WEBVTT - BI Weekend: Warner Discovery Splits, Walmart Credit Cards 

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>with Alex Steel and Paul Sweeney.

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 2>The real our performance has been in US corporate high yield.

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 3>Are the companies lean enough? Have they trimmed all the fats?

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 2>The semiconductor business is a really cyclical.

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Business, breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 4>Do investors like the M and A that we've seen?

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 2>These are two big time blue chip companies.

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 4>Window between the peak and cunt changing super fast.

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steele and Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 2>On Today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 2>business stories impacting Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 4>Each and every week we provide in depth research and

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 4>data on some of the two thousand companies in one

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 4>hundred and thirty industries our analysts cover worldwide.

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Today, we'll take a look at Moderna's new COVID shut

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 2>and vaccine trial.

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 4>Plus we'll take a look at how one university system

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 4>is benefiting from AI, crypto and power.

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 2>But first we moved to some news in the media space.

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:07.639
<v Speaker 4>This week, we heard that Warner Brothers Discovery is splitting

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 4>into two independent companies, Global Networks and Streaming and Studios.

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Global Networks will include entertainment, sports, and cable television brands

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 2>such as CNN, TNT, and TBS, and will hold a

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty percent stake in Streaming and Studios.

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 4>Its separations expected to be completed by mid twenty twenty six,

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 4>allowing each company to pursue deals and investment opportunities on

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:26.559
<v Speaker 4>their own.

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 2>For more on this and the latest media news, we

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 2>were joined by Githa Rang and Athan Bloomberg Intelligence, senior

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 2>media analysts.

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 4>We first asked Etha if she likes Warner's plan and

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 4>if it's at all surprising and exciting.

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 5>We like the plant. This has been many months in

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 5>the making, so last December they had actually reorganized the

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 5>existing business into these two separate units, the TV business

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 5>and then the streaming of the studio business, kind of

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 5>eventually paving the way for exactly the announcement.

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 6>I think the.

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 5>Surprising part and this is a little bit of a

0:01:55.880 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 5>pleasant surprise for Warner Brothers. Discovery has really been on

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 5>the debt side, so as you well know well the

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 5>linear TV business is challenged, but the bigger problem for

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 5>WBD has really been a huge amount of debt. And

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 5>this debt was really as part of the combination of

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 5>Warner Brothers and Discovery, which happened a few years ago.

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 5>At that point, the company had over fifty five billion

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 5>dollars in debt. They've paid about nineteen billion down, but

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 5>they still have thirty five billion. But what they're doing

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 5>now as part of this transaction is they have a

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Speaker 5>tender offer out there, really kind of looking to streamline

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 5>the capital structure. So when you have these two new

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 5>public companies, there's going to be a much more manageable

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 5>debt load at both of those companies. And I think

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 5>investors are really reacting positively to that news.

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 7>Keetha.

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 2>When they put the companies together, one of the arguments

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 2>was to create scale to compete against Netflix and Disney.

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 6>What happened to that.

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 5>Argument, Yeah, exactly, Paul. You know, yes, they did create

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 5>scale as far as the TV networks part of the

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 5>business was concerned. You know, you have Discuss, which is

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 5>really the leader when it comes to nonfiction. You have

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.799
<v Speaker 5>you know, the Warner Networks and HBO, which is the

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 5>leader when it comes to fiction and quality dramas and

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 5>scripted series. And they thought that that would do well,

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:15.799
<v Speaker 5>but unfortunately what happened is, you know, and all media companies,

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 5>as you will know Paul, have this conundrum because they

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 5>have the TV business, which brings in a lot of

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 5>the cash, but is literally a no growth business. In fact,

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 5>it does in decline. Both advertising as well as affiliate

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 5>fees are in decline. But then you had the streaming business,

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 5>which initially kind of had a little bit of trouble

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 5>because you know, in that whole game of subscribers and

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 5>that land gradt for subscribers, they actually ended up incurring

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 5>a huge amount of losses. But there is this whole

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 5>wave of content cost rationalization. We've seen a turnaround and

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 5>all of the streaming businesses and Warner Brothers Discovery actually

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 5>has kind of led the charge there. So they were

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 5>actually the first to get profitable in terms of streaming.

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 5>And so now we're seeing this huge disconnect, or at

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 5>least they are saying that there is this huge disconnect

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 5>between TV network's business and the streaming of the studios businesses,

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 5>which should arguably get a much higher multiple, and that's

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 5>kind of the reason for this split. So we've we're

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 5>seeing how multiple companies do this. Actually, so Comcast, which

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 5>has the NBC division, they're splitting out their cable networks.

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 5>We had Lions Skate and Stars, where you have Lions

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 5>Skate as an independent movie studio, Stars as the media networks,

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 5>and now you have Warner Brothers Discovery. So there's this

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:25.280
<v Speaker 5>whole big movement now towards you know, this vertical kind

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 5>of separation if you will, I mean, do.

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 4>They all come together then and create kind of one

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 4>less great TV network thing?

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's kind of the plan. So the most logical combination,

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 5>and this has been floated around for for months now,

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 5>is that with this news of the Comcast, you know,

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 5>the NBC cable network separation, who would have would that

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 5>become like this kind of roll up vehicle. And that's

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 5>kind of what you know, a lot of the industry

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 5>experts are thinking, they're expecting now that you have this

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 5>news with Warner Brothers Discovery, everybody's kind of expecting down

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 5>the road some common nation of maybe that Warner Brothers

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 5>Discovery TV assets along with the Comcast assets and who

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:08.919
<v Speaker 5>knows who else kind of spins off their networks and

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 5>then that becomes this giant kind of TV network umbrella.

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 5>Going back to Paul's point about scale, because scale really

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 5>matters now at this business.

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:21.359
<v Speaker 2>All right, how about Paramount you other sick child in

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 2>your coverage, what's going on there?

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So we really don't know what's going on there.

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 5>So there's been a lot of ups and downs, Paul,

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 5>with the whole closing of the deal. So the Paramount

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 5>sky Dance transaction, it was announced last year sometime in July.

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 5>It was supposed to close by the first half, by

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 5>the end of the first half of twenty twenty five,

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 5>but there's just been so many different press reports. They've

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 5>had to do different things to appease the current administration

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:51.159
<v Speaker 5>to a peace President Trump, I'm not sure he is

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 5>yielding so easily. So we're actually it's still kind of

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 5>fifty to fifty Paul, whether that transaction actually, yeah, actually closes.

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 5>So there's just too many up in the air. And

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 5>then again there is the lingering question because we know

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 5>that Skydance was really only interested in the Paramount's studio business.

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 5>So again what they kind of do with the TV

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 5>networks business, what they do with the streaming business, that's

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 5>all a huge question mark. So visibility very very limited

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 5>right now for Paramount.

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 4>I guess I just wonder if you stick all the

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 4>cable networks together, how does that actually generate real income?

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I know that's a cash cow to some extent, right,

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 4>but then you have a lot of debt and there's

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 4>no growth.

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 3>Like, what kind of asset is that?

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.559
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's definitely a melting ice cube kind of an asset,

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 5>which is exactly what you know, the TV networks have been.

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 5>The argument that all of these media companies are making

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 5>alex is that somehow by kind of banding together, you know,

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 5>because each one of them will have one or two

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:49.720
<v Speaker 5>networks that is kind of a must have networks. If

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 5>you're looking at Warner, you have CNN, you know. If

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 5>you're looking at again, if you're looking at the NBC networks,

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 5>you have USA, you have MSNBC. So you know, there

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 5>are definitely all going to be some must have networks

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 5>in each portfolio, and kind of putting them all together

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 5>will stem that rate of decliner. At least that is

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 5>the argument that they're making. But again we've seen that

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 5>court cutting has actually been far worse than what was

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 5>initially projected, so again it remains to be seen. But

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 5>the idea is they want to milk it till it

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 5>kind of runs dry.

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to get it Wrong Andathen Bloomberg Intelligence Senior media.

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 4>Analyst, we moved to some news at the world's largest retailer, Walmart.

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 2>This week we heard that Walmart's credit cards will once

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 2>again be issued by the consumer financing company Synchrony Financial.

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Synchrony previously issued Walmart credit cards for nearly two decades

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 2>until twenty eighteen.

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 4>Walmart will now use its fintech startup One Paid a

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.559
<v Speaker 4>partner with Synchrony, and they'll offer co branded and private

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 4>label cards in the US later this year.

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 2>This comes as Walmart makes a renewed push into financial

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 2>services and for more. We were joined by Ben Elliott,

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence consumer finance analyst.

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 4>We first asked Ben for some background on Synchrony, which

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 4>initially lost a partnership with Walmart to Capital One.

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 8>Yes, so they had it for twenty years right up

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 8>until twenty eighteen when the renewal sort of negotiations between

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 8>the two companies got contentious. Walmart was demanding too much

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 8>for Synchrony, and so Synchrony sort of sort of backed down.

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 8>And at the time it was a really big deal,

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 8>and so this is an equally large deal that they're

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 8>coming back.

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Why did it go away?

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 8>So the way Synchrony works is they have these large partners,

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:26.119
<v Speaker 8>right the top five partners are more than fifty percent

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 8>of their net interest in fees. And what they do

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 8>is they share the economics with the partner programs and

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 8>something called a retailer share arrangement. So every couple of

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 8>years the partnerships are up for renewal. And Walmart is

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 8>a gigantic corporation. They have huge leverage and they were

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 8>demanding essentially more of the economics than Synchrony could provide

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:44.719
<v Speaker 8>and still be profitable.

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Ben talk to us about these kind of branded credit

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 2>cards if you will. I mean, my daughter is a

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 2>master at managing points and managing points and doing all

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 2>that kind of full time job it is, but it

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.439
<v Speaker 2>pays off every time she's traveling somewhere it's oh, it's

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 2>on points points. Talk to us about that. The business

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 2>of those kinds of cards and kind of the economics.

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So Syncrety is not so much in that business.

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 8>They're in the business of providing a credit option, usually

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 8>to sort of a lower credit worthiness, lower income borrower

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 8>that is really focused on a single retail partner. So

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 8>this partnership is going to be there's gonna be two cards.

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 8>One's a general purpose card that kind of does what

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 8>you're talking about, but the rewards sort of value proposition

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:30.959
<v Speaker 8>will typically be a little bit lower. The card will

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 8>be more accessible, and then the other card will be

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 8>just used at Walmart. And details are still pretty light

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 8>on what the reward structure might look like. But the

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 8>goal is to drive through put at Walmart and not

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 8>necessarily at sort of other retailers.

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 4>So they also have cards with like JC penny Low's

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 4>Amazon PayPal for example. And you mentioned sort of a

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 4>different type of band of consumer. How is that band

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 4>of consumer doing.

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:00.959
<v Speaker 8>So Synchrony likes to say that they're managing, they're not thriving,

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 8>and they're not struggling. You know, this is a it's

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 8>sort of like a subset of wallet share, all right.

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 8>So the Syncrety is just seeing how these consumers are

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 8>behaving at a single retailer for the most part. But

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 8>there's not a lot of stress. But if you look

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 8>back at twenty eighteen when they first decided not to

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 8>renew the Walmart partnership, it's kind of overnight their charge

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 8>offs went down like sixty seventy basis points, so presumably

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 8>this particular customer set is charging off a little bit higher,

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 8>like maybe one percentage point higher than your typical borrower.

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 8>So there's going to be it's an interesting time for

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 8>Syncrony to go out and look for these sort of

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 8>more marginal buyers basically to get growth.

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Ben your coverage of consumer finance companies, you get a

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 2>good view those companies, get a good view of how

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 2>the consumer is doing, how they're spending their money. What

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:52.079
<v Speaker 2>are you hearing from these companies these days?

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 8>So if you look across spending categories, everything is still

0:10:55.440 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 8>typically growing a couple percentage points above GDP. There's one

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 8>obvious standout, which is travel, which is basically people cutting

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 8>back on their most incremental spend. But if you kind

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 8>of think about travel, right, you're booking your flights a

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 8>couple of months maybe a year in advance, and growth

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 8>in that category is down double digits. So if you

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 8>kind of extrapolate that forward, will we see similar shrinking

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 8>in hotel spending, entertainment, leisure things like that? You know,

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 8>could be a little bit of a canary in the

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 8>coal mine.

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:30.959
<v Speaker 4>What is Synchrony's flexibility when dealing, when they're managing, when

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 4>they're saying that their consumer isn't thriving and they're not

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:36.199
<v Speaker 4>dropping off, but they're managing. What does that translate for Synchrony.

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 8>Well, so this goes back to what we talked about

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 8>the retailer share arrangements. So you share both the profits

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 8>and you share the costs, right, so you know, if

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 8>charge offs were to rise, the retailer in this case,

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 8>Walmart is going to pick up some of those charge offs.

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 8>So that kind of like you know, softens the blow

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 8>a little bit for Synchrony as a as an issuer.

0:11:57.440 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 8>But they have other sort of tools in their toolbox.

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 8>One big one was the late fee, which CFPB had

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 8>been trying to cap at eight dollars instead of about

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 8>thirty dollars. But they can use those things like that

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 8>to incentivize borrowers to pay even when it gets to

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 8>be more painful.

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Ben are your consumer finance companies? Are they talking about

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 2>credit quality concerns at this point?

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 6>Yet?

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 8>Credit quality is still great for companies like Amex, it's pristine, unimpeachable.

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 8>But the thing to look at is delinquency. Just the

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:28.319
<v Speaker 8>mechanics the way charge offs work. First, you have to

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 8>go delinquent before you stop paying. And we're not really

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 8>seeing any sort of increase beyond kind of like seasonal

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 8>trends in delinquency.

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Ben Elliott, Bloomberg Intelligence consumer finance analyst.

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 4>Coming up, we're going to break down the White House's

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 4>plans for nuclear energy.

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 2>depth research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 2>b I go on the terminal.

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm Paul Sweeney and a Malex Steel, and this is Bloomberg.

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Coarclay, and Android

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:14.559
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 3>We moved next to the biotech space this week.

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 4>We were joined by Sam Fazzelli, Bloomberg Intelligence, Director of

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.559
<v Speaker 4>Research for Global Industries and senior pharmaceutical analyst.

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 2>He joined to discuss the latest in the biotech space

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 2>from Moderness recent COVID vaccine approval and placebo trial to

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 2>new obesity drugs from the biotech company met Sarah.

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 4>We first began with the money side of things and

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 4>asked Sam for his take on why more biotech companies

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:38.479
<v Speaker 4>are returning cash back to their shareholders.

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 6>So, I think companies are coming to a realization that

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 6>they can't just sit on a large pilot cash. The

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 6>latest one that just happened was seven hundred million dollars

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 6>in the bank, and the assets weren't particularly going in

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.719
<v Speaker 6>the direction that athy shareholders were happy with, which is

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 6>why the company was sitting at a negative enterprise value

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 6>of like one hundred million or ninety million, depending on

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 6>when you're looking at it. And I think they thought, well, no,

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:11.959
<v Speaker 6>actually two hundred eighty eight million. Sorry, they thought this

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 6>time to return some of that cash to shareholders. And

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 6>you're seeing more of this happening. Investors got tired of

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 6>companies essentially constantly saying, we'll find a better thing to

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 6>do with your cash, and they investors go, we know

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:25.479
<v Speaker 6>what to do with our cash.

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 4>That is like a really weird thing for about tech company, right,

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 4>because this isn't the whole value proposition. Eventually, is that

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 4>you spend all this money on R ANDD to make

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:35.359
<v Speaker 4>that super cool thing that's going to make up bazillion dollars.

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 6>Right, sure, Alex. But if you start off saying I

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 6>am the expert in this area, and I'm going to

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 6>take this expertise and translate this idea into a product,

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 6>and that doesn't work out, then you say, actually, I

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 6>have another idea that wasn't necessarily your expertise. That's where

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 6>investors get a little bit edgy.

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so, Sam, I know the FDA recently approved modarrens

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 2>new COVID BAX seen what's new about it and is

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 2>it better?

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 6>Well, actually, they did a real trial of comparing this

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 6>new version. I'll tell you what's new about it with

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 6>the standard vaccine spike facts that we've been getting. I

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 6>don't even know how to pronounce the new name m

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 6>next via something like that. I could never It's not

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 6>an easy roar rolling off the tongue. What they've done

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 6>is that they've taken the dose from fifty micrograms to

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 6>ten micrograms, and what that does is that it gives

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 6>you less reactions, and in fact, in this particular trial,

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 6>they showed even higher antibody responses compared to the old one.

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 6>So there is a small possibility it was only a

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 6>few ten percent or so higher. A small possibility you

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 6>get a much better efficacy in a real world setting.

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 6>But it seemed to go in that direction here, So

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 6>and that now is going to become the base of

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 6>all their vaccines going forward.

0:15:57.480 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 4>Right, But that's a good news if you take the

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 4>VACS scene. But then you're not allowed to get the

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 4>vaccine unless you have underlying commorbidities, right.

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, alex is only you not allowed to get direction

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 6>because you don't have a whole bunch of the qualifying factors.

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 6>You're not old, you are, you're over sixty four, you're

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 6>not you're not come morbidity. Except the one thing you have,

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 6>which is something that doesn't show up in these conversations,

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 6>is a risk of a really bad reaction to COVID, right,

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 6>which is something that you've experienced. So what is going

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 6>on though, is that the company has whatever specifically, has

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 6>committed to the FDA to do a placebo control trial

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 6>in a fifty to sixty four year or sixty five

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 6>year group of individuals without come moobilities compared to a

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 6>placebo I eat nothing so that will be where they

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 6>will have to do this trial, and by committing to it,

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 6>this trial needs to be large in order to show

0:16:58.160 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 6>a difference. And I remember a whole bunch of people

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 6>going into these trials now with previous immunity, which means

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 6>the difference is going to be smaller, which means you're

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 6>going to need larger trials. So I hope it works

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 6>out and I hope the cost isn't punitive for modernaw.

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 2>New obesity data from a Newish biotech met Sarah and

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 2>their obesity issue. What's going on there? What do they

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 2>have for the market.

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 6>Yes, so they've got a new mechanism, which they're not

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 6>the only people following it. Lily's doing it, and I

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 6>was doing it Zealand and now in partnership with Rash

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 6>are doing it. And it's targeting not jlp ones but

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 6>amelin in the same sort of pathway of hormones that

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 6>hunger and satiety, et cetera, but slightly different. And the

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 6>theory is that you're going to get a drug that

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 6>is less difficult to tolerate. Nausea and vomiting is the

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 6>biggest one with these drugs because they impact the gut

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:58.640
<v Speaker 6>and so here they've presented data that shows pretty good

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 6>weight loss the thirty six week readout, thirty six day readout, sorry,

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 6>five weeks, and you've got unfortunately one hundred percent nausea rates,

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:15.159
<v Speaker 6>but they are at the very low grade. I is

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 6>just feeling a little I'm assuming yuck. And then what

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 6>you've got is that it only seems to majority of

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:25.239
<v Speaker 6>them seem to pass after the first week. So I

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 6>think this is good.

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:29.159
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Sam Fazzelli, Bloomberg Intelligence, Director of Research

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 2>for Global Industries and senior pharmaceuticals analysts.

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 4>We move next to the energy sector, specifically nuclear energy. Recently,

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 4>the White House announced it's gold a quadruple US nuclear

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 4>generation capacity by twenty fifty.

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 2>The goal is to have reliable energy supply to meet

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 2>the growing demand for artificial intelligence from more.

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 4>We were drawn by Scott Levine, Bloomberg Intelligence, senior Energy

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 4>and Industrial Services analyst.

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 2>We first asked Scott to explain the complicated relationship with

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 2>nuclear energy and what the Trump administration would like to

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 2>do with it.

0:18:56.760 --> 0:19:01.439
<v Speaker 9>Nuclear has always kind of been a bit of a

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 9>strange one for environmentalists and for the industry overall. You know,

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 9>it's an emissions free power source, right, which would seem

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 9>to align well with the goals of environmentalists. However, safety concerns,

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:18.400
<v Speaker 9>you know, end up being an issue three Mile Island,

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 9>Fukushima and otherwise. And so you know, with the combination

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 9>of demand from AI for power of all types, coupled

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:32.719
<v Speaker 9>with the fact that it is an emissions free power

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 9>source has really brought it back into the forefront and

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 9>supporting the AI demands story. So you have the demand

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:46.919
<v Speaker 9>picture has clearly strengthened as a result of that. The

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 9>two things that really blew a hole in the story

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 9>the last time it was in vogue and the Obama

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 9>administration was really the shale revolution which made natural gas

0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 9>so cheap as an alternative, and then in twenty eleven

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 9>Fukushima created all kinds of concerns there. So the two

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 9>really blew a hole in the story then. And now,

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 9>you know, in fifteen years has gone by since then,

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 9>and the memory has faded, and now it's back in

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 9>the forefront folks minds.

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 4>So expanding or keeping alive or recommissioning a nuclear plant

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 4>is one thing, and that's what we're doing three Mile Island.

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 4>We're getting it back up and running again. Then Constellation

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 4>also made that deal with Meta on Monday or Tuesday.

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 4>That is just continuing to expand. It's going to keep

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 4>going with its nuclear reactor, right, but building a new

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:36.360
<v Speaker 4>one is like a whole different thing.

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:37.719
<v Speaker 3>How expensive is that?

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so we've only built one plant in the last

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 9>thirty years in this country. It was in Georgia. It

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 9>was initially expected to cost under fifteen billion dollars and

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:54.160
<v Speaker 9>take seven and a half years, and it ended up

0:20:54.280 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 9>costing over thirty billion dollars to complete and taking about

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 9>as long as expected. And that was the one that

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 9>got through, right.

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, but President Trump and what he outlined those executive

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 4>orders is aimed to reduce the time and the money.

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 3>But does it kind of do it that much?

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 9>I mean in theory, In theory it's possible, yes, but

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.360
<v Speaker 9>there's so much we don't know, right, I Mean, our

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 9>expectation would be that, you know, we may not even

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 9>see full sized reactors built at this point, right. Small

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 9>modular reactors, yes, where I want to go are being developed,

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 9>there are, you know, and so these are going to

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 9>be much more they're you know, modular built. They're smaller

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 9>in terms of the unionization. Uh, and so they could

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 9>be built conceivably behind the grid if the regulators can

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 9>get comfortable with the safety aspects. So uh uh it's conceivable.

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 9>But none of those have been built yet, right, So

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:56.120
<v Speaker 9>a lot of it's still on the come uh and

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 9>a lot of will depend on the uh progress of

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 9>technology goes to the regulators, et cetera.

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Is the technology there, because we've had people come through

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 2>here to kind of apply that it is there.

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 9>It is on paper. You know, there's a have we

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 9>built one of them? We have not built any of

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 9>them in the US. There have been a couple built

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:19.159
<v Speaker 9>over seas. Only one design has been approved, and that

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 9>is New Scales small modular reactor, and that's basically mimics

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 9>a light water reactor. It's a smaller version of the

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 9>plants that are in service now. Two thirds are the

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 9>ones in service in the US or Westinghouse one third

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 9>give or takeer ge, and those are all light water reactors.

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 9>And then there's a whole other list of companies that

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 9>are building these more innovative technology gas cool reactors, salt

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 9>cool reactors. None of those are in service, right and

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 9>you know, half of those are in the process of

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 9>commercialization in some way, shape or form, but none have

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:51.880
<v Speaker 9>been built here.

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 4>No, why is nuclear so interesting to hyperscalers Because.

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 9>It's emission's free, and because it runs twenty five or

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 9>by seven, right, And that's the big knock on wind

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 9>and solar, right, And so those two things in and

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 9>of themselves, they need to be twenty four x seven.

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 9>They need to be basedload in order to support data

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 9>center needs number one and number two missions free, you know,

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 9>supports the environmental mandates of the metas, the Googles, the

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 9>Microsoft's of the world. And those are two huge positives

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 9>that can't be ignored. So if indeed we need power

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 9>for a longer period of time than it's taken to

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:33.679
<v Speaker 9>train these models, and all indications suggest that will be

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:39.239
<v Speaker 9>the case for inferencing purposes nuclears, positives are really too

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 9>great to ignore.

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:42.919
<v Speaker 2>But it's expensive. Yes, we're going to pay for this.

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Federal governments can some subsides. Is the President posing that?

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:49.199
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, they are proposing that. And that's really kind of

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 9>the big unknown right now. How much money are they

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 9>willing to put behind this? When they built the scale VC, sorry,

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 9>the Southern Company plant Vogel and Georgia. If I'm administration

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.159
<v Speaker 9>put eight over eight billion loan guarantees towards that, and

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 9>it ended up costing thirty one to thirty four billion dollars. Yeah,

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 9>and so we're in an age now right where the

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 9>budgets are concerned, and some renewable projects are being canceled,

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 9>others are being allowed to move forward, whether it's hydrogen,

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 9>whether it's carbon capture, et cetera. So you know, Trump's

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 9>saying he loves nuclears is a big positive there. But

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 9>how much money they're willing to put behind specific projects

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 9>is really the key question.

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 4>And that's such an interesting point because therein lies the

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 4>problem with hyperscalers. They're not used to taking on that

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 4>particular kind of risk. Also, they need power yesterday. So

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 4>saying that we can get this to you, let's just

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 4>be generous and say seven, it would say four.

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 3>They need it yesterday. Four is not going to be

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 3>good enough.

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:51.159
<v Speaker 4>So are they going to actually like help offset the

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 4>cost for something that won't be available to them in

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 4>four years in an industry like tech that changes really fast.

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 9>I mean, they have a look all every hyper scaler

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 9>has made positive comments regarding nuclear. Then it comes down

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 9>to like how much how subsidy is done. Is that exactly?

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 9>And so you know, the reality here is they need

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 9>interim solutions now to support the growth. They also need

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 9>longer term solutions. Nuclear certainly could be a longer term solution.

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 9>But you know, we'll see what the details are. We'll

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 9>see where the government's willing to subsidize a portion of

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 9>those investments. The one thing I can say is utilities

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 9>are probably going to be redis in to put a

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 9>lot of money behind this on their own without that backing,

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 9>given the history of the last three decades.

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Scott Levine Bloomberg Intelligence senior Energy and

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Industrial anast.

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 4>Coming up on the program, we're going to break down

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 4>the state of offshore wind in the US.

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:41.439
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 2>depth research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence if yeah,

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 2>be I go on the terminal.

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm Paul Sweeney and a Malex Steel and this is Bloomberg.

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am heasterne on Apple Cocklay and Android

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App, listen on demand wherever

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 4>This week we focus on higher education in a story

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 4>titled Oil Rich University of Texas Cash is in on AI,

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 4>Crypto and Power. You can find it on Bloomberg dot

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 4>Com and the Terminal.

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 2>This story discusses how the University of Texas System is

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 2>generating cash from new projects on its land from a

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 2>mix of renewable energy, crypto and oil and natural gas

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 2>production from more.

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 4>We are joined by Janet Lauren, Bloomberg Higher Education finance reporter.

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 2>We first asked Janet to explain how the University of

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 2>Texas System is benefiting from AI, crypto and power.

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 10>So, the University of Texas System has lanned two point

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:48.400
<v Speaker 10>one million acres in the premium basin that the State

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 10>of Texas set aside for higher education in the eighteen

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 10>hundreds when the land was supposed to be worthless. But

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 10>then something happened in nineteen twenty three struck oil and

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:01.920
<v Speaker 10>for the first hundred years the University of Texas grew

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 10>its endowment with oil and gas, and now in the

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 10>next century they're looking for revenue from above the surface.

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 10>They've had, they've started with a few wind and solar facilities,

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 10>they have a crypto mining center, and they're looking to

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:21.640
<v Speaker 10>expand to you know, augment their revenue from surface ventures.

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 3>So that's so fascinating to me.

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 4>How quickly are they diversifying, Like how quickly is the

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:30.919
<v Speaker 4>money moving? And I wonder what policy in DC is

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 4>also sort of filtering down into what the university invests in.

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:39.160
<v Speaker 10>Well, the university actually isn't really investing in anything. They

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:42.680
<v Speaker 10>are the landholder, So they're signing lots of leases.

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 4>Sure, but they're like choosing to then maybe sign it

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 4>for one part of energy and not another.

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 3>One might say, well.

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:51.120
<v Speaker 10>They're they're looking to find new revenue sources. They've had

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 10>a few wind and solar facilities on the land, and

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:59.360
<v Speaker 10>they just signed a preliminary agreement to lease about two

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 10>hundred thousand acres or ten percent of their land to

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 10>a company called Apex Clean Energy for wind and solar.

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 10>And their customers include companies like Meta and the Army

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 10>and eBay. So and right now these are you know,

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 10>these things take years and years and years to build.

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 10>The wind and solar facilities I saw that are up

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 10>and running for a couple of years. You know, those

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:23.679
<v Speaker 10>deals were initially signed several years ago, but it just

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 10>takes time. And there's new transmission lines that were just

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:30.639
<v Speaker 10>approved in Texas in three of them at ten billion

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 10>dollars to move power into the Permian. So these wind

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 10>and solar are producing them and then these lines will

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 10>be able to take them.

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 2>It's you know, Texas is such an interesting, you know

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 2>place in the world for many reasons, one of which

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 2>is me. When I think of Texas, I think a

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 2>big oil you know, the oil rigs and cowboys and

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 2>all that kind of great stuff. But it's also like

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 2>the one of the biggest renewals places. They've got a

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 2>lot of wind, and I got a lot of sun,

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 2>and they got a lot of land. So how does

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Texas kind of bounce those things?

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 10>Well, they need an all all, all in approach. And

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 10>the University of Texas has you know, really grown its endowment.

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 10>It's you know, forty eight billion, you know, coming close

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 10>to Harvard. And I did a story a couple of

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 10>years ago about their record year in oil. You know

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 10>a few years ago they got over two billion dollars

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 10>in oil and gas revenue.

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's amazing and it's just cash into the into

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 4>the endowment. Can other universities replicate the monetization of their

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 4>land in a similar way, Like what what other universities

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 4>have this kind of option?

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 10>Everybody in Texas knows, never sell your mineral rights. But

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 10>you can't really come close to this, I mean rice

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 10>in Texas. They also have revenue coming from oil, you know,

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 10>from land, but nothing even comes close to this University

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 10>of Oklahoma. You know, I did a store several years

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 10>ago about you know, people gift them.

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Land, they keep the mineral rights.

0:29:57.880 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 10>With fracking, they got you know, huge increases over time.

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 10>But you know, you just can't compare anything to two

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 10>million acres in the Permian basin, so one of the

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 10>they are the one of the largest landholders in Texas.

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Still it's you have a great chart in here that

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 2>just kind of shows the growth of revenue from their

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 2>oil and gas business, which is still the vast majority

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:22.479
<v Speaker 2>of it. But this surface piece sounds like it can

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 2>be totally incremental.

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 10>Yes, And you know the head of University Lands, which

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 10>is the unit of the University of Texas system that

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 10>runs it. You know, initially he's saying, we're kind of

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 10>looking for a couple of singles here and there test

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 10>the waters, and now they're looking for bigger projects where

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 10>they can have wind and solar power generation, you know,

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 10>on larger swaths of land to generate more money. Now

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 10>keep in mind, under these projects, the wind turbines that

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:50.719
<v Speaker 10>I saw, they have oil underneath, and you know that

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 10>business is also working, so it's all concurrent.

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, You've got I have to ask you this question.

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Als can answer for you. There's a picture here an

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 2>operator flaring excess natural gas at a well at Ute

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Manage Land in Cood, Texas. So there's gas escaping from

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 2>the well and they just kind of let it on

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 2>fire so it doesn't go into the atmosphere.

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean in theory, they want to capture it economically,

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 4>because if you capture it, you can then use it.

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 4>And also with any sort of environmental restrictions, you got

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 4>to capture it. But those restrictions are changing, let's say.

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 10>And down the road, maybe you can use that natural

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 10>gas to power.

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 4>A data So yeah, it's like you gotta make it

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 4>economic and if you can use it for something else,

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 4>that's where.

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 3>You got it.

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 4>Silly question, What are they using all this money for sports?

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 3>Teams like saying a good question.

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 10>So the money from oil gas goes to basically building things.

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 10>It's not for operations. So if you look at their campus,

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 10>you know, and we described in the story a couple

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 10>of buildings, you know, fifty million dollars for Texas A

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 10>and M's new business school. You know, tens of millions

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 10>of dollars for new hospital facilities. You know, they run

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 10>a bunch of medical schools, different different types of technology

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 10>within those medical schools and those health systems. You know,

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 10>I forget the number of schools between the two systems,

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 10>but it's something like twenty plus, you know, M. D.

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 10>Anderson Cancer Center. Ye, So they build buildings, all right.

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 4>Thanks to Janet Lauren, a Bloomberg Higher Education Finance reporter,

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 4>each week we take a look at research from Bloomberg

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 4>and EF previously known as New Energy Finance.

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 2>They're the team at Bloomberg that tracks and analyzes the

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 2>energy transition from commodities to power, transport, industries, buildings, and

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 2>agricultural sectors.

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 4>This week we looked at BNF's outlook for offshore wind

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 4>for more. We were joined by Oliver Metcalp Bloomberg B

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 4>and EM, head of wind Research.

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 2>We first s Oliver to discuss the state of offshore

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 2>wind in the US.

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 7>Well, offshore wind projects in the US at the moment

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 7>are facing a really, really difficult outlook. It's been tough

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 7>over the last few years. There have been rising costs,

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 7>supply chain bottlenecks that have hit the sector really hard.

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 7>High interest rates for such an expensive technology is also

0:32:57.160 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 7>something that raises costs a lot. There have been strong

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 7>political headwinds since the since the Trump administration took office.

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 7>So the Trump administration withdrew the permit for that Atlantic

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 7>Shores project. That was a project that had already faced

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 7>those higher costs I was talking about already facing a

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 7>lot of economic difficulties, and the removal of that permit

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 7>was that the final straw that really pushed the developers

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 7>over the edge. The project isn't completely canceled, so SHERL

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 7>and EDF that own that lease area that kind of

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 7>marine area are going to hold onto that lease. There's

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 7>potential that they could develop that in a different form

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 7>in the future if there's a more friendly administration to

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 7>off your wind. But yeah, a bit of a bleak

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 7>out outlook for the sector at the moment. In the US.

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 4>What about projects that already are outshore offshore and are

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 4>already producing. Could those lose their lease and get shut down.

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 7>It's not looking like that at the moment. So the

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 7>Trump administration put a stop work order on a currently

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 7>under construction project that would feed parent to New York

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 7>called Empire Wind that's getting developed by the big Norway

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 7>and oil men called Equinor. That and the Equinor had

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:09.360
<v Speaker 7>already invested over a couple of billions of dollars in

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 7>that project. Thank thankfully for the sector, the stop work

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 7>order has been lifted. Now that's a good sign for

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:19.840
<v Speaker 7>the other projects. There are five under construction US offshore

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 7>wind projects at the moment, So the fact that that

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 7>project was allowed to go ahead is a very very

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 7>good single signal for other investors that are building projects

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 7>like AUSTID, like you mentioned, that have projects in the pipeline.

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 7>So those five projects we're expecting to go ahead. All

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 7>the other ones kind of further out in the pipeline,

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 7>federal permitting of projects, federal leasing of new seabed areas

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 7>to build projects, the kind of developer, the development environment

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 7>has has ground to a standstill for those projects that

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 7>are a little bit further out into the pipeline in

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:53.239
<v Speaker 7>US off your wind.

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:55.839
<v Speaker 2>What's the rest of the world doing with offshore winning

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 2>these days?

0:34:57.400 --> 0:34:59.479
<v Speaker 7>Well, some of those effects that I was talking about

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:01.720
<v Speaker 7>that have hit the U have hit other markets around

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 7>the world. So costs have risen globally, there have been

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 7>supply chain constraints, there have been high interest rates. That's

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 7>kind of a global story. But we're seeing a lot

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 7>of growth despite that around the world for offshore wind,

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 7>particularly European countries in the North Sea are building mega projects.

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 7>We're expecting the largest project in the world to start

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 7>to start commissioning their turbines next year, a project called

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 7>Doggerbank off the coast of the UK. And then we're

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 7>just beginning to see markets in Asia start to pick up.

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:34.720
<v Speaker 7>So we're beginning to see the globalization of the offshore

0:35:34.719 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 7>wind industry. So that's markets like Taiwan, Japan, South Korea

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 7>starting to install their first commercial scale projects, and over

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:45.800
<v Speaker 7>the next few years we're expecting them to start installing

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 7>kind of industrial sized projects that we're already seeing in

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 7>the North Sea.

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:50.839
<v Speaker 4>You mentioned this earlier, but a couple of things that

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 4>sort of went wrong for offshore wind before the political

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 4>environment shifted was interest rates and also supply chain issues.

0:35:57.200 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 4>So a lot of at least of the way it

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:00.840
<v Speaker 4>was described to me by some of the players, is

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 4>that they took on a lot of the commodity and

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:06.319
<v Speaker 4>supply chain risk and they didn't properly share that with say,

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 4>customers and other developers, and that that really hurt them

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 4>during COVID. Have those two issues, though, sorted themselves out globally.

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:18.840
<v Speaker 7>So there's a couple of different ways that those issues

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 7>are slowly starting to resolve themselves. So firstly, suppliers are

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 7>pushing to share a bit more of that risk when

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 7>they're signing contracts, so things like linking contract price, your

0:36:30.120 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 7>final contract price the customer pays to a steel price

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 7>index or a copper price index, for example, to partially

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:43.320
<v Speaker 7>protect you from these commodity price movements. Another way that

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:47.440
<v Speaker 7>government's reacting to this kind of thing is linking the

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 7>price of the subsidy you get paid too similar indexes,

0:36:50.640 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 7>So linking the price of subsidies to the consumer price

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 7>index to protect a developer against kind of some of

0:36:57.040 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 7>those inflationary impacts. Same goes for commodity prices. So there's

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 7>a bit a bit of a resolution on the policy side,

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:05.760
<v Speaker 7>and then also a bit of a push from supply

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 7>chain contracts to protect themselves in some of the deals

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 7>they're signing.

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 2>What's the profitability of land based wind farms versus offshore.

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 7>It really depends in the market you're looking at. Typically,

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.600
<v Speaker 7>the kind of required returns for an investor on an

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:27.640
<v Speaker 7>onshore wind farm is lower than an offshore wind farm,

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:31.759
<v Speaker 7>where we're kind of more looking kind of nine plus

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:36.800
<v Speaker 7>internal rates of return on a project. Partially that's because

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 7>the perceived risks of building something on shore are lower

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 7>than building something offshore. Every time you need to fix

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 7>a turbine, kind of the whole construction process is just

0:37:45.040 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 7>much more difficult when you're doing it on water versus

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:51.440
<v Speaker 7>when you're doing it just on land. And also on

0:37:51.520 --> 0:37:54.319
<v Speaker 7>shore wind projects have been operating, we've been building them

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:57.240
<v Speaker 7>for a lot longer, and so just the perceived risks

0:37:57.560 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 7>and how we understand those risks, it's much further along

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 7>for on shore wind firms than on show wind firms.

0:38:03.800 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 7>All right.

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:06.200
<v Speaker 4>Thanks to Oliver met Kaploomberg b A, the app head

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 4>of Wind Research.

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:12.239
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:23.840
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:29.320
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal