Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. The lockdowns are breaking down,
Speaker 1: but now they're saying that protests are actually spreading the virus.
Speaker 1: Plus the fight to open up schools. Gavin Newsom of
Speaker 1: California threatens to fire first responders unless he gets federal money.
Speaker 1: A judge in the Flint case doesn't care if the
Speaker 1: FBI three h two was lost. Another vaccine candidate shows
Speaker 1: promise and some updates on the Pencil Coola shooter. Here's
Speaker 1: a hint he was tied to al Kada. That's coming up.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show, where the mission or
Speaker 1: mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence.
Speaker 1: Make no mistake. Here a great American Again The Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show begins. The CIA analyst. Remember he's a great guy. No,
Speaker 1: welcome to Buck Sex and show everybody. I trust you
Speaker 1: had a good weekend. Able to relax a little bit,
Speaker 1: try to get ready for another week in this changed
Speaker 1: country we live in, but hopefully temporary, temporary if we
Speaker 1: keep our wits about us, if we understand that what
Speaker 1: is going on in the country is largely now unfortunately
Speaker 1: of our own making, that this was a decision, that
Speaker 1: this was not a necessity we did not have to
Speaker 1: go into a depression, and that the data does not
Speaker 1: support at this point the continuation. Let's put aside from
Speaker 1: moment whether we should have done this at all. The
Speaker 1: data increasingly looks like it does not even support that
Speaker 1: we should. Well, we should have done in the past,
Speaker 1: but we also should certainly not continue this any longer
Speaker 1: into the future. This has gotten completely and utterly out
Speaker 1: of control, all right, And of course absolute and maximum
Speaker 1: control is the purpose behind it. It's out of our control.
Speaker 1: It's in the hands of the government, of our overseers,
Speaker 1: of the bureaucratic overlords that now get to determine whether
Speaker 1: you can leave your house, whether you can open your business,
Speaker 1: do your job. They know. The CUOMO briefing now in
Speaker 1: New York, for example, is all right today another day,
Speaker 1: numbers down, good, okay, Next slide numbers down good okay.
Speaker 1: Now everyone, I'm going to repeat everything I've already said.
Speaker 1: What do I mean by that? What I mean is
Speaker 1: that repetition is when you've said something and you say
Speaker 1: it again for clarity, or perhaps because you have already
Speaker 1: said it and you don't know what else to say.
Speaker 1: You know, these are the things that you're hearing from
Speaker 1: from Governor Cuomo, who has I think a lot to
Speaker 1: answer for. In New York, you're also seeing the fight
Speaker 1: over budgets, over federal money. I mean, all this is
Speaker 1: going to continue to play out. So before we can
Speaker 1: even really deal with a lot of the problems that
Speaker 1: we are seeing, the first step is going to be
Speaker 1: letting us out of our gosh darn houses for more
Speaker 1: than just the essential needs. It is time for us
Speaker 1: to go outside, you know, here in the city. I mean,
Speaker 1: I can't speak to what it's like elsewhere across the
Speaker 1: country right now. I can't speak to what you're seeing
Speaker 1: in in your town or your city. But in New York,
Speaker 1: I will say, over the weekend, I was out, I
Speaker 1: was walking. I do not wear a mask in open air.
Speaker 1: I don't do this to be defiant. I just refuse
Speaker 1: to cave to this bizarre insistence, despite the lack of
Speaker 1: evidence for it, that wearing a mask makes you safer,
Speaker 1: that wearing a mask makes you better in open air,
Speaker 1: in public indoors. I will say, there's a major CDC
Speaker 1: study about influenza, so maybe you could say, well, this
Speaker 1: is so different from influenza. Although nobody would really be
Speaker 1: able to explain to you that's the case. In terms
Speaker 1: of transmission. Maybe it's a bit more transmissible, but the
Speaker 1: similar mechanism. Certainly, there is that CDC study that said
Speaker 1: they're not even really sure that masks do all that
Speaker 1: much from influenza. I mean, I think a part of
Speaker 1: it would be if the virus can get inside either
Speaker 1: through your you know, it's able to either get behind
Speaker 1: the mask if it's aerosol eyes, or if you touch
Speaker 1: your face even with a mask, it's then able to
Speaker 1: get in, or perhaps it goes I would assume it's
Speaker 1: possible that you can get the virus in your eye,
Speaker 1: which means that if there are a cloud particles unless
Speaker 1: you're wearing I mean, if there are particles of it
Speaker 1: in a cloud, you would think then you could get
Speaker 1: it without unless you had goggles on. Anyway, I don't
Speaker 1: wear a mask out in public for those for those reasons,
Speaker 1: and people look at you strangely. Here. Now this has
Speaker 1: become a very explicitly political decision, and it's really also
Speaker 1: a virtue signaling exhibition. Now it's like, if you wear
Speaker 1: a mask, your showing everybody that you're a good person.
Speaker 1: If you were a mask. You're showing everybody that you
Speaker 1: care about the next person. And here is a woman
Speaker 1: on social media. I don't know who she is, but
Speaker 1: this one viral over the weekend and there's all this
Speaker 1: talk of Karen Karen is Pruiser Marcus. Karen is a
Speaker 1: is a kind of prototypical upper middle class white woman
Speaker 1: from the suburbs who wants to tattle on everybody. Is
Speaker 1: that Is that a fair description of what a quote
Speaker 1: Karen is. Yeah? And she has the I want to
Speaker 1: talk to your manager look on her face. Yeah, right right,
Speaker 1: she always wants to talk to your manager. Here is
Speaker 1: a woman named Rebecca Brand who was videotaping herself horrified
Speaker 1: there were people on a beautiful sunny day at the beach,
Speaker 1: in open air, not dressed like they're in you know,
Speaker 1: not in hazmat suits. Play clip one. Oh my god,
Speaker 1: not one person with a mask on. Everybody is here
Speaker 1: and nobody Yeah, oh my god, look at all those people.
Speaker 1: There's like twenty what their heck? What are we doing?
Speaker 1: Entire people? Hi, I'm Rebecca Brand and I'm flipping out.
Speaker 1: Because Governor Knewsom announced it this friday, we are no
Speaker 1: longer going to be on total lockdown. We're opening back up.
Speaker 1: I'm flipping out because people haven't been wearing masks and
Speaker 1: this is going to be even more loosey goosey than
Speaker 1: ever before. I think it's all going to go downhill
Speaker 1: from this point on, as people start mingling more, doing more,
Speaker 1: getting on the street, buying more. All of that, as
Speaker 1: you know, is opening up for the COVID nineteen to
Speaker 1: take over in that coronavirus, to just decimate our towns
Speaker 1: wherever we live. And with people not wearing masks, I
Speaker 1: am no longer protected from their sneeze, their cough, they're
Speaker 1: spewing because they're talking loud to me because they're still
Speaker 1: happy to see me. Gosh, we better just wear masks forever.
Speaker 1: Oh gosh, Yeah, all those people, I'm no longer protected.
Speaker 1: You're in an open air. The chance of you receiving
Speaker 1: enough viral load on a beach near Sault Water with
Speaker 1: the blasting sunlight, somebody would have to be effectively spitting
Speaker 1: in your face, based on all the science based and
Speaker 1: everything that we've seen, all the studies that have done
Speaker 1: highly highly unlikely. But this is the attitude you're going
Speaker 1: to have. No, we have to break people of this attitude.
Speaker 1: This is what has to happen. We have to break people.
Speaker 1: You must do what I say because you no longer
Speaker 1: have freedom based on my fear. Fear does not get
Speaker 1: to eradicate freedom. This is what There's a lot of
Speaker 1: people in this country that have to learn this lesson.
Speaker 1: You don't get to say, well, I'm concerned. I have
Speaker 1: an irrational, even unscientific concern about the spread of this disease,
Speaker 1: and therefore you will do what I say because I'm
Speaker 1: so scared. And the people in charge are too cowardly
Speaker 1: and too reckless to accept that. They've made terrible decisions
Speaker 1: along the way, and now what they really need to
Speaker 1: do is take on the mantle of the restoration of
Speaker 1: freedom that needs to happen in this country. They won't
Speaker 1: do that because that comes with risk, and as we know, politicians,
Speaker 1: they don't like risk. Politicians don't want the possibility of
Speaker 1: being told that they're letting people die. They also don't
Speaker 1: want to seed power. They don't want to hand back
Speaker 1: to us the authority that they have taken for themselves.
Speaker 1: And I would just tell you, my friends, and let's
Speaker 1: never forget this. The biggest lesson in this mess. The
Speaker 1: biggest lesson of all is never willingly hand over all
Speaker 1: your rights and freedom to government. Government is not your friend.
Speaker 1: As you know, government is not going to keep you
Speaker 1: safe and warm at night. But if you meekly obey,
Speaker 1: it will allow halfwits to force a depression and lock
Speaker 1: you in your house. And that's where we are now,
Speaker 1: that's what we have been suffering through. Someone explained to me,
Speaker 1: why is it the case that in Europe, including in
Speaker 1: countries that have a much higher per hap at a
Speaker 1: death rate than we do in Europe, you have countries
Speaker 1: that are opening up cafes, restaurants, and schools, whole countries,
Speaker 1: and yet we still have here in New York City.
Speaker 1: Oh no, you can't go into a coffee shop, you
Speaker 1: can't open a retail store, you can't do these things. California,
Speaker 1: which has been very moderate in the cases that it
Speaker 1: has had, right, it has a moderate level. It has
Speaker 1: not had a true crushing epidemic, and it's very fortunate
Speaker 1: in that regard. California is now saying they're going to
Speaker 1: be locked down to what July maybe August. The economic
Speaker 1: devastation from all this is going to be mind blowing.
Speaker 1: When we finally understand it, and the trillions of dollars
Speaker 1: that are at stake mean the politicians, like little piggies
Speaker 1: at the trough, are all trying to make sure that
Speaker 1: they get not just their share, more than their share
Speaker 1: because it benefits them to do so, and all the
Speaker 1: while they have these people yelling, we need more tests,
Speaker 1: we need more testing. That's what the lockdowners yell problem is.
Speaker 1: We already have, even here in New York City, a
Speaker 1: dramatic overcapacity for testing. We're only using about a third
Speaker 1: of the testing capacity that we currently have. One third,
Speaker 1: and you know what we're being told, now, go get
Speaker 1: more tests. People don't want to get more tests. I
Speaker 1: don't want to show up and get a swab in
Speaker 1: my nose for no reason I have no symptoms unless
Speaker 1: I have a reason to do this, if I'm going
Speaker 1: to be around people that are particularly at high risk,
Speaker 1: or if there's some And how often am I supposed
Speaker 1: to do this? I could get a swab and be
Speaker 1: infected tomorrow and be contagious in four days. So how
Speaker 1: much how much asymptomatic testing are they really expecting we do?
Speaker 1: They haven't thought this one through, they haven't worked it
Speaker 1: out yet but once again obey the expert's hysteria drowns
Speaker 1: out the obvious reality here that everybody can see. But
Speaker 1: that's not going to stop them. Are my friends out
Speaker 1: in KiB Los Angeles Land? Here is what Gavin Newsom
Speaker 1: is saying about schools in your state. Play eleven. President
Speaker 1: Trump is vound that quote schools are going to be open?
Speaker 1: Is he right? We'll school schools in California be open
Speaker 1: this fall. I think some schools will not be. Many
Speaker 1: schools will be. And it's all conditioned on our ability
Speaker 1: to not only keep our children safe, but to keep
Speaker 1: staff and faculty stafe, to seek the community safe. So
Speaker 1: it's all predicated on data, on science, not just observed evidence.
Speaker 1: The reality on the ground. Each part of California is
Speaker 1: unique and distinctive eatregion, each region of the United States
Speaker 1: is unique and distinctive, and certain conditions will present themselves favorably,
Speaker 1: some unfavorably. So I think it's a it's a question
Speaker 1: that is a difficult one to answer in absolute terms.
Speaker 1: There's nuance, but we are moving forward in hope and
Speaker 1: expectation that we can start that school year very strategically
Speaker 1: and methodically, again based upon the health as a prime
Speaker 1: frame of reference in terms of dust decisions. Man, a
Speaker 1: lot of smooth talking blah badey blah from that guy,
Speaker 1: blat of talking around in circles. Here's what the answer
Speaker 1: should be. Children are at almost zero risk from this disease,
Speaker 1: and children are very unlikely to be vectors passing it
Speaker 1: to adults. Not impossible, but very unlikely. Again based on
Speaker 1: now we have studies. Now we have additional data and science.
Speaker 1: When all these decisions were made two months ago, it
Speaker 1: was projections, it was fear. It was oh my god,
Speaker 1: look at what happening. What's happening in Italy, and look
Speaker 1: what's going to happen here? And we were told that
Speaker 1: the storm was coming. Battened down the hatches. Do what
Speaker 1: we say, Yeah, we'll do that for a few days,
Speaker 1: maybe a few weeks. We're not going to do it
Speaker 1: for months. It's time for mass non compliance. I'll get
Speaker 1: more into that later on, but people should refuse some
Speaker 1: of these stupid orders. I'm happy to see this gym
Speaker 1: owner in New Jersey who's saying, no, I'm going to
Speaker 1: open up my gym. Okay, people can go to the gym.
Speaker 1: You know what can happen if you go to the gym,
Speaker 1: even in pre pandemic times, you can get mersa. It
Speaker 1: has happened before. You can get antibiotic resistant bacteria from
Speaker 1: working out of the gym. It has happened to people,
Speaker 1: and that's really nasty and it can kill you. But
Speaker 1: you know what, you hope that your gym is relatively
Speaker 1: clean and you take your chances. You also can get
Speaker 1: a blood clot in the in the brain orether and
Speaker 1: die on the treadmill or lifting weights. That can happen.
Speaker 1: You don't sit around worrying about it. It's all about
Speaker 1: what is acceptable risk and adults can have Adults in
Speaker 1: good faith and with good judgment can have those kinds
Speaker 1: of conversations. People that think the government can protect them
Speaker 1: from all risk and will guarantee them that they all
Speaker 1: get to live, you know, seventy six years or whatever
Speaker 1: the average life expectancy is. Why. I know it's different
Speaker 1: for males and females, etc. But you know, we all
Speaker 1: get to make it to Haiti, the government says, or
Speaker 1: make it beyond at whatever it is. That's not something
Speaker 1: the government can do and it never will be able to.
Speaker 1: So we need to move away from this, we have
Speaker 1: had a failure of philosophy here, and it is that
Speaker 1: the government is here to protect you from all risk,
Speaker 1: including unreasonable expectations of security you should have. You should
Speaker 1: have a reasonable expectation that the government will do some
Speaker 1: stuff to help you out, you know, protect us from
Speaker 1: invasion by foreign country, will execute the laws faithfully, law
Speaker 1: enforcement will show up if someone's attacking you or breaking
Speaker 1: into your house, although you still want to be armed
Speaker 1: and be able to take care of it yourself if
Speaker 1: you can. But all of these things, minimal expectation is
Speaker 1: what you should have from the government, not that it
Speaker 1: will protect you all the time. And I'm just happy
Speaker 1: to see that over the weekend you had people who
Speaker 1: were out at least here. And this is the worst
Speaker 1: place for COVID nineteen response in that we've had the
Speaker 1: highest number of deaths, the most number, the most cases,
Speaker 1: and this place is as blue and left wing and
Speaker 1: statist and progressive as any place you'd find anywhere in
Speaker 1: the country really, so we've had it very tough in
Speaker 1: that regard. But as we look now at what's happening,
Speaker 1: people just they're they're done. If it's beautiful outside, the
Speaker 1: weather's warm. They want to live their lives. People want
Speaker 1: to take risks. If you don't want to go outside,
Speaker 1: don't go outside. But don't tell people that they can't
Speaker 1: go outside either, even if you're staying inside because you're
Speaker 1: so scared of what would happen if they go outside. No, No,
Speaker 1: that's not a country that we can live and that's
Speaker 1: not a free country. So you ask yourself, is America
Speaker 1: free country? Another little thing? I thought this was a
Speaker 1: free country. When you want to get a little huffy
Speaker 1: about being able to do something or say something, that's
Speaker 1: a question that we should ask now, and it's one
Speaker 1: that doesn't have an easy answer. Because the imbeciles who
Speaker 1: have been telling us all along to just do as
Speaker 1: they say and will all be safe, they weren't telling
Speaker 1: you the truth. They don't know what they're talking about.
Speaker 1: They're not keeping you safe, and they're doing incalculable damage
Speaker 1: to the economy, to our ways of life. These are
Speaker 1: months that we'll never get back. Remember that, too, These
Speaker 1: are months will never get back. Time is the one
Speaker 1: commodity you can never get more of. The Government's just
Speaker 1: stealing it from you like you're a prisoner. That's what
Speaker 1: they do. People who break the law, they take their time,
Speaker 1: they take time away from them. That's what's happening here.
Speaker 1: I say, we take it back. You're in the Freedom Hend.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. The mortality for
Speaker 1: children zero to eighteen is virtually zero. It's not exactly zero,
Speaker 1: but it's close to zero. It's point zero zero zero
Speaker 1: one percent. It's very very small. And this virus is
Speaker 1: very deadly for the elderly and for those who were
Speaker 1: in nursing homes, but it actually is not deadly at
Speaker 1: all for those who are young. And we should get
Speaker 1: them back to school, and we should have a debate
Speaker 1: over this. Look, this is so bad that I know
Speaker 1: people in my state that are going to send their
Speaker 1: kids to grandparents in other states because our idiot governor
Speaker 1: doesn't want to open the schools. That's what's going to
Speaker 1: happen is ultimately people are going to move to venues,
Speaker 1: or send kids or even buy you rent an apartment
Speaker 1: in an a state that does not have a draconian
Speaker 1: shut down of the schools. That's what this is going
Speaker 1: to come to. He's right, and unfortunately it should come
Speaker 1: to that. I mean, the truth is that if you're
Speaker 1: in a state with a governor who is effectively being
Speaker 1: a moron by thinking that kids are at an unacceptable
Speaker 1: risk from COVID nineteen. They're just not children should be
Speaker 1: allowed to go back to school. We are taking from
Speaker 1: kids on behalf of well, I mean the political system
Speaker 1: really at this point, it's just this has all gotten
Speaker 1: so political. And you have the average age of teachers
Speaker 1: in the United States, according to the Department of Education
Speaker 1: is forty two, So you've got fifteen percent of teachers
Speaker 1: are less than thirty years old. Here. If you're less
Speaker 1: than thirty years old, your risk from this. So I
Speaker 1: know that's only you know, that's less than one and five,
Speaker 1: but that's a fair number. Maybe we have to have
Speaker 1: bigger classroom size, Maybe we have to find a way
Speaker 1: to you know, if you're a teacher over fifty or
Speaker 1: over sixty, I can understand why you have your concerns
Speaker 1: about this one going back in the classroom because of COVID.
Speaker 1: But if you're under fifty, what we're gonna now say
Speaker 1: you can't come in. People have been through flu seasons,
Speaker 1: I mean kids. All the teachers I know say that kids,
Speaker 1: you come in with a lot of stuff that you
Speaker 1: gotta a lot, a lot of coughs and colds and
Speaker 1: sneezes and measles, and you know, all kinds of things.
Speaker 1: So what are we going to do with our school system.
Speaker 1: We're gonna keep it shut down? No, of course not.
Speaker 1: The school should be open. And anybody who's saying otherwise
Speaker 1: just isn't looking at the data. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. I
Speaker 1: just want to make something clear, it's very important. Vaccine
Speaker 1: or no vaccine, we're back and we're arending the process.
Speaker 1: And in many cases they don't have vaccines. An a
Speaker 1: virus or flu comes and you fight through it. We
Speaker 1: haven't seen anything like this in one hundred and some
Speaker 1: odd years nineteen seventeen. But you fight through it and
Speaker 1: people sometimes I guess we don't know exactly yet, but
Speaker 1: it looks like they become immune or at least for
Speaker 1: a short while and maybe for life. But you fight
Speaker 1: through it. But what we'd like to do if we
Speaker 1: can as a vaccine. I think we're going to be
Speaker 1: successful in doing it, and hopefully by the end of
Speaker 1: the year, fight through it. We're back vaccine or no.
Speaker 1: The President is right. This is what we need to do.
Speaker 1: This is what our mindset needs to become. Otherwise we're
Speaker 1: just allowing ourselves to We're destroying ourselves. We're destroying ourselves
Speaker 1: as a country, as a society. Wait wait for a vaccine?
Speaker 1: How long do you think you're gonna wait? What happens
Speaker 1: if the trials are correct? Now, Look, there's I like
Speaker 1: any positive news that I can give you. Positive news
Speaker 1: is something that we should be thankful for and we
Speaker 1: should share it, always with the caveat of you know,
Speaker 1: if something's not yet decided or done, well fine. But
Speaker 1: for example, Moderno, a big pharmaceutical company, just said and
Speaker 1: they had a big rally in their stock. So if
Speaker 1: your own Moderna, lucky you. Twenty six percent went up
Speaker 1: after reporting a positive phase one result for a potential
Speaker 1: coronavirus vaccine. That's after two doses of its vaccine. All
Speaker 1: forty five participants in a trial when they check them out,
Speaker 1: all those forty five participants had coronavirus antibodies. If antibodies
Speaker 1: don't work against this, it would be bizarre. Right. The
Speaker 1: problem with flu is that you get new strains of
Speaker 1: flu every season. But and people would say, well, look
Speaker 1: at cold viruses, you don't have total immunity to those. Well, yeah,
Speaker 1: because there's so many different kinds of colds out there.
Speaker 1: But this COVID nineteen, specifically this corona virus stars COVE two,
Speaker 1: as it is referred to by the scientific community, if
Speaker 1: you have antibodies to this, the mutation of it, the
Speaker 1: different strains of it, are overwhelmingly likely to be less
Speaker 1: dangerous and less lethal. Though that's not a promise, that's
Speaker 1: not a guarantee. But so if you if you are
Speaker 1: safe from this, chances are you're going to be in
Speaker 1: a position to not have to worry about this at all, right,
Speaker 1: I mean meaning if you're safe from it now, at
Speaker 1: least by the time we figure out what's really going
Speaker 1: on here and we have the vaccine trials and it
Speaker 1: goes through, maybe then this will be this will be passed.
Speaker 1: I mean. They also don't really understand entirely how it
Speaker 1: is that some of these viruses just go away, which
Speaker 1: happens over time. Not all viruses just go away. They
Speaker 1: can live in human populations and come back, but some
Speaker 1: viruses do just so we don't know there's so many
Speaker 1: unknowns here, but MODERNA had a good a good phase
Speaker 1: one trial Phase one results, So there you go. So
Speaker 1: it shows that it at least can do something against
Speaker 1: this disease. So that's some good news. Now we have
Speaker 1: to convince other parts of the country that this has
Speaker 1: to happen. This has to be a moment in time
Speaker 1: where we recognize that the left has a very big
Speaker 1: incentive here because of the minimization of the possible blowback
Speaker 1: on any governors in Democrats states. I also remember, and
Speaker 1: people don't spend a lot of time on this now,
Speaker 1: but I remember how there were a lot of left
Speaker 1: wing pundits who were initially telling us that the red
Speaker 1: States and the redder parts of the country this was
Speaker 1: this was out there, you can find this online. The
Speaker 1: red parts of the country. There'll be a lot of
Speaker 1: death in the red parts of the country because they
Speaker 1: don't believe in science and they don't believe. It was
Speaker 1: a horrible thing to say, a vicious, stupid, and as
Speaker 1: we now see, also incorrect thing to say. It is
Speaker 1: the cities and it is the blue states that have
Speaker 1: been hit the worst by this. In fact, some of
Speaker 1: the bluest parts of the country are in fact the
Speaker 1: worst hit parts of the entire country. And so now
Speaker 1: those states, those governors want maximum protection from political blow
Speaker 1: blowback from reopening, want to make sure they maintain I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm walking through their mindset, right, we understand what's going
Speaker 1: on here. They want to maintain their ability to blame
Speaker 1: Trump for this right that they want to make sure that,
Speaker 1: to the degree they can, the economy stays in this
Speaker 1: frozen state for as long as possible, because it is
Speaker 1: more likely than you'll have a Democrat wave election, not
Speaker 1: just for the president, but also for the Senate in
Speaker 1: the fall. They're having dreams of Obama's first year in
Speaker 1: office again when they had the House, the Senate, and
Speaker 1: the presidency. So that's a part of this. They want
Speaker 1: to squeeze as much money out of the federal government
Speaker 1: as they possibly can. And that's also where Pelosi comes
Speaker 1: in here with what everyone is just saying is a
Speaker 1: shockingly unserious. So she's of course they're calling it the
Speaker 1: Heroes bill. I mean, they might as well call it
Speaker 1: the you know, unicorns fairy tales and you know, magic
Speaker 1: rainbows and pots of gold bill. But this is those
Speaker 1: are all the different factors and that's why we need
Speaker 1: to look at what's really happening now with the coronavirus
Speaker 1: bailout bill. For I mean, it's any whether you call
Speaker 1: it a bailout, you call it a rescue package, you
Speaker 1: call it a stimulus. Here for example, is that Well,
Speaker 1: let's start with what they are saying about this. First.
Speaker 1: Pelosi wants to focus on how the CDC was cut
Speaker 1: in Trump's budget. I had to deal with this on
Speaker 1: the bill, Marshall. Trump doesn't set the budget. The CDC
Speaker 1: did not get a big budget cut, all right, So
Speaker 1: I don't know why, I mean, she focuses on this.
Speaker 1: This is a distraction, This is a red herring. Pelosi
Speaker 1: specializes in that though play thirteen, did the CDC let
Speaker 1: the American people down? Well, CDC was grossly cut in
Speaker 1: the president's budget. But setting aside how we got here,
Speaker 1: let's talk about how we go forward. It is important
Speaker 1: for us the American people want the economy to open up.
Speaker 1: We all do. We want our society to open up.
Speaker 1: We all do. And in order to do that, we
Speaker 1: have testing, tracing, treatment, and isolation. And that is the path.
Speaker 1: It's what the scientists advise, that is what we do.
Speaker 1: In the Heroes Act. She's just just going to keep
Speaker 1: saying this, This is not an answer, test, trace treat isolate.
Speaker 1: Guess what, Nancy, fifty percent of people at least are asymptomatic.
Speaker 1: How are you going to get them all to be tested.
Speaker 1: They're spreading the disease all over the place. What we're
Speaker 1: seeing is the government tried to prevent, or to try
Speaker 1: to save us from the process of achieving her immunity.
Speaker 1: And we're going to end up moving toward her immunity
Speaker 1: as a society anyway, just with massive economic damage and
Speaker 1: the erasing of freedom that we have seen happening here right,
Speaker 1: the seizure of your basic rights. But we're still heading
Speaker 1: toward a percentage. You know, once we get forty fifty
Speaker 1: percent of the population to have been exposed to this
Speaker 1: and have antibodies. Now you're talking about getting close to
Speaker 1: a herd immunity level. I mean true herd immunity, I
Speaker 1: think depends on the virus and how fast it's, how
Speaker 1: much it spreads, how fast it spreads, But it can
Speaker 1: be much higher than that eighty nine percent of the
Speaker 1: population I think for measles, because that's that's so contagious
Speaker 1: that I've never even heard anyone explain why it can
Speaker 1: be so much more contagious than other diseases. But you
Speaker 1: have to have a very very high level of infection
Speaker 1: and antibodies or antibodies to what I should say, for
Speaker 1: people to have herd immunity. But Pelosi here with notice
Speaker 1: that she dodges in the CDC because the CDC is
Speaker 1: part of the permanent bureaucracy, as part of that unaccountable
Speaker 1: tier of government that has far too much authority in
Speaker 1: our lives. But unfortunately, as we see, we have to
Speaker 1: rely on it sometimes and we're being told that test
Speaker 1: trace isolate, test trace treat isolate. That was Pelosi's cute
Speaker 1: little phrase, that that is what we need to do here.
Speaker 1: Just remember that in the early days of this the
Speaker 1: CDC was not able to get a test out in
Speaker 1: time so that we could have gone ahead of this thing.
Speaker 1: People keep saying we should do what South Korea did. No, No,
Speaker 1: you would need to You need to stop test trace
Speaker 1: isolate as soon as you're getting cases. We've had cases
Speaker 1: since January at least, you think showing the CDC taking
Speaker 1: an extra four weeks or whatever it was to turn
Speaker 1: around a test that actually works, and that's starting in
Speaker 1: what February March. That's going to be Okay, this is it.
Speaker 1: It's outrageous. These people don't know what they're doing. They
Speaker 1: don't have the answers, and we should not subject ourselves
Speaker 1: to living in the in the bizarre fantasy land that
Speaker 1: they create, where if only we had listened to them,
Speaker 1: or listen to the experts more, everything would be so
Speaker 1: much better off. It's just it's wrong. M We have
Speaker 1: John Kennedy, Congressman Kennedy saying the three on the three
Speaker 1: trillion dollars virus package. You you want to hear about this?
Speaker 1: Play play clip nine. It's three trillion dollars for one thing,
Speaker 1: every penny of which we would have to borrow. That's
Speaker 1: three zero zero zero zero zero zero zero zero zero
Speaker 1: zero zero zero dollars. It's not going to pass the Senate,
Speaker 1: nor should it. My fellow Republicans in the Senate have
Speaker 1: tried to see things from the speaker's point of view,
Speaker 1: but we can't get our heads that far up. Our
Speaker 1: rear ends. And I think any fair minded American would
Speaker 1: agree once they read the bill, Senator Kennedy of Louisiana,
Speaker 1: there is a. He is colorful in his speech, that
Speaker 1: is for sure. But this is this is now going
Speaker 1: to turn into another one of these fights, and and
Speaker 1: Pelosi is going to do everything that she can to
Speaker 1: make sure that the media has an opportunity to bash
Speaker 1: Republicans for being hartless and cruel, when what we really
Speaker 1: see happening is Democrats are going to use this. They're
Speaker 1: going to exploit this moment in time for their own purposes.
Speaker 1: They're going to exploit this opportunity to try to get
Speaker 1: things they would not normally be able to get through
Speaker 1: the legislative process by holding people up. I mean, Gavin Newsom.
Speaker 1: Here's a perfect example. There is an old, an old
Speaker 1: ploy in politics. They call it fireman first, right, and
Speaker 1: fireman first means that whenever somebody and usually this applies
Speaker 1: more in cities, sometimes state level, but you know, cities
Speaker 1: or towns, whenever someone threatens to cut the budget, they
Speaker 1: just say, oh, well, I guess we're gonna have to
Speaker 1: shut down on all the firehouses, you know, no more,
Speaker 1: no more pay for firemen. And you say, well, hold
Speaker 1: on a second, what about the you know, one hundred
Speaker 1: million dollars we're spending on you know, bloated pensions for
Speaker 1: former government workers. What about the money we're spending on
Speaker 1: on you know, administrators who don't really do anything, and
Speaker 1: you know, there's always so much fat in the government.
Speaker 1: But the moment that you try to trim that fat,
Speaker 1: what you're told is that everybody, everybody's an essential worker,
Speaker 1: everybody's a fireman, everybody has a job that you know
Speaker 1: if you will. First they just say firemen and police
Speaker 1: because we know they are essential. So that's what the
Speaker 1: that's their favorite move, right, and then if that gets
Speaker 1: pushed back, they'll say, oh, well, no, we can't get
Speaker 1: rid of that person. But the first level is always
Speaker 1: if you try to touch our budget, there's gonna it's
Speaker 1: gonna turn into the Purge for those of you who've
Speaker 1: seen that movie, because we're gonna let all the cops go,
Speaker 1: or or your house will burn down because there'll be
Speaker 1: no there'll be no fireman because we're gonna let all
Speaker 1: the fireman go, and everyone says, whoa hold on, Maybe
Speaker 1: we can't cut the buddy. See, this is the classic
Speaker 1: move that they pull, and you're going to see it
Speaker 1: in this bill. Congressman Crenshaw Dan Crenshaw from Texas talked
Speaker 1: about the Heroes Act. This is this is what he said,
Speaker 1: played twenty Today's theatrics are shocking. Thirty million jobs, thirty
Speaker 1: five million jobs lost, businesses and livelihoods ruined. And while
Speaker 1: American grosser's nurses and workers kept America going, Democrats kept
Speaker 1: Congress in hiding for the past three weeks. Hiding is fear.
Speaker 1: It is not leadership. And when we finally reconvene, we
Speaker 1: get this. Politico summed it up best. Neither this bill
Speaker 1: nor anything resembling it will ever become law. It's a
Speaker 1: Democrat wish list filled up with all the party's favorite policies.
Speaker 1: Is this a joe, because it certainly isn't based on reality.
Speaker 1: Reality would be working here for the last three weeks,
Speaker 1: examining each problem our nation faces and working together to
Speaker 1: find the best solutions. That shouldn't be all that difficult,
Speaker 1: since I would press zoom. We still have the same
Speaker 1: goals mitigate the virus and save our economy and society. Right,
Speaker 1: That is still our goal, isn't it? If it is,
Speaker 1: then stop playing games. Three trillion dollars of virtue signaling
Speaker 1: to your base is no way to govern in the
Speaker 1: midst of a crisis, and you know it fire from
Speaker 1: a Congressman Cranshaw, that's what I like to hear. Obviously
Speaker 1: a rising star in the Republican Party, and he knows
Speaker 1: what's going on here. Remember Nancy Pelosi when people were
Speaker 1: truly desperate because there there were no federal funds yet
Speaker 1: approved to go to those folks who lost their jobs
Speaker 1: and their businesses are shut down because the government dictated
Speaker 1: they must be. Pelosi wanted to play games then. Oh,
Speaker 1: but now she cares so much about people. M I
Speaker 1: don't think so. You're in the freedom hunt. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show podcast. No, I'm not crazy about
Speaker 1: Democrats are not crazy about it. Democrats talked about this
Speaker 1: bill going nowhere. It's really sick that the Democrats are
Speaker 1: using this opportunity to enforce their socialism. Remember what did
Speaker 1: its bill that they just passed on Friday. Well, it's
Speaker 1: about pot, it's about prisoners, it's about politicizing election law,
Speaker 1: prioritizing illegal immigrants, and pensions. These are all things that
Speaker 1: are socialist wish list that they've been trying to pass
Speaker 1: long before COVID ever came to this land. And that's
Speaker 1: exactly what they're trying to do knowing that it will
Speaker 1: not go anywhere. They're just using this as an opportunity
Speaker 1: to restructure government. And I'm not just saying that that's
Speaker 1: what Democrats say. Joe Biden said it the other day.
Speaker 1: Their whip said at Kleber, it goes beyond AOC is
Speaker 1: now throughout the entire Democrats socialist base of what they
Speaker 1: want to utilize this opportunity to. Because when we wanted
Speaker 1: to help small businesses with their loans, Nancy Pelosi went
Speaker 1: to the freezer to stop it. Here's my concern. Just
Speaker 1: as you have the body has its defenses against pathogens, bacteria, virus, is, parasites,
Speaker 1: and if your overall immunity is reduced, you are more
Speaker 1: susceptible from any one pathogen. You're more susceptible to all
Speaker 1: of them. Right, if your overall immune system is overtaxed,
Speaker 1: then there can be secondary infections and other problems can
Speaker 1: come up. Right now, the American people and our sense
Speaker 1: that we have rights, that there are freedoms that must
Speaker 1: be respected, that there is a contract with the government
Speaker 1: that we all enter into known as the Constitution, that
Speaker 1: it can just be violated on a whim. We are
Speaker 1: suppressed in our desire for freedom. And I worry that
Speaker 1: as we start to have some of those freedoms given
Speaker 1: back to us, will be so grateful that we're finally
Speaker 1: being let out of the prison, that you know, just
Speaker 1: piece by piece, step by step, we're being pulled into
Speaker 1: the light of our lives again instead of being shut
Speaker 1: away in the darkness of lockdown, that we'll just allow
Speaker 1: them to get away with all kinds of nonsense. You know,
Speaker 1: we'll be looking at the one hand that's offering us. Okay, fine,
Speaker 1: you can start to open up stores, all right. Fine,
Speaker 1: you can start to work out at the gym, you
Speaker 1: can go and see relatives, you can track all these things.
Speaker 1: But on the other hand, they're they're gonna be putting
Speaker 1: out there. Oh and we're going to redistribute wealth on
Speaker 1: a scale never before seeing in human history. We're going
Speaker 1: to spend money, which is your children and children's children's money,
Speaker 1: and on a scale never before seeing in human history.
Speaker 1: We're going to fund all of our most progressive left
Speaker 1: wing priorities. And you better not say anything about it,
Speaker 1: because then this other hand that's giving your freedom, perhaps
Speaker 1: it starts to clench once again. Perhaps we start to
Speaker 1: tell you to get ready for another round of lockdowns,
Speaker 1: because we say so, this is volatile, this is fiscile
Speaker 1: stuff for a government, my friends, don't forget it. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. All right, team, we are joined by
Speaker 1: the one and only Denish Dasuza. He is, of course
Speaker 1: a calumnist author. You've seen him on TV. He's been
Speaker 1: in the conservative media game for some time. Here, my friends,
Speaker 1: he has a new book out. He's a best selling author.
Speaker 1: He's got a new one, United States of Socialism, Who's
Speaker 1: behind it? Why it's evil? How to stop it? Very timely,
Speaker 1: in fact, this book comes out now, Denish. Great to
Speaker 1: see you, Great to be on the show. Hi. All right,
Speaker 1: so let's let'sus get in. We're already hearing. I mean,
Speaker 1: we had Governor Insley saying that this is the real opportunity.
Speaker 1: I mean, he's monomaniacal about climate change among the left's
Speaker 1: agenda items. I mean, that's the one thing that he
Speaker 1: always talks about. Others are talking about forgiving loans as
Speaker 1: a racial justice issue, universal basic income. I mean, how
Speaker 1: do you see? I mean, you've got a book out
Speaker 1: on socialism right now. How does the left leverage this
Speaker 1: moment of crisis, unprecedented spending and fear to push for
Speaker 1: some of these socialist agenda items that they've wanted for
Speaker 1: a hundred years. Well, let's see. How do I begin here?
Speaker 1: First of all, I think the ronavirus has given us
Speaker 1: a window, a kind of foretaste of what socialism looks
Speaker 1: and feels like. My wife is from Venezuela. She's been
Speaker 1: telling me now for years about the empty shelves, the limits,
Speaker 1: the rationing. But now we've seen it. We've seen it
Speaker 1: here in America, even if on a temporary basis. We've
Speaker 1: also seen the other signature move of socialism, the attack
Speaker 1: on civil liberties, the invasion of privacy, the attack on
Speaker 1: religious liberty, freedom of assembly. And now, as you say,
Speaker 1: the left is trying to use fear as a pretext
Speaker 1: to do all kinds of things that they couldn't do otherwise. See,
Speaker 1: Marks didn't think you'd need any of this. Marx thought
Speaker 1: that socialism would come because the working class would become
Speaker 1: so discontented that it would revolt. But the left is
Speaker 1: now figured out that's not going to happen. The working
Speaker 1: class actually has it too good. They're not going to revolt.
Speaker 1: We need a climate fever or the world is ending,
Speaker 1: or we need the virus is going to kill you
Speaker 1: if you don't do all these things. So they have
Speaker 1: become specialists in manufactured fear to make people do things
Speaker 1: that in common sober moments, we never would do. So
Speaker 1: they're trying to get socialism ultimately here through a panic.
Speaker 1: And what do you think? And we're speaking to Jenesta Suzo.
Speaker 1: He's got a new book, United States of Socialism, Who's
Speaker 1: behind it, Why it's evil? How to stop it? What
Speaker 1: do you see, for example, just in the latest Pelosi
Speaker 1: grab bag bill, you know this this Hero's Act. There
Speaker 1: are all these things that they're trying to fund, which
Speaker 1: one of the of the democrat socialist agenda items. Do
Speaker 1: you think is that we're in the greatest danger of
Speaker 1: falling into as a result of this coronavirus. If you
Speaker 1: had to focus in on one where you're like, they're
Speaker 1: really going to put it in, put the resources into
Speaker 1: this one in every sense, well, I think the greatest
Speaker 1: danger comes from the fact that when people over a
Speaker 1: fairly extended period of time, are used to sitting on
Speaker 1: the couch and doing nothing and getting money for it,
Speaker 1: and getting money on a regular basis. Suddenly they realized,
Speaker 1: wait a minute, this is actually a pretty comfy lifestyle.
Speaker 1: I have more time to spend with my family. I
Speaker 1: can play frisbee in the yard. This whole notion of
Speaker 1: me having to go to work for eight to ten
Speaker 1: hours a day and get pretty much the same amount
Speaker 1: of money is beginning to look kind of unappealing. So ironically,
Speaker 1: I think the Left is relying on kind of the
Speaker 1: habits of leth rg setting in on people so that
Speaker 1: what the left is proposing is more tempting. Before this,
Speaker 1: people might go, well, how's that kind of work? How
Speaker 1: can a country function when no one's working. Well, we
Speaker 1: see how it's functioning now, And so the left has
Speaker 1: the illusion that we can function like this perpetually. It's
Speaker 1: a very it's a temptation for people, and that's probably
Speaker 1: the best thing going for the Left right now. And
Speaker 1: it seems that the extension, for example, they're already looking
Speaker 1: at pushing some of these unemployment benefits that for a
Speaker 1: lot of people, especial people who are making around forty
Speaker 1: thousand dollars a year or less than that. They make
Speaker 1: more money staying home, and that was intentional, that that's
Speaker 1: not an unforeseen consequence of this. They want to extend
Speaker 1: this now into twenty twenty one. So do you think
Speaker 1: that is the argument for a universal basic income going
Speaker 1: to essentially turn in to become Well, we're spending trillions
Speaker 1: of dollars and taking care of all these people. Why
Speaker 1: don't we just keep spending the trillions of dollars and
Speaker 1: make sure everybody has everything they need. Yes, I mean
Speaker 1: the things, the measures we've taken as so extraordinary. First
Speaker 1: of all, we've never done I don't think the world
Speaker 1: has ever responded this way to any kind of epidemic.
Speaker 1: These are you may almost call them wartime measures. They're
Speaker 1: measures that are taken in extraordinary circumstances, and they're not sustainable.
Speaker 1: I think deep down people do know this. The other
Speaker 1: thing I want to highlight is that you know, you
Speaker 1: mentioned things like the efforts to give money to illegal immigrants,
Speaker 1: or the idea that we need to keep a racial
Speaker 1: count of the minorities being disproportionately affected by the virus.
Speaker 1: We need to have diversity commissions now on corporate boards.
Speaker 1: Even the idea that somehow calling it the Chinese virus,
Speaker 1: the Wuhan virus, is somehow racist. It's important to see
Speaker 1: here that we have a new twist on socialism. It's
Speaker 1: socialism married to identity politics. See Marxist socialism wasn't like that.
Speaker 1: For marx the world is divided into two groups. They're
Speaker 1: basically the working class and the capitalist. That's it. But
Speaker 1: for socialist today, there's a race divide, there's a gender
Speaker 1: divide that, there's a divide between strates and gays. There's
Speaker 1: a divide between legals and illegals. And so the whole
Speaker 1: strategy of the socialist left is to cobble together a
Speaker 1: democratic majority of aggrieved victim groups. That's how you get
Speaker 1: to fifty one percent. Speaking to Nashtra Susa, author of
Speaker 1: United States of Socialism, let's transition for a moment into
Speaker 1: some of the arguments you make in the book, Denesh.
Speaker 1: I mean, when people think of socialism, who's behind it?
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm sure you get into Mars a bit,
Speaker 1: but you mean, who's behind it? Here in America? How
Speaker 1: are we getting and are there are some of the
Speaker 1: folks that would obviously come to mind, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders,
Speaker 1: there are others that anyone who's paying attention to politics
Speaker 1: is aware at least that they're openly pushing for socialism.
Speaker 1: But who else is is a part of this? And
Speaker 1: how else are we getting? You know, are we closer
Speaker 1: to socialism in this country than we've ever been in
Speaker 1: your lifetime? Is that fair to say? And how are
Speaker 1: we getting pushed so far? I mean, if the if
Speaker 1: the defeat of socialism was the big story of the
Speaker 1: twentieth century, you have to say that the revival of
Speaker 1: socialism in the twenty first century is not only a
Speaker 1: big story but a big surprise. If you think of
Speaker 1: a spectrum with the free market at one end and
Speaker 1: full socialism on the other, you'd have to see that
Speaker 1: every Democrat, there is no exception to this, is pulling
Speaker 1: in the socialist direction. Not one of them is in
Speaker 1: the free market direction. Now, the Democrats have rejected the
Speaker 1: explicit socialism of Bernie Sanders and the squad in favor
Speaker 1: of what may be called the creeping socialism of people
Speaker 1: like Warren and Biden. But notice that Biden is now
Speaker 1: moving in the Sanders direction. He was against free college,
Speaker 1: now he's for it. He embraces a lot of the
Speaker 1: same policies as Bernie in the Squad. He's fully behind,
Speaker 1: for example, the Green New Deal, which is the umbrella
Speaker 1: for bringing socialist policies to mainstream respectability. So the bottom
Speaker 1: line of it is that socialism today is now embedded
Speaker 1: in the Democratic Party and has very powerful allies in Hollywood,
Speaker 1: in the media. So it is not only economic socialism,
Speaker 1: but it's a cultural thrust to socialism, and it has
Speaker 1: an appeal even for groups that are traditionally very hostile
Speaker 1: to it. You've got, for example, a successful capitalists who
Speaker 1: say things like, we've now got to redistribute income because
Speaker 1: because if we don't, we're going to have a revolution
Speaker 1: in our society. It's completely nonsense instacle, but nevertheless they
Speaker 1: believe it. In the United States of socialism, you also
Speaker 1: have the how to stop it part of the equation.
Speaker 1: And I I want to ask you, given what we're seeing
Speaker 1: right now in this country where you know, everyone's just
Speaker 1: right now, we're just trying to get it. You know,
Speaker 1: stores open, people back to work, and there are clearly
Speaker 1: our forces that are fighting against this, not just for
Speaker 1: fear of the virus, but also for very political reasons.
Speaker 1: What can the Trump administration and what can conservatives in
Speaker 1: government and outside of it do to stop this what
Speaker 1: feels like massive onslaught of government spending, government control. I mean, genee, look,
Speaker 1: it feels like we're losing right now. So how do
Speaker 1: we turn the tide? Well, it's a very strange thing
Speaker 1: to say that we're losing. I mean, admittedly, we've had
Speaker 1: this economic contraction produced obviously not by failed policies, but
Speaker 1: by an external threat. Look, currently we control the Presidency,
Speaker 1: the Senate, and the Court, and the left basically has
Speaker 1: the House. So under all common sensical calculations, we should
Speaker 1: be in control. But weirdly, even though we are in control,
Speaker 1: we never seem to be in charge. And it's well
Speaker 1: worth asking why that is the case. How can it
Speaker 1: be that when we control most of the rudders of government,
Speaker 1: the left is still setting the agenda. I think the
Speaker 1: answer to that has got to be that the left
Speaker 1: controls the big megaphones of the culture, namely academia, the media,
Speaker 1: and Hollywood. So this is not a straight fight between
Speaker 1: Republicans and Democrats. They've got allies working for them that are.
Speaker 1: And then you have to add in the Deep States.
Speaker 1: So you've got the police agencies of government which purport
Speaker 1: to be neutral, but which have been doing their bidding.
Speaker 1: So it's really important for us to hold these institutions accountable. Recently,
Speaker 1: bar said as quoted saying, you know, we're not really
Speaker 1: going to be going criminally after Obama or Biden. And
Speaker 1: I say, why not if Obama gave the order, if
Speaker 1: he is the mastermind and ultimately of an effort to
Speaker 1: frame and in tract not just General Flynn but ultimately Trump,
Speaker 1: that wouldn't we hold them accountable? Why is it our
Speaker 1: attitude to sort of get over this and move on
Speaker 1: so that those guys can come back and do their
Speaker 1: thing when they have a chance. So I think it's
Speaker 1: very important ultimately to be socialism, not just to refute it.
Speaker 1: I try to do that in a book, but ultimately
Speaker 1: to fight it at every level. And that means holding
Speaker 1: the deep state accountable. It also means creating alternative institutions
Speaker 1: of media, because that's our long term threat. Look, it's
Speaker 1: an even bigger challenge to me than reelecting Trump. Why
Speaker 1: because the lobsidedness of the media affects every election. We're
Speaker 1: speaking to Denishasu is an author of a new book,
Speaker 1: United States of Socialism, Who's Behind It? Why It's Evil?
Speaker 1: How to stop at Denish? You brought up the deep state,
Speaker 1: and you had your own battle with the deep state
Speaker 1: some years ago. You were not treated fairly in that process.
Speaker 1: The President agreed with that assessment and gave you a
Speaker 1: presidential pardon. Given what we have now seen, and you know,
Speaker 1: I worked both with the FBI when I was in
Speaker 1: the CIA, as well as the MYPD Intelligence Division, this
Speaker 1: doesn't really surprise me. What maybe does surprise me is
Speaker 1: how sloppy and obvious they were in this case as
Speaker 1: somebody who was the target of this, I mean clearly
Speaker 1: was was treated differently because of politics by I believe
Speaker 1: it was pre Berara on the Southern District. Correct. What
Speaker 1: do you make of what do you make of these revelations?
Speaker 1: And what do you want to tell people that see
Speaker 1: this and say you mean that there are federal prosecutors
Speaker 1: and FBI agents who are actually bad guys for political reasons. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I think what we're seeing is a disco disc goes
Speaker 1: very far, it goes beyond like creep Berrara wasn't doing
Speaker 1: anything on his own he was in league with the
Speaker 1: Holder Justice Department, and I think I know who Holder
Speaker 1: was playing wingman for. Similarly, here in the Flim case,
Speaker 1: you see that these FBI agents Peter Struck even call
Speaker 1: me Mueller. These guys are not going to do it
Speaker 1: on their own. Some is giving the order that is
Speaker 1: very very high up. And the other point that's very
Speaker 1: alarming is that the judges are in on it. This
Speaker 1: is critical. We see this with Judge Sullivan. It's obvious
Speaker 1: that he is very frustrated by the decision of the
Speaker 1: Justice Department to drop the case against Flynn. So now
Speaker 1: he's looking to see how he himself, the judge, can
Speaker 1: resurrect it, and what's the basis for resurrecting it. Flynn
Speaker 1: pleaded guilty. This is the same thing that people say
Speaker 1: to me, well, you pleaded guilty, then you obviously you
Speaker 1: admit you did it. But here's the key point. When
Speaker 1: you're sitting across from the prosecutors, they will say to me, Denesh,
Speaker 1: you violated the campaign finance law. But that's a fairly
Speaker 1: trivial offense. We're going to charge you with mail fraud.
Speaker 1: And I say mail fraud and they go yeah, because
Speaker 1: you put your check in the mail, and then we're
Speaker 1: going to get you for bank fraud. And I go
Speaker 1: bank fraud and then go, yeah, because you took that
Speaker 1: money out of your own bank account. It's your money,
Speaker 1: but it came out of your bank account, so the
Speaker 1: banks are involved, so it's bank fraud. So the point
Speaker 1: to realize here is that very using laws that were
Speaker 1: passed to go after the mafia and isis against political opponents.
Speaker 1: And so ultimately for someone like me or face with
Speaker 1: the choice a few months in the confinement center or
Speaker 1: years and years in federal prison, a destroyed career, destroyed life,
Speaker 1: no relationship with my daughter. So no rational person is
Speaker 1: not going to take a plea under those circumstances. So
Speaker 1: this is the legal gangsterism that is going on in
Speaker 1: this country. I'm convinced it's much more widespread than I
Speaker 1: would ever have thought possible. And this is one of
Speaker 1: the supreme challenges I think facing Trump to root this out,
Speaker 1: to expose it, and to tie it gets to the
Speaker 1: very root of justice itself. Danesh assues everybody. The United
Speaker 1: States of Socialism is the book. It's out now available
Speaker 1: on Amazon or wherever you buy books. Danish always good
Speaker 1: to see you and appreciate your times are good luck,
Speaker 1: my pleasure. You're in the Freedom Hut. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sex and Show podcast speaking of the deep State,
Speaker 1: and I just have chat with my old friend Denishta
Speaker 1: Suzia about what he went through, and I think it's
Speaker 1: important for you all to hear that that they will
Speaker 1: go after conservatives. And if I continue on my current trajectory,
Speaker 1: I can assure you, my friend, the left wing statist
Speaker 1: apparatus will come after me at some point, so be
Speaker 1: prepared for that. I'm ready for the fight. The Buster,
Speaker 1: he's a polite fellow, but he's a tenacious he's got
Speaker 1: that tenacious old Irish side. So the judge in the
Speaker 1: case against Flynn and Judge Sullivan was presented with the possibility.
Speaker 1: I mean, this was truly stunning that the FBI had
Speaker 1: lost the three O two doesn't have the original three
Speaker 1: O two. Now, the three O two is effectively the
Speaker 1: field report. When I was the NYPD, we called it
Speaker 1: a d D five. That was the intelligence field report
Speaker 1: that you would have and you would talk about your
Speaker 1: confidential informant or whatever it may be. And three O
Speaker 1: two is what the FBI use for their their field
Speaker 1: reporting effectively. And there is a there was this over
Speaker 1: the weekend revelation that Sullivan was told about this. He
Speaker 1: was told that there might and this is how I mean,
Speaker 1: it's just it's just amazing. This is how he responded. Now,
Speaker 1: keep in mind the three or two is what the
Speaker 1: FBI agents struck. And I believe Pientka, I'm not sure
Speaker 1: how to pronounce this FBI guy's name who sat down
Speaker 1: with Flynn. Right that, the the record of the conversation
Speaker 1: is what they write down. That is that is it.
Speaker 1: The record of the conversation is what they say it is.
Speaker 1: And you would think that a record like that that's
Speaker 1: being used as the basis for whether or not someone's
Speaker 1: going to go to prison would be really really important,
Speaker 1: right this would This is like if someone wrote in
Speaker 1: a post at note, this is what you said, and
Speaker 1: then you're going to go to prison because of why
Speaker 1: I said you you said because I wrote that, wrote
Speaker 1: it on this post it note. And then he showed
Speaker 1: up in court and they said, yes, send this guy
Speaker 1: to prison. The judge says, okay, why oh I wrote
Speaker 1: on a post to note what the guy told me. Okay,
Speaker 1: where's the post it note, I don't know, I don't
Speaker 1: know somebody else has got it, don't don't you think
Speaker 1: the judge, don't you think that freedom hangs in the
Speaker 1: balanced document would be important. Here's what Judge Sullivan said
Speaker 1: when he was found out that they do not have
Speaker 1: the original. The government doesn't have the original three or two.
Speaker 1: The government, I'm sure we'll address that. I don't want
Speaker 1: to focus on any other case cases before the court,
Speaker 1: but you know, sometimes throughout the best efforts, notwithstanding the
Speaker 1: best efforts of everyone, things happen, and documents are lost.
Speaker 1: I mean, it just happens. And so we'll wait for
Speaker 1: the government submission. That was what he said. That's stunning.
Speaker 1: This is the This is from James Gagliano, who was
Speaker 1: a legal analyst. He wrote about this. He said, it's
Speaker 1: a shockingly cavalier take by Judge Sullivan to defense counsel
Speaker 1: Sydney Owl on September tenth of twenty nineteen, regarding the
Speaker 1: lost original Flynn three O two comes. Now we look
Speaker 1: at what the judge said about this. Now we find
Speaker 1: out the three O two was revised, it was changed.
Speaker 1: They entrapped Flynn, and the judge was like, oh, you
Speaker 1: guys couldn't find it. No big deal. Oh no, it's
Speaker 1: a very big deal because the FBI and the deep
Speaker 1: state actors within it can charge you for lying based
Speaker 1: upon whatever they write down as your words on a
Speaker 1: piece of paper, and the federal judge meant to protect
Speaker 1: your rights will think nothing of it when that freedom
Speaker 1: hangs in the balance, piece of paper just disappears suddenly.
Speaker 1: Does that sound like the America you want to live in?
Speaker 1: My friends, I don't think so. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Doing
Speaker 1: one feels good. What's convenient, what's easy. That's how little
Speaker 1: kids think. Unfortunately, a lot of so called grown ups,
Speaker 1: including some with fancy titles and important jobs, still think
Speaker 1: that way, which is why things are so screwed up.
Speaker 1: Is he taking a little shot at the administration? Here?
Speaker 1: Is that? Is that Obama? Who's grown up? Arose adults? Child? Oh?
Speaker 1: Do those? Oh does Trump? I'm not gonna I'm not
Speaker 1: gonna call him up by my name, but I'm gonna
Speaker 1: say he's bad. He accs like I could. Oh boy,
Speaker 1: you know Barack Obama is in a different situation when
Speaker 1: he when he comes after the Trumpster. Now I know
Speaker 1: he didn't name Trump here to be fair, but I
Speaker 1: think I think it's pretty clear what the implication is.
Speaker 1: But Barack Obama has never been subjected to a person
Speaker 1: who has a similarly sized megaphone who will really fight back,
Speaker 1: because that person does not care if the media calls
Speaker 1: him horrible names, calls him a racist or whatever. That
Speaker 1: the birth person doesn't care, and therefore you have a
Speaker 1: a more even playing field for the fight. And so
Speaker 1: that's why Trump is stepping into this one right now.
Speaker 1: Oh wait, can I can? I just I wanted to
Speaker 1: throw this in there as well. Whenever you see someone
Speaker 1: now who doesn't like and you're seeing this with leftists
Speaker 1: about the whole collapse of even further collapse of the
Speaker 1: Flynn the Flynn case and Russia Gate all around it,
Speaker 1: and all this reporting that Durham who's investigating the clearly
Speaker 1: corrupt origins of Obama Gate, all the things that are happening.
Speaker 1: Whenever you see someone say, oh, but there are so
Speaker 1: many people dying and you're focusing on this, it tends
Speaker 1: to be people who when the story is something they like,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter that there's COVID nineteen out there, right,
Speaker 1: They'll they'll run stories on whatever they want, but they
Speaker 1: go to Now I'm seeing for a lot of libs
Speaker 1: because the news cycle outside of COVID nineteen has been
Speaker 1: pretty damaging to some major LIB narratives out there. The
Speaker 1: moment that it's rays in territory, they don't like. It's
Speaker 1: how could you focus on this when all these people
Speaker 1: are suffering in so while the pandemic goes on? Are
Speaker 1: we not allowed to talk about any other news? There's
Speaker 1: nothing else is allowed to happen. That's what I That's
Speaker 1: what I'm curious about that. I think it's fair to
Speaker 1: it's fair to ask that question. And we think already
Speaker 1: know we already know what the answer is here. But
Speaker 1: Trump is willing to fight back when when Obama decides
Speaker 1: that he's going to say something mean about the Trumpster,
Speaker 1: and so this is how you get clip ten play it.
Speaker 1: So I think we had a great weekend. We did
Speaker 1: a lot of terrific meetings. Tremendous progress is being made
Speaker 1: on many fronts, including coming up with a cure for
Speaker 1: this horrible plague. That has to be said in our country.
Speaker 1: I think a lot of things have happened very good.
Speaker 1: Very is a working weekend, it is a good weekend.
Speaker 1: A lot of very good things have happened. I didn't
Speaker 1: hear it. Look, he was an incompetent president. That's all
Speaker 1: I can say. Grossly incompetent. Thank you, grossly incompetent. I
Speaker 1: haven't heard people say that about Obama in a while,
Speaker 1: have you. What were the what were the the big
Speaker 1: achievements on policy of the Obama administration? What were the
Speaker 1: genius foreign pology, foreign policy stratagems that were accomplished? Does
Speaker 1: any anybody know, anybody have an answer here? That's what
Speaker 1: I would want to know. I would want someone to
Speaker 1: tell me. Where is it that we could say that
Speaker 1: the Obama administration was in fact adept skillful. I mean, yeah, sure,
Speaker 1: they had the media doing a lot of propaganda for them.
Speaker 1: They had people that were willing to do anything and
Speaker 1: say anything on behalf of the Obama administration. Sure, so,
Speaker 1: I guess in that sense their messaging was certainly helped
Speaker 1: along the way. But when we look back at what
Speaker 1: happened here and what we're being told now is going
Speaker 1: to happen with the investigation of the Russia collusion fantasy
Speaker 1: that was, it wasn't really I mean, it was a conspiracy.
Speaker 1: Actually that's a better word for it. I mean it's
Speaker 1: fantastical in the sense that it never happened, but it
Speaker 1: was a conspiracy. It was brought together for a purpose.
Speaker 1: This wasn't just a bedtime story that liberals told themselves
Speaker 1: that they could feel a little bit less sad about
Speaker 1: Hillary losing the election. They used this as part of
Speaker 1: a coup effort to destroy the incoming administration. That was.
Speaker 1: I mean, this was a weaponization of the FBI and
Speaker 1: the intelligence community. And that's really beyond doubt at this point,
Speaker 1: that's really beyond I think anybody's ability to reasonably question
Speaker 1: on the facts. And now it's just how involved was
Speaker 1: Obama and what diviided? No, And I really want to
Speaker 1: find out who who leaked that phone call between kisel
Speaker 1: Yak and Flynn. Who leaked the phone call to the FBI,
Speaker 1: because if they find that out and that person does
Speaker 1: not face criminal charges, then we know the whole system
Speaker 1: is really just a joke. It's just a joke. It
Speaker 1: doesn't count when they don't want someone to get in trouble.
Speaker 1: That person doesn't get in trouble, no matter how egregious.
Speaker 1: And I think you could already make that argument with
Speaker 1: what happened with Andy McCabe, former acting director of the FBI.
Speaker 1: So he can lie several times under oath and that's
Speaker 1: no problem. But General Flynn lies under oath, doesn't actually lie.
Speaker 1: They rewrite their version of what he said. They already
Speaker 1: had the transcript of every word that was said beforehand,
Speaker 1: and that's supposed to be a serious crime. That's supposed
Speaker 1: to be a thing that they will they will put
Speaker 1: in the I mean, it's just crazy. It's just crazy.
Speaker 1: Oh but now they're all upset because they're saying that
Speaker 1: Trump fire the State Department. I g guess what Trump's
Speaker 1: allowed to fire the State Department? I play play twelve
Speaker 1: years Pelosi whining about it. Well, this is new to
Speaker 1: us and a typical of the White House announcing something
Speaker 1: that is very unsavory. They would do it late on
Speaker 1: a Friday night. The fact is, as you indicated, it's
Speaker 1: the fourth Inspector General Inspector's General. That office was created
Speaker 1: after Watergate to make sure that there was integrity in
Speaker 1: the departments the agencies of government. They are supposed to
Speaker 1: show cause. Even Republicans in Congress are concerned with the
Speaker 1: investigating the Secretary of State. When you say, on Savory,
Speaker 1: is that what you mean? Well, I mean on Savory,
Speaker 1: when you take out someone who is there to enforce
Speaker 1: the to stop waste for aught, abuse or other violations
Speaker 1: of the law, that are they believed to be happening.
Speaker 1: So again, let's take a look and see. The president
Speaker 1: has the right to fire any federal employee. But the
Speaker 1: fact is, if it looks like it's in retaliation for
Speaker 1: something that the attorney, the IG, the Inspector General is doing,
Speaker 1: that could be unlawful, could be unlawful. This is the way,
Speaker 1: this is the way that they do this construct. I
Speaker 1: see it happen over and over seeing that as a piece.
Speaker 1: How you know Trump's firing may be illegal of the IG.
Speaker 1: You know what else could be illegal? Anything, depending on
Speaker 1: the surrounding circumstances that a president would do. Trump just
Speaker 1: signed a bill into law could be illegal, said Buck,
Speaker 1: what do you mean how could it be? Did someone
Speaker 1: did someone give him a bag of money under the
Speaker 1: table to go sign that and he was going to
Speaker 1: veto it, but then they gave him money. Could be illegal.
Speaker 1: You could play this could be illegal game all the time.
Speaker 1: But notice how dishonest it is. What rationale do they
Speaker 1: have for the this could be illegal? Remember, he has
Speaker 1: total authority, total discretion to fire this. Steve Lynnok who
Speaker 1: got fired on Friday as Inspector General of the State
Speaker 1: Department for any reason or no reason, he'd be like
Speaker 1: Steve Lynnock, I just don't think you're very good bye.
Speaker 1: That's it. It's not not reviewable. Oh but now they
Speaker 1: get to corrupt intent. That's what they'll say. Oh, if
Speaker 1: there's corrupt intent for the firing, if he's you know,
Speaker 1: investigating somebody and Trump didn't want to investigate him, you
Speaker 1: know what they're saying. I mean, this is amazing. The
Speaker 1: lives are completely out of their minds, they really are.
Speaker 1: You know, they still think, oh, the Logan Act. They'll
Speaker 1: talk about the Logan Act as if it's a serious
Speaker 1: thing that we should be and we should be listening
Speaker 1: to them, and they're completely absurd. No one goes, no
Speaker 1: one goes a prison on the Logan Act. And they
Speaker 1: know that, but they still tall, Oh, it's a goodst
Speaker 1: the Law Secretary Pompeo. The claim right now is that
Speaker 1: he was under investigation for making a staffer walk his
Speaker 1: dog and make a dinner reservation for him and his wife. Now,
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna go out on a limb here and
Speaker 1: say that if you ask somebody to do something for you,
Speaker 1: that you would ask any like normal person or friend
Speaker 1: to do for you on a you know, on a
Speaker 1: one or two off basis, or you know whatever. I mean.
Speaker 1: Are they what they're gonna They're gonna say that the
Speaker 1: Secretary of State if he said, hey, man, can you
Speaker 1: make a dinner reservation for me? I'm really busy in
Speaker 1: this meeting right now, that's corruption. Oh, it's using it's
Speaker 1: personal benefit for the Come on, man, come on, who's kid? Well?
Speaker 1: This is like the same people that want to bring
Speaker 1: the Emoluments claus suit because Trump gets a benefit from foreigners,
Speaker 1: and they say, under the constitutions is not allowed because
Speaker 1: some foreigners buy I'm not making this up, you know,
Speaker 1: food drinks at the Trump Hotel, they may have undue
Speaker 1: influence on Donald Trump himself. I've just said, try this out.
Speaker 1: Go into Trump International Hotel when it's open, get some
Speaker 1: of their delicious flombade bacon strips, which are amazing, and
Speaker 1: then say, you know, when you sign the little check
Speaker 1: for you know, forty bucks or whatever, they are an
Speaker 1: expensive place. When you sign a little check, then say
Speaker 1: you want your meeting with the president. You know you
Speaker 1: bought your bacon strips. Now you want the meeting. That's right.
Speaker 1: People will I mean they won't even laugh at you.
Speaker 1: They'll think you're sick. I'll think you got a problem.
Speaker 1: I mean, they'll probably call, you know, professionals to come
Speaker 1: help you work through your issues. This is crazy, right,
Speaker 1: But this is what they're bringing the emoluments claws suit on.
Speaker 1: Oh these foreigners are this is real and a judge
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court's gonna have this just happened last week
Speaker 1: and judge said all the emoluments case can go forward.
Speaker 1: First of all, usually you can't sue a president in
Speaker 1: office for any reason. They're letting them sue the president
Speaker 1: for this. This is outrageous, right, But the hashtag resistance judiciary,
Speaker 1: they don't care how much damage is done to the
Speaker 1: rule of law. They don't care what the costs of
Speaker 1: all of this are. They're just disgusting that they will
Speaker 1: do any thing to take this guy down because he's
Speaker 1: such a threat to their sense of their own importance
Speaker 1: and their role in the world and their future and
Speaker 1: everything else. And it's a total it's just a complete,
Speaker 1: a nutter outrage. But look, the Trump firing of the
Speaker 1: IG gives them something else to sink their teeth into
Speaker 1: now other than what we were learning in most recent
Speaker 1: weeks because of what the what the Director of National
Speaker 1: Intelligence has been doing. Richard Grinnelle, you know, I said
Speaker 1: on this show that he was like the wireder of
Speaker 1: the intel community, and that kind of went viral over
Speaker 1: the weekend, and it's pretty awesome, pretty fun to see
Speaker 1: that happen. But it's true. I mean, he's in there
Speaker 1: to clean up. I will give Annie McCarthy credit. Annie
Speaker 1: McCarthy said that we really want him to be more
Speaker 1: like Doc Holiday, you know, and that's I've said that.
Speaker 1: I've said that that's if you want an analogy for
Speaker 1: Trump's foreign policy, and especially when he's dealing with with
Speaker 1: some of the bad actors in the world stage, he
Speaker 1: is like Doc Holliday. Remember in that scene in Tombstone
Speaker 1: where he says they'll be a little less jumpy if
Speaker 1: they know docs on the street. Howits are referring to
Speaker 1: a sawt off shotgun. Yeah, you want a guy who
Speaker 1: you know, you want a guy who's got a bazook
Speaker 1: in his pocket to be the guy who actually might
Speaker 1: use it or else. It doesn't really mean all that much.
Speaker 1: I know you can't fit a bazook in the pocket,
Speaker 1: but it's fun to think about that. So I don't think.
Speaker 1: I don't think anyone's gonna fire the Secretary of State
Speaker 1: because he might have had someone on his staff make
Speaker 1: a thirty second phone call on his behalf. But remember,
Speaker 1: this is how libs play the game. Extreme scrutiny of
Speaker 1: the law and maximum punishment and twisting the intent of
Speaker 1: the law in order to ruin people. And oh, we
Speaker 1: believe in and then when there are people do something bad,
Speaker 1: it's whoa, whoa. Hold on a second, what about the
Speaker 1: mass incarceration state? Man? What's going on? Come on, you
Speaker 1: can't do that. And this is just a good public servant,
Speaker 1: you know, McCabe wasn't lying. Comy's totally cool, man. They're
Speaker 1: just disgusting. They have no principles, they don't care what
Speaker 1: they have to say to get what they want. They'll
Speaker 1: just say it. So you know Pelosi talking about this
Speaker 1: is I mean, she She's an absurdity. And I just
Speaker 1: would love to see somebody make a you know, try
Speaker 1: to make a public defense of why anybody should respect
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi's honor, integrity, I mean she has she has none.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. You got a president who blames everybody in
Speaker 1: the world or the problems that we face except himself.
Speaker 1: You know, this is a guy who you know, used
Speaker 1: to talk about President She is being a great leader,
Speaker 1: a good friend of his. The leader of North Korea,
Speaker 1: who was probably the worst dictator in the world, was
Speaker 1: a wonderful human being. They wrote love letters to each other.
Speaker 1: Look what they're trying to do now is instead of
Speaker 1: address the pandemic that we have, and I should say, George,
Speaker 1: scandal of the moment is that we don't have national policy.
Speaker 1: This is the president of the United States. We should
Speaker 1: have national policy based on science. We should have testing
Speaker 1: going on all over this country so that when we
Speaker 1: reopened the economy, workers understand that they're working in a
Speaker 1: safe environment. Instead, you got fifty states going it alone
Speaker 1: because we don't have that national protocol based on size.
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh. The socialism miss back baby Bernie Sanders,
Speaker 1: we haven't heard from him in the while. He's probably like,
Speaker 1: look at Joe Biden. You guys say I'm old and crazy.
Speaker 1: Look at him in the basement. He's talking nonsense all
Speaker 1: the time. And you know what, the Burn would be right,
Speaker 1: because that is what's happening. But the Burn also sees this.
Speaker 1: And we'll have to be referring back to this this
Speaker 1: week because they're running a little short on time today
Speaker 1: on the show. I don't I never have enough time
Speaker 1: with you guys, never have enough. That reminds me. Also
Speaker 1: buckxxon dot com for the stories. Like I mentioned in
Speaker 1: the story about the wide earp thing, buck sex and
Speaker 1: dot com it's where I need you all to go.
Speaker 1: You can also download the podcast there. That's becoming the
Speaker 1: one stop shop for all things buck. But let's get
Speaker 1: back to Bernie for a second. Here. Here's what he
Speaker 1: says about we should seize this moment. The crisis is
Speaker 1: an opportunity. All the things I've been telling the socialists
Speaker 1: love this moment in time as an opportunity to remake America.
Speaker 1: Play six. If there is any civil lining in the
Speaker 1: midst of this terrible, terrible and unprecedented moment in American
Speaker 1: history in terms of the economy, in terms of the pandemic.
Speaker 1: It is that maybe we thought rethinking some fundamental tenets
Speaker 1: about the way our government and society works, and we
Speaker 1: should ask ourselves, among other things, is healthcare a human
Speaker 1: right that all of us deserve because we're human beings,
Speaker 1: or is it simply a healthcare benefit that somehow we
Speaker 1: lose when we lose our jobs? You know the LISTA.
Speaker 1: Navarro talked about the Great economy, the beautiful it existed
Speaker 1: before the pandemic. Well, half of the people in America
Speaker 1: we're living paycheck to paycheck. I don't think it's a
Speaker 1: beautiful economy. And when paychecks stopped the two weeks, millions
Speaker 1: and millions of people don't have enough money to buy
Speaker 1: the food that they need to feed their families. We
Speaker 1: need an economy that works for all, not just Trump
Speaker 1: and his billion half friends. Socialism, we talked about it
Speaker 1: with the Nash Bernie's telling you right now that's this
Speaker 1: is going to be a huge opening for the Democratic
Speaker 1: Party to try to ram through all kinds of the
Speaker 1: most aggressive socialist policies. And that's really the plan, man,
Speaker 1: That's what they're going to be up to They're they're
Speaker 1: going to look at this as as I've been saying.
Speaker 1: They're going to look at the very damaged and fragile
Speaker 1: state of this country right now, damage that they've been
Speaker 1: pushing for, at least economically with these lockdowns, which are
Speaker 1: completely insane, and they're going to say, well, you know, well,
Speaker 1: we should just be in charge of this all of
Speaker 1: the time. We should be giving people money like this
Speaker 1: us all of the time. That's what's fair, that's what's right.
Speaker 1: They will say, get ready for it. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to the bus seton show podcast. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your
Speaker 1: podcasts Badly Joe Biden's worldview on China is you know
Speaker 1: you used before the word naive. I think that captures it. Well,
Speaker 1: it's hopelessly naive. Gosh, the Chinese. What could be the problem. Well,
Speaker 1: they're malevolent communist who want to dominate us, who want
Speaker 1: to conquer us, and that's part of their strategy. And
Speaker 1: I think that Joe is simply not equipped and doesn't
Speaker 1: even understand the threat exists. Malevolent commis That's what Ted
Speaker 1: Cruz says about China's Communist Party. Well, we've got somebody
Speaker 1: who just broke a story about Western media involving China.
Speaker 1: Our friend Raheem Kassam is in the house. He is
Speaker 1: the host or co host, i should say, of the
Speaker 1: War Room podcast extravaganza. He's there with Bannon and some
Speaker 1: other folks Stephen Miller. Mister Raheem Kasam. Great to have
Speaker 1: you back, sir. We have we have missed you in
Speaker 1: the freedom hunt. I have missed being in the freedom Hunt.
Speaker 1: But I think everyone around the country is currently in
Speaker 1: the hut and missus freedom. Yeah, I think that's very true.
Speaker 1: Tell me about this story. It's an exclusive major Western media.
Speaker 1: This is at the National Pulse. Major Western media CNN, BBC, Reuters,
Speaker 1: the Associated Press participated in Chinese Communist Party's global media summit.
Speaker 1: You wrote this with Kingsley Cortez. What's going on here? Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right. It's a story that we've just pupped. Something
Speaker 1: that we've been looking at for a long time is
Speaker 1: the Chinese Communist Party's influence in Western media outlets. And
Speaker 1: this is just the latest development as a result of
Speaker 1: a long standing attempt by the Chinese Communist policy to
Speaker 1: co opt Western media organizations, western journalists, security analysts, and
Speaker 1: for those that don't know that, the National Pulse, which
Speaker 1: is a relatively new outlet that we've started, we are
Speaker 1: full time dedicated right now to investigating the reach of
Speaker 1: the Chinese Communist Party into Western media agencies, etc. Etc.
Speaker 1: Now this story comes on the back of several days investigation.
Speaker 1: What it shows is that back in twenty seventeen, the
Speaker 1: entity called CGTN, which is a subsidiary of the CCTV,
Speaker 1: the Chinese Communist Television Network, they hold hell a conference
Speaker 1: in China called the Global Media Summit. It was the
Speaker 1: first of its kind, and at the first glance it
Speaker 1: appeared that they had invited Western journalists. I thought to myself,
Speaker 1: this cannot be true that these entities took official part
Speaker 1: in this. But as we dug down into it and
Speaker 1: found footed John Lyne of these events, it turned out
Speaker 1: that CNN, the BBC, the British Broadcasting Corporation, Reuters, the
Speaker 1: Associated Press, the Huffington Post and many others apparently willingly
Speaker 1: participated not just attending this Global Media Summit, but also
Speaker 1: taking part as panelists, as people on stage giving presentations.
Speaker 1: Over the course of the event. Many things were discussed
Speaker 1: in the media space involving reporting, digital media, social media,
Speaker 1: et cetera, as you would imagine at a media conference.
Speaker 1: But really what this Global Media Summit is and was,
Speaker 1: and it still goes on today, was an attempt by
Speaker 1: the Chinese Communist Party. CCTV and CGT and are wholly
Speaker 1: owned by the Chinese Communist Party, is an attempt by
Speaker 1: them to effectively launder their reporting, to allow the CNN
Speaker 1: and the BBC's and the apes and the rooters of
Speaker 1: the world to lend their legitimacy and their credibility as
Speaker 1: Western outlets to backing up what the Chinese propaganda arms
Speaker 1: are doing. And we have been following in detail what
Speaker 1: the Chinese propaganda arms have been doing in recent months,
Speaker 1: especially since the outset of the novel corollavirus, spreading misinformation, disinformation,
Speaker 1: attempting to so discord in the West. Of course, we
Speaker 1: know everything related to the World Health Organization, the exclusion
Speaker 1: of Taiwan from all of that, and we've heard from
Speaker 1: Secretary uprom Pale that this week. So really what it
Speaker 1: boils down to is this, and I encourage people to
Speaker 1: read this story. It's very detailed. We go into the
Speaker 1: detail of who was there and when and what they said,
Speaker 1: and you can read for yourself all the source links
Speaker 1: of everything there. Really, what it comes down to is
Speaker 1: this the question, why are Western media journalists, people who's
Speaker 1: supposedly back transparency and democracy and who are quick to
Speaker 1: repudiate and repute President Trump and other Western leaders when
Speaker 1: they think they fall short of Western ideals. Why are
Speaker 1: they taking part in Chinese communist propaganda. It's a very
Speaker 1: good question. Rahim Kasama is asking it. He is the
Speaker 1: most of the War Room podcast. Go to the National
Speaker 1: Pulse dot com for his exclusive about Western media being
Speaker 1: used as really a propaganda megaphone or an extension perhaps
Speaker 1: of the Chinese communist parties propaganda megaphone. Raheem. You know,
Speaker 1: you look at international relations from a thirty thousand foot
Speaker 1: perspective a lot in the work that you do. Do
Speaker 1: you think that America? Now, you know, Trump had been
Speaker 1: raising the alarm about China on trade for years, and
Speaker 1: much of the conservative establishment was essentially, i should say
Speaker 1: the Republican establishment maybe was against it. A lot of
Speaker 1: the Beltway intelligency, a lot of the think tankers, Oh,
Speaker 1: free trade became this thing. You just say I'm for
Speaker 1: free trade. It means, Okay, so we get pillaged by
Speaker 1: China and just keep taking it. That's what free trade
Speaker 1: apparently means, or that's what it meant, I should say.
Speaker 1: Do you think now we have seen just on the
Speaker 1: right at least a real shift, a solidification of the
Speaker 1: understanding of what Ted Cruz said, where these you know,
Speaker 1: the CCP is a bunch of evil commies that are
Speaker 1: trying to cause real problems for us. I think we're
Speaker 1: just at the beginning of that shift, actually, and there
Speaker 1: aren't enough people taking is seriously enough, and there aren't
Speaker 1: enough people doing enough about it. You know. I was
Speaker 1: speaking to people this weekend about this phenomenon of the
Speaker 1: fact that actually there is scanned leadership in this area. Okay,
Speaker 1: you have the President of the United States who's been
Speaker 1: tough on China in terms of trade for absolutely decades
Speaker 1: now we know, but who's coming in behind it, who's
Speaker 1: actually doing the policy work, who's doing the expose as Obviously,
Speaker 1: we can do what we can with a small outlet
Speaker 1: like the National Parts and new outlet like the National Part,
Speaker 1: but you would expect that somewhere along the line some
Speaker 1: Western media organization would actually go through all of this
Speaker 1: information over the past couple of decades and point how
Speaker 1: exactly what China has been doing, what they've been doing
Speaker 1: in Africa, what they've been doing in the South China,
Speaker 1: see what they have been doing in Hong Kong, what
Speaker 1: they have been doing in Latin America, and what they're
Speaker 1: indeed doing here in the United States of America and
Speaker 1: indeed in my home country of the United's Kingdom, where
Speaker 1: they effectively, you serve, Western media analysts feed them a
Speaker 1: party line, the Chinese communist party line, and those lines
Speaker 1: are regurgitated outward into the Western media. We've exposed several
Speaker 1: of their participants in this over at the National Pulse
Speaker 1: over the last couple of weeks. There's also politicians who
Speaker 1: for decades have said that they believe even free trade.
Speaker 1: We did this story about the one of the Tennessee
Speaker 1: Senate hopefuls, Bill Haggerty, last week, where by Tennessee, under
Speaker 1: his stewardship of the economic side of things, he was
Speaker 1: appointed by Governor has Them to lead Tennessee's economic coordination
Speaker 1: and under his tenure, it was just one year after
Speaker 1: he left, Tennessee was the single most reliant state on
Speaker 1: China and trade from China in the entire Union. So
Speaker 1: I think just at the beginning of seeing all of
Speaker 1: this come to pass and come to fruition, and a
Speaker 1: credit to the people who have been on this for
Speaker 1: a very long time, like Senator Cruz, and indeed people
Speaker 1: who I haven't been a fan over the past, like
Speaker 1: Marco Rubio, has done excellent work on this too. But
Speaker 1: I'm afraid we are just coming to the beginning of it.
Speaker 1: And also I think a little bit of buyer beware
Speaker 1: on these things, caveat emptor some of the people will
Speaker 1: be jumping on this story just to try and get
Speaker 1: their names in the headlines. You've got to be able
Speaker 1: to trust who's saying what, and I suspect and I
Speaker 1: suggest to the audience that you trust people who have
Speaker 1: been on this subject for a little bit of time,
Speaker 1: not people who are coming to it recently, and there
Speaker 1: are many of them out there. There are some serious
Speaker 1: experts in this field where you can look at if
Speaker 1: you're interested in China's influence in the Western world. But again,
Speaker 1: I think we're just at the very our set of
Speaker 1: getting our heads around just how much the Chinese have
Speaker 1: their hand in Hollywood, in our politicians and beyond speaking.
Speaker 1: Raheem Kassam, host of the war Room podcast, which, by
Speaker 1: the way, when is when am I going to be
Speaker 1: a guest on war Room? Huh? Tell Bannon? You know,
Speaker 1: you know, quick qui bono, quick pro quo. You know
Speaker 1: you tell Ben and I miss him. But I also
Speaker 1: want to ask Manni. You know that this audience is
Speaker 1: very a mill or two by the way, he's a
Speaker 1: nice guy, but this audience knows you very well because
Speaker 1: you filled in on the show numerous times in the past.
Speaker 1: We just want to check in, man how are you
Speaker 1: You're in quarantine, not not you know, specific quarantine, but
Speaker 1: we're all on lockdown. I should say, you're in lockdown
Speaker 1: in DC? How's it going down there? And how does
Speaker 1: Raheem Kassam pass the time? Well? Washington, DC and Capitol
Speaker 1: Hill especially, we are very strange places at the moment
Speaker 1: because you have this situation where if you're not walking
Speaker 1: down the street wearing a mask, people sort of start
Speaker 1: looking at you like you've murdered their family or something
Speaker 1: like that. It's a very you know, rules based way
Speaker 1: of looking at things. And Mayor Bowser has extended the
Speaker 1: lockdown in Washington, DC as well. However, in the in
Speaker 1: the DMB area, i e. In Maryland and Virginia. Now
Speaker 1: things are beginning to open up. So a lot of
Speaker 1: DC types are actually going out to Maryland to get
Speaker 1: their hair. Obviously you can see I haven't, but I
Speaker 1: did travel out to how to drive to Kent, Ireland
Speaker 1: this weekend just to see what was going on and
Speaker 1: how the reopening was going. And it seems like, you know,
Speaker 1: people are keen. And by the way, I was a
Speaker 1: lockdown person. They said thirty days to stow the spread.
Speaker 1: I was all in favor of that, but it stops
Speaker 1: at thirty days, right. We didn't give our permission for
Speaker 1: that to last any longer. And I am wholly on
Speaker 1: side of the people who now say say, okay, we've
Speaker 1: done that. We slow the spread. The hospitals weren't overwhelmed,
Speaker 1: that's all. We're out to get the nonsense the fauci
Speaker 1: now and these guys are coming out with that. We
Speaker 1: can't return to normal until you're all pumpful of this rush.
Speaker 1: Vaccine is a manifest nonsense and we must be rejected.
Speaker 1: And I brought the people, and I've seen some gim
Speaker 1: owners in New Jersey for instance, and elsewhere who are
Speaker 1: opening up and opening up safely. I applaud them. It's
Speaker 1: that kind of intrepid spirit. I think that distances America
Speaker 1: from the rest of the world. So carry on, keep
Speaker 1: calm and carry on, as they said. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: like Raheem could have been handling the reaction during the Blitz. Folks,
Speaker 1: he's got you covered. Listen to Raheem or we got
Speaker 1: to have a sniff upper lip, right, that's what the
Speaker 1: Brits say. That's exactly right, that that old Blitz spirit
Speaker 1: comes back again. And you know interesting, keep calm and
Speaker 1: carry on as a thing was designed during the war,
Speaker 1: but it wasn't actually deployed very much during the work
Speaker 1: kind of corn off towards what I say. Let's let's
Speaker 1: do as they intended with it during during the Second
Speaker 1: World War. Let's bring it out as a national slogan now, right,
Speaker 1: keep calm and carry on is exactly what most people
Speaker 1: in the country and indeed the Western world need to
Speaker 1: be hearing right now. Absolutely, man, I'm co sign Righthim
Speaker 1: Kasam Everybody war Room podcast also the National Pulse for
Speaker 1: his breaking story just came out now on China and
Speaker 1: what the Western news media is doing in favor of China. Rahim.
Speaker 1: Great to see you, man, Stay safe. Thanks very much
Speaker 1: for having me, Bud, You're in the Freedom Hunt. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Al Qaeda was
Speaker 1: involved in the strike on the United States back in
Speaker 1: December sixth of twenty nineteen. There was this shooting some
Speaker 1: of you, I'm sure we'll recall, that was out of
Speaker 1: US Naval base in Florida. Three people were killed. The
Speaker 1: attacker was a Saudi named second Lieutenant Mohammed Said al Shamrani.
Speaker 1: He was a member of the Saudi Royal Air Force.
Speaker 1: He was there as part of a US Navy Navy
Speaker 1: training program. So we invite this guy in to train him,
Speaker 1: make him better at his job, and this disgusting piece
Speaker 1: of blank terrorists kills our people. And we had thought
Speaker 1: all along that there was likely a connection here to
Speaker 1: outside jihadi's forces, and now they have even they have
Speaker 1: additional evidence. According to FBI Director Christopher Array, the pencil
Speaker 1: attack was actually the brutal culmination of years of planning.
Speaker 1: Al Shamrani was actually radicalized in twenty fifteen. Now there
Speaker 1: were oh, you may recall as well that al Shamrani,
Speaker 1: one of the instructors, referred to this guy as quote
Speaker 1: porn stash, which he really did not like. And initially,
Speaker 1: if I remember now this is just going off of memory,
Speaker 1: there may have been some journalists that suggested that that
Speaker 1: was that it was merely calling him porn stash that
Speaker 1: led him to go and kill three of our three
Speaker 1: of our soldiers or three of our military members. And
Speaker 1: he was he was shot and kill thankfully by a
Speaker 1: sheriff's deputy right on the scene. So he got he
Speaker 1: got taken out. So there's not going to be a
Speaker 1: trial or anything now. But one of the problems here
Speaker 1: was that they this was one of those times where
Speaker 1: they could not access his communications. They couldn't access them
Speaker 1: because he had an Apple iPhone and they didn't have
Speaker 1: the codes to get into. It looks like they did
Speaker 1: manage to get in get past the decryption, but Apple
Speaker 1: declined to do so. And this always brings up this
Speaker 1: very very thorny debate over whether or not people should
Speaker 1: be companies really should be forced to help the authorities
Speaker 1: to essentially leave a back door or create an over
Speaker 1: for the system, because once you do that, now the
Speaker 1: encryption is inherently weakened. And now it's out there, and
Speaker 1: given what we've seen with the government, you see with
Speaker 1: a terrorist, you'd always say, well, of course we should
Speaker 1: have that backdoor, right or not. Everyone would say that,
Speaker 1: but most people would say some civil libertarians out there
Speaker 1: would probably disagree. But you see this guy Alsham Ronnie,
Speaker 1: This this scum that killed killed three Americans who were
Speaker 1: part of this training program trying to help this guy out.
Speaker 1: This scum was able to hide at least his plans
Speaker 1: on his Apple device, And we would all say, well,
Speaker 1: shouldn't Apple do whatever, you know, whatever law enforce it
Speaker 1: needs it to in this circumstance to help get around
Speaker 1: this encryption for what seems to be a directed an
Speaker 1: outside in attack, meaning outside of the US, foreign directed
Speaker 1: jihatas plot inside the United States. That took a long time.
Speaker 1: I was going to show you what a bunch of
Speaker 1: of just not only the disgraceful and evil and disgusting,
Speaker 1: you know, human beings, al Qaida in general, al Qaeda
Speaker 1: operatives like this guy. But you know, they took years.
Speaker 1: And so he shoots a bunch of he shoots three
Speaker 1: innocent people, and then and then he gets blown away
Speaker 1: by a sheriff's deputy, and you say, what does al
Speaker 1: Qaida really think they accomplish with this? You know, ultimately
Speaker 1: what we've seen is they're really just such a bunch
Speaker 1: of losers. You know, That's how Trump refers to them,
Speaker 1: and a lot of journalists get very snide about that.
Speaker 1: But it's true. The people that do these kinds of things,
Speaker 1: these al Qaeda or Isis or any of these other
Speaker 1: whether their sympathizers are directed by these organizations, they're just
Speaker 1: bad people. They're losers, and their ideology is pathetic and
Speaker 1: it's never gonna win. And you know, we've been lucky
Speaker 1: for a while here and that we haven't had to
Speaker 1: focus in on these still very real jehottest threat around
Speaker 1: the world jihadism has received. It took us almost twenty
Speaker 1: years and a lot of you know, trillions of dollars
Speaker 1: of expense and counter terrorism operations all over the world
Speaker 1: and multiple wars. And whether those wars helped gehotism receid
Speaker 1: or not as a debate for another day. Certainly the
Speaker 1: one Afghanistan I believe did, but a rock we could
Speaker 1: talk about. But this, this this attack in Pensacola was
Speaker 1: an al Qaeda attack. So, um, that's that's where we
Speaker 1: are on this one, and I think you'll see people
Speaker 1: at least reminded m oh and then there was a
Speaker 1: there was audio. I believe that al Qaeda's branch in
Speaker 1: Yemen had claimed this attack already, so a QAPS referred
Speaker 1: to al Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula. It's considered the
Speaker 1: most active for external plotting in the world on this
Speaker 1: because Yemen is a Yemen is a failed state in
Speaker 1: the middle of a civil war. It's got so many
Speaker 1: problems that we could do a whole show just cataloging them. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: it's a it's in terrible shape as a place, as
Speaker 1: a country, but there's freedom for al Qaeda to operate there,
Speaker 1: to plan there, to train, to engage in more over
Speaker 1: terrorist activity than it would in a lot of other
Speaker 1: places around the world. And by the way, in January,
Speaker 1: US officials according this is according to Al Jazeera, so
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, check the source. But US officials
Speaker 1: announced they were sending home twenty one Saudi military students
Speaker 1: after an investigation revealed they had posted anti American sentiments
Speaker 1: on social media pages. I didn't see this until now,
Speaker 1: or had quote contact with child pornography. What the hell
Speaker 1: are these Saudi's doing? My god, But let's just focus
Speaker 1: in on the anti American sentiment here for a second. Yeah,
Speaker 1: if you're a visitor in this country and you're putting
Speaker 1: up anti US posts and you're in a US military
Speaker 1: installation at rbhest Out, you should go. You have no
Speaker 1: free speech rights here if you're a foreigner visiting on
Speaker 1: US soil, on the US military base. So the Saudis
Speaker 1: said they'd review the conduct of the twenty one to
Speaker 1: see if they should face discipline. I'm guessing they did
Speaker 1: in facing scipline. But this was this wasn't al Qaida plot.
Speaker 1: He wasn't contact with al Qaida, according to what they
Speaker 1: found on his phone. They finally got through the encryption,
Speaker 1: so you know, the terrorists took out three more of ours.
Speaker 1: Got to remain vigilant. This threat has receded now, but
Speaker 1: it could come back. And this is something that's still
Speaker 1: going to stay with us, so we've got to keep
Speaker 1: an eye on it. Thanks for listening to The Bus
Speaker 1: Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the
Speaker 1: iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Team Buck,
Speaker 1: It's time for Roll Call Roll Call time producer Mark.
Speaker 1: How was your weekend, buddy, how's everything going? Oh? Pretty well? Well,
Speaker 1: well I stayed in Yeah, me too, Actually maybe, Joy,
Speaker 1: no big parties this weekend. Go to make that joke
Speaker 1: until I can actually go somewhere other than my apartment.
Speaker 1: You know, I can understand. Although I will say there
Speaker 1: were a lot more restaurants open for takeout this weekend
Speaker 1: than ever had been before, so that was encouraging to see,
Speaker 1: at least in my area. And I also just there
Speaker 1: were people all over the streets. I mean everyone's just like,
Speaker 1: get me out of here. They're all trying to just
Speaker 1: get outside and get air, and which is good. I
Speaker 1: mean I wish that they didn't feel like they all
Speaker 1: had to be wearing masks. I mean, I see like
Speaker 1: twenty two year olds on electric scooters with a mask on.
Speaker 1: I'm like, what do you what is that? But I
Speaker 1: know the mask politics, it is what it is. I
Speaker 1: mean I can barely exercise without a mask. I can
Speaker 1: only imagine with one. It wasn't gonna be really uncomfortable.
Speaker 1: I think people have really thought this through. When it
Speaker 1: gets to be eighty eighty five degrees and you have
Speaker 1: to actually be outside and do things to have a
Speaker 1: mask on. This is gonna suck. Okay, doctors wear masks
Speaker 1: indoors in air conditioned offices and hospitals. They're not walking
Speaker 1: around outside, you know, going for a jog in the
Speaker 1: park with a mask on. This is nuts. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: mean I think I might still I'm still gonna do
Speaker 1: it in grocery stores are any indoor confined space, but
Speaker 1: I'm not doing it outside. Do you watch any good
Speaker 1: movies all the weekend anything like that? My wife had
Speaker 1: never seen the FX series on the OJ Trial, so
Speaker 1: we watched. I know, she's stuff like that is news
Speaker 1: to her. It just amazes me. But we watched that
Speaker 1: and she loved it. I'm I watched her for the
Speaker 1: second time. It was great. It's fantastic. I think it's
Speaker 1: the best thing Cuba Gooding Junior has ever done. Oh yeah.
Speaker 1: He portrays OJ so well in that. He is he
Speaker 1: is amazing in that. And I also think that there's
Speaker 1: a scene there with uh Ron Pearlman was the Ron
Speaker 1: Rono was his name. The guy who was killed was
Speaker 1: Ron Goldman. Ron Goldman, m Ron Goldman his father. When
Speaker 1: he sits down with Marsha Clark, that scene, that scene
Speaker 1: like haunts you, you know, oh yeah, where the guy
Speaker 1: is just like yeah, everyone's just talking about this, what
Speaker 1: about you know, what about my son who was a
Speaker 1: really good guy and did nothing wrong and had nothing
Speaker 1: like I had nothing to do with any of this. Really,
Speaker 1: I mean in some ways, you're just like he was
Speaker 1: just you know, I mean, obviously the guy murders his wife,
Speaker 1: he's a psychopath, but there's just a guy who's standing
Speaker 1: next to him, and no one even talks about that. Really,
Speaker 1: I mean, that doesn't get any It's just even today,
Speaker 1: people still forget about him. And look, I mean, I
Speaker 1: mean I stum remembered his first name. I stumbled on
Speaker 1: his last name just because he didn't. Everyone knows Nicole,
Speaker 1: and you know Nicole Brown Simpson, right, I ever knew
Speaker 1: that she she his wife's beautiful woman. She's murdered, mother
Speaker 1: of his children, murders her. I mean, it's just so horrific.
Speaker 1: But there was this other guy who was just there
Speaker 1: who murdered with her, and you know, it is a
Speaker 1: double murder. I mean that's you know, the OJ was.
Speaker 1: OJ didn't just kill the wife and mother of his
Speaker 1: own children. He was willing to kill a guy who
Speaker 1: just happened to be there well, and the fact that
Speaker 1: he I will never do. Wait, how old were you
Speaker 1: when that verdict? Gosh, I was at ninety six when
Speaker 1: the verdict came down, and I was three. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: was gonna say, do you remember? But no, you know,
Speaker 1: I do not. I remember it. It's the only time
Speaker 1: when I was in grammar school that all the teachers
Speaker 1: they had like little radios in the rooms, which I didn't,
Speaker 1: you know, maybe we could get to the bomb shelters.
Speaker 1: It was some old like Soviet you know thing. I
Speaker 1: don't know because I didn't realize that we would have
Speaker 1: had these little, these little old school radios in the room,
Speaker 1: and they all had them. And do I say room funny?
Speaker 1: But I say room funny, don't I? Yeah, a little bit.
Speaker 1: This is the snow Princess is pointing this out that
Speaker 1: I kind of say, almost like rum but yeah, I
Speaker 1: don't like Stewie from the From a Family Guy. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I sound like Stewart. My little sister has actually said
Speaker 1: that before. Yes, you you sound like Seth McFarland. I do. Yeah,
Speaker 1: who is the voice of Stuie and Peter and most
Speaker 1: of the characters. Actually yeah, interesting. Um so anyway, but
Speaker 1: I remember when the OJ bird came down and I
Speaker 1: was that was stunning because it was the first time
Speaker 1: as I was, like, I was kind of a little kid.
Speaker 1: I was like, justice will prevail, Like he's going to prison,
Speaker 1: Like I was only the eighth grade. But we all
Speaker 1: knew the guy did it. Couldn't have been more obvious, right,
Speaker 1: And nope, justice did not prevail. It was a real moment.
Speaker 1: It was a real wow. Every one of the countries
Speaker 1: in those twelve jurors knew that he did it, and
Speaker 1: I think by the way, I think they knew that
Speaker 1: he did it too. But it wasn't about right. When
Speaker 1: you get this from the show, it wasn't about that.
Speaker 1: It was about right. It was about other stuff. It
Speaker 1: wasn't about the fact that he was a double murderer.
Speaker 1: Oh oh my gosh. Anyway, Kyle writes in here, Buck,
Speaker 1: you were talking about the progressive grab bag that is
Speaker 1: the Heroes Act. One of the things I noticed was
Speaker 1: suspending federal student loan payments until September twenty twenty one.
Speaker 1: I think that's meant to condition people to get used
Speaker 1: to not paying their student loans. At all, and as
Speaker 1: a logical step toward advocating simply forgiving the debt. As
Speaker 1: September twenty twenty one approaches, My wife and I sacrifice
Speaker 1: luxuries and lived on one income to pay off six
Speaker 1: figures of student loan debt in less than five years,
Speaker 1: while friends of ours with similar debt took vacations and
Speaker 1: bought their first home. We're doing well now, and the
Speaker 1: thought of us being taxed in the future to help
Speaker 1: forgive the education choices made by others is infuriating. This
Speaker 1: was a story of the ant and the grasshopper. Democrats
Speaker 1: want to punish the ant and reward the grasshopper. I
Speaker 1: don't actually know the story of it. Do you know
Speaker 1: the story of the end? I mean, I can figure
Speaker 1: it out from context, but from cont I can figure
Speaker 1: it out. But no, I don't know. Yeah, but as
Speaker 1: long as the praying man just can still kill the
Speaker 1: murder hornets, we're all gonna be. Okay. Did you see
Speaker 1: that video? I did not. It's amazing you have. It's
Speaker 1: a video when viral. You know, when the murder hornet,
Speaker 1: you know, you know about the murder horns can talk
Speaker 1: about in the show. I'm also good I also gonna
Speaker 1: say something. The French bulldog that killed its owner turns
Speaker 1: out it was a pit bull mix, doesn't really count.
Speaker 1: I'm not throwing shade at pit bulls because oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: your inbox gets wild. I'm not throwing shade at pit bulls. Okay,
Speaker 1: and other of them can be lovely pets. I knew
Speaker 1: you guys all know I love dogs. Everyone can just cool.
Speaker 1: They're cool. There's just this is the pit bull is
Speaker 1: up there with the vaccine discussion as a general matter
Speaker 1: where you feel like you could talk about it, but
Speaker 1: people have very strong opinions on it. So and the
Speaker 1: pit bull people are actually right, see producer Mark Is.
Speaker 1: The people are actually right. So yeah, but it's it
Speaker 1: was a pit mix with a French bulldog because the
Speaker 1: French bulldog is just not large enough and powerful enough
Speaker 1: to kill a person. Okay, that's like saying you're chihuahua
Speaker 1: killed you. It's just not didn't make any sense. Turns
Speaker 1: out that it was a mix with a pit bull,
Speaker 1: so it's substantially larger and more powerful than a standard
Speaker 1: and it had been in a fighting ring. Okay, So
Speaker 1: I'm just saying, so you're not I was like, talu,
Speaker 1: am I being too slow with your chicken over the weekend.
Speaker 1: You know. It's like she started looking at me like
Speaker 1: do I look like a big drumstick walking around this place?
Speaker 1: I don't know, But no, she would never. She just
Speaker 1: wants her belly scratched. Oh but the murder hornets. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there's a video of a praying mantis against her murder hornet.
Speaker 1: A praying mantis takes out that murder hornet. No problem,
Speaker 1: That does sound awesome. I'll have to look it up.
Speaker 1: Yeah you should. It's actually worth seeing. She's like, damn
Speaker 1: praying mantis is there? There's a reason why they have
Speaker 1: their own kung fu style? You see what I did there?
Speaker 1: I didn't. Yeah, well, yeah it's good, Okay, I'll move on. Kenny.
Speaker 1: You're right about the people with cancer who can't get
Speaker 1: checked because of the lockdown. My mother in law just
Speaker 1: had surgery to remove cancer. We found out it had spread,
Speaker 1: were on lockdown and doctors were not allowed to perform
Speaker 1: the procedure. We will never know whether the two weeks
Speaker 1: we waited made the difference, but to suggest the lockdowns
Speaker 1: have no cost, it's clearly wrong. Kenny. I'm so sorry.
Speaker 1: And this was foreseeable for the country as a policy.
Speaker 1: Matter of course, this kind of tragic circumstance was going
Speaker 1: to happen. But we were not allowed when we were
Speaker 1: discussing policy, Kenny, we were not allowed to have a
Speaker 1: discussion about this and what the effects would be. You know,
Speaker 1: we were not allowed to bring this in. If you did,
Speaker 1: you just you don't care enough about you know whatever
Speaker 1: it was frontline workers or granny or whatever. And it's like, well,
Speaker 1: what about granny that might get cancer? What about your mom?
Speaker 1: What about you? Right? What about anybody who might get cancer?
Speaker 1: I don't know that that wasn't allowed to be a
Speaker 1: part of the discussion. Kenny also writes, also, I'm a
Speaker 1: second year at Harvard Business School. Well, Kenny, very nice,
Speaker 1: very impressive, sir. It's pretty woke, But I try to
Speaker 1: spread freedom. Yeah, you do. You listen to this show?
Speaker 1: Just a quick defensive Harvard. They neither requested nor received
Speaker 1: any money from the Cares Act. They shouldn't have been
Speaker 1: blamed for Qualified lying for the nine million. The Cares
Speaker 1: Act allocated money to colleges, and Harvard qualified, but they
Speaker 1: never asked for nor receive the money. There are lots
Speaker 1: of things these woke schools do wrong. But in this
Speaker 1: case the conservative anger was misdirected if the people who
Speaker 1: it was the people who wrote the bill who were slopping,
Speaker 1: not the school's fault. Kenny noted, thank you for the update.
Speaker 1: That sounds about right, considering how many holes and problems
Speaker 1: there were in the bill Other than that. Eric Kaybuck
Speaker 1: just finished watching the new Jerry seinfeldt special. As a
Speaker 1: married man of fifteen years, I have to say his
Speaker 1: bid on marriage was spot on food for thought for
Speaker 1: you to prepare for the snow princess, whoever she might be. Well,
Speaker 1: thank you very much, Eric. Producer Mark and I both
Speaker 1: really enjoyed enjoyed that special. I still laugh about the
Speaker 1: porta Potti thing whatever I think about it, but yes,
Speaker 1: it's Do you remember the married part of it? Mark? Yeah,
Speaker 1: this is gonna stick out to I know we talked
Speaker 1: about it, but I can't remember what the bid It
Speaker 1: was usual, you know, jokes about your wife nagging you
Speaker 1: and stuff like, Okay, fair enough, Seinfeld, I get it.
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sex
Speaker 1: and Show podcast. All right, more roll call here in
Speaker 1: the Freedom Hunt with producer Mark and yours truly, Jake.
Speaker 1: Yesterday my wife went shopping and came home with the comment,
Speaker 1: when are things going back to normal? I think a
Speaker 1: lot of people are wondering that, and my answer is,
Speaker 1: while President Trump is an office, maybe never. But if
Speaker 1: nonspecific Democrat is elected president, then the flipping of the
Speaker 1: script will be immediate and jarring. As long as dem
Speaker 1: media see what I did there, very nice Jake can
Speaker 1: scare people into staying home or wearing masks. Trump will
Speaker 1: suffer and the economy will be collateral damage. But they're
Speaker 1: smart enough to know that normalcy only returns when public
Speaker 1: opinion is fully flipped into thinking we have to be
Speaker 1: brave and go back to living our lives, knowing the cost.
Speaker 1: That's when the elites get to lecture us on our courage.
Speaker 1: Friends lecture us on quote courage. Friends go shopping on
Speaker 1: their nauseating TikTok videos now filmed on their beachfront instead
Speaker 1: of their den full of important looking books. The credibility shelf,
Speaker 1: which is an important thing for your live hits at home. See,
Speaker 1: I have incredibilities, credibilities stacked behind me here in the
Speaker 1: freedom hunt because my apartment is so small don't even
Speaker 1: really have a form of bookshelf in here because my
Speaker 1: apartments so small. So that's how that's how living large.
Speaker 1: We are here in the Freedom Hunt. No bookshelf because
Speaker 1: no room, because apartment too small. But I have books. David, Hey, Buck,
Speaker 1: I cannot get through a day without listening to your program.
Speaker 1: You provide so much important information that I would never
Speaker 1: hear from the mainstream media. I listened to your show
Speaker 1: for several years on Boston twelve hundred talk radio, but
Speaker 1: recently discover what podcasts are and subscribe to the buxx
Speaker 1: and podcast. It is great, well, thank you so much, man,
Speaker 1: But I was wondering what is more beneficial for your
Speaker 1: show in ratings listening on the radio or on the podcast.
Speaker 1: I love the podcast, but if it be more beneficial
Speaker 1: for me to listen on the radio, I will switch back.
Speaker 1: The answer, David is it's great on both man. Whatever
Speaker 1: is easiest for you, whatever you can most consistently and
Speaker 1: comfortably listen, whatever way that that's the way to do it.
Speaker 1: So please do continue to listen if you love the
Speaker 1: like listening on the podcast. Bucksex and dot com is
Speaker 1: now a place where we have the podcast for you
Speaker 1: to listen. You can go on Spotify, you can go
Speaker 1: on Apple Podcasts and the iHeartRadio app. Yes, the iHeartRadio
Speaker 1: app I Heeart Radio being the company that we work for,
Speaker 1: could call Mark, so yes, that those would be the
Speaker 1: ways you can do it. And you know what, David,
Speaker 1: and thank you so much for listening. But the best
Speaker 1: thing you could also do is, if you've got some
Speaker 1: friends you know are conservatives, please share with them the
Speaker 1: podcast and explain it. I mean, I listen to books
Speaker 1: on tape now, I mean I'm somebody who is really
Speaker 1: always operating in the audio world. I don't really I
Speaker 1: don't really listen to other podcasts. I'll listen to some
Speaker 1: history podcasts multi I know, guys, it's coming. But I
Speaker 1: know there's other history podcasts out there. I'll listen to
Speaker 1: them sometimes just out of curiosity because I like history.
Speaker 1: But if you could tell somebody so they would listen,
Speaker 1: that would be the single most effective, most helpful thing
Speaker 1: you could do to help the Freedom Hut. Keep the
Speaker 1: doors open, you know, Otherwise, otherwise Producer Mark is gonna
Speaker 1: end up. You know, I don't know, Producer Mark is
Speaker 1: gonna open up a Italian restaurant with good food, but
Speaker 1: grouchy service, and we don't want that. I would open
Speaker 1: up a bar and name it puzzles, named puzzles, Yeah,
Speaker 1: why puzzles? Do you not get the reference? No, so
Speaker 1: from how I met your mother Barney and Ted wanted
Speaker 1: to open a bar and name it puzzles. Wow, you
Speaker 1: just snuck into how much how I had your mother
Speaker 1: reference past me I did. I'm gonna hang my head
Speaker 1: in shame. I should have gotten that. I'm sorry about that.
Speaker 1: I thought you would, so I figured that was an
Speaker 1: easy roll. I know, I love that. I love that show,
Speaker 1: and I feel like I feel like a lot of
Speaker 1: not a lot of Team Buck really watched that that show.
Speaker 1: I think it's great for what it is. And also
Speaker 1: there's a lot of nostalgia for me because as a
Speaker 1: guy who's been in New York and been single for
Speaker 1: many years, the show resonates. The show resonates for sure,
Speaker 1: and I you know, that's where it's where I learned
Speaker 1: about the Hot Crazy Scale, for example, which is a
Speaker 1: is a thing, the Hot Crazy Scale. I'm not saying that.
Speaker 1: I so I'm not saying that I subscribe to it
Speaker 1: just in case. The Snow Princess is hearing this. You know,
Speaker 1: I'm not saying we don't. There's no such thing as
Speaker 1: a hot crazy scale. And yeah, it's just a thing
Speaker 1: that i've heard about from the show that I do
Speaker 1: not rely on at all. It's not no, no, okay.
Speaker 1: Next one, Corey writes Bruiser Mark is awesome. He's smart.
Speaker 1: Corey knows how to get in the roll call. Hey, guys,
Speaker 1: I just wanted, as a reaction at Red China's obvious
Speaker 1: negligence and response to the RONA, why doesn't the US
Speaker 1: open an embassy in Taipei, Republic of China as a
Speaker 1: result recognizing them as a country. It would punish the
Speaker 1: punish the CCP at home by not being able to
Speaker 1: bring the country a hole as they see it, and
Speaker 1: push back on the influence in the region. Cory, I mean,
Speaker 1: it's a good idea, except that would be seen as
Speaker 1: super provocative by the Chinese Communist Party and no one
Speaker 1: has them. I need to find a word to say
Speaker 1: when someone doesn't have the because you know, in common language,
Speaker 1: we would all we all know what the word is
Speaker 1: that I want to use, but I feel like I
Speaker 1: shouldn't say that on the radio, and so I end
Speaker 1: up saying gall. But that sounds like I'm, you know,
Speaker 1: missus doubtfire up here or something. It's like, oh, he
Speaker 1: doesn't have the gall to pull that off. Like we
Speaker 1: all know, can we say no, that's that's that's just
Speaker 1: a that's an Espanol. You can't just go with an Espanol, okay,
Speaker 1: But I mean the same idea. I don't know. Also,
Speaker 1: I mean I feel like I shouldn't, you know, I
Speaker 1: feel like that B word for some of the audience
Speaker 1: we got. We got some young folks listening and everything else,
Speaker 1: and it's a little I don't know, I think it's
Speaker 1: a little, a little brash, a little on the edge.
Speaker 1: What do you normally play sports with? Book? I mean, yes,
Speaker 1: that is true. There usually are balls in sports, yes,
Speaker 1: soccer ball, basketball, But to say that one had but
Speaker 1: you know, it's tough. There's a lot of phrases. See.
Speaker 1: The problem is that phrases become they kind of get
Speaker 1: numbed over time, and we all use it more and more.
Speaker 1: You know, like when when you run around you call
Speaker 1: someone a jerk, for example, which is acceptable. We're allowed
Speaker 1: to say jerk, that guy's a jerk, But you know,
Speaker 1: you get too into the derivation. It's true. Also, you
Speaker 1: know you you say you talk about people who are
Speaker 1: you know, an idiot? For example, you're talking about some
Speaker 1: of these words we use, you know, the history of them,
Speaker 1: but we've those are now considered acceptable to use. But
Speaker 1: it's always changing, It's always changing. Brandon writes, Hey, Buck,
Speaker 1: I just saw that Tides of History just in an
Speaker 1: episode on the Siege of Malta. I can't wait for yours?
Speaker 1: Is it going to be posted a normal podcast link?
Speaker 1: What the hell is Tides of History? And why are
Speaker 1: they doing a Malta thing? Well, probably because you've been
Speaker 1: talking about it for three months? Who the who the
Speaker 1: heck is Tides of History? And why are they stealing
Speaker 1: my Malta thunder here I've written, I've read like five
Speaker 1: books on Malta in the last month. Tides of History.
Speaker 1: I gotta see what? And now I'm of course giving
Speaker 1: them free advertising on the show, even by mentioning it.
Speaker 1: Oh it's um. I have no idea. I don't even
Speaker 1: know if it exists. I'm I'm gonna look it up.
Speaker 1: Who cares? Because my Malta podcast will be amazing. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna leave it there. Friends, Thank you so much for
Speaker 1: joining as always appreciate it, Thank you so much for
Speaker 1: being here, and yeah, good to go, shield Hie. Everybody