WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2020 NFL MegaPod Week 3 Preview

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Check it down Man Now down Man, Thursday September twenty

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty and meeting the book podcast megapod skill Alexander Uh

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you know how this works? Week three of the National

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 1>Football League. The staples of the show here in the

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>past year and change to my left, live at the day,

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and we're so happy to be live at the d

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>R second week ever, live at the date. By way,

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:32.599
<v Speaker 1>the audio sounds great. Do you think by the end

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of the year we'll have a crowd here at today

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm on a Thursday. At the end of the year,

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll have a crowd at ten am at circa. Oh

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>at circa. Yes, it's Mike Palm. Everybody, how you doing?

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>My great And I'm so happy that Todd uh found

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>town found time to join us this week. Thank you Todd,

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Todd wish Now I won't respond to the

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>verbal Dave Schultz. If everybody remembers the cheap shot artist

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of the NHL, Dave Schultz, there's the verbal cheap shot artist,

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Mikey Palm, who was almost as bad as Dave Schultz

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of the National Hockey League. Since he loves hockey, I

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 1>gave him a hockey example. Now I happened to miss

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>last week's episode because I didn't realize that we had

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a set time yet for this season. I'm sure Gilly

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Ice will call me on that and pretend that somehow

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>there was actually a set time when last week it

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>was all over the place. But whatever, I will be. Um,

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, a martyr in this situation, and I'm here

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to give you just winning kids. Todd, that was just

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the intro. We have a lot to get to, but

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>thank you for that. Uh. We usually have a rotating guest.

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I feel bad even calling this guy a rotating guest

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>because it is upon his shoulders that this megapod was built.

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>But we are thrilled to have him back as a

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>guest today. Uh. And there was a groundswell of support

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter for it as well. I'm getting texts about it.

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Is he on? Is he on? I can't wait to

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>hear him say these things. Uh, Ladies and gentlemen, you

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>have known him as Vegas Runner in the past. Uh.

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>He is my buddy, Ace. How you doing Ace, great

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to have you here. Never better, brother, never better. God

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>bless America. Thanks for having me on. You know this

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>is my favorite besides the fact I was on for

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>so long, so obviously it was my favorite show still is.

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I listened to you guys all the time. You know,

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:18.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm a fan, and obviously Vison who doesn't drive around

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>with that on all the time. So thanks for having

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>me sofully. We give some winners to them, yes, hopefully

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>we get some winners. And the reason you are not

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>here at the d with Mike and because you're here

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>in Las Vegas explained to folks, you are in a

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of pseudo quarantine. Yes, because I go to the UFC,

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the Performance Institute and the APEX and do um content

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>for them, do videos and social media hits and their

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff they're doing this week with their pay per view

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the big card in Albu Dhabi. So I have to

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>get tested. And since I live here, I don't have

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to stay at the hotel like a lot of the

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>fighters and staff that come in from out of state do.

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm able to stay at home, but I have to

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:04.679
<v Speaker 1>sign a waiver that I will not leave and that

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I will stay quarantine. So I've been doing that and

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:13.799
<v Speaker 1>it's been going well. Remember when, yeah, I remember when

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:15.799
<v Speaker 1>you first got the gig. Man, I'm happy for you then,

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and you're right, you know stay there, uh so that

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't get any of the fighters. Uh positive exactly,

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>but you are not positive yourself. Just to clarify, you

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:25.959
<v Speaker 1>are not positively. No, no, no, thank god. I get

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>tested a couple of times a week, so if anything,

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a luxury because I get to know

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that I'm I don't have it. A couple of times

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I woke up for analergies not feeling good. I'm like,

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, I hope I didn't catch it, and

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the unfortunately, you know, I know, I'm getting tested a

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of hours later, so you get the results. Thank god. Well,

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm pumped to have you here. Man, it's great to

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>see your face. Let's thank you for having Let's do

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>this starting with Thursday night football before we get to

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>our best bets. Maybe this might be somebody's won through

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>three best bets. But it's a Thursday night football game,

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>not exactly like the sexiest matchup there is. But it's

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Miami and Jacksonville. Miami O and who after losing the

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo though covering as a dog, but O and two

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>in the standings Jacksonville's one in one. They've covered both

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of their games, could have perhaps one last week, but

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>they got Gaskowski at the end by Tennessee. So Jacksonville

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>after beating uh the Indianapolis Colts week one, their one

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and one Jacksonville favored by three. ACE. We start with

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>you because you're the guests. That's odd. What do you

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>think anything tell you? Yeah, I tell you when I win,

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>when I lose, and I'll tell you when I placed

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the bad bet. And I got involved on this game

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>already at a bad number. I went on thet when

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 1>I sold this total climb from forty four all the

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>way forty eight. I didn't think he's gonna get much

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>higher than that. I know that the problems on defensive

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>side of the football, I know the injuries on the

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>defensive side of the football, but this is still unprecedented

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>territory for both these teams. Just look back over their

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>last ten plus regular season game. I don't think jackson

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Bill's had a total above forty seven forty eight maybe once.

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Miami even had that once in their

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>last ten plus regular season games. Um So, for me,

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a case of recency bias and

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Sharps getting out ahead of the market. We've seen these

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>primetime games flying over to total. The narrative is points

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 1>even though it's a Thursday night game with less time

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to prepare, So it looks like I took a bad number.

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>And I know there's a lot of short money on

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the over, but I'm on under forty eight here in

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the totals twenty nine, so you know you may not

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>want to pay you back that one under forty Is

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 1>that one of your three best bets? Or that just

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a bet? Because okay, so just the Thursday bet on

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>an undert uh, Todd or Mike anything on this one

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>tonight Mike, Yes, okay, Todd. You first, I'm sorry. I apologize.

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I said under Mike, and then you're gonna complain that

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I know. I said sunder Mike, and then I went Mike,

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>but you jumped in. That's okay, go ahead, what do

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>you say? Look, he can dish, he cannot save. It's unbelievable.

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>It's unbelievable. I can receive. Just find my friend. I

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:08.679
<v Speaker 1>had over a hundred catches last season. Uh, here's the deal.

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 1>I would like to use one of these. This pick

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>with this game is one of my three picks. I'm

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with that's right, folks, Miami Dolphins, Miami Dolphins,

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins number one. I'm sorry, since since you've left,

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>it's gone to hell A, so I'm sorry. Apologize. Go ahead,

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>DoD Miami. I have Miami Dolphins plus the three tonight.

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I believe they're the type of teams that just hangs around,

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>hanging around, like from Rounders. They just hang around like

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>alligate their blood. This guy, you can't get rid of them.

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>They just hang around in games, and I think they

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>can hang around with the Jacksonville team. They're getting three points,

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>three points in the National Who's Jacksonville? Who's all of

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a sudden Jacksonville is good? To me? This is just

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a toss up game. I'm getting three points. There's probably

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>no home field advantag Jean Jacksonville even when they do

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>have fans, and now that they don't have fans, Ryan

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 1>Fitzpatrick can keep you in the game. Backdoors always open

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>with Ryan Fitzpatrick. I believe he backdoor for the cover

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>for me last week. And I'm getting three points. I mean,

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>who's the Jacksonville Jaguars. Miami continues to continue to try

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>every single week, play people tough, even the game they

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>lost to New England. The beginning of the year wasn't

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a wipe out. They were hanging around in that game.

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>They hung around with a decent Buffalo team last week.

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>White can't to hang around with Jacksonville. Maybe they can

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>even win the game. Give me Miami plus three, Miami

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>plus three, todd one of number one, number two or

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>number three, best bet for you. I'm gonna make it,

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>uh number two, number two for Toddy, Miami Dolphins. Anything

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>for you to say, no, I'm not gonna play the game,

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>gil Um. I really haven't watched much of Miami this

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>year a little bit because of the two lightning delays.

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>They kind of got a little bit of air time

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>with the one o'clocks against Buffalo last week, But I

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>really don't know a lot about them, And uh, look

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>at this Minster has been pretty good. Yeah, I mean

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>he really has. They had the ball with three and

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a half minutes to go with the chance to go

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>down and win that game tied at Tennessee. So um,

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I just got comfortable with this number laying a whole

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>field goal. Uh, the game was closer to a pick,

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I would probably lean jackson Bill, but as it is,

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a pass for me. It's passed for me as well.

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the best bets. Ace your number one

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>best bet on the board this week, sir. Not surprisingly,

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I like a lot on this week's board. It's week three,

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>so now we have a good enough sample size that

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>there's locks just popping off that board the Sunday night

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>no more value than the New Orleans Saints over Green

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Bay Packers. This should be six on a neutral let

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>alone at home in New Orleans. Forget what you saw

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Monday night with the hundred plus penalty yards and the

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Raiders with their home opener and allegiance who didn't see

0:08:55.800 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that coming Brad six days before that Monday. Um So,

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>if anything, I think this Green Bay team, Listen, we

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>talked to coming into the season last year they were

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the most overperforming team based on their analytics. This year

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>they're doing it again right, and we're expecting the regression

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>they're expect. There's they were supposed to be too a

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>no coming into this game. The thing is they've made

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>it books so easy, scoring forty plus points covering light

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>they have, but it's that a TS differential that sticks

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>out to me. This team is now plus twenty four points.

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>They've outperformed the betting market. They're catching points in New Orleans.

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>They should be catching a lot more. But that's the

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>only reason it isn't the case. UM. As long as

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans is a little more discipline this week, I

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're gonna have any problems beating the Green

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Bay Packers, who, again I just think are an overvalued team. UM,

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and the regression isn't gonna come. I expect think too.

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:03.719
<v Speaker 1>I think most expected it too. And again they are

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:08.199
<v Speaker 1>just playing above their ceiling. I think that eventually crashes.

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>No better time than Sunday night foot Bowl in New Orleans.

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>You have always loved the New Orleans Saints. I know

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you've been to games there. By the way. One other

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>thing that might help you out here, Davante Adams feeling better,

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>but still too early to tell if he'll play Sunday.

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers number one target for the Green Bay Packers,

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>so ace with New Orleans minus three as his number

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>one pick. Mikey, you're number one. You know My favorite

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 1>fifteen minutes of the week each week, uh is when

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Michael Lombardi goes on a numbers game, Because I mean,

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Gil is always so well prepared. I mean the questions

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>are pullet and after week one, Gill asked him, isn't

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.719
<v Speaker 1>this Vikings team a sneaky five and eleven? They might

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>be a sneaky three and thirteen team. This team is

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>god awful. I watched the entire game against the Colts

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>end gaming under. I mean they are how come when

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>they have the ball on their own one they call

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 1>play action with the seventh step drop every week and

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>get him sacked here. I mean they're terrible. They don't

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>even want him to pass. The problem is they get

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>behind in the games because there's nobody left on their defense.

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>This is incredible. I think they win three or four

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>games this year. I love that I don't have to

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>lay more than a field goal. They don't get that

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>home field advantage now this year. That's a tremendous Britt

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>talked about it in tremendously intimidating place to play. That's gone.

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll take Tennessee and I'll lay the two and a half.

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Is my best bet, Todd. I'm gonna step in here

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>because I, once again Mikey and I have the exact

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>same first best bet. Uh in fact, on guessing lines

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>on Monday with Chris Andrews. When I guess this, I

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>said Tennessee minus four and a half. And when he

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:49.839
<v Speaker 1>said it was under three, I was pretty incredulous about that. Uh.

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins, I'll take off the glasses carwkite style to

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>read this. Kirk Cousins zero point zero passer rating late

0:11:56.880 --> 0:12:00.719
<v Speaker 1>into the third quarter last week? Is that good? Zero zero? Uh?

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>He ended fifteen point nine with an fifteen point nine

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>passer reading. Remember that's out of one fifty eight point three.

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Little statistical note quirky. The Vikings have actually taken a

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>safety in three straight games. How amazing is that? That's incredible?

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Going back to last season's regular Cuifinale. But they had

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and seventy five total yards of offense last

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 1>week in their game, there were two of nine on

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>third downs and usually tom of possession. Typically tom of

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>possession doesn't mean much, but in that game it did.

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>They only had the ball for twenty one minutes and

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty five seconds left. Who they played last week twenty

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>one minutes and thirty five seconds Now Anthony Barr already

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:42.679
<v Speaker 1>with the shoulder injury. They've generated no pass rush to

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 1>speak of their Corners. They're there, guys in their secondary

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>are too young. Give me the Titans. What's the number

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>on that? What's the official number? Let's see Titans minus

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>two and a half. That is also my first bet, Todd.

0:12:57.800 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, I looked at that game and I just

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 1>thought to myself, this smells like the game that everybody's

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna be on. And I've watched too much National Football

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:09.199
<v Speaker 1>League football to know there's nothing easy in the world

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of the National Football League. It looks too easy. And

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I agree with everything you both said. I couldn't agree

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>with you more. I think the Vikings stink. In fact,

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>last year I thought the Vikings stunk when Mike loved

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>him in uh in the Visa studio and I had

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to upgrade him on thinking that Kirk Cousins was actually

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna do something good for them. I never like Kirk Cousins.

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>The Vikings stink. I agree with you guys a thousand percent,

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:36.239
<v Speaker 1>but it's too easy. I'm passing on that game instead

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 1>going with my best bet. I'm gonna pull up Gilly

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Alexander's Washington Redskins against the Cleveland Browns over the points.

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.959
<v Speaker 1>Faked this out. I don't want the Redskins. I mean,

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't want the Washington football team or whatever they

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:01.439
<v Speaker 1>call that team. I don't m Haskins. I don't want him.

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>But I do want the over forty five in the game.

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>And here's why I want it. The Cleveland Browns can

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>move the football. They give that ball to Chub, they

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>run right down the field. Washington ain't gonna be able

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to stop them. They showed they don't have a decent

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>defense last week against Arizona. I think Cleveland's gonna get

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>your points, and I don't. It wasn't very impressed with

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland Browns defense at all. I think the Redskins might

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>get you some Lake garbage touchdowns. Forty five give me

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the over. The National Football League is a points league

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>this year. It's points points points. Give me the over.

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Washington Redskins, Cleveland Browns, alright over forty five for the

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Washington football team in the Cleveland Browns. Yeah, Redskins offense

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>has just been terrible. Uh. Front seven is great, but

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the strength of that football team. For the Redskins

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to win games, they gotta keep the opponent to like seventeen.

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>But you're not playing the side here. Forty five over

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>on that ace. Best bet number two, Sir, I'm gonna

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>go to total bet. Yeah. We took first half end

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>game on this and I'll get this one. Is the

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>second bet at Detroit Arizona over at fifty five. As

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>long as it's still fifty five, I like that. Yeah, yeah,

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and the first half I think we got twenty five

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>or twenty five and a half. But anyway to fifty

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>five over is the best bet number two. Um, Like

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>we've seen Detroit defense is just gonna get let up

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of points this year. Most expected them to

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>progress and take a step forward, and they just haven't

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>done that, especially on the defensive side of the ball,

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>where Arizona, if anything, this offense is gonna have a

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>ton of success now another season under their belt, with

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that coaching staff, with a young quarterback. UM, And I

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>think that defense is played well, but it's the offenses

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 1>they faced. You know, they had a San Fran team

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in first first week and then Washington last week. That's

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>not too difficult to keep them to less than twenty points.

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>But I do think Detroit I will be able to

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>get some points on the board even when they lose games.

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Detroit's capable of scorn like we saw against Dallas last

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>year where they lose by a touchdown, but they put

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>up four of their own, and I think it's gonna

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>be that kind of season for Detroit. So I'm gonna

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>go overft is my second best bet over fifty five

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Detroit Arizona, a rematch of their Week one tie last

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>year where where the Lions snatched a tie from the

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>from the jaws of victory. Mikey number two. How come

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>nobody calls out Matt Stafford, I'm just on ace. I mean,

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the decisions he makes are and nobody says

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>anything well because his coach is so bad that we

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>forget right by the way, before last week's game, thirty

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>three games that Matt Patricia has coached, they have squandered

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>eleven fourth quarter leads, so one out of every three

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>games prior to last week. Just it's just, I mean,

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>at some point, so I wish is gil what is?

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Patricia has a big meal at halftime, and he's just

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>not as sharp in the second half, as you can

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 1>see by his giant belly hangings. That could be We'll

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>look into nothing worse than a reformed tour, I'll tell

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>you that right now. My second pick is gonna be

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the Denver Broncos getting six points at home to Tampa Bay.

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm still gonna follow that. I know we lost, this

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>was our only lost last week, Todd taking the nine

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>against Brady with Carolina, But I'm gonna I tell you

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>we were in a position to win that game if

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't break that run when they're trying to run

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>out the clock. First of all, we shouldn't have been

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in a position to cover. They were being totally dominated

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 1>down twenty one to nothing, and they turned the ball

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>over and they got right back in the game. I

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 1>thought Jeff Driscoll outplayed Roethlisberger in the second half of

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that game, and it looks like he's an upgrade for

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos. There's certainly no drop off. There is not,

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and Fancio is a defensive coach. They've made both teams

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>work to move the ball that they played. Tennessee had

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to work to move the ball those games. Pittsburgh had

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to work. They're lucky to come out of there with

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the win last week. I just couldn't believe this number

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is six. I think that Denver's got a real chance

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to win this game. It's tough to go to altitude

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and play. Tom didn't have to do it that many

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>times outside of the playoffs, and the last time he

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>went there, they beat the living hell out of him

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>in the n f C Championship game. I'm gonna take

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the six with the Broncos at home. Wow. Three things.

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>One elevation not altitude. Thank you, you're welcome. Elevation level,

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>altitude to the ground. Uh, that's the English teacher in

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.679
<v Speaker 1>me too. What is this wonderful beverage that you have

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>concocted for me here at the day? Pineapple cranberry mixed.

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:36.880
<v Speaker 1>It's no no alcohol to juice, is mixed, very refreshing,

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>many calories put it down. Todd are a weight loss situation.

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>He thinks he's gonna catch me to this morning. I

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>am hot on your heels, my friend to forty eight

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>this morning. I'm going down babies, Trip tells me. That's

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 1>what it's called the babies. I am going down, but

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>at a snails a glacial pace and a more health

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the pace. And we're healthy. Yes, we're a little worried. Todd.

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a little too quick, too much time. I will

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>be taking nutritional information in from my good friend portly

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Mike Palm. Ever, and the last thing is and and

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>this is just before I get to my second best bet,

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it's fall baseball. Now. Is there anything better than seeing

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 1>baseball with shadows on the field when you know the

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 1>playoffs are about to happen? There Todd Todd Well, who's

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the end game betting expert, although he doesn't host a

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>show on MSG, but the shadows in baseball are very

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 1>important when you're making these end games. Of course, I

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>mean I don't think they're really factored into the line. No,

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>not the algorithm factor in shadows. Excellent point by Michael Palm.

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Once in a while he does come up with a gem.

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>And it happened yesterday actually in the Angels Padres game.

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:53.119
<v Speaker 1>If you were watching, that's right. I was texting with

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>me about it. Here comes the Shadows, and I we

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 1>started betting in game under here comes the Shadow. Didn't

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 1>work out? It did, alright. My second best bed, uh

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is the Seattle Seahawks. I am laying the five against

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys. Uh, don't be mesmerized by that onside kick.

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I know everybody is uh amazed by the Cowboys come back.

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 1>And it was amazing against the Falcons last week, as

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>they overcome a twenty point deficit from the first quarter

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 1>fifteen point deficit late. But that's more of a Falcons

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>thing to me than it is a Cowboys thing. Uh.

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys had three fumbles minus three turnovers. They called

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>two failed fake punts in their own territory, They made

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>an idiotic two point conversion called down nine with under

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>five minutes to play, and then, of course they had

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the five Falcons watched the spinning top on side kick,

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:41.640
<v Speaker 1>mesmerized by it. Um. Here's the thing with the Cowboys defense.

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>They have forced seven punts in eight quarters of football.

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Four of those. By the way, we're in what Atlanta

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 1>might have considered garbage time anyway. No Tyrone Smith, no

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:56.199
<v Speaker 1>Lele Collins, no Cam Irving, no Travis Frederick already on

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line, Blake Jarwin season ending knee injury, a

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>deep vents that lost their top corner and Byron Jones,

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 1>no Latent Vanderish, no Shawn Lee, no Anthony Brown cornerback.

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>The defense is allowed points eight times in a nine

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>or they did allow eight points. Excuse me, the allowed

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>points rather eight times in a nine drive span against

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons. They have a total of two sacks and

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>two games against teams with vulnerable offensive lines, and have

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>already allowed seventeen third down conversions on thirty four attempts

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:26.719
<v Speaker 1>plus three fourth down conversions. By the way, on as

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>many attempts they got one takeaway thus far against opponents

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:35.159
<v Speaker 1>that committed a combined forty nine turnovers last year. Forget it.

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking Russell Williams. I'm giving the points. I know,

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I know the Russell Wilson rather, I know the I

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>know the Seahawks have have trouble of their defense too,

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>but I will take Russell Wilson and his superman cape

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and give the five points against that civil the defense.

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Seattle pick number two, ace number three, Well we have

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a little. I'm a little. There's a lot of short

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>money on Seattle. That one scares me. I gotta go

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>with the Denver Broncos. I agree with Mike here Um

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>actually bet him in the first half at three and

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a half um and took the six. Again, We've talked

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 1>about it on your show millions of times. With the

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>injured player, I think the drop off just isn't as

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>significant as this line reflects. And although we saw down

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the stretch. Um, how good uh denver'se quarterback did? The

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>bottom line was the one loss was against a decent

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 1>past defense. Um. I think driscoll is gonna do just fine.

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>And catching six points at home to me, is a

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>little too many for this Tampa Bay team that we

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>knew coming in was gonna be the sexy pick. Uh.

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Anytime you have Tom Brady, you're gonna get action at

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>the betting window, and I think that's what this is

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a case of. So for me, I like Denver at home.

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>This is a team that's only lost by what seven points? Uh?

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Both games a combined seven. A lot of randomness and

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 1>those results they could be just as easily two and

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>oh as oh and two or one and one. So

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I think we're getting a little line value there. That's

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>why they're two and oh against the spread. So give

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>me Denver plus the six as my third pick, alright,

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:19.120
<v Speaker 1>matching with mikey there on one to Mike, what's your third?

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I struggled for a third pick this week? You'll really

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:25.719
<v Speaker 1>I looked at me. I looked at the Texans getting

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 1>four from the Steelers. Um, but jeez, I just I

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>can't bet on Bill O'Brien. I just couldn't pull the

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>trigger that that was probably going to be my pick.

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.640
<v Speaker 1>That exactly I thought. I kept thinking about what will

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 1>Bill O'Brien do to screw me? Bill O'Brien last weekend

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I just interject, did anybody, I mean, I know he

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 1>went fourth down from his own thirty two? What was

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:47.880
<v Speaker 1>he doing? Fourth down, fourth and one at the Houston

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty four? Down three to nothing with two seconds left

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:53.360
<v Speaker 1>in the first quarter and four plays later, it's tend

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 1>to nothing. What in the world was that? And it

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of got gone playoffs. He wouldn't go forth and

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>inches to try to go up to when he ate

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to nothing. But he can't do bad. No, no, not

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>on the opponent's thirteen. No way, no way. I have

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:09.239
<v Speaker 1>to take it over. I'm an under player. I bet

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>under every sport, and I cannot bet unders in this

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>NFL season because of these points. The crowd noise isn't

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a factor and all that I tried to find it over.

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:20.639
<v Speaker 1>I like, I'm gonna settle on the over in Orchard

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Park with the Rams and the Bills. What is it

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 1>forty six, forty six and a half, where you see, oh,

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>come on, Todd and again with that Okay, Askill, what

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>do you have? I got forty seven. I'm gonna go over.

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go over forties. So look at Todd and

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>that Ginger Bred House in Pittsburgh. I'm gonna go over Cork, Cork,

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go over forty seven. Here, I think McBey

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 1>is it's just maybe the best play caller in football.

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't impressed with Buffalo's defense in Miami against Fitzpatrick.

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought Miami moved the ball in the second half

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty easily and getting as Todd said, getting that back

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 1>door cover um and the Rams. Look, if you can

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>blow Donaldson, you're going to move the ball in the

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Rams and the Phillies. Philadelphia came back from big hole

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 1>and actually had several chances to take the lead in

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that game. I had to pick it over and I'm

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna take this one. Okay, over forty seven Todd, last one. Okay,

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.919
<v Speaker 1>I am going to do something. I am going to

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>hold my nose as I make this pick. I am

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>holding my nose and I'm going to pick the j Okay,

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 1>let me let me just say I'm that's my third

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>as well. By the way, it's too many points. It

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>looks it we've muted him. Go ahead, Todd, go ahead.

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry the j E t has New York. No.

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I was just getting to say, no, no, no, go ahead.

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Too many points. I I agree with this. Okay the

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Jets are getting now it depends on what who you have?

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 1>What do you have? Go eleven and a half? Eleven

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Okay, So the Jets are getting eleven

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half points now. Granted they've got absolutely destroyed,

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>except for in the last drive when I needed them

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>not to score because I had them second half under um.

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>They get that ridiculous touchdown at the end, but they look,

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, horrendous. But a lot of teams look horrendous

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>against San Francisco's defense. Obviously. Look, I'm not saying the

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Jets are a good team. That is not what I'm saying.

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying that maybe they're not that horrendous. And who

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the hell is Philip Rivers and the Colts to be

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 1>giving anybody eleven and a half points? Now? We know

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 1>the Colts are not any like world beaters. Why are you,

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean Indianapolis Colts? I mean, what have you proven

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to me that you should be laying double digits in

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a National Football League game. The Jets, granted they're not good,

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying they are, but eleven and a half

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 1>points in a National Football League team against a team

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 1>that is not the worst team you've ever seen in

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>your life, and the culture certainly not the best team

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you've ever seen in your life. And they have the

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers factor that can always keep be in the game.

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, they could be up twenty to six, and

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>then he starts, you know, doing stupid interceptions. Who knows

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>what that guy? You know he's busy. You know he

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>can't remember all his kids names. The bottom line is

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the Colts do not deserve to be favored by eleven

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and a half points versus anyone, and that includes the

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>New York Jets. Jes Jet stupid interception. She said, I'm

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>with you, it's too many points, and I and I

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>used that line all the time. The Colts should not

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>be favored by that many over anybody. Uh. The Jets

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>only had two hundred seventy five total yards of offense

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:35.199
<v Speaker 1>last week against the Niners, and one of them was

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:37.360
<v Speaker 1>on a big play. I'm most a lot of those

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>was on one big play. Um, so they're not good.

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I agree with all that, and it is about Philip Rivers.

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:45.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't have any problem fading him as

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback. But his injuries too. Right. They lost Marlon

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Mack with an achilles injury the first week of the season.

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 1>Last week it was another torn achilles from a leak hooker.

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Their standout safety, they're uh, they're white out. Paris Campbell's

0:27:57.440 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>on I R as well. He was carded off with

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a knee injury. So US are losing players. But give

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>me eleven and a half. This is one of those

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 1>where it's just I'm turning my brain off. Prove me wrong. Jets.

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>If you can't cover eleven and a half, Adam Gates,

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>if you can't cover eleven and a half, then you

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 1>know I'm an idiot. But I'll take the eleven and

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a half points. Give me the Jets against the Colts

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>team that is good, But you know, I don't know

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:23.160
<v Speaker 1>if they're in I don't know if they're great. Let's

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>put it down. So one other thing is teams that

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 1>get blown out in the National Football League have a

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>tendency to show up the next week. They're all professionals,

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Tug. They are they are all professionals. Very

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 1>well stated. All right, Uh so those are the three

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>best bets per person. Let us go to should we

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>do survivor picker teaser? Let's do the teasers right here?

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh to team six point teachers. We all had Atlanta

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>week one, so we all lost. We all had Kansas

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>City last week, and we just got through it. Everybody wins.

0:28:57.880 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, there was no way you could have lost

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a team is here last week unless you took the Saints.

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>That's right, that's the only one. You weren't gonna tease

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles across the number, right, So I mean what

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>about aces third play? Gil, we had the Bronco kid,

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos, Oh Broncos, my faults stenographer, everybody, he's an

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 1>alright ace. Uh, your favorite two team six point teaser

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of the week would be yeah, and but the teaser.

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>For myself, the only way at top times I've ever

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I ever used a teaser is to tease the number.

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>And obviously you guys have discussed it. I'm sure plenty

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of times. Uh. The only ones that really jumped out

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>at me is first, I'm gonna tease Cleveland, they're up

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to seven, seven and a half and some spots, so

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>we're able to get them down through that set and

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>through that three to add some value. Uh. The other

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 1>one I wanted New England. They were at six. I

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>was gonna bring them down to a pick, but now

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>they're at five, and that kind of kills that value

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>on the teaser, because again, if you shouldn't lay more

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 1>than minus one ten, you should only get six points.

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 1>And we know if you gotta hit what seventy two

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>point four percent to break even on each leg. So

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>if that six point don't help you do that, there's

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 1>no reason to use it. You're better off just straight

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 1>betting it. So the other one that that I have

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to do it too would be the Chargers down to

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 1>minus a half, even though I actually took Carolina at

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>plus seven because some book put up a rope seven

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:26.719
<v Speaker 1>and I thought that was a bad number. But again,

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the only reason I tease is for that purpose, So

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll go Chargers minus a half and uh, Cleveland minus one.

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>That is the closest thing to your your favorite being

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>on a Stanford long teaser this week, Mike, Yeah, I

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>think you have to use the Browns the Browns is

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the play that, and then it's a tough week because

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>they're like right, Like I said, the numbers don't make

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 1>sense for it. It's just the numbers. You may be

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>better off my gun with a dog and teasing it off.

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna O'Brien up to ten. Let's do that. Let's

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 1>take Bill O'Brien up to ten. That's my teaser, brown boy,

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you said that in the way someone just thought of

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 1>something two seconds ago. Well, I was debating it, but

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I got affirmation from a So I did it. Todd.

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>My teaser is going to be the Kansas City Chiefs

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 1>plus nine and a half. Uh, you know, I just

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>think that. You know it's gonna be hard, even if

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 1>you're the Ravens to beat the Chiefs by nine and

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a half. They could be down sixteen late and you

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 1>get the back door touchdown, they go for two, they

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>lose by eight. You're you're in the inside the number there.

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 1>So give me the Chiefs plus nine and a half

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and give me the Los Angeles Rams. I mean, Buffalo

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 1>is a good team, but they're not exactly a team

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that usually wins by margin. They're more of a defensive team.

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Defensive teams have a tendency not to you know, roll

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>up big points on the scoreboard. Plus the Rams can

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 1>usually move the ball. I'm gonna take the Rams plus

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half. I wish I had gone before you.

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>You stole my thunder Kansas City and the Rams. Yes,

0:31:57.760 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking you think that Washington team can win that,

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Yes they do. I mean I don't think they will,

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 1>but I think there's a shot. Give me the Chiefs

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 1>getting all those points is much more favorable to me

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>getting nine and a half and the Rams catching eight

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half. That is exactly what my two team

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 1>teaser is now. Survivor. Uh some of us are in

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the Circus Survivor contests. And by the way, let me

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>just say this. I think I said it last week.

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>It's all I care about. It really is all I

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>care about. Last week, the first week of the season

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of the entry pool went by the wayside. Most of

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 1>those are the hands of the Colts. I had one,

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I had two entries. One of my entries was going

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 1>with the Colts. Last week. With the remaining was it

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 1>five five or something like five? I'm sorry, only four

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 1>were eliminated out of eighth five entries, that's impossible. Well,

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 1>one person took the Eagles, one person took Carolina, but

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that might have been doing what Derek calls that the

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>double option where you take you use the Carolina and

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to Tampa Bay, so you make sure to advance. And

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 1>then two people had to Saint Sun Monday night. That

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 1>was it. Four. It will never happen again. So Todd,

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you're the you're the official bookkeeper of the show. On

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the show, you're the only one alive. But in real

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 1>life you're not the only one alive. So are we

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 1>playing this? Well, here's the thing. I think that folks

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 1>should realize that I'm not in a contest, which means

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that I'm probably going to have survivor winners for sixteen

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 1>straight week. Because Hashem, you know, Hasham out there. She

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>loves to stick it to me. There's nobody who likes

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 1>to stick it to me more than Asham. Hashem to

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the gentiles of the world out there. Yes, Hasham is

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 1>God in the you know, the Orthodox Jews say Hashem

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 1>because it just means the name, and you're not allowed

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to say God's name, so they just say the name Hashem.

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 1>So me and Gil joke about how the fact that

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Hashem hates me and he will always find a way

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to screw me, in fact, sending an earthquake that happened

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the desert to ruin a Las

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Vegas Aces game that I had to the sticks at halftime.

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever lost a bet because of the an

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>earthquake at halftime of a women's basketball game that you

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>were actually at the game at the MGM. It's never

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>happened in the world. Let me just step in and

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:13.319
<v Speaker 1>also say the extent of your neuroses is also when

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I ruptured my achilles, you viewed it as Hashem hurting you, because, yeah,

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 1>explain to people, why is that. Well, basically, I was

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>having such a good time playing Gil tennis. I was

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 1>kicking his ass all over the pace, beating him straight,

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:29.919
<v Speaker 1>beating him against the line, winning money every single day.

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:36.799
<v Speaker 1>It was the fantastic, fantastic experience. And of course Ashem said, no,

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you're having too much fun beating Gilly Ice, and that's it.

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take it away from you because we don't

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 1>want you to be happy in this world. Tau pick,

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 1>what is it? My survivor pick I've already used and

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 1>by the way, if we're gonna make this normal, we

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 1>have to know who I've already used. I've already used

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers and the Packers, and this week I will

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:01.359
<v Speaker 1>use the football team from Cleveland to just eke out

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:05.440
<v Speaker 1>at w for you against the Washington football team. I

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 1>hate betting on Baker Mayfield, but I think it might

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:10.719
<v Speaker 1>be safe this week. Ace. Are you at any survivor

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>pools at all? No? No, did not get into uh

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the West Gate, I mean the Circle this year, So nah,

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>don't have any survivor action going. Mikey, I'm not in

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:25.840
<v Speaker 1>any and and I'm out right, So am I allowed

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:28.359
<v Speaker 1>to make a pick up if you want? Well? No,

0:35:28.520 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. I have no problem with Mikey making

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a pick, but we have to give it some conjecture

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>because there's always the issue of people who have already

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:39.240
<v Speaker 1>used things. So Mike, maybe you should say, well, probably

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 1>people have used the X and X Y team. This

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:44.319
<v Speaker 1>is who I would take of the remaining teams that

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 1>are probably still available to you. Well, I used the

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:49.439
<v Speaker 1>Colts and loss, and then I used the Browns last

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 1>week on Thursday Night. I would use the Cardinals this

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:55.719
<v Speaker 1>week against Allions if I was still alive, and that's

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 1>probably a team people haven't used yet. That one would

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:00.239
<v Speaker 1>scare me. I like that, he Mike gives you the

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 1>proper conjecture, the proper conjectureture, not like I'm using the

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>wrong word. When you're right, you're right. I ask you

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a point of parliamentary procedure. What about Yahweh? I thought

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 1>Yahweh was also God? Yeahwei is a name. It's like

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 1>an English sized thing for a Hebrew name of God,

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>which you're really not supposed to say. That's why you

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 1>say Hashem, because you know Hashem is so exalted that

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you can't say his name out loud. Okay, that's enough.

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 1>That's good stuff. It's education, he said, it's education. We

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 1>get that, we get the Nightlife podcast and we get

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:43.360
<v Speaker 1>constant learning about the Jewish faith. Mike, why don't you

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>tell us how you feel about the you know, Uh, ice,

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 1>ice lakes and Jesus that that's some great stuff. Can

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:50.919
<v Speaker 1>I get my survivor pick anybody? Yeah, we're waiting on Gil,

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Uh. In my entry that is still alive

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:57.879
<v Speaker 1>at at Circle, which I intend to win, by the way, Uh,

0:36:58.080 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 1>first week in the one that is alive, I had

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:04.759
<v Speaker 1>the Tennessee Titans. Thank you Stephen Gostkowsky for finally making

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a kick. And then last week I had the Cleveland

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Browns on a Thursday night, So I am not allowed

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to use either of those. Um, this is a tough

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 1>week because the biggest spread is Cleveland. Okay, I don't listen.

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>The Colts already beat me in the other entry. I

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>am not trying to pick him here. I really am

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:25.800
<v Speaker 1>not going to the Colts this week. Well, you have

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to understand, I have the Jets plus the points. I

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:32.399
<v Speaker 1>can't have that those two things happening in my life. Really,

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to deal you know, you don't want

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to deal with I don't want to deal with Philip Rivers.

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I knows. I didn't say never, but I don't. I

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 1>don't trust them here. Oh I don't trust him. Um,

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I really don't. And I'm just pondering this for the

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 1>first time. By the way, dare I say, Todd, I

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:55.800
<v Speaker 1>don't need suggestions. For God's sakes, I'm going through it myself.

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 1>How about your your life? You love the Seahawks against Dallas?

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 1>You know the tune? Any Uh? The question is do

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I trust the Chargers? Why don't you yell at Mikey

0:38:03.800 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 1>forgiving you let me suggesting, because you're easier to yell

0:38:06.600 --> 0:38:10.000
<v Speaker 1>at the Chargers. Do I trust them? I don't know, Arizona,

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. This is very difficult for me. I

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:20.320
<v Speaker 1>think I think that I may have to Oh God,

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:24.960
<v Speaker 1>actually I may actually go with the New England Patriots. Yeah,

0:38:25.160 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm serious, that's the game. I don't want to bet

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:28.719
<v Speaker 1>when we get to that, I don't want anything to

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 1>do with that. I'll tell you why, because I think

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders are are a little overhyped, and I think

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Belichick versus Gruden is the matchup I might want. And

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I can anticipate lots of other people losing on New

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 1>England later in the year, so that might be my

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a good one. Don't let that. Don't let that

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 1>line move in the other way. Now to five and

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 1>a half scared you. The biggest win for Vegas just

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 1>happened five days ago. This looks like a letdown spot

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 1>for them. I like it, by the way, as people

0:38:57.320 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 1>want to know, because you're famous for many things on

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:03.360
<v Speaker 1>this obvious ones like Sprinkle, which we haven't had yet.

0:39:03.800 --> 0:39:06.759
<v Speaker 1>How proud driving around Gil Now I listened to like

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:12.320
<v Speaker 1>National Radio TV, and I hear guys saying sprinkle, sprinkle, sprinkle.

0:39:12.360 --> 0:39:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, whoa, yeah, that's uh. It was the uh

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 1>what's the big wood barstool? They use it too, like

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 1>they came up with it also. Um, but one of

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the things you're famous for Seattle Super Bowl year you

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>were all, you're like a forget Seattle, forget Seattle. And

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 1>they wanted but you wanted to tell people that you

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 1>were in Kansas City last year. Yes, sir, and and

0:39:31.120 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 1>what a city Kansas City is. Who embraced me with

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 1>open arms. As soon as I bet Kansas City for

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl, they forgot everything I said during the

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 1>last two regular seasons. He said, come on, have some ribs,

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:48.319
<v Speaker 1>come watch the parade with us. You're are people. That's

0:39:48.400 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 1>my kind of my kind of town. Seattle, we just

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:54.399
<v Speaker 1>don't mix. Well, you guys don't get along. I know.

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I thought New Orleans was always your of course, But

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 1>now Kansas City, somehow, they they've accepted me. When I

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 1>was I was anti Kansas City for a while until

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I started believing the height. It takes a while to

0:40:08.160 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 1>convince me. Ason Tom brenhaman with different viewpoints in the

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:14.319
<v Speaker 1>same town in the same time. Uh, that's true. I

0:40:14.400 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 1>like that. So I'm feeling good about New England. Now

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 1>do the question becomes, is he absolutely gonna take New England?

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 1>When I finally press submit on this? Can I say

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that with a certainty. I'm gonna be honest with you.

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:28.959
<v Speaker 1>I can't. But that's still thinking right now. You still

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 1>have You have till Saturday at three o'clock to get

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:33.879
<v Speaker 1>more information. There might be an injury. But I haven't

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:35.759
<v Speaker 1>had the time to think it through. Man, I do

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:39.279
<v Speaker 1>three things a day. You got time. You've got time

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:42.880
<v Speaker 1>just for the stenography, Gil, for the stenography. You have

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the pats And who did you use the last two weeks? Uh?

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I used Tennessee and Cleveland. Tennessee and Cleveland. You got

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you got options? I got options. I do have options.

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 1>But this is a tough week. Which will find got

0:40:57.200 --> 0:41:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore Monday night. They shouldn't lose at home. That's cancer.

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 1>He's trying to run me into a wall. Can I

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:10.120
<v Speaker 1>make a survivor please, which I couldn't make on visa,

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:11.880
<v Speaker 1>but I could maybe make it here. You could do

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:15.400
<v Speaker 1>anything here. How bad do you think that Brianna Taylor

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 1>protests are going to get And the reason I say

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:21.560
<v Speaker 1>this this up. The reason I say this is because

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I was downtown last night and we had a protest

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:25.839
<v Speaker 1>and I was at the Events Center doing a job

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:28.960
<v Speaker 1>fair for c and I mean we had to get

0:41:28.960 --> 0:41:31.360
<v Speaker 1>out of there. I mean the streets were blocked in

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that They're gonna come a time with the timing between

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night and the weekend. If there's issues like this

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:40.759
<v Speaker 1>in a racial pandemic where you might have to take

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville on Thursday night, if everything gets canceled on Sunday

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and Monday, you win the contest. So was this easy

0:41:46.560 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 1>idea or was this your idea? This is my idea,

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:51.320
<v Speaker 1>because don't let me this. He get credit for everything

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:55.359
<v Speaker 1>he texted me this. Wait, is that really true, Mike? No, No,

0:41:55.400 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 1>So listen to this. Listen to this because it's an

0:41:56.960 --> 0:41:59.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting theory, and you're right, this is probably the floormat

0:41:59.880 --> 0:42:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to saying on imagine if something got so bad and

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and yesterday might have been a great example of that,

0:42:08.080 --> 0:42:11.719
<v Speaker 1>right with with with the ruling in in Louisville. And

0:42:11.840 --> 0:42:14.400
<v Speaker 1>we're not talking whatever political side you're on here or whatever,

0:42:14.520 --> 0:42:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that's not the point of this. The point is from

0:42:16.160 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 1>a football perspective, if you're if we're a survivor, right,

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's say something goes down on the Thursday, and let's

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:24.320
<v Speaker 1>say that still the NFL plays the Thursday night game.

0:42:24.760 --> 0:42:26.879
<v Speaker 1>But what if it just the ground, what if it's

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a crescendo of protest on a Friday, on a Saturday,

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:33.799
<v Speaker 1>We're just speculating right to the point where the where

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:36.399
<v Speaker 1>I guess what you're suggesting is the NFL just has

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:39.359
<v Speaker 1>cancelations left and right on a Sunday, what the whole

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:42.760
<v Speaker 1>whole side canceled? So then what would happen to survivor?

0:42:42.760 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Whoever had a correct pick on Thursday wins advance? Well,

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:48.839
<v Speaker 1>they would advance if Jacksonville one the only people left

0:42:48.840 --> 0:42:53.239
<v Speaker 1>would be the people that there's no way that. What

0:42:53.280 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 1>are you talking about, you guys, you're saying no way

0:42:56.080 --> 0:42:59.600
<v Speaker 1>circle would do that, saying you're saying that if a

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:01.960
<v Speaker 1>guy on Thursday night and then they cancel the rest

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 1>of the games, that guy's that's the only Winna. Now

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't know. Now you have to handicap the protests. Sure,

0:43:09.560 --> 0:43:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you have to handicap That's the point of the conversation.

0:43:12.560 --> 0:43:14.400
<v Speaker 1>That's the whole point of the conversation. I thought you

0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 1>were gonna say, there's no way the NFL would do that,

0:43:16.960 --> 0:43:18.840
<v Speaker 1>but you went with there's no way Circle would do that.

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:22.319
<v Speaker 1>We wait, you haven't seen anything yet. Wait till we

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>have elect electoral pandemic, which is again, these are things

0:43:28.640 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 1>we can't talk about on on satellite radio necessarily, but

0:43:32.120 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 1>here I think this is all. This is all very

0:43:34.719 --> 0:43:37.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting stuff because you have to handicap COVID, right, you

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:41.359
<v Speaker 1>have to handicap social injustice, you have to handicap all

0:43:41.400 --> 0:43:43.480
<v Speaker 1>these things. And in something like Survivor, which is just

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 1>do or die period. Could you imagine if it ended

0:43:46.200 --> 0:43:49.120
<v Speaker 1>on something like that, that would be nuts, It would

0:43:49.120 --> 0:43:51.560
<v Speaker 1>be unfortunate, it would be unfortunate, would be very but

0:43:51.600 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 1>it would certainly be talked about for years to come.

0:43:55.000 --> 0:43:59.080
<v Speaker 1>A perfect example. Gil why whenever anyone asks me how

0:43:59.120 --> 0:44:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to get into the the three, how to be a

0:44:01.080 --> 0:44:04.560
<v Speaker 1>professional better? I always tell them, dude, get on the

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:08.120
<v Speaker 1>other side of the counter, don't even don't even bother

0:44:08.200 --> 0:44:11.239
<v Speaker 1>yourself with this side. Don't be a bookmaker. That life

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 1>is so much easier. It's it's it's ever increasingly more difficult.

0:44:16.680 --> 0:44:21.000
<v Speaker 1>This year is just its own thing impossible. But that's

0:44:21.000 --> 0:44:23.760
<v Speaker 1>just that's an amazing scenario. We sat there and rapped

0:44:23.760 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 1>our brains on how to be fair in the in

0:44:26.320 --> 0:44:28.799
<v Speaker 1>the circle millions. If the game gets postponed, we just

0:44:28.840 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 1>give you a half point, right, But we can't do

0:44:31.080 --> 0:44:33.839
<v Speaker 1>that because in Survivor, you must pick a winner that week, right,

0:44:33.960 --> 0:44:37.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's just the unfortunate part of something might happen,

0:44:37.120 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a COVID game or a protest game, that

0:44:39.680 --> 0:44:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you've picked a team and the game doesn't play it

0:44:41.480 --> 0:44:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you've lost that entry and the circle rule. Yes. And

0:44:46.080 --> 0:44:48.600
<v Speaker 1>by the way, if there's anybody listening right now, it's like,

0:44:49.120 --> 0:44:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to hear this stuff that we're not We're

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:53.799
<v Speaker 1>not trying to be ESPN Radio. We understand that people

0:44:54.280 --> 0:44:58.319
<v Speaker 1>any political todd Let me finish the sentence so that

0:44:58.360 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 1>people can understand I'm saying exactly what you're saying, instead

0:45:01.640 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of interrupting and making it seem like I'm not saying that.

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Can we do? Can't we agree on that? So? Uh?

0:45:06.719 --> 0:45:08.359
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I listen in the morning to ESPN

0:45:08.440 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Radio and then what we have on Visa and it

0:45:10.239 --> 0:45:13.359
<v Speaker 1>is just Visa is so much better because they are

0:45:13.480 --> 0:45:15.320
<v Speaker 1>all in on this stuff, but we're just trying to

0:45:15.320 --> 0:45:18.120
<v Speaker 1>say is through through the lens of betting, and we

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:20.839
<v Speaker 1>don't care about the politics of it. That is, they

0:45:20.920 --> 0:45:23.480
<v Speaker 1>just to have to ponder those scenarios is incredible. It's

0:45:23.480 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a handicapping consideration. That's right, handicapping consideration every But by

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the way, if it happens, if something like that happens,

0:45:29.200 --> 0:45:31.680
<v Speaker 1>what a sage you are? What a prophet? I hope

0:45:31.680 --> 0:45:33.719
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't happen. Of course, I hope it doesn't get

0:45:33.760 --> 0:45:35.919
<v Speaker 1>to that point. But here's the first seed of something

0:45:35.960 --> 0:45:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that could happen. We don't know if there's gonna be

0:45:38.080 --> 0:45:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a shooting on not What if there's a shooting on

0:45:40.080 --> 0:45:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a Saturday afternoon, you know what I mean about? How

0:45:44.080 --> 0:45:48.200
<v Speaker 1>about November three? They're they're gonna be some guys gonna

0:45:48.200 --> 0:45:50.880
<v Speaker 1>say I won the election. I'm not saying anything political.

0:45:50.960 --> 0:45:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying I'm gonna say I won the election.

0:45:54.440 --> 0:45:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Other people are gonna say, no, we would like to

0:45:56.239 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 1>count the votes. He's gonna say no, you're not allowed

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to count the votes. And there's going to be a

0:46:01.120 --> 0:46:04.960
<v Speaker 1>gigantic s storm in this country that's gonna make COVID

0:46:05.239 --> 0:46:09.520
<v Speaker 1>in the racial pandemic. Look like child's play, my friends. Now,

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I hope it doesn't happen, and I obviously hope it

0:46:12.120 --> 0:46:15.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't happen, but you know it clearly could happen. And

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the judge that one of those two guys nominates is

0:46:18.000 --> 0:46:21.879
<v Speaker 1>probably going to decide the certification of the election. Oh man,

0:46:22.480 --> 0:46:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that's it. I'm switching to Miami. Okay, don't not switching alright,

0:46:26.400 --> 0:46:28.759
<v Speaker 1>Final two questions, boys and girls. You know how this goes.

0:46:28.920 --> 0:46:31.080
<v Speaker 1>We've done this is the final two questions on the

0:46:31.080 --> 0:46:34.240
<v Speaker 1>show for as long as we've done this show. Uh.

0:46:34.239 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 1>And then the first of which is which the big

0:46:36.160 --> 0:46:38.400
<v Speaker 1>favorites do you think is the most likely to lose? Outright?

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:40.839
<v Speaker 1>The problem with this week is there are no big

0:46:40.880 --> 0:46:44.120
<v Speaker 1>favorites except for one. That's the Colts, who are eleven

0:46:44.160 --> 0:46:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half point favorites against the the Jets. Outside

0:46:48.920 --> 0:46:52.680
<v Speaker 1>of that, here are your biggest favorites. Cleveland seven point

0:46:52.760 --> 0:46:56.480
<v Speaker 1>favorites against the Washington football team, and then everything else

0:46:56.560 --> 0:46:59.840
<v Speaker 1>is below that. Chargers six and a half point favorites

0:46:59.880 --> 0:47:05.400
<v Speaker 1>against Carolina, Tampa Bay six point favorites against Denver, and

0:47:05.600 --> 0:47:09.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll leave it at New England six point favorites against

0:47:09.719 --> 0:47:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas. Those are the biggest favorites on the board

0:47:13.160 --> 0:47:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of those ACE, which do you believe is not Seattle Dallas? No,

0:47:17.160 --> 0:47:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Dallas and the sis. No, it's only five. We

0:47:19.840 --> 0:47:24.080
<v Speaker 1>can't get into that Pats. Technically, Pats are really only

0:47:24.120 --> 0:47:28.759
<v Speaker 1>five two technically good? I oh, yeah, No, I have

0:47:28.840 --> 0:47:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot more sixes there. I have six. Yeah, I

0:47:31.640 --> 0:47:36.480
<v Speaker 1>got six enough. I'm gonna have to go. Then I'll

0:47:36.520 --> 0:47:40.080
<v Speaker 1>have to go with the Carolina Panthers. Um, it's a

0:47:40.120 --> 0:47:43.560
<v Speaker 1>team I think that's capable of beating this one and

0:47:43.680 --> 0:47:48.000
<v Speaker 1>one Chargers team. You know they're zero point differential. Kind

0:47:48.040 --> 0:47:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of ran a little randomness there further Chargers and that's

0:47:52.120 --> 0:47:54.640
<v Speaker 1>six and a half sticks out. Like I said, I

0:47:54.680 --> 0:47:57.799
<v Speaker 1>was able to find a seven. Uh so I grabbed it.

0:48:00.680 --> 0:48:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Don't get me wrong. Um, but I just think this

0:48:04.760 --> 0:48:07.080
<v Speaker 1>offense needs a little while. It's the defense that's getting

0:48:07.080 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 1>it done. I think the top fifteen d v o A,

0:48:09.440 --> 0:48:12.600
<v Speaker 1>so they're keeping them in games. But I think Caroline

0:48:12.719 --> 0:48:14.839
<v Speaker 1>is capable of beating this team, even on the road.

0:48:14.880 --> 0:48:17.239
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the Panthers. Okay, so Chargers is your pick

0:48:17.239 --> 0:48:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of the favorite the big favorite most like to go

0:48:19.200 --> 0:48:21.600
<v Speaker 1>down right. Yeah. Uh And we we've gone this far

0:48:21.640 --> 0:48:24.960
<v Speaker 1>in the show without mentioning to Rod partner with the

0:48:24.960 --> 0:48:29.720
<v Speaker 1>pronce stays to Rod Taylor punctured lung from the doctor

0:48:29.760 --> 0:48:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Chargers. If they would have won the game

0:48:32.080 --> 0:48:35.319
<v Speaker 1>with the doctor have gotten the game ball. Another thing

0:48:35.360 --> 0:48:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I can't say, but you know what, you know what

0:48:40.080 --> 0:48:45.279
<v Speaker 1>it does explain to me. I'm the first one to

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:47.280
<v Speaker 1>love to bury you. But that was could you imagine

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the post game lacker? So every we know who's getting

0:48:49.560 --> 0:48:54.120
<v Speaker 1>this game ball? Everybody? Uh No, by the way, welcome

0:48:54.160 --> 0:48:56.879
<v Speaker 1>to I Heart Radio for this podcast with that note

0:48:56.960 --> 0:48:59.359
<v Speaker 1>right there. No, um, the we're on the I Heart

0:48:59.440 --> 0:49:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Radio Network podcast network, by the way, So that's a

0:49:02.200 --> 0:49:05.959
<v Speaker 1>that's her debut salvo right there. No, but seriously, Anthony Lynn,

0:49:06.000 --> 0:49:07.719
<v Speaker 1>we were all at least at least I know I

0:49:07.760 --> 0:49:09.680
<v Speaker 1>was on a numbers game and I'm sure everybody else was.

0:49:10.000 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 1>When he immediately said Anthony Lynn that they would go

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:15.520
<v Speaker 1>back to Tyrod Taylor as soon as he was healthy,

0:49:15.800 --> 0:49:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's like, what are you talking about? Justin Herbert had

0:49:17.920 --> 0:49:19.200
<v Speaker 1>like a minute to prevary for this game, and he

0:49:19.239 --> 0:49:22.520
<v Speaker 1>was awesome. That explains it to me. Lombardi doesn't think

0:49:22.520 --> 0:49:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm right. He thinks that's he thinks that's nonsense. He

0:49:24.600 --> 0:49:27.520
<v Speaker 1>thinks he likes Tyrod Taylor period, no matter what. But

0:49:27.600 --> 0:49:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I think Anthony Lynn knew something weird happened and he

0:49:30.640 --> 0:49:34.840
<v Speaker 1>had Yeah, you agree, But I thought they won't stairs

0:49:34.880 --> 0:49:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Mid Carolina as they fall under that oh and two

0:49:37.440 --> 0:49:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a T S trend that I keep hearing, which that nonsense,

0:49:40.719 --> 0:49:43.879
<v Speaker 1>which is well, it's it's everywhere with the oh these

0:49:43.920 --> 0:49:46.000
<v Speaker 1>teams are owing to a T S and over the

0:49:46.080 --> 0:49:49.319
<v Speaker 1>last four seasons, blah blah blah, it's twenty two and

0:49:49.520 --> 0:49:52.840
<v Speaker 1>whatever against the spread. Like those kind of things start

0:49:52.880 --> 0:49:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to worry me because I like a couple of those

0:49:55.080 --> 0:49:58.400
<v Speaker 1>dogs in that oh and two, and I just don't trust.

0:49:58.760 --> 0:50:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't like trends like that. When you tell me

0:50:00.880 --> 0:50:03.240
<v Speaker 1>they're twenty two and seven over the last four years,

0:50:03.600 --> 0:50:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Why are you telling me the last five years and

0:50:05.640 --> 0:50:08.440
<v Speaker 1>six and seven? Like does it not fit the narrative?

0:50:08.480 --> 0:50:11.240
<v Speaker 1>And you stopped it four years? Like just say, teams

0:50:11.239 --> 0:50:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that are owing to A T S are probably undervalued

0:50:14.840 --> 0:50:18.160
<v Speaker 1>going into week three, Like that's a fundamental reason we

0:50:18.200 --> 0:50:20.919
<v Speaker 1>could all agree on that it's possible if the team

0:50:20.960 --> 0:50:23.879
<v Speaker 1>hasn't covered first two games out of the gate, they're

0:50:23.920 --> 0:50:26.880
<v Speaker 1>owing two, there may be a little undervalued, But the

0:50:26.960 --> 0:50:29.440
<v Speaker 1>pool out trends like, oh, they're twenty two and this

0:50:29.640 --> 0:50:32.759
<v Speaker 1>over the last three years. To me, that's just nonsense.

0:50:32.960 --> 0:50:37.000
<v Speaker 1>But yet you're spooked by it nonetheless, Yeah, because exactly

0:50:37.040 --> 0:50:40.080
<v Speaker 1>because it's so it's everywhere. I'm like, are they shading

0:50:40.200 --> 0:50:42.360
<v Speaker 1>for it? You know what I mean? Is it baked

0:50:42.400 --> 0:50:46.120
<v Speaker 1>into the cake too much? That's what worries me. But chance,

0:50:46.160 --> 0:50:48.239
<v Speaker 1>you're also saying that's what I was worried about with

0:50:48.280 --> 0:50:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the Titans. You're also saying the teams can theoretically be

0:50:51.400 --> 0:50:53.640
<v Speaker 1>on Technically they're going to be. If you throw a

0:50:53.680 --> 0:50:55.719
<v Speaker 1>thousand teams that went oh and two against spread in

0:50:55.760 --> 0:50:59.520
<v Speaker 1>any sport, they're probably gonna be a little bit undervalued

0:50:59.560 --> 0:51:01.680
<v Speaker 1>going into of that third week because of exactly what

0:51:01.719 --> 0:51:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you just said. Yeah, exactly, regardless of of the trend.

0:51:06.080 --> 0:51:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's just like logical, you know what I mean,

0:51:09.280 --> 0:51:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Like in any market, if a team's under performing, they're

0:51:13.960 --> 0:51:17.719
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna be discounted, you know what I mean? Going forward,

0:51:18.480 --> 0:51:21.279
<v Speaker 1>Mikey's ace has got the Chargers of the team the

0:51:21.360 --> 0:51:23.920
<v Speaker 1>large favorite most likely lose out right, Well, I'm surprised

0:51:23.960 --> 0:51:27.720
<v Speaker 1>they didn't take the team that we are both against, uh,

0:51:27.960 --> 0:51:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay, because we both took the six with Denver.

0:51:30.640 --> 0:51:32.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna say that Denver can beat Tampa Bay

0:51:32.520 --> 0:51:36.919
<v Speaker 1>and I'll use them as that team, all right, Todd, Uh,

0:51:38.239 --> 0:51:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, if the Pats are part of it, I'm

0:51:40.480 --> 0:51:43.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna say the Pats. You know, I don't want, I

0:51:43.239 --> 0:51:45.600
<v Speaker 1>don't really want to do that, but that's what I'm

0:51:45.640 --> 0:51:48.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna say that. Look, the Raiders are moving the football.

0:51:48.239 --> 0:51:51.160
<v Speaker 1>The Raiders showed they could move to football last year

0:51:51.200 --> 0:51:54.120
<v Speaker 1>as well. In fact, I think the Raiders maybe that

0:51:54.239 --> 0:51:57.440
<v Speaker 1>sneaky over team like Tampa was last year because they

0:51:57.480 --> 0:52:00.360
<v Speaker 1>can move the football. Their defense is really not that

0:52:00.480 --> 0:52:04.000
<v Speaker 1>good and you can move on them as well. So, um,

0:52:04.040 --> 0:52:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I wouldn't be shocked out of my brains

0:52:07.000 --> 0:52:09.400
<v Speaker 1>if Cam Newton had a bad game and and the

0:52:09.480 --> 0:52:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Raiders pulled it off. I'm not saying it's gonna happen.

0:52:12.000 --> 0:52:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Shocked out of my brains. Um, I'm I'm gonna say

0:52:18.239 --> 0:52:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the Indianapolis Colts the biggest favorite on the board. I

0:52:22.360 --> 0:52:25.840
<v Speaker 1>don't trust Philip Rivers. I've had too many experiences Philip Rivers,

0:52:26.360 --> 0:52:29.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, over the years, and I the Jets can't

0:52:29.960 --> 0:52:34.640
<v Speaker 1>possibly be as bad as they've looked. I I think

0:52:34.680 --> 0:52:37.839
<v Speaker 1>the Cults are the big favorite, most likely lose out right,

0:52:37.840 --> 0:52:40.080
<v Speaker 1>because I think of all those big favorites, they're the

0:52:40.120 --> 0:52:42.120
<v Speaker 1>shakiest of the bunch. I get it they're playing, but

0:52:42.480 --> 0:52:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I trust Cleveland more than I do against the Washington

0:52:44.880 --> 0:52:48.480
<v Speaker 1>football team. Sorry, I you know, the other one was

0:52:48.520 --> 0:52:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers that I considered. So it's it's but I'm

0:52:50.600 --> 0:52:52.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna say that I'm just for giggles, I'm gonna say

0:52:52.520 --> 0:52:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say the Colts because I really I don't

0:52:54.080 --> 0:52:57.080
<v Speaker 1>trust Philip Rivers one bit and they've got too many injuries,

0:52:57.320 --> 0:52:59.279
<v Speaker 1>so that'd be my play there. Uh, the game you

0:52:59.320 --> 0:53:02.080
<v Speaker 1>want no part? Have to wrap this up, bizarro exercise.

0:53:02.719 --> 0:53:04.440
<v Speaker 1>You have to pick a side in every single one

0:53:04.480 --> 0:53:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of these sixteen games which you get one past one

0:53:06.560 --> 0:53:08.480
<v Speaker 1>game you want no part of one game you wouldn't

0:53:08.480 --> 0:53:12.520
<v Speaker 1>even bet with Wishnav's money. What game my bank mythical

0:53:12.560 --> 0:53:14.520
<v Speaker 1>bank roll. I don't know why you have to keep

0:53:14.600 --> 0:53:19.040
<v Speaker 1>kicking gets so angry, Like, what game would you pick? Ace?

0:53:20.960 --> 0:53:24.279
<v Speaker 1>For me, this is symbol um Atlanta Chicago because it

0:53:24.360 --> 0:53:27.279
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't make sense, like, you know, you have a

0:53:27.360 --> 0:53:31.400
<v Speaker 1>note to Atlanta team given points, getting uh ticket account.

0:53:31.440 --> 0:53:33.520
<v Speaker 1>At least from what I'm hearing, the money's coming in

0:53:33.600 --> 0:53:37.239
<v Speaker 1>on the Atlanta side. To me, that's just a confusing

0:53:37.360 --> 0:53:41.319
<v Speaker 1>type of game. Um nothing. I want to focus on

0:53:41.480 --> 0:53:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Chicago looking good at two and oh a little surprising

0:53:45.160 --> 0:53:47.880
<v Speaker 1>but in catching points. I just want no part of

0:53:47.960 --> 0:53:50.320
<v Speaker 1>this at all. That's a that's as as solid a

0:53:50.360 --> 0:53:53.520
<v Speaker 1>pick as any. Mike I said, it's the Raiders in

0:53:53.560 --> 0:53:55.360
<v Speaker 1>New England, just because I'm not sure how good this

0:53:55.480 --> 0:53:58.759
<v Speaker 1>Raider's team is. I look at this trend and I

0:53:58.840 --> 0:54:00.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, what Gruden did year one year

0:54:00.680 --> 0:54:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to the record keeps improving. But I'm not I'm not

0:54:04.640 --> 0:54:06.759
<v Speaker 1>a car guy. I just don't think cars any good.

0:54:06.920 --> 0:54:10.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so, how good is New England? How is

0:54:10.440 --> 0:54:13.239
<v Speaker 1>is Belichick doing this with all the deserters and and

0:54:13.600 --> 0:54:16.200
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden cams is looks like his arms

0:54:16.200 --> 0:54:18.560
<v Speaker 1>healthy again, and he's he's able to march down the

0:54:18.600 --> 0:54:20.040
<v Speaker 1>field in a minute and a half. I mean, that

0:54:20.120 --> 0:54:22.920
<v Speaker 1>was amazing. So I just don't really know that I

0:54:22.960 --> 0:54:25.080
<v Speaker 1>know either team, and that the number is a tough

0:54:25.160 --> 0:54:27.720
<v Speaker 1>number to bet, So I want no part of that game, Todd.

0:54:27.800 --> 0:54:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I know Todd's gonna take mine. Pittsburgh against the Houston Texans.

0:54:32.800 --> 0:54:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I want no part of Billy O'Brien because if you

0:54:35.680 --> 0:54:39.080
<v Speaker 1>bet on him, you could literally lose your life because

0:54:39.080 --> 0:54:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you'll go crazy, end up in a mental asylum and

0:54:41.719 --> 0:54:45.759
<v Speaker 1>want to kill yourself. Or the Pittsburgh Steelers. Where the

0:54:45.760 --> 0:54:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Steelers? Are they really this good? Are they? I mean?

0:54:49.480 --> 0:54:51.040
<v Speaker 1>What are they? Are they good? Are they bad? I

0:54:51.080 --> 0:54:53.640
<v Speaker 1>know they're two and oh, but they didn't look incredible

0:54:53.640 --> 0:54:57.319
<v Speaker 1>against the Giants. They let Denver hang around with Jeff

0:54:57.400 --> 0:54:59.600
<v Speaker 1>driscoll for all kinds of the time. Could have you

0:54:59.640 --> 0:55:01.480
<v Speaker 1>even lost the game at the end? I don't know

0:55:01.560 --> 0:55:04.160
<v Speaker 1>what Pittsburgh is, I really don't. I know Ben has

0:55:04.200 --> 0:55:06.080
<v Speaker 1>lost a lot of weight, but I don't know what

0:55:06.120 --> 0:55:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh is, and I don't want Bill O'Brien, So get

0:55:08.960 --> 0:55:12.239
<v Speaker 1>me out of that. I know we don't usually associate

0:55:12.280 --> 0:55:15.880
<v Speaker 1>this category with anything but like teams that we just

0:55:15.920 --> 0:55:20.160
<v Speaker 1>don't have a feel for. But Baltimore Kansas City is mine?

0:55:20.920 --> 0:55:24.839
<v Speaker 1>Like you can't pick a better more? Yeah, I can't

0:55:24.840 --> 0:55:27.399
<v Speaker 1>pick a better marquee matchup in the NFL in that game.

0:55:27.560 --> 0:55:30.319
<v Speaker 1>But I want no part of it on the side

0:55:31.200 --> 0:55:35.520
<v Speaker 1>because I think Baltimore could crush him actually, and I

0:55:35.560 --> 0:55:37.560
<v Speaker 1>think Mahomes could do the Mahomes thing and beat him

0:55:37.560 --> 0:55:40.239
<v Speaker 1>at the you know, beat him, beat him late as well,

0:55:40.760 --> 0:55:43.479
<v Speaker 1>or Kansas City have a big league. There's so many

0:55:43.480 --> 0:55:45.640
<v Speaker 1>different results of this as you haven't you have an

0:55:45.640 --> 0:55:48.480
<v Speaker 1>opinion on this game. I do, man, I do, and

0:55:48.680 --> 0:55:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and honestly, listen, it's not a knock against Kansas City.

0:55:52.800 --> 0:55:55.040
<v Speaker 1>It's just they got it done. Man. They won the

0:55:55.080 --> 0:55:57.759
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl like they needed to do, wanted to do,

0:55:57.960 --> 0:56:01.120
<v Speaker 1>aim to do, and for both them more, they haven't

0:56:01.120 --> 0:56:04.440
<v Speaker 1>gotten there. They're the regular season team. They're the Kansas

0:56:04.440 --> 0:56:08.000
<v Speaker 1>City of two years ago of trying to still prove

0:56:08.080 --> 0:56:10.319
<v Speaker 1>themselves to where they're gonna blow teams out in the

0:56:10.360 --> 0:56:14.279
<v Speaker 1>regular season. I don't like teams like this, um, but

0:56:14.560 --> 0:56:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you gotta look at that side. I think Baltimore, what

0:56:18.440 --> 0:56:19.719
<v Speaker 1>what you need to do. I think a lot of

0:56:19.800 --> 0:56:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City money is probably gonna come in. Kansas City

0:56:22.400 --> 0:56:26.240
<v Speaker 1>is an underdogs attractive we know their record with Mahomes

0:56:26.280 --> 0:56:27.839
<v Speaker 1>is a dog. I think they're like four and one

0:56:27.960 --> 0:56:30.239
<v Speaker 1>or five and o against the spread, something like that.

0:56:30.440 --> 0:56:33.120
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna get money. I think you sit back, you wait,

0:56:33.480 --> 0:56:35.839
<v Speaker 1>if a bunch of Kansas City money line comes in,

0:56:36.080 --> 0:56:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you get the bet. Baltimore at home on the money

0:56:39.040 --> 0:56:42.000
<v Speaker 1>line at a discount. Um. I like that, and I

0:56:42.040 --> 0:56:44.520
<v Speaker 1>like Baltimore first half. I think they're gonna come out.

0:56:44.640 --> 0:56:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Like you said, if Kansas City comes in it winsday game,

0:56:47.760 --> 0:56:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna have to do it from behind.

0:56:50.000 --> 0:56:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore has all the momentum, they have everything to prove.

0:56:53.360 --> 0:56:56.680
<v Speaker 1>It's at home and they're that custom made regular season

0:56:56.719 --> 0:56:59.440
<v Speaker 1>team to blow everyone away. But let's see what you

0:56:59.480 --> 0:57:02.200
<v Speaker 1>could do in the postseason. That's when it matters. Well,

0:57:02.239 --> 0:57:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore money line might be what I actually end up

0:57:05.680 --> 0:57:09.799
<v Speaker 1>betting that day. But as long as it as long

0:57:09.840 --> 0:57:11.359
<v Speaker 1>as it's three in a hook or ori end game.

0:57:11.440 --> 0:57:13.080
<v Speaker 1>As long as three in a hook though on the

0:57:13.080 --> 0:57:16.080
<v Speaker 1>pre flop number, that's a line I want no part of.

0:57:16.360 --> 0:57:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't like that hook. If it were three, it

0:57:19.360 --> 0:57:20.880
<v Speaker 1>might not be the game I would choose, But I

0:57:20.880 --> 0:57:24.560
<v Speaker 1>don't like that. I just think they're plicking better offensively, defensively,

0:57:24.640 --> 0:57:28.400
<v Speaker 1>special teams all three facets of the game are playing

0:57:28.800 --> 0:57:31.600
<v Speaker 1>up the speed where I think in Kansas City they're

0:57:31.640 --> 0:57:34.560
<v Speaker 1>not there yet. The talents there, but I don't think

0:57:34.560 --> 0:57:38.120
<v Speaker 1>they're playing as efficiently as Baltimore is. Out of the gate.

0:57:38.400 --> 0:57:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I like it. Let's face it, Kansas City had no

0:57:41.080 --> 0:57:44.040
<v Speaker 1>business to win that game, and in the last as exactly,

0:57:46.720 --> 0:57:48.840
<v Speaker 1>why doesn't he take three points at the end of

0:57:48.840 --> 0:57:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter. Idiotic. He could have been up to nothing.

0:57:51.560 --> 0:57:54.160
<v Speaker 1>And I'm spalking about Anthony Lynn at the thirty four

0:57:54.240 --> 0:57:55.880
<v Speaker 1>yard line. I mean, you could kick. I could kick

0:57:55.920 --> 0:57:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a sixty yard field goal on that, So be yourself,

0:57:57.920 --> 0:57:59.880
<v Speaker 1>which you're right, most people are talking about. They're not

0:58:00.040 --> 0:58:01.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about that. They're not talking about the end of

0:58:01.880 --> 0:58:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the third quarter. They run for eight yards on first down,

0:58:04.880 --> 0:58:06.920
<v Speaker 1>they have second and two with thirty five seconds and

0:58:06.960 --> 0:58:09.160
<v Speaker 1>no play clock. He rushes to the line and throws

0:58:09.200 --> 0:58:11.360
<v Speaker 1>that bad interception. They didn't have to run and play

0:58:11.520 --> 0:58:14.120
<v Speaker 1>in the third That was horrific, horrific. The play calling

0:58:14.160 --> 0:58:16.000
<v Speaker 1>at the goal line, the decision, I mean, there was

0:58:16.040 --> 0:58:18.640
<v Speaker 1>just soles. They were inside the tend to put to

0:58:18.680 --> 0:58:21.000
<v Speaker 1>put a real big, put a big touchdown up and

0:58:21.000 --> 0:58:22.840
<v Speaker 1>they would have been the goal from the four and

0:58:22.880 --> 0:58:24.640
<v Speaker 1>they never let him throw the ball. They never got

0:58:24.640 --> 0:58:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the ball wide, They never play action nothing. It was

0:58:27.560 --> 0:58:30.640
<v Speaker 1>hard down. Was a broken play. It wasn't a broken play.

0:58:30.720 --> 0:58:33.360
<v Speaker 1>It was supposed to be some motion seper He turned right,

0:58:33.400 --> 0:58:36.160
<v Speaker 1>he was supposed to turn left. Yeah, yeah, rookie quarter beat,

0:58:36.200 --> 0:58:38.560
<v Speaker 1>what are you gonna played? Great? Defense, played great. They

0:58:38.560 --> 0:58:41.240
<v Speaker 1>should have won the game. I was shocked that the

0:58:41.320 --> 0:58:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs kicked the field goal at the end. I thought

0:58:43.000 --> 0:58:45.160
<v Speaker 1>they it was fourth and I thought I thought they

0:58:45.200 --> 0:58:47.560
<v Speaker 1>were going to go for How how let's think about

0:58:47.600 --> 0:58:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that feat he kicked. Technically, he kicked four fifty eight

0:58:50.800 --> 0:58:55.160
<v Speaker 1>yard field goals in that game. Radst kicking displays. Why

0:58:55.160 --> 0:58:57.280
<v Speaker 1>would you go for it when if you miss a

0:58:57.320 --> 0:59:00.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight yard field goal the other team has incredible feel?

0:59:00.240 --> 0:59:03.840
<v Speaker 1>But I don't even understand why you would go because

0:59:03.920 --> 0:59:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Michael Lombardo tell you of the time, Yeah, why would

0:59:08.040 --> 0:59:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Why would you go for the field goal? That's what

0:59:10.040 --> 0:59:12.240
<v Speaker 1>we're saying. We would have went fourth and the bigger

0:59:12.240 --> 0:59:14.040
<v Speaker 1>one to me, and I don't know if it's bigger,

0:59:14.080 --> 0:59:16.840
<v Speaker 1>but just as egregious like John Gruden got away with it.

0:59:16.920 --> 0:59:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Two on Monday Nights, half I got plus eight and

0:59:21.120 --> 0:59:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a half. Right when thirty one seventeen, the Raiders going

0:59:24.840 --> 0:59:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to go up fourteen, I said, I gotta gotta take

0:59:26.840 --> 0:59:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the Saints here plus eight and a half. You know,

0:59:28.280 --> 0:59:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the Saints are coming down for the easy backdoor touchdown.

0:59:30.680 --> 0:59:34.320
<v Speaker 1>They go marching down the field. I'm in it's over,

0:59:34.440 --> 0:59:38.360
<v Speaker 1>there's no chance. And then this idiot Cruden picks the

0:59:38.360 --> 0:59:41.600
<v Speaker 1>field goal. What are you doing? He had money line

0:59:41.800 --> 0:59:45.080
<v Speaker 1>on he goes. I was, he goes. My bet was

0:59:45.160 --> 0:59:47.280
<v Speaker 1>like minus five thousand, and when he kicked the field goal,

0:59:47.280 --> 0:59:49.080
<v Speaker 1>now it feels like minus seven hundred because if he

0:59:49.080 --> 0:59:52.360
<v Speaker 1>misses it, the good I wasn't even talking. I wasn't

0:59:52.360 --> 0:59:54.440
<v Speaker 1>even talking to him, and I texted you guys, and

0:59:54.440 --> 0:59:56.840
<v Speaker 1>then he said, oh, not only that. Yeah, here's what

0:59:56.920 --> 0:59:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I had on it. He had and I liken it

0:59:59.480 --> 1:00:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to like the ends of NBA games when a team

1:00:01.840 --> 1:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>is up three. If if if it's a coach that's

1:00:04.640 --> 1:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>up three that you know is going to foul the opponent,

1:00:07.200 --> 1:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I would lay minus the money line. But if he's

1:00:10.800 --> 1:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>if he's not going to foul, you wouldn't lay minus

1:00:13.480 --> 1:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>two fifty on it even And that's exactly what Gruden did,

1:00:16.560 --> 1:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and when he led up for the field goal, he

1:00:18.120 --> 1:00:20.080
<v Speaker 1>is dying. And then of course it goes in right,

1:00:20.080 --> 1:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty four yard field goal. And by the way, I

1:00:22.360 --> 1:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>love analytics, but all these analytics people on Twitter afterwards

1:00:24.840 --> 1:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you're like, oh, it's just a wash. He could have

1:00:26.560 --> 1:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>punted it, kicking the field goal, and it was the

1:00:28.240 --> 1:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>same thing. I'm sorry, your model does not factor in

1:00:31.400 --> 1:00:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Drew Brees cannot throw the ball down field,

1:00:33.960 --> 1:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and so that drove me crazy. The model is wrong.

1:00:38.160 --> 1:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Thanks are great if the math inside the analytics are great.

1:00:42.920 --> 1:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>If the math inside the analytics are bad, analytics sucks

1:00:45.880 --> 1:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and models suck. Yes, and we have got well said

1:00:48.840 --> 1:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and well said what that's going to come out of it? Yeah,

1:00:52.800 --> 1:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and we have gotten We have gotten to the point.

1:00:54.960 --> 1:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree that we've gotten to the point where

1:00:56.800 --> 1:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>if anybody even says they have a model, our knee

1:00:59.720 --> 1:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>jerk reaction is, oh, they must be super smart. That

1:01:02.120 --> 1:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>must be right. If you had punched, punt it or whatever.

1:01:05.360 --> 1:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>There is no chance anybody who's ever watched football thinks

1:01:08.520 --> 1:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that that should have been a field goal attempt. And

1:01:10.160 --> 1:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>because Daniel Carlson makes it, now they are so buoyed

1:01:13.640 --> 1:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>by that he's gonna do it again. Yeah, we gave

1:01:15.600 --> 1:01:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the kicker confidence we'll do it again. It's football. I'm like, okay,

1:01:19.720 --> 1:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Raiders got a little that says I have a model

1:01:21.880 --> 1:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>that says I will always weigh more than you and

1:01:23.800 --> 1:01:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Mike Palm. That model is wrong. Oh I see what

1:01:27.080 --> 1:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>he did there. You can do it, bro I lost

1:01:30.160 --> 1:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a hundred pounds. Anyone can do it. But how did

1:01:32.600 --> 1:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you do it? Ace? Honestly, the way you be the

1:01:36.880 --> 1:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>same way I learned how to finally make money betting

1:01:39.360 --> 1:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>sports and playing blackjack. Discipline. It's the truth. Even when

1:01:43.360 --> 1:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I had access to winning information as a runner back

1:01:46.160 --> 1:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>when before the Internet, I had better information than anyone

1:01:49.280 --> 1:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>back then, and I still managed to go broke multiple

1:01:52.160 --> 1:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>times because I didn't know how to use it. I

1:01:54.320 --> 1:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>had no discipline. And it's the same with losing weight.

1:01:57.600 --> 1:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, unless you have something physic lead an ailment,

1:02:01.520 --> 1:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a different story. But otherwise it's a case of

1:02:04.680 --> 1:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of of discipline and choices. I mean that the model

1:02:09.240 --> 1:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>hasn't changed. You need to take in less than you burden.

1:02:14.120 --> 1:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>There's no the other way to do it other than

1:02:17.480 --> 1:02:21.439
<v Speaker 1>eat less, move more. That's all I did. I did

1:02:21.440 --> 1:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>it for a year. I changed my my habit. You

1:02:24.480 --> 1:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>can't diet. You gotta change your life because you can

1:02:28.080 --> 1:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>only diet for so long, and you're gonna stop doing

1:02:31.320 --> 1:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that eventually, and your body's gonna bounce back to what

1:02:33.720 --> 1:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>it remembers. What you have to do is change your

1:02:36.200 --> 1:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>lifestyle and then you then your choice has become easy.

1:02:39.880 --> 1:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Like I no longer eat meat more than once or

1:02:43.040 --> 1:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>twice a month, so that problem is solved. I don't

1:02:46.560 --> 1:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>eat carbs more than this many times. That problem solved.

1:02:49.960 --> 1:02:52.920
<v Speaker 1>That's all you gotta do. Just make lifestyle changes, and

1:02:54.000 --> 1:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>its diet. It's not even the exercise, to be honest

1:02:56.920 --> 1:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>with you, that's the other. That's the other little key

1:02:58.880 --> 1:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>to it. They don't tell you that what you go

1:03:00.200 --> 1:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to a gym, you know, an important piece of exercise

1:03:03.240 --> 1:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>equipment is the fork. Yeah, there it is. Ace. I'm

1:03:08.400 --> 1:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>very impressed how respectful Todd was of your deference, the

1:03:14.160 --> 1:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>deference he held you in. I mean, most guests he

1:03:16.240 --> 1:03:18.800
<v Speaker 1>puts through the ring are very dismissing. Remember the Doctor

1:03:18.920 --> 1:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Bob cheap shots were cheap shots by the day. The

1:03:23.840 --> 1:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>verbal day showed something of the national megapod so impolite. Well, doctor,

1:03:31.000 --> 1:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Bob doctor. First of all, I tipped on a serious note,

1:03:37.360 --> 1:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>even though these two lulligans don't know what the hell

1:03:40.000 --> 1:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about. I have to tip my hat lunatics

1:03:43.480 --> 1:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>with hooligan. I have to tip my hat to you

1:03:47.520 --> 1:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>for losing over hunter pounds. I've actually lost over hunder

1:03:49.600 --> 1:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>pounds five times, not to not to uh you know,

1:03:53.240 --> 1:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>super seed you I'm just that's because I, like you said,

1:03:56.280 --> 1:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I go back off the lifestyle. Now. Last time I

1:03:59.200 --> 1:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>had issues about seeing, you know, my my eyes getting blurry,

1:04:02.400 --> 1:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>my hands starting to get tingly from diabetes. So I

1:04:05.160 --> 1:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>put down the pizza on June twentie of last year.

1:04:07.640 --> 1:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>So hopefully it sticks this time. But I do have

1:04:09.800 --> 1:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to tip my hat because that's just take your time, man, patient,

1:04:12.400 --> 1:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Just take your time. That's all you gotta do. Don't

1:04:14.520 --> 1:04:16.720
<v Speaker 1>look at the scale every day. I mean, it's okay

1:04:16.720 --> 1:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to do that, so, you know, make a habit, but

1:04:19.200 --> 1:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>just take there's no rush, take your time the way.

1:04:22.680 --> 1:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>It didn't come on in two months, so it takes

1:04:25.720 --> 1:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a little while. People just like, hey, here's a serious question.

1:04:29.520 --> 1:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Mike Palm weever come to his senses

1:04:32.960 --> 1:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and decide not to be a portly young man who

1:04:35.280 --> 1:04:38.160
<v Speaker 1>can't really do anything except play moonball and tennis. Wow.

1:04:38.480 --> 1:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I think as we get older, we all have no choices.

1:04:41.040 --> 1:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, once you start getting the blood example, the

1:04:43.480 --> 1:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>test back and your dogs, that starts telling you, you know,

1:04:46.880 --> 1:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you gotta do the right thing. You start seeing on

1:04:49.080 --> 1:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the back nine like myself. You know, once you get

1:04:52.200 --> 1:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>on that back nine, you gotta start taking things a

1:04:55.000 --> 1:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>little more seriously. And I know a young Filipino boy

1:04:58.360 --> 1:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>who wants to see his dad stay live a lot longer.

1:05:01.280 --> 1:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>So we got to get that guy out on tennis

1:05:03.160 --> 1:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>court and get him to put the fork down. I

1:05:06.160 --> 1:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>played for an hour and eighteen degree heat with e. I.

1:05:09.480 --> 1:05:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I was only eight games, but still well, wishing everybody

1:05:16.360 --> 1:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>weight loss. I need something myself because Todd's catching me good,

1:05:20.080 --> 1:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>is doing a great job. He Gil has a different systems.

1:05:22.600 --> 1:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>It's called the oily cheeseball system. Can you eat the

1:05:25.960 --> 1:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>oily and cheeseball down to Italy? And then you go,

1:05:28.840 --> 1:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand, come up anyway, I don't know. I

1:05:33.840 --> 1:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>still struggle. I honestly, like you've you've known me now

1:05:37.440 --> 1:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>for a decade and you've seen me get a little

1:05:40.600 --> 1:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>chubby and then lose it, Like if I let myself

1:05:43.360 --> 1:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>go for a number of months. I have that kind

1:05:45.840 --> 1:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of body where I'll get weight on pretty quickly, so

1:05:48.520 --> 1:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I always still have to maintain discipline. I'll get heavy quickly. Yeah,

1:05:52.960 --> 1:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>but if I was your mom, I would say to you,

1:05:54.480 --> 1:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe you should eat a little more. You're looking my

1:05:56.680 --> 1:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>mom just I can't for that. She's in Greece, but

1:05:59.240 --> 1:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>when when I visited her, when she's here, that's all

1:06:02.000 --> 1:06:05.479
<v Speaker 1>she does. She thinks I'm sick. I forgot. She thinks

1:06:05.480 --> 1:06:08.840
<v Speaker 1>there's something wrong with me. I wish I had your problems. Uh,

1:06:09.040 --> 1:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>good luck, I really do. Good luck with everybody. Everybody

1:06:11.760 --> 1:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>with all your bets. Uh, Toddy and Mike, thank you, Ace,

1:06:15.400 --> 1:06:17.480
<v Speaker 1>so good to see you. Thank you for doing this.

1:06:18.920 --> 1:06:20.840
<v Speaker 1>The pleasure is mine. I'm a fan. Like I said,

1:06:20.840 --> 1:06:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm all three of you guys, so thanks for having me.

1:06:23.120 --> 1:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate it so much. Good luck with all your bets.

1:06:25.720 --> 1:06:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for listening from all of us here

1:06:27.520 --> 1:06:28.280
<v Speaker 1>on the Bug of pot