WEBVTT - Building Bespoke Weather Forecasts

0:00:15.316 --> 0:00:22.516
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Here's the thing I did not know about weather

0:00:22.596 --> 0:00:28.316
<v Speaker 1>forecasts until very recently. They basically all come from the government. Sure,

0:00:28.356 --> 0:00:30.836
<v Speaker 1>you may have your favorite weather app, your favorite TV

0:00:30.996 --> 0:00:35.796
<v Speaker 1>weather person, but their forecasts are almost entirely driven by

0:00:35.876 --> 0:00:40.556
<v Speaker 1>data that's collected and analyzed by government agencies. And you know,

0:00:40.676 --> 0:00:43.596
<v Speaker 1>it makes a certain kind of sense. Gathering the data

0:00:43.676 --> 0:00:46.876
<v Speaker 1>you need to make a useful forecast has traditionally been

0:00:47.276 --> 0:00:51.876
<v Speaker 1>a huge expensive undertaking, and having a reliable forecast is

0:00:51.996 --> 0:00:55.596
<v Speaker 1>really valuable for lots of people in lots of different settings.

0:00:55.636 --> 0:00:58.396
<v Speaker 1>So it's good that the government does the work and

0:00:58.516 --> 0:01:02.836
<v Speaker 1>makes forecasts freely available to everybody. But the government is

0:01:03.236 --> 0:01:06.476
<v Speaker 1>the government, and we shouldn't expect it to tailor forecasts

0:01:06.476 --> 0:01:09.556
<v Speaker 1>for different businesses, or even to build forecasts that are

0:01:09.596 --> 0:01:12.436
<v Speaker 1>really useful for people who live in other countries, in

0:01:12.516 --> 0:01:17.676
<v Speaker 1>countries where the government can't afford to produce its own forecasts. Now,

0:01:17.836 --> 0:01:21.316
<v Speaker 1>imagine what a private weather company could do. A company

0:01:21.316 --> 0:01:23.756
<v Speaker 1>that relied not only on government data, but that went

0:01:23.796 --> 0:01:26.836
<v Speaker 1>out and collected data on its own, A company that

0:01:26.876 --> 0:01:30.076
<v Speaker 1>came up with forecasts that would not have been possible before.

0:01:34.796 --> 0:01:37.476
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jacob Goldstein, and this is What's Your Problem, the

0:01:37.516 --> 0:01:40.756
<v Speaker 1>show where entrepreneurs and engineers talk about how they're going

0:01:40.796 --> 0:01:43.356
<v Speaker 1>to change the world once they solve a few problems.

0:01:43.876 --> 0:01:48.116
<v Speaker 1>My guest today is Shimon Alphabets, co founder and CEO

0:01:48.236 --> 0:01:51.676
<v Speaker 1>of tomorrow dot Io, a private company that plans to

0:01:51.716 --> 0:01:54.876
<v Speaker 1>put a constellation of weather satellites into orbit in the

0:01:54.876 --> 0:01:58.516
<v Speaker 1>next couple of years. Shimoon's problem, how do you build

0:01:58.556 --> 0:02:02.556
<v Speaker 1>a private weather company from scratch? We realized it's from

0:02:02.556 --> 0:02:05.956
<v Speaker 1>a jew political and cost effective way, and all kind

0:02:05.956 --> 0:02:08.276
<v Speaker 1>of the only way to solveet is to go to space.

0:02:09.236 --> 0:02:12.076
<v Speaker 1>Shimon and his co founders launched tomorrow dot Io in

0:02:12.156 --> 0:02:16.276
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen. The company hasn't launched its satellites yet, but

0:02:16.356 --> 0:02:20.116
<v Speaker 1>it already provides weather related advice for companies like Jet Blue,

0:02:20.356 --> 0:02:24.036
<v Speaker 1>Uber and the NFL. Even before he thought of founding

0:02:24.036 --> 0:02:27.116
<v Speaker 1>the company, weather was a big deal for Schimon When

0:02:27.116 --> 0:02:29.156
<v Speaker 1>he was in his twenties. He was an officer in

0:02:29.196 --> 0:02:32.196
<v Speaker 1>the Israeli Air Force. Whether it is obviously a huge

0:02:32.236 --> 0:02:35.996
<v Speaker 1>deal for pilots for planes, and Shimon was constantly on

0:02:36.036 --> 0:02:41.636
<v Speaker 1>the phone with meteorologists. The solution was, Hey, let's talk

0:02:41.636 --> 0:02:44.996
<v Speaker 1>to a meteorologist three, four or five times, a day, Hey,

0:02:45.036 --> 0:02:46.796
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen here, what's going to happen there?

0:02:47.436 --> 0:02:49.956
<v Speaker 1>And then I take the data, I analyze what it

0:02:49.956 --> 0:02:52.836
<v Speaker 1>means for me, what it means for the organization. And

0:02:52.876 --> 0:02:54.836
<v Speaker 1>I have to do it several times because the weather

0:02:54.876 --> 0:02:58.036
<v Speaker 1>forecast is constantly changing, and I care about multiple locations

0:02:58.036 --> 0:03:01.236
<v Speaker 1>and I care about multiple parameters. So that was a

0:03:01.356 --> 0:03:05.316
<v Speaker 1>very archaic way of addressing challenges at scale. Calling the

0:03:05.356 --> 0:03:08.476
<v Speaker 1>meteorologist and deciding what each plane should do does not scale.

0:03:08.516 --> 0:03:11.196
<v Speaker 1>So in that universe you're not at scale yet, not scale,

0:03:11.236 --> 0:03:14.116
<v Speaker 1>not efficient, not automatic. When there's a human in the loop,

0:03:14.196 --> 0:03:18.516
<v Speaker 1>there will always be an error. Huh did you make mistakes?

0:03:19.356 --> 0:03:24.276
<v Speaker 1>Of course everyone makes mistakes. I made a few of them.

0:03:24.876 --> 0:03:28.396
<v Speaker 1>You know. I have colleagues that unfortunately lost their lives

0:03:28.436 --> 0:03:32.596
<v Speaker 1>due to whether they did accidents. It was very unfortunate.

0:03:33.116 --> 0:03:35.596
<v Speaker 1>It's just been there, you know. But I didn't think

0:03:35.596 --> 0:03:38.156
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to start a company around it. Shimon moved

0:03:38.156 --> 0:03:40.436
<v Speaker 1>to the US to go to business school, and one

0:03:40.516 --> 0:03:43.436
<v Speaker 1>day a few of his friends, military veterans who like

0:03:43.516 --> 0:03:46.796
<v Speaker 1>shimone wanted to start a company, started talking about the weather,

0:03:47.476 --> 0:03:52.276
<v Speaker 1>and we started talking about past experiences, and everybody We're like,

0:03:52.316 --> 0:03:54.876
<v Speaker 1>oh you also feel this way, Oh you also experienced that.

0:03:54.916 --> 0:03:56.796
<v Speaker 1>And when we started looking at it, we said, okay,

0:03:57.036 --> 0:03:59.436
<v Speaker 1>there is something here. We need to start looking into this.

0:03:59.716 --> 0:04:03.796
<v Speaker 1>And let's try and understand whether you know how the

0:04:03.876 --> 0:04:07.596
<v Speaker 1>technology how forecast is being generated, why is it limited

0:04:07.596 --> 0:04:11.556
<v Speaker 1>in accuracy? And now let's look at how businesses make decisions.

0:04:12.596 --> 0:04:14.236
<v Speaker 1>Do they do it in the same way we did

0:04:14.276 --> 0:04:16.356
<v Speaker 1>it in the past, or is there a better way

0:04:16.356 --> 0:04:19.636
<v Speaker 1>to do it? And what we found out led us

0:04:19.676 --> 0:04:22.276
<v Speaker 1>to start a company. Well, what did you find out

0:04:22.316 --> 0:04:24.636
<v Speaker 1>that led you to start a company? All right, that's

0:04:24.676 --> 0:04:27.316
<v Speaker 1>where it's becoming interesting. So the first thing we found

0:04:27.356 --> 0:04:31.596
<v Speaker 1>out is that climate change is here. That was in

0:04:31.676 --> 0:04:33.996
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen. It wasn't cool to speak to speak about

0:04:33.996 --> 0:04:36.636
<v Speaker 1>climate change back then. I mean I think it was cool.

0:04:36.956 --> 0:04:38.996
<v Speaker 1>I think it was cool to me in twenty sixteen.

0:04:39.196 --> 0:04:41.716
<v Speaker 1>Trust me, when I spoke to investors back at the

0:04:41.796 --> 0:04:44.076
<v Speaker 1>time and you spoke about climate change, they were like,

0:04:44.156 --> 0:04:46.196
<v Speaker 1>give me some sass solution. Don't talk to me about

0:04:46.236 --> 0:04:49.596
<v Speaker 1>climate change. Okay, fair sass software as a service keep going.

0:04:49.716 --> 0:04:54.036
<v Speaker 1>So we understood that the problem of managing whatever the

0:04:54.116 --> 0:04:57.876
<v Speaker 1>challenges are is going to get bigger climate change equals

0:04:58.036 --> 0:05:01.196
<v Speaker 1>weather events become more frequent and more volatile in any

0:05:01.196 --> 0:05:04.276
<v Speaker 1>given ear in every part of the world. More hurricanes,

0:05:04.356 --> 0:05:07.876
<v Speaker 1>more wildfires, more heat waves. Doesn't really matter where you are,

0:05:07.956 --> 0:05:12.436
<v Speaker 1>there's some extreme phenomen it is going to happen more frequently. Okay,

0:05:13.236 --> 0:05:15.036
<v Speaker 1>So that's one thing we'll learn. The second thing we'll

0:05:15.076 --> 0:05:19.796
<v Speaker 1>learn is that the technology of forecasting weather, meaning what's

0:05:19.836 --> 0:05:26.716
<v Speaker 1>responsible for the accuracy, is generated and dominated by government agencies.

0:05:27.436 --> 0:05:31.596
<v Speaker 1>And as folks who served in the government for many years,

0:05:32.156 --> 0:05:36.116
<v Speaker 1>we understood that there must be a way to privatize

0:05:36.716 --> 0:05:41.036
<v Speaker 1>and innovate faster. And just to give an example, you know,

0:05:41.156 --> 0:05:44.996
<v Speaker 1>NASA for decades innovated and paved the way to space right,

0:05:45.916 --> 0:05:49.916
<v Speaker 1>But today you have SpaceX, who's augmenting the capability of

0:05:50.236 --> 0:05:54.156
<v Speaker 1>a private company doing what the government has done for decades. Yeah,

0:05:54.356 --> 0:05:57.436
<v Speaker 1>maybe not inventing the rocket from from scratch, but definitely

0:05:57.476 --> 0:06:00.556
<v Speaker 1>taking all the decades of research and adjusting it to

0:06:00.756 --> 0:06:03.436
<v Speaker 1>a commercial use case. What we found out is that

0:06:03.476 --> 0:06:06.996
<v Speaker 1>there is an opportunity to create a SpaceX of weather.

0:06:07.556 --> 0:06:11.636
<v Speaker 1>So SpaceX built rockets. You want to build weather forecasts.

0:06:11.636 --> 0:06:12.916
<v Speaker 1>How do you do that? What do you need to

0:06:13.316 --> 0:06:17.916
<v Speaker 1>make a weather forecast, you need three ingredients. On a

0:06:17.996 --> 0:06:23.276
<v Speaker 1>very high level. You need observations that describe the atmospheric

0:06:23.276 --> 0:06:26.676
<v Speaker 1>conditions in real time, the temperature, the wind pressure. Yeah,

0:06:26.756 --> 0:06:28.836
<v Speaker 1>then you have a good real time description, right. The

0:06:28.916 --> 0:06:31.796
<v Speaker 1>next thing you need is a model, an equation, a

0:06:31.876 --> 0:06:35.116
<v Speaker 1>set of equations. Physical models doesn't really matter. The point

0:06:35.196 --> 0:06:37.756
<v Speaker 1>is that you take the observations and you assimilate them

0:06:37.956 --> 0:06:40.636
<v Speaker 1>into a model, and then the last thing you need

0:06:40.796 --> 0:06:43.636
<v Speaker 1>is a computing power on which you process the model.

0:06:44.676 --> 0:06:48.796
<v Speaker 1>The output of the model is a weather forecast. And

0:06:49.196 --> 0:06:52.596
<v Speaker 1>what we found out is that there is an industry

0:06:52.596 --> 0:06:55.876
<v Speaker 1>of weather forecasting companies, you know, big brands. You know,

0:06:56.036 --> 0:07:00.116
<v Speaker 1>a blue logo, an orange logo, Acy Weather. Right. The

0:07:00.156 --> 0:07:04.156
<v Speaker 1>point is that these guys are here since the sixties, seventies,

0:07:04.276 --> 0:07:08.916
<v Speaker 1>maybe eighties. They just repackaged the forecast that the government

0:07:08.956 --> 0:07:15.436
<v Speaker 1>agency or the government agencies publish every day, every hour whatever.

0:07:16.196 --> 0:07:18.756
<v Speaker 1>So I'll say, I know, the weather forecast is like

0:07:18.796 --> 0:07:20.956
<v Speaker 1>a classic thing to complain about. Oh the weather man

0:07:20.996 --> 0:07:22.636
<v Speaker 1>said it would be Sunday and we had a picnic

0:07:22.636 --> 0:07:25.556
<v Speaker 1>and it rain. I do feel like weather forecasts are

0:07:25.596 --> 0:07:29.516
<v Speaker 1>pretty good, and clearly they've gotten better. Was there a

0:07:29.636 --> 0:07:35.516
<v Speaker 1>particular weakness or failure or set of weaknesses or failures

0:07:35.516 --> 0:07:39.236
<v Speaker 1>that you really thought you could improve. First of all,

0:07:39.276 --> 0:07:41.516
<v Speaker 1>you set out to do this. If I may ask,

0:07:41.556 --> 0:07:44.396
<v Speaker 1>where do you live, I live in New York. I

0:07:44.436 --> 0:07:47.676
<v Speaker 1>live in New York City. Okay, so you're privileged because

0:07:47.716 --> 0:07:49.876
<v Speaker 1>I am privileged. I'll be the first to say I'm

0:07:49.916 --> 0:07:52.916
<v Speaker 1>in Boston. I'm as privileged as you are. Most of

0:07:52.956 --> 0:07:56.236
<v Speaker 1>the world doesn't have Noah, the US government agency, the

0:07:56.276 --> 0:07:58.676
<v Speaker 1>big rich country government agencies that do a pretty good

0:07:58.756 --> 0:08:01.316
<v Speaker 1>job of forecasting exactly. And if you're a private company

0:08:01.316 --> 0:08:06.236
<v Speaker 1>and you try to provide equally accurate forecast for the

0:08:06.276 --> 0:08:09.676
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world, you're limited. You cannot provide it.

0:08:09.996 --> 0:08:12.156
<v Speaker 1>So there is a global problem. So one thing you

0:08:12.196 --> 0:08:15.956
<v Speaker 1>want to do better is provide better forecasts for people

0:08:16.116 --> 0:08:18.516
<v Speaker 1>businesses who don't live in rich countries that have big,

0:08:18.556 --> 0:08:22.156
<v Speaker 1>fancy weather agencies like NOAH in the US. That's one thing.

0:08:22.516 --> 0:08:25.556
<v Speaker 1>The second thing is that even within the US, you know,

0:08:25.916 --> 0:08:30.116
<v Speaker 1>the agency's main job is to save people's lives, Okay,

0:08:30.156 --> 0:08:34.236
<v Speaker 1>it is not to optimize businesses. Right. That also seems reasonable,

0:08:34.276 --> 0:08:37.996
<v Speaker 1>like absolutely, that's what I want them to be optimized for. Absolutely,

0:08:38.036 --> 0:08:41.876
<v Speaker 1>we're on the same page here. But with some scientific

0:08:41.916 --> 0:08:46.156
<v Speaker 1>improvement you can help businesses have better outcome, improve their

0:08:46.196 --> 0:08:50.876
<v Speaker 1>top line, their bottom line, their safety, their efficiency. So

0:08:51.156 --> 0:08:53.236
<v Speaker 1>there is a lot of room for improvement. The other

0:08:53.316 --> 0:08:55.996
<v Speaker 1>element of it is that remember that I said, you

0:08:56.036 --> 0:08:59.916
<v Speaker 1>know it's it's one thing to handle the forecast. The

0:08:59.956 --> 0:09:04.036
<v Speaker 1>second thing is that once you improve either on the observation,

0:09:04.156 --> 0:09:06.276
<v Speaker 1>on the modeling, on the computing power, and you get

0:09:06.276 --> 0:09:10.116
<v Speaker 1>to more accurate forecasts, there is the are part of it,

0:09:10.276 --> 0:09:12.156
<v Speaker 1>which is how you make decisions and how do you

0:09:12.156 --> 0:09:15.996
<v Speaker 1>do it at scale? Right, So this is something that

0:09:16.036 --> 0:09:20.236
<v Speaker 1>the government almost doesn't address at all, except maybe like

0:09:20.276 --> 0:09:22.836
<v Speaker 1>when you need to evacuate a city for a hurricane

0:09:22.916 --> 0:09:28.716
<v Speaker 1>or something, right, very rare circumstances, exactly exactly. Now, I'll

0:09:28.716 --> 0:09:32.116
<v Speaker 1>give an example. A lot of company like utilities or airlines.

0:09:32.716 --> 0:09:35.316
<v Speaker 1>They work in a very similar way to the way

0:09:35.356 --> 0:09:38.316
<v Speaker 1>that I described in my military service. Some guy calling

0:09:38.396 --> 0:09:40.196
<v Speaker 1>some other guy on the phone and being like, what

0:09:40.236 --> 0:09:42.916
<v Speaker 1>should we do. You go to a metrologist, You speak

0:09:42.956 --> 0:09:45.316
<v Speaker 1>to that meteorologist or get a report of road data,

0:09:45.356 --> 0:09:47.636
<v Speaker 1>and then you have to do a full analysis of

0:09:47.636 --> 0:09:49.956
<v Speaker 1>what it means and make a decision it's not scalable.

0:09:50.476 --> 0:09:53.076
<v Speaker 1>Or if I have thousands of trucks driving in the country,

0:09:53.196 --> 0:09:56.236
<v Speaker 1>or if I have thousands of miles of railways track,

0:09:56.796 --> 0:09:59.276
<v Speaker 1>or if I have many airplanes in the air and

0:09:59.316 --> 0:10:02.476
<v Speaker 1>I care about hundreds of airports globally, it's very hard

0:10:02.516 --> 0:10:07.476
<v Speaker 1>to rely on five or ten even meteorologists on staff. Right.

0:10:09.676 --> 0:10:13.036
<v Speaker 1>I've heard you say that a mistake you made early

0:10:13.116 --> 0:10:18.196
<v Speaker 1>on was optimizing for accuracy, and that's really interesting to me,

0:10:18.276 --> 0:10:19.916
<v Speaker 1>and I want you to tell me what that means.

0:10:22.036 --> 0:10:26.236
<v Speaker 1>So at the beginning, we thought that if we just

0:10:26.396 --> 0:10:31.956
<v Speaker 1>create a more accurate forecast, that's it. It's done. Deal

0:10:32.156 --> 0:10:34.596
<v Speaker 1>with serve like that's a hugely valuable thing, right, even

0:10:34.636 --> 0:10:36.796
<v Speaker 1>if you're a little bit more accurate, that's worth a

0:10:36.836 --> 0:10:39.476
<v Speaker 1>ton of money to an airline or the NFL or

0:10:39.556 --> 0:10:43.036
<v Speaker 1>any any number of really big companies. But what we

0:10:43.156 --> 0:10:47.076
<v Speaker 1>found out, but we learned that most of the businesses

0:10:47.116 --> 0:10:51.756
<v Speaker 1>that are impacted by weather do not know what to

0:10:51.796 --> 0:10:55.196
<v Speaker 1>do with a weather forecast or with a weather data

0:10:55.276 --> 0:11:00.516
<v Speaker 1>and they need the full loop, the translation to insights

0:11:00.596 --> 0:11:05.596
<v Speaker 1>and decisions. And that's what helped us design our platform

0:11:05.956 --> 0:11:09.436
<v Speaker 1>and the way we're operating today. So nobody understands hands

0:11:09.476 --> 0:11:12.796
<v Speaker 1>how to read a weather forecast. Basically, how do you

0:11:12.796 --> 0:11:15.916
<v Speaker 1>think from a business perspective? Yeah, so you realize from

0:11:15.916 --> 0:11:19.036
<v Speaker 1>that that like, providing these people with a better weather

0:11:19.036 --> 0:11:21.316
<v Speaker 1>forecast isn't actually going to help them solve their problem

0:11:21.356 --> 0:11:25.276
<v Speaker 1>because they don't because they're not experts in analyzing the

0:11:25.356 --> 0:11:28.636
<v Speaker 1>meaning of a weather forecast. Yeah. I mean you've named

0:11:28.636 --> 0:11:31.276
<v Speaker 1>a lot of your clients publicly, right, I mean whatever,

0:11:31.356 --> 0:11:34.796
<v Speaker 1>Delta and jet Blue and what Uber and the NFL.

0:11:34.836 --> 0:11:36.796
<v Speaker 1>I guess the NFL isn't playing now, Like what do

0:11:36.836 --> 0:11:39.076
<v Speaker 1>you telling JetBlue today? Like what do they want to

0:11:39.116 --> 0:11:43.476
<v Speaker 1>know today? So you know, it's almost summertime. In the

0:11:43.516 --> 0:11:46.796
<v Speaker 1>summer time, as you know, in the biggest hubs like

0:11:46.996 --> 0:11:52.236
<v Speaker 1>JFK or Boston Logan, you have disruptions related to lightning

0:11:52.316 --> 0:11:56.196
<v Speaker 1>strikes thunderstorms. Well, well exactly, they'll shut the airport down

0:11:56.276 --> 0:11:59.036
<v Speaker 1>for hours and everything will be a total mess exactly.

0:11:59.196 --> 0:12:02.156
<v Speaker 1>So instead of someone looking at a model and whatever,

0:12:02.476 --> 0:12:06.716
<v Speaker 1>we're just basically providing a weekly calendar that says, expect

0:12:06.756 --> 0:12:09.556
<v Speaker 1>the disruptions between dead time to dead time. Here are

0:12:09.596 --> 0:12:13.436
<v Speaker 1>the recommendations to do. ABC staff more people here, staffless

0:12:13.476 --> 0:12:17.996
<v Speaker 1>people there. So we actually go into the operational recommendations

0:12:18.156 --> 0:12:21.036
<v Speaker 1>as a result of the expected disruption as a result

0:12:21.076 --> 0:12:23.876
<v Speaker 1>of the weather forecast. Now, listen carefully to what I'm saying.

0:12:24.156 --> 0:12:26.676
<v Speaker 1>It's as a result to the weather forecast. So if

0:12:26.756 --> 0:12:31.076
<v Speaker 1>you're not relying on an accurate forecast, the business insight

0:12:31.236 --> 0:12:35.076
<v Speaker 1>is useless. It's actually damaging. So there's no way to

0:12:35.196 --> 0:12:41.676
<v Speaker 1>get around the need to improve the accuracy. Specifically, what

0:12:41.876 --> 0:12:46.556
<v Speaker 1>are you better at forecasting than anybody else right now?

0:12:47.476 --> 0:12:54.036
<v Speaker 1>Precipitation data. We provide global real time and now casting

0:12:54.356 --> 0:12:58.276
<v Speaker 1>data that is providing a kind of like minute by

0:12:58.356 --> 0:13:01.356
<v Speaker 1>minute forecast for a range of about six hours on

0:13:01.476 --> 0:13:05.796
<v Speaker 1>every point on Earth, which is quite useful. For example,

0:13:06.436 --> 0:13:09.636
<v Speaker 1>you have some sixty minutes minute by minute works that

0:13:09.756 --> 0:13:12.076
<v Speaker 1>you have on some phones, but it's only in the

0:13:12.236 --> 0:13:14.996
<v Speaker 1>US and in the UK. Yes, I do find I

0:13:15.116 --> 0:13:17.356
<v Speaker 1>have that on my phone and I find it's pretty good.

0:13:17.916 --> 0:13:19.996
<v Speaker 1>Dark Skies. I have Dark Skies on my phone and

0:13:20.076 --> 0:13:22.036
<v Speaker 1>it's good. But you're saying, if I if I left

0:13:22.116 --> 0:13:25.356
<v Speaker 1>the US, if I went on vacation to Mexico or something,

0:13:25.436 --> 0:13:29.476
<v Speaker 1>it just wouldn't work. It's not available. It's just not available.

0:13:30.036 --> 0:13:32.996
<v Speaker 1>And we created this thing on a global scale with

0:13:33.276 --> 0:13:36.316
<v Speaker 1>longer time horizon. That's one example. And the other example

0:13:36.476 --> 0:13:39.916
<v Speaker 1>is like quind, we forecast twind in higher accuracy for

0:13:40.036 --> 0:13:41.876
<v Speaker 1>the next day, two days, three days, which is very

0:13:41.956 --> 0:13:44.596
<v Speaker 1>useful for farms. I think, so okay, and are you

0:13:44.716 --> 0:13:47.956
<v Speaker 1>just better at that because you're more focused on it

0:13:48.036 --> 0:13:50.396
<v Speaker 1>and you've trained the models more than and it's more

0:13:50.436 --> 0:13:52.516
<v Speaker 1>important to your clients than it is to say, a

0:13:52.596 --> 0:13:55.556
<v Speaker 1>government agency, so you have an incentive to figure it

0:13:55.596 --> 0:13:59.236
<v Speaker 1>out exactly that. I'm sure that if Noah wanted to

0:13:59.556 --> 0:14:03.196
<v Speaker 1>double down on that, specifically Noah the government agency, they

0:14:03.236 --> 0:14:05.076
<v Speaker 1>would have been able to do that. But they have

0:14:05.196 --> 0:14:08.396
<v Speaker 1>no incentive, and you know, the pace of making a

0:14:08.476 --> 0:14:13.636
<v Speaker 1>decision in a large organization, it's just not enabling them

0:14:13.716 --> 0:14:17.836
<v Speaker 1>to move fast enough. The next problem Shimona's colleagues are

0:14:17.836 --> 0:14:20.556
<v Speaker 1>trying to solve, how do you predict the weather for

0:14:20.716 --> 0:14:23.236
<v Speaker 1>people who live in countries that can't afford a big

0:14:23.396 --> 0:14:27.196
<v Speaker 1>national weather service like Noah to do that. Tomorrow, dot

0:14:27.276 --> 0:14:36.876
<v Speaker 1>Io is going to go to space. That's the end

0:14:36.916 --> 0:14:39.836
<v Speaker 1>of the ads. Now we're going back to the show. Tomorrow.

0:14:39.916 --> 0:14:44.036
<v Speaker 1>Dot Io's next big project is putting a constellation of

0:14:44.116 --> 0:14:47.316
<v Speaker 1>weather satellites into space. And there are two big questions

0:14:47.396 --> 0:14:50.716
<v Speaker 1>I had about that. What problem will it solve and

0:14:51.036 --> 0:14:53.596
<v Speaker 1>what's it going to take to make it happen. So

0:14:54.436 --> 0:14:56.436
<v Speaker 1>the first thing I'll say, what motivated us to get

0:14:56.476 --> 0:15:00.476
<v Speaker 1>to space. The main motivation was how do we optimize

0:15:00.516 --> 0:15:03.316
<v Speaker 1>forecast and make it more accurate? And when we looked

0:15:03.356 --> 0:15:07.716
<v Speaker 1>at the blend between okay, we have observations, we have models,

0:15:08.356 --> 0:15:11.356
<v Speaker 1>we found out that the lack of observations on a

0:15:11.396 --> 0:15:15.196
<v Speaker 1>global scale are the main reason why we cannot improve

0:15:15.236 --> 0:15:19.356
<v Speaker 1>whether focussing significantly on a global scale. So the problem

0:15:19.476 --> 0:15:21.836
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the models. The problem wasn't the computing power. The

0:15:21.876 --> 0:15:24.676
<v Speaker 1>problem is just there's just not enough data when you

0:15:24.716 --> 0:15:27.276
<v Speaker 1>get outside of what outside of the US, Europe, Japan,

0:15:27.436 --> 0:15:31.396
<v Speaker 1>basically the data quality falls off. Yeah, okay. And the

0:15:31.556 --> 0:15:36.036
<v Speaker 1>most important weather sensor that we identified and I think

0:15:36.236 --> 0:15:40.316
<v Speaker 1>is agreed on all the community from NOAH to NASA

0:15:40.396 --> 0:15:44.356
<v Speaker 1>to others, is Doppler radar. A Toppler radar, just to

0:15:44.396 --> 0:15:45.636
<v Speaker 1>be clear, is it the one where you see a

0:15:45.676 --> 0:15:47.876
<v Speaker 1>color like if it's raining really hard, it's red or

0:15:47.916 --> 0:15:52.436
<v Speaker 1>something that stopple? Correct? Okay, Now, radars are looking out

0:15:52.476 --> 0:15:54.596
<v Speaker 1>in the sky and they help us know where is

0:15:54.636 --> 0:15:58.356
<v Speaker 1>the training in real time, how the cloud formation looks like.

0:15:58.516 --> 0:16:01.316
<v Speaker 1>It gives you some kind of three D description of

0:16:01.356 --> 0:16:06.676
<v Speaker 1>the atmosphere. Okay, now what we found out is that

0:16:06.996 --> 0:16:11.796
<v Speaker 1>five billion people leave outside of radar coverage. Five billion.

0:16:11.916 --> 0:16:14.756
<v Speaker 1>He goes out of the border to Mexico, all the

0:16:14.876 --> 0:16:19.196
<v Speaker 1>way to southern South America, and basically you don't know

0:16:19.236 --> 0:16:22.156
<v Speaker 1>where it's raining in real time, say for Africa, India

0:16:22.316 --> 0:16:24.956
<v Speaker 1>and many other places. That is surprising to me. Maybe

0:16:24.996 --> 0:16:29.396
<v Speaker 1>I'm naive, but like, were you surprised when you learned that, No,

0:16:29.596 --> 0:16:31.156
<v Speaker 1>because I came from a place where it was not

0:16:31.676 --> 0:16:34.596
<v Speaker 1>Oh you didn't have it either. You didn't have it either. Yeah,

0:16:34.636 --> 0:16:36.996
<v Speaker 1>it was pretty broken most of the time. And it's

0:16:37.316 --> 0:16:40.396
<v Speaker 1>not a new technology, right, it's a decades old. It's

0:16:40.436 --> 0:16:43.396
<v Speaker 1>not a new technology. But the implication of not having

0:16:43.476 --> 0:16:48.596
<v Speaker 1>it is huge. You cannot provide flood alerts. Pilots when

0:16:48.636 --> 0:16:51.436
<v Speaker 1>they fly, for example, to Cancun, they don't know the

0:16:51.596 --> 0:16:54.436
<v Speaker 1>weather in the route. It's a huge problem for the economy.

0:16:54.836 --> 0:16:57.716
<v Speaker 1>The next point is that the oceans and the seas

0:16:58.636 --> 0:17:02.356
<v Speaker 1>are not covered with radars, and every time, for example,

0:17:02.396 --> 0:17:05.556
<v Speaker 1>a hurricane is formed over the Atlantic. The US government

0:17:05.756 --> 0:17:08.196
<v Speaker 1>is flying airplanes over the eye of the storm to

0:17:08.396 --> 0:17:10.716
<v Speaker 1>scan it with a radar so we can send it

0:17:10.796 --> 0:17:12.276
<v Speaker 1>back to the model that as an understand if it's

0:17:12.276 --> 0:17:14.436
<v Speaker 1>going to be category one, two or three, when and

0:17:14.516 --> 0:17:16.516
<v Speaker 1>where it's going to eat, and whether we should evacuate

0:17:16.596 --> 0:17:21.436
<v Speaker 1>Miami or New Orleans. So rest assured, nobody's flying any

0:17:21.516 --> 0:17:24.276
<v Speaker 1>airplane over a typhoon or a cyclone in the East.

0:17:24.436 --> 0:17:26.796
<v Speaker 1>So this is a huge in Asia. In Asia, they're

0:17:26.876 --> 0:17:28.876
<v Speaker 1>not going out in Asia to get a really accurate

0:17:28.956 --> 0:17:31.116
<v Speaker 1>forecast of where it's going to go. They can't afford

0:17:31.276 --> 0:17:33.516
<v Speaker 1>to do that. But you can do it from space.

0:17:33.676 --> 0:17:36.476
<v Speaker 1>Is that where this is going so exactly, So we

0:17:36.636 --> 0:17:40.476
<v Speaker 1>realize that from a geopolitical and cost effective way and

0:17:40.556 --> 0:17:42.476
<v Speaker 1>all kind of the only way to solve it is

0:17:42.516 --> 0:17:45.356
<v Speaker 1>to go to space. The problem is that radars are

0:17:45.396 --> 0:17:48.916
<v Speaker 1>pretty big. We actually the world has one radar in

0:17:49.036 --> 0:17:53.356
<v Speaker 1>space today. It is called the GPM. It's a program

0:17:53.516 --> 0:17:57.436
<v Speaker 1>by NASA with the collaboration of the Japanese agency. It's

0:17:57.556 --> 0:18:00.596
<v Speaker 1>more than a billion dollar program that created one radar

0:18:00.676 --> 0:18:04.676
<v Speaker 1>in space, a very sophisticated one. We have one radar

0:18:04.756 --> 0:18:08.036
<v Speaker 1>in space today. That radar cost about a billion dollar

0:18:08.156 --> 0:18:11.916
<v Speaker 1>if not more, and it samples every point on Earth

0:18:12.036 --> 0:18:14.956
<v Speaker 1>every three days, So it's not very useful for hurricane

0:18:15.036 --> 0:18:18.996
<v Speaker 1>forecasting because imagine you just sample the hurricanes moving too fast,

0:18:19.356 --> 0:18:22.516
<v Speaker 1>or general weather forecasting. So what we were trying to

0:18:22.636 --> 0:18:26.476
<v Speaker 1>do was to say, how can we take this huge

0:18:26.596 --> 0:18:29.596
<v Speaker 1>radar and minimize it so we can put many of them.

0:18:30.716 --> 0:18:32.876
<v Speaker 1>But we are a small company, we don't have a

0:18:32.956 --> 0:18:35.836
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar How can we actually do it in a

0:18:35.916 --> 0:18:39.436
<v Speaker 1>way that will be cost effective? And the goal is,

0:18:39.636 --> 0:18:42.596
<v Speaker 1>of course, to monitor every point on Earth with a

0:18:42.716 --> 0:18:46.156
<v Speaker 1>radar in almost real time, because when you do that,

0:18:47.036 --> 0:18:51.596
<v Speaker 1>you are going to improve weather forecasting dramatically. You're going

0:18:51.676 --> 0:18:54.956
<v Speaker 1>to improve hurricane cyclone typhoons, you are going to be

0:18:55.236 --> 0:18:58.676
<v Speaker 1>able to provide flood alerts for every point on Earth.

0:18:59.436 --> 0:19:02.476
<v Speaker 1>And it will improve also climate science because now climate

0:19:02.516 --> 0:19:05.516
<v Speaker 1>scientists will have better understanding of what actually happen. No,

0:19:05.676 --> 0:19:07.596
<v Speaker 1>I'm sold on why it would be useful. It seems

0:19:07.636 --> 0:19:09.756
<v Speaker 1>like the hard thing is how do you do it exactly?

0:19:09.876 --> 0:19:12.956
<v Speaker 1>So how do we do that? The first thing we

0:19:13.076 --> 0:19:15.236
<v Speaker 1>did was to focus on the sensor. How can we

0:19:15.316 --> 0:19:19.116
<v Speaker 1>build a sensor that we'll keep most, if not all,

0:19:19.156 --> 0:19:23.916
<v Speaker 1>the characteristics of the radar. We looked at and how

0:19:23.996 --> 0:19:26.996
<v Speaker 1>can we make it small enough so we can launch

0:19:27.036 --> 0:19:31.596
<v Speaker 1>it a not a nano or micro satellite, but something

0:19:32.156 --> 0:19:35.676
<v Speaker 1>smaller than you know, the stationary satellites, a low orbit.

0:19:36.236 --> 0:19:40.236
<v Speaker 1>And bottom line, we've finished the development of the radar

0:19:40.836 --> 0:19:42.636
<v Speaker 1>and in a few months we're going to launch the

0:19:42.676 --> 0:19:46.196
<v Speaker 1>first satellite out of a constellation of about thirty And

0:19:46.316 --> 0:19:49.756
<v Speaker 1>our constellation is going to have two types of sensors.

0:19:49.916 --> 0:19:52.196
<v Speaker 1>One is the radar, the second is a microwave sounder.

0:19:52.716 --> 0:19:55.676
<v Speaker 1>The combination of the two is going to provide a

0:19:55.876 --> 0:19:59.156
<v Speaker 1>very good scientific result for every point on Earth. You

0:19:59.276 --> 0:20:02.036
<v Speaker 1>sound very confident, like are you at a point where

0:20:02.076 --> 0:20:03.476
<v Speaker 1>you know it's going to work or is it the

0:20:03.556 --> 0:20:05.636
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing that you hope is going to work. No,

0:20:05.796 --> 0:20:07.836
<v Speaker 1>we know it's going to work. The question is, okay,

0:20:07.916 --> 0:20:10.076
<v Speaker 1>will it take us more time? Will we fail in

0:20:10.116 --> 0:20:12.356
<v Speaker 1>the first lunch? Will we need to reiterate between one

0:20:12.436 --> 0:20:15.516
<v Speaker 1>lunch to a number? But it is feasible, it is working.

0:20:15.876 --> 0:20:17.796
<v Speaker 1>It is And how much is it going to cost

0:20:17.836 --> 0:20:21.316
<v Speaker 1>you to get roughly thirty satellites up and monitoring the weather.

0:20:21.916 --> 0:20:29.476
<v Speaker 1>Our early estimations, which so far given the inflation, are

0:20:29.556 --> 0:20:32.636
<v Speaker 1>still are still in the same ballpark. We're looking at

0:20:33.156 --> 0:20:36.676
<v Speaker 1>around one hundred million dollars for the entire constellation. So

0:20:36.876 --> 0:20:39.196
<v Speaker 1>that's a big cost reduction. That's compared to what is

0:20:39.276 --> 0:20:41.916
<v Speaker 1>it saying a billion for an existing one that only

0:20:41.996 --> 0:20:45.276
<v Speaker 1>does once every three days? Yeah, what are the things

0:20:45.316 --> 0:20:47.156
<v Speaker 1>that might go wrong? I mean, it seems like a

0:20:47.276 --> 0:20:50.116
<v Speaker 1>quite hard thing that you're trying to do. I feel like,

0:20:50.276 --> 0:20:51.916
<v Speaker 1>as you're describing it, it's like, oh, yeah, now, all

0:20:51.956 --> 0:20:54.156
<v Speaker 1>we got to do is get these thirty satellites up

0:20:54.156 --> 0:20:56.676
<v Speaker 1>into space and we're going to go But so imagine

0:20:56.716 --> 0:20:58.596
<v Speaker 1>it's still going to be quite hard and lots of

0:20:58.636 --> 0:21:00.916
<v Speaker 1>things can go wrong, of course, So you want me

0:21:00.956 --> 0:21:03.316
<v Speaker 1>to give you examples of things that can go wrong? Yeah,

0:21:03.396 --> 0:21:06.676
<v Speaker 1>what are you worried about? Okay, the rocket can explode

0:21:06.716 --> 0:21:10.476
<v Speaker 1>in lunch. Sure. Classic second thing is that you know,

0:21:10.916 --> 0:21:14.636
<v Speaker 1>we may have some communication malfunction. We may have some

0:21:16.436 --> 0:21:19.276
<v Speaker 1>when we build our satellites and the radars. We may

0:21:19.756 --> 0:21:23.516
<v Speaker 1>have to wait for longer than expected for chips to

0:21:23.636 --> 0:21:26.756
<v Speaker 1>arrive or all kinds of chips. Radiance like supply chain,

0:21:26.836 --> 0:21:29.916
<v Speaker 1>supply chain, supply chain issues is something pretty big right now.

0:21:30.636 --> 0:21:34.636
<v Speaker 1>There are so many things that can happen. But are

0:21:34.716 --> 0:21:36.436
<v Speaker 1>you sure the thing you built is going to work?

0:21:36.516 --> 0:21:38.356
<v Speaker 1>All the things you've described as like, oh yeah, the

0:21:38.436 --> 0:21:40.516
<v Speaker 1>rocket could blow up, that's not really our faulter, the

0:21:40.596 --> 0:21:43.276
<v Speaker 1>chip oncome, that's not really our fault. Like, is it

0:21:43.476 --> 0:21:44.716
<v Speaker 1>is it at the point where it's like, oh, yes,

0:21:44.796 --> 0:21:46.716
<v Speaker 1>this will definitely work. Is it like that or is

0:21:46.716 --> 0:21:50.116
<v Speaker 1>it possible that Okay, it's gonna work. It's gonna work.

0:21:50.316 --> 0:21:52.996
<v Speaker 1>The question is is it going to be more expensive

0:21:53.076 --> 0:21:55.796
<v Speaker 1>than we thought, It's going to take longer, and there

0:21:55.876 --> 0:22:00.876
<v Speaker 1>might be you know, business implications on tomorrow. But it

0:22:01.116 --> 0:22:04.476
<v Speaker 1>is going to work. It's not a question of science

0:22:04.756 --> 0:22:07.396
<v Speaker 1>business like like might you run out of money before

0:22:07.436 --> 0:22:09.676
<v Speaker 1>you can get it going? When you say business, everything

0:22:09.756 --> 0:22:12.876
<v Speaker 1>can happen in that context. But this thing is working.

0:22:13.756 --> 0:22:16.356
<v Speaker 1>Pending one hundred million to put a fleet of satellites

0:22:16.356 --> 0:22:19.876
<v Speaker 1>into space, is it's still a lot for your business?

0:22:20.196 --> 0:22:23.476
<v Speaker 1>It is a lot. And the market is very bad.

0:22:23.516 --> 0:22:25.996
<v Speaker 1>It's probably the toughest market in the last twenty years

0:22:26.556 --> 0:22:30.676
<v Speaker 1>for tech companies. The market for raising funding you mean, yeah, yeah.

0:22:31.116 --> 0:22:36.276
<v Speaker 1>The investors are not very happy to see businesses that

0:22:36.916 --> 0:22:39.836
<v Speaker 1>waste money or spend money or invest money, depending on

0:22:39.916 --> 0:22:44.036
<v Speaker 1>how you look at it to build a solution, and

0:22:44.156 --> 0:22:49.116
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely a challenge, and I just hope that, you know,

0:22:49.276 --> 0:22:53.876
<v Speaker 1>the investment community will keep supporting us. We'll get to

0:22:53.916 --> 0:22:55.836
<v Speaker 1>the lightning round in a minute, but before we do,

0:22:56.356 --> 0:22:58.756
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say that what Shimone talked about

0:22:58.796 --> 0:23:01.916
<v Speaker 1>in this episode is actually a really good example of

0:23:01.996 --> 0:23:04.796
<v Speaker 1>a big idea that came up in an earlier episode

0:23:04.916 --> 0:23:07.836
<v Speaker 1>of the show. It was the episode where I interviewed

0:23:07.876 --> 0:23:10.476
<v Speaker 1>the founder of the company Rocket Left, and I was

0:23:10.556 --> 0:23:13.596
<v Speaker 1>going on about how making rockets and satellites cheaper was

0:23:13.676 --> 0:23:15.716
<v Speaker 1>a big deal, and he made the point that the

0:23:15.796 --> 0:23:19.036
<v Speaker 1>big breakthrough is not just that they're cheaper. It's that

0:23:19.276 --> 0:23:23.276
<v Speaker 1>cheaper rockets and satellites enable people to do big new things,

0:23:23.556 --> 0:23:27.396
<v Speaker 1>things that just did not get done before. And Shimone's

0:23:27.396 --> 0:23:31.076
<v Speaker 1>plan tomorrow dot Io's plan is a perfect example of

0:23:31.196 --> 0:23:34.196
<v Speaker 1>that idea. Even a decade ago, it would have been

0:23:34.276 --> 0:23:38.676
<v Speaker 1>prohibitively expensive, but today it's possible to put a constellation

0:23:38.756 --> 0:23:42.356
<v Speaker 1>of satellites into orbit to improve forecasts everywhere on the

0:23:42.476 --> 0:23:45.396
<v Speaker 1>globe for a price that is affordable for a startup.

0:23:45.836 --> 0:23:47.636
<v Speaker 1>As long as they can get a few more years

0:23:47.676 --> 0:23:50.556
<v Speaker 1>of funding, we'll have the lightning round with Shimone in

0:23:50.676 --> 0:24:01.116
<v Speaker 1>just a minute. Now, let's get back to the show. Okay,

0:24:01.436 --> 0:24:03.036
<v Speaker 1>I know you have to go soon, but let's do

0:24:03.196 --> 0:24:06.396
<v Speaker 1>a quick lightning round. What is one piece of advice

0:24:06.476 --> 0:24:08.836
<v Speaker 1>you'd give to someone trying to solve a hard problem.

0:24:09.556 --> 0:24:12.956
<v Speaker 1>Focus on the problem and not on a solution. The

0:24:13.036 --> 0:24:16.156
<v Speaker 1>solution will be obsolete. There are many kinds of solutions,

0:24:16.196 --> 0:24:18.836
<v Speaker 1>but if you're focused on the problem, you're going to

0:24:18.916 --> 0:24:22.436
<v Speaker 1>objectively look at what's right, what's wrong, and you'll be

0:24:22.476 --> 0:24:25.396
<v Speaker 1>able to ditch something that doesn't work and find out

0:24:25.476 --> 0:24:27.956
<v Speaker 1>something that is better. Focus on the problem. What do

0:24:28.036 --> 0:24:31.476
<v Speaker 1>you prefer really hot weather or really cold weather? Hot?

0:24:31.956 --> 0:24:36.156
<v Speaker 1>Okay hot? Could there really be a shark nado like

0:24:36.396 --> 0:24:40.956
<v Speaker 1>in the movie Shark Nado? I don't know. What's the

0:24:41.036 --> 0:24:48.276
<v Speaker 1>most underrated weather hazard? Most underrated heatwave? Lots of people

0:24:48.636 --> 0:24:52.436
<v Speaker 1>die from heatwave annually, strokes, health issues, heart attacks. I

0:24:52.516 --> 0:24:55.076
<v Speaker 1>actually testified in front of the Congress in the summer

0:24:55.436 --> 0:24:59.716
<v Speaker 1>of twenty one on this topic, specifically, other than weather,

0:25:00.116 --> 0:25:05.836
<v Speaker 1>what's the domain where people should use probabilistic thinking more finance,

0:25:05.956 --> 0:25:08.636
<v Speaker 1>for sure? I mean, how do you manage your investments?

0:25:09.396 --> 0:25:13.476
<v Speaker 1>Although I feel like bad. Use of probabilistic thinking was

0:25:13.516 --> 0:25:16.436
<v Speaker 1>a major problem in the run up to the financial

0:25:16.476 --> 0:25:18.116
<v Speaker 1>crisis of two thousand and eight. I don't know if

0:25:18.156 --> 0:25:21.796
<v Speaker 1>you remember, but people kept saying like this is a

0:25:21.916 --> 0:25:26.996
<v Speaker 1>one in ten thousand year move in whatever you know race, Like,

0:25:27.316 --> 0:25:30.636
<v Speaker 1>clearly it's not your model is wrong? Right, yeah? Yeah,

0:25:30.836 --> 0:25:34.556
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking more in a personal level. On a personal level,

0:25:34.636 --> 0:25:37.356
<v Speaker 1>like a household, how can a household manage their risk

0:25:37.436 --> 0:25:40.396
<v Speaker 1>and everything? I think they should think about all the scenarios,

0:25:40.436 --> 0:25:43.196
<v Speaker 1>all the probabilities, and I think people don't do that enough.

0:25:43.876 --> 0:25:47.276
<v Speaker 1>So whether it's like this classic way to make small talk,

0:25:47.436 --> 0:25:49.316
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you don't want to talk about work, right,

0:25:49.756 --> 0:25:52.076
<v Speaker 1>So what do you talk about when you want to

0:25:52.076 --> 0:25:54.836
<v Speaker 1>make small talk and don't want to talk about work? Oh? Football,

0:25:54.916 --> 0:25:59.316
<v Speaker 1>I mean soccer? I guess that's the other classic, right sports? Yeah? Yeah,

0:25:59.876 --> 0:26:02.236
<v Speaker 1>but I'm very passionate about it for real. I mean

0:26:02.236 --> 0:26:03.876
<v Speaker 1>I can we could talk about it for an hour.

0:26:04.036 --> 0:26:05.556
<v Speaker 1>Who's your team? What do you say? Who's your club?

0:26:05.676 --> 0:26:09.556
<v Speaker 1>Who's your club? My club is in Israelity team called

0:26:09.996 --> 0:26:16.436
<v Speaker 1>mac It's uh, how's doing and learning? Will if everything

0:26:16.516 --> 0:26:18.596
<v Speaker 1>goes well, what's a problem You'll be trying to solve

0:26:18.636 --> 0:26:24.196
<v Speaker 1>in five years how to reduce carbon emission with our solution.

0:26:24.516 --> 0:26:27.156
<v Speaker 1>That will be probably the next step and will be

0:26:27.316 --> 0:26:31.276
<v Speaker 1>the most impactful thing we can do. But we'll try, okay.

0:26:32.756 --> 0:26:35.916
<v Speaker 1>Simon Alphabets is the co founder and CEO of tomorrow

0:26:35.996 --> 0:26:39.876
<v Speaker 1>dot Ido. Today's show was produced by Edith Russelo, edited

0:26:39.916 --> 0:26:43.236
<v Speaker 1>by Robert Smith, and engineered by Amanda ka Wong. I'm

0:26:43.356 --> 0:26:45.716
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Goldstein, and I'll be back next week with another

0:26:45.756 --> 0:26:47.036
<v Speaker 1>episode of What's Your Problem.