:17:20.045
<v Speaker 1>very interesting. And I think, you know, Darjeeling limited, which

0:17:20.105 --> 0:17:22.725
<v Speaker 1>I like, and it's worth, it's worth another view. I

0:17:22.725 --> 0:17:26.115
<v Speaker 1>would say, Adam, um, I, it didn't leap ahead of

0:17:26.155 --> 0:17:28.055
<v Speaker 1>his other films for me when I looked at it again,

0:17:28.095 --> 0:17:31.275
<v Speaker 1>but one thing that helped clarify is his, um, use

0:17:31.315 --> 0:17:35.175
<v Speaker 1>of slow motion and how it's more than just an

0:17:35.335 --> 0:17:38.765
<v Speaker 1>easy go-to for effect. To get us to feel like

0:17:38.805 --> 0:17:40.965
<v Speaker 1>something important is happening when it really isn't. I think

0:17:40.985 --> 0:17:44.895
<v Speaker 1>that's how lesser filmmakers use slow motion, but this is

0:17:44.935 --> 0:17:48.015
<v Speaker 1>a great example of how Wes Anderson tends to employ

0:17:48.055 --> 0:17:51.355
<v Speaker 1>it when there are, this speaks to the layered nature

0:17:51.395 --> 0:17:54.185
<v Speaker 1>of the song. There are like eight things going on

0:17:54.225 --> 0:17:56.585
<v Speaker 1>at once. And so we're able to take it all in.

0:17:57.185 --> 0:18:02.775
<v Speaker 1>And if you think about Brody in particular, his. face

0:18:03.055 --> 0:18:05.855
<v Speaker 1>and how the slow motion allows us to register what

0:18:05.915 --> 0:18:08.855
<v Speaker 1>he's registering when he beats Murray onto the train.

0:18:08.955 --> 0:18:09.575
<v Speaker 3>That's it.

0:18:10.115 --> 0:18:13.495
<v Speaker 1>We see the competition. We see the triumph. We see

0:18:13.515 --> 0:18:16.055
<v Speaker 1>the smugness and those are all different, right? Those are

0:18:16.105 --> 0:18:19.325
<v Speaker 1>all different layers. Then it shifts and you wouldn't catch

0:18:19.365 --> 0:18:22.165
<v Speaker 1>this without slow motion. It shifts into like a little

0:18:22.205 --> 0:18:26.285
<v Speaker 1>hint of guilt, some helplessness. Like there's a part of

0:18:26.305 --> 0:18:31.705
<v Speaker 1>them that feels like, oh, could I have done something? um, sadness,

0:18:32.045 --> 0:18:35.765
<v Speaker 1>maybe even pity. And then ultimately I think there's like

0:18:35.805 --> 0:18:39.235
<v Speaker 1>some dismissal there. It's like, well, I'm on the train.

0:18:39.275 --> 0:18:41.935
<v Speaker 1>I'm moving on too bad for that guy. Um, and

0:18:41.955 --> 0:18:43.715
<v Speaker 1>to have, you know, the song is part of that

0:18:43.815 --> 0:18:47.975
<v Speaker 1>like this, because the song is as complicated as all

0:18:47.995 --> 0:18:52.315
<v Speaker 1>of those emotions in the way it's lyrics point against

0:18:52.755 --> 0:18:54.565
<v Speaker 1>the poppiness in certain aspects.

0:18:54.625 --> 0:18:57.965
<v Speaker 2>So I've always wanted to talk to Wes Anderson. I've

0:18:58.005 --> 0:18:59.765
<v Speaker 2>never gotten a chance to him. One of the reasons

0:18:59.845 --> 0:19:03.285
<v Speaker 2>is to know how he gets a, that kind of thing,

0:19:03.705 --> 0:19:06.785
<v Speaker 2>any director to get, how do you direct? Like it,

0:19:06.785 --> 0:19:10.615
<v Speaker 2>it seems like if you're going to slow down and

0:19:10.645 --> 0:19:12.615
<v Speaker 2>the point of slowing down, which I think you're right,

0:19:12.735 --> 0:19:15.695
<v Speaker 2>is to get all of that. How do you direct

0:19:15.755 --> 0:19:17.775
<v Speaker 2>it so that you get all of that? Because how

0:19:17.815 --> 0:19:19.735
<v Speaker 2>do you get an actor to flash through all of

0:19:19.815 --> 0:19:23.015
<v Speaker 2>that at once? And I also wondered to what extent

0:19:23.055 --> 0:19:24.715
<v Speaker 2>he knew the music that he was going to put

0:19:24.755 --> 0:19:27.655
<v Speaker 2>into that sequence at that moment. I'll bet he knew.

0:19:28.945 --> 0:19:29.785
<v Speaker 2>There are a few.

0:19:30.685 --> 0:19:31.025
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine.

0:19:31.045 --> 0:19:31.885
<v Speaker 2>I'll bet he wrote it in.

0:19:31.905 --> 0:19:32.845
<v Speaker 1>I would think so.

0:19:32.865 --> 0:19:34.745
<v Speaker 2>It's my favorite soundtrack, by the way. I agree with

0:19:34.785 --> 0:19:36.805
<v Speaker 2>you that it's one of his, like, yeah, I love

0:19:36.845 --> 0:19:39.565
<v Speaker 2>that soundtrack. And by the way, there are a ton

0:19:39.625 --> 0:19:42.695
<v Speaker 2>of Indian tunes, including Indian film music on that. And,

0:19:43.115 --> 0:19:44.835
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think it's maybe one of his most

0:19:44.875 --> 0:19:46.975
<v Speaker 2>cinematic sounding soundtracks, maybe.

0:19:49.255 --> 0:19:49.915
<v Speaker 3>Number two.

0:19:50.375 --> 0:19:50.835
<v Speaker 1>Number two.

0:19:51.585 --> 0:19:53.425
<v Speaker 2>This is one of the great, this would be number

0:19:53.545 --> 0:19:55.505
<v Speaker 2>one if I didn't have an even better number one.

0:19:55.545 --> 0:19:59.365
<v Speaker 2>That's how good my number one is, in my opinion.

0:20:00.085 --> 0:20:03.115
<v Speaker 2>Number two is Amy Mann, Wise Up from Magnolia.

0:20:03.125 --> 0:20:04.695
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the.

0:20:07.315 --> 0:20:07.915
<v Speaker 4>Experience.

0:20:11.285 --> 0:20:13.625
<v Speaker 2>I saw that I'm pretty sure it was opening weekend

0:20:13.645 --> 0:20:15.545
<v Speaker 2>because I know it was packed. The theater was packed.

0:20:15.585 --> 0:20:18.845
<v Speaker 2>It was here in L.A. where I live. And there

0:20:18.865 --> 0:20:21.205
<v Speaker 2>was a lot of buzz about that movie and nobody

0:20:21.245 --> 0:20:23.995
<v Speaker 2>knew what to expect. The preceding movie had been Boogie Nights.

0:20:24.355 --> 0:20:26.615
<v Speaker 2>I think maybe people were expecting something on that level,

0:20:26.935 --> 0:20:29.515
<v Speaker 2>maybe with a little bit more, maybe a little more form.

0:20:30.265 --> 0:20:34.845
<v Speaker 2>and less episodic and, you know, heady and emotional the

0:20:34.865 --> 0:20:37.805
<v Speaker 2>way that it was, that moment in that movie is

0:20:37.925 --> 0:20:40.244
<v Speaker 2>still like amazing to me. I feel like since that

0:20:40.275 --> 0:20:42.835
<v Speaker 2>movie's come out, there've been something similar, but for those

0:20:42.855 --> 0:20:46.795
<v Speaker 2>who don't know, first of all, that movie was written

0:20:47.215 --> 0:20:51.995
<v Speaker 2>with Amy Mann songs in PTA's head. He knew Amy Mann.

0:20:52.415 --> 0:20:54.675
<v Speaker 2>She had given him, I think a tape of unreleased

0:20:54.735 --> 0:20:56.675
<v Speaker 2>songs or I think something like that.

0:20:56.775 --> 0:20:57.595
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they've been released.

0:20:57.655 --> 0:20:59.835
<v Speaker 2>I can't remember. But he listened to them over and

0:20:59.875 --> 0:21:02.395
<v Speaker 2>over again and lyrics from the song appear in the

0:21:02.715 --> 0:21:05.415
<v Speaker 2>script and the references to the songs through the script.

0:21:05.695 --> 0:21:08.155
<v Speaker 2>And in the middle of it, as almost a love

0:21:08.195 --> 0:21:10.555
<v Speaker 2>letter to her as well as being a great dramatic

0:21:10.615 --> 0:21:13.955
<v Speaker 2>moment in the movie, every character stops what they're doing

0:21:14.195 --> 0:21:17.155
<v Speaker 2>or basically pauses in the middle of what they're doing.

0:21:17.515 --> 0:21:20.655
<v Speaker 2>And they lip sync to the entirety of one of

0:21:20.675 --> 0:21:22.855
<v Speaker 2>the most beautiful songs ever written, Wise Up, which is

0:21:22.895 --> 0:21:25.875
<v Speaker 2>an incredibly sad song as is typical of Amy Mann.

0:21:25.895 --> 0:21:27.495
<v Speaker 3>It's not.

0:21:43.605 --> 0:21:47.055
<v Speaker 2>Every character in all their different situations are all basically

0:21:47.095 --> 0:21:50.285
<v Speaker 2>saying to themselves what this song is saying, which is...

0:21:50.885 --> 0:21:54.885
<v Speaker 2>When are you going to stop repeating these really bad

0:21:54.925 --> 0:21:56.985
<v Speaker 2>patterns in your life? When are you going to wise up?

0:21:57.055 --> 0:21:59.335
<v Speaker 2>When are you going to stop dating the wrong person,

0:21:59.885 --> 0:22:03.535
<v Speaker 2>listening to the wrong people, living for the wrong things,

0:22:04.535 --> 0:22:08.255
<v Speaker 2>all of this stuff and the audacity of it. You

0:22:08.315 --> 0:22:11.795
<v Speaker 2>cannot imagine if you were not there at the time,

0:22:11.835 --> 0:22:13.415
<v Speaker 2>because like I said, I think that this kind of

0:22:13.455 --> 0:22:16.325
<v Speaker 2>thing has happened since, but to stop a movie. And

0:22:16.385 --> 0:22:19.855
<v Speaker 2>have everybody acknowledge the song in some strange way and

0:22:19.895 --> 0:22:22.635
<v Speaker 2>for it to make total sense. And it's so beautiful

0:22:22.675 --> 0:22:24.735
<v Speaker 2>and heartbreaking. It's like you could have heard a pin

0:22:24.795 --> 0:22:27.075
<v Speaker 2>drop in that theater. And I just was like, what

0:22:27.095 --> 0:22:32.965
<v Speaker 2>is happening? It's just an incredible kind of artistic leap

0:22:33.145 --> 0:22:36.265
<v Speaker 2>of faith to take, particularly at that moment in his career.

0:22:36.965 --> 0:22:37.855
<v Speaker 3>Great way to phrase it.

0:22:38.145 --> 0:22:41.645
<v Speaker 2>It's still like mesmerizing. It's my favorite part of that movie.

0:22:42.245 --> 0:22:44.445
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's so good. Let's go ahead and go out

0:22:44.465 --> 0:22:46.265
<v Speaker 5>of order here a little bit, Josh, because it's my

0:22:46.285 --> 0:22:46.725
<v Speaker 5>number two.

0:22:47.345 --> 0:22:48.935
<v Speaker 1>Okay, go for it. Go for it.

0:22:49.125 --> 0:22:54.155
<v Speaker 5>And it's a needle drop that is both non-diegetic, the

0:22:54.195 --> 0:22:57.575
<v Speaker 5>song is playing over the film, but it is a

0:22:57.655 --> 0:22:58.515
<v Speaker 5>performance scene.

0:22:58.635 --> 0:22:59.455
<v Speaker 3>It's diegetic.

0:23:00.075 --> 0:23:03.255
<v Speaker 5>They're singing it within the scene, even though they're not

0:23:03.955 --> 0:23:08.445
<v Speaker 5>hearing the song ostensibly, right? But it's emanating from the

0:23:08.505 --> 0:23:12.895
<v Speaker 5>movie world, the characters all singing it. They're all unified

0:23:13.455 --> 0:23:17.155
<v Speaker 5>within the movie world. The characters are all unified by experience,

0:23:17.345 --> 0:23:23.605
<v Speaker 5>by trauma. And the filmmaker then could have a music

0:23:23.645 --> 0:23:27.225
<v Speaker 5>sequence like another very good needle drop, like Donnie Darko.

0:23:27.485 --> 0:23:30.565
<v Speaker 5>It could be like Mad World, right? Where it just

0:23:30.625 --> 0:23:34.625
<v Speaker 5>goes from character to character, letting us observe each one

0:23:34.645 --> 0:23:40.055
<v Speaker 5>of them while we contemplate the juxtaposition of their circumstances. Yeah. But,

0:23:40.215 --> 0:23:43.494
<v Speaker 5>you know, this song is fundamentally about, as you said, Rico,

0:23:43.555 --> 0:23:48.105
<v Speaker 5>it's about life choices and it's about their regrets and

0:23:48.265 --> 0:23:51.645
<v Speaker 5>it's about misfits, which they all are. And it's about

0:23:51.925 --> 0:23:55.215
<v Speaker 5>whether or not there's a possibility of growth and whether

0:23:55.235 --> 0:23:58.655
<v Speaker 5>or not you can move forward. And here you have P.T.A.,

0:23:59.865 --> 0:24:05.105
<v Speaker 5>In 99, still kind of this renegade filmmaker saying, screw

0:24:05.145 --> 0:24:07.765
<v Speaker 5>it to all the rules. And it's, you know, I'm

0:24:07.785 --> 0:24:10.885
<v Speaker 5>going to actually unify all of them. And the song

0:24:11.065 --> 0:24:13.405
<v Speaker 5>isn't going to be just backdrop. It's going to be

0:24:13.445 --> 0:24:17.085
<v Speaker 5>this kind of vocal handoff where each character is actually

0:24:17.105 --> 0:24:21.605
<v Speaker 5>going to express what they've been repressing. And the music

0:24:21.685 --> 0:24:24.485
<v Speaker 5>is going to be the vehicle for that expression.

0:24:24.545 --> 0:24:24.965
<v Speaker 3>And you're right.

0:24:25.765 --> 0:24:31.055
<v Speaker 5>It's completely audacious. It's arguably totally absurd. But that's what's

0:24:31.095 --> 0:24:34.275
<v Speaker 5>so brilliant about it. The Brechtian nature of it, just

0:24:34.315 --> 0:24:37.715
<v Speaker 5>the pure emotional nakedness of it, I think is why

0:24:37.775 --> 0:24:40.555
<v Speaker 5>it's brilliant and why it's so moving. And I remember

0:24:40.615 --> 0:24:42.815
<v Speaker 5>sitting in the theater just like you. If you didn't

0:24:42.855 --> 0:24:46.235
<v Speaker 5>have that theatrical experience, it's hard to maybe fully appreciate it,

0:24:46.515 --> 0:24:50.325
<v Speaker 5>watching it on DVD now. But in the theater, and

0:24:50.365 --> 0:24:53.865
<v Speaker 5>you don't have many experiences like this anymore. In the theater,

0:24:54.465 --> 0:24:57.425
<v Speaker 5>there was a charge. It was sort of like, are

0:24:57.605 --> 0:25:04.125
<v Speaker 5>we all unified by this experience? Are we all together

0:25:04.205 --> 0:25:05.725
<v Speaker 5>sharing this experience right now?

0:25:05.815 --> 0:25:08.815
<v Speaker 3>Is this actually happening? That was incredible.

0:25:08.935 --> 0:25:11.855
<v Speaker 5>And I definitely didn't know the song at the time.

0:25:12.595 --> 0:25:15.175
<v Speaker 5>Even when I looked up later, I was like, I

0:25:15.215 --> 0:25:17.695
<v Speaker 5>don't know who Amy Mann is. Then I put it

0:25:17.735 --> 0:25:18.395
<v Speaker 5>together a little bit.

0:25:18.495 --> 0:25:19.765
<v Speaker 3>Oh, the face, the voice.

0:25:20.525 --> 0:25:22.845
<v Speaker 5>I grew up seeing the video for Voices Carry by

0:25:22.885 --> 0:25:26.785
<v Speaker 5>Till Tuesday in constant rotation on MTV, but I was

0:25:26.805 --> 0:25:30.105
<v Speaker 5>still surprised that that was her. I had no idea

0:25:30.165 --> 0:25:34.625
<v Speaker 5>that it was apparently on the Jerry Maguire soundtrack. Cameron Crowe, again,

0:25:35.065 --> 0:25:38.105
<v Speaker 5>had originally put that song on the soundtrack but didn't

0:25:38.225 --> 0:25:39.685
<v Speaker 5>use it in the film.

0:25:40.595 --> 0:25:41.745
<v Speaker 3>It's just a stunner.

0:25:42.885 --> 0:25:44.755
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I should have gone with this.

0:25:44.795 --> 0:25:45.095
<v Speaker 2>Come on, Josh.

0:25:45.135 --> 0:25:48.095
<v Speaker 1>It could have been three for three. Honestly, the only reason...

0:25:48.455 --> 0:25:50.825
<v Speaker 1>Here's the only reason, and you guys have spoken to it.

0:25:50.915 --> 0:25:54.695
<v Speaker 1>It's so unique. It's almost not a needle drop. It's

0:25:54.755 --> 0:25:59.715
<v Speaker 1>its own cosmic use of music that has rarely been repeated.

0:26:00.355 --> 0:26:04.695
<v Speaker 1>And I just felt like, I don't know. I should

0:26:04.895 --> 0:26:07.045
<v Speaker 1>have done it. I just felt like it was too unique.

0:26:07.085 --> 0:26:11.105
<v Speaker 1>It was too singular and didn't quite fit the definitions

0:26:11.145 --> 0:26:13.945
<v Speaker 1>I was working with. But I agree with everything you said.

0:26:13.965 --> 0:26:16.085
<v Speaker 3>So what's your lesser number two, Josh?

0:26:16.145 --> 0:26:16.955
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, beat it.

0:26:16.965 --> 0:26:17.485
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:26:17.565 --> 0:26:17.845
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:26:18.625 --> 0:26:22.195
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, okay. I think I have a filmmaker who

0:26:22.315 --> 0:26:24.855
<v Speaker 1>one-ups Paul Thomas Anderson in the needle drop category. Are

0:26:24.875 --> 0:26:26.455
<v Speaker 1>we ready to talk about Scorsese?

0:26:26.815 --> 0:26:29.695
<v Speaker 3>Okay, you're right. The only one, perhaps.

0:26:29.815 --> 0:26:30.235
<v Speaker 4>You're right.

0:26:30.335 --> 0:26:32.715
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right. You challenged me.

0:26:32.735 --> 0:26:33.915
<v Speaker 3>Here we go.

0:26:34.955 --> 0:26:37.075
<v Speaker 1>What do you do with Scorsese? I mean, in a way,

0:26:37.375 --> 0:26:39.715
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Adam and I couldn't choose Goodfellas helped

0:26:39.895 --> 0:26:45.915
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, but Goodfellas is actually integral to the

0:26:45.955 --> 0:26:48.665
<v Speaker 1>pick I'm going to go with. And What helped me

0:26:48.725 --> 0:26:51.545
<v Speaker 1>work my way through this is this dissertation I just

0:26:51.585 --> 0:26:55.465
<v Speaker 1>finished up. I did devote a section to Scorsese's sacred

0:26:55.565 --> 0:26:58.695
<v Speaker 1>use of secular music. And that led me to a

0:26:58.715 --> 0:27:00.755
<v Speaker 1>bit of a peculiar choice. So I'm curious to see

0:27:00.775 --> 0:27:02.895
<v Speaker 1>what you two make of this one. I'm not going

0:27:02.915 --> 0:27:05.355
<v Speaker 1>to go with Rolling Stones, Jumpin' Jack Flash from Mean Streets.

0:27:05.975 --> 0:27:11.195
<v Speaker 1>That's like the source of Scorsese's needle drops. Yeah, it's

0:27:11.215 --> 0:27:14.915
<v Speaker 1>ground zero. And perhaps all needle drops. I mean, I

0:27:14.935 --> 0:27:18.335
<v Speaker 1>know they were used before that, but still. Not going

0:27:18.355 --> 0:27:20.135
<v Speaker 1>to go with that. If I were going to go

0:27:20.175 --> 0:27:22.675
<v Speaker 1>with a Goodfellas pick, and this relates to my pick,

0:27:22.755 --> 0:27:25.495
<v Speaker 1>it would be The Crystals' Then He Kissed Me, when

0:27:25.555 --> 0:27:28.505
<v Speaker 1>Henry and Karen are being ushered to their VIP table

0:27:28.545 --> 0:27:31.145
<v Speaker 1>at the Copacabana. I'm going to go with something that

0:27:31.185 --> 0:27:34.305
<v Speaker 1>I think of as a response to Then He Kissed Me,

0:27:34.685 --> 0:27:38.475
<v Speaker 1>and it comes from The Irishman, which I think is

0:27:38.875 --> 0:27:42.215
<v Speaker 1>a response, a continuation, a culmination of all of Scorsese's

0:27:42.275 --> 0:27:45.365
<v Speaker 1>mob movies. And that song, my pick, is going to

0:27:45.385 --> 0:27:48.365
<v Speaker 1>be the Five Satins doo-wop classic In the Still of

0:27:48.405 --> 0:27:52.045
<v Speaker 1>the Night, which actually bookends The Irishman. So if I

0:27:52.085 --> 0:27:54.845
<v Speaker 1>were restricting myself, I'm breaking two rules here. It both

0:27:55.165 --> 0:28:00.245
<v Speaker 1>opens the movie and ends the movie. Not really credits necessarily,

0:28:00.325 --> 0:28:04.445
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, it bookends the movie for sure. At the

0:28:04.485 --> 0:28:07.505
<v Speaker 1>same time, Scorsese is employing in a new way one

0:28:07.545 --> 0:28:11.685
<v Speaker 1>of his techniques, the single take here. The camera is

0:28:11.795 --> 0:28:14.575
<v Speaker 1>finding its way to Robert De Niro's Frank Sheeran, who's

0:28:14.635 --> 0:28:18.015
<v Speaker 1>sitting in a wheelchair at this senior care facility. So

0:28:18.095 --> 0:28:21.655
<v Speaker 1>something I noticed the first time I saw The Irishman

0:28:21.675 --> 0:28:24.435
<v Speaker 1>in 2019 is the way the use of In the

0:28:24.455 --> 0:28:26.895
<v Speaker 1>Still of the Night here is really the inverse of

0:28:26.955 --> 0:28:28.715
<v Speaker 1>Then He Kissed Me. So when you think of Then

0:28:28.735 --> 0:28:32.345
<v Speaker 1>He Kissed Me, it has this expectant rumble. There's an

0:28:32.525 --> 0:28:35.665
<v Speaker 1>air of exhilaration to the music and also to the moment.

0:28:35.805 --> 0:28:38.705
<v Speaker 1>It matches it, right, in Goodfellas. In the Still of

0:28:38.745 --> 0:28:42.735
<v Speaker 1>the Night instead has a gentle swing. It has reflective

0:28:42.835 --> 0:28:48.165
<v Speaker 1>lyrics repeating, I remember, I remember. It invites introspection rather

0:28:48.205 --> 0:28:51.765
<v Speaker 1>than celebration. And that's fitting, of course, right? For a

0:28:51.785 --> 0:28:54.865
<v Speaker 1>movie about a man slowly coming to grips at the

0:28:54.925 --> 0:28:58.225
<v Speaker 1>end of his life with his days as a mob hitman.

0:29:07.175 --> 0:29:10.235
<v Speaker 1>The music works this way, as I was just describing,

0:29:10.335 --> 0:29:13.995
<v Speaker 1>but the lyrics are interesting as well. I'll hope and

0:29:14.015 --> 0:29:17.655
<v Speaker 1>I'll pray to keep your precious love well before the light.

0:29:18.105 --> 0:29:20.885
<v Speaker 1>Hold me again with all your might in the still

0:29:20.925 --> 0:29:23.925
<v Speaker 1>of the night. Now, in the context of this aging

0:29:23.985 --> 0:29:27.645
<v Speaker 1>man who is beginning to reckon with his crimes, the

0:29:27.685 --> 0:29:32.675
<v Speaker 1>singer sounds less like making a romantic pledge and more

0:29:32.715 --> 0:29:36.085
<v Speaker 1>like this prayerful plea. coming from the darkness, pleading for

0:29:36.125 --> 0:29:38.965
<v Speaker 1>some sort of redemption, which we know is a theme

0:29:38.985 --> 0:29:43.745
<v Speaker 1>Scorsese is interested in, the possibilities of redemption. So in

0:29:43.815 --> 0:29:46.755
<v Speaker 1>terms of, this is my collide pick, basically. It's not

0:29:46.815 --> 0:29:51.395
<v Speaker 1>necessarily colliding with the moment, but I think it's colliding

0:29:51.595 --> 0:29:57.715
<v Speaker 1>or at least contradicting or commenting on Goodfellas and one

0:29:57.735 --> 0:30:02.565
<v Speaker 1>of Scorsese's other masterful needle drops, For me, maybe because

0:30:02.585 --> 0:30:04.585
<v Speaker 1>of that restriction, not being able to go with Goodfellas,

0:30:04.605 --> 0:30:06.205
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go with In the Still of the

0:30:06.245 --> 0:30:08.075
<v Speaker 1>Night from The Irishman.

0:30:08.425 --> 0:30:11.155
<v Speaker 2>It's one of the few of his movies you're going

0:30:11.235 --> 0:30:13.095
<v Speaker 2>to look at me like I'm an insane person because

0:30:13.135 --> 0:30:15.255
<v Speaker 2>it's also one of his, it was instantly one of

0:30:15.295 --> 0:30:17.075
<v Speaker 2>his most available movies. I didn't even have to go

0:30:17.115 --> 0:30:18.495
<v Speaker 2>to the theaters to go and see it, but I

0:30:18.535 --> 0:30:22.215
<v Speaker 2>haven't seen it. Um, I have seen that opening sequence though,

0:30:22.815 --> 0:30:24.475
<v Speaker 2>because there were a lot of clips going around at

0:30:24.495 --> 0:30:28.575
<v Speaker 2>the time and it's, uh, I've, it looks amazing. And

0:30:28.615 --> 0:30:32.575
<v Speaker 2>I love that in a way, I don't know why,

0:30:32.615 --> 0:30:34.605
<v Speaker 2>but the first thing that I'm flashing on is the movie.

0:30:35.305 --> 0:30:39.365
<v Speaker 2>Do you guys see train spotting too? Surprisingly decent movie. Yes.

0:30:39.805 --> 0:30:41.345
<v Speaker 3>Talk to Boyle here on the show.

0:30:41.365 --> 0:30:41.645
<v Speaker 1>Me too.

0:30:41.705 --> 0:30:44.365
<v Speaker 2>I actually spoke to that movie too. And it's a

0:30:44.705 --> 0:30:48.195
<v Speaker 2>surprisingly good movie. And that it acknowledges his own mortality

0:30:48.355 --> 0:30:50.895
<v Speaker 2>and subverts a lot of what is in the first movie.

0:30:50.915 --> 0:30:52.685
<v Speaker 2>Instead of trying to go for the same thing that

0:30:52.705 --> 0:30:54.465
<v Speaker 2>they did in the first movie, it acknowledges that you

0:30:54.505 --> 0:30:57.385
<v Speaker 2>can't because we're all older now. And that's ridiculous to

0:30:57.425 --> 0:30:58.025
<v Speaker 2>try to go for.

0:30:58.845 --> 0:31:01.125
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you've really got to see the Irishman for that quality.

0:31:01.185 --> 0:31:04.825
<v Speaker 1>But I understand the reluctance, absolutely. If I hadn't... I mean,

0:31:04.885 --> 0:31:07.485
<v Speaker 1>who wants to experience a Scorsese movie for the first time?

0:31:07.725 --> 0:31:07.905
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:31:08.525 --> 0:31:12.925
<v Speaker 1>You know, on... streaming. If you had the opportunity, I think,

0:31:12.945 --> 0:31:16.775
<v Speaker 1>you know, I understand reluctance, but it's really rich. It's

0:31:16.895 --> 0:31:20.395
<v Speaker 1>really rich as a commentary on, you know, what a

0:31:20.435 --> 0:31:22.635
<v Speaker 1>quarter of his career. So, yeah.

0:31:22.995 --> 0:31:23.195
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:31:23.495 --> 0:31:23.875
<v Speaker 3>Agreed.

0:31:24.195 --> 0:31:28.115
<v Speaker 5>And I'll just add that another option you could have

0:31:28.135 --> 0:31:30.035
<v Speaker 5>gone with certainly. And I wonder if you did consider

0:31:30.075 --> 0:31:34.265
<v Speaker 5>it is the Santo and Johnny sleepwalk, which would be

0:31:34.305 --> 0:31:37.605
<v Speaker 5>a perfect example of collision because there, I think he

0:31:37.705 --> 0:31:41.365
<v Speaker 5>uses it twice and And you would never, only Scorsese

0:31:41.385 --> 0:31:46.025
<v Speaker 5>would think to use that when there's mob hits being

0:31:46.065 --> 0:31:46.545
<v Speaker 5>carried out.

0:31:46.965 --> 0:31:47.985
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:31:48.125 --> 0:31:50.965
<v Speaker 3>It's so well done. So Rico, here's the thing.

0:31:51.145 --> 0:31:53.505
<v Speaker 5>I know what your number one is, and I obviously

0:31:53.545 --> 0:31:55.855
<v Speaker 5>know how good your number two was because I shared it.

0:31:56.005 --> 0:31:59.995
<v Speaker 5>And the thing is, you're right. Your number one's even better.

0:32:00.215 --> 0:32:02.495
<v Speaker 5>That's how good your number one is. I can't wait

0:32:02.555 --> 0:32:05.755
<v Speaker 5>for you to drop it on our listeners.

0:32:06.135 --> 0:32:08.275
<v Speaker 2>Have you built up expectations enough? There's no way to

0:32:08.315 --> 0:32:10.035
<v Speaker 2>meet this level of expectation, my friend.

0:32:10.695 --> 0:32:11.495
<v Speaker 1>You know what?

0:32:11.595 --> 0:32:15.755
<v Speaker 5>Our listeners, when they hear it, they'll understand. They know

0:32:15.795 --> 0:32:18.355
<v Speaker 5>my tastes and they'll understand why I'm so backing this.

0:32:18.675 --> 0:32:22.625
<v Speaker 2>It is the moment in the movie Before Sunrise. When

0:32:23.125 --> 0:32:26.265
<v Speaker 2>Ethan Hawke's character and Julie Delpy's character, who have just

0:32:26.305 --> 0:32:30.135
<v Speaker 2>met a few hours before on a train going through Europe,

0:32:30.175 --> 0:32:32.655
<v Speaker 2>they've decided to get off together in the city of

0:32:32.695 --> 0:32:35.615
<v Speaker 2>Vienna and they go to a record store. And this

0:32:36.015 --> 0:32:40.975
<v Speaker 2>is one shot. They go into a little listening booth, again,

0:32:41.275 --> 0:32:49.205
<v Speaker 2>literally drop the needle. Nobody knew this song at the time.

0:32:49.225 --> 0:32:51.325
<v Speaker 2>There's no way that anybody had ever heard of this tune.

0:32:51.345 --> 0:32:54.205
<v Speaker 2>It was a completely unknown tune by this woman named

0:32:54.225 --> 0:32:58.865
<v Speaker 2>Kath Bloom, who I don't think, you know, that album

0:32:58.945 --> 0:33:01.485
<v Speaker 2>may even be like self-released or something. I'm not even

0:33:01.535 --> 0:33:03.075
<v Speaker 2>sure it was released on a label. I don't know

0:33:03.095 --> 0:33:04.275
<v Speaker 2>how Linklater heard about it.

0:33:04.615 --> 0:33:09.695
<v Speaker 4>There's a wind that blows in from the north And

0:33:09.775 --> 0:33:15.915
<v Speaker 4>it says that loving takes its course Come.

0:33:16.965 --> 0:33:19.845
<v Speaker 2>These two have just met, but they're attracted to each other.

0:33:19.945 --> 0:33:22.605
<v Speaker 2>And we just hold on the two of their beautiful

0:33:22.645 --> 0:33:26.135
<v Speaker 2>young faces while they kind of sneak shy looks at

0:33:26.175 --> 0:33:31.335
<v Speaker 2>each other because they 100% should kiss at this moment.

0:33:31.835 --> 0:33:34.615
<v Speaker 2>They know they should kiss. They just met though.

0:33:35.015 --> 0:33:35.635
<v Speaker 3>Will they kiss?

0:33:35.895 --> 0:33:38.545
<v Speaker 2>Should we kiss? I don't know. What is she looking

0:33:38.565 --> 0:33:40.705
<v Speaker 2>at me? I'm not sure. Emma, it is like the

0:33:40.745 --> 0:33:45.505
<v Speaker 2>most tangible moment. And you're like, and it's all one shot.

0:33:46.375 --> 0:33:50.015
<v Speaker 2>You were literally watching two people falling in love on screen.

0:33:51.015 --> 0:33:53.215
<v Speaker 2>Julie Delpy later said that she kind of did fall

0:33:53.255 --> 0:33:55.855
<v Speaker 2>in love with Ethan Hawke a little bit during the

0:33:55.875 --> 0:33:58.785
<v Speaker 2>filming of this scene. And what I really love about

0:33:58.805 --> 0:34:02.465
<v Speaker 2>it is that it starts diegetic. Other movies do this too,

0:34:02.505 --> 0:34:04.425
<v Speaker 2>and I realize I love this as a technique. It

0:34:04.505 --> 0:34:08.645
<v Speaker 2>starts diegetic, and we're watching them in this moment. And

0:34:08.985 --> 0:34:11.194
<v Speaker 2>instead of showing us whether they kiss or not or

0:34:11.275 --> 0:34:14.975
<v Speaker 2>resolving that scene at all, suddenly it cuts off. With

0:34:14.995 --> 0:34:17.515
<v Speaker 2>the music, it goes from being a diegetic song to

0:34:17.555 --> 0:34:21.015
<v Speaker 2>a non-diegetic song. And it's just them now going through

0:34:21.055 --> 0:34:24.815
<v Speaker 2>Vienna together and seeing all the beautiful sights of Vienna.

0:34:25.755 --> 0:34:28.355
<v Speaker 2>And it goes from being this little intimate moment to

0:34:28.415 --> 0:34:32.165
<v Speaker 2>something huge. It's not just about these two characters. It's

0:34:32.205 --> 0:34:35.445
<v Speaker 2>about the feeling of finding somebody you're into, knowing that

0:34:35.465 --> 0:34:39.065
<v Speaker 2>you're probably into each other, not waiting for just the

0:34:39.105 --> 0:34:41.305
<v Speaker 2>right moment to do it and being in the perfect

0:34:41.365 --> 0:34:44.465
<v Speaker 2>place with the exact right person at that moment. Like

0:34:44.485 --> 0:34:47.305
<v Speaker 2>we've all had maybe a few of these perfect moments

0:34:47.485 --> 0:34:52.105
<v Speaker 2>and this, it just captures it so intensely. And if

0:34:52.145 --> 0:34:54.685
<v Speaker 2>you're ever in a, I don't know if I can

0:34:54.725 --> 0:34:56.805
<v Speaker 2>totally say this. I just feel like whenever I'm like

0:34:56.865 --> 0:34:59.425
<v Speaker 2>down on humanity, I will go to YouTube and I

0:34:59.445 --> 0:35:02.765
<v Speaker 2>will watch that clip and then read the comments. And

0:35:02.825 --> 0:35:05.965
<v Speaker 2>it's almost, it's just like a license for people to

0:35:06.045 --> 0:35:09.225
<v Speaker 2>tell their most beautiful life story in the comments. They're

0:35:09.305 --> 0:35:11.725
<v Speaker 2>all like, this reminds me of the girl that I

0:35:11.785 --> 0:35:15.185
<v Speaker 2>met once in Spain. Or this reminds me of the

0:35:15.205 --> 0:35:17.465
<v Speaker 2>girl that got away. Or this reminds me of when

0:35:17.485 --> 0:35:19.585
<v Speaker 2>I met my husband, you know, something like that. Or

0:35:19.605 --> 0:35:22.435
<v Speaker 2>just like this perfect moment of travel or transcendence. Everybody

0:35:22.475 --> 0:35:26.674
<v Speaker 2>has some way into that scene. And it just, even

0:35:26.695 --> 0:35:28.495
<v Speaker 2>in the moment that I saw it, I was just like,

0:35:28.535 --> 0:35:30.955
<v Speaker 2>this has captured something so universal and so amazing. And

0:35:30.995 --> 0:35:35.725
<v Speaker 2>it is also pure cinema. It's one shot, one song,

0:35:36.485 --> 0:35:40.094
<v Speaker 2>no dialogue. It's just one of the most perfect moments

0:35:40.155 --> 0:35:42.015
<v Speaker 2>of cinema ever. I feel like that and the ending

0:35:42.035 --> 0:35:44.035
<v Speaker 2>of that movie instantly put it in my top 10

0:35:44.035 --> 0:35:44.755
<v Speaker 2>movies of all time.

0:35:45.355 --> 0:35:45.555
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:35:45.935 --> 0:35:48.245
<v Speaker 5>Oh, I just realized I don't have to feel shame

0:35:48.285 --> 0:35:51.065
<v Speaker 5>about this, Josh, before Sunrise is in the Pantheon.

0:35:51.165 --> 0:35:51.965
<v Speaker 3>It was ineligible.

0:35:52.045 --> 0:35:54.005
<v Speaker 1>So there, you have an excuse.

0:35:54.205 --> 0:35:55.825
<v Speaker 3>I have an excuse. I knew that.

0:35:56.105 --> 0:35:58.205
<v Speaker 1>Are you going to add it out where you forgot

0:35:58.245 --> 0:35:58.795
<v Speaker 1>to include it?

0:35:59.025 --> 0:35:59.225
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:35:59.555 --> 0:36:01.755
<v Speaker 3>Yes, Sam, take that out.

0:36:02.155 --> 0:36:05.175
<v Speaker 5>No, because of course it would have been eligible because no,

0:36:05.215 --> 0:36:06.535
<v Speaker 5>there's no way I knew that song.

0:36:06.945 --> 0:36:07.625
<v Speaker 3>That you're right.

0:36:07.685 --> 0:36:12.165
<v Speaker 5>The scene is a wonder. I'm moved by it every time.

0:36:12.325 --> 0:36:14.735
<v Speaker 5>And I will, I will every time. And I will

0:36:14.795 --> 0:36:18.395
<v Speaker 5>point out on behalf of film spotting PA, Sophie Kempinar,

0:36:18.935 --> 0:36:23.195
<v Speaker 5>that you will occasionally very, very regularly spot her wearing

0:36:23.275 --> 0:36:27.515
<v Speaker 5>her Alton new t-shirt, the record store, because she, when

0:36:27.575 --> 0:36:31.245
<v Speaker 5>she studied abroad and, She was sure to travel to

0:36:31.305 --> 0:36:35.045
<v Speaker 5>Vienna simply so she could do her before sunrise walking tour.

0:36:35.565 --> 0:36:37.884
<v Speaker 5>And she went to the Alta new record store so

0:36:37.905 --> 0:36:38.445
<v Speaker 5>she could have that.

0:36:38.465 --> 0:36:38.915
<v Speaker 3>It's still there.

0:36:38.955 --> 0:36:40.705
<v Speaker 2>My understanding, you can tell me whether this is true.

0:36:40.725 --> 0:36:43.555
<v Speaker 2>My understanding is that that listening booth did not exist.

0:36:43.615 --> 0:36:45.255
<v Speaker 2>They made it for the movie and they just left

0:36:45.275 --> 0:36:45.555
<v Speaker 2>it there.

0:36:45.715 --> 0:36:46.175
<v Speaker 5>Exactly.

0:36:46.755 --> 0:36:46.955
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:36:47.295 --> 0:36:47.715
<v Speaker 1>Amazing.

0:36:47.735 --> 0:36:47.855
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:36:47.935 --> 0:36:49.635
<v Speaker 2>I want, I totally, by the way, that's one of

0:36:49.675 --> 0:36:52.715
<v Speaker 2>the episodes that I wanted to do this year. I 100%

0:36:52.715 --> 0:36:55.315
<v Speaker 2>wanted to do that thing. We just couldn't get it together.

0:36:55.575 --> 0:36:58.135
<v Speaker 2>And I was in Germany last year. I was like, well, maybe.

0:36:58.625 --> 0:37:00.865
<v Speaker 2>If we do that episode, why don't, Mubi, why don't

0:37:00.885 --> 0:37:03.325
<v Speaker 2>you just pay me to go down to Vienna and

0:37:03.385 --> 0:37:05.404
<v Speaker 2>I'll just go record in there. It'll be a great

0:37:05.445 --> 0:37:06.405
<v Speaker 2>little thing.

0:37:06.945 --> 0:37:07.344
<v Speaker 1>Why not?

0:37:07.525 --> 0:37:08.325
<v Speaker 2>Turns out they didn't.

0:37:10.325 --> 0:37:12.345
<v Speaker 1>But amazing. Next time.

0:37:12.365 --> 0:37:12.985
<v Speaker 2>Thanks, man.

0:37:13.065 --> 0:37:14.625
<v Speaker 3>Well done. Well done, Rico.

0:37:15.225 --> 0:37:15.505
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:37:15.525 --> 0:37:16.765
<v Speaker 3>Excellent.

0:37:17.405 --> 0:37:21.344
<v Speaker 1>Your pick, Rico, was my number one Richard Linklater scene

0:37:21.495 --> 0:37:25.395
<v Speaker 1>when we did that top five. And yeah, couldn't go

0:37:25.435 --> 0:37:27.745
<v Speaker 1>that way because of the Pantheon. But I am going

0:37:27.785 --> 0:37:31.864
<v Speaker 1>to go with another number one filmmaker scene for my

0:37:31.905 --> 0:37:34.705
<v Speaker 1>number one needle drop scene. This is a filmmaker we've

0:37:34.745 --> 0:37:38.065
<v Speaker 1>already discussed, Wes Anderson. Hope people are up for a

0:37:38.085 --> 0:37:40.765
<v Speaker 1>little more Wes Anderson talk. I think so because this

0:37:40.825 --> 0:37:44.285
<v Speaker 1>is a movie, I guess, kind of like Darjeeling Limited,

0:37:44.305 --> 0:37:48.615
<v Speaker 1>not quite as highly regarded as some of the others

0:37:48.915 --> 0:37:53.115
<v Speaker 1>in his filmography. Um, but I'm going to go with

0:37:53.145 --> 0:37:56.634
<v Speaker 1>a choice from the Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou. And

0:37:56.655 --> 0:38:01.135
<v Speaker 1>the stong is Starover from Sigur Rós. It anchors the

0:38:01.155 --> 0:38:04.575
<v Speaker 1>climactic encounter with the Jaguar shark in the Life Aquatic

0:38:04.615 --> 0:38:08.094
<v Speaker 1>with Steve Zissou, which was my pick for best Wes

0:38:08.155 --> 0:38:10.835
<v Speaker 1>Anderson scene. I called it the, I wonder if it

0:38:10.895 --> 0:38:14.415
<v Speaker 1>remembers me scene. That's the response Bill Murray's Steve Zissou

0:38:14.495 --> 0:38:18.415
<v Speaker 1>has to finally meeting this creature who's devoured his friend

0:38:18.475 --> 0:38:23.315
<v Speaker 1>Estevan on an expedition Rather than this exercise in vengeance, though,

0:38:23.595 --> 0:38:28.295
<v Speaker 1>Zissou is overcome. He's stunned. Just has this experience of

0:38:28.755 --> 0:38:34.515
<v Speaker 1>awe when he sees this creature. You know, it is

0:38:34.555 --> 0:38:38.525
<v Speaker 1>Zissou's moment, but it's also this experience of communal epiphany.

0:38:39.425 --> 0:38:42.445
<v Speaker 1>All the other characters in the movie, almost every single one,

0:38:42.845 --> 0:38:46.265
<v Speaker 1>they're squeezed into the submarine with Zissou for this. And

0:38:46.465 --> 0:38:49.205
<v Speaker 1>I do often reference the epiphanies that take place in

0:38:49.265 --> 0:38:53.035
<v Speaker 1>Anderson's films. And for me, this is his grandest. Even

0:38:53.095 --> 0:38:54.795
<v Speaker 1>if it's hard to, this is probably what I like

0:38:54.835 --> 0:38:57.075
<v Speaker 1>about it, it's hard to exactly locate what's happening here.

0:38:57.145 --> 0:39:00.765
<v Speaker 1>What is the nature of the illumination that is actually

0:39:00.825 --> 0:39:03.605
<v Speaker 1>taking place during this epiphany? I mean, we do have

0:39:03.965 --> 0:39:06.924
<v Speaker 1>what I mentioned, Zissou going from vengeance to reverence, but

0:39:07.865 --> 0:39:09.955
<v Speaker 1>why are the others reaching out to touch him in

0:39:09.975 --> 0:39:13.535
<v Speaker 1>this strange benediction? I mean, probably half of them have

0:39:13.575 --> 0:39:16.715
<v Speaker 1>been wronged by him over the course of the movie.

0:39:16.775 --> 0:39:17.955
<v Speaker 3>He does not deserve this.

0:39:18.785 --> 0:39:22.665
<v Speaker 1>Um, but it's, but it's happening now anyway. Um, so

0:39:22.685 --> 0:39:26.335
<v Speaker 1>there's something, you know, more mystical than those going on

0:39:26.395 --> 0:39:28.435
<v Speaker 1>here that I've never quite been able to put my

0:39:28.495 --> 0:39:30.635
<v Speaker 1>finger on. And I do think holding all of it

0:39:30.695 --> 0:39:35.055
<v Speaker 1>together and enabling that mystery is this Sigur Rós track.

0:39:35.575 --> 0:39:38.795
<v Speaker 1>You've got these swelling chords that sort of usher us

0:39:39.035 --> 0:39:43.095
<v Speaker 1>into the moment. You have the twinkling keys that start

0:39:43.335 --> 0:39:47.975
<v Speaker 1>just when we get this, these bioluminescent hints. of something

0:39:48.055 --> 0:39:50.085
<v Speaker 1>out there in the depths, in the darkness? Could it

0:39:50.125 --> 0:39:53.185
<v Speaker 1>be the shark? That's when those keys start to come in.

0:39:54.125 --> 0:39:58.205
<v Speaker 1>And then, of course, you have Yancey Bergeson's glorious vocals, too,

0:39:58.325 --> 0:40:02.345
<v Speaker 1>which they just break out over the screen as the

0:40:02.405 --> 0:40:12.495
<v Speaker 1>shark cruises over the submarines. as we were talking about

0:40:12.515 --> 0:40:16.555
<v Speaker 1>with Darjeeling limited, you know, the timing of the bits

0:40:16.645 --> 0:40:20.525
<v Speaker 1>of music with the images is so precise and on

0:40:20.585 --> 0:40:25.285
<v Speaker 1>track here. I didn't ever really think about what this

0:40:25.385 --> 0:40:29.905
<v Speaker 1>song meant. Like I never had it translated before as

0:40:29.925 --> 0:40:32.685
<v Speaker 1>the many times I've watched it as I've picked it

0:40:32.745 --> 0:40:35.685
<v Speaker 1>for other lists. So I took the time to do it.

0:40:35.965 --> 0:40:39.545
<v Speaker 1>The title means little elf. It's basically about going to

0:40:39.585 --> 0:40:44.685
<v Speaker 1>bed and encountering A magical creature? So, okay. I guess.

0:40:45.105 --> 0:40:47.105
<v Speaker 1>It actually is translatable.

0:40:47.125 --> 0:40:49.865
<v Speaker 2>I always thought that they like sang in their own language.

0:40:50.865 --> 0:40:53.725
<v Speaker 1>This is what I found researching it. So maybe my

0:40:53.785 --> 0:40:56.735
<v Speaker 1>information is incorrect, but take this with a grain of

0:40:56.775 --> 0:40:59.634
<v Speaker 1>salt then. What I found does track though. I mean,

0:40:59.655 --> 0:41:02.535
<v Speaker 1>a few lines I found that they did catch my attention.

0:41:03.195 --> 0:41:07.335
<v Speaker 1>Stares at me, a little elf, transforms me into, but

0:41:07.395 --> 0:41:10.675
<v Speaker 1>doesn't move. And I like that notion of being transformed,

0:41:10.715 --> 0:41:13.975
<v Speaker 1>but not exactly how or into what. I think that

0:41:14.095 --> 0:41:17.555
<v Speaker 1>fits so well for this moment in the movie. It's

0:41:17.615 --> 0:41:21.855
<v Speaker 1>just this emotionally, even spiritually resonant experience that can't entirely

0:41:21.895 --> 0:41:24.395
<v Speaker 1>be explained. So I don't know. I hope, Rico, that

0:41:24.435 --> 0:41:29.545
<v Speaker 1>that isn't all gibberish that I found. But what I

0:41:29.665 --> 0:41:32.265
<v Speaker 1>did discover does track with kind of my experience of

0:41:32.285 --> 0:41:35.675
<v Speaker 1>the moment, at least. Help me process it. And it's

0:41:35.715 --> 0:41:39.175
<v Speaker 1>another completion for me in terms of compliment collide or complete.

0:41:40.475 --> 0:41:44.225
<v Speaker 1>This definitely completes that moment. And in a weird way,

0:41:44.265 --> 0:41:46.925
<v Speaker 1>I've never really figured out kind of completes the movie.

0:41:47.645 --> 0:41:49.864
<v Speaker 1>Maybe someday I'll get there. I'm probably going to watch

0:41:49.905 --> 0:41:50.605
<v Speaker 1>it again next week.

0:41:50.985 --> 0:41:52.925
<v Speaker 2>I kind of feel like as you were saying this,

0:41:52.945 --> 0:41:54.665
<v Speaker 2>and I don't know if I've ever like thought this

0:41:54.945 --> 0:41:57.325
<v Speaker 2>through though, but you're right. It's like, he's done terrible things.

0:41:57.365 --> 0:42:01.285
<v Speaker 2>He's wrong people. And they kind of forgive him in

0:42:01.305 --> 0:42:03.825
<v Speaker 2>a way that, All of, a lot of his movies.

0:42:04.005 --> 0:42:07.245
<v Speaker 2>I mean, certainly the Royal Tenenbaums. A lot of them

0:42:07.365 --> 0:42:13.114
<v Speaker 2>are about, even, yeah, Grand Budapest Hotel. These are characters

0:42:13.145 --> 0:42:15.665
<v Speaker 2>who aren't always like doing the right thing. They were

0:42:15.705 --> 0:42:19.075
<v Speaker 2>not always nice. And by the end, they're somehow forgiven

0:42:19.095 --> 0:42:20.194
<v Speaker 2>in a way.

0:42:20.215 --> 0:42:20.695
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:42:21.055 --> 0:42:23.895
<v Speaker 3>Some redemption for the bastards. Inevitably.

0:42:23.935 --> 0:42:25.015
<v Speaker 1>Which is lovely. Yeah.

0:42:25.055 --> 0:42:25.335
<v Speaker 4>You know?

0:42:25.355 --> 0:42:28.355
<v Speaker 2>And it is like, by the way, it's also a

0:42:28.415 --> 0:42:30.904
<v Speaker 2>really great use of that song because of that. That

0:42:30.925 --> 0:42:33.625
<v Speaker 2>could be a really obvious song. Like basically using any

0:42:33.665 --> 0:42:37.275
<v Speaker 2>time using Sigur Rós because they are so cinematic by design.

0:42:37.335 --> 0:42:38.905
<v Speaker 2>They're so orchestral in a way.

0:42:38.915 --> 0:42:39.215
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:42:39.495 --> 0:42:40.935
<v Speaker 2>But it really deserves it.

0:42:40.975 --> 0:42:41.114
<v Speaker 5>Yep.

0:42:41.635 --> 0:42:45.125
<v Speaker 1>You're halfway to a movie score with their music already.

0:42:45.425 --> 0:42:46.545
<v Speaker 1>And so, yeah.

0:42:46.565 --> 0:42:48.364
<v Speaker 2>But it really deserves it. And I think it may

0:42:48.405 --> 0:42:53.705
<v Speaker 2>also work because he has such that picture box aesthetic.

0:42:53.725 --> 0:42:53.825
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:42:54.405 --> 0:42:58.625
<v Speaker 2>Where the image isn't necessarily grandiose. It's beautiful. It's beautifully composed,

0:42:58.845 --> 0:43:00.344
<v Speaker 2>but it's kind of like, you know, it's not like

0:43:00.365 --> 0:43:03.825
<v Speaker 2>an actual creature. It's not CGI. It's not like beautifully done.

0:43:03.865 --> 0:43:06.985
<v Speaker 2>It's almost puppety in a way, but the music gives

0:43:07.045 --> 0:43:08.065
<v Speaker 2>it a little more grandeur.

0:43:08.085 --> 0:43:10.865
<v Speaker 1>Do you know, I saw, I actually saw the actual

0:43:11.205 --> 0:43:14.115
<v Speaker 1>Jaguar shark prop because I was in London when the

0:43:14.145 --> 0:43:18.094
<v Speaker 1>Wes Anderson exhibit was there at the design museum. It's,

0:43:18.275 --> 0:43:22.255
<v Speaker 1>it's smaller. I want to say it's like maybe seven

0:43:22.275 --> 0:43:25.805
<v Speaker 1>or eight feet. Yeah, it's like a puppet. It's like

0:43:25.845 --> 0:43:31.174
<v Speaker 1>a model. And not quite as awe-inspiring as it was

0:43:31.235 --> 0:43:33.815
<v Speaker 1>for Zissou, but interesting nonetheless.

0:43:33.835 --> 0:43:37.815
<v Speaker 2>I remember actually seeing Grand Budapest at the Arclight Cinema

0:43:37.855 --> 0:43:40.855
<v Speaker 2>here in LA, and they had the Grand Budapest Hotel model. Again,

0:43:40.875 --> 0:43:43.075
<v Speaker 2>it was large, but yes.

0:43:43.265 --> 0:43:44.865
<v Speaker 1>That was there too. That was incredible.

0:43:44.885 --> 0:43:46.125
<v Speaker 2>But it's beautiful to see.

0:43:48.525 --> 0:43:51.785
<v Speaker 5>Well, I had to have, or I ended up having

0:43:52.005 --> 0:43:55.535
<v Speaker 5>one good opening scene needle drop. I thought it was

0:43:55.575 --> 0:44:01.005
<v Speaker 5>fitting or I guess it's, it's ironic a little bit too, too.

0:44:01.325 --> 0:44:03.705
<v Speaker 3>Or no appropriate damage.

0:44:03.405 --> 0:44:08.435
<v Speaker 5>To conclude my list with a closing needle drop. And I,

0:44:09.145 --> 0:44:11.815
<v Speaker 5>I am going to reveal to the world just how

0:44:11.935 --> 0:44:16.015
<v Speaker 5>uncool I was, or certainly how non edgy I was

0:44:16.915 --> 0:44:19.655
<v Speaker 5>back in 1999. Not that that will be a shock

0:44:19.675 --> 0:44:26.114
<v Speaker 5>to anyone because I had heard the, Of Pixies in 1999. Yes,

0:44:26.185 --> 0:44:29.795
<v Speaker 5>I am going with back-to-back 1999 films here at number

0:44:29.815 --> 0:44:35.795
<v Speaker 5>two and number one. I had never heard Pixies in 1999.

0:44:35.795 --> 0:44:38.535
<v Speaker 5>So I had never heard the song that would be

0:44:38.595 --> 0:44:42.634
<v Speaker 5>playing on a loop on my little MP3 player. Yes,

0:44:42.695 --> 0:44:47.495
<v Speaker 5>I had an MP3 player throughout the entire fall after

0:44:47.555 --> 0:44:52.775
<v Speaker 5>seeing David Fincher's Fight Club. The song, Where Is My Mind?

0:44:53.155 --> 0:44:56.815
<v Speaker 5>even though it was released in 1988 on their Surfer

0:44:56.835 --> 0:45:02.675
<v Speaker 5>Rosa album, that scene with Edward Norton, Eleanor Bonham Carter,

0:45:04.345 --> 0:45:08.985
<v Speaker 5>looking out on all the skyscrapers as the bombs go

0:45:09.185 --> 0:45:14.005
<v Speaker 5>off and the buildings fall, the timing of the cut

0:45:15.065 --> 0:45:19.535
<v Speaker 5>from Ed Norton's face, the timing of that cut and

0:45:19.555 --> 0:45:25.015
<v Speaker 5>the flashes from the bomb's With the snare hits building

0:45:25.075 --> 0:45:30.775
<v Speaker 5>to the guitar riff. And then you get, of course,

0:45:30.835 --> 0:45:34.265
<v Speaker 5>Ed Norton's memorable line, You've met me at a very

0:45:34.325 --> 0:45:38.525
<v Speaker 5>strange time in my life. I actually think this number

0:45:38.605 --> 0:45:43.275
<v Speaker 5>one pick, Rico, is like the evil romantic cousin to

0:45:43.315 --> 0:45:46.855
<v Speaker 5>your number one pick from... You two people standing there

0:45:46.875 --> 0:45:47.594
<v Speaker 5>looking at each other.

0:45:47.615 --> 0:45:48.825
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Right.

0:45:49.455 --> 0:45:52.205
<v Speaker 5>And you've met me at a strange time in my life.

0:45:52.865 --> 0:45:55.645
<v Speaker 5>All the, all the cutting to, to this song. So

0:45:55.665 --> 0:45:57.285
<v Speaker 5>this is, this is like you were saying, Josh is

0:45:58.105 --> 0:46:00.885
<v Speaker 5>you can have great songs that are used at the

0:46:01.065 --> 0:46:02.344
<v Speaker 5>end of a movie and it's.

0:46:02.285 --> 0:46:03.265
<v Speaker 3>Not just over the credits.

0:46:03.305 --> 0:46:05.705
<v Speaker 5>It can even be somewhat leading into the credits, but

0:46:05.825 --> 0:46:08.705
<v Speaker 5>it kind of feels like any great song could have

0:46:08.725 --> 0:46:11.864
<v Speaker 5>been plopped in there. That's not the case with your

0:46:11.925 --> 0:46:13.645
<v Speaker 5>choice or this choice. It's.

0:46:13.905 --> 0:46:14.125
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:46:14.525 --> 0:46:14.925
<v Speaker 3>Integral.

0:46:16.505 --> 0:46:19.245
<v Speaker 5>No other song feels like it could be used in

0:46:19.285 --> 0:46:23.485
<v Speaker 5>terms of not only the thematic resonance, but also the

0:46:23.565 --> 0:46:28.725
<v Speaker 5>way it's cut together, the way the camera moves here,

0:46:30.145 --> 0:46:33.925
<v Speaker 5>the rhythm of it, the body movements. It's all timed

0:46:34.545 --> 0:46:38.245
<v Speaker 5>with the music. That main shot is the wide shot

0:46:38.285 --> 0:46:42.145
<v Speaker 5>from behind them, and it tracks slowly forward.

0:46:42.805 --> 0:46:44.385
<v Speaker 3>As they hold hands. It's in pace.

0:46:45.245 --> 0:46:49.515
<v Speaker 5>With this kind of dirge of the song. And Kim

0:46:49.535 --> 0:46:55.755
<v Speaker 5>deals that, that wailing is just completely eerie and deranged.

0:46:56.675 --> 0:46:59.025
<v Speaker 5>And it's, that's how I've always thought of it.

0:46:59.415 --> 0:47:01.335
<v Speaker 3>And it's, it's hollow sounding too.

0:47:01.635 --> 0:47:01.855
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:47:01.915 --> 0:47:04.725
<v Speaker 5>And so it, to me, it really is like a

0:47:04.765 --> 0:47:10.085
<v Speaker 5>voice in your head that just is incessant and will

0:47:10.125 --> 0:47:14.735
<v Speaker 5>not go away. I think it's the paradigm of, to

0:47:14.855 --> 0:47:16.594
<v Speaker 5>use the terminology you were using, Josh, I think it's

0:47:16.635 --> 0:47:20.185
<v Speaker 5>the paradigm of a complimentary needle drop. It goes without

0:47:20.265 --> 0:47:23.905
<v Speaker 5>saying that the lyrics are totally appropriate for a movie

0:47:23.945 --> 0:47:27.785
<v Speaker 5>about a main character having psychological issues.

0:47:28.965 --> 0:47:29.645
<v Speaker 3>Where is my mind?

0:47:29.705 --> 0:47:33.685
<v Speaker 5>Also, literally, the lyrics say, you'll have a collapse as

0:47:33.805 --> 0:47:42.025
<v Speaker 5>financial buildings and potentially the market collapses. And The song,

0:47:42.265 --> 0:47:45.445
<v Speaker 5>apparently it was fairly successful for them as a tune

0:47:45.705 --> 0:47:49.685
<v Speaker 5>on that album. But then Sense, as you would imagine,

0:47:50.345 --> 0:47:54.365
<v Speaker 5>has become their signature song. And Rolling Stone in 2021

0:47:54.365 --> 0:47:57.245
<v Speaker 5>did a top 500 greatest songs of all time. And

0:47:57.265 --> 0:48:00.905
<v Speaker 5>it made the cut at number 493, which would not

0:48:00.945 --> 0:48:05.384
<v Speaker 5>have happened, surely, without the boost it got from this movie.

0:48:05.425 --> 0:48:08.355
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I think it's thought of You already have

0:48:08.435 --> 0:48:11.855
<v Speaker 5>one of the great twist, iconic twist endings in movie history.

0:48:12.115 --> 0:48:14.315
<v Speaker 5>You add on to it one of the greatest needle

0:48:14.355 --> 0:48:18.255
<v Speaker 5>drops ever, and it just elevates it even beyond that.

0:48:18.335 --> 0:48:23.355
<v Speaker 5>So the choice of Fincher here, I don't think we

0:48:23.435 --> 0:48:27.765
<v Speaker 5>think of Fincher as one of the top seven needle droppers,

0:48:28.115 --> 0:48:34.945
<v Speaker 5>even though there are other good options from Fincher, including from.

0:48:34.865 --> 0:48:36.424
<v Speaker 3>Zodiac, Hurdy Gurdy Man.

0:48:36.695 --> 0:48:37.875
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, right, exactly.

0:48:38.475 --> 0:48:41.315
<v Speaker 5>And possibly some others that are not immediately coming to mind.

0:48:41.835 --> 0:48:43.655
<v Speaker 5>But he was the one that didn't, he was the

0:48:43.775 --> 0:48:46.155
<v Speaker 5>one of the five for me that maybe wasn't in

0:48:46.195 --> 0:48:50.695
<v Speaker 5>that upper echelon of filmmakers who regularly employs them.

0:48:51.175 --> 0:48:54.645
<v Speaker 2>Ironic because he's a rock video director. He starts off

0:48:54.685 --> 0:48:55.725
<v Speaker 2>being a rock video director.

0:48:55.985 --> 0:48:56.425
<v Speaker 3>Yes, good point.

0:48:56.485 --> 0:48:58.805
<v Speaker 2>It's almost like he consciously didn't quite want to lean

0:48:58.925 --> 0:49:00.925
<v Speaker 2>super into that. He was going to be an auteur,

0:49:00.965 --> 0:49:01.275
<v Speaker 2>damn it.

0:49:02.285 --> 0:49:03.025
<v Speaker 1>Maybe, yeah.

0:49:03.065 --> 0:49:03.425
<v Speaker 3>Perhaps.

0:49:03.445 --> 0:49:03.525
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:49:04.385 --> 0:49:07.615
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm a little older than you guys. I

0:49:07.655 --> 0:49:10.595
<v Speaker 2>was around when the Pixies first broke. And for the

0:49:10.615 --> 0:49:14.855
<v Speaker 2>college radio crowd, they were instantly iconic. That was one

0:49:14.895 --> 0:49:16.735
<v Speaker 2>of the things that was amazing about them, actually. They

0:49:16.775 --> 0:49:19.375
<v Speaker 2>broke on the scene. They put out basically three perfect albums.

0:49:19.395 --> 0:49:21.535
<v Speaker 2>They put out one more after that. But the first

0:49:21.615 --> 0:49:23.395
<v Speaker 2>three records that they put out, it was like every

0:49:23.435 --> 0:49:27.555
<v Speaker 2>single song was amazing. The entire albums were amazing. It

0:49:27.595 --> 0:49:30.344
<v Speaker 2>was the sound that you wanted before you knew that

0:49:30.365 --> 0:49:34.055
<v Speaker 2>you wanted it. And they also... Looked like they should

0:49:34.115 --> 0:49:36.075
<v Speaker 2>not be the people to deliver it. They just looked

0:49:36.095 --> 0:49:39.395
<v Speaker 2>like the squarest people. They were like from Boston. They

0:49:39.435 --> 0:49:43.395
<v Speaker 2>wore like, you know, t-shirts, you know, Frank Black is

0:49:43.435 --> 0:49:44.715
<v Speaker 2>kind of, you know, at the time he was calling

0:49:44.755 --> 0:49:47.655
<v Speaker 2>himself Black Francis and he screeches like a banshee. You

0:49:47.695 --> 0:49:49.975
<v Speaker 2>expected him to be this like crazy punk and he's

0:49:49.995 --> 0:49:55.935
<v Speaker 2>like this schmo wearing like a t-shirt and shorts. And

0:49:56.275 --> 0:49:59.315
<v Speaker 2>Kim Deal was very beautiful, but also I loved when

0:49:59.335 --> 0:50:02.465
<v Speaker 2>they came back. She basically was dressing like a soccer

0:50:02.485 --> 0:50:06.225
<v Speaker 2>mom on stage and doing those exact kind of eerie vocals.

0:50:06.245 --> 0:50:08.765
<v Speaker 2>It was like this incredible thing. But they never quite

0:50:08.805 --> 0:50:12.665
<v Speaker 2>during their lifetime had the impact on the larger culture

0:50:13.125 --> 0:50:15.915
<v Speaker 2>during the first phase of that band. They broke up

0:50:15.955 --> 0:50:17.935
<v Speaker 2>before they got huge. I mean, they were like opening

0:50:17.975 --> 0:50:19.655
<v Speaker 2>for U2 and stuff. They were always right on the

0:50:19.675 --> 0:50:23.455
<v Speaker 2>verge of being gigantic. And people within a subculture really

0:50:23.495 --> 0:50:26.855
<v Speaker 2>dug them. But it was, I feel like that was

0:50:26.935 --> 0:50:30.275
<v Speaker 2>the thing that really brought them to mainstream fame for

0:50:30.355 --> 0:50:33.385
<v Speaker 2>sure was that track. And it is like, in a way,

0:50:33.415 --> 0:50:36.705
<v Speaker 2>it's the ultimate Gen X moment because it's so, although

0:50:36.805 --> 0:50:39.125
<v Speaker 2>you're right, all of those lyrics work with the images

0:50:39.145 --> 0:50:41.785
<v Speaker 2>you're watching, the song is actually just about Frank Black

0:50:41.825 --> 0:50:44.685
<v Speaker 2>being really high in the Caribbean, like swimming around looking

0:50:44.725 --> 0:50:45.105
<v Speaker 2>at fish.

0:50:45.305 --> 0:50:47.745
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, like scuba diving or something and a fish that

0:50:47.765 --> 0:50:48.265
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't leave him alone.

0:50:48.285 --> 0:50:49.785
<v Speaker 2>It's like it's the end of the world and you're

0:50:49.805 --> 0:50:52.125
<v Speaker 2>listening to a song about a dude stoned in the ocean.

0:50:52.225 --> 0:50:54.525
<v Speaker 2>You know what I mean? It's like, and yet it works.

0:50:55.345 --> 0:50:55.585
<v Speaker 5>It is.

0:50:55.765 --> 0:50:58.445
<v Speaker 3>It is perfect. Talk about a collision.

0:50:59.005 --> 0:51:02.585
<v Speaker 5>Indeed. Those are our top five needle drops. We do

0:51:03.445 --> 0:51:06.185
<v Speaker 5>have some honorable mentions. I know you have some, Rico,

0:51:06.225 --> 0:51:08.645
<v Speaker 5>that you wanted to share. Just before we get to those,

0:51:08.955 --> 0:51:10.435
<v Speaker 5>I mentioned that I had a top seven.

0:51:10.475 --> 0:51:13.094
<v Speaker 3>We've named all of them. They've come up. I had

0:51:13.115 --> 0:51:13.755
<v Speaker 3>them in this order.

0:51:13.895 --> 0:51:19.475
<v Speaker 5>Martin Scorsese, Quentin Tarantino, PTA, Wes Anderson, Sofia Coppola, Richard Linklater,

0:51:20.035 --> 0:51:23.125
<v Speaker 5>Cameron Crowe. And then those are the top seven. And

0:51:23.145 --> 0:51:25.835
<v Speaker 5>then I think number eight would be probably a battle

0:51:25.875 --> 0:51:26.515
<v Speaker 5>between like.

0:51:26.435 --> 0:51:28.035
<v Speaker 3>Edgar Wright and Danny Boyle.

0:51:28.615 --> 0:51:28.835
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:51:29.335 --> 0:51:29.735
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps.

0:51:30.535 --> 0:51:33.615
<v Speaker 5>Those seem like the filmmakers, the directors who most commonly

0:51:34.155 --> 0:51:37.195
<v Speaker 5>use needle drops. I, of course, encourage any listeners to

0:51:37.235 --> 0:51:40.255
<v Speaker 5>write in with other filmmakers they think of when they

0:51:40.375 --> 0:51:44.265
<v Speaker 5>immediately think about needle drops being used in films, feedback

0:51:44.305 --> 0:51:49.225
<v Speaker 5>at filmspotting.net. But Rico, who are some other Not who

0:51:49.265 --> 0:51:51.205
<v Speaker 5>are some other directors, but actually what are some other

0:51:51.245 --> 0:51:53.505
<v Speaker 5>films and some other needle drops that were really tough

0:51:53.765 --> 0:51:54.775
<v Speaker 5>for you to omit?

0:51:55.295 --> 0:51:57.095
<v Speaker 2>This one mainly because it's a pretty deep cut of

0:51:57.135 --> 0:51:59.835
<v Speaker 2>a movie. I don't even remember who directed this. Maybe

0:51:59.855 --> 0:52:02.295
<v Speaker 2>you guys can remember this. It's a 1987 movie called

0:52:02.375 --> 0:52:05.765
<v Speaker 2>Five Corners. What I mainly remember it as is being,

0:52:05.785 --> 0:52:08.965
<v Speaker 2>I think it's the film debut of screenwriter John Patrick Shanley,

0:52:09.285 --> 0:52:13.455
<v Speaker 2>who went on to make Moonstruck, write Moonstruck. And there's

0:52:13.475 --> 0:52:16.135
<v Speaker 2>this moment in it. It's typical John Patrick Shanley. It's

0:52:16.175 --> 0:52:18.725
<v Speaker 2>about kind of like wisecracking people. I think that's set

0:52:18.785 --> 0:52:22.485
<v Speaker 2>in Baltimore, something like that. It's a period piece. It's

0:52:22.705 --> 0:52:24.885
<v Speaker 2>set in the mid 60s. So there's a lot of

0:52:24.905 --> 0:52:27.985
<v Speaker 2>mid 60s music in it. But this moment stands out

0:52:28.005 --> 0:52:29.665
<v Speaker 2>because there are a number of needle drops like the

0:52:29.705 --> 0:52:31.975
<v Speaker 2>doo-wop stuff that you would imagine that would be in it.

0:52:32.605 --> 0:52:34.605
<v Speaker 2>It actually ends with In My Life from the Beatles.

0:52:35.365 --> 0:52:37.215
<v Speaker 2>But there's a moment right in the middle of it

0:52:37.255 --> 0:52:40.635
<v Speaker 2>where these two kind of juvenile delinquent types who are

0:52:40.655 --> 0:52:42.745
<v Speaker 2>playing hooky from school, who you're not quite sure how

0:52:42.785 --> 0:52:45.785
<v Speaker 2>to feel about. They're, they're kind of cool. They seem fun.

0:52:46.185 --> 0:52:47.905
<v Speaker 2>One of them, I think might even be an exchange

0:52:47.945 --> 0:52:49.965
<v Speaker 2>student or something, but they're playing hooky from school. They

0:52:49.985 --> 0:52:52.005
<v Speaker 2>meet up with these two gum cracking girls who are

0:52:52.045 --> 0:52:54.864
<v Speaker 2>also playing hooky from school and convince them to hang

0:52:54.925 --> 0:53:00.045
<v Speaker 2>out with them. And they go to, it's great because

0:53:00.665 --> 0:53:04.175
<v Speaker 2>it's a moment where they, they, It's like this is

0:53:04.215 --> 0:53:06.035
<v Speaker 2>something they've done before that they know is going to

0:53:06.075 --> 0:53:08.475
<v Speaker 2>wow these girls, but it's the last thing that you'd expect.

0:53:08.575 --> 0:53:11.685
<v Speaker 2>They have created some device that allows them to open

0:53:11.765 --> 0:53:15.565
<v Speaker 2>up an elevator doors and step out through the open

0:53:15.605 --> 0:53:20.634
<v Speaker 2>elevator doors onto the top of elevators. And As they

0:53:20.695 --> 0:53:23.725
<v Speaker 2>go up and down inside the elevator shaft, being able

0:53:23.765 --> 0:53:25.965
<v Speaker 2>to see the inside of the elevator shaft instead of

0:53:26.005 --> 0:53:28.805
<v Speaker 2>being stuck inside the elevator. I think they paired up

0:53:28.865 --> 0:53:31.045
<v Speaker 2>as couples, one's on one elevator, one's on the other.

0:53:31.065 --> 0:53:32.465
<v Speaker 2>And they're kind of going up and down and seeing

0:53:32.505 --> 0:53:36.545
<v Speaker 2>each other and talking to each other. Suddenly, Deleuze's Lakme

0:53:36.765 --> 0:53:40.725
<v Speaker 2>starts playing, which is actually a pretty cliched cut. I've now,

0:53:40.915 --> 0:53:42.595
<v Speaker 2>since I've seen that movie, which I saw when I

0:53:42.635 --> 0:53:45.815
<v Speaker 2>was pretty young, that is used all the time. It's

0:53:45.835 --> 0:53:47.815
<v Speaker 2>a very elegaic piece of music. So anytime you want

0:53:47.835 --> 0:53:50.255
<v Speaker 2>to convey grace, you use that thing. But to use

0:53:50.315 --> 0:53:53.935
<v Speaker 2>that in the middle of this milieu, this gritty milieu,

0:53:54.555 --> 0:53:58.515
<v Speaker 2>this moment of magic that is actually not all that magical.

0:53:58.535 --> 0:54:01.245
<v Speaker 2>They're in an elevator shaft, but to them, it's this

0:54:01.325 --> 0:54:04.445
<v Speaker 2>magical moment. That just really always resonated with me as

0:54:04.485 --> 0:54:06.265
<v Speaker 2>this beautiful moment. I've since returned to that movie and

0:54:06.305 --> 0:54:09.785
<v Speaker 2>it has some flaws, but that moment still kills. So

0:54:09.825 --> 0:54:11.685
<v Speaker 2>that's one of them. Maybe we should be going around

0:54:11.705 --> 0:54:13.155
<v Speaker 2>or do I just get to like reel these off?

0:54:13.895 --> 0:54:15.575
<v Speaker 3>Oh, just go ahead and list the other ones that

0:54:15.595 --> 0:54:16.595
<v Speaker 3>stand out to you. Okay.

0:54:17.725 --> 0:54:19.785
<v Speaker 2>Hush from Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. That's my

0:54:19.805 --> 0:54:22.985
<v Speaker 2>Tarantino pick. That just captures what it's like to drive

0:54:23.045 --> 0:54:24.925
<v Speaker 2>late at night in Los Angeles if you've ever been here.

0:54:26.225 --> 0:54:28.585
<v Speaker 2>All the Elliott Smith tunes from Good Will Hunting. That

0:54:28.625 --> 0:54:31.205
<v Speaker 2>was the movie that brought him to fame, and I

0:54:31.245 --> 0:54:34.425
<v Speaker 2>will always love it for that. I can't believe I

0:54:34.465 --> 0:54:38.295
<v Speaker 2>didn't use anything from Repo Man, that song. album changed

0:54:38.375 --> 0:54:40.355
<v Speaker 2>my own and a lot of people's musical lives. Uh,

0:54:40.815 --> 0:54:44.515
<v Speaker 2>probably TV party by black flag from that, uh, soundtrack

0:54:45.035 --> 0:54:47.785
<v Speaker 2>head over heels from Donnie Darko. Another example of kind

0:54:47.805 --> 0:54:49.705
<v Speaker 2>of doing a music video in the middle of your film.

0:54:49.765 --> 0:54:52.305
<v Speaker 2>And like the filmmaker is just like, that's what I

0:54:52.325 --> 0:54:55.885
<v Speaker 2>want to do. And it's awesome. Um, an end credit

0:54:55.905 --> 0:54:59.145
<v Speaker 2>song from my own private Idaho, the old main drag by, uh,

0:54:59.205 --> 0:55:01.765
<v Speaker 2>the Pogues, which kind of sums up the story that

0:55:01.785 --> 0:55:03.685
<v Speaker 2>you've just heard. And I'd never really heard the Pogues

0:55:03.745 --> 0:55:06.055
<v Speaker 2>before that. It's beautiful. You got to go with Blue

0:55:06.075 --> 0:55:10.555
<v Speaker 2>Daniel Waltz, 2001. That is a needle drop. That was

0:55:10.595 --> 0:55:11.355
<v Speaker 2>not score.

0:55:12.135 --> 0:55:13.135
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't written for the film?

0:55:13.155 --> 0:55:15.785
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:55:16.245 --> 0:55:19.904
<v Speaker 2>And Under Pressure from After Sun, the way that that,

0:55:20.165 --> 0:55:21.105
<v Speaker 2>oh my God, I just.

0:55:22.825 --> 0:55:24.185
<v Speaker 1>Brings you to tears, that thing.

0:55:24.225 --> 0:55:24.505
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:55:25.385 --> 0:55:28.665
<v Speaker 2>And then finally, just for fun, Slaughterhouse. That's my David

0:55:28.705 --> 0:55:32.085
<v Speaker 2>Lynch pick. Which is this metal tune that's used twice

0:55:32.245 --> 0:55:34.745
<v Speaker 2>in wild at heart. Yes And the reason that I

0:55:34.825 --> 0:55:36.665
<v Speaker 2>really love it is the second time it's used the

0:55:36.725 --> 0:55:39.145
<v Speaker 2>first time they go out dancing They're like, let's go dancing.

0:55:39.265 --> 0:55:41.384
<v Speaker 2>You think it's gonna be like to some David Lynch

0:55:41.425 --> 0:55:47.385
<v Speaker 2>in like 1950s. That's Speed metal Dancing to speed metal

0:55:48.345 --> 0:55:50.985
<v Speaker 2>later They're driving through the desert and they switch through

0:55:51.005 --> 0:55:53.185
<v Speaker 2>the radio and they hear it and they have to

0:55:53.305 --> 0:55:55.965
<v Speaker 2>stop the car and get out and start dancing to

0:55:56.045 --> 0:55:59.375
<v Speaker 2>speed metal in the desert Which then suddenly fades out

0:55:59.395 --> 0:56:03.835
<v Speaker 2>and turns into like this elegaic Angelo Badalamenti score. Only

0:56:03.915 --> 0:56:08.645
<v Speaker 2>David Lynch would fade from speed metal to like whatever

0:56:08.705 --> 0:56:11.305
<v Speaker 2>Angelo Badalamenti is doing with his beautiful lush music.

0:56:11.325 --> 0:56:13.725
<v Speaker 3>So good. Josh, what about you?

0:56:13.745 --> 0:56:17.165
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to name one because though I'm happy

0:56:17.205 --> 0:56:20.145
<v Speaker 1>you put a Sofia Coppola film on your list, Adam,

0:56:20.165 --> 0:56:23.475
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't not at least mention where I would have gone.

0:56:23.495 --> 0:56:27.075
<v Speaker 1>And that would have been from Lost in Translation. Jesus

0:56:27.095 --> 0:56:29.634
<v Speaker 1>and Mary Chain over the ending, just like Honey. It's

0:56:29.815 --> 0:56:30.835
<v Speaker 1>just beautiful.

0:56:31.345 --> 0:56:32.165
<v Speaker 3>Just a few for me.

0:56:32.185 --> 0:56:38.105
<v Speaker 5>A couple that fit my criterion about Discovery, anyway, songs

0:56:38.165 --> 0:56:40.745
<v Speaker 5>I wasn't familiar with. The one that made your list already,

0:56:40.845 --> 0:56:44.085
<v Speaker 5>Silly Games from Lovers Rock. I did actually mention this

0:56:44.165 --> 0:56:46.645
<v Speaker 5>one already, Mad World from Donnie Darko, a song I

0:56:46.685 --> 0:56:49.975
<v Speaker 5>hadn't heard until I saw that film. Link later, the

0:56:50.035 --> 0:56:53.975
<v Speaker 5>song Hero from Boyhood by Family of the Year. how

0:56:54.015 --> 0:56:54.935
<v Speaker 5>that's used.

0:56:54.935 --> 0:56:57.475
<v Speaker 3>In that movie. How about this one?

0:56:58.355 --> 0:57:00.555
<v Speaker 5>Damn, it feels good to be a gangster by ghetto

0:57:00.575 --> 0:57:02.385
<v Speaker 5>boys from office space.

0:57:03.445 --> 0:57:03.785
<v Speaker 4>So good.

0:57:03.845 --> 0:57:04.305
<v Speaker 3>So good.

0:57:04.385 --> 0:57:07.105
<v Speaker 5>Now the, this is, this is all I have in

0:57:07.145 --> 0:57:09.965
<v Speaker 5>terms of three more. Cause it would just go on

0:57:10.045 --> 0:57:12.925
<v Speaker 5>two more, two, two long, three more that it just

0:57:12.985 --> 0:57:15.305
<v Speaker 5>pains me that I couldn't find a way to fit

0:57:15.345 --> 0:57:17.635
<v Speaker 5>into my list. One of them is the one you

0:57:17.675 --> 0:57:22.595
<v Speaker 5>said Rico already under pressure from after sun. Yeah. Cameron Crowe,

0:57:23.665 --> 0:57:27.185
<v Speaker 5>both in your eyes from say anything that wasn't written

0:57:27.205 --> 0:57:30.105
<v Speaker 5>for the film. Was it Peter Gabriel already, already had that, right?

0:57:30.265 --> 0:57:30.485
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:57:30.685 --> 0:57:33.565
<v Speaker 5>Don't, I want to make sure in your eyes from

0:57:33.625 --> 0:57:38.825
<v Speaker 5>say anything. And of course, tiny dancer, most famous, almost.

0:57:39.345 --> 0:57:40.785
<v Speaker 2>That's one of those tracks where it was just like,

0:57:40.825 --> 0:57:43.305
<v Speaker 2>I would not, I'm, I was too much of a

0:57:43.325 --> 0:57:45.535
<v Speaker 2>hipster at that time to give that song credence. And

0:57:45.575 --> 0:57:48.695
<v Speaker 2>it was like, that I don't care. It's a nose.

0:57:48.715 --> 0:57:49.015
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:57:49.815 --> 0:57:51.695
<v Speaker 1>There's a, there's a, yeah. I mean, we could do

0:57:51.735 --> 0:57:54.675
<v Speaker 1>a list of, I wouldn't call it a reclamation project,

0:57:54.795 --> 0:57:57.915
<v Speaker 1>but something where you could do top five needle drops

0:57:58.115 --> 0:58:01.575
<v Speaker 1>as reclamation projects where they take a song that you're,

0:58:02.135 --> 0:58:06.385
<v Speaker 1>you dismiss perhaps unfairly, but used in the right hands

0:58:06.425 --> 0:58:09.805
<v Speaker 1>in the right film. Suddenly you're made, you're made aware.

0:58:09.625 --> 0:58:10.505
<v Speaker 3>Of how good the song is.

0:58:10.505 --> 0:58:11.945
<v Speaker 5>I didn't love Tiny Dancer when I saw it used

0:58:12.025 --> 0:58:14.025
<v Speaker 5>in that film. I wasn't a big Elton John guy

0:58:14.085 --> 0:58:18.135
<v Speaker 5>and now I'm kind of obsessed with it. And then PTA,

0:58:18.175 --> 0:58:20.205
<v Speaker 5>of course, one of the most famous ones, maybe the

0:58:20.245 --> 0:58:21.085
<v Speaker 5>most famous one.

0:58:21.025 --> 0:58:22.345
<v Speaker 3>In any of his films. It's Boogie Nights.

0:58:22.425 --> 0:58:23.385
<v Speaker 2>Sister Christian.

0:58:23.405 --> 0:58:23.725
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry.

0:58:23.745 --> 0:58:26.665
<v Speaker 5>It's Sister Christian in Boogie Nights. Of course, the use

0:58:26.685 --> 0:58:28.605
<v Speaker 5>of Night Ranger. So have to at least get that

0:58:28.825 --> 0:58:33.435
<v Speaker 5>one on the record. This was obviously.

0:58:33.015 --> 0:58:36.735
<v Speaker 3>Fun because we had a lot to say about these picks.

0:58:36.975 --> 0:58:40.655
<v Speaker 1>Thanks, Rico, for giving us four shows worth of discussion

0:58:40.735 --> 0:58:41.795
<v Speaker 1>and conversation here.

0:58:41.815 --> 0:58:43.415
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if you knew you were in for this,

0:58:43.535 --> 0:58:44.355
<v Speaker 3>but you were game.

0:58:44.395 --> 0:58:45.805
<v Speaker 2>No, I knew as soon as it was like, oh,

0:58:45.825 --> 0:58:46.885
<v Speaker 2>this is going to be a night.

0:58:48.725 --> 0:58:52.645
<v Speaker 3>Once again, just remind people where they can find your show.

0:58:53.285 --> 0:58:59.065
<v Speaker 2>That is MUBI Podcast, cunningly named after the film company

0:58:59.165 --> 0:59:02.485
<v Speaker 2>that puts it out, MUBI Podcast. And you can find

0:59:02.545 --> 0:59:06.485
<v Speaker 2>it wherever pods are cast. And I hope you do.

0:59:07.305 --> 0:59:08.915
<v Speaker 3>Yes, definitely seek it out.

0:59:08.975 --> 0:59:12.435
<v Speaker 5>We thank Rico Galeano from the MUBI Podcast for joining us.

0:59:12.875 --> 0:59:15.295
<v Speaker 5>And we hope you will send us your picks or

0:59:15.435 --> 0:59:18.035
<v Speaker 5>any other feedback about the top five. You can email

0:59:18.075 --> 0:59:20.035
<v Speaker 5>us anytime, feedback at filmspotting.net.

0:59:20.295 --> 0:59:21.655
<v Speaker 2>Thanks, Rico. Thank you, sirs.

0:59:22.185 --> 0:59:25.155
<v Speaker 3>Our thanks again to Rico Galeano. So much fun.

0:59:25.635 --> 0:59:27.575
<v Speaker 5>And next time we have him on, not that it

0:59:27.615 --> 0:59:30.615
<v Speaker 5>was his fault, certainly, we'll try to have a strategy

0:59:30.655 --> 0:59:30.975
<v Speaker 5>in place.

0:59:31.065 --> 0:59:33.625
<v Speaker 3>When we pick such a good topic, Josh.

0:59:33.745 --> 0:59:37.235
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we could do a joint list, though. Sometimes that

0:59:37.295 --> 0:59:40.655
<v Speaker 1>works for a topic, sometimes not. But yeah, it was

0:59:40.735 --> 0:59:43.075
<v Speaker 1>fun every minute of it. So good to have Rico on.

0:59:43.355 --> 0:59:45.375
<v Speaker 5>Producer Sam right now is banging his head against the

0:59:45.415 --> 0:59:50.185
<v Speaker 5>table because he's wanting to announce to the world... I

0:59:50.265 --> 0:59:53.245
<v Speaker 5>knew this would happen. I proposed a joint list, which

0:59:53.265 --> 0:59:56.505
<v Speaker 5>he did to me. And I said, there's no way

0:59:56.865 --> 0:59:59.605
<v Speaker 5>this can be a joint list. I already can't get

0:59:59.645 --> 1:00:03.905
<v Speaker 5>my list down anything lower than 22. And you want

1:00:04.305 --> 1:00:05.845
<v Speaker 5>me and Josh to agree on five?

1:00:06.265 --> 1:00:06.385
<v Speaker 3>No.

1:00:06.525 --> 1:00:06.745
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:00:07.005 --> 1:00:07.625
<v Speaker 1>Can't happen.

1:00:07.885 --> 1:00:10.685
<v Speaker 5>So we remind you that you can find all of

1:00:10.765 --> 1:00:17.025
<v Speaker 5>our picks and links to clips over at filmspotting.net slash lists. Josh,

1:00:17.065 --> 1:00:18.685
<v Speaker 5>that is part two of our show.

1:00:19.305 --> 1:00:21.605
<v Speaker 1>That's it for Film Spotting for now, but we have

1:00:21.705 --> 1:00:24.855
<v Speaker 1>more coming ahead in the Film Spotting feed on Monday.

1:00:25.275 --> 1:00:28.655
<v Speaker 1>Look for the movie Racket with Michael Phillips. The movie

1:00:28.695 --> 1:00:32.175
<v Speaker 1>Law he'll be exploring on that episode is pictures are

1:00:32.195 --> 1:00:36.535
<v Speaker 1>for entertainment. Messages should be delivered by Western Union. Samuel

1:00:36.755 --> 1:00:40.615
<v Speaker 1>Goldwyn shared that one on Tuesday. It's Film Spotting SVU.

1:00:40.695 --> 1:00:43.895
<v Speaker 1>They'll be discussing Desert Warrior. This is a Hulu podcast.

1:00:44.435 --> 1:00:48.535
<v Speaker 1>offering a 7th century Arabia set epic with Anthony Mackie

1:00:48.855 --> 1:00:53.325
<v Speaker 1>and Ben Kingsley. The director of this one is Rupert Wyatt,

1:00:53.385 --> 1:00:56.985
<v Speaker 1>who did Rise of the Planet of the Apes. On Thursday,

1:00:57.045 --> 1:01:00.445
<v Speaker 1>we will have the next picture show for you, where

1:01:00.465 --> 1:01:02.325
<v Speaker 1>there will be a little bit more of the end

1:01:02.485 --> 1:01:06.035
<v Speaker 1>of Oak Street talk. They're pairing it with Steven Spielberg's

1:01:06.475 --> 1:01:09.835
<v Speaker 1>The War of the Worlds. Friday, we're back with a

1:01:09.875 --> 1:01:14.835
<v Speaker 1>draft and another guest. Roxanna Haddadi from Vulture is joining us.

1:01:15.395 --> 1:01:19.845
<v Speaker 1>We'll be picking our favorite Ridley Scott films. Film Spotting

1:01:19.885 --> 1:01:22.305
<v Speaker 1>is produced by Golden Joe Disseau and Sam Van Hogren.

1:01:22.645 --> 1:01:25.665
<v Speaker 1>Without Sam and Golden Joe, this show wouldn't go. Our

1:01:25.705 --> 1:01:29.915
<v Speaker 1>production assistant is Sophie Kempinar. Ariana Martinez is our new

1:01:30.175 --> 1:01:34.955
<v Speaker 1>marketing and social media assistant. Welcome, Ariana. Great to have

1:01:34.995 --> 1:01:39.215
<v Speaker 1>you aboard. And special thanks to everyone at WBEZ Chicago.

1:01:39.335 --> 1:01:43.815
<v Speaker 1>More information is available at WBEZ.org. For Film Spotting, I'm

1:01:43.835 --> 1:01:44.455
<v Speaker 1>Josh Larson.

1:01:44.615 --> 1:01:48.135
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Adam Kempinar. Thanks for listening. This conversation can

1:01:48.155 --> 1:01:49.775
<v Speaker 3>serve no purpose anymore.

1:01:49.795 --> 1:01:51.115
<v Speaker 5>Goodbye.