WEBVTT - Efficiency isn't everything

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:09.479
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Before Breakfast, a production of iHeartRadio. Good Morning.

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Laura. Welcome to the Before Breakfast podcast. Today's

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 1>tip is that efficiency isn't everything. Even if there is

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a task that could be done cheaply by someone else,

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>or that theoretically could take less time, if you enjoy it,

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>feel free to keep doing it, at least some of

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the time. The endpoint of efficiency is freeing up time

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 1>for tasks you enjoy. If you are already at that

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>enjoyment step, you are winning at life. So I have

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>been reading various books lately on how entrepreneurs can free

0:00:56.920 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 1>up time. Many entrepreneurs work very long hours because they

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>are tackling everything in their businesses. That can be a

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>problem if people want to eat and sleep and see

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 1>their families. I have certainly pondered which tasks I can

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>get off my plate. I have delegated a great deal

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>in my business and in my personal life. However, as

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I think about this question, I realize that there are

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:30.960
<v Speaker 1>some things I don't want to take off my plate,

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>even if I can see the argument for doing so.

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>For instance, I love to hear from readers and listeners

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>if someone has taken the time to read my work

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>or listen to my work, and has written me their

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>thoughts about it. I want to acknowledge that. I want

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to share my follow up ideas and hear what the

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>person thinks about those as well. So I read all

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the messages I get from readers and lists, and I

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>respond to about ninety percent of them. Sometimes this can

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>be time consuming. I recently ran a time tracking challenge

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>where several thousand people kept track of their time for

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a week. Many of those folks then sent me their

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>time logs afterwards with thoughts on their schedules and their lives.

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Studying these time logs and responding to people's questions and

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>discoveries took at least an hour a day for several weeks.

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>It was pointed out to me somewhere in here that

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I could have created some automatic responses or response templates,

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>or had somebody else helped me go through all this,

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>which is totally true. But I love learning about time.

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I love seeing how people spend their time. I like

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>digging through the data so I really understand the choices

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that people make. So even if this did take a

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of time, I was glad to do it. Other

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>people might make different choices, but reading and responding to

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>my own messages works for me. Perhaps you, likewise have

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 1>certain work tasks that you enjoy, even if they are

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily the core of your job. Maybe you are

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>mostly in management, but you enjoy using your technical skills

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>from time to time. Maybe you are mostly acquiring new

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>book projects, but you still like editing a few on occasion.

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>You are mostly designing menus or training restaurant managers, but

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy hopping in during the dinner rush to help out.

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe there are tasks you do that you are

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>well aware could be done quicker. I can crank out

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a blog post or newsletter quickly when I need to,

0:03:56.280 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>but sometimes I enjoy carving out extra time. I'm coming

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>back to the work a few more times to tweak

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>a phrase or at a new angle. Does anyone notice

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>or care? Quite possibly not, But I enjoy it, so

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I do it. There is no need to go overboard

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 1>on these things. We probably shouldn't spend all our time

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>on lower value tasks when we are responsible for the

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>higher value ones that pay the bills, but we don't

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 1>need to offload them completely either, or do everything at

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:42.799
<v Speaker 1>the absolute swiftest speed. Efficiency isn't everything. It is a lot,

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>but it isn't everything. Best to keep it in perspective.

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, this is Laura. Thanks for listening, and

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>here's to making the most of our time. Hey, everybody,

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:09.359
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to hear from you. You can send me

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 1>your tips, your questions, or anything else. Just connect with

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram at Before Breakfast pod

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>that's B the number four, then Breakfast p o D.

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 1>You can also shoot me an email at Before Breakfast

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts at iHeartMedia dot com. That Before Breakfast is spelled

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>out with all the letters. Thanks so much, should I

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>look forward to staying in touch. Before Breakfast is a

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.