WEBVTT - The Star Trek Economy

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. He don't even welcome to Forward Thinking, the

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>podcast that most of the future, and says, but tell

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>him while he wanders his starry ce remember remember me.

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jonathan Strickland, I'm Lauren Focan, and I'm Joe McCormick.

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>And today we're tackling another listener request episode about economics. Yeah,

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>if you listen to our last episode about will the

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>robots take our jobs? You know already what we're going

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to tackle today. Now. Of course, this isn't the kind

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of ben Stein economics hopefully where we talk about what

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>is it ben Stein talks about it? Don't voodoo economics? Yeah, no,

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>this is uh, this is gonna be some sci fi

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>economics here. So our listener, George wrote in, I believe

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>from Facebook. No on at our email address, email, which

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>is FW thinking at stuff works dot Com? We have email?

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Is the incredible future? You thinking at how stuff works?

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Dot COMW thinking dot Com FW thinking it how stuff

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 1>works dot No? No, no, no, no, no dot com

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Did George have to say, Lauren? George said,

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I would suggest that you do a podcast about the

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 1>economic systems of the future, i e. Star Trek. Does

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>anyone get paid for their work on enterprise for Voyager

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Deep Space nine? Obviously, our current economic system has had

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>changes in the past a hundred years, electronic payments, online

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>banking and the like. Thanks for reading this, George, Thank

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 1>you George. And uh yeah, first of all, did you

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>guys recognize where the lyric came from? Now? That lyric

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>is from the unsung unpublished to the general public lyrics

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to the Star Trek theme song and the original series. Yeah,

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>great story about that involves economics. I'll tell you after

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the podcast because it doesn't really pertain to the actual

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>discussion here. Fine, not cool. So the theme was written

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>by a guy named Courage. He wrote the theme and

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>he was getting residuals for that theme whenever Star Trek

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>was playing. Rod and Berry had an agreement with Courage

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:13.839
<v Speaker 1>that said that he could write lyrics to the theme.

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>So after the fact, Rodd and Berry wrote lyrics knowing

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that they would never ever be sung because it meant

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that he got a cut of those residuals, which effectively

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 1>had the amount of money that Courage was getting. So

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the future of the economy, well, let's look at the

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>economy of Star Trek because I'm interested in this too.

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really cool. Uh And obviously, Star Trek

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>is a fictional system. It's not like we're reporting on

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>something that has actually happened. But I do think he

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>gives us a very interesting framework for imagining how certain

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>types of future economies might play out. So what does

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>money look like on Star Trek and the Star Trek universe, jobs, economies, cash,

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>what does it all mean? Well, Gene Roddenberry, despite his

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>apparently slightly problematic business practice, well we'll call it ethically questionable.

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>He he. He admittedly designed Star Trek partially as this utopia,

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>this post scarcity utopia where everyone has what they need.

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah he uh he. After the fact, after the first

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>series started to air, began to kind of lay down

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>some rules. But those rules were not hard and fast

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:31.919
<v Speaker 1>early on. So there are some contradictions. First of all,

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>we have to admit that in the Star Trek universe

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>you have lots of different cultures. The one that the

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Enterprise is from is from the United Federation of Planets,

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>which has Earth is kind of its central member, and

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>so we often talk about their not being any money

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>in Star Trek. What we're really referring to is that Federation.

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>We're not talking about the universe as a whole, because

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>there are other societies like the Farringhi that do still

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>use money. So this isn't just cut and dry stuff.

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>They're actually contradictions within the Star Trek episodes themselves. So

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>for example, at one point, Kirk offers to pay some

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>miners on Rigel twelve for lithium crystals, not di lithium,

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>just playing old lithium crystals. In another episode, he claims,

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>quote the Federation has invested a great deal of money

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in our training end quote. And another one spot even

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>goes so far as to start exactly saying how much

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>how many Federation credits have been spent in his training.

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 1>It's one of those, you know, funny little moments. Do

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>you have any idea how much money they spend on you?

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>One of one of those Whagni mcady dudes um Scotty

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>In Star Trek six the Undiscovered Country claims that he's

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 1>going to go and buy a boat, So that suggests

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>he's actually going to purchase something. You'd need to have

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>something to purchase things with. He's going to go buy

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 1>it from the Ferenghi maybe so. Uh. Even in Star

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Trek the Next Generation we have mentioned of money. The

0:04:56.520 --> 0:05:00.159
<v Speaker 1>Federation offers one point five million quote Federation credits end

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 1>quote for the Bars and Wormhole in the episode The

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Price Uh, Cisco's father on Deep Space nine he owns

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a restaurant in New Orleans. So does he just open

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the doors and let people come on in and eat

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>for free? Or are they paying for this food? Do

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>they have to wash the dishes? There's no is there

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>no root to do that? Yeah? Well, actually that's a

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>good point. In Star Trek the use of robots is

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 1>criminally underrepresented. But well we'll get into that. So, well,

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 1>what's the okay, So you've outlined the contradictions, but what

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>is the party line? What's the real what do they say?

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Run Berry was saying that there wasn't going to be

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 1>any actual money with the Federation, that that they had

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>evolved beyond money, And in fact a lot of the

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 1>other references we find are along with that. So for example,

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Star Trek four the Voyage Home, Kirk at one point

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>is talking with a person from our present who says

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>don't they have money? Like, do you not have money

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in the twenty century, and he's like, no, we don't.

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Picard mentions that money quote doesn't exist in the twenty

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>four century. The acquisition of wealth is no longer the

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>driving force in our lives. End quote. I'm being superior

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 1>to you as only Jean loup Acard can be. You

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>should be ashamed of yourself. And then, according to Paris

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>on Voyager, the economy of star Trek took shape in

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the twenty second century when quote money went the way

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of the dinosaur. In quote fort mix becomes a museum.

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>So the money was killed by a combination of climate

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>change in an asteroid impact. But it implies so um,

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, like I said, asteroid. Sorry. And then then

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that when there when the gold standard for real, I

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>know we were technically on it since the seventies, but still,

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>uh so the fringy, like I said, they do still

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>use money. There's actually some some direct quotes where they

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about how look, just because you gave up cash

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:56.159
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean the rest of us did. Uh. In fact,

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>they value a rare liquid metal called latin um. Yeah,

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:04.280
<v Speaker 1>they frequently trade in gold pressed latinum because because latinum

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is liquid at room temperature, right, they have to find

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>it with something like, for example, goal. Yeah, and that's

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>what that's what allows it to be solid at room temperature. Uh.

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>And conveniently, this metal can't be replicated because reasons, because

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>plot reasons. Yeah, there's no like I'm sure someone somewhere

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>has gone to the trouble to explain why you cannot

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>create latinum in a replicator. But maybe it's because of

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the quarks. Yeah, Well, up the issue of the replicator,

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>which I think is sort of central to the way

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>in which this economy is run. So in Star Trek

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>they have replicators, these machines that can produce whatever you

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>want out of base materials on demand. They essentially convert

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>energy into matter. Yeah, and when you have something like this,

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>it kind of makes sense that there would be no

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>such thing as money, because what's the point if you

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>can make anything you need basically for free. Yeah, well

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>except for for specialist goods, is the thing. Uh yeah, yeah,

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you could have what there might be a demand for

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>things that are made the old fashioned way, because we're

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>human and we value that, right. But in large part,

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about the ability to create anything you ever want, uh,

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, anything physical you ever want that fits within

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the confines of the replicator. You can't like print a spaceship. Uh.

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.319
<v Speaker 1>In fact, there is a scarcity because there's a scarcity

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of spaceships. That actually happens after the Borg invasion. There's

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>a problem that they don't have enough spaceships to combat

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the Borg, and so it becomes clear that there is

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a limitation on this ability to convert energy into matter.

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>There's also obviously an energy cost. I mean, if you're

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>using energy to turn energy into matter, the energy has

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to come from somewhere. But we're at least lead to

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>believe that in the future, at least on Earth and

0:08:56.800 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>most of the colonies that are near Earth, there's an

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:07.719
<v Speaker 1>overwhelming energy surplus. So that's it's effectively a non factor. Yeah. Yeah,

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 1>we can probably assume that most of the manual labor

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of jobs have been automated. Yeah, this is the

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:19.559
<v Speaker 1>problem that we have where one of the weirdest things

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>about Star Trek is you don't see a lot of robots.

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you've got data who's an android. Those doors

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>open and close all on their own, and yeah, you

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>got the doors, but then after that, like every time

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>something goes wrong, they send Jordie LaForge into the Jeffrey tube. Yeah,

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>he's like crawling on his elbows and knees, and like

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>there's always that one panel that's four hundred feet down,

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>this tiny little thing in your You don't have a

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>robot to do that. We have robots now that can

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>do that and do it better, I guess. So. I mean,

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:54.959
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of questions to come up from this,

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>but I will I would suggest that perhaps one of

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the issues here is, well, Joe and I talked about

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:03.679
<v Speaker 1>this too. We we mentioned that, uh, this is bad

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>for narrative obviously if you take the characters out of

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>those situations. If we want to follow that same logic, really,

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>like why are you having Sulu fire the weapons? Shouldn't

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you have an automated system that detects an incoming threat

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:23.959
<v Speaker 1>and responds immediately automatically Take the automation out. I mean,

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>but at that point, why is he I mean, we

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>could ask infinite questions about this, like why is he

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>pressing buttons on a panel when really Kirk should be

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>able to just say okay, Glass fire the torpedo, Or

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:39.199
<v Speaker 1>why is Kirk making the decision when obviously an AI

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.839
<v Speaker 1>could make the decision faster and with more ethical consideration,

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and well, certainly with more ethical consideration than Kirk. I

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>love that that you. I mean that you went with

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the Google glass because now I'm thinking like engage warp drives,

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Like where are we going? I'm feeling lucky. Well, obviously

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>this points out that the fact that's true a pretty

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>much all science fiction, which is that their narrative requirements,

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>in order to create a dramatic story, you have to

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 1>have some elements that might not really make sense given

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:12.959
<v Speaker 1>the technological assumptions of the setting. Yeah, you just kind

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>of have to overlook that. It's like, the story is

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>not going to be interesting if there aren't human characters

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>doing things. And the fact that we're making it in

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>our present means that we're limited somewhat by our our

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>imagination of what our personal scope. Yeah, what the user

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>interface can be. But there are some other things that

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that kind of throw monkey wrench into this. You know,

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 1>no need for money, you know world. One of those

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is that people appear to own personal property. Uh, for example,

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you've got Cisco's restaurant, got Chateau Pacard where they still

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>his family still runs a vineyard, so you've got land.

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>How did you get the land. Did you have a flag? Flag?

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>You didn't have a flag. I think this points out

0:11:56.880 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a potential problem with the whole idea of post scare city,

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>because there are some items with value that can't be

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>replaced even by replicators. As we talked about the whole starships. Uh.

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:10.959
<v Speaker 1>For example, high quality real estate would be one. You

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>might say that by becoming a space faring species, we

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>could extend the supply of real estate to an effective

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>infinity where if you can say, terror form all these

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>infinite number of planets out there and colonize them all,

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>but there would still be a demand for quality real estate,

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the patches of land that are close to the other

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:37.319
<v Speaker 1>things you want to be close to or scenic, or

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the one that's right really close to that pleasure planet,

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>or if it's a restaurant at the street corner where

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>people would actually walk in. I mean, it's no good

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 1>building a restaurant on the moon and there's nobody, but

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:54.199
<v Speaker 1>there's there's no money being exchanged. That doesn't matter if

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:56.719
<v Speaker 1>anyone shows up or not. Well, I don't know that's

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>a good question. I did we figure out whether money

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>was being exchanged or well? Run Barry said that they

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>had evolved beyond the need for money. But there's some

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>other economists who have different views on this. Yeah, let's

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 1>look at what some some modern thinkers have said analyzing

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the Star Trek economy. So I read a series of

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>three articles, uh that that were published in in various

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>in different outlets, but they were each in response to

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>like one one was an initial article, the next was

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a response to the first one. The third was response

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to the earlier two. So it's one of those fascinating

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>things where you get a bunch of people who have

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot to say on this issue. They're really well

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>versed in both the economics and star Trek, and it

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 1>becomes amazing. Uh So, Rick Webb and medium wrote the

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>first piece, and it was probably it was the longest

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>of the three um and it was all about the

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Federation being in a pro to post scarcity economy. Okay,

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>so it's not quite post scarcity, but they're getting there exactly.

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>He says that the Earth is kind of poised between

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>still being in that scarcity based economy where things like land,

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, you obviously have, especially if you're talking about

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>land on Earth, you know, there's a limited amount of that,

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>so there's still some things of scarcity. Spaceships are another example.

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Spaceships are not uh not unlimited, so not not your

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>average person can't just go out and get a space sia.

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>But other things are not scarce at all anymore because

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you can make everything with no perceivable cost. So for example,

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>food in the Star Trek, or clothing, or or houses

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>or warmth, yeah, pretty much anything else. Yeah, anything you've

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>ever seen being made on board the Enterprise. Imagine that

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>someone has one of those in their home. They're capable

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of doing the same thing. So he argues that to

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>get from a priest you know, an actual scarcity based

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>market to a post scarcity one will have this interim

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>period in which some things are abundant in some places

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and other things will remain scared, either all over the

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>place or in very particular places. Uh. And that's where

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the proto post scarcity comes in. So he talks about

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>episodes of Star Trek where there are planets in the

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Federation that are dealing scarcely issues like famine and starvation.

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>And I don't I mean, I know that there have

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>been episodes like that. It does make you wonder, all right,

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>so why why are they in this situation? What led

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to this problem? Well, it's been portrayed from the episodes

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that I remember at least as being like either their

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>replicators malfunctioned or there was some kind of issue with

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the replicators, or they otherwise got cut off from civilization

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and some interesting plot there might be some energy crisis,

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>for example, that whatever whatever they had been using to

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>produce energy had failed in some fundamental way. So he

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>proposes that in this economy under normal circumstances, so like

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>let's say the economy of Federation Earth, Uh, everyone is

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>essentially on a welfare benefit and the benefits far exceed

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>person's needs. He gave in the arbitrary example of it's

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>like every single man, woman, and child is essentially gifted

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>ten million dollars and they can do pretty much anything

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>they want. However, there are some social pressures that put

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:21.239
<v Speaker 1>people to, you know, cause people to avoid conspicuous consumption,

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>so that no one goes out and buys everything that

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>they don't need. And it's kind of funny because conspicuous

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>consumption makes a lot less sense if everybody has access

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to tons of money. I mean, the whole idea of

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to buy a flashy sports car so people

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>can see it is to show off your relative value

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>compared to other people, right, and every everyone has that

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>same value, then there's no point in doing that. Like

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>if if everyone has the capability of going out and

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and building that exact same sports car, uh, then it

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>has no unique value to you anymore. Uh. So the

0:16:56.240 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>accumulation of possessions doesn't actually what would cost something, and

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the government itself would keep track of it, according to

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>his argument. He says that they would sort of look

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 1>and see how much each person is using. And you

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>you have an allotment, a limit to how much you

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>can use. But that limit is so high that under

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>normal circumstances you would never ever deplete it. So you'll

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>go through your entire life without ever running anything. Yeah, you'll,

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you'll you're operating at a surplus. Uh. But then he

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>suggests that workers are quote unquote paid by having that

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>welfare benefit increased by a small amount. In other words,

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:37.399
<v Speaker 1>they get a little bit more than someone who doesn't

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>do anything. He says that there's probably gonna be some

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>jobs that people still need to do. He's he's seeing

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 1>a future where we're never gonna have robots doing absolutely everything,

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>they are gonna be some things that humans need to do.

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 1>So how do you give an incentive to someone who

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>has access to everything they need for their entire lives

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to go and do this job that other people don't

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>want to do. He says, well, you actually, we do

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 1>pay them. You give them a little more of that

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>huge amount. So maybe they get ten million, one thousand dollars.

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>And he says, sure, in the long run, this doesn't

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:15.880
<v Speaker 1>mean anything because they already have more than what they require. However,

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>on a subconscious level, we humans tend to think I

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>want more, and that that would be enough of an

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>incentive for people to go and get jobs, even though

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:28.679
<v Speaker 1>they would never they would never want for anything. Now,

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of course, this is assuming, as you said, that some

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>menial or unpleasant jobs remain in this future. If we're

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>assuming this kind of thing we're actually enacted in the

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>real world, I think we should take into consideration the

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:43.159
<v Speaker 1>possibility of what we talked about in the last podcast

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:46.360
<v Speaker 1>on robots replacing us, which is that it could very

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:49.879
<v Speaker 1>well be that robots can do all of these jobs,

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and especially any job, any job you wouldn't find people

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>wanting to do out of their own personal fulfillment. Sure. Sure,

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>And and it's possible that all of the hallways and

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>floors and ceilings of the enterprise are covered in self

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>cleaning materials that are very advanced, and or that there

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 1>are an army of of rumbas that are just off

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:17.199
<v Speaker 1>screen and every single shot cleaning everything. But you know,

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's I think that that's one of those suspensions

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of disbelief that we have to. Yeah, I agree, and

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that you know, once you take

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>in the robots idea and the fact that there aren't

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 1>any jobs that have to be done, then that problem

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of goes away. It ends up being people do

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>things for self enrichment, which is the way ron Berry

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>pitched it is the idea that the people make choices

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that are all about, uh, what they find fulfilling themselves personally,

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's less it's not about what you get out

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.199
<v Speaker 1>of it monetarily, but what you get out of it

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>in personal satisfaction. Well that's what the next piece from

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:57.919
<v Speaker 1>Slate argued, right, yes, yes, uh, and uh so Slate

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>goes that was Matthew Iglesias who wrote the piece and

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Slate and he specifically referenced this earlier piece, and he

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>said that there's at least some sort of scarcity based

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>economy in Star Trek, again pointing at Cisco's restaurant Picard's

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Family Vineyard as examples, uh, and said that that was

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 1>historical production, which would have its own kind of scarcity

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 1>based value, because while you could go to the replicator

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and print out gallons of wine to your heart's content, uh,

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:32.479
<v Speaker 1>it would not be the same as going and getting

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:37.239
<v Speaker 1>a bottle of wine that was traditionally produced right, right,

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 1>And we've talked about that on the show before. I

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>think in our Food Replicators episodes wherein UH, there are

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>characters on Star Trek, like Riker has this little uh

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 1>dinner club sort of thing on on the enterprise to

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>show off his Riker skills at cooking. You know, I

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 1>think this actually points to something that's really interesting that

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that I would like to suggest, is that robots and

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>replicators might never be able to recreate those intangible things

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that we love most about life. Like a robot cannot

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:13.479
<v Speaker 1>create coolness, do you know what I mean? Like the

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 1>fact like that you see an object James Dean bot,

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>it can't A robot can't figure out what's cool about

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a handcrafted artifact? That is cool. Well, and part of

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it also is just the the idea of someone making

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>something for you or you making something for someone else. Well,

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the coolness is like the knowledge of

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 1>where it came from. This this indetectable physically maybe, but

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>by knowing where an artifact that was handcrafted came from,

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>it has this aura of specialness. Oh yeah, yeah, well,

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's why people pay millions of dollars

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>for an actual ruby slipper that was worn by Judy

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Garland or or or why people are you know, oh yeah,

0:21:58.200 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a good point, or you can you can see

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and in pop culture these days a lot wherein people

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>are are purchasing these these microcraft beers or uh, handmade

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>things on Etsy rather than buying something that's been mass produced,

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>because you know, if you it's this conception that if

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you have the money to do it, knowing that a

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:22.880
<v Speaker 1>human hand crafted this thing, abuse it with some kind

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of property of awesome. It's a kind of lingering, magical

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 1>thinking that we might not ever be able to get rich.

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Shake yeah. Now. Iglesia says that he envisions us as

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>being sort of a gift economy as opposed to a

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:39.919
<v Speaker 1>welfare uh economy that that was proposed by web explain

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the difference there. So he's saying this as uh, you know,

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>everything else is provided for you. It's it's because of

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 1>the replicators and the energy surplus. You're talking about, like

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 1>basic needs like food and water and shelter, and then

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 1>these these other sort of handcrafted items or whatever would

0:22:57.280 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>essentially be freely given away. So if you were to

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 1>eat Cisco's restaurant, it would not cost you anything because

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the purpose of the restaurant is to bring joy to others,

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 1>to have the joy of making food and serving it

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to people, as opposed to this is how I make

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 1>my living, and that there might be some bartering going

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>on depending upon who you are, Like you might be, Oh,

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:20.919
<v Speaker 1>I got you this bottle of wine. I really like

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 1>that chair you carved, that kind of thing, but that

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.439
<v Speaker 1>it would largely just be gift economy, and that you

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>give the things you make away because the pleasure is

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>in the making and the giving and not it's not

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 1>motivated by a need for for resources. And that's that's

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a that's almost unimaginable. It's it's so it's so far

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:43.640
<v Speaker 1>out from the way that our world works right now.

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's a it's a really terrific and

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting concept. It is easily imagined by me, but only

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>because I've done a lot of theater work in Georgia

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 1>where you don't necessarily have to get paid. You're not

0:23:55.920 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 1>necessarily going to get paid. This is a commentary on

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 1>on the arts in Georgia. No, but at any rate,

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe the people who are coming to the play aren't

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>expecting to receive value. Well, I'm just getting despite the

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:14.920
<v Speaker 1>fact they don't expect it. Uh So, Now in both

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:16.919
<v Speaker 1>of these cases, with both Webb and Iglesias, they have

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to acknowledge the fact that there is this thing called

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 1>Federation credits, right, so that that becomes problematic because you say, well,

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 1>there's no money, but they mentioned federation credits. Well, websites

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>the Federation credit as being a private currency, kind of

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>like bitcoin, so it's not something that's government backed, and

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 1>it was really, in his mind, used to help, uh

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>facilitate really complex transactions that would not be easily managed

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>through barter those kind of systems. I mean, that's really

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 1>why we've got currency in the first places that you know,

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I might grow chickens, and Joe, you might grow grapes,

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and Lauren has a bunch of cows, and I want

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>some milk. But Lauren doesn't have need of chickens, but

0:24:57.680 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>she would like some grapes. You'd like some chicken And

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 1>it starts getting this complicated mess, whereas we all just agree, Hey,

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>this piece of paper represents this amount of value for

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 1>which you can get all of these different things. Yeah,

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>so credits he thinks of as being used as for

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:15.439
<v Speaker 1>these complex transactions, not day to day stuff. So he

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:17.679
<v Speaker 1>thinks you could still get away with the no money

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>uh definition that run Barries set up. He also thought

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of it, well, it could be used for for trade

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>between the Federation and other societies. Like you wouldn't necessarily

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>use this to buy something on Earth. You would use

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it when you are dealing with some other race like

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the Romula right right, or like on Deep Space nine

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:42.360
<v Speaker 1>when they had a bunch of different cultures interacting, and

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 1>so you had to the members of the Federation crew

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 1>there had to pay Quirk and Federation credits for whatever

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>it which they wanted. Cork would sometimes accept and sometimes

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>he didn't want to accept. Federation credits. He was so flighty. Uh, well,

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know for ran I do, I do.

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm related to a few, um but yeah. Now, Iglesias

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:08.639
<v Speaker 1>sees credits as being a means of regulating government provided

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 1>scarce products and services, because, like I said, not everyone

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>has infinite access to everything. So if you needed to

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>take a trip from Earth to some distant star system,

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you probably don't have your own starship, so you need

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to have a way of being able to negotiate that

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.400
<v Speaker 1>because there's a limited number of there's a limited starships.

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Each starship has a limited amount of space on it,

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>so that is a scarcity issue. And of course they're

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>still real estate like we talked about earlier, exactly so

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that this would probably be the means of regulating that

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. And so it's not so much purchasing

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 1>power as much as it is a limit on how

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 1>much stuff you can demand from the Federation before you

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>run out of demand. So in a way, it's it's

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of restating what web It said earlier, this idea

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that you get a certain allotment of credits that you

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>can use, uh, and you can't put so hard a

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>demand that it would seed your credit limit. So, in

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 1>other words, if I wanted to, you know, in in

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>this if it was truly a post scarcity economy, there's

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>no scarcity whatsoever. I could say I want a hundred

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:15.880
<v Speaker 1>spaceships and that would be a possibility, but that's clearly

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>not going on in Star Trek. So then you have

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Joshua Gans over at Digitopoly uh, and Gas points out

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 1>that it's difficult to measure a thing's worth once that

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 1>thing becomes freely available. Using the standards that we use today,

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>we often a sign of value by how much it costs, right,

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>which is not necessarily a good representation of an object's

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>actual value. Uh. An object might be more valuable than

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>what you paid for it depending upon your need, or

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:48.640
<v Speaker 1>it may be less valuable. But you're like, well it's

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>either that or nothing. Um, so it's interesting, but but

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>it's still if it becomes freely available, how do you

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 1>say it's worth something? Uh? You know. There and I've

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>seen a lot of philosophical discussions about this particular issue

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>that are really interesting. But uh. His conclusion was that

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 1>the Star Trek economy is quote a well defined general

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>equilibrium production exchange economy with a large government presence end quote.

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not exactly sure what difference that makes from the

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>previous ones, but he seemed really emphatic about it. Okay, well,

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:28.439
<v Speaker 1>are there any other interesting science fiction economic systems? I

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>was trying to think of others, and I couldn't. Really

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that weren't dystopian. Star Wars is not truly dystopian. Star

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Wars is incredibly complicated. They have the Trade Federation, whatever

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the heck that is, and I've seen those movies. If

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>somebody wants to try to explain it to me, I'll

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>walk away. I'll run away. Well, well, there's there's a

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>whole problem in Star Wars where it's not quite a dystopia,

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>but I'd say that it's more or less equivalent to

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>our current modern economy, in which we've got, uh, you know,

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>various corrupt governmental presences in in the Galactic Empire, and

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>in various people operating at various levels of honesty and

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>legality throughout the system. So, you know, Star Wars essentially,

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:18.479
<v Speaker 1>you've got your your local currencies, your planetary currencies, your

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 1>system currencies, your galactic currencies. You've got smugglers who pick

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>up the slack that's left when the empire says certain

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 1>things are are permissible and certain things aren't forbidden. It

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>seems to be imperfect but workable. Yeah. Now, granted we

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 1>can also say that this isn't a future economic model,

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a past economics. Has it happened a long time ago? Yeah?

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>And yeah. The other ones that I can think of

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that aren't quite dystopian are also along the same lines,

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff like an in far Escape or Firefly. You know,

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 1>things where they're do seem to be like interplanetary governmental

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 1>systems that are that are at work. But you know,

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 1>again for plot reasons. Where it becomes interesting in most

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of these stories is that there is a need for

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>some kind of smuggler, some kind of black market, or

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 1>something outside of society's norm. Yeah. I think we see

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of where it's just basically some kind of

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>regulated capitalism. You know, I'm wondering if there are any

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 1>good past or present analogies to the Star Trek system. Obviously,

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's no such thing as a replicator, But

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>is there is there anything we could look to in

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 1>history and say, well, here's this case where they tried

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to create something like Star Trek. Again, depends upon whom

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you ask Rick. Web argues that comparing star Trek systems

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to earlier systems, like our earlier economic systems, is the

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>wrong way to go, and that we're more or less

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>heading in that direction already. So he's he's arguing for

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a new economic model that is not directly analogous to

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>something that we've already seen. So he argues that his version,

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>this this proto post scarcity economy, is not akin to

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 1>communism or socialism. Uh maybe it's closer to socialist capitalism.

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 1>So sort of the systems that you find in Europe

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 1>where it's still a scarcity based market in Europe, but

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you also have a social uh safety net that's that

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 1>underlies that, and that this would kind of be that

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:24.719
<v Speaker 1>crank to eleven. Right, there's free enterprise, but there's just

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>uh plenty of government redistribution. Yeah, So he would argue

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that that is the closest the models that we see

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 1>in Europe would be akin to what we see in

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>star Trek. There is a proposal out in Switzerland, uh,

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>in which every adult citizen would be given two five

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred Swiss francs that's some two hundred American dollars every month.

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Everyone whether they're old or young, or healthier, sick or

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>already rich or poor, whether they have a job or not,

0:31:55.160 --> 0:32:00.479
<v Speaker 1>just for existing, for for being a citizen in Switzerland period.

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:04.959
<v Speaker 1>And this this proposal was accepted by the government for

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 1>an eventual vote after a petition of I believe a

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty six thousand signatures was collected that that

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>asked for for consideration of the idea. And this kind

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of thing has been in fact considered and implemented in

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 1>other places, and never quite to the scale, like for example,

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>once um Namibia. Instead of that, there was an experiment

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>in which instead of distributing various aid workers supplies to

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a community, they handed out a flat sum to everyone,

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and the community basically pulled about half of their resources

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and and built what they thought they needed most, which

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 1>was a post office, which was something that the aid

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 1>workers had never considered before, so so it was a

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty rad thing, but but again on a on a

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 1>much smaller and experimental scale. And the idea in in

0:32:55.920 --> 0:33:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Switzerland and with this experiment in Namibia was that you know,

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 1>giving giving a kind of base pay to people will

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>help remove clunky and potentially expensive government aid programs from

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 1>from these places. But it removes a lot of the

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>complaint that you would have saying that that any given

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 1>governmental system is is favoring one portion of the population

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 1>over every other one. And what you're talking about the

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>clunkiness of it. I mean, I think even if someone

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>takes a you know, a very liberal political philosophy, typically

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you would still grant that. Yeah, well, sure, lots of

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 1>government organizations tend over time to become kind of bloated

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and like they can they can become inefficient. Sure, and

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and there can be lots of problems in distributing more

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 1>specific kinds of aid, and that you need to figure

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 1>out who deserves it or doesn't deserve it. And all

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 1>of those were in air quotes if you couldn't hear

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>them at home. Um And and that's problematic, and it's

0:33:56.320 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>something it gives. It gives our lovely political sense system

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 1>something to argue about at length, which can again lead

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to complication in getting that money to the people that

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 1>need to receive it. Um. You know, experts say that

0:34:13.200 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 1>this proposal that's out in Switzerland is pretty unlikely to

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:20.359
<v Speaker 1>be accepted. Um. And there's not even a date out

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 1>for a vote. Uh, this thing has been floating around

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:25.839
<v Speaker 1>for about a year and and they haven't even put

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 1>it on the docket yet, so so it's not a

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:31.760
<v Speaker 1>high priority item. It's probably never going to happen. Um,

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's it's cool that that's one of

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:36.839
<v Speaker 1>the systems that people are talking about, is a way

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:40.400
<v Speaker 1>to fix the economic problems that we're having. Well, you

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>said probably never going to happen. But I'm wondering, could

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:47.359
<v Speaker 1>we ever expect to instantiate a system like the Star

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Trek economy in the future and what would really be required? Well,

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:54.840
<v Speaker 1>because sorry, just one thing is Lauren, you and I

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 1>at least I think one time when Jonathan wasn't here,

0:34:56.880 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 1>we talked about replicators and we talked about how molecular

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 1>assemblers replicators. I don't know if that's going to happen.

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 1>It's real technologically unlikely. Yeah, um, I mean you you

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:14.400
<v Speaker 1>can talk about smaller and smaller uh, programmable matter, but

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 1>taking individual atoms or molecules and building stuff out of

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>them that that seems unlikely, especially to scale. You could

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:25.840
<v Speaker 1>do it on like a laboratory setting where you're doing Look,

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:29.839
<v Speaker 1>we we assembled these five molecules into this shape, like well,

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that's that's fantastic. Where's my slushy? Of course, anything is possible.

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we can never really predict. Sometimes sometimes technology

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:41.479
<v Speaker 1>outpaces our predictions. But it seems like a really tough

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>road to try to create Star Trek style replicator. I

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't think replicators are necessary for us to

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:51.959
<v Speaker 1>arrive at the same kind of economic status is Star Trek.

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I think post scarcity does not require replicators for it

0:35:56.680 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>to happen. There are other routes that might lead us

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to post scarcity. In fact, we there's some who argue

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that we are already in a post scarcity world, at

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>least for some items like food. And you might say, well,

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 1>how can you say that with huge numbers of people starving?

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>And the fact is that you know, we have we

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:17.839
<v Speaker 1>have enough food to feed everyone. It's just that it's

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 1>not equally distributed exactly, and so it would take effort

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and and energy and willpower to make that kind of distribution.

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 1>It would also be very uh counter intuitive to certain

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>economic systems like capitalism. Right, Well, we've trained our instincts

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 1>uh in systems where we were dealing with scarcity. I mean,

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>for thousands of years we've been working on the assumption

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that there's not enough to go around, so you've got

0:36:44.680 --> 0:36:48.479
<v Speaker 1>to compete really hard to get what's yours. And once

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you're in a system where there is enough to go around,

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you're still fighting that instinct that you've developed back when

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:57.400
<v Speaker 1>there was not enough for everybody. Wasn't a good idea

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 1>on a very small scale. This is why if someone

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 1>if there is free pizza, I will eat way more

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:07.720
<v Speaker 1>free pizza than I want or need because it's free,

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and there's still part of my brain that's that she

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want me getting it. Hungry college students who's going

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 1>like why, I will always be at the head of

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the line. And this is true. My coworkers can attest

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to it, like like, I'm there ten minutes before the

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 1>food is being served. Jonathan's like a dog that runs

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to the other dog's bowl first and you have to

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:34.760
<v Speaker 1>chase him away. I accept that it's I don't object

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:37.799
<v Speaker 1>at all, but yeah, it's it's obviously if we were

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:40.719
<v Speaker 1>to make this move, it would not I don't think

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it would be a gradual thing. I think this would

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:45.880
<v Speaker 1>have to be something where we reach a tipping point,

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 1>right where we reach a point where we say no,

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:52.799
<v Speaker 1>the things that we need. We have more than enough of.

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 1>There is no reason anyone should go wanting for these.

0:37:56.160 --> 0:38:01.880
<v Speaker 1>There's there's no purpose unless you are just completely divorcing

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 1>yourself from any kind of compassion or empathy. And I

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think we've gone there. I hope we haven't gone there.

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:11.840
<v Speaker 1>And uh so I think that there could be a

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:15.839
<v Speaker 1>tipping point where we say, now it's undeniable, we have this.

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 1>There's a responsibility at some point to to figure out

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 1>how to distribute it properly, which would buy necessity, uh

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:28.800
<v Speaker 1>involve a really big economic shakedown, because it's completely different

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:30.840
<v Speaker 1>from what we do today here in the United States,

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:33.759
<v Speaker 1>at least well tying into what we talked about in

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 1>our last episode about about robots, you wouldn't necessarily need replicators,

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and you wouldn't even necessarily need political action. You could have,

0:38:42.840 --> 0:38:47.359
<v Speaker 1>I think, an organic realization of the post scarcity economy

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:50.719
<v Speaker 1>by a sudden, you know, rapid maybe over the course

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of five or ten years, acceleration in robot productivity, when

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:58.280
<v Speaker 1>suddenly robots can make everything we need and it totally

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:00.880
<v Speaker 1>takes us by surprise, and then what are you going

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to do? I mean, at that point, do the people

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:06.320
<v Speaker 1>who own the robots still say no, no, this is

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 1>all mine. That almost kind of becomes silly. I mean,

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I know they're people are greedy, But at the same time,

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 1>once we're living in that world, wouldn't people kind of

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:22.399
<v Speaker 1>have a revelation. Wouldn't there be an epiphany? I think.

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what Star Trek presupposes, and I think

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:28.279
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a lovely presupposition, you know. It's it's

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:32.640
<v Speaker 1>very nice to think that the kinds of problems that

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:36.720
<v Speaker 1>we're having due to greed right now are are going

0:39:36.800 --> 0:39:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to go away. Um, and I do think that it

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 1>would have to be a paradigm shift culturally speaking, I

0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 1>think so too. And and not only that, but it

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:47.760
<v Speaker 1>would be so incredibly disruptive. I mean, we're talking about

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:52.840
<v Speaker 1>this and thinking about the the beautiful future where nobody

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 1>wants for anything, you know, at least at as far

0:39:55.600 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>as the basic necessities go. But then you think, well,

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 1>this world would also eliminate some big institutions that have

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>been around for for centuries, like banks, you know, and

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:11.839
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, when you're talking about an institution that's

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:14.920
<v Speaker 1>been around that long, like the type of institution even

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:17.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're not talking about specific you know, branch or whatever.

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Then again, then again, now I don't want to police.

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Feel free to tell me I'm wrong, Banker listeners and right.

0:40:27.400 --> 0:40:30.320
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know if anybody is really like I

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:36.720
<v Speaker 1>love banking so much. I love banking and Mary Poppins,

0:40:36.800 --> 0:40:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I would be banking even if I didn't get paid

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:42.719
<v Speaker 1>for it. I kind of don't really think that. I

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:45.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know, As I said, maybe I'm assuming it's difficult

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:48.719
<v Speaker 1>to to put forth that opinion. I mean, being that

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 1>all all three of us talking here are our artists

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:57.399
<v Speaker 1>and writers and and you know, amateur armchair philosophers, and

0:40:57.520 --> 0:41:00.160
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's kind of difficult, I think, for us

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:10.320
<v Speaker 1>particularly to to consider uh that level of love of banking. Anyway,

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:12.320
<v Speaker 1>So if I owned a bank, I guarantee you I

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 1>would love it. No, no, no, I'm getting to the

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to the point I was trying to make us. If

0:41:16.960 --> 0:41:20.640
<v Speaker 1>we imagine a scenario when society is flush with wealth,

0:41:20.719 --> 0:41:23.080
<v Speaker 1>like we're talking about, there's enough for everybody to have

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:27.320
<v Speaker 1>tons of money without doing anything at all. Then even

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 1>with that benefit, would bankers still want to preserve banking?

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't they rather be uh writers? And podcasters and arm

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:42.040
<v Speaker 1>chairfuhilosophers and restaurant No, I'm not saying that they might

0:41:42.120 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 1>rather be chefs, or they might rather play golf, or

0:41:44.680 --> 0:41:47.120
<v Speaker 1>they might rather do I don't know what I think

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:49.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that would be. I think there would be

0:41:50.000 --> 0:41:55.320
<v Speaker 1>a an interroom period where there'd be a lot of turmoil. Yeah, yeah, absolutely,

0:41:55.320 --> 0:41:57.840
<v Speaker 1>And so after that, I think we emerged to the

0:41:57.880 --> 0:42:01.800
<v Speaker 1>world where everyone's a golfer. But before that, golf clubs

0:42:01.800 --> 0:42:07.040
<v Speaker 1>are being used for other purposes. So I'm just saying

0:42:08.040 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that. I think because because you're talking about

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:13.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, when we say paradigm shifts, it's those are

0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:17.960
<v Speaker 1>simple words, but we're talking something really fundamental. Here is

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>something that that is a huge, like a bigger change

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:23.719
<v Speaker 1>than anything that's been faced in well, at least in

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:26.840
<v Speaker 1>our lifetimes, if not the human species. You could argue

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that there have been some pretty major ones like uh,

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:33.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, the Industrial Revolution, but still is it's

0:42:33.440 --> 0:42:36.439
<v Speaker 1>hard to think of something that would be more disruptive

0:42:36.640 --> 0:42:41.359
<v Speaker 1>than this particular tipping point moment. I'd say. The one

0:42:41.440 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 1>last question, then, is one that we also had to

0:42:43.680 --> 0:42:47.520
<v Speaker 1>deal with in in the previous podcast about robots, but um,

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:50.560
<v Speaker 1>is there a worry that in a post scarcity economy

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:54.400
<v Speaker 1>where people aren't forced to work, while people will choose

0:42:54.440 --> 0:42:57.399
<v Speaker 1>not to work, but that will also make them miserable.

0:42:57.520 --> 0:43:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we make decisions all the time that are

0:43:00.520 --> 0:43:03.719
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed to make us less happy, just because in the

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 1>short term it seems like the best thing to do.

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna eat these nachos because it seems really great now,

0:43:10.080 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and then an hour later, I'm like, wow, why did

0:43:12.120 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I wish? And it could be the same thing with

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:19.520
<v Speaker 1>with our laziness instinct. I I do lazy things where

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:22.959
<v Speaker 1>I really wish I'd made better use of that time. Uh,

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and it kind of makes me sad. And then I

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:28.480
<v Speaker 1>wonder if I didn't have to work, would my entire

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:30.960
<v Speaker 1>life turn into one of those moments where well, I

0:43:30.960 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 1>don't have to do anything right now, so I'm not

0:43:33.239 --> 0:43:36.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna And then I'm near the nearing the end of

0:43:36.120 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 1>my life, and I'm like, wow, what a waste of time.

0:43:38.160 --> 0:43:40.040
<v Speaker 1>You're like, Man, that's twenty eight years that I spent

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 1>browsing Facebook really could have been used differently. I think,

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:47.080
<v Speaker 1>in my experience, the neat thing and I'm sure it's

0:43:47.120 --> 0:43:49.279
<v Speaker 1>true for both of you as well, uh to some

0:43:49.600 --> 0:43:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to some level at least, is that the thing that

0:43:52.640 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I like to do in my spare time back before

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:58.239
<v Speaker 1>I had this job, is what I'm doing now for

0:43:58.360 --> 0:44:01.319
<v Speaker 1>my job. So I'd like to think that in this

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:04.880
<v Speaker 1>wonderful future where I no longer need to be paid

0:44:04.920 --> 0:44:07.959
<v Speaker 1>for anything, I would be doing something akin to this

0:44:08.680 --> 0:44:10.799
<v Speaker 1>for fun, because that's what I was doing before I

0:44:10.800 --> 0:44:13.400
<v Speaker 1>had the job. So I I am one of the

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:18.560
<v Speaker 1>incredibly lucky people who is legitimately doing what I love

0:44:18.640 --> 0:44:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to do as my job. So I would imagine that

0:44:21.520 --> 0:44:24.080
<v Speaker 1>my life would be not much different. I mean, obviously

0:44:24.600 --> 0:44:27.359
<v Speaker 1>I would. I mentioned the technology to be better, so

0:44:27.440 --> 0:44:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I could, you know, have a robot edit my podcast

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:33.240
<v Speaker 1>for me. But other than that putting all out of work,

0:44:33.719 --> 0:44:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying my personal podcast, not my work podcast,

0:44:36.960 --> 0:44:40.560
<v Speaker 1>because we've already established there's no work anymore. There is

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 1>no robot that could make disgusting electronic music like NOL.

0:44:44.840 --> 0:44:51.600
<v Speaker 1>That's true, beautifully disgusting electronic. No, it's great stuff. Those

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:58.479
<v Speaker 1>faces read from all the backhanded compliments we've been giving him. Okay,

0:44:58.880 --> 0:45:00.800
<v Speaker 1>we just he just poked out and behind us speaker

0:45:01.480 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 1>it at us. We should wrap this up all right,

0:45:03.760 --> 0:45:07.279
<v Speaker 1>So this was a ton of fun to look into, right,

0:45:07.600 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we have to thank George for the email

0:45:10.680 --> 0:45:15.239
<v Speaker 1>and the suggestion because uh, we're all star Trek fans here,

0:45:15.320 --> 0:45:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and the thought of going into the economics behind it

0:45:19.360 --> 0:45:25.240
<v Speaker 1>as as vaguely described as they were, was a fun challenge.

0:45:25.360 --> 0:45:28.200
<v Speaker 1>So if you guys have any other suggestions something that

0:45:28.239 --> 0:45:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to hear us talk about, whether it's science

0:45:30.480 --> 0:45:32.480
<v Speaker 1>fiction related or just some sort of topic and you

0:45:32.520 --> 0:45:34.720
<v Speaker 1>wonder what's that going to be like in the future,

0:45:35.080 --> 0:45:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you should write us in. Let's know. Our email address

0:45:37.480 --> 0:45:40.759
<v Speaker 1>is once again f W Thinking at how Stuff Works

0:45:40.800 --> 0:45:44.080
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Or drop us a line on Facebook, Twitter

0:45:44.320 --> 0:45:46.480
<v Speaker 1>or Google Plus. At Twitter and Google Plus, we are

0:45:46.600 --> 0:45:49.440
<v Speaker 1>f W Thinking. Just search fw Thinking and Facebook will

0:45:49.480 --> 0:45:51.480
<v Speaker 1>pop right up. Let us know what you think and

0:45:51.520 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk to you again really soon for more on

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 1>this topic in the future, which technology I'll visit Forward

0:46:01.520 --> 0:46:14.400
<v Speaker 1>thinking dot com. Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go

0:46:14.560 --> 0:46:15.040
<v Speaker 1>places