1
00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:07,040
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio studios, podcasts, radio news.

2
00:00:07,840 --> 00:00:12,160
Speaker 2: Investors assessing the market impacts consumers and businesses already readjusting

3
00:00:12,240 --> 00:00:15,200
Speaker 2: torson Snock of Apollo, writing, this is a weight and

4
00:00:15,280 --> 00:00:19,200
Speaker 2: see economy. Consumers are more reluctant. The bottom line is

5
00:00:19,280 --> 00:00:21,239
Speaker 2: that this eventually needs to a slow down in the

6
00:00:21,280 --> 00:00:24,800
Speaker 2: hard data, and markets should prepare for that scenario. Towson

7
00:00:24,840 --> 00:00:27,040
Speaker 2: joins us now for more. Tourston, good morning.

8
00:00:26,840 --> 00:00:27,280
Speaker 1: Good morning.

9
00:00:27,520 --> 00:00:29,520
Speaker 2: We've seen the shift and the soft data. The last

10
00:00:29,520 --> 00:00:32,680
Speaker 2: time we spoke, you raise the issue are believe Lisar

11
00:00:32,680 --> 00:00:35,640
Speaker 2: asked the question, with that soft data bleed into the

12
00:00:35,680 --> 00:00:39,040
Speaker 2: hard data, do you sense inevitability now toward that?

13
00:00:39,400 --> 00:00:41,000
Speaker 1: We are beginning to see that if you look at

14
00:00:41,080 --> 00:00:43,519
Speaker 1: high frequency data, so over the last several weeks, we

15
00:00:43,600 --> 00:00:45,400
Speaker 1: have seen and I know some of these indicators are

16
00:00:45,400 --> 00:00:47,519
Speaker 1: a little bit special, but we've seen the number of

17
00:00:47,520 --> 00:00:50,320
Speaker 1: people who are going to movie theaters, a number of

18
00:00:50,360 --> 00:00:52,559
Speaker 1: people going to Broadway shows. If you look at the

19
00:00:52,600 --> 00:00:55,360
Speaker 1: TSA data for how many people flying airplanes, even if

20
00:00:55,360 --> 00:00:57,280
Speaker 1: you look at how many people are visiting the Statue

21
00:00:57,320 --> 00:00:59,360
Speaker 1: of Liberty here in New York City. All that has

22
00:00:59,400 --> 00:01:02,160
Speaker 1: actually started weeken and now we get another soft data

23
00:01:02,240 --> 00:01:05,120
Speaker 1: print here at ten with the Michigan centiment for consumers.

24
00:01:05,240 --> 00:01:08,119
Speaker 1: So overall it is still a little bit too early,

25
00:01:08,400 --> 00:01:10,800
Speaker 1: but given that we have this weight and see situation

26
00:01:11,000 --> 00:01:14,320
Speaker 1: both for consumers and for corporates, it does make sense

27
00:01:14,360 --> 00:01:16,680
Speaker 1: that the soft data should eventually begin to spill over

28
00:01:16,760 --> 00:01:19,400
Speaker 1: to at least some weakening in the hot data.

29
00:01:19,440 --> 00:01:21,320
Speaker 2: One feature of this cycle that I think a lot

30
00:01:21,319 --> 00:01:25,080
Speaker 2: of people underestimated, you not included is the resilience of

31
00:01:25,080 --> 00:01:28,280
Speaker 2: this economy. What is our capacity to absorb sharks now

32
00:01:28,319 --> 00:01:29,200
Speaker 2: has that been reduced?

33
00:01:29,560 --> 00:01:31,640
Speaker 1: Well, that's a very important question because that depends on

34
00:01:31,680 --> 00:01:33,839
Speaker 1: the nature of the sharks, and we're facing two sharks

35
00:01:33,840 --> 00:01:36,160
Speaker 1: at the moment, name the DOGE, which is laying off

36
00:01:36,160 --> 00:01:39,320
Speaker 1: government workers. Estimates suggests that will be around three hundred

37
00:01:39,360 --> 00:01:42,200
Speaker 1: thousands workers that might be losing their jobs. Remember that

38
00:01:42,240 --> 00:01:45,680
Speaker 1: for every federal worker, there are two contractors, according to Brookings.

39
00:01:46,160 --> 00:01:49,400
Speaker 1: So Brooking starties show that in total, true employment in

40
00:01:49,440 --> 00:01:52,680
Speaker 1: the federal government is roughly around nine ten million people.

41
00:01:52,920 --> 00:01:55,160
Speaker 1: So if you now think about total above households one

42
00:01:55,240 --> 00:01:57,640
Speaker 1: hundred and thirty million, and someone in the federal work

43
00:01:57,760 --> 00:01:59,919
Speaker 1: or contract that lives together with someone in the private sector.

44
00:02:00,120 --> 00:02:02,480
Speaker 1: You get that as much as ten fifteen percent of

45
00:02:02,520 --> 00:02:05,480
Speaker 1: all households in some way or another is being impacted

46
00:02:05,600 --> 00:02:08,720
Speaker 1: from a sentiment perspective by doose A loan and tariffs

47
00:02:08,760 --> 00:02:11,960
Speaker 1: of course, also in particular impacts anyone who is associated

48
00:02:11,960 --> 00:02:14,160
Speaker 1: with trade with Canada and Mexico, and you have that

49
00:02:14,160 --> 00:02:16,480
Speaker 1: that is also a particular of course across the border

50
00:02:16,520 --> 00:02:18,680
Speaker 1: to the north and to the south, playing a significant

51
00:02:18,760 --> 00:02:21,000
Speaker 1: role in a number of states. So the bottom line

52
00:02:21,040 --> 00:02:24,160
Speaker 1: is is not only terriffs and trade warm. It's also

53
00:02:24,200 --> 00:02:27,560
Speaker 1: the combination of the risk that government workers and contractors

54
00:02:27,639 --> 00:02:30,560
Speaker 1: potentially losing their jobs. That are the main reasons why

55
00:02:30,840 --> 00:02:32,640
Speaker 1: the soft data is weakening the way it is. And

56
00:02:32,680 --> 00:02:35,120
Speaker 1: it's not only consumer soft data is also corporate. If

57
00:02:35,160 --> 00:02:37,640
Speaker 1: you look at the CAPEX planning from the regional feds

58
00:02:37,760 --> 00:02:40,440
Speaker 1: Dallas FED, Field, Delpha FED, New York FED, that's showing

59
00:02:40,480 --> 00:02:43,320
Speaker 1: that businesses in those districts are saying we're beginning to

60
00:02:43,320 --> 00:02:47,720
Speaker 1: cut back CAPEX plans. Likewise, NFIB also roundtable surveys KAPEX

61
00:02:47,720 --> 00:02:50,560
Speaker 1: planning is also moving lower. So both consumer confidence moving

62
00:02:50,600 --> 00:02:53,359
Speaker 1: lower corporate confidence moving lower. It is a precursor for

63
00:02:53,480 --> 00:02:55,160
Speaker 1: slow downcoming in the hot data.

64
00:02:55,200 --> 00:02:58,240
Speaker 3: There's an argument being made that if what was propping

65
00:02:58,320 --> 00:03:00,840
Speaker 3: up the United States economy was goverm meant spending, it

66
00:03:00,880 --> 00:03:03,320
Speaker 3: wasn't that strong to begin with, And this is actually

67
00:03:03,400 --> 00:03:05,640
Speaker 3: somewhat of a withdrawal from a sugar high from an

68
00:03:05,680 --> 00:03:09,080
Speaker 3: incredible amount of fiscal spend in the direct aftermath of

69
00:03:09,120 --> 00:03:09,840
Speaker 3: the pandemic.

70
00:03:10,200 --> 00:03:12,920
Speaker 1: Do you buy that there is some truth to the

71
00:03:13,040 --> 00:03:15,720
Speaker 1: detox argument in the sense that if you look at

72
00:03:15,840 --> 00:03:18,880
Speaker 1: hiring in nonfound payrolls over the last two years, twenty

73
00:03:18,919 --> 00:03:21,160
Speaker 1: five percent of jobs created in twenty twenty three and

74
00:03:21,240 --> 00:03:24,360
Speaker 1: twenty four were government jobs. The previous years it was

75
00:03:24,440 --> 00:03:26,640
Speaker 1: like five ten percent much months or less, So a

76
00:03:26,760 --> 00:03:29,200
Speaker 1: very significant part of jobs in the last two years

77
00:03:29,360 --> 00:03:31,760
Speaker 1: had been coming from the government sector. So it is

78
00:03:31,800 --> 00:03:35,160
Speaker 1: true that job growth has been slowing in the private sector,

79
00:03:35,440 --> 00:03:38,320
Speaker 1: even going into these shocks that we're looking at the moment.

80
00:03:38,160 --> 00:03:40,680
Speaker 3: Heading into twenty twenty five, you are pretty clear that

81
00:03:40,720 --> 00:03:42,880
Speaker 3: you think that the inflationary shock was going to be

82
00:03:42,960 --> 00:03:44,840
Speaker 3: maintained and that it was going to create a real

83
00:03:44,840 --> 00:03:47,160
Speaker 3: problem for the FED to actually offer response to that

84
00:03:47,240 --> 00:03:50,440
Speaker 3: kind of weakness in the economy. Do you continue to

85
00:03:50,480 --> 00:03:53,640
Speaker 3: see that even though the shocks that we're seeing right

86
00:03:53,640 --> 00:03:56,880
Speaker 3: now to policy might have a bigger ramification on growth

87
00:03:56,880 --> 00:03:58,040
Speaker 3: than you'd previously expected.

88
00:03:58,280 --> 00:04:01,400
Speaker 1: Well, the real challenge is that going to tariffs, we

89
00:04:01,480 --> 00:04:04,560
Speaker 1: had that inflation unfortunately was still too high at around

90
00:04:04,560 --> 00:04:07,800
Speaker 1: three percent, and most calculations suggest that you will add

91
00:04:07,920 --> 00:04:10,520
Speaker 1: roughly half a percent's point to core PCE as a

92
00:04:10,560 --> 00:04:13,000
Speaker 1: result of terriffs. So it makes a huge difference where

93
00:04:13,040 --> 00:04:15,840
Speaker 1: you start. If you start with inflation at three and

94
00:04:15,880 --> 00:04:18,000
Speaker 1: you add half a percent, of course, the risk is

95
00:04:18,000 --> 00:04:19,840
Speaker 1: that you will have too much upside and we're way

96
00:04:19,880 --> 00:04:22,800
Speaker 1: above the FETs target. Whereas if inflation had started at

97
00:04:22,800 --> 00:04:24,279
Speaker 1: one and a half, which is where we were in

98
00:04:24,279 --> 00:04:27,400
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen, and you add half a percent, then inflation

99
00:04:27,440 --> 00:04:29,680
Speaker 1: will move up towards the FEEDS target. So the problem

100
00:04:29,760 --> 00:04:32,600
Speaker 1: was really that the starting point for inflation when these

101
00:04:32,640 --> 00:04:36,119
Speaker 1: policies came along was that it was unfortunately well above

102
00:04:36,200 --> 00:04:38,200
Speaker 1: the FETs target. So the risk is in this situation

103
00:04:38,279 --> 00:04:41,200
Speaker 1: that you have inflation moving higher and growth flowing down,

104
00:04:41,240 --> 00:04:43,800
Speaker 1: which of course is a definition of as deflationary shock.

105
00:04:43,839 --> 00:04:46,400
Speaker 3: We were talking to Mohammad Olarian earlier this week and

106
00:04:46,440 --> 00:04:49,760
Speaker 3: he made the point that given these dual shocks, the

107
00:04:49,800 --> 00:04:52,640
Speaker 3: FED should probably allow inflation to run a little bit

108
00:04:52,720 --> 00:04:54,919
Speaker 3: hotter for a longer period of time and address the

109
00:04:54,960 --> 00:04:58,200
Speaker 3: growth issues and cut rates at least once this year.

110
00:04:58,640 --> 00:05:00,920
Speaker 3: Do you agree that that's more prudent at a time

111
00:05:00,960 --> 00:05:03,960
Speaker 3: where there are these stagflationary forces starting to loom?

112
00:05:04,120 --> 00:05:06,880
Speaker 1: Absolutely, because the FED has the dual mandate. On the

113
00:05:06,880 --> 00:05:09,080
Speaker 1: one side, if growth is slowing is saying the fat

114
00:05:09,120 --> 00:05:11,560
Speaker 1: should be cutting. If inflation is going up is saying

115
00:05:11,600 --> 00:05:13,760
Speaker 1: the feature should be hiking. I think the FED will

116
00:05:13,760 --> 00:05:15,800
Speaker 1: look at if growth starts to slow, and if we're

117
00:05:15,839 --> 00:05:18,520
Speaker 1: with the next several weeks, begin to see that unemployment

118
00:05:18,560 --> 00:05:20,719
Speaker 1: begins to go up. Let's not forget that non farm

119
00:05:20,760 --> 00:05:23,239
Speaker 1: payroll is always done in the week of the twelfth

120
00:05:23,520 --> 00:05:25,760
Speaker 1: means this week, so this is the week when they

121
00:05:25,760 --> 00:05:28,000
Speaker 1: do the survey for the employment report. And if we

122
00:05:28,080 --> 00:05:30,560
Speaker 1: do believe that this week was somewhat intense on the

123
00:05:30,560 --> 00:05:32,680
Speaker 1: policy front, then there is of course a chance that

124
00:05:32,680 --> 00:05:35,279
Speaker 1: non farm payrolls for March could be on the weaker side.

125
00:05:35,360 --> 00:05:36,960
Speaker 1: And if that's the case, then in the next seven

126
00:05:37,000 --> 00:05:39,320
Speaker 1: weeks and particularly going into April and with the April

127
00:05:39,400 --> 00:05:42,760
Speaker 1: second deadline also from Trump, with a reciprocal tariffs. We

128
00:05:42,880 --> 00:05:45,160
Speaker 1: come to the conclusion that the risk is that we

129
00:05:45,240 --> 00:05:47,080
Speaker 1: might begin to see growth slow down, and the FED

130
00:05:47,120 --> 00:05:50,480
Speaker 1: will say, well, as long as inflation expectations are anchored, yes,

131
00:05:50,520 --> 00:05:53,600
Speaker 1: actually inflation may be higher. But if inflation explctiations are anchored,

132
00:05:53,720 --> 00:05:56,119
Speaker 1: they will be focusing on growth slowing down, and therefore

133
00:05:56,120 --> 00:05:58,920
Speaker 1: the risks are that markets will be pricing in more

134
00:05:58,960 --> 00:06:01,120
Speaker 1: cuts at the time. By the way, it looks like

135
00:06:01,160 --> 00:06:03,880
Speaker 1: from stock markets that they are almost saying, well, the

136
00:06:03,920 --> 00:06:06,720
Speaker 1: fit should be cutting many more times, whereas race markets

137
00:06:06,720 --> 00:06:08,360
Speaker 1: are saying, no, no, we only need two more cuts.

138
00:06:08,360 --> 00:06:11,400
Speaker 1: So there's almost an inconsistency between the messaging from stocks

139
00:06:11,440 --> 00:06:14,440
Speaker 1: that are now in correction territory and race markets saying no, no,

140
00:06:14,600 --> 00:06:15,839
Speaker 1: we only need two more cuts.

141
00:06:15,880 --> 00:06:18,760
Speaker 2: In the news conference on March nineteenth, next Wednesday, how

142
00:06:18,760 --> 00:06:21,520
Speaker 2: does Chairman Pound address those issues? What are you looking for?

143
00:06:21,720 --> 00:06:24,480
Speaker 1: So I'm looking very much for how much he's focusing

144
00:06:24,600 --> 00:06:26,760
Speaker 1: on the soft data slowing down. He did do that

145
00:06:26,800 --> 00:06:29,359
Speaker 1: at the USMPF last Friday here in New York City,

146
00:06:29,440 --> 00:06:32,760
Speaker 1: where he was in his prepared remarks saying, ah, everything

147
00:06:32,800 --> 00:06:35,080
Speaker 1: is generally okay. But when he was sitting down with

148
00:06:35,120 --> 00:06:37,760
Speaker 1: Andrew Cashev and asked questions. He was more saying, hey,

149
00:06:37,839 --> 00:06:40,279
Speaker 1: something is going on that has some downside risks that

150
00:06:40,320 --> 00:06:42,279
Speaker 1: we maybe should be putting more weight on. So I

151
00:06:42,320 --> 00:06:44,800
Speaker 1: do think that he will begin to talk about, well,

152
00:06:44,839 --> 00:06:47,719
Speaker 1: there's softness in the soft data, but maybe we're also

153
00:06:47,720 --> 00:06:49,480
Speaker 1: worry about softness in the hot data.

154
00:06:49,560 --> 00:06:52,680
Speaker 2: We have seen this incremental shift from the November meeting

155
00:06:52,880 --> 00:06:56,320
Speaker 2: into December. We don't assume, we don't guess, we don't speculate.

156
00:06:56,520 --> 00:06:59,800
Speaker 2: Then in December there was some assumption, some guessing, some speculation,

157
00:07:00,240 --> 00:07:02,159
Speaker 2: and then I agree with you the recent address we

158
00:07:02,200 --> 00:07:04,880
Speaker 2: had from Chairman Power, there was another subtle shift. Just

159
00:07:04,920 --> 00:07:07,800
Speaker 2: started to tackle policy issues head on in a way

160
00:07:07,800 --> 00:07:09,760
Speaker 2: he hadn't done in the previous few months.

161
00:07:09,800 --> 00:07:12,000
Speaker 3: And on some level he kind of has to, because

162
00:07:12,040 --> 00:07:15,040
Speaker 3: there is a sort of scenario analysis that has to

163
00:07:15,040 --> 00:07:17,400
Speaker 3: come from the FED for them to even be relevant

164
00:07:17,640 --> 00:07:20,120
Speaker 3: about how they're measuring some of these aspects. And that's

165
00:07:20,160 --> 00:07:22,880
Speaker 3: probably why the statement of economic projections, which could be

166
00:07:22,920 --> 00:07:25,640
Speaker 3: a darkboard, but it is sort of a messaging tool

167
00:07:25,800 --> 00:07:28,720
Speaker 3: about how they're going to potentially respond to what is

168
00:07:28,760 --> 00:07:32,280
Speaker 3: transpiring in policy and how it's transpiring and data even

169
00:07:32,320 --> 00:07:34,280
Speaker 3: if it doesn't necessarily come to full pass.

170
00:07:34,320 --> 00:07:36,440
Speaker 2: The difference now, I guess is we're actually getting the policy.

171
00:07:36,480 --> 00:07:38,640
Speaker 2: They don't have to speculate about it anymore. But that

172
00:07:38,680 --> 00:07:41,040
Speaker 2: policy comes with a lot of volatility and tours, and

173
00:07:41,040 --> 00:07:43,600
Speaker 2: they've got to manage interest rates through the cycle. Maybe

174
00:07:43,680 --> 00:07:45,520
Speaker 2: Chairman Power steps down in the next couple of years.

175
00:07:45,600 --> 00:07:47,240
Speaker 2: I imagine he will. I don't know for sure, but

176
00:07:47,280 --> 00:07:49,000
Speaker 2: I think we all think he will. I want to

177
00:07:49,080 --> 00:07:51,400
Speaker 2: understand from that perspective. You sit there and you acknowledge

178
00:07:51,400 --> 00:07:53,000
Speaker 2: the risks right now, but also you've got to think

179
00:07:53,000 --> 00:07:56,040
Speaker 2: about tax cuts, the potential for looseid regulation further down

180
00:07:56,040 --> 00:07:58,400
Speaker 2: the road. How do you manage through the cycle with

181
00:07:58,520 --> 00:07:59,040
Speaker 2: that in mind.

182
00:07:59,160 --> 00:08:02,920
Speaker 1: Well, that's why this did betabout is it policy dependent?

183
00:08:03,160 --> 00:08:06,000
Speaker 1: Is it data dependent? Becomes really really important because of

184
00:08:06,040 --> 00:08:09,120
Speaker 1: course the policy that's in place suggests that well so far,

185
00:08:09,200 --> 00:08:11,120
Speaker 1: the two things that we have seen from the beginning

186
00:08:11,200 --> 00:08:13,800
Speaker 1: is those which is putting the unemployment rate up, and

187
00:08:13,960 --> 00:08:16,680
Speaker 1: also terrorists, which is putting inflation up. So if that's

188
00:08:16,720 --> 00:08:18,920
Speaker 1: the case, they need to deal with that shock as

189
00:08:18,960 --> 00:08:21,160
Speaker 1: the first thing. Even as you say, if there are

190
00:08:21,320 --> 00:08:25,080
Speaker 1: other policies coming on deregulation, on lower taxes and potentially

191
00:08:25,120 --> 00:08:26,200
Speaker 1: also more energy production.

192
00:08:26,440 --> 00:08:28,880
Speaker 2: Toston Clinic has always got to say, sir. Looking ahead

193
00:08:28,880 --> 00:08:32,040
Speaker 2: to next week March nineteenth for Federal Reserve next Wednesday

194
00:08:32,040 --> 00:08:35,079
Speaker 2: for that meeting, including a news conference and forecast for

195
00:08:35,200 --> 00:08:37,840
Speaker 2: the Chairman J. Powell tosson slock of Apollo