WEBVTT - Elon Musks Gets on Twitter's Board

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power Colli

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Vallet and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay i'memerly check in San Francisco, and this is

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour. The plot thickens.

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Twitter adds Elon Musk to its board just a day

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>after must disclose he is now Twitter's largest shareholder. Turns

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>out former CEO Jack Dorsey and new CEO Paragua Wall

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 1>are in on it. What does it all mean for Twitter,

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>free speech, and the world's most public town square. We

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>will uncover this story from all angles through the hour,

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>plus what's it like to work on a board with

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk? Anyway. We'll be joined by former Tesla board

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:00.080
<v Speaker 1>member Steve Wesley, who will share the good, the that,

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and the unexpected that comes with having one of the

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>world's most controversial innovators in the room. And he has

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>fashioned himself as a free speech defender. But will must

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>be good or bad for free speech? Could this open

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>the door to former President Trump being unbanned from the platform?

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Will debate, But first, Twitter share still soaring on all

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of this, up another two percent after spike Monday bloom

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>works at Ludlow here to break it all down, and

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>we can debate the long term impacts of this, but

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>no question, it's been good for investors the last forty

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>eight hours. Yeah, exactly so, especially considering was a day

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:39.479
<v Speaker 1>where equities broadly will lower, especially tex stalks as yields

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to rising. That a lot of hawkish comments out of

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the Fed, which weighed on technology shares, and yet Twitter

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>buck the trend right bam up another two percent, its

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>biggest two day gain in record above on record above,

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>And here's the reality of the situation. If you come

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and me into my Bloomberg terminal, there's just a staggering

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>volume of Twitter shares that have exchange hand over the

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>last two days. I mean that chart, Emily says it all.

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Look at the right hand side of the screen. Two

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred sixteen million shares changing hands on Tuesday. That's after

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>more than two hundred fifty million chairs change hands on Monday.

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Investors also taking a real interest on the retail side.

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>You look at many of the trading platforms like Fidelity

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>for example. We'll touch on this later in the show,

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of demand for Twitter shares. His investors

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>try and work out, well, is this a good thing?

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk being on the board of the company. The

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>direction travel on the stock certainly suggests so final chart

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit of irony and all of this.

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:37.239
<v Speaker 1>This is year to day Twitter and Tesla, and before

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the big surge, we've got a Monday around and other

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>two percent. On Tuesday, Twitter was down year Today it's

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.519
<v Speaker 1>now very firmly in positive territory year to day and

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>as you can see, we're now outperforming Tesla on a

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>year to date basis, which is higher. It's up around

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>three percent. And it's interesting the direction of travel, the

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk effects that you have about these stocks and

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.519
<v Speaker 1>how he uses Twitter is a met is and to

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>communicate with investors, well, I'm sure we're gonna be paying

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot close attentions Twitter now and all right, blood law,

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you now. And yet another plot twist, Twitter CEO

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Parague Aggerawall announcing Elon Musk has joined Twitter's board and

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Jack Dorsey, who set to leave the board in May,

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>says he's happy about it. Musk's Twitter ownership will be

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>capped at fourteen point nine percent as a board member

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to avoid him having undue influence, though he's currently at

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>nine point two percent, which will give him plenty of influence. Enough,

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>let's discuss the moving more with Teconomy founder David Kirkpatrick,

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>along with Bloomberg's Max Chafkin. Max. Elon Musk has often

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>talked about his Tesla master plan. What do you think

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>his master plan is for Twitter and how does it

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>fit into Twitter's master plan for Twitter? Well, I think

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>that Elon Musk really likes Twitter. He's obviously an enthusiastic user,

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and you can totally see why Twitter would want him

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>on the board. I think for Musk, um the master

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>plan is as you said about Tesla, and I think

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>what's what's happening here? Although I'm sure Ellen has some

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>really big ideas for for Twitter, you know, around free speech,

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the I think the really the game behind this is

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>protecting Tesla's most important, you know, marketing channel, and you

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>know Ed mentioned it's Elon Musk's you know, sort of

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>way of communicating with investors, of of just sort of

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 1>raising enormous amounts of almost unlimited capital for Tesla. It's

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>also this great way that he's been able to market

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, both himself and the cars. And I think,

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, having a stake in that literally a seat

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter's board um is going to help him in

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.919
<v Speaker 1>the long term. You know, yesterday, Twitter's value, you know,

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>went up a bunch of eight hundred million dollars or

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>so would have been Musks gained. Tesla went up a

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 1>whole lot more, you know, a whole lot less as

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a percentage. But but Musk made a lot more money

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>on Tesla. His money is still in Tesla, and I

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>think we should still be thinking about it in those

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:50.280
<v Speaker 1>terms now. Looking at these tweets from Parague, Agawalla and

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Jack Dorrisey today, Parague tweeting, I'm excited to share where

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>are pointing el on to our board? It became clear

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 1>to us through conversations in recent weeks that he would

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>bring great value to our board. Jack Dorsey then retweeting this,

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and what you can imagine is a coordinated effort saying

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm really happy Ellen is joining the board. He cares

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>deeply about our rule and Twitter's role in it. Parague

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and Ellen both lead with their hearts and they will

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>be an incredible team. David, what do you make of

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>their wholehearted embrace of this. Well, first of all, we

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>know that Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk are good friends

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 1>and they've sort of think alike in a lot of ways,

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>although certainly Elon Musk is a much more impetuous person

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:36.359
<v Speaker 1>than Jack Dorsey. But um, you know, you have to say,

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>having the richest man in the world, one who's every

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>move is attended to with such incredible attention, has got

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to be good for any company. Uh, it's certainly been

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>good for Tesla. And I think that if he really

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>cares about Twitter, which he must, although this is something

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>we're really just learning that he cares about organizationally as

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>opposed to just being one of its greatest power users. Um,

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna certainly bring tremendous value to their deliberations about strategy,

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>product design, etcetera. Now what kind of freedom do you

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:14.479
<v Speaker 1>think Elon Musk feels he is lacking on Twitter, given

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that he seems to have roamed there quite freely. Um, yeah, well,

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I think there's some risk though to to Elon's a

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Twitter presents. First of all, he's somebody who's continually pushing

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the boundaries right and Twitter has been you know, aggressive

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>or not aggressive, but but has made some moves in

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.359
<v Speaker 1>terms of trying to rein in um you know what

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it terms misinformation or hate speech and and that sort

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of thing. He's also in the middle middle of this

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>very messy fight with the SEC over tweets that he sent,

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, years ago. Tesla has this Twitter sitter, and

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>right around the same time that Um Musk was acquiring

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>these Twitter skate stakes, there's a court filing that drops

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>where Musk is complaining about about his you know, being

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>muzzled as he saw it by the SEC. So I

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>could see it both, you know, as as partly as

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 1>a protective action. You know, this is a way for

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>him to ensure that this um stays put. Now, it'll

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>be interesting, David, how this impacts the rest of the

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>social media landscape. There was quite a moment um. Elon Musk,

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>in response to his question about an edit button, got

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of feedback, including from Andrew Bosworth, who's now

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the CTO of Facebook, saying that they solved the question

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of editing on Facebook long ago. You just leave a

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>log of the edit, Elon Musk responds, Facebook gives me

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the Willie's What do you think? Having Elon in Twitter's corner,

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>or at least on Twitter's board means for Facebook, well,

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I would reiterate that having him on your corner is

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be bad for your rivals. Um period Um.

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I would say, many of us find things that have

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>happened on Facebook give us the willies in recent years.

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>So I can understand why he would say that, and

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I do think Twitter, on balance has been a more

0:07:55.720 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>responsible platform than Facebook. Um. The confusing thing is his

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>repeated statements are several times saying, you know, he wants

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>free speech to be more allowed on Twitter, that he

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>thinks it's it's gonna be more that it's maybe too restrictive,

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't really make sense to me since he

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>has never been restricted by Twitter itself. He's been restricted

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>by the SEC, and I think he's had second thoughts

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>about some of his own tweets. But um, you know,

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't I think it's bad for Facebook. I do

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>think maybe an edit function is a good idea for Twitter.

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I personally have trouble using Twitter. I'm a I just

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>find it awkward and off putting in many ways. I'm

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:42.679
<v Speaker 1>an outlier in the tech journalism community in that way.

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>But I can understand Twitter needs product improvements. Even Jack

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:48.319
<v Speaker 1>Dorsey says that all the time and doesn't make any

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>bones about it. And yet Katie Stanton, longtime former Twitter veteran,

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 1>was on the show yesterday. She said, this is a

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty expensive way to add an edit button if that's

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 1>what you want. Max. You know, as you point out,

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:06.199
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk like likes making jokes, but he's rarely doing

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it just to joke. I mean, a steak is now

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>worth for billion dollars. You have to be more than

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>an edit button desire here, right right, And I think

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that's why, you know, David's pointing out withstanding um, Twitter's

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>playing with fire here. I mean, Elon Musk is really

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 1>good at attracting attention. There's obviously we saw on that

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>chart there is a large community of investors who will

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>basically buy anything that he tells them to. And that's

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>really good. But if but if Twitter has a bad

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>quarter or you know, if Twitter loses its market value,

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's disastrous for Twitter's management team. And that's

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>just like a blip on Elon Musk's radar. It doesn't

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>affect his long term visions or anything like that. So

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the fear, I think would be, this is somebody who

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:49.959
<v Speaker 1>has in the past had trouble raining himself in is

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>very impetuous, and now all of a sudden, Twitter, this

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.560
<v Speaker 1>relatively small company, is attached to the Elon Musk train.

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>So so it's gonna it's gonna ride that way for

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>better and probably for So here's an open question, what

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>does this mean for former President Trump? David who has

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:11.199
<v Speaker 1>been banned from Twitter. I've asked Twitter executives CFO net

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Segal many times if there's a path for him to

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>come back, and he has said no. Could this Could

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>this open the door? David? Well, it's a very legitimate question, given, um,

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:27.439
<v Speaker 1>given the point that Musk has made about free speech,

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>because the first thing you think of, if Twitter were

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>more lax in enforcing its speech rules, the implication, number

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>one implication would be that Trump might be allowed back on.

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:42.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't think of Musk as a particular defender of Trump.

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I think he's in a libertarian by inclination, although he

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.719
<v Speaker 1>has a very complex mix of views. So I would say,

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>if anything is positive for the president x president. But um,

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>we can't know. There's so many things about this we

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>can't know. The speed with which it all happened is dizzy.

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's it's I've just been thinking, what a

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>weird thing. The richest man in the world is so

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>incredibly impetuous. You never know what he's gonna do next.

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>It's like he's a professional global entertainer or something. So

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:13.679
<v Speaker 1>all the implications are going to be found out only

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:18.559
<v Speaker 1>through time. I'm afraid the plot has thickened indeed. David Kirkpatrick,

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:23.199
<v Speaker 1>founder of Teconomy, and Bloomberg's own Max Chafkin, thank you both.

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, we're gonna hear from a Republican Representative darryl

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Isa his thoughts on what musk means. First, free speech

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:32.959
<v Speaker 1>and what is it like working on a board with

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Elon Must school ask a former TESLA board member that

0:11:36.840 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>is next. This is Bloomberg. Well, lawmakers on both sides

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>of the aisle. I've had plenty to say about Twitter's

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>handling a free speech on its platform, and for different reasons.

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Here's Republican Representative Darla Isa of California earlier with my

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>colleague David Weston. I've known Elon must for a long time,

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and I watched him break a glass ceiling that kept

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>him from competing in rockets and missiles. Uh, and he

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:28.319
<v Speaker 1>did so over a long period of time with his dedication.

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>He believes in sort of that free enterprise system, and

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>so I think he's going to be a positive for

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a Twitter that has been airing on the side of

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>less free speech. Uh. You might remember taking down things

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>uh as misinformation that later proved to be true. I

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to look at it as no, we're

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:51.079
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be for free speech in a bigger way.

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's positive for Twitter. It is positive

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>for all of us who would like to see um

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>social media be less about censoring and more about simply

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>being a conduit for people's ideas, whether we disagree with

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>them or not. So as I have been listening to

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Congress over the last couple of years, I hear two concerns.

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>One is the one you just identified, and that is

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Twitter's role in saying who can talk and who can't talk.

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 1>And I understand you're saying Elon Musk will make it freer,

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>he won't just prejuice in favor of his own point

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>of view, but also in terms of concentration, there's a

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of concern about you have a trust responsibility as well.

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Are you concerned at all about this the wealthiest man

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>in the world now having significant influence over Twitter. You know,

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>uh ten doesn't run a company, um and you know

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>there are two extreme anti oil people on Exog's board,

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>so uh you know. I think that it's the power

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of his argument that's going to be more important than

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>in his actual vote, because he is going to be

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>outnumbered essentially nine to one. But there is something else

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>here at work, and that is that, yes, Twitter has

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a monopoly on one section, Facebook has a monopoly on

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>another section. These giants we are concerned about, but remember

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:10.439
<v Speaker 1>if they operate like your public utility, charging everyone the

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>same amount to buy electricity and not shutting anyone off

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>as long as the bill is paid, then the monopoly

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>is pretty benign. And I think that's one of the

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>concerns we have in Congress is not whether an entity

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>has monopolistic power, but how they use that power, whether

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>they have used it or simply have the luxury of

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>being the dominant force. That's been true in tech for

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a long time. I remember when Microsoft basically owned your

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>ability to get on the Internet. That's not true today,

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>but it did take looking at and making sure they

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>were an honest broker in their tie ins uh some

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Republican Darryl is Sa They're of California, who

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>himself has worked in tech and business. Well, how will

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>having Elon Musk in the board influence Twitter's handling a

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>free speech, misinformation and so much more. Let's get to

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that question now with someone who worked on a board

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>with Elon Musk for many years. Steve Wesley is the

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>founder of the Wesley Group and was an early investor

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>in Tesla and a former Tesla board member. Steve, great

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to have you back with us. So what is it

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>like serving on a board with Elon Musk? Well, it's

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>never boring. Look, I think this is a big win

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>for Twitter. He's brilliant, he sees the future. He's a driver.

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Look for sure, he's a bit temperamental and irascible, but

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>he pushes people to be their best. He's also, of course,

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>twitter It's greatest power user. So I think it's a

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>good thing that he likes pushing boundaries. And my advice

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>to Twitter executives is put on your track shoes now,

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>because Elon is going to push you to pick up

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the pace all at all. I think that's a good

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:51.119
<v Speaker 1>thing for Twitter users and a good thing for Twitter investors.

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Ellen is his own biggest marketer. I wonder how that

0:15:54.640 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>could work to Twitter's advantage. Well, look, I think a

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>case can be made. Did Ellen's reinventing twenty one century marketing?

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Just look what he did at Tesla. He had a

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>marketing budget close to zero. He took every penny he could,

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>even though we were a much smaller auto company, invested

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>in innovation, making greater products. In contrast, the world's major

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>auto companies GM for Toyota, spent billions it could have

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>been spending on R and D in tired commercial campaign,

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>super Bowl ads and so on. And you just have

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to wonder how much further ahead would the major auto

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>companies be if they'd done what are elon dated Tesla.

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think in a lot of ways he is

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the perfect poster boy for what some might call twenty

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>century marketing, forming that direct relationship with your customer customer,

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and he's doing it all on Twitter. What's a better

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>advertisement than Twitter for Twitter than that? Well, he's gonna

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>have a very direct relationship with Twitter's leadership and other

0:16:56.600 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>board members. What do you imagine his relationship with Parague aggrawall,

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>the new CEO will be well, it's not gonna be quiet.

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna push all of them. I mean,

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>here we are, day one into this and he's already saying, hey,

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's time to to get that edit function in there.

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna shake things. Uh. I think that's

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>part of the future. In the old days used to

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>say if it ain't broke, don't fix it. The new

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>mantra of the twenty one century is from Steve Jobs.

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 1>If you're not busy obvious leading your own products, someone

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 1>else he is. And I think Ela is gonna come

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>in like he's gonna shake things up, and he's gonna

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 1>simultaneously make a statement two CEOs of the other five

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:38.679
<v Speaker 1>fortune companies you need to form a direct relationship with

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>your customers. Twitter is probably the most cost effective way

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to do it. Look, Elan is not a chrismatic guy,

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>slightly awkward. That he's genuine, he's real, he's authentic. I

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of other CEOs how to be taking note. Now,

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk has used Twitter too, basically, as you say,

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:57.640
<v Speaker 1>replace his own marketing department. And I wonder how an

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:01.199
<v Speaker 1>investment in Twitter fits into the broader Musk portfolio. Do

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you think there's some broader end game in terms of

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 1>how Twitter relates to Tesla and SpaceX and the boring

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 1>company hyper Loop for example. Well, look, Elon has a

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 1>big picture guy, and I think what he's simply saying

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>is I'm an innovator. I have transformed the American auto industry,

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the global auto industry, have transformed prediction in space. This

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:27.439
<v Speaker 1>old world marketing has got to go. CEOs of the

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>future needed direct relationship where they can tell the truth

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>in real time to their customers, not waged six months

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:36.919
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of crazy ads. I think that's a

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>step forward, and I think he's going to become a

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:42.160
<v Speaker 1>role model for a lot of other not just CEOs,

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>but politicians. And I think having that direct relationship with

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the customer and the voter instead of the can adds

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that so many of us are used to is probably

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a net positive. But you're still going to have to

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 1>manage it. Well, we'll see how they do. What do

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you think you a musk falls on Twitter's banning of

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 1>President Trump. So look, only Elon knows that, but a

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of people said, oh my gosh, he's a free

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 1>market heater. Uh, he's gonna let Trump back on doing

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>he wants. I don't think that's the case. Elon has

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>higher standards. He holds people to a high standard. And look,

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the reality is that I say this for all of

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>tech because someone who spent part of my life as

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>an elected official and part of my life as a

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>tech executive, Tech overall needs to hold a higher standard

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 1>for people telling the truth. They need to remove people

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>who are telling flat outlies, They need to remove people

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>who are inciting violence. So I believe and hope Kill

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>set a higher standard that firms like Facebook can follow.

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>On that note, though, I mean some would argue that

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk has peddled his own version of the truth,

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>for example the funding secured tweet, which got him in

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 1>trouble with the SEC when funding wasn't secured. Look, Elon

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:55.880
<v Speaker 1>is always pushing the boundaries. So he will be one

0:19:55.920 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>of nine board members, uh On bar or on on

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the whole. I think he's going to push them to

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 1>innovate in terms of setting government policy, what the standards are.

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if he'll be taking the lead on that.

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 1>It's more of an innovator, more of a tech guy,

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>but we'll see one thing. I can promise you it

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 1>won't be boring. It won't be boring indeed, Steve Wesley,

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 1>founder of the Wesley Group, former Tesla board member Steve

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>good to have you back with us. A few other

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>stories we continue to watch. Amazon is buying dozens of

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>rocket launches to deploy slate lights for its high speed

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:40.679
<v Speaker 1>internet service. The company will buy as many as eighty

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>three launches from Aaron Space, Blue Origin, and United Launch Alliance.

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Amazon's license with the FCC requires it to launch at

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>least half its thirty two hundred satellites by July. And

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Mackenzie Scott has transformed American philanthropy in the last three

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 1>years by giving away twelve point four billion dollars, often

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 1>to overlooked causes. She's now stepping up her donations outside

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of the United States. Scott's latest giving spree three point

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>nine billion dollars, including about sixty nonprofits based outside the US.

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>These serving causes across five continents, from Micronesia to Brazil.

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 1>And I be am Banking on the lingering relevance of

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>mainframe computers at a time when many businesses are moving

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>to the cloud, the company has unveiled a new model

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>designed for corporate data centers. IBM has been marketing itself

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>as a key player to support data storage both on

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>premise and in the cloud. Coming up, we'll have more

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>on what Ela musk plans could be for Twitter and

0:21:41.720 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 1>especially free speech. That's next, Mrs Bloomberg, Welcome back to

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>bloomber Technology and Emily Chang in San Francisco. Well, you've

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>heard it from investors, to analysts, to Twitter's onn CEO

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and former CEO. There are a lot of opinions out

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 1>there about what Elon Musk means for Twitter. Bloom Brooks

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 1>and Ludlow has been taking a look at the markets

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>view on it and d so far so good. Here

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>is there any indication that this could be bad for investors? Yeah,

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. I mean the stock is held up for

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>two days, right, only a two percent gain on Tuesday,

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>but over the two days that's the biggest two day

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>jump in Twitter's history as a public company. And what's more,

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the broad range of analyst notes that came

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>out in reaction to the news that Elon Musk had

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 1>been first taking a stake in Twitter, but then second

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of all, been appointed as a board member were largely positive.

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, they basically range from the opinion that they'll

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:55.439
<v Speaker 1>help he'll help Twitter by association. Right, he has some

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>star power, the Elon Musk effect, but also he has

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>good ideas. He has a track record of innovation which

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.679
<v Speaker 1>could help. But there's an interesting thing, M. There's a

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>gap between what people see as him doing for the

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:09.120
<v Speaker 1>platform and what they see him doing for the stock.

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>So coming into my Boomberg terminal and take a look

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>at this chart, there's been a big pop in the stock. Right.

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 1>You see that on the right hand side, which is

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the white line. The blue line is the average analyst

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>twelve month price target for Twitter, which you can see

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 1>is around forty four dollars a share when we're currently

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 1>trading at a share. What's interesting, some analysts even cut

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 1>their price targets after the recent run up in the

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>stock because they don't think there's that much upside to run.

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 1>So this is gap in where people think that Elon

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Musk could take Twitter and where they see the stock

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and going. And there's a further breakdown of that real

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 1>quick MD, which is the influence of retail investors. I

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>told you earlier in the show that around four sixty

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 1>million shares of Twitter had changed hands over the last

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>two days, but there's real insatiable retail investor appetite. These

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>are the top names on Fidelities trading platform over the

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>last set Tuesday's training session Twitter number one. More than

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand by orders for Twitter and around eight thousand,

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 1>six hundred for Tesla. The third company is Sunshine Bio,

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:16.239
<v Speaker 1>a bio company in pharmaceuticals. But clearly it's not just

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street looking at this and going what's Elon Musk

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:21.400
<v Speaker 1>going to do? But the retail investor, just as they've

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 1>done with the test, the story, hang on Ela Musks

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:26.640
<v Speaker 1>every word had brought in over the last two sessions

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.120
<v Speaker 1>as well. All right, my Ludlow, thank you. I want

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>to stick with this and bring in our next two guests,

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Tim O'Brien, a senior columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, and Jennifer Greigl,

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Associate professor of Communication at Syracuse University. Tim, I want

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to start with you. Not only has Twitter added Elon

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Musk to their board, but brock Agawall said that they

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>have been talking to him for weeks. Why is that significant, Well,

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>it's significant because Elon Musk took a stake in this

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>company under the guys, essentially being a passive investor, which meant,

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>if or if you're following that classic definition, uh, that

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>he was merely stopping by and parking his money and

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>was going to watch from the sidelines and not seek

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 1>great changes or significant changes at the company, not do

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:16.680
<v Speaker 1>things like sk a board seat, for example. Um, all

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of which was up in the air yesterday when this

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>investment was disclosed. And then lo and behold, we find

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>today that he has a board seat, and that Twitter

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>CEO has said that they've been talking together for weeks,

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 1>which certainly doesn't bear any hallmarks of a passive investor.

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anyone thought he would be a passive investor,

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>uh in this. I think he's he is an activist

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>by nature. Um. But I also think it represents a

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:45.639
<v Speaker 1>little bit just another tiny chapter in an Elon Musk

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:50.120
<v Speaker 1>flouting his you know, thumbing his nose at convention and

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 1>at SEC guidelines as he sees fit. He has had

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>a long run in with the SEC about tweeting inside

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 1>information or misleading information, and and and I said, I

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>suspect this will be a little bit more fodder for

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the SEC to chew on now Musk has been positioning

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>himself as a free speech defender. Professor Greigle, what do

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you think that means for President Trump? In particular? Where

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>does Musk or will Musk fall on this? This really

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 1>isn't about free speech. If anything, Twitter has just become

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more about Elon's speech. You just saw

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a large portion of this company and gets to kind

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:36.159
<v Speaker 1>of steer what happens there now. If anything, he's figured

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>out that this is a powerful platform. Maybe he took

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>some notes from Mark Zuckerberg and others that you need

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to have some influence over a platform. So I I think,

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 1>if anything, the future for former President Trump is still TBD.

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I've never seen it as a band.

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a band for as long as those who are

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>in control of the company wanted to be a band,

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and we just need to be You're realistic about that, Tim,

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>what's your response to that? In your column today, you

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>refer to Ellen as a quote unquote world class troll

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.719
<v Speaker 1>because that's how he's used Twitter historically and for as

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 1>much you know, he defines himself as a self described

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 1>free speech absolutist, and yet he's routinely over the years

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 1>tried to shut down his critics, uh, silence them. He's

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>used Twitter to savage them, to make fun of them.

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 1>He's used Twitter as a troll to to go after people.

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 1>He's used Twitter to talk up his own investments and

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 1>things like cryptocurrencies. Um and so this whole time that

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>he's in the recent weeks where he said that Twitter

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 1>is throwing blockades in the way of free speech and

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that maybe he needs to um launch a new platforms

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 1>and the enticing things he put out there prior to

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>this investment being is closed really want run counter to

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 1>his entire personal experience on Twitter. He has been unfettered

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. Um. But Elon Musk is a libertarian, and

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he has a posture uh that is part

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:07.439
<v Speaker 1>of the far right site guys right now that the

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>social media platforms have turned against conservatives, when in fact,

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the social media platforms have finally woken up

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to some of the virtues of policing divisive propaganda, which

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:22.159
<v Speaker 1>is I think a different thing than free speech in

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>certain cases. So hang on, Tim, We've actually got some

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>breaking news now. Twitter has just announced via a tweet

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:31.439
<v Speaker 1>from its Twitter Communications account that they are the company

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>is working on an edit button. Internally, this is a

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>feature that they have been testing um and testing and

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>working on since last year. Tim Well, you know, Elon

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Musk tweeted last night after his investment was disclosed that

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>he'd really like to see an edit button a Twitter.

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>So I suppose this is Twitter making a big bowl

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>public statement that they're responsive to what Elon Musk wants

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to see. But of course they've been working on this

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. If they step up their pace

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>on things like better user experiences, better communication tools on Twitter,

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>because Elon Musk is there, that's great, and that's good

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>for investors, and it's good for its users. That's again,

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that's apart from what he might do to either curtail

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 1>or or pervert actual free speech on the platform itself.

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Professor Griggle Eileen aside, how do you think an edit

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 1>button would change the nature of Twitter? I mean, this

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>is the company. This is something that users, some users

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>have been asking for for a long time, but Twitter

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>has always resisted. I believe in the name of uh

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>maintaining and protecting the authenticity of the platform. I don't

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 1>think this is about typos, you know, like I I

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>think he's trying to use this as a way to

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 1>look like he's appealing to the public, that he's some

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 1>type of like rebel leader, you know. But Elon Musk

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>is about the only thing I'm sure of is that

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>he's really good acute relating wealth. Um, and when that

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>comes power. So you know, again, there's been some conversation

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>about how Facebook lets you edit things too, and Facebook

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and Twitter are not the same thing. Um. Last time

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I checked, journalists around the world have not been impetting

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Facebook posts in news stories. Um, and uh. I think

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it just would fundamentally kind of change what the platform is.

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>But like, maybe that's what Ellen wants to do. I

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't know why he's taking a mistake in this,

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>other than he's figured out that this is somehow going

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to help him serve his agenda. So we'll have to

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>wait and see. But it will, I think, culturally change

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>what Twitter is, and maybe that's for the best. Maybe

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 1>he wants to burn it down, and you know, maybe

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a good thing. At this point, it's it's just

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:49.719
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of CEOs, politicians, state actors and folks like

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>exploiting this are competing the press. Maybe it's a maybe

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not that great anymore. To that point, Tim, in

0:30:56.840 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>your article just this week where you suggest that Elon

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Musk could be bad for free speech, the venture capitalist

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Mark Andreason reposted it. Uh didn't seem to agree with

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>your premise. Elon Musk then commented, saying, uh that such

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 1>an article is always good for a laugh. He confused

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the fact that your article written for Bloomberg was actually

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>republished in the Washington Post. But what do you make

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of a quote unquote defender of free speech criticizing your

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>free speech. Well, they're entitled to do that because I

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>believe in free speech too, so I'm okay with that.

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, Mark Andreason and and Elon

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Musk are are cut from the same cloth. They're Silicon

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Valley titans who have a view of the world. I

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:46.719
<v Speaker 1>think that is pretty mechanistic and individualistic. There can be

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 1>virtues to that, But I think when you're talking in

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the context of why they have an interest about the

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of speech that appears on Twitter, it has nothing

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>actually to do with free speech, and as everything to

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>do I think with their own biases being put to

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the test by the things that appear on Twitter. Tim O'Brien,

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Opinion, Jennifer Gracle, professor at Syracuse University. So much uh,

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 1>so much to continue to debate. Thank you both. Let's

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>get to our crypto report now and come back to

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>today's main story. Elon Musk joining Twitter's board. How would

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 1>this shape the social platform's future? Will it bring the

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 1>elements of blockchain networks into Twitter? Let's talk about all

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 1>of this and more with Kristin Smith, executive director of

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the Blockchain Association, and Kristen It's no secret that Twitter

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>has been um bulking out some of its crypto features.

0:32:55.400 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 1>They've got this a blue sky project that they've been exploring.

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:04.240
<v Speaker 1>But what do you make of Elon Musk's influence on

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the crypto community and how that could influence Twitter? Yeah,

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean these are all great questions, Emily. I think

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk's um news about him taking such a large

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>steak and joining the board of Twitter is very important.

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:21.719
<v Speaker 1>I think I think one of the reasons is he

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 1>really truly understands the value of cryptocurrency, whether it be uh,

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, bitcoin or doge coin. He has and he

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 1>knows the value of open source networks, and he knows

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the value when you have many multiple minds thinking and

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 1>building on how to create a better network. That's very

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:44.479
<v Speaker 1>different than a centralized company like Twitter. UM. So what

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I think is going to be interesting is is he

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>going to bring these elements of the crypto world, these

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 1>anti censorship elements, the open source elements, and allow for

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a way for new people to come in and maybe

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 1>import their own algorithm that could potentially go through and

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 1>sort the news in the way that they want to

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>be seen, not in the way that Twitter is dictating

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that it be seen. So I do think there is

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a potential for innovation here, and you know, given that

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, we represent the crypto industry at the Blockchain Association,

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and we're hopeful that that by you know, bringing in

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:21.760
<v Speaker 1>this kind of mindset, that there will be new ways

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to to get this platform UM to a place that

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 1>serves more more of its users, because it certainly is

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly powerful platform, and I would argue probably the

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 1>most powerful platform for sharing and receiving information and and

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 1>just how important is Twitter do you believe to the

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>crypto community. Obviously there's a strong and very passionate uh

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>community of cryptocurrency supporters on Twitter. I mean, we call

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>it crypto Twitter back in crypto topics are trending on

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Twitter because of the volume of these users there. Yeah, no,

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.439
<v Speaker 1>crypto Twitter is is a real thing. And it's really

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:05.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting because what you have. Twitter enables developers all across

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the globe to debate whether or not they should make

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 1>technological changes to open source networks. It's a forum for

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>this kind of debate. It's it's really a public commons

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:19.880
<v Speaker 1>for exchanging ideas and a way for people that have

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 1>very targeted and narrow interests to find one another and

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to build a community. And I think the crypto community

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>uses Twitter perhaps more so than any other community or

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:35.320
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem out there. Um. It's also an incredibly powerful tool

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 1>for the crypto community. The if you look back to

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:43.240
<v Speaker 1>last summer in August, we had over forty phone calls

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 1>generated to the US Senate over the course of five

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>days because they shared a link on Twitter and it

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 1>went viral. And you had um crypto Twitter influencers, you

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:57.800
<v Speaker 1>had members at the House and Senate tweeting these links.

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 1>You had celebrity influencers, you had business leaders. Um. You know,

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:05.440
<v Speaker 1>this is a tool for political activism, it's a tool

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 1>for sharing and debating ideas. It's an incredibly important platform

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's one where concepts that we find

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 1>every day in the crypto world will only improve the

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:19.840
<v Speaker 1>way that the platform can work. So I'm excited to

0:36:20.320 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 1>be part of it. The SEC has obviously been paying

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>attention to Elon Musk, and he's had some run ins

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 1>with them before. How do you imagine the SEC is

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:34.720
<v Speaker 1>watching this steak in Twitter his influence on Twitter in particular. Well,

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the SEC pays very close attention to what

0:36:37.040 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>he does. They also pay very close attention to the

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 1>crypto community. So um, definitely a lot of eyes going

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:46.719
<v Speaker 1>on out there. But listen, I think is you know,

0:36:46.920 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 1>as long as he's transparent with what's going on and

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 1>brings perhaps more transparency, I don't think that's necessarily a

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>bad thing for for him to be a part of it,

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:00.439
<v Speaker 1>and um, I don't think it should pos is any

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 1>problems um for the SEC at this time. But but yeah,

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure that they have to keep a close eye

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 1>on him, just just like they do with many other

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 1>people in the crypto space. They are most definitely watching.

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Kristin Smith, Executive director of the Blockchain Association, Thank you

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:28.719
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. I think he really believes he can

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:32.719
<v Speaker 1>do something really good for society with this platform. He's

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly making a statement, and it's a statement about censorship.

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:41.000
<v Speaker 1>He he doesn't agree with censorship. UH for a smooth

0:37:41.080 --> 0:37:45.400
<v Speaker 1>functioning democracy. I interpret this as a sign of just

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 1>how influential Elon Musk is. Uh. There's nothing changed in

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental outlook for Twitter. I think this really just

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:57.440
<v Speaker 1>starts what's gonna be. I think a broader strategic initiative

0:37:57.600 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 1>for Elon at Twitter. I think it's a very expensive

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:03.359
<v Speaker 1>way to get yourself an edit button. UM. I think

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a very interesting move. UM. Elon is obviously a

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 1>power user. He knows a product well. He knows that

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:11.359
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is the place for the world's conversation. It will

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:15.360
<v Speaker 1>lead to be our grule, changing the policy of the

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 1>company to you know, really open source, uh the the

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>censorship or or call people out on censorship, or it

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 1>will be a management change. I don't know what's going

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to happen. Twitter chairers meantime have skyrocketed since the news

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of elon mistake in the company. But how long can

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:40.239
<v Speaker 1>the rally last? Brent, They'll have Jefferies joins us now

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 1>he currently has a hold on the company and Brent,

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 1>are you sticking with it? Stating with the whole you

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 1>had a big move, clearly a positive move for the company,

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:54.920
<v Speaker 1>not taking any way on that side, but when you

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 1>have a thirty plus percent move, it's inbanding a lot

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:02.239
<v Speaker 1>of the fundamental improvement which we haven't seen yet. Uh

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 1>is my friend mark me and he pointed out in

0:39:04.680 --> 0:39:06.799
<v Speaker 1>the earlier segment. You know we I think many of

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 1>us have been asking advertisers, you know, has any changed

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and the answer is no. Uh. So clearly this is

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a bet on the future that they can take the foundation.

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've called this a a foundation of a

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 1>great car. But Ellen knows how to put the pet

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 1>u or the dog mode inside the car to let

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:27.759
<v Speaker 1>your dog in the car, that the whole user interface.

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 1>In terms of what he's done in in the autle world, Uh,

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:35.919
<v Speaker 1>I think he could bring a lot to to this world. Uh.

0:39:36.160 --> 0:39:37.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's he's gonna have no doubt to

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the positive impact. It's gonna take time, and so investor

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:43.440
<v Speaker 1>by now we're betting not for the next four or two,

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:45.759
<v Speaker 1>but they're betting a year out that that that's going

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to have an improvement, which I think again is grateful

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:50.239
<v Speaker 1>long term, sure old their short term I think there's

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:51.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a a lot of all affilia the stock still,

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:55.840
<v Speaker 1>So here's a question. Will this materially change the game

0:39:56.120 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 1>for Twitter's business? I mean, there was an argument made

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:03.440
<v Speaker 1>earlier that Twitter could spend less on marketing because Elon

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Musk will do that for them via Twitter. But but

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 1>but really, though, when you look at the balance sheet,

0:40:09.440 --> 0:40:12.840
<v Speaker 1>how will this change? I don't know if it's a

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 1>game changer. I mean, look, the board is stacked, and

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:18.759
<v Speaker 1>they have a phenomenal ward Brett Taylor from salesforce dot com.

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:22.600
<v Speaker 1>He's a broduct guy. Great the thumbs up for Facebook.

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he knows how to how to effectively create

0:40:25.000 --> 0:40:28.600
<v Speaker 1>amazing products. So they are surrounded by rooting at a

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:31.240
<v Speaker 1>body of people. And I think right now Twitter doesn't

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 1>have an awareness issue. They have a usability each and

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:37.879
<v Speaker 1>that is what I think many of the advertisers and

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 1>end users are still looking for better, better solutions from them. Advertisers.

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:47.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, one advertiser last week said it perfectly. Snap

0:40:47.280 --> 0:40:49.759
<v Speaker 1>has had ten improvements of the platform in the last year.

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Twitter hasn't had that many in the decade. Okay, that

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:56.799
<v Speaker 1>to me is the opportunity. And I think this is

0:40:56.800 --> 0:40:59.560
<v Speaker 1>why he's betting a huge amount of his zone. Well

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 1>one less than one percent is net worth a huge

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:03.880
<v Speaker 1>amount for all the rest of us the planet. Uh,

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:06.760
<v Speaker 1>he's put a big dollar amount in because he seeds

0:41:06.800 --> 0:41:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the future three or five years that if they can

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 1>make these changes and make it more usable and they

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:16.399
<v Speaker 1>can get you know today, right, there's over two three

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:19.319
<v Speaker 1>billion on Facebook's platform, you know, over two hund million

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:22.319
<v Speaker 1>en users today. It's a tiny number relative to those

0:41:22.360 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 1>are on other platforms. Right, what are the risks of

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 1>bringing Elon Musk into the room? Big ideas can go haywire. Right,

0:41:32.719 --> 0:41:35.719
<v Speaker 1>you can see some of these ideas. I've no doubt

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:37.680
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna have huge influence on the board and the

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 1>manager team to make big, big bets. And anytime you

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 1>make a big bet, it can flare off. But we

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:47.319
<v Speaker 1>we know that. Uh, we think he's gonna have a

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:50.120
<v Speaker 1>very positive impact. I don't I think one person's view

0:41:50.560 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and opinion on this as a board member. Uh, you know,

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:56.360
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be a lot of other voices. And I

0:41:56.400 --> 0:41:59.239
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's run, it's it's gonna be running very

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:02.480
<v Speaker 1>well over time, I think, uh so, I don't think that.

0:42:02.600 --> 0:42:04.799
<v Speaker 1>I think the risk right now is just stock a

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 1>huge run in and beds near term fundamentals. Attorney. If

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:10.719
<v Speaker 1>fundentals don't turn the next quarter or two on, the

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:13.400
<v Speaker 1>investors are gonna gonna be be put on hold in

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the short term. I don't think there's a lot of

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 1>outside given that he's in. I think, you know, as

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:19.239
<v Speaker 1>we say, debab, don't be against must. You know you've

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:21.919
<v Speaker 1>got a nice floor probably put in in the short

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:25.759
<v Speaker 1>term given his arrival. But the risk is that the

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 1>recent running the stock combined with this is gonna take

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:31.360
<v Speaker 1>selver course, this is not going to be an overnight

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 1>experiment that that turns uh that turns out of you know,

0:42:34.840 --> 0:42:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a perfect solution, but it is certainly going to be

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:43.240
<v Speaker 1>an entertaining one. Brent Fill of Jeffreyes, we are along

0:42:43.320 --> 0:42:45.719
<v Speaker 1>for that ride. Thank you. That does it. For this

0:42:45.920 --> 0:42:48.840
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Technology, make sure to tune in tomorrow

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:52.040
<v Speaker 1>will continue our coverage of Elon Musk's big steak in Twitter.

0:42:52.160 --> 0:42:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Daphne Keller of Stanford will be joining us along with

0:42:55.600 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin two that kicks off in Miami, will have a

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:02.880
<v Speaker 1>slew of special guests. I'm Emily Changing in San Francisco.

0:43:03.280 --> 0:43:04.759
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg