WEBVTT - Markets, Twitter, And The Night Effect (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. We were talking about

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the two year you know, bonds, and this is your

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Bailey Wick Matt being a German resident for so many years,

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>but again the two year German bond fort the buond,

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the boon forty two basis points down twenty five basis

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>points today just brutal. So this is perfect timing for

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>our next guest, Pooja kumera European rate strategist at t D. Pooja,

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>do you look at the European you know, just the

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>German bond market. What's it telling us today? Good money? Yes,

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really think that ECB high fifty basics points yesterday.

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I think what markets are seeing right now is that

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Europe cannot escape procession, and that has been seen in

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of weeks because we are reading more

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>into weaker data than instation strips, and even next week

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>when we are going to get the next euro area

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.559
<v Speaker 1>of dash PM MICE, I doubt see itsel up that much,

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:21.919
<v Speaker 1>just because the move is all towards the growth data

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 1>I've been instation data. I think I just want to

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>point out that we saw this morning we had more

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>ECB headlines. Kasimir came out and said the September rate

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 1>hike could be UM fifty as well, obviously or fifty UM,

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>so I think that's what moved markets there. But even

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>here in the U s PUJA we've seen massive moves.

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, UM Paul and I were just looking at

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the ten year We're down twenty seven basis points in

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>two sessions. What's going on? It's it's it's been horrible.

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I think one thing to note yesterday priced action that

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>we saw across rates for mostly driven by a very

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>poor liquidity because we could see a lot of block

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>trades having that cause to move, and today's move us

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>primarily with one of the other. We've got reeper data

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:16.639
<v Speaker 1>from Europe MS to us p M, so I think

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>right now any reaction is anyway is getting much more

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>exaggerated because we are heading towards the summer liquidity season

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and also markets somehow now we know that we are

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>sitting the end of the hiking cycles. They know that

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>we could see maybe a couple of big moves from

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>our central banks bankers, but they cannot continue. And that's

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:42.679
<v Speaker 1>the kind of message that we've got from Easy to

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.799
<v Speaker 1>be itself. They have to move forward rate guidance that

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>we had before. They haven't said that they will be

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>looking for bigger calibrations with respect to rate heights or

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>September that we had before. So September could either be

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, fifty or seventy five. And I think if

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>if data continues to decree, rate market will start even

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>thinking about twenty five, markets will think that the ECB

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>is actually done with gritis. So I think you are

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>we will be extremely data dependent and we could see

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>moving much more exacuated just because there's thin liquidity. So

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>put you know, so much news coming out of Europe

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>this week with the ECB and what's going on in Italy.

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's focus on just real quickly on Italy here as

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>we have a little bit of the benefit of hindsight

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 1>here with drug resignation, how's that viewed within the rates market,

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the European rates market. It can't be good. But how

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>much of a concern is it? It is a concern.

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I think markets will get much more concerned when we

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>hit closer to the election in September. Train ships. ECB

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>has announced to tp I tool, but first of all,

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>this tool needs to be activated by the member states

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and comes with a lot of fistical conditions, so I

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>think no member state would actually be ready to actually

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>use it. It seems more of namesake pool right now.

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think we did see I think today's move

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>is more of a positioning let move, but it's talent

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>politics will start actually getting more and more attention as

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>we had closed it to this September day, so I

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 1>would actually continue to stay with the moves with respect

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>to wideners in btpsspots, I'm I'm a bit cautious about

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the rally that we have seen today. All right, Puja Kuma,

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us, Puja Kuma, Europeans

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Rates strategists for a t D. Looking at the markets here,

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>just kind of churning here. But we've got the SMP down,

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of more or less. We've got the

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>fixed income down double digits wanted to look at the

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 1>corporates or treasuries. I mean, that's sixty or forty portfolio

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>just got crushed in the first half of the year.

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how these people do it for a living.

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Brent Shooty, he does it for a living. He's a

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>chief investment strategist at Northwestern Mutual. Brent, how do you

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and your team? But wait, hang on a second, Brent, Paul,

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you did this for a living for three decades. Yes,

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>I still don't get longer doing it. Probably, yes, exactly.

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>That's why I'm on the radio now. Brent. How do

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>you and your team's kind of reset after that brutal

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 1>first half of two Yeah, I guess kind of commenting

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>on the stocks and bonds both thing down and how

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of I think shell shocked many investors. They

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't expect that to happen again. And so if I

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>take you back to ninety six and I look at

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 1>stocks and bonds, there have been twenty five periods, twenty

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>five annual time horizons in which stocks have been negative

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 1>since ninety six and bonds were positive, and all but

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 1>four of those, and so you have this weird period

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of time beginning of two. The other three time periods

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>or four time periods, where nineteen thirty one, the Great Depression,

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 1>ninety six, nineteen sixty nine, in nineteen seventy three, besides

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the Great Depression, the thing that occurred in each and

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>every one of the other ones was high inflation. And

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>this is where we recommend people own commodities because in

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>those other three time periods that I mentioned, besides the

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Great Depression and now the beginning of two, um, you've

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>seen commodity prices rise. And so I guess two takeaways

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>from that one you need to own some commodities as

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>part of your long allocation. And to don't expect this

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 1>to happen back to back years because it hasn't happened.

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:19.720
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean it can't, but it hasn't happened in

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 1>the ninety other years. So are you saying, then, Brent,

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>A portfolio is not dead. It is not dead. I

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's been declared dead about twenty seven times in

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>my twenty seven year career. Apparently the beginning part of

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>this year was trying. But UM, I don't think that

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 1>renders it dead for just because it hasn't worked for

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 1>six or some months, and what about commodities? Retail investors

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>should get that exposure. How do you think, um, actually,

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, um trading futures or buying ETFs or a fund.

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is the best way for a

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 1>retail investor to get pork bellies exposure? Sure probably the

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>easiest in the most efficient way for them to get it.

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you need to of it. You saw

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>what actually happened the first part of the year. How

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a little can go a long way. Uh, And certainly

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>over longer periods of time, it's not going to return

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.720
<v Speaker 1>as much as the stock market. Um, they should get

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that through a diversified exposure to commodities. Perhaps something called

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Commodities Index is kind of a decent place

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to think about funds tied to that. Certainly it's not

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>as tax efficient as money, but I think, as we've

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>seen during recent time periods when inflation is rising, it

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly helps shelter you from some of the losses that

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>are occurring in your other parts of the portfolio. You know, Brent,

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>when pros like you say, boy in particularly the fixed

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>income folks say we've never seen negative returns in the

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>fixed income markets like we saw in the first half.

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>When I hear stuff like that, I'm like, well, I'm

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna go out and buy that stuff. But it's not

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the same for equities, and we're down and equities I

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>don't feel like I have to run out and buy

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>equities here. Um, how are you guys thinking about kind

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of you know, just maybe valuation or can't get any

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>worse than than the psychology of the markets. Yeah, I mean,

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you've seen horrible son, I'm and I know that this

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>week we had the Bank of America survey that everybody's

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>in referencing, but you've seen the American Association of Individual Investors.

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I believe we've had uh eight sub twenty readings, which

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't occur very often going back to and most of

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>those have given away to positive future year. By the way, Yeah,

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>people's emotion kind of a contraining indicator. And so I'm

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>not suggesting it can't get any worse. It certainly could,

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>But I do think the worst isn't on the inflation side,

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>which I do think will help alleviate those fears, which

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 1>are essentially that the economy slows but inflation doesn't. And

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:34.959
<v Speaker 1>I think the reason why the markets handled. Some of

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the bad news on the economic side over the past

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>few weeks that we've seen, including today, is because inflation

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>is starting to push lower. I think people are catching

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:47.439
<v Speaker 1>on that inflation is being driven lower. You mentioned agriculture

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>in the beginning. I mean I talked about commodities. The

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>irony of commodities is now they're falling just a bit,

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>which is actually good for your stock and bond portfolio.

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's also good for inflation pushing forward.

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think you're gonna see inflation fall, which will

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>allow the market to guide. The Bloomberg Commodities Index UM

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>started the year just under a hundred. It peaked in

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>June at UM one thirty six seven, and now we're

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>back down to one seventeen. And it's also been a

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty good month for stocks. I mean, we started the

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>month off at thirty and change I think on the SMP,

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and now we're pushing four thousand. Okay, it's a down day,

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:25.079
<v Speaker 1>but it's been a good week. UM. When markets fall

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty some percent brent, for a retail investor who's got

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a longer time horizon, isn't it a decent idea to

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and at least dollar cost average in or

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>am I dated in that thinking? No, you're not dated.

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>All the all the old rules of investing still work.

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>The first one that I've mentioned to people listening in

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>is don't sell what others are um, even if you

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:47.559
<v Speaker 1>don't want to buy, don't sell what you have. But

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly adding to your exposure during downturns, it's historically proven

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 1>to be a good thing, and I don't think this

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>time will be any different. You certainly may have to

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>go through some uh periods of doubt about what you

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>just did. Um, but certainly, you know, I don't think

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a bad idea if you do,

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, two, three, or four five years from now,

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>which hopefully, if you're buying stocks, you have that horizon

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>for those to actually kind of come to fruition. Alright,

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. Brent Shrudy joins his chief investment strategist for

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Northwestern Mutual. You know, he's in Milwaukee, so that it's

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:20.199
<v Speaker 1>summertime now, it's probably like a hundred degrees there and

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:22.319
<v Speaker 1>it'll be snow on the ground in two months. He's

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>he's the Chicago guy though NBA from University Chicago. No, Yeah,

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 1>NBA from those guys work hard, they're smart, they're all

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>about the numbers. Um. I'm more of a big picture

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.839
<v Speaker 1>story guy. But you know, Chicago people, you've got to

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>be into this, like those freshwater economics come down. Yeah, exactly.

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, good stuff. Bruce Levine joins the CEO of

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>night Shares, and we're gonna talk first, Bruce about what

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that is. I know that UM for a long time

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:53.959
<v Speaker 1>in crypto, it's been a good strategy to buy at

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the close and sell at the open, or buy on

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Friday and sell on Monday. Is that a similar idea

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 1>behind night Shares? What's night Years? Yeah, I think there's

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:06.959
<v Speaker 1>some similarity there night chairs. Is this really with the

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>night effect? I should say? Is this really surprising phenomenon

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that a very large percentage of the returns of being

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>buy and hol they're coming through the night session, and

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>they're coming with substantially less volatility than the daytime session.

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>So from the risk adjested basis, it makes a lot

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of sense to be playing in the night session as

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>compared with the day session. All right, So what securities

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>in particular have a meaningful night session? If you will, Yeah,

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting in the night effect we found is very

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>broad in acrey markets. It exists around the world. So

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>if you were a Japanese investor who would buy the

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Japanese clothes and sell the Japanese open you'd have good

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>risk agested returns. If you're a German investor, same thing,

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>And um we find it at the single stock level.

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>But what we've decided to launch is to broad based

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>indexes give you this night effect essentially in the large

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>cap in the small cap space. So how many et

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>s do you think you're inna launch and how long

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:13.439
<v Speaker 1>is it this going to take? Yeah, So just to

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>give a sense of you know, kind of what I'm

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:20.439
<v Speaker 1>talking about and why we launched these, Uh, we were

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>getting returned in the large cap space, let's say over time,

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you were getting maybe the return coming in the night session,

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and the volatility of that being uh maybe fifty of

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>buy and hold. So again nice risk of just returns.

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>We saw something really amazing and small caps where the

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:44.199
<v Speaker 1>daytime return on the Russell two South over a long

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>period of times was either negative or just about flat.

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>So all of the return was coming in the night session.

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>So so the two that we launched so far are

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the end spy, So think of a night spy. Uh,

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and then that also playing on the ticker and the

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 1>heavily traded russell to E T F I, w M

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.199
<v Speaker 1>D and w M. So those are the first two.

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>We have four more in registration and we'll see what

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>happens over time. But we think it's a really interesting

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>concept that's never been done in ets before. So have

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>these two E T s have you launched them? And

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:23.199
<v Speaker 1>if so, kind of what's the interest been. Yeah, so

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>we launched them on JU and I'd say we're getting

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a really good reception. People are very interested in the concept.

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:30.839
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to figure out how to blend them into

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 1>their portfolios. And you know, we're just out there telling

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:36.439
<v Speaker 1>our story in the down days of summer that we're

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>getting a good responsible. But do you expect to focus

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>on equities? I mean, I type E T F go right,

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:45.559
<v Speaker 1>and um, I can put in night shares if I

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>leave it on equity. I see these, but then I'm

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>reminded you could be doing bonds, you could be doing commodities,

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you could be Because of my experience in crypto, I

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:57.199
<v Speaker 1>see that it's worked across asset classes. Yeah, I know

0:13:57.280 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>it is so now it's equities, and part of that

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>is just the operational complexities of actually doing this. So

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, cryptos obviously there's no cryptos being traded in

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>et F format period other than the futures um you

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>know with UH commodities is a good example where we

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>have looked at it. That's something you might look at

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>on the bond side that you get some interesting results

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>on the on the high yield side, it tends to

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>look a little bit like equities that kind of returns.

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Yet and sometimes on treasuries you get the opposite of

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the night effect, which is when people are going out

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of the equities to get flat at the end of

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the day, um, they're going into treasuries. So so we're

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>looking at all that. It's really interesting. Are you looking

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>also at crypto Bruce, mean, do you have you know,

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>like SEC news alerts on your phone just in case

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>they do approve of crypto e t f UM Not yet,

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we're we're we're just doubt there on

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the equity side started we're starting down the path here,

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>so we will make sure to put that crypto alert

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>on our phone. It's it's interesting that in such a

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>difficult year for I p O s, you know, no

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>new issues and UM and for the market in general,

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>E t F introductions have still been pretty strong this year,

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>right ye have. But I think I heard a statum

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>about two and the sifty new funds this year, you know.

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I think what you're seeing is two things. One is,

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>most of the innovation and asset management in my opinion,

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>comes through the et F structure these days. That seems

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to be the preferred vehicle for most investors. The second

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>thing you're you're seeing is you've seen the mutual fund

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>industry really um embrace the E t F vehicle, and

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 1>so you've seen conversion. Then you've seen some of the

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>traditional folks get into the industry for the first time.

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's driving a lot of product launch. It took

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>them long enough. So Bruce, you're at I Shares, Black Rocks.

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Selection of e t F s give us a sense

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of just how the et F space it's kind of

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>evolved over time, and is it a good attractive area

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to look at today. It's kind of a duopoly, right

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>with I mean, I Shares and Vanguard are the two

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>biggest shops on the street. They are and they take

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>in you know, the lion's share of the money, and

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>they do it in the more traditional et f that

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>were launched twenty five years ago. You know, I launched

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>actually a number of them, and you know that if

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you take some of the flows away from them, it's

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>still pretty large numbers. It's still a growth industry and

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>there's always room for innovation. You have seen some good

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>things happening from some of the smaller firms, and you know,

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I expected to just continue to be the center of

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>innovation and asset management. All right, So you have an

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>affinity here. I'm just looking at kind of your CV.

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>You have affinity for Charlottesville, Virginia, University of Virginia undergrad

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and then you get the NBA at the Darden School

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>of Business, and I was considering going there. That was

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>my choice between Duke and Virginia. But you know what,

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the people Bruce at Darden, they just worked too hard.

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 1>You guys really worked hard at doing that case stuff, right, Yeah,

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>we the series Lament. The type of the law school

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:18.919
<v Speaker 1>which was right across from us is really playing softball

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>while we're working on our cases. But um, now I

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>have a greater finishing Charlotte, Like you said, it's a

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>great place. You know. I was down there Matt for

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>my tour and they were just telling me how hard

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>they worked. And I was literally getting off a stretch

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of like twenty seven days straight work, you know, as

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:38.199
<v Speaker 1>an investment banking analyst, scrub analyst. And the last thing

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to hear was we worked the hardest. Yeah.

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>So I went to Duke and had a phenomenal two years.

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>And so all right, Bruce, thanks so much for joining us.

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Levine, CEO of Night Shairs, I didn't know this

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>night trading thing was a thing. Yeah, it's huge, and

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>um it's amazing if you look at the charts, because

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 1>you don't expect it to be as successful as it is,

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and then I guess it would be laborious. Um well,

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>from my perspective, maybe the kids could write code for it,

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>but obviously in E t F just makes it easier

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and keeps the cost down. Where you go to Man Deep,

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>because we need to get smart here on the social

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:22.199
<v Speaker 1>media named snap down thirty, uh pinterest down twelve, Twitter

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>also a down, So Man Deep seeing he covers technology

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence. Man Deep, is this some of this

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>week just we're seeing some of these smaller social media names.

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Is it just because they're not players and we need

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to really wait for the facebooks and the Google's next week? Yes,

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I think what it shows is that not

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>everything in ad spending is going to be cut. So

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>if companies are looking at their discretionary versus you know,

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>essential ad spend, So in the discretionary bucket, probably snap Pinterest,

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the smaller social media platform sofall as opposed to the

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>non stationary where you Google search spend is probably the

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 1>last thing to be cut. So I think that's what

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>the market is hinting at. But who knows, maybe Google

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>disappoints as well. It's very unlikely. And you know, the

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>valuation multiples have compressed a lot in anticipation, so I

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 1>think even if the report an inline quarter, you are

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 1>going to see the stock will be up. So uh yeah,

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 1>I I think a lot has already priced in in

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of weakness. Man, deep, why does um Snapchat have

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the power to move the market. I mean, it's wiped out.

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I think eighty billion dollars in social media market cap,

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:42.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's not even worth eight billion dollars itself. And

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even really know people still used it. I

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>remember back in the day the idea was college kids

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>could text each other and it would disappear or something.

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>But is it still like a big deal. Well, so

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>they still have around three forty and daily active users.

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>So when you start looking at you know a number

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of platforms that have got over two hundred million daily

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 1>active users, you can it's probably you know, less intent

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>at this point of time. So clearly they have that

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:18.159
<v Speaker 1>user base. Now their engagement seems to be falling, and

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>part of that has to do with competition from TikTok.

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, the advertisers are pulling back

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:30.119
<v Speaker 1>because they just don't seem to get the r Y

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 1>they were getting before. And that is the big change.

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Because Apple's privacy changes has really heard the r o

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 1>I on ad spending for some of these platforms, and uh,

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that is the big change. I mean, doesn't

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:48.679
<v Speaker 1>warrant eighty billion dollar route in terms of the market

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 1>cap of all these companies, I don't think so. But

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>clearly there's a lot of uncertainty around how much those

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>changes would affect the large companies like Alphabet and Matter.

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, Snap has a market cap at of

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>sixteen point eight billions, a little bit bigger than that,

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>but nothing relative to the Facebook's and Google. So thirty seconds,

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Man Deep, what's the key thing we should look for

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>from those big companies next week? Facebook and Google? Yeah,

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>direct response adds because those are the ones directly hit

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 1>by Apple's privacy changes. If Meta can show you know,

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>even an inline quarter, the estimates have been devised the

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>lower by ten percent if they report an inline quarter,

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I thinks those stabilized. All right, Man Deep,

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. As always appreciate your phone in it in

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 1>from home. But I see him here. He's here all

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the time too, So he's one of those guys A feeling.

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>He also works very hard from home. This is you

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>know the debate, right, do people are they pretending to

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 1>work from home? As Elon Musk says, or as we

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>see from Man Deep, are they excelling They're? Deep is

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a smart dude and he's a hard work He puts

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>out some great research. You can get it in b

0:21:55.680 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I go. I'll just get right to next guy, Dan Mary,

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>CEO and founder of Vertex Software UM and I also

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to talk to about what's going on in great

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:10.120
<v Speaker 1>state of Iowa. We'll get to that in a minute. Hey, Dan,

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:12.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Tell us what Vertex

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>software is, what are you guys doing, and and kind

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of what's your outlook? Well, hey, thanks for having me.

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>So we have cloud based software that helps manufacturers use

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>three D and sales service, factory and supply chain that

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>helps them increase efficiencies, lower costs, and drive revenue. That's

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of the nutshell. It's kind of like if you

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>think about video games, to do games make today, you

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>make heavy use of three D content. Well, manufacturers have

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of three D content that they provide. It's

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>just much more complex, a lot bigger, and it has

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to be more precise. So we help happen leverage that

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>content to get more bang for the buck out of

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that investment. So is it like CAD your own version

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 1>of AutoCAD, Well, it's kind of like that, except we're

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>more like Netflix for CAD. So we take their CAD

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>data and we make it easier for them to use

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:05.479
<v Speaker 1>it downstream of product of alopment and engineering where they

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 1>make it so they can use it and put in

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:10.479
<v Speaker 1>the hands of a salesperson or someone on the factory

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>for or in the hands of their customers. That historically

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 1>has been really really hard to do, and we make

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that easy and orders the magnitude more cost efficient. Dan

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>talks about your partnership with John Deer one of my

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 1>favorite companies out there, Mine too, Mine too. Yeah, I mean,

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:29.679
<v Speaker 1>we're just so grateful to work with. You know, iconic

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 1>company like John dere is such innovators. So we help

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 1>them leverage three D cads like you just said, uh,

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to see the state of the factory for forecasting and planning,

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 1>for visualizes and equipment of function and for service. Again,

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 1>that concept of putting three D in the palm of

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>people's hands on devices that they use today. Again, it's

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>been a horse historical challenging. So what is the state

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of US manufacturing like right now, especially with the supply

0:23:56.359 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>chain issues? Are they getting any better? Chip short ages

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>really bumming me out? Um, is there an improvement that

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you see with the partners you work with? Well, I

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>think just generally what I'm seeing is certainly right now.

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody knows demand for goods as weakening. You know,

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 1>consumers are starting to spend more on service, labor, energy

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>costs are rising, and their supply chain bombs. As you mentioned,

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 1>so I think what I'm seeing, and I was just

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>actually on site of one of our customers earlier this week.

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm just seeing this accelerating need, almost an urgency for automation,

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>automation and distributed collaboration across time zones. They want to

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>shorten a side of supply chain and be more nimble

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and flexible. That's really what what I see in the

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 1>microchip shortage. The nail on the head with that is

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 1>we have customers that have equipment parked in parking lots

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that they're leasing right because they don't have the parts

0:24:53.960 --> 0:25:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to complete the production to deliver the orders. So you know, man, Dan,

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>do I understand that? You know, I ordered a Chevy

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Silverado at the beginning of the year, and it is

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:10.360
<v Speaker 1>apparently as far as I can track, built in Mexico,

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:13.640
<v Speaker 1>sitting in a lot waiting for I think a window

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:19.160
<v Speaker 1>switch chip. I don't ever need to roll the windows down.

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the truck now, thank you very much. Hey Dan,

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, Matt and I are stuck here in midtown Manhattan.

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:27.360
<v Speaker 1>We have no idea what's going on in the real world.

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>So we left talking the folks that are out and

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:33.239
<v Speaker 1>about doing stuff you have a bachelor's mechanical engineering from

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Iowa State University. That's an eyewa. These days, well, you know,

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:40.119
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, generally speaking, I think things are

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty good in Iowa. We have a you know, state

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>government here that has been really uh you know, supportive

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>of from my world, support of the innovation. I I

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>am excited about what's going on in Congress right now

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and support for you know, kind of diversifying uh you know,

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>diversity of the investments for National Science Foundation and Department Energy.

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that's something I've heard a lot of excitement

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>about with his latest bill. Um just making it possible

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 1>for people in more rural states like us to tap

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 1>into you know, grant money. How's it you the farm

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 1>economy out there. We've seen big swings and commodity prices

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that Mett and I like to talk about, but you

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 1>guys are actually putting the stuff in the ground and

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>taking it out. Yeah, you know, I gotta tell you,

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm in Iowa, and that's not not really my area.

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Got a lot of friends, and I got a lot

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>of friends in the act. But I grew up in

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of science technology and was a child at the

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>early video game generation, Like, what what are your favorite games?

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Oh gosh, geez, well, I go all the way back

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to dude, I was there at the Commodore sixty four.

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>You know. Oh yeah, yeah, oh you that that impossibation?

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, all right, dad, good, good, good stuff. We

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 1>always appreciate checking in with some of these entrepreneurs out

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>there all over the country. Dan Murray's doing it CEO

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and founder Vertex Software bringing some technology solutions to some

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:13.880
<v Speaker 1>industrial companies. And I'm sure that's a big, big plus

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:15.360
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of these companies when they can get

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of really step up their tech game, and Dan

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Murray does that. Appreciate it. Thanks for listening to the

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three. Put

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>on Ball Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.