WEBVTT - SpaceX Launches Private Astronaut Mission to Space Station

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carole Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Weekend iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com. You

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>can also listen to our radio show at two pm

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Time on the Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg clovel News. Well. Over the next thirty minutes,

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>we're digging deep into the world of space exploration and evs,

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>all with an Elon Musk connective threat. So right now

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>we want to talk about what's going on with that

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX Falcon nine rocket caring for private astronauts that lifted

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>off at eleven seventeen am Eastern Time from the Kennedy

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Space Center in Florida. Tim It was the first private

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>mission to the International Space Station sanctioned by NASA fifty

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:57.279
<v Speaker 1>five million dollars per seat. But think about it, it's

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a big deal. That's a lot of money. It is

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money. It's not something that's the big deal, though,

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a huge about what's going on. Let's talk about

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>it with Ed lud the West Coast correspondent for Bloomberg News.

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>He finds himself now though in Flora Cape Canaveral, Florida,

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 1>where he joins us to talk about SpaceX launching its

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>first private astronaut mission to the space station. And that

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>happened just a few hours ago. Where are these astronauts

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 1>right now. Yes, so they're in their orbit right there now,

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>slowing things right down inside the capsule, and they're about

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>two and a half hours into a twenty hour journey

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to the International Space Station. And I can tell you

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Carol and Tim that they've taken off their space suits.

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>They're shiny white SpaceX space suits, and they've had their

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>first space meal as they get some R and R

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>ahead of that long journey. Uh, it's unbelievable. I mean,

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel like there's just so many ways to look

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>at it in terms of space exploration generally right, private

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>public sector working together. And then of course there's a

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>political aspect. So what's what's the historic moment. I think

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I heard you talking about the launch pad that was

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:03.639
<v Speaker 1>being used today. Well, yeah, so this launched Complex thirty

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>nine A. It's the same pad that first took man

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to the moon, right, and and it's you know, without

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 1>getting too carried away with ourselves. I spoke to NASA

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Administrator Bill Nelson, and he called today an inflection point

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>because what he as under his leadership, what NASA has

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>tried to do is pass the baturn from public sector

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to private sector. Where NASA doesn't have an infinite budget.

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>The I S S costs four billion dollars a year

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the US contribution to maintain it. So

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>what they want is the private sectors to step up.

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Not just in the context of SpaceX carrying humans to

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the I S S. Today was the first all private crew,

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>no public sector or government astronauts, but they actually want

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the private sector to take over for the space station itself.

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>And as you guys know, the I S S goes

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>gets decommissioned in one and their hope is that Axiom,

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>this Texas based startup, by that point will have built

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>its own commercial, private sector space station that will maintain

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and stay up in orbit. So what are these folks

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>doing once they get to the space station. How long

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>are they going to be there? And who are they

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:12.519
<v Speaker 1>gonna be with? So everyone's been at pains to point

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>out that they're not there for a vacation, although you know,

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>they kind of are. They've paid fifty five million dollars

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a seat for the opportunity. But they're going to be

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>conducting scientific experiments. They're going to be conducting assembly AI

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>related in experiments looking at the human anatomy and physiology

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>on in a zero gravity environment. And they did almost

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a thousand hours each of training for this mission, the

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>four private astronauts, So they have prepared for this, and

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>NASA is kind of excited, right because they get access

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to the data generated up there. And I guess the

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>other part of your question, Tim, My understanding is they

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>could have dinner with the three Russian astronauts that are

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>currently on board the s S. Yeah, that's going to

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>go well, or is it? Like? So, how does the

0:03:55.640 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>backdrop of our geopolitical tensions um and tension, it's war,

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>let's just call it what it is. How might that

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that conversation or that meeting or you know, will it

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>even happen? So it's at the discretion of the three

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>cosmonauts to invite either the private Axiom crew, the four

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>members or the exist Remember there's three US astronauts currently

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:20.919
<v Speaker 1>on I S S and the German you know, so

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>it's completely at their discretion. Bill Nelson, national Administrator, told

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.280
<v Speaker 1>me he thought it would happen. CAFEE leaders who run

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>space operation here as associate administrators, told me it would happen.

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>The fighting talk is really coming from the Russian side.

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Dmitri Ruggazin, who's the head of ross Cosmos, their space agency,

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>said that the economic and trade sanctions in place on Russia,

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>if they're not removed, then Russia could pull out of

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the I S S agreement, which is quite a threat.

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>That's a really big deal because Russia is responsible for

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a large portion of the I S S yearly budget,

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>just after the United States contribution. And then there's also

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the element for years, the US relied on soy use

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>rockets to actually get astronauts from from the United States.

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>They would go to you know, go to parts of

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Russia or after parts of outside, just outside of Russia

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to actually get to the International Space Station. Explain what's

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>going on here, Yeah, it's multifaceted. But yes, historically NASA

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>has in part relied on Russia and the Sawyers system

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to get astronauts from Earth to the International Space Station.

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about U s citizens, right, hitching a ride

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>with Russia essentially, and of course they've relied on them

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to bring them back. SpaceX has changed that somewhat, of course,

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>because SpaceX is sending and bringing back astronauts are quite

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a regular cadence from here in Florida. The other side

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>of it is you have names like Northfrook Grumman, You

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>have names like United Launch Alliance that use Russian built

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>engines for their own launch systems. Now with the sanctions situation,

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>they don't have access to those, and SpaceX isn't going

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 1>to start selling their engines to those US players. Blue Origin,

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the jeffs Or startup is trying to. But this whole

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>conflict or war in Ukraine has completely changed the dynamico

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>spaces cut Russia off from its customers, and it's cut

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Nasser off. But I would say that Bill Nelson did

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>leave the door open to US astronauts traveling on Sawyers,

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>whether it's this year next year, because as he puts it.

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>There are level terms, there are professional terms when it

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 1>comes to space, and we have peace in space irrespective

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of what's happening on Earth. That's actually comforting words and

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting considering our backdrop. Ed Ludlow, Um, you're reporting is

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>just fantastic and so glad that we had some time

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 1>with your Ed Ludlow. He's a West Coast correspondent at

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News from Cape Canaveral, Florida. And I just want

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to point out that, as we said, we're gonna do

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a bit more on Tesla and Elon Muskers coming up next,

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get into what happened at last night's Tesla

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>cyber rodeo in Austin, Texas. Yeah, it's been a big

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>week from Twitter to Texas to Florida for space X.

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>We got it all covered here on Bloomberg Radio. You

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about innovation to disruption like him, are not. He

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 1>definitely moves the needle on a lot of things. I

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>sell some statistic about E VS. The ramp up and

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the number that's out there. It's just showing that it's

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>great gaining traction overall. All Right, you're listening to Bloomberg

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:17.559
<v Speaker 1>Business Week on Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg Business Week

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. So we did promise you more from the

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>world of Elon Muss Last night, Elon and Tesla hosting

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a cyber rodeo at the company's new factory in Austin, Texas.

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>And uh did a lot of things, including giving some

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>updates for delayed products and more. We weren't there, but

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>we know who was. Sean o'caine is EV reporter for

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. He joins us via zoom from Austin, Texas. Sean,

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>really good to have you with us on Bloomberg Business

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Week Radio. What was it like last night? Overwhelming? There's

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot going on, um, and not just in sort

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of the events and the concert aspect and all of that.

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>And of course Elon must talking that, you know, just

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>being inside this new factory and seeing a lot of

0:07:59.920 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the stuff they've already set up and have pretty much

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>ready to go. Well, and let's talk about this because

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>this you know, you know Tesla well, and we talked

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>about a lot for such a long time. You know,

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>he'd put out, you know, estimates forecast they wouldn't happen,

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and so on and so forth. Um, we are waiting

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>for the cybertruck, the roadster, the tell us what we

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>we found out and can we believe it? Well, I mean,

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>how much time do you have? Uh? It was surprisingly

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a news light event for the most part. Um. You know,

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk got up there and spoke for about a

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>half an hour and really just sort of ran everybody

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>through sort of the history of Tesla and abridged version

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>um and uh, and a little bit about the future

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and the plans that he has for expansion. But it

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really anything too new, um compared to what we've

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>heard him talk about before on earnings calls or at

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>other events. Maybe the only really sort of new thing

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that we heard was that he said Tesla's working on

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>building a dedicated robotaxi um, so a whole new vehicle

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that would be just sort of purpose built for fully

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>autonomous vehicle travel. But you know, we still haven't seen

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the company come up with that technology in the cars

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that has today, even though it's working towards it. So

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the many things you can add to

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the list, Like you know, the Tesla van, which was

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>something you talked about a long time ago. We were hey, Sean,

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>we were showing video for our YouTube users, and so

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the silver truck or whatever that he was getting cyber truck,

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:27.719
<v Speaker 1>is that the cyber truck. That's it, right? Yeah, And

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that was the first time that we've ever seen, at

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>least that we know of the two prototypes that they

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>have working of the cyber truck in the same place. Uh.

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>And so yeah, that was something that a lot of

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>people they were really excited to see. Okay, how big

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of a grain of salt should we take these dates? Uh, Sean,

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Because well, I hear Tesla robo taxi, right, and I

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>think back to when you know, Elon must promise we'd

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>be seeing he's on the roads back. So well, here

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>we are three years later, no robo taxis, and then

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:00.319
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, the cyber truck in the semi

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>or you know this, we're supposed to be in production already. Um.

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think you're right in thinking that there

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>should be grains of salt taken with some of this stuff. Uh.

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, as a writer myself, I know I have

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>trouble with deadlines, so I can't but you still got

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>this piece in last night. And yes, uh though with

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.559
<v Speaker 1>help for sure. And uh and Ellen is definitely someone

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>who likes to go it alone, at least at the

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>top level of the company a lot of times. So yeah,

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think we should view any date that

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>he sets, whether it's Tessla or any of the other

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>companies that he runs with, with huge skepticism. Um it

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:36.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that they aren't working on these things, they

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>are just sort of, uh, you know, test this problem.

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>And Elon's problem really has always been never willing. He's

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>never really willing to fully accept or understand the challenges

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that he's sort of put in front of him because

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>he's been able to accomplish him pretty wild things. But

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I think he thinks at the outset of some of

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 1>these projects that he's going to be able to make

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>those sort of breakthrough moves along the way that he

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>typically stumbles his way into or designs his way into,

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes those are a little bit harder to come

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>by than I think he expects. You know, I think

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>it was back I was just checking. I was doing

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:11.559
<v Speaker 1>quick Google search. I think it was back in we

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>used to keep track of um Lan's forecast deadline schedules

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>because it was constantly Sean so fluid um and that's

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>just kind of who he is. But it's interesting how

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>investors have kind of gotten used to it, because you know,

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>if we look at what he's done, he ultimately does

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>seem to deliver um. Can you just tell us about

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the drones flying in the night sky? Did you get

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to see that? Yeah? That was pretty cool. I mean

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>they we've seen this a lot of tech companies and

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>stuff and started doing this and sporting events and everything.

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>But it was nice to see them sort of go

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>through sort of the design work and put in the

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>thought to come up with really kind of clever or

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>funny things to show in this drone show. We saw

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>like a portrait of Nicola Tesla. We saw the she

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you know that is sort of thematica coach coin. We

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>even saw a little um uh, the meme that kind

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of shows up at the end of the ordering process

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>when you buy a Tesla, this little hedgehog that is

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>throwing up the little okay symbol. So it was you know,

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a very considerate as far as uh, you know,

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.839
<v Speaker 1>things within the realm of Tesla uh and people who

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>follow the world closely U that surrounds this business. It

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 1>was a very considerate thing for all those people to

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>see it was it was something else, the humanoid robot

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>that didn't make it just quickly it was there. But

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 1>it's still very much a just department store mannequin uh

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>prop up on a stage. It is. It is not

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>something that is working. So we'll see that one might

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>need a little bit more salt than some of the others.

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Looking forward to that timeline coming true. Sean Okaine, thank

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Really fun Evie reporter or Bloomberg News.

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:52.679
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well the

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>new Wayshaw Bloomberg business Week. It is out. It's online

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>at business Week dot com, Bloomberg dot com, also on

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:00.959
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal, and it's on newstand. Joel Weber is

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 1>editor at Bloomberg business Week. He joins the via the

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Access line from Brooklyn. You can follow him on Twitter

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 1>at Joel Weber's Show. Joel, I got in my hands

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the current issue of Bloomberg Business Week magazine. I want

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to start with the cover and then we're gonna get

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 1>to the cover story, but one of my favorite parts

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>about Business Week each week is talking to you about

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:19.439
<v Speaker 1>how the cover is made, or even just finding out

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>how the cover is made, flipping it open to the

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 1>table of contents and reading that take us through how

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>this one came together. So this cover story is by

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Joshua Green, and it's about David McCormick, who, until earlier

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>this year is actually CEO of Bridgewater, the world's largest

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund UH. He is now a candidate for the

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 1>gop UH Senate position, a seat in Pennsylvania, and that

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>primary is unfolding now. The election primary election is next

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>month and he's in a heated race with Dr Rosz.

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>So the story really focuses on McCormick um and and

0:13:57.280 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of his transformation from being U hedge fund finance

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>type into a Trump loving maga UH politician. And to

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>do that, we really wanted to, you know, show show

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:13.319
<v Speaker 1>what he was like the environments that he's now at

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>with these rallies. And we just had this amazing photo

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that we got of him sort of cackling, and it

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>was just the perfect image to go with a line

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>um The dominant part of which is you know, full maga.

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I said to Tim, this is a guy who is

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>on a mission. If it looks like, you know, we'll

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of do whatever he needs to do or be

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>whoever he needs to be to get to his ultimate goal. Yeah,

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think, you know, um John, it's not like

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the Republican um side of his politics as a surprise.

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's long been um known to be Republican

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and has prob you know, Josh, as Josh writes in

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the story, like potentially grand ambitions than just this the

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Senate seat. But it has taken his Bridgewater colleagues a

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit by surprise just how um full maga he's gone.

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>And it also speaks, as Josh writes in the story,

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to what it takes to actually really uh be a

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 1>successful Republican at this stage. And for a while post Trump,

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>there was maybe a theory that you would be able

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to to see more centrist candidates, and it turns out

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>that even somebody like McCormick, who who probably in a

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>non Trump world would have been a centest, has to attack.

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>And now you know, there he and Dr Oz are

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>effectively trying to out trump one another, and all all

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to basically get Trump's blessing, and if either of them

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>happens to get the blessing, it might be enough to

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>put him over the top. Well, I do want to

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>give a shout out to not just Josh who who

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>wrote the story, but also to our editor's roundtable discussion

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that's part of our Bloomberg Business Week weekend show, which

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>drops tomorrow, because we do talk a lot about the

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>story Joel, but one area that we didn't get to

0:15:55.840 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>hit with Josh was China connections for David McCormick. And

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought this was a really interesting part of the

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>piece because if we think about what the Trump administration,

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the Trump Adminstration's tone towards China and where we are

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Republicans in China, Uh, what he

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>did at Bridgewater, many would argue, uh, does not really

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>jell with that. Yeah. And and there's a very memorable

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>scene with with Josh and Dr oz In in the

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>in the bathroom actually where Josh got to interview Dr

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>oz And and basically Dr oz at that moment said

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>as much um to Josh and that he was surprised

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>that more people haven't been frustrated with McCormick on that

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>on on the China score, because you're right, Bridgewater um

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>famously has been very sympathetic to China, has court of

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Chinese dollars, has made a ton of money there and

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of that happened on McCormick's watch

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>as CEO. Uh so you know what what he can

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Also he's also pushed back on that and said, you know,

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>it's only a fraction of the business and um, you know,

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>was in direct something that that he oversaw. But you know,

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the fact of the matter is if in the political

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 1>world in which we look in now, everything looks like

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:11.959
<v Speaker 1>it could be weaponized and that looks like something that

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:15.919
<v Speaker 1>may continue to be used against them, um, either in

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>this race and racist com All right, so that's the

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>domestic cover story. We also, um had a chance to

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>catch up this week with you and Sarifire on the

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 1>international cover story, which has to do with the French elections. Yeah,

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>so we uh we You know that that McCormick story

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:34.360
<v Speaker 1>is interesting because that I forgot to mention that it's

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 1>the most expensive primary and Senate history, but it's all

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and it also just shows how this idea that that

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I think transfixed the US the last election cycle, the

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>last election cycles of you know, how misinformation can be

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>weaponized and how rife it is on social media, and

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've spent a lot of time talking about

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the social media companies and the platforms and what they're

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 1>doing to fight misinformation. And it turns out that a

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of these problems are still um are still festering.

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>And France, which has an election on Sunday, happens to

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>be a surprising case study in just how how wrong

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it all still looks. The far right candidates there, Marine

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Lepine ericson Moore have managed to basically get UM uh

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Emmanuel McCrone to to have to have to veer more

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>towards their lane. UH. The race which I think a

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of people would probably thought McCrone would probably be

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>able to to walk away with looks really tight and even,

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and it will basically lead to a runoff. And even

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 1>in that runoff, it looks like UM currently like some

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>of the numbers suggest that Lapin could have the edge.

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 1>And it all comes down to basically what what Sarah

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 1>Fryar and company right in the story UM is that

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 1>there's more tactics really brought racial grievances to the forefront

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:01.439
<v Speaker 1>country that's already obsessed with nash fialism has become just

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 1>it's become a weapon there and a lot of the

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 1>same echo chamber of misinformation. They there's a more campaign

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>is used to great advantage. Well, let's go to another

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>story featured in Bloomberg Business Week this week, this one

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 1>by Mark German, and it's about Apple workers are pushing

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>back on their return to office almost two years after

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>they were first sent home. So Monday marks the day

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that Apple employees are set to return to the office. Um,

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>are they just willingly going to come back to the office. Oh? Man,

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a story that I'm really interested in

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>because even um, you know, the world's moth valuable company

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>on Apple UH is struggling to get its employees to

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>come back to the office. And the German story opens

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 1>with uh this reference to a promotional video titled Escape

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:54.880
<v Speaker 1>from the Office that Apple published recently, and it's basically

0:19:54.920 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 1>about how a group of of heroes in this US

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>ad working for this fictitious company basically get Apple devices

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and can start their own company. And boy, the irony

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 1>there is just that if I can use a bunch

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of Apple devices to start my own company, Like why

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 1>why do I have to work from an office for Apple? Uh?

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 1>And that is exactly what Apple is wrestling with. It's

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>not alone, a lot of corporate America is wrestling with

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>this same thing. Uh. And you know they're having to

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>come up with some accommodative policies because maybe exacts need

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to be in the office, but others, um, not not

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.160
<v Speaker 1>so much. So all of that UH leads to sort

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of like you know, even even the most fabulous, wealthy

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>companies in the world are are wrestling with uh. You

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:42.719
<v Speaker 1>know how how ranks want to deal with rto talk

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 1>about tensions man, um, great issue and so fun to

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:49.880
<v Speaker 1>check in with you. Uh. The editor of Bloomberg Business Week,

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Jill Weber, on the phone from Brooklyn, And of course

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:55.679
<v Speaker 1>check out our weekend show. You can hear it on

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>radio Bloomberg Radio at eight am Saturday. You can also

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>catch it on our podcast Speed and check out also

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that editor's roundtable that we do with Joel and we

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about cover stories. You are listening to Bloomberg, I'm roam, yeah,

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>but you let me drive? No, no, no no, honey, please,

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the ravels. I want to drive it's good question. Drive,

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>which is the Drive to the Clothes down on bloom

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Bird Radio. All right, we've got about ten minutes left

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:38.640
<v Speaker 1>in today's trading session, getting ready to wrap up the week.

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's not forget earnings start in a big way next week,

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 1>those little things with the big banks, uh, Tippian Morgan, Morgan,

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Stanley Goldman Sachs. That will be a focus next week.

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Right now that we're focusing on stocks, we're seeing some

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>selling into the clothes, not quite at our loads of

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the day, as we just heard from Charlie, but nonetheless

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>moving down. Let's get to it, and let's get to

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:00.040
<v Speaker 1>the Drive to the clothes. Lisa eric Son is co

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the Public Markets group at US Bank Wealth Management.

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>Lisa joins us on the phone from Minneapolis, Minnesota. Lisa,

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 1>how are you? How are things in Minneapolis? We're having

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a great day, thanks so much to him. Great is

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it you always? Whenever everyone says that and the markets down,

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Carol says, do you really mean really having a good day?

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Tell me what great means? Uh No, But in this environment,

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:26.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a rough one. You know, we held our Bloomberg

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 1>lives as rough as it was a month ago, that's true.

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>We hear a Bloomberg Live Wealth event, uh and talking

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of investment professionals like yourself, and I

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>caught up at the president of the Nicey Group and

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Catherine Keating over at b and Y Melon. She's ahead

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of b and Y Melon Wealth, and there was a

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of optimism, but everybody's keeping a very close watch

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>on how aggressive the FETE is going forward. What is

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>it that kind of keeps you up up at night

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the outlook. Well, to your point, Carol,

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>we really do think the FET is one of the

0:22:57.119 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 1>key items we need to keep our eye on. And

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>really the reason why is as they move from this

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 1>approach of accommodation to normalization, they really have a tight

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>rope to walk. And that's because coming into this year

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>we really knew already that the comparisons would be hard.

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 1>We had such strong reopening in one that it was

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:19.640
<v Speaker 1>just going to be hard for growth to be anyway.

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>And now on top of that, inflation has been elevated

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>for longer than I think most expected, And on top

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of that we have the very unfortunate human situation and

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>tragedy in the Ukraine and Russia. Which again may keep

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>prices elevated and supply constraints uh going forward. So really

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 1>they've got a tough hole in terms of really trying

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to moderate those price pressures while not hopefully denigrating growth

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>toe to great a degree. Yeah, sometimes I have to

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>say it certainly feels crossed talking about equity markets and

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>environment like this because there is so much suffering happening

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>around the world. Um, but we we should note that

0:23:57.440 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of what we're seeing playout in market today

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>is a dire result of geopolitics right now, especially when

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>it comes to inflation on when it comes to energy. Lisa,

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering, can you give us some numbers behind how

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking inflation will moderate or if it will stay

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>elevated this year, because we do get CPO next week

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 1>and it's and it's looking like it's going to be

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:18.479
<v Speaker 1>pretty hot. Absolutely well, we do see that there are

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 1>some pressures on the side to help that moderate. On

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the positive side, we have seen the labor force continue

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to heal and particularly those participation numbers pick up, and

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that's really nice because there's more workers come back into

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the workforce. That's going to help offset some of those

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:39.199
<v Speaker 1>supply chain pressures. Uh, And we have seen just organically

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>some improvements overall in logistical chains and things like that,

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>so there are some countervailing forces. Again, the really the

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>wild card, I think is going to be to your point,

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>some of these geopolitical events, it's really hard to handicap

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and to assess really what the outcome is going to be.

0:24:55.600 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>But obviously the longer those constraints continue, the it's going

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>to be a force to keep that inflationary pressure up.

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, So what do you have to do then

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>for investors portfolios at this point or how do you

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>think about it in terms of you know, there's capital preservation,

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 1>which sometimes in a crazy market environment, that's what it's about,

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>just not losing too much in an environment, rather than

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 1>thinking about gains or out performance. Absolutely well, we're really

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>at a balanced position right now on our outlook across

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>asset classes. And what that means for us is really, uh,

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 1>for the investor, all other things being equals staying at

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>their typical strategic allocation to equities. And the reason for

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that is despite you know, some of these risks that

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about, and really the difficult situation if you

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 1>look at the underlying fundamentals. We're actually in an okay place.

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 1>When we track our global health check of indicators across

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the US, what we see is really actually a solid picture,

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.679
<v Speaker 1>and while there's some slowly in some of the indicators,

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it's really from a very high level, and corporations have

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>continued to do well in terms of their earnings. So

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>we're starting from that solid operational base and really just

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>watching to see how some of these risks play out

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>as the year continues to unfold. Okay, so you talked

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 1>about what an investor should be doing right now when

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>it comes to their own allocation and staying the course.

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>If you were to deploy new money right now, where

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:21.679
<v Speaker 1>would you put it? Would you put it in ships

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>because they're selling off. Yeah, Well, we really are advocating

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>rebalancing again to what those strategic positions would be in equities.

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>And then on the fixed income side, we're really a

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.159
<v Speaker 1>little bit more cautious again on the back of UH

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the Fed is got this road to

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>UH move towards in terms of continuing to normalize policy.

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>And so with that more cautious stance with fixed income,

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>we actually think an interesting place to invest this global infrastructure.

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>We see that as an opportunity to benefit both from

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:59.919
<v Speaker 1>some internal to the US ongoing reopening activity at all,

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>so provide some inflationary offset as well as provides some

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>really nice diversified cash flows on an ongoing basis. Okay,

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 1>what about you know, market indicators. We follow different things,

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the VIX, whether it's the doubt transports. The

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:16.680
<v Speaker 1>transports down another one percent in today's session, if I

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 1>look for the week overall down almost seven percent, you know,

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 1>in times past, I'm thinking of different market cycles, we

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>would say that that's a negative sign about what's to

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:29.959
<v Speaker 1>come in the economy. Do you buy it well, certainly,

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and I don't mean do you well. Do you buy

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>it in terms of is it an opportunity investment opportunity

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>or do you buy the signal that things are getting darker? Well,

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 1>certainly it is an important indicator to watch. But we

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 1>really take a whole mosaic approach though, again as we

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 1>look at not only the transports and the VIX, but

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a number of other indicators. That's really leading us to

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 1>this more balanced conclusion that at least as far as

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the risk on stance, really just staying more at the

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>neutral position with typically wherever you would be and continue

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 1>to watching how that data unfolds. Well, again, there's some

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 1>risk on the horizon. We do see this appetite for reopening,

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:12.919
<v Speaker 1>and consumers and corporate coffers really continue to remain healthy,

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 1>although there's been a little bit of draw down on

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the consumer side. That again is a support for the

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>equity market. Really interesting stuff. Um, we only have about

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:25.479
<v Speaker 1>twenty seconds left with you. Um, does the US hit

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a recession the next twelve months? Well, our bass case

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>really is we're going to see some slowing, but we

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>aren't seeing recession yet in the cards. Again, the path

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 1>forward is pretty uncertain, so we're going to just have

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to continue to monitor, monitor, and buckle up. Sounding like

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the FED, we're gonna be data dependent, which makes sense.

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I really think that's a fair assessment in terms of

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 1>where we are. Lisa, listen, have a great weekend. Nice

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to check in with you again. Lisa Erickson, she's senior

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>vice president co head of the Public Markets Group over

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>at US Bank Wealth Management. On the phone from Minneapolis.

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud or Bloomberg dot com, and you can

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>also listen to our radio show at two pm Eastern

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on YouTube. Search to

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Global News