WEBVTT - Rosenstein Resignation Would Be Greatest Gift To Trump

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Rob Rosenstein,

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the Deputy Attorney General, is heading to the White House.

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>He's been summoned apparently, and they're conflicting reports about whether

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>he is going to resign or president. As we speak.

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>It's just changing every every second because now there's an

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>indication that perhaps he's resisting, which is what we would

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>have expected before because he's been through so many of

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>these turmoils and has always resisted. So that's why this

0:00:57.840 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>report was so shocking to you when it said that

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>he was going to just hanging in. Let's bring into

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Al Hunt's opinion columnist. I want to get your thoughts

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.759
<v Speaker 1>out about how how big of a deal this is. Basically,

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>what's the implication. I think that's what markets are trying

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to figure out. That's what a lot of political strategistic

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out as well. If I were Joe Biden,

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I would say things I can't say in radio, to

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 1>say there's a big deal, A big blanking deal. I

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>mean it really, we got it. I think that I

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:28.680
<v Speaker 1>think most listeners got at the first time. Um it is.

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 1>And whether he resigns or is fired is also a

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>very big deal. And there's a there's an uncertainty at

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>this stage if he resigns because he feels he has to.

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a that's that's the greatest gift that Donald Trump

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>has had, maybe in a year and a half. Because

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>whoever takes over this investigation, and there is the law

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>spells out who would who would be the next in line?

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>It would be the Solicitor General, who would probably recuse

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>himself because his law firm is involved in this. And

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>then it would probably be the head of O l

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>C and Mr Angle. I think it's almost certain they're

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>both movement conservatives. It's almost certain that they would not

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>want to give Bob Mueller the kind of freedom and

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>flexibility and independence the Rosen scene did. So therefore I

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.239
<v Speaker 1>doubt they would fire Mueller, but I think they would

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>probably try to undercut the investigation. So it is a

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>very big deal. Al hunt. Are there figures and individuals

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that are currently working in the White House that are

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:29.239
<v Speaker 1>trying to undercut the president? Oh? Yeah, yeah, they really are.

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, every day he commands no loyalty,

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:36.919
<v Speaker 1>and there there are fights, they're internees, seeing warfarees that

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>go on, those going and go have going on in

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>other and other administrations. They're probably more in this administration.

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 1>The stakes are probably more petty than before, and there

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>is almost no loyalty to this president. So every day

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>there is a sense, I think among a number of

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>people who work there is my god, what is he

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:01.239
<v Speaker 1>up to? I mean, we've had the quotes attributed to

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Gymatics and attributed to John Kelly and attributed to Gary

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Cone that he's a fifth or sixth grade education, he's

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>an idiot. I think there's a widespread weef among a

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>number of people who are in the administration that he's

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>not up to this job and and and it's dangerous,

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:17.119
<v Speaker 1>all right. So I want to want to push back

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:19.959
<v Speaker 1>on you with that, because the economy is doing well,

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'm looking at markets, and frankly, markets have not

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:24.519
<v Speaker 1>been taking that big of a hit from this. I

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>mean Initially there was a spike down, but otherwise it's

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>steady as she goes. We're down a little bit today,

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>but that's to be expected in between earning season and

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>then they're There are a bunch of other reasons, in

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>particular trade, the idea that the US and trying to

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>trade discussions are not going that well. I'm just wondering,

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>do you think that people are too sanguine about what's

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>happening and that it will affect things, just not in

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the near term, or do you think that this is

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>just you know, the political and economic are two totally

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>separate universes that aren't intersecting right now. You know probably

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>better than I do, that it's impossible to separate the

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>two um But I do think that there is a

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>sense the economy is doing well, the underlying fundamentals are strong.

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>There's not a sense there's going to be a problem

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>in the foreseeable future, and there's a feeling that whatever

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the political instability in Washington is, that that's not going

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to affect it much. Whether that's right or not, I'm

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>not sure, uh, And I'd have to go back and

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:18.919
<v Speaker 1>check all the data during the next years, but my

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 1>impression is that that that the the economy at least

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't tank because of the perception that there was a

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>lack of stability in Washington back in seventy three and

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>seventy four. So I'm not really surprised by that. L

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>This is June. Um. What do you think will happen

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>if it turns out that Rod Rosenstein is retiring? How

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>do you think Democrats will react? Well, you put it,

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you put it very diplomatically, retiring. Is he going to

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>resign or resign? Sorry, resigning? I keep on saying retiring,

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>because I think he's had a tough go of it.

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>He sure has. Um. Look, he was appointed in the

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>first place by Jeff Sessions in order to run the

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Department of Justice manage U S attorneys, and then only

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>after he was appointed did it come out that Sessions

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>had his own conflict of interest with the Russians, so

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:07.839
<v Speaker 1>he was he was It was almost an accident that

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>he was put in charge of this, which is what

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>drives Trump so crazy. So if he is fired, I

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>think the Democrats will go ballistic. I think they will

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>try to get legislation that some Republicans have sponsored to

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.679
<v Speaker 1>assure Mother's independence. I think there will be a sense

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that it could be very harmful for Republicans in the

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>midterm elections if he, however, resigns because he says, I

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 1>just can't, I can't, I can't stay there anymore because

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of the perception. Although all of his people have said

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that whatever he said about wearing a wire and it's

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 1>likely for the men's going for the men were said

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>in jest. But if he feels he has to resign,

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that takes a lot of the pressure off

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Republicans al Hunt. The ongoing question of whether he resigns

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>or whether he will be fired, does it really matter it?

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Does it? Does it matters? Uh? It certainly matters politically

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>number one. And secondly it matters and the kind of

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:04.359
<v Speaker 1>pressure that is brought to bear on whoever takes his

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>place overseeing the Mueller investigation. If he is fired, and

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>say Mr Engel, who is the head of the OLC,

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>becomes in charge of the Mueller investigation, Uh, they're going

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to be whether it's the Congress, whether it's outside groups,

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the press, They're gonna be watching him like

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a hawk. And I think there'll be a lot more

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>pressure on him not to blow out the case. So

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it does matter. What do you expect us

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to actually find out what Mueller has been doing aside

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>from the cases that currently have been prosecuted. In other words,

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>does he have the goods to actually get up to

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the White House or is it just gonna be sort

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of left where we've seen it? Well, I don't think

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:45.280
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna know for certainly months. Um, you know, on

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the relative uh spectrum of independent councils, this has not

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>been in the joint out process. I mean, what can

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>start to four years, five years and you know, much

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>less serious charges and much less success. So, you know,

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:02.679
<v Speaker 1>I think we're talking about at least until the early

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>part of next year. That assumes that there's not an

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>interference in the investigation in the process. I don't think

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>he's going to doing between now and November six, and

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>then afterwards, I'm not sure what he's gonna do. But

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole bunch of people, whether it's Michael Cohen

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>or Paul Manaford or some of the others who you

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>know who, as they say, flipped and they're telling him

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff they don't. He doesn't give them that kind of

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a deal unless he thinks they have something to tell,

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>something to reveal, and that is almost always about someone

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>higher up, and there's a limited number of people who

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>were who are higher up. Yeah, Alhan, thank you so

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. I hear your phone beeping.

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure it's on fire. I'm sure you're getting calls

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>from everyone under the sun, and I would love to

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>hear what they have to say. Alhant Bloomberg Opinion columnists

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>coming to us from Washington, d C. Just in the

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>past a few weeks, leaders from the corporate as well

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>as the governmental worlds came together to try to figure

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>out how to steve off some of the malefacts of

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>global warming. One of them was Berry Parking is Chief

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Sustainability and procubent Officer for Mars Incorporated, and he joins

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>us here in our studios. So, Brian and Barry, I

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>was talking about the Global Climate Action Summit in San Francisco.

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>You have pledged to reduce mars is economic ecological footprint

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>carbon footprint by more than sixty percent by the year

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>How do you plan to do that? Well, good morning,

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>all um. It's an incredibly tough challenge because we plan

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to do that while we continue to grow. So we're

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:46.079
<v Speaker 1>going to do that by getting to zero carbon from

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>our own factories and then transforming what we buy and

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>where we buy it. Because most of our greenhouse gas

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>footprint is upstream in the raw materials in agriculture, So

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 1>we have to change the way agricultural works today. Bart

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:01.199
<v Speaker 1>and One, if you could just suscribe a trip that

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you made to a Indonesian coconut supplier, tell that story

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>about how that opened your eyes. I mean, you're a

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>veteran at Mars. How did this open your eyes to

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>this new area for the company. Yeah? Absolutely, you know,

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 1>I think I didn't grow up believing my career was

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be in sustainability. So it came to me,

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and it came to me through procurement and buying raw materials.

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>So I guess maybe fifteen years ago I visited a

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>coconut plantation in Southeast Asia and the scale of this

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>thing is incredible. Hundred kilometers by a hundred kilometers if

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine that, just coconut sixty miles by sixty miles,

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and you can't get to it by road. No, you

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>get there by boats, and you get onto a canal

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>system and you travel around the whole day and all

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you see is coconut. At the end of the day,

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I got back to the to their ports and they

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>have two huge factories where they're processing this coconut and

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a the thing that then it's a big place. And

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>then they said, you're our biggest customer and this is

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>quite a small ingredient for us. And I suddenly got

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a sense of the amount of land, the amount of

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>people that were at that point almost invisible to us

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>upstream in our supply chain. And and that's what got

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.839
<v Speaker 1>really really interested in. You know, what's our footprint on

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the planet and what's our footprint on people? And how

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>do we bring that into our thinking and into our strategies.

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>So how do you make it more sustainable and how

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>do you do it with a cost effectiveness that allows

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>your business to grow? Well, you you start by setting

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the right goal, and we've talked about that extremely challenging goal,

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:42.079
<v Speaker 1>but you have to you have to drive transformation and

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and that means that we have to We have about

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a million smallholder farmers in our supply chain. And you

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>know the story about smallholder farmers today is they're they're

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>either the victim of climate change, their livelihoods are going

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to get impacted. Although the villains of of climate change

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that they're the ones deforesting UH and an expand expanding

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>their land use. So we believe we can move them

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 1>from the victim or or them or the villain to

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the hero. And we can do that by the way

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>they grow the crops in the future. They grow diversified crops,

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>lots of different plants and trees, and they work on

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the quality of the soil. They can actually pull carbon

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>from the atmosphere and and actually be a big part

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of the change that we see. So we have to change.

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:27.839
<v Speaker 1>We have to go back. So we're you know, we're

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>an industrial food business. We have to go back to

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:33.080
<v Speaker 1>agriculture and go all the way back to those farmers

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning our supply chain and work with them

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to change what they do. That that's what will make

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the big difference. I just want to bring a headline

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to you that this is coming to to us from

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>axios Is. The Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein has verbally

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>resigned to the Chief of Staff John Kelly in anticipation

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of being fired by President Donald Trump. This is according

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to a source with direct knowledge of the situation, and

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>this of course from Axios. Will be bringing you more

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>details as we get them. And just to give you

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a sense of the market reaction, the SMP five hundred

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>does is dropping to a session low in response to

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:11.959
<v Speaker 1>this news, but very you know, I want to pick

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>up on what you're talking about, how you have to

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>go to the farmers and I just want to go

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>more to the corporate leaders. When you were in San Francisco,

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 1>did you feel like there was sort of a ground

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>swell of support for this view that you have and

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to push companies in this exact direction or is

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>there more pushback given the political situation? Talking about politics, uh,

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and sort of a reduction of some of the gas

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>emitting regulations. I think everybody gets the size of the

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 1>challenge and the urgency here and and most big companies

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>are working on this. I think what we're saying is

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>that the level of of disruption that has to happen

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>is huge. And you know, we talk about a transparency race.

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, we have to know where all of these

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 1>materials come from, because that's what I can sumers expect

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's what the activists in our supply change. So

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing a level of disruption and transformation that perhaps

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:09.319
<v Speaker 1>others are not yet seeing. I talk about the end

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of the commodity's era. You know, we used to buy

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>these raw materials at arm's length, not really knowing where

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>they came from and not really knowing what conditions. We

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>think that's that era is over. You have to know

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>where everything that's going into your products, whether it's food

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>products or electronics or wherever, you have to know where

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>it all comes from. I just am struck by coconut

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>water that there's an advertisement for it where it says

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>feel good about your life and feel good about what

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you've putting your body in a cost about eight dollars

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to buy, you know, twelve ounces, and I just have

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:40.839
<v Speaker 1>to wonder, you know, is there a cost that people

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>are not willing to pay in order to make things

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 1>more sustainable? On the consumer side, yeah, you know, I

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's been slower than anybody would expect, but consumers

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>are moving towards sustainability. There's always been a few percent

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that really care about this, and I think we're slowly

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:00.439
<v Speaker 1>seeing that grow. It's not happening as fast there's probably

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>any of us predicted, but our view going forward is

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that in five, ten, fifteen years, consumers will make more

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and more conscious choices around more sustainable products. And we

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>want to be at the forefront of that. And that

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>means one of the things that they have to know

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>where everything that's going into the product that they're going

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to eat comes from. And and that's the big change.

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>And if you if you do that, then you're inevitably

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>into longer term relationships and more direct relationships with those farmers.

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>And and that's the big procurement sourcing change that's happening

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>in the world at the moment. Barry because of Eminem's,

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>because of Mars Bars, because of all the great chocolate

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>confectionery products that you make. I want you to talk

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>if you can about coco supply because the whole supply

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>chain topic that you just described as something that you're

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>currently working on with Coco. Indeed, this is part of

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>our overall initiative. You're going to be spending what a

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars over the next decade. Yeah, you know, we

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>all love chocolate and the that the truth is you

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>can't make chocolate without cocoa. So we have to fix

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain of cocoa and and it's incredibly hard.

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Coco is grown by hundreds of thousands, millions of smallholder

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>farmers and we have to help them become more productive

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and and increase their incomes. That many of them are

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>not doing great, and it's been really challenging. We and

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the instrument working on this for decades.

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>So we announced in the last couple of days a

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>big new investment, as you say, a billion dollars to

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>be spent over the next ten years to to invest

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>with farmers to move them from being smallholder farmers that

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>just grow coco too larger farms. We think that that

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that will happen over time and they'll grow more things

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>than coca. Because it's seventy five thou farmers. You're talking

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>about a lot of people right now. Yeah, that's the start.

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think what we need to do is we

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>need to demonstrate at scale as a path to those

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>farmers becoming more and more successful, employing other people and

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and you back to what we're talking about earlier, also

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>pulling carbon out of the atmosphere into their into their farms.

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>We've we've proven this at small scale. The challenge has

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>always been to scale this up to tens and hundreds

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>of thousands, and that's why we're investing more money. So

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm just wondering which countries that are major farm producers

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>have been the most eager to work with you and

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the most effective in making some of these changes. Um

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>we source from Africa, Asia, all over the world. I think,

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, a good example would be on on deforestation

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>in West Africa, where we've made a real breakthrough and

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>building a public private partnership industry and the governments of

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Code of War a Ghana. We've got a really strong

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Cocoa and Forests Initiative now where it lays up very

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>clearly what government going to do and very clearly what

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>industry is going to do. And I think that's a

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>great example of you know, if you really spend the

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>time to work out and get an alignment of interest,

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you can make progress. And and we think we can

0:16:56.640 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>stop deforestation by working together. This is not easy, you know,

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and and many other countries were not yet necessarily on

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 1>the same wavelength. And but that's what we have to do.

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we've shown over and over the industry can't

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 1>solve this on their own, and often government can't solve

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:12.959
<v Speaker 1>this on their own and it's the two together that

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:15.719
<v Speaker 1>will get this done. Berry Parkin, thank you so much

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>for being with us. Truly a pleasure having you. Berry

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:22.199
<v Speaker 1>Parking his chief sustainability and procurement officer for Mars in

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 1>New York. They have a one billion dollar sustainability investment

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:28.679
<v Speaker 1>currently to reduce the carbon footprint of its businesses and

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 1>supply chain by more than six A Crisis of Beliefs,

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Investor Psychology and Financial of fragility and is the title

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.919
<v Speaker 1>of a new book written by Professor Andre Schleifer. He

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 1>is a professor of economics at Harvard University. His co

0:17:56.680 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>author with the book is Nicola Genali is the professor

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of finance at the Bocona University in Italy. In Milan,

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:07.719
<v Speaker 1>and Andre Schleifer joins us now. Professor, thank you very

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>much for being here. Talk a little bit about the

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>misconceptions that investors, or indeed anyone has about financial crises. Well. Thanks,

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a pleasure to be here. Uh. This is a

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 1>book about financial crisis. It uh kind of takes off

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>from where Charlie Kindelberger, the great economic historian, has left off,

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe forty years ago, and it says that, uh, most

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:37.159
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis are kind of the same, which is to

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>say that they start with a bubble. Uh. This time

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>it was a bubble in the housing market sometimes as

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>bubble and government bonds. When the bubbles collapse, people lose

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money, but more importantly, banks lose a

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of money. And that's how you get into a crisis.

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>And oh, it was pretty similar. Now you asked about

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>misconceptions that are kind of two stories that are often

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>floating around that don't square well with this uh uh

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>set of facts. The first one is that it's all

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the bank's fault. You probably have heard about two big

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to fail and how banks were speculating, uh and getting

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>homeowners to households to buy houses. The truth is everybody

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 1>was in on it. People wanted to buy homes, banks

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>wanted to finance homes. Rating agencies wanted to make it simpler.

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 1>When you have a bubble, everybody is speculating. So it's

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>not just the banks, Uh, it's everybody. The second misconception,

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>which is more dramatic one uh. And it's been a

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>misconception that has been kind of um advocated or pursued

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 1>by some of the protagonists, the policymakers in two thousand

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and eight, which is that the crisis is a total surprise,

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 1>which is to say that Lehmann came out of nowhere.

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>The fact of the matter is that bubbles move, bubbles

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and crisis move very very slowly, and there was eighteen

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 1>months of banks facing stratospheric losses before we had Lehman.

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>That's really a very big misconception. There also is a

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>misconception of behavioral economics and how that plays into things.

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 1>People talk about the post two thousand and eight era

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and how millennials, for example, have not been investing in

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>stocks as much as their peers, and not to mention

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the fact that, you know, the sort of fervor that

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>creates bubbles. How does behavioral economics and psychology plan into this. Well,

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the crucial part about bubbles is twofold. One is that

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 1>people think that trees grow to the sky, which is

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:46.919
<v Speaker 1>to say, in this case that people felt that they

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>would get ten percent a year returns on their homes forever,

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>which is what happened for a few years, but it

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:57.640
<v Speaker 1>can't happen forever. The second part, and this is why

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 1>behavioral economics also comes in, is that people don't see

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the risks of bubbles and in particular of imploding bubbles,

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and that gets them too optimistic. But then just as

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you said, incredibly scared. So when you talk about the millennials,

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the millennials, of course, to the extent that they were

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 1>involved in it, got really terrified and have now stayed

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>out of the market. So talking about that balance of

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 1>being overconfident and too overly terrified, where are we right now?

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we clearly are in the regime of overconfidence

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and extrapolation. You know, stock market is at very high levels,

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>they volatility is very very cheap, credit spreads are very

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:46.919
<v Speaker 1>very low, expectations are very optimistic. That are all the

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 1>indicators of UH of financial markets being in a bubble. Now,

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 1>the good news, just to finish this thought, is that,

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 1>of course banks are in much better shape today than

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>they were in two thou eight. So if this bubble

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>starts UH imploding, I don't think we're going to see

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the crisis that we saw ten years ago. But in

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:13.919
<v Speaker 1>that same vein, if indeed the banks are unduly blamed

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>for the financial crisis one of the misconceptions, then do

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you believe that the policy responses were overdone and that

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:26.400
<v Speaker 1>they don't necessarily need all this additional capital, since perhaps

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>they were not as responsible as many people believe. Well, actually,

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I think quite the reverse. Um. It seems to me

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that to the extent that there was a policy here

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eight, it was that the policy

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:41.919
<v Speaker 1>makers were way too slow. They were way behind the curve.

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 1>The way in which huge crisis like Liman occur is

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 1>when banks UH lose a tremendous amount of money and

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>when people think that there's ovency is threatened. When the

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 1>economy or when the financial system in such a situation,

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the UH regulators and policymakers need to intervene fast, and

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>they need to intervene aggressively. And what happened in two

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:13.959
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight is that policy was pretty passive until Lehman,

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 1>and of course it was very active and very aggressive

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>right after Lehman, but it was too late to save

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the U s economy. Yeah, I just want to go

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>back to something you said, where you said we're definitely

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:29.160
<v Speaker 1>in the overconfident part of the cycle. Some people would

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:32.159
<v Speaker 1>argue that you have so many daysayers out there threatening

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to see the downfall of markets, and

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 1>they have been doing this for years that that is

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of a credible specter of threat that sort of

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:41.439
<v Speaker 1>keeps everything in check. Just quickly, here, we have a

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>minute left. What's your what's your perspective on that. Look,

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 1>it's one thing we know about bubbles is that it's

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>impossible to call the top. All the evidence shows that.

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:53.919
<v Speaker 1>And so right now I'm not telling you the markets

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>are going to go down next month, or next year,

0:23:57.800 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>or even in two years. They might keep going up

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>for while. The point is that there are all the

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>signs of a financial system in the state of quite

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>extreme exuberance. Thank you so much for being with us.

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, it's great to be here. Andre S. Lifers,

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Professor of economics at Harvard University in Boston, co author

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of a new book, A Crisis of Beliefs, Investor Psychology,

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and Financial Fragility, talking about some of the misconceptions of

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>financial crises. So there has been a lot of discussion

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:43.199
<v Speaker 1>around investing with a lens toward gender, in other words,

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.360
<v Speaker 1>women and how much power they have in the workforce

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>in a variety of different ways. Reading us now is

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 1>someone who's been working deeply on that. Alicia Levine, chief

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 1>market strategist at bny Melon Investment Management. Thank you so

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>much for being here. Before we get started, I know

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 1>you are announcing a new fund that focuses on gender

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 1>parity in the Japanese workforce, but can you just talk

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>more broadly about the concept of women nomics. Well, thanks

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:12.640
<v Speaker 1>for having me here today. So this is actually very

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>exciting because women omics is actually an an economic platform

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>of the Japanese government. In two thousand and thirteen, the

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister san Zo Abe realized that there had to

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 1>be socio economic changes in Japan in order to have

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 1>economic growth. And that's because Japan has negative population growth,

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and in order to grow g g d P, you

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>have to have a population that can work. And so

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>with negative population growth, you can't grow g d P.

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:44.199
<v Speaker 1>So what does Japan have as a perfect resource, a

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 1>highly educated population. Women were staying home and they weren't

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 1>going into the public sphere and working. And so women Omics,

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 1>which was launched in two thousand and thirteen by the government,

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>is a policy and economic and social policy to encourage

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>women to work and go into the workforce. So that

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 1>means everything from building daycare centers to rewarding companies who

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>promote and hire women, to senior leadership, and so everybody

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 1>has a stake in this now the dry Fast Japan

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 1>Women Omics Fund. It's the first US thematic fund for

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>B N y Melon. Why was that the first one?

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>So actually um B and y Melon Investment Management has

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 1>launched eight thematic funds over the last seven years, but

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 1>many in Europe and Asia. This is the first women

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:39.439
<v Speaker 1>on Mix fund that we're launching here in the US,

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and we think this is the perfect time for several reasons.

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 1>The first is that we have a four year track record,

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and as we know, institutional and on the retail side,

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:54.639
<v Speaker 1>clients wants to see a track record and evidence that

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the thematic investing is actually working, and in fact, we're

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>very proud and happy with our manager's track record here.

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>The other thing is that we just feel like this

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:08.880
<v Speaker 1>is the right moment for thematic funds and gender lends investing.

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>With everything that's happening and the conversations that are happening daily,

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>we think there's a lot of interest. So it is

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:17.199
<v Speaker 1>the idea here to invest in companies that adhere to

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:20.719
<v Speaker 1>the sort of concepts of women omics. The most closely

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>is that the idea so so the fund looks at

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:28.360
<v Speaker 1>companies through three different criteria. The first is do they

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 1>hire and promote women into senior leadership? The second is

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>is their consumer more likely to be a woman than

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a man? And third do they directly or indirectly benefit

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>from women omics? So here's my question, how do you

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of correlate performance with respect to company earnings with

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>some of these policies, Because at the end of the day,

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 1>people want to make money. That's true. So let's let's

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>let's back up a little bit and talk about labor

0:27:56.480 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>force participation. So it took twenty years for or labor

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the female labor force partition participation rate to go from

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty to sixty percent, So that took twenty years. In

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>five years too, from two thousand and thirteen to today,

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:16.479
<v Speaker 1>that rate went from six to sixty seven percent. It

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:20.119
<v Speaker 1>also means that the entire labor force is being driven

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 1>by women entering the labor force, not by men. So

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>if your consumer is a woman, you're more likely to

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 1>be a growth company, you're more likely to outperform. And

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a simple topic, but you can actually

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>draw the lines between women working having more economic power

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and the decisions they make with their capital and it's

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a simple thing, but it works, and

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that you can invest this way. In addition,

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 1>it's UM companies which have or more women on executive

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>committees or in senior leadership tend to outperform the Topics Index,

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>So there is evidence that promotion of women to senior

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>leadership does lead to company out performance. What would you

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:05.719
<v Speaker 1>measure the performance of the fund against? Since there is

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>no specific benchmark, So so we use the Topics Index,

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>which is uh an index of all the Japanese companies UM.

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>That index has over two thousand stocks right now. Our

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>fund is a high conviction fund with fifty positions that

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 1>are curated and and picked specifically on one of these

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>three criteria, and also growth going forward and you know,

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 1>earnings going forward. One thing I'm wondering is how applicable

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>this concept of women on mix is to say the US,

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 1>because Japan is sort of uh its own story unto

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>itself due to the population shrinkage, whereas a place like

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the United States has immigration, has a higher population rate.

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>So we think right now Japan is the place to

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>actually test the gender lens thesis because it's the only

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 1>place where you have an enormous change of women entering

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the workforce driven by the government, and it's measurable, it's

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>very hard. And other places where you already have very

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>high labor force participation rates and closer gender parity in income,

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Japan still has a wage gap, a very wide wage gap,

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and as the government tries to get that to close,

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>you can see that the spending power for women just increases.

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>The criteria for the companies doesn't matter in terms of

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>market cap size, it's all it's all sizes in our

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>fund right now, it tends to be more skewed to

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>small cap. But for instance, we look at sectors all

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 1>over the place, and one of the most interesting sectors

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>were looking at is construction because you wouldn't think that

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>this would be a sector that would benefit from women

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 1>on However, they can't find labor. And as construction becomes

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>more tech oriented and less heavy lifting, it turns out

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that the marginal marginal employee is a woman right now.

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>And so those are the kinds of decisions that we're

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 1>looking and you can really only do it by fundamental

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 1>analysis and knowing what you own. So we tend to

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>be heavy in retail and services construction UM. But something

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>for example as a as a UM, you know a

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>when when when people are out of the house, you

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>may need security services because there's nobody home. So security

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>services are doing well because all of a sudden, the

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>women are not at home anymore. So things you wouldn't

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>think of, but you can definitely draw the line A.

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for being with us and sharing

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>this information. Alicia Levine is the chief strategist for a

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>b N Y Melon, speaking about the Dreyfuss Japan equity

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>women on mix fund. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>p m L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast.

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio m