WEBVTT - 12/22/21 DPS Hour 3 Steve Palazzolo

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:03.480
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to The Dan Patrick Show on Fox

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio. Welcome to the program, already in progress, final

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:11.399
<v Speaker 1>hour on this Wednesday. Come on in stay a while,

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Dan and The Dan at Stan Patrick Show. The Fuel

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Great Movie of the Holidays Season sing two Now in theaters.

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Scan the QR code to buy tickets now eight seven

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>seven three. DP Show email address DP at dan Patrick

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>dot com, Twitter handle at dps show. During a normal

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>week in the fall, there's a sense of emptiness on

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday night when you don't have NFL games to watch.

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>This week, we got more than enough midweek football, and

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, it wasn't that great. One of the

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>reasons the NFL is so popular is the schedule. The

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>scarcity of the product makes every game special. Baseball seasons

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>are endless by comparison, and it doesn't help. The quality

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>was inconsistent in the games that were delayed by COVID.

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland started Nick Mullins at quarterback. Washington had to go

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>with Gary at Gilbert and they just picked him up

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>from the Patriots. Seahawks Rams game was supposed to be

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a more key game, and it turned out to be

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a sloppy win for La and I understand that, you know,

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the postponements were a matter of necessity, but it is

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>a reminder the NFL has pretty much figured out what

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to do with a regular season schedule, and while we

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>might fantasize about having a game every night, the reality

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:30.119
<v Speaker 1>is the product wouldn't be up to the sports normal standards.

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>And you saw that last night. You know, there were

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>moments of good football, but there were also moments of

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>bad football as well. We did pose the question of

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday night football. You know, the NFL is all about

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>revenue streams, and if the players would get that money,

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>they might sign up for something like that, because that's

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>what it comes down to. But the quality of play.

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not big on Thursday night games either, just because

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, you end a game on Sunday by the

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>time you show up for work, and then how much

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>prep time and then you're going to play in a game,

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, Chargers against the Chiefs, you know, in a

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>big game on a Thursday night. You know, good game,

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>But you know, are we being fair to these players

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and what's it going to mean long term? As far

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:19.559
<v Speaker 1>as long term for the season going into the postseason.

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, the you know, sheer attrition that happens with

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>injuries in COVID and look at the Buccaneers. You know,

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the Buccaneers are decimated with injuries. Last year. They were

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>healthy at this time and one of the reasons why

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>they won the Super Bowl. You look at teams who's

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>getting healthy. The Buccaneers are trending in the opposite direction.

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay going to get some players back, Kansas City

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>getting healthier. But you start to look at some of

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>these other teams and you say, all right, what are

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>they going to be like in two weeks, three weeks,

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>even a month down the road? Eight seven seven three

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>d P show email address DPA dan Patrick dot com.

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Paully asked this morning, where did the term dropping dimes

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>come from? And I said, well, I have an opinion.

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>We were talking about basketball. Paully goes, everybody save it

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>dropping dimes? All right, Todd, do you want to give

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:20.799
<v Speaker 1>your explanation definition of dropping dimes in basketball? Thigs, Dropping

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>dimes is just the way you release the ball and

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.679
<v Speaker 1>just kind of putting it like over the defender. That's

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>dropping a dime. Okay, Mclubbin, I'm not sure I understand that,

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>but okay, I don't know exactly how. But I think

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a reference to payphones. Okay, pay phones, see an O'Connor,

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>m something so great just happens. You need to call somebody, kay, Polly,

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Like you got so much change in your pocket, it's

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>just fall out over place you you got so many

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>assists are just flying out. I always thought that you

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna help somebody out by giving them a dime

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>when you to be a dime to use a payphone.

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Now I know it's going to sound strange to a

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>portion of our audience, so they're gonna go, what are payphones?

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>What's a dime? What's a dome payphone? But that's what

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I always thought. It was that, hey, can you help

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a brother out, give me a dime, give him a dimon.

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Then you know they're making a call. Yeah, Dan, I

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.359
<v Speaker 1>think you're the closest explanation so far. We did a

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>deep dive the I team. We have a lot of

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>free time. The first explanation for dropping dimes comes from

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 1>the early days of payphones. It would cost a dime

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to make a phone call. If someone would assist you

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>in helping with a phone call, they would be dropping

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 1>a dime for you. This term, like most terms, made

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>it way into sports and became known as a spectacular

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>well time passed well time pass. It's also become a

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>football term of a great pass. But dropping a dime

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the origins payphone. You have Danny dimes with the New

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>York Giants. That's not helping the cost, no, But there's

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 1>also a term dropping a dime on someone, which means

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to wrap them out. That would mean to call the cops,

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to nark someone out, as we used to say. So

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it it's it's it's phone related. Yes, the

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>origin is to drop a dime on somebody. You're gonna

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>write them out, or I'm dropping a dime. I'll help

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a brother out, and here you go, exactly, here's a dime.

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Make a call dropping dimes. I never dropped dimes when

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I played, so that's why it's kind of foreign to me.

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>And I never knarked anybody out and dropped a dime

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>on somebody either. Yes, MC club, is it you're saying

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you didn't drop a dime because you just wanted to

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>shoot every time? Yes? I do, got it? Yes, like good? Yeah.

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>So if I was big number fifty two down low

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and I felt open, I wasn't getting it. Probably not, probably,

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>but I would look your way. I always loved doing this,

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and you'll see players who do it like they the

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 1>guy's open, but you don't want to throw it to

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 1>him because you know he's not that good. But you

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>give it the oh and then you turn away and

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you throw it just somebody else. I kind of mastered that.

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, I can't get a two you down low

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>even though you're wide open. Yeah. NBA TV last night

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>after you left, had an old Lakers Bulls game on,

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:14.239
<v Speaker 1>I think it was from eighty eight with Michael Jordan,

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and the Bulls would start every single game by getting

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.919
<v Speaker 1>the ball download to Bill Cartwright, the Aging Service bull Center,

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and that was the Bulls plan for years and years.

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>So Cartway would get the first pass, the first shot,

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and then Michael Jordan would take away you. You're right

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 1>he would. It always felt like Bill Cartwright had the

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:34.919
<v Speaker 1>first basket for every Chicago Bulls game and then he

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>never got the ball after that. Yes, can I say,

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>is the guy who doesn't get that pass? There's nothing

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.720
<v Speaker 1>more deflating to their confidence. That guy's never going to

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>hit a shot now, because when the guy looks at

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 1>you and knows you're not going to get you're a

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>star player. You just can't hit the shot after that.

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>It's terrible. I know, I know. Let's get some phone

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>goals in here. Age seven seven three DP show Fritzie. Um,

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>do you have a limerick today? I kind of do? Wait,

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>do you or don't? I do have a limerick? Okay,

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of meeting I don't know, have you love

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it or not? But it isn't limerius. Well I kind of.

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I know I won't like it, but you kind of

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>have a limerick? Would you like me to share it? Yeah?

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>It was tiight. What's the topic the Rams Seahawk Rams

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 1>overaw Seahawks is the thank you? Thank you for the annunciation.

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>There it was time to show us what's up the

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Rams A big dog, not a pup. They gave us

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a good reason Hawk's clinch losing season. So far, so

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>good with staffords to cup. Okay, yeah, thank you, that's nice.

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>That once again was a limerick of Rams over Seahawks. Yeah,

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I got it, I got it. Thank you big game

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>for Cooper Cup last night. Yes it was, yeah it was.

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>And the so far part was because they were at

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a home game. Yeah, I got it. I got the

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl. Thank you for explaining. I always appreciate that.

0:07:56.680 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Sean and Oregon. Hey Sean, what's on your mind today?

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Good morning Dan? Thanks for taking my call. You know,

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I know Michael Jordan's, you know, one of the best players,

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and but I'm I want to say, you look at

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>YouTube and look at Clyde Drexler against Michael Jordan. I mean,

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Clyde was never afraid. And I don't think or Jordan

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>ever tried that stuff in Portland or tried that stuff

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>outside the bus calling on the Blazers. And I wanted

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to touch on Pete Carroll. You know, Pete's seventy and

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>seventies like the New sixty. You know, I think Pete's

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>in good health. I think you got to look at

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the team diminishing, and you gotta look

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>at Russell Wilson diminishing last night over ten yards. He

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>has won for eleven this year that the Seahawks. There's

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 1>seven games they haven't scored more than seventeen points. Do

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 1>you want to kill do you want to keep Pete

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Carroll or Russell Wilson If it came down to that,

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a Pete Carroll fan, but I'm not going

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to put it all on Pete Carroll, but it might

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>come down to that, Sean that that I don't know

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>if these two can coexist after this, you know, so

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that they're gonna have to make a decision. And look,

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Pete looks like he's you know, fifty years of age,

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 1>got the energy. But I don't know if Seattle looks

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>at this and going forward says we want to follow

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Pete or do we still want Russ here? And I

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>think Russ would be amenable to going some other place.

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's one of those to be careful what

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you ask for, because if you say, oh, Russ, we

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>can send you to the Giants, you know, we lost,

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, our first round draft pick with Jamal Adams,

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and Russ is gonna go there, and you're gonna go,

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>uh wait, this team isn't any better than what I

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>had in Seattle. Yeah. Don't you think that's a really

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>dicey situation From a PR standpoint? If somehow the management

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of the Seahawks coach to Russell Wilson s that's luck,

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>would you be in favor of us replacing the quarter

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the coach an offensive coordinator, like he always said, Russell said,

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I want input. And if he agrees to it and

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>it gets out that Pete Carroll is gone because Russell

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Wilson gave the green light to it, that's a tough

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>one PR wise, and he's a PR guy, Russell Wilson, Yeah,

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I know, big PR guy. I get the feeling that

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Russell be elsewhere, and I think that that would probably

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>be best for PR legacy, even for Russ's future. That

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and for both sides here. Russ is a big figure

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>there and you don't have any help on the way.

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>You need some draft picks. You could get some draft picks.

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Giants have a couple that are expendable Miami if it

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>would be a place like that Denver. So I think

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that there's possibilities here. But you know, I don't think

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Russ has been healthy since he had the finger surgery.

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's played well. And I can put

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>some of this on him, absolutely, but I always question

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the game plan. They're not a team where you go, man,

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 1>Seattle can score some points. It's always would they get

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 1>like eighteen points? What they get twenty two points? It's

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>always some strange number there they're always going into the

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter down fifteen twelve. Yes, it just felt like

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that and be like, oh my god, they're tough to watch.

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:20.439
<v Speaker 1>Tough to watch. All right, well, let's see what else

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:22.559
<v Speaker 1>do we have here? Andrew and Michigan. Hey Andrew, what

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>do you have for me? Hi? Dan, thanks for taking

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 1>the call. Six foot a hard two forty question, a

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 1>potential I team report. What is the sounds like there

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>may be a little conflict that mcloven may have been

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>using this as a power play to squeeze a little

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>bit more money out of the institution. I just wanted

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to hang up and hear your thoughts on what the

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>potential of that was and then pail the tip that

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>mcleven had here. Okay, playing hardball, that's my style. Yeah, yeah,

0:11:55.840 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>there was never any McLevin did not use this for

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:04.319
<v Speaker 1>leverage to get a pay raise. He just says, I'm leaving.

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>So this is what happened. Mclovin came to me and

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>he goes, I need to talk to you. And once

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>he said that, I knew that mcleven was leaving because

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I could tell it was written all over his face

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that this was really going to be difficult. And I thought,

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, let me let me make this easier for him.

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.839
<v Speaker 1>And we go into my office. He sits down and

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 1>he says, I'm leaving, and I said, okay, I said,

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and then he told me what the job is. I said,

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm proud of you. I'm happy for you, and there

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 1>was no i'll stay if Yeah, I understood mclovin would

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>drive ninety minutes each way every morning from Brooklyn and

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:49.839
<v Speaker 1>never complained, got here in time, did everything he was

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>supposed to do. I can't begrudge you to improve your life.

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Now we'll miss you. Absolutely be a big void there.

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know, once I could tell that you got

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>it out, and then I was able to kind of

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 1>just say, you know, feel feel proud for yourself. You

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 1>know you parlayed this into an afternoon radio show in

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>New York. My biggest relief was when you started doing

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>your to do list to replace me right in front

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of me. You were just like, no, And in a sense,

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.559
<v Speaker 1>because you're like you were, you weren't mad at all.

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>You were just like and you're including me. You you

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't make me leave the officer. I think you just

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>talk to me like we always talked. So it was

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>it was. That was a hard moment to be honest, No,

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>it was, yeah, but I wanted you to know that

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>you should feel proud, and I know you had mixed emotions,

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>but I mean I move on. It was like, okay,

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 1>now I gotta go, Okay, what do we do here?

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 1>When are you going to leave? Okay? Uh, this person

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 1>can help and do those jobs, Like I had a

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>checklist here right in front of you, right. But it

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>was zero percent callous at all. It was totally just

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>like you're you know, you basically said you're still always

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 1>part of the family. Well, I wanted you to help

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>me replace you or have people who we're going to

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 1>be able to do what you do on the show. Yea.

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>And that was it. That's I wanted your input, not

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>like all right, mclovin's gone all so you know I didn't.

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to replace you with anybody. Yeah, I

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>mean security walked me out that day. It was no

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:17.719
<v Speaker 1>big deal. I uh, we have breaking NBA news pointing, Yes,

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>we do it. First, do you want us to just

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>clip that last four minutes and play at the end

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>of tomorrow's show and then we could all leave a

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>form us early I'm not going to feel that way tomorrow, right,

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>so maybe I could just clip it and then make

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you seem emotional. Oh well, Todd, and I have a

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>bet you do need to shed one tier God says,

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I will shed a tear, may bring it an onion

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and kind of sneak it on your side of your

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>glass dead that bet. Will mclovin shed a tear? Oh

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>my god, are you kidding me? Definitely? Oh? Okay, I

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>think so. I don't know. Yeah, but that was our

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>most emotional moment. We just ruined the whole bit right there.

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>You know when you say, don't give everything away before

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the show. Yeah, yeah, but trust me, tomorrow it is

0:14:56.520 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>going to hit you hard that you're leaving a show

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and everything that you meant to this show. You know,

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna you better cry, I would word. Yeah. If

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't cry, I'm gonna be really upset. What's the

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>breaking NBA news? We got breaking news. Not to mess

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>with this beautiful moment, but this is gigantic from WOA.

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Free agent guard slash forward Joe Johnson is signing a

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>ten day deal with the Boston Celtics. Yeah, Joseph, Joe

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Johnson is back. Johnson is expected to return to the

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>franchise that drafted him twenty years ago. I expected to

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>play tonight versus Cleveland. He's already ready to play. I

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>love it. I'm gonna pencil him in for fifteen The

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Good still, Yes he is. He greed shit

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the door for the Hall of Good. Yes. McLeman. Paul

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Kind stored our emotional moment for the eleventh Joe Johnson

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to the Celtics signing. It is kind of emotional that

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Joe Johnson. I mean, listen to the emotion in this

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>laugh by Joe Johnson. That's a man full of emotion.

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it's fair to ask who's meant

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>more to the program, Andrew or Johnson, because it's Joe

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Johnson has been a major figure. Yeah, let's take a break.

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Starting to get a little misty on right here for

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Joe Johnson, not McLevin leaving, And we'll take a break

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>back after this, Dan Patrick show, M Drive. You want

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to achieve your health and fitness goals, you got to

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 1>put in the work every day, Todd, every day. Every

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to get it done. But you know, I

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>realize M drives not for everybody. Todd. It's for the driven.

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh and I don't know. I don't know if you're driven.

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I could be driven, but you're not. I have some

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>drive left in me that I need to tap into.

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>M Drive the supplement for driven men with no plans

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>on slowing down even as they age. M Drive special

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>blend of clinically tested herbs and vitamin support your body's

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>natural testosterone production, giving you the energy and the strength

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and the mental boost you need to compete every single day.

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>M Drive dan dot com, Free shipping, sixty day money

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>back guarantee. Nothing to lose, Todd except four lbs. M

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Drive available also at Walgreen's Write Aid and Vitamin Shop,

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>does not contain testosterone. Instead, it helps your body maintain

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 1>natural testosterone production. M Drive strength energy you need to

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>fuel your daily drive. Don't let age beat you. Visit

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>M drive dan dot com. Thanks for listening to the

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Dan Patrick Show podcast. Be sure to catch us live

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>every weekday morning nine until noon eastern six to nine

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Pacific on Fox Sports Radio, and you can find us

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 1>on the iHeartRadio app at FSR or stream us live

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>on the Peacock app. This award nominated program brought you

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>by Mercedes Benz Vans. They go far beyond from their

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>customization options, cutting edge tech, five star sales service, financial

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 1>support crew. Mercedes Benz Vans build equipped and engineered to

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>be ready for anything, go the extra mile, taking the

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 1>old important first step to an authorized dealership. Today we'll

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>get to Steve Palozzolo, who is the co host of

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focus the NFL podcast. Here in a moment,

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Scott and Austin would like to counter Todd's limerick of

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks and the Rams with one of his own. Scott,

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>thanks for joining us, and that was a better limerick

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 1>failed there? Yeah, well, now you're gonna say by default,

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm the winner of the thank you? What the other

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:29.199
<v Speaker 1>way on me? Thank you Tom. Steve Palozolo the co

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>host Pro Football Focus the NFL podcast. You can check

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 1>out the podcast and go to pro football focus dot com.

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Their sale going on on Elite subscriptions a great gift

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 1>for the holiday season, and the promo code is Elite.

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Up there to take advantage of that, Steve joins us. Now, Steve,

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you do this for a living where you're grading players

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 1>and looking at all the film. Uh, what kind of

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:58.719
<v Speaker 1>seasons Matthew Stafford having right now, this is great. This

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>is the season that I predicted for him. I thought

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna lose it for a while, but my

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:07.239
<v Speaker 1>prediction was he was gonna grade in our system in

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a similar manner as he did in previous seasons, which

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:13.360
<v Speaker 1>for US was low eighties, which is good, very good quarterback.

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 1>But I predicted that his production would be a lot

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.440
<v Speaker 1>better in that system with the great receivers that he have.

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know Pooper Copp was going to be as

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>good as he's been this year, but I figured the

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>system and the supporting cost would would increase Stafford's production.

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we're seeing that Stafford has been good this season.

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Had a couple of those rough games in the middle,

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the turnovers, the Sunday night football game against Tennessee, but

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>overall Stafford has He's made some big plays. He's missed

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a few open throws, had some turnover worthy throws. But

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I think these last few weeks we're seeing the big

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>time throws that they got him for right the fifty

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>yard or a couple of weeks ago to Van Jefferson

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>special pros into tight coverage. So overall, I think Stafford

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 1>is having one of the better years of his career,

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 1>but not as good as maybe the he's a passer

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>rating one of Waight and you know, most productive passing

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>offense in the league. I don't think he's been that good,

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>but he's been good and the supporting cast has helped

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to elevate his game even further. Is he a top

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>ten quarterback this year? Yeah? We have him at number

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>seven overall as a passer, so yeah, he's in that

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>top He's definitely in that top ten range right now,

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>especially in a year where there hasn't really been There

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:21.479
<v Speaker 1>hasn't really been elite quarterback play across the NFL. Nobody's

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>really standing out. So Stafford's got They've got the best

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>passing production in the league and he's at number seven

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 1>in our passing grade. So far this year, Rodgers has

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:33.120
<v Speaker 1>been pretty elite. Yeah. I think I think people are

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>forgetting a couple of Rogers games in here, because Week

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>one he had that game against the Saints where he

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>was terrible. They lost thirty eight to three. It was

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was pretty much the same thing we

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>just saw from Tom Brady the other night. It just happened,

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, months ago, so I think people forget it.

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>And honestly, the game they won seventeen to nothing against

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the Seattle Seahawks, he was just as bad through an

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>end zone interception he was. He was not good in

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 1>that particular game. So Rogers has had a few duds

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and he has not been I don't think as good.

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Throw up with Rosy was last year in the NBA. Yeah,

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>but thirty touchdowns, four interceptions, that's an off year. No,

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I get it. He also has twelve turnover worthy plays

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>because again we tracked this stuff. So he's got far,

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>but he's usually he's one of the best in the league. Wait, wait,

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I can explaining that Steve turnover worthy. So we're grading

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:18.719
<v Speaker 1>every player in every place. So we're going in there

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and saying, if you misread the play and throw the

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>ball two way linebackers say. Whether or not the linebacker

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>catches the ball, it's a bad play. Right. If it's

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>a cod it's an interception. If it's not, it's the

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 1>same bad play. So Rogers has gotten away with a

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>few of those plays this year more than usual. He's

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>still one of the best at taking care of the ball.

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>But that's why I don't always look directly at touchdown

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>interception ratio, because in this particular case, Roger's interception totals

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it's lying a little bit this year, I think, compared

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to previous seasons, I don't know what to make of

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts. I find him a valuable weapon, but I

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Unless Philadelphia embraces him like Baltimore did with

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson, then it feels like that question is always

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna loom there with him. Is he the right quarterback?

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Franchise quarterback? How do you grade Jalen Hurts because it's

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>what he gives you is not normal from quarter quarterbacks perspective. Yeah,

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:12.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think it took them a few weeks

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to figure out they need to play this style of football,

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and now that style of football being this team that

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 1>can run for one hundred and fifty two hundred yards

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>every single week and use Jalen Hurts in the design

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>running game. They had games earlier this year where it

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>was just throw, throw, throw, and look, I'm a past

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>game enthusiast, I love that. But when you have a

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts a run, a quarterback who brings value in

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the design running game, is it's tough to defend. And

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I think you see a game like last Night where

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts is used in the design run game. It

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>opens things up for the running backs. You run play

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>action off of that. You can win with that in

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>this in the NFL, right, you could do that and

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>then this what do you make of Jalen Hurts. The

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:53.360
<v Speaker 1>tough part's gonna be do you want to sign him

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>long term? Right? Has he's done enough there? I think

0:22:57.040 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 1>he's good on a rookie contract. Right, you could do

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>some cool up on a rookie contract, building this great

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 1>roster around him. Don't necessarily know if I want to

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>lock him up long term. We're still a little over

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>a year into his career, so hey, he can improve.

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>So in other words, he's he's a good enough passer,

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:15.159
<v Speaker 1>and in playing that style opens up throws. Lamar Jackson

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>has more open throws than other quarterbacks because the defense

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.439
<v Speaker 1>has to account for him and that Russian attack, and

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it creates open receivers. Jalen Hurts brings that to the

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>table as well, so you can mitigate some of the

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.679
<v Speaker 1>maybe lack of polish in the pocket that Jalen Hurrits has.

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Is Carson Wentz a positive or a negative for the Colts.

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Can I say neutral? He's neutral. I mean he's a

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>league average quarterback and he has for a while. I

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 1>think he's been more positive than negative this year. Though

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>he's generally taking care of the ball. He did not

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:47.440
<v Speaker 1>take care of the ball on Saturday Night against the Patriots.

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>He was pretty bad in that game and they got

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>away with it. But overall you take away the game

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:55.439
<v Speaker 1>and with the river rain, you know, on Sunday Night

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>football against the Niners, Carson Wentz has done a really

0:23:58.119 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>nice job of taking care of the ball. And when

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you do that, when you have the Colt offensive line

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and Jonathan Taylor, you can win some games, right, And

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 1>they've scored a ton of points. They've got Michael Pittman emerging.

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Wentz does get the ball to him pretty well, So

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's been more positive than negative. But I

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 1>don't think Wentz is out there carrying the team or

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>anything like he did say in two thou seven. Yeah,

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>but when you say boy he takes care of the ball,

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't have a franchise quarterback sound to it. Should

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the Colts be in the market for another quarterback an upgrade? Yeah?

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how they're going to be challenged with

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that contract and everything, but I'm generally of the mind

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>unless you have one of say, the top eight quarterbacks

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>in the league, and defining those probably harder than ever,

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>harder than it was, you know, five or six years ago.

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:42.199
<v Speaker 1>If you don't have one of those guys, I think

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you're always in the market because, yeah, you want a

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:47.439
<v Speaker 1>guy that can elevate those around you, not do what

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 1>I just described, taking care of the ball and relying

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>on everyone else to kind of carry you. The Seahawks

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>offense is not good because what why who they have?

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Walden is a new offensive coordinator, and they just they've

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>been early in the season, they were a little top heavy.

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Russell makes those special pros down the field a couple

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of times a game. Overall looks efficient, they're just play

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>by play they're not good that it's the intermediate level

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of the field that they're not attacking. So I think

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a little bit of play calling, there's a little

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>bit of Russell Wilson, and they're that ten to nineteen

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>yard range in this new offense just has been non existent.

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's been a bunch of short passes Rust hits

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a couple of bombs over the top, and then you

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>have a game like last night when he doesn't hit

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>those bombs. This offense is terrible. So it's just two

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 1>that there's not enough high percentage quality plays in this offense.

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's a combination of Shane Waldron as

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>offensive coordinator, this new system just not meshing with Russell

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:46.679
<v Speaker 1>Wilson's skill set, and plus Russell Wilson's just not playing

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>nearly as well as he did for the majority of

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>last year twenty eighteen the rest of his career, whether

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>that's partly the finger injury, We're just not seeing the

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 1>same Russell Wilson for the most part of this season.

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 1>How do you rank rate Cooper cups season? Man, it's

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>it's incredible. I mean, I think you know, he's got

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:07.959
<v Speaker 1>that triple Crown of receptions and yards and touchdowns and everything.

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>But he is just he's good at everything right, and

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>he's great after the catch. He's good at getting open

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>against man coverage. He's got a great feel for his zone.

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Him and Matthew Stafford have just had an incredible connection

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>as far as being on the same page. So help

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>has been the best he's best receiver in the league

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>this year, but it's somebody hadn't seen Cooper Cup play.

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:31.439
<v Speaker 1>How would you describe him? I would say he's like

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>he's an uber slaw receiver who took his game from

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>gets open underneath and you know, has a good feel

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>for the game. He had taken his game to the

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>next level where you can't leave him one on one

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and he can win at every level of the field,

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>like the best receivers came and then the Rams put

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:50.640
<v Speaker 1>him in good position to succeed as well. So very

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 1>good all around receiver, does everything well, surehanded, great after

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the catch, creates being played. But is he Davante Adams category,

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>is he health DeAndre Hopkins category? Or you know, there's

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>quite a few great receivers, but Cooper Cup is having

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the greatest seasons of all time. I think

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>he's a step below those guys because you do have

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you do have a built in advantage when you're in

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the slot right, so, and that's where he does most

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:19.399
<v Speaker 1>of his work. I don't think you just dropped Cooper

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Cup into Green Bay's offense and say, hey, go beat

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Vante Adams, right, go beat man coverage? As often as

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:27.199
<v Speaker 1>you do. So he's a step below those true outside

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 1>X receivers, but it's one of the best slot receiver

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>seasons of all time, which is, you know, technically a

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:36.679
<v Speaker 1>little bit easier, but at this level of production, you know,

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Cup, it's definitely a special I see what you said.

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:42.199
<v Speaker 1>You know, step a step below here comes down to

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 1>forty yard dash time. I see what you're doing, Steve.

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm just a speed guys to be able to be

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 1>able to fast guys. Is Lamar Jackson improving, No, he's

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:55.679
<v Speaker 1>not earlier this season. I may have said yes, but

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the last few weeks you know, prior to his injury

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>were pretty bad and it was a lot of decision

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 1>making stuff, right, It was a lot of just him

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:06.879
<v Speaker 1>throwing into coverage. And the curious part here is I

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 1>think he's got his best group of playmakers that he's

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>had in his entire career, you know, with Marky's Brown

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>breaking out, with Rashad Bateman there, with Sammy Watkins and

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 1>what Mark Andrews. Mark Andrews continuing to take his game

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to the next level. This should have been not maybe

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the best statistical season for Lamar because you know, everyp

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>season was great, but this should have been a much

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 1>better season for Lamar Jackson, and I think the last

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 1>few weeks he's he's taken a step back in his

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>development where he's just not seeing the field very well.

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>The Packers Chiefs great out as the two best teams

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>right now. Yeah, I think. I mean, I think trending

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>wise too. You know, the Chiefs defense, I think they

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 1>went on a run. I don't. I still don't know

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that they're necessarily championship caliber. I think the Chiefs offense

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>has shown flashes of being what they were before, but

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>they will. They're not exactly where they were, but it's

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>dangerous enough. And I think the Packers. Part of the

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>intrigue with the Packers is maybe David Bactr he's going

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to come back. Maybe you know, j Alexandrew is going

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>to come back at some point. The Packers last year,

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I think we're very reliance on just Aaron Rodgers and

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 1>DeVante Adams and jare like the top heavy roster. They're

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>in the wind. In other ways now, guys like Russell

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Douglas and Devandre Campbell stepping up on defense. So I

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>love the way the Packers are trending and they're getting

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>other good players back. So yeah, I think the top

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>two seeds, Packers and Chiefs are the two best teams

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL right now. Thank you Steve as always,

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Merry Christmas, thanks for joining us my best. Everybody at

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focus, Thank you, Dan, Mary, Christmas to you

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and all the viewers. That's Steve Penelsa and our listeners

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>as well. Steve may just think it's a TV show.

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 1>You may not know that he's also on radio entertaining

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a nation right there. I love that they look at

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 1>every play and even those moments of like that a

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>pass should have been intercepted, that they count that as well.

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>But Aaron Rodgers still when you say, if I take

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>away the Saints game, that the numbers for Aaron Rodgers

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>are like crazy, still thirty and four interceptions here? Yeah, poling,

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 1>what was the phrase he said? Was it turnover friendly,

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>passed t t N TF something turnover worthy, turnover worthy,

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>turnover worthy, that's what he said. I think so, yes, McLevin.

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Did you agree with his take that Cooper Cups is

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>stepped low because he lines up in the slot. I

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 1>actually I didn't even ever heard that. I don't care

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 1>where you line up. It's where you end up, and

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>he's ending up in the end zone. So you can

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>wind line up wide. That's one thing, all right, you

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>line up in the slot. Oh he's in the end zone. Okay,

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the goal. Yeah, Poling, do you guys think you'd

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 1>take Travis Kelsey over to Vante Adams? Are those guys

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>consider the best at the position right now? Davante Adams

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and Travis Kelsey fair Julie's lean tight end. Well, there's

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of good tight ends, so Kittle, there's there's

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a crazy wave of great tight ends. But um,

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I would take to Vontae Adams and Travis Kelsey has

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, Tyreek Hill. You gotta always remember that Davante

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Adams doesn't have that other weapon. Yeah, mclovin. I think

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the wide receivers get paid more like franchise and they

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 1>get drafted higher. Yeah. Well that's why you had, you know,

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the big controversy. Jimmy Graham wanted to be layout a

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver and Jimmy Graham's a tight end. A couple

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of phone calls, Nate, Oklahoma High, Nate, welcome back. What

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 1>do you have for me? Hey? Dan? Going bold? Comparison

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>with mclovin and once in turn chill. But I love

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 1>it on the two day night games. I'n't have to

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. I think just too much. I think

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 1>my wife would kick me out. A few weeks ago

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>she said, what was their Columbus Day football? Of course

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>there's not a special game, and I was like, oh,

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>it's Monday nine. She was not happy. Also, you mentioned

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 1>he smoked a cigar every night. Just curious, what's your

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 1>go to cigar? All right, thanks guys, all right, well

0:31:54.360 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Nate. Variety, Wide Variety, Pedrone anniversary, uh artro Fuente.

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>That there's so many great cigars. Boulevard, Yeah, someone the

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>x x X. Yeah, that is great. Joya Demantere, that's great.

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>A lot of great sigars. And you don't have to

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>like a Gloria Cubano. You could get that and it's

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 1>like nine bucks. It's not a Cuban, but it's it's

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>still if you want a cigar, to smoke a cigar,

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 1>And people always make the mistake, they go, oh, I

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 1>want a Cuban cigar, and I always go, no, you don't.

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to go there? Well, well that's the

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>best cigar. Well, I don't want you throwing up. I

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 1>don't want your head spinning, because there's cigars that will

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 1>turn you green. And usually it'll be somebody who doesn't

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 1>have a cigar. They'll be at a holiday party and

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:53.959
<v Speaker 1>they'll go, oh, you got cigars, and I'll go, now,

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:56.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to smoke those? Here, you smoked this one,

0:32:57.080 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and then like, no, I want to try a cuban.

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I go, okay. Next thing you know, they're quiet, they're

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 1>they're they're just kind of sitting and then they're weaving

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, and I go, I told you it'll

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>mess you up. Yeah, pol. Do you think people have

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the same mentality with wine that if they hear that

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 1>a wine is expensive, they think it's better. When I

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 1>have my holiday party, people assume, man, you spent a

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of money on this wine. And usually you get

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a great bottle of wine for twenty two dollars. But

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>they think, well, you're you spend a lot of money, Like, no,

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to good good bottle of wine. Yeah, pol.

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>To be fair, I've gone to your holiday parties and

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>your guests go through all your alcoholics. True, I mean

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it's gone. That is true, it's a wasteland one thing.

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I know, I knew, I knew they grabbed like the

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 1>blue label or oh that happened with my neighbor, did

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you grab like a bob? Yeah, it was brand new.

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 1>It was a gift that I got that day and

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 1>it was Johnny Walker blue label, and I so, I

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't even open it up. But Bob opened it up.

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 1>And he's sitting downstairs and he's cracked the bottle and

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I go, hey, Bob, and then he goes, ah, Johnny

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Walker's great. I said, yeah, I got it as a

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:09.839
<v Speaker 1>gift today. He goes, oh, that's great, so he cracked it. Yes,

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that does mean seems like a full pot. You don't

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:15.359
<v Speaker 1>crack another man's alcohol. You wait, you if it's open,

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you could have a step. I don't think there are

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 1>any rules after a while at a holiday party, ID

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:22.919
<v Speaker 1>get at that bar seems to be sparse. Yes, yes

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 1>it is. You need like a cover charge. I need

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 1>a bouncer, is what I need? There a dom for you.

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 1>The Raptors at the Bulls game scheduled for tonight has

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:36.399
<v Speaker 1>been postponed. The Raptors don't have the league required eight

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 1>available players to proceed the game against the Bulls. Last

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>call for phone calls. What we learned once in store tomorrow,

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, they might get desperate enough that somebody may

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:47.399
<v Speaker 1>want to call me up, because I'd be more than

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 1>happy to, you know, leave this job for a little

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:52.759
<v Speaker 1>while somebody needs some help. Spot up shooter Celtics to

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you and Joseph Joe. Yeah, Joe Johnson, you're calling him

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:57.400
<v Speaker 1>up shooters? Yes time. How many minutes you think you

0:34:57.440 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>could give right now? Someone said, you know, we need

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you out there, not long, but we need you to

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 1>be serviceable on the court. You know, I could give

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 1>you a ten like I don't play at the other end.

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's almost like that old Iowa basketball women's basketball

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 1>where some stayed at the other end. I would do that.

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Take a break back after this. Thanks for listening to

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 1>The Dan Patrick Show podcast. Be sure to catch us

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 1>live every weekday morning nine until noon eastern six to

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:27.080
<v Speaker 1>nine Pacific on Fox Sports Radio, and you can find

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>us on the iHeartRadio app at FSR or stream us

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:36.279
<v Speaker 1>live on the Peacock app. Hey, I'm Doug Gottlieb. The

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 1>podcast is called All Ball. We usually talk all basketball

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 1>all the time, but it's more about the stories about

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 1>what made these people love their sport and all the

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting interactions along the way. We talked to coaches, we

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:52.799
<v Speaker 1>talked to players. We tell you stories. You download it,

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you listen to it. I think you like it. Listen

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to All Ball with Doug Gotlieb on the iHeartRadio app,

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:04.800
<v Speaker 1>apple Pie Cast or ever you get your podcast. Michael

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Boublay is going to join us on the program tomorrow.

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:12.319
<v Speaker 1>He was great last time he was on. Can we

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:16.919
<v Speaker 1>sing for Michael Boublay? Could we come up with our

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 1>own Christmas song for Michael Boublay to sing? You want

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to write a Christmas song? Yeah? Wow, what do you think? Right?

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 1>And he sings it right? Or we sing? No, he

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>sings it. He just canceled. No, No, he'll do it.

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>He's a gamer. If he's a crooner, then he'll be

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 1>able to do this. No, Michael Boublay. Todd is so

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 1>excited to have Michael Booblay. Yeah. My thought he was awesome.

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 1>But what if I say everybody gets to sing except

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:47.440
<v Speaker 1>for you. It's your show. If that's what you want

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to do, I would be disappointed. Did you book Michael

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Boublay so you could sing, I did not. I booked

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:55.879
<v Speaker 1>John Oates so that I could say, oh, notes im

0:36:55.880 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 1>hoping that you would walk into that, and you thankfully did.

0:36:58.280 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 1>But no, if you want a thing, I'll sing. If not,

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. But that's was not the impetus for inviting him.

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 1>It was more because he's a Christmas kind of guy

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>holiday season and he was great last time around. Thank

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you to you guys. So tomorrow the last day for mclovin. Also,

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I hand out the least valuable danette has already been decided.

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:21.760
<v Speaker 1>There was no mystery there. It's Todd. I will reveal

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>who was the most valuable danette and also the most

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:28.919
<v Speaker 1>valuable back room guy as well. That will happen. All

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:31.959
<v Speaker 1>of that happening tomorrow. Yes, a couple of things. Ryan

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:34.359
<v Speaker 1>and Honolulu asked if there's gonna be at MBC this

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:38.439
<v Speaker 1>year most of valuable caller, He asked it, so he's

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 1>hoping he gets it. Secondly, Fritzie for two weeks said

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that he was going to book a guest to make

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 1>mcloven happy, and the last segment of the show that

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:49.239
<v Speaker 1>he's on, I assume it was gonna be doctor Jay

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 1>or Randall Cunningham. No, McLevin doesn't want a guest in

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the last segment. Mclovin wants the last segment to be

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:58.759
<v Speaker 1>about mcloven Fritzie teas Michael Buble as if it was

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Mike Schmidt coming on. MC mclovan happy. I did think

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:05.279
<v Speaker 1>that the surprise mystery guests had something to do with me.

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 1>But as long as it's not like a breaking news

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:11.400
<v Speaker 1>for like Joe Johnson signs with the Celtics, interfering with

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:13.840
<v Speaker 1>my emotional Yeah, because you might have something that happens

0:38:13.880 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow takes over the show. We don't get time to

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:22.439
<v Speaker 1>say goodbye. I don't know. I mean, you know, news

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>as long as breaking. So I'd a Friday Thursday before

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Christmas Eve quiet. I know, I'd hate for it to

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:36.840
<v Speaker 1>happen classic news dump. Yeah, NFL cancel season plus, So

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I gotta throw something on the grill. You know we're

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:44.320
<v Speaker 1>not here for Friday, So have a meat Thursday. Something

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:50.279
<v Speaker 1>simple and maybe hamburgers, hot dogs, nothing elaborate for you. Yeah,

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:53.479
<v Speaker 1>because you're kind of a meat and potatoes kind of guy. Well,

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I still mad. I tried to do tofu, which the

0:38:56.560 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>traker did a great job with by the way, but

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 1>still it didn't work. Yeah, Brandon in South Carolina joins us.

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Hi Brandon, Hey Dan, Dan, that's I appreciate you taking McCallum. So,

0:39:09.520 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 1>my twelve year old son, Dan loves the show. He

0:39:12.520 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 1>listens to the podcasts either after school or like right

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:17.759
<v Speaker 1>now on Christmas break. He's maybe even watching the show

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:21.760
<v Speaker 1>right now, probably at home. So I purchased the Jimmy

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Jimmerson shirts from the DP store. Shout out to the store.

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 1>It's awesome. And I was really hoping Jimmy could give

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:32.840
<v Speaker 1>us his take on our favorite team, University of George Bulldogs,

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 1>what they will do differently in the playoffs after that

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:41.200
<v Speaker 1>horrendous loss in the SEC championship game. All right, well, Brandon,

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Merry Christmas to you and your son. Let's go to

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Jimerson get his thoughts on the Georgia Bulldogs. Jimmy, Well, obviously,

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 1>when you think of Georgia, you think of their defense

0:39:49.400 --> 0:39:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and that that's going to play a big role, a

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 1>big role in getting them into a title contention. Well,

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:00.919
<v Speaker 1>thank to you, well, thank you, Jimmy Wells no doubt

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:03.960
<v Speaker 1>about that than you. Yeah, thank you. Great insight there

0:40:04.680 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Jimmerson. I mean, we're talking about Georgia. I know, Okay,

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:11.279
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the Georgia Bulldogs here. Okay, I'm not

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 1>sure people realize that that's Seaton's favorite go to long Okay,

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:19.879
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about Okay, I mean we're talking about Tom Brady. Okay,

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 1>do people realize that? Don people realize that? Right now?

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:26.759
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about Tom Brady? And it buys you time too,

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:29.440
<v Speaker 1>because that's all the analysts wants to do. They just

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 1>want it. So how good are the Buccaneers? Now? Well,

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about Tom Brady here? So now I've I've

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:41.799
<v Speaker 1>bought myself about six or seven seconds. And then you

0:40:41.840 --> 0:40:44.959
<v Speaker 1>go the National Football League. It's never the NFL. Never,

0:40:45.080 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 1>it's always the National Football League. I mean, okay, look,

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 1>let's just start with the quarterback. Okay. But they got

0:40:50.040 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady, all right, So I mean I think that

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:53.960
<v Speaker 1>gives them a chance to win just about everything. Okay,

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously injuries are concerned, but I never count Tom Brady

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:04.160
<v Speaker 1>out of anything. Ian in Colorado, Ian, what do you

0:41:04.200 --> 0:41:08.759
<v Speaker 1>have for us? Hey? How's it going? Fellas? Five eight

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:15.759
<v Speaker 1>one eighty, thank you? Um Micklevin Peas out. It's been

0:41:15.760 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a pleasure. I'm happy for you, and so Dan, I'm

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:21.759
<v Speaker 1>calling about a dilemma I've got going on with. I'm

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to go to a Lakers game out here in Denver.

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Should I go to D one against the Nuggets on

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the fifteen, I know they're not playing very well. Or

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:32.960
<v Speaker 1>should I go to the one at the very end

0:41:33.000 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 1>of the season on April tenth, maybe a little more meaningful,

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:40.759
<v Speaker 1>depending on the standings. And lastly, I was hoping maybe

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I could hear Tod's impression and doctor phil Okay, well,

0:41:45.200 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Ian, that's random. It's very random. So I

0:41:49.520 --> 0:41:52.480
<v Speaker 1>would go later. I'd go in April because maybe the

0:41:52.560 --> 0:41:56.319
<v Speaker 1>Lakers will be healthy and you might be getting a

0:41:56.800 --> 0:41:59.239
<v Speaker 1>team ready to make a postseason run. I don't know

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 1>what you're gonna get in a couple of weeks with

0:42:01.080 --> 0:42:04.640
<v Speaker 1>this too, Todd, do you want to provide Ian your

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Doctor phil impersonation? You got this big, elaborate, expensive fish

0:42:08.400 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to you ain't got no fish in it, and that

0:42:10.080 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make any sense. You're walking around, You got your lasso,

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you got your boots on everything. You ain't no cowboy though.

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:17.920
<v Speaker 1>That's not gonna get it done. What's that got to

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:20.880
<v Speaker 1>do with my kid that's done drugs? Because you're walking

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 1>around trying to tell you that I paid attention. You're

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:26.160
<v Speaker 1>walking around, you're riding the horse and everything, but that

0:42:26.239 --> 0:42:31.360
<v Speaker 1>don't make no cowboy. He does use those analogies, and

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you're going, where's he going with this? You're going to

0:42:34.640 --> 0:42:36.239
<v Speaker 1>the foot doctor for us, so a throat. We're not

0:42:36.200 --> 0:42:40.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna make you any progress here this day in sports

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:44.240
<v Speaker 1>history Paul nineteen sixty two. Vince Lombardi, the coach the Packers,

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:46.440
<v Speaker 1>was on the cover of Time magazine. Nineteen ninety six.

0:42:46.520 --> 0:42:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Cordell Stewart of the Pittsburgh Steelers man for eighty yards

0:42:49.560 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 1>against the Panthers. It was the longest scoring running run

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 1>by a quarterback in NFL history. Todd, What did you

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:58.359
<v Speaker 1>learn them Today's Award nominated programs? I love this one.

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:00.319
<v Speaker 1>Chris Sims gave us a new term when a different player.

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:04.840
<v Speaker 1>It's whistle for barely touching the quarterback. Nothing the passer,

0:43:05.360 --> 0:43:10.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, mclovin. Jeff Van Gundy, Oh man, I mess

0:43:10.080 --> 0:43:12.840
<v Speaker 1>it up. Come back to me, uh Seaton? What was

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the new stat we just heard about? Like a turnover?

0:43:15.040 --> 0:43:18.760
<v Speaker 1>A like turnover? Like the event. Yeah, something like something

0:43:18.800 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 1>like that Paulie turnover, friendly pass. Yeah, yes, mclovin, Anthony Mason.

0:43:24.200 --> 0:43:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Irrational confidence can be good. The Compact GLA proves it's

0:43:27.320 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 1>not the size of the suv in the fight, the

0:43:29.200 --> 0:43:31.840
<v Speaker 1>size of the fight in the suv. Learn more about

0:43:31.840 --> 0:43:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the nimble and ready for anything Mercedes Benz Vehicle at

0:43:34.440 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 1>MBUSA dot com. Mercedes Ben's the Best or Nothing. Tomorrow,

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the Final Day, the Final Show, as we say goodbye

0:43:42.360 --> 0:43:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to mclovin. Oh but wait, there's one more item before

0:43:44.880 --> 0:43:48.279
<v Speaker 1>we close out this Wednesday. Hottest Rookies, biggest superstars, the

0:43:48.320 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 1>old time great It's only one place to collect them all.

0:43:50.719 --> 0:43:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Panini Trading Cards, the exclusive trading card partner of the NFL.

0:43:54.840 --> 0:44:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Paniti America utilizes the iconic brands, Contenders, National Treasures, Don Russ, Prism.

0:44:01.760 --> 0:44:05.000
<v Speaker 1>You get instant classic trading cards, the most popular players,

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Mac Jones, Patrick Mahomes, Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers, and so

0:44:08.600 --> 0:44:12.800
<v Speaker 1>many more. Autograph cards, memorabilia cards, rare inserts, hottest rookie cards.

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:15.680
<v Speaker 1>There's something for everyone in Panini America packs, and it's

0:44:15.719 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 1>more than just the NFL. Panini is the exclusive home

0:44:18.640 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 1>for the NBA, UFC, NASCAR and collegiate trading cards. Some

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of the matchups for Week sixteen, Big Ben will be

0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:28.480
<v Speaker 1>visiting Patrick Mahomes in the Chiefs, Josh Allen goes to

0:44:28.520 --> 0:44:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Foxborough rematch against Mac Jones and the Patriots. Baker Mayfield

0:44:32.520 --> 0:44:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Browns traveling to Lambeau. Starter continue your collection

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:40.200
<v Speaker 1>now go to Panini America dot net. Panini America dot

0:44:40.280 --> 0:44:43.160
<v Speaker 1>net the official trading cards of The Dan Patrick Show.