WEBVTT - Curtis Strange

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to another edition of the Fridagg Podcast. Today's

0:00:04.840 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>episode is brought to you by our friends over at

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>b Draddy. B Dratty makes some of the finest golf

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>clothing on the market, and they have a great special

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>running right now. If you spend one hundred dollars in

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 1>there on their website, bdratty dot com, you'll get a

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>free bonus mystery polo from the Draty Vault. So this

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>is a neat little promotion. You don't know what you're

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna get. I think we're all stuck in our own

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>styles in preferences. But you might get sent in something

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>that you wouldn't normally buy and you put it on

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and your wife or your significant other might say, wow,

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I really like that and it gets to you out

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of their comfort zone. So check that out bedratty dot com.

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>If you spend over one hundred dollars you'll get a

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>free bonus polo. So that's that's a good deal. Today,

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>our guest on the podcast needs little introduction. Curtis Strange

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>one back to back US opens and fourteen other PGA

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Tour events during his Hall of Fame career. We talk

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>about his career Brighton's new style of play, what he

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 1>loved most about working in the US Open broadcast with Fox,

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 1>and much more.

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 2>I missed a green, for example, I'm already upset. When

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 2>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 2>And when I find my ball in a bright egg

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Frida egg, the dreaded Friday Frida egg Frida egg brid egg, Lie,

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm about ready to run off the golf course.

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you you had a lot of

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>huge moments in your career, obviously your two US Open wins,

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>But I'm curious where the closing eagle to win the

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>NCAA title as a freshman ranks in your kind of

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>golf memories.

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's it's it's it's a good question, and

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 2>it's one that I always answer when you talk about

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 2>fortunate enough to have some highlights. I put that in

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:26.799
<v Speaker 2>there because highlights just aren't professional highlights. Highlights are at

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 2>each stage in your career, and that highlight propelled you

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 2>or gave you confidence to go forward. And certainly that

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 2>was huge for me personally as a freshman for Wake

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Forest as their first NCAA golf championship. For my teammates

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 2>for my coach. You know, it was just huge and

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 2>then the shot itself hit a one iron to eight

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 2>or ten feet and making the putt. I was just

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 2>trying to two putt. They went in. But you know

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 2>it's just yeah, it was it's it's in my top,

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:08.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, three or four Be honest with you, because

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:10.639
<v Speaker 2>it was a one that you know what, what pops

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 2>up in your memory back that that's one of them

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 2>that does.

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I imagined you can probably vividly remember all the

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>details of that, that one iron. And you know, for

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>younger listeners, this isn't your driving one iron, this is

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a butter knife.

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 2>This is this is one you could cook a file,

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 2>you could cut a flay with. Yes, go to your

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 2>next time you go away. I don't know if you

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 2>could even fond a one iron anymore. I don't know

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 2>if a youngster went to see what a one iron McGregor,

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Spaulding Wilson one iron used to look like, gosh, where

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 2>would you go to look for something like that other

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 2>than your your granddaddy's garage? You know, I don't know,

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 2>but uh, you know, we the blades were smaller, they

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 2>were all forged. They were you had to hit them,

0:03:57.920 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, the closer to the housal, the more solid.

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 2>But we did it. I mean it was something you

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 2>didn't you didn't know any better. And you know, quite frankly,

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 2>the middle and short irons were when you hit it

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 2>solid there was with the softer old ballotta ball. It

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 2>was like butter. It was so solid and so had

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 2>such a sound, soft sound, and it flew so nicely.

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 2>But things have changed in all aspects of that sound

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 2>and feel and look than yesterday.

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, speaking of change, how being a young player in

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>tour on tour in the late seventies and eighties, how

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>is it? How was that different than the young players today?

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 2>Oh? You know what I I'm first going to say

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:52.239
<v Speaker 2>in the course of this conversation. I never I never

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 2>ever look at the youngsters today and say, gosh, it

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 2>was better in my day, or I never want to

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 2>be the the old jealous you know, crudgeon, that was

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 2>better in my day. I think that it's all pretty

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 2>much the same. You're out there to you know, as

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 2>a youngster, you get on tour and first of all,

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 2>you happy to be there. It was a dream. And

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 2>now let's go forward from here and you keep your

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 2>nose to the grindstone. You work, you hit out balls

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 2>and balls and balls every single day. You progress slowly.

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes you don't think you progress, but you do, and

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 2>then you then you might you know back in the

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 2>day it was the top sixty. But anyway, you just

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 2>you competitively, keep grinding and and trying to compete against

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 2>the best there is and and so from that standpoint,

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 2>it's all the same. You're trying to be the best

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 2>you can be. You all have similar backgrounds in that

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, it came up in the game. You progressed,

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 2>You enjoyed winning, but you knew there's a lot of

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 2>work and more likely and not you you loved it

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 2>more than the next guy. You competed harder, You worked

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 2>harder than the next guy, and it showed. And so

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 2>now you know, if you work hard on tour that

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 2>I should improve. Some do, some don't. I mean there's

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 2>a lot of there's a lot of variables here that

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 2>to be successful on tour that you have to have.

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, you have to be an athletic type of individual.

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Now we've had our exceptions, but most in the most cases,

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 2>you're a pretty good damn good athlete. Uh, you have

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 2>to be stubborn. You know, you have to have a

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 2>work ethic, you know, all these things that you have

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 2>to love to compete, and you have to be able

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 2>to You have to be able to accept the the

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 2>failure on the stage and be able to get up

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 2>the next day and look forward to going to the

0:06:56.880 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 2>golf course again and all those things. So my answer

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 2>to your simple questions, I think it's all pretty much

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 2>the same as all competition at a young age. Yeah.

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I've talked to Jeff Ogilvie a couple of times, and

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>he's obviously played an era a little bit later than yours,

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>but one with huge change with obviously track Man, and

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>he talks. One thing he talked about was the idea

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>of everybody used to be searching for something and you'd

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>get to the range on a weekly basis and somebody

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>would say, oh, I think I figured it out. And

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>with the advent or track Man, it's it's not really

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a secret anymore. Everybody's got to figure it out every day.

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, I track Man gives you more knowledge,

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 2>more detail of what's really happening. But you figured it

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 2>out as a player. You knew what worked in a

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 2>feel or what you thought was a movement on the

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 2>backswing or down swing. You knew that feel. When I

0:07:56.640 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 2>felt that, say on the start of my down I

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 2>hit the ball better. So you tried to emulate that

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 2>and repeat that. Now that you can do that in

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 2>a daily in a particular day, and then when you

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 2>go to bed, it never seems to be there the

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 2>next morning. Yes, so you have to try to find

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 2>that the next morning, and it might be a little

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 2>bit different feel, it might be, but you get it.

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 2>You get what I'm saying is that we had our

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 2>own track man, within our own feel. And you have

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 2>to go back to the clubs and balls were different.

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 2>So I think you could feel the impact a little

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 2>bit better because a mishit just off center. You could

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:44.959
<v Speaker 2>feel it because the blades were such a smaller had

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 2>such a smaller sweet spot. They were so much smaller,

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 2>and the balls were softer, so you could feel where

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 2>they were on the face. And so you had your

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 2>own track man, and you kind of knew your own

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 2>strength and weaknesses. Hopefully you did in your swing, and

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 2>you knew how to adjust. And it was all about adjusting.

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 2>And those who could do that more better than others

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 2>were more successful.

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Did you through your career have like a certain feel

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that you were always trying to trying to get in

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>when you were swinging and playing your best, you you

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>were getting that specific feel and if so, what was it?

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes? I did. Again, we were We were mostly all

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 2>field players. There were a few mechanical type players, but

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 2>again this was before it got so mechanical and teachers

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 2>changed and became way too mechanical with young kids, and

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:46.559
<v Speaker 2>that's another story for another day. But yeah, I had feels,

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 2>but they changed throughout a career because your body changes

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 2>throughout a career and your swing changes, so that in

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 2>itself is an adjustment, not every daily adjustment, but it

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:03.079
<v Speaker 2>just you know, from from time to time. Early on,

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 2>I was a big swinger, very upright, stronger griped, launched

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 2>it for for in the day, so the feel was

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 2>more movement from the body from the ground up to

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 2>create the speed that I wanted. I was. I was

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 2>reasonably accurate in those days doing that, and I didn't

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 2>know it at tom but I had a good swing.

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, my swing was online so and I didn't

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 2>know anything about that stuff when I was in college.

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 2>I just launched it and it went straight but and

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 2>and but as you get on tour, I tried to

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 2>change my swing to be more consistent. I wanted to

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 2>be able to compete every day, even those days you

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 2>didn't feel very well or someone was out of sorts,

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 2>I still wanted to be able to get it around

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 2>the golf course. So I throttled back just a little bit.

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 2>I tried to tighten up a little bit. And so

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 2>you so your feels changed. So my my my feel

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 2>in those days when I went through this change, starting

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 2>back in the early eighties, was you know, my grip

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 2>got a little weaker. You know, I kind of held

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 2>on almost like a block, and uh, I guess it

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 2>was somewhat of a block uh through impact, But with

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 2>the weak grip, it never went left. And my key

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 2>looking back on it now, was that I never ever

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 2>worried about the ball going left. So I basically had

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:33.080
<v Speaker 2>eliminated one side of the golf course. And you know,

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 2>when I missed, it went to the right, and so

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 2>I knew that and therefore I could drive it straight.

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 2>I'd ironed it pretty well. But more than anything else,

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 2>I eliminated one side of the golf course.

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, one of my favorite sayings faders eat fil a

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 1>and hookers eat hamburger.

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know it's uh when you do hook and

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:59.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, I don't know the last guy that

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 2>hit sweeping hooks or hooks. First of all, the clubs

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 2>don't allow it. The balls really don't allow it. The

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 2>spinning sideways. But you know when you when you in

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 2>the day, if you hit a if you hit a

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 2>big draw. You know, the last guy I remember was

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 2>uh sheesus what was his name? Back in Arnolds? Anyway,

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 2>they used to hit draws because they released it and

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 2>they wanted to get maximum distance. But if you hit it,

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 2>if you released it perfectly, it drew okay. But what's

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 2>the If you release it too much, it drew too

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 2>much and the ball runs out. So you didn't want

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 2>to do that. So the next thing you hold on

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 2>a little bit and goes the right. So now you've

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 2>got both sides of the golf courses going. And there

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 2>was a guy that didn't neat filet Okay, when he's

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 2>when he's going both ways, he's searching for that feel

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 2>and when it's on, it's good. Now think about that

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 2>little that little soft hang on cut that first of all,

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't cut as much because of the angle of attack.

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 2>As a hook, it comes down softer and more than

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 2>likely because you're hanging on you never miss left. I

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 2>mean you might miss left once in a while. And

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:11.599
<v Speaker 2>a guy I think of in modern times as a

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Jordan speed, he has it kind of blocked through the ball,

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 2>but he misses left once in a while. And I

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 2>don't know why that are used to anyway, and I'm

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 2>not picking on him, but just most of those guys

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 2>have a little weaker grift that hold on don't miss left,

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:30.079
<v Speaker 2>and so therefore, you know it, it's kind of easy

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 2>to control. You know, it listens a little better than

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 2>that hook.

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>They say, yeah, yeah, I think I grew up playing

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a draw, and you're exactly right. And then one of

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the best things I did was I got my game

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to where I just never think about hitting the ball

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>left and I hit a little fade. And my favorite

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>thing is when you miss, when you miss right, and

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>with a fade, it just sits immediately. You know, you

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>hit that high right poofball. And then if you hit

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the hard hook, as soon as it hits the ground,

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you got fifteen. It misses fifteen two yards more or left.

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh my gosh. You know, first of all, say you're

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 2>hitting a five r and into a green and you

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 2>hit a kind of a hard draw, it's going to

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 2>run through the back left of the green every time.

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 2>More than likely, if you hit it in the left

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 2>center of the fairway, she's gonna run right on out

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 2>of that fairway every time. So that cut doesn't And

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, when I was playing my best golf in

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 2>the eighties, my I kind of hit a little straight ball,

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 2>a little tiny cut. But the shot I hated with

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 2>a passion was that kind of little heey cut fade.

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 2>But you know the difference it it may it stayed

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 2>in the faraway every time I and I won some

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 2>tournaments with that horrible shot that I hated, But I

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 2>could find it every time in the fairway. Yeah.

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, even though it's not your favorite shot, you find it.

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>It might be twenty yards short, but you're playing from

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the fairway. I mean, you don't make a lot of

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>bogies from the fairway.

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, and there's a good comment which you meant it

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 2>might be a little shorter, yes, but it is in

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 2>the fairway. And remember in our day, we didn't have

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 2>anybody that because of the equipment. You couldn't. You just didn't.

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 2>You didn't hit it farther than anybody else. I never

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 2>felt like I couldn't compete against anybody because they hit

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 2>it a little bit farther than I did. Because nobody

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 2>launched it thirty or forty yards by you. The first

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 2>guy that did that that ever came on the scene

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 2>was John Daly, and those who when I was coming up,

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 2>those who were maybe big six six launchers of the

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 2>golf ball. You know, they weren't considered great players because

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 2>they hit it so far. The balls spun so much,

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 2>they didn't hit many fairways. And so that's how the

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 2>game has changed.

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>A guy that would remind me of from your era,

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 1>like Dan Pole? Would that be a guy that would

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>fit that description.

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, Dan Pole was a better strike of the

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 2>ball than his career ever showed because of what we

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 2>were talking about. He kind of hit a little drop

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 2>fade every time he had a short swim baseball swing.

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 2>He was a baseball player, very very fast hands, but

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of almost a little blocker if I remember correctly now,

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 2>and so he drove the ball pretty well. I don't

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 2>know if Dan was a great put or not. I

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 2>don't remember, but Dan did a lot of TV when

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 2>he stopped playing. But Dan Poll, here's a stat where

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 2>he won the driving distance and I think it was

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 2>nineteen eighty eight. Don't hold me to these facts. Nineteen

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 2>eighty eight he won the driving distance on tour and

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 2>his distance was like two eighty seven or too eighty eight,

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 2>and that was it. I but that changed for a distance,

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 2>yeah a little bit.

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're to eighty eight, your your bottom

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of the tour.

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Now bottom of the tour. And with bryceon averages three

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 2>p fifty last week, seventy sixty five yards difference. That's

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 2>all because.

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>The shorter hitters in the eighties were two forty two

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty compared to to eighty.

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well I was pretty much the middle of the field,

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 2>very average, maybe maybe a smission below average. And I

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 2>was like two fifty five or two fifty six. And

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 2>you know I made my living with with four, five

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 2>and six irons. I mean, seriously, you know a four

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 2>forty four fifty park par four was a four or

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 2>five iron, maybe a six iron. All day long golf

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 2>courses like Firestone, h Augusta was long in cases when

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:38.640
<v Speaker 2>it when it when it got cool in the spring,

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 2>Pebble Beach, well, Pebble Beach went long, but there was

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 2>some courses out there. I mean just there were certain

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 2>golf courses. Mirefield Village in the spring when it was

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 2>cool was a long golf course and it was four

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 2>or five or six irons all day long, every day.

0:17:56.080 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh to Bryson, you hit on obviously, he unbelievable performance.

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, goes mist and beyond the three fifty drives

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 1>was the incredible putting.

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 2>You know what. I He's been the talk of every

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 2>golf for the last really kind of a couple of

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:17.719
<v Speaker 2>two or three weeks, and especially after this week. You know,

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 2>there's there's First of all, I think he's showing the world.

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Now I'm a titlest guy. Okay, I'm a titless ball guy.

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:32.439
<v Speaker 2>And I've always been very careful on, you know, saying

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 2>talking about the ball because they don't they used to

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 2>pay me, so you can't criticize the hand that feature.

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 2>But the point of the fact is he's showing the

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 2>world of golf that it's just not all about the

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 2>golf ball and the driver. Now it's a big part

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 2>of it, trust me, a huge part of it, the

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 2>majority part of it. But the part of the equation

0:18:55.640 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 2>that has never gotten enough attention in this ball that

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 2>goes so far is the ability of these kids and

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 2>the speed that they create, okay, and the accuracy in

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 2>which they hit it with the speed. I walked for

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Fox the last four years on the in the US Open.

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 2>I've seen it firsthand. I saw Dustin Johnson carry the

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:22.400
<v Speaker 2>three wood at arian Aaron Hill's three forty three point

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 2>thirty something up the hill on the last hall of

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 2>the Freewood one day. I mean, it's incredible stuff. But

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 2>when you see what Bryson has done, He's gone from

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, a nice hitter, you know, a nice plenty

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 2>of length to putting on muscle, gaining speed. But more

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 2>so than anything else, Now I'm not a physicist, but

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:48.919
<v Speaker 2>it's the mass that he's moving. It's the forty pounds

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:52.199
<v Speaker 2>that he's put on that I never knew about. But

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 2>when you add masks and speed, the ball will go farther.

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 2>It's not about flexibility more. It's not all about strength.

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 2>It's about the mass and moving that mass and having

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 2>the strength to support it. Now, some of you might

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 2>have proved me wrong in what I just said, but

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 2>it looks like that's what it is to me. And

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 2>plus he's trying to hit it bloody hard every time,

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 2>but he's driving it. I saw it this morning. He's

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:19.640
<v Speaker 2>hitting sixty three percent of the fairways or something that's

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 2>good on a on a normal for a normal person,

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 2>seventy percent was very accurate on tour. And so he's

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 2>proven all these people wrong that said it was just

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 2>about the golf ball driver. It's about the athleticism of

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 2>these players and the speed in which they create and

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 2>he kind of marveling I do. Okay, he's a little different. Well,

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 2>we're all a little different. Okay, we're all type a

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 2>different ego maniacs and very we're ego maniacs on tour,

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 2>and we're also the most insecure individuals on the planet

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 2>with our golf poings. So that if that isn't a contradition,

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 2>but it's he he's kind of figured something out here.

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 2>And don't think you might not have somebody else try

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 2>the same thing in the next year or two or three,

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 2>because it seems to work. My question, I have two

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 2>questions with this. I'm rambling now, but I have two

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:18.479
<v Speaker 2>questions with Bryce. One when you try to hit it

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 2>so hard every time? How long would that last? Okay,

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 2>now all it has to last is eight years, and

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 2>then he'll blee be you know, maybe a twenty five

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 2>time winner, thirty time winner and five majors, who knows

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 2>what's going to be, what the future holds for him.

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 2>But the other thing is, well, it is Will's body.

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Hold up, Oh, I know the short game. When you

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 2>put on this mass and you change your body structure,

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 2>do you change your feel? I don't know. I think

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 2>your feel is born within you. It's bred within you,

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 2>so it might change a smidgeon. But some people will

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 2>question that will it change is for you? I don't.

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 2>I don't know the answer to that because my body

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:06.719
<v Speaker 2>never changed. But if it does, you'll have to contend

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 2>with that. But you know, he's a smart enough guy.

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 2>He'll he'll take care of every every stone will go

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 2>will be unturned with Bryce, And trust me.

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think you hit the accuracy is unbelievable. And

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, one of the things that gets

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 1>lost a little bit with the distance debate is that.

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, with accuracy, and with accuracy I always thought, now

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:32.439
<v Speaker 2>within control. But the harder you hit it the straighter,

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 2>you should hit it with a driver because everything is

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:37.919
<v Speaker 2>straightened out. Okay, if you're in control. I you know,

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 2>whenever you start to get manipulative and hit it's eighty

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 2>percent or seventy five percent, that's when you your body doesn't react,

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 2>you're putting it in positions. But when you swing ninety

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 2>ninety five percent, everything straightens out an impact, And if

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 2>you have a good swing, a good grip, a swing

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 2>that's on plane, it should go just the straightest it's

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 2>ever going to go. And so yeah, as long as

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 2>he's in control of the swing, he should drive it

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:07.479
<v Speaker 2>as straight as he used to. The only difference is

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 2>the farther the ball goes. You know, with physics, the

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 2>more it can go offline just with just the cheer

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 2>numbers of it. But he's really driving it pretty straight

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 2>for as hard as he's hitting it.

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and to create that speed you have to be

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty fundamentally sound.

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh yes, yes, yes. You can't do it with just

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 2>upper body. You can't do it with just arms and hands.

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:31.479
<v Speaker 2>Everything's moving, you know. It starts in the ground up

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:33.679
<v Speaker 2>the weight shift to the left, the lower body, the

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 2>upper middle tor so you know, it's just and he

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 2>seems to be doing even that with himself. Remember he's

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 2>a golf machine guy. He's a very very mechanical guy

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 2>in his swing. And I personally didn't know a guy

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 2>that I shouldn't speak for him because it could be wrong,

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 2>But a golf machine theorist is very mechanical, so therefore

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 2>you're thinking about positions so much so I always wondered

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 2>if you could swing as hard as you wanted to

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 2>think about positions. But he seems to be free wheeling

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 2>it and not encumbered with with positions right now, which

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 2>is what he used to be.

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Did you play a bunch with Bobby Klampett, who's obviously

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a golf machine guy.

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I did. Yeah, I played with him. You know,

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:23.639
<v Speaker 2>I was. I didn't play with him a lot, but

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:26.479
<v Speaker 2>you know, I was already established on tour when this

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 2>this can't miss kid was winning all these amateur tournaments

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:34.360
<v Speaker 2>and he was long. He wasn't big, but we knew

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 2>he was long. And he played in a couple of

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:40.159
<v Speaker 2>tournaments as an amateur, being from the West Coast, and

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 2>you know he was. That was my introduction to the

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:47.439
<v Speaker 2>kind of the golf machine theory theory. I don't even

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 2>know if it's a theory or not, I don't know

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 2>what it is. But and so he comes out and

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 2>everybody's kind of intrigued. What is this guy? You know,

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:57.880
<v Speaker 2>he's got this tremendous lag and impact. I also did

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 2>some clinics and played with him a little bit when

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:04.239
<v Speaker 2>he started going bad. And what he did was I

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 2>think he overdid the golf machine. But I don't know

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 2>for a fact, but yeah, I was, I knew and

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 2>saw Bobby come up and then fall off the face

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 2>of the earth.

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>It seemed like that open where he was leading by,

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I can't remember how much, but through two

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>rounds was and then he kind of blew it coming

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>down the street. Maybe it might have been Sandy Lyles

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>when I can't remember who won that year, But that

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 1>really had a lasting impact on him.

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know what, it really shouldn't have, because every

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 2>we all lose big tournaments throughout our career, especially when

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 2>we're inexperienced. The pressure in a major championship is so

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 2>amplified over a regular tour event, and a regular tour

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 2>event is plenty. I mean, you couldn't spit if you

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 2>had a gun to your head in a regular tour

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 2>event when you're coming down the stretch and early on

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 2>in your career and then you throw yourself in a major.

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:05.880
<v Speaker 2>It's so I might disagree with that that it had

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 2>a huge effect. If anything else, if nothing else, you

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 2>should have learned from it. Okay, you know, what did

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 2>I do wrong? How can I improve? What did I

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 2>learn from? The pressure? Uh? Affecting my body, my swing, speed,

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 2>my thought process, all that stuff. You you you take

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 2>an account many cases subconsciously, and so the next time

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:33.439
<v Speaker 2>you get in position, you learn from your mistakes before prior.

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 2>And so I disagree that it had a huge impact. Yeah,

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:40.199
<v Speaker 2>later on, Uh, you know, we all get disappointed, but

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 2>you have to get back up the next day and

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 2>go work.

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that. I think on every single level

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of golf that that helps, even like your you know,

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>eight handicap out of the club on weekends and loses

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>a you know, a net club championship, because the next

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>year he's in that position, he's going to do better.

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of that, you know, the eighty five Masters is

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously one that in your career that kind of may

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>might have gotten away a little bit, but it's also

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:12.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the craziest stories shooting eighty in the first

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>round and then having a two shot lead on Sunday

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>on the back nine at Augusta. Is that the tournament

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that you kind of think back to most and kind

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of long for a do over? And also how did

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that you know, speaking about what you just talked about,

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:30.879
<v Speaker 1>how did that tournament have a positive impact on you

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>on your career?

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's when we just talked about Bobby Clamping and

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 2>the Open Championship with the laws, that's you know, I

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 2>can speak from experience. Yeah, you know, you you're disappointed.

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean you you know you you feel terrible for

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 2>a while. And I knew the best thing I could do,

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 2>and people told me that is get your ass up,

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 2>get back on the golf course as soon as you can,

0:27:57.560 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 2>and get in contention. That we all want to get

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 2>in contention, but in contention as soon as you can,

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 2>and you know, and and learn from it. Just kind

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 2>of get up and go. And I did. I mean,

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 2>that's that's the way I am. But yeah, eighty five,

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 2>I we had just had our second baby, and Sarah

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 2>wasn't there, and so I was there with a couple

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 2>of friends and so shot eighty the first round, had,

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, was disappointed because I was playing well. I

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 2>already won once or twice that year, and and but

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 2>I'd made playing reservations to get home Friday late and

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, be with our second son, who would just arrived.

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 2>But I shot sixty five the next day and jump

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 2>back in contention. The scores weren't real low that year,

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 2>so I jumped right back, kind of not in to

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 2>make the cut or anything, but kind of got back

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 2>in contention. And then the shot sixty eighth Saturday. And

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 2>I know all these details, but anyway, I'm still behind

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Raymond Floyd. But I'm in the last group, and next

0:28:56.800 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 2>thing I know, I'm on the tenth t with a

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 2>four shot lead. And so uh, but the pressure, I've

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 2>never felt anything like that. I you know, I knew

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:08.959
<v Speaker 2>how to play off. You'd play golf. You've been successful

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 2>throughout you know, the different stages of your career, and

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 2>and so I knew what to do. You breathe number one?

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 2>People say, what do you mean you breathe? Number one?

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:19.959
<v Speaker 2>You make sure you breathe in deeply and out deeply,

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 2>and just kind of take your time. And you know,

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 2>I didn't play terribly on the backside, but I lost,

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 2>and uh, and give a lot of credit to Bernhard

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Langer who won. But it was hard. It was hard,

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 2>and it is the one I think about that got away.

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 2>I was very fortunate that many didn't get away from me.

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 2>And I don't say that I didn't. I didn't get

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 2>all that many chances to win, but I felt like

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 2>I took advantage when I when I had a chance

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 2>to win. And but that is the one that I

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 2>think about, and it's it was. As much as we

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 2>all dearly love the Masters in Augusta National, it would

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 2>have been great to to go back there forever and

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 2>put on a green jacket. But hey, it all works

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 2>out in the end, and I can't dwell on it

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 2>too much because we all lose a whole lot more

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 2>than we went on tour. And that's why you have

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 2>to be somewhat tough mentally, because the golf beat you up,

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 2>the competition beats you up. You're playing against the best

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 2>of the world every day, and you have to prove

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 2>yourself every single day. You're only you know this is harsh,

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 2>but I feel like I'm only as good as my

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 2>last shot or my last round, And so I did

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 2>beat myself up a lot, but the Masters was one

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 2>that was the one that I wish I had maybe

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 2>a do over it too.

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>We talked just before about how much the games changed

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 1>from a distance standpoint. I read an old SI article

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 1>about that round and you were hitting a forward on

0:30:58.120 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 1>thirteen from a hanging live to ten and you think about,

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, or thirteen today, like what Bryson might do

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:08.959
<v Speaker 1>this year is obviously everybody's talk about it. You might

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>be hitting the lob wedgeon.

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Well. And I had a good drib too, you know.

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:16.959
<v Speaker 2>I got up there and you talked about earlier not

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 2>worrying about the ball going left. You know, I had

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 2>to hit it at three in the day, those three

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 2>pine trees out there on the other side of the fairway,

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 2>and I couldn't drive it through the fairway. Okay, on

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 2>my line, I couldn't drive it through the fairway. Now

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 2>you're up in the pines draw a lot, but and

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 2>I hit a really good drib. I hit it at

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 2>that middle pine is she hits the fairway and jumps

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 2>a little bit to the left, and I think I

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 2>had what two to eight or two eighteen something like that.

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 2>It was a perfect fourwood off the hanging lie and

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 2>it would carry plenty over the creek, and I just

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 2>hung it a little bit. And people that never been

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 2>there don't understand the slope in that fairway. These guys

0:31:56.520 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 2>make it look easy, but it really isn't, and is

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 2>how you get out there and practice. But I hung

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 2>it to the right, and so the one shot I

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 2>wish now, I wish I had the second shot there back,

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 2>and the second shot at fifteen, of course, but the

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 2>third shot out of the water at thirteen is one

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 2>that was such a simple shot. Just hit it like

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 2>a semi buried, semi buried bunker shot. And I didn't

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 2>hit it hard enough and it didn't get out and

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 2>I end up making bogie. But that's one I would

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 2>like to have back because that was just a simple

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 2>shot that we all have hit over the years, and

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 2>not a lot, but you know how to hit it.

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 2>So's that's one of three or four or five or

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 2>six that i'd want back with the back. But you know,

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 2>you learn, you know what, I have won two US Opens.

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 2>If i'd won there, who the hell knows, But I

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 2>go back there, you know, still work for ESPN there

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 2>every year, and I don't think about it often, But

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 2>when you go back to Augusta every year, it seems

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 2>to come up, and it seems to come up, and

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 2>uh in a good way, in a good way. But

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 2>it would have been it would have been a wonderful

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 2>story to shoot eighty and win. I don't give a

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't give a rats asset if I shoot eighty

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 2>and win or not. I just want to win. Yeah,

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 2>but it was it was one of those times.

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Yep, it's it would have been an incredible I uh

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>for that hanging lie. It's funny. I was playing last

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>week with a buddy who's who plays on tour, and

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:32.719
<v Speaker 1>I had a hanging lie. It's very similar to that

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 1>one you might see at thirteen and apart five and

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I had to I was trying to hit a three iron.

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 1>It came out low, it didn't carry over this bunker

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that I had to carry over. And I turned to him,

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I go, how how do you hit that thing high?

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 1>And he goes, you know, Andy, you got to play

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot more off than you play to hit that high.

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, yeah, and you know strength and be

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 2>able to do it and and and trust me, sometimes

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 2>it just won't come out high. It will come in hot.

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 2>It's will come in hot and low, and you gotta

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, you gotta account for that. But you know

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 2>that's that's the beauty of Augusta. I don't think you

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 2>get a level lie on the entire golf course. And

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 2>that's the part of it that the camera angles and

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 2>the camera which flattens the two D camera flattens everything.

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 2>And it's just hard to describe, uh, the little nuances

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:25.879
<v Speaker 2>around Augusta National that make it tough.

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that those uneven lies, especially today with power,

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 1>do you feel that uneven lies throwing kind of scored

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a par out the window? Because I don't think that

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 1>really matters anymore. It's completely different game than when all

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 1>these pars were established. Do you feel like level lies

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:51.360
<v Speaker 1>is probably the best way to test the best players

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 1>in the game now?

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 2>Uh, it certainly throws up you know, kink and and

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:03.840
<v Speaker 2>your every day just kind of flat Florida course. Yeah,

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 2>excuse me. It's just one of the things that as

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 2>a professional you learn to adjust every shot and and

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:17.319
<v Speaker 2>and deal with it. Uh. Wind, not so much rain,

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:23.479
<v Speaker 2>but wind, hard conditions. Uh, unlevel lies, a lot of rough.

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:25.760
<v Speaker 2>All these things are elements that make the game tough.

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:30.879
<v Speaker 2>That's why the US Open and maybe sometimes the Open

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 2>Championship are the toughest test because there is a lot

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:36.360
<v Speaker 2>of rock, a lot of a lot of rough and

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 2>accuracy is as a priority and if you don't, if

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 2>you make mistakes, your your mistakes are magnified. Uh, you know,

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 2>it's just it's it's a game played outdoors. And sometimes

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:53.319
<v Speaker 2>if it's like it looked like this past week with

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Bryson and mean, it looked like it was a game

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 2>played in a dome. It looked like there was no wind,

0:35:57.640 --> 0:35:59.800
<v Speaker 2>the weather was perfect, it was hot, the ball goes.

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:03.359
<v Speaker 2>All the above makes it easy, but hitting it three

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 2>fifty off the team makes it so much easier. And

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:08.839
<v Speaker 2>so now you go compare Bryan Bryson, if you could

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:13.399
<v Speaker 2>average three thirty three forty three fifty Augusta, Augusta being

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 2>a second shot golf course, okay, very very little off

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 2>wider corridors than any other golf course. So it's a

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 2>second shot golf course with the undulating greens that they have,

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:28.399
<v Speaker 2>and they're so hard and fast. So now he's coming

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 2>in with such a shorter club than the average guy.

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 2>It just makes the game easier at Augusta National. You know,

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 2>if he's coming in with a non iron and I'm

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:38.879
<v Speaker 2>back there hitting a five iron, guess who's gonna win?

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Bryce every time? And the putting is so different, I

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 2>tweeted out yesterday, if I was Bryson when I got

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 2>to Augusta this year, I would, knowing what I know

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 2>now at sixty five years old, I would hit a

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 2>few balls, not play eighteen or play nine holes, whatever

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 2>they do. But I would spend twice as much time,

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:01.280
<v Speaker 2>half my time, twice as much time as I normally

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 2>do on the putting green to get used to the speed,

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 2>to feel to feel really comfortable Thursday morning, ready to play.

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 2>I never felt really comfortable at Augusta until maybe Friday

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 2>afternoon or Saturday, because now, you know, you get four

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 2>or five days under your belt and you're getting used

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 2>to the speed. But that's how fast they were in

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:24.839
<v Speaker 2>the day compared to other greens. Now there's a lot

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:28.239
<v Speaker 2>of greens fast, but they're still the fastest. Augusts are

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:32.319
<v Speaker 2>still the fastest with the most undulation. So therefore there's

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 2>putts out there that are so much faster than you've

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 2>seen all year long, and they're actually frightening at times.

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:41.239
<v Speaker 2>You wonder sometime you look at a putt and say,

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:43.360
<v Speaker 2>how the hell, when is this ball going to stop?

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 2>And it does. But I would get out there at

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 2>boxing Bryce and spend a lot of time on that putting,

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:52.880
<v Speaker 2>green putting, swooping putts, downhill putts. So he's comfortable because

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 2>if he makes a few putts and he drives it well,

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 2>it can be tough to beat.

0:37:57.000 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think you just hit on that. One of

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the things that makes it's so tough is that fear factor.

0:38:01.719 --> 0:38:04.280
<v Speaker 1>It's just like the golf swing you alluded to earlier,

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:07.280
<v Speaker 1>where when you go eighty percent instead of ninety five,

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, your body doesn't react it. And

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel like getting defensive on the greens is one

0:38:12.520 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of the worst things that can happen to your putting

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 1>in a tournament setting.

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Especially well, boy, great point there you do. And that

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 2>brought up another thought. I putted a lot of putts

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 2>in Augustus so defensively just because of speed, and therefore

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:31.279
<v Speaker 2>you stroke even changes, you take it back slower, you

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:34.320
<v Speaker 2>go through slower, and now you're manipulating the putter and

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 2>you don't you don't put by feel and therefore you

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 2>don't put as well. It was some of them were

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm telling you some of them. You looked at it

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:48.439
<v Speaker 2>and say wow, and then you don't. You don't show that,

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 2>you don't. Nobody can sense that, but you just go,

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:57.759
<v Speaker 2>my wow, where is this ball gonna stop? Yeah? One

0:38:57.800 --> 0:39:00.880
<v Speaker 2>of the great stories. One of the great stories. Sabby

0:39:01.600 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 2>four putts from about four feet at sixteen one year

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 2>and he goes the press room, Hey, sebb, how did

0:39:08.680 --> 0:39:13.960
<v Speaker 2>your four putts? Sixteen? Am? I? Me? I? Me? I

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 2>make In other words, enough of these silly questions, you know.

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of Seve. So you had some you had some

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Ryder Cup matches with Seve, and I read that there's

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of gamesmanship from Seve. Talk about Seve

0:39:34.480 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 1>in the Ryder Cup. He kind of was a foil

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:41.279
<v Speaker 1>to Americans, and I'd love to hear a little bit

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:44.839
<v Speaker 1>about the gamesmanship and some of the things he would

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 1>do to get under people's skin.

0:39:48.000 --> 0:39:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, you're exactly right, and that was just Sevy. Uh.

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 2>You couldn't take it personally, but I did. He You

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:57.400
<v Speaker 2>know what would always pissed me off about Sebby And

0:39:57.440 --> 0:39:59.799
<v Speaker 2>it's nothing personal. I like the guy who was such

0:39:59.840 --> 0:40:02.920
<v Speaker 2>a competitor, and he was. He was the backbone of

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:08.200
<v Speaker 2>the entire Rotti Cup, not research Surgeon's up in Europe. Uh,

0:40:08.239 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 2>he was their leader. But you know, he he thrived

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:16.600
<v Speaker 2>on some of the gamesmanship that you you might think

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 2>that happens in mash play, and it does. What pissed

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:23.840
<v Speaker 2>me off so much is that I knew that he

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 2>had gotten to me, and I knew it was coming,

0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:29.440
<v Speaker 2>and I still let it affect me. And so that's

0:40:29.440 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 2>a that's a problem with me. Uh it's not a

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:34.880
<v Speaker 2>problem with him, but it's a problem with me. And

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:36.799
<v Speaker 2>that's the way he but he throbbed on it, and

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 2>he knew when he'd gotten to you, and I got

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:41.640
<v Speaker 2>I got a flaud him for doing that. That's you

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:44.360
<v Speaker 2>knew he was coming with it and he got to you.

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 2>And so uh, I say that with a big grin

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 2>on my face because uh, you know, gosh, we miss

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:54.040
<v Speaker 2>him and what a what a charismatic guy he was,

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 2>and what a great player. Unfortunately he lost his game.

0:40:57.320 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 2>I never could understand why he didn't drive it or

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 2>hit it any straight because he had a good swing,

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:05.759
<v Speaker 2>great grip swing. It looked like it was online the

0:41:05.760 --> 0:41:08.920
<v Speaker 2>whole way, but in the later years he didn't hit

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:12.760
<v Speaker 2>it very straight. But anyway, he was such a force

0:41:12.800 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 2>in the Rotterer Cup. And you know, I'm asked all

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:18.279
<v Speaker 2>the time, when did europe become a force? Why did

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:20.080
<v Speaker 2>they become a force. And I'll tell you why they

0:41:20.160 --> 0:41:25.280
<v Speaker 2>became a force. Sevy, Nick, Faldo, Ian, Rusnam, Bernhard Langer,

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Sandy Nick, Sevy, Ian and Bernhardt five of the top fifth, twelve, ten, twelve,

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 2>fifteen in the world. It's a pretty good nucleus to

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:39.520
<v Speaker 2>have when you're a roder Clip team.

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, when you were playing your best golf most of

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the top end players, you were kind of the only

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:50.799
<v Speaker 1>American that was challenging those that European crop for a

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>couple of years.

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know what that was. I mean, we

0:41:54.080 --> 0:41:58.440
<v Speaker 2>had we had you know, Greg and Sevy and then

0:41:58.520 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 2>that crop of European players, and then you know, Tom

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:05.839
<v Speaker 2>Watson was still playing, you know, really really well and

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:11.239
<v Speaker 2>winning tournaments, and and heyo Irwin and uh a lot

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:15.160
<v Speaker 2>of younger players. I mean, I guess the US opens

0:42:15.160 --> 0:42:18.799
<v Speaker 2>thrust me in front, but I didn't never feel that way.

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 2>I always felt I was just one of many. I

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:25.279
<v Speaker 2>never put myself thought of myself as better than those

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:27.640
<v Speaker 2>guys who were you know, look at Tom Watson and

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:34.319
<v Speaker 2>his you know, tremendous career, UH and and I just

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:37.359
<v Speaker 2>I never I never did that. I just that wasn't

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:39.279
<v Speaker 2>the way I believe. I, Like I said, you're trying

0:42:39.320 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 2>to prove yourself every day, and and that's what I

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 2>tried to do.

0:42:43.400 --> 0:42:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Was with Stevey in Ryder Cups? Was was that style

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:50.759
<v Speaker 1>that where he was never seemingly in the fairway? And

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 1>was that part of the frustration of playing against him?

0:42:55.719 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 2>No, I never sense that at all. You know, I

0:42:58.160 --> 0:43:02.960
<v Speaker 2>played with him numerous other times and in major tournaments

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 2>and not you know, you didn't. I didn't pay any

0:43:05.120 --> 0:43:08.279
<v Speaker 2>attention to anybody else playing with UH, Nor did I

0:43:08.320 --> 0:43:11.719
<v Speaker 2>play against anybody. I'm out there doing the best I can. UH.

0:43:12.160 --> 0:43:15.360
<v Speaker 2>You learn that early on is that you're playing against

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 2>some people you feel like you should beat. You're playing

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:20.320
<v Speaker 2>against some of the guys that you admire and greatly

0:43:22.080 --> 0:43:25.440
<v Speaker 2>greatly admire for their long career. But I didn't. I

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 2>didn't care who I was playing with. Certainly the better competition,

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:35.920
<v Speaker 2>the bigger name, inspired you to do well. But I

0:43:35.960 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 2>didn't never look at anybody's swing. I was into myself.

0:43:38.760 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 2>I was into my game and just doing what I

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:43.200
<v Speaker 2>thought I knew how to do.

0:43:44.880 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you about the eighteen hole playoff

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:52.240
<v Speaker 1>at your one of your US Open wins with Faldo

0:43:52.320 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and how that compared, like pressure wise, that Monday eighteen

0:43:58.680 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 1>hole playoff versus a Sunday final round.

0:44:04.360 --> 0:44:10.360
<v Speaker 2>U magnified. And you're right, I mean a Sunday final

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:15.279
<v Speaker 2>round head to head against a world class player is

0:44:16.400 --> 0:44:18.880
<v Speaker 2>it's not like a playoff because there's other players that

0:44:19.200 --> 0:44:22.840
<v Speaker 2>could come from behind and win. So in that respect,

0:44:22.880 --> 0:44:26.160
<v Speaker 2>it was a little different. But you know, you don't

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:31.960
<v Speaker 2>sleep the night before. You're anxious, you're on point. You

0:44:32.080 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 2>know every shot you hit the next day is going

0:44:34.040 --> 0:44:36.839
<v Speaker 2>to be magnified. But you don't dwell on that. You know,

0:44:36.920 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 2>you try to do the best you can and you

0:44:39.120 --> 0:44:45.440
<v Speaker 2>prepare the next morning. The longest time for any professional

0:44:45.480 --> 0:44:48.319
<v Speaker 2>golfer is that from the time he gets up to

0:44:48.400 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 2>the time he tees off, and it's the most boring.

0:44:53.040 --> 0:44:56.320
<v Speaker 2>It lasts forever. Say you get up at eight o'clock

0:44:56.400 --> 0:44:58.960
<v Speaker 2>on Monday morning for the playoff in the US Opening,

0:44:58.960 --> 0:45:01.560
<v Speaker 2>you don't tee off till two a two thirty. It's

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:04.640
<v Speaker 2>an eternity. But once I get to the golf course

0:45:05.280 --> 0:45:08.319
<v Speaker 2>and got to the practice tee, it was game on.

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:11.799
<v Speaker 2>That's now you're now you're in your comfort zone. So

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 2>you try to do the whole thing. You're anxious, you're

0:45:14.760 --> 0:45:18.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, I never got comfortable all day long. I

0:45:18.560 --> 0:45:21.120
<v Speaker 2>really didn't because you know that each shot, this next

0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:26.879
<v Speaker 2>shot could could win or lose your dream tournament. So, uh,

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:30.400
<v Speaker 2>you get to the first tee and I was nervous,

0:45:30.920 --> 0:45:33.480
<v Speaker 2>but you now, you do what you know how to do.

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 2>You go play golf, and uh, I played. I really

0:45:37.680 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 2>chipped and putted well, so winning. We got up that

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:43.520
<v Speaker 2>day and it was breezier in Boston that ordinarily it

0:45:43.520 --> 0:45:46.680
<v Speaker 2>would be in a hot summer day June day, so

0:45:46.719 --> 0:45:48.680
<v Speaker 2>I knew it was gonna be harder. You know, it's

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:53.440
<v Speaker 2>a US opened set up courses, fast and firm, so

0:45:54.000 --> 0:45:56.799
<v Speaker 2>there's gonna be there's gonna be some miss greens and

0:45:56.840 --> 0:45:59.080
<v Speaker 2>I missed some greens, but I really chipped and putted well,

0:45:59.640 --> 0:46:02.080
<v Speaker 2>and uh, and you know, we had a we had

0:46:02.120 --> 0:46:05.560
<v Speaker 2>a great day. And you know how many wards were said,

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:10.799
<v Speaker 2>zero between the two of us, And that's exactly the

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:13.640
<v Speaker 2>way I wanted it and the way it should have been.

0:46:14.160 --> 0:46:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Two guys going head to head and what I think

0:46:19.640 --> 0:46:21.600
<v Speaker 2>is the greatest championship in the world. Nick thinks it

0:46:21.640 --> 0:46:25.640
<v Speaker 2>is the second greatest championship in the world. And trying

0:46:25.640 --> 0:46:29.080
<v Speaker 2>to trying to win, trying to win, and uh, it was.

0:46:29.160 --> 0:46:30.239
<v Speaker 2>It was good competition.

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I mean, and then so you win the

0:46:34.120 --> 0:46:37.719
<v Speaker 1>next year also and uh and then but dinah, you

0:46:37.760 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 1>had you were in the hunt there for a three peat?

0:46:40.560 --> 0:46:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Was it? I read somewhere that the it was really

0:46:44.320 --> 0:46:48.640
<v Speaker 1>soft comparatively to you know, your traditional US Open setup.

0:46:50.200 --> 0:46:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we got to o Kill that Monday, and it

0:46:53.760 --> 0:46:57.080
<v Speaker 2>was hard and fast, and it was a tremendous amount

0:46:57.080 --> 0:46:59.640
<v Speaker 2>of rough. It was the old style US Open setup.

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Greens were hard and fast. A lot of sloping greens,

0:47:03.360 --> 0:47:05.440
<v Speaker 2>not a lot of not a lot of like Augustin

0:47:05.560 --> 0:47:08.399
<v Speaker 2>National bumps and mounds and bruises, but just a lot

0:47:08.440 --> 0:47:09.920
<v Speaker 2>of slope from back to front of a lot of

0:47:09.920 --> 0:47:13.400
<v Speaker 2>the greens. So we're going, Wow, this is really hard.

0:47:13.760 --> 0:47:16.520
<v Speaker 2>This is really hard. Fair drives are running out of

0:47:16.520 --> 0:47:19.600
<v Speaker 2>fairways into the rough. And then we got like three

0:47:19.600 --> 0:47:24.440
<v Speaker 2>inches of rain on It was Tuesday night. I think

0:47:25.400 --> 0:47:28.040
<v Speaker 2>earlier in the week, Tuesday night we got an enormous

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:34.080
<v Speaker 2>amount of rain and the whole setup changed, and from

0:47:34.080 --> 0:47:37.480
<v Speaker 2>a player's standpoint, you felt like now you could play,

0:47:38.480 --> 0:47:41.920
<v Speaker 2>You could play more golf versus play so defensive and

0:47:42.000 --> 0:47:43.960
<v Speaker 2>know you're gonna get screwed a couple of times out

0:47:44.000 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 2>there because of the firmness, and the whole thing changed.

0:47:47.280 --> 0:47:50.160
<v Speaker 2>In my mind, it changed that now we'll be able

0:47:50.200 --> 0:47:53.040
<v Speaker 2>to drive it in all the fairways and keep these

0:47:53.080 --> 0:47:57.239
<v Speaker 2>longer irons on these greens easier than before. And it's

0:47:57.280 --> 0:48:00.720
<v Speaker 2>exactly what happened. I didn't I didn't miss many fairways

0:48:00.760 --> 0:48:05.080
<v Speaker 2>all week long. I really drove it well. Uh, the

0:48:05.160 --> 0:48:07.440
<v Speaker 2>second round won me the golf term. I shot sixty

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:11.600
<v Speaker 2>four and that's the and so now I'm just hanging on.

0:48:12.760 --> 0:48:15.680
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, it turned out well. But it did change overnight.

0:48:16.680 --> 0:48:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, in your mind, I guess you know there in

0:48:20.680 --> 0:48:23.840
<v Speaker 1>that era there are a lot of US Open players

0:48:23.880 --> 0:48:27.040
<v Speaker 1>where you know, like a Scott Simpson seemingly was always

0:48:27.040 --> 0:48:30.720
<v Speaker 1>in the hunt. You were obviously a great US Open player.

0:48:30.760 --> 0:48:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Fell was there a certain style that really thrived in

0:48:34.880 --> 0:48:37.279
<v Speaker 1>US Opens? And do you feel like in covering the

0:48:37.360 --> 0:48:40.200
<v Speaker 1>US Open the last few years that it's it's changed

0:48:40.239 --> 0:48:40.759
<v Speaker 1>a little bit.

0:48:42.200 --> 0:48:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the style was you better put it in the

0:48:44.040 --> 0:48:47.920
<v Speaker 2>fairway off the tee because remember we nobody dominated in length,

0:48:48.600 --> 0:48:51.839
<v Speaker 2>and the roof was such back in the day that

0:48:51.920 --> 0:48:54.399
<v Speaker 2>if we drove it in the rough, it was tough

0:48:54.440 --> 0:48:57.400
<v Speaker 2>to get it anywhere near the green because we weren't strong.

0:48:57.520 --> 0:49:01.279
<v Speaker 2>The ball didn't go. You couldn't overpower rough like that,

0:49:01.520 --> 0:49:05.520
<v Speaker 2>so you mostly most of the time couldn't get it

0:49:05.520 --> 0:49:06.840
<v Speaker 2>to the green. So then you had to get it

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:11.319
<v Speaker 2>up and down. Now with the US Open setups, it's

0:49:11.360 --> 0:49:14.200
<v Speaker 2>so much different that that I don't agree with. But

0:49:14.680 --> 0:49:18.759
<v Speaker 2>a little bit wider fairways and a first cut that's

0:49:19.000 --> 0:49:22.239
<v Speaker 2>six eight ten steps wider that you can play out of.

0:49:22.400 --> 0:49:25.479
<v Speaker 2>And plus these players are bigger and stronger than we were,

0:49:25.520 --> 0:49:28.279
<v Speaker 2>so the whole, the whole thing is easier. But that's

0:49:28.320 --> 0:49:33.200
<v Speaker 2>another conversation for another day. But it was so you

0:49:33.239 --> 0:49:34.880
<v Speaker 2>had to put it in a fairway, and then there

0:49:34.960 --> 0:49:37.120
<v Speaker 2>was always a lot of rough around the greens and

0:49:37.120 --> 0:49:39.080
<v Speaker 2>you had to put it on the green. It was

0:49:39.120 --> 0:49:41.640
<v Speaker 2>tough to get it up and down from three or

0:49:41.640 --> 0:49:45.439
<v Speaker 2>four inches of rough, you know, and you into a hard,

0:49:45.480 --> 0:49:49.440
<v Speaker 2>fast green. So the whole thing was so different. And

0:49:49.520 --> 0:49:51.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying, you know, we have a lot of

0:49:51.320 --> 0:49:54.920
<v Speaker 2>runoff areas now around US open golf courses, which if

0:49:54.920 --> 0:49:56.799
<v Speaker 2>the golf course doesn't set up to that, why do

0:49:56.920 --> 0:50:01.719
<v Speaker 2>that and why to me have a runoff area when

0:50:01.719 --> 0:50:04.040
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the golf course has rough around it.

0:50:04.040 --> 0:50:07.040
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of manipulating the golf course where the architect

0:50:07.120 --> 0:50:09.520
<v Speaker 2>I didn't think had that in mind. But that's again

0:50:09.560 --> 0:50:13.600
<v Speaker 2>another story. But anyway, so priority was to put it

0:50:13.600 --> 0:50:16.359
<v Speaker 2>in the fairway and put it on the green, and

0:50:16.400 --> 0:50:18.040
<v Speaker 2>that's what you that's what you try to do.

0:50:19.280 --> 0:50:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think, I mean, I think the runoff areas

0:50:21.760 --> 0:50:26.280
<v Speaker 1>are they have to obviously fit. It's it's an interesting

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:31.400
<v Speaker 1>debate whether obviously there's if your short game around the

0:50:31.400 --> 0:50:34.680
<v Speaker 1>green and rough requires a certain type of skill, and

0:50:34.719 --> 0:50:38.720
<v Speaker 1>then short grass around the green it requires a different

0:50:38.760 --> 0:50:42.600
<v Speaker 1>type you know, different shots. It opens up way more

0:50:42.640 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 1>shots and recovery options for players. But you could say

0:50:47.080 --> 0:50:50.279
<v Speaker 1>that if the more skilled player might separate themselves even

0:50:50.320 --> 0:50:52.600
<v Speaker 1>more from short short grass.

0:50:53.400 --> 0:50:55.719
<v Speaker 2>You know, I I a will debate that with you.

0:50:56.200 --> 0:50:59.480
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of people that don't know how to

0:50:59.520 --> 0:51:01.360
<v Speaker 2>hit it out of the rough. But it is a skill.

0:51:02.080 --> 0:51:04.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is there luck involved with is luck involved

0:51:04.520 --> 0:51:11.760
<v Speaker 2>in everything? But you're trying to penalize a poor second shot.

0:51:12.040 --> 0:51:15.440
<v Speaker 2>And what I don't like is that, first of all,

0:51:15.560 --> 0:51:19.160
<v Speaker 2>if it's if it's just a if it's not a

0:51:19.160 --> 0:51:22.000
<v Speaker 2>poor shot, if it's just shot, it's not exactly accurate.

0:51:22.320 --> 0:51:26.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't like balls running away from the green twenty

0:51:26.680 --> 0:51:31.520
<v Speaker 2>and that's not you know, if the whole golf course

0:51:31.560 --> 0:51:35.680
<v Speaker 2>is set up like that, like a Pinehurst, that's perfectly okay.

0:51:36.160 --> 0:51:38.200
<v Speaker 2>But when you go around a golf course and all

0:51:38.200 --> 0:51:40.160
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden, the fourteenth hole is a perched up

0:51:40.200 --> 0:51:43.239
<v Speaker 2>green and now you have runoff everywhere, whereas the other

0:51:43.320 --> 0:51:47.719
<v Speaker 2>thirteen fourteen holes you have rough, and now you manipulate.

0:51:47.800 --> 0:51:51.839
<v Speaker 2>You're changing the whole concept of the setup. And it's

0:51:51.880 --> 0:51:55.280
<v Speaker 2>just my mic theorya of setting up a golf course.

0:51:56.080 --> 0:51:59.200
<v Speaker 2>But it's become in vogue. It's been around for a

0:51:59.280 --> 0:52:03.960
<v Speaker 2>long time. The Players Championship has a lot of runoff area,

0:52:04.640 --> 0:52:07.319
<v Speaker 2>but that's the way the golf course was originally set up.

0:52:07.760 --> 0:52:10.360
<v Speaker 2>And they've gone back and forth a little bit on

0:52:10.560 --> 0:52:14.280
<v Speaker 2>rough or runoff, but there's still a lot of runoff.

0:52:14.960 --> 0:52:17.719
<v Speaker 2>When we go to Pebble Beach and this past year

0:52:17.920 --> 0:52:20.680
<v Speaker 2>they didn't have one or two runoffs and that's okay.

0:52:21.239 --> 0:52:23.560
<v Speaker 2>The prior US Open they had a lot of runoff

0:52:23.600 --> 0:52:27.759
<v Speaker 2>and that's not the way anyway. Let's just be consistent

0:52:27.840 --> 0:52:30.480
<v Speaker 2>with what I'm trying to say and whatever's in vogue.

0:52:30.480 --> 0:52:33.960
<v Speaker 2>I know it changes, but you know, US Open to me,

0:52:34.080 --> 0:52:37.080
<v Speaker 2>is supposed to be the hardest championship in our country

0:52:37.120 --> 0:52:40.600
<v Speaker 2>because it's our national championship. It should test every bit

0:52:40.640 --> 0:52:43.799
<v Speaker 2>of your skill and ability and you should be exhausted

0:52:43.840 --> 0:52:47.319
<v Speaker 2>on Monday morning after playing the US Open. And that's

0:52:47.360 --> 0:52:48.400
<v Speaker 2>the way I believe it should be.

0:52:49.120 --> 0:52:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree with the consistency thing because it looks

0:52:53.840 --> 0:52:56.840
<v Speaker 1>stupid too when you have one runoff on eighteen holes

0:52:56.920 --> 0:52:59.759
<v Speaker 1>or two runoffs and you don't have them everywhere else.

0:53:01.040 --> 0:53:04.560
<v Speaker 2>And I was remissed by not mentioning Aaron Hills was

0:53:04.600 --> 0:53:07.560
<v Speaker 2>all run off as well. That was good, that was fun.

0:53:08.160 --> 0:53:10.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, Aaron Hills was not a bad golf course.

0:53:10.880 --> 0:53:12.799
<v Speaker 2>It was just we had perfect weather all week long

0:53:12.840 --> 0:53:17.080
<v Speaker 2>and that's why we shot those scores. But anyway, it's

0:53:17.120 --> 0:53:20.160
<v Speaker 2>not a historical, traditional golf course, but it was it

0:53:20.200 --> 0:53:21.600
<v Speaker 2>was a nice challenge for the guys.

0:53:22.280 --> 0:53:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey, I wanted to talk about eighty four. You finished

0:53:25.360 --> 0:53:30.440
<v Speaker 1>third at Wingfoot and you know, as just behind Norman

0:53:30.560 --> 0:53:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and Zeller. I'm curious, are you know? Obviously it's a

0:53:35.120 --> 0:53:37.280
<v Speaker 1>bummer that you're not going to be on the ground

0:53:37.480 --> 0:53:42.279
<v Speaker 1>covering it for Fox this year, But what uh tell

0:53:42.360 --> 0:53:46.520
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit about Wingfoot as a US Open venue.

0:53:48.680 --> 0:53:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Wing Put's a hard golf course, uh in the day,

0:53:52.200 --> 0:54:00.719
<v Speaker 2>and it still is long, straight forward, traditional, no no secret,

0:54:01.640 --> 0:54:05.440
<v Speaker 2>hard golf course, a lot of slope from back to

0:54:05.520 --> 0:54:09.760
<v Speaker 2>front on a lot of greens, deep bunker deep deep bunkers,

0:54:09.800 --> 0:54:14.680
<v Speaker 2>hard to get it up and down. Just you have

0:54:14.760 --> 0:54:16.880
<v Speaker 2>to be it's you have to be accurate. You have

0:54:17.000 --> 0:54:23.680
<v Speaker 2>to be accurate. Greens aren't that big. It's just it's

0:54:23.800 --> 0:54:25.759
<v Speaker 2>just it's just one of the great golf courses you

0:54:25.840 --> 0:54:29.600
<v Speaker 2>ever play. And I must say the greatest grill room

0:54:29.680 --> 0:54:34.200
<v Speaker 2>bar room in America. But anyway, you know, it's just

0:54:34.440 --> 0:54:36.719
<v Speaker 2>when I played wins finished third there in eighty four,

0:54:37.080 --> 0:54:38.880
<v Speaker 2>that's some of the best golf I ever played my

0:54:38.960 --> 0:54:40.799
<v Speaker 2>life because it was so long and if you drove

0:54:40.840 --> 0:54:42.520
<v Speaker 2>in the rock, you didn't have a chance to get

0:54:42.560 --> 0:54:46.960
<v Speaker 2>it near the green. And I really really played well.

0:54:46.960 --> 0:54:48.680
<v Speaker 2>I went to the last not wholes thinking I could

0:54:48.719 --> 0:54:50.680
<v Speaker 2>get part of a playoff if I shot a couple under,

0:54:50.719 --> 0:54:54.279
<v Speaker 2>and I just didn't put very well. But anyway, you know,

0:54:54.400 --> 0:54:58.000
<v Speaker 2>I just I wonder it's a hard golf course. When

0:54:58.040 --> 0:55:03.120
<v Speaker 2>I see five six seven over par one in a

0:55:03.239 --> 0:55:06.040
<v Speaker 2>US Open, I think, why, why is it so so hard?

0:55:06.040 --> 0:55:08.560
<v Speaker 2>What have they done to it? In course, you can

0:55:08.600 --> 0:55:11.879
<v Speaker 2>always make put whole locations where it's impossible to punt,

0:55:12.200 --> 0:55:15.040
<v Speaker 2>and make me punts. But I always think par is

0:55:15.080 --> 0:55:17.400
<v Speaker 2>a good score. That means if Parr is shot in

0:55:17.400 --> 0:55:21.880
<v Speaker 2>the US Open, that means it's plenty hard. It would

0:55:22.000 --> 0:55:24.880
<v Speaker 2>it would. It's going to be and will be a

0:55:25.000 --> 0:55:28.280
<v Speaker 2>great test this year, a great, great test. They've actually

0:55:28.280 --> 0:55:30.480
<v Speaker 2>put a new p in on the tenth hole, which

0:55:30.520 --> 0:55:32.760
<v Speaker 2>is a great was one hundred and ninety yards before

0:55:32.800 --> 0:55:35.080
<v Speaker 2>a great great par three and now it's like two thirty.

0:55:35.600 --> 0:55:40.680
<v Speaker 2>So that'll be interesting to watch. But I am ims

0:55:40.800 --> 0:55:43.920
<v Speaker 2>usually disappointed and not be able to go back to

0:55:43.920 --> 0:55:45.920
<v Speaker 2>the US Open. The first time in many, many years

0:55:45.920 --> 0:55:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I was. I was at a TV for three years

0:55:48.360 --> 0:55:51.799
<v Speaker 2>from fifty to fifty three, and an ESPN called me

0:55:52.200 --> 0:55:54.960
<v Speaker 2>and said, would you host the US Open with Mike

0:55:55.040 --> 0:55:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Trico not call golf at hosts. I said, are you

0:55:57.760 --> 0:56:00.600
<v Speaker 2>kidding me? Yes, to get back involved in golf TV.

0:56:01.640 --> 0:56:04.640
<v Speaker 2>And that led to, you know, sixty five years old

0:56:04.760 --> 0:56:08.080
<v Speaker 2>doing the US Open, and I thought we were going

0:56:08.120 --> 0:56:09.799
<v Speaker 2>to do it for seven more years. And you know,

0:56:09.840 --> 0:56:15.040
<v Speaker 2>the transition from Fox to NBC disappointed. We're all disappointed,

0:56:15.080 --> 0:56:17.600
<v Speaker 2>but me especially because I will miss going to the

0:56:17.719 --> 0:56:20.000
<v Speaker 2>US Open. It's a part of my life. It's a

0:56:20.080 --> 0:56:23.719
<v Speaker 2>huge part of my family's life. And Bill colgolf in

0:56:23.760 --> 0:56:25.719
<v Speaker 2>the US Open and be around the players, and be

0:56:25.800 --> 0:56:29.000
<v Speaker 2>around the officials, and you know, just be in that atmosphere.

0:56:29.000 --> 0:56:32.160
<v Speaker 2>There's nothing like it. And you know, some of my

0:56:32.239 --> 0:56:38.319
<v Speaker 2>greatest moments were playing, Yes, but I must say being

0:56:38.320 --> 0:56:40.840
<v Speaker 2>able to watch being the last round of brisk cupa

0:56:40.920 --> 0:56:43.560
<v Speaker 2>two years ago to win back to back was was

0:56:43.560 --> 0:56:47.120
<v Speaker 2>a great thrill for me to be there and see

0:56:47.120 --> 0:56:49.799
<v Speaker 2>the next guy do it back to back and to

0:56:49.840 --> 0:56:53.560
<v Speaker 2>watch some of the incredible shots that Gary Woodland hit

0:56:53.640 --> 0:56:57.400
<v Speaker 2>last year, incredible shots the three would on the fourteenth

0:56:57.480 --> 0:57:02.440
<v Speaker 2>hole of the pitch off the green at seventeen and

0:57:02.520 --> 0:57:05.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean just incredible shots. Was really a thrill from me.

0:57:05.400 --> 0:57:09.200
<v Speaker 1>The start of that round was just incredible, how how

0:57:09.239 --> 0:57:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Woodland and Kopka were just going blow for blow those

0:57:12.760 --> 0:57:14.960
<v Speaker 1>first six holes, birdie after birdie.

0:57:16.040 --> 0:57:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, and don't think that for all the

0:57:20.120 --> 0:57:23.360
<v Speaker 2>listeners and out there that, don't think that I don't

0:57:23.360 --> 0:57:25.240
<v Speaker 2>get fired up when I see that I'm in the

0:57:25.280 --> 0:57:29.080
<v Speaker 2>last group waiting in the first fairly for Gary Woodland

0:57:29.080 --> 0:57:31.320
<v Speaker 2>to tee off, and I'm here and on my headset

0:57:31.840 --> 0:57:34.360
<v Speaker 2>that Kepka's just birdied what two of the first three

0:57:34.440 --> 0:57:36.640
<v Speaker 2>or three of the first four, and so now he's

0:57:36.680 --> 0:57:42.720
<v Speaker 2>tied or something, and now he's really challenging Gary Woodland,

0:57:42.720 --> 0:57:46.040
<v Speaker 2>who's never done this before. And Gary Woodland, they're both

0:57:46.080 --> 0:57:50.439
<v Speaker 2>great guys, are both you know, they're both you know, strong, fit,

0:57:51.680 --> 0:57:55.800
<v Speaker 2>competitive individuals. And and don't think that I don't get

0:57:55.840 --> 0:57:58.440
<v Speaker 2>fired up. And I'm one point and I want to

0:57:58.440 --> 0:58:01.520
<v Speaker 2>do the best I can possibly do, and anything that

0:58:01.560 --> 0:58:05.040
<v Speaker 2>comes out of my mouth, I wanted to be concise

0:58:05.560 --> 0:58:08.880
<v Speaker 2>and right on and exactly what the player is thinking.

0:58:09.280 --> 0:58:12.960
<v Speaker 2>That's all my position out there that day was to

0:58:13.160 --> 0:58:16.040
<v Speaker 2>bring the viewer closer to what this guy is thinking

0:58:16.560 --> 0:58:20.720
<v Speaker 2>and feeling and what's presented in front of him. And

0:58:21.280 --> 0:58:24.640
<v Speaker 2>so I'm on point, and then the whole day was

0:58:24.760 --> 0:58:28.680
<v Speaker 2>like that, and it was it was a thrill. I

0:58:28.720 --> 0:58:31.520
<v Speaker 2>can't understate this, it was or overstate this. It was

0:58:31.560 --> 0:58:33.680
<v Speaker 2>such a thrill for me to be out there be

0:58:33.760 --> 0:58:35.920
<v Speaker 2>a part of something like that. And I'm gonna miss it.

0:58:36.320 --> 0:58:41.560
<v Speaker 1>If you were talking to, say, a player and giving advice,

0:58:41.680 --> 0:58:44.400
<v Speaker 1>what what's some stuff that you picked up? Obviously you

0:58:44.400 --> 0:58:47.520
<v Speaker 1>were a great major championship player. What were what was

0:58:47.600 --> 0:58:50.760
<v Speaker 1>some stuff that you picked up that you hadn't thought

0:58:50.800 --> 0:58:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of while you were a player, when you were when

0:58:53.960 --> 0:58:56.760
<v Speaker 1>you were doing you were announcing and part of the

0:58:56.800 --> 0:59:00.960
<v Speaker 1>telecast watching golf. That would you think would have helped

0:59:00.960 --> 0:59:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you as a player?

0:59:03.720 --> 0:59:08.520
<v Speaker 2>You know what? It's it's it's I thought about that

0:59:08.960 --> 0:59:11.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot. And there's one thing. But before I tell you,

0:59:12.120 --> 0:59:13.600
<v Speaker 2>I want to say that I've heard a lot of

0:59:14.120 --> 0:59:20.840
<v Speaker 2>announcers say that, you know, they they learned from announcing

0:59:21.320 --> 0:59:24.440
<v Speaker 2>more about playing and improve their game from announcing and

0:59:24.480 --> 0:59:26.640
<v Speaker 2>that kind of stuff. That's a crock of shit. What

0:59:27.080 --> 0:59:29.440
<v Speaker 2>you do. The only way you the only way you

0:59:29.480 --> 0:59:33.600
<v Speaker 2>improve your games to go out there and practice and

0:59:33.680 --> 0:59:36.720
<v Speaker 2>hit golf balls and play competitive golf. That's the only

0:59:36.760 --> 0:59:39.720
<v Speaker 2>way you get better. But the one thing I did learn,

0:59:40.360 --> 0:59:43.000
<v Speaker 2>the one thing I did learn that I didn't know

0:59:43.040 --> 0:59:44.880
<v Speaker 2>when I was playing, is that you don't have to

0:59:44.880 --> 0:59:48.280
<v Speaker 2>be perfect to win. And I always felt like I

0:59:48.360 --> 0:59:51.200
<v Speaker 2>had to be perfect to win. And therefore I think

0:59:51.280 --> 0:59:54.240
<v Speaker 2>I beat myself up a little bit too much. Maybe

0:59:54.280 --> 0:59:56.480
<v Speaker 2>on the weekend or on Sunday when I didn't hit

0:59:56.520 --> 0:59:59.320
<v Speaker 2>the perfect shot, I might have gotten down a little

0:59:59.320 --> 1:00:03.200
<v Speaker 2>bit too much. And I never got really a defeatist attitude.

1:00:03.240 --> 1:00:07.240
<v Speaker 2>But you know, things change, and when I have been

1:00:07.280 --> 1:00:09.520
<v Speaker 2>in the booth for twenty three years now and around

1:00:09.600 --> 1:00:12.920
<v Speaker 2>the game and TV that there's a lot of guys

1:00:12.960 --> 1:00:16.000
<v Speaker 2>that mishit shots and miss putts, but they take advantage

1:00:16.040 --> 1:00:19.280
<v Speaker 2>of the opportunity when it presents itself and they're not perfect.

1:00:20.080 --> 1:00:21.920
<v Speaker 2>And I always felt like I had to be perfect

1:00:21.960 --> 1:00:26.160
<v Speaker 2>to win, and I would have I would take a different,

1:00:26.240 --> 1:00:30.480
<v Speaker 2>little different attitude to the backside on Sunday or maybe

1:00:30.600 --> 1:00:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Sunday's round, if I had to do it all over again.

1:00:35.000 --> 1:00:37.680
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you one other thing I would I learned

1:00:39.040 --> 1:00:42.240
<v Speaker 2>over the years in a little bit different vein than

1:00:42.280 --> 1:00:45.720
<v Speaker 2>your question, was that I hit a lot of golf

1:00:45.720 --> 1:00:48.920
<v Speaker 2>balls and I enjoyed practicing, but I felt like I

1:00:49.040 --> 1:00:52.280
<v Speaker 2>had to beat balls to keep up with the Joneses. Okay,

1:00:53.040 --> 1:00:55.040
<v Speaker 2>if I had to do it all over again, I

1:00:55.040 --> 1:00:58.240
<v Speaker 2>would hit half as many balls because you never nobody's

1:00:58.280 --> 1:01:01.600
<v Speaker 2>ever won a tournament in history golf by striking the

1:01:01.640 --> 1:01:04.880
<v Speaker 2>golf ball. You have to make putts and you have

1:01:04.920 --> 1:01:07.439
<v Speaker 2>to chip well. So I would hit half as many

1:01:07.440 --> 1:01:10.280
<v Speaker 2>balls because you're never going to get so good. That's

1:01:10.720 --> 1:01:13.000
<v Speaker 2>a boring trait is to be able to hit the

1:01:13.040 --> 1:01:15.280
<v Speaker 2>golf ball. You can improve a little bit from here

1:01:15.320 --> 1:01:18.880
<v Speaker 2>to there, but where you can really improve is chipping

1:01:18.920 --> 1:01:22.280
<v Speaker 2>and putting. Become the best chipper and putter you possibly can,

1:01:22.760 --> 1:01:26.720
<v Speaker 2>and therefore that will take advantage of your ball striking.

1:01:27.760 --> 1:01:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Win You win tournaments by short game. You don't win

1:01:30.640 --> 1:01:34.400
<v Speaker 2>them by driving in the fairway and striking the golf ball.

1:01:35.040 --> 1:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I feel like what gets lost with statistics and

1:01:38.240 --> 1:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>everybody always, you know, talks about how important driving and

1:01:41.400 --> 1:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>approach play is, but you know, those things get you

1:01:45.000 --> 1:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>into contention, and it's it's very rare, and you look

1:01:48.720 --> 1:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>at players over the histories of their careers, it's very rare.

1:01:52.480 --> 1:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, almost all the people that you would tab

1:01:55.160 --> 1:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>in underachiever in terms of their win totals. Are great

1:01:58.760 --> 1:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>ball strikers who struck around and on the greens, you know,

1:02:02.160 --> 1:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and those that's where you win tournaments.

1:02:04.880 --> 1:02:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Is like you said, Bryce and d Chambeau was number

1:02:10.200 --> 1:02:14.600
<v Speaker 2>one in strokes game last week driving, Okay, that didn't

1:02:14.600 --> 1:02:17.680
<v Speaker 2>win in the golf tournament. He was number one in

1:02:17.800 --> 1:02:22.800
<v Speaker 2>putting that won in the golf tournament. Certainly, the driving helps,

1:02:23.840 --> 1:02:26.800
<v Speaker 2>but the end game is getting into the hole. And

1:02:27.400 --> 1:02:29.680
<v Speaker 2>whenever I ever won a golf tournament, and I didn't

1:02:29.720 --> 1:02:32.000
<v Speaker 2>win many, because so I remember a lot of them.

1:02:32.040 --> 1:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think you're selling yourself a little short there.

1:02:34.960 --> 1:02:38.919
<v Speaker 2>Well, but when I when I won a tournament, yes

1:02:39.000 --> 1:02:43.200
<v Speaker 2>I played well, but I putted really really well. Every

1:02:43.320 --> 1:02:46.840
<v Speaker 2>single time I really putted well. And something else. I

1:02:46.880 --> 1:02:49.240
<v Speaker 2>always made a key putt coming down the stretch. You

1:02:49.280 --> 1:02:51.640
<v Speaker 2>always have to hit a shot or make a putt

1:02:51.880 --> 1:02:54.520
<v Speaker 2>coming down the stretch to win. Nobody ever lets it

1:02:54.560 --> 1:02:59.040
<v Speaker 2>be easy for you. So you have to perform. But anyway,

1:03:00.120 --> 1:03:03.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, you got to make putt. Yeah, it's very simple.

1:03:04.120 --> 1:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>What's that most you know you talked about hitting a

1:03:07.360 --> 1:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>shot down the stretch. Which shot, in your mind is

1:03:11.200 --> 1:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the most memorable one of all the shots.

1:03:15.640 --> 1:03:20.240
<v Speaker 2>The which qualifies what we were just talking about. The

1:03:20.280 --> 1:03:23.520
<v Speaker 2>most important shot that ever hit in my life was

1:03:23.560 --> 1:03:26.520
<v Speaker 2>the bucker shot on the seventy second hole in the

1:03:26.640 --> 1:03:29.480
<v Speaker 2>US Open in nineteen eighty eight to get in the

1:03:29.480 --> 1:03:32.600
<v Speaker 2>playoff with Nick Faldough. If I don't hit that bunker

1:03:32.640 --> 1:03:35.040
<v Speaker 2>shot and get it up and down, then I never

1:03:35.080 --> 1:03:38.000
<v Speaker 2>have a chance to win. So that's the most important shot.

1:03:38.040 --> 1:03:41.800
<v Speaker 2>The best shot might have been the one iron in

1:03:41.840 --> 1:03:47.000
<v Speaker 2>the NC DOUBLEA in seventy four. It might have been

1:03:47.040 --> 1:03:51.439
<v Speaker 2>the foreron on the last hole over water to get

1:03:51.480 --> 1:03:55.040
<v Speaker 2>in the playoff with Greg Norman in the Houston Open.

1:03:55.880 --> 1:04:01.520
<v Speaker 2>It might have been mean There's there's three or four

1:04:01.600 --> 1:04:04.880
<v Speaker 2>that you think about, uh, and I qualify not only

1:04:04.920 --> 1:04:07.400
<v Speaker 2>were the good shots, they were late Sunday afternoon and

1:04:07.440 --> 1:04:13.160
<v Speaker 2>they met something when the pressure was on. So I

1:04:13.200 --> 1:04:17.880
<v Speaker 2>think about those type of shots. It's and and it

1:04:17.920 --> 1:04:20.760
<v Speaker 2>makes you feel good when you do it, especially because

1:04:21.000 --> 1:04:23.800
<v Speaker 2>this is what you strive to do, to do it

1:04:23.840 --> 1:04:27.040
<v Speaker 2>on the stage. And this doesn't starting professional golf. This

1:04:27.120 --> 1:04:29.320
<v Speaker 2>starts back there. When you're nine and ten years old,

1:04:29.680 --> 1:04:32.600
<v Speaker 2>you dream about the US Open, you dream about the Masters,

1:04:33.040 --> 1:04:36.600
<v Speaker 2>and so you dream about being on the last hole

1:04:36.600 --> 1:04:41.360
<v Speaker 2>against Hogan, Snead, you know, Palmer, Nicholas, whoever your heroes

1:04:41.440 --> 1:04:46.280
<v Speaker 2>might be, and you compete against them in your own imagination.

1:04:46.440 --> 1:04:49.600
<v Speaker 2>You're hitting three or four balls out there, and so

1:04:50.480 --> 1:04:53.480
<v Speaker 2>when you finally get there. I've always felt like, you know,

1:04:53.520 --> 1:04:56.080
<v Speaker 2>you you better have the guts to fail, because you're

1:04:56.120 --> 1:04:58.240
<v Speaker 2>going to fail a whole lot more than you than

1:04:58.240 --> 1:05:01.360
<v Speaker 2>you're than you succeed. But you got to when you fail,

1:05:01.360 --> 1:05:03.080
<v Speaker 2>you got to get back up up. You can't go

1:05:03.160 --> 1:05:05.600
<v Speaker 2>back in your hole and bury your head for the

1:05:05.640 --> 1:05:08.520
<v Speaker 2>next three weeks. You know, you've got to be able

1:05:08.560 --> 1:05:10.560
<v Speaker 2>to get back up there and do it again. And

1:05:11.160 --> 1:05:15.080
<v Speaker 2>some can do it and some can't. And I enjoyed

1:05:15.680 --> 1:05:19.000
<v Speaker 2>the competition. I love being in the last group or

1:05:19.040 --> 1:05:22.240
<v Speaker 2>the late Sunday afternoon because that's when you find out

1:05:22.600 --> 1:05:25.560
<v Speaker 2>did all this work pay off? Have us succeeded in

1:05:25.600 --> 1:05:28.680
<v Speaker 2>this game? Can I do this on this grandest stage?

1:05:29.120 --> 1:05:31.960
<v Speaker 2>And if I can hit those shots, you know, on

1:05:32.040 --> 1:05:34.720
<v Speaker 2>the last shust under the US Open or wherever it

1:05:34.840 --> 1:05:40.200
<v Speaker 2>might be, then you know what I've done my work.

1:05:40.240 --> 1:05:41.200
<v Speaker 2>This is all I can do.

1:05:42.880 --> 1:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's I mean golf. You hit on so many

1:05:46.200 --> 1:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>things there, but I think one of the I played.

1:05:49.640 --> 1:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I qualified for a mid Am, a US Midam a

1:05:52.520 --> 1:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>few years ago, and one of my buddies who I

1:05:54.840 --> 1:05:57.959
<v Speaker 1>played tournament golf with, we were talking after and he said,

1:05:57.960 --> 1:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, you really got to you got to savor

1:06:00.560 --> 1:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>this moment because this is the one percent. You know,

1:06:03.800 --> 1:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine percent of the time golf just kicks you

1:06:06.440 --> 1:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>in the nuts and says it says, you know, go

1:06:09.040 --> 1:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>go try harder, play better next time. But that one

1:06:12.280 --> 1:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>percent when you when you pull off the shot or

1:06:15.120 --> 1:06:17.720
<v Speaker 1>when you when you get it done down the stretch,

1:06:17.960 --> 1:06:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is like the best feeling in the world.

1:06:21.920 --> 1:06:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh absolutely absolutely to hit that to hit that five

1:06:25.800 --> 1:06:31.000
<v Speaker 2>or six iron or whatever club it is right flush,

1:06:31.120 --> 1:06:33.880
<v Speaker 2>you finish in balance, the ball's going where you're looking.

1:06:34.360 --> 1:06:38.600
<v Speaker 2>It means a lot, you know, It's just there's nothing

1:06:38.760 --> 1:06:40.520
<v Speaker 2>like it, and you don't have to hit many of

1:06:40.560 --> 1:06:42.760
<v Speaker 2>them to keep it coming back. But let's not forget

1:06:42.840 --> 1:06:46.200
<v Speaker 2>this isn't about professional golf. This is about you qualifying

1:06:46.240 --> 1:06:49.240
<v Speaker 2>for the Midam or or my son qualifile for the

1:06:49.240 --> 1:06:51.800
<v Speaker 2>mid Aim some three years ago. And it could be

1:06:52.000 --> 1:06:54.920
<v Speaker 2>the USM, it could be a college tournament, it could

1:06:54.960 --> 1:06:57.560
<v Speaker 2>be you could be a you know, an older guy

1:06:57.720 --> 1:07:01.080
<v Speaker 2>playing amateur golf, senior amate golf, and you're you know,

1:07:01.160 --> 1:07:06.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe a senior amateur in the senior Open championship. Yeah,

1:07:06.240 --> 1:07:12.400
<v Speaker 2>club championship. Absolutely. And so it's it's all these stages

1:07:12.400 --> 1:07:15.800
<v Speaker 2>of golf that that keeps bringing you back when you

1:07:15.880 --> 1:07:18.560
<v Speaker 2>hit the good shot or you perform when it matters

1:07:18.600 --> 1:07:19.040
<v Speaker 2>the most.

1:07:20.160 --> 1:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>So I got I got a couple of quick questions

1:07:23.040 --> 1:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>on the on the way out. Thank you so much

1:07:25.080 --> 1:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>for the time. But what's the what's the scariest what's

1:07:28.840 --> 1:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the scariest screen? At wing Foot?

1:07:33.880 --> 1:07:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Uh, let me think here for a minute. Nine is

1:07:41.280 --> 1:07:44.680
<v Speaker 2>has got a lot of undulation to it, meaning not

1:07:44.800 --> 1:07:47.880
<v Speaker 2>so much back to front, but a lot of movement.

1:07:48.680 --> 1:07:51.920
<v Speaker 2>One has a lot of slope from back to front.

1:07:52.080 --> 1:07:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Three has a tremendous amount of slope from back to front.

1:07:56.800 --> 1:07:58.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, keep them below the hole is gonna be

1:07:58.520 --> 1:08:00.480
<v Speaker 2>key there. Putting it in the fair and keep it

1:08:00.480 --> 1:08:03.760
<v Speaker 2>below the hole. It's pretty simple wing Foot. And again

1:08:03.760 --> 1:08:07.280
<v Speaker 2>at Wingfoot be an old traditional golf course, everything's right

1:08:07.320 --> 1:08:10.840
<v Speaker 2>in front of you. There's there's no hidden gems out there.

1:08:10.880 --> 1:08:13.080
<v Speaker 2>It's right in front of you. It's just it's just

1:08:13.080 --> 1:08:13.760
<v Speaker 2>a tough test.

1:08:14.200 --> 1:08:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it'll be it'll be interesting to see how if

1:08:19.160 --> 1:08:22.479
<v Speaker 1>the powers nullified a little bit by the rough and

1:08:22.560 --> 1:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the greens there, because those greens, if you're in the rough,

1:08:26.479 --> 1:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>can be so tough to get to really control the

1:08:29.920 --> 1:08:30.439
<v Speaker 1>golf ball.

1:08:31.640 --> 1:08:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's and that's the key of the rough, Uh

1:08:35.040 --> 1:08:37.000
<v Speaker 2>is that? Yeah, you can get it as strong as

1:08:37.000 --> 1:08:39.400
<v Speaker 2>these players are now, they can get it to the green,

1:08:39.439 --> 1:08:41.639
<v Speaker 2>but you can't control where it's going to stop so much.

1:08:42.040 --> 1:08:44.680
<v Speaker 2>And so therefore, with being a really tough course to

1:08:44.680 --> 1:08:47.000
<v Speaker 2>get it up and end, now you'll be left with

1:08:47.040 --> 1:08:50.439
<v Speaker 2>some very very difficult up and ends. And that's that's

1:08:50.479 --> 1:08:51.800
<v Speaker 2>the equalizer at wing foot.

1:08:53.400 --> 1:08:57.599
<v Speaker 1>And then I stumbled across the story about an old

1:08:57.640 --> 1:09:00.439
<v Speaker 1>bullseye putter that you had that you so you kind

1:09:00.479 --> 1:09:02.719
<v Speaker 1>of trashed after a buddy of yours.

1:09:03.200 --> 1:09:07.639
<v Speaker 2>Uh, you know, this is college golf at its finest.

1:09:08.200 --> 1:09:11.120
<v Speaker 2>So I got this old bullseye. My my favorite putter

1:09:11.240 --> 1:09:14.880
<v Speaker 2>still of all time is the bullseye Plans putter. Okay,

1:09:15.600 --> 1:09:21.120
<v Speaker 2>you talk about butter feeling soft, feeling U. And so

1:09:21.479 --> 1:09:24.080
<v Speaker 2>we played a college tournament. I didn't cut well. I

1:09:24.240 --> 1:09:26.559
<v Speaker 2>was rent and raving on the six hour drive home

1:09:26.640 --> 1:09:29.920
<v Speaker 2>or whatever. In Jayhawk, who was always on my ass,

1:09:30.320 --> 1:09:33.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, NonStop, and he's telling me, you know, that

1:09:33.960 --> 1:09:36.479
<v Speaker 2>putter is not very good for you. You don't your style,

1:09:36.640 --> 1:09:39.200
<v Speaker 2>your way, that's not very good for you. You should

1:09:39.240 --> 1:09:41.519
<v Speaker 2>change Pudder's blah blah blah. And finally I had enough

1:09:42.040 --> 1:09:44.240
<v Speaker 2>and I opened the window of the car running eighty

1:09:44.280 --> 1:09:47.080
<v Speaker 2>miles an hour down the interstate and dragged this son

1:09:47.120 --> 1:09:49.599
<v Speaker 2>of a bitch on the asphalt for about three miles

1:09:50.040 --> 1:09:57.560
<v Speaker 2>and destroyed this this, this, this wonderful putter. But I

1:09:57.760 --> 1:09:59.519
<v Speaker 2>just destroyed it and then let it go and threw

1:09:59.560 --> 1:10:01.680
<v Speaker 2>it away. Then all of a sudden I look back

1:10:01.680 --> 1:10:04.600
<v Speaker 2>at Jay and he's laughing his ass off, thinking I

1:10:04.760 --> 1:10:09.559
<v Speaker 2>was just kidding you. So that was that was one

1:10:09.600 --> 1:10:12.880
<v Speaker 2>of the stories of some of the stuff that happens

1:10:13.320 --> 1:10:15.880
<v Speaker 2>in college golf, which is some of the greatest three

1:10:15.920 --> 1:10:16.679
<v Speaker 2>years of my life.

1:10:17.160 --> 1:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how many how many majors you would have

1:10:20.040 --> 1:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>gotten with if that, with that old putter.

1:10:24.280 --> 1:10:26.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, I got a couple I still have in

1:10:26.360 --> 1:10:29.439
<v Speaker 2>my house that were exact copies of that. Of course,

1:10:29.479 --> 1:10:31.760
<v Speaker 2>they all they all were a little bit different because

1:10:31.760 --> 1:10:34.360
<v Speaker 2>they're all so hand ground. Back in the day. But

1:10:34.920 --> 1:10:37.360
<v Speaker 2>those putters, I putted with him my whole life until

1:10:37.400 --> 1:10:42.639
<v Speaker 2>I finally went to the Zing two back in about

1:10:44.080 --> 1:10:48.599
<v Speaker 2>middle to late eighties, middle eighties. But you know, when

1:10:48.640 --> 1:10:50.720
<v Speaker 2>you when you look at these modern day putters, they're

1:10:50.720 --> 1:10:53.519
<v Speaker 2>big and their spaith balance and they're solid, but they

1:10:53.560 --> 1:10:57.080
<v Speaker 2>had big sweet spots. You talk about the old cash inns,

1:10:57.200 --> 1:11:01.000
<v Speaker 2>the old bull's eyes, the old this or that. You

1:11:01.120 --> 1:11:03.759
<v Speaker 2>talk about small sweet spots, but when you put it well,

1:11:03.800 --> 1:11:05.080
<v Speaker 2>there was no feeling like it.

1:11:05.880 --> 1:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's Everybody talks about the driver and

1:11:10.320 --> 1:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>how forgiving it is, and the ball, and I think

1:11:12.800 --> 1:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the other big things is the putter. Just

1:11:15.120 --> 1:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>hitting even in nineteen ninety five, putter versus today is

1:11:20.160 --> 1:11:22.439
<v Speaker 1>so much harder to putt well with it because if

1:11:22.439 --> 1:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you miss it just a little, you're going to end

1:11:24.400 --> 1:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>up ten feet short.

1:11:26.720 --> 1:11:30.679
<v Speaker 2>Oh absolutely, But I think the putters in the clubs

1:11:30.720 --> 1:11:35.880
<v Speaker 2>being bigger, bigger sweet spots have even professionals, we've gotten

1:11:35.880 --> 1:11:40.639
<v Speaker 2>a little careless in our striking, in our putting. If

1:11:40.680 --> 1:11:43.400
<v Speaker 2>you went back to the old equipment, you would adjust quickly,

1:11:43.840 --> 1:11:49.640
<v Speaker 2>but you would adjust by being more exact, because you

1:11:49.880 --> 1:11:51.680
<v Speaker 2>know you have to be exactly I went back to

1:11:51.760 --> 1:11:55.719
<v Speaker 2>Blade Irons three or four years ago, titles Blade Irons

1:11:55.720 --> 1:11:57.640
<v Speaker 2>for that simple reason, I said, I came out of

1:11:57.680 --> 1:12:01.200
<v Speaker 2>the room playing blades. I'm going back the gray playing blades.

1:12:01.280 --> 1:12:04.080
<v Speaker 2>And because you have to be more exact, and and

1:12:04.160 --> 1:12:06.960
<v Speaker 2>I think it makes you play better and and and

1:12:06.960 --> 1:12:09.920
<v Speaker 2>and and just I don't know. I like the look

1:12:09.920 --> 1:12:11.679
<v Speaker 2>in the field. And maybe I'm a little stubborn.

1:12:12.080 --> 1:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I have a I have an old person and

1:12:14.479 --> 1:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>driver that sometimes when I'm struggling with the driver, I'll

1:12:17.840 --> 1:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>bring that out and I have to focus so much

1:12:20.280 --> 1:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>on just hitting it solid that it just gets everything

1:12:23.960 --> 1:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of back into place exactly.

1:12:27.200 --> 1:12:29.519
<v Speaker 2>And that's all. I mean, everything back in the place.

1:12:30.040 --> 1:12:33.640
<v Speaker 2>You concentrate on what you're doing, and and and and

1:12:33.680 --> 1:12:37.360
<v Speaker 2>you hit it really well, you really do. H Yeah.

1:12:37.560 --> 1:12:40.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So Curtis, thanks so much for for the time.

1:12:40.720 --> 1:12:43.479
<v Speaker 1>We'll have to have you on again maybe around uh

1:12:43.600 --> 1:12:46.679
<v Speaker 1>maybe around a major and UH really going to miss

1:12:46.720 --> 1:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>you not being on TV with Fox this year, and

1:12:50.240 --> 1:12:53.559
<v Speaker 1>uh and thanks again, well.

1:12:53.400 --> 1:12:56.439
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate it, Thanks for those comments, and always enjoy

1:12:56.520 --> 1:12:58.479
<v Speaker 2>talking about the game of golf. It's it's been a

1:12:58.479 --> 1:13:01.240
<v Speaker 2>great it's been a great uh life for me and

1:13:01.280 --> 1:13:04.599
<v Speaker 2>a career, and I still think about it every day.

1:13:04.640 --> 1:13:06.519
<v Speaker 2>Even though I don't play much, I still think about

1:13:06.560 --> 1:13:07.800
<v Speaker 2>it every day. So thanks for having me on