WEBVTT - Michael Tomasky & G. Elliot Morris

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Molly John Fast and this is Fast Politics,

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>where we discussed the top political headlines with some of

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>today's best minds and Larry David Rose, Bill Maher's meeting

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:13.400
<v Speaker 1>with Trump as my dinner with Adolf.

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 2>We have such a great show for you today.

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>The New Republic's Mike Tamaski tries to make sense of

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.440
<v Speaker 1>where Trump's lawlessness is headed. Then we'll talk to the

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>author of the Strength in Numbers newsletter, g Elliott Morris,

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>about what polls can tell us about Trump's agenda.

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 2>But first the news.

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 3>So, Molly, there's a million reports out that Pete Haiksith

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 3>is going to have to resign. I'm always skeptical of

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 3>those in US, are you? But we do have the

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 3>first Republican calling for him to resign, and it's the

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 3>guy with the most Republican name of all time, Don Bacon.

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>So Bacon has done this before. Bacon is sort of

0:00:56.600 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the Jeff Flake twenty twenty five. He calls Hegseth an

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>amateur person, which for a weekend television hosts, that's not

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>very nice. He stood up for things before. Now I

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>want to just remind you that he is in Nebraska.

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>He comes from Nebraska's second congressional district. Whenever you see

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 1>a Republican standing up for something, and this is not

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>always true, but it is often true, you should look

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>at their district and find out if it's a red

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>district or a purple district.

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 3>A helpful thing is right on Wikipedia usually says their CPI,

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:36.559
<v Speaker 3>which a lot of people don't know, is the Cook

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 3>Political Index, and I'll tell you how far it leans

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 3>left or right.

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>So Nebraska's second congressional district, which is where he comes from,

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>it's an R plus three, so it is not a

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>very Republican district. So Marjorie Taylor Green is in an

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>R plus nineteen and Don Bacon is in an R

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>plus three, and the difference between an R plus three

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and an R plus nineteen is Don Bacon says things

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>like Donald Trump should be king. Marjorie Taylor Green says

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>things like Donald Trump should be God king because there's

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 1>seventeen percent more Republicans in her district. That is why

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I say to you, always be suspicious of Republicans who stand.

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 2>Up, but not even that.

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean Bacon has done that, and I think it's good,

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think standing up to Trump is always good, and.

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.639
<v Speaker 2>There's a dearth of courage right now in America.

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>But that said, just always be a little cynical because

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 1>these people are cowards. That said, I do think we're

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>going to see more standing up to Trump as his

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>poll numbers creator and as they crash the economy. So

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very likely that you'll see more quote

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.239
<v Speaker 1>unquote bravery and well it is good and we do

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 1>like it, and it may be the difference between authoritarianism

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and continuing as are you know, not perfect democracy. I

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 1>do think it's worth remembering like public sentiment has changed.

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>The people have different incentives, structures. They are not just

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>doing this out of the goodness of their heart. That said,

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Bacon did say that he does not think texting sensitive

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>or plans is something the Secretary of Defense should be doing.

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>By the way, this man manages three million people. This

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>is a humongous agency filled with a lot of important

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff that they're doing. Also, Elon wants to fire a

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:30.119
<v Speaker 1>huge swath of them because of Doge.

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:30.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 3>In other bleak News, sixty Minutes, despite its weakening relevance,

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 3>has long been one of the better journalists that out

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 3>what our country has had and a long time producer

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 3>is leaving because they feel the tide turning.

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>On that So sixty Minutes has done some really really

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>important journalism, especially right now. And this producer is a

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>guy called Bill Owens. And every time someone does something

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>like this, there are not a lot of great jobs

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>in television journalisms. There are not a lot of jobs

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in journalism period. So the fact that this guy is

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>leaving probably one of the best jobs in television. But

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>he's been there for a long time, and he's a

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>serious journalist. In fact, what he tells The New York

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Times is so having defended this show and what we

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>stand for from every angle over time, with everything I could,

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm stepping aside so the show can move forward, he

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>wrote in the memo, which was obtained by The Times.

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 1>Sixty Minutes has faced mounting pressure in recent months from

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>both President Trump, who sued CBS for ten billion dollars.

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 1>You'll ten billion dollars to get you know what, CBS

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have ten billion dollars to give to Donald Trump.

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Some real Austin Powers stuff right there.

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Accused the program of unlawful.

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>And illegal behavior. And this is because I don't know

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>why he's mad at them.

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 2>About this. Is this because of the Harris interview where

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 2>they he felt that it was.

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Edited in a way that made her look better than

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just this is this thing with Trump.

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>He's an Autocrat, and you know, not all of this

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.839
<v Speaker 1>makes sense or any of this, not even any of

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>this makes sense. So this guy, bill Owens is really

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 1>a hero to do this, to give up one of

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>these really best jobs in media because you don't feel

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:31.479
<v Speaker 1>that CBS is doing what's right or that that's a

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>big deal. And we really do applaud him in a

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>world filled with cowards and a world filled with Paul Weiss's.

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.039
<v Speaker 1>Don't be a Paul Weiss, be a Mark Elias, be

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a Bill Owens, like, do the right thing, even if

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the short term looks bad. We got to stick up

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>for what's right here some mind.

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 3>Now we turn to the Handmaid's Tale like portion of

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 3>our news unbelievable. The White House is presently a sessex apollo,

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 3>such as baby bonuses, menstrual cycle classes, and some other

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 3>questionable ideas to try to boost the birth rate.

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 2>So here's the problem.

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>For the economy to survive, we've got to keep having children,

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>otherwise we're going to become Japan. But the problem is,

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're probably going to become Japan anyway because

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>of stiflation, but we won't have the cute outfits or

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>any of the cool food. Will just be US with Japanese.

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>But no, the problem here with this is that so

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration doesn't want immigrants. They hate immigration, they don't

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>want immigration. But the problem is the only way for

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>our economy to survive is to get immigrants. So instead

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>of just welcoming immigrants and making a path to citizenship,

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:47.919
<v Speaker 1>which is what you would do if you were not

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 1>completely insane, they're going to try to make the white

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>people have babies.

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>This is natalism, This is the whole idea is to

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>get more white babies. And the problem is America is

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>wildly expect and nobody has seen their way of life go, right.

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 1>We all feel we have less than our parents, right,

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>So how they're going to do this They have no

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>idea because nobody wants have kids. So because the really

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>we need old white guys to decide to get women

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to have babies. So here are some of their ideas.

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think that it's worth remembering that a lot

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff has been tried in Hungary by Victor

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>orbon who Donald Trump wants to be. Most importantly, none

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of its work there still can't get people to have kids.

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>And also Hungary is just disaster on every level. But

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>here's where we're going, Donald Trump's. Here are some of

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's best ideas, and maybe not Donald Trump, maybe

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>one of his creepy friends. Five thousand dollars baby bonuses

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to every woman after she delivers. That will cover about

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>half of the tariffs for the first year.

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 2>What else? They have?

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Menstrual psycho classes, because that is not creepy at all.

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 2>There are calls on the government.

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>To fund programs that educate women on their menstrual cycles.

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>You're cutting headstart, okay, You're cutting free breakfast, You're cutting

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>child's care, you're cutting early whatever medicine for kids. You're

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>cutting food stamps, you're cutting snap, You're cutting all of

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>these things. But you're going to start menstrual classes.

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Does anyone see how insane these are? These are insane ideas.

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:34.439
<v Speaker 1>But I'm excited to know that Vance and Musk are

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>policy experts and advocates of boosting the birth rate have

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>been meeting with White House AIDS. That's creepy people like

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Steven Miller, and they are boosting the birth rate. These

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:48.839
<v Speaker 1>are written proposals. I mean, this is their best mind

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>sitting there trying, and they can just watch The Handmaid's Tail.

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>They don't even need to spend so much time thinking.

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:57.559
<v Speaker 1>Just watch The Handmaid's Tale.

0:08:57.880 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 3>All I'm gonna say is they don't bring us their best.

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>They do not bring a service. By the way, I

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>think Elon himself should be able to pretty much do it.

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 3>He gets rejected a lot. I mean, you saw what

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 3>happened with him in Tiffany Fong on Twitter.

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, come on, yeah, yeah, yeah, that's true. Doesn't

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 2>she know the birthrate needs her?

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So, speaking of other bleak Handmaid's Tale like news,

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:24.239
<v Speaker 3>you know who I don't want having my health.

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 4>Records speak for yourself.

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 3>The guy who picks up road kill that testified that

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 3>he had a braid wor RFK Juniors watching a disease

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 3>registry to track autistic people, and he's going to use

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 3>private medical records to make it happen.

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh, come on, it's too easy to remember that RFK

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Junior is planning to tell us. He's probably going to

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>tell us the vaccines cause autism in the fall September

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 1>yeh time, Yeah, September again, an autism registry. I just

0:09:57.760 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>want to go back to this for a minute. RFK

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>has a worm in his brain. It's dead. The worm

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is no longer eating his brain, but his brain is

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>not fully recovered. No, some things the guy does are

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:15.559
<v Speaker 1>not terrible, like food coloring and organic food.

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 3>We're going to talk about a really bad one in

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 3>the moment of fuckery today.

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Right, this feels like Germany nineteen thirty three, like registry tracking.

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I just want to point out, like

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>RFK is going to do this. He's ended all of

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>these different programs like tracking all sorts of health stuff. Right,

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>They're not tracking certain diseases like they're going to end

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>all that tracking, but they are going to track people

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>who have autism. So just explain to me how this

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>makes any sense.

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 2>No, don't, you can't.

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 3>I was good to say it not to do with that.

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 3>But what I will explain to you, which I'm sure

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 3>you already know, is that Trump is now saying about

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 3>his deportations that the reason they're going to start evading

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 3>new processes, they cannot everyone a trial.

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I love it so much. Yeah, you can't give

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:05.439
<v Speaker 1>everyone a trial.

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah you can.

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>That's how we do it here. He said this during

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>one of his truths. These truths we hold from his

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>truth social America can't give everyone a trial. It's actually

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the bedrock of our constitution. He's very unhappy. He wants

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to ship hundreds of Venezuelan men to Seecott, the scary

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>torture prison in Al Salvador. Funny, you know last week

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>we had some Republicans go to Seacott to mug for

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the cameras in front of all the men in the

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 1>shaved heads and the white pajamas, a little bit like

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Abu Grave right when we saw soldiers do that. Not

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>another dark moment in American history. You know, It's funny

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>because it's like, here we are Trump World trying to

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:58.079
<v Speaker 1>enact this Alien Enemies Act, which was every time it's

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>been enacted, it's been during war, but it's also been

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of the darkest moments, Like nobody is like we

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>need to go back to turning the Japanese, like that

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>was one of our darkest moments, and that's where we

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>are here more of the darkest moments. So not not surprising,

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>but you know here we are.

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 3>I can't think of anything more American than our proud

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 3>tradition of making people wait two years for trials, to

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.319
<v Speaker 3>the point that when we see somebody finally stayd trial

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 3>for something, we all go I thought they were dead.

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's what we do here.

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Mike Tamaski is the editor of The New Republic and

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the author of The Middle Out The Rise of Progressive Economics.

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:45.839
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Fast Politics, Mike Tamaski.

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 5>It's my favorite thing. Molly Jong Fast.

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 2>We know each other forever. You taught me how to

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 2>write opinion.

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the moment we find ourselves in not great,

0:12:57.840 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>not great great.

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it gets weirder every week. This week's weirdness again

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 5>with the fact that the Pope sized up jd Vance

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 5>and decided it was time to go check out.

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm so bad, oh, the poor Pope.

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, absolutely no. He was one of the great popes

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 5>of my lifetime, which extended back much farther than I

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 5>care to admit, includes briefly, although I wasn't sentient and

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 5>wasn't aware of him, But it includes briefly John the

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 5>twenty third who, from our point of view is the best,

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 5>because you know, he was the liberal and he opened

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 5>things up in the English mass of this and that.

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 5>But then Pape Bendict never went as far as we

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 5>would have hoped. But he did a lot of things

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 5>and planted a lot of seeds that I hope will

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 5>sprout in the future. Anyway, let's stop so.

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>We know he was a good pope because Marjorie Taylor

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Green tweeted after he died today there were major shifts

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>in global leaderships. Evil is being defeated by the hand

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:03.079
<v Speaker 1>of God.

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 5>I did see that tweet. I didn't quite realize that

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 5>this was what she was referring to.

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 1>But of course I too did not realize that was

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>what she was referring to. But later I realized that

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>she was in fact referring to the death of the pope.

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Imagine if a Democrat did that. Imagine if a Democrat

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>was like even just was like, I never liked him anyway.

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 5>I mean, yeah, it's insanity, and it's reached an intolerable point.

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 5>So what else do we have. We have a defense

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 5>secretary who's obviously way it over his head. It's not

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 5>as if we didn't know. Now, it's not as if

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 5>we didn't know. When he was nominated, there were dozens

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 5>hundreds of people who said, is he kidding? When Trump

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 5>was talking last year about his beautiful tariffs, the most

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 5>beautiful world word in the dictionary, there were dozens or

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 5>hundreds of people saying, he's out of his mind. He's

0:14:57.720 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 5>going to tank the markets, he's going to cause a

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 5>global trade war, he's going to ruin the economy, and

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 5>he just genuinely doesn't know what he's talking about when

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:11.479
<v Speaker 5>he says having an individual trade deficit with any particular

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 5>country in the world is a horrible thing.

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 5>Another aspect of that that is under discussed, in my view,

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 5>is that he has said many times he wants to

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 5>go back to like it was in the eighteen hundreds,

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 5>when we didn't have an internal revenue service. The government

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 5>just lived off tariff income. That is an insane thought.

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 5>I could go into the numbers very well. Then, of

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 5>course there's the jailing of innocent people. And Khalil, his

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 5>son was born this week.

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Did you cactually miss the birth of his son.

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because he's in a detention facility, but they moved

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>him to New Jersey.

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but he's a permanent resident.

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>If I'm not mistaken, he's married to a citizen who's

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>married to a citizen another citizen, and whose only supposed

0:15:56.920 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>crime is having political opinion that this administration doesn't agree with.

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>It's sick, and it's getting sicker. I think the good

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>news here, if there is good news, and you know,

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you and I we talk about this all the time

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>because we are friends and we tuk on the phone,

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>is that my prior is that I'm a little bit optimistic,

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>which is my worst quality and has proven me has

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>proven to be my achilles heel again and again and again.

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>But we're going to be a little optimistic here. It

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>does feel as if this is still the gang that

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>can't shoot straight. Like they may have had some help

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>with the Heritage Foundation, with Project twenty twenty five, they

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>may have had some more intellectual fortitude, or at least

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the appearance of, but ultimately, at the end of the day,

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>this crew is still pretty incompetent.

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and thank goodness for that, although you know, I

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 5>also read that like they've executed x out of the

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 5>total y number of ideas in Project twenty twenty five.

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 5>And for a gang that can't shoot straight, that's only

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 5>been in office ninety days. It was a surprisingly high percentage.

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I want to talk about that today because I

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>saw an academic writing about this.

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 2>This morning, and I thought this was important.

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Executive orders are Trump World's favorite tool because they're really

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>ultimately like he does them that are not legal, right,

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>They're not thought out the way Democrats used to do.

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 2>The more Republicans even.

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Like, you know, a lot of these are like I'm

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 1>targeting Mark Elias for the Steel dossier and his lack

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:35.880
<v Speaker 1>of respect for how.

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Great I am.

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:38.639
<v Speaker 1>And they fall apart in court. And there's a reason

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 1>they fall apart in court, because they're not legal, right.

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 5>We have to hope they continue to fall apart in court,

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 5>especially the one court that matters more than all the

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 5>other courts. And we'll see what they have to say.

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:51.360
<v Speaker 5>You know, I think it's now obviously it's incumbent upon

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 5>the Supreme Court to say something more forceful about returning

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:58.640
<v Speaker 5>Kilmar Abrado Garcia to the United States and getting him

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 5>out of El Salvador, the one where he wasn't supposed

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 5>to be sent. Yeah, what are there hundred and ninety

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 5>five countries in the world they could have sent him

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 5>to Lesotho. They could have sent him to Sri Lanka.

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 5>They had any and they have a lot of people.

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 5>This hasn't quite gotten through to a lot of people.

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 5>But they can bring him back and then immediately that

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 5>same day begin legal deportation procedures against him if they

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 5>wish to do that. But they don't wish to do that.

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 5>They're keeping him in the one place where they were

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 5>told they can't keep him. So yeah, I hope the

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 5>courts follow through. But then if the courts follow through

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 5>and Trump says, you know, okay, enforce it, then where

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 5>are we Look.

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 1>The Supreme Court went nine to zero on the due process,

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and again I think the reason why the wording was

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>so vague, at least what I've read, is that it

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>was probably that Roberts was trying to get the two

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Fox News hosts to sign on, because when it was

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>more specific, it was seven two. But even seven to

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>two is humongous for this court. I mean, there's a

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>court that overturned Road. This is a court that said

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:03.479
<v Speaker 1>Trump was a king a year ago. So you'll have

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 1>to wonder if Roberts sort of understands how precarious this

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>moment is.

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 5>Well I think he does. I think he understands it.

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 5>The question is whether he has the courage to act

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.919
<v Speaker 5>on that understanding. But I share your optimism to this extent,

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 5>Molly More and more people are standing up. What Harvard

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 5>is doing is very admirable because they didn't just say

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 5>no to Trump. Now they've turned around and turned the

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 5>tables on him and said we're suing you. And that's

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 5>going out of their way and kind of asking for

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 5>trouble in a good and admirable way. That should embolden people.

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 5>The schools of the Big ten, I hope make this

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 5>commitment of theirs. More firm does NATO Alliance affairs. I

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:44.919
<v Speaker 5>hope more law firms stand up, and you know, I

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 5>think I do think. And finally, just to say what

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 5>Rachel Maddow was showing every night for the first ten

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 5>minutes of her show, all these demonstrations across the country

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 5>over time, that's all going to matter.

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 1>So let's just for a minute talk about Trump's Warren

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's important. This is straight out of

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the Hungary playbook, right, This is you go after because

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Hungary had these fine academic institutions. We saw orbon target

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>academia it worked. He won, quote unquote, which means destroyed

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the academic institutions. Congratulations, and you no longer matter and

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the academics just move somewhere else. But this is a

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>page from that, right, because as you and I both know,

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 1>this is not this is not and in fact, this

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 1>letter and I want to talk about this. So the

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>letter that they sent, the task on Anti Semitism sent

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that had three different of these arts of the Trump

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 1>government signed it.

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Right, major letter.

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Had all of these things that would basically put the

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>university into receivership. We will supervise all your teaching, we

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>will supervise all your admissions, we will supervise I mean,

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it was just like a you will know longer be Harvard,

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you will be Hillsdale. We're going to make Charlie Kirk

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>your dean of admissions. That was basically what they were saying.

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:08.919
<v Speaker 1>What Harvard did right away was publish the letter and

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>say there's no way we can fucking do this, and

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>there's no way we will do this. The next day

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you had just donations, endless donations coming in, and then

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you had a groundswell of public support for Harvard. Contrast

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that with Columbia which acquiesced and now Trump wants more.

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's the age old lesson people like this. You

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 5>give them a little bit and they just keep taking more.

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 5>But the bottom line question and all these kinds of things,

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 5>Molly to me is always this, just like, how are

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:40.640
<v Speaker 5>you going to be judged by history? House? History going

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:43.239
<v Speaker 5>to see you. I think it's pretty clear History's going

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 5>to judge Harvard very favorably when all this is over,

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 5>and hope, hopefully we return to being a more or

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:52.160
<v Speaker 5>less normal democracy. Brad Karp, the head of SCAD and Arps,

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 5>is not going to be judged so favorably. That's where

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 5>people have to take their stands. And then you know

0:21:57.560 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 5>it's going to include journalists someday too.

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 1>You and me, baby, we're going to be this Selena Zito, No,

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm just kidding. When you look at this idea, right

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that history, it's partially that it's the right thing to do,

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>but also even if you look at the law firms

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>for example, so all of these law firms, right, they're

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 1>scared about losing corporate clients. This is a money game.

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>The corporate law firms. These guys make ten fifteen million

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year. I mean, this is like the really

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, these guys make a ton of money and

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>they were worried about losing clients.

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 2>This again goes back to these executive worders.

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>None of these are you know, they say they're binding,

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>they're fucking bullshit. It's all made up, right, You take

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Trump World to court and they lose. The law firms

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>that said no way actually have been winning in court.

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:49.199
<v Speaker 1>So the idea here that any of this is, you know,

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 1>it's all boogeymen.

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 2>But the ones who made the deal, like scan now.

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump wants more because of course, and so I'm sure

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you read this or you saw him muse about how

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:03.880
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the pro bone of work that these law firms

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>might do could be to help coal companies.

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 5>I miss that, but I'm sure you know that's just

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 5>for starters.

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 1>But coal companies. Like, you're a young associate. You went

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to Harvard, then you went to Yale law school. You

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>kill yourself working and working and working twenty hour days,

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and now you are going to represent a coal baron.

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 5>Right, because they can't afford legal counsel after all.

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 2>Also, yeah, exact, isn't that crazy?

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 5>It's total craziness. We don't know what to be outraged at,

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:40.159
<v Speaker 5>because at eight in the morning, it's one thing, and

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:41.919
<v Speaker 5>by tenth thirty in the morning, it's another thing. At

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 5>bout one o'clock in the afternoon, it's another thing. But

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 5>we're outraged by all of them. And they're all authoritarian,

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 5>they're all un American, and some of them are just well,

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 5>they're not all. Some of them are just as you said,

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 5>ignorance and stupidity and incompetence. So one I wrote about

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 5>in my column this week was Vladimir Putin calling for

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 5>a ceasefire and easter ceasefire and then breaking it right again, yeah, again,

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:10.919
<v Speaker 5>and then asking, well, you know, after what Marco Rubio

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:13.160
<v Speaker 5>said last Friday, what kind of thing do you expect

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 5>Vladimir Putin to do? Of course, he's going to do

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 5>whatever he wants. After the Secretary of State of the

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 5>United States of America said, we're just going to check

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 5>out on this unless we get something within days. It's

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 5>not our problem. It's not our war. That's what he said.

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 5>It's not our war. So you're sitting in the kremline

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 5>and you just you high five the guy next to you.

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 5>And now I take it back to Trump saying many

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 5>many times on the campaign trail. I will solve that

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 5>on my first day, in my first twenty four hours.

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 5>As I wrote a lot of times, when people say

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 5>use a phrase like day one, everybody understands they don't

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 5>mean it literally. But he did mean this letter he

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 5>said on the first day, in the first twenty four hours,

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 5>and he said it over and over again. Who was

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 5>idiot enough to believe that?

0:24:59.119 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>But again, I wonder if you could speak to little

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Marco's incredible weakness here.

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 2>He has his job. You've seen other Secretaries of State.

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:14.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking of Rex Tillerson, right, who have done this

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 1>job and seemed weak, but not quite weak the same way.

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Why does Marco seem just so weak?

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 5>I would say, because of what we know from his background. Okay,

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 5>so he was running against Trump. He was originally appalled

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 5>by Trump, and then he went through this short period

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 5>before he dropped out of the race where he was

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:37.679
<v Speaker 5>an insult comic toward Trump. You know, he was like

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 5>the Don Rickles of the Republican field of twenty sixteen

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 5>for about a week and a half. And he cracks

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 5>some very funny jokes. I must say, at Trump's expense,

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 5>but then all that was gone and he became a sycophant,

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 5>and he's been a ridiculous sycophant ever since. So of

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:56.879
<v Speaker 5>course he's been a sycophant. So I mean when Trump

0:25:57.040 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 5>named him, I remember thinking to myself, Okay, that's actually

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:04.640
<v Speaker 5>a plausible choice for secretary of State for three reasons.

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 5>One Rubio has been a sycophant for seven years. Number two,

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 5>Rubio will pass unanimously because he's a senator and he's not,

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 5>you know, a child bolister. And number three, he's a

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 5>perfect choice because Rubio is a nothing. You know, Trump

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:23.440
<v Speaker 5>will be the real secretary of State. And I think

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 5>that wasn't you know, that wasn't a particularly insightful reaction

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 5>on my part. I'm sure it was your reaction. It

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 5>was the reaction of hundreds of people. Those three things.

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that Trump is doing this time, which

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>he didn't do last time, which I'm wondering if you

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>can speak to if you think it's going to work.

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Trump is this time not firing people, because last time

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>he fired everyone and I think he thought that it whatever,

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>it gave him less gravitas. So he's like knock, going

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to fire Hagsatz, despite the fact that heg sas is

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>pretty fast and loose with a lot of that did

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the information that he probably shouldn't be fast and loose with.

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 2>What do you think the play there is?

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 5>I see, I'm firing he Sith. I mean based on

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 5>what you said yesterday at the Easter Egg thing, but

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 5>also just based on what we know about him. I mean,

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 5>that's not their play. Their play is to turn everything

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:19.400
<v Speaker 5>around and make everything about the liberal media and the leftists.

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 5>As Hexath said also at the Easter Egg hunt, nothing's

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 5>their fault. Everything's the fault of the left wing media.

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 5>And so you know that's that's really all they have

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 5>to say. And that's that, and that Fox and Newsmax

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 5>and Sinclair and the rest of them ate that, and

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:38.679
<v Speaker 5>that becomes the gospel. So if that's what you believe,

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 5>then why on earth would you fire Hexith? You didn't

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 5>do anything wrong because it's all the fault of the media.

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, So true, Mike TAMASKI, will you.

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 5>Please come back anytime?

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 2>My dear.

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>G Elliott Morris is the author of these Strength in

0:27:56.720 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Numbers some stuff Welcome too fast polity ex Sally Morris.

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Wally This is very exciting for me because I

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 1>had wanted to have you on for a million years

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>when you were at five point thirty eight and you were.

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 2>At a network, and network can be persnickety.

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:14.239
<v Speaker 1>So I'm very delighted to get to have you on

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 1>because I think there's just a lot to learn from data.

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:20.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, I think, especially in this moment in politics,

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 4>it's really good to ink ourselves two of the facts.

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 4>I mean, this seems to be a problem that's getting

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 4>even worse as the media fractures, and you have one

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 4>party in power that is really in favor of that fracturing,

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 4>seeming egging on some of the factlessness. So I think

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 4>it's a good time for independent people to strike out

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 4>and devote publications two facts. If I can be oral,

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 4>self congratulatory here.

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>And partisan too, a little bit partisan, and we like

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>it here because I'm on the opinion side.

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 2>So you have a bunch of things I want to

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 2>talk to you about.

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>The first thing I think we should talk about is

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump's popularity, because I do think there's this authoritarian push

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that the administration is doing. You could say it's dismantling

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the administrative state. You could say it's authoritarianism. I say

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it's authoritarianism, they say it's dismantling the administrative state. But

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is, I want you to talk about just

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of how popular he was when he came into

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>office and sort of where he's gone since then, because

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 1>it's almost one hundred days.

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, whether or not it's authoritarianism or remaking

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 4>the administrative state, it's kind of like calling a blackbird

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 4>a grackle. That's the same thing. They're using the power

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 4>of the state to their goals. To your question, that

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 4>does seem to be having an effect on Donald Trump's popularity,

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 4>on his approval rating in particular, but also his approval

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 4>rating on handling certain issues. So on my stub stack

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 4>at Strengthen Numbers, I have an average of Trump's approuval polls.

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 4>It's sort of the intellectual follow of the average we

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 4>had at five point thirty eight before it was shut down,

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 4>and it has Donald Trump's net approval rating today at

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 4>minus six. Okay, that's the difference between his approval rating

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 4>at forty five percent and his disapproval rating at fifty

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 4>one percent. So we find a majority of the country

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:12.959
<v Speaker 4>disapproves of the job he's doing today. And when he started,

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, his approval rating was at fifty and his

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 4>disapproval rating was at forty. So this is a pretty

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 4>big inversion of where he started as presidency.

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I want you to sort of track how this went.

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 1>He was as popular as he'd ever been, won the

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>popular vote.

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 2>What were the sort of.

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Things that you can point to that change the trajectory.

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 4>This is a hard problem to solve in social science

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 4>because there's two things going on. One is just there's

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 4>like a general trend down in your approval rating as

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 4>time goes on. So you know Trump, twenty seventeen, Joe Biden,

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 4>Barack Obama, all of those approval ratings just fell gradually

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 4>as the presidency kicked off. The political scientists would say,

0:30:56.600 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 4>this is because the party in power moves policy away

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 4>from the average voter just by virtue of being the

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 4>party in power, and you marginalize a small number of

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 4>people with every policy change, and that just adds up.

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 4>It certainly seems to be part of the explanation Trump's

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 4>his net approval rating falling, you know, seventeen points is

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 4>about how much it fell in twenty seventeen as well

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 4>over this amount of time in his first term. But

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 4>that's not to say that events don't matter. It's just

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 4>that they kind of pile up on each other over time.

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Right, But there are certain For example, in Biden world,

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the Afghanistan withdrawal, say what you will about it, liked it,

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't like it. Most people didn't like it. I think

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty true, but it did not pull well. So and

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 1>it really was a moment where his numbers started to

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>just create. So I wonder, like it seems to me

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>from what I understand, the tariffs are huge. That was

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a huge moment in Trump administration.

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so on April second, Best Liberation Day, the day

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 4>his tariffs go into due effect, he's at a minus

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 4>two approval rating, and now now he's at minus six

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 4>minus seven, And that's where most of the change in

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 4>his apprewer rating has happened since April second. So you

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 4>kind of have to use the other data to make

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 4>the argument that these things are being noticed by people.

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 4>But I think you have a strong argument there as well.

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 4>It's the lead story on every news outlet, at least

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 4>until last week. People say terrorists arey, you know, they

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 4>don't like them by twenty points or nineteen points. So

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 4>that's a compelling argument to me. I think that's probably

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 4>the biggest political misstep for the administration so far.

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>So the tariffs, and this gets to something you wrote

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 1>about just recently on your Strength a numbers substaff. Should

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Democrats focus on immigration or the economy? So Gavin Newsom

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>said this thing about how the tariffs were more detrimental

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 1>than the disappearing people and that Democrats should focus on that.

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 2>What what is the data say?

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, if you look at the answer to the

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 4>question do you approve of the job the president is

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 4>doing on X? Where X is like immigration, economy, trader,

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 4>what have you, then you get about a four point

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 4>approplarating for the president. So four percentage point more people

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 4>say he approves than disapprove, you know. So you might

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:27.720
<v Speaker 4>see that numbers say like, oh, what he's doing is popular,

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 4>But what's actually happening is this question is too broad

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 4>to really capture the nuances of public opinion on immigration.

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 4>That's my argument at least. So if you then ask people,

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, not do you approve of the job the

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 4>president is doing on immigration, but do you think the

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 4>president should obey federal court rulings even if he disagrees

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 4>with them. For example, which is what's happening in the

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 4>Abrego Garcia case. Eighty two percent of people say the

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 4>president should obey the court ruling. If you ask, you

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 4>should Trump keep deporting people just by the court order?

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 4>Stop it? You know? Most Americans about sixty percent say

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 4>he should stop. If you and sorry to list things,

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 4>but if you ask people you know, should should the

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 4>US government deport undocumented immigrants who have lived here for

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 4>more than ten years? Than by thirty seven points people

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 4>say no, don't do that. So my whole sort of

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 4>project here at this immigration polling is just to get

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:21.760
<v Speaker 4>people to acknowledge that there's nuances, that there's some types

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 4>of immigration policies that people like and don't like, and

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:27.840
<v Speaker 4>that the broad question do you approve of whatever the

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 4>executive is doing is not super helpful.

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly.

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 1>So let's just go another sort of minute on this,

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 1>which is, and I think you're right when you write

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:39.439
<v Speaker 1>about this. You talk about the idea that in fact,

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:43.399
<v Speaker 1>parties can hold two things in their head, right, that

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you can focus on this sort of norms crushing of

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:50.879
<v Speaker 1>deporting people who have not faced through process, and then

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:57.240
<v Speaker 1>also the importance of not crashing the economy. So Trump's

0:34:57.280 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>people seem and I think this is something I really

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:02.879
<v Speaker 1>want to dig into because today is yet another day

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that ends and why and so the markets are down

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 1>and the bond anxiety gold is up. I mean, all

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the indicators that they that people are not happy with

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 1>what the government is doing on the economy. Explain to

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:18.760
<v Speaker 1>me how it breaks down on Poland, because it's interesting

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and important.

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:19.880
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so maybe some relevant numbers here. About seventy percent

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:27.320
<v Speaker 4>of Americans say they don't like Trump's tariff policies.

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Seems pretty high.

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's like a pretty negative signal with the incumbent

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:33.280
<v Speaker 4>White House.

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Since you're a data die, can you just explain to

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 1>us how hard it is to get seventy percent of

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Americans to agree on anything.

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 4>Seventy percent disapproval is pretty high. That's about the percent

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:45.879
<v Speaker 4>of people who said Joe Biden was doing poorly out

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 4>inflation with seventy percent. And I think, and we acknowledge

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:51.799
<v Speaker 4>in hindsight that inflation was pretty bad in twenty twenty two.

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 4>So it's it's getting to the point where it's like, oh,

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 4>this is this is nearly an obvious and obvious truth,

0:35:57.120 --> 0:35:59.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, something you can see with your eyes inside

0:35:59.320 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 4>of with data.

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the MAGA crew still has his back talk us

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 1>through those numbers and sort of what they're thinking is.

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think the White House is thinking here

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 4>is that if they and shore up manufacturing in the

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 4>long term, then that would be politically popular. If they

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 4>can stick it to China, then those sort of victories

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:23.960
<v Speaker 4>are popular. But those are long term plays and in

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 4>the short term you are like draining people's For one case,

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:31.439
<v Speaker 4>people are losing their jobs in manufacturing because businesses can't

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 4>afford tariffs, and that is definitely showing up in the numbers.

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:38.239
<v Speaker 4>So by an eighteen point margin. For example, in the

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 4>latest polling, people say they disapprove of Trump's trade and

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 4>economic policy.

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Right, which is amazing for a Republican, Right.

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the Republicans had the advantage on this question

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 4>for the last fifteen years, so he's really you know,

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 4>one way of looking at this as Trump is sort

0:36:56.120 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 4>of blowing probably the best asset Republicans had so the

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 4>last five elections on his sponge that tariffs would work

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 4>out right, completely uneminenced.

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is something I think about a lot. What's

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the number of die hard magos. What's the number where

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you crash the economy and they're still like, my guy

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:18.280
<v Speaker 1>is great, he knows what he's doing.

0:37:18.560 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 4>That's a great question. I think it's probably twenty five,

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:24.800
<v Speaker 4>maybe thirty percent. And the reason they say that number

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:27.719
<v Speaker 4>that that's the number of people who say you should

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 4>deport immigrants who have been here for like two decades

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 4>and have legal status. That is the number of people

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:39.760
<v Speaker 4>who say they support Trump's tariffs, who approve extending tax cuts,

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:42.800
<v Speaker 4>even if it means cutting Medicare, Like about thirty percent

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:46.840
<v Speaker 4>is what you get as the yes to all of

0:37:46.920 --> 0:37:50.239
<v Speaker 4>the most extreme Trump policies let's call them extreme, the

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 4>most trumpy policies. So I think it's probably about twenty

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 4>five or thirty percent, But that would depend on the

0:37:56.120 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 4>scale of the economic crisis, like great Depression level might

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 4>be worst session level, Like I guess it depends on

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 4>how many people are still paying for Fox News and

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 4>X subscriptions. You know, there's a media influence going on

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:08.919
<v Speaker 4>here too.

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 1>What percentage of America do you think is the group

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:14.719
<v Speaker 1>that went with Trump but has regrets.

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:17.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, if you ask people straight up, it's like five percent.

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:19.440
<v Speaker 4>If you ask people, Hey, who do you know, do

0:38:19.480 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 4>you regret your vote? In twenty twenty four, low single

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 4>digits of people say that they regret it, But that's

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:28.440
<v Speaker 4>a really hard thing to poll, Like people don't like

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:31.400
<v Speaker 4>to admit they were wrong. And if yeah, if you

0:38:31.440 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 4>ask Kamala Harris supporters, do they regret their vote, it's

0:38:34.239 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 4>also low single digits. So you know, these things can

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:40.239
<v Speaker 4>equal allow they can cancel each other out and have

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 4>small effects on electro performance even if you're you know,

0:38:43.640 --> 0:38:45.720
<v Speaker 4>even if there's some regret on either side.

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:47.719
<v Speaker 1>We talk a lot about sort of the middle of

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 1>the country, like the ideological middle of the country, and

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious there's an added to the seventy percent of

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the country is the middle. They're all sort of ideologically

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:01.319
<v Speaker 1>much more centris. Do you think that number's right?

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:03.879
<v Speaker 4>What percentage of other country did you say you think

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:04.719
<v Speaker 4>was centrist?

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 1>What we've sort of heard is that seventy percent of

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:09.719
<v Speaker 1>the country is sort of the is more centrist.

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, I'll just as some nuance here. So

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 4>like usually people don't have moderate opinions on a bunch

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 4>of different issues, and you call them moderates. That's really rare.

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:23.359
<v Speaker 4>Most people don't pay attention to politics, and they feel

0:39:23.440 --> 0:39:26.239
<v Speaker 4>very intensely about a couple of issues, and then they

0:39:26.360 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 4>pick countervailing opinions on a bunch of stuff. So they'll

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:32.319
<v Speaker 4>have a liberal, really liberal position on one thing, and

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:34.400
<v Speaker 4>I'll maybe trade in a really conservative position on the

0:39:34.400 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 4>other thing, maybe immigration, let's say. And then we call

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 4>those people moderates just because of the way that polsters

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 4>and academics have combined all of those opinions together. But

0:39:45.680 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 4>most people don't pay attention to politics enough to like

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 4>be centrist. They're just kind of living their lives, and

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:54.359
<v Speaker 4>you can activate them on the left or the right,

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:57.680
<v Speaker 4>depending on what issues are most important to them. So

0:39:57.920 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 4>one way to answer your question is, like, on immigration,

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 4>maybe the country is more right leaning than the audience takes.

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 4>But on economics, like what people want is stability, predictability.

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:11.839
<v Speaker 4>They want a president who's like committed mostly to fed independence,

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 4>so the monetary policy is and politicized, and that like,

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, people also have this baseline expectation that politicians

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:22.280
<v Speaker 4>will react to data that shows they did something wrong.

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:24.640
<v Speaker 4>And I guess if you call that said all that

0:40:24.680 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 4>stuff's centrist, I think it's at least rational, or that's

0:40:28.200 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 4>how people should be behaving. Then definitely a lot more

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:33.799
<v Speaker 4>interests than the ones that are in the whitehounch So

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:34.440
<v Speaker 4>I guess.

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:38.319
<v Speaker 1>So interesting and also just you know, it's sort of

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 1>not how I think about things, which I think is important.

0:40:41.120 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'm curious when you look at these protests, what

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 1>do you see in the data on the protests?

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the way that I analyze this is like what

0:40:50.520 --> 0:40:55.480
<v Speaker 4>historical midterm cycles does this one look like? And the protests,

0:40:55.520 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 4>like the number of people that are out protesting in

0:40:57.640 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 4>the street, And that matters if it's like twenty million

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 4>versus two, of course, but the real important thing is

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 4>like are their protests at all? Are their mass protests?

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:11.600
<v Speaker 4>And then do those protests align with like popular positions

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:15.280
<v Speaker 4>from the opposition party that would indicate an opposition party

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:17.840
<v Speaker 4>doing well in the next election. Is the media responding

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:20.879
<v Speaker 4>to these protests, covering them, putting footage of people out there?

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:22.759
<v Speaker 4>It's like, yes, well then well then a lot of

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 4>people are going to see the coverage of these protests.

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 4>So this is sort of the data driven journalism in

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 4>terms of like checking boxes empirically to try to match

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:34.399
<v Speaker 4>things up historically, rather than the data driven journalism that's like, oh, look,

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 4>fifty million people turned out, Like I don't know how

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:40.240
<v Speaker 4>many people turned out the last weekend. That doesn't really

0:41:40.520 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 4>matter because all the conditions for Democrats capturing the momentum

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 4>from the protests are there.

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:52.400
<v Speaker 2>So interesting. Thank you, thank you, thank you, Elliott. I

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 2>hope it'll come back.

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:55.360
<v Speaker 4>Okay, thank you, this is great.

0:41:58.120 --> 0:42:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Moment. Jesse Cannon, Samali.

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:08.680
<v Speaker 3>The FDA under rfk's rule, it's suspending milk quality tests

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:11.760
<v Speaker 3>amid workforce cuts, which seems bad.

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to explain this to everyone here. Okay, they

0:42:15.160 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 1>are cutting the workforce so that they can give very

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:22.279
<v Speaker 1>wealthy people a tax cut. There is no reason that

0:42:22.360 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 1>this needs to happen. There is no like, all of

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:27.600
<v Speaker 1>this is like, well, we can't do this. We can't

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:30.720
<v Speaker 1>give very wealthy people a tax cut unless we cut

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:35.080
<v Speaker 1>what the government does for people. So let's cut workforce cuts.

0:42:35.120 --> 0:42:38.040
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to food safety, because you know, again

0:42:38.200 --> 0:42:41.240
<v Speaker 1>like this is the whole Trump thing. You don't understand

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:44.839
<v Speaker 1>why you have regulations until things go horribly wrong. So

0:42:45.280 --> 0:42:49.440
<v Speaker 1>like that train that derailed in East Palestine, Ohio, you

0:42:49.480 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have those regulations until you have the train derail

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in East Palestine. Ohio, and everyone gets sick from the

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the all the chemicals. That's what this is, right.

0:43:01.719 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 1>So now they're not going to inspect milk quality. And

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:07.359
<v Speaker 1>here's what's going to happen. People are going to get

0:43:07.360 --> 0:43:11.319
<v Speaker 1>sent for milk. This is why we have these quality inspectors.

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:14.400
<v Speaker 1>This is why we have regulation. Is because there was

0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a reason. Like Donald Trump loves to talk about tariffs

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and how there was a time before the internal revenue system.

0:43:21.840 --> 0:43:24.080
<v Speaker 2>I swear to God, like my man has he has

0:43:24.120 --> 0:43:26.880
<v Speaker 2>like very few ideas and they are so stuck in

0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:32.160
<v Speaker 2>his brain with like sticky tacky whatever. So he's like, yeah,

0:43:32.160 --> 0:43:35.799
<v Speaker 2>there was a time when America is really great. You

0:43:35.840 --> 0:43:38.640
<v Speaker 2>know during that time, like people would eat bad fish

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:42.040
<v Speaker 2>and die. This is the goal, right, It's like, you know,

0:43:42.200 --> 0:43:44.360
<v Speaker 2>you drank that milk and it made you so sick.

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:47.399
<v Speaker 2>That's where we're going to folks, and you hear you

0:43:47.480 --> 0:43:50.920
<v Speaker 2>heard it here first. And when that milk makes you sick,

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:53.760
<v Speaker 2>remember who told you this is all going to happen.

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 2>And visit me in Seacott.

0:43:57.480 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 3>I often think of discussions you and I have that

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:01.719
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people say, oh, this is all to

0:44:01.760 --> 0:44:04.319
<v Speaker 3>benefit the rich, and this is one of those ones

0:44:04.320 --> 0:44:06.480
<v Speaker 3>where it's like, no, this is just stupid.

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:08.359
<v Speaker 2>This is all to benefit the rich.

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I say, this is someone who was you know, who

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:12.120
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of advantages.

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:15.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, but this is also will affect the rich and

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:18.320
<v Speaker 3>is also just the stupid one that affects everybody.

0:44:18.680 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I guess Elon has a food taster. If

0:44:22.600 --> 0:44:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't have a food taster, this is going to

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:27.720
<v Speaker 1>be very annoying and perhaps you might die.

0:44:27.880 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Trump's America. You probably won't die, but you

0:44:31.000 --> 0:44:32.160
<v Speaker 2>might get a release it.

0:44:32.880 --> 0:44:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's it for this episode of Fast Politics. Tune

0:44:38.880 --> 0:44:44.560
<v Speaker 1>in every Monday, Wednesday, Thursday and Saturday to hear the

0:44:44.560 --> 0:44:48.799
<v Speaker 1>best minds and politics make sense of all this chaos.

0:44:49.080 --> 0:44:51.960
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoy this podcast, please send it to a

0:44:52.000 --> 0:44:54.400
<v Speaker 1>friend and keep the conversation going.

0:44:54.880 --> 0:44:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening.