WEBVTT - Purdue Targeted as Trump Declares Opioid Emergency (Audio)

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:03.560
<v Speaker 1>President Trump is going to declare widespread opioid abuse a

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>public health emergency today, but he will not make additional

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>federal money available to fight the epidemic. The opioid epidemic

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>has emerged as one of the nation's most pressing public

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.319
<v Speaker 1>health matters, killing more than sixty four thousand Americans last year.

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:21.120
<v Speaker 1>This falls short of declaring a national emergency, which would

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>have given states access to funding from the Federal Disaster

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Relief Fund. Trump's Presidential Commission on the crisis had recommended

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that action, and Trump indicated in August he would follow

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that recommendation. The opioid crisis is an emergency, and I'm

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:39.239
<v Speaker 1>saying officially right now it is an emergency. It's a

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>national emergency. We're going to spend a lot of time,

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot of effort, and a lot of money on

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the opioid dressing. The public health emergency last ninety days

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and can be renewed indefinitely, joining us as Richard Austin

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>as a professor at the University of Kentucky School of Law. Richard,

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>what's the result of this declaration of public health emergency?

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>What happens next? Well, it's it's hard to say what

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>ultimately will happen. It's a good first step. Uh, it

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>comes a little late in the game. This has been

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>going on for at least fifteen years, but it is

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>nice that the federal government is finally taking it seriously. Richard.

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>How much more would would be be done if the

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>President had gone further and declared a national emergency? Well,

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like the states would have been able to

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>apply for money to help with opioid addiction, and certainly

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take a lot of money and a

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:45.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of time to uh make a dent in that

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>in that problem, Richard. Would there be any downside to

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>declaring a national emergency besides the amount of funding, Well,

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't see any downside it. I suppose you could.

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>You could argue that it's not an emergency like a

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>flood or or an earthquake or something like that. You

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>know that it's really a long term, very serious social problems.

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>So it isn't the sort of thing that a few

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars at you know, at one fail swoop

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to help much. Well, let's talk a little

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>bit about the things that actually will do. So, if

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:29.959
<v Speaker 1>I understand it correctly, we're talking about wider access to

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:34.799
<v Speaker 1>telemedicine services, UH, speeding up the hiring process to get

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>more people in place who can you can deal with

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>this problem. Let's uh local governments repurpose some funds. UH.

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Which of those steps of any are gonna potentially have

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a significant dent in this problem? Well, probably none of them.

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>None of them will have a significant UH dent or

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>making a significant dent. I mean, the trouble is, they

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>are millions of people who are addicted, and it's it's

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>going to take a few huge commitment of resources to

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:05.919
<v Speaker 1>UH to deal with that problem. And I think it's

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>probably beyond the capability of the states to do it,

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>at least by themselves. UH. You know. The trouble is

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>that that we tend to attack problems of this sort

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>piece meal. So, for example, a few years ago, it

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>was shut down the pill mills UM and so a

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of effort was focused in that direction and was

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>largely successful, but it didn't really cure the the overall problem.

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.519
<v Speaker 1>People just turned to other drugs like heroin UH and

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>UH and other sources of supply, and so the problem

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really alleviated very much, Richard, Because there have to

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>be a comprehensive legislative package from Congress with a dedicated

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>stream of funding, or are there other ways to approach

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>this Well, I think that that would be a good idea,

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps it could be the foundation for an overall

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>comprehensive program. I mean, it can be totally federal, but

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever long term solution there is, it's going to require

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of a lot of money. So the federal

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>government certainly has an important role to play in that respect.

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh And of course uh uh, it can try to

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>regulate the drug companies, who are at least a part

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of the source of the problem. Uh and uh for

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>focus on them. That might help some too. But it's

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>a very very complex problem, and there's probably no one

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>particular thing that's going to be the solution. It's going

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to be a multitude of of of efforts. Uh and

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and and it's going to be a long term project

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>as well. Richard, Don't we only have got a minute

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 1>left right right now, But you mentioned that that taking

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 1>the federal government a long time to get to this point.

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>It's been going on for fifteen years. Should we be

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>casting blame not just at at the Trump administration, but

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>at the Obama administration not moving more quickly on this. Well,

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 1>I think, I mean, there's certain parts of the federal government,

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the UM certain U. S. Attorneys have been pretty aggressive

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>in going after the drug companies, bringing criminal proceedings against them.

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh So it's not that the government hasn't done anything,

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's sort of sad and ironic that Congress just,

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>uh not just but several months ago pasted legislation that

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:33.919
<v Speaker 1>greatly reduced the drug the as enforcement powers against drug companies,

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and it was passed unanimously, I might add, uh and

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>promptly signed by the president was President Obama at the time.

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>So they seemed to, uh go, they seem to be

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>ambivalent about how they want to approach the problem. President

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump is going to declare widespread opioid abuse the public

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>health emergency today, but there's also a wave of government

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits where states, counties, and cities have sued opioid makers

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and distributors. There's all so a federal criminal investigation and

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:06.119
<v Speaker 1>to produe farmers marketing of the opioid pain killer OxyContin,

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and Insist Therapeutics founder John Kapoor and six other former

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>executives have been charged with conspiracy to him at fraud

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>by bribing doctors to prescribe the company's opioid pain drug.

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Our guests are Richard Austiness, professor at the University of

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Kentucky Law School, and Leo Belotowski, professor at Northeastern University

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Law School. Leo, let's start with the government lawsuits. What's

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the legal basis of the suits? Well, there's a number

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of legal theories, um, you know, basically fraudalent marketing, and

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of consumer protection rules that are alleged to

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>be violated. Um. And you know, in many ways, these lawsuits,

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 1>in my view, are you know, somewhat late to the

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>late to the punch, um. You know. The From a

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>public health perspective, the crisis now is driven non by

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>pharmaceutical drugs, and although certainly industry practices deserve a lot

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of scrutiny, um, you know, I doubt that these lawsuits

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>will make much of a doe in the current crisis

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>as it exists today. Richard, let me ask you about

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>this criminal investigation into Perdue Pharma. What do we know

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>based on either the civil lawsuits or or other news

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>reports about the allegations against Perdue And how hard will

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it be for prosecutors to prove any sort of criminal wrongdoing. Well, um,

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>as I understand it. Uh. The basis for the for

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>these criminal proceedings is that the drug company misrepresented the

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>efficacy of the drug, saying it would last twelve hours,

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>when in fact it rarely did that. This is in

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>part due to the fact that it's sort of front loaded,

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>so you get most of the or a large part

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of the opioid analgesic effect early in the in that

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>twelve hour period and it just sort of tapers off

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to practically nothing by the end, so that means people

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>would start taking it taking a new dose sooner rather

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>than later. Uh and And it's alleged that Produced had

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>its sales reps misrepresent this, uh two doctors uh and

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and so this is largely the the The interesting thing

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>is it's sort of like groundhog Day. They were led

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>guilty to essentially the same charges in two thousand and seven,

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and we're fined a substantial amount of money, and it

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>looks like they're back at it again. And Leo produced

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>said that that it's misconduct that it pleaded guilty to

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:54.839
<v Speaker 1>was only from through two thousand one, and then it

0:08:55.040 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 1>stopped and they regret what they did. Is there proof that, uh,

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that you've seen or that you know of that the

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>FEDS have that it's still going on. I'm not you know,

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I would not want to comment on whether or not

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 1>there's proof. I I don't know the case closely enough. UM.

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:20.839
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know. Another aspect of this is, uh,

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>basically the allegation that produm misrepresented the risk of misuse

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and addiction, which was for these long release UM formulations

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to be lower and it and it appears

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps it wasn't lower, and these drugs were made

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>out to be safer than than they were in fact. UM.

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:52.199
<v Speaker 1>But you know, certainly, UM, there may have been continued

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 1>uh wrongdoing on the part of some representatives who continued

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 1>to essentially make claims about the medication that we're not

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>we're not rooted in the evidence. Richard, What is the

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>fact that that there might be ongoing wrong doing? Tell

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>us about that earlier plea agreement? I mean usually, I

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>think plea agreements have provisions in them that try to

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>make sure that the defendant doesn't doesn't repeat the behavior. UH.

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Can we infer can we imagine that maybe that that

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>agreement wasn't tough enough one perdue. Well, I'm not sure that.

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there was a memor memorandum of agreement. That's uh.

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:40.439
<v Speaker 1>And I think the interesting aspect of this, and I

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know the answer, is how long it was supposed

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to last. It's not necessarily forever, So once the scrutiny

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.439
<v Speaker 1>was off, they may have reverted back to what they

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>were doing before. At least that seems to be what

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the government is alleging. Leo. There are all kinds of

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>problems with the opioid crisis. There's addiction, there's treatment, there's

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>regulatory policy, enforcement, all kinds of different things. Is there

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>one area that you would cite as the most important

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:16.679
<v Speaker 1>to handle immediately? And you have about forty seconds here? Sure,

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh, you know, first, stop people from dying

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>when they order, so, making sure that people are revived

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and receive help, and that, you know, moving upstream, making

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>sure that people have access to adequate and evidence space

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>drug treatment. Those are the two top priorities to sort

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of bend the curve right now, Richard, Do you want

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to mention your top priority in your mind? Well, I'm

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>not sure what that would be, but I would say

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that the litigation, the civil litigation that you spoke of earlier,

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is probably not going to be uh much of a

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>much of a solution. It might enrich state governments, but

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's going to do very much

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to alleviate the obioid crisis. Thank you both for being

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Law. That's Richard Ousiness, a professor at the

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>University of Kentucky School of Law, and Leo Biletsky, professor

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>at Northeastern University Law School, coming up on Bloomberg Law.

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>A federal judge has rejected a request from eighteen states

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and d C to force the Trump administration to resume

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 1>paying Obamacare subsidies, so called cost sharing reduction payments to

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 1>health insurers. This is Bloomberg