WEBVTT - 2018 Farmers Insurance Preview

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I miss the green.

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:03.480
<v Speaker 2>For example, I'm already upset. When I find my ball

0:00:03.520 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 2>in the bunker, I'm really upset. And when I find

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 2>my ball in a fried egg Friday Egg, the dreaded

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Friday Egg, Frida Egg, Frida Egg, Bride Egg, Lie, I'm

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 2>about ready to run off of the course.

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Ladies and gentlemen, Welcome back to another edition of the

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Frida Egg Podcast. I am joined again by Kyle, Nathan

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 1>and Polly. We're gonna break down last week's Career Builder

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and the Abu Dhabi Tournament and look ahead to this

0:00:55.880 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>week's Farmers Insurance at Tory Pines. Guys will come on,

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, we're going, Andy, Andy, Paul.

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 3>Good to see you guys again, or speak with you

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 3>guys again.

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 1>I should say, yeah, I'm down in the uh. I

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know what you would call it the epicenter of

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>club pros. This week in Orlando for this PGA show,

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 1>I'm on a search for my new air Westies. Since

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Westwood is no longer with foot Joy, it's left me shoeless.

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I can't I can't even wear those old air Westis anymore.

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, the good thing is you'll have seventy seven thousand

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 3>different brands of shoes to choose from making your way

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 3>around the convention center.

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm gonna make one lap around there. I

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I can I can handle it.

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 3>That's like going through Dante's Inferno.

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>So did you guys watch golf last week?

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 2>I did?

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 3>I Actually I wound up watching more of the DABI

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 3>event then the PGA golf. I really a big statement

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 3>by the European Ryder Cup team this week.

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>No, pretty crazy. Sergio won two in Singapore with them.

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:16.919
<v Speaker 1>But then rom and Fleetwood. I've been saying it for

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a while. The young players in Europe are really good.

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, Peters and d Tree and Paul Dunn's really

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>good player who he was in the final. He was

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>held the fifty four whole lead at the Open Championship

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 1>as an amateur. And then you know they've got still

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>like I mean, Rose is playing the best golf of

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>his career the last eight weeks, and Sergio is still around.

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean Fitzpatrick right there too, he was what a

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 3>couple off the couple off the lead?

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? And uh and Rory first start back.

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think you got the The Euros are

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 2>really strong up on top of just a matter of

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 2>whether the last three or four guys on the euro

0:02:57.560 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 2>team are gonna be able to be at the same

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 2>caliber some of the US players this year.

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 3>It's a fun storyline to watch all year. I feel

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 3>like it's one of the more anticipated Ryger Cups in

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 3>recent memory. I feel like it should be a real battle.

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 2>And I think you're gonna have some good players left

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:17.399
<v Speaker 2>off of both teams in terms of the captains picks

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 2>there give me some very difficult decisions.

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, Yeah, It's one of the things Doak said about

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the Ryder Cup and why there's such drama and interest

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 1>in it is because these guys are selected based off

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>of their whole year and regardless, like thirty three percent

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of them are going to come in in really bad form.

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>And that's the interesting part is watching guys play bad golf.

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Kind of a right. Never thought of it that way before,

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>but it's very true.

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you don't always get the h Rory Patrick Reid,

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, throwing birdies at each other. You sometimes get

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 3>the war of attrition.

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Would you did you guys watch any of the Career

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Builder PAULI? Where you watching Rom?

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Definitely definitely, Did I mean Rom just kind of

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 2>dominated the field. It seems like, you know, looking back,

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 2>it was obviously a close result, but I feel like

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 2>if he just put it a little bit better, he

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 2>easily could have won that tournament by by four or

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 2>five shots. I mean we kind of saw that on

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Sunday based upon how he kind of you know, didn't

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 2>necessarily capitalize early in his round where he should have.

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he didn't burdy a par five on Sunday, I

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>saw he was like negative almost negative a shot on

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 1>strokes gained around the green in the final round, so

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:35.359
<v Speaker 1>he was putting on a chipping expos a. Mike should

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>have probably pulled out the Texas wedge possibly, But those

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:43.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean the drives on eighteen he was hitting with

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 1>the three wood, I mean they were just lasers. You

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>got trouble left and he just stand it. I mean,

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>just has no fear. And he's one of the best

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>ball strikers in the world.

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 2>No, And that's one of the things like I enjoy

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 2>watching that t shot with having the you know, the

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 2>tracer on there so you're actually able to see the

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 2>ball flight. It makes it makes you see how good

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 2>those tea shots actually are. By rom that he did

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:06.239
<v Speaker 2>in the playoff.

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, I saw that CBS is introducing shot tracer

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 1>on all eighteen holes this year for their coverage. It's

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>welcome to the twenty first century for them. Did you

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>guys take away anything else from the Abu Dhabi Tournament

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 1>or the Career Builder?

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, one thing I noticed in the Career Builder

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 3>was in the playoff you could definitely tell who was

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 3>the more experienced composed golfer. I felt like, you know,

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:41.919
<v Speaker 3>Rom had a chance to win. It was it the

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 3>second playoff hole. I think he had a real good

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 3>look and just hit the putt through the brake where

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 3>you could definitely tell when Landry was putting for the win.

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 3>I think on the third playoff hole just kind of

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 3>made it hesitant, waved at the ball, you know, the

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 3>tendency to get under the gun and leave punch short,

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 3>and it just that's what stood out to me. Was

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 3>not necessarily golf, because they were both hitting pretty good

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 3>golf shots, but the uh, just the different poise when

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 3>they were putting.

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.479
<v Speaker 1>You know that that last putt Landry hit was not

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a good pot either. I mean he knew from like

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 1>the second that ball hit the club face it was

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 1>not going in right. He didn't even leave any drama

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>for viewers by like holding his pose and you know

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:25.479
<v Speaker 1>he was walking.

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 3>No, no, that was that was out the whole way.

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>That's That's like when I get one of those like

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>three foot left to right sliders, I have a tendency

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of just you know, hitting them, starting them right of

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the hole, and it just you know, I just start

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 1>walking immediately.

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:45.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, right, when you get about halfway into your backstroke,

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:46.720
<v Speaker 3>you're like, oh God.

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Paulie, what about you?

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think he just one of the things of

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.919
<v Speaker 2>the Kerb builders. We continue the trend of close results.

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 2>So I think this is the sixteenth time in the

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.160
<v Speaker 2>last thirty seven years that it went to a playoff,

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 2>which is kind of an insane stat And then you

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 2>and you looked at John ram Is only the second

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 2>four and winning in the last fifteen years, or besides

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Johnny Vegas back in twenty eleven.

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>How about rom getting to world number two at age

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty three and doing that without a major championship. Pretty crazy.

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, we've seen a couple of guys in

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 2>the past.

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 3>Dude.

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 2>I think I think Jordan did it when he originally

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 2>got on tour and the first year wasn't necessarily to

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 2>second in the world, but he made a rise from

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, way down on the bottom up to maybe

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 2>in the mid twenties. But you know from rom moving

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 2>from the think mid five hundreds the second is a

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 2>pretty metioroc rise.

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 3>It's crazy too because a year ago today he still

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 3>hadn't won yet. He was still waiting on his first

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 3>tour win. And you know he got up this week

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 3>at toy But that's that's crazy. Guy goes from not

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 3>winning an event to second in the world in a year.

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he just keeps top fiving and all the you know,

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 2>all the events that have high level of you know,

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 2>strength of fielding there and so he's it would build

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 2>up his world golf rank in that way.

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I've been kind of monitoring the status his percentage of

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>top ten finishes, and it was like forty five percent

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I think a week ago. So he's got he's forty

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>eight percent and that includes when he was an amateur,

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>So like forty eight percent of the time that he

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>plays he finishes in the top ten, which is just

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>it it's way too early to play something. But like

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:32.439
<v Speaker 1>his consistency, like it's got to be he's the most consistent.

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah you want to say, but not say it. Yeah, yeah,

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:37.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean I can tell you were hesitant to say it.

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 3>But it's I mean, that's about the level of consensus

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 3>consistency he's playing it.

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>He's got four wins and forty he's just under ten

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:48.319
<v Speaker 1>percent win percentage, which is insane.

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, it's it's remarkable.

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Rom now goes into a title defense week, so we'll

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>go to see the first time he defends the title,

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's at Tory Pines. But the big story is

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:07.079
<v Speaker 1>the big cat, Tiger Woods making his twenty eighteen debut

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>at an event he's won seven times, and he's also

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>won a US Open at Tory Pines. So what do

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you guys expecting out of Tiger?

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 3>I speaking of those eight victories, I saw a crazy

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 3>stat from Justin Ray today. He said, notable players with

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 3>eight official tour wins in a major Jeff Ogilvie, Justin Rose,

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Mike Weir, and Tiger has eight tour wins and a

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.959
<v Speaker 3>major at torri alone. So I think you get it.

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 3>You'll get a really good indication of exactly where his

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 3>game is. Obviously, last year, excuse me, he played well

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 3>at the Hero, you know, well enough to get people

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 3>hope and really struggle to Tory. So I'm looking at

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 3>it as a huge barometer to see how the rest

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 3>of the year will play off for Tiger. I still

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 3>don't know. I hope he wins four times five times,

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 3>but you know, if he can you know, be in

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 3>the top ten to fifteen, I think that might be

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 3>him winning again. This year starts to become realistic. But

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, if he MCS again, and of course obviously

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 3>he plays so well and knows so well, I'd be concerned.

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, in terms of Tiger this week, I think he's

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:22.439
<v Speaker 2>gonna play good t to Green. It's just a matter

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 2>of how he does around the green because we saw

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 2>one of the things he struggled with the Hero was,

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, chipping around the greens, and with the rough

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 2>up around here at Tory, he's gonna be definitely missing

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 2>some greens. So it's gonna be key to see whether

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 2>he can actually you know, scramble and get up and down. Yeah.

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I almost think that that long grass makes it easier

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>for bad chippers to chip, or if you're struggling with chipping,

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I think long grass is easier than short grass, agreed,

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I can.

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 3>I can agree with that one hundred percent from experience.

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 3>It's it's very easy. He just open the blade and

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 3>pop it up, whereas you're trying to nip it from

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 3>a tight line, it's much more difficult.

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I Jeff Ogilvie told me that he's like, the

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>worst thing is the long grass around the greens because

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>it diminishes short game skill. And I think that's it's

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>so true as I think about it, Like, if I'm

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>struggling with my chipping, the last thing i want is

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>like short sighted tight lie in the fairway, I'll gladly

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 1>take juicy rouff that I can kind of play like

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a sandshot.

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's also ingrained in your head. I feel like

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 3>when you're you know you're short sighted in the rough,

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 3>you got to play a megaflop in the you know,

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 3>your expectations to get up and down are fairly low.

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 3>But if you're you know, you just have a pitch

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 3>from the fairway, you know, stop and check it. You

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 3>should be able to get that up and down, So

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 3>you put a little more pressure on yourself too. So

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 3>I agree completely long rough is probably easier to play

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 3>out of than a tight, wet lie.

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>So one thing Tiger did so well at Albany at

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the Hero was he drove it really well. The fairways

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>there are really wide this week, very narrow, and the

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>rough is very very penal Pauly, do you do you

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to have a good week driving the ball?

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:12.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is that the really million dollar question with him.

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm not as much concerned about driving off the team

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 2>because he's gonna be able to hit it far enough

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 2>up there to where he's still gonna be able to

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 2>advance it around the green there. And that's where Tiger's

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of played well at Tory in the past is

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 2>even if he doesn't hit the fairway, he has enough

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 2>strength to where he can still hit a pitching regend

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 2>nine iron out of the rough and get it, you know,

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:32.199
<v Speaker 2>in the middle of the green because the green's a

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Tory kind of all camber towards the middle, so he's

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 2>gonna be able to give himself at least makeable Birdie

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 2>puts in that you know, twenty to forty foot range.

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Tory's the quintessential tiger proofing golf course. And it's just

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you look at the golf courses that Tiger won a

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:51.559
<v Speaker 1>lot at They're all very long, so you got you

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>got Tory, Firestone and bay Hill. There are long courses

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>with like trouble on either side. You got to hit

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the ball straight off the tee. And for some reason

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:09.679
<v Speaker 1>people thought Tiger proofing would work making courses longer and narrower,

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and then he just won more and more

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of those courses. It's pretty fine. Yeah.

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 2>And going back on Kyle's point earlier with a crazy stat,

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 2>I got a few other Tiger stats here. So in

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Tiger's seven wins a toy, he's a combined to one

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 2>hundred and twelve under par, beating the next best player

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:29.959
<v Speaker 2>by twenty three shots in those events. So that's pretty

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 2>solid for those seven wins. And then the last seventeen

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 2>times they had the tournament here, Tiger is the only

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 2>guy to win by more than four shots, and that

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 2>happened three times.

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>That's dominance. There's a there's Tiger stats for like every

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>day of the week. I feel like you could pick

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>out a new crazy Tiger stat. So what are we

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>sending the you know over under on his finish this week?

0:13:57.960 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Like thirty fifth?

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking he fit. I think he makes the cut

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 2>but probably finishes somewhere fortieth to fiftieth.

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>So you're going over thirty five.

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 2>I would go over thirty five, just barely.

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 3>What about you, Kyle, I'll play Devil's advocate. I'll take

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 3>under thirty five, but just barely. What's crazy is I

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 3>was looking up the odds for him to win there

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 3>right now. They're twenty five to one to win, which

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 3>is crazy low, and he's only two to one to

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 3>make the cut. So I don't know. I think he

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna say, I'm going to hope that, you know,

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 3>without the long Asian trip, he will come in in

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 3>better for him than he did last year. And I'm

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 3>going to say he makes the cut and finishes twenty fourth.

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think he's gonna put four good rounds together.

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't played a lot of tournament golf in the

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>last two years, and I just think he'll have one

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>round where he'll shoot a seventy four. Hopefully it's not

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>like one of the first two rounds. But I think

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>he finishes fifty to sixtieth somewhere in there, but hopefully

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>just healthy. That's why he needs reps. He needs reps yep.

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>So this week, you know, the sponsors axemptions are actually

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting at Tory. So you got Sam Burns, who was

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a All American, one of the best players in college golf.

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>You've got Cam Davis, who was the Australian kid that

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>just won the Australian Open. He's twenty three. You got

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>McNeely again, that was kind of a disastrous miscut from

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>him last week. What he shoots seventy seven in the

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>third round and miss.

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think he messed up in the last couple

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 2>holes coming in.

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, he made a five on seventeen. So

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you got Maverick mcne former, uh number one player in

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the world as an amateur. But then you got Norman

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Jong who won the Western m last year. He's a stud.

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>He's a sophomore at Oregon. He I remember the first

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>time I saw Norman Jong. I was I went out

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to the ntaas last year and I remember, like, you know,

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>reading and hearing about this freshman for Oregon, and I

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>like was looking around. I looked at their team and

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I was looking for like a little kid that was

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>like a skinny little freshman and this guy's like six'

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>three and like has like giant. SHOULDERS i, mean he's

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a monster mashes the. Ball it'll be. INTERESTING i think

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>he's going to turn pro after this. Year IF i

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>had a guess and then will zl taurus uh unbelievable ball.

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Striker you might remember him for having like kind of

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>like a yippie stroke at the usam At, riviera but

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>he's a pro now. Too he turned pro after first,

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>semester so. Interesting sponsors. Exemptions they actually used him on young,

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>guys which is. Rare, paul you get to roster any

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of these.

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Guys potentially you have guys Like davis and McNeely And

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 2>john who definitely hit the ball far WHO i think

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 2>could you, know potentially make it into my lineup on on.

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 2>Draftings i've always been always been impressed with how how

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 2>McNeely hits hits the, Ball so we'll. See still have

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 2>a few days of a side on.

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>That MM. Hm So rom and title defense is he

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>is he your guy you're rolling with with for one and? Done?

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:36.919
<v Speaker 2>NO i actually Used rom last week and one and,

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 2>done SO i was very happy with that. Result SO

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 2>i will not be able to use him this. Week

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 2>but there are definitely a couple other. Options SO i, mean,

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 2>obviously if you haven't used rom he is a potential,

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:49.120
<v Speaker 2>option but you may want to go with guys such

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 2>as Maybe Patrick cantley Or Tony finow or maybe A

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Xander schoffley this.

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:58.679
<v Speaker 1>Week, YEAH i can't. Leave this is a great course for.

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>HE i feel like he's added like ten. YARDS i,

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>mean he hasn't played a ton of, events but it

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 1>seems like he's hitting it really long this. Year And

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Southern california Kid cantley is a great pick this. Week

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and THEN i agree with F now what do you

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 1>think about going with Like?

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Fowler i'm thinking he may want to Use fowler possibly

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 2>next week In phoenix as a choice there or potentially

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 2>one of the.

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Majors, kyle who do you?

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 3>Like you, know everybody you touched. On the one guy

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 3>Who i've actually used here a couple of times Is Chucky.

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 3>Howell he's like he's never missed a, cut, RIGHT i

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 3>think he's whatever he is fifteen or twenty, something fifteen

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 3>out of fifteen or twenty on twenty and a couple

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 3>of runner up. FINISHES i THINK i Like howell and you,

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 3>know keep the big boys for later in the.

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 2>Season, yeah how can. Definitely it probably is a very

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 2>good chance in terms of providing value for a top

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 2>ten is the question Is ken controls how actually win the.

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Tournament and that's the only thing that's holding me back

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 2>from putting him in this week for a one and done.

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Purposes what about your Boy snataker you two burned from last? Week,

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>no it's it was it.

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 2>Wasn't the best result last, week but you know in

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 2>the grand scheme of things that he missed the cut

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 2>by two. Shots But i'm just not entirely sold based

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 2>on WHAT i saw last. WEEK i, mean one of

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 2>the things THAT i was watching him AND i think

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.199
<v Speaker 2>the seventeenth hold island green. There it's you, know most

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 2>guys are hitting wedge or nine. Iron he gets a

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:38.439
<v Speaker 2>nine iron thirty yards right of the right of the

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 2>pin in the middle. Lakes so that's a little concerning

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 2>to see see shots like.

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:43.679
<v Speaker 3>That you don't like, Shanks.

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>No it's it's a sign of poor ball. STRIKING i.

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Guess definitely it's maybe a little rust on Senet O,

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>kerr but defending, CHAMPION i feel like he could be

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a good little contrarian. Play he always he puts so

0:19:58.760 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 1>well On Poe.

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:02.880
<v Speaker 2>GREENS i still think a lot of people are gonna

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 2>pick him this week just because they're gonna look up

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.880
<v Speaker 2>his record and see, that oh brand, Stunnaperer oh he's

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 2>one here, before and just kind of automatically choose him

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 2>because he has you, know two wins and two seconds

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 2>in his last eight appearances. Here SO i think he's

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 2>still gonna be a popular play for people that don't

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 2>want to burn a rom or follower this.

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Week you, know looking at at DraftKings and, pricing it's,

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:29.680
<v Speaker 1>like why why Is Phil mickelson priced at eighty nine.

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Hundred it's probably because of how he's played here in the.

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 2>PAST i think he's won here a couple of. Times

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 2>so based upon that and the fact that they kind

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 2>of tend to price up some of the more popular.

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Players that's the same reason that you See Tiger woods

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 2>this week at ninety seven hundred as the fifth most expensive,

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:51.439
<v Speaker 2>player because they realize that they put you, Know tiger

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 2>down at eighty five hundred or fill down in eight,

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 2>thousand you're gonna have so many people roster him that

0:20:56.800 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 2>it's may not be as much on that, way that's.

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Hilarious he's the fifth most expensive.

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Player, yes which goes in line with The vegas odds

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.400
<v Speaker 2>which had him you know, one which IS i think

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 2>the fifth or sixth the you know favorite.

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:15.120
<v Speaker 3>There what what percentage of people will roster.

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Him, Tiger Phil, Tiger tiger and. Tournaments i'd probably say

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 2>fifteen percent Though, jesus which is which is. Crazy but

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 2>if you kind of look at, that in that price,

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 2>range you Have tiger at ninety, seven no one above

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:30.880
<v Speaker 2>him until ten, six and the guys below him are

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 2>like Are Brian harmon And Patrick. Cantley so if somebody's

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 2>in that range that's just a general golf, fan they're

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 2>probably gonna Take Tiger. Woods if they're, not they're not

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 2>following the tour that.

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Much, Right, Right so you like for, tournaments you're going

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to stay away From tiger this?

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:49.919
<v Speaker 2>Week, Yeah i'm not going to Play tiger until he

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 2>shows me that he, can you, know have the ability to.

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Contend it'd be different if he was like seven, thousand

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 2>AND i thought he's gonna be. CHALKY i might potentially play.

0:21:56.640 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 2>Him but at ninety seven, Hundred i'll just let fifteen,

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:04.679
<v Speaker 2>people fifteen percent of people take them And i'll just you,

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 2>know let them let me go with the fortieth place, finish.

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:11.119
<v Speaker 1>SOMETHING i didn't follow up looking. INTO i remember Seeing

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>tiger or saying Seeing phil say before last week that

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 1>he really found feels like he found something with his,

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:21.199
<v Speaker 1>driver AND i didn't. Do you, know how he drove the.

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:24.640
<v Speaker 2>BALL i think he drove all pretty well last. WEEK

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 2>i think he just hit his irons kind of. Bad

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 2>that's the way it seems TO ea got off to

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 2>a hot start in the first. Round he thought, everything

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 2>it feels back to, normal and then you just kind

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 2>of just taper it.

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 1>Off that's it makes me a little bit more bullish

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 1>on Playing phil this, week IF i mean historically he's

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>one of the best approach players of all time in. Golf.

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah the only thing that concerns me is That phil

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 2>used to play the courses very well before they got.

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Redone but in his last six attempts here and he's

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 2>missed the cut four. Times so uh, that in combination

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 2>with a miss cut last, week stand off of fill this.

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 3>Week what your name we haven't talked about yet is Mac.

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Leishman he he's got two runner ups At tory and you,

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 3>know it wasn't too long ago we were saying he

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 3>was going to Overtake Jason day as the Best australian

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 3>player in the world right.

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 2>NOW i think he is Well leishman here is that

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 2>if you look at what's actually made up to the,

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 2>courses you have The Coclear fairways And Poe. Greens that's

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 2>the similar grass THAT i think he grew up on In,

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 2>australia so he's pretty comfortable playing off of those. Services

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:29.440
<v Speaker 2>SO i think that might be why you've seen a

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 2>lot Of australian guys have good results here. Is you've,

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 2>had you, Know jason daywin, Here leishman finished second. Twice

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 2>you've had even going back a little, further you've had

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 2>guys Like michael sim Or Nathan green even finished runner up,

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 2>here who Are australians wouldn't necessarily think would play.

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 3>WELL i haven't heard those names in a.

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:48.679
<v Speaker 1>While Michael simmet is a blast from the.

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:52.360
<v Speaker 2>PAST i think that was twenty ten he did.

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>THAT i wonder what happened to that, guy why he

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>had like one of the greatest web dot seasons of all.

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Time where are they?

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 2>NOW i THINK i think he went back onto the

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 2>web dot com after get knocked off for THE Pga

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:09.879
<v Speaker 2>tour for a year or, two and THEN i think

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 2>he's kind of went into the abyss after, that.

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Need cody to fire back up the where are they? Now?

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Serious that's?

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:16.719
<v Speaker 3>Great where are they?

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Now?

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah so getting past the studs DraftKings you Like rom And.

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:30.120
<v Speaker 2>FOLLOWER i actually probably wouldn't Roster rom this week BECAUSE

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 2>i think he's going to be very high owned and

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 2>probably more likely to Go. Follower when you have a

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 2>guy win the week before and then go to a

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 2>course where he won last, YEAR i think you're going

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 2>to Have rom probably be close to thirty. Tournaments So

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 2>i'd rather stay away from that and Get follower or

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Potentially macia'm at a third of the.

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Ownership what About Justin? ROSE i, mean arguably he's been

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:57.719
<v Speaker 1>playing the best golf of anybody in the, world and

0:24:57.760 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 1>he's got the form.

0:24:58.720 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 3>Here.

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah the the one thing that concerns me Is rose

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 2>having a flyback From Abu dhabi, here so there is

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 2>gonna be the jet, legs so it may take him

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 2>a day or two to adjust to the time difference coming.

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Back so and we've seen guys in the past have

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 2>issues with, that such AS i THINK i THINK dj

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 2>last year played over, there came back over here missed the.

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 2>CUT i, mean the one thing that's that weird To

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 2>torri here is that we've said a lot of the

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 2>top players missed the cut in the, past so that

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 2>might happen again this.

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Year do you think that's just because the golf courses

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>is so. Challenging if you're a little, off the scores

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>are just going to. Balloon.

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 2>YEAH i think it's because the course is challenging and

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 2>it's early in the year to, whereas like last week

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 2>at The Career, builder if you hit shots that were

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 2>a little bit, off you didn't get, Penalized whereas if

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 2>you hit a shot out of the fairway, here you're

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 2>going to be. PENALIZED i, mean if we look at last,

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 2>year you Had, Kopka, CHAPEL Dj, Day, Fowler, Walker, Berger

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:53.880
<v Speaker 2>woods And shockley all missed the cut.

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Here that was that was Pre xander being THE x.

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Man now he didn't have His, yeah, TRUE.

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 3>I agree with. That you can't fake it At. Toy you,

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 3>COULD i mean you. Could you could fake it and

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 3>shoot four or five under At lakeensa, probably BUT i

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 3>don't think you can fake it and shoot four Under. Tory.

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah And i've seen the same trend going back to

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 2>twenty sixteen and fifteen as well with you know you

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 2>got you got ten guys that are arguably with inside

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 2>the top fifty in the world at that, time you,

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 2>know missing the cut which you just normally don't see

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 2>on a non major, slash you, know huge field event like.

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:35.719
<v Speaker 1>This so getting into these middle tier guys and, UH

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:38.919
<v Speaker 1>i mean upper middle tier where these guys could be

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>sneaky one and done plays, too.

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:44.679
<v Speaker 2>Right, yeah that's kind of getting into the kind of

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 2>like The Xander schaffli down to like eighty one. Hundred you,

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 2>know it could be a potentially good one and none

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 2>play this week because his strength is hitting a long straight,

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 2>drive which we'll put you in very good position at

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 2>toy here on both.

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Courses what About Alex norrin Making why is he playing this?

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 2>WEEK i am not, entirely entirely sure why he's playing.

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:11.159
<v Speaker 2>Here SO i unless he's maybe playing to play in

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 2>the next couple of, Weeks i'm not. Sure maybe he's

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Playing riviera in a few. Weeks i'm not not quite

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:17.919
<v Speaker 2>sure why he's playing in THE us this week as

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 2>opposed to over In.

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:25.159
<v Speaker 1>Dubai Brendan steele seems to play really well On West. Coast, yeah, well.

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 2>He's A california, guy so he's very you, know very

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 2>comfortable putting on the pole greens that are on The south,

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:32.880
<v Speaker 2>course even THOUGH i think The north course is now

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 2>bent grass greens they redid a few years. Ago but

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 2>he seems to be very comfortable on this. Track SO

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 2>i look for him to finish you, know you, know top,

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty top thirty again BECAUSE i think he's made his

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:46.119
<v Speaker 2>last five cuts here and finished top fifty and all

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 2>five of.

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 3>Those how ABOUT jj, spawn did he was he in

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:52.439
<v Speaker 3>the final group last year or he was in one

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 3>of the last few groups last? YEAR i think, YEAH.

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 2>I think he was in one of the one of

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:58.400
<v Speaker 2>the final. GROUPS i, KNOW i know he finished ninth last.

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 2>Year so he's actually one of the Guys i'm looking

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 2>looking to kind of break out possibly over the next couple,

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 2>events because he's going to tracks where he's you, know

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 2>he's played, Well he's played you, know ninth here last.

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 2>YEAR i think he finished fourth at The, phoenix which

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 2>is where they're going next. Week so he's a guy

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:16.239
<v Speaker 2>that's been trending up played well in the. Fall we'll

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 2>see if you can kind of carry it over to

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 2>beginning of the.

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:21.479
<v Speaker 1>Season ali had a good finish here. TOO i remember

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>he was another rookie that played well, here, Right.

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 2>YEAH i Think. ALI i Think Tide spawn last year

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 2>in ninth place as, Well so he's another guy that

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of plays well during this you, know one month

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 2>time frame on The West Coast, swing playing well At,

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 2>toy playing welllet In phoenix THEN i think he had

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 2>a top ten At rivier as well last.

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>YEAR i Mean Schneider jans his game fits really well.

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Here he's so long off the tee, that like you

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>said About, tiger he gets to a point where he's

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>hitting such a shorter club in if he misses the fairway.

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Exactly because if he unless you're amazing with the short,

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 2>game and some of the guys that have won, here

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 2>such Like snedecker or even like A Ben, crane unless

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 2>you're absolutely getting up and down from every where and

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 2>putting lights, out it's very difficult to contend out.

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Here so with that in, mind you, know heading down

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to some of these lower, guys who do you like

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>from the you, know kind of seventy eight hundreds in Down.

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 2>So some of the guys that like down there would.

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 2>BE i Think Johnny vegas seventy Seven hunter is. Interesting

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 2>he's been on a little bit of a roll the

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 2>last couple of, weeks and he's also had some pretty

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 2>good course history, Here So i'd probably be rostering him

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 2>in some of my tournaments BECAUSE i think he's last

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 2>three times here he's finished top, thirty and then he's

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 2>finished eleventh and seventh in his last two starts this,

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 2>year so that's a pretty good trend coming together. There

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 2>did you see anybody down there that.

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 1>You guys like what About? Han he played so well

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 1>At where was that At? Sony?

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah he lost in the lost in the playoff N,

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:01.719
<v Speaker 2>SONY i. BELIEVE i THINK i probably rather play him

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 2>in somewhere maybe Like riviera or something like. That he

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 2>hasn't finished inside the top forty and his five starts

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 2>here even though he's made three of the, cuts so

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 2>it's probably not the best fit for. HIM i think

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 2>he's better fit for somewhere Like, riviera WHICH i think

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 2>HE'S i think he won there right in the.

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Past, Yeah, yeah that's WHAT i was. Thinking is because

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of the, grasses But aaron, wise he drives it great

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>so and he's really really long and he had a

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>good week last. Week that could be a good. Pick.

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 2>YEAH i think you could have a lot of the

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 2>younger guys because you, know the typical prototype for that

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 2>is hitting the ball long and. Straight SO i think

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 2>some of those guys could, actually you, know knock on

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 2>the door on top ten finishes this, week just BECAUSE

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 2>i think the court suits the younger bomber pretty.

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Well what happened TO. Jb holmes like in the last

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:51.959
<v Speaker 1>like six to eight, MONTHS i feel like he's like

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 1>fallen off the face of the. Earth just.

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 2>YEAH i, know he hasn't played in the last thing nine,

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 2>weeks So i'm not entirely sure where he he's, uh

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 2>you know where he's been during that time. Frame but

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 2>he definitely didn't have the results that he wanted to last.

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 2>YEAR i mean this last man he played was The,

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 2>shriners which he missed the, cut and then he played

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 2>THE Cj cup before that and finished almost dead.

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:16.479
<v Speaker 3>Last so LAST i remember watching him was the final

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 3>round of the.

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Players, YEAH i mean the last recorded was that was

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 2>The greenbrier during the, summer so.

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>That that last round of the players was was a

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>rough one FOR. Jb he was missing fairways by like

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>two hundred.

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Yards, yeah it's so brutal when like especially like on

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 3>like sixteen and, seventeen when you know there's not a

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 3>lot of players on the golf course and they're, like HERE'S.

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 3>Jb holmes now just plus eight on the, Day it's, like,

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 3>god poor.

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Guy well poor the poor guy wants from contenting to.

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 2>FINISHING i think like fortieth.

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Gosh you know another guy in this range is, uh

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:52.479
<v Speaker 1>he's got a new swing training Aide brison with his.

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Shacket you know that that jacket. Swinging have you seen,

0:31:56.720 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that the shirt swinging. Shacket, YEAH i don't know what Is.

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 2>YEAH i think he should SHOULD i should try playing

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 2>one round with that. On it'd be interesting to see

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 2>what would.

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Happen so he's always trying for. Something what about what

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 1>about Bow?

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 3>Hostler you said you took him at what three one

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 3>or something last? Week he threw up a little sixty

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 3>four to start the week for you had to be

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 3>getting a little. Excited.

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 2>YEAH i was shaking my little space boots for a

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 2>little bit after the first round. There but, YEAH i

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:27.479
<v Speaker 2>mean it's another course WHERE i think it Suits. Hostler well,

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 2>AGAIN i mean he's a you Know. California guy familiar

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 2>with the grass type out, here should be able to

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 2>contend that not necessarily, contend but be able to you,

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 2>know make the cut and finish top, twenty your top,

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 2>THIRTY i think and if he you, know he's a

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 2>guy whoere if he's on his, game he can you,

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 2>know he can go. Low he's he's not afraid to you,

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 2>know contended win events based upon his amateur.

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Record what About, Landry he's he's a shorter, hitter but

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>he hits it like really.

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Straight, Yeah i'm thinking he may be a little NOT i, say,

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 2>tired but after last, week a little bit of a

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 2>let down this, WEEK i wouldn't be surprised me missus

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 2>the cut this week At.

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Torri man sounds like you want to bet?

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 2>There, yeah that, POSSIBLY i kind.

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 1>OF i think he's gonna play. WELL i think he'll

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 1>have like A i think he's gonna have a good

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 1>little run. Here he's got a lot of.

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Confidence so what do you think he's gonna finish this? Week?

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>THEN i think he's gonna finish in the top.

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Thirty, OH i definitely go over on that one for.

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Sure, WELL i said make. Cut you Know i'm not

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 1>going to negotiate down from made contating against.

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Yourself it was worth the, shot worth the.

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Shot, Yeah but then down in, uh we're down in

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the kind of the bargain basement. Here who do you?

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Like the one guy that sticks out down there to

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 2>me Is Nick. Watney So watney showed some life last.

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Week you think he's down at sixty eight. Hundred it's

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 2>played very well At tory in the. Past he's one

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 2>here and he's also HAD i think five other top

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 2>tens in his last twelve starts, here so sixth top

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 2>top tens and half his starts. Here so and he,

0:34:09.160 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 2>YEAH i think he finished fiftieth last, week but he

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 2>started out fairly. Well so if he, can you, know

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 2>find that. Game he's another you, know guy very comfortable In.

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 2>California sixteen. Hundred that's pretty good value because you can

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 2>take some of the studs by putting him in your.

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Lineup, YEAH i. WAS i was surprised after the first

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 1>round to see you, Know, Kyle kyle was On Nick

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>watney AND i was On Grayson murray and those guys

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:34.759
<v Speaker 1>shot the low rounds of the stadium course.

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 2>And then they woke.

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Up so then we go. DOWN i Mean. Kate what

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:45.760
<v Speaker 1>about the the AGELESS kJ.

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 2>TROY i, Mean chroy's played okay here in the. Past

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:52.880
<v Speaker 2>it's just a matter OF i just don't know if

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna be able to compete with with with some

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 2>of the young Gun, zadie with the guys that are

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 2>is bombing it down, there BECAUSE i think somebody this

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:00.880
<v Speaker 2>week is going to catch fire with the driver and

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 2>have it three twenty on the string and you, KNOW

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 2>kJ will be giving up forty five yards those guys

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 2>all day and that's just not something he can deal.

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 2>WITH i think what About Martin.

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Piller he he played really well last.

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:18.399
<v Speaker 2>Week, yeah he's a potential option. Here the question is

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 2>is he going to be able to you, know piggyback A,

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 2>palmmet you, know A pommet good week last week coming in,

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 2>here and it's not that easy for some of the

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 2>guys That he obviously had a ton of success on

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 2>the web dot, com but he hasn't had that on

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 2>THE pga. Side SO i, Mean i'd want to see

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more From pillar BEFORE i start rostering.

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 2>HIM i, mean there's some other guys down, there like

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 2>a like A Sam ryder or something like. THAT a

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 2>guy who's a premier ball.

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Striker what About sean, O'Hare, uh probably probably.

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Not he's a guy who's usually going to be very

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:55.879
<v Speaker 2>up and. Down we're probably not gonna able to put

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 2>four solid rounds, together which which is what you're gonna

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 2>need here At. Tory AND i don't think he has

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 2>the best short game.

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Either are we ready yet for our once a Year

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 3>Retief goosen siding or?

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 2>No, POSSIBLY i don't know is even in the field this?

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:13.400
<v Speaker 3>Week or, No, yeah he's in the. Field he's in the. Field,

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah i'm guessing that you're not gonna roster this.

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 4>Week.

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 2>NO i don't Think i'll ever be Rostering Ratief hoostad

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 2>until he wins about four times in a, year and

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 2>that would be in The Champions tour in about eight.

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Years who do you think is the worst play on this?

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh out of anybody? Here who who'd you you, know

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>if you had the last pick and it was a you,

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:36.400
<v Speaker 1>know the whole, field who do you think you would be?

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:37.400
<v Speaker 1>TAKING i THINK.

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:38.399
<v Speaker 3>Pauli basically just Took.

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 4>Retief, No i'd probably go maybe somebody like a like

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 4>A Ted potter or maybe A derek Fath hour this,

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:52.319
<v Speaker 4>WEEK i, mean those are guys that tend to miss

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:52.719
<v Speaker 4>a lot of.

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Cuts BUT i, mean you're not gonna be rostering those guys.

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Anyway they're gonna be a ten percent of undraft. Games

0:36:58.000 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 2>SO i wouldn't you, KNOW i.

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:04.239
<v Speaker 1>Can, Anyway i'd Picked Norman john this. Week he's he

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 1>won a couple of times in the, fall and he

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 1>had an unbelievable. Summer he murders the ball. TOO i

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna play.

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, YEAH i think it's a valid. Option the one

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 2>THING i wish draftings it IS i wish they spread

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 2>the prices on more so that maybe the guys at

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 2>the bottom would be six thousand or fifty eight, hundred

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 2>so you can pick some of these. Guys whereas you,

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 2>know the difference Between jeong or whatever and the whatever sixty,

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 2>seven sixty one hundred whatever he, is the difference between

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:30.880
<v Speaker 2>him and somebody at seventy five price wise is not that,

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 2>much but ability wise it is a lot.

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 3>Usually m.

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Hm so, uh should we get into some overrated? Underrated?

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Sure all? RIGHT i want to know Is Tory Pines

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:47.880
<v Speaker 1>south overrated or underrated from you?

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:51.279
<v Speaker 3>GUYS i THINK I i THINK i said this on

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 3>the last, one but it's very. OVERRATED i JUST i

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 3>don't like what they did with the property At there's

0:37:56.760 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 3>so many courses that are so much worse stentory pines

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:04.439
<v Speaker 3>that are more enjoyable along the. OCEAN i just it's.

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Hard it's a good test for A Pga tour, event

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 3>but IF i had my choices of WHERE i wanted

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 3>to play, personally it wouldn't be in the TOP i don't,

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:17.319
<v Speaker 3>know one hundred two. Hundred, YEAH i.

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Would probably go actually a little bit underrated from A

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:22.799
<v Speaker 2>Pga tour, aspect but overrated from like a personal playing.

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:25.359
<v Speaker 2>Aspect i've played there didn't necessarily impress me that, Much

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 2>but in terms of being A Pga tour, course it

0:38:27.800 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 2>does happen to showcase the player as. Well where you've

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:31.719
<v Speaker 2>had a lot of the top players win, there you

0:38:31.719 --> 0:38:33.880
<v Speaker 2>haven't had you, know you've obviously had somebody Like Scott

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 2>stalling's on, there but besides, that you've had a lot

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 2>of top tier players with you, know Rom, Snedecker Day,

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Woods Bubba. Watson you haven't had a lot of the

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 2>no name players or dark horse players win. There AND

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:47.839
<v Speaker 2>i think that's one of the things of a good

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 2>course is being able to show you know that the

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:51.760
<v Speaker 2>best players are winning.

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 3>There, yeah it's just LIKE i said, earlier it's one

0:38:54.600 --> 0:38:57.759
<v Speaker 3>of those courses you just cannot fake youre. Out you

0:38:57.800 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 3>can't fake it out, there especially not for four.

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Rounds, yeah.

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Definitely, yeah it's, uh you gotta play well the whole round.

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Too as soon as you start to hit bad drives out,

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 1>there if you're not really, long it's just.

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Brutal or just shoot sixty four on The north course

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 2>and give yourself.

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:14.440
<v Speaker 3>Some, patting.

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:16.400
<v Speaker 4>All.

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 1>Right are sweet potato fries overrated or? Underrated?

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Man that's a tough. ONE I i Guess i'm Gonna

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 3>i'm gonna say overrated BECAUSE i WHENEVER i whenever given that.

0:39:29.320 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 3>Option you, KNOW i ordered my cheeseburger and they said

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 3>you want, Fries, yes how about sweet potato. Fries i'm, like, oh, yeah,

0:39:34.120 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 3>sure love. Some but then they come And i'm just, like,

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:38.959
<v Speaker 3>ah why DID i do? THAT i was so excited about.

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 3>It now now they're JUST i WISH i ordered regular.

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:43.120
<v Speaker 3>Fries So i'm gonna say.

0:39:43.160 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 2>OVERRATED i would go underrated on swee potato, fries especially

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:48.880
<v Speaker 2>if you sprinkle like a little bit of cinnamon on.

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Them they're probably to die.

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 1>FOR i didn't know that About polly love sweet potato

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:59.800
<v Speaker 1>fries and. CINNAMON i, LIKE i like all bab what about.

0:39:59.800 --> 0:40:06.360
<v Speaker 1>You i'm gonna go. UNDERRATED i like, Him, no actually.

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Overrated they've gotten way too popular or, lately you, know

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:12.360
<v Speaker 1>like everywhere has sweet potato. Fries. NOW i liked it

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:14.920
<v Speaker 1>when like occasionally they'd be, like, hey do you want

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:18.240
<v Speaker 1>sweet potato? Fries? Why, yes, certainly.

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:19.400
<v Speaker 3>But now absolutely.

0:40:19.600 --> 0:40:23.439
<v Speaker 2>Controlling here Comes Contrarion andy right now super.

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Popular so here's a player, overrated Underrated Shane.

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:35.799
<v Speaker 3>Lowry that's a good. ONE I, Uh i'm gonna say

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:40.600
<v Speaker 3>underrated because, YEAH i think he has the ability to

0:40:40.640 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 3>win a. Major you, know obviously we've seen him in

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 3>contention Before. OAKMONT i JUST i feel like he's a

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 3>guy that's gonna kind of pop up one day and

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:52.400
<v Speaker 3>he's gonna be standing there On sunday of A Us

0:40:52.400 --> 0:40:56.440
<v Speaker 3>opened or H Pg, Championship British open and have the.

0:40:56.480 --> 0:40:58.920
<v Speaker 3>TROPHY i, REALLY i really think he definitely has that.

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Potential but he might not win three more events in his,

0:41:02.120 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 3>career so it's hard to, say But i'm gonna say

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 3>a little underrated because he's got what it takes to

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:07.440
<v Speaker 3>win a.

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 2>MAJOR i would go in the opposite Of kyle THAT

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 2>i would go overrated On lowry. HERE i think he

0:41:13.040 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 2>plays good and you, know in, bunches hopefully good for

0:41:15.239 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 2>two or three weeks stretch and then seemed like he

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:19.920
<v Speaker 2>just plays the rest of the year and just never

0:41:20.160 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 2>never record the top. Ten and so for that, RESPECT

0:41:22.640 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 2>i help view him in the same respect as a

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 2>lot of the guys that are you, know simmer.

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:33.000
<v Speaker 1>RANKED i THINK i would go underrated With lowry because

0:41:33.920 --> 0:41:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of What kyle. SAID i, mean the guy like just

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:41.600
<v Speaker 1>will win big. Events and granted he only has three

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:44.400
<v Speaker 1>wins in his, career and he did win as an,

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:49.279
<v Speaker 1>amateur which is. Badass you. Know, yeah he does have

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of seconds. Too he's a puzzling. Guy i've

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:54.920
<v Speaker 1>never been able to get a read on, him and

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:57.960
<v Speaker 1>WHENEVER i pick him in like A DraftKings or a,

0:41:58.680 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>pool he always lets me, out like because they'll shoot

0:42:02.200 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 1>like one horrible.

0:42:03.239 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Round, yeah like a seventy.

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Seven all, right who you guys picking this? Week?

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 2>YEAH i think this week And i'm not entirely sure,

0:42:15.160 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 2>yet But i'm probably in between taking Either Xander schoffley

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Or Mark leishan probably That i'm probably gonna want to

0:42:21.880 --> 0:42:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Save Can't lee Or fenale for some other events on the.

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 3>LINE i Think i'm gonna Go Charles.

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:33.319
<v Speaker 1>Howe you, KNOW i THINK i might Take Jason day

0:42:33.600 --> 0:42:38.040
<v Speaker 1>just BECAUSE i always like forget to use him in

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:43.439
<v Speaker 1>one and done, leagues And i'll take. HIM i don't

0:42:43.520 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 1>ever like picking him because he's rather unreliable as of,

0:42:47.280 --> 0:42:48.719
<v Speaker 1>late AND i think He's.

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:51.799
<v Speaker 2>Aren't you a bit worried that he has a new

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 2>caddy in the bag this?

0:42:52.600 --> 0:42:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Week, no he's it's just like buddy.

0:42:55.280 --> 0:42:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Right, well it's the way his buddy From australia can't

0:42:59.680 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 2>make it for visa, issues so he has another friend

0:43:02.200 --> 0:43:03.759
<v Speaker 2>i think From ohio on his bag this week for

0:43:03.800 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 2>the first. Time so that's a little bit of causer concern.

0:43:06.640 --> 0:43:11.800
<v Speaker 1>There, Eh i'm not worried caddies caddy are caddies overrated or?

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:15.239
<v Speaker 1>UNDERRATED i think.

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Underrated, actually a good caddy can be OH i you,

0:43:18.640 --> 0:43:22.160
<v Speaker 3>know a good caddy can be the difference between tenth and.

0:43:22.320 --> 0:43:24.360
<v Speaker 3>Winning you, know if you don't have the, game obviously

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 3>it's not going to matter if you, had you, know

0:43:26.239 --> 0:43:28.480
<v Speaker 3>the best caddy in the, world But i'm still going.

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Underrated, Yeah i'm going to underrated on caddies as. Well

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 2>they're the ones able to keep your composure and make

0:43:33.120 --> 0:43:36.399
<v Speaker 2>you have the correct thought process going through the, round

0:43:36.520 --> 0:43:39.640
<v Speaker 2>especially if you're in. Contention, yeah well one.

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Over how about overrated Underrated Beef. JOHNSTON i saw an

0:43:44.200 --> 0:43:47.480
<v Speaker 3>article today that he gave an interview and he believed

0:43:47.520 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 3>that his social habits poorly affected his golf game last,

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 3>season which you, know if you saw a lot of the,

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:55.880
<v Speaker 3>coverage you know he was doing interviews and pubs and

0:43:55.960 --> 0:43:58.840
<v Speaker 3>this and, that so that's not too, shocking BUT i

0:43:58.920 --> 0:44:00.399
<v Speaker 3>hope he gets it back to you over.

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:04.360
<v Speaker 1>It SO i Think Beef johnson is a victim of

0:44:05.040 --> 0:44:09.400
<v Speaker 1>golf media and its, awfulness and you, know like anything

0:44:09.560 --> 0:44:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that is remotely what they think trendy or cool or

0:44:14.440 --> 0:44:16.759
<v Speaker 1>look at. This this is this guy is so neat

0:44:17.320 --> 0:44:19.759
<v Speaker 1>they're going to just blow him up and ruin, it.

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Right, YEAH i mean they kind of almost treated him

0:44:24.000 --> 0:44:25.759
<v Speaker 2>kind of like almost like A John daily figure for

0:44:25.840 --> 0:44:27.480
<v Speaker 2>the year that he came over here To. America it's

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:29.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of almost like a semi cult figure because he

0:44:29.920 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 2>was always, featured even though you, know he wasn't playing that,

0:44:32.800 --> 0:44:34.440
<v Speaker 2>well the only played good In europe for one, year

0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:37.279
<v Speaker 2>obviously played good in a major over, here but you,

0:44:37.360 --> 0:44:40.280
<v Speaker 2>know for a guy that wasn't that high of a caliber,

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:41.440
<v Speaker 2>player was kind of. Surprising.

0:44:42.120 --> 0:44:44.200
<v Speaker 3>YEAH i thought they did him. Wrong they treated him

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:45.560
<v Speaker 3>like a circus freak or. Something it.

0:44:45.680 --> 0:44:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Was, yeah it was.

0:44:46.960 --> 0:44:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Ridiculous, yeah so, uh all, right we'll see what what.

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:54.759
<v Speaker 1>Happens I'm i'm guessing that you, Know landry's going to

0:44:54.840 --> 0:44:57.720
<v Speaker 1>make the. Cut so that's What i'm watching this. Weekend

0:44:58.880 --> 0:44:59.080
<v Speaker 1>well you.

0:44:59.120 --> 0:45:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Don't you won't be watching on the. Weekend you'll be

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 2>watching That friday afternoon.

0:45:02.000 --> 0:45:03.920
<v Speaker 4>Only so m.

0:45:04.080 --> 0:45:06.839
<v Speaker 3>H i want to See tiger and contention one of these.

0:45:06.840 --> 0:45:07.480
<v Speaker 3>Weeks it's gonna.

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:13.840
<v Speaker 1>HAPPEN i Think riviera he's gonna make the. RETURN i like.

0:45:13.960 --> 0:45:14.800
<v Speaker 3>It, YEAH i like.

0:45:14.920 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 1>It i'm gonna Be i'm gonna be at.

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:19.239
<v Speaker 3>Riv solid, final group final.

0:45:19.320 --> 0:45:22.839
<v Speaker 1>Round all, right talk to you guys next.

0:45:22.840 --> 0:45:24.279
<v Speaker 3>Week all, right see you.

0:45:24.280 --> 0:45:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Guys you've been listening to the Fried egg. Podcast we

0:45:28.360 --> 0:45:29.680
<v Speaker 1>do the digging for. You