WEBVTT - Hold The Line w/ Buck Sexton - 06-11-22

0:00:11.657 --> 0:00:14.937
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Buck Sexton Joe podcast, make sure

0:00:14.937 --> 0:00:17.577
<v Speaker 1>you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeart Radio app

0:00:17.817 --> 0:00:22.857
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts. President Joe Biden is

0:00:22.857 --> 0:00:25.177
<v Speaker 1>making a plea to federal lawmakers to take action to

0:00:25.297 --> 0:00:28.457
<v Speaker 1>curb gun violence in America. Of course, Democrats never explained

0:00:28.497 --> 0:00:31.577
<v Speaker 1>how their legislation would stop the shootings. As a matter

0:00:31.577 --> 0:00:33.977
<v Speaker 1>of fact, their ideas tend to have the opposite of

0:00:34.017 --> 0:00:36.737
<v Speaker 1>their intended effect. And it's all good though, as long

0:00:36.737 --> 0:00:39.977
<v Speaker 1>as they do something right. That's what they seem to think. Friends,

0:00:40.137 --> 0:00:48.617
<v Speaker 1>it's time for hold the line. Welcome to hold on.

0:00:48.697 --> 0:00:51.817
<v Speaker 1>I'm Buck Sexton. He had another chance last night, Joe Biden,

0:00:51.857 --> 0:00:54.137
<v Speaker 1>President of United States. Better for worse. I think we

0:00:54.177 --> 0:00:56.937
<v Speaker 1>all see it's pretty much always for worse. But he

0:00:56.937 --> 0:00:59.697
<v Speaker 1>had an opportunity to bring together the American people and

0:00:59.977 --> 0:01:04.457
<v Speaker 1>say some intelligent things, first of all, about the national

0:01:04.857 --> 0:01:07.457
<v Speaker 1>healing process that should still be underwear in the aftermath

0:01:07.457 --> 0:01:10.857
<v Speaker 1>of the horrific shooting in Uvalde, amongst some other shootings

0:01:10.897 --> 0:01:12.897
<v Speaker 1>as well in recent days that having gotten nearly as

0:01:12.937 --> 0:01:17.577
<v Speaker 1>much attention but also atrocious the shooting in Oklahoma, for example.

0:01:18.497 --> 0:01:21.977
<v Speaker 1>But Joe Biden took the opportunity to give a speech

0:01:22.057 --> 0:01:25.977
<v Speaker 1>that was rooted in emotional blackmail, a lot of untruth,

0:01:26.097 --> 0:01:29.977
<v Speaker 1>a lot of misdirection, and was basically just an opportunity

0:01:30.457 --> 0:01:34.777
<v Speaker 1>to attack his political opponents instead of actually looking at

0:01:34.817 --> 0:01:38.577
<v Speaker 1>what would be serious about trying to stop violence in

0:01:38.617 --> 0:01:41.577
<v Speaker 1>this country. Joe Biden wants to tell you how much

0:01:41.577 --> 0:01:44.497
<v Speaker 1>he hates the NRA and the gun owners out there

0:01:44.497 --> 0:01:47.177
<v Speaker 1>who don't want to go along with this. Here he says, though,

0:01:47.217 --> 0:01:52.257
<v Speaker 1>that he has by partisan legislation to do something. This time,

0:01:53.417 --> 0:01:56.577
<v Speaker 1>we have to take the time to do something, and

0:01:56.617 --> 0:02:00.537
<v Speaker 1>this time it's time for the Senate to do something.

0:02:01.137 --> 0:02:03.657
<v Speaker 1>But as we know, in order to do any get

0:02:03.697 --> 0:02:06.057
<v Speaker 1>anything done in the Senate, we need a minimum of

0:02:06.137 --> 0:02:11.377
<v Speaker 1>ten Republican senators. I support the partisan efforts that include

0:02:11.417 --> 0:02:14.497
<v Speaker 1>small group of Democrats and Republicans centers trying to find

0:02:14.497 --> 0:02:18.697
<v Speaker 1>a way, But my god, the fact that the majority

0:02:18.697 --> 0:02:22.297
<v Speaker 1>of the Senate Republicans don't want any of these proposals

0:02:22.617 --> 0:02:26.377
<v Speaker 1>even to be debated or come up for a vote,

0:02:27.377 --> 0:02:32.137
<v Speaker 1>I find unconscionable. We can't fail the American people again.

0:02:33.657 --> 0:02:36.897
<v Speaker 1>Do what, Joe, That's really what this comes in. Okay,

0:02:36.937 --> 0:02:38.977
<v Speaker 1>do what we'll talk about some of the things that

0:02:39.017 --> 0:02:41.137
<v Speaker 1>he said should be done. And see, the reason they

0:02:41.137 --> 0:02:43.177
<v Speaker 1>want to get so much of the emotion out there

0:02:43.377 --> 0:02:46.817
<v Speaker 1>is that they just want a mobilized mentality on this

0:02:46.897 --> 0:02:50.657
<v Speaker 1>issue without having to explain how then the actions that

0:02:50.737 --> 0:02:55.657
<v Speaker 1>they want taken wouldn't actually change anything that we've seen

0:02:55.777 --> 0:02:58.457
<v Speaker 1>going on. And for example, Biden mentioned there have been

0:02:58.657 --> 0:03:01.297
<v Speaker 1>twenty mass shootings. Now, how you define mass shootings is

0:03:01.337 --> 0:03:04.497
<v Speaker 1>something that people There are different definitions of it out there,

0:03:04.497 --> 0:03:06.617
<v Speaker 1>but usually it's three or more people who have been shot.

0:03:06.857 --> 0:03:10.977
<v Speaker 1>Often these mass shootings involve gang activity and other criminal

0:03:11.017 --> 0:03:16.417
<v Speaker 1>activity that is completely in a different category from the

0:03:16.497 --> 0:03:19.897
<v Speaker 1>kind of mass murder that we saw in that school

0:03:19.897 --> 0:03:22.177
<v Speaker 1>in Uval Day. But here's Biden saying, there have been

0:03:22.217 --> 0:03:25.537
<v Speaker 1>twenty mass shooting since you've all day watched, since Valdi

0:03:25.857 --> 0:03:28.817
<v Speaker 1>just over a week ago, there have been twenty other

0:03:28.937 --> 0:03:32.657
<v Speaker 1>mass shootings in America, each with four or more people

0:03:32.737 --> 0:03:39.417
<v Speaker 1>killed or injured, including yesterday at a hospital in Tulsa, Oklahoma,

0:03:39.657 --> 0:03:43.577
<v Speaker 1>a shooter to liberally target a surgeon using an assault

0:03:43.617 --> 0:03:45.377
<v Speaker 1>up and he bought just a few hours before his

0:03:45.537 --> 0:03:50.937
<v Speaker 1>rampage that left a surgeon, another doctor, receptionist and a

0:03:50.977 --> 0:03:56.457
<v Speaker 1>patient dead and many more injured. That doesn't count the

0:03:56.497 --> 0:04:01.057
<v Speaker 1>carnage we see every single day. It doesn't make the headlines.

0:04:02.537 --> 0:04:06.057
<v Speaker 1>So how would any of the things which include an

0:04:06.057 --> 0:04:11.697
<v Speaker 1>assault rifle, band, magazine limitation, How would any of these

0:04:11.737 --> 0:04:17.057
<v Speaker 1>things that he wants, safe storage requirements, red flag laws

0:04:17.697 --> 0:04:19.737
<v Speaker 1>would they have stopped? He said there have been twenty

0:04:19.737 --> 0:04:22.057
<v Speaker 1>mass shootings. Would they have stopped any of those mass shooting?

0:04:22.537 --> 0:04:25.177
<v Speaker 1>If the answer is yes, Joe Biden should tell us

0:04:25.657 --> 0:04:28.457
<v Speaker 1>how and which mass shooting would have been stopped. Let's

0:04:28.457 --> 0:04:32.617
<v Speaker 1>just say, for example, the shooter in Tulsa, Oklahoma, had

0:04:32.657 --> 0:04:35.217
<v Speaker 1>been told sorry, there's an assault rifle ban. In effect,

0:04:35.737 --> 0:04:38.377
<v Speaker 1>shooter could have just bought a pistol, just as lethal,

0:04:38.417 --> 0:04:41.737
<v Speaker 1>could have used two pistols, like the horrific mass shooting

0:04:41.777 --> 0:04:44.297
<v Speaker 1>at Virginia Tech, where it was two pistols. It was

0:04:44.337 --> 0:04:46.177
<v Speaker 1>not a rifle that was used in that mass shooting.

0:04:46.657 --> 0:04:48.457
<v Speaker 1>In fact, if you look at the ford Hood shooting,

0:04:48.457 --> 0:04:51.937
<v Speaker 1>another mass shooting, high casualty account many debts attributed to

0:04:51.977 --> 0:04:56.617
<v Speaker 1>that incident. That horrific incident, pistols, not a rifle. So

0:04:57.297 --> 0:05:01.057
<v Speaker 1>changing the weapon isn't going to actually change the lethal

0:05:01.097 --> 0:05:05.017
<v Speaker 1>intent of psychopathic Hillers, So how would it have stopped anything?

0:05:05.017 --> 0:05:08.337
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't even pretend that he has an answer to that.

0:05:08.897 --> 0:05:11.937
<v Speaker 1>But what he does want, of worse is political mobilization. Here.

0:05:11.937 --> 0:05:16.137
<v Speaker 1>He wants people who are Democrats and I guess some independence,

0:05:16.137 --> 0:05:18.177
<v Speaker 1>although he's not winning over any independence with this from

0:05:18.257 --> 0:05:21.697
<v Speaker 1>the numbers that we can see. He wants his political rivals,

0:05:21.777 --> 0:05:25.177
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party, to suffer the consequences of not going

0:05:25.217 --> 0:05:28.777
<v Speaker 1>along with these proposals that quite clearly would do nothing

0:05:28.817 --> 0:05:33.777
<v Speaker 1>to stop gun violence in any meaningful way. Why. I've

0:05:33.777 --> 0:05:36.737
<v Speaker 1>been in this fight for a long time. I know

0:05:36.777 --> 0:05:41.937
<v Speaker 1>how hard it is, but I'll never give up. Congress fails,

0:05:42.537 --> 0:05:44.657
<v Speaker 1>I believe this time a majority of the American people

0:05:44.657 --> 0:05:47.377
<v Speaker 1>won't give up either. I believe the majority of you

0:05:47.457 --> 0:05:50.017
<v Speaker 1>will act to turn your outrage into making this issue

0:05:50.297 --> 0:05:57.417
<v Speaker 1>central to your vote. Enough enough, No, he's wrong, that's

0:05:57.457 --> 0:06:00.697
<v Speaker 1>not going to happen. But it does make the left

0:06:00.777 --> 0:06:04.977
<v Speaker 1>wing anti gun base feel good about themselves. Really, so

0:06:05.057 --> 0:06:08.177
<v Speaker 1>much of Democrat politics around guns is just they don't

0:06:08.177 --> 0:06:11.937
<v Speaker 1>like gun owners in general, lawful gun owners, criminals Democrats

0:06:11.977 --> 0:06:14.657
<v Speaker 1>always have a soft spot for, but lawful gun owners

0:06:14.697 --> 0:06:17.497
<v Speaker 1>they do not like, and they want to always remind

0:06:18.137 --> 0:06:22.657
<v Speaker 1>everybody of that fact in whatever ways they can. Um karine.

0:06:22.737 --> 0:06:25.977
<v Speaker 1>Jean Pierre says that Biden knows how to get things

0:06:25.977 --> 0:06:29.377
<v Speaker 1>done because he's taken on the gun lobby. Watch thanks.

0:06:30.017 --> 0:06:33.057
<v Speaker 1>If the resident thinks that Congress must act immediately to

0:06:33.497 --> 0:06:35.897
<v Speaker 1>end this apidemic of gun violence, is he going to

0:06:35.937 --> 0:06:38.337
<v Speaker 1>bring any of the key players from Capitol Hill to

0:06:38.377 --> 0:06:44.257
<v Speaker 1>the beach with him tonight? Okay? Um uh so, I

0:06:44.297 --> 0:06:48.857
<v Speaker 1>don't have a whole thing that he knows how to

0:06:48.897 --> 0:06:50.897
<v Speaker 1>get things done. He does, he does. I mean, he's

0:06:51.057 --> 0:06:56.177
<v Speaker 1>he's beating the gun lobby before he has but it's

0:06:56.217 --> 0:06:58.137
<v Speaker 1>not it's not say this is how it's done, but

0:06:58.177 --> 0:07:00.817
<v Speaker 1>it's not his thing. It's actually fact we saw he

0:07:00.937 --> 0:07:04.297
<v Speaker 1>did that in the Senate during his crow Congress days,

0:07:04.297 --> 0:07:08.217
<v Speaker 1>that he beat the gun lobby. Think about this beat

0:07:08.417 --> 0:07:13.977
<v Speaker 1>the gun lobby as if there's some all powerful enemy

0:07:14.017 --> 0:07:17.097
<v Speaker 1>out there. That's the gun lobby. The problem that they

0:07:17.137 --> 0:07:20.017
<v Speaker 1>have is gun owners, as in Americans who have Second

0:07:20.017 --> 0:07:23.337
<v Speaker 1>Amendment rights who don't agree with this nonsense. That's it.

0:07:23.377 --> 0:07:24.937
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the day. By the way, since

0:07:24.937 --> 0:07:30.017
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about ending or rather limiting mitigating violence to

0:07:30.057 --> 0:07:32.457
<v Speaker 1>the greatest of your possible loss of life. Look at

0:07:32.457 --> 0:07:34.577
<v Speaker 1>Democrat policies and cities all across the country. Do you

0:07:34.577 --> 0:07:36.857
<v Speaker 1>think they're really strict about enforcing gun crimes when it

0:07:36.897 --> 0:07:40.097
<v Speaker 1>comes to when it comes to people who are associated

0:07:40.137 --> 0:07:43.257
<v Speaker 1>with gangs, people who have a previous criminal history. Not

0:07:43.377 --> 0:07:48.897
<v Speaker 1>in New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Chicago. Oh no, no,

0:07:49.017 --> 0:07:52.817
<v Speaker 1>they're letting them walk. In many cases, they're giving them

0:07:52.897 --> 0:07:55.377
<v Speaker 1>plea bargains that they should never be handing to people

0:07:55.377 --> 0:07:57.857
<v Speaker 1>with any kind of violent intent who are carrying firearms

0:07:57.857 --> 0:08:01.257
<v Speaker 1>on the streets. But you know, social justice. And then

0:08:01.297 --> 0:08:06.377
<v Speaker 1>there's this Oregon's decriminalization of drugs, for example, Democrats push

0:08:06.457 --> 0:08:09.377
<v Speaker 1>this Oregan's first in the nation's scheme to decriminalize drugs

0:08:09.377 --> 0:08:12.057
<v Speaker 1>and encourage those possessing them to seek medical help has

0:08:12.057 --> 0:08:15.697
<v Speaker 1>been blighted with problems. They've had a seven hundred percent

0:08:15.737 --> 0:08:19.057
<v Speaker 1>increase in overdoses in the past year seven x. Another

0:08:19.097 --> 0:08:22.537
<v Speaker 1>Democrat policy like going soft on crime, like defunding police

0:08:22.577 --> 0:08:25.657
<v Speaker 1>that results in people dying in large numbers. Why don't

0:08:25.657 --> 0:08:28.537
<v Speaker 1>they address that? Because these large numbers of people that

0:08:28.577 --> 0:08:31.737
<v Speaker 1>are dying from this one hundred thousand plus overdoses last year.

0:08:31.897 --> 0:08:36.337
<v Speaker 1>Now Democrats would rather just do a lot of virtue signaling.

0:08:38.057 --> 0:08:39.777
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about protecting your home first. I don't know

0:08:39.777 --> 0:08:41.257
<v Speaker 1>if you saw this. There was a recent story about

0:08:41.257 --> 0:08:43.417
<v Speaker 1>an Arizona real estate agent who found that the home

0:08:43.497 --> 0:08:45.817
<v Speaker 1>she lived and was listed for sale. That's fine, right,

0:08:45.817 --> 0:08:48.697
<v Speaker 1>except no, it wasn't actually selling her home. He was

0:08:48.737 --> 0:08:51.097
<v Speaker 1>the victim of home title fraud, a devastating crime that

0:08:51.137 --> 0:08:53.457
<v Speaker 1>happens all over the country. According to the experts at

0:08:53.497 --> 0:08:55.857
<v Speaker 1>home title lock, the crime is incredibly profitable and hard

0:08:55.857 --> 0:08:58.817
<v Speaker 1>to detect. An identity thief simply creates a fake title

0:08:58.857 --> 0:09:00.977
<v Speaker 1>transfer for your home and refiles as the new owner.

0:09:01.217 --> 0:09:03.017
<v Speaker 1>Then he can take out loans on your home or

0:09:03.057 --> 0:09:06.017
<v Speaker 1>sell it. Typical identity theft services don't cover you, and

0:09:06.097 --> 0:09:09.937
<v Speaker 1>neither does homeowners insurance. Home title lock does. Home title

0:09:10.177 --> 0:09:12.537
<v Speaker 1>puts a barrier around your home's titled the instant. They

0:09:12.537 --> 0:09:15.137
<v Speaker 1>detect anyone tampered with your home's title, They help shut

0:09:15.137 --> 0:09:17.017
<v Speaker 1>it down, and they help get your home back in

0:09:17.097 --> 0:09:20.177
<v Speaker 1>your name. So go to hometetlelock dot com. Now tell

0:09:20.217 --> 0:09:23.177
<v Speaker 1>them that Bucks sent you for thirty free days or protection.

0:09:23.497 --> 0:09:29.897
<v Speaker 1>That's hometetlelock dot com again, hometetlelock dot com. Support from

0:09:29.897 --> 0:09:32.577
<v Speaker 1>my podcast is brought to you by Manscape, the best

0:09:32.577 --> 0:09:36.257
<v Speaker 1>and men's below the waste grooming. Their products are precision

0:09:36.417 --> 0:09:41.737
<v Speaker 1>engineered tools. Manscapes Performance Package is the ultimate men's hygiene bundle.

0:09:42.217 --> 0:09:45.657
<v Speaker 1>Join over four million men worldwide who trusts Manscape with

0:09:45.697 --> 0:09:49.017
<v Speaker 1>its exclusive offer for you twenty percent off and free

0:09:49.097 --> 0:09:53.177
<v Speaker 1>worldwide shipping with the code buck at manscape dot com.

0:09:53.457 --> 0:09:56.257
<v Speaker 1>The Performance Package four point zero includes a ton of

0:09:56.377 --> 0:09:59.937
<v Speaker 1>men's grooming products like the Lawnmower four point zero trimmer,

0:10:00.217 --> 0:10:04.097
<v Speaker 1>the weed Whacker, Era NOO's hair trimmer, performance boxer, briefs,

0:10:04.097 --> 0:10:06.737
<v Speaker 1>and a bunch of other great men's hygiene products you

0:10:06.777 --> 0:10:09.537
<v Speaker 1>never knew you needed, plus a travel bag to hold

0:10:09.537 --> 0:10:12.377
<v Speaker 1>at all. A lawnmower trimmer is the best. It's got

0:10:12.377 --> 0:10:15.817
<v Speaker 1>a cutting edge ceramic blade to reduce grooming accidents, and

0:10:15.937 --> 0:10:18.857
<v Speaker 1>it's waterproof so no more messes on the bathroom floor.

0:10:19.137 --> 0:10:22.177
<v Speaker 1>You'll also get the waterproof weed Whacker Nose, an ear

0:10:22.217 --> 0:10:26.377
<v Speaker 1>hair trimmer with proprietary skin safe technology which helps reduce

0:10:26.497 --> 0:10:30.057
<v Speaker 1>nick snags and tugs in all those delicate areas. Get

0:10:30.057 --> 0:10:32.617
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent off and free shipping with the code buck

0:10:32.697 --> 0:10:36.657
<v Speaker 1>at manscape dot com. That's twenty percent off with free

0:10:36.657 --> 0:10:39.777
<v Speaker 1>shipping at manscape dot com and use code buck to

0:10:39.897 --> 0:10:44.617
<v Speaker 1>unlock your confidence and always use the right tools with Manscape.

0:10:46.537 --> 0:10:49.657
<v Speaker 1>I want to tell you Gorsuch. I want to tell

0:10:49.697 --> 0:10:54.817
<v Speaker 1>you Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind and you will

0:10:54.897 --> 0:11:02.097
<v Speaker 1>pay the price. You won't know what hit you if

0:11:02.137 --> 0:11:06.457
<v Speaker 1>you go forward with these awful decisions. That was that

0:11:06.617 --> 0:11:09.977
<v Speaker 1>under Chuck Schumer back in twenty twenty, funding and off

0:11:10.137 --> 0:11:13.817
<v Speaker 1>a lot like he's calling for consequences, perhaps even inciting

0:11:13.897 --> 0:11:20.337
<v Speaker 1>violence against sitting Supreme Court justices. Suspect Nicholas Roski has

0:11:20.377 --> 0:11:23.497
<v Speaker 1>been arrested fast forward, of course there's today and charged

0:11:23.497 --> 0:11:27.777
<v Speaker 1>with the attempted murder or kidnapping of Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh.

0:11:28.457 --> 0:11:31.337
<v Speaker 1>This man was arrested less than a block from Kavanaugh's

0:11:31.377 --> 0:11:34.497
<v Speaker 1>Maryland home in possession of a handgun, knife, zip ties,

0:11:34.577 --> 0:11:38.617
<v Speaker 1>and burglary tools, among other things. Roski also made a

0:11:38.697 --> 0:11:41.177
<v Speaker 1>deranged nine one one called the police as a warning

0:11:41.617 --> 0:11:44.017
<v Speaker 1>before he attempted to find the justices home. New York

0:11:44.017 --> 0:11:47.297
<v Speaker 1>Post reports California man was incensive about the League Supreme

0:11:47.337 --> 0:11:51.457
<v Speaker 1>Court draft opinion, and he was arrested near Justice Kavanaugh's

0:11:51.497 --> 0:11:54.177
<v Speaker 1>Maryland home Wednesday, after he hatcheder planned to kill the

0:11:54.217 --> 0:11:57.777
<v Speaker 1>jurist to quote, give his life purpose, join me now,

0:11:57.897 --> 0:12:01.097
<v Speaker 1>discussed senior editor at The Federalist, David Orsaani. David, thanks

0:12:01.097 --> 0:12:04.697
<v Speaker 1>for being with us, Thanks for having me. So this

0:12:04.817 --> 0:12:08.977
<v Speaker 1>is officially someone arrested for attempted murder of a sitting

0:12:08.977 --> 0:12:12.897
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court justice. Don't I don't know how much digging

0:12:12.937 --> 0:12:18.337
<v Speaker 1>around you did, David into the Democrat media, but this

0:12:18.497 --> 0:12:23.177
<v Speaker 1>was covered, if at all, as like a page seven

0:12:23.297 --> 0:12:26.537
<v Speaker 1>midway down the fold story. In a way, it was

0:12:26.577 --> 0:12:29.337
<v Speaker 1>pretty shocking. No mention of it at all last night

0:12:29.537 --> 0:12:32.777
<v Speaker 1>on PBS airwaves or on PBS's website. It may may

0:12:32.857 --> 0:12:36.457
<v Speaker 1>have updated it today, but this happened yesterday. It was

0:12:36.497 --> 0:12:39.337
<v Speaker 1>a minor news item in either the New York Times

0:12:39.377 --> 0:12:41.657
<v Speaker 1>a Washington Post. I can't remember now which one it was.

0:12:42.377 --> 0:12:46.497
<v Speaker 1>But if this had been let's say, you had a

0:12:46.617 --> 0:12:50.737
<v Speaker 1>sodomayor under similar threat with a pending decision, does anyone

0:12:50.777 --> 0:12:52.777
<v Speaker 1>think that the media wouldn't act like this was the

0:12:52.817 --> 0:12:54.737
<v Speaker 1>great And by the way, it is a grave threat

0:12:54.777 --> 0:12:58.777
<v Speaker 1>to the institutions of our government. But it feels like

0:12:58.777 --> 0:13:00.777
<v Speaker 1>the partisanship is all that really matters to a lot

0:13:00.817 --> 0:13:04.617
<v Speaker 1>of the folks in the media. Well, yeah, it doesn't

0:13:04.697 --> 0:13:07.097
<v Speaker 1>get tiring to always say. Imagine if it had been

0:13:07.537 --> 0:13:10.937
<v Speaker 1>you know, a liberal who has happened to you or whatever,

0:13:11.097 --> 0:13:13.137
<v Speaker 1>you'd have you know, we'd have we'd be in the

0:13:13.137 --> 0:13:17.977
<v Speaker 1>midst of a national conversation about right wing violence. You know,

0:13:18.537 --> 0:13:20.297
<v Speaker 1>it would be front page news. We'd still we talk,

0:13:20.377 --> 0:13:22.937
<v Speaker 1>we'd be talking about it all the time on every

0:13:22.937 --> 0:13:26.377
<v Speaker 1>single cable network. And these people just simply don't care

0:13:26.577 --> 0:13:30.977
<v Speaker 1>because they other people incite and instigate this sort of thing.

0:13:31.017 --> 0:13:33.697
<v Speaker 1>And it's not just I'm not saying that Chuck Schumer,

0:13:34.257 --> 0:13:37.497
<v Speaker 1>you know, is responsible for the actions of a madman,

0:13:37.977 --> 0:13:41.297
<v Speaker 1>but I will say that it's not. It's it's the

0:13:41.457 --> 0:13:46.737
<v Speaker 1>constantly calling people child murderers, fascists, insurrectionists. You're talking about

0:13:47.337 --> 0:13:51.177
<v Speaker 1>people on the right and dehumanizing them. So if I

0:13:51.217 --> 0:13:53.737
<v Speaker 1>thought those things were true that they said, I would

0:13:53.737 --> 0:13:55.217
<v Speaker 1>pick up a gun too. I mean, we'd all want

0:13:55.217 --> 0:13:57.417
<v Speaker 1>to pick up guns. It would be a rational thing

0:13:57.457 --> 0:13:59.537
<v Speaker 1>to do. But it's of course an insidious lie, and

0:13:59.617 --> 0:14:01.977
<v Speaker 1>yet they do it all the time. And it's it's

0:14:02.017 --> 0:14:06.137
<v Speaker 1>just this whole rhetoric that you see on MSNBC that

0:14:06.217 --> 0:14:08.777
<v Speaker 1>now you hear senators. I mean, Chuck Schumer is a

0:14:08.897 --> 0:14:11.657
<v Speaker 1>very powerful man, and the things he said in that clip,

0:14:11.977 --> 0:14:17.617
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's specific threats to specific people. It's just insanity. Yeah,

0:14:17.657 --> 0:14:19.577
<v Speaker 1>I mean to anybody would say, well, oh, he's just

0:14:19.617 --> 0:14:23.857
<v Speaker 1>talking about what political consequences they have lifetime appointments to

0:14:23.857 --> 0:14:27.577
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court? Well, how are they gonna feel the

0:14:27.617 --> 0:14:30.617
<v Speaker 1>fury of the public for a decision that some leftist

0:14:30.697 --> 0:14:32.977
<v Speaker 1>lunatics don't like. I mean, there's you know, it's not

0:14:33.017 --> 0:14:35.617
<v Speaker 1>like when you're running against somebody in the general election

0:14:35.657 --> 0:14:37.657
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, oh, you know, you're gonna feel the fury

0:14:37.697 --> 0:14:40.577
<v Speaker 1>of at the ballot box, and these are these are judges.

0:14:40.777 --> 0:14:43.417
<v Speaker 1>He did have to step back from that and apologize,

0:14:43.417 --> 0:14:47.057
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, I also can't forgive or forget that

0:14:47.137 --> 0:14:51.057
<v Speaker 1>in the immediate aftermath of the leak of the draft opinion,

0:14:51.137 --> 0:14:55.057
<v Speaker 1>David and the protests outside some of these judges, including

0:14:55.137 --> 0:15:00.657
<v Speaker 1>Kavanaugh's home, which are explicitly clearly illegal under federal statute.

0:15:00.777 --> 0:15:03.537
<v Speaker 1>And as I've explained this to anybody who asks, oh, okay,

0:15:03.537 --> 0:15:06.417
<v Speaker 1>so if I'm being prosecuted, I can hire a mob

0:15:06.537 --> 0:15:09.577
<v Speaker 1>to go stand outside the home of my prosecutor, screaming

0:15:09.617 --> 0:15:12.577
<v Speaker 1>crazy stuff. That's the justice system we think we're allowed

0:15:12.577 --> 0:15:15.977
<v Speaker 1>to have. So Jensaki at the time was saying, well,

0:15:16.017 --> 0:15:17.897
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a lot of stuff that people are

0:15:18.017 --> 0:15:21.017
<v Speaker 1>upset about, so no big deal for these protests outside

0:15:21.017 --> 0:15:25.937
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court justices homes, and it's conservative justices. Let's be honest. Yeah,

0:15:25.977 --> 0:15:28.097
<v Speaker 1>of course, I mean they would never let this happen

0:15:28.297 --> 0:15:30.737
<v Speaker 1>to the others. But I'll say that, you know, you

0:15:30.777 --> 0:15:33.497
<v Speaker 1>make a good point. These are lifetime appointments for a reason.

0:15:33.657 --> 0:15:38.257
<v Speaker 1>They're lifetime appointments because we don't want justices pressured by

0:15:38.377 --> 0:15:44.137
<v Speaker 1>by politics, by protests, by picketing. And yet the Senate,

0:15:44.417 --> 0:15:47.737
<v Speaker 1>the Senate leader tells people to go to the president.

0:15:47.777 --> 0:15:50.737
<v Speaker 1>They actually said. I think Saki said like something like,

0:15:50.857 --> 0:15:52.737
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's just part of the process or whatever

0:15:52.777 --> 0:15:56.017
<v Speaker 1>she said. It was basically encouragement for people to go

0:15:56.137 --> 0:16:01.777
<v Speaker 1>and pressure politically lifetime lifetime judges. I mean, it's it's

0:16:01.817 --> 0:16:04.777
<v Speaker 1>an attack on on separation of power, it's an attack

0:16:04.817 --> 0:16:08.817
<v Speaker 1>on civility and decency. I'm all, listen, I'm basically a

0:16:08.857 --> 0:16:12.377
<v Speaker 1>First Amendment um, you know, absolutist. I mean, if you

0:16:12.417 --> 0:16:14.537
<v Speaker 1>want to you know, go on the street and yellow people,

0:16:14.817 --> 0:16:18.337
<v Speaker 1>you know from you know, decent you know, decent space.

0:16:18.377 --> 0:16:21.497
<v Speaker 1>That's fine by me, but they're but to have our leaders,

0:16:21.617 --> 0:16:25.057
<v Speaker 1>to have left wing leaders basically inciting and egging on

0:16:25.137 --> 0:16:28.457
<v Speaker 1>these people, that is completely out of line. And you know,

0:16:28.537 --> 0:16:30.177
<v Speaker 1>and that's why I think part of the reason why

0:16:30.217 --> 0:16:32.377
<v Speaker 1>they don't cover this stuff. You wrote in The Federalist,

0:16:32.457 --> 0:16:34.697
<v Speaker 1>David that normally I wouldn't blame Democrats for the actions

0:16:34.697 --> 0:16:37.977
<v Speaker 1>of extremists. The problem is that not only does the

0:16:38.057 --> 0:16:40.377
<v Speaker 1>left continue to push the boundaries with humor like threats,

0:16:40.657 --> 0:16:43.217
<v Speaker 1>but they are engaged in the relentless daily smearing of

0:16:43.217 --> 0:16:47.377
<v Speaker 1>their political opponents as seditious, vote stealing, child murdering, fascists

0:16:47.417 --> 0:16:50.497
<v Speaker 1>and insurgents. If this were true, violence would be justified.

0:16:50.537 --> 0:16:53.417
<v Speaker 1>But it's just a sinister lie. I mean, I do

0:16:53.537 --> 0:16:57.217
<v Speaker 1>think that that we have reached a point now where

0:16:57.217 --> 0:17:02.017
<v Speaker 1>you have the total normalization of from the left, from

0:17:02.017 --> 0:17:05.457
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats, of treating anyone who would cast a vote

0:17:05.457 --> 0:17:08.857
<v Speaker 1>for any Republican as effectively a threat to our government.

0:17:08.937 --> 0:17:11.297
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's what this whole direction thing is all about.

0:17:11.457 --> 0:17:15.497
<v Speaker 1>They don't care about the you know, the very foolish

0:17:15.537 --> 0:17:19.617
<v Speaker 1>and simple minded and you know, in some cases criminal

0:17:19.657 --> 0:17:21.697
<v Speaker 1>depending what they did. People that were actually in the

0:17:21.777 --> 0:17:24.857
<v Speaker 1>Capitol on January six. It's about everybody. It's about everyone

0:17:24.857 --> 0:17:28.617
<v Speaker 1>whoever casts a vote for a Republican Yeah, have you

0:17:28.737 --> 0:17:32.297
<v Speaker 1>noticed that, you know, I've noticed that people demand that

0:17:32.337 --> 0:17:34.577
<v Speaker 1>I take some kind of ownership of people who went

0:17:34.577 --> 0:17:36.657
<v Speaker 1>into the Capitol. I don't have anything to do with them.

0:17:36.737 --> 0:17:39.377
<v Speaker 1>I don't agree with what they did. I don't probably

0:17:39.377 --> 0:17:42.297
<v Speaker 1>even agree with their philosophical ideas if they have any ideas.

0:17:42.297 --> 0:17:44.577
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they had any. But yet you

0:17:44.697 --> 0:17:47.897
<v Speaker 1>have a person who tries to wipe out Bernie Sanderson,

0:17:47.977 --> 0:17:50.537
<v Speaker 1>tries to wipe out Republican leadership, or you have someone

0:17:50.617 --> 0:17:53.137
<v Speaker 1>showing up someone's house where you have a summer of

0:17:53.377 --> 0:17:57.337
<v Speaker 1>rioting and you know, and murder, and you know, the

0:17:57.417 --> 0:18:00.297
<v Speaker 1>destruction of the lives of thousands of people. And no,

0:18:00.497 --> 0:18:02.777
<v Speaker 1>they don't take any any ownership of that. They don't.

0:18:02.857 --> 0:18:05.137
<v Speaker 1>They just disconnect from it like it has zero to

0:18:05.217 --> 0:18:07.897
<v Speaker 1>do what they're reatoring. Well, it can't. You know, again,

0:18:07.937 --> 0:18:09.617
<v Speaker 1>we're trying, you know, they want us to play by

0:18:09.657 --> 0:18:11.577
<v Speaker 1>two sets of rules, and that you can't have a

0:18:11.657 --> 0:18:15.657
<v Speaker 1>civil society of functioning democratic republic, when you have two

0:18:15.697 --> 0:18:18.297
<v Speaker 1>sets of rules where you put you know, when one

0:18:18.337 --> 0:18:20.857
<v Speaker 1>person doesn't show up for a subpoena, you put him

0:18:20.857 --> 0:18:23.457
<v Speaker 1>in shackles, and the other guy gets you know, nothing

0:18:23.497 --> 0:18:26.297
<v Speaker 1>happens to him. I mean, you just simply can't function

0:18:26.377 --> 0:18:28.417
<v Speaker 1>that way. And that's literally what's happening. I know I'm

0:18:28.457 --> 0:18:30.697
<v Speaker 1>jumping all over, but I think these things are connected.

0:18:31.777 --> 0:18:33.257
<v Speaker 1>Agree with you. By the way, De Santis had a

0:18:33.297 --> 0:18:35.657
<v Speaker 1>good statement in the Kavanaugh threat situation. He said, it

0:18:35.697 --> 0:18:37.337
<v Speaker 1>wasn't even just the fact that this guy was looking

0:18:37.377 --> 0:18:39.777
<v Speaker 1>to murder someone, which is very serious in itself, that

0:18:39.977 --> 0:18:43.137
<v Speaker 1>was being done in service of changing the outcome at

0:18:43.177 --> 0:18:46.177
<v Speaker 1>the judicial branch of government. And that is really really problematic.

0:18:46.177 --> 0:18:49.177
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is someone who was looking to alter

0:18:49.257 --> 0:18:52.657
<v Speaker 1>the course of this nation through violence, and it's coming

0:18:52.657 --> 0:18:55.337
<v Speaker 1>at a time when Democrats are suggesting that people who

0:18:55.337 --> 0:18:59.337
<v Speaker 1>don't agree with them are a threat to the government itself. Yeah,

0:18:59.377 --> 0:19:03.337
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the leak itself, most likely, almost surely was

0:19:03.417 --> 0:19:07.297
<v Speaker 1>meant to put pressure on the justices who might turn

0:19:07.377 --> 0:19:11.057
<v Speaker 1>overturn rov way and the things that, you know, a

0:19:11.137 --> 0:19:13.857
<v Speaker 1>Senate leader of standing on the steps of the Scode

0:19:13.937 --> 0:19:18.177
<v Speaker 1>is yelling about consequences, is trying to make them intimidate

0:19:18.337 --> 0:19:20.937
<v Speaker 1>those judges. This is just it's a outlandish I don't

0:19:20.977 --> 0:19:23.857
<v Speaker 1>even know historically speaking as certainly in modern history, nothing

0:19:23.897 --> 0:19:26.337
<v Speaker 1>like this has happened. I mean, the closest I can

0:19:26.617 --> 0:19:29.177
<v Speaker 1>think of is when Barack Obama sort of braided the

0:19:30.297 --> 0:19:33.457
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court for upholding the First Amendment. But other than that,

0:19:33.537 --> 0:19:36.537
<v Speaker 1>I really, I really can't think of any comparable situation

0:19:36.617 --> 0:19:39.457
<v Speaker 1>to this. David, appreciate joining us, Thanks for being here.

0:19:40.577 --> 0:19:42.697
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. At first, I want to talk you about

0:19:42.697 --> 0:19:45.777
<v Speaker 1>protecting your online data. A lot of companies promise your

0:19:45.777 --> 0:19:48.337
<v Speaker 1>privacy is guaranteed, but we know that's not true. That's

0:19:48.337 --> 0:19:51.257
<v Speaker 1>why you need a new privacy and cybersecurity application tool

0:19:51.337 --> 0:19:54.897
<v Speaker 1>called Secure. It's spelled SEK. You are. Secure is using

0:19:54.937 --> 0:19:59.057
<v Speaker 1>proprietary encryption and offering secure instant messaging and email with

0:19:59.217 --> 0:20:01.817
<v Speaker 1>Secure all of your communications based on servers and data

0:20:01.817 --> 0:20:04.857
<v Speaker 1>centers hosted in Switzerland, without using any of the big

0:20:04.897 --> 0:20:08.097
<v Speaker 1>tech platforms. Privacy is a big issue now. Without real security,

0:20:08.097 --> 0:20:10.697
<v Speaker 1>people can read your emails, your messages, even your bank information.

0:20:11.017 --> 0:20:13.617
<v Speaker 1>Secure will never mind your data, never ask your phone number.

0:20:13.777 --> 0:20:15.817
<v Speaker 1>You can send emails to your doctor. Banker, lawyer, or

0:20:15.817 --> 0:20:18.217
<v Speaker 1>anyone else with total confidence you're not being spied on.

0:20:18.577 --> 0:20:20.817
<v Speaker 1>Secure is your solution to stop the constant theft of

0:20:20.817 --> 0:20:23.257
<v Speaker 1>your digital identity. Costs only five dollars to the messenger,

0:20:23.497 --> 0:20:26.097
<v Speaker 1>only ten dollars to the messenger and email combination package.

0:20:26.337 --> 0:20:28.817
<v Speaker 1>Go to secure dot com and take back your privacy today.

0:20:28.817 --> 0:20:32.097
<v Speaker 1>That's sekuar dot com and use promo code buck for

0:20:32.177 --> 0:20:34.657
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent off. We'll be right back with more.

0:20:34.857 --> 0:20:42.977
<v Speaker 1>Hold the line. Pandemic Arab policy. Title forty two remains

0:20:42.977 --> 0:20:46.777
<v Speaker 1>in limbo, but migrant shelters in Bordertown say now is

0:20:46.817 --> 0:20:49.777
<v Speaker 1>the time to prepare for its end. With a massive

0:20:49.937 --> 0:20:53.537
<v Speaker 1>migrant caravan already heading toward our border, many are concerned

0:20:53.537 --> 0:20:56.097
<v Speaker 1>that the termination of Title forty two will open the

0:20:56.097 --> 0:20:59.857
<v Speaker 1>floodgates even more to illegal immigration. More than a year,

0:20:59.897 --> 0:21:02.657
<v Speaker 1>Arizona's Attorney General, Mark Bernovich has been fighting to get

0:21:02.697 --> 0:21:05.817
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration to do its job. From suing DHS

0:21:05.897 --> 0:21:10.657
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Mayorchis to the CDC to present Biden himself. Bernovitch

0:21:10.777 --> 0:21:13.537
<v Speaker 1>is doing everything in his power to protect this community,

0:21:13.577 --> 0:21:17.337
<v Speaker 1>stop the White House from rescinding Title forty two. Berney

0:21:17.337 --> 0:21:20.657
<v Speaker 1>in general the state of Arizona, joins me. Now A G. Bernovich.

0:21:20.737 --> 0:21:23.577
<v Speaker 1>Good to have you, sir. Thank you Bob for having me.

0:21:23.617 --> 0:21:27.857
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate it. So just tell me this. The

0:21:27.977 --> 0:21:30.057
<v Speaker 1>end of Tittle forty two would be a problem. But

0:21:30.097 --> 0:21:34.337
<v Speaker 1>as I understand it, mister Attorney General, the reality of

0:21:34.337 --> 0:21:36.737
<v Speaker 1>Title forty two as it is at the border right now,

0:21:36.897 --> 0:21:40.897
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Arizona, Texas, you name it, is that they're

0:21:40.937 --> 0:21:44.937
<v Speaker 1>not really using it except against illegal Mexican and Central

0:21:44.977 --> 0:21:49.217
<v Speaker 1>American migrant. What's going on? Yeah, I mean, you know

0:21:49.777 --> 0:21:52.217
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned this that we'ven't been involved in so many

0:21:52.297 --> 0:21:55.937
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits against the Bide administration trying to force them to

0:21:55.977 --> 0:21:58.457
<v Speaker 1>do their job. Now we went into court, we led

0:21:58.457 --> 0:22:01.657
<v Speaker 1>the coalition, our lawyers argued that the Biden administration who

0:22:01.697 --> 0:22:04.417
<v Speaker 1>could not resume the title forty two. And what we

0:22:04.457 --> 0:22:06.137
<v Speaker 1>had found out they were doing was they were trying

0:22:06.137 --> 0:22:08.337
<v Speaker 1>to play these games where they were trying to create

0:22:08.497 --> 0:22:11.937
<v Speaker 1>exclusions and exceptions for people from certain countries, and the

0:22:11.977 --> 0:22:14.697
<v Speaker 1>court told them they could not do that. But we

0:22:14.777 --> 0:22:17.097
<v Speaker 1>have seen the Biden administration in the past when we

0:22:17.137 --> 0:22:20.617
<v Speaker 1>suit him over the permanent guidance or that time most

0:22:20.617 --> 0:22:24.257
<v Speaker 1>temporary guidance where they were not supporting people deportation orders.

0:22:24.457 --> 0:22:26.137
<v Speaker 1>You know, they would tell the court they're doing it,

0:22:26.297 --> 0:22:28.777
<v Speaker 1>and they would slightly tweak the policy, and then they

0:22:28.777 --> 0:22:31.497
<v Speaker 1>would say, well, we're following that decision, but then they

0:22:31.497 --> 0:22:34.377
<v Speaker 1>would change and create a new policy. So the one

0:22:34.417 --> 0:22:37.697
<v Speaker 1>thing that has been very consistent is the Biden administration

0:22:37.817 --> 0:22:41.657
<v Speaker 1>is trying to systematically undermine the rule of law and

0:22:41.777 --> 0:22:45.217
<v Speaker 1>basically eradicate our entire southern border. I know, folks like

0:22:45.697 --> 0:22:48.337
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about this where we thought at one point

0:22:48.337 --> 0:22:50.817
<v Speaker 1>they maybe wanted to abolish ice, but it's clear they

0:22:50.817 --> 0:22:53.217
<v Speaker 1>just want to eradicate the southern border. So that's why

0:22:53.617 --> 0:22:55.977
<v Speaker 1>I keep having to go into court and keep getting

0:22:55.977 --> 0:22:58.857
<v Speaker 1>these injunctions, keep getting these restraining orders, just to try

0:22:58.937 --> 0:23:01.217
<v Speaker 1>to get the Biden administration to do their actual job.

0:23:01.817 --> 0:23:04.697
<v Speaker 1>Entitle forty two is one of the last things we

0:23:04.777 --> 0:23:06.777
<v Speaker 1>have left in our toolbox, so I'm doing everything I

0:23:06.817 --> 0:23:10.177
<v Speaker 1>can to save it. Here's that list of one of

0:23:10.217 --> 0:23:15.897
<v Speaker 1>the cases you've brought Arizona v. Garland challenging DHS fast

0:23:15.897 --> 0:23:20.057
<v Speaker 1>Track Asylum system, Arizona VCDC, challenging the replication of Title

0:23:20.097 --> 0:23:23.217
<v Speaker 1>forty two. We were just discussing. You've also challenged DHS's

0:23:23.257 --> 0:23:27.937
<v Speaker 1>final guidance, challenging Biden administrations illegal violation, led into cancelation

0:23:28.057 --> 0:23:32.177
<v Speaker 1>of border wall construction, and once again challenging interim guidance.

0:23:32.257 --> 0:23:36.577
<v Speaker 1>So you are not afraid to take the Feds into

0:23:36.657 --> 0:23:40.177
<v Speaker 1>court over this stuff. How have these challenges played out?

0:23:40.297 --> 0:23:44.737
<v Speaker 1>You're winning, some losing some something in between. What's going on? Yeah,

0:23:44.737 --> 0:23:47.537
<v Speaker 1>I mean we unfortunately, for example, in the border wall,

0:23:48.057 --> 0:23:49.897
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's still a litigation. We didn't know we

0:23:49.977 --> 0:23:53.657
<v Speaker 1>were successful at the beginning to appen. We we're continuing

0:23:53.697 --> 0:23:56.697
<v Speaker 1>to litigate it. One thing you did not mention is

0:23:56.737 --> 0:23:59.817
<v Speaker 1>that I literally argued to a Supreme Court in February

0:23:59.857 --> 0:24:02.017
<v Speaker 1>of the public charge rule, and this is where the

0:24:02.017 --> 0:24:06.097
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration tries is trying to give government welfare medicst

0:24:06.177 --> 0:24:09.257
<v Speaker 1>non citizens. And so I'm very confident we're gonna win

0:24:09.297 --> 0:24:11.257
<v Speaker 1>that case. We had take that all the way to

0:24:11.297 --> 0:24:13.857
<v Speaker 1>the US Supreme Court. You know, we got the restraining

0:24:13.977 --> 0:24:16.937
<v Speaker 1>order to stop a Title forty two from being revoked,

0:24:16.977 --> 0:24:19.457
<v Speaker 1>and you know on the permanent guidance, some of these

0:24:19.457 --> 0:24:21.977
<v Speaker 1>other cases are still winding them way through the courts,

0:24:22.017 --> 0:24:25.497
<v Speaker 1>and unfortunately, what the Biden administration is shown is a

0:24:26.257 --> 0:24:30.337
<v Speaker 1>complete disregard not only for administrative procedures, but they're shredding

0:24:30.337 --> 0:24:33.417
<v Speaker 1>the constitution of the process. And so I'm doing everything

0:24:33.417 --> 0:24:35.617
<v Speaker 1>I can but to try to hold them accountable and

0:24:35.657 --> 0:24:38.897
<v Speaker 1>to try to force them to just follow the existing law.

0:24:39.217 --> 0:24:42.417
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, we've been very successful in some cases.

0:24:42.657 --> 0:24:44.777
<v Speaker 1>In some cases we literally are having to take to

0:24:44.817 --> 0:24:47.457
<v Speaker 1>the US Supreme Court to make sure the court orders

0:24:47.497 --> 0:24:49.977
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration just follow the law and do the

0:24:50.057 --> 0:24:53.937
<v Speaker 1>right thing. So with that in mind, what would need

0:24:54.017 --> 0:24:57.377
<v Speaker 1>to happen for I mean, right now, obviously a federal

0:24:57.457 --> 0:24:59.897
<v Speaker 1>judges said Title forty two cannot be rescinded as it

0:24:59.937 --> 0:25:03.657
<v Speaker 1>currently stands. At some point it will be rescinded. One

0:25:03.657 --> 0:25:08.257
<v Speaker 1>would assume, right it's a pandemic related CDC authority. So

0:25:08.577 --> 0:25:12.457
<v Speaker 1>what would have to happen for it to be legal?

0:25:12.777 --> 0:25:16.137
<v Speaker 1>And what would be the change is necessary from your

0:25:16.177 --> 0:25:18.737
<v Speaker 1>perspective that the Biden administration could make so that they

0:25:18.737 --> 0:25:21.617
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't get the massive search. I mean, we already have

0:25:21.697 --> 0:25:23.937
<v Speaker 1>a huge caravan. They asked him a ten to fifteen

0:25:23.937 --> 0:25:26.817
<v Speaker 1>thousand on the way, So what could they do differently?

0:25:26.937 --> 0:25:28.657
<v Speaker 1>And then how could we get and then what happens

0:25:28.697 --> 0:25:32.737
<v Speaker 1>when Title forty two goes Yeah, Title forty two, I

0:25:32.777 --> 0:25:36.097
<v Speaker 1>think we all recognize it's like the little kid the

0:25:36.137 --> 0:25:38.457
<v Speaker 1>story about holding the finger in the diet. I mean,

0:25:38.497 --> 0:25:41.057
<v Speaker 1>that's all we're doing. These are stock out measures, and

0:25:41.097 --> 0:25:44.417
<v Speaker 1>it's because the Biden administration is feeling to build the wall,

0:25:44.417 --> 0:25:46.737
<v Speaker 1>which when it was working, they tried to ascend the

0:25:46.777 --> 0:25:50.137
<v Speaker 1>remain in Mexico policy. They aren't deporting people's deportation orders.

0:25:50.257 --> 0:25:53.177
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to incentimize and monetize people coming here like

0:25:53.257 --> 0:25:56.817
<v Speaker 1>in government benefits. We're trying to stop that. So Type

0:25:56.897 --> 0:25:59.737
<v Speaker 1>forty two. What we basically argued is that, look, if

0:25:59.737 --> 0:26:02.297
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration wants to rescind it, what has been

0:26:02.337 --> 0:26:04.497
<v Speaker 1>good for the goose is good for the gander and

0:26:04.617 --> 0:26:07.657
<v Speaker 1>an assents these left wing groups, they always sue Republican

0:26:07.697 --> 0:26:10.617
<v Speaker 1>administrations trying to tell them they cannot change rules or

0:26:10.617 --> 0:26:14.457
<v Speaker 1>policies without going through the proper rulemaking process. So what

0:26:14.497 --> 0:26:16.537
<v Speaker 1>we've said, and what the judge agreed with, is that

0:26:16.897 --> 0:26:19.457
<v Speaker 1>if the Biden administration wants to restend to revolt Title

0:26:19.537 --> 0:26:22.017
<v Speaker 1>forty two, they have to go through the process, the

0:26:22.097 --> 0:26:26.697
<v Speaker 1>legal process, and now would include rulemaking and public notice

0:26:26.817 --> 0:26:31.897
<v Speaker 1>in common and so yeah, ultimately, if the administration wants

0:26:31.937 --> 0:26:35.017
<v Speaker 1>to change that policy, they can, but we've are that

0:26:35.057 --> 0:26:37.337
<v Speaker 1>they have to do it in the legally correct way,

0:26:37.497 --> 0:26:40.737
<v Speaker 1>and that basically means the states get to have input

0:26:41.057 --> 0:26:43.617
<v Speaker 1>saying this has happens will affect us and this is

0:26:43.617 --> 0:26:47.417
<v Speaker 1>how illegal immigration is impacting us all over the country.

0:26:47.457 --> 0:26:49.617
<v Speaker 1>So they have to provide that notice and they have

0:26:49.657 --> 0:26:52.457
<v Speaker 1>to provide public input in notice in common from the

0:26:52.497 --> 0:26:55.617
<v Speaker 1>states as well. So you are currently the attorney general

0:26:55.657 --> 0:26:58.857
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona, you are running for a Senate seat on

0:26:58.857 --> 0:27:02.057
<v Speaker 1>the Republican side from your state. You have a primary

0:27:02.097 --> 0:27:05.577
<v Speaker 1>to get through here with your primary opponent being like

0:27:05.937 --> 0:27:11.017
<v Speaker 1>Masters Trump Donald Trump, former present the United States Dorist Masters,

0:27:11.057 --> 0:27:13.617
<v Speaker 1>and today he put out a statement I wanted to

0:27:13.697 --> 0:27:15.857
<v Speaker 1>let you react to a mister attorney general. He said

0:27:15.897 --> 0:27:18.497
<v Speaker 1>that Mark Bernovitch is such a disappointment to me. He

0:27:18.617 --> 0:27:21.417
<v Speaker 1>is the current Arizona attorney general, and while he understands

0:27:21.417 --> 0:27:23.977
<v Speaker 1>what took place in the twenty twenty presidential election and

0:27:24.017 --> 0:27:26.297
<v Speaker 1>that it was rigged and stolen, he only views it

0:27:26.297 --> 0:27:28.537
<v Speaker 1>as something he would not like to see happen again.

0:27:28.697 --> 0:27:31.337
<v Speaker 1>That was a statement that former President Trump put out,

0:27:32.577 --> 0:27:34.697
<v Speaker 1>how do you respond to that? I mean, I think

0:27:35.257 --> 0:27:37.817
<v Speaker 1>I've heard your policies, and I've seen a lot of

0:27:37.817 --> 0:27:40.497
<v Speaker 1>what you've you've done as attorney general. It would seem

0:27:40.497 --> 0:27:45.217
<v Speaker 1>to be in line with President Trump's ideology. So what

0:27:45.337 --> 0:27:49.257
<v Speaker 1>happened here? Yeah, you know, Buck, I can never control

0:27:49.697 --> 0:27:51.297
<v Speaker 1>whether people are going to say or do, and what

0:27:51.337 --> 0:27:54.737
<v Speaker 1>I've said, I'm literally told President Trump this is that

0:27:54.977 --> 0:27:57.537
<v Speaker 1>if you care about securing the border, if you care

0:27:57.537 --> 0:28:00.337
<v Speaker 1>about confirming good federal judges that were the first laws

0:28:00.377 --> 0:28:03.297
<v Speaker 1>it is, and not create policy. You care about low

0:28:03.417 --> 0:28:07.457
<v Speaker 1>energy prices and energy independence, if you care about low taxes,

0:28:07.497 --> 0:28:11.417
<v Speaker 1>low regulation, you go through that entire agenda. I've actually

0:28:11.417 --> 0:28:13.777
<v Speaker 1>been there. I mean, I was a prosecutor and I

0:28:13.817 --> 0:28:16.817
<v Speaker 1>began my career game prosecutor protecting our communities. I worked

0:28:16.817 --> 0:28:18.777
<v Speaker 1>in a think tank called the Goldwater to where I

0:28:18.777 --> 0:28:22.977
<v Speaker 1>wrote extensively about federalism and low energy prices. And now

0:28:23.017 --> 0:28:24.977
<v Speaker 1>as an age, look at all I've done. Whether we're

0:28:25.017 --> 0:28:28.897
<v Speaker 1>suing the Biden administration of run constitutional vaccine mandates were

0:28:28.897 --> 0:28:31.337
<v Speaker 1>literally last year, and I've brought this up to the President.

0:28:31.657 --> 0:28:34.377
<v Speaker 1>The most important election case in the generation is literally

0:28:34.417 --> 0:28:38.017
<v Speaker 1>called Bernavici, DNC, And when the left wing groups tried

0:28:38.017 --> 0:28:40.777
<v Speaker 1>to come into places like Arizona, I fought them all

0:28:40.817 --> 0:28:43.577
<v Speaker 1>the way to the Supreme Court and the Court of

0:28:43.697 --> 0:28:47.337
<v Speaker 1>heel ability of states like Arizona and other states now

0:28:47.577 --> 0:28:51.137
<v Speaker 1>to enact election integrity measures that limit and restrict ballot

0:28:51.137 --> 0:28:53.537
<v Speaker 1>harvesting and out of preseine voting. So I've actually been

0:28:53.577 --> 0:28:55.457
<v Speaker 1>in the forefront of these fights. So you get a

0:28:55.457 --> 0:28:57.817
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks now that come up and they talked

0:28:57.857 --> 0:29:00.497
<v Speaker 1>the talk, they've never walked the walk, They've never actually

0:29:00.497 --> 0:29:02.177
<v Speaker 1>been in the fight. And then they can say a

0:29:02.217 --> 0:29:04.817
<v Speaker 1>lot of things now, but where's the evidence, where's the

0:29:04.897 --> 0:29:08.017
<v Speaker 1>receipts as kids saying nowadays with what they've actually done.

0:29:08.057 --> 0:29:10.337
<v Speaker 1>And I've been in the forefront of this and holding

0:29:10.417 --> 0:29:12.577
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, I think it's important

0:29:12.617 --> 0:29:15.857
<v Speaker 1>to be principled. Arizona taken on Mark Kelly because the

0:29:15.897 --> 0:29:19.097
<v Speaker 1>stakes are so high, and if you want someone that

0:29:19.337 --> 0:29:23.857
<v Speaker 1>understands limited government, federalism and concernative principles, then I'm the

0:29:23.897 --> 0:29:27.857
<v Speaker 1>guy learning General Bernovitch, State of Arizona. Good to see you, Sara,

0:29:27.937 --> 0:29:30.337
<v Speaker 1>thanks for being with us today. Thanks Mark, Thank you

0:29:30.457 --> 0:29:36.177
<v Speaker 1>very much. Each morning, the president of the United States

0:29:36.217 --> 0:29:39.417
<v Speaker 1>receives a highly classified briefing on the most important issues

0:29:39.457 --> 0:29:43.377
<v Speaker 1>facing the country. It's called the President's Daily Brief, or PDB.

0:29:43.577 --> 0:29:46.817
<v Speaker 1>It's delivered by America's spies and analysts. Well, now you

0:29:46.857 --> 0:29:49.697
<v Speaker 1>can hear your very own PDB in the form of

0:29:49.697 --> 0:29:53.017
<v Speaker 1>a podcast hosted by me Brian Dean Wright, a former

0:29:53.017 --> 0:29:56.777
<v Speaker 1>CIA operations officer. Each morning at six am Eastern, I'll

0:29:56.777 --> 0:29:59.137
<v Speaker 1>bring you fifteen to twenty minutes of the most important

0:29:59.137 --> 0:30:02.297
<v Speaker 1>issues facing the country, giving you the critical intelligence and

0:30:02.337 --> 0:30:13.177
<v Speaker 1>analysis you need to start your morning. One of the

0:30:13.177 --> 0:30:17.177
<v Speaker 1>most liberal cities in America is putting its progressive prosecutor

0:30:17.257 --> 0:30:21.537
<v Speaker 1>on notice. Finally, the first time ever, San Francisco has

0:30:21.657 --> 0:30:25.777
<v Speaker 1>recalled its district attorney, Chessi bud Dan, as voters hold

0:30:25.817 --> 0:30:28.737
<v Speaker 1>him responsible for a surge in murders, violent crime, and

0:30:28.937 --> 0:30:32.337
<v Speaker 1>shameless shoplifting. So will this recall send a message to

0:30:32.457 --> 0:30:36.177
<v Speaker 1>soft on crime prosecutors across the country. Let's ask former

0:30:36.257 --> 0:30:40.937
<v Speaker 1>NYPD Coppen conservative commentator John Cardillo. John, good to see you. Hey,

0:30:40.977 --> 0:30:43.777
<v Speaker 1>Bacco is good to be again. So this is a

0:30:43.777 --> 0:30:47.977
<v Speaker 1>good thing. It's not a seismic shift, right, I'm sure

0:30:48.017 --> 0:30:52.937
<v Speaker 1>they're going to replace. When the mayor London Breed puts

0:30:52.937 --> 0:30:55.217
<v Speaker 1>forward his replacement and they have elections, they're going to

0:30:55.257 --> 0:30:58.777
<v Speaker 1>replace him with a Democrat to San Francisco. But at

0:30:58.857 --> 0:31:00.857
<v Speaker 1>least it's moving in the right direction here. What do

0:31:00.897 --> 0:31:04.777
<v Speaker 1>you think? Yeah, I mean, look one thing about We'll

0:31:04.817 --> 0:31:07.697
<v Speaker 1>get into this guy ratible as they come, right. Aaron's

0:31:07.697 --> 0:31:14.097
<v Speaker 1>for whether underground members, convicted cop killers, contemporaries of such

0:31:14.137 --> 0:31:19.457
<v Speaker 1>illustrious luminaries as Bill Ayres and Assada Shakur, who the

0:31:19.737 --> 0:31:22.897
<v Speaker 1>Joanne Chesimar and wrights a bit on those, I mean,

0:31:22.937 --> 0:31:28.657
<v Speaker 1>just radical radical terrorists. But here's the thing. Jesse Bodin

0:31:29.417 --> 0:31:33.577
<v Speaker 1>did not do one thing that he did not tell

0:31:33.657 --> 0:31:36.937
<v Speaker 1>people he was going to do any campaigned. Nothing was

0:31:36.977 --> 0:31:39.897
<v Speaker 1>a surprise with this guy. He laid out the blueprint

0:31:40.097 --> 0:31:44.217
<v Speaker 1>during his campaign then executed it to the letter. San

0:31:44.297 --> 0:31:49.057
<v Speaker 1>Franciscans is radical leftist. Fuck. Maybe they don't really like

0:31:49.337 --> 0:31:53.337
<v Speaker 1>the real life version of these utopian which are really

0:31:53.417 --> 0:31:57.057
<v Speaker 1>dystopian policies they promote. Because he didn't do anything he

0:31:57.057 --> 0:32:00.937
<v Speaker 1>didn't say he was going to do. Here he is

0:32:01.017 --> 0:32:03.177
<v Speaker 1>last night, by the way, in his concession speech, here's

0:32:03.217 --> 0:32:06.257
<v Speaker 1>Jesse Budan soon to be the former District Attorney of

0:32:06.417 --> 0:32:12.297
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. Watch. People are angry, they're frustrated, and I

0:32:12.337 --> 0:32:17.657
<v Speaker 1>want to be very clear about what happened tonight. The

0:32:17.777 --> 0:32:23.857
<v Speaker 1>right wing billionaires outspent us three to one. They exploited

0:32:23.857 --> 0:32:29.937
<v Speaker 1>an environment in which people are appropriately upset, and they

0:32:29.977 --> 0:32:33.377
<v Speaker 1>created an electoral dynamic where we were literally shadow boxing.

0:32:34.817 --> 0:32:38.697
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is amazing. We just take this is amazing.

0:32:38.977 --> 0:32:42.937
<v Speaker 1>The right wing billionaires are I mean, sixty percent of

0:32:42.977 --> 0:32:46.497
<v Speaker 1>San Franciscans voted to kick this clown out of office

0:32:46.817 --> 0:32:50.217
<v Speaker 1>because they're sick of the home invasions, the assaults on

0:32:50.257 --> 0:32:53.657
<v Speaker 1>the street, the theft, the armed robbery, you name it.

0:32:54.377 --> 0:32:57.377
<v Speaker 1>And why does he think they're all so upset? This

0:32:57.417 --> 0:33:00.457
<v Speaker 1>guy is like a lunatic. Oh, I mean, didn't you

0:33:00.497 --> 0:33:03.617
<v Speaker 1>see the AGM and cameras that that hidden footage of

0:33:03.697 --> 0:33:08.017
<v Speaker 1>Hilarry Ellison and Elon must upping raw sewage and Herwin

0:33:08.137 --> 0:33:10.857
<v Speaker 1>needles on the streets of San Francisco. I mean, the

0:33:10.857 --> 0:33:13.417
<v Speaker 1>guys out of his mind. Look, he was letting bad

0:33:13.497 --> 0:33:18.977
<v Speaker 1>guys go free. He wasn't prosecuting worse bad guys. And

0:33:19.057 --> 0:33:23.777
<v Speaker 1>he and so many other Democrats have abandoned quality of life. Crimes.

0:33:23.777 --> 0:33:26.257
<v Speaker 1>They won't even touch him, which we know. You and

0:33:26.297 --> 0:33:28.617
<v Speaker 1>I know this, right, we both in some fashion with

0:33:28.657 --> 0:33:30.777
<v Speaker 1>the NYPD. You were over there on the intel side,

0:33:30.777 --> 0:33:33.897
<v Speaker 1>I was there on the law enforcement side. We know

0:33:34.017 --> 0:33:36.737
<v Speaker 1>that when you addressed what Rudy Giuliani get, addressing quality

0:33:36.737 --> 0:33:39.577
<v Speaker 1>of life crimes typically leads to a reduction in the

0:33:39.577 --> 0:33:42.657
<v Speaker 1>bigger crimes. This had nothing to do with anyone or

0:33:42.657 --> 0:33:45.097
<v Speaker 1>anything other than you're so polite in the way you

0:33:45.137 --> 0:33:50.177
<v Speaker 1>say his name as well Chessebo'dan's refusal to be a prosecutor.

0:33:50.617 --> 0:33:54.017
<v Speaker 1>He wanted to be a far less activist, not the

0:33:54.097 --> 0:33:58.417
<v Speaker 1>chief law enforcement officer, the chief prose prosecutorial officer of

0:33:58.497 --> 0:34:02.377
<v Speaker 1>the city of San Francisco. It's amazing, John, because as

0:34:02.417 --> 0:34:04.857
<v Speaker 1>we all know, there was a thirty percent increase in

0:34:04.937 --> 0:34:09.697
<v Speaker 1>homicides in nationwide in twenty twenty to twenty twenty one.

0:34:10.817 --> 0:34:14.537
<v Speaker 1>George Floyd Movement and BLM and all this played into this,

0:34:14.577 --> 0:34:17.177
<v Speaker 1>of course, But the progressive prosecutors, they had already been

0:34:17.257 --> 0:34:21.457
<v Speaker 1>seeded into all these different city bureaucracies in the years

0:34:21.537 --> 0:34:24.017
<v Speaker 1>leading up to this, in part because I think of

0:34:24.057 --> 0:34:27.657
<v Speaker 1>the media stoking a racial panic over the election of

0:34:27.697 --> 0:34:30.697
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump, right so twenty seventeen, twenty eighteen, you start

0:34:30.737 --> 0:34:34.497
<v Speaker 1>seeing the Chessa bou Dan and you know the Kim

0:34:34.577 --> 0:34:38.537
<v Speaker 1>Fox and these other Larry Kraszner, these progressive prosecutors taking office.

0:34:39.057 --> 0:34:41.737
<v Speaker 1>And it wasn't just that they had one year. The

0:34:41.937 --> 0:34:44.497
<v Speaker 1>next year, twenty twenty two to twenty twenty one was

0:34:44.577 --> 0:34:47.097
<v Speaker 1>also terrible in these cities. So we knew it wasn't

0:34:47.137 --> 0:34:49.697
<v Speaker 1>just a pandemic blip or whatever crap they were saying

0:34:49.697 --> 0:34:52.097
<v Speaker 1>at the time, the lies they were telling. In San Francisco,

0:34:52.137 --> 0:34:55.977
<v Speaker 1>for example, twenty twenty two verses twenty twenty one. Larceny

0:34:56.097 --> 0:35:00.297
<v Speaker 1>so far this year up twenty percent, assaults up eleven percent,

0:35:00.337 --> 0:35:04.537
<v Speaker 1>homicides up eleven percent, rape up nine percent. So they

0:35:04.577 --> 0:35:07.777
<v Speaker 1>had a terrible year of crime rise across the country,

0:35:07.777 --> 0:35:11.617
<v Speaker 1>but in San Francisco, San Francisco specific, and it keeps going. John,

0:35:11.657 --> 0:35:14.937
<v Speaker 1>I think that was what people disabled. Enough is enough? Yeah,

0:35:14.937 --> 0:35:16.937
<v Speaker 1>I mean it goes back to addressing those quality of

0:35:16.937 --> 0:35:20.097
<v Speaker 1>life crimes, right, the broken windows pleasing strategies you do.

0:35:20.377 --> 0:35:22.537
<v Speaker 1>And I talk about this a lot, and so sometimes

0:35:22.537 --> 0:35:25.057
<v Speaker 1>I don't delve into it when we're on air, but

0:35:25.217 --> 0:35:27.777
<v Speaker 1>it's important to understand that maybe you have new viewers,

0:35:27.857 --> 0:35:30.217
<v Speaker 1>which I'm sure you do with your audience grows who

0:35:30.457 --> 0:35:33.257
<v Speaker 1>or maybe younger, they don't understand we're talking about. And simply,

0:35:33.297 --> 0:35:36.697
<v Speaker 1>but what Rue Giuliani his police commissioners understood in New

0:35:36.777 --> 0:35:40.057
<v Speaker 1>York City in the nineties when they manage a crime reduction,

0:35:40.177 --> 0:35:43.217
<v Speaker 1>crime fell off a cliff in New York is if

0:35:43.257 --> 0:35:45.897
<v Speaker 1>you go after the little things, the big things follow.

0:35:46.057 --> 0:35:49.097
<v Speaker 1>Very simply put, if you arrest a guy or a

0:35:49.217 --> 0:35:52.617
<v Speaker 1>shoplifting or jumping the turnstile in the subway not paying

0:35:52.657 --> 0:35:57.057
<v Speaker 1>the fair oftentimes when you run their information after the arrest,

0:35:57.497 --> 0:36:03.017
<v Speaker 1>you find they had warrants for delany robbery, delany burglary, felony.

0:36:03.057 --> 0:36:05.897
<v Speaker 1>Has solved some of these bigger crimes, and but getting

0:36:05.897 --> 0:36:08.657
<v Speaker 1>those people off the street, returning them on those warrants

0:36:08.977 --> 0:36:13.377
<v Speaker 1>to a judge, you were reducing crime across the board. Again,

0:36:13.457 --> 0:36:16.257
<v Speaker 1>these progressive das. I'm so glad you brought up Larry

0:36:16.297 --> 0:36:20.937
<v Speaker 1>Krasner in Philadelphia. He was really George Soros' first experiment

0:36:21.097 --> 0:36:25.057
<v Speaker 1>with funding far left district attorneys to affect social change

0:36:25.057 --> 0:36:27.777
<v Speaker 1>in the wrong direction. And look where Philadelphia is today.

0:36:27.817 --> 0:36:30.377
<v Speaker 1>It's a mess. I have phillyops reached out to me

0:36:30.417 --> 0:36:32.537
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter on Facebook all the time telling me how

0:36:32.577 --> 0:36:35.537
<v Speaker 1>bad it is. But it's very simple. If you address

0:36:35.657 --> 0:36:38.377
<v Speaker 1>the quality of life crimes, if you actually enforce the

0:36:38.457 --> 0:36:43.217
<v Speaker 1>law as crazy as it sounds, buck crime drops, and

0:36:43.257 --> 0:36:46.777
<v Speaker 1>when you do the opposite, prime rises. The big city

0:36:46.777 --> 0:36:49.257
<v Speaker 1>crime spike isn't just San Francisco, as I noted a

0:36:49.257 --> 0:36:52.537
<v Speaker 1>moment ago, John, and again in its second year of

0:36:52.657 --> 0:36:55.177
<v Speaker 1>rise right twenty twenty, twenty twenty one was the worst

0:36:55.257 --> 0:36:57.457
<v Speaker 1>year pretty much ever for a one year crime spike

0:36:57.577 --> 0:37:00.537
<v Speaker 1>nationwide twenty twenty one verse twenty twenty two, though San

0:37:00.537 --> 0:37:03.337
<v Speaker 1>Francisco's up seven point eight percent, New York City though

0:37:03.977 --> 0:37:07.017
<v Speaker 1>with a new mayor, up thirty eight percent, Los Angeles

0:37:07.057 --> 0:37:11.297
<v Speaker 1>eleven percent, Chicago thirty five percent, Philadelphia twenty two. Philadelphia

0:37:11.377 --> 0:37:13.897
<v Speaker 1>last year had its all time murder record, and it's

0:37:14.057 --> 0:37:17.177
<v Speaker 1>just running slightly below that pace six months into twenty

0:37:17.217 --> 0:37:19.937
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. John, I, I just want to know what

0:37:20.097 --> 0:37:22.337
<v Speaker 1>your take is on I've got a theory that in

0:37:22.377 --> 0:37:25.617
<v Speaker 1>some of these cities they're realizing that the progressive prosecutors,

0:37:25.617 --> 0:37:28.737
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's just essentially suicidal for the city, but

0:37:28.897 --> 0:37:31.737
<v Speaker 1>bringing in a kind of mainstream Democrat who's still a

0:37:31.777 --> 0:37:34.297
<v Speaker 1>little you know, wishywashi. That's not going to turn the

0:37:34.337 --> 0:37:37.177
<v Speaker 1>momentum around. They're gonna need a Giuliani like figure to

0:37:37.177 --> 0:37:40.457
<v Speaker 1>come in and say there's a new sheriff in town.

0:37:40.937 --> 0:37:43.137
<v Speaker 1>I mean New York City is the proof of that, right,

0:37:43.537 --> 0:37:45.497
<v Speaker 1>Eric said Eric Adams. I mean the guy who's in

0:37:45.577 --> 0:37:49.617
<v Speaker 1>New York City police officer, retired as a New York

0:37:49.617 --> 0:37:54.057
<v Speaker 1>City Police captain. And crime is rising in New York City.

0:37:54.097 --> 0:37:57.257
<v Speaker 1>Why because instead of being a leader, instead of saying

0:37:57.257 --> 0:37:59.097
<v Speaker 1>I had twenty three years in the New York City

0:37:59.097 --> 0:38:02.097
<v Speaker 1>Police Department, I made a d behind my name. But

0:38:02.137 --> 0:38:04.697
<v Speaker 1>I know it works, and I know what doesn't to

0:38:04.777 --> 0:38:07.697
<v Speaker 1>reduce crime. What's he doing? He's deferring to guys like

0:38:07.777 --> 0:38:10.977
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Bragg, the bar left Manhattan District that won't prosecute

0:38:10.977 --> 0:38:14.937
<v Speaker 1>anyone for anything. He's now beholding the radicals in the

0:38:15.017 --> 0:38:18.737
<v Speaker 1>New York City Council and crime is rising. Also important

0:38:18.777 --> 0:38:21.417
<v Speaker 1>notice city like Portland, Ted Wheeler, one of the furthest

0:38:21.457 --> 0:38:23.937
<v Speaker 1>left mayors in the United States. There was a period

0:38:24.177 --> 0:38:26.497
<v Speaker 1>in those years you mentioned Buck twenty one, twenty two,

0:38:26.577 --> 0:38:30.857
<v Speaker 1>twenty to twenty one when Portland saw an eight hundred

0:38:31.057 --> 0:38:35.617
<v Speaker 1>percent increase in murders. This is unheard of. We haven't

0:38:35.617 --> 0:38:39.777
<v Speaker 1>seen these numbers since the seventies. Crazy, but we'll see

0:38:39.817 --> 0:38:41.977
<v Speaker 1>if people are waking up. Even Democrats they got to

0:38:42.017 --> 0:38:43.817
<v Speaker 1>wake up too, because they've managed to take over and

0:38:43.857 --> 0:38:47.217
<v Speaker 1>now destroy their own cities. John, my friend, always words

0:38:47.217 --> 0:38:50.017
<v Speaker 1>a wisdom. Good to see it, great to see a buck. Thanks.

0:38:55.657 --> 0:38:58.377
<v Speaker 1>Billionaire Elon Musk seems to have won at least one

0:38:58.417 --> 0:39:01.417
<v Speaker 1>battle against Twitter. Earlier this week, Must threaten to walk

0:39:01.457 --> 0:39:03.657
<v Speaker 1>away from a deal to buy the social media company

0:39:03.657 --> 0:39:06.897
<v Speaker 1>if it didn't allow him and his legal team full

0:39:06.937 --> 0:39:10.417
<v Speaker 1>access to its internal data to address concern about the

0:39:10.457 --> 0:39:13.697
<v Speaker 1>number of spambots on the platform. In a letter to Twitter,

0:39:13.777 --> 0:39:16.777
<v Speaker 1>must attorney wrote Twitter's latest offer to simply provide additional

0:39:16.897 --> 0:39:20.577
<v Speaker 1>details regarding the company's own testing methodologies, whether through written

0:39:20.577 --> 0:39:24.977
<v Speaker 1>materials or verbal explanations, is tantamount to refusing mister Musk's

0:39:25.057 --> 0:39:28.617
<v Speaker 1>data requests. Twitter's effort to characterize it otherwise is merely

0:39:28.617 --> 0:39:31.217
<v Speaker 1>an attempt to obfuscate and confuse the issue. Mister Musk

0:39:31.297 --> 0:39:33.337
<v Speaker 1>has made it clear he does not believe that the

0:39:33.337 --> 0:39:37.337
<v Speaker 1>companies lacks testing methodologies are adequate, so he must conduct

0:39:37.457 --> 0:39:40.897
<v Speaker 1>his own analysis the data he has requested as necessary

0:39:40.937 --> 0:39:43.537
<v Speaker 1>to do so. After Twitter had about forty eight hours

0:39:43.577 --> 0:39:47.057
<v Speaker 1>of deliberation, it appears Musk will receive the information he

0:39:47.097 --> 0:39:50.377
<v Speaker 1>asked for. Joined me now to discuss former Facebook intelligence

0:39:50.417 --> 0:39:54.377
<v Speaker 1>analyst and director of Heritage's Heritage Foundations Tech Policy Center

0:39:54.737 --> 0:39:57.697
<v Speaker 1>Para Frederick Carrett. Thanks for being with us, orts, thanks

0:39:57.697 --> 0:40:00.417
<v Speaker 1>for having me. So let's start with what is it

0:40:00.457 --> 0:40:02.657
<v Speaker 1>forever and at home? You know, people work in this

0:40:02.657 --> 0:40:04.377
<v Speaker 1>stuff and the media care a lot more about the

0:40:04.377 --> 0:40:07.657
<v Speaker 1>Twitter situation, I think than everyday folks. But so explain

0:40:07.777 --> 0:40:12.257
<v Speaker 1>to us what the issue was here. There are too

0:40:12.257 --> 0:40:15.377
<v Speaker 1>many bots on. Basically, Elon, as the purchaser of Twitter,

0:40:15.457 --> 0:40:17.257
<v Speaker 1>wants to know how many fake accounts there are? Is

0:40:17.297 --> 0:40:21.377
<v Speaker 1>that what this is exactly? And the lawyers, the letters

0:40:21.417 --> 0:40:24.657
<v Speaker 1>that are flying between the lawyers, Elon's lawyers at least

0:40:24.697 --> 0:40:28.177
<v Speaker 1>are saying that this is a clear material breach of

0:40:28.177 --> 0:40:31.857
<v Speaker 1>the takeover agreement because Twitter has said we're not going

0:40:31.897 --> 0:40:33.737
<v Speaker 1>to let you look under the hood in this way.

0:40:33.937 --> 0:40:37.097
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to reveal proprietary information. They're calling it

0:40:37.177 --> 0:40:39.697
<v Speaker 1>private information that they don't want to reveal to the

0:40:39.737 --> 0:40:43.537
<v Speaker 1>public about their bot counting. And their spam methodologies. So

0:40:43.577 --> 0:40:47.897
<v Speaker 1>Twitter has itself publicly said that we the platform is

0:40:47.897 --> 0:40:51.457
<v Speaker 1>comprised of only five percent bots, but Elon said, nah,

0:40:51.537 --> 0:40:53.617
<v Speaker 1>I've done a little digging with my own people, and

0:40:53.657 --> 0:40:56.737
<v Speaker 1>we're thinking it could be upwards of twenty percent bots,

0:40:57.257 --> 0:41:00.257
<v Speaker 1>composed of you know, what the platform is, or the

0:41:00.257 --> 0:41:04.057
<v Speaker 1>automated accounts that are on the platforms vice the real legitimate,

0:41:04.097 --> 0:41:08.137
<v Speaker 1>authentic users. So that's what this is about, because if

0:41:08.217 --> 0:41:12.097
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is comprised of twice any percent bobs, then Elon's

0:41:12.177 --> 0:41:14.657
<v Speaker 1>not getting his money's worth out of this platform. It

0:41:14.737 --> 0:41:17.897
<v Speaker 1>doesn't Hey, it's not real political discourse that's going on.

0:41:17.977 --> 0:41:21.657
<v Speaker 1>It's not real authentic users that are engaging with each other.

0:41:21.697 --> 0:41:25.137
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, those automated accounts that push various you

0:41:25.137 --> 0:41:29.817
<v Speaker 1>can push propaganda, you can push advertising, you can push

0:41:29.857 --> 0:41:33.697
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of crazy things, you know, strings and puppeteers

0:41:33.737 --> 0:41:37.017
<v Speaker 1>from state ling actors like the CCP can run rampant

0:41:37.017 --> 0:41:40.177
<v Speaker 1>on these platforms too. So Elon wants to know what

0:41:40.257 --> 0:41:44.297
<v Speaker 1>he's paying for, and Twitter has thus far said, we're

0:41:44.497 --> 0:41:46.137
<v Speaker 1>not going to let you in on that because all

0:41:46.137 --> 0:41:50.377
<v Speaker 1>of that is proprietary to us, our private platform. In

0:41:50.417 --> 0:41:53.297
<v Speaker 1>an article on the Verge, they wrote that Twitter will

0:41:53.337 --> 0:41:57.497
<v Speaker 1>give Elon Musk fire hose data access to settle bot complaints,

0:41:57.497 --> 0:42:00.617
<v Speaker 1>and Twitter preparing to grant Elon Musk unprecedented access to

0:42:00.817 --> 0:42:03.337
<v Speaker 1>platform data in an effort to address his concerns about

0:42:03.377 --> 0:42:09.057
<v Speaker 1>automated accounts. So this fire hose of data they're talking about,

0:42:10.217 --> 0:42:11.777
<v Speaker 1>how could they assume that? I mean, if someone's going

0:42:11.817 --> 0:42:14.097
<v Speaker 1>to buy your company, don't they and you have an

0:42:14.097 --> 0:42:16.017
<v Speaker 1>agreement with them that they're looking at they're doing their

0:42:16.097 --> 0:42:18.737
<v Speaker 1>due diligence. How could they hide this? I mean, that's

0:42:18.817 --> 0:42:22.217
<v Speaker 1>it just seems like this is so basic. Yeah, no kidding,

0:42:22.217 --> 0:42:24.377
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I think what's going through Elon's head

0:42:24.417 --> 0:42:27.577
<v Speaker 1>as well. He wants to make sure that he's what

0:42:27.657 --> 0:42:30.617
<v Speaker 1>he was promised is what he's actually getting. So if

0:42:30.657 --> 0:42:32.937
<v Speaker 1>that fire hose of data comes at him, you know,

0:42:33.017 --> 0:42:35.497
<v Speaker 1>Elon knows a lot of smart people in the industry.

0:42:35.577 --> 0:42:39.177
<v Speaker 1>I hope he has an army of data scientists, of programmers,

0:42:39.217 --> 0:42:42.537
<v Speaker 1>of people who can actually comb through this data and

0:42:42.617 --> 0:42:45.457
<v Speaker 1>make sense of it. That would be great and look

0:42:45.497 --> 0:42:48.857
<v Speaker 1>and basically double check the methodologies for bot counting and

0:42:48.897 --> 0:42:51.857
<v Speaker 1>all of these spam accounts. So that would be fantastic,

0:42:51.897 --> 0:42:54.457
<v Speaker 1>But you're right, it's the most basic thing. And what

0:42:54.537 --> 0:42:57.497
<v Speaker 1>I think this actually does end up highlighting buck is

0:42:57.537 --> 0:43:00.937
<v Speaker 1>the fact that these tech companies they do not operate

0:43:00.977 --> 0:43:03.977
<v Speaker 1>with transparency as one of their major goals or one

0:43:04.017 --> 0:43:08.137
<v Speaker 1>of their major values whatsoever. If Elon Musk, the richest

0:43:08.177 --> 0:43:10.857
<v Speaker 1>man in the world, has to beg and beg and

0:43:10.977 --> 0:43:14.177
<v Speaker 1>beg to get access to a platform that he should

0:43:14.297 --> 0:43:17.017
<v Speaker 1>ultimately end up owning, then this is a problem. Think

0:43:17.017 --> 0:43:20.537
<v Speaker 1>of what the average American user gets when they sign

0:43:20.617 --> 0:43:23.777
<v Speaker 1>up for these tech companies. It ain't transparency. Well, what

0:43:23.817 --> 0:43:25.777
<v Speaker 1>do you what do you think he may find here?

0:43:25.817 --> 0:43:29.497
<v Speaker 1>Because there's clearly some sensitivity on the part of the

0:43:29.657 --> 0:43:34.377
<v Speaker 1>current and hopefully soon to be former Twitter leadership about

0:43:34.457 --> 0:43:38.617
<v Speaker 1>their data their practices. Do you have some sense of

0:43:39.337 --> 0:43:43.057
<v Speaker 1>what Elon could be looking at beyond just bots? You know,

0:43:43.137 --> 0:43:47.377
<v Speaker 1>Twitter's had a long heads up right now, so they've

0:43:47.417 --> 0:43:49.497
<v Speaker 1>had time to sort of try to clean up their act.

0:43:49.697 --> 0:43:53.097
<v Speaker 1>There were reports initially when the deal first emerged in

0:43:53.137 --> 0:43:55.777
<v Speaker 1>the public eye that they were sort of mining their

0:43:55.857 --> 0:43:59.617
<v Speaker 1>p's and ques, that they were halting all a product

0:43:59.697 --> 0:44:03.297
<v Speaker 1>tinkering and any sort of different sort of evolutions of

0:44:03.337 --> 0:44:06.417
<v Speaker 1>their product. From being shipped so that remember everyone was

0:44:06.457 --> 0:44:09.777
<v Speaker 1>experienced on the conservative side at least that there was

0:44:10.177 --> 0:44:13.737
<v Speaker 1>tick in user counts and whatnot. So I think they've

0:44:13.737 --> 0:44:16.257
<v Speaker 1>had a while to try to clean up their act

0:44:16.297 --> 0:44:20.177
<v Speaker 1>and get those content moderation processes. If they don't want

0:44:20.177 --> 0:44:23.737
<v Speaker 1>Elon to investigate and look at what they're doing that's

0:44:24.137 --> 0:44:28.377
<v Speaker 1>obviously been very biased, they're probably cleaning that up right now.

0:44:28.377 --> 0:44:30.737
<v Speaker 1>They've probably had a lot of time to clean it up,

0:44:31.297 --> 0:44:34.617
<v Speaker 1>as you know, we in the intelligence community to burn

0:44:34.657 --> 0:44:36.937
<v Speaker 1>all the documents and whatnot would have done before we're

0:44:36.977 --> 0:44:40.577
<v Speaker 1>getting out of embassies overseas, So I think it's I

0:44:40.617 --> 0:44:43.177
<v Speaker 1>think they've been given a lot of lead time to

0:44:43.177 --> 0:44:45.537
<v Speaker 1>clean up their act. But you know, Elon's good and

0:44:45.617 --> 0:44:48.217
<v Speaker 1>again he has really powerful friends who are good at

0:44:48.217 --> 0:44:50.737
<v Speaker 1>this stuff too, so we'll see. I think they'll be

0:44:50.737 --> 0:44:53.057
<v Speaker 1>able to ferret something out for the American people to

0:44:53.137 --> 0:44:56.937
<v Speaker 1>look at. Do you think this transaction, the purchase of Twitter,

0:44:57.257 --> 0:45:02.217
<v Speaker 1>which could have enormous implications for our information ecosystem on

0:45:02.257 --> 0:45:05.377
<v Speaker 1>the new side, just free speech implications in general, Do

0:45:05.417 --> 0:45:08.257
<v Speaker 1>you think Elan's gonna actually end up the owner of

0:45:08.297 --> 0:45:11.457
<v Speaker 1>Twitter based on what you're seeing? You know, book I

0:45:11.497 --> 0:45:14.137
<v Speaker 1>think it's fifty fifty. And just in terms of what

0:45:14.177 --> 0:45:17.857
<v Speaker 1>Elon's thinking himself, he could be walking away or he

0:45:17.897 --> 0:45:21.497
<v Speaker 1>could again be setting himself up for those more advantageous

0:45:21.617 --> 0:45:24.777
<v Speaker 1>terms and actually trying to get this platform added discount.

0:45:24.857 --> 0:45:27.577
<v Speaker 1>So at this point, you know, I was a little

0:45:27.617 --> 0:45:31.097
<v Speaker 1>skeptical in the beginning. Then my hope really really spiked.

0:45:31.137 --> 0:45:33.697
<v Speaker 1>But look at what they're throwing at him. Remember when

0:45:33.737 --> 0:45:36.857
<v Speaker 1>the board took those poison pills. Look at the Joint

0:45:36.897 --> 0:45:42.097
<v Speaker 1>SEC and DOJ investigations by the Biden administration reportedly into

0:45:42.257 --> 0:45:46.297
<v Speaker 1>his other business dealings. Look at the sexual misconduct allegations.

0:45:46.337 --> 0:45:49.617
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these people are throwing everything they can at Elon.

0:45:49.777 --> 0:45:53.377
<v Speaker 1>And if he ends up actually confirming that the bobs

0:45:53.417 --> 0:45:55.817
<v Speaker 1>are only at five percent or in an area that

0:45:55.897 --> 0:45:58.857
<v Speaker 1>Twitter sets they are, I really really hope he does,

0:45:58.897 --> 0:46:02.377
<v Speaker 1>and I really hope he takes over breaks the ideological

0:46:02.417 --> 0:46:06.417
<v Speaker 1>monopoly that these big tech companies have over Americans and

0:46:07.217 --> 0:46:09.897
<v Speaker 1>uses it as a force for free speech in the world,

0:46:10.097 --> 0:46:13.057
<v Speaker 1>as he says, So I hope it goes through. Right now,

0:46:13.137 --> 0:46:16.097
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fifty fifty. To be completely honest, do

0:46:16.177 --> 0:46:19.457
<v Speaker 1>any of these free speech devoted platforms that have been

0:46:19.497 --> 0:46:21.737
<v Speaker 1>popping up in the last couple of years. I mean,

0:46:21.777 --> 0:46:24.897
<v Speaker 1>you were at Facebook, which is kind of the granddaddy

0:46:24.937 --> 0:46:26.297
<v Speaker 1>of all this, if you will, right, I mean, the

0:46:26.457 --> 0:46:29.657
<v Speaker 1>biggest one and the one that really got the whole

0:46:29.697 --> 0:46:32.937
<v Speaker 1>social media revolution started. So do you think that whether

0:46:32.977 --> 0:46:36.577
<v Speaker 1>it's Getter or truth Social or any of them, could

0:46:36.577 --> 0:46:40.377
<v Speaker 1>they maybe break parlor? Could they maybe break out? You know,

0:46:40.457 --> 0:46:44.217
<v Speaker 1>I think it really depends on their underlying technologies. So

0:46:44.497 --> 0:46:46.577
<v Speaker 1>there's a company called Rumble that you're familiar with, the

0:46:46.657 --> 0:46:50.857
<v Speaker 1>YouTube competitive competitor, and there they have their own cloud

0:46:50.897 --> 0:46:55.977
<v Speaker 1>hosting services. There's other even specifically designed cloud hosting services

0:46:55.977 --> 0:46:58.617
<v Speaker 1>that are for free speech, like righte Forge. So you know,

0:46:58.737 --> 0:47:03.257
<v Speaker 1>it depends on if they make themselves themselves invulnerable to

0:47:03.537 --> 0:47:06.697
<v Speaker 1>something like Amazon Web Services yanking a parlor off of

0:47:06.697 --> 0:47:10.177
<v Speaker 1>their cloud hosting services. So, conservatives, if they build with

0:47:10.257 --> 0:47:14.417
<v Speaker 1>that full digital stack in mind and have an acknowledgement

0:47:14.497 --> 0:47:17.857
<v Speaker 1>that the infrastructure actually matters, not just the platforms sitting

0:47:17.857 --> 0:47:20.777
<v Speaker 1>on top of those cloud oasting services and those servers,

0:47:21.057 --> 0:47:23.217
<v Speaker 1>then I think they have a chance at survival. But

0:47:23.297 --> 0:47:25.657
<v Speaker 1>if they just ride on top of what these big

0:47:25.657 --> 0:47:28.817
<v Speaker 1>tech platforms have already built, then you know there's always

0:47:28.817 --> 0:47:30.937
<v Speaker 1>the chance that you're going to get snuffed out, or

0:47:31.017 --> 0:47:34.217
<v Speaker 1>you have to be beholden to the ideology of these

0:47:34.257 --> 0:47:37.297
<v Speaker 1>companies and what they're pushing. Dare I always appreciate it.

0:47:37.297 --> 0:47:56.137
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for being with us. Thanks Buck. Each morning, the

0:47:56.217 --> 0:47:59.457
<v Speaker 1>President of the United States receives a highly classified briefing

0:47:59.497 --> 0:48:02.337
<v Speaker 1>on the most important issues facing the country. It's called

0:48:02.337 --> 0:48:06.177
<v Speaker 1>the President's Daily Brief or PDB. It's delivered by America's

0:48:06.177 --> 0:48:09.137
<v Speaker 1>spies and analysts. Well, now you can hear your very

0:48:09.217 --> 0:48:12.297
<v Speaker 1>own PDB in the form of a podcast hosted by

0:48:12.337 --> 0:48:16.417
<v Speaker 1>me Brian Dean Wright, a former CIA operations officer. Each

0:48:16.417 --> 0:48:18.897
<v Speaker 1>morning at six a m. Eastern, I'll bring you fifteen

0:48:18.897 --> 0:48:21.577
<v Speaker 1>to twenty minutes of the most important issues facing the country,

0:48:21.897 --> 0:48:25.297
<v Speaker 1>giving you the critical intelligence and analysis you need to

0:48:25.337 --> 0:48:26.457
<v Speaker 1>start your morning.