WEBVTT - Draft Episode for May 26, 2021

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene. Along

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferroll and Lisa Brownwitz. Daily we bring you

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcast, Suncloud, Bloomberg dot com,

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:29.639
<v Speaker 1>and of course, on the Bloomberg Terminal. So this Morning

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>with Francie Lacuai featured one of the great market calls

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>of all time, David mal Past years ago at bear

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Stearns screaming about the end of the end of deflation

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>in Japan. It was one of the truly great calls

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of the early part of the last decade. He is

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 1>now President of the World Bank. David mel Past joins

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>us this morning. David, you have always been one to say,

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>let markets act. The market for menu factured vaccines is

0:00:57.040 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>out there. Is it a legitimate market or is it

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>held up now by politics? Is so many nations are

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>desperate for vaccination. Hi, Tom, they are desperate, and I

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's really important that the countries that have excess

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>free up those excess so they can go to countries

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>which have vaccination programs. It's important to do that. Matching

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>between the halves and the ones that are ready to

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>actually put shots in arms. We have World Bank has

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>will have fifty countries by mid year that are ready

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>with with the personnel standing by, ready to put shots

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in arms if the world will only let the vaccines flow.

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's not really a market. It's controlled a lot

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:44.039
<v Speaker 1>by the various governments and the options that they took out.

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>That was good because it got supply going, but now

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a chance to really distribute the supply worldwide. Who

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>is your most important phone call to Washington or to

0:01:54.280 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>London to get this done. I've talked with the US administration.

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>There's several different parts of the administration. There's UH, there's

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the the NSC, and the there's the HHS, the Health

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and Human Services Department, and so it's I think there's

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>there's got to be a consensus within the US that

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>there is sufficient supply and therefore it can be released.

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>And I emphasize to countries that have programs in place.

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 1>You saw the New York Times article I guess yesterday

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>which described the waste that's going on for some of

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the distribution outlets. They go to countries that can't use it,

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and then the vaccines are burned because they've they've expired,

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 1>So we want to avoid that and actually get people

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:44.919
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated that have systems in place. I repeat. The World

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Bank has fifty programs UH will will have uh nearly

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollars more than four billion dollars ready to

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>pay if someone needs money to facilitate and importantly, the

0:02:56.600 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>money can go to actual deployment within countries so that

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>they can they can vaccinate we hope hundreds of millions

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:08.079
<v Speaker 1>of people. Meanwhile, the US has actually started to release

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>much more vaccine to other nations that are in need recently.

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>How much has a distribution. The increased distribution from the

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>US and other companies other countries forestalled the emerging markets

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>crisis the World Bank has been seeing brewing. It's important

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to note what the delivery schedules for those vaccines are

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and to know if they're going into countries that are

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>prepared to receive the vaccines and actually and actually UH

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>deploy them, you know, put shots in arms. UH. And

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the one of the big challenges in the

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>developing countries really worldwide is the hesitancy. Some people don't

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>want to don't want to be vaccinated, So one of

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the things we're doing in in our in client countries

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>is have a communications effort by the country to encourage

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>people to be vaccinated. That's going to say of lives

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>UH and it also brings the economies back on stream.

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's important to be vaccinated and to have a

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>program of vaccination in these countries. I don't know where

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the us UH supplies are going, and I think you know,

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I've called for much greater transparency in terms of the

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>supply we have. The World Bank has put up a

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>major website that shows all of our program documents. You know,

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>it takes a lot of preparation for countries to actually

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>show they can vaccinate. So each of the documents is

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, as much as fifty pages describing who will

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>do the vaccinations, what the what the system within each

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>country is in order to do it fairly, and how

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>how they'll be paid for, how the costs will be

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>paid for. So I've encouraged others to do that to

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the transparency is important, David. This is a sensitive question.

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>There's a question of which vaccine which countries actually receive,

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and it comes as independent studies show that, for example,

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Chinese vaccines have not been as efficacious as those created

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>by Visor and MODERNA. Is the World Bank placing an

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>emphasis on the type of vaccine, the brand of vaccine

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that is received and given it to specific countries, or

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 1>is it any vaccine treated equally. They need to be

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 1>w h O approved or approved by a by a

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a regulatory agency the US, Europe, Japan, UH and there's

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>only a few that have been approved. But but one

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>thing I emphasize is most of the vaccines are better

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>than not being vaccinated, and so that's important. Are initially

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>in our in our in our January and February programs, UH,

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it was it was mostly Visor and MODERNA and we're

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>still we're still using that. But it's very important that

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 1>Astra Zeneca, that Johnson and Johnson, that the Chinese vaccine,

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>even which has now been approved at least initially by

0:05:57.160 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>w h O, are available and when ctly. Our programs

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 1>allow different vaccines to be distributed in different parts of

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a country. Rural areas may want a different vaccine than

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 1>hospitals and made your cities, and we've described that in

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>our programs. That's a really important part of getting the

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 1>job done properly. So we're able to accept and use

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>all of those that I mentioned. Uh, and there will

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>be more, which is which is great. Uh. And we

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>can also acquire or receive vaccines through kovacs the International Consortium,

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>if it has supplied. That's been one of the challenges

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and that was discussed in the New York Times article yesterday. David.

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>That's an important distinction. And as always we appreciate your time.

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>You're often generous with it, So thank you, David Malpas

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:52.919
<v Speaker 1>that the World Bank President how Would Walked, joined us

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 1>now compaty fun Sea of growth equities. Howard, what an

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.279
<v Speaker 1>important transition point for this economy is You've pointed out

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>pink growth is here potentially and we're about to make

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>this transition from recovery to expansion. How it is a

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>market participant? How do you think about that dynamic? Hevin Polton?

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Is it? Well, first of all, it's been I think

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you have to say that we can argue about the

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>amount of stimulus, what the Feds done and all the spending,

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.559
<v Speaker 1>but it's been very successful. The economy is rip roaring,

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and this is the quarter where we will transition from

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>recovery to expansion, and we don't know the exact data

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>on then maybe it's today. Maybe we expansion has just

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>begun this morning. I don't know, but uh, the outlook

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>remains sterling. In terms of growth. You're looking at six

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>percent plus growth this year. We haven't seen that in

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>this country since after last year we had negative three

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent growth, the worst growth since nine

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and next year we're looking for a slowdown to aout

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>four percent. We haven't even had that for twenty years.

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>And so the stimulus and the reopening in the economy

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>is providing a tremendous lift. And I do think you

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>were talking about the bank lending earlier. I do think

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you're going to see the demand for lawns pick up.

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>It has to, given what's going on in the general economy. Howard,

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>were you talk about the rocky road ahead. We had

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a lovely move here coming out of this expansion, and

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you are enthusiastic, But you talk about a grind and

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>you talk about a rocky tape. What I n if

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm enjoying a rocky tape day to day? Well, I

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>would first of all just make the point that typically

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>in the second year after you get the big advance

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>in the market coming off the bottom, that second year

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.599
<v Speaker 1>usually is much more muted, you know, think returns in

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the sort of eight to twelve percent range, not range.

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>And if you went back and compared the current trajectory

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of the market to what happened coming out of the

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>oh nine bottom, we've been following that path very closely.

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>And if we do continue to follow that path or

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that script, then we will have a hiccup or two

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 1>in the next six months, because in two thousand and ten,

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>after a surging market in two thousand and nine, that's

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly what happened. Now that market is still close higher

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and ten, and I think it will

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>be nicely higher this year. Uh, particularly so because I

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>think even more so than in two thousand and ten.

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Earnings outlook is is truly uh remarkable, to say the least,

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>because the while the consensus earnings expectations would be for

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>growth of about thirty this year and next year, so

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 1>two dollars on the SMP this year, two oh five,

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>two oh six next year. Tom if you look at

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter earnings that have been reported, the annualized

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:42.079
<v Speaker 1>runway on those is around two hundred dollars. So that

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:46.319
<v Speaker 1>would suggest that the consensus earnings numbers for both this

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>year and next year are materially lower that can be

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>substantially higher, and so I do think that, Yeah, I

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna have a rocky tape. We've seen that

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Rates are are and should be grinding

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>higher in tangent with an economy this strong and with

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>some heightened inflationary fears. And it's going to be that

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>grinding higher interest rates that creates the rocky tape. But

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>beyond that, the outlook at mean is very positive. I

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>would not be too cute in trying to trade this market.

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>It's too early to turn your back on this school market.

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Just real quick here, I'm wondering what is priced in,

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly to US equities at this point, given the fact

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that Janie Henderson just upgraded their forecast for global dividend

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>payments to one point three six trillion dollars this year,

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the third highest on record, Well, there's a lot priced in,

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:39.319
<v Speaker 1>and and so you're talking if you looked at those

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>consensus numbers and markets, you know, twenty three or so

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>times for twelve month earnings historically, you know, for example,

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand nineteen, when rates were in the low

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:55.559
<v Speaker 1>two percent range, on the tenure, you had the marketed

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>around sixteen and a half times fuller learnings, So there's

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big gap there. And uh, we should be

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>returning to an environment over the next six to twelve

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>months where that tenure yield us back in that two

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and a quarter to two and a half percent range.

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>That's that's my opinion. And so if you go back

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.319
<v Speaker 1>to that range, that should call, you know, maybe for

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>some pressure on equity prices. But but I'll have to

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>go back to my comment on earnings. If we earned

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>over two hundred dollars this year and to maybe even

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to thirty five next year. Uh, and interest rates are

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>moving higher, who's gonna want to own anything but stocks?

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, bonds that are going to be negative returns.

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>The last twelve months, bonds went nowhere bonsibly negative stocks

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>are really the only game in town. And so I

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>think that people have to bear that in mind. We

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 1>could be getting a lot of money coming out of

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:54.439
<v Speaker 1>both cash where a lot of money went during the

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>last twelve months, both cash as well as fixed income

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 1>in order to fuel continue games and are a lot

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:02.319
<v Speaker 1>of money still that how we got a lady that

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>how it will that abuty fund seat of growth, Sancuty.

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 1>What we're doing economics is we have death siles ten

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of the American public, say is one estimation. Jared Bernstein

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>is expert at the analysis, the breaking apart, the slicing

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>dicing of those death siles, those one tenths of the

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:30.319
<v Speaker 1>American public. He is with the White House Council of

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Economic Advisors and has been a lead advisor to the

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>President of the United States for over a decade. Dr Bernstein,

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us today. Do you

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>have an understanding now about which death siles have been

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 1>advantaged by this historic fiscal stimulus? Who's benefited? Yeah, I know,

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a great question. One of the things you see

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>when the job market tightens up, and this has been

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a theme of my work for decades, is that those

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>in the bottom half we be the bottom I've deciles,

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 1>if you want to stick to that metric, um UH

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>benefit disproportionately. When the job market tightens up. You see

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the black unemployment rate come down faster. In those situations,

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you see the wages of low wage workers get a

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>bigger pop. They're just a lot more sensitive to the

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>kinds of bargaining power benefits that come from a full

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:25.959
<v Speaker 1>employment economy, so heading back the full employment as quickly

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>as possible is one of the goals of our of

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>our fiscal policy, and the American Rescue Plan is clearly

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>helping to pull the recovery forward. Not unlike comments I've

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>heard on your show this very morning, the kind of

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>outcomes that you'd expect maybe later on the psycho charity,

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>you starting to see them develop a little bit earlier

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:48.079
<v Speaker 1>than anticipated. I'm sorry, what were you asking about in

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>terms of the outcomes you'd expect in the labor market

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>later on in the cycle, which is when you really

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:55.599
<v Speaker 1>really start to erode some of the slack. Are you

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>starting to see some of those symptoms earlier in the cycle.

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:00.439
<v Speaker 1>We're starting to see them now, as as to say

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>several years down the line. I think you're seeing a few,

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's more anecdotal and scattered. It really hasn't shown

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>up in the data yet. If you look at the

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 1>wage data adjusted for compositional effects, you see some promising

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>hints here and there, and you certainly hear anecdotal wage

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>offers that are getting a bump. I do think lower

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>wage workers have some bargaining power based on these dynamics

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that we've been talking about. But remember, we still have

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a highly elevated unemployment rate north of six percent. For blacks,

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment rate is nine point seven percent, So we

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>still have a long way to go. But yeah, we're

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing some hints in that regard, and I like

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the way you teed it up, John, which is eroding slack.

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>That's precisely that that's just so important to middle and

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>low wage workers at the moment. There's another dynamic that

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>has become very political Charitis. I'm sure you'll appreciate more

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>than twenty Republican states, the governors have basically gotten rid

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of the extra additional unemployed and insurance. What do you

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>think the consequence of that decision will be in the day, Sat,

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that would expect to see in the coming month, coming

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>complements deeper into sum up. Yeah, it's it's it's a

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a good question. And and here's you know, one

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of the natural experiments that economists love to tap um.

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:20.479
<v Speaker 1>And we're we're definitely concerned about taking off enhanced unemployment

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>benefits too soon. Every state's going to act on its own,

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and obviously, economic conditions differ across states. The President has

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>leaned into this pretty firmly, saying that, you know, people

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>who are offered a suitable, safe job need to take it.

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>That's part of the rules of the unemployment insurance system.

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>But this system has been so important to helping workers,

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>not just the standard based system, but also the added

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>enhanced benefits for workers who are less connected to unemployment

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>because maybe they're gig workers, are self employed, and so

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it's really helped people get through the recovery, gets i'm sorry,

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>get through the crisis to the other side. And along

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>with the distribution of the vaccine, it's been one of

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the more important parts, you know, shots and arms, checks

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and pockets. That's been part of the formula. Jared, do

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you see the enhanced unemployment benefits as being a template

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>or serving as a template going forward for some sort

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of universal basic income, especially if the participation rate continues

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to fall as it has over recent decades. You know,

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a fair question. I would probably say the direct

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>impact payments are the checks are closer to that than

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the UI the unemployment insurance payments. I mean, unemployment insurance

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>is just that it's a specific insurance program, a safety

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>net for people who lose their jobs. And it's one

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that those course has been in place for many, many decades.

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 1>It's proved to be an extremely important countercyclical force. I

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>do think the system needs work, and the administration is

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>very committed to doing that. If you listen to the

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>President's discussion of making sure that the next time we

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>hit it down trip we hit it with the with

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>with the UI system, that's that's more ready for that.

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>That that I think is an important part of our

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of policy infrastructure, that that that we're we're committed

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to working on dr pruting. I want you to speak

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to a small business out there that is petrified of

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>what they see from fancy, big corporations of fifteen dollars

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:18.120
<v Speaker 1>an hour, seventeen dollars an hour and up and up wages.

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I want you to study David Card and the wonderful

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Alan Krueger and the arch fear that if we raise

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:28.679
<v Speaker 1>those low minimum wages, all the other wages come up

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>with it. What's your evidence on that study? Yeah, So

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>this is a very consistent finding around minimum wage increases.

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>So that if if the minimum wage goes up, many

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 1>studies have found that there are spillover effects that give

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a bump to workers right above that minimum wage level. Again,

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned earlier, we are we are seeing increases

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>in low wage offers, uh. And I think that's really

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.640
<v Speaker 1>important to people who are coming back into the labor market.

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Think of it as a price signal. You know, I

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 1>was thinking of you the other day, Tom, because I

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>was sort of thinking of this in my head, and

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm what I thought was kind of a Keenian way,

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>which was sort of like Cane's meets Highak. You know,

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the idea that the stimulus both on the fiscal and

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>monetary side, really relief on the fiscal and monetary side,

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the the uh, the monetary policy uh

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>also also helping to move the recovery forward. You've got

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>price signals. You've got price signals. You've got price signals

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that are that are that are pulling workers back into

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the labor force. You've got the vaccine out there, fifty

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>percent of adults vaccinated, way ahead of our schedule. And

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>I think those are all very promising developments. I mean,

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>he does this right at the end of the interview,

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 1>John Ferroll. I mean, Dr Burnstein has set this up huge.

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna come back. Dr Burnstein. And I don't mean

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>on jobs today. We love day have you with John

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>on jobs? Say, after the report, you've got to come

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>back and we've got to talk about the information that's

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>out there that we can't see. We gotta go on

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the edge of Joe Stigler and you know the others

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of the information. Just because he said he was thinking

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 1>of you want him back, I only wanted he was thinking, Jared,

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>do you look at the dal Jones industrial average? Yeah,

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I've heard about that. When you're in the Here's the thing.

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 1>When you're in the White House, you're you're very careful

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>not to react every blip in any index, you know,

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>minute to minute or day to day. Much more heads down,

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>keep recovery going, deliver the goods to the middle class.

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's a very diplomatic accounts of that. Yeah,

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>it's always think, always going to get you on the show.

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, sir, besting that house trying to us right now,

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and I am going to rip up the script here

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and I can do that. Of course with the gentleman

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 1>from the Dakota is Kevin Kramer is with orth Dakota,

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I've always got to keep my Dakota is careful here,

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:04.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be careful what I do. Senator Kramer, I want

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 1>to stop for a moment for you to speak of

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:10.639
<v Speaker 1>the symbolism of your Republican Party and the path from

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>John Warner dying today at ninety four over to the

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>modern Republican party you have identified. I love the idea

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:22.199
<v Speaker 1>that I think, like Lincoln, you lost your first three elections.

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Tell me how your GOP keeps the Republicans like John

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Warner and frankly, Senator Deportment of Ohio in the full

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>how do you keep these liberal Republicans in the party? Well, no,

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>thanks for the question. Actually, you know, pragmatism works, and

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that one of the things that Donald Trump

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:46.360
<v Speaker 1>brought to the Republican parties he brought the working class

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 1>Americans to the Republican Party. I think at the end

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of his four years, one of the things we lost

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 1>perhaps are not so much moderates as as probably that

0:20:55.800 --> 0:21:00.199
<v Speaker 1>the polite uh, you know, moderates if you will, um

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly the suburban suburban women for example. All of that said,

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that we we take the Trump mantra, and

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:11.399
<v Speaker 1>that is to say, the more um less globalist but

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>on America first, globalism, a populism, conservatism, and apply it

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>in a gentler way, not not not shyly, by the way,

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>but I think we have the right governing philosophy to

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 1>be a majority party. And I just think that. And

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and the other thing is this, quite honestly, Joe Biden

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 1>is going to help us immensely if we can get

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>out of our own way and keep highlighting the you know,

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the Biden agenda, which includes everything from destroying American energy

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:41.439
<v Speaker 1>while building up Iran and in Saudi Arabia and Russian energy. Uh,

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>if we talk about, you know, putting so much money

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 1>into the marketplace, um that we create hyper inflation, and

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 1>all the other stuff, the border crisis, what's going on

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Middle East, his lack of attention to the

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>really big issues. You know, there's nothing like a common

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 1>opponent to help unite people. But I do think our

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>own message, to your point, needs to be the Trump

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>message delivered in a way that people are listening, and

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the lessons learned of losing the presidency, losing the House,

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>losing the Senate. Granted, these are by all small numbers.

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand twenty two, beccons, how do you coalesced

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the GOP on social issues so removed from the core

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump constituency, and I might say social issues that Senator

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Warner of Virginia lead with through the seventies and the eighties. Yeah.

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's a couple of things. On one

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>is we're seeing a trend that actually does benefit us,

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a demographic trend, and that is the Hispanic Americans are

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>coming for our way, and they came more our way

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>under Donald Trump. They became our our way because of

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump because they identified more as a working class

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Americans than they do as Hispanic Americans, which is really

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the heart of the American dream. I think we take

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that same social message and social message that is job

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>creation and and pro family. You don't have to apologize

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>for being a family. Have to certainly understand the culture

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:05.199
<v Speaker 1>you live in and and and speak to it. But um,

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that we need, you know, we need to

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 1>get back in many cases to our roots, but also

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 1>remembering that the working class American, the forgotten man and woman,

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>is still out there and they're still looking for a voice.

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>And Donald Trump was that voice. And I think we

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 1>can continue to give, you know, give that voice, but

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>at the same time recognizing that the world's a shrinking place.

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>And and we also have to remind people that are

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>all of this that we cherish so much depends on

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a really strong military. And we have to remind people

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:39.919
<v Speaker 1>that we didn't used to have a near peerle adversary

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>in China, but now we do. Um. You know, the

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Soviet Union broke up, but in many respects is coming

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 1>back in the person. Senator. There's a question of giving

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a voice to the working class Americans, and there's also

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a question of creating the right economic backdrop for them.

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I believe a coalition of Republicans are about to propose

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 1>count to propose a one trillion dollar plan to present

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Biden's infrastructure spending initiative. Do you have a sense of

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>what's in it and whether you would sign on to this? Sure? Great,

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>great question. Um, I do have some sense of it,

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and I likely would sign on to it. In fact,

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:17.239
<v Speaker 1>I think I've always thought we could go bigger than

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>than we've gone as Republicans while maintaining our philosophy and

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>our integrity, and that is a couple of things. So

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I actually am the ranking Republican of the Transportation Infrastructure Subcommittee,

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to mark up our surface transportation bill today,

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's been negotiated between the four corners that

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>include Tom Carper, Shelley Moore, Capital, Ben Cardon, and myself,

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and and that's going to be a good step in

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the right direction. We can go bigger on that simply

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 1>by adding another year or two to the authorization. One

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I'd like to see is I'd

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 1>like to see US expand infrastructure. I know Republicans say

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>let's keep it to the you know, the hard concrete issues,

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not against that, but I think when you

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 1>take energy as an example, pipe lines, transmission lines. I

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 1>had a long visit just Friday with Jennifer Granholme in

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the Secretary of Energy and said, the beautiful thing about

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 1>energy infrastructure is it is infrastructure. It does move commerce

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to the marketplace, it does create really high paining jobs,

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 1>it does have a national security implication to it, and

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't require any spending on the part of the

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>federal taxpayer. So I think you can get to a

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars by having some simple permitting and regulatory reforms

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that maintain the integrity of our environmental excellence while at

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the same time unleashing the private sector investment. And here's

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the other thing, you guys. By putting more money in

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>investment in American energy rather than Iranian and Russian energy,

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>you actually help the climate in the environment because we

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:45.880
<v Speaker 1>produce even fossil fuels with a much lower car footprint

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>in other countries do Senator, what's the distinction between going

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>even bigger in the proposal that you're talking about and

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 1>the one point seven trillion dollar the dollars plan that

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 1>President Biden is talking about, especially when you talk about

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.200
<v Speaker 1>high inflation rates. Why is the plan that you're proposing

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>not gonnagonnite inflation or is the other one? You say, well, yeah,

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:09.120
<v Speaker 1>because ours doesn't involve more federal spending or more borrowing

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:12.159
<v Speaker 1>or you know, more printing of money. To the degree

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we can repurpose the fifty billions to a trillion dollars

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>it's already been appropriated but won't be spent by the

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>end of this fiscal year. That's not new taxes, that's

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 1>not new printing. So that actually puts that that liquidity

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>if you will, to work in the marketplace in a

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:32.239
<v Speaker 1>way that creates jobs and creates an asset that at

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the end has a value and has you know, the

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:38.159
<v Speaker 1>movement of goods and services throughout the country. So I

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:41.439
<v Speaker 1>actually think that we do just the opposite by by

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>going bigger, as long as we're not printing new money

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>or borrowing more money. Senator, the only reason we had

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 1>you on is Lisa A. Bramowitz puts down the German

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:55.360
<v Speaker 1>skillet at Crolls Diner like nobody in Fargo, North Dakota.

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to do this in February, but we

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>need a surveyor's road trips so Lisa can remember her

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>years in Fargo, North Dakota. I'm thinking pheasant hunting, and

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:09.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe in the autumn September, October, can we

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>get that done. We can absolutely get that done. Lisa

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>probably knows the perfect guide and and if she doesn't,

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 1>I'll find the best land you can go hunting on um.

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>But so so Carol's Kitchen truly one of the great

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:25.479
<v Speaker 1>institutions in North Dakota, and they know how to make

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>homemade German food. They do. Senator, thank you so much

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 1>for joining us today. He is a Senator from North Dakota.

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Kramer here on the day of the death of

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the senator from Virginia. Truly, he was a Senator from Virginia.

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>John Warner right now over to fix income Marca. John

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>was looking forward to Kathy Jones or Schwab joining us today.

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Kathy worked from home, and we've just got to understand

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 1>right now that it is too trophy taking and the

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>pandemic pianos. There is the Kathy Jones piano shot, and

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a Stephen King over at HSBC piano shot. And

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>for those of you on radio, all you need to

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 1>know is MS Jones is fabulous and piano and she

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>is a gorgeous is a Steinway, Cathy, You've got behind

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you nine thirteen Steinway Major Jermy. Okay, So that can

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 1>take us, John back to the Dow Jones industrial average

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:22.959
<v Speaker 1>and where it was a hundred twenty five years ago. Cathy,

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:27.880
<v Speaker 1>explain why yields are lower? Well, I think a couple

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>of things. We've seen some of the commodity prices come

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 1>off the boil recently. We've seen um some of the

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>indicators that were just skyrock things start to roll over

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit. You know, the markets moved up

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 1>over hundred basis points from the lows last summer so

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a consolidation. And frankly, the talk

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>about tapering canny interpreted as bullish for bonds. So if

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>you think back to two thousand fourteen, everybody remembers a

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>taper tantrum when nels shot up on talking about QUI ending,

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>but when q we actually ended, when they actually papered yields. Well,

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>so if you look at it as the first step

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 1>towards tightening, you know, it isn't surprising to me that

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>yields have come off a little bit. Can you imagine

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a scenario where this continues, then, Kathy, would that be

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>your base case that the removal of QUI will lead

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to lower yields? No, I think we put q V aside. Frankly,

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I think on the margin it's somewhat there should allow

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>yields to rise, But I think the more important driver

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>is where is the economy going, where's inflation going? And

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the big difference between now and say after the financial

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>crisis is we have huge fiscal stimulus and we didn't

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>have that the last time around. We've been much quicker

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>to bounce back and close that output gap. So I

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>think that yields do continue to move higher from here,

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not sure that it's driven by que or

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>anything else other than the economy and inflation and inflation

0:29:57.120 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>expectations continuing to run pretty strong within the bright town

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of any given yield right now, Kathy, when you look

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 1>at inflation expectations real yields, is it real yields that

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>needs to adjust a little bit more And what kind

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of adjustment you anticipating? Yeah, that's the kind under right now.

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really sure that why really yields are as

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>low as they are. Um Partly, I think inflation expectations

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>have run up pretty rapidly and anticipation of more inflation.

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>But I do think real yields have to come back.

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's one reason we expect you'lds to go back

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>up on the tenure to two two and a half

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>percent potentially. I think, really you'lls have to adjust if

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have real growth in the economy, which

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 1>is which is what we have, Kathy, how high can

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>benchmark treasury yields go before disrupting financial markets enough to

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 1>create this feedback loop to send people back to safe havens.

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Great question. I'm not a dent sure that I have

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the right answer to that, But I think what we

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>need is what we would probably need to see is

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:00.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of that um not only to see you two

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half percentage on the tenure, but start to

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>see the value of the curve move a bit more.

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 1>It started to move of just a little bit um,

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>but you start to get the three year, five year,

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>et cetera moving up. Then the overall cost of capital

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 1>starts to don't really higher because then the refinancing that's

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>taking place five years out on the curve starts to

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 1>get more expensive. Cathy, are you going more into risk

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 1>your credit with the hope and the expectation that the

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve will backstop markets enough to allow these credits

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to continue to pay out bigger coupons giving you the

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>returns regardless of deteriorating credit quality. Should that happen, now,

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I know it's again a comemdrum in the high yield market.

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>This is a great environment for high yield because you

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 1>have all those fiscus stimulus, you have pretty easy monetary policy,

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>have the backstop from the Fed, which I think is

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 1>winding its way down, and you have some upgrades. Right

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 1>as the economy has improved and seeing some upgrades The

0:31:56.560 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 1>problem is high yields can a price for perfection to

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>take totally like trickle cs, and so we wouldn't be

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>really aggressive in that part of the credit market because

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I think at the stage of the game, you know,

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll adjust to more greater reality that some of these

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>companies aren't that aren't that solid, Kathy. What will be

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the market reaction is the real yield migrates to zero

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 1>give us a I mean, I think Schwab is such

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a expanse of what money flow will do. How will

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 1>flows in fixed income change is we're shocked by a

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>move to zero percent inflation adjusted yield. Well, you know,

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>if I just look at where our investors are, particularly

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 1>our retail clients, but even the more institutional clients, they're

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>hoping for higher yields, and they're certainly hoping for higher

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 1>real yields to extenduration. So I would expect that as

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 1>we see yields to move up, if we're right about that,

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll start to see more investor flows into longer David bonds.

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen much of that recently because they're still

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty low, but I think that as fields move up,

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 1>will definitely see it blows in that direction. You know,

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 1>people are nervous enough about risky assets. If they want something,

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 1>talk set it. If you've got positive really gields and

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 1>bonds um, definitely, I think move move in that direction.

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Canthy always get ahead from you. Thank you, Canthy Jones

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that to have sense of a financial research chief fixed

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:27.959
<v Speaker 1>account strategies. This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening.

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Join us live weekdays from seven to ten am Eastern

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television each day from

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 1>six to nine am for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and of course on

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the terminal. I'm Tom Keene and this is Bloomberg