WEBVTT - Traders Eye Renewed Iran Peace Push

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 2>What's wonderful about this? Our guests get lost in the building,

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 2>there's so many.

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 3>Floors, get snacks and stuff, or they go shopping.

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, Madison Avenue is just so close joining us now,

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 2>just back from the new Prada store.

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 4>Thanks guys.

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Did you see the product expansion the store? They bought

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 2>the building and they just blew it out one hundred

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 2>percent is well? What does the luxury boom? Alicia Levine

0:00:55.160 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 2>say about the caution the worry the consumer in America?

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there's like two worlds out there.

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 4>It's two worlds out there. I mean, look, it's obvious.

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:09.400
<v Speaker 4>I think that if you just look at results of luxury.

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 4>You know, asset prices have skyrocketed since twenty twenty, and

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 4>global wealth owners have simply become wealthare And if you

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 4>had your assets in the US, you're about seventy five

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 4>percent wealthier than you were six years ago. And it's evident.

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 4>I mean, if you just look at the airlines, they're

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 4>talking about one hundred and ten dollars oil prices, raising

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 4>estimates because demand is so.

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:41.839
<v Speaker 2>Rgic Christ fifty six fifty seven United Airlines out of Newark.

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 2>It's the one benchmark I use in two cups of coffee.

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 2>You go, it was seven five hundred dollars business class. Well,

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 2>you'd be enjoying that this morning at ten one hundred.

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 5>Oh boy, there you go.

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 2>That's that's your list.

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 5>So what do we do with Alicia?

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it seems like the market's trying to discount,

0:01:57.560 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 3>trying to price.

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 5>In I guess higher energy costs.

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 3>I guess maybe some higher inflation, maybe even some slower

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 3>economic growth.

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 5>Has that changed the way you view the market?

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 4>So it has not changed. And we've had some really

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 4>interesting discussions in our investment Strategy Committee where we discuss

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 4>all these things. And we came into the year, you know,

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 4>overweight the US and we have a healthy allocation to

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 4>international because we recognized earnings our moving higher, develop international

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 4>and emerging markets for the first time in a long time.

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 4>So we came into the year we were not one

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 4>of the dollar is getting crushed shops. We were I'd

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 4>say more ambivalent about it. This could see some dollar weakness,

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 4>but not overall because the US economy is so strong,

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 4>and we really expected close to three percent growth this year,

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, on January first, twenty twenty six, so we

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 4>never really changed our views. You have to be concerned

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 4>about tail risk. I think what we've seen since the

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 4>cease fire and some of the leaks about what the

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 4>discussions were about, you've got to bring the tails in right.

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 4>You're not going to get the best case scenario where

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 4>US owns oil globally, but you're not also getting you're

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 4>not getting a catastrophe either. And so therefore, if I

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:15.839
<v Speaker 4>can dare say the word tariffs, which nobody has talked

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 4>about in the last six weeks, I can say, if

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 4>you go back a year ago, right, but the market

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 4>priced in when it's not the worst case scenario, we

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 4>bring in the left tail risk and we continue with

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 4>our story. And the story is earners are moving higher

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 4>three percent from the beginning of the year.

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Alicia Levine with this with BNY well through thrilled that

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 2>she's with us this morning. She's under selling herself. I'll

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 2>talk about that in a moment. Good morning around the world,

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Good morning across America. The way you choose to listen

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 2>to us major good morning to YouTube. Alicia Levine was

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 2>one of the first people to say, hey, stupid, look

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 2>at YouTube. It's what everybody's using. Because her kids are

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 2>glued to it, absolutely glued to it. They do. They

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 2>look in they go Lego construction and there's like four

0:03:56.440 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 2>hundred videos abound how to put legos together. Make sure

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 2>you're underselling yourself. You had the courage here with your

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 2>prodigious math skills to say, have courage stay in the market.

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 2>The percentage of people, particularly institutions that were you know,

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 2>they didn't where, they weren't in Chicago looking at cartosis

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 2>and the answer is they missed this. Yep, what's the

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 2>pop now after the shortcover?

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 4>So look, thank you for that. It's not easy, as

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, I think. Here we're now looking at earning season.

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 4>So now we got to the nitty gritty, what are

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 4>the fundamentals going to tell us? So that three percent

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 4>earnings increase in expectations driving into something like fifteen or

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 4>sixteen percent earnings growth for the year has come from

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 4>the energy sector, obviously, because the earnings are now massively

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 4>positive and not negative materials. And also our old favorite

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 4>of the tech sector, remember dance with the one that

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 4>brought you. So that's what's driving earnings higher. What has

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 4>not happened is that we haven't seen companies guide down.

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 4>We haven't heard a discussion about hire input costs, and

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 4>analysts have not put pen to paper yet because why

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 4>would you. An earning season is this week starting and

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:10.719
<v Speaker 4>the next three weeks we will know a lot. So

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:12.919
<v Speaker 4>I guess that's what we're looking at. We're really looking at.

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 4>You know, what are the sectors that are most exposed

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.600
<v Speaker 4>to higher input? Cause from the energy side, I'll say this,

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 4>the airlines are remarkable. And we have a merger possible

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 4>merger announcement this morning too, So.

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, stop the show. We go to aircraft carrier Lander

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:33.119
<v Speaker 2>lives at Newark. Paul Sweeney, are you kidding me? No way?

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:34.679
<v Speaker 5>I mean way the regulators.

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 3>So I asked Jen Rey, who's our you know, anti

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 3>trust analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence where the regulators ever allowed

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 3>that deal?

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 5>And she's like, no way.

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Can you can you get her run? Or are you

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:46.479
<v Speaker 2>going to steal it? We're working on it. He steals

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 2>our guest folks at ten am. It's flud. She's ruthless, scarletless,

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 2>absolutely ruthless. January is world class in this. On This

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:55.839
<v Speaker 2>Paul Sweeney with Alisia Levine.

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 5>At least before we got into this war.

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 3>Aspect to the market, that black Swan, one of the

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 3>bigger stories was just AI and how do I.

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 5>Play AI now?

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 3>Because it used to be I just buy the hyperscalers

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 3>and whoever spending the money, that's where I want to

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 3>own it. Now the market seems to be saying winners,

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 3>losers were not sure kind of buckets.

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 5>How do you guys think of it?

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 4>So I think you want to look at what was

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 4>working before the war, And interestingly, what was working before

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:23.679
<v Speaker 4>the war, about four or five months before was energy

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 4>because energy is powering this. So energy is a winner

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 4>from the war. Energy was a winner beforehand. So you

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 4>want to play build out. You want to play things

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 4>right because I think what we learned in the software

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 4>sector that there's some risk to the terminal value as

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 4>yet unknown what the discount should be. It looks like

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 4>the market is paying you to play right because the

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 4>discount and software has become so extreme. You've got names

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 4>down fifty percent. But ultimately, I think what you're playing

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 4>here is the hardware side, the scare city side, the

0:06:56.480 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 4>energy side, the commodity side, and the builds out. And

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 4>so we like industrials, we like energy, and we like

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 4>materials here because that's what you are going to need

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 4>for the build out. Now. The other thing if you

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 4>look at just memory, is that that was this was

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 4>a very sleepy area of the Semis that just exploded

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 4>in the last eight months because that also was scared.

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 5>Come from Michael.

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, others, What.

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Are your kids doing? Alicia Livin's kids are well behaved.

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 2>What are they doing with a AI? Do you have

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 2>like one problem child? It's totally all day in their

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 2>bedroom just killing AI.

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 4>No, but I wish I did. I wish I did.

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 2>It's like the future. I'm waiting for some of the

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 2>offspring to go. You know, well, I'm in anthropic this

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 2>you know stuff I don't understand.

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 5>Well, I mean, you talk to the kids. I mean,

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 5>it is their life. It's not something that they use,

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 5>it's just there.

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 4>It's part of the research process, it's part of their

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 4>process of learning, it's part of who they are.

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 2>One of my heroes is Kent, a husband who wrote

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 2>a book called Iceberg Risk. It's about you know, think

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 2>of the Titanic movie with Kate Winslet and the other guy.

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 2>They're on the tip of the bow looking at the icebergs.

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Except Ken opens a book with two statisticians. One of

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 2>them is as nerdy as Alicia Levine, and they're certain

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 2>they're not going to hit an iceberg because that's what

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 2>the distribution says. And buried in his book is heavyweight

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 2>binomial theorem on the xyz space the volatility matrix of

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 2>a given derivative instrument. Can AI help you when you

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 2>were at Chicago killing it?

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 5>Oh?

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 4>It helps all the time. It helps right now. We

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 4>all use AI at the bank, all of us use

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 4>it for everything, for daily, for everything.

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Forevery because I agree, my life would have been different.

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 4>It would have been very different, the way our lives

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 4>would have been different if we had, you know, technology

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 4>in our pocket in a way. I mean some of

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 4>us whose typewriters just going to say, just going to.

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Say, you know, they don't unlictit is too young, you

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 2>didn't know what to typewrite. It help me alsha with

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 2>the estimate forward on the standard of course, five hundred,

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 2>everybody's recapitulate and seven thousand plus. Can I make some

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 2>news today? Can we get to eight thousand?

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 4>Can we get to eighth? O? Look, we're in print

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 4>at seventy six hundred. Okay, three weeks ago when I

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 4>kept it at seventy six hundred, and we're still there.

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 4>It's Look, it's a midterm election year. Things get very volatile.

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 4>Since nineteen thirty eight, the pattern has never been broken.

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 4>As a historian, I'd have to say, if we just

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 4>get away with a seven to nine percent draw down,

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 4>I'll consider myself lucky. But we do see a rally

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 4>into the year. I would think that you really have

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 4>to pay attention to input costs here because right now

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 4>expectations are for the highest margins. Ever, not sure that's realistic.

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Alicia, Thank you so much. Alicia Levine, head of investment

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 2>strategy ban Why Wealth, thank her. Stay with us. More

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 2>from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch US Live

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>watch US Live on YouTube.

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.719
<v Speaker 2>Shannon O'Neill owns a high ground on a study of

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:27.559
<v Speaker 2>Latin America. She drives so much of the research capability

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 2>at the Consul on Foreign Relations. We're really honored she

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 2>could show up, given a war, given a geopolitics, Shannon,

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:39.679
<v Speaker 2>the output of CFR and Foreign Affairs Magazine is a

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 2>national treasure. Over the last what is it forty eight days? More? Yeah?

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 2>We up to five? Oh yet close close, you know,

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 2>whatever it is, Shannon, Michael O'Hanlon from Brooks in there,

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 2>the gentleman from King's College writing on warre them halfway

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 2>through the article, and on and on and on. Where's

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 2>the realist thought? Now? The heritage of Kissinger, the heritage

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 2>of Robert D. Kaplan, the heritage of Kindie Rice. Where's

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 2>realist foreign policy given this war?

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:16.359
<v Speaker 6>Well, the great thing about CFRs there's a lot of perspectives,

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 6>and we've got a great lineup of folks that look

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 6>at Iran and look at the Middle East more broadly.

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 6>But I think what we are seeing from lots of

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 6>those scholars is, you know, looking at this and this

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 6>is one of.

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 2>The most difficult situations.

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 6>And this is partly why the United States, for years

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:33.839
<v Speaker 6>there's been tensions with the Iranian regime, but nobody went

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 6>to war because it was such a pickle to get

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 6>out of. And we're seeing that. We're seeing that this

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 6>asymmetric warfare basically which United States has a long history with.

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 6>We're in that right now where they can shut down

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 6>the strait of our rooves with some drones, with some

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 6>fast foods. We have the most powerful navy in the world.

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Nate Swanson just publishing is a resident senior fellow. That

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 2>means he gets our coffee, gets sharing his coffee. Is

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 2>that means okay? You know, seriously, director for Iran, for

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 2>the National Security Council, I mean Nate Swanson publishing this morning,

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Shannon O'Neill, Trump is still underestimating Tehran's resolve. Full the

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 2>cultural aspects of Persia, the levant in America into the debate.

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 6>You know, I think it's right. You see, if you remember,

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 6>it seems like an eons ago, but just at the

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 6>start of this year you saw the Trump administration go

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 6>into Venezuela and remove the head of state there, set

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:30.839
<v Speaker 6>up a regime that's very friendly to the United States

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.559
<v Speaker 6>and has been exporting oil since then. And I think

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.439
<v Speaker 6>there probably was a little bit of a misperception that

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 6>Iran could be as easy, and just as you're saying, right,

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 6>there's a huge difference in terms of size, huge difference

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 6>in terms of culture, huge difference in terms of the

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 6>resolve of the regime and the ideological nature, which wasn't

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 6>the case. So I think there's a mismatch here which

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 6>has gotten us where we are today, Shannon.

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 3>At this stage, what would be a reasonable I guess

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 3>ceasefire agreement with Iran?

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 5>And do we have the right people negotiating this?

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 6>You know, it seems I think we may end up

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 6>in a space there's lots of different possibilities, but we

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 6>may end up in a space where we don't have

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 6>a war. We have some oil coming out, but we

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 6>don't really have oil either. We get into this freeze

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 6>where it's not a hot war. But it's hard for

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 6>me to see where we find real resolution here. So

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 6>a shaky cease fire, but also challenges for the rest

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 6>of the Middle East, right, because this isn't just now Iran.

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 6>This has to do with Lebanon, it has to do

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 6>with other parts of the Middle East, So it will

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 6>be I can imagine a scenario where we're not in

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 6>a hot war, but we continue to see these real

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 6>tensions and flare ups.

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 3>What are the next steps here? I mean, it seems like,

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, both sides are ratcheting up the rhetoric here.

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 3>Is there an argument that this is a really, really

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:54.679
<v Speaker 3>a pressure point for a Ran, that they do need

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 3>peace here in this region?

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:00.439
<v Speaker 6>You know, I think Iran has come out of this surprise. Well,

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 6>there's a great column this morning from Javier Blass in

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg that you know, I read it, I recommend everybody read.

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 6>But the idea here is in the end, they kind

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 6>of came out winning. Yes, they have had real challenges.

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 6>There have been you know, leaders killed and the like,

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 6>but they're selling more oil, they're making more money on

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 6>the international markets, and they've been able to consolidate control

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 6>in fun. I think the interesting thing here is while

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 6>it's the United States and Iran that are negotiating here,

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 6>the countries that have been hit hardest by this are

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 6>those in Asia, right in many of these countries in

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 6>the Philippines, and like they're really having a hard time

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 6>keeping the lights on because they are the countries that

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 6>took the oil, that took the natural gas and that

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 6>really took lots of the petrochemicals, the helium. You know,

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 6>Asian supply chains depend on a lot of what comes

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 6>out of the Middle East. So that is an area

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 6>of the world that is being hit hardest, even if

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 6>they're not right after negotiating.

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 2>What's to the headlines right now with doctor O'Neil, folks,

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is a telegraph in London. Love their work,

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 2>really really current, like t live for Bloomberg as well.

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 2>China East tanker sails through Armas despite Trump blockade, and

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 2>the trick is the tankers didn't go to Iranian ports.

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 2>And there's if I read the quick article, folks, there's

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 2>three tankers out there trying to slide by because they're

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 2>not out of Iranian ports. I mean, what is your

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 2>study of this, Shannon O'Neill. Of blockades, I mean, this

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 2>is not Aubrey and maderin you know, a Patrick O'Brien

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Napoleonic War novel. Russell Crawl's not out in the Persian

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 2>golf getting it done. How do blockades work, Shannon?

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 6>I mean, the US could blockade all the ships. The

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 6>question is geopolitically do they want to? I mean, as

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 6>you Remember there's a planned meeting between she and Trump

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 6>coming up in May, so just a month plus away.

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 6>And you know, do you want to stop oil that

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 6>China depends upon?

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 6>Trump doesn't want to see a pullback on the Chinese

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 6>side there, and so perhaps they're going to let ships

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 6>go through, not because they can't stop them, they could,

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 6>but for g political reasons. You also saw, speaking of blockades,

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 6>you saw the United States let a Russian tanker full

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 6>of oil get into Cuba just a couple of weeks ago.

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 6>So there is other reasons for the sort of geopolitical

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 6>lens why you might let ships through.

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Shenon At this stage, do you think a diplomatic breakthrough

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 3>is likely in the near term or are both sides

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 3>just so entrench that maybe not.

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 6>You know, they have said that they're going to go

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 6>back to the table and have conversations, but it's hard

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 6>for me to see what can be put on the

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 6>table between the two governments that really leads to an agreement.

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 6>I do think the Uuradians have been emboldened after what's

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 6>happened over these last forty eight days to state their case.

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 6>And for the Trump administration, while you know he often

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 6>declares victory on various things. It's hard to see what

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 6>the US could agree to. So I think a sort

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 6>of a ceasefire or a continuing freezing of the conflict

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 6>maybe where we end up for a while.

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Paul kind of do one Latin American question. Though Shannon's

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 2>people aren't angry at Shannon Cuba. I remember my parents

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 2>hiding the newspapers of the Cuban missile crisis. There's all

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 2>that baggage. Are we beyond America's baggage on Cuba?

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 7>No?

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 6>I think here, actually, the Trump administration in the United

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 6>States has has more leeway. This really is an area

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 6>where there's a deeper set of connections, and the Cuban

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 6>government right now is much more transactional than ideological, very

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:33.199
<v Speaker 6>different than the Iranian government. And so we do know

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 6>that there's conversations going on between some in the Cuban

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:38.919
<v Speaker 6>government and some in the Trump administration. You know, perhaps

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 6>there's a space there where you could find some sort

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 6>of of deal or some sort of of agreement between

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 6>the two. But you know, right now, I'm sitting in Miami,

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:50.640
<v Speaker 6>actually here down attending a conference, and obviously there's strong

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 6>feelings down here about the future of Cuba.

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 2>She's buying six thousand square feet and coral gables. Shannon Oni,

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 2>congratulations to mister Frohman, to Kurt's Falen and all Foreign

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Affairs magazine. You people are leading the debate. Shannon O'Neil

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 2>is with the Counsul on Foreign Relations. Stay with us.

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern. Listen on

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Apple Karplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:33.680
<v Speaker 1>or watch US live on YouTube.

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Adam Farstrup right now, is leading the pack in chart

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 2>and his set of charts in his research Don't Fall

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 2>is absolutely to die for. He has a killer scattered

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 2>dot chart here. That's a dark you know, it's like

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 2>the dots with a fed It's like little Polka dot.

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:55.199
<v Speaker 2>It looks like a Damien Hurst print. Falling growth doesn't

0:18:55.240 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 2>lower inflation expectations. Get his fabulous work from Schroeder where

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.880
<v Speaker 2>he has had a multi ascid. How do you put

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 2>the charts together? Do you do it yourself at two am?

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 8>Or do you have a team that helps We have

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:11.919
<v Speaker 8>an amazing team. So our economics team in London is

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:14.719
<v Speaker 8>the one that's really driven that scenario analysis you're looking for,

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:17.679
<v Speaker 8>looking at trying to help us understand what happens from

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 8>here with this degree of uncertainty.

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 2>The fact is the equity markets are walking away because

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 2>double digit earnings expectation. Do Schroders believe double digit earnings

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 2>will continue given a war?

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.120
<v Speaker 8>You know, it's the question we're debating this morning at

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 8>four am, not two am. But we actually think that

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 8>the earnings are pretty resilient from here, and we've been

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 8>saying we sound like a broken record. You have that right,

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:44.919
<v Speaker 8>and you think, surely the risk of recession potentially is

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 8>rising here. And I think it would be naive to

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 8>say it's not that chart that you're referencing. A stagflationary

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 8>risk scenario is really starting to come into frame.

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 2>But when you look at what's happening with the.

0:19:56.040 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 8>Earnings power in US equities today, we're seeing companies continuing

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 8>to maintain that optimism. They haven't cut their forecasts yet.

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.879
<v Speaker 8>Whether that's a degree of uncertainty or unwillingness to acknowledge

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 8>energy prices or not yet.

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we say ninety eight dollars a parallel.

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely, so Adam, here in the US, how do

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 3>you think about asset allocation, stocks.

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 5>Bonds, and commodities alternatives. I know, where are you guys

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 5>today versus maybe where you were at the beginning of

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 5>the year.

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 8>So where we are today is really starting to wonder

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 8>about the diversification pieces of our portfolio that have worked

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 8>to this point. So things like energy. Look at the

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 8>volatility that we've now had in the energy price. Can

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 8>any of us actually map out I'm not smart enough

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 8>anyways to figure out the spread between the future's market

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 8>and energy and the physical market and energy. So you

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 8>look at the data spread the data brent rather and

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 8>so from an allocation standpoint, we still like equities.

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 2>The question is do you start.

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 8>Moving back into government bonds for that downside protection as

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 8>recession risk starts to increase from here the valuations are

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 8>come back a little bit right now, so maybe that's

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 8>an attractive play.

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 5>And in US equities we had i think, starting late last.

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.199
<v Speaker 3>Year heading into this year of rotation out of what

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 3>had been kind of the higher multiple higher growth tech

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 3>names MAGS seven into some more cyclical kind of stories

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 3>even small to mid mid mid cap for that matter.

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 3>Was that a short term trade or is that something

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 3>we're still we should be still thinking about.

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:27.199
<v Speaker 8>I think there's some short term trades out of that.

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:29.199
<v Speaker 8>I think, particularly in the small cap market, we have

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:31.879
<v Speaker 8>yet to see really that durable earnings coming through in

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 8>the broad market, So you have to be very selective.

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 8>We think within small caps when you look at that

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 8>cyclical trade versus the more defensive trade, a lot of

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 8>that is going to hinge on. Do we get that

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 8>stagflationary outcome? Technology? I think still has legs to go

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 8>on it despite all of the disruptions. You were talking

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 8>about private credit. I mean, we're getting into private markets here.

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 8>But you know, when you look at Anthropic, they grew

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 8>from nine billion to thirty billion in revenue right over

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:03.439
<v Speaker 8>what was at nine or twelve months, and that was

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 8>limited by their access to compute.

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 2>Does all the earnings growth come from such a narrow

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 2>set of sections? My reading over the last seventy two

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 2>hours is everybody's revisiting this question. Like Paul, it's shocking

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 2>if you say, okay, there's ten percent earnings growth, where

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 2>are that growth's coming from?

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:28.679
<v Speaker 8>Discuss I mean, it is so interesting, Tom, because we

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 8>have seen this playing out and that concentration does continue

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 8>to drive the earnings premium in the US. And I'll

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 8>give a shout out back to Bloomberg and the brilliant

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 8>Odd Lots podcast from Saturday when they talked about the

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 8>difference between earnings and free cash flow and this paper

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 8>that's out from the FED, because that actually goes to

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 8>the heart of what you're talking about. Free cash flow

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 8>has been driven higher by the earnings of tech. Specifically,

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 8>if tech is becoming more capital intensive, what happens to

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 8>free cash flow goes down?

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Yep?

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 8>What does that mean for the US equity market? I

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 8>think this is what we're going to be wrestling with

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:07.360
<v Speaker 8>over the next thirty six months.

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Is it just issue bonds? Paul, come on, yeah, they could.

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 5>You're at Duke, it's.

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 2>Open, You're at Duke. It's an eighty degree yep. April afternoon.

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 2>Are you're doing Merton and Mediglia? Honey, No, I'm on

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 2>the golf. Just issue just issue bonds.

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:20.959
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, exactly, that's what.

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:25.400
<v Speaker 2>That's what. That's what's you know, Shiffman would.

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 5>Say, yeah, exactly, no problem there.

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 2>So all right, So.

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 3>We do have this higher energy complex out there it

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 3>seems like it's going to be higher for longer. What

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 3>does that mean for inflation? What does that mean for growth?

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:42.199
<v Speaker 3>Are you guys changing your outlook or changing your position

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 3>your portfolio?

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:47.639
<v Speaker 8>So I think the first thing to reiterate here is

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 8>this idea that none of us has certainty on what

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 8>path happens from here. It hinges on the next tweet.

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 8>And so this is where the scenario analysis really matters.

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 8>If you map in a scenario of one hundred and

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 8>fifty dollars barrel oil for a tracted period of time,

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 8>we see that putishing inflation higher by almost a percent

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 8>over time. When you think about the second order impacts, right,

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 8>because it's not just the energy price itself, and that's

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 8>where we think you actually have to spend your time. Now,

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 8>what happens to food prices, what happens to manufacturing input prices,

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 8>what happens to labor? With this uncertainty about AI.

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 2>But to go back to your academics and your great

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 2>work at first or over the years, I'm going to answer,

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 2>the corporations are incredibly malleable, and they have lots of

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 2>width to cut expenses if they have to. That's the

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 2>history of our lives. They cut with a vengeance when

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 2>they have to, that's right.

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 8>But what happens to demand destruction in that scenario when

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 8>we have all these questions about the labor market?

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 2>So what are you modeling GDP for it?

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 8>So you model an initial hit with no dynamic response

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 8>to GDP of about fifty basis points on GDP. But

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 8>this demand destruct action is the thing we now have

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 8>to answer because look at just we've had this discussion

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:08.880
<v Speaker 8>of airlines and saying, you know, we're resilient, we've got

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 8>hedges in through May. But what's happening in Europe right now?

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 8>Europe has have that got two weeks of jet fuel left?

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Right. I agree with you on this because I full disclosure, folks.

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 2>I got half my family on the phone to the

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 2>Pacific rim thank you mister Lazier T mobile and always

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 2>supporting him. I mean, this is not in the American

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 2>zeitgeist right now that they're running out of things. Yep,

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 2>that's right.

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:36.640
<v Speaker 8>So when you run out of things, right, it's almost

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.399
<v Speaker 8>our commodity team talks about like a reverse.

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 2>COVID situation, right, I haven't heard this. It's good.

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 8>So you think about we've ignored running out of things,

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 8>and that supply shock might be coming across the board. Rationing.

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 8>I mean, you're talking about gas stations in Australia not

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:56.120
<v Speaker 8>having diesel fuel right now.

0:25:57.000 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:01.679
<v Speaker 8>Manufacturing might not be open five days a week in

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:02.439
<v Speaker 8>parts of Asia.

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:06.679
<v Speaker 8>And the tankers, right, there's a great chart out there

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 8>the tankers that the last orders are actually coming through.

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 8>So we've had the physical supplies coming through and now

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 8>the tankers are running out.

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Adam, thank you so much. What a great brief.

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 2>And Forrester, whether this is schroeders to stay with us.

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us Live

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern. Listen on

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Apple Karplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Hermann Schan nailed krtosis, particularly the krtosis of the banking system.

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 2>We get an update this morning. Just an open question.

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:52.679
<v Speaker 2>We've been so busy here with the newshow, folks Futures

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Up eighteen. How did Citygroup do versus the larger Brethren?

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 7>City Group did great, probably the best of the three

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 7>that reported today, really strong results across all of its businesses, markets, wealth, services.

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 7>Really interestingly, their returns on Tanaba equity thirteen point five percent,

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 7>much higher than their ten to eleven percent they're targeting

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 7>for the year. So starting off the year greats. We'd

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 7>expect to hear more from management on expectations for returns

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 7>going forward.

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:24.200
<v Speaker 5>It's nice.

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the stock has doubled over the past twelve months.

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 3>It's the turnaround is there, which has been long, long,

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:35.360
<v Speaker 3>long way coming since a great financial crisis. Arguably, how

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 3>do you position or how does Citygroup position itself vis

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 3>a v JP Morgan, you know, Bank of America, even

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 3>the Goldens and the Morgan Stanleys of the world.

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 5>How does City position itself nowadays?

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 7>So, really strong areas in markets, particularly in rates trading,

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 7>really strong services business moving cast around for their corporate clients.

0:27:57.200 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 7>That's been the crown jewel for the longest time. They're

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 7>weaker in the US, specifically in consumer banking. They don't

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 7>have a really strong branch presence. So there was a

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 7>Bloomberg News article about a month ago saying that they

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:15.479
<v Speaker 7>might be interested in buying a large regional bank just

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:17.919
<v Speaker 7>to bolster their deposit presence, because.

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 5>Everywhere if you're in New York, yes.

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 7>They are not in sort of like your your areas

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 7>that you're a betther, they're not. So they've retreated and

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 7>gotten rid of a lot of their branches, which now

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 7>has been to the detriments.

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Do they have a Plano Texas? I mean, Paul's good question,

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean is what's coming is is Jane Fraser is

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 2>going to say, Okay, we need to migrate from New

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 2>York right somewhere else. Is that what's ahead?

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 7>What GP Morgan has shown And to your earlier question, Paul,

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 7>is that JP Morgan is growing their branches everywhere. You

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 7>can look in there and your shareholder letter that just

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 7>came out last week and they talked about Alabama of

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 7>all places, growing their branches. Saw the whole thing, right,

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 7>And so City Group just doesn't have that. They have

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 7>a very thin branch precedents that's really just focused on

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 7>the large country.

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 2>The heritage is John Reid in Riston, and it's international

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 2>banking Mexico. They got rid of it that right, is

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 2>that their future is to really lead on international banking.

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 7>Well, they're reducing their footprint internationally as well they're trying.

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 7>They only have about fifty one percent steak in their

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 7>Mexican business.

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Now I'm lost. Then what are they doing right?

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 7>So simplifying their businesses, focusing on returns and then potentially

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 7>growing the US deposit base.

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean again, a stock's doubled over the last year.

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 3>It's taken so so long. I mean, no, kid, it's

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 3>even for the great financial I sold my stock the

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 3>second I literally.

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 5>As I'm walking out the door, I'm so much.

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Can you do a shout out? Mike Mayo? He's been

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 2>long city Girl. When you back when he was fat,

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 2>before you get the before I did the weightlifting and

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 2>all that stuff. Back when he's a chubby old lad,

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 2>he was long City group. But finally it's paid off.

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 3>Especially so what's the takeaway from just today with the

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 3>big banks?

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's something good.

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 7>Business is great. I think the market's quibbling over some

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 7>net interesting income noise for JP Morgan that really, in

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 7>the grand scheme of things, doesn't really move the needle

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 7>for US. And then Weils Fargo had a bit of

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 7>a some margin compression, so there's going to be questions

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 7>about that on the call. But overall, everything looks really good.

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 2>How the regional's doing what you used to cover? Yeah,

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 2>it's still cover.

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 7>You had a real job of an emphasis. I guess

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 7>today regions are going to do great. Some of the

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 7>trends that we're talking about for the largest banks are

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 7>are happening for the region as well. Strong balance sheet growth,

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 7>particularly in commercial commercial lending. Your your core small business

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 7>borrower is coming back, and so that's been lifting results

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 7>for the regionals expect for this year margins are going

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 7>to be stable, and then you have a shareholder returns

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 7>in dividends and bibecks.

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 2>It's way too much Optimism's got it, Alicia levin her

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 2>can we get side? Can we get somebody in here?

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Gloomy credit in person in here? Something Tucker's coming in

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Herbert Chan, thank you, thank you, thank you so much. Seriously, folks,

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Mister Chan will be publishing today for Bloomberg Intelligence, and

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 2>that's a must read on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 1>weekday seven to ten am Easter and on Bloomberg dot com.

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>The iHeartRadio app tune in, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal