WEBVTT - Countdown to a Global Energy Shock

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 2>We have the strongest and most powerful by far military

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:18.280
<v Speaker 2>in the world, and we will easily prevail. We're already

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 2>substantially ahead of our time projections. But whatever the time is,

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 2>it's okay, whatever it takes.

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm Stephanie Flanders, head of Government and Economics at Bloomberg,

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 3>and this is Trumponomics, the podcast that looks at the

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 3>economic world of Donald Trump, how he's already shaped the

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 3>global economy and what on earth is going to happen next.

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 3>One common element of that Trump shaped economy is there's

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 3>a wide range of possible outcomes. Recording this Wednesday morning

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 3>in Europe, the range of potential consequences from the conflict

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 3>underway between the US and Israel and Iran looks about

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 3>as wide as it could be. And we're focused for

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 3>the next twenty five minutes or so on just the

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 3>economic piece of that. The human and social impacts we

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 3>leave to others. But since America's first strike on Iran

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 3>on Saturday, oil and gas traders have watched us in

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 3>many ways, the worst case scenario unfolded for Middle East

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 3>energy supplies. That critical strait of Hormus is effectively paralyzed.

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 3>Saudi Arabia's largest oil refinery is closed, and Iranian missiles

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 3>and drones have shut down the largest liquefied natural gas

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 3>refinery on the planet in Katar. Predictably, oil and especially

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 3>gas prices have jumped, stocks have taken a hit, and

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 3>long term interest rates have jumped as traders see less

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 3>chance of further cuts from central banks. All of that

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 3>could deal a severe blow to the global economy at

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 3>an already uncertain time. But what matters, of course, is

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 3>what happens from here. As I record this, it still

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 3>seems perfectly possible that Washington and Tehran will somehow find

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 3>an off ramp, oil will settle back to its pre

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 3>conflict average of around sixty five dollars a barrel, and

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 3>the global economy will dodge a blow. But as you're

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 3>hearing this conversation I had on Tuesday with two of

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's sharpest analysts, there are some much darker scenarios out

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 3>there which could be a lot more damaging, especially for

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:32.519
<v Speaker 3>countries without a lot of backup plans. That's one lesson

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 3>I took from this discussion that the negative impacts of

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 3>this mess will not land evenly and may indeed land

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 3>especially heavily on some key American allies Europe for one,

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 3>but interestingly also South Korea, Taiwan. Russia, by contrast, emerges

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:53.839
<v Speaker 3>as a big winner both its budget and its war

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 3>effort in Ukraine another lesson, It really matters how quickly

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 3>the US can reopen the straight of home.

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Moves with me.

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm delighted to say Javier blast is back Bloomberg opinion

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 3>columnists covering energy and commodities for Bloomberg and the co

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 3>author of the World for Sale, Money Power and the

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 3>Traders who barter the Earth's resources. Have you? Thank you

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 3>very much. This almost smoke coming out of your ears

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 3>because I know you've been working very hard the last

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 3>few days, but I really appreciate you.

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 4>Thank you for having me and did.

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 3>Dubai Zi Daoud, chief Emerging market's economists for Bloomberg Economics,

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 3>also a regular guest on this show, So yeah'd love

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 3>you to see you.

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Wonderful to be here.

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 3>We're going to talk about the sort of shortish term

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 3>economic impact for the sort of broader economy around the

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 3>world and also for oil markets in particular, and then

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 3>maybe get into some of the sort of longer term stuff.

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 3>But zied I know we have what we call this

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 3>global shock model, which allows you to put different scenarios

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 3>for the global economy into the model and work out

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 3>what the impact is. For example, this kind of increase

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 3>in energy prices, what do we get if we just

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 3>feed in what's happened in the last few days and

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 3>assume that it sticks around for a while.

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 5>We'd publish a piece on this with my colleagues Jamie

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 5>Russi and Beyond fa Envoy and actually spend some time

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 5>before coming to the podcast playing some more of the

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:17.919
<v Speaker 5>shock model.

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>And here's the conclusion.

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 5>It is very, very hard to generate a significant recession

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 5>in the US with all prices alone.

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you can get.

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 5>Two consecutive quarters of negative growth, but the magnitude is

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.119
<v Speaker 5>rather small. So for the US, the shock from oil

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:35.679
<v Speaker 5>is not a growth shock. It's more of an inflation shock.

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 5>That is different to other countries in the UK, in

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 5>the Euro Area, in China and possibly and even in India,

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 5>oil prices would mean slower growth and it'd mean higher inflation.

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 3>You almost sound disappointed in saying you just haven't been

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 3>able to get a recession out of this. No, matter

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 3>how hard you tried with the model. We're very glad

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:55.919
<v Speaker 3>obviously that we don't get a recession out of this,

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 3>But what are we looking at in terms of inflation,

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 3>say in Europe the UK as a result of this

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 3>and the impact on growth.

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 5>So if we plugging an extreme ore price increase, which

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 5>is one hundred and eight dollars all price, if you're

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 5>thinking about the euro Area and the UK, we're talking

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 5>about a growth shock which is like half a percentage

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 5>point at peak, and an inflation shock of around one

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 5>percentage point. These are not exigible numbers, but you know,

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 5>for the US is much smaller than what used to be.

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 3>So it's depending on where you are. It's a kind

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 3>of half a percentage point on the inflation rate, maybe

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more in the US, and then a

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 3>sort of somewhat less than that on the growth rate,

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 3>at least if you're in the Europe or UK. And

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 3>I do notice one immediate result, which is a bit

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 3>closer to home, is vestors were expecting and economists we

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 3>were expecting a second interest rate cut this year in

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 3>the UK, which will obviously would feed into a lot

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 3>of people's mortgages, and as of today, there's almost no

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 3>expectations that's going to happen in the next month. In

0:05:56.680 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 3>the US is less affected because it might get the

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 3>higher inflation, but then that would stimulate lots of those

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 3>shale producers to get going.

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so I think there's a lot of analogies to

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 5>the Iraq War in two thousand and three. People are

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 5>comparing the twenty twenty six war in Iran to the

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 5>two thousand and three invasion of Iraq. One thing that

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 5>has changed significantly in the US since then is positioned

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 5>as a net oil exporter. In two thousand and three,

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 5>the US was a huge net oil importer. Today is

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 5>a small exporter. What that means is that when you

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 5>get an all price shock, some segments of the US

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 5>economy benefit from this. Now, I know the shock inaggurgate

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:42.840
<v Speaker 5>may not seem so big, by in economics these days

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 5>we think about inequality as well, so it doesn't spread

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 5>out evenly. The segments of the US economy that benefit

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 5>from how all prices are energy companies. But there's a

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 5>whole segment of consumers in the US who will suffer

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 5>from how all prices. As fuel prices start to increase,

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 5>there is an inequality effect here, and it matters. It

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 5>matters because President Donald Trump when he came to office,

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 5>if you think about his economic agenda, lower interesturation is

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 5>definitely up there, and lower oil prices were there, and

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 5>this war that's a threat to both.

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 3>And we have certainly heard some concerns around that in

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 3>the US, have you. A Ziah has mentioned one of

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 3>the big things that means that we tend to say

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 3>all price shocks and not what they used to be

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 3>in their impact, namely that the US is now a

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 3>big exporter of energy, is not nearly as reliant or

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 3>at all reliant really on Middle East oil. But we

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 3>are seeing a reaction in markets to the disruption on

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 3>the straits of forem moves, which are still pretty important

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 3>to the global economy. So what are the risks there?

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 3>How are you looking at it?

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 4>So far?

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 6>So good or considered? I mean, you have asked me

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 6>decay the goo tomind the market reaction to what has

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 6>unfolded over the last few hours since Saturday. I will

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 6>have expected much much higher oil prices, certainly about one

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 6>hundred dollars by now. And I don't want to sound

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 6>this as a celeboratory that it has not happened. I mean,

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 6>the price of oil has increased quite significantly already. We

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 6>are talking about already a ten to fifteen percent increase

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 6>since the hostility started, and it's still early hours.

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 4>I have kind of chwer scenarios on my mind.

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 6>It's one that I'm not particularly concerned because we don't

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 6>get two one hundred dollars, and if we get thereabout that,

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 6>this is not like a long lasting price shock. We

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:34.559
<v Speaker 6>are eighty to one hundred for a couple of weeks.

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 6>It's nothing for the global economy. I'm expecting still I

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 6>get a lower mortgage rate this year. But this is

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 6>a thing that the United States has four or five

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 6>days to reopen the Stralia hormos before it gets really

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 6>really ugly. I mean, we can all make worst cases

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 6>scenarios and best cases scenarios. I mean, the best case

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 6>scenario is that by the end of the week the

0:08:57.280 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 6>oil market is lower because the Australia hormos has real

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 6>The worlst case scenario is that these last three months

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 6>and we don't get a drop of Middle East and

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 6>oil on that period, in which case I don't want

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 6>to give ideas, but I think that Siad needs to

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 6>put an oil price on the shock model that it

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 6>starts with a two and probably followed by a five

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 6>and then a zerial.

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 3>So I think lots of people are familiar with the

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:23.839
<v Speaker 3>shale revolution in the US and what that's done for

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 3>the US, But a lot of people in the last

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 3>few days have highlighted that China, for example, gets a

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 3>significant chunk of its oil from Iran and India. Other

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 3>countries also potentially quite reliant on straight to form moves

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 3>for their oil. They also have more alternatives, alternative roots

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 3>for the oil and also alternative sources of energy.

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 4>Is that the difference.

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 6>I think that we all have a skin on the

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 6>game on the straight of hormones and what is happening

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 6>just generally on the Middle East. Whatever you get the oil,

0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 6>it doesn't matter because it's going to be priced on

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 6>a global market, and therefore you're affected by the same price.

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 6>Even you are important or your oil say from Brazil

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 6>far far away from the conflict across the Atlantic, you

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 6>will be still paying a global pride that is determined

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 6>by what is happening in the Middle East.

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 4>So effectively everyone has the skin of the game.

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 6>China is the largest buyer of crude oil from the

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 6>Persian Gulf, so it has a lot of interest in

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 6>that that remains open. And it was interesting that yesterday

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 6>the Chinese authorities were on the phone with the Iranian

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 6>authorities and this morning Beijing has pood estainment just basically

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 6>reiterating we want to see the street hormones open. Of

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 6>course it was a Chinese statement, so it was on

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 6>the one hand, on the other just basically as all

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 6>the parties, including the United States, to stop bombing each other.

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 6>But the focus on the shipping lanes from China was

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 6>not missed. And I wonder whether at some point we

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:55.599
<v Speaker 6>are going to have I think that rather quickly, and

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 6>I believe that that's happening already behind the scenes.

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:00.040
<v Speaker 4>We have a conversation that is going to.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 6>Involved multiple navies, multiple regional players trying to keep the

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 6>hormones open for the sake of the global economy. Whether

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 6>we can see something similar to Ernest World, which was

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 6>an operation in the eighties where the US provided escort

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 6>to convoys of oil tankers in and out of the

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 6>Persian Gulf. I think that that is one of the

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 6>things that the industry is right now discussing with the

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 6>US government.

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:30.679
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I mean you're sitting in Dubai. We've had

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 3>quite a lot of discussion here, you know. Of course

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 3>it's been a sore point for the UK government. There's

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot of talk, sort of anecdotal evidence of people

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 3>moving to Dubai, and it's more than anecdotal from a

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg standpoint, because we see clients hedge fund investors moving

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 3>their accounts from London to Dubai. But part of that

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 3>was that Dubai was felt to be not just very

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 3>low tax or no tax, but safe and secure. What's

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 3>at stake if economically for Dubai, which doesn't have relative

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 3>to its neighbors, doesn't have a huge amount of oil,

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:10.439
<v Speaker 3>if you have a lot of tourism and air plane

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 3>disruption over the next few months, and people just generally

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 3>stop thinking it's a safe place to go, or at

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 3>least think it's a less safe place to go.

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 5>I think in terms of the business model, I think

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 5>Dubai and the rest of the GCC is trying to

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.839
<v Speaker 5>diversify away from oil, and Dubai has basically succeeded in this,

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 5>and one sector where the whole region has succeeded is

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:35.199
<v Speaker 5>moving into logistics, having big airports, big airlines, big ports.

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 1>That is obviously that model is under That business model

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 1>is under threat. Now my hunch for.

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 5>Dubai is it's probably going to be the business model

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 5>is going to be more resilient than we expect. And

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 5>it's more resilient because I think if you're a logistical hub,

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.319
<v Speaker 5>it's hard to change geography. You're sitting somewhere between Asia,

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 5>Europe and Africa. You probably need somewhere in the middle

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 5>to be a hub. I think a lot of Dubai's

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 5>residents do like living here and they're for the more

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 5>stick event than we think, although a lot of them

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 5>are foreign. And I think also if the conflict ends,

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:10.559
<v Speaker 5>whenever that ends, Dubai does tend to benefit from conflicts

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 5>and money that flows in from conflict zones.

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think the business model I'm less worried about.

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 5>What I'm worried about is a security model of the GCC,

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:19.559
<v Speaker 5>not just to buy, but the whole of the Gulf.

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 5>You know, one pillar of the GCC is the American

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:25.679
<v Speaker 5>security umbrella, and that did fail in the past, and

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 5>that's definitely failing now. Let's remember under the current Trump administration,

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:33.959
<v Speaker 5>the GCC hosted Trump for his first presidential visit. Excluding

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 5>the Vatican. They have pledged trillions of dollars to Trump

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:42.439
<v Speaker 5>in terms of investment and purchases and even O PET plus,

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 5>which is about said the Arabia started to increase all

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 5>apps significantly short shortly after Trump took office after months

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 5>of delay.

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>And what did they get.

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 5>Other got attempt directly by is roll back in September.

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 5>When it came to lobbying between the GCC, which did

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:00.559
<v Speaker 5>not want a ward to start with Iran and which

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 5>wanted to start the World Iran, the GCC came second

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 5>to Israel. And now it's the question about Iran. Whatever

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 5>system ends up happening ends up taking place in Iran,

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 5>whether it's a current system or a new one. They

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 5>know that if they want to lash out of the US,

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 5>the GCC is sort of a soft spot that is nearby.

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 5>And I think that security model will probably be a

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 5>revised in the GCC when this war ends, and which.

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 4>Just remind people.

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 3>So the GCC is the Golf Cooperation Council, which is

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 3>basically all of the countries that you would think would

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 3>be in a group of countries in the Gulf have you,

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 3>there's a few other pieces that we should unpack that

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 3>are also perhaps a little bit less familiar to people,

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 3>and gas was the one I wanted to ask you

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 3>about because a liquid natural gas, a liquified natural gas

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 3>has obviously been sort of one of the big new

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 3>newish players in the energy scene, and it seems like,

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 3>certainly from reading our coverage was much less prepared for

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 3>what's happened in the last few days than the ore markets.

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 3>So just talk through why do we get that significant

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 3>response and what's potentially the impact for countries that are

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 3>quite reliant on this gas.

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 6>LNG is dominated by Qatar. They produce twenty percent of

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 6>the walls LENG. And with oil, we have a couple

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 6>of bypass routes where oil can get out of the

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 6>Persian Gulf. There is a pipeline that runs from the

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 6>eastern coast of Saudi Arabia into the west coast, effectively

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 6>from the Persian Gulf into the Red Sea that is

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 6>a deep bottled neck in some oil will continue living

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 6>the area. There is a pipeline effectively from Abu Dhabi

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 6>area to Fujia which is in the Araby and c

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 6>outside the Strada hormos, so that that kind of provides

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 6>some relief for the oil market. It's not like shutting

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 6>down the strait of hormones does in shutdown completely the

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 6>sport capacity or some of the countries with LNG we

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 6>do not have that advantage. Everything has to go by

0:15:56.520 --> 0:16:00.080
<v Speaker 6>tanker through the straight of hormones. And I think that

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 6>that also there is a lot more concern about the

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 6>facilities themselves. I mean these are very concentrated facilities in

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 6>one single point in Katar. We have oil facilities all

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 6>around the person Gulf, multiple oil fields, multiple oil refineries,

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 6>multiple oil poorts. If one is attacked, we still have

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 6>some resilience. And here we are talking about something that

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 6>is an area of fifty by fifty miles where fourteen huge.

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 4>Allergy trains concentrate in Katar.

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 6>You attack that and it is goodbye for twenty percent

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 6>of the world's allergic capacity for years, not weeks, no months,

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:39.239
<v Speaker 6>but years.

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 4>So that is what the concern is.

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 6>I mean, good news is we are in the shoulder

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 6>season for natural gas. You're going to have a problem

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 6>with natural gas supply. Right now is about the best

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 6>time of the year because in the northern hemisphere we

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 6>are getting out of the winter into the springs, so

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 6>the money is literally dropping by the day and in

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 6>a yeah, it's not yet the summer, so the air

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 6>conditioning nies are not really great. And we use natural

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 6>gus in Asia to fire power plans to produce electricity

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 6>to run air conditioning, so we are we have a

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 6>bit of time, and perhaps that's the reason why the

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 6>market has not reacted as much as you will expay

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 6>yes prices when I have fifty percent yesterday, twenty percent today.

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 4>But we're around fifty euros per megab the hour.

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 6>We reach three hundred and fifty during the crisis in

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty one, twenty twenty two, so it's not as bad.

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 6>But it can get really bad on LNG. And again

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 6>it's the duration of the disruption. A few days the

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 6>system can manage. There is not buffer everywhere. If by

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 6>kind of end of week, say Friday, the market starts

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 6>to get conveniced that actually we are really hitting into

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 6>a four or five week period, then I think that

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 6>things change a lot. What if this is actually four

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:58.640
<v Speaker 6>or five weeks, we are talking about forty days rather

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 6>than twelve, that match really changed things. And in LNG

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 6>it will be dramatic.

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 3>And in a few days it should be said We've

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 3>had a lot more ordnance fired and I'm sure a

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 3>lot more damage on the ground in Iran and of

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 3>course human implications of that than we had in the

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 3>war last year. We're not going into that because that

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 3>is not the focus of this podcast. But it is

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 3>always a lesson these times in the connectedness of the

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 3>global economy and in some unexpected ways. So reading your

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 3>piece and reading some of the other analysis haveavier, you

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:36.680
<v Speaker 3>discover it's not just China that is pretty dependent. China's

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 3>important about a third of its lerg from Katar last year,

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 3>but places like Pakistan ninety nine percent of its gas

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 3>came from Katar. You have Pakistan, India, Bangladesh. They're in

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 3>the frame. I mean, I take your point. Havevier that

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 3>timing wise is not heating up in those countries yet,

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:59.199
<v Speaker 3>but are they potentially more significantly affected short term? They

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 3>don't have the same kind of buffers that China has.

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 3>They're gonna be very effective. In China has a lot

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:06.919
<v Speaker 3>of buffers. First of all, in terms of lergy. It

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.159
<v Speaker 3>can just literally shut down any use which is not

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 3>very large, any use of gas in the electricity system,

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.360
<v Speaker 3>go to col can do call to chemicals to replace

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 3>one of the gas in the chemical industry. India can

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 3>do a bit of that, but I think that countries

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 3>like Pakistan Banglades, they do not have many other options.

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:26.439
<v Speaker 3>And if this crisis last, it is going to be

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 3>really felt in Asia in terms of leng where where

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 3>things are gonna get very ugly.

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 4>You allow me.

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 6>There are two other commoities that I think that they're

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 6>going to be critical that we have not talked about,

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 6>and they're going to be inside the Persian Gulf. One

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 6>just generally is food. The region produces very little food.

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 6>A lot of it comes imported by ship and air,

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 6>and those supply chains have been disrupted. Yes there are stockpiles,

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 6>but this goes down four or five weeks. Some food

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 6>items will not be on the menu in the Persian

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:03.360
<v Speaker 6>Gulf region.

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 4>The other one that I am.

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:10.919
<v Speaker 6>Extremely concerned and can't really make a huge escalation that

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 6>I don't wish to see, but it's to me the

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 6>most important commodity in this world, and it could make

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 6>it and in hours is water. The region relies on

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 6>the salinization. Some countries ninety percent of their drinking water

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 6>come front plants that process seawater into drinking water. Shut

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 6>down those by attack, and it's three or four days

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 6>before the countries really get very thirsty.

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 4>They will not be water.

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 6>In Kuwai Bahrain, the eastern coast of Saudi Arabia, the

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 6>uie Katar READD itself relies ninety percent of its water

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 6>supply on a single desalinization plan.

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.360
<v Speaker 4>In the course of the Persian Gulf.

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 6>Those are absolutely critical items. If Iran moves to attack that,

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 6>I will expect a massive retaliatory action by the Persian

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:09.679
<v Speaker 6>Gulf countries and also the United States. But that to

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 6>me is something that has not been really as spoke

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:16.199
<v Speaker 6>so far because it's almost taboo. No one one to

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 6>address that because it will really change the dynamic.

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 3>We tend to think about big cities in Europe and

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 3>elsewhere being very vulnerable in the modern world to a

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 3>power cust or not getting food for a few days

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.959
<v Speaker 3>because of how tightly wired our economies are now. But

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 3>I get that seems even more true at a very

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 3>basic level.

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>For the golf, yeah, absolutely.

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 5>I mean a reductive model for the golf is that

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 5>it exports oil and gas and imports everything else.

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 1>Including food location.

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 6>The joke in the oil industry has been always that

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 6>the Middle East esports hydro carbons and imports carbohydrates. That's

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 6>the equation.

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 1>And we've seen a sample of this. I mean, it's

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>not a secret.

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 5>Every single Gulf country has a food security program, usually

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 5>part of this several wealth fund. We've seen a sample

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 5>of this when there was the blockade on Katar in

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 5>twenty seventeen and supply chains moved, except that was much simpler.

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:34.239
<v Speaker 5>Then Ata had to import the dairies from Turkey and

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 5>Iran instead of getting the stairies from Saudi Arabia. You know,

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 5>if the straight performance is shot and you can't get

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 5>your input from anywhere else in the world, that's a

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 5>much tougher problem to solve. I guess emergency airlines would

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 5>be the solution, but it's obviously no ideal given the

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 5>size of the population.

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:50.360
<v Speaker 4>Amazing.

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 3>Have you remember you when we talked about Venezuela a

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 3>few months ago, you also highlighted the importance of food

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:58.679
<v Speaker 3>and the lack of food in that country. So I

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 3>appreciate that you're not always the thinking about oil. You've

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 3>also got your right to the other potentially more important commodity.

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 3>But another thing you said on that show was you

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:10.919
<v Speaker 3>made the point that that operation in Venezuela, along with

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 3>the other policies in Latin America, were potentially greatly increasing

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 3>the US effective control over the energy market. I mean,

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 3>if there's a world in which the US is quote

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 3>unquotes running Iran in the way that it's running Venezuela,

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 3>how much does that increase that kind of that control

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 3>over the energy market.

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 6>It's quite funny, if I may put it that way.

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 6>I was talking to European a diplomat this morning who

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 6>said to me that the White House must be one

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 6>of the luckiest organization in this planet, because every time

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 6>that they go to our country to liberated it, they

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 6>find oil. And I thought that the diploma had a point.

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 6>I hesitate to make a parallel between Venezuela and Iran.

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 6>Oil is always part of American foreign policy, but maybe

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 6>the first time that I say this, but this war

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 6>in the Middle East is not about oil this time.

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 6>I do think that it's about the influence of Israel

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 6>in the US administration, and it's about the policies of

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 6>the Iranian regime or missiles and nuclear et cetera.

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Et cetera.

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 6>I mean, obviously, will the US care about Iran the

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 6>same way that it cares if then't have oil.

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 5>No.

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:30.919
<v Speaker 6>Will Iran be able to finance a nuclear program and

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 6>a missile program the way that has been able to

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 6>withow oil. No, absolutely impossible. But I don't think that

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 6>this is a war where the US wants the Iranian oil.

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 4>That's a fair point.

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:42.879
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think at the basic level, they clearly

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 3>want a change in the regime, in its policy. It's

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 3>interesting that even in that long sort of shopping list

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 3>of changes they want from the government, it doesn't talk

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 3>about who they're sending the oil to or anything up.

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 3>So I think you're probably right. You can't help thinking, though,

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 3>have you? And one of our columnists, Mark Champion, made

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 3>this point in a slightly different way this morning. Longer term,

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:07.919
<v Speaker 3>one of the winners from this policy could be President Putin.

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we've tended to see him as a loser

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:14.199
<v Speaker 3>because Iran was an ally. He's been unable to support

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 3>that ally, So it sort of sends a message that

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 3>it's not so great being friends with Russia. It also

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 3>potentially could strengthen its hands and selling oil to places India,

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 3>China that are not able or don't find it run

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 3>a reliable source anymore. And crucially having more resources in

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 3>Ukraine at a time when the US is going to

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 3>be even less keen to provide things that can go

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 3>to Ukraine.

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 4>So is Russia a winner from this? I think that

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 4>Rassia is a winner.

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 6>You see some of the commentary emerging from the Kremlin

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 6>on social media. They barely can hide their satisfaction to

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 6>see the oil price going up. The traditional said an

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 6>American foreign policy has been that that Rasia is a

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:58.880
<v Speaker 6>gas station mascaradeing as a country, and I think that's

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 6>largely true, at least the financing of the country. All

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 6>of a sudden, the price of oil is much higher,

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 6>and it was only a few days ago ten fifteen

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 6>to twenty percent higher. At the price of Russian oil

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 6>is even much higher because Russia was really struggling this

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 6>time to sell his oil in the black market, because

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 6>a number of countries the market, the global oil market

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 6>was so well supplied that some countries were able to

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 6>switch from Russian oil blacklisted oil to say the mainstream market.

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 4>India was a case in point.

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 6>Russia was keeping up his production, but it was filling

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 6>up loading tanker after tunker, and those tankers were sitting

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 6>in the high seas unable to dis charge because they

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 6>didn't have a client. They didn't have a customer for

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 6>that oil. All of a sudden, we are going to

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 6>see that oil that is floating around near the coast

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 6>of China, near the course of India's going to find

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 6>a home.

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 4>India and China are going to be taking those barrels, and.

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 6>Russia is going to be able to set a price

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 6>that is going to be much higher than a few

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 6>days ago where it had to be really salinated at

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 6>these stress levels because only by for in huge discounts,

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 6>it will entice the Indian refiners to buy and risk

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 6>the potential blowback from America and the White House. Now

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 6>I will expect that the White House is going to

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 6>be turning a blind eye to any Indian or Chinese

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:17.919
<v Speaker 6>refiner buying Russian oil. Therefore, the Russian field that they

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:20.399
<v Speaker 6>have been on a stronger hand, those discounts are no

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 6>longer there, and it's just basically I Yuana, weare oil,

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 6>which by the way, is the only oil of a

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 6>label right now to you Indian refiner. The price is

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 6>the market price, take it or live it, and they

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:31.919
<v Speaker 6>are taking it.

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 3>And I guess last word to you, going back to

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:37.479
<v Speaker 3>that global model, I mean one thing that is pretty

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 3>striking when you look at the way the impacts, the

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 3>economic impacts of this war are being distributed. It feels

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 3>like the biggest costs are often going to be felt,

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:53.199
<v Speaker 3>or at least the risks are potentially being felt by

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 3>some of America's biggest allies, and the Gulf. In Europe,

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 3>the UK householders who aren't going to get their rake cart,

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 3>and Russia's one of the winners, and the US economy

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 3>overall relatively unaffected. Or do you think still you should

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 3>need to keep an eye on that gasoline price.

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I think you need to keep an eye on the

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 1>gasoline price.

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 5>You know, if you think about the winners and losers

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 5>in the US, you have a few companies that are

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 5>winning and a large number of consumers who are losing.

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 5>And you know, in terms of if you're going into elections,

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 5>the numbers are not equal. There's a larger number of

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:32.439
<v Speaker 5>consumers then there is a number of companies. And I

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 5>think even if you think about the winners in Russia

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 5>as economically a winner, every old producer is a winner

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 5>in this case if you're not part of this region.

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 5>Of course, I think also US remember that Russia shares

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 5>borders with Iran. It's already lost influence in Syria, and

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 5>it US applies it with Drunze for as war in

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 5>Ukraine and losing that government if it ends up losing it,

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 5>and that sort of ally might be a political loss,

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:01.479
<v Speaker 5>which partly of says the economic game bag guests from

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 5>higher oil prices.

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, I can imagine that we will have plenty more

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 3>to talk about on this in the coming weeks, at

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 3>least if it does carry on for those five or

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 3>six weeks that have been talked about. But z Dode,

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Javier Blast, thank you so much for making the time

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 3>on a very busy day. Thank thanks for listening to

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 3>Trumpnomics from Bloomberg. It was hosted by me Stephanie Flanders,

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 3>and I was joined this week by Bloomberg opinion columnist

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 3>Javier Blass and Zia Dold, chief Emerging Market's economists for

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Economics. Trumpnomics was produced by Summer Sadi and Moses,

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:44.479
<v Speaker 3>and we've helped this week from Stephen Carroll, Andrew Gavin

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 3>and Amy keen sound design by Blake Maples and Kelly Garry,

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 3>and to help others find the show, Please rate and

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 3>review us highly wherever you listen