1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:07,080 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:07,360 --> 00:00:11,160 Speaker 2: Let me start with I don't respond to comments by 3 00:00:11,200 --> 00:00:14,640 Speaker 2: other officials, whoever they may be. It's just not appropriate 4 00:00:14,640 --> 00:00:17,040 Speaker 2: to do that. I will tell you why I attended. 5 00:00:17,840 --> 00:00:21,560 Speaker 2: I would say that that case is perhaps the most 6 00:00:21,560 --> 00:00:25,120 Speaker 2: important legal case in the FED one hundred and thirteen 7 00:00:25,200 --> 00:00:28,320 Speaker 2: year history, and as I thought about it, I thought 8 00:00:29,000 --> 00:00:31,080 Speaker 2: it might be hard to explain why I didn't attend. 9 00:00:32,200 --> 00:00:36,280 Speaker 2: In addition, Paul Volker went to a Supreme Court case famously, 10 00:00:36,320 --> 00:00:40,000 Speaker 2: and I guess nineteen eighty five or so, so it's precedented, 11 00:00:40,200 --> 00:00:42,440 Speaker 2: and I thought it was an inappropriate thing, and I 12 00:00:42,440 --> 00:00:42,760 Speaker 2: did it. 13 00:00:44,440 --> 00:00:47,720 Speaker 3: That was Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Palell answering questions today 14 00:00:48,080 --> 00:00:50,880 Speaker 3: on why he attended the Supreme Court hearing regarding President 15 00:00:50,880 --> 00:00:54,400 Speaker 3: Trump's attempt to dismiss FED Governor Lisa Cook. As we 16 00:00:54,440 --> 00:00:57,200 Speaker 3: also wait to hear who President Trump's next FED chair 17 00:00:57,280 --> 00:01:00,520 Speaker 3: pick will be, let's discuss all this with Laol. She 18 00:01:00,600 --> 00:01:05,000 Speaker 3: is Distinguished Fellow at the Georgetown Center for Financial Markets 19 00:01:05,000 --> 00:01:07,920 Speaker 3: and Policy. She's also the former Vice chair of the 20 00:01:07,920 --> 00:01:12,160 Speaker 3: Federal Reserve and the former NEC director. It's fantastic to 21 00:01:12,160 --> 00:01:14,280 Speaker 3: have you with us. There was a lot. Jerome Prow 22 00:01:14,440 --> 00:01:17,479 Speaker 3: did not address today, nothing on the dollar, nothing on 23 00:01:17,520 --> 00:01:19,679 Speaker 3: his plans as to whether he'll leave the FED in May, 24 00:01:19,720 --> 00:01:22,800 Speaker 3: and nothing really more on political pressure on the Fed 25 00:01:22,920 --> 00:01:26,360 Speaker 3: on himself. But he did comment on that case against 26 00:01:26,400 --> 00:01:29,319 Speaker 3: Lisa Cook his decision to attend that hearing. Do you 27 00:01:29,360 --> 00:01:33,160 Speaker 3: agree with that characterization that this potentially is the most 28 00:01:33,240 --> 00:01:36,080 Speaker 3: important legal case in the Fed's one hundred and thirteen 29 00:01:36,160 --> 00:01:37,880 Speaker 3: year history. 30 00:01:38,080 --> 00:01:41,360 Speaker 4: I do. I think that the Supreme Court case on 31 00:01:41,720 --> 00:01:46,760 Speaker 4: whether the President can fire a sitting governor of the 32 00:01:46,760 --> 00:01:52,680 Speaker 4: Federal Reserve Board without any due process and without showing 33 00:01:53,160 --> 00:01:58,200 Speaker 4: clearer connection to their ability to undertake the responsibilities that 34 00:01:58,240 --> 00:02:01,920 Speaker 4: they were confirmed by the Senate to do, is extremely 35 00:02:01,960 --> 00:02:04,080 Speaker 4: important for the independence of the FED. And I think 36 00:02:04,120 --> 00:02:08,320 Speaker 4: that the press conference the statement today just really conveyed 37 00:02:08,320 --> 00:02:11,560 Speaker 4: the message that the Federal Reserve is doing its job. 38 00:02:11,680 --> 00:02:15,240 Speaker 4: It is staying out of the political fray. It is 39 00:02:15,360 --> 00:02:19,880 Speaker 4: looking carefully at the data and making policy exactly on 40 00:02:20,000 --> 00:02:23,720 Speaker 4: the lines that Congress told it to, which is to 41 00:02:23,880 --> 00:02:27,720 Speaker 4: preserve a strong labor market, maximum employment, and to get 42 00:02:27,760 --> 00:02:31,160 Speaker 4: inflation down to two percent. And I think that was 43 00:02:31,200 --> 00:02:35,160 Speaker 4: the focus of the Federal Reserve Chair today in the 44 00:02:35,200 --> 00:02:39,320 Speaker 4: press conference, didn't allow himself to get distracted, didn't really 45 00:02:39,919 --> 00:02:42,120 Speaker 4: get pulled into the political fray. 46 00:02:42,800 --> 00:02:44,840 Speaker 3: How much longer, though, do you think that the Fed 47 00:02:44,919 --> 00:02:48,160 Speaker 3: can stay out of that political phray, especially as we 48 00:02:48,240 --> 00:02:51,440 Speaker 3: approach May, when the President will have his pick of 49 00:02:51,480 --> 00:02:54,600 Speaker 3: who to nominate to the Federal Reserve. Of course, the 50 00:02:54,720 --> 00:02:57,919 Speaker 3: chair is just one of many votes, but even still, 51 00:02:57,960 --> 00:03:00,840 Speaker 3: you have to imagine that ideological they will fall in 52 00:03:00,880 --> 00:03:03,400 Speaker 3: line with the President's thinking on interest rates. 53 00:03:04,400 --> 00:03:07,799 Speaker 4: Well, certainly that is important to the president. He has 54 00:03:07,880 --> 00:03:11,840 Speaker 4: said that many times that the chair that he selects 55 00:03:12,000 --> 00:03:17,760 Speaker 4: needs to reflect his views. On the other hand, all 56 00:03:17,800 --> 00:03:22,640 Speaker 4: of the candidates also will be looking carefully at the data. 57 00:03:22,840 --> 00:03:26,320 Speaker 4: We heard a lot about the data today from share pal. 58 00:03:26,600 --> 00:03:30,320 Speaker 4: We saw that the statement reflected the fact that there's 59 00:03:30,360 --> 00:03:33,680 Speaker 4: been an upgrade to the labor market. There's less concern 60 00:03:33,800 --> 00:03:38,560 Speaker 4: now about unemployment. And so the new chair is going 61 00:03:38,640 --> 00:03:43,360 Speaker 4: to have to get support from the remainder of the committee, 62 00:03:43,360 --> 00:03:46,120 Speaker 4: that committee that's been in place for some time now 63 00:03:47,040 --> 00:03:52,040 Speaker 4: if he wants to take the committee in a very 64 00:03:52,080 --> 00:03:54,560 Speaker 4: different direction, and he'll have to do it based on 65 00:03:54,600 --> 00:03:58,000 Speaker 4: the dual mandate that was provided by Congress and based 66 00:03:58,040 --> 00:03:59,840 Speaker 4: on the evolution of the outlook and. 67 00:03:59,760 --> 00:04:02,640 Speaker 1: The I'm curious though with regards to that data level. 68 00:04:02,680 --> 00:04:04,839 Speaker 1: I mean, obviously, you know, a lot of a big 69 00:04:04,880 --> 00:04:07,560 Speaker 1: takeaway from the statement in the press conference was the 70 00:04:07,560 --> 00:04:10,360 Speaker 1: idea that the economy is kind of a surprisingly stronger 71 00:04:10,400 --> 00:04:12,920 Speaker 1: I think I'm kind of paraphrasing his words there than 72 00:04:12,920 --> 00:04:15,400 Speaker 1: what they thought a little bit more stabilization in the 73 00:04:15,440 --> 00:04:17,680 Speaker 1: labor market. But then towards the end of that press conference, 74 00:04:17,680 --> 00:04:19,520 Speaker 1: he started talking about I think what a lot of 75 00:04:19,560 --> 00:04:21,800 Speaker 1: us has talked about, this K shaped economy, the idea 76 00:04:21,839 --> 00:04:25,039 Speaker 1: that yeah, overall we're doing good, but there is some bifurcation, 77 00:04:25,160 --> 00:04:28,320 Speaker 1: and I'm wondering if it's the fed's job to address 78 00:04:28,360 --> 00:04:31,160 Speaker 1: that or do they ignore that and just focus on 79 00:04:31,480 --> 00:04:32,040 Speaker 1: the aggregate. 80 00:04:33,120 --> 00:04:38,200 Speaker 4: Well, we're certainly seeing this divergence with strong aggregate growth 81 00:04:38,320 --> 00:04:42,880 Speaker 4: clearly being driven by the AI boom, the boom and 82 00:04:43,040 --> 00:04:48,240 Speaker 4: data centers and semiconductors in AI infrastructure. But on the 83 00:04:48,320 --> 00:04:53,799 Speaker 4: other hand, we're seeing the labor market basically treading water, 84 00:04:53,960 --> 00:04:58,960 Speaker 4: with low hiring, low firing being kind of the characterization 85 00:04:59,720 --> 00:05:03,880 Speaker 4: really the last several months in the labor market and 86 00:05:04,279 --> 00:05:08,159 Speaker 4: in consumer sentiment. We saw yesterday that the combination of 87 00:05:08,279 --> 00:05:12,320 Speaker 4: high prices and diminished job opportunities are leading to some 88 00:05:12,480 --> 00:05:15,360 Speaker 4: real concern on the part of consumers, with the lowest 89 00:05:15,360 --> 00:05:19,520 Speaker 4: consumer sentiment since twenty fourteen, which is a little just 90 00:05:19,560 --> 00:05:24,160 Speaker 4: a little hard to understand given the pandemic. But the 91 00:05:24,360 --> 00:05:28,160 Speaker 4: job of the Federal Reserve is to focus on the 92 00:05:28,560 --> 00:05:32,520 Speaker 4: overall labor market, and it does look like the labor 93 00:05:32,560 --> 00:05:37,000 Speaker 4: market is in pretty good balance. It certainly has stabilized. 94 00:05:37,200 --> 00:05:40,440 Speaker 4: We saw some uptick in the unemployment rate, but then 95 00:05:40,600 --> 00:05:42,680 Speaker 4: in the last month or so it seems to be 96 00:05:42,800 --> 00:05:47,479 Speaker 4: holding steady, and growth is certainly strong, and of course 97 00:05:47,520 --> 00:05:50,599 Speaker 4: you've still got strong inflation, which the chair talked about 98 00:05:51,360 --> 00:05:55,600 Speaker 4: core PCE, which is really their focus three point one percent. 99 00:05:55,880 --> 00:05:58,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, well, I am curious, so lil too about another 100 00:05:59,000 --> 00:06:01,680 Speaker 1: aspect of this talk about the FED being data dependent. 101 00:06:01,920 --> 00:06:03,839 Speaker 1: One of the reporters asked them a question about the 102 00:06:03,880 --> 00:06:07,320 Speaker 1: reliability of the FED models, specifically in the context of 103 00:06:07,400 --> 00:06:10,440 Speaker 1: some meaningful structural changes going on in our economy, whether 104 00:06:10,480 --> 00:06:13,960 Speaker 1: it's the potential advocation for a week or dollar. Obviously 105 00:06:13,960 --> 00:06:16,680 Speaker 1: a huge shift in trade policies and other things here, 106 00:06:17,120 --> 00:06:19,240 Speaker 1: and you seem to suggest that those are to a 107 00:06:19,240 --> 00:06:24,920 Speaker 1: certain degree or another incorporated into the FED models, are 108 00:06:24,960 --> 00:06:26,560 Speaker 1: they so? 109 00:06:26,800 --> 00:06:32,680 Speaker 4: Look, I think every policy maker on the FOMC uses 110 00:06:33,040 --> 00:06:38,440 Speaker 4: a combination of both the fed's models but also outside models. 111 00:06:38,839 --> 00:06:44,000 Speaker 4: They look at private sector forecasts, They talk to business contacts. 112 00:06:44,360 --> 00:06:49,000 Speaker 4: I certainly talk to community leaders, labor leaders, consumers. You 113 00:06:49,080 --> 00:06:52,440 Speaker 4: gather as much information as you can about how the 114 00:06:52,680 --> 00:06:57,640 Speaker 4: economy is likely to evolve, so it's not really driven 115 00:06:57,720 --> 00:07:00,760 Speaker 4: by a single model. I think that would lead to 116 00:07:01,800 --> 00:07:06,920 Speaker 4: perhaps much less robust policy making. And of course you're 117 00:07:07,000 --> 00:07:11,680 Speaker 4: right that with AI driving potentially a real structural shift 118 00:07:11,680 --> 00:07:16,400 Speaker 4: in the economy, they have to be getting data from 119 00:07:16,680 --> 00:07:20,440 Speaker 4: businesses and from workers on the ground to get a 120 00:07:20,480 --> 00:07:23,800 Speaker 4: sense of that turning point, which is so hard to 121 00:07:23,880 --> 00:07:27,040 Speaker 4: capture in models that are based on past data and 122 00:07:27,080 --> 00:07:28,280 Speaker 4: past relationships. 123 00:07:29,000 --> 00:07:31,080 Speaker 1: Well, I have to ask you, with all the things 124 00:07:31,080 --> 00:07:34,120 Speaker 1: going on in Washington right now, do you have faith 125 00:07:34,200 --> 00:07:37,000 Speaker 1: conviction that this will remain an independent FED. 126 00:07:38,720 --> 00:07:42,920 Speaker 4: Well, it will, I think, remain to be seen. It 127 00:07:42,960 --> 00:07:50,920 Speaker 4: will hinge on whether or not the Supreme Court strengthens 128 00:07:51,600 --> 00:07:56,000 Speaker 4: the independence of the Federal Reserve by making clear that 129 00:07:57,600 --> 00:08:01,640 Speaker 4: the four cause protection that Congress put into the Statute 130 00:08:01,680 --> 00:08:05,160 Speaker 4: in nineteen thirty five is really observed, or whether it 131 00:08:05,200 --> 00:08:08,720 Speaker 4: turns out the president can fire a governor at will, 132 00:08:08,760 --> 00:08:10,800 Speaker 4: in which case I think the independence of the Federal 133 00:08:10,840 --> 00:08:12,960 Speaker 4: Reserve will be fundamentally compromised. 134 00:08:13,480 --> 00:08:16,000 Speaker 1: Loyle, always great to have you, great insights. Leil Brainer, 135 00:08:16,120 --> 00:08:18,440 Speaker 1: former vice chair of the FED. Now where we're at 136 00:08:18,440 --> 00:08:21,040 Speaker 1: the Georgetown Center for Financial Markets and Policy