WEBVTT - Remdesivir Needs More Trials Before Going All In: MMKCC's Bach

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Kind the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:21.759
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. It is time for Bloomberg Opinion.

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>We're pleased to be joined by Bloomberg Opinion colums Peter Back.

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>He's a director at the Center for Health Policy and

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Outcomes at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City.

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Dr Box, thanks so much for joining us here. Really

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>fascinating column you have out talking about hospitals and the

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>drug that's getting a lot of i think press and

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of attention for treatment, which is ROMM depth severe.

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Give us a sense of kind of how hospitals are

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>viewing this drug, how successful it has proven to be,

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and what you think it's future might be. Well, good morning,

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for having me. The drug it's a

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>drug that works against the COVID virus, has some data

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>us suggesting it helps speed the recovery of COVID patients

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and we don't really have a lot of other treatments

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>out there. So there's enthusiasm, but right now there's a shortage.

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>The drug costs a tremendous amount of money. It's about

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>three thou dollars plus per treatment course. It has no

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>data that demonstrates convincingly it saves lives, and uh, the

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>administration has sought to corner the worldwide market for it

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 1>so hospitals can use it. But with all that optimism,

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>my column focuses on two things. One is the data

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>on remdesiviere is from a different time, even though it's

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 1>a few months ago. It was studied on older people.

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>The pandemic has moved to younger people, and it was

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>studied without steroids, deck and me etho zone specifically, which

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>is clearly showing an ability to save lives. And so

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>now we need to understand is remdesiviere have a place

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>here before we proceed to give it to a bunch

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of people and spend billions of dollars on it. Dr Bach,

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:08.359
<v Speaker 1>what can we say categorically and scientifically about round U

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>severe in terms of its relationship with COVID nineteen, We

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>can say that there is one study that shows it

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>shortens the duration of illness. Uh, and that is about it.

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>That's good news that don't get me wrong. But this

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>is not the panacea. This doesn't turn around the pandemic.

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>This doesn't mean we can get rid of masks or

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:32.399
<v Speaker 1>go back to school or anything like that. We need

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to make these incremental steps. That's how it always works.

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>And so this is not a disparagement of this piece

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of progress. It's a fair reckoning with just how big

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:48.679
<v Speaker 1>these steps typically are, which is not very dr buck.

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm reading more, and I guess we're all

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>reading more and more stories about hospitals in southern California

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and Texas and far to being overrun. No more, I

0:02:56.760 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>see you beds available. It's just it's just a simple

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.279
<v Speaker 1>replay of what we experienced in the New York metropolitan

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>market back in March and early April. Are you surprised

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 1>that the hospital system across the country, given what they

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>witnessed in New York metro area, aren't better prepared? No,

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. Part of it is you know, triumph of

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:23.959
<v Speaker 1>hope over experience, the optimism that you know, it hasn't

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>happened here, so it won't happen. Uh ever, but it's

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>also these are you know, fixed physical structures. They can't

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>suddenly have four times as many I see you beds. Uh.

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>There are serious limitations to workforce surge. There's not that

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>much supply, there's personal protective equipment. People are scattered across

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the country, and moving people is difficult. And so no,

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not surprised at all. We knew from the beginning

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that our most limited, our biggest constraint in handling this

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>pandemic was the health care system itself. Was the reason

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>we tried to flatten the curve so we could both

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>get better at treating this and also maintain, if you will,

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a steady, manageable flow of patients. And we have failed

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to do that, even though every other Western country has succeeded.

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I think because we have foolishly sat around saying, oh, well,

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll get a vaccine soon so we can be casual

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>about this. We've allowed ideology to creep into public health planning.

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe more creep in, how about trample over And you know,

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:37.679
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not surprised by any of this. And these

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>hospitals are I think, you know, pushed to the limit,

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and they are not designed in almost any cases to

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:49.280
<v Speaker 1>focus purely on the management of one problem. They manage

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a mix of problems in a ratio where there various

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>constraints hospital beds, staffing, I V. Tubing, Everything is kind

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of gets them there, but dr bach when it comes

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>to the round us of your problem and the fact

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that there aren't significant, large scale trials that can tell

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>us exactly what it can and can't do. When it

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 1>comes to coronavirus, how do you get around the fact

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that in a pandemic people jump on anything that looks

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 1>like it might work. But for a trial to give

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>us any real information, you need one sick person and

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>one other sick person. One gets the treatment, one doesn't.

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>How do you make that kind of moral judgment at

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a time like this, Well, it's you know, this is

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the foundation of empirical science, that we take our time,

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that we don't assume our guesses are right. And this

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>isn't some fake humility. This is a hard learned humility

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>from having been shown over and over again our guesses

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>were wrong, and so we have to do the studies

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 1>for exactly the reasons you're suggesting. There's an argument that

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't be doing them. We are in a crisis

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that is exploding and expanding around us. What we learned

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 1>today will have impact on ten times, a hundred times,

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>potentially a thousand times as many people down the road.

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>And so that is one element of the moral or

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>ethical underpinning of research. Another is, frankly, we have a

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>rimmed desevere shortage. So what I'm calling for is let's

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 1>go do a trial. Let's it will take maybe about

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>two thousand people. We could enroll such a trial, get

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the patients for it in a matter of days. Unfortunately,

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.799
<v Speaker 1>because of the number of people coming into hospital, everyone

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 1>gets decks of methods m which we know saves lives.

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 1>Half get rammed deseverere hal get placebo or some other control.

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>We will know in fourteen days and a month whether

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>or not we're out of time. I'm afraid we'll We'll

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:45.919
<v Speaker 1>revisit this, Thank you so much. Well. One of the

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>byproducts of this pandemic is it's just kind of exacerbating

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>or highlighting some of the tensions between a lot of

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>nations across the world. And clearly it's a unique time here,

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and one of the questions is how will the new

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 1>world order look post pandemic as we think about kind

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 1>of how the United States may or may not lead

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in how your positioning of Europe and so on. So

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>there's no one better to discuss these big, big geopolitical

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>issues in Alan Crawford, Senior editor International Government for Bloomberg News,

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>joins us on the phone from Berlin. Alan, thanks so

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:18.679
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us here. You're out with this story

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>a few days ago, A new world order for the

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>coronaviruy era is starting to emerge. Give us a sense

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of how you think this new world order may look. Well,

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we all get the feeling that there's something

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>momentous underway, and so I tried to take a step

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>back to take a look at where we are six

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>months and and already there are definite trains that we

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>see that the US and I have to see it

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>from an outsaye perspective, it just looks regardless of the politics,

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>it just looks as if it's increasingly self obsorbed. I

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>head of going into the nev election, of course, but

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>also with the pandemic, it is having to this this

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>terrible envirus, and it's occupied U as far as the

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>outside world is concerned. But then of course we're seeing

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>China for for reasons of its own that I don't

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>think are completely understood. It's there are these high frictions

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>with countries from Canada to Australia, to the UK over

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong, and of course with the US as well,

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and these are all coming together at once, and then

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Europe is in this kind of strange in between position

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>where it's trying to it there are signs that may

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:42.319
<v Speaker 1>just emerge from this crisis stronger. What will be the

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 1>decisive moment at which it really becomes obvious that China

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>has already sort of become a bigger figure in world

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>politics than maybe the US and Europe had given it

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:58.719
<v Speaker 1>credit for. Well, I mean, if we're looking at the

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 1>six months ahead, and obvious we um the US elections

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a huge it's the elephant in the room, if you like.

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>And certainly the the the analysts that I spoke to,

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 1>they were somewhat wary about um conflicts ahead. I'm not

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:16.119
<v Speaker 1>talking about open conflict, but you know, tensions, more frictions

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the November election. But equally, as I said

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that China is, it's there's all these frictions with other

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.839
<v Speaker 1>countries middling powers if you like. And I think that

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the saints is that these countries, like well across the EU,

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the UK, Assulia, Canada and others, they are being faced

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>with a very difficult choice. Do they stand up to

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>China or do they basically try and keep their head down.

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think that there's a sense that their decision

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>will actually go a long way towards determining the approach

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to China. So it's interesting here We're gonna have you

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the election, And let's say, for argument's sake, that

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the that Vice President Biden wins the election, does the

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>does his Secretary State spend the first one days administration

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>simply on a plane traveling around to all these countries

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>saying that, Okay, those last four years, just forget them.

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>We're going back to businesses as usual. We are your friend,

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>we will be part of the solution. We will lead

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:24.199
<v Speaker 1>you against you know, whether it was a Cold warf

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty or forty years ago to whatever way is we

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>have in the future, I think undoubtedly that would be

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the case. But for what effect that would have, I'm

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>not sure, because on the one hand, yes, it was

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>room to improve relations um. On the other then really

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>detensions between for example, European countries and France Germany with

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the with the Trump administration, then that has really highlighted

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Europe's m europe dependence on the U S which is

0:10:57.240 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>as uh, it's obviously it goes back to the same

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in World War and all of the help that the

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>US has given to Europe and the you know, the

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>how essential the transatlantic relationship is. But really it's highlighted

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>just this this dependence. And I think that I know

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that European governments and the EU independently are already taking

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 1>step to try and to decoupled to some extent, to

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>some limited extent. Alan you know, there's always this talk

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of clash of civilizations, you know, Henry Kissinger and Neil

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Ferguson talking about, you know, a new Cold War between

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:39.439
<v Speaker 1>the US and China. Those things though, are quite hyperbolic.

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Where is there any evidence that there will actually be

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of a breakout of conflict, you know, soft or

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>hard between you know, the bipolar countries in this war. Well,

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly one of the islands that I was speaking to,

0:11:56.840 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>who sits in Singapore, then he said that, um, that

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>his the greatest concern going forward, and he's talking short

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to medium term. Is not that there's some kind of

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>open conflict between the US and China, because the government's

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously realized that that's it would be catastrophic. His concern

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>is more that there is some kind of like basically mistake,

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>some kind of error in in these high presentitive areas

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>such as the South China Sea. Who are you know

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the US has same two aircraft carriers through recently, uh,

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And that there's more it's basically an accident that could happen.

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 1>That's that's what the concerns are and um, certainly among

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:53.959
<v Speaker 1>the analyst community. So Alan, what's the consensus of the

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>European Union and Brexit and what the role the UK

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>may play here in a prose brexit world terms of

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the world or or well, that's a good question. That's

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>actually my next story I'm working on. But I mean,

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the UK is in a difficult position that it's it's

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>really setting out on its own to try and forward

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>its own um, its own path in this increasingly um

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>increasingly attains world at the moment, and so that they

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>are having the DEPARTMN Minister and Domini grab Con Secretary

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:33.959
<v Speaker 1>has made it clear that they have difficult choices ahead,

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing that already over Hong Kong, we're seeing

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>it over Huawei. That's not not unique to the UK,

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of course, but these are these are decisions which will

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>have potentially very deep ramifications for its relations as an

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>independent country, a middle and power when it's having to

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>deal with the superpowers of of China, but also with

0:13:56.320 --> 0:14:00.679
<v Speaker 1>the any with either the Trump administration, which strangely and

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>wants a treat deal, or the Biden Biden administration. We

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know what their position would be on on on

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>post projexit UK and a treat deal. Alan, looking forward

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to seeing that story. But this particular story you about

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>this this morning in the last couple of days, is fascinating.

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Out urge everybody to read it. Alan Crawford a senior

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>editor for International Government and Bloomberg News, and his story

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>as a new world order for the coronavirus era is

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>starting to emerge, and it is an interesting question Paul,

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to talk about who Joe Biden might pick. You know,

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>in terms of foreign policy, we know already that he

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>has the former CIA deputy director on a potential transition

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>team worthy to become president at some point and you know,

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>it looks like there might be you know, quite a

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>forceful stance there. So we have a deal today, Analog

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Devices acquiring Maximum Integrated Products twenty point nine billion dollars

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>or twenty two premium too Maxims closing shares Friday, and

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>it's helping the NASDA lead the gains for the indussees today.

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring somebody in who can tell us so all

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the details about why this deal was done Wood and

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>who is senior technology analyst add Bloomberg Intelligence. We'll just

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>explained to us. First of all, why Analog would want Maximum. Great,

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me on body. So this is all

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>about scale and trying to broaden Analog devices ship book print.

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>So the competter compete against the larger competitor Texas Instruments

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>over the long term. So actually, Fannie, I should probably

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>let you know. The first thing I do when I

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>see an M and A deal in the news, I

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>go to M A go and I see I type

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>on there and I click click click on the deal.

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to see who the advisors are, who are

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the bankers on this deal? And yes, it was be

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of A Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley advising the buyer

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>on the sell side, JP Morgan. So so the big

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>heavyweight investment banks weighing in on this deal. So whould

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>can we look at this deal here? You talk about

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>it scale, we've heard that before. Give us a sense

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of kind of how the same conductor industry is in

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>terms of consolidation. Is it's still a fragmented industry or

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>redound to just a handful of heavyweights. Well, I mean

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it is a bifurcating market. So you you have the

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>heavyweights like Texas Instruments, um. You know, as well as

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>analog devices, you have microchip So you have these larger players,

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and then you have a bunch of smaller players, specialized

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>chip makers. UM. So to some degree, it's still fairly fragmented.

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Uh roughly, I would say about forty of the market

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>share go through these heavyweight players and then fragmented on

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the on the other side. UM. And the one thing

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you is that look like this market

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>has been uh in a phase of consolidation over the

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>last uh five years or so. Um. You know, it

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>took a hiatus for the last couple of years. Now

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>it's finally it seems as if some companies are looking

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to come back and deal making and and and the

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>analog devices, and Maximum is an example of that. Who

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't we have two D seventy five million dollar cost

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 1>synergy announcement. It doesn't seem like a lot of cost synergies.

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Am I expecting too much from a merged analog Maximum? Sure? So? So,

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, if you look at the scale

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 1>of of Maximum, there's there's really not much that you

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:21.360
<v Speaker 1>can take out. And if I look at the cost

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>nergy opportunities here, it's on the gross margin side and

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>then uh, not much on the operating margin side. So

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>on the ghost margin side, you can actually poured over

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:33.439
<v Speaker 1>some of the chip capacity over to the analog devices

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>uh FABS and then on on on the the outputing

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 1>expense side. Um uh Maximum has actually done a very

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>good job a streamlining the organization over the last five years,

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>so they were really running into the bone. There's a

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit that they could take away, but not that

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>much more. But but even then you are going to

0:17:55.680 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>still see the overall maximum margins in proved to where

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>analog devices is, which is around So we'll talk to

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>us about the end users here of some of the

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>chips that analog and maxim puts out it's a sense

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of who their big customers are and what are some

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of the growth drivers for their part of the chip industry.

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't necessarily that UH call out any particular big

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 1>customers similar to someone like an inteler and Nvidio. If anything,

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:28.439
<v Speaker 1>these guys have a portfolio of over ten UH you know,

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>ten to twenty thousand ships combined addressing you know, UH,

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, fifteen thousand different customers. It'll go anywhere between

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:43.159
<v Speaker 1>maximums exposure into your your Nintendo, UH, your your your

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Nintendo switch. Apple has exposure to UH some UH Analog

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>devices as an exposure to some Apple devices. Automotive, they're

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 1>they're very big on automotive, industrial robotics are very big

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>on UH in that sector, and also data center powered

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:05.640
<v Speaker 1>chips and and UH and UH converted chips. So well,

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>they're very broad based from from a customer and industrial perspective. Now,

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.479
<v Speaker 1>these are two of the biggest semiconductor companies. There are

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>obviously bigger ones, but you know, Analog at forty three

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars market cap and you know maximum eighteen nine

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars, Well, who will be next? So even Finny

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and we have an XP skyworks really really really tough

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to say. Any Um, you know, I didn't think the

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Maxim deal would happen now during the pandemic. Uh. You know,

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be surprised if uh some of the smaller companies,

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 1>some of these these smaller these fenders would come into play. Uh.

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:47.479
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've I've seen some headlines where someone like

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 1>a serious Logic that provides chips to the iPhone, or

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 1>or semd Tech which which provides a wireless chip, wireless

0:19:56.520 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>chips to the uh to industrial applications, you know. And

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:04.680
<v Speaker 1>then there's also you need to think that we need

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to have a willing buyer as well. I mean, this

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:13.360
<v Speaker 1>is an all stock deal which helps preserve analog devices cash. Uh.

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>The one thing we do have to think about that

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:20.439
<v Speaker 1>some of the larger companies, uh maybe in cash preservation mode,

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>so they won't be able to use their cash as

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 1>much to consumate a large deal like this. Wiginho, thanks

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:28.880
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us helping us break down this deal.

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Wiginho is a senior tech analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. He

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>follows all the devices and the chip makers out there,

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>so we appreciate his opinion. Well, The responses to the

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>economic fallout of this pandemic have been swift and severe

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States. First, we had the Federal

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 1>Reserve really step in and inject tremendous amount of liquidity

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>UH into the marketplace. We've had three rounds of fiscal

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>stimulus coming out of Congress, capped by round three a

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of months ago, totally three trillion dollars UH. Now

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>pressure is building on a fourth round to come out

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of Washington, and that is less clear what will be

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:10.239
<v Speaker 1>in that and the size and the timing and so on.

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>So to get an update here what it means in

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:15.199
<v Speaker 1>the world of Washington and for a broader economy, we

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>welcome Matt Girkin, geopolitical strategist for b c A Research

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>based in Montreal, Quebec. Thanks so much for joining us. Matt.

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's just start off there. Fiscal stimulus round number four.

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 1>What do you expect? When do you expect it? Hey,

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me on. Well, I would expect something

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>upward of two trillion US dollars and by the time

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 1>then it goes for recess on August and the anything

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 1>much less than that, anything much less than with the

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>House impress past three trillion risks forcing the U S

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 1>fiscal thrust to pull back, and that's not something that

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>president running for re election would want to have happened.

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 1>What makes you think it'll be two chillion. We're seeing

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>one trillion for the next round, and does strike me

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that there will have to be some kind of accommodation

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>made in Congress? Yeah? Right now, the Senate GOP and

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>actually for several months been saying one trillion. President Trump

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and some members of his administration have said two trillion,

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 1>but most recently Mike Pence and one of his ay

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>implied that maybe he's on the one trillion side. And

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>then the Democrats haven't mentioned we're pushing for a three

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar bills. So Trump's in the middle. But as

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I say, he's got an election to fight, and he's

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a big spinder anyway, He's been fiscally propligate, so I

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 1>think he'll end up on the big end of this

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:34.679
<v Speaker 1>h siding with the Democrats. And then I think that

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the GOP senators are going to have to just get

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.679
<v Speaker 1>with the program because if they don't, they'll suffer if

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump suffers. So, Matt, We're we're getting closer and closer

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to that fall election, which strangely has been on the

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:50.439
<v Speaker 1>back burner heres as everyone is focused on the pandemic.

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>What's kind of a thinking in your world as to

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>what perhaps a Biden presidency might mean. What are something

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you're takeaways that you're looking at right now? Yeah, Well,

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the big change that has happened is that the United

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>States is doing this massive stimulus and so if if

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm anywhere close to correct on that stimulus, we could

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 1>end up with something of six percent of global gop

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>GDP being US physical stimulus. We're looking at the US

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe putting in twenty percent of its own GDP and stimulus.

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's a massive turn, and that's going to power

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a cyclical rebound as we've seen in over the long run.

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>That should be the decisive factor kind of regardless of

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 1>who wins the election. But a Biden administration clearly is

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>going to have a major regulatory shock, reversing the deregulation

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>that Trump did. And that's even if he doesn't win

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the Senate. In truth, he's very likely to win the

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Senate for the Democrats if he does win the White House,

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and then in that case you could have I think

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinary windfall of of of a shift to the

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:56.719
<v Speaker 1>left in terms of healthcare, in terms of immigration, in

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>terms of even the tech sector facing a little bit

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>more scrutiny. And then of course you also have, uh,

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you have the cyclical reflationary impacts. They are spending more

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and giving more for people in wages and household uh spending,

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>but then you have this headwind for corporates that have

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:15.879
<v Speaker 1>to worry more about taxes and regulations. The only clues

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>we have us to the type of campaign that he's

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>he's you know, running, or the type of presidency that

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>he would he would lead, though Matt is the people

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that he's already appointed to a potential transition team. We're

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:34.120
<v Speaker 1>not really seeing a whole lot of economic messaging. Where

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>is your evidence to suggest that there will be a

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 1>hard turn left? Yeah, Biden is a centrist and that's

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 1>how he won the nomination. He's a He's a sensor

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:47.679
<v Speaker 1>left establishment politician, no question about that. But remember that

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:51.119
<v Speaker 1>the way that you try to predict the outlook for

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>things like this is not by wildly guessing based on

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a president's preferences. I mean, President Trump had a preference

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 1>of a tear up on all Chinese and words, but

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:04.439
<v Speaker 1>he didn't get that. The issue is that the winner

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>of the White House is likely to bring the Senate

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 1>with them, and when the Senate goes Democratic and you

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>get a full blue sweep, which is certainly what looks

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 1>likely today if the election were held today, Well, in

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that environment, the constraint on the Democratic Party is removed,

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Biden will be pressured by his party to take advantage

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of a historic situation. And that's remember similar to when

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the Obama administration came in. But there's a lot of

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>frustration in the party that there was too much of

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 1>an attempt to be bi partisan under the Obama administration,

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 1>so that this is a crisis that really can't go

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to wait this time around. And I think that's how

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the party is going to play things. So the filibuster,

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>for instance, very much at risk in the Senate. So, Matt,

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>given that these the Senates, the Republicans in the Senate

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>are at risk, here, are you surprised they haven't broken

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 1>ranks with President Trump? Well, I think in some ways

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>they have. I mean, I think in the news flow

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:00.360
<v Speaker 1>over the past several months, you've seen a lot more

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>flaking off from the Senators than you had at any

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 1>previous time and Trump's administration. And that's because the administration

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>is just fundamentally weakened and embattled by a global pandemic

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 1>and a recession. Trump's handling of those issues. So I

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 1>do see some some wobbling within the Senate ranks. But also,

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of course you're seeing the real divisions that always existed

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>between the establishment Republicans who might want to be more

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:27.360
<v Speaker 1>physically hawkish, and President Trump, who's just a big spending

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>populist and wants, especially in this case, to make sure

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that he gives the economy ajolt ahead of the election.

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>And that may even be behind that little difference between

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, Trump implying that he wants to go even

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 1>bigger than the Democrats on stimulus, while Mike Pence's office

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 1>is maybe implying he wants to be more where Mitch

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>McConnell is at one trillion dollars. But what can we

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 1>expect to hear from Biden next? I mean, we haven't

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 1>heard all that much. I guess it's not a there's

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 1>not a whole lot of advantage to him being out

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>there and uh, you know, making a lot of public statements.

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>But when when Wally start well in August. You know,

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>we obviously the virus is throwing everyone for a loop

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>on timing. But in August you're supposed to have the

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.880
<v Speaker 1>party conventions, and the party convention is a time where

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>he will complete this process. We've seen in recent months

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of him touching every base in the Democratic Party and

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>its constituency to show everyone in across the nation that

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:25.159
<v Speaker 1>he's allied with the Progressive, that he's allied with the

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 1>different voting groups, um and and ultimately he's gonna want

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>President Barack Obama's backing and other top Democrats backing. So

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna have to start getting out more

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 1>uh later in uh in August. But in the meantime,

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:41.919
<v Speaker 1>he is perfectly happy to kind of hide away in

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>his basement or wherever he is and let President Trump

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>attract the attention with often his controversial or unorthodox statements

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and and take the heat. Well. Yes, indeed, Matt, thank

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you so interesting to speak with you. And and indeed,

0:27:56.520 --> 0:28:00.200
<v Speaker 1>as he say, August, it seems quite late. It's I'm

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>very close to an election. It must be one of

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the few times that you really have only had a

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>competitor sort of emerge properly a couple of months before.

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean there was there was a little time back

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>where he was. He was out there, but he was

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:13.919
<v Speaker 1>pulled back in quite I think it's a strategy, just

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it is. It's nothing but bad news out there.

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Why getting that news cycle exactly? Matt Garkin is geopolitical

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>strategist to b c A Research. You joined us there

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 1>from Montreal in Canada. So that's that'll do it for

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>this two hours of markets produced day tuned. We're following

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the markets throughout the day here on Bloomberg Radio. Inducas

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 1>now of one of a quarter percent plus. In fact,

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>thanks for listening to Bloomberg Markets Podcast. You can subscribe

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn. I'm on Twitter at

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Bonnie Quinn, and I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 1>pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch us

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>worldwide at Bloomberg Radio