WEBVTT - The 2025 Ig Nobels, Part 1

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Hey you welcome to each Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 2>My name is Robert.

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick.

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 2>And it's that time of year again. The exact time

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 2>of year again has shifts for us anyway. Sometimes it's

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 2>late September, other times it's early November. But this is

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 2>generally the window in which we aim to discuss the

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 2>latest winners of the Ignobel Prizes, the ig Nobels. For

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 2>anyone who has forgotten, or maybe you're new to the show,

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 2>you don't know what I'm talking about. It's a series

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 2>of awards given out once a year by a scientific

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 2>humor journal called the Annals of Improbable Research, edited for

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 2>many years now by Mark Abraham's. The publication's stated purpose

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 2>is to quote honor achievements that first make people laugh

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 2>and then make them think. You can learn much more

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 2>about them at improbable dot com. They have a wonderful

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 2>list where you can just you can scroll through all

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:11.759
<v Speaker 2>the winners over the years, different peer reviewed papers, scientific papers,

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 2>and sometimes just individual researchers that are singled out for

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 2>these different studies that are in one way or another

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 2>comedic and hilarious, but also deep down our legitimate science

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 2>that it is often answering very important questions or things

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 2>on the borders of very important questions, things that are

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 2>still part of the ever growing expanse of scientific curiosity.

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would say usually are legitimate science. Occasionally something

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.959
<v Speaker 3>will get highlighted that is itself intended to be satirical.

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 3>But I almost think of that as kind of like

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 3>remember in the days of America's Funniest Tone videos, when

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 3>there would be the occasional video that was funny on purpose.

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 3>I never liked that. Even as a kid. I would

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 3>watch that be like, uhh, that's not acceptable. You can

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 3>only this has to be an accident or it doesn't work.

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 2>I remember watching America's Funniest to videos with a skeptical

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 2>eye too, and thinking that looks set up. Yea, they

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 2>intended for that sled to roll right into the house.

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Clearly this was maybe the third or fourth take. I

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 2>can see the sled marks now. I kind of got

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 2>sidetracked there because I didn't intend for you to draw

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 2>the same conclusion about that, Like I hate the satirical

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 2>papers that get featured or something. I mean, the reology

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 2>of cats. One was funny, yeah when done right, but

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 2>it's perfect.

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah right. But the point being that occasionally it is

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 3>something that is just supposed to be silly from the

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 3>get go. But most of what gets featured on the

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 3>Ignobels is just actual research of one kind or another

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:52.920
<v Speaker 3>that people end up finding funny. Maybe it's because the

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 3>subject matter is farts or something. Maybe it's because the

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 3>the conclusion that the paper comes to seems blindingly obvious

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 3>or weirdly counterintuitive. I guess there are a lot of

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 3>different ways that a scientific paper can end up being funny.

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.919
<v Speaker 3>But one thing I always really enjoy about doing these

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 3>episodes is that usually even when something seems really silly

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 3>at first glance, once you actually read into it, there's

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 3>kind of some interesting stuff going on underneath the hood.

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, and I think that. I mean that's one

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 2>of the reasons we keep coming back to covering the

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 2>IGNO bells is, Yeah, it's genuinely laughter inducing, but once

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 2>you dig into them, there's something fascinating there, and it's

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 2>not always something that we would necessarily devote an entire

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 2>episode too. Though we should also note that sometimes the

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 2>honorees are very recent studies other times they may just

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 2>be decades old. So sometimes we'll get excited for the

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Ignobells and we're like, oh, yeah, yeah, that's something we

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 2>covered that years ago.

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 3>There is one paper this year about like a guy

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 3>who documented his own fingernails growing for decades and it

0:03:57.680 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 3>has been a while, but I know we covered that

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 3>on the show. Oh I think maybe we did an

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 3>episode about fingernails or something where we got into this.

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, So they cast a wide net, both in

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 2>time and space. Yeah, And sometimes I think, you know,

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about the different ways papers are funny. Sometimes

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 2>it's about the methodology alone. For instance, earlier that this

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 2>was not an Ignobel winner yet. But earlier this year

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 2>I chatted with Rusalind Dakin about hummingbirds and one and

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 2>then you know, hummingbirds perfectly natural thing to study, fascinating creatures.

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 2>But one of the studies they were doing with the

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 2>methodology that they employed, involved putting little necklaces around their necks,

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 2>and like, that is in and of itself hilarious. Right,

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 2>anytime we put little bits of clothing or something even

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 2>akin to clothing on an animal for scientific purposes, it's

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 2>going to cause us to giggle. On some level where

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 2>it's going to make me giggle. Anyway, serious scientists may disagree.

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 3>Why did you make a diaper for category pillar as well?

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 3>It was for science?

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. So, as always, or as recently has been

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:10.559
<v Speaker 2>the case, we are not going to discuss all the winners. Again,

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 2>go to improbable dot com if you want to go

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 2>through and explore all the different honorees this year, but

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 2>we are going to pick and choose a few and

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 2>we're going to discuss them over the course of a

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 2>couple of episodes this week.

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 3>All right, well, Rob, I know you looked into this

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 3>year's Nutrition Prize. Do you want to start with that one?

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yeah, This this one was pretty fun. This was

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 2>probably the first one I selected. It went to a

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 2>paper by Danielle Deddy, Gabriel h. She Nagabeto, Roger Meek

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 2>and Luca Luisselli. And it is the title of the

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 2>paper published an African Journal of Ecology was Opportunistic foraging

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Strategy of rainbow lizards at a seaside resort in Togo.

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 2>And the paper in question was a Nigerian, Togalese, Italian

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 2>French production and was awarded quote for studying the extent

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 2>to which a certain kind of lizard chooses to eat

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 2>certain kinds of pizza, and it published in twenty twenty three.

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 3>I feel like this is a big step up in

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 3>the world of pizza. Rat pizza, pigeon, pizza. Lizard is

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 3>just the next place it had to go.

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Right, right, It's obvious why this one. Any non human

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 2>animal eating pizza is just inherently funny, And I don't know,

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to really describe why this is the case.

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the word pizza itself can be funny given

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 2>certain contexts, and on top of that, I don't know,

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 2>there's something just very comedic about a slice of pizza.

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I don't know if it's if it's

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 2>inherent to the slice of pizza, or is it just

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 2>the way that we often use the slice of pizza

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 2>right pizza.

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 3>I think it's because pizza is very far from a

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:56.799
<v Speaker 3>food found in nature. If a bird comes and plucks

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 3>a grape off of your plate, that's not that funny.

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 3>It's a little bit funny. If it comes and plucks

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 3>a French fry off your plate, that's funnier than a grape,

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:11.679
<v Speaker 3>because the bird in nature would never encounter a fried

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 3>piece of potato, but it's still basically just a piece

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 3>of potato. Something has happened to it. A pizza is

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 3>a whole production. You have made a dough, you have

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 3>made a sauce, you have you know, you have created

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 3>cheese out of milk and probably added some other things

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 3>to it. It's all this stuff coming together and producing

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 3>this very synthetic, technological product. And the fact that an

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 3>animal is taking your pizza away. I think that's what's

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 3>funny about it.

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 2>I think you're right. But yeah, plus the triangular slice

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 2>that especially screams unnatural, man made, but you know, pizza

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 2>rat doesn't care. Pizza rat is going to drag that

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 2>slice away for its own, its own consumption. So this study,

0:07:56.480 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 2>again that doesn't involve rats. It involves rainbow lizards a

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 2>gama agama, and in particular, we're dealing with rainbow lizards

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 2>in urban African environments, so in cities, in towns, or

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 2>very specific to this particular study, at beach resorts, and

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 2>so lizards eating pizzas. This is even more hilarious. You know,

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 2>we're clearly getting into teenage mutant into turtle territory. Here

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 2>brings to mind not only the pizza loving Turtles themselves,

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:34.079
<v Speaker 2>but also fellow mutant Mondo Gecko. I don't know how

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 2>many episodes of the old cartoon Mondo Gecko actually factored

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 2>into I included an image of this particular character for

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 2>you here, Joe, obviously a half human, half lizard hybrid

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 2>with a lot of attitude.

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Oh man, So I was into the Turtles when I

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 3>was younger, But I don't know if I genuinely remember

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 3>this guy or not. I'm getting that tingling half memory

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 3>feeling right now, but it could be a false positive.

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I did not have time to go back and

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 2>watch any of these episodes in full, but I did

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 2>notice that there is an episode titled Michelangelo Meets Mondo Gecko,

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 2>and one of the pizza's reference in the episode is

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 2>locks and cream cheese. Just a reminder i'd forgotten this,

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 2>but the teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles cartoon program frequently mentioned

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 2>gross sounding pizzas that the Turtles were ordering, or into,

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 2>or had consumed like the day before. See.

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 3>I always thought of them as just getting your standard

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 3>pepperoni pizza or cheese pizza. That's what they show in

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 3>the ads for the show.

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Right, right, But no, they were ordering all sorts of

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 2>strange pizzas. And I did a short detour in my

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 2>research here, and I discovered a YouTuber somebody who goes

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 2>by the name of Kirk Cooks that's with a K,

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:56.439
<v Speaker 2>and apparently on YouTube over the course of I don't know,

0:09:56.600 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 2>multiple episodes, maybe even years, this guy cooked all sixty

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 2>seven pizzas mentioned on the original Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle series,

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 2>So things like anchovies and butterscotch ice cream, pepperoni and marshmallow,

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 2>pickled herring, and caramel fudge, and of course locks and

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 2>cream cheese, which I just referenced.

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Clearly the most reasonable of all.

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:22.319
<v Speaker 2>The Yeah, I did check out that episode, and that

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 2>was that was what the host was said, like, this

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 2>one had the possibility to actually be pretty good, and

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 2>it seems like they were pleased with it.

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 3>That's the most reasonable of the ones you mentioned, because

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 3>it's the only one that doesn't have candy on it.

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a number of them had some sort of like

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 2>gross candy candy situation going on, And I did not

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 2>watch all of these reviews, but I can only assume

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 2>that the grosser ones were indeed gross, So I mean

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 2>that was part of the humor of the turtles being

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 2>into these strange pizza orders.

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 3>Wait, Rob, do you personally I mean, hey, we don't

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 3>shame people for the foods they like here. You know,

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 3>a lot of strange sound foods are delicious. But Rob,

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 3>do you personally have like a standard pizza topping that

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 3>you can't stomach?

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Ooh? I mean, I mean there are things that are

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 2>not in my diet anymore, but in terms of toppings

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 2>that I just that I've historically had an issue with.

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 2>I think I was a little cranky about pineapple for

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 2>a while, but I think I had pineapple on a

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 2>pizza not too long ago, though to be clear, it

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 2>was not the sort of classic ham in pineapple combo,

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 2>and I think I ended up liking it. So I

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 2>suspect that my problem was not with pineapple on a

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 2>pizza but fruit meat combos. Okay, because there were other

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 2>like fruit meat combos back when I ate meat that

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 2>I also didn't like, like prostudo and melon like some

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 2>people love that. I just never it was never for me.

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 3>I can see that I'm not the biggest pineapple guy either.

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm not opposed to sweet flavors on a pizza,

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 3>but pineapple is like so sweet and so juicy, it

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 3>just seems a little over the top for me. The

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 3>big one that I can't do that a lot of

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 3>people love is not a topping, but an alternate sauce,

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 3>And people love these barbecue chicken pizzas with barbecue sauce

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 3>is the pia. I can't deal with barbecue sauce and

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 3>the sauce. That's just that's not doing it for me.

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 2>I remember having some of those, like California Pizza kitchen

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 2>type thing, and I liked it back in the day.

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.199
<v Speaker 2>I think I can take some barbecue sauce out of context.

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 3>Apparently I can't. I just can't hang all right.

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 2>So getting back to the actual study here, we've firmly

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 2>established why it is funny. You know, it's lizards eating pizza.

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Why does it matter? Well, despite being hilarious, the study

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 2>here too is certainly a valid inquiry. As we've discussed

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 2>on the show before, human cities, especially greatly alter the

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 2>lifestyles and diets of the creatures that continue to thrive

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 2>in them, and for most of you listeners, this is

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 2>instantly going to bring to mind things like pigeons and

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 2>rats obviously, but it also concerns all manner of creatures

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 2>that find ways to thrive in human augmented environments. Highly

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 2>adaptable creatures with varied opportunistic diets often do quite well.

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 2>And in parts of Africa that means rainbow lizards. You

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 2>know what they're eating from our refuse why and then

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 2>what it's doing to their health and door behavior is

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 2>totally worth studying. If for no other reason you might

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 2>think of it as like they're eating pizza because of us,

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of our responsibility to figure out why this

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 2>is happening and what are the ramifications.

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, entirely makes sense, and I would think that you

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 3>could also probably learn some interesting things about the lizard

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 3>and about its relationship to its environment by studying what

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 3>kinds of pizza it likes best.

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Exactly exactly now, Joe, I included an image of a

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 2>gama agama for you right here, the rainbow lizard. I

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 2>do encourage listeners out there when it is safe to

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 2>do a search as well, so that you can see

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 2>this creature.

0:13:57.559 --> 0:13:57.719
<v Speaker 3>It is.

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 2>It's quite a stunning lizard. You can understand why was

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 2>subsequently introduced into Florida. Via the reptile trade. Like it's

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 2>a gorgeous lizard.

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, it's striking, bright orange head.

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Bright orange head, dark body. Yeah. So they're also known

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 2>as the common agama and the red headed rock agama.

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 2>It's found throughout most of Sub Saharan Africa, which is

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 2>a considerable range. It's endemic to a number of Sub

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Saharan African countries and has also again unfortunately, been introduced

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 2>into Florida via the reptile trade. They're primarily insectivores. They

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 2>live in social groups built around feuding lead males and

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 2>apparently the conflict between these males. It's more pronounced in

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 2>urban environments because they're kind of constricted in their territory,

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 2>so they can't spread out as much and they grow

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 2>to around thirty centimeters or eleven point eight inches in length.

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Now in the paper, the authors point out that the

0:14:56.680 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 2>species has high ecological plasticity, especially so far as thermal

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 2>ecology and foraging strategy goes. So in rural areas they're

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 2>strictly diurnal, but in urban areas they apparently make use

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 2>of artificial lighting to become nocturnal foragers. And apparently most

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 2>of this has to do with keeping their body temperature up,

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 2>taking advantage of those lights to stay warm in the night,

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 2>and continuing to hunt. Oh interesting at first. When I

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 2>first read it, I thought, oh, well, you know, insects

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 2>drawned with lights, and maybe that's a part of it.

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 2>I didn't read that specifically, but it seems like thermal

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 2>regulation is the main feature here now. In addition to

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 2>eating insects, though, it has for a while been observed

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 2>that they will sometimes eat certain bread based foods, and

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 2>this led directly into this study that considered that asked

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 2>the question what sort of pizzas do they prefer? And

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 2>this took place at a particular seaside resort in Togo.

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to read from the paper here. After having

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 2>opportunistically observed an adult male quote stealing a piece of

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 2>four cheese pizza from tourists by climbing a table, we

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 2>decided to investigate whether this behavior was occasional or usual

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 2>in this rainbow lizard population. So again, observations of adult

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 2>lizards not only you know, dining on thrown away slices

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 2>of pizza or you know, pizza bones in a garbage can,

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 2>but just straight up stealing slices of pizza pizza rat

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 2>style from human tourists.

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 3>That's a bold lizard. Yeah, has become accustomed to our

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 3>delicious foods.

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So the researchers here decided to do a little

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 2>taste test. They set up feeding stations for the lizards

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 2>that featured two different pizza selections, so a little bit

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 2>of a you know, like a pizza bar scenario, but

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 2>with only two choices. One choice was the four cheese pizza,

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 2>which they had already been observed stealing, and the others

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 2>was a four seasons pizza. I don't know about you,

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Joe was not super familiar with this, but it's apparently

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 2>traditional in many areas. It's divided into four sections, So

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 2>one quarter of the pizza is artichoke hearts for spring,

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:13.719
<v Speaker 2>and then another quarter is basil and tomatoes for summer,

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 2>and then another quarter is mushrooms for autumn, and then

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 2>another section is ham for winter.

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 3>I just looked it up. No, I've never had one

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 3>of these before.

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, you know, sound I guess it sounds

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 2>fine to me. I have no objections, but but you know,

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 2>we'll get to what the lizards think. So the lizards

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 2>here had a choice between a cheese pizza and a

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 2>mostly veggie pizza, but one that also featured a little

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 2>bit of meat, and all of the rainbow lizards observed

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 2>went purely for the four cheese pizza.

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 3>Interesting. I wonder, why could that be visual differences or

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 3>it's actually like nutritionally preferable to them, or.

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 2>I wonder, Yeah, the authors here right that this suggests

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:00.640
<v Speaker 2>quote that they may have some chemical cues attracting them,

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 2>or that the specific four cheeses type may provide nutrients

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 2>that are more easily digested, which I mean that also,

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 2>I realized sounds a little crazy, right because we're talking

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 2>about cheese here, we're talking about a dairy product, and

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 2>it's you know, it's one thing to talk about mammals

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 2>consuming dairy even when they shouldn't, such as you know,

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 2>giving a cat a saucer of milk. Yes, they do

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 2>it in the cartoons and in the movies all the time,

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 2>but I think most of us know by this point

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 2>you're not supposed to do that. But these are lizards, right,

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 2>Why would lizards need cheese? Why would lizards need milk?

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 2>In fact, I was looking around and like, in general,

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 2>pet owners who have lizards are generally reminded, do not

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 2>feed your lizard milk. Do not give your lizard cheese.

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 2>They don't need it, they can't handle it.

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Interesting, okay, But then did the researchers like study like,

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 3>were the lizards who were eating this pizza like in

0:18:59.040 --> 0:18:59.679
<v Speaker 3>bad health?

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:00.200
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:03.679
<v Speaker 2>Apparently, so this is definitely one of those areas where

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 2>more research is required. But it seemed to be this

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 2>be the case that the pizza eating lizards were doing. Okay,

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 2>it's not like they were getting bloated on pizza and

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 2>then just like you know, dying in the sun or anything.

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 2>They seem to be in good overall health. And it

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 2>seemed like one of the leading hypotheses here is that

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 2>they're perhaps benefiting from a high fat, high calorie energy

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:30.639
<v Speaker 2>boost when they eat this cheese pizza, specifically the cheese here.

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 2>As for like the bread itself, I don't. I don't.

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm not to understand that that has any like real impact.

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 2>But maybe that's the main way that these lizards, lizards

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:44.880
<v Speaker 2>have been observed to obtain cheese like this off of

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 2>a you know, a type of food that has spread

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 2>around the world, like invasive pet lizard species. In this case, the.

0:19:52.920 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 3>Pizza rob I've found a slightly related story. Would you

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:11.120
<v Speaker 3>like to hear about it? It's only sort of related.

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 3>It's not about lizards eating pizza, but it's close.

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 2>Hey, it's close. Even then, we should definitely explore it.

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So did you know that one of the most

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 3>extreme cases of constipation ever documented in nature was caused

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 3>by a lizard eating at a pizza parlor?

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 2>Wow? This absolutely sounds unreal.

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 3>To be clear, we have no evidence that the lizard

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 3>was eating pizza itself, but I guess we can't be sure.

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 3>But part of the cursed concoction that this lizard consumed

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 3>seems to have been sand contaminated with pizza grease and

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 3>some other stuff, including other lizards that may also have

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 3>been eating pizza grease and greasy sand. So yeah, delicious, right.

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 3>So here My source is a press release on the

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 3>website of the Florida Museum of Natural History from April

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty by Halle Marchesi, and the story goes like this,

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Some researchers at the University of Florida and at the

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:20.680
<v Speaker 3>Florida Museum came into possession of a remarkable specimen, an

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 3>adult female northern curly tailed lizard. The species is Leocephalus caronadus,

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:33.400
<v Speaker 3>and this northern curly tailed lizard was so constipated when

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 3>they found it that the mass of impassable poop in

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 3>its digestive tract had become almost eighty percent of the

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 3>animal's total body mass. I think the exact figure was

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 3>seventy eight point five percent. Yikes, so more poop than lizard.

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Wow. Wow. I mean, the only thing that even comes

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 2>close to this were examples we've discussed of specific scorpion

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 2>species that lose their ability to poop if they have

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 2>to eject their tail and therefore cannot poop for the

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 2>rest of their lives. But that this sounds even more impressive.

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 3>So at the time, and I don't know if this

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 3>has been surpassed since, but I kind of doubt it.

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 3>The authors believed this was the largest feces to body

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 3>mass ratio ever recorded in a living animal, so it

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 3>was the most constipated a live animal had ever been

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 3>as far as we have documented. Obviously, we can't know

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 3>what has happened out there in nature, but the most

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 3>constipated animal we've ever seen.

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Do you think this? I'm imagining the cinematic moment where

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 2>the researchers suddenly get really serious and one is like,

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think this is it. I think this

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 2>is the largest feces to body mass ratio ever recorded.

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 2>I think it's happening.

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.159
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I think I'm about to describe that moments. So

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 3>one of the researchers, a PhD candidate at the time

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 3>named Natalie Klaunch, is quoted in this press release saying

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 3>that when they caught the lizard, they first assumed because

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 3>it was an adult female, they first assumed it was

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 3>about to lay eggs quote, but when we went to

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:10.120
<v Speaker 3>feel for eggs, it just felt like it was full

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 3>of silly putty. So they did a CT scan of

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:17.880
<v Speaker 3>the lizard and they discovered it had this gigantic fecal

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 3>bullus stuck in its digestive system. And again, the bullus

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 3>to body mass ratio was huge. It was so far

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 3>past the previous record that it was crazy. The previous

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 3>record was in a Burmese python, and this ratio was

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 3>six roughly six times greater than that. Edward Stanley, director

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:44.400
<v Speaker 3>of the Florida Museum's Digital Discovery and Dissemination Laboratory, said, quote,

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:47.479
<v Speaker 3>I was blown away by how little room there was

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 3>left for all the other organs. If you look at

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 3>the three D model, it has only a tiny space

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 3>left over in its ribcage for the heart, lungs, and liver.

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 3>So the sad part of this story is that unfortunately

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:04.439
<v Speaker 3>this condition was not survivable for the lizard. The lizard

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 3>was humanely euthanized. But how did it get so constipated. Well,

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 3>this lizard had been feeding in the parking lot next

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 3>to the grease collection bin outside of a pizza parlor

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 3>in Cocoa Beach, Florida, and the researchers think that this

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 3>lizard was probably hunting insects and other smaller lizards that

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 3>were drawn to the pizza grease, and as a result,

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 3>it was ingesting a lot of greasy sand. It had

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 3>probably eaten a bunch of insects. I think they said

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:40.919
<v Speaker 3>it had eaten another lizard in a knoll and a

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 3>bunch of grease soaked sand along with these other meals,

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 3>and this turned into the bullus that it couldn't pass. Now, Rob,

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 3>you were just speaking about invasive lizards in Florida. The

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 3>northern curly tail lizards originally native to Cuba, the Bahamas,

0:24:56.320 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 3>and the Cayman Islands are also not originally to Florida.

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 3>They were intentionally introduced to Florida in the nineteen forties

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 3>in an attempt to control agricultural pests. How many times

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:11.679
<v Speaker 3>have we heard that story they were brought into control.

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:14.199
<v Speaker 3>I think it was sugar cane pests, and as so

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 3>often happens, they became a problem in their own right,

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 3>out competing and threatening native lizard species and contributing to

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 3>a decline in the native diversity of reptiles in Florida.

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:29.199
<v Speaker 3>Apparently they are especially at risk for getting blocked up

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 3>intestines because their diet is so diverse, and they will

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 3>eat all kinds of things they find in human environments.

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:40.119
<v Speaker 3>To quote Claunch in that article, quote from bits of

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 3>fish to cheese and crackers. So again, we don't know

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 3>for sure that this lizard was actually eating pizza. It

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 3>was eating in the parking lot next to the pizza parlor,

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:54.239
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know cheese and crackers. Is that too

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:56.679
<v Speaker 3>far off from pizza or be happening.

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 2>Let's not ignore the possibility that it just right up

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 2>ordered and a bug in sand pizza from this place,

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 2>turtle style yea, and consumed it. In the parking lot

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 2>and paid the paid the ultimate price.

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 3>A Sicilian style with extra sand. So the article emphasizes

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 3>how unlikely it is that you would find a lizard

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 3>this constipated alive in the wild, because usually they end

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 3>up usually they're only going to eat small amounts of

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 3>sand as they consume prey. It seems like this one

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 3>must have eaten a lot of grease contaminated sand, and

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:35.199
<v Speaker 3>when they do get constipated, they become sluggish, so it's

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:37.719
<v Speaker 3>pretty easy for predators to pick them off, but that

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:40.479
<v Speaker 3>had not yet happened to this one. Though. I do

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 3>wonder this is not anything that the sources were suggesting.

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 3>I'm just just guessing here. Would those predators now have

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 3>a higher likelihood of also getting constipated. You got to

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 3>wonder if if you're a bird or something and you

0:26:56.920 --> 0:26:59.919
<v Speaker 3>eat a lizard that is actually like eighty percent fecal

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 3>bullus made of largely, you know, pizza, grease, and sand,

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 3>do you get constipated with pizza, grease, and sand.

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Oh? I don't know. I mean, I guess in this scenario,

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:12.719
<v Speaker 2>the predator in question, be it a like a raptor

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 2>or what have you, has to end up consuming the

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 2>lizard hole and not rupturing it in a way that

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:21.959
<v Speaker 2>might turn it off, like if you were to rupture

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:25.160
<v Speaker 2>the creature with your talons and then realize it's basically

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 2>one big lump of pooh. I you know, I don't

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 2>don't know my raptors well enough to whether that would

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 2>be at a turrent if the raptor might say, actually,

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm in way over my head here and I'll just

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 2>leave this one. B maybe I'll only eat a part

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 2>of it, or you know how that ends up going down.

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 2>I know that, Like, there are various predators who you know,

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 2>that do not want to consume the fecal matter of

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 2>their prey, like I believe. I remember reading that Komodo dragons,

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 2>for example, might like swing the animals around like to

0:27:55.920 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 2>dislodge in intestines that may have fecal matter inside them.

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:04.399
<v Speaker 2>So even if you're eating most of the animal, you

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 2>might not eat it home. But then again, there are

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:09.200
<v Speaker 2>also plenty of examples of animals that absolutely do eat

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:13.160
<v Speaker 2>their prey hole and then either it all passes through

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:16.199
<v Speaker 2>or you know, some of it gets you know, barfed

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 2>back up again and the rest continues. The journey.

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:22.439
<v Speaker 3>Researchers who made this discovery? Are you listening? Do you

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 3>have any insight on this? I would love to know more?

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Right and tell us what's going on in Florida? Contact

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 3>at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, well, what do you have as a selection? Joe?

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Which is the first that you decided to pick off

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:36.360
<v Speaker 2>the list? Here?

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay? I decided today to talk about the twenty twenty

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 3>five Psychology Prize. This year's Psychology Prize was presented to

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:50.239
<v Speaker 3>Marson Zagenkowski of the University of Warsaw in Poland and

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Jill Jiniak of the University of Western Australia. Quote for

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 3>investigating what happens when you tell narcissists or anyone else

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 3>that they are intelligent? So the name of the winning paper,

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 3>published in twenty twenty one in the journal Intelligence perhaps

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 3>emphasizes what's funny about this more than the ceremony language does.

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 3>It's called telling people they are intelligent correlates with the

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 3>feeling of narcissistic uniqueness, the influence of IQ feedback on

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 3>temporary state narcissism.

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So the basic idea of being that by telling

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 2>someone they're smart, you could at the very least induce

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 2>temporary narcissism in them.

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah. This is a part of a long running

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 3>tradition where it's a study where what's funny about it

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 3>is that the result seems ridiculously obvious. If you tell somebody, oh, wow,

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 3>our tests confirm that you are much smarter than other people,

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 3>it will tend to increase their feelings that they are

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 3>special and unique, at least temporarily.

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Right until you do the next dumb thing and then

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 2>you're like, ooh, maybe that finding was off.

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 3>So many Ignobel winners over the years, especially in psychology,

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 3>have this quality. What's funny about them is that they

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 3>find something that seems really obvious. It's like, well, I

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 3>could have told you that. This is also a common

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 3>refrain from the comments section underneath any write up of

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 3>a new finding, especially from the social sciences, something in

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 3>economics or political science or psychology. You know, people just

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:25.719
<v Speaker 3>chiming in to say that's obvious. You didn't need an

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 3>experiment to tell you that. I've made this point many

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 3>times on the show before, including in previous Ignobel episodes,

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 3>but I just want to do my brief speech on

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 3>this again right now. To the extent people actually mean

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 3>this kind of thing when they say it. I think

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 3>this point of view really misunderstands the purpose of most experiments,

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:48.479
<v Speaker 3>and it misses the value of science. The whole reason

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 3>we have experimental science is to test what we think

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 3>will happen against what actually happens. So we have a

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 3>hypothesis and we subject it to an experiment. Sometimes the

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 3>results apport the hypothesis, sometimes they don't. So if you

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 3>say I have an intuition about how this experiment will

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 3>come out, therefore you shouldn't run an experiment, that essentially

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 3>reduces to saying that we shouldn't have experimental science at all.

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 3>It's like saying, however, I assume the world works based

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 3>on just living my life and getting a vibe is

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 3>good enough. We don't need to look any deeper. Now.

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 3>That doesn't mean, on the other hand, that every scientific

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 3>experiment and every paper published is amazingly valuable. You know,

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 3>there are some phenomena that are probably not the most

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 3>important things in nature to study, though sometimes you don't

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 3>realize how important something is until after you study it.

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 3>And of course I would say that the most important

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 3>criticism you could make of a study is if its

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 3>design is poor meaning, it could be generating false knowledge.

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 3>But I would argue that just looking at the result

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 3>and saying I could have told you that is not

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 3>a good criticism of research, because the history of science

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 3>is full of counterintuitive things where a lay person would

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 3>assume an experiment would find one thing, and instead it

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 3>finds the opposite. Even in psychology, there are tons of

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 3>results that violate a lay person's intuition and have proven robust,

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 3>meaning they've been replicated many times by independent teams of researchers,

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 3>and we've talked about a bunch of these on the

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 3>show before. Just in the domain of psychology, I think

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:26.719
<v Speaker 3>about the great example that it is a super common

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 3>lay intuition that we are really good at spotting lies

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 3>and liars. Most people think that they can tell when

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 3>somebody is lying to them by I don't know, reading

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 3>facial expressions or verbal cues. Tests show over and over

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 3>again that Nope, our intuitions here are very misguided. We

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 3>grossly overestimate our ability to tell when people are lying

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 3>to us. In the same vein rob remember those episodes

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 3>we did on authenticity last year, it's very common lay

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 3>intuition that we can tell when people are being inauthentic

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 3>when not really being themselves. Turns out if you test this,

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 3>like if you compare other people's ratings of Johnny's authenticity

0:33:08.640 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 3>to Johnny's own rating of how authentic he's being in

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 3>an interaction, the correlation tends to be pretty low. We

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:16.959
<v Speaker 3>think we can tell, but actually we're not very good

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 3>at it.

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it just turns out we're all jerks.

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 3>And I could go on and on listing a bunch

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 3>of things like this. There are just so many things

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 3>that we think based on intuition and life experience, and

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 3>when we test those assumptions, some are broadly confirmed. Sometimes

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 3>lay intuition is right, other times it's wrong, and it

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 3>gets contradicted in interesting ways. And this final point is

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 3>very important. Sometimes the process of investigating the assumption with

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 3>an experiment, even if it confirms our intuition, it reveals

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 3>new ways of thinking about the issue, and it leads

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 3>us to ask new questions we didn't think of before.

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 3>So I'll get off my soapbox now, but I just

0:33:57.400 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 3>do want to reiterate this thing. I probably end up

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 3>saying this most years when we talk about the ignobels

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 3>in one way or another. I could have told you

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:07.240
<v Speaker 3>that is not a good criticism.

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Now, another criticism that often is leveled at the sorts

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 2>of papers that are honored in the ig Nobel Prizes

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 2>is like, well, this is not an important study. It's

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 2>not answering important questions or solving important problems. It's not

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 2>big enough, and like this tends to I don't know,

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 2>it kind of comes back to that saying, you know

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 2>that the modern scientists there they're standing on the backs

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 2>of giants, which is true, but they're also standing on

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 2>a lot of gnomes and halflings and other smaller Like

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of small studies in science that are

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:43.800
<v Speaker 2>just necessary stepping stones and the whole ordeal. Again, I

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:46.279
<v Speaker 2>think if we just think about science, is this thing

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 2>like this, this focused lamp that we need to shine

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:53.799
<v Speaker 2>onto various problems, Like sometimes it is that, but it

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 2>also is about the like the larger you know, full

0:34:57.360 --> 0:34:58.320
<v Speaker 2>lantern elimination.

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:00.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's true. I mean there are a lot of

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:02.239
<v Speaker 3>things going on. A lot of experiments that don't seem

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 3>very exciting to the layperson are just laying important groundwork,

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 3>like testing a tool or a concept to see if

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 3>it is valid and thus can it be used in

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 3>further research or making establishing a small establishing something in

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 3>a small setting to see is it worth investigating with

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:24.279
<v Speaker 3>a more high powered study, right or again, as is

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 3>often the case, you know, looking into things that might

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 3>be of interest to the researcher, but a lot of

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 3>people would say, well why does this matter? And you

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:35.400
<v Speaker 3>don't always know why it might matter. Maybe it doesn't

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 3>end up mattering to the whole world that much. And

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:41.720
<v Speaker 3>then other times things could have very squarely been seen

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 3>when they were first being studied and the why does

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:46.319
<v Speaker 3>this matter category, and then they turned out to be

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 3>a huge significance.

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Right right, I mean figuring out why lizards certain lizards

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:56.400
<v Speaker 2>eat certain pizzas. It's probably not going to cure cancer.

0:35:55.840 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 2>But ultimately, with science you never know exactactly you know,

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 2>what discovery leads to another discovery. It's not I mean,

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 2>it's not incompletely impossible. All right, Well let's get back

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 2>to these narcissists.

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 3>Right, So this study, I don't think this is going

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 3>to cure cancer, but I do think it is interesting.

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:18.880
<v Speaker 3>So again the paper is called telling people their intelligent

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 3>correlates with the feeling of narcissistic uniqueness. The influence of

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:26.360
<v Speaker 3>IQ Feedback on Temporary State Narcissism. And again this is

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 3>by Marson Zegenkowski and Jill E. Geniak, published in the

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 3>journal Intelligence twenty twenty one. So the authors begin by

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 3>making a statement that will take a little bit of unpacking,

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 3>but that statement is a statement about the background research

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 3>stuff that has already been established before they started their

0:36:44.680 --> 0:36:48.879
<v Speaker 3>paper here, and that background research finding is that what's

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:55.640
<v Speaker 3>called grandiose narcissism is positively correlated with self assessed intelligence

0:36:55.840 --> 0:37:00.879
<v Speaker 3>or SAI. Now let's define terms here, starting with psychological

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:05.440
<v Speaker 3>concept of narcissism. It is defined in the Encyclopedia of

0:37:05.480 --> 0:37:12.240
<v Speaker 3>Social Psychology as follows quote. Narcissism in its extreme forms

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 3>is considered a personality disorder. It is defined as a

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:20.839
<v Speaker 3>syndrome or combination of characteristics that includes the following a

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 3>pervasive pattern of grandiosity, self importance, and perceived uniqueness, a

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:33.319
<v Speaker 3>preoccupation with fantasies of unlimited success and power, exhibitionism and

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:39.240
<v Speaker 3>attention seeking, emotional reactivity, especially to threats to self esteem,

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:44.440
<v Speaker 3>displays of entitlement and the expectation of special treatment from others,

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 3>and an unwillingness or inability to show empathy. So that's

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:51.239
<v Speaker 3>a lot of different things. It's hard to say that

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 3>all in one short phrase, but I would say, for

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 3>simplicity's sake, you can think of narcissism as an extreme

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 3>form of self centeredness that manifests in a host of

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:07.320
<v Speaker 3>characteristic behaviors, these kind of behavior clusters that we see

0:38:07.320 --> 0:38:11.239
<v Speaker 3>happening together again and again. And those behaviors include the

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:15.400
<v Speaker 3>need for praise, attention and adoration, the lack of empathy

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 3>for others, the sense of entitlement and a desire for

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:20.440
<v Speaker 3>special treatment, and so forth.

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Now, but before anybody self diagnosis too much, just remember

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 2>all those things can occur to varying levels in just

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 2>about any of us. We're talking about, you know, all

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 2>the all the lights burning at the same time here, right.

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 3>And there's also a difference this paper will address between

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:41.160
<v Speaker 3>trait narcissism and state narcissism. You know, you can in

0:38:41.200 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 3>a particular you can get into a particular state where

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 3>you show more of certain narcissistic tendencies than you would

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:49.800
<v Speaker 3>in the rest of your life, for example.

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:52.280
<v Speaker 2>And that's an I think that's important to note because

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:56.239
<v Speaker 2>just you know, as a reminder that you know you

0:38:56.280 --> 0:38:59.480
<v Speaker 2>can get into this narcissistic state without being like a

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:01.840
<v Speaker 2>narcissist all the time. You know, it's kind of without

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:04.080
<v Speaker 2>thinking like, oh, I'm not a narcissist. I could never

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:07.759
<v Speaker 2>be like that. Well you could at least at least

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 2>in bursts, and therefore you know it pays to watch

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 2>out for that in your own behavior.

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 3>But there is also a special thing, which is where

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 3>you see this syndrome where somebody pretty consistently displays all

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 3>of these traits and they cluster together and like that.

0:39:22.719 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 3>That's sort of a type of person. So that that's

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:39.719
<v Speaker 3>narcissism in general. But what about the grandiose part. Grandiose narcissism.

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:44.839
<v Speaker 3>Grandiose narcissism is one of two main types of narcissism

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 3>identified by the authors. These are grandiose narcissism and vulnerable narcissism.

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 3>For a succinct distinction here, I found another paper from

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 3>twenty eighteen in Frontiers and Psychology called vulnerable and grandiose

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:03.879
<v Speaker 3>narcissism are differently associated with ability and trait emotional intelligence.

0:40:04.480 --> 0:40:07.120
<v Speaker 3>And note that the first listed of the four authors

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:09.720
<v Speaker 3>on this paper here was the same as the Ignobel paper.

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:15.000
<v Speaker 3>That's Marson Zagenkowski The authors make the distinction as follows quote.

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:20.719
<v Speaker 3>Grandiose narcissism is characterized by high self esteem, interpersonal dominance,

0:40:20.800 --> 0:40:26.319
<v Speaker 3>and a tendency to overestimate one's capabilities, whereas vulnerable narcissism

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 3>presents defensive, avoidant, and hyper sensitive attitude in interpersonal relations. So,

0:40:34.600 --> 0:40:39.200
<v Speaker 3>based on these definitions, I would say that your grandiose

0:40:39.280 --> 0:40:44.359
<v Speaker 3>narcissist is probably the most stereotypical type of egomaniac, all

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:48.440
<v Speaker 3>of the typical self obsessed and self privileging narcissistic traits,

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:51.839
<v Speaker 3>but with an emphasis on really high opinion of your

0:40:51.880 --> 0:40:58.920
<v Speaker 3>own abilities and powers and an orientation toward personally getting ahead, competitiveness, dominance,

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 3>and self aggrandize.

0:41:00.560 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, yeah, this is your kind of classic. The

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Emperor has no close sort of narcissism, right.

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:10.960
<v Speaker 3>So that's the grandiose narcissism. The other definition from the

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:15.680
<v Speaker 3>opening statement would be self assessed intelligence, which is pretty straightforward.

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 3>It's not how smart you actually are, but how smart

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:23.120
<v Speaker 3>you think you are. So again, the background knowledge is

0:41:23.120 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 3>that people who score high in grandiose narcissism also tend

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 3>to rate their own intelligence very highly. And as a

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 3>side note, I think it's worth exploring for a minute

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 3>the idea that having high confidence in your own intelligence.

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:41.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, at first, when I think about that, I

0:41:41.640 --> 0:41:43.799
<v Speaker 3>have a negative reaction to that, and they're like, Oh,

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:47.319
<v Speaker 3>that's pompous, that's no good, which I don't think I'm

0:41:47.320 --> 0:41:49.759
<v Speaker 3>wrong in thinking that. But also it's worth noting that

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:53.280
<v Speaker 3>having high confidence in your own intelligence can have both

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:58.440
<v Speaker 3>good and bad consequences. In terms of good consequences, studies

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:01.879
<v Speaker 3>have found that even if you can't for actual intelligence

0:42:01.960 --> 0:42:07.080
<v Speaker 3>or actual ability, higher self assessed intelligence is correlated with

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 3>some desirable outcomes, like greater feelings of well being, and

0:42:11.400 --> 0:42:15.120
<v Speaker 3>some studies have found it correlated with better academic achievements.

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:19.520
<v Speaker 3>So there are some benefits to seeing yourself as smart,

0:42:20.040 --> 0:42:22.520
<v Speaker 3>whether or not you're actually smart, and there could be

0:42:22.520 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 3>a lot of reasons for this. For example, one possibility

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 3>is just, even beyond the narrow domain of intelligence, just

0:42:30.320 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 3>generally believing I can do this whatever the domain allows

0:42:35.239 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 3>you to take more risks and actually pursuing goals and

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 3>developing your own skills compared to someone who is actually

0:42:42.280 --> 0:42:45.279
<v Speaker 3>at the starting point just as capable as you, but

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:49.399
<v Speaker 3>feels I cannot do this and thus doesn't take any

0:42:49.480 --> 0:42:53.400
<v Speaker 3>risks on development or skill attainment, doesn't get opportunities for

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:56.680
<v Speaker 3>success and so forth. As you know, as the saying goes,

0:42:56.800 --> 0:43:00.600
<v Speaker 3>some percent of success is showing up, and in some cases,

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 3>believing I am very smart helps motivate you to show up,

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 3>whether or not you're right about that.

0:43:06.040 --> 0:43:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, that makes sense.

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:10.480
<v Speaker 3>On the other hand, if we should absolutely note that

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:15.680
<v Speaker 3>there are major downsides to high self assessed intelligence. For example,

0:43:15.719 --> 0:43:18.600
<v Speaker 3>if you go through life thinking I am very smart,

0:43:19.160 --> 0:43:21.800
<v Speaker 3>I would argue it makes you more likely to fool

0:43:21.840 --> 0:43:26.440
<v Speaker 3>yourself into dangerous misguided certainty, makes you more subject to

0:43:26.480 --> 0:43:30.279
<v Speaker 3>intellectual hubris. It can prevent you from paying attention to

0:43:30.360 --> 0:43:34.160
<v Speaker 3>good advice from others. One big thing you see with

0:43:34.239 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 3>people high in grandiose, narcissistic traits who rate their own

0:43:38.239 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 3>intelligence very highly is that they do not take feedback

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:47.120
<v Speaker 3>that contradicts them. So if a piece of information contradicts

0:43:47.160 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 3>their view or contradicts their way of understanding the world

0:43:51.640 --> 0:43:55.839
<v Speaker 3>or their view of themself, they attack the new information

0:43:56.239 --> 0:44:00.359
<v Speaker 3>or they attack the person delivering the new information, rather

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:03.960
<v Speaker 3>than incorporating that information as feedback and updating their model.

0:44:04.360 --> 0:44:06.600
<v Speaker 3>And this is one reason it can be so dangerous

0:44:06.640 --> 0:44:10.640
<v Speaker 3>to have grandiose narcissists in like leadership and authority positions,

0:44:10.960 --> 0:44:13.960
<v Speaker 3>and they do often end up there. You know, this

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:16.880
<v Speaker 3>is a personality type that specifically is set up to

0:44:17.440 --> 0:44:20.440
<v Speaker 3>reject information that is threatening to their ego.

0:44:21.400 --> 0:44:23.839
<v Speaker 2>And it's just curious that this does kind of get

0:44:23.840 --> 0:44:26.279
<v Speaker 2>back to what you were talking about earlier about the

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:29.360
<v Speaker 2>basic mission of science to sometimes explore things that we

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:32.759
<v Speaker 2>feel are to one level or another already settled in

0:44:32.800 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 2>our own mind.

0:44:33.880 --> 0:44:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, you can find out you were on Yeah,

0:44:37.120 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 3>And it's good to pay attention when you get that

0:44:39.040 --> 0:44:41.000
<v Speaker 3>signal and not just say, oh, that can't be right,

0:44:41.040 --> 0:44:44.600
<v Speaker 3>that's not already what I think right. A few more

0:44:44.640 --> 0:44:48.239
<v Speaker 3>interesting facts from the introduction to this paper, just little

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:51.799
<v Speaker 3>tidbits here. One is that we may have talked about

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:53.920
<v Speaker 3>this on the show before, but the so called better

0:44:53.960 --> 0:44:57.840
<v Speaker 3>than average effect most people believe their own intelligence is

0:44:57.840 --> 0:45:04.000
<v Speaker 3>above average. It's interesting giving people an intelligence test tends

0:45:04.080 --> 0:45:08.520
<v Speaker 3>to reduce our level of overestimation of our own intelligence.

0:45:09.200 --> 0:45:11.839
<v Speaker 3>And so this occurs not even at the getting your

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:14.799
<v Speaker 3>score on the test stage, like you just take the

0:45:14.840 --> 0:45:18.759
<v Speaker 3>problem solving portion of the test, and this experience of

0:45:18.960 --> 0:45:24.160
<v Speaker 3>the task itself reduces people's overconfidence about their own intelligence.

0:45:24.200 --> 0:45:26.960
<v Speaker 3>It's something about the process, like having to solve the problems.

0:45:28.440 --> 0:45:31.919
<v Speaker 3>And finally, though on average we are we're all likely

0:45:32.000 --> 0:45:36.319
<v Speaker 3>to overestimate our own intelligence, some people overestimate their intelligence

0:45:36.560 --> 0:45:40.400
<v Speaker 3>more than everybody else, particularly people who score high in

0:45:40.440 --> 0:45:44.520
<v Speaker 3>the traite narcissism. But anyway, coming back to the main

0:45:44.600 --> 0:45:48.840
<v Speaker 3>thrust of the paper here, yes, grandiose narcissism is correlated

0:45:48.880 --> 0:45:54.279
<v Speaker 3>positively with self assessed intelligence. It is typically assumed in

0:45:54.320 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 3>the scientific literature that the direction of causation here flows

0:45:59.239 --> 0:46:03.360
<v Speaker 3>from the narcarcissism to the self assessed intelligence. In other words,

0:46:03.719 --> 0:46:07.400
<v Speaker 3>because I have a narcissistic personality, I think I am

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:10.520
<v Speaker 3>very smart. I think I'm smarter than other people. But

0:46:10.680 --> 0:46:13.920
<v Speaker 3>the central question the authors are asking in this paper is,

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:18.200
<v Speaker 3>to some extent, could the causation be going the other

0:46:18.280 --> 0:46:21.399
<v Speaker 3>way or could it be going in both directions? Could

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:24.080
<v Speaker 3>it be that something causes me to think that I

0:46:24.120 --> 0:46:28.120
<v Speaker 3>am very smart, thus I become more likely to exhibit

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:32.600
<v Speaker 3>narcissistic traits. So the authors designed an experiment with three

0:46:32.640 --> 0:46:35.719
<v Speaker 3>hundred and sixty four subjects where they measured the effects

0:46:35.719 --> 0:46:39.680
<v Speaker 3>of giving the subjects IQ tests and then randomly telling

0:46:39.680 --> 0:46:43.239
<v Speaker 3>the subjects either that they performed better than average or

0:46:43.280 --> 0:46:47.080
<v Speaker 3>that they performed worse than average. The subjects also took

0:46:47.120 --> 0:46:51.440
<v Speaker 3>standard inventories to measure the presence of particular narcissistic personality

0:46:51.480 --> 0:46:54.960
<v Speaker 3>traits or state traits, you know, things that could just

0:46:55.040 --> 0:47:00.600
<v Speaker 3>indicate being in a narcissistic state of mind temporarily. Specifically,

0:47:00.600 --> 0:47:03.200
<v Speaker 3>the authors were looking to see if there were temporary

0:47:03.200 --> 0:47:08.160
<v Speaker 3>boosts to traits of what's called narcissistic admiration, which quote

0:47:08.239 --> 0:47:14.239
<v Speaker 3>is characterized by striving for uniqueness, grandiose fantasies, and charming behavior.

0:47:15.280 --> 0:47:18.600
<v Speaker 3>And the authors found that feedback from the IQ test,

0:47:18.680 --> 0:47:21.680
<v Speaker 3>which to be clear, was random it's not actually reflective

0:47:21.719 --> 0:47:27.000
<v Speaker 3>of performance, did positively correlate with people's self assessed intelligence.

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:29.759
<v Speaker 3>So if you tell somebody that they did better than

0:47:29.760 --> 0:47:33.319
<v Speaker 3>average on this IQ test, it did also make them

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:38.359
<v Speaker 3>see themselves as smarter, And it also temporarily increased one

0:47:38.600 --> 0:47:43.719
<v Speaker 3>particular subscale of narcissistic admiration, but not the others. The

0:47:43.760 --> 0:47:47.400
<v Speaker 3>one part of narcissism that it did increase, at least temporarily,

0:47:48.640 --> 0:47:53.319
<v Speaker 3>was known as striving for uniqueness, which the authors characterize

0:47:53.320 --> 0:47:57.600
<v Speaker 3>as the feeling of being special, bragging about one's abilities,

0:47:57.640 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 3>and the enjoyment of one's successes. So the core hypothesis

0:48:02.120 --> 0:48:04.600
<v Speaker 3>there was that it was a kind of mixed result.

0:48:04.640 --> 0:48:07.439
<v Speaker 3>Actually did not find that telling people they did well

0:48:07.480 --> 0:48:11.400
<v Speaker 3>on an IQ test increased all aspects of narcissistic admiration,

0:48:11.800 --> 0:48:16.440
<v Speaker 3>but it did significantly increase one aspect of it. Also,

0:48:16.600 --> 0:48:19.719
<v Speaker 3>the people who were told that they did below average

0:48:19.719 --> 0:48:23.680
<v Speaker 3>on the test reported lower self assessed intelligence afterwards, so

0:48:23.840 --> 0:48:27.920
<v Speaker 3>the effect went both ways, and they tested lower on

0:48:28.040 --> 0:48:32.400
<v Speaker 3>temporary measures of the same narcissism subscale striving for uniqueness.

0:48:32.920 --> 0:48:36.600
<v Speaker 3>So the authors say, we conclude that IQ feedback may

0:48:36.640 --> 0:48:40.440
<v Speaker 3>shape people's beliefs about their intelligence, and that lay concepts

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:44.560
<v Speaker 3>of intelligence might incorporate some narcissistic elements, such as the

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:50.160
<v Speaker 3>feeling of being uniquely special. So, like any good research,

0:48:50.280 --> 0:48:54.760
<v Speaker 3>this raises more questions. If it's true that being told

0:48:55.080 --> 0:48:58.239
<v Speaker 3>you did well on this IQ test causes at least

0:48:58.280 --> 0:49:03.959
<v Speaker 3>a temporary increase in, but not all, components of state narcissism.

0:49:04.400 --> 0:49:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Is it possible that things like this could have an

0:49:08.080 --> 0:49:12.120
<v Speaker 3>additive effect over time. Could it be that various types

0:49:12.160 --> 0:49:17.000
<v Speaker 3>of positive feedback about intelligence could be contributing to the

0:49:17.080 --> 0:49:20.919
<v Speaker 3>narcissism of the world. In other words, like, not only

0:49:21.000 --> 0:49:25.040
<v Speaker 3>are people high in narcissistic traits going around with an

0:49:25.120 --> 0:49:27.680
<v Speaker 3>inflated view of their own intelligence. We already know that

0:49:27.840 --> 0:49:31.960
<v Speaker 3>is true, but perhaps people all over, regular people too

0:49:32.560 --> 0:49:37.120
<v Speaker 3>are being pushed in a more narcissistic direction by getting

0:49:37.400 --> 0:49:41.920
<v Speaker 3>various kinds of lavish and unearned praise about how smart

0:49:41.960 --> 0:49:44.680
<v Speaker 3>they are. I think there are a lot of ways

0:49:44.760 --> 0:49:46.879
<v Speaker 3>this can happen, but I'm just thinking, like every time

0:49:46.960 --> 0:49:50.720
<v Speaker 3>they ask chat GPT a question, it starts the answer with, Wow,

0:49:50.760 --> 0:49:53.920
<v Speaker 3>that's a great question. You are so curious and thoughtful

0:49:54.000 --> 0:49:57.640
<v Speaker 3>for asking that. You know it is so special. And

0:49:57.719 --> 0:50:00.880
<v Speaker 3>to be clear, like this is not to proven finding

0:50:00.920 --> 0:50:03.120
<v Speaker 3>of the paper, but I think it's a really interesting

0:50:03.200 --> 0:50:05.440
<v Speaker 3>question that it raises and something that would be a

0:50:05.440 --> 0:50:07.160
<v Speaker 3>good subject for future research.

0:50:07.600 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh now, now I'm worried about those of us who

0:50:10.920 --> 0:50:14.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't do this every episode obviously, but who periodically

0:50:14.080 --> 0:50:20.040
<v Speaker 2>interview people for a podcast, because what is kind of

0:50:20.080 --> 0:50:22.840
<v Speaker 2>like a go to response when you ask a question, Sometimes,

0:50:22.880 --> 0:50:25.760
<v Speaker 2>whether it's a good question or not, the interview subject

0:50:25.800 --> 0:50:29.080
<v Speaker 2>will say that's a good question or that's a great question.

0:50:29.360 --> 0:50:31.719
<v Speaker 2>And even though I, deep down, you know, know that

0:50:31.719 --> 0:50:34.759
<v Speaker 2>that wasn't necessarily a great question, am I letting that

0:50:34.840 --> 0:50:37.759
<v Speaker 2>sink in? Am I on some level? Am I saying yeah,

0:50:37.880 --> 0:50:41.120
<v Speaker 2>that was a great question. I'm a great interviewer.

0:50:42.960 --> 0:50:44.920
<v Speaker 3>I know the feeling. Rob Yeah, No, I mean there

0:50:44.920 --> 0:50:48.160
<v Speaker 3>are so many ways that we have to be sensitive

0:50:48.160 --> 0:50:50.600
<v Speaker 3>to the fact that in a you know, if you're

0:50:50.600 --> 0:50:53.359
<v Speaker 3>dealing with nice and polite people, they might be kind

0:50:53.360 --> 0:50:57.759
<v Speaker 3>of buttering you up, or maybe even maybe some people

0:50:57.800 --> 0:51:01.800
<v Speaker 3>are intentionally manipulating you. But even put that aside, people

0:51:01.800 --> 0:51:06.280
<v Speaker 3>who are buttering you up to manipulate you on purpose, Yeah,

0:51:06.800 --> 0:51:12.040
<v Speaker 3>lots of just pleasant, happy interactions could potentially, like if

0:51:12.080 --> 0:51:14.440
<v Speaker 3>this does actually have a kind of additive effect on

0:51:14.520 --> 0:51:16.759
<v Speaker 3>personality over time. We don't know that it does, but

0:51:16.800 --> 0:51:20.480
<v Speaker 3>if it does, could be encouraging people to become more

0:51:20.560 --> 0:51:23.360
<v Speaker 3>narcissistic in certain ways. Now, I don't know if that

0:51:23.520 --> 0:51:25.440
<v Speaker 3>were actually the case. I don't know what the remedy

0:51:25.440 --> 0:51:26.920
<v Speaker 3>would be. I don't know if we should be going

0:51:26.960 --> 0:51:29.640
<v Speaker 3>around negging each other all the time. That seems wrong too.

0:51:30.160 --> 0:51:33.279
<v Speaker 2>The world needs to be a little more negative. It's

0:51:33.280 --> 0:51:37.120
<v Speaker 2>our only hope. Yeah, it's kind of difficult to suss

0:51:37.160 --> 0:51:39.480
<v Speaker 2>out what you do with that. I mean, I guess,

0:51:39.760 --> 0:51:44.960
<v Speaker 2>I guess there are some definite application points for you know, balancing,

0:51:46.040 --> 0:51:50.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, praise and like, you know, in in the

0:51:50.680 --> 0:51:55.120
<v Speaker 2>teaching environments and in the home environment, we'll.

0:51:54.960 --> 0:51:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Be giving being given positive encouragement, a lot of positive encouragement,

0:51:59.239 --> 0:52:04.520
<v Speaker 3>but also just very straightforward feedback. Yeah, it's like, you know, yeah,

0:52:04.680 --> 0:52:06.799
<v Speaker 3>you can do this. Here's what you didn't do right

0:52:06.840 --> 0:52:09.840
<v Speaker 3>this time. You can try again, you can make progress,

0:52:09.880 --> 0:52:12.400
<v Speaker 3>You're doing well. Yeah, yeah, I don't know. I mean,

0:52:12.440 --> 0:52:14.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm not trying to tell teachers how to teach. I

0:52:14.400 --> 0:52:17.040
<v Speaker 3>don't know what. I don't know what actually works. But yeah,

0:52:17.280 --> 0:52:19.799
<v Speaker 3>so I think this does raise a lot of interesting questions,

0:52:19.840 --> 0:52:23.200
<v Speaker 3>and obviously I think the investigation of the subject does

0:52:23.239 --> 0:52:26.600
<v Speaker 3>not end here, Like there are more questions to ask,

0:52:26.840 --> 0:52:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Like we were talking about earlier, a couple more interesting

0:52:30.520 --> 0:52:33.640
<v Speaker 3>elements I wanted to mention from the paper. One that

0:52:33.719 --> 0:52:36.919
<v Speaker 3>I thought was actually quite funny was subjects who got

0:52:36.960 --> 0:52:40.120
<v Speaker 3>positive feedback, who you know, were told you did better

0:52:40.160 --> 0:52:43.279
<v Speaker 3>than average, rated the test as more valid than those

0:52:43.320 --> 0:52:48.040
<v Speaker 3>who got negative feedback. Yeah, something's wrong with that test.

0:52:49.160 --> 0:52:52.960
<v Speaker 3>And then also I'm coming back to not just regular people,

0:52:53.000 --> 0:53:01.120
<v Speaker 3>but specifically people who showed higher narcissism. Narcissism generally caused

0:53:01.160 --> 0:53:05.160
<v Speaker 3>people to rate their own intelligence more highly, but this

0:53:05.320 --> 0:53:09.200
<v Speaker 3>was especially true in the condition where subjects got negative

0:53:09.200 --> 0:53:12.360
<v Speaker 3>feedback when they were told that they had done worse

0:53:12.560 --> 0:53:17.640
<v Speaker 3>on average. This seems to indicate a very important role

0:53:17.920 --> 0:53:22.520
<v Speaker 3>of narcissistic behavior patterns in ego protection. This seems to

0:53:22.520 --> 0:53:26.960
<v Speaker 3>be a lot of what narcissism is about. Narcissism means

0:53:27.040 --> 0:53:32.680
<v Speaker 3>that you are more likely to ignore and discount feedback

0:53:32.800 --> 0:53:37.279
<v Speaker 3>that reflects poorly on yourself, and so it is especially

0:53:37.480 --> 0:53:41.760
<v Speaker 3>important in maintaining a high self assessment in the face

0:53:41.840 --> 0:53:47.399
<v Speaker 3>of ego threatening information. It's kind of the narcissistic superpower

0:53:47.560 --> 0:53:49.920
<v Speaker 3>is just like, you know, you don't get discouraged when

0:53:49.960 --> 0:53:51.880
<v Speaker 3>you do bad on a test. It's like the test

0:53:52.000 --> 0:53:52.400
<v Speaker 3>was wrong.

0:53:52.960 --> 0:53:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, because you have to you have to deflect

0:53:55.640 --> 0:53:58.880
<v Speaker 2>against these things. You could negatively impact the swollen ego

0:53:58.960 --> 0:54:03.439
<v Speaker 2>here yeah yeah. Where in reality like that, the ego

0:54:03.480 --> 0:54:06.040
<v Speaker 2>swelling probably needs to go down a little bit. Yeah yeah,

0:54:06.160 --> 0:54:08.040
<v Speaker 2>it needs a needs a bit more balance here. This

0:54:08.200 --> 0:54:12.680
<v Speaker 2>is the the the engorged bladder needs to be drained.

0:54:12.800 --> 0:54:14.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I guess another way to think about it

0:54:14.880 --> 0:54:18.120
<v Speaker 3>is just that this paper exists somewhere within the domain

0:54:18.200 --> 0:54:22.440
<v Speaker 3>of trying to understand both the functioning but also the

0:54:22.480 --> 0:54:27.840
<v Speaker 3>positives and negatives of self assessment. That you know that

0:54:27.920 --> 0:54:31.799
<v Speaker 3>there are good things, there are like empowering things that

0:54:31.840 --> 0:54:34.440
<v Speaker 3>can come out of positive self assessment, and there are

0:54:34.480 --> 0:54:37.200
<v Speaker 3>also negative and destructive things that can come out of it,

0:54:37.800 --> 0:54:41.520
<v Speaker 3>and a lot of maybe, uh, self cultivation and living

0:54:41.560 --> 0:54:45.879
<v Speaker 3>the good life is about trying to understand how these

0:54:45.920 --> 0:54:48.640
<v Speaker 3>things work in your own mind and balance them correctly,

0:54:48.760 --> 0:54:53.440
<v Speaker 3>to empower yourself with enough positive self assessment that like

0:54:53.480 --> 0:54:55.799
<v Speaker 3>you feel you feel like you can do things and

0:54:55.840 --> 0:54:58.319
<v Speaker 3>you can you know, pursue opportunities and take risks and

0:54:58.320 --> 0:55:01.120
<v Speaker 3>stuff like that, but also not puffing yourself up and

0:55:01.160 --> 0:55:02.600
<v Speaker 3>thinking you're better than other people.

0:55:03.200 --> 0:55:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, yeah, like you have to be at least

0:55:06.160 --> 0:55:08.680
<v Speaker 2>a little over confident at times to try new things,

0:55:09.480 --> 0:55:12.480
<v Speaker 2>to take risks. I mean to a certain extent. It's like,

0:55:12.560 --> 0:55:15.040
<v Speaker 2>how many podcast episodes would we not have even done

0:55:15.239 --> 0:55:18.480
<v Speaker 2>had we not been maybe a little over confident at times,

0:55:18.480 --> 0:55:20.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, or just open to the idea that's like, yeah,

0:55:20.680 --> 0:55:22.840
<v Speaker 2>let's see what happens if we say we're going to

0:55:22.920 --> 0:55:25.440
<v Speaker 2>do an episode on X, Y or Z, you know,

0:55:26.080 --> 0:55:28.400
<v Speaker 2>and then you sort it out. Then you see what

0:55:29.040 --> 0:55:33.160
<v Speaker 2>your capabilities are, you see what the resources are, and

0:55:33.200 --> 0:55:35.280
<v Speaker 2>you find a landing spot.

0:55:35.640 --> 0:55:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay, that's all I've got on the Psychology Prize

0:55:48.120 --> 0:55:50.800
<v Speaker 3>this year. But Rob, you also looked into the twenty

0:55:50.840 --> 0:55:53.920
<v Speaker 3>twenty five Aviation Prize, right, yes.

0:55:53.840 --> 0:55:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, this one went to another multinational paper, this one

0:55:57.640 --> 0:56:04.880
<v Speaker 2>by Francesco Sanchez, Mariana Melcon, Karmi Corene, and Barry Pinchot

0:56:05.120 --> 0:56:09.360
<v Speaker 2>for Ethanol ingestion affects flight performance and echolocation in Egyptian

0:56:09.400 --> 0:56:14.120
<v Speaker 2>fruit Bats, published in Behavioral Processes back in twenty ten,

0:56:15.120 --> 0:56:18.600
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, slightly older paper here. Why is it funny? Well,

0:56:18.680 --> 0:56:21.439
<v Speaker 2>it is a story about fruit bats getting drunk off

0:56:21.440 --> 0:56:24.719
<v Speaker 2>of fermented fruit. So it's a perfect combination of two

0:56:24.800 --> 0:56:29.160
<v Speaker 2>inherently funny things, drunken animals and just fruit bats. Just

0:56:29.400 --> 0:56:33.640
<v Speaker 2>fruit bats in and of themselves. I don't know, I'm

0:56:33.800 --> 0:56:35.279
<v Speaker 2>maybe there are a few of us out there, but

0:56:35.320 --> 0:56:38.120
<v Speaker 2>I just find the idea of a fruit bat hilarious.

0:56:38.520 --> 0:56:41.400
<v Speaker 2>And then fruit bats in the wild are at least

0:56:41.480 --> 0:56:43.040
<v Speaker 2>extremely amusing to observe.

0:56:43.640 --> 0:56:45.880
<v Speaker 3>I do think certain kinds of fruit bats are among

0:56:46.040 --> 0:56:49.840
<v Speaker 3>the funniest and cutest looking animals in nature.

0:56:50.520 --> 0:56:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's you know, there's like an adorable awkwardness to

0:56:53.719 --> 0:56:55.520
<v Speaker 2>them at times. I don't know. I observed one in

0:56:55.520 --> 0:57:01.239
<v Speaker 2>Indonesia like dive bombing a discarded bit of ban by

0:57:01.280 --> 0:57:03.400
<v Speaker 2>the beach, and it was I don't know, it's just there.

0:57:03.560 --> 0:57:05.560
<v Speaker 2>There was an innocence to what they were up to.

0:57:05.840 --> 0:57:08.440
<v Speaker 3>There's a little bit of puppy about them, yeah, but

0:57:08.600 --> 0:57:11.000
<v Speaker 3>also a little bit of raggedy rat.

0:57:11.440 --> 0:57:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And while they're clearly not vampire bats, I think

0:57:15.560 --> 0:57:17.760
<v Speaker 2>it is always hilarious. Sometimes they kind of stand in

0:57:17.800 --> 0:57:22.080
<v Speaker 2>for vampire bats and movies. Yeah. So yeah, So it's

0:57:22.120 --> 0:57:24.600
<v Speaker 2>obvious why this is funny. As for like why it

0:57:24.680 --> 0:57:27.120
<v Speaker 2>matters and why it's a study at all. Well, the

0:57:27.160 --> 0:57:31.040
<v Speaker 2>consumption of ethyl alcohol and ripe fruits has been documented

0:57:31.040 --> 0:57:33.400
<v Speaker 2>in various creatures. We've talked about this in the show before.

0:57:33.400 --> 0:57:40.400
<v Speaker 2>I believe, various primates, various birds, Malaysian tree shrews, moose, elephants,

0:57:40.840 --> 0:57:44.080
<v Speaker 2>and various insects. I think mainly you're looking at cases

0:57:44.120 --> 0:57:46.200
<v Speaker 2>of the ones anyway that were coming up from me

0:57:46.320 --> 0:57:48.640
<v Speaker 2>or like fruit flies. But then also there are cases

0:57:48.640 --> 0:57:52.560
<v Speaker 2>with bees and nectar, so we're not talking about a

0:57:52.600 --> 0:57:55.479
<v Speaker 2>weird totally like what if scenario, like what if blue

0:57:55.480 --> 0:57:58.240
<v Speaker 2>whales drink red bull? You know, it's like because you know,

0:57:58.320 --> 0:58:02.360
<v Speaker 2>fruit bats, being of rougivores, are certainly exposed to ethyl

0:58:02.360 --> 0:58:07.000
<v Speaker 2>alcohol via ripe fruits, or at least potential to consume them,

0:58:07.240 --> 0:58:11.040
<v Speaker 2>and ethyl alcohol is present in all fleshy fruits when

0:58:11.080 --> 0:58:15.200
<v Speaker 2>those fruits have ripened sufficiently, And of course it also

0:58:15.240 --> 0:58:18.880
<v Speaker 2>goes without saying that this is the foundational principle behind

0:58:18.960 --> 0:58:22.400
<v Speaker 2>human alcoholic beverages as well. So the study in question

0:58:22.480 --> 0:58:27.040
<v Speaker 2>here looked at the Egyptian fruit bat, that is Rosettis agypticus,

0:58:27.560 --> 0:58:30.920
<v Speaker 2>which certainly can be found in Egypt along the expanse

0:58:30.960 --> 0:58:34.600
<v Speaker 2>of the Nile River, but its range includes large areas

0:58:34.640 --> 0:58:39.320
<v Speaker 2>throughout Africa, the Middle East, the Mediterranean, and the Indian subcontinent,

0:58:39.400 --> 0:58:44.280
<v Speaker 2>so that they are not just found in Egypt. The

0:58:44.360 --> 0:58:48.720
<v Speaker 2>researchers here had previously found that the marginal value of

0:58:48.840 --> 0:58:52.720
<v Speaker 2>food for Egyptian fruit bats decreases when its ethanol content

0:58:52.840 --> 0:58:57.440
<v Speaker 2>exceeds one percent. They hypothesize that if ingested food containing

0:58:57.480 --> 0:59:00.160
<v Speaker 2>more than one percent ethanol would be toxic today, these

0:59:00.240 --> 0:59:04.320
<v Speaker 2>bats probably causing an abriation that would then affect flight

0:59:04.400 --> 0:59:07.640
<v Speaker 2>and echolocation skills. And they predicted that this might be

0:59:07.680 --> 0:59:11.400
<v Speaker 2>the reason why Egyptian fruit bats had previously been observed

0:59:11.600 --> 0:59:15.600
<v Speaker 2>to avoid highly ripened fruits. So this is another case

0:59:15.600 --> 0:59:17.680
<v Speaker 2>where this is not highlighting something that had not been

0:59:17.720 --> 0:59:21.120
<v Speaker 2>already observed to some degree, like Egyptian fruit bats seem

0:59:21.200 --> 0:59:25.120
<v Speaker 2>to not really go for the hard stuff, and the

0:59:25.240 --> 0:59:27.480
<v Speaker 2>idea might be, well, maybe they don't want to get

0:59:27.480 --> 0:59:30.400
<v Speaker 2>slashed on super right fruit because they have to fly

0:59:30.560 --> 0:59:33.200
<v Speaker 2>everywhere and that could get them into problems.

0:59:33.440 --> 0:59:35.760
<v Speaker 3>Right. Nature makes wine, but I'm not going to drink

0:59:35.800 --> 0:59:36.600
<v Speaker 3>it because I've got to.

0:59:36.600 --> 0:59:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Drive home right right, so you know, And in the

0:59:39.320 --> 0:59:42.640
<v Speaker 2>paper the authors here discuss in abriation in various animals

0:59:43.240 --> 0:59:46.600
<v Speaker 2>driving home that numerous studies have pointed to animals displaying

0:59:46.720 --> 0:59:52.000
<v Speaker 2>decreased coordination and other negative physiological effects that can result

0:59:52.080 --> 0:59:57.360
<v Speaker 2>in reduced fitness via greater susceptibility to predation as well

0:59:57.440 --> 1:00:02.400
<v Speaker 2>as like fatal and debilitating accidents. And you know, sometimes

1:00:02.520 --> 1:00:05.280
<v Speaker 2>we humans have to be reminded. But this is also

1:00:05.520 --> 1:00:07.680
<v Speaker 2>this also can be the result of alcohol consumption and

1:00:07.760 --> 1:00:10.720
<v Speaker 2>human beings as well. We may like how it makes

1:00:10.800 --> 1:00:13.840
<v Speaker 2>us feel, but it can certainly make us more susceptible

1:00:13.880 --> 1:00:17.600
<v Speaker 2>to injury via accident in many different ways. And I

1:00:17.600 --> 1:00:20.160
<v Speaker 2>suppose you know, it would also make you more susceptible

1:00:20.160 --> 1:00:23.200
<v Speaker 2>to predation in cases where an animal predator was already

1:00:23.240 --> 1:00:26.560
<v Speaker 2>in play. If there's a tiger in your backyard already,

1:00:27.200 --> 1:00:30.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe you should limit it to two beers

1:00:30.480 --> 1:00:32.800
<v Speaker 2>if you're having a backyard barbecue. That just sounds like

1:00:32.880 --> 1:00:33.840
<v Speaker 2>reasonable advice.

1:00:34.280 --> 1:00:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, I don't think I've ever thought about

1:00:36.840 --> 1:00:39.680
<v Speaker 3>it like this before, but I just realized that probably

1:00:40.440 --> 1:00:45.680
<v Speaker 3>a lot of unnecessary and dangerous human wild animal interactions

1:00:45.720 --> 1:00:49.200
<v Speaker 3>are fueled by alcohol on the humans part. Like when

1:00:49.240 --> 1:00:52.040
<v Speaker 3>you see a video of somebody approaching a wild you know,

1:00:52.080 --> 1:00:54.160
<v Speaker 3>going up to a snake and trying to grab it

1:00:54.280 --> 1:00:56.600
<v Speaker 3>or go you know whatever. I've been a lot of

1:00:56.880 --> 1:00:58.960
<v Speaker 3>a lot of these cases. Some of these people might

1:00:59.000 --> 1:00:59.800
<v Speaker 3>be a few beers in.

1:01:00.200 --> 1:01:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well they have very possible. I mean, certainly humans

1:01:03.240 --> 1:01:07.280
<v Speaker 2>don't have to imbibe in order to do stupid things,

1:01:07.960 --> 1:01:13.320
<v Speaker 2>but you know it probably helps, so so yeah, I

1:01:13.360 --> 1:01:16.680
<v Speaker 2>think basically this all drives home the fact that like

1:01:16.920 --> 1:01:20.120
<v Speaker 2>the changes that take place inside a human being are

1:01:20.160 --> 1:01:23.439
<v Speaker 2>also going to be present to some degree within a bat. Yes,

1:01:23.480 --> 1:01:25.960
<v Speaker 2>we cannot fully put ourselves within the mind of the bat,

1:01:26.440 --> 1:01:29.280
<v Speaker 2>but we can see how this might play out. The

1:01:29.320 --> 1:01:32.000
<v Speaker 2>authors here point out that you know alcohol, alcohol effects

1:01:32.040 --> 1:01:37.360
<v Speaker 2>multiple tissues and functions. It can impact cognition, reaction time, coordination, reflexes,

1:01:37.600 --> 1:01:41.880
<v Speaker 2>and nerve transmission. It can make a human being trip

1:01:42.080 --> 1:01:44.760
<v Speaker 2>over something in their house and hurt themselves. And we're

1:01:44.800 --> 1:01:48.000
<v Speaker 2>just walking, we're not flying, and seeing the world through

1:01:48.560 --> 1:01:51.000
<v Speaker 2>through our screeches and then the reception of those screeches.

1:01:52.160 --> 1:01:55.360
<v Speaker 2>So with the bats here, the researchers found that yeah,

1:01:55.480 --> 1:01:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Egyptian fruit bats took longer to fly between the two

1:01:59.480 --> 1:02:01.920
<v Speaker 2>landing st in this study. I believe they use like

1:02:01.960 --> 1:02:04.880
<v Speaker 2>a hallway. So this is not like you know out

1:02:04.880 --> 1:02:08.200
<v Speaker 2>in the wild. It's in an artificial testing environment after

1:02:08.280 --> 1:02:12.960
<v Speaker 2>being fed ethanol containing food, and this, they argue, indicates

1:02:13.040 --> 1:02:17.320
<v Speaker 2>that the deterrence perceived in Egyptian fruit bats for ethanol

1:02:17.440 --> 1:02:21.560
<v Speaker 2>rich fruit is justified and that its ingestion can result

1:02:21.640 --> 1:02:25.440
<v Speaker 2>in impaired flight and reduce decolocation skills. So again, this

1:02:25.520 --> 1:02:27.280
<v Speaker 2>is one of those things that yes, it kind of

1:02:27.280 --> 1:02:29.760
<v Speaker 2>sounds like a no brainer. If a bat gets drunk,

1:02:30.040 --> 1:02:32.200
<v Speaker 2>it's not going to fly as well, it's not going

1:02:32.240 --> 1:02:35.720
<v Speaker 2>to echo locate as well. But this study seem to

1:02:35.880 --> 1:02:38.320
<v Speaker 2>bear that out as well, because again, this would hurt

1:02:38.320 --> 1:02:40.880
<v Speaker 2>the bat's ability to effectively fly from one location to

1:02:40.920 --> 1:02:43.880
<v Speaker 2>the next safely, which they're having to do through, you know,

1:02:44.360 --> 1:02:49.400
<v Speaker 2>in a varied environment with all sorts of factors tree, limbs, buildings, rocks,

1:02:49.440 --> 1:02:52.520
<v Speaker 2>and so forth, and this could potentially make them more

1:02:52.560 --> 1:02:56.320
<v Speaker 2>susceptible to predation as well. And Egyptian fruit bats have

1:02:57.080 --> 1:03:02.280
<v Speaker 2>many predators, including various raptors and owls. Also the genet

1:03:02.360 --> 1:03:06.120
<v Speaker 2>which is a cat like non feline carnivore, so it's

1:03:06.200 --> 1:03:09.760
<v Speaker 2>ultimately more related to something like a bentarong as opposed

1:03:09.760 --> 1:03:11.280
<v Speaker 2>to a cat. But you look at it and it's

1:03:11.360 --> 1:03:14.880
<v Speaker 2>very much a feline like form and you know it

1:03:14.960 --> 1:03:17.880
<v Speaker 2>is and for it, the Egyptian fruit bat is on

1:03:17.960 --> 1:03:21.640
<v Speaker 2>the menu. So again like this is a study that, yeah,

1:03:21.840 --> 1:03:24.480
<v Speaker 2>it is humorous, but I also I think the study

1:03:24.520 --> 1:03:28.120
<v Speaker 2>is worth highlighting as well because the examples of animals

1:03:28.160 --> 1:03:32.880
<v Speaker 2>that seem to readily engage in high alcohol ripe fruit consumption,

1:03:33.160 --> 1:03:35.760
<v Speaker 2>like well of course, you know humans in our own way,

1:03:35.800 --> 1:03:42.320
<v Speaker 2>but also chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas. This often overshadows cases

1:03:42.400 --> 1:03:46.320
<v Speaker 2>of animals that tend to avoid such fruits, which includes

1:03:46.560 --> 1:03:49.439
<v Speaker 2>not only Egyptian fruit bats, but orengtex They have also

1:03:49.440 --> 1:03:53.680
<v Speaker 2>been observed in the wild to avoid these super ripe

1:03:54.240 --> 1:03:58.480
<v Speaker 2>ethanol rich fruits. So good role model for the teetotalers

1:03:58.480 --> 1:03:59.680
<v Speaker 2>and the sober curious.

1:04:00.040 --> 1:04:03.600
<v Speaker 3>I guess, I guess it's an interesting question if there

1:04:03.640 --> 1:04:07.720
<v Speaker 3>are any generalizations you could make about the biological or

1:04:07.760 --> 1:04:11.600
<v Speaker 3>ecological factors that would cause an animal to be more

1:04:11.760 --> 1:04:17.360
<v Speaker 3>open to consuming ethanol in nature versus less open to it.

1:04:18.080 --> 1:04:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I don't have the hard facts, but

1:04:20.880 --> 1:04:24.280
<v Speaker 2>just thinking in general about like what does an Egyptian

1:04:24.360 --> 1:04:27.919
<v Speaker 2>fruit bat and an orangutank have in common? I mean, well,

1:04:28.000 --> 1:04:30.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, the Egyptian the orangutank does not fly, but

1:04:30.480 --> 1:04:35.080
<v Speaker 2>the orangutank does live among the tree limbs. Then there

1:04:35.080 --> 1:04:37.760
<v Speaker 2>could be an argument made that, yeah, this is there's

1:04:37.760 --> 1:04:40.280
<v Speaker 2>maybe sort of a fine tuning of your abilities that

1:04:40.400 --> 1:04:43.840
<v Speaker 2>needs to be in place here, otherwise you're going to plummet.

1:04:44.360 --> 1:04:45.720
<v Speaker 3>But then against from the ground.

1:04:45.800 --> 1:04:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, But then again, I mean many other cases

1:04:50.080 --> 1:04:53.040
<v Speaker 2>are going to involve situations where yeah, you could, you

1:04:53.040 --> 1:04:55.240
<v Speaker 2>could easily make the argument that, well, this is an

1:04:55.280 --> 1:04:58.520
<v Speaker 2>animal that has its predators, it has its environmental hazards,

1:04:58.920 --> 1:05:03.960
<v Speaker 2>and you know, any change to its physiological state via

1:05:04.000 --> 1:05:06.800
<v Speaker 2>the consumption of alcohol is going to be to its detriment.

1:05:07.880 --> 1:05:09.919
<v Speaker 2>But then I guess there's also a case to be made.

1:05:09.920 --> 1:05:13.520
<v Speaker 2>There's probably some exploration to be made anyway about available fruit,

1:05:13.600 --> 1:05:16.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, does it what are its options? Like is

1:05:16.480 --> 1:05:18.960
<v Speaker 2>there a case where there's just suddenly a glut of

1:05:19.080 --> 1:05:22.040
<v Speaker 2>super ripe fruit and that is just what is available, Like,

1:05:22.080 --> 1:05:24.520
<v Speaker 2>that's the biomass you have to consume and then you

1:05:24.640 --> 1:05:28.840
<v Speaker 2>just have to roll with the consequences or do you

1:05:29.080 --> 1:05:31.760
<v Speaker 2>have stuff to choose from? And can you do you

1:05:31.800 --> 1:05:35.160
<v Speaker 2>have the freedom then to say no, thank you to

1:05:35.200 --> 1:05:38.200
<v Speaker 2>the boozy fruit because I would prefer not to glide

1:05:38.240 --> 1:05:41.320
<v Speaker 2>into the side of a tree. Certainly something we could

1:05:41.360 --> 1:05:43.680
<v Speaker 2>come back to on the show with a deeper dive.

1:05:44.120 --> 1:05:47.040
<v Speaker 2>But again I think that often more emphasis is put

1:05:47.080 --> 1:05:50.400
<v Speaker 2>on the fact that there are animals that get drunk

1:05:50.440 --> 1:05:53.000
<v Speaker 2>off of fruit as opposed to looking at those that

1:05:53.080 --> 1:05:53.600
<v Speaker 2>avoid it.

1:05:53.880 --> 1:05:57.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, interesting, totally, all right, Well does that do it

1:05:57.680 --> 1:06:01.160
<v Speaker 3>for part one of our twenty twenty five Nobel exploration.

1:06:01.520 --> 1:06:04.040
<v Speaker 2>It certainly is, but hey, we'll be back on Thursday

1:06:04.320 --> 1:06:07.800
<v Speaker 2>with another look at this year's winners for the twenty

1:06:07.840 --> 1:06:11.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty five Ignobel Prizes, so we hope you'll join us then.

1:06:11.600 --> 1:06:13.920
<v Speaker 2>In the meantime, we'd like to remind everyone out there

1:06:13.920 --> 1:06:15.800
<v Speaker 2>that Stuff to Blow Your Mind is primarily a science

1:06:15.800 --> 1:06:18.400
<v Speaker 2>and culture podcast, with core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays,

1:06:18.440 --> 1:06:21.240
<v Speaker 2>a short form episode on Wednesdays, and on Fridays. We

1:06:21.240 --> 1:06:23.280
<v Speaker 2>set aside most serious concerns to just talk about a

1:06:23.280 --> 1:06:25.400
<v Speaker 2>weird film on Weird House Cinema.

1:06:25.920 --> 1:06:29.600
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway.

1:06:30.000 --> 1:06:31.640
<v Speaker 3>If you would like to get in touch with us

1:06:31.640 --> 1:06:34.240
<v Speaker 3>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

1:06:34.280 --> 1:06:36.280
<v Speaker 3>a topic for the future, or just to say hello,

1:06:36.440 --> 1:06:39.240
<v Speaker 3>you can email us at contact stuff to Blow your

1:06:39.280 --> 1:06:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Mind dot com.

1:06:47.800 --> 1:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

1:06:50.840 --> 1:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

1:06:53.760 --> 1:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.