WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance: BlackRock's Kate Moore

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts.

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Radio News.

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 3>We begin with our top story, It's Share Pale Day one,

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 3>the Fed chap heading to Capitol Hill, where he's expected

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 3>to reiterate the Central Bank's call to wait and see

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 3>on rate cuts. Black Ross Kate Moore saying this where

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 3>prices continue to moderate, inflation is still running above target,

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 3>and we believe the Fed needs to feel a higher

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 3>degree of confidence before rushing to cut rates. We view

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 3>rate cuts will likely be appropriate in twenty four and

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 3>we believe that a June first cut is realistic. Kate

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Moore joins us now for more. Kate, great to catch

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 3>up with you ahead of this testimony from Shairman Powell.

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 3>We've pushed out the time of the call, We've reduced

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 3>the magnitude, and stocks have done Okay. A thing for

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 3>us this morning is just how important, how relevant is

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 3>monetary policy to this equity market as we speak.

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 4>I think people are still fixated, of course, on inflation

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 4>and on kind of the messaging and tone from monetary

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 4>policy decision makers. That said, I look at the internals, John,

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 4>and what has been performing within the equity market. It

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:08.839
<v Speaker 4>has been fundamentals that have been driving stock prices much

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 4>more than just expectations around inflation.

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>So when we initially got excited.

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 4>About inflation coming down a disinflationary trend and rate cuts

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 4>in twenty twenty four, there was a pop in some

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 4>really kind of lower quality stuff that was getting hit

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 4>hard on higher rates for longer. But what is performed

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.759
<v Speaker 4>today and what is performing right now in this market

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 4>are companies that are putting up good numbers on earnings,

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 4>that have been raising guidance, and that have very strong fundamentals.

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to talk about it to we're blue

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>in the face.

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:43.400
<v Speaker 4>Inflation and FED policy and parsing all of the speeches

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 4>is going.

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>To be what we do for hours on end.

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 4>That said, we really have to focus on what companies

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 4>can perform in this economy in order to make money.

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Okay, for years you and I were talking about price

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:56.919
<v Speaker 3>and power when inflation was high, they had this ability

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 3>to kick up prices and boost marchins. Have you impressed

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 3>by their ability to preserve margins given the bank drop currently?

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I don I think you're asking this question because

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 4>you know, I have great faith and confidence in the

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 4>US corporate sector to continue to maintain margins even through

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 4>lots of last year, where prices were rising and where

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 4>there was a lot of strain, we saw companies continuously

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 4>focus on maintaining margins and think about strategies that would

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 4>allow them to expand their.

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Margins in twenty twenty four.

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 4>I'm actually very optimistic, and I think this is the

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:30.639
<v Speaker 4>consensus of a lot of analysts on the street that

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 4>margins will gradually expand over the course of this year

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 4>as prices come down and as companies continue to focus

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 4>have this laser focus on maintaining and expanding margins.

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>This is going to be critical for.

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 4>The fundamentals, and as I said, the fundamentals are going

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 4>to underpin equity risk and sentiment I think for the

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 4>balance of this year.

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 2>So your overweight risk assets strongly overweight risk assets piling

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 2>on shrugging off all the bubbletalk. Are bonds a good

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 2>diversifier or right now? Are they the toxic ones at

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 2>a time of concern about deficits and inflation being stickier

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 2>for a longer period of time.

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Look, we have a significant portion of our portfolio

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 4>and bonds, but we're not massively overweight when it comes

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 4>to say treasuries. You know, we're seeing a more opportunity

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 4>in the credit side. I think the fixingcum plays an

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:20.239
<v Speaker 4>important part in a balanced like allocation portfolio. That said,

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 4>there are lots of parts of fixed incum that are

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 4>more attractive than others, and we've.

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Used cash as a tool aggressively. Over the last you know,

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>twelve to eighteen months.

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 4>We're seeing more alternatives and currency opportunities as well. So

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 4>I think we need to think holistically about the acid

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 4>class opportunity set. Even though Lisa, you know this, I'm

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 4>very constructive on equities for the balance of the year.

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 4>We're going to get this periodic pullbacks, but I think

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 4>that is where you're going to deliver the bulk of

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 4>your returns for a multi assid portfolio.

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Kay, I've been putting together a project where I'm trying

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 2>to collect all the worries and put them on a

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 2>list and then take them off as people basically shrug

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 2>them off.

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any to put on the list?

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 4>Of course, I mean I barely last night thinking about

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 4>all of my worries. No, Lisa, for sure, there are

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 4>a couple things that really concern me.

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 4>One of the things I'm focused on, and we were

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 4>paying attention to this with target reporting yesterday was what

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 4>is the true health of the US consumer? Some of

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 4>the data gets amasked by the higher end or kind

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 4>of well, think about the upper two quintile of earners

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 4>and you know, does low end consumer continue to show

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 4>cracks and what does discretionary demand look like?

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I worry a little bit about that.

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.159
<v Speaker 4>I'm frankly worry a little bit about the election cycle

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 4>having an impact on overall spending. We've seen in previous

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 4>election cycles that companies pull back or hold back on

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 4>non essential capex as they're waiting for you know, trying

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 4>to figure out who the next administration is going to

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 4>be and what that policy will look like. So I

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 4>worry that that could have a dampening effect on overall economy.

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 4>And then I worry a decent amount around the impact

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 4>that geopolitical risk and geopolitical tensions could have on multinationals

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 4>in terms of their overall operations. Does any of this

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 4>like take my enthusiasm out of the SMP and NASDAC

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 4>not fully, but I think these are things that could

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 4>be risks for certain sectors as we look through the year.

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, it was going through year old coves at the

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 3>end of last year credit where it's too top favorite

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 3>markets US one Japan the other US up by six

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 3>point five percent, MIK two twenty five, twenty percent this year.

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 3>What was it that you liked about Japanese equities? What

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:21.599
<v Speaker 3>is it that you still like about Japan.

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:24.600
<v Speaker 4>We've seen a bunch of small green shoots, I would say,

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 4>across the Japanese equity space, and there was also a

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 4>large positioning and.

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Technic technical component.

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 4>John, you know, the Japanese equities have been underloved for

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 4>some time. We continue to see you know, stronger growth

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 4>across Asia and with some of the trading partners that

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 4>we thought would bolster earnings across the Japanese corporate sector,

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 4>and we, like a lot of people, remain hopeful that

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 4>we will continue to see a change in BOJ policy

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 4>over the balance of this year, which will change sentiment

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 4>for the overall ASSAD class.

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I will say US is our largest.

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:55.359
<v Speaker 4>Overweight by a long stretch, and that's where we're taking

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 4>our concentrated equity risk. But I think Japan continues to

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 4>bear some food and will continue to have an overweight

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 4>there through coming quarters.

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 3>Some pretty decent fruit, that's for sure. Kate Moore of

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 3>black Rock. Congrats on a call, Big call Japan. Just

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 3>massive out performance year today so far,