WEBVTT - First Republic Rescue May Rely on US Backing

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg business Week Inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>global business finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebec from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm gonna say I'm so glad that we're

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>doing this segment next because I feel like coming off

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that discussion. Yeah, it's all about banks and what happens next,

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>So let's get to it. Because we did have some headlines.

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to our Bloomberg News Finance reporter Shree Natarajan.

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>He's here in our Interactive broker studio along with Herman Chance,

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>senior analyst for US Regional banks at our Bloomberg Intelligence team.

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Because we did have pack West sharing up it's liquidity first,

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Republic again under pressure, and then you had Janet yell

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and want wanta sure. Let me start with you, what

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>are the headlines as you look at this situation that

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 1>you think we need to be sharing with our audience.

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Look as I walked over to the radio booth, you

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>could see the markets taking a nose dive into the close.

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 1>But that's not all. When you look at someone like

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>First Republic going down sixteen percent. That's a stock that's

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 1>been beaten up this month, down ninety percent. This was

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 1>a three digit stop. Now that long ago, the start

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:23.279
<v Speaker 1>of the month, this was around one hundred and thirty dollars.

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Why aren't things coming down for this one with all

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the assistance it's gotten so far? Well, the question is

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>is that enough? And we have a very good story

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg right now if you read it, which gives

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you a very good explainer as to why there is

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>such reluctance in any sort of White Knight coming forward.

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 1>There is a big gaping hole in that balance sheet.

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>They break it down there. Their securities portfolio has taken

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a four billion dollar hit their loan book. And this

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>is a bank, First Republic, that has a big presence

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in the real estate market, is a big player in

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of that jumbo mortgage loans. Think about the dynamic there.

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>They must have met so many major loans with two

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>percent three percent fixed rate long term marketges that have

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously taken a hit. So you have a situation where

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>there's this twenty six point five billion dollar hole, and

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>tangible common equity is probably worth thirteen billion dollars, So

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>there's still the hole that needs to be filled. So

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not quite easy for anyone to come in without

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>possibly some sort of government backing. We've talked about that idea.

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>We believe that is at least being studied, but is

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a solution on the horizon that's unclear to us. And

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:30.639
<v Speaker 1>at three pm, in the middle of a market day,

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the Treasury Secretary speaking to the Senate,

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:36.799
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of a J. Paul press conference, when

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the bank has to put out a filing that says

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>their top executives, their CEO, the chairman, and a few

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>other executive officers are going to zero their bonus for

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the year, are going to take a salary cut. That

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really instill a lot of confidence, does it. Yeah?

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Three luck, I mean you know SVB signature first Republic

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Pack West term and feel free to jump in here.

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>There are fifty banks in the KBW regional banking induction

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>from Bank of Hay which is down thirty percent this year. That's,

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>by the way, a few hours like I think I

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>ran that thirty minutes ago to the New York Community

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:05.079
<v Speaker 1>Bank Work, which is up like ten percent in the year,

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>which other banks seem most vulnerable to you? That's a

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>risky question to answer, and in fact I would I

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>would probably sort of try and get at that by

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>looking at what has happened to the stock So what

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>are equity invest is seemingly most concerned. But and some

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of the names that we flagged, our names like pack

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>West and Western Alliance Bank of why pack West at

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 1>least some good news this morning they put out a

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:32.679
<v Speaker 1>detailed press release which a at least indicated that they

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>have showed ab liquidity measures. They've got help from Atlas

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>sp fun fact backed and owned by Apollo, which recently

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>bought the Securitized Products group from Credit SUAE rest in

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Peace and spun it off as the standalone investment firm

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that is now stepping in here to be a little

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>bit of a rescue entity for pac West, if you may.

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>They're not doing any of the capital race, but for

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>now they have more cash than uninsured deposits, and that's

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>good news. Hermann a PacWest issue. The big deposit outflow

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>was in the venture banking business, which is what SPB does,

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>what Silicon Valley Bank does. So when PacWest had venture

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 1>banking deposits down forty three percent. It just shows that

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the herd mentality of the VC community affected SVB is

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>affecting Pac West. And we also did a rid across

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>in our research today looking at Westerner Alliance, which also

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>has some technology related deposits. It's only fourteen percent of

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the total deposit base, which it should insulate them going

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>forward if we do see a similar deposit outflow from

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the technology clients. So how are you guys? I mean,

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting because we were also just talking about kind

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>of real estate exposure to and then you wonder, you

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>know what that implications will be sore? The what do

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>we need to be thinking about that should we expect

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be more problems? Tree, I mean, I

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know what are you hearing from your sources, But

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the FED chair was out there talking about the fact

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that there are some small banks that they are concerned about.

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 1>At this point, everyone is focused on First Republic because

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:11.479
<v Speaker 1>as as the term they all likely use is it's

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 1>a real bank. And the reason they say that it's

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>not a small entity it has It had about one

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventy five billion dollars in deposits at the

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>end of at the end of the year, right, So

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a reasonably sized bank. It's clearly going through a

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of problems. Not just that, but it also had

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:29.559
<v Speaker 1>this consocium eleven of the country's biggest banks coming forward

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and trying to provide it. That might just have been

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>financial hug. If you wear it is the ultimate financial hug.

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>But did it really? Not very heavy though? Exactly thirty

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars when we estimate the whole in their deposit

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>outflow was eighty nine billion, So it gives them a

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>short term bridge to a longer term solution, which we're

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>still waiting to hear what that is. Janet Yellen's comments though,

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it took out the banking sector again today, So did

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>she make a mistake? Why did she do that? She

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>had to know that there might be that impact. She

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>spoke recently at the American Baker's conference on Tuesday and

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>said that if there were a smaller institution that would fail,

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:14.279
<v Speaker 1>the regu layers would step in and guarantee of the deposits.

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 1>So the market was working under the assumption that that

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>was the case. But then she came out today near

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the market closed and said there's no blanket guarantee. So

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>those two concepts aren't directly opposed to each other, but

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:31.840
<v Speaker 1>it just doesn't instill a lot of confidence with the

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>broader market. I will point out that it is a

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 1>common that was made in Washington, d C. It is

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a common that was made in front of a lot

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>of politicians, and in that city, every single word matters,

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and there is careful word choice going on their blanket.

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>For once, I am not considering for others, because we

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>have reported that her stuff is actually considering measures on

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>how they could perhaps have a temporary increase in deposits.

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:57.280
<v Speaker 1>They've certainly given a thought considering it. Not considering a

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>blanket increase in deposit guarantee could well will mean that

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>nothing zimminine. We're not planning to do that, but are

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the scenario planning perhaps so you mentioned Washington d C. Herman,

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned Apolo. I have to ask this. Apolo's rescue

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of pack West comes on the heels of the UBS

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>acquisition of CS. My question is this he got talked

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>now Warren Bethett trying to get back involved with some

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of these bailouts, right, I mean, if you remember the GFC,

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean he was involved with all the ZACS and

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>made a killing. How do you think these deals are

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>going to work out for people like Ubs, for some

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of these other banks out there that are the acquirer.

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean to me, it seems like things are setting

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>up pretty nicely. Yeah. I would say that the UBS

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>credit Sweet Steel. It was a bit different than what

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Apollo's doing. Apollo is doing a lunch back deal where

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>if things go bad, they at least own the deposits

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and can monetize, so their risk is much lower versus

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>taking an equity stake in a regional bank that is

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>feeling some pressure. So that there are going to be

0:07:56.200 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>other types of deals like what Apolo was doing, but

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>they're not putting equity skin in the game at this point.

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>No surprise. First Republic haut to be from w by

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:11.239
<v Speaker 1>Fitch maybe cut further, No surprise. Surely if First Republic

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>can figure something out and there is something done, um,

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>does it start to calm down? Yes? Because if if, if, if, if,

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the current thinking across the spectrum is there is no

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>obvious solution, there is no easy solution. Suddenly tomorrow morning

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>you come and tell me that they have found out

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a solution that should help even with the broader sector. Yes,

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:36.199
<v Speaker 1>because when this is, this has been sparked by a

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>crisis of confidence, not not sort of any obvious irresponsible

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>risk taking to the hilt, right like these these people

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>are talking about hits to their security s portfolio, which

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>is which is not because they invest in the riskiest

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff out there, but afford to let First Republic fall

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>real quick hard to say, but the obvious answer I

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>would have to assume is no they would because then

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>if you have to find a whackamole solution, it then

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>becomes a whackamle literally because then okay, then another FDIC

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>has to step in. Then every investors then go and

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:11.599
<v Speaker 1>see which other bank would be most pressure. Then you

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>go from one to one to one to one to

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the next, and that's not a fun game to play.

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I wish we had half an hour more, but folks,

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>that's what you needed to know when it comes to banks.

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>That's where we are. Four seventeen pm. Moll Street, Time Street,

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Week podcast. Catch us live week the afternoons from three

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:37.559
<v Speaker 1>to six Eastern Listen on Bloomberg dot com, the Ihard

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>radio app, and the Bloomberg Business App or watch us

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>live on YouTube. So, by one measure, do you know,

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:47.079
<v Speaker 1>at a bit of research ahead of this segment, the

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>global cloud communication platform market likely to reach more than

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty one billion by twenty thirty compound annual growth rate

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of nearly twenty percent. So one player in that market

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 1>is the cloud based communications provider you know, the name

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.839
<v Speaker 1>Vantage are owned by Ericson and with us here in

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:04.959
<v Speaker 1>her Bloomberg Interactor Broker studio, Rory Reid, he is a

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>CEO of on It. She's also a senior VP at Ericson. Welcome, Welcome,

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Nice to have you here with Damien and myself here

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in our studio. How are you and how do you

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>feel the business environment is amid what we're seeing continued

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.319
<v Speaker 1>volatility in parts of the financial market. Well, I'm great. So,

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>first of all, thank you for having me here in

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>New York at the beginning of spring tonight. And I

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.199
<v Speaker 1>suppose you know, in the macro level it's going to

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>be choppy. There's no question and volatility, but there's choppy.

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>There's financial crisis choppy, there's choppy, Like I'm not short choppy,

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm you know, three four decades in the

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>tech space. I've seen all these cycles before. Yeah, one

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>thing is the market's going to turn, particularly in tech,

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and when it does, it turns hard and it turns well.

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be choppy for a couple, a few

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>more quarters, whatever it is. But in the meantime, what

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 1>we have to do is focus on cash flow management.

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you're managing your cash. Invest where you can

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>in market dislocations, in M and A and in your

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>product get differentiation right now because the market's there. The

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>long term tech trend is intact, and the opportunities are

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>right now to take advantage or right North America advantage

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>is core market, right. I wonder if you could just

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.679
<v Speaker 1>help me understand what scares you more the thought of

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>our recession or persistently higher inflation. You know, from a

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>standpoint of the business, our business is actually a third

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>or third or third across the globe. I think from

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a business perspective, inflation has a long term negative impact

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>on everything. It's just not good. You have to clean

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it up. A recession is temporary, it doesn't usually last

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a long time. I'm hopeful that we can move through

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>this period of volatility and what you're going to see

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>with Ericson support, we're in a very unique position. Many

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of our editors won't make it through this issue. We've

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>got the support of a company like Ericson. We can

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.319
<v Speaker 1>double down, we can build in the better products at differentiations.

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Why won't they make it down, make it through. Well,

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>many of them in the tech space have lived off

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of cheap money for a long time, so they've been

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>very speculative. So this big moving rate to the past

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>hurt them and then the Valley Bank, right, I mean,

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:14.959
<v Speaker 1>how does that impact that? It hurts them, So you

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>want what you're seeing is we've always had a positive

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>cash flow and we've managed because we had that historic

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>voiceover of IP business. And then we have the vantage

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 1>communication platform business. That's the future, that's the cloud. We'll

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>use that cash flow to make sure we have the support.

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Now you also have a huge corporate parent, right right,

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Ericson waters for six point two billion dollars last year.

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>They then give us the support underneath that we make

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the investment. Not only can we grow a core business

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:44.959
<v Speaker 1>now it's not growing at the same rate it was

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a year ago, probably half, but we'll see somewhere between

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>fifteen and twenty business and residential both not growing equally

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>or residentials definitely on a decline. That's just a cash

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.439
<v Speaker 1>flow engine for us. The cloud is the future that

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>have been growing at thirty thirty five percent right now,

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>it's probably grown somewhere between eighteen and twenty percent. Still

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:06.599
<v Speaker 1>a great business, yeah, and it's going to continue to

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>be critical because those multimodal communications you interact with companies

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>now twenty four to seven anywhere around the world, whether

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>it's voice, video, you want support, you want commerce, that's

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>just the way of the future. Every industry, you know,

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>every vertical is going to need this, and that's why

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>we got to invest now to create the differentiation for

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>our audience and those who are unaware. Eric's inquired voltage

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>just last year in July, right for six point two

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. My question is, you know, talk to us

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>about the AGM that's coming up next week for Ericson.

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Where does vantage fit into the company's you know, the

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>company enterprise five G market, Where does that fit into

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the company's future plans. You know, Ericson's amazing company. They're

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:51.319
<v Speaker 1>they're they're driving almost half of the traffic and the

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>five G space outside of China around the world. I

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>mean this is a technology leader. They see an opportunity

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to take our communication APIs that's really the cloud base,

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>bits of code that allows every enterprise to interact with customers,

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>whether it's telling you your coffee's ready or having a

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:15.679
<v Speaker 1>telemedicine environment. What they see is now we can take

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the network. What's in the network that we can expose

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to these APIs so we can create better quality of service,

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>we can create location, we can create silent authentication. Now

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>instead of you just having to type in six digits,

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>it'll know who you are by traversing the information that's

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>in the network. We're going to create a whole new

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>generation of APIs based on the network. That's a first mover.

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>And if you were at Mobile World Congress in Barcelona

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago, yeah, this was a big

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>theme in the industry. This is going to drive that

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>TELECOO space for the next five ten years. API you

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>mean application programming interface right, what they are is, that's

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>exactly what it is, Carol. And there bits of code

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that allows enterprises like you know, chocolate companies, ride sharing companies,

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>telemenacing companies to embed video voice messaging into their applications

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to reach anyone around the world who has a smartphone,

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and the smartphone what five billion of them? Yeah, there's

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a few out there, Okay, just a few. I want

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to ask you, because you were talking about geography. You

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>are global, so when you look around the world, it's

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>great when we have somebody like you in studio when

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>we are at this moment of we talk recession, we

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>talk hard landing, we talk soft landing, certainly here in

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the US, but we're looking around the world. Are the

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>stronger markets geographically we're the weaker markets. Sure, in the

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>tactical time frame. I still like the US it's strong

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>because it's growing. It's definitely growing. All our businesses are

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>growing in all geographies right now. Where the rate? Okay,

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>where's it not growing there as strongly? I think if

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you thought about it in terms of Europe and China

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>are probably the most under pressure. For sure. Would you

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>think that that has something to do with data privacy

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>concerns and piracy issues and all the things that are

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>going Yeah. Sure, where Europe, I think there's been more

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>pressure because of the inflation, the Ukraine Russia war, that's

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>put some pressure on it. Still growing India, strong, Africause,

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>reasonably strong, parts of Asia good. But it's all temporary.

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>There's definitely kind of a dislocation that's occurring, but it's

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>going to turn and we have to be prepared for

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that term. Even China and Gia politically, we certainly have

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>lots of conversations around this table about that. It's a

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>different relationship with China going forward. Certainly between the United

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>States and ship it seems that way. But we have

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a good you know, we're going to continue to deliver

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>messages for multinationals wherever they need to get that multimodal

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>communication out there. You know, it seems like a problem,

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>but again, thirty forty years things change rather quickly. Two

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>years from now, I think things could be very different

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>than they are today. I'm an optimist, for sure, but

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I also plan. I'm an optimist. I cover emergent markets

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm a I'm a New York Jet fan, so

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm a I'm an ever optimist, but I've managed by

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.640
<v Speaker 1>opics and I make sure I keep the headcount under

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:19.360
<v Speaker 1>continent political pressures between the US and China. And yet

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>as a global company, you guys still have a lot

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 1>of business in China or with China. We have a

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>reasonable presence in China, but you can say that the course,

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>even though there can be that disconnect between you never know.

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>So you never know. But what we have to do

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>is continue to grow, continue to deliver the value to

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>our multinationals, the digital natives around the planet, and continue

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to create the differentiated product solutions that they need. Well,

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>let's bring it back today. I mean, let's bring it

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>back close at a home there. Let's talk about the

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>reason the US banking system and SVB in particular. You know,

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, are there any lasting damage that you see,

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 1>maybe not to your company, but to your clients that

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>this is going to leave them with? I mean, do

0:17:57.560 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you see do you potentially see some of these venture

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 1>in early stage growth companies going under because of US? Well,

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Silicon The bank issue, particularly that one,

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>is huge. I think what they have to do is

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>contain it now, and I think they're working to make

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>sure they do that. I think the bigger pressure is

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>companies that were able to survive on a very marginal

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 1>business model. Yeah, because money was so cheap. They need

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to create business models that are more cash flow positive

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and with less burn, and I think because of the

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 1>market entreprenturnialists will adjust so orrige just ten seconds or

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>does that mean because of some of the cracks you

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>may be seeing with a smaller competitors, I think there's

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 1>an acquisition move potentially as a result, real quickly. There's

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>no question, there's absolutely you need to take advantu Yes,

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>And there's always an opportunity. These market issues and volatility,

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>they're opportunities. Find them. The market will change and it

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 1>will return, and it will return fast and strong. Well,

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you were fun with us, and we were a little

0:18:58.000 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of a rapid fire, but we really appreciate it.

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Rory Reid, Chief Executive Officer A vantage.

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio, you're listening to

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:11.959
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 1>from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>Business App and YouTube. You can also listen live on

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just say

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. I'm bro bloom a journal.

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>How about you let me drive? Oh no, no, no, no,

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 1>who's going to drug home, honey, please, I'll do the

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>bride rebels. Lest I want to drive. It's good question drives.

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the Drive to the closet. Punk music. Well,

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>jog down on Bloomberg Radio. All right, very good afternoon, everybody.

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 1>You are listening and watching Bloomberg Business Week Karl Masser

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>along with Damien's ass hour watching the markets making sense

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of the FED decision. And it's been an interesting trade,

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about it. Yeah, yeah, no, all right, all right,

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 1>all right, I mean we are down across the curve.

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>The two year is down below four percent again, I

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:14.479
<v Speaker 1>mean a twenty three basis point move on the two year,

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 1>but it's also extending into the belly. I mean the

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>five years down another twenty three BIPs. So yeah, you know,

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're seeing you know, we're seeing buying a bonds. Yeah,

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting, right, and you look at the markets

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:25.959
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like the treasury trade telling you one thing.

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>The equity trade, which rallied initially on that FED decision,

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 1>has come on down and now we're below the levels

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing losses across the board. So let's get

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to it with Aaron Kennon, co founder and chief executive

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>at the registered investment advisory firm, Clear Harbor Asset Management.

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>They've got over a billion in assets under management. Aaron

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 1>back with us on the phone in Stanford, Connecticut. Actually,

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I think via zoom, Hey Aaron, good to have you here.

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Market reaction. What is it telling you in terms of

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.160
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen with stock reaction? And then the Treasury

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>trade post fed decision. Well, I wouldn't call today a

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 1>pivot earl, but certainly a pause, and I think a

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>justified one. And I say a pause because yes, they

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>went twenty five basis points, but if you look at

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:12.919
<v Speaker 1>the SEPs or their dot plot or predictions for future

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 1>rate moves, they're essentially saying we're on hold here and

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:20.360
<v Speaker 1>we're going to monitor economic conditions. There's some natural tightening

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>occurring in the market due to the banking crisis, due

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to prior policy prescriptives, ie higher rate heights, and this

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 1>really is something that I think the market welcomed, and

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 1>you could see that on the Treasury front. Certainly a

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 1>devish posture. And yeah, I mean, as as Damien just indicated,

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>rates have moved about eight to twenty odd basis points

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:51.400
<v Speaker 1>across the curve today, equities are under pressure, and that's

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 1>because there's a real concern that we've passed sort of

0:21:55.480 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the peak growth cycle and the curve is still inverted.

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>And when the curve is inverted ahead of in a

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>cycle like the one we've been in, which is a

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>tightening cycle, you tend to it tends to signal a recession.

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>And and even though the curve is less inverted today,

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that's often the case just before a recession. And so

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that should be a positive signal that

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 1>we're now at forty five basis points two is tends

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and not one hundred and ten was for just a

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago. Right, Yeah, if we're not at

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the depths we once were, but you know, you mentioned

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 1>this interest rate vall move and it's still pretty high.

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering if you could focus. I mean, let's go

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>back to your days at RBC and CIT group. Your

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>day is treading ig credit. Talk to me about spreads.

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, what are you taking from the gap wider

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and spreads? And then you know the correction we're seeing

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>right now. Yeah, Well, you know we've gone from you know,

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 1>we're sort of past the peak inflationary period. Damion, and

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:52.959
<v Speaker 1>I also think we're past you know, peak tight spread

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>levels and for the most part we're seeing spreads trend wider.

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Frankly been surprised with the move index as high as

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>it has been for many years, and not really the

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>levels since seeing since two thousand and eight two thousand

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and nine financial crisis, which I remember quite quite well.

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:16.880
<v Speaker 1>My view is as the probability of recession hits our shores,

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>we will continue to see high yield spreads widen. An

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 1>investment great spreads wide, but certainly not as much as

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the high yield sector. So can high yield s frends

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>move back out to eight hundred bases points over? You

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 1>bet they can. And I think I was going to

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>just say sorry to cut you off, But to me,

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>what that means is that, you know, when spreads widen

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 1>like this, I mean it means that borrowers are reassessing

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the external funding environment. Right, So does that mean that

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>as investors we should be pacing greater emphasis on you know, coverage,

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>ratio's repayment risk and the like. Absolutely, you know, you

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>look at the regional bank outflow of deposits and what

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>does that really mean? That means lending standards are tightening.

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>That means there's less credit availability. When that happens, it

0:23:57.320 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>tends to be by about a delay of two or

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>three quarters prelude to a recessionary period. Higher rates have

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>huge consequences for public funding. But of course you just

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>alluded to, you know, the commercial real estate market. We

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>have almost a trillion dollars of commercial real estate debt

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>coming due within the next twelve months. That needs to

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>be you know, repriced, repriced wear at higher levels and

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>higher spreads, wider spreads well, and I have to say

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that if you take a look towards the end of

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that press conference, j Pale specifically talked about financial conditions

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>tighter than index is indicated, and talked about how many

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 1>of the indexes that we all talk about are all

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>about the equity trade and that he said, in terms

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of talking to banks and so on and so forth,

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing those tighter conditions. He also mentioned commercial real estate.

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Is that potentially Aaron, We all talk about it a

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>lot here at Bloomberg, and I don't want to be

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:51.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of alarmist, if you will, but we are kind

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of wondering coming off the pandemic, you know, ultimately, with

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 1>commercial real estate being used differently, vacant if you will,

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 1>is that the next big shoe to drop in the

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>financial community. What was interesting today during the Q and

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 1>A Chairman Powell sort of put a rather rather rosy

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 1>picture on commercial commercial real estate in the risk that

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>it may pose to the economy. And I understand why

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>he's the FED chair and cracks do not appear at

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:21.479
<v Speaker 1>least in the public domain yet. But we look at

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the vacancy rates. Of course, the most magnified issue is

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>probably still in New York. But I think, um, you know,

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:30.640
<v Speaker 1>there's and not all commercial real estate is created equal.

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>You have office, you have distribution segments, you have multi family,

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>which still is reasonably strong. So you guys left New York, right,

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you left New York during the pandemic. Forget me, but

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, we did, um, and we're here in Connecticut

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and Fairfield County, and we still make our way in

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:50.120
<v Speaker 1>New York. We still have our many meetings in New York.

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>But you know, certainly big fan of New York wanted

0:25:53.800 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to thrive. But certainly the current concern, as it should

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>be for real estate exists in the marketplace due to

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>higher rates wider spreads and tighter lending standards. Not to

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>mention too, the consumer out there is experiencing tighter you know, spreads.

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>You look at your credit card. If you pay it

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>off every month, that's great, but if you look below

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 1>where the amount is, it tells you you're probably going

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to be charged an APR rate of twenty percent. And

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the problem with that is the revolving lines of credit

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>are increasing. People are more more leveraged at the household

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>level over the last several quarters. And you look at

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the household savings rate and it has a two odd

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>percent handle, which is below any sort of historic norm.

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 1>So you know, we're certainly aligning for a period of uncertainty.

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think the FED was very justified in signaling

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:48.680
<v Speaker 1>verbally and in their written statement, and that was a

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>nice thing to see too, the written statement and the

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Q and A was a little more consistent this time. Totally. Yeah, No,

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Aaron, I aged up one really question. You

0:26:57.119 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that one trillion dollars of the commercial real estate

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 1>loan that are supposed to be maturing between now and

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the end of next year. That seems to be a

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>huge maturity wall. I mean, what are your thoughts on

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>cap rates. I mean, what are your thought if you

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>know banks can't extend and there's no equity cushion available.

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean sponsors that own the property, you're going to

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 1>have to come up that with that additional equity. No,

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean are they capable of doing that? Well, we'll

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>have to see, Damian. I think that is the Yeah,

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 1>the short the short answer um cap rates certainly our problem.

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 1>But you're gonna have adjustments in price, and so the

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>question is by by how much? And you know, I

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:34.440
<v Speaker 1>think the leverage ratio is a big question, you know,

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>loaned to value on a refinance. Yes, Aaron, sorry, I

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 1>mean we have a million questions for you were venting

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>at a time, so twenty seconds left here, So how

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>what are you doing differently with your investors portfolio right now?

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:50.719
<v Speaker 1>Just quickly? Well, you know it in a stormy period,

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 1>we hope and we do ensure that our clients asset

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>allocations are not just reflective of their risk tolerants, stirring

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the rosiest periods of the ecout, but also during these

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>these more uncertain moments. So the half sufficient liquidity are

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>we positioning them for that and for the long term

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>needs that they have, so I'm gratified that we try

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to do that work beforehand. We don't always get it

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>perfectly right, but we've done it. We've done it quite

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 1>well here and really proud of the team. Aaron Kennon

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a Clear Harbor Asset Management. Thank you so much. This

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcast. Listen live week

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:37.160
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from three to six Easterning on Bloomberg dot com,

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg jermital of them